TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fearless-File-3625 Archive

View 2 posts and 4,757 comments by Fearless-File-3625 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,757 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

Equal conscription only exists in fantasy land, Ukraine also "equalised" their conscription law before the war but in reality only men are actually conscripted. I have no doubt that if Sweden was attacked tomorrow, you will be getting your limbs blown up in the frontline while your female relatives will have their backs blown in London.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 06:43 PM
200

Europeans and their sleazy politicians talking so casually about deporting men to their certain deaths should be a radicalising moment for men all over the world. When the war comes, no women or rich man will stand up for you. They will be the first to flee and you will be sent to die.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 06:36 PM
2

Alimony is peonage and permanent alimony is debt slavery. There is no place for such evil practice in modern society.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 08:53 PM
22

That's not how two-tiered gender apartheid justice system of UK works. Women are perfect divine creatures that can do no wrong in UK.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 08:47 PM
21

Feminist create the false narrative that system is rigged against women and that's why most rape cases don't go to trial, yet there are many cases like this where the evidence is clear cut against the accuser and still the case wasn't dropped by the prosecutors. Makes you wonder about of level of "evidence" in cases that don't go to trial.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 08:44 PM
2

What I meant was they don't care enough to fight (and possibly die). It's their choice and they will live with it. Make your own choice (to fight or not) and stop enslaving others to do the same.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 02:01 PM
2

Why wouldn't there be enough volunteers ? IRA didn't have conscripts. If there aren't enough volunteers then clearly most people don't care if they live under current government or invading one. Why do you care then ? I don't support conscription in evil nations either, so it's equal fight.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:39 PM
5

No, if enough people don't volunteer to win the war then that country don't deserve to exist. Everyone should have the choice to flee, fight, or live under the rule of their invaders. It's not your choice to make. If you want to fight and die, very well go ahead. Don't force others to do so. Conscription of men is slavery.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 06:06 PM
14

If a man doesn't want to fight, he shouldn't be forced or coerced to do so. Don't care what women do or who is going to pull your injured ass. That's it. It's not hard to understand.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 07:05 PM
17

They don't register ONLY men for selective service for nothing. It's an inactive draft.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 07:01 PM
0

Can't use dictionary or just low iq ?
/r/MensRights30/05/26 10:03 AM
1

"For me, first one is paternity fraud ..." Yeah that's what I said. Can't read or just low iq ?
/r/MensRights28/05/26 07:30 PM
0

What deplorable behaviour ?
/r/MensRights28/05/26 07:29 PM
0

When did I say it's not paternity fraud ? LOL "For me, first one is paternity fraud ...." LMAO, learn to read before blabbering you braindead bot.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 07:28 PM
0

If you could read you would know I agreed with that in literally the line after it.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 07:27 PM
14

It reflects more on the society that boys are more happy with glorified chatbots than girls.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 07:10 PM
32

Your experience is skewed and not representative of general population's experience of discussions of negative effects of porn. Far more people talk about of negative effects of porn on men, though that is not out of empathy for men but out of fear that porn is lessening the control that women exert on men's lives through sex.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 07:08 PM
1

Feminists have brought about no positive social change. It's a regressive and authoritarian ideology. Also feminists constantly malign MRAs as terrorists even though their own history is filled of terrorism.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:56 PM
-12

Depends on how it is implemented. Does a cheating wife who accidentally got pregnant count as fraud ? or there has to be proof of intent of defrauding the man by having someone else's child. For me, first one is paternity fraud if the wife didn't disclose her affair before the father was declared.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:50 PM
6

Women have more institutional power than men.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:35 PM
4

Yes that's how feminist propaganda works.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 05:11 PM
1

Bro what you talking about ? You can have two different distributions with different means such that distribution with higher variance will have higher least value. As I said, feminists don't send their smartest anymore. Please refrain from talking about things you have no clue about.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 05:09 PM
29

STEM is a feminist cherry pick construct, they exclude applied science fields with more female graduates to skew the data and present a non existing bias towards women. Higher variability doesn't mean there are more dumb men. Feminists don't send their smartest anymore.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 07:05 PM
21

It depends on the context, in places where it is advantageous to be weak women are weakest creatures ever and in places where it is advantageous to be not weak women are stronger than anyone ever.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 06:08 AM
2

Mingling with treacherous women who left will be the last in my mind if I was an young man in Ukraine.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 09:42 AM
1

Dubai is not conservative or theocracy and doesn't have a single male only beach. It's better to keep quiet if you no idea what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 12:47 PM
6

It's not a smoke screen if they are giving women what they want, which they are. It's collusion of wealthy and women to screw over average man.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 05:20 PM
12

Most people don't realise but everything south of US is a bigger shithole for men's rights than US and Canada. These countries have worst laws and they have worst mixture of feminist and tradcon.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 04:24 PM
11

If spending time with children was so important for her then she wouldn't be falsely accusing him.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 04:15 PM
0

ok bro, everyone knows that. and that only makes it worse for average Ukrainian man.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 08:56 PM
4

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/may/10/ukrainian-women-face-harsh-reality-poland-abortion-laws I can type poland, Ukrainian women and abortion in order on Google and multiple articles come up about Ukrainian women complaining about abortion rights. These women probably fucked around and are scared their mutilated and PTSD suffering husbands or bfs might find out.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 10:38 AM
7

That's because those women had no choice, it literally fight or die. They were not allowed to flee to safer parts of USSR. Ukrainian women today have no restriction, they can easily flee out of Ukraine, so they don't bother to fight.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 09:35 AM
3

He is doing more for conscripted Ukrainian men than most Ukrainian women, so you are wrong.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 09:32 AM
19

It's pretty accurate assumption. Women only "care" about conscription when their sons and husbands are being conscripted. I have seen more Ukrainian women protest lack of abortion rights in Poland and murder of Iranian women than enslavement of their own sons and fathers.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 07:09 PM
109

Because they are neither the victim nor the enforcer of that violence. It will be men beating other men and these women will be cheering from the stands.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:38 PM
1

I understand they are being "sarcastic" and try to gotcha male victims of SA. But the thing they are trying to mock, i.e men making fun of female rape victims, doesn't happen. And even if that was happening it still doesn't warrant making fun of this guy unless you have evidence that this guy made fun of female rape victims in past.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:36 PM
3

I understand they are being "sarcastic" and try to gotcha male victims of SA. But the thing they are trying to mock, i.e men making fun of female rape victims, doesn't happen. And even if that was happening it still doesn't warrant making fun of this guy unless you have evidence that this guy made fun of female rape victims in past.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:36 PM
40

No they are not. Strop spreading fake information.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 10:05 AM
3

Poland is not conservative outside of rural areas and women are not discriminated in Poland. Regardless I hope success for this association.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 05:35 AM
-2

SK men are the biggest chads in the whole world, they actually take the fight to the feminists instead of just complaining like men in the rest of the world. Don't talk about lenient sentences and toxic work culture, you dumb bitch. Women all over the world, including in SK, get far more lenient sentences for heinous crimes and work culture is far more toxic to MEN than women. Hell, SK men had to do grueling military service for 2 years while SK women leech off of government sponsored programs. …
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:49 PM
20

It's the same in every country.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 10:08 PM
29

No jail No restraining order 500 pounds fine I don't want to hear any UK w*m*n talk about not getting in cases of revenge porn.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 05:32 PM
13

Higher % of men engage in feminist bs than % of women who engage in any sort of advocacy for men. So don't talk about percentages. Ideally no man should ever engage positively with evil feminists, he is putting himself and every other man in danger by empowering such a hate group.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 05:26 PM
1

Sounds like something a very dumb person or feminist roleplaying as MRA would say.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 05:16 PM
1

Pre gen Z feminists were domestic terrorists and KKK levels of hate group. And none of that is an exaggeration. The things that they have said/done is nothing compared to what gen Z feminist are doing.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 03:51 PM
1

They want to change laws so any man accused by any woman is sent to prison forever. You not getting mad doesn't affect them.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 03:48 PM
6

"ragebaits" like these are how feminists have eroded protections for accused in rape cases in many countries and perpetuated the myth of rape culture (rape culture is real but not what feminist think). Stop coping and start taking action.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 08:49 PM
4

Pre gen Z women have done far more henious things than gen Z women like white feather, rape culture hoax, biased laws against men ...
/r/MensRights20/04/26 10:57 AM
1

Epstein islanders also had/have wives, didn't stop them from doing what they did.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 10:54 AM
3

Decades of brainwashing and propaganda by feminist media and pop culture.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 09:40 AM
4

Some do and their husbands become a laughing matter "cucked by 13 year old" when these types of things happen.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 04:33 AM
13

0 public awareness about the issue + huge bias in every level of "justice" system in favour of female teachers + feminist media working night and day to protect such teachers Real rape culture.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 11:05 PM
32

Pedophilia is rampant among female teachers there is no other explanation. If they just want to fuck they can easily find some adult on dating apps, but they resort to raping children cause that's what they want.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 05:48 PM
18

50% has a good view of men doesn't mean they will not vote for exploiting men to gain privileges. When they see feminists governments making man hating laws they don't think how it will negatively affect their sons but how it will positively affect them.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:50 PM
33

Elites can't do that alone, its the women that do their bidding and irrationally hate men that are the problem.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:31 AM
2

True, feminists are tradcons. They seek to uphold power structures that has enslaved men for centuries.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 09:32 PM
30

German men will be shipped to get maimed and die in brutal while the German government at levels works overtime to give infinite privileges to women. Healthcare, homelessness, education literally everywhere German women get a lot more privileges than men. Hell, men can't even do paternity test on their children.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 06:57 AM
12

Already happening in Russia, well documented cases of women snitching on their ex husbands to conscription officers and getting rewarded for it.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 06:44 AM
7

That's not true, Germany can start refusing men to go aboard from tomorrow if they want without being a military dictatorship. You have no fucking clue you should stop yapping. That's how these laws work to enslave men, nothing is enforced until it is enforced and then it is too late to protest.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 06:41 AM
2

Depends of the type of abuse. Cursing at someone is not the type of abuse police should be concerned.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 06:01 PM
44

There are more german women who march in solidarity with women in Iran than protest against their own government enslaving their own brothers and sons.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 01:02 AM
13

50 % of feminist germany parliament is women.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 12:52 AM
4

A surveillance state like Germany can easily enforce this if they want to. Men will not given tickets, not be allowed to cross via road borders etc.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 12:46 AM
8

The contract is part of the claim, she is claiming that she could sue due to him breaking a contract that was never signed.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 08:39 AM
41

Cat calling and abusing someone is not how any decent person should behave but it's not something police should get involved with. And arresting for staring at someone in a public place is insanely authoritarian. UK is a shithole garbage.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:27 PM
12

Even if she is 300 lbs, she can get someone to fuck.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 06:40 PM
2

Enemy of my enemy is friend mentality doesn't work here. Tradcons are as bad as feminists for men.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 12:25 PM
1

You are not wrong but you are probably getting downvoted because it is very difficult to understand what you are saying.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 12:21 PM
8

Protecting one of their own.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 12:52 AM
24

These "retard" fans will be voting for feminists and their man hating policies. Not caring is how things have gone so bad.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 04:04 PM
2

Even if there isn't a minster for women, there should one for men. In fact there shouldn't be a minster for women, at least in UK cause till now it has only caused harm against men.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 10:03 AM
1

High time someone be on men's side.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 10:02 AM
3

Same as any western conservative country really.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 11:48 PM
8

I don't give a shit, it's not a time to protest this when men are literally being kidnapped and fed to the meat grinder. It would have been reasonable if women protested against forceful conscription of men other 364 days.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:01 PM
18

Women will always make it about themselves no matter how much men are oppressed. I don't see protests for unfair conscription, they literally don't care if their own fathers, brothers, sons and husbands are dying en masse but somehow women are oppressed. This is evil beyond words.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 07:57 PM
14

And Australia, France, India, Singapore etc. Pretty much every government in the world works solely for women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 07:43 PM
77

Yes from day one. It was never about equality.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 07:38 PM
20

Germany is a country where government works solely for women. Men can't do paternity tests without permission from court or mother and now can't even expect basic privacy rights that even 3rd world countries. But when it comes to defending the country ONLY men are expected to take up arms and sacrifice themselves.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 07:38 PM
2

Ukraine literally had the lowest birth rate out of all European countries and top 5 lowest overall. Ukrainian women are *not* traditional.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 07:40 PM
33

Internet is full of clips and videos of women controlling how their partners look, probably 1000x more of men doing the same. UK government should be cracking down on this "violence against men and boys" by women. High time honestly.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 01:24 AM
38

Because most people don't care if few thousands of men off themselves and those who care can't do much because of gynocentric governments all over the world that don't want to invest resources to cause not directly beneficial to women.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 11:52 PM
11

Is that why Iraqi military with conscripts folded so quick against US with only volunteers during gulf wars ? Number of conscripts doesn't determine who will win.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 05:50 PM
11

Supporting conscription of men while women get to flee the country is supporting the mass murder of men. Ukrainian men should be allowed to flee the country.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 02:55 PM
14

Enslavement of men is never acceptable, doesn't matter if the country is in a war or not.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 02:53 PM
2

Yes it's an ideological opinion. Men have protected and provided for women throughout history even at the cost of their own lives. JK is not progressive and neither is any feminist. Feminism is a regressive ideology that is build upon pseudo history and innate hatred of men by women. Male individuals can take sides and have an opinion upon on anything, it doesn't matter if they identify as women or not and it doesn't matter if that opinion hurts or favors women. That's called living in a progres…
/r/MensRights02/02/26 10:24 PM
2

No it doesn't.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 10:16 PM
2

When did I say you did ? I responded to the fact that ruling doesn't have to do with frequency of baldness in men vs women like you are trying to insinuate in your comment. I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about the rationale behind the ruling. Again I was talking about the rationale behind the ruling. You clearly gave Gynecomastia as a comparative example to baldness in women, to which I responded that it isn't comparative because it is not classified as a disability in UK like baldnes…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 12:47 AM
1

Of course it is not a disability, neither did I say so. I only commented about the fact baldness is not any more unnatural in women than men in most cases.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 12:35 AM
6

Men are more "affected" by baldness because it's a NATURALLY OCCURRING PHENOMENON specific to the sex for tens of thousands of years. Most men go bald because of genetics same as women, so according to you its natural in women too. And I don't see how it matters, do you believe that someone who lost their vision due to some accident is not disabled ? because it was not natural.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 07:08 PM
9

You have no idea what you are talking about. Judge didn't rule so because it happens more in men vs women, he did it because it impairs the ability of bald women to function normally. I don't see how that doesn't affect bald men, many bald men have self esteem and confidence issue. And I have no reason to believe that bald men function more normally than bald women. Gynecomastia is not treated as disability against men, even though as you said it adversely affect men more than women.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 07:03 PM
19

DNA testing at birth should be done by default and only opt out if both parents refuse. Men should be able to sue at any point for paternity fraud and get compensation, no matter the age of the child.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 01:54 AM
2

Her anti trans opinions are exclusively anti men. She hates men as proven by her anti male actions, I don't give a shit if she has male friends or not. That's a dumb conservative way of looking at things, which you certainly seem like.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 01:45 AM
2

Conservatives hate men cause they support anti men ideas like conscription and men needs provide and protect women. Patriarchy is not real, so no conservatives are not creating or maintaining that (or anything else). Conservatives don't hate women, they worship women. Women being housewives in past is a delusional feminist myth, only rich and powerful women could afford to be a housewife and not do anything else. Low and middle class women always worked in some capacity to earn for the family.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 01:33 AM
6

Oh, right I got her confused with that Australian teacher that was in news this week.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 01:29 AM
25

You never ever see meathead dumbass pedo hunters go after women teachers. They would rather false accuse an innocent man into suicide than go after these teachers.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 06:11 PM
3

Nothing, they stopped posting anti feminist content or stopped posting at all because anti feminist content was shadowbanned on yt.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 02:21 AM
17

He probably meant the algorithm by "software" that is used to train on the data to make this chat bot software. Yes the software is biased, misandrist and has no intelligence but the algorithm used to train it is not biased.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:18 PM
1

It's India, laws are so fucking regressive against men that anything is possible no matter how braindead. If a guy promises marriage to a girl, have sex with her and later breaks up then the girl can claim rape and he can go to prison for 10 years. That's how you get headlines like "Judge asks rape accused to marry the victim" posted in feminists spaces as ragebait when in reality that rape claim wouldn't hold in any civilised society.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 12:34 AM
10

That's because of policies for police and prosecutors to up the convictions rates no matter the cost.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 11:32 AM
1

It was a failure to not capitalise on 2010s momentum, we might never get it again.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 05:52 PM
15

Feminists caught up with the internet and censored the MRA content on the social media. Popular names from that time got banned, retired or rebranded into conservative politics content.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 02:34 AM
17

2010s were the heyday of men's rights advocacy, most of them are gone now. Only grifter tradcons remain.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 06:59 PM
1

3rd world countries like India, Mexico, Brazil etc have worse than most 1st world countries because they have the worst of traditionalism and feminism.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:48 PM
4

Why do feminists pretend that men and women are equal in tennis and should be paid the same in tournaments. That was the excuse for making prize money for all the grand slams equal even though men play longer games. Everyone knows that best women's tennis players are as good as teenage boys in a fair 5 set match.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 04:27 AM
1

It's really not a good stereotype these days, I know few shy attractive guys who have average personality but are very successful in dating and getting girls. Honestly it's just ugly or average looking guys that struggle with getting girls.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 05:40 AM
39

They write such books because that's what sells. This tells more about the target audience and the fact there is a sizeable amount of such people is concerning.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 12:21 PM
20

Why is no fault divorce a bad thing ? fault divorce only incentivising women to file fake DV and rape cases to get out of the marriage. Conservatives are so stupid that instead of removing rewards for divorces, i.e 50/50 property distribution and unequal child custody law, they would rather force people to stay in unhappy marriages, which only incentivising more abuse of law and fake cases.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 09:43 AM
2

Many feminists and conservatives hate porn and games for different reasons.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:19 AM
43

In 2025, we are learning that women can do bad things, wow such revelation. Feminism is an exercise in global mass psychosis and gaslighting.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:06 AM
13

No good country for men these days.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:01 AM
-2

Ragebait title makes it seem like UK government is including men but not girls in VAWG, so they are misogynists. In reality they are including everyone under the same policy, whose name suggests it is specifically for women and girls, and 38% of all the victims are men. They are not excluding girls, they don't have a different policy for men and the one that they have is not named correctly.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 10:04 PM
9

Nothing unites US congress like hating on men.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 09:51 PM
19

Some court in Europe needs to look at their child genital mutilation laws and apply it to circumcision, that's the only way. Politicians are sold everywhere, either to Israel or Muslim lobbies are never going to ban circumcision.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 05:15 PM
6

No this is not gender neutral in any way, A bill that would redefine rape as any penetration of a male’s or female’s reproductive organs by an object or a reproductive organ, was approved for a first vote by the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee on Tuesday. If a woman rapes a man, then it is not rape under this law because nothing is penetrating inside the man's body. This only covers rape of men by men, not by women.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 09:59 AM
13

Why not same for women who commit murders ?
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:27 PM
11

They know who is a woman when it comes to discriminating against men.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:26 PM
9

When has it ever happened in history that after losing a war, there was a systemic breeding program where one man was fucking 100 women to repopulate the country ? Yeah that has never happened. In the triple alliance war, 70%+ of male population of Paraguay was killed and still there was no breeding program. Women had children with soldiers of the winning triple alliance military. Women would rather stay single or get married to men from the winning faction than be part of some fucking weird bre…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 09:33 PM
2

DV between two women is highest because men abused them in previous relationships, sure buddy. Totally true.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:12 PM
36

The average women is misandrist and bigoted.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 06:05 AM
1

Thanks, yeah that's all NATO and west's doing.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 11:30 PM
1

what videos ?
/r/MensRights03/12/25 11:27 PM
1

I don't agree with your assessment. It might have started as a way to neutralize military assets but it quickly devolved into androcide. They killed every man irrespective of how capable threat he was. The definition of femicide is vague, 5 different people will give different judgements on a murder being a femicide depending on their hatred of men.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 02:47 PM
0

It is taken over by tradcons and conservatives that are as bad as feminists, if not worse.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 12:08 PM
3

Ofc reddit is filled with warmongering western chauvinists that blatantly dehumanise and villianise men from other cultures.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 12:07 PM
1

NATO, especially americans, are war criminals of the highest order. Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, My Lai, ... there are countless examples, so I am not going to give any benefit of doubt to these scumbags.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 11:50 AM
2

Wtf ? I didn't say anything about palestinians or gays.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 11:32 AM
29

What about "kill fighting-aged males... even when they did not pose a threat" you don't understand. Vast majority of men did not have any affiliation with Taliban, especially in early years of the war. They lived in small villages, lived off of farming and herding. Blatant war crimes and destruction to their way of life by NATO forces is how Taliban got so much support and manpower. This policy was not safety because Taliban routinely used women and non fighting aged men as suicide bombers. This…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 11:15 AM
2

Pure motivation does exist, like the in Srebrenica genocide where the motivation was to kill men. That's an accurate example of an gender based killing (androcide). That's different from a brother killing her sister because of her relationship. The motivation there is the relationship, not the gender of his sister. Men are honour killed too in those parts of the world, for the perceived dishonour brought to the family by their actions. It is just that these don't make it to the news as much as w…
/r/MensRights01/12/25 07:05 AM
52

The gathering of most privileged people in the history of mankind pretending to be oppressed victims.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 06:43 AM
1

Who was killed for just being a woman and no other reason ?
/r/MensRights01/12/25 06:33 AM
20

Most people are afraid of walking alone in the night. It's just that in most cases men don't have any choice, they have to risk their lives to earn for themselves and their families. Women corrupt this noble sacrifice into "men are not afraid of walking in night, streets are uniquely dangerous to women".
/r/MensRights30/11/25 08:51 PM
2

Honour killings are not femicides. Qandeel Baloch -> Her father said she was killed for money and the court concluded that her brothers killed her because they believed she dishonoured her family with her actions. Her gender was not the cause. Farzana Parveen -> murdered cause she eloped with someone. Her relationship was the motivation, not her gender. Banaz Mahmod -> murdered because she got into relationship with someone her family disapproved. Her relationship was the motivation, not her gen…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 08:49 PM
1

There is a difference between a hookup and a girlfriend.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 06:51 AM
4

Who was killed because of her gender ?
/r/MensRights30/11/25 06:46 AM
3

Leaving your gf of 5 years is less morally reprehensible than leaving your wife of 6 months ? just because of a government stamp in the second case. What a dumb take. Tradcons like you have 0 empathy or morals.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:38 PM
56

Remember when women ran a fake ass study that men are more likely to leave their ill partners, where they counted men whose partner died as having left their partners. That fake study is cited everything to show how disloyal men are.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:33 PM
7

I don't need to have sympathy for criminals to state the obvious fact that nobody deserves to do time for a crime they didn't do. A murderer deserves to be punished as per the homicide laws and sentencing, not some made up bullshit femicide thing that is not even real.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:23 PM
5

Yes there are men who were killed because of their gender, mostly in wars and conflicts when innocent men are routinely massacred just because of their gender, but I don't recall a single instance when the attacking forces killed all the women and left men untouched, they either kill just men or everyone. Just because androcide is a real thing doesn't mean femicide is real.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:09 PM
1

Who was killed because of her gender ?
/r/MensRights29/11/25 10:53 PM
5

Who was killed because of her gender ?
/r/MensRights29/11/25 10:53 PM
30

Conservative government btw. Femicide is not real, no woman is killed because she is a woman. There is always some other motivation.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 12:57 PM
19

Feminism doesn't mean equal rights for women, it means infinite privileges to women.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 10:29 PM
2

And be put on 5 different terrorist lists.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 05:49 PM
11

Just a stupid man hater.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 04:10 AM
14

Get your misandry apologia out of here mate. Those two things are not mutually exclusive, it can be misandry and also politically impossible to conscript women. And I don't give a shit if it is possible to conscript women or not, it is unacceptable to enslave men and send them to their deaths. If anything, since the German government spends far too on welfare programs for women than men, it should be the duty of women to protect their country and they should be drafted.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 09:22 PM
17

World is far more misandrist today than 10 years. All these progressive and feminist countries with all kinds of "equality"/"non-discrimination" laws are enslaving men one by one. European men need to wake up and realise that no women, stranger or not, is going to save them. Women are infinitely more concerned with random women getting murdered in Iran than their own sons, brothers and husbands being enslaved, tortured and killed in some random war 5 years from now.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:22 PM
11

Focus on the topic, not on your bs right wing purity tests. And Merz is right wing, most germans including him would agree with that. He is also a misandrist pos.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 07:08 PM
30

Absolutely disgusting but not surprising, Google is massively feminist even more so than other big tech companies. There was one other case that I remember from few years ago where a male employee was fired cause he stood up against sexual harassment by his female boss.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 06:49 AM
2

There is no such thing as universal mandatory draft. Men are doing all the hardwork and women are just to control the optics of enslavement of men for military.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 11:44 PM
13

I remember arguing with conservatives and conservative "mens rights" larpers here on how Ukraine enslaving men and sending them to deaths all the while Ukrainian women were riding schlongs all over the Europe is perfectly fine because they love their country and would have volunteered anyways. Conscription is the biggest evil in the modern world, under no circumstance is enslavement of men is justifiable or should be practiced.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 11:42 PM
50

Women can stream attempted rape of a man to thousands of live viewers and not face any consequence. Cops could easily arrest those two rapists even if the guy doesn't want to press charges cause there is video evidence in HD.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 06:26 PM
2

No, it's something else. There are other "conservative" EU countries with conscription that UN has no problem with, probably because male only conscription violates the constitution of Croatia but not in other EU countries.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 08:46 AM
8

Courts are some of the top most misandrist institutions in the world, they routinely enact violence against men on behalf of women. The "context" only makes the sign worse.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 07:42 PM
14

That's how the feminism infested liberal brain works. For them men are lesser humans than women, so it's ok to afford them all the same rights, protections or privileges.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 02:27 AM
1

I don't know, it hard to choose one when all of them were so terribly bad and misandric.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 02:51 AM
10

All cultures are misandric, historic or modern. The difference is the level of misandry.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 04:26 AM
8

Woman who started metoo is a pedo and serial liar. Ofc the movement by design only went after men.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 04:21 AM
8

And Germany and Switzerland. Soon it will whole EU.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 08:07 PM
111

No fault divorce is a red herring. Forcing women to stay in marriages they don't want to will only make them try more nefarious ways to get out, like making false accusations. Instead the focus should be eliminating the incentives for divorce, like alimony and 50/50 property distribution. All couples should be required to state how they would split finances and child care in case of a divorce, before getting married. This would reduce the divorce unnecessary dramas.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 07:44 PM
95

There are more men in prisons because criminal women are on the streets.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 02:45 AM
21

It's not real.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 10:48 AM
10

Femicides is a myth outside of select few mass shooter attacks. In every other case, the murderer had some grudge with that individual woman or he would have killed anyone and it just happens that the victim was a woman.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:48 AM
1

They never do.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 07:31 AM
22

Feeling unsafe is not a justification for a sexist crime.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 08:10 AM
1

Adopt not abort (murder).
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:54 AM
10

4 months suspended sentence (= 0 months in prison) and fines for life altering injuries after years of running around courts is a fucking joke. I except a harsher punishment if someone did this to a stray dog France is a cuck country.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 06:10 PM
11

Abolish draft for men.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 08:38 PM
5

Conservatives are such giga simps that they would rather gaslight men into marriage than fix the marriage laws because women won't allow them do that. Conservatives act all macho and manly but they are women worshippers after all.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 08:12 PM
1

Yes and everyone knows what's happening but they choose to not punish if the criminal is women.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:29 PM
11

Because 80%-90% of criminal women are not punished.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:25 PM
4

They do it because everyone else does it too. Imagine the giga backlash if they picked off women from streets and sent them frontline where they are captured or killed and videos of them being tortured were circulated on Telegram. Nobody would support Ukraine at that point.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 10:08 AM
8

Any group of people with majority women will always be misandrist. No exceptions.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:03 PM
7

Ofc I blame women, they directly benefit from genocide of Ukrainian men and I haven't seen a single women complain about this. And 100% of the frontline should be conscripted women for at least 3 years, otherwise it's not fair and equal.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 10:58 PM
85

3+ years of war and I haven't see a single Ukrainian women, or any women for that matter, complain about Ukrainian men being picked from the streets and thrown to meat grinder.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:51 PM
32

It's not the same. Ukraine is a literal death camp where men are picked from the streets and thrown in the meat grinder. That's why men are trying to flee any way possible even though it is illegally. Women, on the other hand, are only fleeing because they don't want to abandon their life of comfort and do bare minimum for their country. And it's legal for them to do so. I 100% blame the women.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:41 PM
3

Marriage, in it's current form, is a extortion racket and needs to abolishment. Not all never-marrieds are happy and probably have a high suicide rates, but people with long term partners are much happier, especially after a breakup compared to divorcees.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 02:58 AM
17

That's just your delusion, when women are raped people fantasize about how the rapist (even if not convicted) should be tortured and killed, almost nobody is saying "what was she wearing" nowadays. You just need to an excuse to be a rape apologist, even if that excuse is deranged and completely divorced from reality.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 08:05 PM
42

Divorced men are 6x more likely to commit suicide than divorced women. 95% of workplace fatalities are men.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 05:28 AM
0

Imagine being a OBGYN and not knowing that a sperm cell only has half of the chromosomes and isn't a human. A zygote on the other hand satisfy all the conditions for a living human being. She should either lose her license or is purposefully strawmanning the pro-life argument to hate on men.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 03:01 AM
14

But women did have greater benefits, so it's time to pay the reparations.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 06:21 AM
67

Absolute truth, in triple alliance war 90% of paraguayan men died yet the wikipedia article on that paints a picture of women were equal to men in this war.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 10:38 PM
15

The cope and female worship is so ingrained in human DNA that most people, even here, believe that early feminists or any feminists were good. There is no such thing as a good feminist, they all are man haters by definition.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:42 AM
25

"Protect the weak" is a dogwhistle for "protect women". Men, weak or strong, are robbed all the time but you never see someone complaining how bystanders didn't put their lives at risk to save those men. These types of posts are always only about women getting robbed.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:53 PM
3

Why are women such supremacists? You never see a man saying "no woman has come close to defining pop culture in this way" about giga popular male musicians.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:38 PM
22

Don't know which shithole you are living in, but in the civilised world male robbers are caught and punished, usually more harshly than female ones.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:08 PM
8

Two completely different things, draft is far worse and it is still possible today. So there is more than "little carryover" when it comes to the draft.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:40 PM
5

No they won't.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:34 PM
11

Yeah that frontline is in German Tinder.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 07:35 PM
28

Pretty sure she is talking about all men, not just straight or white.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:22 PM
10

Men are currently in the dog class, probably go down in future.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 02:45 AM
4

Apartheid was always there, just that back then the back of the bus had benefits that front didn't.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 02:44 AM
48

How about stop using the gender slur "incel" to shame men?
/r/MensRights23/01/25 10:45 PM
37

During WW1, men were on the frontlines, boys were in the mines and women were on the street handing white feather to returning veterans.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 10:43 PM
1

This post is about conscription which is military slavery and slaves don't have right to their own body.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:12 PM
1

No, it's privilege because the same right is not given to men and it's murder because it involves killing the unborn child's body. Don't worry, you and your misandry won't be missed at all.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 07:54 PM
3

It doesn't. Just accept your mistake, don't be a baby.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 04:57 PM
2

First of all it's a privilege, not a right, and secondly it's still legal in many states. I am not conservative but abortion is murder.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 04:54 PM
4

You have never made that point, so unless you think I can read your mind I don't think I could respond to that even if I wanted. It is due to violent nature women as much as any murders committed by men are.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 02:53 AM
6

Conservative women groups have been lobbying against gender neutral SSS since 1970s and they have done it successfully for last 3 years when amendment in NDAA was proposed by democrats. They also lobbied successfully against ratification of ERA due to fear of being conscripted.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 02:50 AM
6

Just because unicorns aren't real doesn't mean horses aren't real. Idiots, like you, who believe in femicide care fuck all about male suicide or loneliness anyways. I am not going to lie to pander to disgusting scums like you. Femicide is not real, now go cry more.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 02:33 AM
4

How's that relevant?
/r/MensRights23/01/25 02:28 AM
9

Infanticide by women has a lesser punishment than murder by a psychotic man. That's the reality, deny as much as you want. These laws were created in early 20th century when nobody had any clue about mental illness or hormones in body. The reason was juries were not convicting mothers of murders due to gynocentric bias, so they created a lesser crime to at least give some punishment to baby killers.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:22 PM
19

Patriarchy is not real. In many countries, women can legally rape men, so it's women who get away with rape.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 04:58 PM
15

Many people who suffer from depression also suffer from psychosis and that includes many school shooters and "incel" shooters. Why should murder when in depression caused by pregnancy be treated any different than murder when in depression caused by other factors? Elderly people with alzheimers get harsher sentence for murder than women do for killing children, even though alzheimers is much worse illness. There aren't many better points than saying murdering children who can't even talk should …
/r/MensRights22/01/25 06:23 AM
10

No that's deranged statistics. Ratio of IPV murders out of total murders doesn't tell you about frequency of IPV.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 10:31 PM
43

Femicide is not real.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 08:45 PM
51

Does this also apply to some depressed boy shooting up a school? or to "incel" shooters like Elliot Rogers? Regardless, saying cold blooded murder of children is not violence is certainly a deranged take.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 08:44 PM
0

That's just your fantasy, that's not an accurate description of reality. Please go out and meet real people.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 08:54 PM
0

Men don't have victim mentality, instead they have anti victim mentality when the perpetrators are women.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 08:49 PM
1

There is no reason to believe that a 20 year woman is more likely to die than a 59 year old man, yet the young woman is going to be saved here. You are just a dumb women worshipping right wing grifter larping as a MRA.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 11:30 PM
15

Now? It always has been this way, Engels wrote how marriage is slavery of wife by husband in The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State that inspired many 1st wave man hating feminists. Left pretends to care about poor and working class men which the first ones to be sacrificed on the altars of feminism.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:03 AM
2

This is an all out assault on men. There is no bigger discrimination against men. It can't get worse than this, literal subhuman slave treatment.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:52 AM
2

What kind of an MRA are you if you are covering for Israel favouring women in hostage deal?
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:58 PM
2

Men are 3rd class citizens and this is a an example of it. You are coping because you refuse to accept that fact.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 03:14 PM
31

Crazy cope bro. It's exactly as it is stated, men are 3rd class citizens in the society and their lives are worth as much as a street dog. Israel conscripts men to fight wars (women are not sent to the frontlines) but those same men are not even prioritised in hostage deals. That's a subhuman slave treatment if I have ever seen one. No amount of your bullshit sugar coating will change.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 02:05 AM
4

Jordan Peterson and other right wingers are gynocentric women worshipping misandrists. Almost all social issues that right complains about has an underlying element of misandry.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 05:30 AM
33

Number of conscripted men in Ukraine and Russia alone is probably enough to tip the scales here.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 10:23 PM
21

Lowest rug, in terms privilege, of the society is forever dominated by men, historically there used to more women there but in modern times there isn't any. Why would men create a system for themselves where they are the most underprivileged? Can you give an example of a system created by a group of people for themselves to exploit another group of people but first group dominate among the most underprivileged in that system? I can bet good money that you probably can't because the requirements …
/r/MensRights11/01/25 11:18 PM
90

Patriarchy doesn't exist. He is just yapping feminist propaganda, why would men create a system that makes 80% of men are substantially more unattractive to women yet the same system has a bell curve for attractiveness of women to men? clearly that favours women more than men. In a real patriarchy, all the deadly jobs would be done by women. Many studies have concluded that women don't face discrimination during hiring in male dominated fields while men face discrimination in female dominated fi…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:43 PM
1

That's what happens when you allow right wing morons to infiltrate.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:32 PM
1

India has a million different anti male laws, she is somehow only complaining about the one that hurts her directly. Does her brother needs to be made a victim of each of those for her to complain about them? She probably used some anti laws herself to scam someone else's brother.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 09:52 PM
25

Do you seriously believe if there was a picture of a gagged man in front of 100s of women then these people would sympathise with the man and completely ignore the women?
/r/MensRights10/01/25 03:58 PM
2

She wouldn't care if her brother wasn't accused.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 03:43 PM
271

Many of those boys were burnt alive. Boko Haram made a big mistake by going after the girls, nobody would have cared if they kept going after boys.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 10:44 AM
4

Mods locked the post related to this on r soccer but they won't lock posts when some footballer is accused of rape.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 10:20 AM
4

Of course you can sue anyone, doesn't mean you are going to win or even get a trial date. Court can just throw out your lawsuit. And who is going to pay for the lawyer? which is extra hard with no job.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:32 AM
20

Peak delusional take. There are many men who were acquitted with DNA evidence after spending decades in prison and still received 0 compensation. Real world is not some hollywood legal drama, you can't just sue out of every wrong done to you. Most people neither have money nor time to run around courts while getting feathered and tarred as a pedo.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 10:45 PM
25

Was sentenced to 20 months, suspended for 2 years in may last year. Just UK things.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 10:27 PM
3

Yeah that is.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 09:14 PM
24

There is very few of them? much fewer than women doing it to men over fake sexism.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:26 PM
11

Men know how to "release" emotions in healthy ways, just because men don't do in ways women do it doesn't mean it's not healthy. That's a feminist propaganda. Men do reach out for help, it either isn't their or not effective. That's just a feminist talking point. Study: of 1,500 men who committed suicide, 91% had been in contact with a health agency to seek help. The notion that men die because they don't ask for assistance is untenable. Only person being a sexist here is you. Stop regurgitating…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 09:04 AM
28

This one is an old one, she was sentenced to 3 years in 2018.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 08:38 PM
105

Successfully changing the legal definition of rape to include men as victims, instead of just women. No they didn't. They fought against men as rape victims in India and Israel. As a result raping a man is perfectly LEGAL in India. Anyone can rape men in India with impunity and feminists supported it. Getting equal parental leave for fathers (Sweden), fighting negative portrayals of fathers. Feminists are the fight ones to deny parental alienation and lobby against shared equal custody laws. Bri…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 03:17 AM
15

Anyone with half a brain here will tell that men who are raped are believed less and blamed much more than women, but somehow the "researchers" hypothesise the other way around.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:29 AM
1

What about the Engels' claim that marriage is a slavery of women by men? I would say that is pretty rabid anti male statement by one of the founders of left movement in one of his most popular work.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:35 PM
0

When you are done crying, come back with some arguments. Or is providing argumentation for one's position a capitalist thing? lmao
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:25 AM
1

When was the left not feminist? Labour party supported feminists since late 19th century and Engels himself wrote "The modern individual family is based on the open or disguised domestic enslavement of the woman" in his The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Of course Engels claim is absolute BS because a man provides everything and is responsible for the well being of the wife and children in a marriage while the women reaps the benefits, analogous to how a worker produces ev…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 04:45 AM
0

Lol you couldn't find a single left wing party out of tens of thousands in the world that is openly anti feminist? lmaooo and you want me to believe anti feminist left is a real thing. Very feminist behavior. I'm kind of disgusted with you. The feeling is mutual you little shit. Read before replying! I very, VERY clearly stated that there's no way 'low class' women have more privilege than 'high class' men. Damn I might missed this little gem in all of your irrelevant yapping. This just gives it…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 05:16 AM
1

So no leftist anti feminist party out of tens of thousands all over the world. I am sure there were nazi party members who were against fascism, doesn't mean nazis were not fascists. Feminism and left are indistinguishable.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 04:27 AM
9

How do you know 99% of them do not share this opinion? did you interview all 4 billion women on earth to come to that conclusion?
/r/MensRights03/01/25 12:54 PM
11

There is no incel ideology, either you are an incel or not. Just like there is no poor ideology. I can't be banging 10 chicks on Sunday and deciding to be an incel on Monday. Just like I can't decide to become poor while owning 5 mansions and 10 yachts. It doesn't matter what incel means for it to be a slur, it how people use it. People, like you, use it to abuse men that's why it's a slur.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 12:53 PM
6

Cause you do feminist apologia here. Just because most women have relationship with men doesn't mean they don't hate men, that "I can't be racist I have a black friend" defense is bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 12:45 PM
12

Being a involuntary celibate is not an ideology. That's like saying being poor is an ideology. It's a gender slur because it is used, mostly by women, to shame men. It's no different from any other slur.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 10:44 AM
8

Yes you hate men, as evidenced by you numerous comments on this sub. Who uses facebook is completely irrelevant here, it's real women who hate men, like you.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 10:39 AM
12

Incel is a gender slur. Stop using it.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 10:29 AM
8

100% of them do.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 10:29 AM
15

That's not YT, that's facebook. Those comments are not by anonymous trolls those are by real women who hate men, like you.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 10:25 AM
224

If someone says anything related to men's issues under a post about "women's issues", they would complain that it is derailing the post and men should create their own posts.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 02:42 AM
0

Please find me a single left wing party that openly is anti feminist? After all if there are plenty of anti feminist left wingers as you state, there must be a at least one anti feminist left wing party. Read before yapping, I compared low class women with high class men. If it is about class then how come low class women are more privileged than high class men? Give an example of economic system that doesn't exploit men?
/r/MensRights03/01/25 02:14 AM
1

Please find me a single left wing party in the whole fucking world that has won even a single vote in any election and is openly anti feminist. Is feminism not man hating movement because there is some random self declared feminist is not a man hater?
/r/MensRights03/01/25 02:06 AM
4

There is no non feminist left, you could go on the street and ask 1000 lefties if they support feminism and 1001 of them will say yes. Also it isn't about class or capitalism because lower class women will have certain rights that higher class men don't have and communist, socialist or any other form of economies will exploit men just as much as capitalism does.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 04:04 PM
7

There is no way a system created by men for men, i.e patriarchy, would treat men as slaves that are exploited for the privileges of women. It's the biggest lie in the history of the world.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 08:03 PM
1

Paternity test didn't solve paternity fraud, artificial womb won't solve women's privilege issue.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 07:12 PM
51

Women with children shouldn't get preferential treatment either.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 01:50 PM
8

Feminism is not losing control of the left, left itself is losing. If you ask 1000 leftists on whether they are feminists, 1001 of them will reply yes. Feminism has completely consumed the left, there is no left without feminism. And left losing is not even a good news for MRAs because right is equally misandrist and gynocentric. Men are fucked and will be exploited no matter who wins politically.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:00 PM
1

Which rights did they gain by handing by white feathers to random men on the street?
/r/MensRights29/12/24 07:00 PM
1

1st and 2nd are much worse and more damaging than 3rd and 4th. All feminism is female supremacy.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 09:39 AM
17

Learn from this and stop helping random women. It's asking for trouble with laws in countries like Canada and UK.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 08:06 AM
24

First of all, no man would say that because, unlike women, men don't hate women even those who are actually traumatised by women. Secondly, your logic of "hating a group of people is justified because of trauma" is age old propaganda used by everyone from Nazis to KKK. Do you support those people too?
/r/MensRights28/12/24 10:58 PM
3

The point is female elites don't give a fuck about men.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:46 PM
2

Nobody has went to prison for 40+ years for making a false accusation.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:34 PM
43

If women express their fear by calling all men rapists then of course I will undermine that fear. Just because you are fearful of something that doesn't give you can say or act any way you want.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:33 PM
3

What about the women who lobbied against ERA because it will give equal rights to men in things like child custody and conscription? Women groups have lobbied against the amendments to NDAA, for every year for last 10 years, that would make it mandatory for women to register under SSS (like men have to do).
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:20 PM
48

How does a random man in monogolia is going to ruin your life? The argument isn't men or women can't have their life ruined, the argument is when some woman is raped by a man it is used to demonise all men but if a man's life is destroyed by a woman then it's a singular bad woman and not all woman.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:07 PM
17

Women kill more men than women.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:51 PM
74

In vast majority of rapes, the victim and perpetrator knew each other. You are already defending yourself from vast majority of men by following the advice that you give to men: "You should have some control as to who you let into your life.". A woman doesn't have to come into the man's life to ruin it, there are countless examples like that london guy who spent 2 years running around courts because he brushed past a woman in the Tube.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:50 PM
6

It's not unique to capitalism. USSR, China, Cambodia and other communist countries conscripted men to fight wars.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:08 PM
7

It used to far better when there were less women.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 04:50 AM
1

No bro, every physics class doesn't have to start with flat earth theory or geocentric model of solar system in order to not be an echo chamber. Everyone here knows that arguments for the law are complete bullshit and we don't have to spent 10 paragraphs repeating on every post why they are.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 05:48 PM
3

And I am telling you that the motivations claimed by the government are total hogwash and straight out of feminist propaganda playbook. Not presenting the government propaganda actually shows reality of the situation and is not outrage porn. You should also stop repeating those propaganda points.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 12:04 PM
30

Leave to germans to completely misconstrue the argument. The issue with banning discreet paternity test is that it effectively enslaves men who are unknowingly raising someone else's kids but have suspension that they can't confirm due to variety of reasons like legal costs or fear of drama in their relationship with the mother. A father should be able to paternity test their children, it's no different than taking them to doctor. The privacy arguments are totally nonsensical.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 04:19 AM
2

That's a terrible take. Nothing except the last paragraph is relevant anyway. Doing paternity test is made into a social taboo by women and going through courts is a time and money consuming process. Fathers who suspect they are unknowingly raising kids of someone else should be able to do paternity test discreetly without court permission or telling the mother and with minimal cost. We are talking about non invasive and unharmful procedure.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 04:14 AM
8

There is no such thing as a sincere british journalist when it comes to men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 05:39 AM
2

Libertarians have dropped the ball on social issues long time ago, they are just conservatives with a different name now.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 06:24 AM
2

The punishment is by gender.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 09:12 PM
62

Surely reddit will ban all the female subreddits like they did with "incel" ones after the "incel shootings".
/r/MensRights18/12/24 01:03 AM
3

Let's be real, there are no ladies affected by Title IV D. Women don't get custody only when they are completely batshit crazy and can't hide it.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 01:00 AM
6

They are just actors in a short film that she acted, directed and produced. It's not a big deal, nobody did a crime here.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 12:31 PM
10

I am not complaining, just saying it's not anything special to gen z.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:43 PM
22

You can find songs by women lusting for handsome, successful and rich men in any generation. They just don't sugar coat it anymore.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 02:34 PM
2

There are 15+ year old posts on this sub talking about dogshit Indian laws. It's sad that a tragedy is necessary for people to notice something that obvious to anyone that took 5 mins to read these laws. I don't expect any change nevertheless.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 08:49 PM
8

She got a slap on the wrist (18 years) for a cold blooded murder which wasn't even her first attempted murder. She will be out in 2026 if she doesn't fuck up. That's as good as free for someone with that record in North Carolina.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 08:27 PM
16

There could be a new proven false accusation for next 100 days on r/ news and on 101st day they would be witchhunting based on some allegation.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:57 PM
1

Because it works for women.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:38 PM
6

Economics literally doesn't matter, men commit more suicides in almost all countries. It doesn't matter if the country is communist, capitalist, socialist, rich, poor, western or eastern. Blaming all these unrelated factors is a red herring. Fake feminist propaganda statistics + it doesn't matter anyway. Another red herring.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 08:52 AM
11

Russia is a matriarchy and Russian men are worth more dead than alive if they refuse to be enslaved by the government that works for women.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:45 AM
10

This is old news, it is removed from the final bill. Conservatives, particularly conservative women groups lobbied extremely hard for this. Now under republicunts, it's not going to happen at all. It's was very unlikely democrats anyways, they just as a bargaining chip to get concessions from republicunts every year. Again it's proven that America is a matriarchy and american men are more worthless than dogs.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 01:57 AM
7

Prenups should be mandatory in every corner of world.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 01:47 AM
7

When was women not allowed to drive? do you realise that first car ever was driven by a woman and she was the first person do to a cross country journey in a car?
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:34 PM
59

India is a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:17 PM
33

That's how the sisterhood works.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:52 AM
1

When did I say a lawyer doing anything is STEM? Phd physicist reading comprehension strikes again.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 08:50 PM
1

There is a difference between legal research and investigating facts of a case. I clearly wrote that lawyers do legal research not scientific research. Crazy how 5th grade reading comprehension is not required to become phd physicists these days.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 05:26 AM
1

MDs, JDs and MEs (most engineers have BS/MS) all do research. MDs and MEs do scientific research while JDs do legal research. Do you actually believe every novel machine, surgery or legal theory is created by some Phd ? if you are a phd physicist that says more about the institution that gave that degree than about you.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 04:44 AM
4

Saying medicine is not science and is like law shows you know nothing about law or science. Doctors can have academic degrees and Engineers can have professional degrees. Many Engineers with professional degrees do academic research and many chemists, physicists and mathematicians with academic degrees work as Engineers. Same with doctors and biology graduates. The "nature" of the degree matters very little in the real world. I hope you have never been to a University, or any academic institutio…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 04:46 AM
19

70% women and children makes sounds like women are being targeted more than men and as much as children, when it reality women are literally the least targeted group behind children and men. Creating fake narratives by lumping together women and children is an age old tactics mastered to perfection by feminists.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 08:06 AM
2

Watch conservative and libertarians (free staters) vote against this even though they pretend to be against government financed healthcare, especially in NH.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 05:05 AM
2

Ukraine.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 06:44 PM
67

The way Americans justify cutting off baby dicks to reduce penile cancer risk by 0.000001%, you would think they probably super health conscious, live 100 years and don't have 70% population obese.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 03:33 PM
11

If you cut your limbs, you would be 50% less likely to get skin, bone and soft tissue cancers. If you remove your colon and use ostomy bag you would be 100% less likely to get colon cancer. If you remove your prostate, you would be 100% less likely to get prostate cancer. Less tissue = less chance of bad mutation = less chance of cancer.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 03:21 PM
1

Can I say all Christians believe Jesus is God?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 11:47 AM
1

Blatantly wrong about what? They have gender bias in the same way as KKK has racial bias.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 10:34 AM
1

Blatantly wrong about what? They have gender bias same way KKK has racial bias.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 10:33 AM
6

If it's on r/science it's junk
/r/MensRights04/12/24 03:42 AM
11

That's not how "it is". Women have all the time and money to complain about 1000s of wrongs in the world but I am yet to find a single women out of 4 billion+ that complained about conscription of men in Ukraine and Russia. In general, the number of women who actually care about men's rights are in single digit out of 4 billion that is. Women don't care cause they benefit from the exploitation. That's actually how it is. Everything else is an excuse.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:10 AM
1

Because they benefit from it. if you won't say (it doesn't cost any money to do, so being poor is not an excuse) or do then don't also make use of the benefits.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:03 AM
22

You realise that that's not a good excuse when men are enslaved and exploited for women's benefits? Just like you can't say white americans were trying to make a living and don't care about slavery issue or germans were trying to make a living and don't care about holocaust issue. Staying silent is not an option when you benefit from the exploitation.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:04 PM
10

All feminists WITHOUT A SINGLE EXCEPTION, believe in hating men or have misandrists views.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:01 PM
3

ECJ would defend slavery back in the day.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 09:58 PM
1

They won't understand, conservatives are not good at reading anything other than the headline and there are far too many here.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:05 AM
2

None of those are related to coverature in any shape or form. Married women could own property which their husbands would have to pay mortgage on, failing to do so will result in imprisonment. That's matriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:37 PM
3

No and no.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:33 PM
3

Unless you want Sharia to be the law of the land everywhere, idk why you would bring that up. Adultry is not criminal in vast majority of the countries.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:31 PM
3

Dowry is not trading women as goods. It is no different from women expecting men to earn 6 figures to be a candidate for LTR or marriage. Unless you are in a disney movie, people have preferences and many of those can be financial motivated.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:28 PM
5

Under coverture, men were financial responsible for their wives like paying taxes or debts. If the man failed to pay his wife's taxes or loans, he would go to prison. Many men went to prison because their wife's hid their income and debts from them. Coverture is an example of matriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:22 PM
4

It isn't, but paternity fraud should be, that's why we need mandatory paternity tests.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:05 PM
4

Women were never property of their husbands. If some men say that then that means they work for women, so it's a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:02 PM
3

Men have plenty of outlets of expression. I also hate that men are more likely to put prosecuted and given longer prison sentences for the same crime than a woman. Another proof of matriarchy. Glad to be your advisor, first thing I suggest is to prosecute feminists for their genocidal hate propaganda against men.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 10:59 PM
4

Only women can do paternity fraud. Paternity fraud is more than just cheating. Both are immoral, but one should be criminally immoral.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 10:54 PM
6

Men and women enact more violence on men than women. It doesn't mean anything, male criminals are not evidence of patriarchy, laws and policies are. And those favour women. Nothing wrong with mandatory paternity test. Why do banks collect collateral? Why do employers do background check? Paternity fraud takes away at least 18 years worth of a man's hardwork and earnings and causes mental trauma that no amount of money can fix. The fact that it is not punishable in any country on earth proves tha…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 10:51 PM
4

Probably not. Why did Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, FDR enslaved free men to fight wars ? if it was a patriarchy, they would have enslaved the women.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 10:35 PM
10

But men (and their wives) on the VERY TOP OF SOCIETY work only for women, so it's matriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 08:25 PM
1

You are conflating two different perspectives, From the perspective of god, yes someone is guilty and not everyone is innocent because god has infinite knowledge. Since no human is that knowledgeable, we can never be sure of someone's guilt completely, we can only be sure of someone's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That's why we do investigation to find evidence to prove someone's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. You are questioning her bf's innocence without being a god or having any evidenc…
/r/MensRights29/11/24 04:19 PM
2

Unless you are a fucking GOD, you don't know if he guilty or not. So "legal protections" (whatever that means) and being innocent is the same.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 09:03 AM
0

Afghanistan was a failed western imperial crusade against tribals in flip flops. That's not a real war, you can call it asymmetric warfare or whatever to help you cope that you guys lost to tribals with ak47 in flip flops. Afghanistan is not stuck in bronze age, it was sent there by US supporting religious fundamentalist mujahideen, many of whom later joined Taliban, under Operation Cyclone against the democratic government of Afghanistan who were trying to push for progressive reforms in the ru…
/r/MensRights28/11/24 11:42 PM
15

Ofc he can be guilty but we don't know. You can be guilty too, we don't know. So we presume you and her bf both are not guilty before evidence is presented to the contrary. I hope that answers your "Amazing how you know he is not guilty even before the police investigate."
/r/MensRights28/11/24 11:12 PM
23

Same way we know you are not guilty of killing her.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 08:34 PM
6

That's false equivalency, they care about female citizens otherwise they would be conscripted.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 08:17 PM
100

Governments don't care about rights of men and wrongs of women.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 01:11 PM
25

That's not an excuse.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 01:10 PM
41

It's the same in Germany, 5000 euro fine for private paternity test.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 01:03 PM
3

Go check the IOF stats on number of deaths for men and women, it is as if women are never conscripted. Women who are in logistics, which is very few, are far far away from the frontline. They are no in danger, not from missiles, drones or anything. Afghanistan was not a real war and Norway only sent volunteers. Norway will never conscript women to frontline.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 12:54 PM
3

If enough men wish that, it surely can be made into reality.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 12:06 PM
3

That's how it works in majority of the countries when illegal goods or services are transacted, the provider is punished more heavily than the consumer. The only exceptions are when the consumer is primarily men and the providers are primarily women, then the consumer is punished and provider isn't. It's pure women worship and misandry.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 06:36 AM
16

Israel women are not sent to the frontline, worst they do is logistics and administrative things and Norway hasn't fought a real war in 200 years. Believe me, all this is performative; when push comes to shove only men will sent to the meat grinder.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 06:13 AM
14

Who talking about "equality"? Men fought for 2 years, now it's time for women to fight and men can use Tinder in Western Europe.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 06:03 AM
38

It's actually worse than giving free pass, they are straight up letting women flee the country. In WW2, women worked in factories in US, conscripted as nurses in UK and fought on the frontline for USSR. Only thing Ukrainian women are fighting for is German schlongs.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:52 AM
4

I didn't say anything like that, but believe whatever makes you sleep at night. For the all yapping you do about strong/weak men, you sure don't act like half a man. Grow up and stop supporting slavery.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:45 AM
6

Who said I will be at the front? it will be meatheads like you who will be front being made into salamis. Now be a strong man and reply with your real account, not this sock puppet.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 09:42 PM
8

Yes I want that, now STFU.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 09:03 PM
9

Asking for dowry is a fake crime invented by Indian feminists so women could falsely imprison their husbands. Consider: Asking for dowry causes no harm to anybody; don't want to pay, just say no and call off the marriage. Harassing or assaulting someone for dowry is no different than extortion or blackmail, so it is already covered by laws in every country on earth. Then why do feminist need a new law for dowry? because saying "he extorted me" doesn't put someone in jail without any evidence but…
/r/MensRights27/11/24 12:31 PM
36

How many CP videos do you have?
/r/MensRights26/11/24 08:24 PM
3

Which old one? the one that started the white feather movement to shame men into enlisting?
/r/MensRights26/11/24 08:22 PM
6

Ofc it's generalizing but it's a correct one. Someone calling themselves a feminist implies they support a hate filled ideology, so they are a bad person. And being a feminist is not a immutable attribute like someone's race, anyone can stop feminist at anytime they want.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:21 AM
12

All feminists are evil, not only radical ones. Most of KAMs types are not even radicals.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:24 PM
6

Chill out, that's feminist propaganda for today. Feminism = nazi hate movement against men
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:22 PM
2

The reason for that privilege is men worshipping women, not only women giving birth to children. If that was the case, then post menopause women and women who can't give birth won't the privilege and women who gave birth to more children would have more privilege.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:08 PM
9

If you don't have a good argument then just shut up.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:34 AM
10

Incel is a gender slur, stop using it. Do you think a someone doing research on homosexual men would title their post as "I am looking for individuals part of faggot community ..." ? This is not an "incel" community, why are you asking this here? Why do you have a question like "I would rape if I thought I would get away with it" in your survey? Do you think "incels" are more likely to be rapists? when most rapist men are not "incels" and many serial rapists (like Ted Bundy and Richard Ramirez) …
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:18 AM
9

Because people use it as an slur. Have you ever thought why fag or n-word are considered slurs? because people used those as slurs.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:43 PM
25

It's has everything to do with feminism and women not wanting to birth children. It's literally never been easier to give birth and have children in the entire history of homo genus. If economics had anything to do with birth rate then no human would have ever been born. And you don't even have to compare today with past, just look the places with highest fertility rate (sub Saharan Africa) vs the lowest (South Korea and Taiwan). It's not a coincidence that sub Saharan Africa is probably the lea…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:29 PM
59

Probably not, we have the technology to stop paternity fraud completely but still men get cucked (probably more than ever) and the use of it is a taboo. The same would happen with artificial wombs or any other technology that challenges the privileges of women. Things can only change for men if men change their women worshipping and slave mentality.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:08 PM
2

Because women collect in their subs to hate men.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 03:57 PM
1

To score once you need to have at least one options. Many men don't have that.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 12:20 AM
12

Incel is a gender slur, only misandrist use it to shame men.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 12:12 AM
2

Men are frustrated with lack of options and women are frustrated with excess of options. It's not the same.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 08:01 AM
1

It's not a pendulum if it only swings in one direction.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:48 AM
24

Men will give up on everything, including their own lives, except for one thing that they actually need to give up, women worshipping. That's why misandry is so rampant.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 03:20 PM
-2

Enough people have died or have their life ruined by these "screw ups" that there is a whole wikipedia page about listing just the deaths. If these frats and their bonehead members had any concern for their bad PR, they would stop hazing and take accountability for their actions, which of course they never do.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:34 PM
1

You are delusional if you think hazing only happens in fraternities major unis.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:03 PM
4

She did hit piece few years ago on MRM by calling trans rights movement "new men's rights movement" that harms women and children.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 03:45 AM
8

Basically everyone is in favour of conscription in Finland, you can look up the polls. The point of contention is whether to include women or not. Since basically all Finnish women are in favour of conscription of men, it makes them hypocrites when they sing different tune for conscription of women. It's the same story in Poland, women are 50/50 for conscription of men, they will probably be 90/10 when it comes to including them also. Women get to say on whether to enslave men for war but would …
/r/MensRights13/11/24 03:22 AM
-1

Why will the republicunts fix this issue? when in last 10 years they have shot down at least 4 attempts (3 in last 3 years) to fix the issue.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:33 PM
22

Referendums don't happen every day on conscription do they ? But here's more recent data According to polls women, more than men, are in favour of conscription in Poland, Finland and South Korea. https://x.com/IBRiS_PL/status/1495785047965765642 / https://yle.fi/a/3-12655465 / Women groups have lobbied against women having to register for selective service for last 3 years. They have also shot the equal rights amendment because it will open up the possibility of gender neutral conscription.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:29 PM
10

Just because feminists claim something that sounds remotely same doesn't mean it's true. Only way to become a mother without choosing to be is rape which is illegal, only way to become a solider without choosing to be is conscription which is legal. Do you understand the difference? Wtf is the natural state and who defines it? animals rape and murder each other all the fucking time, so should it be legal to rape and murder? Men are not made to be enslaved to fight and die in wars.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 10:53 PM
40

It's nothing to do with modern women, women never acknowledged the sacrifice. Even if they did, it doesn't make enslaving men for war any better. Women need to be conscripted.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:21 PM
4

It has reached table multiple times and republicans scrap it every time.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 10:47 AM
25

By any reasonable standard, a teacher sending her nude pics to her students should be a criminal behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 07:52 AM
3

Why will it remain small? women love man hating, it will only grow.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:12 PM
5

Unemployment being all time low doesn't mean switching jobs is easy. It's very hard in current economy.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:19 PM
12

What rights?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:09 PM
7

Conscript them.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:13 PM
8

Because it used to be much better deal for women with life long alimony and stuff. Nowadays they only get alimony for like 10 years on top of child support and 50% of the assets. As the feminists love to say, equality is oppression for those entitled to privilege. Very apt in this situation.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:18 AM
4

More women voted for Trump than Harris. She won't blame those women, so it proves she already hated men and this election is only an excuse for her to spew her vitriol publicly. I could write this same comment about women, just change context so "evil winning" means feminism winning in place of DT.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:01 AM
6

Who said they are competing issues? other than the women who say things like "abortion would be legal for 9 months if men could get pregnant".
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:51 AM
2

95% of women get pregnant because they want to and women dying due to pregnancy when there are 100 different types of contraceptives available to women. Why don't you compare the rate of circumcision between US and other industrialised countries? Abortion was legal in Idaho for any reason till 2022 and even after that there is exception for medical emergency. So how is abortion being banned after mid 2022 related to mortality rate increasing between 2019 to 2022? I have never faced a situation w…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:46 AM
13

Then your experience is unusual. Conservatives fear monger 24x7 about transwomen in women's bathroom let alone a man in women's bathroom.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:19 PM
13

Both are issues of bodily autonomy, it's really not that hard to understand if you try instead of yapping. If nobody wanted babies to die from circumcision then they would ban it because it's a useless procedure.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:16 PM
1

Title IV D is a Block grant program. So it's a funding program as I said. You are slow but we are making progress. States can still collect child support without it, like they used for decades before it.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:55 PM
35

Feminism does no good and only harm.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:44 PM
1

use contraceptives. use brain.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:43 PM
1

Title IV D is a funding program for states so they collect more child support. It's not an enforcement program, any state can stop collecting child support and there's nothing feds can do except not giving the Title IV D money, and vice versa, any state can enforce child support even without getting that money from feds. Yes, education is important. I hope you are little more educated now.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:42 PM
1

Do you realise that FBI is not coming for child support? It's the state cops, prosecutors and child welfare officials that actually go after men who don't pay child support.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:35 AM
6

Child support is enforced by states anyways.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:39 PM
13

Nothing. Even if you combine all election media coverage, you wouldn't be able to compile 30 mins of MRA talking points. We had no influence on the result of the election, we won't get anything from it.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:06 AM
1

Kamala worshipped women, not herself. Biden and Kamala are abetting two genocides right now, one in Palestine and one in Ukraine. It can't get anymore fascist or xenophobic than this. Trump will probably continue with the same.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:02 AM
11

Tradcon grifiters talking about how traditional gender roles are good for men sounds exactly as delusion as feminists talking about how dismantling the patriarchy will solve all men's issue.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:18 AM
0

There is no men's rights coalition, you are not badgering them into supporting any MRA talking point. Men didn't vote dems because they alienated men with their rhetoric. The best case is dems will learn their lesson and will be less unhinged on their messaging next time.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:03 AM
1

Who do you think builds buildings in Japan? maintains the grid? or cleans the sewers? Yep that's men proving labour and assistance to women who won't such dirty and demanding jobs. Who is working in JSDF and police ? Yep that's men providing protection to women. Labour participation is decreasing for men in West because labour jobs are being outsourced to non western countries. You are delusional and have no grip on reality.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:46 AM
5

Yes I already covered that, but that doesn't mean much other than maybe dems won't be so overt next time.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:10 PM
14

Anyone who is not a conservative grifter posing as MRA knows Trump is not a saviour of men. He will not dismantle the draft (SSS), he will not ban circumcision, he is not going increase funding for men's health, he will not punish female teachers who rape boys in schools etc. That said, Trump winning is still marginally better because: he might rollback Title-IX regulations like the last time and it showed that one can't just run a campaign focused so overtly on worshipping women like Kamala did…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:46 PM
3

He is pretty clear on what he is going to do with Israel.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:22 PM
60

Men are not withholding anything, especially not labour, assistance or protection.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 11:43 PM
4

They have sent men to live under the bridge for far less or even nothing. If a man had done what she did, he wouldn't be allowed near 10 km of a child ever again.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 07:23 PM
8

That's not just another woman, is it? They wouldn't celebrate a man being happy who has even the half the past as her. OP is suggesting this, not strange at all.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 07:20 PM
11

That's different, they were mad cause she is married because they want to marry her. That happens with western celebrities too, nothing unique with Asia. But I have never ever seen any group of men getting mad because their favourite celebrity had a girl.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 04:55 AM
220

Find me a group of men that got mad when their favorite celebrity had a daughter.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 07:19 PM
1

🤖 Thanks.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:59 PM
1

You are changing your position now (not that it is any true now). Your original comment is When you live with a supporter of political violence, you fear the violence at home. It mentions nothing of races or gender of the "supporter", but now you are talking specifically about white men. Of course there is nothing wrong with being wrong, but you humility to accept that.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:57 PM
1

Threat doesn't have to be terrifying to be a threat.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:51 PM
5

Stop yapping, you don't make sense. GBH is worse than rape that doesn't involve GBH, that's a fact.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:35 PM
2

Are you really unable to follow your own, flawed, line of argumentation? Let me spell out it for you: your argument that women will fear their husbands because more men support GOP implies that white men should fear white women because white women support GOP. My comment was a rhetorical refutation of your flawed argument, looks like it just went over your head.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:29 PM
2

There needs to be threat for coercion not necessarily "threat of force". Using your own words, "threatening to leave someone" is a threat. Get a dictionary my friend.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:21 PM
10

That's not the point, is it? the point is that the ad is wrong and it's the women coercing men to vote.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:05 PM
7

Is that why white women have supported republicans all but twice since 1954? I guess most white men are fearing violence at home from their political violence supporting wives.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:51 PM
6

All you do here is look for gotchas and fall flat on the face every time, either you need to get better at looking for gotchas or you need to find some humanity inside you and support the cause.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:20 AM
5

That only makes it worse.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:14 AM
3

Chase is bad when it comes to circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 07:12 PM
1

That I understand but how are you measuring the fact that men are less assertive, i.e weaker, today vs 100 years ago?
/r/MensRights02/11/24 03:34 PM
1

Men saying they are assertive or women saying men are assertive?
/r/MensRights02/11/24 11:41 AM
44

Without men, this country will go back to stone age within a month. Women know this but still would act ungrateful and say men are useless because it's about asserting power and dominance. Like a bully, they get dopamine hits from diminishing the importance of men while living solely on the fruits of exploitation of men.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 01:54 AM
7

That's just the lingo. Millennial women say "kill all men" and Gen Z women say "be mean to men" but they both mean the same thing.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 01:44 AM
1

I have no clue about Russia but trying to use "Birth rate" as a way to figure out how the way of life for a nation is styled is retarded. Russian and Ukrainian women are expected to be a mothers but actually won't have any kids. Russian and Ukrainian women are expected to be a wives but actually won't remain married. Your claims are objectively false. Ukraine's rapidly plummeted due to The war. So did Russia's. Russia and Ukraine having lowest birthrates for last 2 decades in whole of Europe bec…
/r/MensRights02/11/24 01:42 AM
1

How do you measure assertiveness ?
/r/MensRights01/11/24 11:59 PM
10

Man haters not immature.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 02:09 PM
4

What's your criteria for calling men weak today vs 100 years ago?
/r/MensRights01/11/24 01:58 PM
45

They will defend their own, no matter the crime. It's a gender cult.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 12:01 PM
17

It's suspended, she doesn't have to go jail. She is free to do whatever she wants.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 09:00 AM
2

Do you really think Russia and Ukraine is in pre-1950s state? Both are infamous for some of lowest birthrates and highest divorce rates in the world. That's not indicative of the slightest of a culture that expects women to be mothers and wives. They are a mixture of tradcon and feminist progressives. They pretend to be conservatives with the right wing posturing and chest beating but when it comes to enforcement they are only enforce trad gender roles for men while women get to do whatever the …
/r/MensRights01/11/24 07:56 AM
1

What does those choices have to anything here? Most Ukrainian women fled the country given the voluntary choice to either fight or flee. So I don't need to ask questions to strangers to support my assertions, I have millions of Ukrainian women (vast majority of it) to support it.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 07:42 AM
0

Nobody here is war with anything. So we are not hiding from it.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 07:38 AM
3

If enough people are not signing up then that CLEARLY means most citizens of the country don't want to ensure the continuity of that country.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 07:37 AM
0

Anti trans and anti immigrant bullshit that tradcons here spread. The cause for both is pure misandry.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 05:05 PM
142

She hid that for 5 years, then when it came out she blamed it on her bf, then when that didn't work she claimed the minor guy assaulted her and in the end paid him 380k to shut up. Rose McGowan, another one of MeToo witch hunters, said "None of us know the truth of the situation and I'm sure more will be revealed. Be gentle.". Funny how she and other women never offered this courtesy to men who were accused during MeToo.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 05:01 PM
20

You argument which is basically "men are valuable because they get the privilege to be forced to die for their country wooohooo!!!" is most stupid argument ever made in favour of conscription.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:41 PM
1

Most offices are in cities, so why are you comparing chores in rural areas vs jobs in urban one.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:36 PM
2

No it's not misogyny because given the choice women would flee rather than fight. Nothing you wrote is logical and it's barely coherent.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:34 PM
3

Russia is not traditional and neither is Ukraine.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:29 PM
0

What adversity befell this sub? Nobody told me this sub is at war.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:27 PM
16

The fact that there are 10 women on the frontline doesn't change the reality that majority of the Ukrainian women are in other parts of Europe while Ukrainian men are abducted off the streets to be turned in salami.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:23 PM
5

Never seen a feminist complain about women and children given 1000x higher preferences in cases of actual disasters. They don't hate that phrase. They love it because it protects women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:20 PM
4

Hiding from what?
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:17 PM
9

Wtf? vast majority of Ukrainian women are in Western Europe not on the frontline. There's probably more women in US military than Ukrainian frontline.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 06:13 PM
2

You asked for the source, I gave it to you. Go raises your grievances with them. There is not statistic that accounts for every single member of the population. That's literally not possible. I suggest you learn some statistics and how results from a sample is generalised to the whole population.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 02:59 AM
2

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1185107&page=1
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:47 PM
3

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1185107&page=1
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:46 PM
42

Feminists on false accusation: if you didn't rape you have nothing to worry about.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 08:41 AM
8

It's from a AABB survey done in 2000. https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1185107&page=1 Is that reputable enough?
/r/MensRights29/10/24 08:35 AM
6

It's from a AABB survey done in 2000.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 08:32 AM
19

It's not hard to find examples of women committing murders and getting away with it. 100 years 0 progress.
/r/MensRights28/10/24 06:05 PM
9

It used to go both ways, a man can't be guilty of raping his wife and a woman can't be guilty of raping her husband. Women can't guilty of raping any man, even today, in many countries.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 07:59 PM
8

Why did Chrissy Houlhan measure failed? Why did Equal Rights Amendment failed? because Christian tradcon women groups lobby against it and is doing so since before 70s.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 07:54 PM
4

Most office jobs are multiple folds harder than doing chores.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 07:41 PM
1

What a clueless moron you are. FBI doesn't make laws, they can't decide what is or isn't rape. FBI definition only matters in the crime stats they publish which is absolutely irrelevant to the discussion. Rape of men is completely LEGAL (even by other men) in India (that's like 10% of male population) and legal by women in Muslim countries, South Korea, most of central Asia and many countries in eastern Europe. Overall, it's not a stretch to say that in more than half of the world, a woman can r…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 07:39 PM
10

A curfew like that for a year would make UK a third world country.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 10:09 PM
12

Christian women are the biggest obstacle to removing draft inequality in US, they lobby against ever bill against it.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:07 AM
3

Are you actually illiterate? He never once used the "chattel" in his post, why are you assuming he is talking about chattel slavery? "Slavery" is not a shorthand of "chattel slavery". Chattel slavery is not even the worst kind of slavery. Jesus these dumb americans.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:03 AM
5

There is a difference between fighting in a war vs forced to fight against your will. If slavery is forever then how did so many slaves were freed by master?
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:55 AM
3

https://www.monticello.org/slavery/online-exhibitions-related-to-slavery/landscape-of-slavery-mulberry-row-at-monticello/meet-people/george-granger-sr/
/r/MensRights24/10/24 05:50 PM
8

Many places slaves did get paid and many were not traded. But that's besides the point, being traded or getting paid is not the defining characteristic of being a slave, can I keep someone in my farm as long a I "pay" them and never trade them? Is it not slavery? To an average galley slave in 1500s, it would have been a luxury to be a slave in American south, does that mean slaves in American south were not real slaves? If you were more informed, you wouldn't be write this illogical comment.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 05:36 PM
20

What happened to Ukrainian women? they chose to flee and having a great time (relatively) in rest of Europe.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 02:02 PM
2

Is there any other option?
/r/MensRights24/10/24 08:50 AM
2

Who?
/r/MensRights24/10/24 08:48 AM
2

If they don't have no say then why did protest against compensation given to men? and why did the government succumb to those protests. They literally have a whole ministry for women in Korea. How the fuck do they have no say? Just because you say so?
/r/MensRights24/10/24 08:47 AM
3

If you read further than what you need to back up yourself, you would know that Korean law has also changed in 2012 that recognise men as victims of rape It only recognises men as victims of rape by other men but not by women. Homicide rates for men were higher due to many of it being gang related activities interpersonal conflict involving other males. However the homicide for females were largely due to intimate relationship whereby perpetrators are a current or formal partner That's straight …
/r/MensRights24/10/24 04:35 AM
2

If laws are not egalitarian then culture of course isn't. Singapore isn't more egalitarian, it's actually less. At least in Korea they give inheritance to sons which can be seen as compensation for all the misandry.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 04:20 AM
8

I mean if you do bare minimum leg work you can find multiple studies on it.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 06:15 PM
9

Separate comment: Are you an internet detective? Do you go around interrogating everyone on their motives for asking questions on the internet?
/r/MensRights23/10/24 06:11 PM
12

I don't know what your comment has to do with this post but rape of a woman has always been a crime. Rape of woman, that is, rape of a man by a woman was historical legal everywhere and is still legal in majority of the jurisdictions. Does your book covers this?
/r/MensRights23/10/24 06:04 PM
4

Singapore has conscription for men and corporal punishment for only boys. Very egalitarian indeed.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:53 PM
5

If Koreans don't value women as humans then why do they only conscript men? any rational human would assume that they would at least enslave subhumans (women) before humans (men) for war. Spousal rape is not illegal in Korea, they don’t take that into consideration This was changed in 2012. In 2019, the Korea Women’s Hotline, a Korean feminist association, estimated that a woman was killed every 1.8 days in South Korea and that 98% of homicide victims were women, one of the highest rates in the …
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:49 PM
3

No idea what point you are trying to make but it really doesn't matter how good a student is at paying attention in the class if he can get the grades in an objective test. IDK how anyone can argue with that, but here we are alas!
/r/MensRights23/10/24 04:15 PM
24

One extra woman getting throat cancer compared to last year is technically a rise but the fact is that it is twice as common in men vs women, so men should be more cautious.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:55 PM
3

First wave feminists: White feather Equality and supporting first wave feminism is mutually exclusive. Choose one.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:52 PM
23

Now you have moved on from "teachers are not biased" to "it's good that teachers are biased". So you were wrong before, got it. Children are not clones of each other, some would be inherently better at sitting quietly in a classroom for 6 hours than others. Two equally good math students get equal grades, it doesn't matter if one is a better student according to someones made up subjective metrics. I personally don't thing it's necessary but schools can separate grading for measuring on how "goo…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:50 PM
1

Please find me a real world feminist organization that doesn't support gendered laws.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:16 PM
27

It really doesn't unless you are illiterate. It clearly shows that teachers will favour (i.e they are biased) towards students that display behaviour more common in girls, even if students are not academically better. You can argue that this bias is good and teachers should be biased this way (that would mask off misandrist moment) but you can't argue that they are not biased.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:07 PM
1

Majority of Ukrainian women have already left.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 02:21 PM
0

Republicans are better on draft because they were against slavery 150 years ago, even though they shoot down every bill on that matter and instead pass bills that would make it even worse. Ok dude, I hope you are getting paid for glazing this much.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 05:40 AM
8

Women vote for whoever gives them privileges, they used to be conservative back in the day because conservatives gave them privileges. Now it's the liberals.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 01:26 AM
-3

Stop glazing republicans, they are worse on this issue. Just because they didn't create the inequality doesn't they get the right to oppose fixes to it.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 01:23 AM
0

Add women and remove men.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 01:18 AM
13

Rogan is not libertarian and I don't remember him ever claiming that.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 05:29 PM
5

Why not from women's from past?
/r/MensRights20/10/24 12:34 PM
7

Gentlemen like Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez or Jeremy Meeks?
/r/MensRights20/10/24 12:31 PM
10

He is talking like a true gyno slave, that he is. It doesn't matter if women love or hate men, there is no justification to treat men as subhumans to protect women.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 02:07 PM
3

No, that's bullshit. You can read the study, it never mentions the word "rape" or anything similar to that.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 02:01 PM
4

No gender oppressed the socialists.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 01:03 PM
3

Do you think men in USSR weren't masculine enough?
/r/MensRights18/10/24 08:34 AM
11

You people ignore 90% of actual substantive posts and flock on ones that aren't that important. You have remember that there is only one MR sub, unlike 1000s of feminists subs for women, so all issues get posted here and not all of them will have the same level of importance.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:27 PM
1

That's a crazy rant. Yes in a lot of situations men are sent to fight against their will and they should never be forced to but the majority of them were ok with fighting for their country in most situations. Who said majority of them were ok with being conscripted? even if that was true, is it ok to slave people if majority votes yes? Men had the right to go out alone. Women didn’t. Men had the right to be with whoever they wanted to. Women didn’t. Men had the right to hit their wives due to wo…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 11:20 AM
3

Men throughout the history are conscripted to fight in wars against their will, are the first and largest casualties in almost all genocides and massacres and are last in line for aid in humanitarian disasters. If there a sinking ship with 50 men and 50 women and only 50 people can be recused, 50 women would be recused and not 25 men and 25 women. History is testament on how men's lives are valued less than women's and that's the biggest indicator on which gender is treated as subhumans and whic…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 10:38 AM
1

Do you really think we should judge movements by their textbook definition written by their propagandists ? or by their deeds? since I am not a moron I prefer the latter. Feminists deeds, like white feather campaign, have made it abundantly clear that they are a nazi man hating ideology. It doesn't matter what some definition says.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 10:20 AM
11

Seems like it's a post about someones personal experience on misandry in the society.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 06:25 AM
5

I am not talking about 50-50 feminist type equality (though I don't oppose quotas for men). I am talking about equal treatment before the law. Educate yourself on feminist history and stop being a clown.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 08:05 PM
2

Because feminists are in charge.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 08:03 PM
9

Can you link any post here that isn't about men's rights?
/r/MensRights16/10/24 08:02 PM
-1

Probably more of this, he seems to be conservative to me and conservatives can't stop worshipping men.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:13 PM
1

It's a bunch of policy positions that might help everyone regardless of the gender, sugar coated as pitch to black men.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:12 PM
69

Hardly any posts here are not about men's rights. Feminists never wanted equality. Educate yourself on feminist history. There is no fairness without equal treatment.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:05 PM
1

His wife falsely accused him to the pedo hunters. She got 4-7 years and the guy that tortured him and killed him got 30 to life.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 02:59 PM
1

It's mostly conservatives, of course it's a cringe name.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 02:57 PM
10

If he goes against women he would be cancelled.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 04:58 AM
42

Half of the deaths are women and children, while the other half is men alone. Clearly more men are being killed.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 12:11 AM
4

Women have far more rights since forever. Feminism is about exploiting men and it's very good at it. And who are you to tell who is or isn't a feminist ? do you give feminist certifications or what?
/r/MensRights16/10/24 12:08 AM
1

No, I didn't mean like that. How many women wouldn't take advantage of unjust preferences given to them? between that and being a feminist sympathizer that covers almost all the female population. Even for the protests, I for one has never seen a women protest for men's rights but have seen countless men do it for women. Early feminists were going around shaming men into enlisting, so yeah feminism today stands for exactly the same things it was initially supposed to be.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 12:07 AM
12

Pedo hunters killed an innocent man with chainsaw last year. Not all their allegations are wrong and that's not my point. My point is that they would go after men that might be innocent than women who are clearly guilty.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:50 PM
14

There's no non radical feminism just like there is no non radical nazism. It's all radical by definition.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:52 AM
1

I have never seen a woman who unilaterally support men's rights even if she gains nothing from it.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:47 AM
45

British women doesn't deserve chivalry.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:46 AM
247

You never see pedo hunters going after these women, they would rather go after innocent men with dubious to fake evidence.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:41 AM
74

She gains nothing by helping her country, worst case Ukraine falls and she will flee to some nice European country. Neither left nor right will ever give men same rights as women, because the world runs on the exploitation of men but elections are won by appeasement of women.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:27 AM
40

I would say the men should take the children and flee to some nice developed European country like Germany. Hook up with some nice German girls and get some job through immigration welfare schemes. All the while the women can fight and die for Ukraine, if any refuses enlistment officers can kidnap her and beat the shit out of her until she agrees to go to the meat grinder. That's the only fair way.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:04 AM
49

Lowest fertility rate in all of Europe, highest abortion rates and infamous for mail order brides. These are not traits of traditional women.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:55 AM
3

Are you a woman? Ofc getting a good job is not easy but getting one isn't that hard. If you think not all normal women can get a job even if they took any possible job then I don't know what to tell you.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:34 AM
3

She's a college graduate applying for some white collar jobs. She can start flipping burgers at mc donalds anytime of week. Of course that's not the job she wanted but she can get a job if she was desperate enough.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:26 AM
3

Women have enough stamina to work a normal shift.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:20 AM
4

Whiteknighting is standing up for a women even when she is in the wrong.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 05:15 AM
5

No way you can't come up with a better argument than women can't get jobs. This isn't 1950s, every normal woman who wants a job can get one.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 05:10 AM
2

There's no hope then.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:25 AM
6

900 since when? this year?
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:17 AM
23

tf? watching too much Animal Planet or what?
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:14 AM
4

They can get a job. I didn't impregnate any SAHM, I don't want my tax money funding their parenthood.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:08 AM
1

Of course I do. But you certainly doesn't. You feel SAHMs should be compensated for their work in monetary means after the marriage but you don't value all the compensation paid to the SAHM during the marriage, like not having to work and spending time with kids, something which most dads would gladly take over grinding themselves for the paycheck. Maybe apply the same standard to yourself that you uphold for me. You are a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:07 AM
5

What the Daily mail .... Go read the same news in your favourite news outlet. Stop yapping about Daily Mail like it's editor fucked your mother or something. my opinion is as valid as yours is. No. I can't help but laugh at your notion that everyone should suffer conquest and genocide because draft dodgers prove they deserve to. Who is everyone here? Ukrainian women? they are not fighting and most are riding cocks in Germany. so they don't care about Ukraine at all. Nato countries? they are not …
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:01 AM
1

Yes, be a SAHM but don't expect anything after the divorce. The SAHM work is already getting paid by the guy working and providing for the help. If you need real money for the SAHM work then have a prenup that says you are entitled to x% of property.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:38 PM
5

Why it is ok for a woman to flee their male family members and ride cocks in Germany ? And there is no bigger threat than dying, which men being victim of 10000x in Ukraine.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:30 PM
2

wdym? "No single mothers need the aid." or "No, single mothers need the aid."
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:25 PM
41

Daily Mail is a red herring, you verify this news in any other news outlet of your choice. There is no shortage of clips from Ukraine on slave treatment of Ukrainian men by enlistment officers, so you don't have to pretend it's some crazy new news. I love how people like you, who have no dog in the race, defend male only conscription. Ukraine only has the right to exist as long Ukrainian men (women are cowards) are willing to defend. If a man doesn't want to fight, then for him living under Russ…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 02:04 AM
11

No pride in a nation that practices wartime slavery.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:42 AM
8

Why are women should be allowed to stay home or flee but not men?
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:41 AM
10

America had conscription in past and has SS which is basically inactive conscription.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:37 AM
9

Men and women on the top conscripting men below them while allowing women below them flee unconditionally is patriarchy, what? Feminist brain rot.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:35 AM
2

Men are not victims of rape and DV in poor countries ?
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:29 AM
8

No muslim country would ever conscript women. That has never happened and that will never happen. That's pure delusion.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:26 AM
7

I would rather be a woman in Afghanistan then be a man in Ukraine. You have no fucking clue about Islam or muslim country, they are giga chivalric. Women in muslim countries don't have many freedoms but they also don't have obligations that fall on men, like defending the country from invaders. In liberal countries like Ukraine, women get all the freedoms but no obligations. So you get situation where Ukrainian women are whoring out all over the Europe while Ukrainian men are made in salamis on …
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:24 AM
1

Unless one have 4-5 kids, SAHM is not worth it. It's not 1820s anymore, it's easier than ever to have a job and manage 2-3 kids.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:08 AM
2

SAHM itself is unfair + can always have prenups on how the property should be divided.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 02:25 PM
10

Do you believe if yours views on men’s rights were achieved, women and men would be happier? Women wouldn't be happy for sure. Do you believe in feminism, and do you understand the different “types” of feminism? No, feminism needs to be eradicated. Do you feel immediately on edge when a girl posts/replies to your comments? idc but women who post here generally womansplain and regurgitate feminist falsehoods instead of actually having a constructive conversation. What would you say your “biggest”…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 07:36 AM
0

Instead of stalking me you can backup your tall claims with data, which somehow none of you feminists do. Why I wonder.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:07 AM
4

It's pretty clear that I was talking about averages and not "every woman in the world works less than every man". Since all you do is yap and not provide any data, I will do that for you, Here is data from US BLS: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.t01.htm I will calculate T = Household activities + Purchasing goods and services + Caring for and helping household members + Caring for and helping nonhousehold members + Working and work-related activities For men T = 6.74 hours and for women it…
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:57 PM
17

Abolish alimony, Abolish unilateral equal division of property (every cent should goes to whoever earned it), Make child support accountable (every cent should to the child), Have equal shared custody laws, Abolish unnecessary government aid to single mothers, etc. Overall we need to make being divorced at least as costly as being married by stop favouring women in case of divorce.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 10:40 PM
7

Women work less hours than men so they compensate it by doing relatively more household chores on average. Work hours + chores hours are mostly same for both men and women, if not more for men. There are many things that men do that in the household that is typically not counted towards the chore hours with in published feminist academic hacks.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 10:22 PM
1

Cause with a woman, the man get double the blame even if he did half the work.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 07:13 PM
7

Jesus Christ, so much yapping. His wife is a bad person because she broke the boundaries she agreed to. Yes I am not a arbiter of someone else's marriage (unlike you), that's why I suggest she should have married to someone who is more open to her voyeuristic desires. You broke a contract you agreed to, you are a bad person to me. Pretty basic morality. I hold both of us to same rhetorical standard. A normal person with normal intellect would realise that (unlike you). More yapping ... zzzz I di…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 01:48 AM
0

Who talked voting rights? lmao Is low IQ and kindergarten level read comprehension correlated with being a leftist lunatic? wondering because you and that other moron are making a exemplar case for that. The fact that he can make a genocidal threat against men in a university show how men are dehumanised in the society and dehumanisation of men is a men's right issue. I hope that's clear for you, if not please consult the an elementary school english textbook before spewing further nonsense.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 01:34 AM
8

I don't have time for your brainless yapping, so read carefully now This man have any boundaries in his relationship, it doesn't matter what you think about it, you are not married to him. If his wife breaks those boundaries, that makes her unequivocally the bad person here. It doesn't matter how ridiculous you think those boundaries. He can react to whatever way he wants to, doesn't matter how ridiculous you think they are. You are neither the arbiter of acceptable relationships boundaries nor …
/r/MensRights10/10/24 01:13 AM
2

So you support making genocidial threats as long as it's against a RWer male ? Why doesn't this guy makes the same threat against women, blacks, jews or any other racial minority ? If it was just a political threat and not an act of genocidal sexism, then the distinction between a RWer male or female is irrelevant and both should be shot according to him. He feels emboldened enough to openly dehumanise men without any risk of social or legal repercussions. He dared to comment the same thing abou…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 12:38 AM
7

World doesn't revolve around you, so you can keep your idea of boundary to yourself and to your relationship. You are not married to his wife, you don't have any rights to tell him how he should react when his boundaries are broken. STFU, mind your own business and stop using feminist jargon like "(male) fragility".
/r/MensRights10/10/24 12:25 AM
3

It's not some random doofus, it's a university instructor that is teaching impressionable young people that it's fine to delete men that don't agree with them. Why don't you show if a video of an instructor threatening to murder women or blacks or jewish people who doesn't vote Kamala? Yeah that's not happening Men are dehumanised to the level that someone feels emboldened enough to make genocidial threats without facing any social or criminal repercussions.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 12:04 AM
5

Open threat to massacre men who doesn't share the same political ideology is obviously a men's right issue. Get some help if that's not evident to you.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 11:56 PM
5

I can find plenty of examples of this behaviour from Twitter, Reddit, Insta, YT or from real life women. It's not TikTok, it's the mentality of a certain 50% of the population.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 11:42 PM
3

Open genocidal sexism is feminism.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 11:27 PM
10

Women make worst accomplices, you never work with a woman but always for her.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 11:19 PM
19

It definitely is, painting male immigrants as rapists, paedophiles and "invading army" is the favourite pass time of conservatives. It's not surprising that there is bias against male immigrants. Even if the bias is subconscious it is still fueled by attacks on male immigrants.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 08:55 PM
0

First of all, most kids probably don't like to get fucked by an adult. Secondly, liking has nothing to do with the fact that a person is mentally not capable of giving informed consent. I am sure many 7 year olds would like to drive a car or shoot a gun but they are not capable of comprehending the consequence of doing those things. It's a logic why you can't drug a woman and have her say "yes" and then proceed to fuck her. That would be rape. Adolescent boys going through puberty may feel like …
/r/MensRights12/08/24 08:45 PM
2

Because consent has to be informed, that's the person giving should have the knowledge as well the mental capacity to know the consequences of their consent. Kids obviously neither have the mental capacity nor the knowledge to consent to sex, so it's a rape. It's same if a man fucks a clinically insane adult woman that consents to sex, he would go to prison for rape. Of course it's need to be proven that the woman didn't have the mental capacity to consent and the man could reasonably know that.…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 07:14 PM
10

Ofc they are the biggest enemy, although conservatives are not far behind. Most feminist branches are blatantly female supremacists and select few that aren't NEVER ever call out the ones that are, instead they protect these female supremacists.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:41 AM
1

Only a lawyer could help.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 08:15 PM
5

Absolutely true. It's peak lunacy that women complain about smaller prize money when at their absolute best they play at u-18 boys level, why shouldn't these boys earn the same prizes as professional women athletes ?
/r/MensRights11/08/24 08:13 PM
5

True, this is because of Title IX. Most of money for men's sports goes to 3-4 popular sports while the same amount of money is spent on dozens of different women's sports. That's why US wins most of its olympic medals in women's sports. Title IX literally murdered most men's sports.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 07:59 PM
54

No equality where it actually matters - 24 months of mandatory conscription.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 07:52 PM
1

You need to give data first, not me. You made the claim.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 10:16 AM
2

Only right answer. Conservatives blabbering falsehoods about patriarchy and wage gap under this post is truly stupid.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 02:24 PM
1

No non-feminist data shows women less than men for same work. Feminists calculate wage by dividing income of all women by number of women and then compare it with men's wage. Of course that would more for men because there are more women than men but there are more working men than women.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 02:16 PM
2

No idea who you are talking about but I find it weird that I have never seen that manifesto referred in this sub, an incel sub according to you.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 09:42 AM
6

I don't know any incel manifesto.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 08:31 PM
9

I don't know if you are on the right sub, when I look at top 5 posts right now, they are about body shaming, debunking feminist historical revisionism, DV and murder of an UK man. How is incel an ideology? Incel means involuntary celibate, which is a social status like how being poor is an economic status. A poor person can't get up one day and decide to not be poor, just like how an incel can't decide on his own to not be an incel.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 07:38 PM
5

Why is this an incel sub? and what problems do you have with incels?
/r/MensRights09/08/24 07:18 PM
15

Let's hope for -100%.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:48 PM
8

Women complain about incel forums, which are 1000x harder to participate that these groups, and how men don't speak out against other men who promote violence against women but I have yet to see a single woman, out of 4 bil, complain about these groups. Empathetic gender in action.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:29 PM
1

You are a moron if you can't see difference between business contracts and marriage. First, laws can change without your consent. Second, if you get divorced in a different state then laws of that state will apply. Third, you have more more flexibility on how assets should be split and on what conditions, which is not possible in a marriage. Your wife can participate in gangbangs every day of the month and you still have to split assets 50/50 with her.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:10 PM
1

You say you aren't the moral police but here you are complaining about someone generalising women. Did you even think that maybe generalising women is part of his moral system? why are you policing his morals? Nothing he said is generalising women, he only this is a common behaviour among women which it definitely is and always has been. So stop gaslighting.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:42 PM
9

Labour is in charge, Jeffery Dahmer wouldn't to go to prison had he been a female in present day UK. Conservatives aren't better either, they would label immigrant men paedophiles and rapists but won't say anything about literal child rapists getting away scot-free.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:31 PM
3

Business contracts are explicit in how assets are divided, marriage isn't.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 09:45 AM
12

Men marched alongside women since day 1. There were 32 signatures by men, out of 100, in Seneca Falls Convention, which marked the start of feminist movement in US. Men supported women's suffrage movements all over the world, even when most women were against it. In UK, anti-suffragists movements, almost always exclusive lead by women, got more signatures from women than men. Early on it was so bad that in many places there were more men than women in feminist rallies. Still, an all male parliam…
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:23 PM
2

Soon they will too, last year it was 27+.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 12:41 PM
1

25+
/r/MensRights06/08/24 10:46 AM
13

Because they are majority women, anything on the internet that exceeds a certain critical mass of number of women turns into man hating hell hole.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:18 AM
93

Hundreds of men were killed and thousands imprisoned in "women" protests in Iran and thousands of men participated in Sarah Everard protests in UK. I have yet to see a single woman, out of 4 billion, talk about gendered aspect of war slavery in Ukraine or Russia. It's crazy how not a single, out of 4 billion +, of so called "empathetic" humans have to anything to say about the biggest inequality in modern times. There are literally thousands of examples of men standing up for women's rights thro…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 05:36 PM
9

They probably fund women's sports more.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 03:54 AM
1

Better but a bit vague in the context of US politicians.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 04:52 PM
1

Yes the competition itself is based on genetic differences but you can't remove them, no two people are exactly the same - even identical twins. So best thing to do is to create a system that sorts people into divisions based on their skill level.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 10:11 AM
8

You can check anywhere, she opposed DNA testing in the case of kevin cooper and she refused to comply with PLRA even after supreme court ordered her to do so.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 10:06 AM
3

Who said anything about how many men are insulted by Kamala's comment? maybe it's 0 but she still shouldn't make it. This is not an US politics sub, so why should everything Trump or Kamala says have to be discussed here.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 09:36 AM
1

If they reached their potential highest division and just maintaining it then that's system working perfectly.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 09:30 AM
8

Women rarely go to prison for child rape.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:40 AM
1

What's your point? genetic characteristics obviously play a huge part.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 03:23 AM
-4

Me neither. I am more worried about her record as prosecutor, things like withholding evidence that would exonerate an innocent man on death row and keeping men longer in prison for prison labour money definitely concern me more.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:57 AM
14

You can call out someone without insulting the half of population they belong to.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:51 AM
7

But the democrats still accepted when he won the election rather than crying fraud It's not like they went full crybaby with Russian interference propaganda, which turned to be complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:48 AM
8

Name calling Trump "Corporal Bone Spurs" as if draft dodging is a bad thing, when it's the moral duty of every man to oppose such institution of slavery.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:44 AM
1

There is prestige and money in being the best, so there is incentive to not throw games.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 02:35 AM
3

Just because left hates men doesn't mean right doesn't hate men. They hate men for different reasons.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:01 PM
25

I don't sink as low as women because I don't like alimony and think it is peonage (slavery), which I have never seen a women say. They have created this evil system, let them suffer in it.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:11 PM
35

Left started hating her after she turned against trans, they loved her when she was making random HP characters gay or black. Now right loves her because she's against trans. Only thing constant about her is that she is a man hater and of the worst kind.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:01 PM
0

Of course conservatives have embraced TERFs. Conservatives also hate men just in different ways, TERFs are the feminists that align with many of those ways.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:56 PM
-3

No need to create random divisions based on like bone density, t levels that will never ever work and will definitely be abused. The only egalitarian way to do sports is to have a league type system with divisions - based on elo or something that depends on lifetime W/L/D record - where everyone competes. With enough matches, everyone will automatically get sorted into their own divisions according to their skill level.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:47 PM
83

Yes it leech behaviour and alimony is peonage, but I have absolutely 0 sympathy for this woman or any women paying alimony. It mainly women who support alimony and even oppose any reforms to the system. There are men in US who can't retire even in their 70s because they have to pay permanent alimony to someone they married 30-40 years ago. Literally modern day slavery, yet you never hear women complain it.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:40 PM
12

Then have an explicit agreement before marriage underlining what amount of alimony, for how long and under what condition should be paid after divorce. Marriage is not the justification for peonage after divorce.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:23 PM
0

What's your definition of a man or woman? Because saying someone with XY chromosome is a man doesn't work because these people don't that, they XXY chromosome.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 11:26 AM
-10

XXY is neither XX nor XY, so separating based on chromosomes will not work. There are also people with single X chromosome, should they be allowed to compete in women's competition?
/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:54 AM
2

There is no rational justification for why there should be separate competitions for women, everyone should compete in the same competition. The rationale that there should be separate competition for women because they couldn't compete with men is total BS. Yes women can't compete with men but that doesn't there should be separate competitions. Most men couldn't compete at Olympics level enough if they trained their whole lives because most Olympics athletes have genetic advantages that simply …
/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:46 AM
15

Women have always been more favoured, and it has only got worse. So it will always going to get worse and probably never improve.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:09 AM
38

It's in India, so probably never.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:54 PM
25

No because women never help men in distress while they expect to be saved at every inconvenience, no matter how minor.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:35 PM
18

How did you know those women tried multiple times, or even once, to tell him "no"? it looks to me they filed complains first and so they refused to testify because they were scared of cross examination. These girls obviously don't have the social skills to deal with diverse group of people and so are not fit for a diverse environment like a university.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:32 PM
1

It's also illegal in Germany, eurocucks are hopeless.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:13 PM
4

Tories were man haters but Labour is simply worse in every aspect. Don't expect anything good from them.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:05 PM
27

Is being creeped out a crime? I am being creeped by you, should you be sent to prison? If they want to get rid of him, why they didn't tell him to fuck off instead of trying to ruin his life by filing false cases?
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:00 PM
26

If women were so upset then why did all three of them refused to testify against him ?
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:49 PM
1

Oh my bad, it looked like you were covering for feminists.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:35 PM
11

Alimony is literally peonage. No man should be forced to pay an adult just because he was once married to her.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 01:01 AM
6

That's nothing exclusive to feminists, most people don't want to accept that men can struggle because then that would mean allocating resources to fixing it. Feminists just use this flaw in our society to further their dehumanisation agenda.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 12:41 AM
7

This is a common tactic by liberal menslib type feminists - they will first agree with some of the points MRAs make but then deflect the cause of these issues to boogeymen of the left, which in this case is capitalism, nationalism and patriarchy, from the real cause which is feminism and tradcons. Take Domestic violence as an example: UK feminist against gender neutral DV bill: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/domestic-abuse-bill-parliament-criticism-theresa-may-women-men-violence…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 12:34 AM
1

As opposed to whose standards, yours? you are literally worse than a feminist, so no we will go by my standards. Revisionism? I think the word you are looking for is cherrypicking - you accuse me of cherrypicking Pankhurst as an example of bad early feminist to make all early look bad. Unless you actual believe that Pankhurst was not a man hating feminist and I unfairly took her name? in that case you should just fuck off from here. And btw do you even know who Pankhurst? If I give the example o…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 12:10 AM
9

It used to much more popular in UK, Aus, NZ etc. but in 40s and 50s they stopped doing it but being bonehead, americans never did. It has become a cultural thing in US. Even if it is not tradition in UK, it is still legal for parents - in every country on earth - to have their son circumcised. That's the real problem. The powerful Jewish & Muslim lobby across the world makes sure it will stay legal, eg: A German court declared it multilation in 2010s but these lobbies pressured German government…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 11:44 PM
4

Divorce rape.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 06:43 PM
1

It's wrong to denounce the work of an ally simply because you hold them to your personal standards. No its not, standards are required otherwise blatant anti male idiots start acting like MRAs. There is ample evidence to support a parental right to decide circumcision based on health concerns No there isn't. I am not open to arguments on this at this time, Because there isn't any valid arguments. but this makes me no less an MRA Not only that, supporting circumsion makes you worse than all but m…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 06:40 PM
1

Never said they are MRAs and they don't have to but they do, so I will criticise them if they do a shit job of it. Never seen a MRA advocate in favour of circumcision and conscription, in fact I have never seen a feminist do that. It's not a debatable topic. Just because tradcons idiots are allowed to spew shit on this subreddit doesn't mean MRAs are not against conscription or circumcision. Supporting conscription and circumcision is a RED LINE, no matter how good someone is on everything else,…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 12:12 AM
59

90% of criminals are male because 90% female criminals are roaming free. If criminal justice system was applied fairly, a much higher number of criminals would be female compared to what it is now.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 11:57 PM
20

Posting about woman committing a crime is not same as saying all women are criminals and no women should be loved or cared for. So you are falsely equating these two scenarios. The top most post currently is about mods removing an older post for generalising women even though it is VERY benign compared to what's said in this tweet or what's regularly being said by feminists on reddit. Clearly generalising women is not tolrated on this sub. Since you are already on a soapbox, I hope you go to som…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 11:53 PM
1

Well, there is not a single instance of change brought about by these two, so they are totally useless. They are controlled opposition because they don't talk about REAL oppression like conscription and circumcision.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 07:57 PM
2

So what? you can still be against circumsion.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 07:06 PM
2

Obviously that was a typo. Circumsion rates are over 99% among muslims because it mandatory for men as written in Hadiths.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 06:59 PM
1

Both CHS and Paglia are totally useless controlled opposition.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 11:58 PM
1

In many countries (UK, Aus etc) where women have got special laws, for centuries, that protect them from charged with murder, like a man would, in case of infanticide. The sentencing is very lenient, in case of a conviction. This is grave injust against those murdered children and discrimatory against men. So it is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 11:56 PM
1

I used to be active around a year ago, not much recently but I say a post recently on that made be so triggered that I had to write something about it.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 11:43 PM
11

Since you are muslim, how about not circumsing your son, if you have one and advising your muslism friends to not circumcise their sons.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 11:41 PM
1

Good
/r/MensRights14/07/24 04:15 PM
2

It's a systematic feminist plan to rid of weird/ugly men, they have combined innate disgust of women for such men with government to send these men to prisions or traumatise them enough so they unalive themselves.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:34 AM
6

No women view men beneath them, that's why women feel oppressed and complain when they are treated as equally to men. That is as true in relationships as in wider societical issues.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:26 AM
5

10x more men died and imprisioned in hellish prisions in "women-led" Iranian protests.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:19 AM
3

Shut up, just join Ukrainian foreign legion and protect democracy. Here's the link: https://ildu.com.ua/ Surely you are willing to put up your life for the "greater good" or is it just all talk?
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:05 AM
5

Nothing wrong with dodging the draft aka avoid becoming a war slave. It's a duty of every man to revolt against such blantant dehumanisation.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 08:57 AM
5

What's the point of Ukraine if no Ukrainian man is alive and all Ukrainian women are living aboard ?
/r/MensRights14/07/24 08:54 AM
2

What was your original account?
/r/MensRights13/07/24 09:54 PM
1

Infanticide is nothing to do with this title, stop justifying dehumanisation of men. Of course I understand rape of women every 20 mins (fake stats btw) doesn't justify legalisation of rape against men, but Indian women don't, that's why they protest against rape laws for men.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 09:50 PM
64

Men always stand with women when injustice is done to them, no matter the country. Thousands of men participated in protests that followed after Mahsa Amini was arrested in Iran or after death of Sarah Everard in UK and these are just recent examples, there are literally thousands of examples for men standing up for rights of women. I have yet to see a single women who has publicly said that conscription of Russian and Ukrainian men is evil while women of those country are free to do whatever th…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 09:47 PM
7

Well they can conscript both men and women.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 09:27 PM
9

Why don't they conscript women then? Average of Ukraine army is like 40+, young Ukrainian women could help their country instead of whoring out in rest of Europe.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 09:13 PM
5

Lmao do you really think they are going to ask for your opinion before sending you to eat bullets on the frontline?
/r/MensRights13/07/24 09:09 PM
3

Mens lib is a front for feminism and LWMA is a front for left wing politics. Neither have any particular empathy for men they just want their ideology to not be perceived as man hating, while those ideologies are responsible for majority of anti male laws.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:56 AM
5

Rape of women is not normalised in any country, including India, it's literally considered one of the most heinous crimes and has the most severe punishment after murder. Rape of men was never criminalised in India, they got rid of a homophobic law under which no one has ever served even 10 years in prison. The only rape culture in India is the rape culture against men. it is literally legal to rape a man in India. Indian feminists and women have fought for years to exclude men from protections …
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:46 AM
4

There is literally no evidence that a bunch of people planned a stampede to kill women. Stop reaching and justifying blatant dehumanisation of men.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:30 AM
16

All of those countries are gynocentric shitholes, feminist or not.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:25 AM
75

Men's healthcare should be funded more than women's and retirement age for men should be less until this inequality is fixed.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:22 AM
23

The comments under that thread are so abhorrent that it triggered me into writing this comment. So here are the list of justifications and their rebuttals: 1. Its biological: Maybe some of it is biological but 10 years difference isn't. The life expectancy of top 1% rich men is only 2 years less than top 1% women, so in the worst case men should die 2 years, on average, than women. Even if assume that most of it is due to biology, it is still not a justification for not doing anything about it. …
/r/MensRights04/07/24 01:18 AM
21

Life of a man is literally worthless compared to women. They will burn through every last Ukrainian man, all the while women are free to leave the country and do whatever the fuck they want. Millions of Ukrainian women fled to other European countries but not a single one has complained about how their husbands/fathers/sons are treated as subhumans and thrown to meat grinder. This is in stark contrast to the situation in Iran, where murder of one woman caused thousands of men to protest against …
/r/MensRights13/10/23 10:17 PM
9

Because that would mean shutting down of extortion industry by women.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 08:33 PM
11

Just so you know, most countries will deport men who owe child support, especially if they are from US.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 11:22 PM
1

Of course, tradcons and feminists are same when talking about men. Tradcons will say: "men should protect women and give their lives doing so because women are weak but their lives are more important." Feminists will say: "men have oppressed for millennia and so it's their duty to protect women and redeem themselves. It's really the same thing and result in the end is also the same. That's why tradcons and terfs are such good bedfellows.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 11:12 PM
1

Nick Fletcher is saying this for years, there are some other MPs who have supported Nick along the years but nothing ever materialised. Nothing will happen now too.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 11:02 PM
2

No both are not abusers, stop supporting abusers. Shameless moron.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 11:00 PM
1

Still worth more than you.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 10:53 PM
4

STFU War zone is the best fucking time to complain about men's rights because nothing shows how men are treated as subhumans than a war.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 10:50 PM
2

Damn good resource.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:33 PM
11

He proved that AH lied about him being abusive and she did it out of malice and it was not an innocent mistake. She would be charged in a just society where prosecutors are not on feminist payroll.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:26 PM
13

What if your sisters partner is an abuser. He attacks your sister with a glass bottle and cuts tip of her finger. He is trying to defame her in public as a criminal and trying to destroy her livelihood. All your sister does is scream and hit few inanimate objects out of frustration of the situation. Are you going to act like your sister is an abuser? and go tell him partner to run the hell away from your sister? JD is not an abuser and there is no evidence for it.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:22 PM
1

Not all, they only pillage men to give it to women.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:10 PM
11

It's a "face saving" take. "Not completely deranged feminists" can't defend AH anymore because she is proven abuser but they support JD either because 1. they are man haters and 2. they rallied behind lies by AH for 5+ years. So now they blur the lines and paint both as abusers to prevent people taking about injustice against JD.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 05:53 PM
1

It really is though. Stop erasing human suffering because it doesn't suit your narrative.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 05:40 PM
22

Nick Fletcher is one of few good people in an ocean of man haters that is the UK government. My only concern is that because UK is so insanely misandrist and feminist that it is very likely that ministry for men will be hijacked by feminists (just like every other institution) to spread feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:58 PM
13

Unfortunately we live in a gynocentric society where women worshipping is the state religion, so only ministry for women.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:47 PM
6

Dumbass, pointing out blatant sexism is same as feminist screeching for yet another privilege for women.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:33 PM
71

It's not just modern feminists: A list about feminism misandry for anyone who thinks that feminism fights for men’s rights, for anyone who thinks that feminism was only a sexist movement starting from the third wave and for anyone who accuse the MRM of being a sexist movement, while still defending feminism. And it's not just "disappointment". Feminists have worked for over a century to enact laws and policies that exploit men for unending privileges for women.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:25 PM
21

That's already the policy in UK but it is capped at 2 mil and government does everything in their power to not pay a dime of it.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 10:19 PM
10

Except lack of female accountability. This problem is 100% on women and they will only double down on it and make it worse. Today it is 50% of young men from less than 15%, 10 years ago. Soon enough it is 80%-85% of men across all ages and only men will be blamed for it.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 10:17 PM
38

It's infuriating to see SK conscript their men for 2 years, all the while their women have thrown their population into complete free fall. Men are forced to do their traditional duty while women get a free pass even if they fail at theirs.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 10:09 PM
6

Not few, pretty much all future generations.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 09:24 PM
14

This is the norm, that's how these things are reported every single time. Effacing the Male
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:27 PM
1

He probably has to if the mother decides to go after him.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 01:41 PM
4

Damn the guy is a literally a man hating trashbag.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:06 PM
1

From reading the news articles?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 11:14 AM
13

A lot of religious extremism, women only recently being able to get credit cards, no reproductive rights, material rape being legal, and among other things. Literally not a single thing is true for any western country. There are a lot of abuses for both sides, my question is why does anyone want to keep America going for what it does to males as well as what it does to females. This society was built to destroy them both. Society is not destroying "both", it is only destroying men by exploiting …
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:36 PM
1

Food lines all were women only. There was no general food line where men were allowed.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:29 PM
6

Why not "32 people killed and 200 wounded including civilians" then? At least try a little harder, if all you are going to do here is create post hoc rationalisations to justify blatant sexism against men. Don't make your bigotry so obvious.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:23 PM
2

It's not a just a random "court principle" that was invented out of thin air, it was agreed upon over hundreds of years due to innocent people getting punished. People should still follow it and not punish a man without seeing the evidence.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:18 PM
1

That's a post hoc rationale given for worshipping women. Even if men could produce babies just by themselves (not even ovum required), women would still be worshipped and they would have invented new rationale for doing so.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:11 PM
6

I am pretty sure that paranoia would be about men using it to create babies to rape them. That's already the "reason" why discrimination against single men in adoption is accepted.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:06 PM
2

Only race based AA is unconstitutional, not gender based. Colleges can have gender based AA and it has to be challenged separately in courts.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 09:24 PM
7

Women are less vicious to each other than there are to men.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 09:15 PM
4

What about Benjamin Mendy? 7 women accused him, and no woman, afaik came out in his support. Yet he was found not guilty and that too with strong evidence.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 08:20 PM
49

Women would use low conviction rates to argue that false accusation is rare but use low conviction rates for rape that there is a rape culture and governments are protecting rapists. It's shameless really, using the same consistent argument for both cases goes against their narrative.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:47 AM
1

As if multiple women can't lie. Brett Kavanaugh, Marilyn Manson, Benjamin Mendy etc. all had multiple accusers and all false.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:36 AM
4

5000 euro fine in Germany for the same.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:15 AM
2

That psychology is a not a real science anymore and it infested with feminist ideology. That's people, like her, who aren't even qualified to flip burgers call themselves "Clinical Psychologist".
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:58 AM
5

She made the false accusation, she is just as responsible.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:38 AM
4

US is also generally harsher on women murdering infants than Australia or UK, where it is basically a free pass.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:32 AM
2

Which western country treats men fairly? They all are same.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:29 AM
4

Men were the primary study group, mostly because ... It is mostly because men volunteer more for clinical trials. men for these previously, was women and men have different symptoms in mostly everything. Men and women can have same symptoms in vast majority of cases. Vast majority of studies done on men translate very well to women. If the symptoms were so wildly different, doctors wouldn't be able to treat women and more women would die than men. Of course men matter just as much with heart dis…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 06:43 PM
1

Marriage is a predictor of lifelong income and socioeconomic status, and this is related to correlation and causation. Wrong. It's the other way around. Marriage is not the cause of socioeconomic status and higher income, those two are predictor of marriage, particularly a successful one. Women get married to broke ass men all the damn time. And married men commit crimes all the damn time. Just because there are exceptions to a trend doesn't mean that trend is wrong. A random group of men making…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:46 PM
1

There is definitely a general definition, do a google search, the most common one is the general definition. The language and surnames arguments are usually considered as a proof of patriarchy in sociology. According to what definition?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:30 PM
2

A quick google search will also show me that 97% women in west are sexual harassed, but that's blatantly feminist propaganda from one bad conducted study.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:25 PM
2

What a brainless take. He caught 6 women that made false allegations for child custody. Literally making sure that you children belong to the right parent and not get taken away because vindictive false allegations by the other parent.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:25 AM
2

These "fucking evaluators" caught 6 women making false allegations to get child custody. What a travesty, after all making false allegations is birth right of women.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:20 AM
5

Tim Pool is a typical tradcon, of course he is going to spout tradcon nonsense.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:09 AM
5

Patriarchy is generally defined as the socio-political system created by men for the benefit of men. Under this definition none of your "motte-points" proves as an evidence for patriarchy. Except for Major religions and their gods are male-centric Most top politicians and CEOs are men none of the other "motte-points" can even be considered as evidence for patriarchy. Yes there are more male leaders, including religious leaders but these leaders don't benefit men. Women had much easier time getti…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:06 AM
9

Age old tale of woman hooked up with a guy, regretted it and made a fake allegation to cover up.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:55 AM
25

It's not like those men are not mocked. Making fun of nerdy men is the most common pass time on the internet.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:39 AM
3

Apart form this not being an actual charity, it also doesn't matter what should happen in some hypothetical fictional world. The reality is that men rights groups get 0 funding from the government, feminists only deserve to get less than that.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:29 AM
4

Those trains exist because Japanese trains have an incredibly high amount of groping. They were made to protect people from an actual, quantifiable harm, and comparing it to racial segregation What is the evidence for this? From (Horii and Burgess 2012): Women's use and support for women-only train carriages is not solely dominated by anxiety over the risk of chikan. Our survey indicated that it was a symbolic rejection of a particular type of masculinity, rather than the physical separation fro…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:08 AM
10

It was a pretty common belief that blacks were dangerous and violent and so were segregated from whites. Similar to how men are segregated from women because they are perceived as dangerous and violent.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:48 AM
9

Have you even read the research paper you are citing? You are misinterpreting the paper that you are citing. From the abstract: Women's use and support for women-only train carriages is not solely dominated by anxiety over the risk of chikan. Our survey indicated that it was a symbolic rejection of a particular type of masculinity, rather than the physical separation from a risk of being groped. According to their survey, only 30% of women were approving users of women only carriages, meaning th…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:44 AM
10

The difference is when a woman is a called golddigger, she is more likely than not actually being a golddigger. Incel is different because it is used as a slur to shut down anyone with a opinion that is not worshipping women. It has nothing to do with the original meaning of the word.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:16 AM
1

Don't tell "I don’t think this is nearly that simple" when your whole premise is nothing more than "men are inherently violent like rabid dogs and need women to be kept in line". That's the most bonehead sexist stereotype about men ever. Around 20% of men are destined to single because there are 20% more males under the age of 30-40. By your logic 20% of men are committing violent crimes all over the world. Compare that to actual data, no country in the world has it's 20% of men committing crime…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:09 AM
1

Men in communities with high rates of marriage are more well off than men in communities with low rates of marriages. Women don't get married to poor broke men. The reason for a man to become criminal and for a man to be single is generally the same: lack of financial resources and status. You don't understand the difference between correlation and causation. Being single, committing crimes and being poor are correlated but being single doesn't make you poor or criminal. It's being poor makes yo…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:00 AM
20

Yeah women could change that, but likelihood of that is close to 0. It's better that men learn the reality and stop sacrificing themselves for random women that give 0 shit about them.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:41 PM
14

Terribly sexist. Young single men are more violent because they are generally poor and low status, due to which they get into addiction and crime. And since they are poor and low status they are single. Being single is not the cause for violence, but single and criminal is the result of being poor.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:15 PM
47

Iranian men died in hundreds and protested in thousands for women's rights. Ukrainian women fled their country to rest of Europe where they are more busy complaining about abortion rights than sexist military enslavement of men in Ukraine. Women are the first ones to ditch the men, including their own family members, to seek refuge. Men always try to be the "hero" and sacrifice their lives for women. ​ We don't live in that world because women refuse to be "heroes".
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:51 PM
23

Women only lines were created first and left men (especially single men) with two options: either get the food somehow or die from starvation.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:34 PM
9

Yes she is a garbage, she had 2 children while having no way to care for them other than by leeching off of a man that she has no interest in. She is ruining the life of at least 3 people.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:20 PM
17

She is marrying him for money, it is exactly a gold digging situation.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:15 PM
1

Maybe we don't. Appeasing feminists and women is certainly not it because that's has been tried for last 50 years and it never worked.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:51 PM
1

Suffragette bombing and arson campaign
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:43 PM
18

Women, unlike children, are not most affected by climate change. This is just a common tactic used by feminists: associate with a reasonable position ("children are most affected") to give credence to their unreasonable position ("women are most affected"). Women aren't the ones laying bricks in scorching heat, doing underwater welding in high tides or fighting wildfires. Most of hazardous jobs that are affected directly by climate change are done by men and not women. Women only look at how cli…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 10:03 PM
3

No you don't. Feminists don't have to worry about what people are saying when they go "kill all men", lobby for man hating policies or publicly support female abusers. It's only MRAs that tip toe around feminist bigots to not get labelled as misogynists, which they get labelled regardless.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 09:05 PM
7

Why do think "we" are not worrying about it for last 40 years? Maybe "we" would be "winning" more if "we" didn't worry about it for last 40 years.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:59 PM
5

Incels using it is not the reason, its a post hoc explanation. Women made female into a taboo word and now using incels to justify it. The real reason is female entitlement and victim mentality, like always. The irony is complaining about "female" while causually using "incel", which is actually used as a slur, unlike female.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:50 PM
23

"Danger" in what sense? More men are killed and assaulted by strangers than women.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 07:00 AM
14

Women get more attention period. If there are more men then any women is seen "stunning and brave" and is centre of attention. If there are more women then it's a women's "group" and they will keep all the attention to themselves. Any man in a women's group is not treated the same as women in men's group.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 06:49 AM
1

Deciding which students receive a $30k award based on what will win brownie points with feminists sounds pretty far-fetched Feminist co opted and changed the definition of STEM and your leftoid shithole adopted it for this random award. What is so far fetched about it? Most practicing doctors (clinicians) don't do much to drive innovation. Most engineers don't do research at all. Some computer nerd creating a website is not "research", yet web developers and software engineers are somehow more S…
/r/MensRights04/09/23 10:58 PM
1

No, where in the article states schools in California can't conduct kangaroo courts for sex crime allegations. They are literally required to do by the federal government otherwise they will lose the federal funding. Another one who has no idea what he is talking about.
/r/MensRights04/09/23 09:25 AM
1

Why do think the NY (a literal feminist hellhole) won't choose feminist definition of STEM? Excluding medicine from STEM is a feminist ploy and that's exactly what your shithole state is doing. You are talking as if medicine and biology doesn't drive scientific and technological innovation? when in fact they drive more technological innovation far more than engineering or physics ever could.
/r/MensRights04/09/23 09:20 AM
2

Nice stupid reply. Why would they not be allowed to do so? they are allowed and have done so for at least a decade. As I said you have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 11:29 AM
8

It has always been about power. Most early feminists were white upper class american and british women who realised that politicians (and men in general) are willing to give them whatever they ask, no matter how ridiculous their claims were.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 11:02 PM
8

What are you smoking? How come biology is not a exact science but physics and chemistry is? And medicine is not a exact science but engineering and computing is? The whole argument here is that the usual definition is carefully curated by feminists to only include subjects that have more male students.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 10:55 PM
8

Social sciences shouldn't come in STEM because they are hardly a science, but medicine is as much science as engineering. Medicine is applied biology just as Engineering is applied physics and chemistry. Feminists have copted the term STEM to only include subjects that have more male students to play victims. They have made this a norm and not the other way around (that medicine related fields are not STEM) like your anecdote suggests.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 10:46 PM
5

They all are 90%+ men.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 10:43 PM
2

Really seems to imply to me that anyone that's choosing to label themselves a incel probably has a pretty f*cked up attitude about women No, it really doesn't imply that a guy choosing to label himself incel will be a woman hater. It's just your bias.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 10:07 PM
1

No, that's not how it works. You can't sue a school in California state courts for prohibiting cross examine, that's literally what this case is all about.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:37 PM
1

That was in Connecticut this is California.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:32 PM
1

Do you realise that schools can have kangaroo courts to dispel students based on these accusations? This only worsen that problem. Of course no one is talking about things being a thing in actual courts. Seems like only one who has no idea wtf he talking about is you.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:31 PM
1

Taking from women's funding is fine.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:06 PM
1

I think sexism is the only factor.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:00 PM
3

That's why fighting and dying is not worth for any country.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 11:11 PM
20

Probably even more since I suspect most of the budget for adolescent health is spent on girls. Men's health is only the least funded category, it is also the only category for which the funding is reduced in the past decade. You will never see Australian feminists and women complain about this inequality.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 11:14 PM
9

That's not the point. You can keep funding lobbyists and writing to politicians, it wouldn't to anything unless enough people also do that. Bitching on public forums is necessary to educate people about the issue. If you don't like the tone of post, which is pretty mild imo, you can create your post in your proffered tone.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 10:54 PM
15

Most of funding comes from government, not fundraisers. NIH spent $700 million on breast cancer vs $200 million on prostate cancer last year. Bitching is how you change this, more people need to bitch about it, so government spends equally.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 10:34 PM
12

In many places where prostitution is illegal, man (client) goes to jail not the woman (service provider). In this case the doctor (service provider) will go to jail and not the women (client). This is how it works in a gynocentric society. Women are never responsible whether they are providing or consuming some illegal service.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 12:39 PM
2

She is a hardcore anti feminist and has done a lot of research in early feminism/feminists (late 1800s - early 1900s).
/r/MensRights26/08/23 10:51 PM
16

Some yes but mostly no. I would assume that more than 50%+ of women have sons or brothers but I don't see 50% of women complaining about feminism and man hating laws. I don't see these women complaining about women only quotas in education and jobs, or more funding for women's healthcare etc. after all these things affect all men. They "sold" their sons and brothers for privileges.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 09:37 PM
2

Women control all the power in a marriage (and in most relationships between men and women). If your wife wants to fuck you up she can do that easily and will be praised for it, there are no barriers to stop her other than her own conscious. Women understand this power dynamics and act dominant without any fear. Sayings like "happy wife happy life", "he is going to sleep on couch tonight" etc. are cliche but clearly show who wears the pants in a marriage.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 10:56 PM
10

Poor/very limited understanding of feminism, e.g. feminism is a crazy woman saying "i hate men" on twitter or on a university campus A list about feminism misandry for anyone who thinks that feminism fights for men’s rights, for anyone who thinks that feminism was only a sexist movement starting from the third wave and for anyone who accuse the MRM of being a sexist movement, while still defending feminism. Please go gaslight somewhere else.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 10:20 PM
2

Not first ever, there is one in Georgia and there was one in California that expired in 2007.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:38 PM
10

She only has to serve 2 years.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:29 PM
3

Effacing the Male: Gender, Misrepresentation, and Exclusion in the Kosovo War
/r/MensRights23/08/23 07:01 PM
4

The evidence is 10x in this case than in that dutch case, for one Lucia de Berk didn't keep notes confessing murder. By your logic one can argue even Harold Shipman was innocent.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 06:32 PM
31

Because feminist are very interested when "man did bad thing" is in the news. Feminists were man hating 24x7 Sarah Everard was murdered - hundreds of protests, proposal in house of commons for curfew for men after 6 pm, etc. Now feminists are quiet because a woman is broke into top 15 of all time serial killers in UK.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 05:16 PM
0

No! That’s why people are usually not declared innocent! Because not guilty and innocent are the exact same thing. There’s millions of instances of people who are not innocent of driving without putting on seatbelts, and almost none of them get caught. There is no criminal proceeding for not wearing a seat belt. You comparing a minor traffic infraction with DV show how much of a braindead idiot your are. We don’t, and we don’t know that Justin Roiland did or did not do what he is accused of. We …
/r/MensRights21/08/23 07:23 AM
2

They know economics, they just want to steal money earned by men.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 07:02 AM
6

USMNT had a contract where they would only get paid when they played and they had minimal added benefits. USWNT had a contract where would be paid less but the pay was not depended on whether they play matches or not and they had added benefits like healthcare and what not. Even the Judge in lawsuit by USWNT acknowledged that women had the better contract. Now they have made it so that women would be paid the same, men still won't get benefits and the tournament earnings will pooled and divided …
/r/MensRights21/08/23 07:01 AM
30

He's clueless. Australia is one of biggest man hating countries in western world. There are stories from Australia on sub like every 4-5 days. It's not a bad place to live but it's pretty bad if you look from purely men's rights perspective, just like UK.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:18 PM
3

Holy shit fucking retards need to read the fucking law. Oh my god, do you realise that all verdicts are either guilty or not guilty? and there is no legal difference between innocent and not guilty. Of course there are people who got off on a technicality but those are extraordinary cases. No system works perfectly, but that doesn't mean it never works. People are not innocent by default, they are only presumed innocent by default, with no respect to what actually happened. That's the same thing…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:11 PM
9

That's exactly what how it works. Innocent = not guilty and vice versa. He is innocent by default, he doesn't need to prove his innocence, state needs to prove his guilt. And what is "actually innocent"? Which court he should go and prove his "actual innocence" ? and how the fuck anybody can even prove "actual" innocence?
/r/MensRights20/08/23 02:32 PM
28

Conscription and paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 02:13 PM
6

Memphis state representative’s DNA bill making its way through TN legislature However the Tennessee Department of Human Services says if made into law, their department could be at risk of losing about 52 million in federally matched dollars.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 02:11 PM
15

How do you know its was not because she was a woman? Can you find an instance where they protected a baby killer male nurse from doctor's complaints? She being a woman was certainly a factor. It was a combination of saving their reputation + women never hurt babies + lack of evidence at that time in many of murders that they ignored the doctors.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 07:40 PM
1

Ok my bad you are right that she was youngest GM for 3 years. But she doesn't hold the record now.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 11:40 AM
1

Do you realise that she never held the record for being the youngest GM?
/r/MensRights19/08/23 08:27 AM
1

Whether it is ancient Greece or Afghanistan, the problem is the same traditional roles. Men protecting women over themselves and getting labelled misogynists in return.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:58 PM
5

You are slightly wrong in the last para. This movie doesn't encourage superiority complex in women, they already have it, that's why watch these movies and that's why these movies are made.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 03:31 PM
2

https://kvartal.se/artiklar/jamstalldhetsmyndigheten-kvinnors-vald-mot-man-ar-en-del-av-mans-vald-mot-kvinnor/
/r/MensRights18/08/23 02:45 PM
1

People said about industrialism too. AI and robots will create more jobs than it will take.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 02:00 PM
3

There's no men's category in football (FIFA doesn't exclude women from playing in men's football only men from women's football) or most other sports. If women are good enough they can play with men, but women are so trash in others sports that they open's category is defacto men's category.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 01:54 PM
2

She is not the youngest gm today, not even top 10. And she was not even the youngest when she became gm.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 01:51 PM
4

There has never been ANY absence of law protecting women. There are always more laws protecting women than men. How about you show some evidence for your extraordinary claims? All you can do is "blah blah .... women oppressed ... blah blah". No evidence for anything.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 01:46 PM
7

Women weren't treated terribly or as a property. How many women would rather do back breaking labour in terrible conditions or fight in a war than be a housewife? I would certainly be a housewife. Now that jobs are safer, women acting like all those centuries of sacrifice and protection was literal oppression.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 02:52 PM
2

They just want to control the narrative.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 12:38 PM
1

100% correct. Most people simply don't realise this.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 12:24 PM
8

Show me one law that said women had to obey their father's or husband's every command. Show me one law that protected men but not women.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 12:08 PM
7

Women were not treated as property.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 08:01 PM
5

No it shouldn't be illegal, at the end of the day most catcalling is just a form of obnoxious speech. Making it illegal is an attack on freedom of speech. Of course there can be situations where catcalling turns into real criminal behaviour like stalking. I agree it should be prosecuted in those cases.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 07:56 PM
16

Women can murder, sexual assault and physical assault men in UK and serve less than 2 years.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 07:37 PM
2

That's not what that quote means. It means women are loved and cared more by society than men, missing women are more likely to reported in media, women are first to be rescued in a disaster, women are not conscripted to die in wars etc. the list is endless. Same applies here, posts about women failing relationships gets more empathy because people care more about women. It has nothing to do with unconditionally loving your wife, but even then women file 80%+ divorces. Men keep up with far more …
/r/MensRights16/08/23 03:19 PM
1

I doubt that but ok
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:51 PM
12

Police and CPS are pressured by feminists and man hating government to get the conviction rates up no matter what. It doesn't matter if they find a rapist or create a rapist out of thin air. False convictions are only going to increase as more and more policies are being pushed to prevent police from collecting the evidence that would acquit someone.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:29 PM
1

Worked for women, since they don't have to actually work.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:04 PM
1

I didn't ask you to womansplain me on a month old comment about feminism 🤦, but if you are going to do so at least be correct 💀. Patriarchy doesn't exist and you are certified man hater for saying so.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 01:57 PM
2

He's a lowlife feminist troll. All he does is lie and fallacious claims (like he is doing under this post). Absolute scum of the earth.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:16 PM
7

You are welcome to make the noble sacrifice along with others that volunteer, just stop forcing those who don't want to.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:14 PM
2

Murder rates is higher for men in like every country.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:38 PM
3

Tradcons and feminists are the two sides of the same misandrist/gynocentric coin.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 09:19 PM
4

He probably notices but ignores, he can't do anything after all. He is powerless.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 09:18 PM
5

He is a tradcon man hater, of course he respects those that agree with him.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 08:27 PM
1

Feminism is a hate movement and feminists are man haters.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 06:58 PM
3

Warehouse jobs are not scarce, there is huge demand workers in these jobs. Addressing the UK’s warehouse labour shortage Demand for UK warehouse workers has risen by over 40% since 2019, data shows Strong and independent women don't want to do these physically laborious jobs, which has been proven time and time again. There are 50% quotas for women in many physically demanding jobs that go unfulfilled. Instead they prefer whine about wage difference and have daddy government come down and "fix i…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:44 PM
4

Then why don't retail workers quit and do the "back of house" roles?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 01:35 PM
3

Like I said country doesn't matter. Anyways here's research from NZ, https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9xieqk/men_pay_tax_more_than_women / https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926 Ok now you show breakdown of taxes vs welfare for your country.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 10:05 AM
6

It does everywhere, especially in countries with large welfare programs. If you are so sure, then why don't you show the official breakdown of taxes paid by gender and how much is spent on welfare programs by gender.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 09:19 AM
10

Lack of empathy. They think even if few hundred thousands men die from preventable causes, there is always more men to exploit. And every dollar spent on men's health is a dollar not spent on women's health. It's a zero sum game for women who take money from men's health research to fund their own.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:45 PM
10

All the welfare that women get from governments is paid by men. Women are net negative and men are net positive in terms of tax money to the government. In this sense all women are provided by men, irrespective of individual situations.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:24 PM
13

Women don't attempt more suicides, attention seeking and self harm behaviour is categorised as suicide attempts to inflate these numbers for gendered funding. Even if women attempted more suicides, men dying more from suicide is a much more serious. Funding women's mental health more than twice is literally ignoring the fire and looking for smoke where there isn't any. Health researchers don't pick patients, it's the patients who opt in for experimental trials. Men take more risks and opt more i…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:15 PM
12

Less overall suicides but the ratio between men and women is almost the same across the country. You are complaining about research done in this post yet you fail to do the most basic research and instead parrot suicide myths.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 08:28 PM
13

Complete BS. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/suicide In 2020, ~37000 men and ~9000 women died from suicide in US. 2500 women vs 2800 men died due to poisoning and Poisoning: 2500 women, 2800 men Suffocation: 2700 women, 9800 men Firearm: 3000 women, 21000 men So men die more regardless of the method. TheTinMen even made a infographic that illustrates this fact better. Men choose the more lethal methods because they actually want to die and not seek attention. If you remove guns, like …
/r/MensRights10/08/23 08:27 PM
2

Divorce rates are falling because marriage rates are falling.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:45 PM
2

That law is specifically for calling police on someone because of their race, gender etc in the state of New York. Even if someone could argue that she did because of his gender (not going to work for a white male), this happened in Wisconsin so it doesn't even apply here. In general, nobody (especially women) ever goes to prison for long time in US for making false accusations regardless of consequences.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:31 PM
7

Germany is also like this.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 12:16 PM
15

Are you a spokesperson for her? how do give that guarantee? She did mean all men because that's what appeals to women she is trying to sell to.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:27 AM
10

It was a hate movement from day 1.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 07:29 PM
5

Alimony is peonage, it shouldn't be a thing. Fault or no fault.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 11:30 AM
4

Stupid and ill informed opinion. Click on the link in the post and go read the cases yourself.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:12 AM
36

From the article: And in at least two earlier instances, McEwen had obtained child pornography from two men she’d met online before she’d even met Dickens. She met him in 2007, so she is into child porn for longer than that (more than a decade). How sick in the head are you to believe that she is not innately attracted to children?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:18 AM
25

She is not on the list because she is a woman, that's the official reason. Your fake reason, "she is less likely to be a repeat offender", is not even true because she was into child porn before she even met him and she recorded without him. Clearly she is attracted to babies. And that master-slave sexual contract is just a weird fetish, she was following the contract willingly. If she wanted to leave, she could have done at anytime (or at least tried to do so).
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:09 AM
12

Protesting against not allowing men to leave the country. What does the gender makeup of the government has to do with anything? The men who are making these laws are not the same who will suffer from it and it's not like women aren't going to benefit from it.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:57 AM
4

Those studies are BS. Men aren't more happy cause they are married, the men who are divorce raped are (obviously) less happy.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:18 AM
4

The Ministry of Health stepped in to restrict testing to just three state-run laboratories - though the director of public health, Daniel Kyabayinze, said there was more social media hype than a surge in testing. Did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:52 PM
12

Government doesn't come in to prevent women from catching their cheating husbands, like in this case you fucking donkey.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:25 AM
21

The one who earned that money should be able to spend it as they wish.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:23 PM
5

A list about feminism misandry for anyone who thinks that feminism fights for men’s rights, for anyone who thinks that feminism was only a sexist movement starting from the third wave and for anyone who accuse the MRM of being a sexist movement, while still defending feminism. And it's not even 1% of feminist misandry. Just because your are gullible enough to buy into the obvious propaganda that feminist became bad after 3rd doesn't mean it's true. Modern feminists have 0 original ideas they lit…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 06:15 PM
53

No, nobody is brainwashing women. Women wilfully demand for privileges like AA at the expense of men and politicians give it to them, if they won't they will lose their power. Politicians pander to women to stay in power because women are the biggest voting bloc in every democratic country. People are always trying to find scapegoat for bad behaviour by women. "Oh she cheated on her husband, he probably left her with no choice", "Oh she murdered her bf, he was probably abusing her", "Oh women ar…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:53 PM
1

Both cases are making a sacrifice but it's not the same. Someone voluntarily making a sacrifice can choose to not do if he feels he is not compensated proportionately. Someone involuntarily forced to sacrifice can't do so.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:27 PM
1

Because voluntarily serving is not same as involuntarily serving.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:47 AM
3

Any country that only drafts men should only give voting rights to men without exception. If men are going to put their lives at risk for a country then they must be 100% in charge of running it.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:07 AM
6

Five years is too much, and bachelor's degree is not required to get a job.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 05:40 PM
1

100% true
/r/MensRights31/07/23 05:14 PM
47

Russian White feather movement.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 01:21 PM
10

Protecting women more than men is literally the opposite of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:35 AM
26

Boko haram burnt down schools along with all the students for years, nobody cared as all those students were boys. But kidnapping 150 schoolgirls draws international outrage and literal military response from UK and US. Boko Haram's mistake was not burning thousands of boys alive but going after the protected class.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:34 AM
1

no
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:10 AM
1

They have a different picture for men in the article.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:01 AM
2

He was sleeping.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 09:43 AM
7

"Innocent Until Proven Guilty" is a perfectly correct formulation that clearly communicates the code idea. Anyone and everyone is completely innocent of any and all crimes until proven otherwise. "Neutral until proven innocent or guilty" is closer to assuming that accused is guilty than innocent because proving innocence is almost impossible in most cases. We have assume innocence to correct this inherent imbalance of power between the accuser and the accused. Most people understand this pretty …
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:22 AM
16

Given the fact that western education and media is literally women worshipping and male bashing, it is pretty reasonable to conclude that it is not the men who are in control of anything.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:45 PM
18

Yes. Women naturally don't care about men's lives as much as men do for women's lives. That's a fact. One woman was unjustly sent to prison in Iran and thousands of Iranian men poured out on streets protesting and many of them literally gave their lives protesting for women's rights. Millions of men are made into slaves in Ukraine and not one women complained. They flee the country like pathetic cowards. It is always men who sacrifice themselves for protecting women and never the other way aroun…
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:36 PM
13

Wtf are you talking about? she deserves to be thrown into the worst 3rd world country prison for life. Men with 10x worse childhood than her who murder women are neither given such "sympathy" nor such lenient sentencing. Look at all those women under the video defending her and cheering for the judgement, shows how much women value the life of men.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:23 PM
94

Rate of suicide after divorce only increases for men, because men are mentally tortured in the courts.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 10:34 PM
3

Probably because Mike Buchanan is politician who has supported fathers rights in UK for a long time. He is also a tradcon like Pearly though.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 01:54 PM
54

Not sure if true but someone commented The judge has other questionable cases. One was ordering a man to pay alimony 37 years after final decree was signed by all parties. Appeals reversed it. She needs to be removed. Sounds like the judge is a feminist misandrist.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 01:52 PM
1

Why would society collapse? and why would extremism in feminism alienate people? There are feminists who have gone on record saying men should be reduced to 10% of the populations and that didn't alienate people. Feminism itself is extremism.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 01:34 PM
18

Feminist researchers have 0 credibility, they write the conclusion first and then come up with post hoc justification for it. These feminist researchers have hijacked every field in social science.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 09:16 AM
5

That's what's happen in Australia as well.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 08:54 AM
163

No, that comes from one bullshit study that event the authors themselves retracted. Basically they counted the men who left the study as abandoning their wives. https://www.deseret.com/2015/8/4/20569426/study-that-found-husbands-prone-to-leave-sick-wives-was-flawed-researchers-say Of course media and feminists ran with it and now it has become a "fact" that men abandon their ill wives. I see people state that without even verifying the facts. Even if that was true, it's not like women are more l…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 10:01 PM
5

In Liam Allen's case, police sat on the phone records till the last moment to somehow get a conviction. Of course they fixed this "mistake" by prohibiting police from searching the phone records of an accuser. Mark Pearson has to fight for 2 years in courts when the video evidence clearly shows he barely even touched the false accuser woman. Feminists have created a fake narrative that because conviction rates are low that system is trying to protect rapists (completely illogical statement) when…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:17 PM
14

Prosecutors had the DNA evidence to clear his name but they hid it. And he was eligible for release after 6 years yet they made him serve 17 years. Women who are guilty don't even serve half of their sentence.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:09 PM
1

They are calling out transphobia not misandry, so that doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 11:47 AM
1

It's not a pendulum if it only swings in one direction. You have no idea about feminism if you think 1st and 2nd wave are "innocent". In fact they probably did more damage (particularly 2nd wave) than 3rd wave cause they were actually able to influence the law in a big way. Modern feminists don't influence the law in the same way and are mostly riding on the coattails of the early waves.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:20 PM
2

That's a really good point, "good" feminists should denounce fake and bad faith feminists. Since that never happens, we can safely say no "real" feminists exists.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:13 PM
3

Man hating is their real ideology. No matter how much two feminists disagree with each other, they all agree on hating men.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:09 PM
15

They already get 50%+ of the assets from divorce, just get a job like everybody else. No alimony is needed.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:58 PM
2

It's everywhere. Safe haven laws allow women to give up their babies anonymously anywhere in the country. Since they don't maintain a DNA database, no way a father is going to find out.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:38 AM
8

Because women are also conservatives? Conservative women groups protested against ERA in 70s because they didn't want to be conscripted. Women groups lobbied against making selective service gender neutral in 2021 and 2022. Feminists were protesting in 2010 when Norway made conscription gender neutral. All over the world, you look at polls in any country and it is always women who are more opposed to gender neutral conscription.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 06:45 AM
11

Children are not lifelong commitment for either parents and women are not forced to have children.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 03:32 PM
16

In 1839, 1842 and 1848, working class men collected over a 1 million signatures (more than women ever did) to demand for voting rights for men. In June 1839, the Chartists' petition was presented to the House of Commons with over 1.25 million signatures. It was rejected by Parliament. This provoked unrest which was swiftly crushed by the authorities. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/electionsvoting/chartists/overview/chartistmovement/ Chartists were the reason …
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:56 PM
1

Women are rarely punished for more than 10 years in UK, even if it is murder.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 08:07 PM
2

It's not OP's job to determine if she is guilty or not beyond a reasonable doubt, wtf do you think courts are for? Normally CPS and police would investigate her and charge her with making false accusation if they find any evidence. But that rarely happens, in fact there are countless cases were CPS and police sat on evidence that proved an accusation false and never charged the accuser.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 09:04 PM
23

It not just mental healthcare, it's almost all healthcare/medicine and women also dominate in biological sciences. When women dominate a field they don't allow scholarships for men (the same ones that they beg for in engineering and physical sciences subjects) Female students blast sexist veterinary medicine scholarship 78% female students oppose AA for men in Yale.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 08:44 PM
2

Yeah that wouldn't be a win in my book cause that would mean men's issues will only be fixed if and when women are affected by it.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:36 PM
2

Made to penetrate comes under causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/1/crossheading/causing-sexual-activity-without-consent?view=extent. That woman was convicted of https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisi/2008/1769/part/2/crossheading/causing-sexual-activity-without-consent?view=extent, which is basically the same law but for NI. ​ The maximum sentence for rape and this crime is same, i.e life imprisonment, but the sentencing …
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:34 PM
1

Rape: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/crown-court/item/rape/ Other crime he is talking about: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/crown-court/item/causing-a-person-to-engage-in-sexual-activity-without-consent/
/r/MensRights18/07/23 12:41 PM
1

Same maximum sentence but that other crime is far less serious than rape. Sentencing guidelines are very lenient when compared to rape.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 08:16 AM
10

ABC, CBC, BBC, NPR etc. all government funded and all incredibly biased against men. Clearly shows who is in power and who controls the government.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 06:35 AM
58

Perhaps you remember that we guys had prevented women from having "legal personhood" for, oh, .. CENTURIES To make this insanely wrong claim is insulting of intelligence. Either you have no knowledge of history or you are so maliciously biased to make claim.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 06:29 AM
1

It won't be long when women will be richer than men on avg, and would have to face these laws. That's when they would get rid of these laws.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 06:10 AM
0

There is no left wing, right wing or centre wing definition of capitalism. You neither understand what is capitalism nor why men are oppressed instead you create a "nebulous bs" that has no basis on reality to push for your ideology. Men's rights need less ideologues that use for their own gain and instead people who can look past their petty politics to actual support men.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 05:51 AM
3

It is definitely caused by pandering to women. Politicians pander to women for vote, there are literally countless of examples of that from any time period (even last month). Capitalism didn't cause alimony, conscription, countless female welfare programs or failure to prosecute false accusations. All these things are caused by politicians pandering to women, who demanded these privileges at the expense of men. Deflecting blame on capitalism and other irrelevant factors is why men are oppressed.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 05:47 AM
16

It is nothing to do with capital and everything to do with gynocentrism. Top 1% men pander to women and put down men because they themselves only have power as long as they keep pandering to women. If they stop pandering to women they would definitely lose their power and probably also their wealth, just look how many rich and powerful men have to fight false accusations by average women. The system benefits all women, not just rich women at the expense of men. Alimony, conscription, countless f…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:23 PM
2

She no doubt said FGM is not comparable to MGM (which is bs) and so the ruling is wrong. What she probably didn't say was whether circumcision should be legal or not.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:12 PM
1

They are going to mix alimony and child support together (it is already but even more so) because supporting the mother is supporting the child. That way they would still be able to leech off of men without getting married.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 01:56 PM
1

​ Your logical fallacy fell down of its own accord when you used me as a red herring. Please name the logical fallacy. The impetus is on the invaders for their wrongful position impeding the sovereignty of another nation. I never commented on whose fault it is, neither Russia nor Ukraine, neither Putin nor Zelensky. You keep bringing this up like a moron and then cry when I rightly call you stupid. An argument you are cowardly dodging over and over again to personally insult. It reeks of insecur…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:40 AM
3

That made it pretty clear that either you are mentally incapable understanding my position against conscription or dodging it on purpose. And yes you can go fight for your country as many times as you want, but that doesn't give you the basis to justify enslaving another man in his country for fighting in war.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:16 AM
8

Stupid? my comment has nothing to do with who started, Putin or Russia. If Ukrainian men cared they would voluntarily sign up and they wouldn't need to be forcefully conscripted. If you care so much, go there and fight instead of sitting on your pathetic ass and justifying slavery on reddit.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 12:04 AM
9

Slavery is not a solution for anything. If people actually cared then they would go and fight voluntarily.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 11:53 PM
8

ADL harassing countries is nothing compared to what happened in Germany in 2012 when a district court judge in Cologne ruled that circumcision should be illegal due to a loophole in the law that made FGM illegal. Germany was an harassed by international Jewish and Muslim organisations and Israeli government. They caved in and fixed the loophole in 2 weeks. Mutilators have too much power, it is almost impossible to ban circumcision in Western world.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:32 PM
2

Honestly surprising that Nevada, Oregon and Washington are dark green. Makes me little suspicious of the authenticity of the the data used for the map.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:18 PM
5

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/27/circumcision-ruling-germany-muslim-jewish Women's rights groups and social policy makers also condemned the decision, but for the reason that it would have the effect of putting male and female circumcision on the same footing, when they were "in no way comparable", said Katrin Altpeter, social minister in the state of Baden-Württemberg. Female circumcision she said, was a far more drastic act. It is already outlawed in Germany.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 08:15 PM
23

They make clothes like this with cause women buy them, and they don't clothes with misogynistic writing cause there is no demand for them. Basic capitalism. So even after counting all the incels, andrew tate followers, red pill guys and other groups that feminists falsely smear as misogynists, there are still countless more women that hate absolutely men and flaunt it publicly.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:33 PM
1

Link is to his other comment that has the sources.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:21 PM
40

If he didn't have a family nobody would care about him or make this post. In reality nobody cares about him or any other men who commit suicide, they just mad their slave died too early.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:54 PM
2

Not anymore, I used to get surprised more often before.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:29 PM
13

Stupid? I don't know any country except Scotland that ever had a legal difference between innocent vs not guilty. Even Scotland removed that last year. People are innocent by default in most sane places. If there is no evidence of act then that act didn't happen.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:12 PM
3

Depends on the country. In US only few states allow common law marriage and it's not that easy even in those states. In Canada and NZ though, two people can be considered married in less than 6 months.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:05 PM
6

No, feminist academics is complete dogshit scam. People, with no prior knowledge, have published papers in top feminist journals by writing "men bad women good". People who study these courses are not "few extremists" that we shouldn't care about, they are going to lawyers and judges tomorrow. You let these few extremists run around freely and they will convert everyone to their religion, that's how academia became a man hating hell hole.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:09 AM
1

It went from 1224 to 3000 in 7 years, latest figures are probably 6000+ now.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 09:04 PM
9

Women aren't complaining though, this is the only article I can see about this and it is a conservative from source. Feminists and women love to be patronised when it favours, they only complain when it harms them (like not taken seriously). If they banned women from best teacher award (idk if its real) to balance gender equality, then you will see women complaining.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 06:14 PM
44

So I guess Marriage by abduction soars in Bihar, over 3,000 grooms tied knot at gunpoint in 2016 is completely fictional?
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:24 PM
29

It's not something special to atheism, even churches (mainly protestant ones) are infiltrated by feminists. Controlling institutions to control culture is their forte.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:17 AM
2

U dummy, if you can't read then go back to school. I asked you "Why is she entitled to continue living her married lifestyle in the first place?" and you give me all this drivel instead of answering.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 03:11 AM
1

https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/14601/GehrhardtA.pdf;jsessionid=B67A377AD88A9241D8F7BC4B1D910A7F?sequence=1
/r/MensRights12/07/23 03:06 AM
12

Also in 2019: Domestic abuse bill condemned for ignoring ‘gendered nature’ of violence amid austerity cuts DV is a gendered crime.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 10:16 PM
10

Disfigured soldiers, who were single, returning from WWI found it very difficult to get married, even though there was a huge surplus of single women. After WW2, many single women got married to foreign men (so much for the loyalty to your nation). So not only women didn't start getting into polygamous relationships to repopulate the country but they didn't even want to get into monogamous relationships with "unsuitable" men.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:48 PM
6

I didn't ask you to explain is alimony. I know what is alimony.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 08:44 PM
11

Why is she entitled to continue living her married lifestyle in the first place? Is the man also entitled to the continue living his married lifestyle? Should the government also mandate her to provide services so he lives the lifestyle that he became accustomed to?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 08:02 PM
18

Florida is better than before but nowhere close to best states like Texas, NC etc. BTW DeSantis shouldn't much credit for this, he vetoed a better bill last year which was protested by feminist and lawyer lobby. By signing this bill, he did absolute bare minimum.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 07:51 PM
1

♥️ Thanks
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:41 PM
1

Take your dementia pills, you might remember.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:07 PM
17

Both genders? it's only women who are cutting throats.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 02:04 PM
1

It's been few months, maybe you forgot but your original comment was about justifying male only conscription because "mass breeding". I am not confused, you are gaslighting me. Nobody asked your mate preferences but ok.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:35 PM
1

Women want rich and powerful men and would rather be in harem with one of them then get involved with a average man. All of that is still nothing to do with mass breeding program. Women aren't producing babies in peacetime countries (Japan, South Korea etc) with best medical facilities, and you want me believe they would be a mass breeding program (literally never happened)? delusional and dishonest man hating feminist.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 12:34 PM
37

This case shows the sheer hypocrisy of both sides. Right was all for due process and not believing accusation on face value when political hitjobs against Kavanaugh and Trump happened. Left is all about believe all women, women never lie about SA and Biden himself is the architect of Title IX guidelines that stripped due process rights and railroaded the lives of thousands of falsely accused men. Now the positions have completely switched on this case. I haven't read the accusation in detail bec…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:14 PM
1

Haha lol expected response. I just schooled right wing idiots here pretending to support men's rights few days ago. Today it is leftwing idiots. Imagine not dick sucking politicians and political ideologies.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 08:34 PM
1

Do you...really not see how those are crazy extremists? Do I really have to explain it? Radicals doesn't mean crazy extremists. Abolitionist were radicals, not crazy extremists. These positions are espoused by majority of left wing governments and politicians, organisations as well as have supported by left wing voters. Either most of you are extremists or these are not extremist positions. Pick your poison. left wing doesn't say that either It is always leftists who go around saying things like…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 08:07 PM
2

That only makes you worse xoxo
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:55 PM
1

Not true, people oppose conscription for specific wars not conscription itself. If they support the war, they will support male only conscription for it. You can go look at polls in countries that have male only military service, almost every time women are much more in favour of male only conscription than men themselves.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:50 PM
1

What populace? left wing voters overwhelming support these positions. I didn't even get into actual radical positions. I am not saying he does (he probably does) I was just informing him that left wingers are not "good guys", they are just as bad in different ways.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:48 PM
2

How are these radical positions? Forced shared parenting doesn't exist. Right wingers don't say women are superior than men in most cases, this is a pure left wing position. You don't even know the laws passed by YOUR left wing governments, you are not knowledgeable enough to have any political talk that is not regurgitating the propaganda piece by your favourite left wing pundit. Go educate yourself about the laws, dick sucking politicians and political ideologies is such a cringe behaviour.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:34 PM
2

These are not nutjobs positions, these are standard left wing position adopted by left wing governments all around the world. You can't say all of them are radicals.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:24 PM
3

Doesn't take much to know a run of the mill NPC.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 11:54 PM
8

You realise that left is opposed to shared parenting while right has passed shared parenting laws in multiple states. Left wing feminists opposed alimony and child support reforms last year in Florida. Left wing feminists continuously undermines male victims of DV all around the world. Feminists in UK want men to be excluded from DV bill in the parliament. Left is eroding the due process rights of falsely accused men all around the world. Left wing perpetuates the fake narrative that men are pri…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 10:33 PM
2

Concern troll. Male only draft for 1000s of years: silence Random comment calling for equality: "noone should be drafted" How many times have you complained about male only draft? or you only remember this "abolish the draft" when it's women turn to get some equality?
/r/MensRights29/05/23 10:14 PM
2

Government always on women's side.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 08:35 PM
1

That law was made in 1920s, they is no mention of mental illness as a justification then, it was purely done to keep them out of murder charge. Mental illness is BS excuse anyway, mentally ill male criminals who murder go to psychiatric prison. Murder is max life sentence, infanticide is max 5 years. It definitely kept them out of prison.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 08:18 PM
5

They would change the law. In England when too many women were convicted of murder of their infant kids, they changed the law to infanticide.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 03:42 PM
5

Never seen any female teacher go to jail for rape, US or otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 02:17 AM
1

Yes I agree, I believe only reason we see so many incels and other "undesirable" men because back in the day they would be sent to war to die or work in some dangerous job till death.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 01:08 AM
18

There are only 1 case I know where a woman was convicted of rape, crazy Montana machete girl who 20 years in a mental hospital, which is pretty lenient. If a man did that, he would get life. There is a new female teacher raping student story every week, never heard anyone getting jailed for rape.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 12:37 AM
65

Even in other states, how those laws are applied should be looked at. Many times, law is gender neutral only in writing and guidelines for police, prosecutors, and judges would give unfair leniency to women.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 12:20 AM
2

In that list of how women put the needs of others before their own. Better than being poor and depressed.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 03:11 PM
4

Did you read those links? Just shows how much better woman have yet they complain, which proves women are taught self preservation over anything else.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:36 PM
2

4500-5000 men died last year from work fatalities.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:22 PM
151

Will be out in 10 years.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:11 PM
1

? He is making fun of him and uncle as sex offenders, not victims.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 12:46 PM
6

Switch the genders and tell me which comedian has balls to make the same "joke"? "Le joke" excuse is not going to work if you make the same joke other way around.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 11:07 PM
3

Narrative is Ukraine good so even if they commit mass genocide of their own citizens it's ok. Even for Russia, people are awfully quiet about conscription (probably because they don't have any standing as Ukraine is the same) even though hazing of conscripts is the no 1 cause of non-combat death in Russia military.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 11:05 PM
0

The bar is very low for rape accusations to go to courts, police and prosecutors are dying to prosecute any man for rape. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435317/Tried-sex-crime-brushed-past-film-star-rush-hour.html If a case with such ridiculous premise and such clear evidence can go to courts, just imagine the level of evidence in cases that don't make it to the court.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 10:46 PM
4

Same in UK, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435317/Tried-sex-crime-brushed-past-film-star-rush-hour.html. This guy was accused of fingering a woman in London Underground in broad daylight, there even a video of him burshing past the accuser. Even after all this clear evidence, he has to fight 2 years in courts to get his name cleared.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 01:20 PM
5

51% of rape cases result in conviction in courts of UK, this 1% number is probably from police reports.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 12:54 PM
14

That dumbass man hater is straight up lying, Ukraine wouldn't need hold men hostage if they were so eager to go to the frontlines. This guys propaganda is at least 10 months old, Ukraine has doubled down on conscription since late last year.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 08:41 AM
7

Only rights of Ukrainian men are restricted.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 08:16 AM
3

IDK if you know or not but women blocked ERA from ratifying in 1970s because it would get rid of male only conscription. Polls about conscription in almost every country show women being more in favour of male only conscription than men themselves. Almost all reform that would help men is opposed by some group of women, either conservative or liberal: conscription - conservative, DV - liberal, rape - both, child custody - liberal etc. Women are the most powerful political group, rich men are not…
/r/MensRights27/05/23 03:09 AM
5

It is incredibly tone deaf to say "but what about women" when men are being treated worse than literal animals in Ukraine and nobody is talking about it. This is one of only few places where it is being talked about. Global organisations, MSM and everyone on social media, including vast majority of reddit, is either completely silent or worse, talking about how women have it worse. I think your message is better preached in thousands of Ukraine threads everywhere on reddit, particularly the ones…
/r/MensRights26/05/23 09:55 PM
1

That was because of pro life women and church. Take any situation, like paternity fraud or false accusations, where men are primarily victims and women are perpetrators and it has only got worse.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 09:39 PM
4

Women are elites.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 07:27 PM
16

If you like to burn Russia then go do it yourself, no need gaslight an ill man into essentially committing suicide.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 05:36 PM
1

It's only going to get a lot worse in future.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 01:05 PM
3

Can you literally show one instance of mass breading program? Germany, Japan and Soviet Union lost millions of men, didn't need an breeding program to get the populations up. Wars are over long before you get in 1 man breeding 15 women situation.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:58 AM
5

It never happens, complete lie to gaslight men into fighting. In post WW2 germany or Soviet Union, men were not enjoying haram of women. Most single women got married to foreign men and those who didn't died alone.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:27 AM
1

Women telling their daughters to marry 1% of men is not patriarchy. They marry 1% of men because it is the easiest shortcut to access 1%er wealth. Same is the reason why they see 1% of men as better. If 1% of men were actually in control, they wouldn't be making laws that pander to women at the expense of men. Average man get treated worse than average women, he has to become 1% to get the same treatment as women.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 08:19 PM
19

Not worshipping women = misogyny
/r/MensRights24/05/23 08:01 PM
11

They probably have no evidence so they asked for a low sentence.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:57 PM
1

I wouldn't be too sure of that considering how many women are caught "have sex" with their students.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:59 PM
6

Completely right. Nobody cares when women use men's washroom or when female reporters can go into men's locker rooms on live television. They only care if a man does something even remotely close to the same.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:41 AM
44

They had the guy and child, when she was born, should have just done a paternity test to determine if he is the father. Yet they didn't do that and instead put the child up for adoption without his consent. It's been 5 years now, so even if he wins, they are going to say the child is settled in the foster home and deny his rights. ​ All this legal junk around rights of married and unmarried father is total misandry. Married fathers are cucked into parenting some other man's child and unmarried f…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 01:46 AM
1

She was not threatened to get involved in these crime and she didn't act under duress. She encouraged the guy to do this. ​ Texts between Burns and Upton show she was aware of activities in Hull and intentions to profit from drugs. She encouraged Upton to do this ​ 'She was not acting under duress and she should have and could have made different decisions
/r/MensRights19/05/23 11:59 PM
70

They have both been charged with being concerned in the supply of heroin and crack cocaine. They are also charged with three counts each of arranging or facilitating travel of another person with a view to exploitation (Modern Slavery Act 2015).And, Upton is also accused of possession with intent to supply heroin. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/two-charged-modern-slavery-offences-23341151 She was also charged with that human trafficking that you are talking about. ​ Burns took Upto…
/r/MensRights19/05/23 12:15 AM
12

Being against government micromanging every aspect of personal life based on some bullshit feminist garbage is good thing. Maybe you should learn from incels cause clearly you are worse than their dumbass bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 08:40 PM
1

Yes I am aware of it, I read it from time to time. You guys are doing a great job.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 09:53 PM
2

Looks like she being tried in Delaware, where that age is 18.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 12:10 PM
8

His whole argument is gender apartheid is fine because Indian men are rapists. Literally making the same arguments (black people are dangerous) that racists made for support for racial apartheid. And he would dismiss any evidence, if even they are from the government, contrary to his narrative.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 12:30 AM
4

Since you are incapable of discussing without research papers, I would like you to cite some research papers that refute the articles. How about you cite a research paper that show rape laws in India are not gender exclusionary? Or a research paper that refutes the 53% false rape case claim? as reported by a government agency.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 10:49 PM
2

First article is reporting false accusation statistics by a government agency, second and third are comments by Judges on rape cases and fourth is about gender biased rape laws (actual rape crisis). The fact that you would dismiss news articles on government statistics and policies without even reading shows you are not open to discussion. One more thing, research papers are not anymore trustworthy than newspaper articles. Vast majority of research papers are complete shit and not worth the pape…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 10:45 PM
11

What's wrong with these newspaper pieces? You reject them because they don't support on your racist narrative.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 09:24 PM
3

Read your own pathetic article, it is wrong on many levels. The author got her 0.5% by using 5% false accusations rate (already very low) and assumes only 10% rapes are reported so 5% false accusation can only come from those 10% of reported cases. The first problem is that 5% of false accusations doesn't consider the all the cases where the evidence was insufficient for rape. Those ones can be false as well, just their isn't enough evidence to tell. These 5% cases are cases were accusation is p…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:53 PM
2

Those abortions were always legal, they don't need to cry rape to get abortion for medical complications.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:23 PM
2

Your point is moot. The law they are trying to get rid off doesn't protect those who are on trial, it only protects those who are yet to stand a trial.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:47 AM
7

Even feminists won't put it that low, it is at least 10%.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:46 AM
2

If it was really a life death situation, they would use contraceptives before and not falsely accuse after.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:43 AM
53

This is wrong because the law only prohibits media from naming and shaming men who are yet to stand trail. After the trial is started, it doesn't matter if the man is convicted or not, he can be named publicly. The official reason behind changing the law is Attorney-General Shannon Fentiman first announced the law changes in November, stating the publication bans on an accused’s name were based on “rape myths” that women would make up allegations. basically, false accusations are a "rape myth" a…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 01:53 AM
1

Accuser(s) is not the victim. Go read the article.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 06:43 AM
1

You replied You just keep ranting about nothing because you hate women! How do you want the victim punished and she’s the one that helped free him to the person who wanted to punish the accuser. Clearly you thought both were same, since you didn't read the article. It's ok just admit it, no need to lie.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 05:14 PM
4

Did you read the article? the victim and the accuser is not the same person. The girl was 6 years old when this happened and so other family members accused this man, her stepdad, of rape. Please read the article before responding same 100 comments.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:12 AM
5

How can you say that 50% of all accusation resulting in a conviction is poor? Maybe only those 50% of the accusations are true and thus should lead to convictions, in that case that's a perfect conviction rate. Same thing with 1% conviction rate, it can be a perfect conviction rate. Defining conviction rate based on the number of accusations is completely meaningless, unless of course your goal is to convict innocent men.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:06 AM
4

Politicians are using this to pander to feminists and women who would vote for anyone who helps them secure privileges for women even if it means turning their democratic country to a authoritarian shithole. The extra seats doesn't help them much since it only dilutes their power in parliament.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:22 AM
7

Probably but he needs to file a lawsuit and win it first.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 11:34 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 07:01 PM
3

I would like to see source on this. That 38% is mainly because of european queens destroying natives in colonies. From that study Queens were also more likely to gain territory over the course of their reigns, but did not experience greater internal instability. Seems pretty to me that queens did not experience greater turmoil. Which makes sense because vast majority of time challengers to the throne were male relatives of the monorach or military leaders (also most male).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/23 12:42 PM
16

She was not drunk or intoxicated, this both confirmed by the prosecutors and her videos in which was parading around telling everyone about what had happened. "normal people subs" LMAO sure buddy whatever you say.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 09:47 AM
16

She lied about her age, and she was fully conscious to recognise who she was banging. And no, you are not troll because of your pathetic shitbag opinions, but because this just another one of your sock puppet accounts, you use to troll here.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 09:13 AM
16

Comment by u/ryanisbetter below: Nope because this was in Commiefornia which recognizes the mistake of age defense and she told everyone she was 18. I haven't seen the law myself but that's makes them clear of statutory rape. She was not "barely conscious" and so misidentified him. You just made that up, shitbag troll.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 09:03 AM
9

Who, here, said that?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 08:29 AM
1

Most of what you wrote is completely wrong, it's clear that you are pretty ignorant of history and pretty proud of it. I don't have time to dissect each point in all 4 comments, but I will contest three relatively low hanging fruits: Conscription and voting rights are generally linked because in many places, most notably UK, men were granted enfranchisement due to their military service, WW1 for UK. Women who opposed voting rights for themselves, routinely cited conscription as a privilege that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/23 08:10 PM
3

That's honestly so pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:39 PM
3

I feel all these trolls are literally one or two people, their tone in comments are so similar.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:15 PM
4

One woman can change centuries of family law back in "patriarchy" days yet today men are offing themselves after getting fucked in divorce courts.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:00 PM
1

That's bit weird but doesn't show that study is garbage. Let me make it clear, reading a DailyMail article about a study is not the same thing as reading the study itself. So please go read it and tell me errors in their methodology.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:23 PM
5

I never said there weren't any opposition by men, but is dwarfed in terms of opposition by women. There were 200k women's organisations opposing voting rights. https://www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/pdfs/M15_Miller.pdf ​ Why did you switch accounts from u/Intelligent25 to u/intelligence200? Oh right, they all are throwaways troll accounts.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:21 PM
9

No, there was never a large scale organised opposition by men against women's voting rights unlike there was by women. The portion of men who opposed it was nothing compared to the portion who opposed it. Men had no reason to oppose, they didn't lose by giving voting rights to women. Vast majority of women's clubs in late 1800s and early 1900s were firmly opposed to voting rights.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 07:56 AM
1

Nobody cares about laws in India and China if they don't live there. It's pretty clear you didn't read the study and getting triggered because its conclusion doesn't suit your narrative.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 07:50 AM
55

Men were much more receptive to women voting than women themselves. In UK suffragettes routinely excluded women from their polls because women would oppose voting rights for themselves but men would support it. Just to put it in context, it took suffragettes 16 years to get 190k signatures from women in support of voting rights, but it took mere 18 months for anti suffragettes to get 300k signatures from women opposing suffrage. Even in US, there were far more anti suffragist women than suffragi…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 11:52 PM
10

There are plenty of jobs that pay less than childcare primarily done by men. There is no lower limit on pay that a job must satisfy for men to do. This is a feminist myth that men don't take jobs with low pay and leave them for poor oppressed women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/23 10:58 PM
14

Female reporters are allowed in men's changing rooms for interviews and in many places there is a unisex washroom and a women's washrooms so men have to share with women. Why don't you and other conservatives complain about this? Where was your "every group deserves its own space" then. Oh right because it affects men. Even with this trans issue, I hope you realise that a 10 year boy can also see a naked women at his changing room. I have yet to see you all complain about transmen in men's chang…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 09:46 PM
1

I guess it is a good "theoretical victory" but practically it looks lacking. The question is whether other states make similar laws or better laws because California had laws against paternity fraud but they let it expire in 2007.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 08:28 PM
1

Yes, it is 5 years less for women.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:19 PM
2

Yeah this is mostly useless, ignores majority of cases and too lenient of a punishment for cases it doesn't.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 10:27 AM
22

Feminists believe whatever helps them give extra privileges to women. Feminists will claim being a mother is oppressive when they want things like welfare for women. Feminists will oppose shared parenting cause it means women lose all the privilege that they get from having custody. ​ Another example is false accusations, they claim that false accusations are rare and inconsequential but they oppose gender neutral rape laws because men will them to make false accusations.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 09:53 AM
1

Yes, Sweden is the most feminist country, it definitely has worse policies in other areas.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 09:36 AM
3

Austria not even strictly better than Sweden, compulsory military service (slavery) is male only in Austria but gender neutral in Sweden. Looks like Austria just takes all the man hating ideas from both progressive feminists and conservative tradcons, just like Germany and France.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 09:21 AM
1

Concluding based on overall world population is useless, it is better to judge based on countries like done in the study. I don't know if men are logical but you clearly aren't.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 09:06 AM
28

I don't think she even feels bad, she said in interviews that she didn't know this could have happened to him. I have never seen any formal apology from her. She has changed her version of story multiple times, days after the incident she claimed that he only wolf whistled at her but 5 decades later she told FBI that he touched her hand. Funniest thing is that she even accused the white knight murderer, her husband, of DV and divorced him.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:11 PM
32

The point is not to prove women evil, that's what you took it from post.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 10:22 PM
55

Lived a long comfortable life without any repercussions or even remorse. Believe all women and all this push to artificially inflate conviction rates is nothing new, it's just feminist repackaging of age old tale of women lying to ruin lives of innocents.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 09:27 PM
10

We don't have a defacto family role as primary caregiver. Men have de facto role of provider. Men have over 75% of the legislative seats and no women have been the US president. Over 90% of corporate CEOs are men. Over 75% of homeless are men and over 90% of work related deaths are men. Grow some balls already and suck it up without crying like boys suckling their mothers breast. You grow your pea-sized brain first.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 07:21 PM
3

I am very certain if you go and do a poll on this, majority (70%+) women will either agree with or don't see anything wrong with it.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 09:24 PM
10

Men are already taught to worship women. Men don't lack respect for women. The fact that you and other women think men need to be "taught" to "respect" women shows that you all need to be taught to respect men.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 09:23 PM
7

So anti sex work feminists were able to the anti sex work crowd and influence the laws. What were pro sex work feminists doing then? I would like to see any evidence of opposition to nordic model laws, when they were implemented, by pro sex feminists. It is one thing to ban sex work and another to punish only men for using it. I can't think of a single other service where consumer is punished while provider isn't.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:47 PM
9

You vastly underestimate the number of SWERFS and their influence, after all they have managed to convince so many countries to adopt nordic model. That's certainly no doing of a minority. Many pro-sex work feminists ignore these SWERFS because criminalising sex-work mainly affects men and they are willing to sacrifice few female sex workers in the process.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:02 PM
7

This is very common problem in countries with laws written gender neutral language. They never enforce those laws in gender neutral fashion, and that to only when it favours women.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 10:56 PM
26

Most common types of FGM, like pricking the clitoral hood to draw blood, is not any worse than circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:58 PM
1

Left, Obama appointed him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/23 10:45 PM
6

These people also get paid based on the amount of child support dollars they collect. There is massive incentive to never fix the system.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:31 PM
15

Thank you, it is so frustrating to see this mega bullshit study still getting referenced so many times. It needs to die.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:26 PM
2

Corporal punishment is legal in 18 states in US and 80% of victims are boys.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:21 PM
3

A lawyer was using it to "find" rapists and it replied with false accusation.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:02 AM
10

longer than your list.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 04:08 PM
3

What is the evidence lab screwed up here? This was a court ordered paternity test, the likelihood of screw up very low. It is far more likely that she committed fraud.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:53 PM
9

By whom? this list only contains quotes by feminists, the "real" list of misandric quotes is definitely longer.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:23 AM
10

The chance of test being false is very low (sub 1%). I wouldn't stress too much about it unless there is evidence of it.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 09:06 AM
4

In middle ages, crimes against nobility carried harsher punishments, nowadays it is women.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 10:10 PM
1

Yeah it literally makes circumcision legal, maybe you should read it? It's not just US, I for sure know there are laws in Germany and Belgium that make circumcision legal for < 6 months old and legal on religious ground for more than 6 months. But I already done enough research for your ignorant ass, but you can find similar laws all over the world. Nevertheless, your presumption that something is illegal unless it permitted by law is complete horseshit. For something to be illegal it should eit…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 10:03 PM
8

You can pick any mens rights related topic and you will see a clear bias. One of the most glaring examples is their article on circumcision, wikipedia claims There is strong evidence that circumcision reduces the risk of men acquiring HIV infection in areas of the world with high rates of HIV. This evidence is principally derived from three randomized controlled studies conducted in Africa in 2002 All three studies in Africa were poorly designed and unethical (they did it in Africa for a reason)…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:39 AM
1

Wrong https://legiscan.com/AL/text/SB184/id/2566425
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:18 PM
1

Show me one case from anywhere in the whole world where someone is charged with GBH for doing circumcision. There is no technicalities here, it is literally legal in every country.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 06:28 AM
-3

Circumcision is legal in every country. Edit: just to clear, I think it should be illegal - which should be clear from my previous comment but it's reddit after all.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 08:03 PM
5

Illegal procedures are not recommended.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 07:36 PM
-1

If the data itself is biased then how are you going to do statistics. Very critically thinking brain there.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 07:34 PM
21

Have you? There many different types of FGM (like MGM), some just involve pricking the skin near clitoris and some involve sewing the whole thing shut. Regardless all of them are illegal. I don't think pricking clitoris is any worse circumcision, yet only one is illegal.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 07:14 PM
0

Wtf? are you stupid? You don't need hard science to see that they won't register female pedos because they literally don't believe females can be pedo. Courts operate on precedence, they don't randomly create contradictory judgements on the whims of the judges. Use your fucking brain before going on deranged rants.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:56 PM
8

Go on a deranged rant on men, not take any responsibility and apologise and deflect blame on the victims. Yep, has all the hallmarks of entitled feminist moment.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:37 PM
1

Women get away with it a lot more. In Canada, they literally refused to register a woman that gave a 2 year old blowjob and recorded it and reason cited was women can't be pedophiles.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:22 PM
1

Do you know about Sally Miller Gearhart?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/23 11:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter