TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fausty79 Archive

View 0 posts and 308 comments by Fausty79 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes, I do know the data you are referencing. Even the US Bureau of Labor Statistics says that its annual report does not account for hours worked, education, experience, or job titles. Do you know the data you are referencing? If you are implying that the older male population is not 1) participating in the workforce at a higher rate 2) more educated than their female counterparts 3) working jobs that have higher earning rates, you are wrong. I don't know what age had to do with anything... expe…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 11:16 AM
6

Not if you actually correct for comparable jobs, experience, and education, which their study for some reason doesn’t do. But, you’d need to be good at deciphering statistics to pick up on it, because it definitely seems to be the headline. Here’s a simple breakdown: https://www.iwf.org/2023/03/13/5-myths-to-bust-about-the-gender-pay-gap/ But if interested, you can find reports that have corrected for that data.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 08:11 PM
0

So, the whole problem with the pay gap argument is that the often quoted percentage is based on all full time jobs, so everyone in the service industry up to CEOs. So the pay gap accounts for all the women who do jobs like cashiers, teaching, waitressing and other jobs that women traditionally do (no,not only women… I get it). End of the day, there are a lot more women in low paying jobs than men, and there’s a lot of factors that go into that, but every waitress wasn’t going to be a CPA anyway……
/r/MensRights10/09/23 04:46 PM
1

You do know that that exact statement has been in sitcoms making it something many women have grown up hearing… although most of us heard it from our own fathers, grandfathers, uncles, etc
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/23 10:05 AM
2

Actually, water isn’t wet, it makes things wet. Maybe stuff isn’t as simple as your limited knowledge leads you to believe.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/23 12:44 PM
1

Yeah… that “it puts the lotion in the basket” kind of strange one.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/23 01:19 PM
-7

So Men’s Rights is a failure of a movement? Any religion is a failure? Any political party? It is very rare indeed that large groups facing large problems unilaterally agree on the solution. Often, they can’t even agree on the exact problem. And the fact that saying that a woman dressed in skimpy clothing does not deserve to be sexually harassed or assaulted and that the overt over sexualization of women in media is rampant and problematic are not mutually exclusive just shows the lack of insigh…
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/23 01:15 PM
-1

The post I replied to had a broken link no one could read, but ok. Still doesn’t appear to link to anything. Feminists as a whole don’t support that only men can be violent, and it is asinine to accuse an entire movement of something that the vast majority don’t agree with. And the studies show that male-male partnerships had similar or HIGHER rates of IPV than those in populations of women. Doesn’t make any IPV right and I don’t know a feminist who thinks otherwise
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/23 06:34 PM
1

Don’t belong to any and I’m not oppressed. Too bad you can’t say the same is true for you. You are defending an anti female subreddit and all you guys do here is complain that women are keeping you down. Like I said, cognitive dissonance
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/23 06:24 PM
-7

“Wonder what will happen to all the stinky Slitches when that happens?” Found a woman hater… as I never fail to do on here. There is nothing legitimately anti-feminist on this sub, just a bunch of guys mad at women as a whole because they think women don’t know their place. Bunch of boys that are mad that women have finally reached a point in history where they don’t need men, they can choose whether to be with a man or not and not face negative consequences. Women don’t have to settle, and the …
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/23 03:44 PM
-6

Nah, this is an anti woman subreddit mislabeled as something else. The title fits here
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/23 03:35 PM
1

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X12001453 Reality is a thing, you should experience it.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/23 06:24 PM
1

Yes, facts totally are overruled by your uneducated assessment of the situation. Nevermind that your theory has been proven incorrect…
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/23 06:20 PM
1

The net detriment is the increase in trafficking. I thought that was clear. The sex trade also disproportionately targets women, it is also terrible for boys who end up getting trafficked. You’re right to call me out for just relating to women, it’s terrible for both sexes. Every study on the legalization of the sex trade counters your “I should be able to buy what I want, even if it’s people” argument.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/23 03:03 PM
-1

Agreeableness is not a feminine quality, it’s you idea of what a woman should be. Agreeableness is just as much a masculine quality in my book. I think men should be agreeable, I find that many are.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/23 02:58 PM
-1

No, the definition of femininity is “qualities or attributes regarded as characteristics of women or girls” Agreeable may be in your idea of femininity, but it certainly isn’t in everyone’s Clearly you haven’t raised a daughter, there is nothing agreeable about them from about age 12 on up
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 11:55 PM
2

When did feminism demonize motherhood? What are you people smoking over here? Telling a girl she doesn’t have to have kids to have value is not portraying motherhood (which frankly isn’t all it’s cracked up to be) as negative, it is just stating that you are more than just a womb.
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 11:52 PM
2

Actually, it’s just a point that many feminists disagree on. I know women on both sides of the legalization of sex work. I for one am against it due to the net detriment to society (as if the conversation here doesn’t prove many men look at women as commodities instead of people, women tend to be in greater danger of being trafficked where the sex trade is legal).
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 11:44 PM
9

Wooowww… I don’t care how washed up and shitty I look, I would not fuck you because you’re clearly a shitty person. That’s not picky, that’s having an ounce of self respect. You’re entire take on this is gross
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 11:36 PM
0

You are confused. You are making some strange correlation between shitty people and feminists. I literally don’t know an actual feminist who would say the thing on top. Reverse it and say it’s men’s rights people saying that fat chicks should just kill themselves and being offended by dick size and height. Does that sound right to you? This sub is just really becoming a woman hating sub pretending to have a point by claiming feminism as a target.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 11:45 AM
0

So, some guy infected her with Hpv that killed her and a guy also has a child from a bar hookup. That’s a whole lot of blame you are putting on one person that definitely belongs to at least 2 people
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/23 05:24 PM
0

And, as usual in these groups, honesty gets the downvotes.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 03:46 PM
-1

They are referring to the subreddit, not the ideal. Whether or not I agree, that subreddit has far less to do with men’s rights than woman-hating most of the time. I believe in equal rights, I believe both sides have valid complaints, but I think most participants on either side here are too simple minded and just blame their respective “other” instead of looking for solutions and root causes. Maybe it would do both movements some good to have discussion boards that aren’t based on a movement’s …
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 03:45 PM
-3

But they do all the time, they talk about how it is silly for women to claim victim hood when men experience more violence… from men.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 05:41 AM
-7

Here’s the thing, there is an awful lot of false information and women hating going on over there. There’s also a lot of man bashing that happens in women’s groups. The men’s right crowd bitches about the man bashing, women’s rights crowds bitch about the woman bashing. Literally the same thing you all are doing here. It’s almost like if everyone could see their own hypocrisy, an intelligent conversation could be had, but it’s a bunch of finger pointing without either side taking a look at it’s …
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 05:38 AM
-1

Intuition is a thing. If your mom or sister told you a man made them uncomfortable at the store, something didn’t feel right, and another woman kept an eye out until they were safely in their car, would you really be so bent out of shape? There are men we all need protection from, quit being butt hurt that women pretty much have universally learned to accept that.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 11:25 AM
1

And it's a whole lot more of the latter...
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/22 04:27 PM
-3

You can marry a black women and be a racist. You can marry a woman and be a misogynist. You want people to respect men’s rights as an actual movement, you are going to have to learn a whole lot about oppression, power structures and reality.
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/22 02:58 PM
0

So, y’all are mad because she called her dad out for being a racists POS? You just hate women and girls who speak their minds. Admit it
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/22 02:56 PM
1

I don’t disagree, but white women weren’t writing the rules, just benefiting from them. That wasn’t the question though, and white women are getting hated on too. White people in general have had all the hate they are receiving as a race coming to them for quite some time.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 11:44 AM
0

Because white men had a realllly long run of being the most racist and sexist people on the planet… like REALLY long. It’s all a pendulum.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 01:51 PM
0

So now we can judge all men’s right activists by any one men’s right activist, right? Y’all are ready to be painted with ignorant broad strokes? Because if you think your movement is any different then feminism, you are truly laughably fooling yourselves
/r/MensRights12/11/22 01:14 PM
0

Your inability to stay on topic would be the reason I would question your intellect, but I wouldn't do so until you demonstrated it.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 08:43 PM
0

No, you were raped by someone who doesn't understand consent, just like I was. Just like every time I was sexually assaulted too.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 08:39 PM
0

Calling it mansplaining means it is being done by a man to a woman because she is a woman. There is a definite vibe about it, there is a level it needs to meet. I can take men explaining things to me, that isn't an issue, I wouldn't get very far if that was my problem. I do not respond well to men who are condescending and who talk to me differently than they do my male peers. I do not respond well to men with no experience in my field telling me what they think they know better than I do in a t…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 06:09 PM
1

Actually, I was calling him condescending. It's also HOW things are explained. Why assume I don't know how a car works but my husband does? If I need something dumbed down for me, I am not too proud to say as much. And, for the record, last time I went to my mechanic, I had already determined the issue, told them what it was, second guessed their initial assessment, and finally got them to look at the ACTUAL problem... guess who was right?
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:57 PM
0

So, what you are saying is that "in your experience" your male friends are far more likely to appeal to their experience bias instead of the research and studies of experts in a field, where as women are more likely to trust the word of someone who has studied and tested theories to draw accurate conclusions. I don't think this bodes as well for the fellas as you think it does.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:20 PM
1

No, "mansplaining" is a term for a very real phenomenon that occurs when men who assume women are less capable or intelligent than them (because, yes, there are a lot of men that think women aren't their intellectual equals for no reason but their gender) speak to them condescendingly about topics that they are either equals in or they actually are less experienced in. Not all men do it, but too many of them do. If you are not a woman, you have likely never experienced it. If you are, chances ar…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:12 PM
1

Or the men doing it are misogynists…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 11:30 AM
1

Or maybe you’re just another dude telling a woman something he knows nothing about 🤷‍♀️
/r/MensRights10/11/22 08:46 PM
1

Lol, I guarantee that’s not it.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 04:09 PM
0

Yeah, just read that article. Probably a bunch of old white guys getting upset that they were being called racist and sexist online. “Name calling” is a pretty weak bar for harassment. And men complain plenty. Some valid, mostly what I see here is the ridiculous stretching to try to make statistics fit your narratives
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:08 PM
1

Actually, studies suggest your opinion here is wrong, but don’t let facts distract you.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/22 02:05 PM
1

Yes, it was almost if they were calculating the earning for working men and women. Crazy thing to do for an article about the earnings of working men and women…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/22 01:59 PM
1

I absolutely do, or I respond with something in like ("honey buns" usually gets a double take). I was referring more to the condescension. I'm very familiar with mansplaining and what it is.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:38 AM
0

Maybe because men haven't had their intellect undermined and underestimated since, well, forever.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:36 AM
0

But when it's not sexism and you continuously come at someone using a false narrative, completely triggered and not listening to sense, and they ask you politely to disengage, you should do so. Since that is the actual circumstance here, not the situation you referred to, I stand by my original comment.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:33 AM
1

Did I need a tool? I felt like the stated fact that things can be equal but different was all the explanation that was necessary.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 06:53 PM
2

Did someone say that women never do that? I didn’t, maybe someone else did. I will say that I see men do this on a significantly greater scale than women, but maybe that’s the field I’m in.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 03:42 PM
2

It absolutely is. I don’t appreciate being referred to as one would refer to a child, and I don’t care who’s doing it. If they are in a position where I need to know they take me seriously or understand that I’m their equal, I have a problem being talked to as a child. I guess men don’t face that concern nearly as often
/r/MensRights07/11/22 03:39 PM
2

No, the difference is in the service and listening to me vs. my husband, hence the vastly different results. The “and” was there to segue into the language used when addressing me vs my husband which is condescending and indicates how they view women as a whole. Maybe before you try to belittle someone, use a minimal level of reading comprehension to understand what they were saying first.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 03:36 PM
3

Ok, but when my husband and I take the car in, we sometimes get vastly different results, and I have literally never heard a mechanic refer to him as “sweety” “darlin” or “lil miss”, not even anything remotely as condescending like “sport” or “champ”.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 12:35 PM
1

You should call this “wombsplaining” because too many women think women are the only capable parent because they carried the baby.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 12:31 PM
0

So men also mansplain to other men, great. Women, in my experience, tend to assume that individuals possess a basic understanding of the field they are working in or the conversation they are partaking in. Men (and to be fair, generally older men from a different generation and mindset) often underestimate women, and maybe other men, but definitely women. You can all sit around and pretend it’s not a thing, but it’s just silly to deny it when the vast majority of women experience it.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 12:29 PM
-2

Yes, you approached this wrong, took it far too personally, and did not respect an individual who multiple times explained themselves (which you weren’t listening to) and repeatedly respectfully requested to end the interaction which makes you come off as hostile and aggressive
/r/MensRights07/11/22 12:25 PM
-17

No, they aren’t. PEOPLE are mad about things that ANYONE should be angry about, like: “Women were prosecuted even when they reportedly went to police only under pressure, quickly recanted, or never named their attacker at all.” “The CPS has prosecuted women who police were not sure had lied. In one instance detectives declined to charge the woman for making a false complaint. Prosecutors went ahead anyway.” Grow up, boys.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:37 AM
1

So, once again, they ARE equal, but they are not the same.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:28 AM
0

I’m glad to see you believe men and women are equal but not the same, which was the original point. To say things are unequal is not the same as saying they are of the same value but different.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:27 AM
0

Gee, fellas, thanks for rewording EXACTLY what I said to explain something I clearly already understand back at me. I think there’s a term for this… Two thing being unequal still suggests one is of higher value. The guy who used the currency analogy completely missed the point apparently. Those two amounts are equal, but they are not the same. That was exactly my original point. And the NBA player guy missed the point completely. To say that men and women aren’t equal absolutely implies one is o…
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:14 AM
1

Inequality suggests one is of higher value. Two things can be equal and not the same.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:54 PM
1

What was incorrect here? She didn't say women don't/won't/never commit these crimes. The VAST majority of sexual assaults, even on boys, are committed by men. Same goes with rape and murder.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:53 PM
3

“ The moral of the story is that no one has a lock on privilege. The two sexes have different burdens and advantages, and also different preferences. ”
/r/MensRights03/11/22 12:17 PM
-3

And you think most women admire other women who “bite your head off for holding a door for her” (something I have literally never seen, but midwesterners tend to be a bit more chill) or who baby trap men or use a guy for his money? Here’s the reality, you can’t tell people to police their kind, pretty moronic thing to say. I can’t police women who baby trap guys or use men for money or manipulate people emotionally because I don’t know women who do that, I choose my company wisely. If I DID know…
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/22 02:12 PM
-3

And if men want women to quit viewing them as sexual predators they need to police their own. Sound fair?
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/22 11:42 AM
1

Yes, everything about the idea that a woman’s life would be completely destroyed because she “dishonored” her family by having premarital sex is archaic. What a horribly oppressive society she must have been raised in
/r/MensRights01/11/22 11:35 AM
1

I don’t think anyone thinks it’s “natural”, like all men are born to murder and rape. Just FAR more likely.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 11:10 AM
0

Men are statistically more likely to be attacked by other men. They are also more likely to be a physical match for their attacker. Tell me about all the times you hear about a group of girls or women attacking people. I don’t walk down the street scared of everyone, but as soon as a guy acts remotely suspicious, my radar is up. It’s common sense.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 04:34 PM
-4

If a guy gets attacked and drugged by a woman, people will be surprised, they won’t blame him. If a woman gets attacked because she put herself in a situation with a guy she hardly knows, society will tell her she should have known better. You know why? Because the second scenario is far more common and it would be stupid to ignore that statistic. I don’t think anyone should trust anyone without it being earned. I don’t think women should go to remote places with men they don’t know, I don’t thi…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:36 PM
-1

Tell me about all the times that has happened vs. all the times women have been sexually assaulted on a first date. Some of you just make up stuff to hate women for
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:02 PM
1

Well, here’s the thing, it can be either. Some women have a choice in the matter and sincerely choose sex work in a safe environment where they have protection and control. Many (most) women do not. Sex workers are often exploited individuals, many do so through force, coercion, or desperation and many face threats of violence, are raped at a higher rate, and are victimized in many other ways. That’s not empowering, obviously. Unfortunately, there’s also the fact that human trafficking is higher…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:37 AM
0

Yeah, as a woman I am probably not comfortable taking a walk around a park away from people with some guy I don’t know.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:23 AM
1

I cared, but it was so common it felt defeatist to fight it and the men who are guilty of it don’t care or see a problem. Fuck it all if I’m going to let my girls go through life thinking they owe men in general the space to conduct themselves that way without impunity.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/22 06:24 PM
1

None of you, but you probably should have
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:20 PM
1

Lol, downvotes for telling the truth. Some people are just so offended by reality
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:14 PM
1

It’s not expensive It’s not really life changing unless you decide down the line you want kids and you are one of a small percentage who can’t get a successful reversal, and even then, you can still get viable sperm harvested. The likelihood of a vasectomy being reversed successfully is higher than 0%, which is the likelihood of reversing a hysterectomy. I was simply saying that pretending that getting a vasectomy and a hysterectomy are even remotely close is incorrect.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:09 PM
2

But not really… it’s not easy to get a hysterectomy, it’s not reversible, it is considered a major surgery, and most doctors will not give you one until you have a husband and/or children
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:08 PM
0

Why should the rest of society have to carry a burden for your careless choices before you do?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:06 PM
2

Funny, I wasn’t much of a femanist until I had girls, and it’s only gotten stronger now that I watch grown ass men ogle my 11 year old or make comments to her. Funny how I was willing to tolerate it as how the world was when I was young, I want better for my daughters
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/22 11:50 AM
-2

How about recognizing the fact that the experience of pregnancy is vastly different for men and women, and since it exclusively happens within women, women should have a greater say in how it is legislated? Quit wanting to control women’s bodies. Abstain or use birth control if you really think the girl you’re about to bed is trash enough to have a kid for money. Make better choices
/r/MensRights27/10/22 11:45 AM
0

Well, the “thick” part of the username is right… Yes, God forbid someone actually ask you to think of the consequences of what you are proposing… that’s clearly a step too far and they must hate men.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 11:40 AM
6

That I can agree with! I agree that men shouldn’t be forced into fatherhood. But you can’t force a woman to terminate a pregnancy
/r/MensRights27/10/22 11:34 AM
-10

No, poor mental health and low self esteem do that to people. Maybe this is the reaction to the reaction… women, rightfully, fear dangerous men. Since you can’t tell by looking at them which ones are dangerous, it just becomes a general fear of all unknown men (and some they do know). Maybe so many men shouldn’t be so violent?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 11:30 AM
0

Lol, ok. How about once it’s not your body you don’t control it. Use birth control, strap on a condom, bring your own. Really worried? Abstain or get snipped, which is FAR more accessible than getting your tubes tied.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 11:23 AM
1

It's accurate. Look when they overturned R v W, births are on a rapid decline. Birth rates have been steadily decreasing and we are now either nearing or below our needed replacement rate. Every man is not going to commit to not ejaculating.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 10:16 AM
0

Lol, y'all downvote me, but know you have nothing factual to say to contradict me. Sorry to hurt your feelings with facts.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 08:57 PM
0

So, what you're saying is that facts and logic escape them and their feelings are more important to them than reality?
/r/MensRights22/10/22 08:55 PM
-2

The more you comment, the more ignorant you prove to be. You damage your own cause, intelligent people won’t want to be grouped in with the likes of you.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 06:55 PM
-5

Lol, agnostic humanist, not part of any “religious cult”. Sorry you don’t have enough sense to manifest an actual argument. I bothered replying to one completely asinine comment you made previously, it’s clearly all you’re capable of.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:25 PM
-3

All the ignorance in one long stupid post… bravo. 👏 👏 👏
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:49 AM
-10

So, let’s just think for a second… you do realize that a patriarchal system was in place until like the 70s (in the US), right? Women couldn’t get many jobs, couldn’t get loans or mortgages, and were barred from opportunity due to their gender. Women basically had to have a husband or father attached to them to navigate the world. Women who chose otherwise were often ostracized. That is the foundation our society was built on. It is ingrained, it’s becoming less and less every generation, but th…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:47 AM
1

Dude, the simple fact that so many on here thought that women comprised most of human traffickers proves some of you are thick, posting an article that says the opposite as evidence just put a bow on it. Sometimes all it takes for someone to realize how stupid they’re acting is to let them know how stupid they are acting. It helps those it helps. The alternative to live and learn is die stupid. I have no doubt there are those who will choose the later.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:38 AM
1

Never said it doesn’t happen. Just also not making up that it is done by woman at a greater rate than men. Some of you are really thick. Here’s the thing, is it somehow worse depending on who does it? I don’t think so. But it is men at a higher rate than women despite what the headline (that does not represent the claims made in the attached article) says. I hope you all think men are just as awful as you are saying women are because they do these things at a higher rate than women.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 12:01 AM
0

Why post it to feminist threads? It supports what they already know and if they come here and read what all these people are saying they’ll just think you’re a bunch of morons who can’t read.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:55 PM
1

There you are, reading like you have an education. Thank you
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:54 PM
1

Things that didn’t happen for $100…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:50 PM
1

It’s this group that’s spinning it by believing an incorrect headline without reading the article nor the report
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:50 PM
1

That’s not even what the article says, nor does the report.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:49 PM
0

So, any segment of humanity is capable of evil. Women aren’t inherently evil, neither are men. The fact that you think that women don’t think women are capable of bad things means you don’t talk to many women. Men are far and away the perpetrators of the majority of evil acts in the world, but it isn’t because they are men, it’s because of worldwide power dynamics. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. I guarantee if women had the power, we would see a shift in the dynamic of wrongdoing and the vi…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 12:43 PM
0

But, the headline is wrong. The article nor the report agree with it. Y’all are just HUNGRY for women to be evil. Turns out men still are the majority, so make sure you tear them up like you’re tearing up women here.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:11 AM
0

That is not even what the article says, lol You all don’t read so well, do ya?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:09 AM
0

That headline is wrong, it shows poor reading comprehension, and the source shows lack of critical thinking skills.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:08 AM
1

Because when men “quiet quit” a marriage, women walk away. Just staying is not enough for women, and unhappy men are either distant, passive aggressive, or straight up abusive. Women are more likely to take action when they find their relationship in this state because they are also far more likely to receive support when that’s what they are experiencing vs. men who experience the same from their partner. I think that come from the fact that for ages, if a woman left a man, he must have really …
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:55 AM
1

And in turn comparing "incels" to Jewish people. I don't think you are in a position to criticise my reading comprehension. And exactly what bigotry do you see in my comment? Looks like maybe you should read more carefully.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:47 AM
1

Um, lol, I'm an atheist. Grow up.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:21 PM
-19

No, you don't get to compare yourself to a group of people who are persecuted for their religious beliefs for centuries and who underwent one of the worst tragedies in history because of their heritage. Just stop.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:17 AM
-3

"I understand there’s a common phenomenon between little girls and older male relatives" So, what you're saying is that you recognize there is an issue, it is prevalent enough to be widely accepted as an issue, but you want everyone to ignore that because showing you they trust you is more important that potentially avoiding damaging a 9 year old girl. Be offended, I would, but understand the reasoning. After finding out the last man on earth that I thought could do such horrible things did them…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:13 AM
0

Or just like being a fucking deadbeat that doesn't financially support the child you helped bring into the world.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:04 AM
1

I'm sorry, but guy must have been a bit of an ass to send that to his son. I don't like to speak ill of the dead, but he probably wasn't a shining beacon of fatherhood. I mean, if everyone is gonna bash the mom, let's at least try to be realistic about the dad here.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:01 AM
0

And I have a strong distaste for masculinists, only one of these movements is inherently anti the other sex, and it isn't feminism.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 07:53 PM
0

You don't read so well. What I said was that mediocre men don't have as much power as they used to, because now women who are more capable are taking the positions that were offered them based on having a dick. You haven't actually managed to point out any hypocrisy in feminism, just that you don't like it because you feel that women getting equal rights has somehow taken away from yours. If I were to take my "history" otherwise known as anecdotal evidence and widely considered a poor substitute…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:17 PM
1

And actual numbers would indicate that men make up the majority of pro-lifers, but don't let something silly like facts and data get in your way... https://news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pro-choice-pro-life-2018-demographic-tables.aspx https://www.businessinsider.com/abortion-roe-v-wade-poll-men-women-2022-7
/r/MensRights07/09/22 03:02 PM
1

Alright, your violence point, let's just quit kidding ourselves. Who perpetrates the most violence on women? Men. Who perpetrates the most violence on men? Men. Who perpetrates the most violence on children? Men. Who perpetrates the most sexual violence against groups across the board? Men. It's almost like everyone needs protection from one gender... So, men, who traditionally have higher paying jobs pay more tax while women, who generally get saddled with the responsibility of the children and…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:56 PM
1

For example,someone brought up circumcision as an issue in another conversation (they compared it to abortion which is a bit of a stretch, but I digress...). This issue has a lot of points that could garner support. It constitutes as genital mutilation, it can be botched and have long lasting ill effects, and the individual it is happening to has no say in the matter because they can't consent. The only protection I can see is on a religious basis, and there is only one religion that I am aware …
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:12 PM
1

Talk about funny... some pitiful empty threats you got there, and some unfounded fear you harbor because you listen to mediocre guys who don't understand how they aren't top dogs anymore. Whining never helped women. Coming up with clear solutions to the issues that plagued them and figuring out how to get those solutions implemented helped them. In fact, it is the only thing that has ever actually helped anyone. Anyone can sit around and cry that life's unfair, but even those who WANT to help ca…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:53 PM
1

Apologism for unfalsifiability Haven't studied too much sociology or history, huh? It's ok, we can't all be informed... oh wait... Maybe spend less time blaming others for your shortcomings and more time learning the root of your problem (hint: it's not women)
/r/MensRights07/09/22 12:16 PM
1

Explain how "most men have way less power than women". You know that is the bs you're making up, right? Making yourself a victim when you aren't isn't helpful to your cause, I have been telling women the same thing forever. Focus on actual issues, not made up boogeymen. You can't get anywhere whining about "women are BAD", you have to have concrete and actual issues and solutions to move forward. Women have worked very hard to dismantle the patriarchy, that's why you can barely recognize it anym…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 12:12 PM
0

He gets it! Unless you are being factious and are actually just unaware of ingrained power structures and their pervasive nature. Bet you think racism is a farce too.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:19 AM
1

Tell me what policies “across the board” favor women… those sound like cheap words to me. Abortion and circumcision are both related to bodily autonomy, but the right to have one is not religious, hence why so many politicians also go after abortion. I mean, are we going to pretend all politicians are supporting abortion? What curriculum is built towards girls strengths over boys? I’m sorry, but this sounds more like a sad excuse. The greatest disparities in educational curriculum are on socioec…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:17 AM
0

It’s like you don’t even understand how a patriarchal society works. Women can actively enforce a patriarchy, just like men can be some of the biggest oppressors of men’s rights. You all seem to need to educate yourselves a bit better, I feel like a lot of you are late to the game of understanding power structures and how pervasive they really are.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:00 AM
1

Many women would like to see a woman President, just not the one men running things want to shove down our throats.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:57 AM
1

No, it is the fault of an entire society that for generations told woman they weren’t smart enough, that men were better and more capable, and men ran things and many men worked very hard at keeping women from gaining power. Unfortunately so did some women… because a culture built by men and run by men lead them to believe they were not as good as men. It’s laughable to suggest that women and their progress has not been hindered by misogynistic and patriarchal ideals. It is purely ignorant and i…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:56 AM
2

" Is that something that you feel you have to actively work against for your gender within your own gender?" I don't understand the question, or its relevance to the topic. The relevance is that, outside of very tiny fringe groups like your own, the majority of the population is ok with a male president. In my experience, there are no men who oppose the idea of a male president, but there are women opposed to the idea of a female president. I also know men who are opposed to the idea of a female…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:53 PM
1

I think most politicians do campaign on lowering violence... and crime in general. Going after circumcision is going against common religious practices. I personally agree with you 100%, but there are plenty of things a politician won't touch with a 10 foot pole and that is definitely going to be one of them. Education is another platform that pretty much every politician campaigns on. The difference in high school graduation rates between boys and girls is as negligible as the gender wage gap. …
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:42 PM
2

I'll take things that didn't happen for 1000, Alex. Just check post history. Making up ridiculous stories doesn't further the cause, it dilutes it. There are plenty of men who have faced false accusations, there is no need to make up a story about it.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 06:01 PM
1

Notice I said "eligible voters", meaning specifically that a larger percentage of women who are eligible to vote do so compared to men. Less attention to men, though? How do you figure? What should a politician campaign on to specifically cater to men that they are not speaking on?
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:53 PM
1

So, just conservatives don't like women? Interesting. Also, trying to compare another political system to the US is just not really doable. If you truly understand US politics, you know it has almost nothing to do with being the best candidate, it has to do with being the right candidate for specific groups of people who realistically run our political system despite what we are lead to believe.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:50 PM
3

Except the very people who decide who gets nominated... and if you think that's the general public, I have got some sad truths for you. And I wouldn't say that every female wants a female president. I would say that some women would be very against the idea because some women have actually been taught to believe that women aren't as capable as men. How many men do you know that are fully against a man being president? Is that something that you feel you have to actively work against for your gen…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:03 PM
0

Yes, but then it's all about who really gets the big money thrown at them for name recognition and party support. The only female candidate that has ever really gotten serious backing for POTUS is HRC, and if you want to see how party backing can kill a viable candidates run for office, just look at how the DRC's support for her squelched Sander's campaign. She was popular for a female candidate, but she certainly wasn't popular, she was a hold-your-nose-and-vote candidate for many people.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:56 PM
0

Everyone. Just because a larger percentage of eligible women vote than eligible men doesn't mean men lack power. Maybe that just lack civic mindedness.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:46 PM
0

The fact that women vote for men when no women are candidates doesn't really back your assessment. Whether female candidates are given the same opportunities to participate by their party is a better measure, and despite the perception that women are far more likely to possess the traits that people claim to want in their leadership, women are less likely to gain voters and therefore less likely to be backed by their party because, let's face it, it's all a numbers game to them. Additionally, ju…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:42 PM
3

Or they haven't had the opportunity to vote for a good female candidate...
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:35 PM
1

Fair point.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:34 PM
3

America isn't a patriarchy because we haven't had a female president. America is a patriarchy because it fits this definition: -a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it. Men hold the majority of government positions. Yes, less women run, but when women run, they are less likely to get party backing because men perform better in elections because men in the US are seen as being more capable despite no evidence to show that male leaders a…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:32 PM
1

Women having an easier time with dating simply has to do with women finally having true agency over the one asset most men value in them, their bodies. It isn't up to their dad's and families anymore, they don't need to provide a man with a physical relationship in order to create financial security, they are able to do that themselves. This does not make women "overvalued", it just gives them an advantage they have not really had in previous generations. Women do not have an easier time in coll…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 02:15 PM
1

Also, it's not to be taken for granted that a woman has a right to an abortion without taking into account the father, half of the child genetically. He has rights, as we all fight for here. Many men, like me, would gladly raise a child from an unintended pregnancy. That should at least be considered. It was this portion that I was referring to in my original comment.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:42 PM
1

Absolutely they are. There are men that believe if the man wants to keep a fetus that the woman wants to abort, he should have a say in whether or not she should be able to get that abortion. There are also plenty of pro-lifers that believe in forcing a woman to give birth. The requirement to have the permission of the man is actually standard in some countries. They tried to pass a law requiring the man's permission in Arkansas not too long ago. The entire question was "what should be the man's…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:40 PM
1

Nope, not until the rich fucks in power have to send their own progeny to the front lines with no preferential placements will we see consideration for human life taken into account when entering into conflicts with other countries.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:26 PM
1

And when I am discussing the "expendability of women", I refer to cultures that normalize rape against women because the man's desires outrank her right to exist without sexual violence, that the murder of women for insubstantial dowries is an issue in some cultures, that women are killed in Honor Killings, that female fetuses are still disproportionately aborted due to the favor towards having a male in countries like India and China... basically that men on average across all cultures are cons…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:20 PM
1

So, here's the problem... who stops first? Seems simple, right? Everyone should just stop. But, let's face it, the world that women had to fight for equal rights in, the world that women are still fighting to be seen as equals in, was built by men. The reason women are angry at men is because men built the system we have to fight against. Not the younger generations necessarily, but there are still plenty of men in positions of power that helped maintain the suppression of women's rights. There …
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:11 PM
1

https://www.redbrick.me/us-military-recruitment-and-the-weaponization-of-poverty/ https://newrepublic.com/article/156131/military-views-poor-kids-fodder-forever-wars https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/us/military-enlistment.html
/r/MensRights02/09/22 04:22 PM
2

To be clear, I do sympathise with men when there is an ACTUAL issue. I think women should have to sign up for the draft as long as men do; however, I don't think we should be signing anyone up to go to war to protect the financial interests of the wealthy and powerful, so to me it shouldn't even be a thing. Want something to actually get angry about? Look at how the military preys on the underprivileged. That is an actual problem, and it DOES disproportionately affect men from poor backgrounds.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 04:13 PM
0

Yes, because living subservient to a man, succumbing to his wills and whims, being reliant on him for basic necessities, running a house and raising children... none of that has a down side ever. Men are not seen as expendable by the vast majority of society. Why do you want to be a victim of a problem that does not actually exist? The one who controls the money has the power. That's just common sense. Pretending that men never lorded financial control over women (and that none continue to do so…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 04:08 PM
0

Agreed. As long as those in power can keep us fighting amongst ourselves, they are winning the war. I know women that have unhealthy views on men as a whole. It largely has to do with what they have experienced from the men in their lives. And the same goes for men with unhealthy views of women. I just see a lot of woman bashing here, and women are not men's enemies. Men are not women's enemies. If anything, I would say that the worst of what both sexes experience in societal pressure comes from…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:53 PM
-1

Lol, downvote me because you don't like logic.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:22 PM
0

Instead of assuming you're some kind of victim here, how about you take a poll. I think you will be pleasantly surprised with the results.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:14 PM
0

How are traditional gender roles worse for men? Without the option to act outside of those gender roles, women were oppressed, trapped in abusive relationships because their stability was completely tied to their spouse. Fuck ALL of that. Traditional female gender roles tend to be subservient. To expect that one gender should be subservient to the other is believing in the oppression of one gender. That's not equality.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:12 PM
0

I'm sorry you feel expendable. I certainly don't see men that way and I don't think I know people who do. If anything, I see men often saying women are expendable, all they do is take advantage of men offering nothing in return, ruin the workplace, "baby trap" men, and are generally unnecessary until men want sex or to procreate according to most of what I see in this sub.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:04 PM
0

You mean the party that works directly against what the majority of Americans are in favor of? Shocking.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:01 PM
0

Well, to be fair, I never even heard of this guy until I saw this article. Politicians say stupid shit about women all the time. Fact is, this guy is wrong, I think you'd be hard pressed to find people who agree with his statement.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:00 PM
1

No, but your comment does and the circumstances you mention are covered in the study.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:30 AM
1

"Surprisingly, eggplants, tomatoes and avocados are botanically classified as berries. And the popular strawberry is not a berry at all. Botanists call the strawberry a "false fruit," a pseudocarp. A strawberry is actually a multiple fruit which consists of many tiny individual fruits embedded in a fleshy receptacle."
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:29 AM
-15

No, it says everything about this dipshit. Look at the fact that he lost as the societal take.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:16 AM
15

The idea that he thinks anyone is "expendable" to go fight a war to secure other people's financial assets shows the real disconnect. Too bad this is most of out government.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:15 AM
-1

So, what you are saying is feminism isn't bad, just what you have decided feminism has become, which is inaccurate. I am a feminist. The wage gap is a misleading myth, a gotcha headline. On the other hand, the idea that jobs that have traditionally been women's jobs have suffered greater wage stagnation is not wrong. I think women should be free to choose their path, housewife to POTUS, all paths should be equally as available to a woman with the same qualifications as a man. I would say you suf…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:04 AM
-4

So why aren't you working to silence all the misogynists? Certainly that is as much your job as it is this woman's job to silence all the misandrists.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:58 AM
4

I did. Nothing in it supports your statement.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:55 AM
0

The "pseudo scientists" who wrote the paper... who are actual scientists in the fields of neurology, psychology, biobehavioral science, and brain mapping... Yeah, they probably don't know what they're talking about. "Empathy – the ability to understand and share in the internal states of others – is a complex, multidimensional phenomenon that includes a number of functional processes, including emotion recognition, emotional contagion, and emotion priming, as well as the abilities to react to th…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:54 AM
1

The exact meanings and types of empathy are outlined in the study. Does no one read the thing they are commenting on?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:42 AM
2

That is covered in the study posted here. Male mice are less distressed.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:41 AM
1

According to this study, your thinking is incorrect.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:40 AM
1

It's actually covered in this study...
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:39 AM
6

"As we review next, these studies indicate not only that the level of empathy is positively correlated with pro-social behavior, but also that females may be more empathic and thus more altruistic than males." "Some sex differences in ToM tasks may be driven by the fact that males, compared to females, report that they less often adopt someone else’s perspective during everyday situations (Pearson et al., 2013). Studies of imagined perspective transformation (in which the participant has to ment…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:38 AM
1

Yes, and good swimmers who rape girls get off easy too. There are plenty of shitty judgements that are handed to people of both sexes. And explain to me how a woman has 0 responsibility for a child she conceives? And tell me about the 100% of men who are apparently taking 100% responsibility for all the children. You are not living in reality, talk about reaching.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:25 AM
2

When you can carry a pregnancy, I will concede that your opinion on the matter holds as much weight as a woman's. Whether you run for office or not makes no difference. The genuine issue is bodily autonomy, and until everyone is ready to give up a kidney or a lung to save a life whether they want to or not, women should not be required to be incubators. I would argue that your idea that you have a right to control anyone's body under any circumstance is pretty immoral. Another person's body is n…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:18 AM
1

That is the least of my post pregnancy issues.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:07 PM
1

There's NO downside to engaging in what would have been sexually risky or even deadly behaviour. Sounds like you would be saying that being a sex worker is safe... unless you just don't see being unsafe as a downside. Never once did I say all the factors that make it unsafe are the men attracted to using their services, but I WOULD say a large majority of them are. Do tell, what is the standard men are so strongly held to that women can just buck? Women are shamed for their sexual exploits in wa…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:05 PM
2

A woman can end up suffering lifelong mental anguish from giving birth, so that negates your argument on that point. A man's mental anguish over the child he never had does not hold more importance than a woman's mental anguish over violation of her right to her own body not to mention that a woman actually experiences chemical changes in the brain during pregnancy that have lifelong effects, so while you can seek therapy, she is left with an irreversible condition. Where you draw the line on a …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:23 PM
1

I think you started out lost.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:04 PM
2

Agreed. As is proof here, many men think it's 9 months and boom, yer done. Totally underestimating or simply discounting the long term effects of pregnancy and birth on a woman.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:03 PM
1

And in some situations it is both right and wrong. Right for the woman but maybe morally wrong. Wrong for the woman, but right for her health and wellbeing. There are varying degrees of how right or wrong or both right and wrong an individual may perceive an abortion and the circumstances around it. It is not simply black and white.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:00 PM
1

I can tell you that 100% of the time, forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy and give birth against her will is wrong.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:56 PM
1

Well, I can tell you for certain you're wrong. Abortion isn't ideal in any situation that I can come up with, but it is a good thing that it exists and a blessing to many. In some situations, it is the right thing to do. In some situations, it is avoidable and on it's face a selfish thing to do, which would make it wrong in those circumstances in my personal opinion. Both of those stances would be based on my moral perception of the situations, and it is not for me to inflict my moral perception…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:54 PM
3

But if a procedure existed that was just as safe and no more invasive than an abortion, I would back the idea that it would be a viable alternative if the father wants to keep the child and an unwillingness to undergo that procedure as opposed to abortion would give rise to the idea that the woman should not be granted an abortion without a medical cause. There would be no reason not to protect the fetus because there would be no reduction in the woman's right to her bodily autonomy. Largely, th…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:41 PM
1

Agreed! And charge women who want to opt out of parenting child support! Fuck yeah, kid shouldn't have to suffer! I would legitimately be down with men having every right to determine whether a fetus was aborted if this was a possibility. I really don't think most women have a problem with the child being born, I think most women have a problem with them having to suffer the consequences of giving birth against their will.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:35 PM
3

No, a woman should not have to go through the physiological changes that occur due to pregnancy due to an error in judgement or failure of birth control. If men could remove the fetus and carry it to term, great, then I would say they should definitely have every right to do that. Until then or some other equivalent solution, no one has the right to inflict the effects of pregnancy and birth on a woman against her will.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:30 PM
4

It is not just 9 months. Pregnancy and birth leave permanent changes, some of them can be drastic and life changing. It can also physiologically have an effect on a woman's mental health, it factually changes a woman's brain chemistry. Your right to "mental wellbeing" does not trump a woman's right to bodily autonomy. Thinking that pregnancy is nothing more than "9 months of ubitoquous (I assume you mean ubiquitous) medical state" shows a severe lack of understanding of pregnancy and it's effect…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:23 PM
0

There are a ton of things in this world that one can morally object to on a personal level but also understand that their will does not need to be inflicted on everyone. I think very few people would argue that "abortion is right". However, the majority of the US is of the belief that the right to abortion should be protected, because most people understand that it is a massively complex issue and does not have a one-size-fits-all solution. It is not black and white, trying to make it so shows a…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:09 PM
-1

And I think that would be fantastic if they could also carry the unintended pregnancy to term. Until men have to suffer the physical consequences of pregnancy, they really can't expect women to be forced into birth. It's not just a 9 month commitment with no further repercussions.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:00 PM
2

Yes, people are happy to slut shame women who find themselves in the situation of carrying an unwanted pregnancy. Most of them are men.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:56 PM
-2

Oh, believe me, pro-lifers tell women alllll the time to "keep their legs closed" or "don't have sex if you aren't ready for the consequences". Too many men in MY experience think that birth control is solely the responsibility of the woman because there's a pill and condoms don't feel good.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:55 PM
0

Yes, because being a sex worker is a notoriously safe profession... /s/ But also, can we talk about the real difference? Women can work, women can earn a decent living, women don't need to hope a man will value them for sex so that they can own property and feed themselves, they can do that themselves. Acting like women throughout history had a lot of choices is pretty ridiculous. And to pretend that "women are not held to any standard" when there are plenty of men IN THIS FUCKING THREAD slut sh…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:57 PM
0

Because it seems that for many men in this sub (not all) men's rights are really more about oppressing women. The irony is that many of the men here are exactly what they claim to despise in women.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:48 PM
2

I would say there are feminists on both sides of the argument, just like all of the men in this sub don't agree on everything. Many people (men and women) believe that porn is dangerous because A. it can be addictive B. there is a significant portion of it that includes violent sexual acts against women and C. it creates unrealistic and unhealthy expectations for sexual relationships. The problem being that there are people out there that think porn is realistic, most of it is not. However, ther…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:42 PM
2

I think we support women having consent and doing with their bodies what they feel is right. The reason strippers were considered nearly prostitutes is because they really had no agency, strip club owners made the lion's share of the money off of women's bodies. If women's bodies are going to profit anyone, shouldn't it be the women? I still think girls who don't consent to having their nude images circulated amongst a bunch of their peers would be mortified to have that happen. I don't think th…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:29 PM
0

So, why can't you have your cake and eat it too? I'm not referring to the basics you listed, more the men here who seem to want a woman to take on the traditional role in the home and relationships. You can't want your women meek and mild and then also want them to go to war. The idea of conscription being limited to men was founded in the idea that someone had to stay home to raise the children, and since women weren't really permitted to work, that was their job. It's a pretty outdated standar…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:16 PM
0

I feel like there’s an inconsistency here, like in this community. Many seem to think that “traditional” roles/families are important, but then there’s a lot of people who think it is unfair that men are expected to take on traditional roles in society. Like, people want “traditional” in their marriage but not anywhere else. Personally, I feel that if military service is compulsory in a country, everyone should have to do it, men, women, gay, straight, rich, poor, everyone, and with no preferent…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:49 AM
-2

You are literally saying you are not interested in stepping up to take on the role of a dad. Do you get mad when you don't get trophies for competitions you didn't enter?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:31 PM
2

It can be hard to unlearn. I grew up in a family of shitty men, shitty husbands, and all around misogynists. I married a great guy, but sometimes it is hard for me to believe that a man is capable of loving a woman the way women love men because I have not seen healthy relationships, and I am extremely suspicious of the ones that look healthy, and sometimes that includes my own. It's amazing how what is imprinted on us as children can be so incredibly hard to overcome, even if we know that what …
/r/AntiFeminists27/08/22 06:23 PM
1

Same reason some people raise their kids to believe different races are dangerous. Sometimes it is their personal experience that causes an ingrained prejudice. Some people can be helped by therapy, but it can be hard for them to recognize they need it. There are people who have had enough bad experiences with men/women/Blacks/whites/Christians/Police/etc that they are traumatized and they don't always realize it, or they realize it but feel their fear and anger is reasonable. Unfortunately, the…
/r/AntiFeminists27/08/22 05:55 PM
2

Yeah, this is a mental illness right here. There is nothing normal about that.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 02:53 PM
5

It's an old lady thing. My husband takes the kids to the grocery store and he's some kind of hero, every old lady tells him how wonderful he is, wouldn't matter if they were climbing the shelves. If I take my kids and they don't get out of some old lady's way fast enough I'm liable to get a referendum on teaching them manners. Older woman are not used to seeing men do all the things that really only women did when they were younger.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 04:46 AM
1

Commenting on actual cases. If it doesn't suit you you call it propaganda. Childish. The first one is pretty well known. This is the same case: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/18/nyregion/christopher-belter-rape-sentence.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/christopher-belter-rape-sexual-assault-case-b1960618.html And are you just going to act like an ignorant cuck and pretend we don't allll know who Brock Turner is? Get real.
/r/AntiFeminists17/08/22 01:35 AM
1

Nah, most people aren't wealthy. Rich white guys get off easy over and over again in some pretty high profile cases. You can deny it if you want. Many even plead guilty. https://www.themarysue.com/rich-white-man-no-jail-for-rape/ https://time.com/43626/wealthy-child-rapist-jail-delaware/ https://trofire.com/2016/08/11/another-rich-white-boy-gets-away-raping-unconscious-young-woman/ https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/02/us/brock-turner-college-athletes-sentence And they aren't even all rich... https://w…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 11:10 PM
1

So, what is it when they give them to men? Because that also happens frequently
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 11:57 AM
-1

Except rich white boys…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 11:54 AM
2

This is a problem in general. Child molesters and rapists get off too easy too often. https://myfox8.com/news/child-molester-accepts-deal-with-district-attorneys-office-and-gets-probation/ https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/judge-sentences-admitted-rapist-probation-prison-time/story?id=81264495 https://www.refinery29.com/amp/en-us/2019/06/235704/joseph-meili-missouri-child-molestation-probation-judge-calvin-holden https://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Man-gets-probation-after-pleading-guilty-in-preschool…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 11:53 AM
2

I don’t think it’s a misogynistic policy. I’m a woman and I follow that rule because of the number of men that have been inappropriate when in a one on one situation. It’s just smart, there are a significant number of shitty people walking around out there.
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/22 12:38 PM
-2

Wrong. I'm a feminist (not what you all seem to think is a feminist, just and actual feminist) and this I can get on board with. They should also have to pay restitution. There should be criminal charges. I don't believe in anyone destroying someone else's life with false allegations and getting away with it.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:54 PM
1

Men were certainly involved... because they had to be... because women had no say. The suffrage movement was lead by women who protested and fought for their right to vote. Without the support of men they would have never succeeded simply because it was men who had to make the decision. That's similar to saying it was white people who freed the slaves. Well, sure it was. They had to be the ones to do it because they held all the power.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 02:49 PM
1

Well, if you choose not to see how women being able to function fully in society is beneficial to society, you might just hate women. For example, someone pointed out the issues regarding battered men's shelters not being a thing. In fact, the first ones in existence were started by women, one of the more prominent ones being a feminist. Additionally, it was stated that the rate of spousal murder was nearly equal prior to women's shelters. That was largely because woman were trapped. There was n…
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 02:42 PM
1

I disagree. I have taken women to task for false claims, I have seen many other women do the same. I have ended friendships over accusations that I knew to be fabricated. Unfortunately, I have seen women bashed and ostracized for legitimate claims of sexual assault as well. I grew up with 4 brothers, I am very attuned to the dangers false accusations can have on a person's life.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 02:10 PM
1

But, fundamentally, the issue of abortion comes down to bodily autonomy to me. You can't take organs, blood or tissue from a corpse without their express permission while alive due to the idea that your body is yours. You cannot force an individual to give blood or bone marrow even if it will save the life of another person or a hundred other people. I do not believe a woman should be able to be forced to incubate a fetus in her body against her will. It isn't a simple matter, it changes your bo…
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 02:06 PM
1

I don't believe that until men's bodies can bear the burden of carrying a child that they should have a say in whether a person should be forced to have a child. That's accurate. Much like I don't think women have a place in determining the debate for or against circumcision, that is a uniquely male topic. While we may have our opinions, I do not think we should, legislatively, be allowed to weigh in on the matter. You are entitled to your opinion on abortion, but you are not entitled to determi…
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 01:28 PM
1

I'm willing to bet my education far exceeds yours, because while you may have managed to graduate from a public high school with your writing ability, there's no way you made it through college. If you can't make sense of what is being very clearly stated, then I suppose there's no point in continuing to provide you with the excessive proof of your own lack of intellect. Enjoy your ignorance, I hear it's bliss.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 01:22 PM
1

accountability being kryptonite for any woman And you have illustrated all I need to know about women hating men (not that I wasn't already aware). You like to assume where we stand, put words in our mouths, and resort to claiming we're liars or stupid because you can't comprehend simple concepts. I really just expect the educated and intelligent individuals to understand that the issue of bodily autonomy affects everyone and that removing it is problematic for everyone. I guess I don't necessar…
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 01:17 PM
0

Once again, almost nothing you are saying here makes sense... it would be funny if it wasn't so disturbing how entrenched you are in the idea that you are communicating clearly. Maybe read what you are typing out loud before you post it.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 01:10 PM
1

You're a funny and insecure lil person. I think I'll just be done with you. It takes a truly pitiful individual to die on the hill of a debate they have clearly lost, I kinda feel bad for your deep and problematic levels of insecurity. Those are the very issues that often breed problems like misandry/misogyny, racism, xenophobia... you should try to get over that in order to be part of the solution instead of part of the problem. Also, try punctuation, maybe it will help.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 01:07 PM
1

"I did just your cognitive dissonance and lack of being able to write clearly”like your supposed to do btw” is probably interfering with that" What's with the quotes there? I'm not sure what you're getting at. Certainly isn't a quote from me. You should also probably learn the meaning of cognitive dissonance as I have been consistent, despite your accusations to the contrary. "I didn’t admit anything?" Also, not following why there is a question mark there. Maybe you should go back to your eleme…
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 12:56 PM
1

But I don't. I expect people to support people. I don't expect men to support women regardless, and I'm not really sure where you get that idea. I expect people should want to support bodily autonomy for other people. I mean, I suppose there are people who think that if you have a spare healthy kidney it should be able to be commandeered to save a life or that there should be compulsory blood donations, but I think the vast majority of people are against that.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 12:45 PM
1

You literally did not read the comment thread or read it poorly... maybe you're drunk? I don't know how to argue a false claim besides telling you to go back and read what I wrote again. You are misrepresenting what I said, you are claiming I called the commenter something I did not. I did state that people believe, due to comments like the one that was made, that these subs are full of incels. When that word was discredited, I substituted misogynists. I really don't know how to make that any cl…
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 12:39 PM
1

I looked into it, it appears to be completely falsified rage karma farming. I get incredibly upset when women make false accusations against men, why would you think I wouldn't? I also get mad when people make up fake stories about very real issues that only serve to discredit the issue. I do not expect people to get outraged over fake stories unless that outrage is toward the individual that is fabricating the story for whatever sick reason they have to do so. I'm not sure how we got to R v. W,…
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 12:29 PM
1

I'm sorry... do you speak English as a second language? Because, if so, it would make sense and I would feel bad for making fun of your writing.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 12:18 PM
0

These unfortunate contrived events that did not occur and do nothing to further the actual cause of men being victimized by false accusations?
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 12:17 PM
1

The irony of you accusing me of poor written communication... I'm not even sure what you are trying to say with your first ... sentence? Did you read the entire comment thread? My guess is no, you did not.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 12:15 PM
-2

No, it did not. It was a 7 hour old account, first and only post ever. If an ivy league kid gets expelled for sexual misconduct with no one to pay to keep his name out of the news, it will be covered somewhere. This didn't happen and it is a disservice to actual victims of these kinds of situations.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 11:56 AM
-2

That's exactly what it was made up to do.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 11:54 AM
0

Wow. Going right to the Nazi comparison, huh? I can see the depth of the intellect you have to offer... definitely not diving territory. I'm not saying there are not problematic feminists, there are problematic people of every ideology. To group all people who believe in feminism as anti-men is pretty ignorant.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 11:53 AM
-1

I didn't call anyone a misogynist, do you struggle with reading comprehension? I said comments like his are why people say these subs are full of misogynists. I didn't say he was a misogynist, I said he was ignorant, which he is.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 11:48 AM
1

"in the spirit of equality I'll use that word for all of women's gripes." I don't see why not, I certainly do. But also, what grown ass adult with a kid who went to an ivy league school is posting a TIFU about destroying their own son's life? While I believe incidents similar to this occur, I definitely think this is fabricated for maximum rage. It was a 7 hour old account with no previous posts or posts since. Generally when ivy league students get in trouble for sexual misconduct and don't hav…
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 11:44 AM
1

Nope. Didn't say that either. I think men have some legitimate gripes. To say something like "no one will ever trust a feminist" is just about the silliest statement one can make. You don't even know what a feminist is. I suppose I would trust someone who fits your idea of a feminist either; but since you are way off, I certainly wouldn't say I distrust all feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 09:48 AM
-1

No, no it absolutely isn't, and you are positively delusional if you believe that.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 09:29 AM
-19

On what basis? What man hating thing did I say? I find many in subs like this to be problematic, but men aren't horrible, I don't hate them, I certainly don't blame them for everything that makes me unhappy or for my shortcomings. Most of my friends are men, my husband is a great guy. Feminism was and is necessary, and not your twisted take on it, actual feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 09:28 AM
-4

On what basis? None? Just name calling? Typical.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 09:24 AM
1

But... it's not rare...
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 09:10 AM
0

Yes, leave, don't talk about. Just make sure your willy is happy. It's all that really matters in this world anyway. /s/
/r/MensRights11/08/22 09:06 AM
2

Thank you
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 09:05 AM
-28

And fine, not a bunch of incels then, just a bunch of misogynists.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 09:05 AM
-3

Feminism also provided women the right to vote, outlawed marital rape, allowed women to be financially independent by allowing them to get college educations, jobs, bank accounts, and loans, reduced sexual harassment in the workplace, made contraception obtainable... You all have no idea what feminism actually is nor how important it has been and it shows.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 09:03 AM
1

Nope. Fucking nope. Jail? Yes. Karma? Yes. Rape? No.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 08:55 AM
-36

Well, that's a pretty ignorant view of feminism. Comments like that are why everyone thinks this sub is full of incels.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 08:53 AM
-9

Nobody denies this happens, but it is a very, very small number of accusations. Is even one too many? Yes. So is even one rape.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 08:52 AM
0

OPs original post was coming here asking about sex after a child. Why would he ask here? Because he's communicating so well with his partner? Because he's trying to see it from her perspective, or even grasp her perspective? No, because he's upset he's not getting sex. Pretty easy to draw the conclusion that he is not being there for her emotionally, he's too worried about the sex he isn't getting. You are looking at it from the one perspective you can understand. Women do not stop having sex wi…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 07:44 AM
-1

So is emotional support, and to assume that you can get sex without providing emotional support is also arrogant. It's almost like... *gasp*... there are two sides to the issue. Men do not understand the metamorphosis that comes with giving birth. To claim otherwise is like saying you know what it's like to have kids because you love your dog.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 11:40 PM
1

Studies show that gender segregation largely benefits girls and women and is detrimental to boys and men. As in, females show a greater benefit and better outcomes in an all female environment while men do not receive the same benefit in an all male environment and actually perform worse. Just putting that out there, because there is a difference, especially in educational institutions.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 11:35 PM
0

But men often don't respect female spaces, and often don't respect females in general. Your initial post reflects disrespect toward women, and a profound and deep misunderstanding of women as well. And I think that's why many women comment here, you have the hateful leading the blind and it doesn't create any better understanding nor does it bridge any divides. Here's the thing, when we have a country of people, both men and women, who can overlook a man saying that he intentionally walked in on…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 11:32 PM
0

"No your just ignorant" (but the grammar on your part just makes this funny) "Get off your high horse..." "That means you were the root of the issues." Bet you gaslight your wife too and then bitch about it when she doesn't want to have sex with you. Sex doesn't have to be piv, sure. Sex is also not a right. No one has a right to another person's body; to assume one does or should is in itself at the very root a selfish belief.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:42 PM
0

You're right, I'm very surprised you've managed to remain married for decades. Bet you're a peach, seeing as you somehow managed to gain no understanding of woman and squarely place the blame on any shortcomings in the bedroom on a woman when her body has just underwent an enormous change. The answer to the OPs question is that women don't want sex when they feel physically and emotionally depleted, and that men get mad that no one will tickle their willy for them instead of looking at WHY it ma…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:06 PM
0

No, I did get medical advice, like I said. I had a hard time discussing it with my partner because he wasn’t very understanding of the issues after birth and was just frustrated. We had a communication issue on both sides, one where even when I talked, he wasn’t really listening, so we both stopped talking about things we should have been discussing (pretty common issue, frankly, I’m gonna guess you also don’t know much about how many marriages go through ups and downs either, especially after c…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:30 PM
0

Actually, no, it took me a long time to discuss it with my partner. We were in a pretty uncomfortable situation around our sex life at the time and we were both not talking about it. It’s also not very rare, not even really uncommon. Once again, clearly you are at the very least under informed on the topic.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 02:17 PM
0

My uterus shifted after birth making sex very uncomfortable and sometimes downright painful. Talked to my doctor. Know what they said? "Yeah, sometimes that happens." Like I said... delightfully naive.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 01:57 PM
3

OP, please don't listen to these kind of morons. They are bitter and hateful and were probably left by women because they are concerned about no one but themselves.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:24 PM
1

Nope, not really. But this way of thinking is pretty toxic to a healthy relationship.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:22 PM
2

That is some woman hating vitriol nonsense lol
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:21 PM
0

Um, this could 100% be a physical issue, and you are delightfully naïve of the joys of giving birth if you don't think so.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:14 PM
-1

Um, if it was going to improve my marriage and make my spouse happy, one can learn to cook. One can also learn to be better in bed.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:10 PM
-1

Yeah, you make too much sense to get listened to here.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:08 PM
0

I don't disagree with you completely. I think this is a point for compromise, and a much needed discussion. I'm just saying, both sides are just as wrong and just as right, and without discussion this becomes an impasse many relationships can't get past. Often, when a woman stops having sex after children, it has nothing to do with whether she is physically attracted to her partner or how much she loves them. It's often something emotional or related to their physical self. Empathy toward the pe…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:01 PM
0

Selfish is also assuming you have a right to someone’s body for your own pleasure
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:32 PM
0

It often doesn’t come from finding your husband unattractive, it comes from having already given so much of yourself physically and emotionally when you’re approached. Look up the phrase “touched out”, it’s a constant physical need of everyone else of your physical body and it feels exhausting and invasive. Additionally, after vaginal birth, things are not always the same and many women get extremely self conscious and many lose a lot of sensation, but it’s hard to talk about. It’s no more selfi…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:31 PM
1

So, what’s funny? Who said the mom “tried and failed to poison her daughter’s relationship with her father”? Sounds like that is just something you assume because you have an issue with women.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 12:06 AM
-11

If you don't see it, you aren't looking or you simply don't recognize it when it is in front of you.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 05:42 PM
0

Lots of speculation on your part. As a normal, well-adjusted parent, I just see a kid who is experiencing a disconnect with a parent, and I feel sad for the kid. I would feel sad for the kid if she was "forgetting" to add her dad into family pictures too. But, big win for the fellas here, I guess. /s/
/r/MensRights26/07/22 04:23 PM
0

Then it was a point poorly made.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 04:20 PM
0

I don't know, as a person who can see the big picture and doesn't make everything selfishly about myself, I just find it a bit sad. I don't see any joy in this. I just see a kid that I feel for, because whatever the reason, she isn't showing a normal or healthy attachment to her mother with that behavior, and that is sad for the child.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 04:19 PM
-25

Yes, how absolutely wonderful that his daughter has a questionable attachment to her mother. Let us also celebrate boys with absentee fathers! Hoorah!
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:47 PM
0

Well, then teach me. Show me how men aren't more likely to sexually engage undage girls than the reverse. Show me something that says men are less likely to be sexual predators than women. Show me how men in power haven't repeatedly used that position to sexually exploit girls and women. Show me where women's bodies are used less frequently to sell products than men's. Show me all the think pieces on how boys clothing is getting increasingly more revealing. Show me entire and fairly large groups…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:59 PM
0

Lol…. Just no.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:40 AM
0

You need a thesaurus... and a dictionary so you can get a basic understanding of terms you misuse. Then you need to learn to feel less attacked when corrected, it's a bad look on anyone.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 06:34 PM
1

When did I justify sexism? What are you even talking about? I'm referring to the fact that men are largely still the ones in power. Men make up the majority of government positions, heads of industry, heads of corporations, heads of communications... it's basically like men still run things and women are finally getting to exert some influence. It is positively laughable to deny the reality.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 06:31 PM
0

Further proving the point...
/r/MensRights15/07/22 06:14 PM
1

I also think you should know that misogyny does not necessarily mean "hate", it is a prejudice as well. Prejudice often arises from ignorance, and an ignorance for what being stuck in "traditional" roles really looks like for women would explain being a strong proponent of that arrangement. It is fine for those who want that life, it is not ok to expect that someone would want that life nor to insist that it is beneficial for everyone, it certainly has not been.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:16 PM
1

No, what it means is that you don't think women are capable. It also alludes to a complete unwillingness to recognize that not all men are altruistic in their home life. Being the one who makes more money and being the one who is good with money are not the same thing. Making decisions should not be solely a "man's job", and the idea that all women should be in a position that they are subject to the whims of their spouse is suggesting that an imbalance of power to the benefit of men is ideal. Y…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:12 PM
1

Yep, pretty common tactic, and honestly I don't even know if it's just considered "normal", like it's a method they all know and use and it's like some secret society to not admit that they all know they do it. It's amazing how the rare occasion my husband ever feels he has to do laundry that he always manages to mess up my clothes which he has specifically been asked not to try to wash.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:38 PM
0

You are unnecessarily aggressive (and pretty prejudice) toward women and you are factually misusing "objective" and "subjective", but then getting even more angry for being corrected; you are not owning your error but instead wrongfully attacking the person who pointed it out. That's pretty toxic and an extremely undesirable trait in a potential partner. That's what I'm alluding to, and only a moron would not be able to look at this exchange and not recognize it.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:27 PM
1

You cannot be of the belief that woman should be restricted from financial independence and not be a misogynists. What would be the rational for such an opinion that does not in any way, shape, or form suggest women should be held in a subservient position? What would be the impetus for such an opinion? Because there is no woman that would be a better breadwinner or handle the household finances better? There is no dad better suited to being at home with the kids than a woman? It is archaic and …
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:41 PM
1

I definitely don't think everything women do is fine. As a matter of fact, my argument here has largely been based on the idea that there are shitty people on both sides, always have been, but the fact that is happening to men more now has to do with society putting men and women on more equal ground and woman not being as controlled or intimidated by men as they once were. It's a shift in the power dynamic. I was pointing out that you were the one who listed the "varieties" of men's materials b…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:32 PM
1

You wouldn't have done as much housework if you didn't work from home? Like, was taking the trash out one of "your" things, and maybe there were her things she did all the time? Or was the trash really a tipping point in the unfair distribution of duties between the two of you? Or was it her hill to die on because she had her things she did and you had your things you did?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:08 PM
1

No, but assuming power and control, enforcing power and control, can be used as a form of abuse. Not every male breadwinner is a misogynist, especially if they would be just as fine with their wife earning more... but many men do and have historically used money as a factor to control women. And while there are men who provide for their family financially and prefer that role, not every man who is a breadwinner loves or respects his spouse either. It is still not an uncommon power dynamic in man…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:00 PM
1

There is also the whole mentorship idea. I personally have a friend who has made her way pretty far in the IT arena, and she will tell you how hard it is, how difficult it can be to find mentors simply because men would overlook her and women were scarce. Being the only woman in a department can make networking difficult, you aren't often invited to lunches or to be the 4th for the golf scramble with the boss. Also, husband works in construction, says there is no way he would feel comfortable wi…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:44 PM
1

Do you think that having control of the finances allows for some degree of power and control in a relationship?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:37 PM
1

I'm sorry... can we just stop here for a second because this is nuts. Let's say we take America, just for example. How many of the founding fathers we either Black or women? How many years were they in control, making laws, leading the charge on societal norms? How many more years did men have of being able to dictate who could own property or businesses, or get loans and have bank accounts? So, who built the foundation of the system? And who continues to hold the majority of the power? I'm sorr…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:34 PM
0

I think I may see where some of the dating issues come from...
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:16 PM
1

This, right here. I mean, does my husband take out the trash generally?** Sure, but he almost never does laundry, and I changed about 99% of all diapers and take care of all the scheduling for our kids and their activities, but he does the grocery shopping and cooking. We both cut the grass and/or shovel snow (but he's the one who trims because I can't get the damn thing started). We both work and in 13 years together we have each carried the financial burden of our household, sometimes him more…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:08 PM
1

You know you can be a feminist and a stay at home mom, right? Not all feminists want to be CEOs, they just want equal rights to pursue that path if they so wish.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:00 PM
1

Were you living there?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:56 PM
1

Just a question, how much housekeeping did you do? Did you split laundry duties, dishes, cooking, childcare, grocery shopping, cleaning, things like scheduling doctors appointments or school/sports enrollment for the kids? Or did she take on more of that stuff?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:54 PM
1

No, I really don't want anyone to be objectified. I also don't play victim just because it has happened to me and every woman I know. I have learned to recognize that what I have been TOLD is a big deal all my life isn't unless I make it one. Oh no! I don't have big tits! No one is going to want me.... except that is so incredibly wrong. Maybe everyone won't, but that's fine by me. The idea that the term BDE is objectifying men based on their penis size is a bit misguided, because it doesn't hav…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:45 PM
1

Big leap there, bud. I don't want that, and I also don't want those boys to make fun of the girls for their breast size. I don't want any kids getting made fun of and I'm not even sure what got you there.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:01 PM
1

Lol, because every fat person is just a lazy slob that lacks self control? Way to be dense there, bud. And I didn't say they were distraught. As a matter of fact, I feel like a lot of large women are realizing that they don't need to be everyone's cup of tea, I feel like big girls are empowered and confident in a way they have not always been.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 05:29 PM
1

Yeah, I mean relatively you would. Society would be far more accepting of that coming from you than a peer on her societal level. The power dynamic and context matter. Still classless as all get out, but that's expected of us plebs.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 05:24 PM
1

Bro, I disagree with you. It's no different than any other physical attribute, people have preferences; but the enormous weight of importance it has been given is given by guys. I sometimes wonder if guys even realize how little time is taken up in an average girl's life thinking about her genitalia. It's normal for guys I guess, but it is fucking bizarre.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 05:21 PM
1

Bro, I am simply trying to explain that for like all of history men have been far too obsessed with their dicks when in the grand scheme of things no one gives a fuck but them.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:51 PM
1

Maybe that's why women go for dick size as an insult. It's punching up. The low blow tends to get a pass when the power dynamic differs.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:44 PM
1

The fact that large women who have been told forever that they are disgusting find some joy and solace in reading about a big girl hooking up with stereotypical hot guys is not even remotely surprising. If men were a target audience for romance novels, someone would be writing them to fit the audience. Unfortunately, they'll just have to settle for the majority of the porn industry. Dude, "dad bod" was a whole thing. I personally like my man furry and a bit heavy. I don't find a guy who's ripped…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:32 PM
1

No, your avatar does not make that clear. I am sorry that your self esteem is so low that you feel you are just a hole to stick a dick in and there is no person attached to your vagina to consider. I feel like you may be a victim of misogyny and a patriarchal society. I don't really get your last point. Give me an example of women saying that they shouldn't have to care at all what men want? Like, what they want us to be or how they want us to act? Because, yeah, that's true. You want Suzy homem…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:54 PM
1

Like, am I supposed to be mad at society for valuing large breasts? Are men awful because they like women with big boobs? Or do maybe not all guys care about breast size? Like, maybe some guys actually prefer smaller or average breasts... Maybe I shouldn't be concerned or self-conscious about what marketing teams are trying to make me think is important to men and just live in the reality where sure, some guys (maybe even most) prefer big tits but plenty of guys don't really care or have differe…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:43 PM
1

I really don't know, because the guy I was with that had the biggest dick was fucking awful in bed. Like really bad. Basically, he figured he had all he needed in size, he was terribly wrong. Average sized guys and even guys on the small side have been WAY better in bed in my experience. And I don't know what you're talking about, but I grew up with 4 brothers, constantly surrounded by guys, they all were A. obsessed with the size of their own dick and B. made fun of each others dicks, testicle …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:35 PM
1

If a woman is faking, that's on her, 100%. Some men legitimately don't care or pay attention. They manhandle women or get them in a position where they can't adjust, I have literally cried, winced, screamed out in pain, and asked men to stop what they are doing to no avail. These were all "nice guys", and this is not even remotely uncommon. Sometimes it's easier to just grit your teeth and bear it (and it fucking sucks that that is reality), but if you don't notice that the person you're with is…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:24 PM
1

You don't think PTA moms have a look? I do. They have that I-want-to-see-the-manager haircut, they wear capris and those shoes that aren't quite sandals but not quite sneakers just somewhere in between, they are 30-40 and not handling it well... I guess I conjure an image when I think of that person, and the image is definitely comprised of physical attributes. But I digress... Sorry for you that men have for hundreds of years been so focused on their dicks that they themselves have decided that…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:13 PM
2

^^^This right here is what I'm talking about. The number of guys who think their dick is some kind of gift to women and will ram it in a woman with no consideration for her pleasure or comfort is too high. Sure, you may not make her orgasm every time, but it should at least be pleasurable. I absolutely do think about my partners enjoyment while having sex, and if you don't you may be a bit of a piece of shit. If you ever learn to satisfy a woman, you may come to recognize that sex is WAY better …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:58 PM
1

Yes, I don't think anyone is saying otherwise. You can't expect someone to be "willing to help" if you don't ask for it. But I think it's fair for a guy to also be expected to read their partner a bit, no one wants to be giving stage directions the whole time.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:53 PM
0

I think men largely place that pressure on themselves and one another. Just the same way I think that women are often women's worst enemies. Both sexes have enormous undue pressure on them to be "perfect" and control uncontrollable attributes.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:58 AM
0

What you seem to be missing is that guys with little dicks can have BDE. The two are not mutually exclusive. Men who perceive their genitalia as above average tend to garner some confidence from that. The key here is, no one really knows what a guy has going on between his legs if they have only seen him dressed, unlike most attributes pointed out here on women. Your point was poorly made, by the way. You really just threw out an attribute that you perceive as negative in woman with no further e…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:51 AM
-5

See, I think Lizzo when I think "fat girl energy", like a cocky self confidence despite how others may see you or devalue you based on your physical attributes. I envy big girls who own what they are and don't let what others may think of them shake their confidence (one may even say they exude BDE) I would call what you're describing as like "PTA mom vibes" or something.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:39 AM
-2

Yeah, guys on romance novels aren't really all that attractive. How about every Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition or females in video games or the women on romance novels? Or any number of places that women can look to see that they should be tall, slender, reasonably well endowed in the breasts, wear makeup, be smiling, dress well, and be a wildcat in the sack, while being able to keep a home, work a job, and seemingly never age? Neither sex has had realistic expectations placed on them. The …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:31 AM
1

Agreed, it was coined by a woman referring to Anthony Bourdain.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:53 AM
-6

Did I not refer to the term as crass? It's not something I have adopted into my vernacular, I don't defend it, but I don't think that people equating it to a direct correlation is really accurate. I feel like it has more to do with how men perceive themselves, and in turn how they act, due to their confidence in their genitalia and it's perceived measure against others which for many men is something they are very conscious of.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:38 AM
-1

Agreed. Never said it should, but some guys can really screw it up. Women should know what they want, and men should be willing to help in that venture. Quite a few of them aren't or just don't. Too many guys cut their teeth on porn and think that's how it supposed to be. Most grow out of it, some never learn. Frankly, guys who just ram their dick in a girl as hard and fast as they can are just too common.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:31 AM
-9

Enlighten me.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:27 AM
-11

Um, women care more about what you can do with it than size. Extremes on either end are not ideal. BDE is about the confidence the guy exudes, not necessarily his attractiveness. Plenty of unattractive guys have BDE, it's just a crass way of saying "swagger".
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:25 AM
-4

How do women with loose pussies generally act? Like, what is their shared characteristic? I would actually guess that a lot of women don't even know where they fall on the spectrum unless they are at one extreme or the other. I don't know a single woman that has measured the size of her vaginal opening. I don't know what would be average. On the other hand, I don't think I know a guy who hasn't gotten a ruler out to measure his dick at least once. And, off the top of my head, I believe 5.5" is a…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:20 AM
-1

And you can get Penuma.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:13 AM
-16

How about the long normalized sexualization of women and girls? Sometimes, when the pendulum starts swinging the other way, some damage gets done to the other side. It's an overcorrection, but this blip in history when men are being made to feel self-conscious about their bodies due to phrases in the current slang over factors out of their control is really pretty mild compared to what women have experienced. Also, it didn't take anyone here very long to come up with an equivalent, but in fact t…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:10 AM
-9

Also, plenty of guys out there that don't know how to use their equipment, but have unearned confidence because they know they have volume.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:57 AM
-19

Because guys seem oblivious to the concept. They think a big dick is good and a little dick is bad. It's just not that simple.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:56 AM
-11

I don't think that's true, it's that society largely believes that MEN think that having a small dick makes them seem "weak/wimps/lesser" and they act out on it, they act like someone who feels like they have to overcompensate to make up for it, like they have something to prove. A really confident guy has BDE, doesn't have anything to do with what he actually has in his pants. Men are obsessed with their junk in a way women simply are not.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:53 AM
-22

I don't think that equates. Juliette Lewis, Cameron Diaz, Olivia Wilde, Sandra Oh, Natalie Portman, Mila Jovovich... all famously in the itty bitty titty brigade, yet big dick energy. Guys place way too much emphasis on dick size, it's what you do with what you got.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:42 AM
1

Well, to paraphrase what so many of the pro-life boys say... keep it in your pants, nothing to worry about.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter