TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fearless_Ad4244 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,127 comments by Fearless_Ad4244 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,127 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Wonder what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 12:39 PM
5

Funny that they speak about rebuilding the population and women are needed more to do that, but I'm not seeing many babies being born even though there is a need for that in western populations. Also they revert any time to this argument when the draft comes up in a discussion otherwise how do you dare to say women should do that lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 10:59 PM
0

Lol and was the US in the 1950s fascist lol? And Matt Walsh most likely has it as a joke lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/25 07:50 PM
1

So you have seen tradcons on average saying that they are fascists? Do you seriously mean that lol? Amd what do you mean with describing themselves that way?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/25 01:23 AM
2

Fascist lol? Where did you get that hahahaha?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/25 12:54 PM
1

As with heteronormativity this is another thing in the lgbt framework to make homosexuality the norm and heterosexuality the fringe. When you go against evolution that's what happens.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/25 09:10 PM
1

No, basically a man especially a white man wouldn't be a part of marginalised groups in their oppressed hierarchy.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/25 05:33 PM
2

https://news.arizona.edu/news/incivility-work-queen-bee-syndrome-getting-worse
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 12:17 AM
2

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201906/scientific-bias-in-favor-studies-finding-gender-bias
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 12:06 AM
2

I thought that as well. I wonder if it is twox though.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/25 05:40 PM
6

What is the subreddit I wonder?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/25 02:31 AM
7

Yes this is true. They are like feminists in that they do the analysis through a left wing lens and feminists do it through a feminist lens. I think instead of doing it through just a logical lens without politics since you risk of being biased.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 07:07 PM
4

Damn sad to hear. That's disgusting.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/03/25 09:40 PM
7

Damn I knew that twoxchromosomes was bad, but they dox too lol? They are even worse it seems.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/03/25 01:58 PM
36

Mensrights is slandered. The reputation of it being misogynist is unfounded. It is nothing more than rumours so that no one discovers the subreddit and by doing that, the truth. Feminism had Valerie Solanas who wrote the SCUM manifesto, but it's not like feminism became any weaker. Not to mention the other misandrists since the beginning. It is just a smear attack to lower mensrights credibility. People shouldn't fall for these things and think for themselves and make up their own mind about it.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/03/25 12:17 AM
10

Or the claim that the first programmer was a woman lol. It isn't truly known if Ada Lovelace even did an algorithm or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 01:11 AM
3

Nope. Watson and Crick didn't steal anything.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/25 05:51 PM
3

This is wrong. Men are smarter than women. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20066931/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0191886994900302#:~:text=Among%20adults%2C%20males%20have%20slightly,than%20the%20mean%20for%20females https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309120677_Sex_differences_in_intelligence_on_the_American_WAIS-IV#:~:text=Men%20obtained%20significantly%20higher%20scores,the%20Processing%20Speed%20index%20IQ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26158978/ https://www.re…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/25 05:47 PM
1

She is a r@ce tr@itor so I could care less about her.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 07:05 PM
2

Men killing men is homicide. Men killing women is femicide. Women killing men isn't called androcide. It seems to me that a male death is just a statistic and a woman's death is a real problem because male on male killings are larger than femicides, but they aren't given even the same kind of importance never mind more. This is sexism at first glance.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 04:05 PM
6

So a man died, but woman suffers and men joking about her being single is so bad, but they disrespected the man far more than the woman?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 03:58 PM
1

Got it. I think this is first hand experience with wanting second hand sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 08:45 PM
1

Interesting. Quite funny actually. Did he have articles in order to construct the wikipedia page?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 06:26 PM
1

So you are saying the convention lasted until 2019?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 02:42 PM
1

Interesting. I don't get something though, did the event that happened to your friend in 2019 too or something else?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 02:38 AM
5

They also don't regard primary sources as important compared to secondary sources as far as I know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 08:12 PM
-1

"That was me being more nice than you frankly deserved in referencing your misogynistic beliefs. You have an anti-women view, and I can't ever fucking support that, and I don't fucking want to associate with people who hold such viewpoints. It doesn't matter, then, what we might be able to have some sort of minor agreement on, because you'll be coming to that from a point of hate. It's like I don't want to talk to racist nationalists about patriotism; I love my country dearly, but I sure as fuck…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 07:58 PM
-1

"Your entire basis for going into this "argument" is something that I consider hostile to my beliefs, and so it doesn't matter if there might be issues we might agree on, to some extent, further down the line, because ultimately we still don't fundamentally see things the same way and you will want things that I can't ever support. You trying to convince me over is you acting in bad faith (and unfortunately for you, I saw straight through it)." What do you mean with seeing things the same way? W…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 04:52 PM
-1

"No, I just don't want to engage with you. I like my sanity intact, and I don't want to get dragged down to your level. Also, is it an ad hominem if it's true? I mean, you then said;" What dragging to my level? Being asked to provide proof for your claim is dragging down to my level? And how can the ad hominem be true? How can you prove that I am a fool? And even if it was true (which it isn't) yes it would be an ad hominem since you are not dealing with the argument, but you are just insulting …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 03:05 AM
1

Sure you don't have an argument so you don't want to engage and resort to ad hominems. And it's not up to you if I am in the wrong sub or not. And men not having and equivalent right is not a separate issue it is directly related to this issue if you care about equality that is, but of course you don't. It would be like saying only women having the right to free speech and men not having it and me mentioning it would be a separate issue according to you (and before you say that it is an equivale…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 08:57 PM
23

I have a problem with the hypocrisy that men can't say their opinions about women that they find attractive no matter how outlandish not that women say things to men no matter how outlandish that they find attractive.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/24 06:17 PM
2

Saying that men are the majority in power isn't wrong. I never said otherwise, but they aren't there to oppress women on the contrary they are to help them since women are the ones who benefit from state policies mostly. Whereas in the case of jews you have to be more careful in looking at things. It has more proof for it than for the patriarchy. https://motoristoppression.wordpress.com/2016/11/03/32/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 06:13 PM
-2

They aren't. You would have far more truth to your side if you speak anything about jews (seeing as ADL the organisation against hate made the definition of racism to be something that only white people can make towards others) or that US media is owned by jews and not to forget in the country where free speech is praised republicans wanted to have an anti semitism bill. This is something that is only done for jews. The patriarchy theory has no basis at all in reality at least as feminists defin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 05:43 PM
-1

First of all I am not a child. Secondly you are doing history revisionism because you can't defend your point. You don't bring any proof for your claim just your biased opinion. Anarchism isn't communism it can't be since in an anarchy you don't have workers having the means of production you would have to have trade just like it was before for that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 05:38 PM
7

I can't even reply right now to her because it's pointless since she deleted her account. She truly thinks that men just came and decided to just think that you should have money just because some guy said so lol. I guess accountability is for men only.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 05:34 PM
7

It's not a drastic turn. It is related to your point about abortion and it shows how privileged women are. It's something that has happened in US. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 02:54 AM
2

Abortion is a privilege not a right. Men don't have reproductive rights. The fact that you think that abortion is a right shows how privileged you are lol. And since you think that patriarchy is worse for women and benefits men can you show how is that so?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 02:47 AM
0

Wait what? What does anti-semitic conspiracy theories have to do with the notion of the patriarchy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 02:41 AM
12

Women didn't fight tooth and nail. Beyond some bombs by british feminists there wasn't much of a fight. They would have lost against men if men truly didn't want to give them the rights. In the US men had to protest to win their vote it wasn't given to them even though they should have gotten it since many of them served in their state militias. Men were drafted by the government in the revolutionary war before they got the right to vote. And men had a suffrage too. It was called the white male …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 02:38 AM
11

"Men are expected to be tall, have money, be fit, be stoic." These are due to women liking those traits not some patriarchy lol. Or do you think that women have no agency or can't think for themselves in this case about what they desire that they rely on the patriarchy to tell them about it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/24 02:33 AM
0

As always "real communism has never been done bro". Do you know that the creator of that shit ideology said that if need be for a violent revolution that it should happen? And how do you contrast that with that sort of government leading to the scenario you mentioned?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/24 06:19 PM
1

Yes I do far more than you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/24 02:29 AM
-2

Communist*
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/24 07:28 PM
6

(in Greta Thunberg's voice)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/24 07:20 PM
1

Yeah this is what I was saying too with a caveat that I mentioned short distance for a reason, that when people say that they have encountered a bear I think they say encounter as in they have the bear in their line of sight not that they encounter one where they are so close that they could brush shoulders lol which should be taken into account since it's different if the bear is in a 500m radious for example and if he is in a 1m or 10m radius. A brown bear might attack you even if you are far …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/24 03:52 PM
13

Since racism and misandrism is accepted towards white men that means that the bear vs man discourse is correct to many women (and some men) online. And the funny thing is that they say that statistically they are more likely to be killed by a man than a bear (whilst not taking into account the amount of encounters in a short distance) and if we go the route of statistics especially by capita then that argument can be used against black men, but they then bakctrack since they attacked one of thei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/24 02:53 AM
2

Yes. Funny how he managed to understand what feminism was then, but many if not most can't understand it now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/24 04:13 PM
3

http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/51877
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/24 05:23 PM
1

Maybe I don't know tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/24 11:56 PM
2

Misogyny type rhetoric? And how would you define that? Also are you on youtube by the same username by any chance?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/24 07:10 PM
1

I'm not opposing that, I was just wondering from his side.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/24 07:08 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/i0j2g9/some_sources_on_sexual_abuse_of_men_and_boys/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 01:05 AM
1

Would you say that the right thing to do is replicating ourselves (ie reproduction)?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/24 12:07 AM
12

What proof do you have for misogyny being on the rise?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 10:50 PM
23

There's not a "men are wonderful effect", but "women are wonderful effect"
/r/EverydayMisandry20/12/24 10:47 PM
3

https://web.archive.org/web/20241220222758/https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED356186.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240801855_The_Culture_of_Sexual_Harassment_in_Secondary_Schools
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 10:32 PM
2

https://web.archive.org/web/20241219010907/https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/gsh/2023/GSH23_Special_Points.pdf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 02:18 PM
1

https://sci-hub.se/https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/vio.2019.0005?journalCode=vio
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 02:12 PM
1

I don't think that Warren has denounced feminists, but maybe I am wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 02:10 PM
2

https://web.archive.org/web/20241216230733/https://boysmeneducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Strauss-Concealing-and-distorting-female-DV.pdf
/r/MensRights16/12/24 11:08 PM
1

This is why whores should be condemened. She is also a race traitor too. No fucking sympathy for her lol. Having a nice life and choosing this? Nah, she should be shamed
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:57 PM
5

This is why I find it funny when guys think that lesbians are on their side or that they understand what it means to be a man. Even guys in this sub I remember once they were swallowing a sob story of a lesbian who was complaining about her dating life when that's what she was here for only to find some sympathy. A lesbian is still a woman with a caveat that she now competes with men for women (ie bisexual women for example).
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:52 PM
6

This is why men in the past structured the society where men were the leaders and women had no say. We can see how destructive it has been to men now that they have power whilst being forgiven for the bad shit that they do. Sometimes we have to agree that men in the past knew something and weren't stupid for the way that they build society
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:45 PM
2

The fact that a whore is not being held responsible for being a whore, but the men that she slept with is never going to not be funny lol
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:40 PM
1

How is sex variable? Gender was used to actually mean sex though it seemed as a less vulgar and more polite way since the word sex held and still holds to a little extenct some shame when it is spoken in public or with other people. What feminists did is separate completely the 2 words to make it seem that they aren't related. Even though the meaning of gender at first isn't what it is today if we go by the etymology of the word. I think it is related to giving birth or something like that.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:36 PM
14

Misanthrope is when you hate humans. She didn't seem like she hated women more like she seemed that she was annoyed that women supposedly have internalised patriarchy which is quite ironic since it seems that women are quite far from liking the patriarchy or internalising it more so they express their hatred for it. I could be wrong, but women today in US from what I see online are closer to the school shooter (in term of seeing men as evil not necessarily wanting to kill them) thought than bein…
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:30 PM
3

https://archive.is/2024.12.16-205653/https://x.com/PETR0GRAD/status/1868760571929411669
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:24 PM
1

Gender comes from biology it didn't come out of nothing. Do you really think that they created this elaborate social conscruct just to "oppress" people? There are things that are cross culturally considered masculine or feminine.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 06:59 PM
2

Yeah that's what I think because it seems a lot that this large amount of women have been raped.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 06:55 PM
1

It doesn't matter if the public still thinks of them as having done the crime they were accused off. If people know that they didn't do it at least the blow is lesser, but that still doesn't mean that justice is served as long as she has gotten scot free from the false accusation she made.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 12:35 AM
5

So you only made one claim which is related to statistics the other 2 are based on subjective views and some rationalised thought. What proof do you have that she said that women are more likely to commit violent acts or crimes. And your point about men not being taught to express their emotions verbally and that leads to those violent crimes is just bullshit. You didn't bring any proof for that. Secondly the marriage rate is lower than before. And as for divorce being illegal did she say about …
/r/MensRights15/12/24 12:30 AM
2

How do we even know if the lifetime estimates of 18.3 to 21.3 rapes for women are even correct? So is it true that 1 in 5 women have been raped?
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:37 PM
1

The accused were white guys so no one cares about it. They will quickly go over it and the guys will still be thought of as having done it
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:25 PM
8

First off I'm not horny for her. Secondly your movement is entirally created on fabricated things​ and still uses fake stats so to insult her for that is quite funny and you can't even back what you say.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:19 PM
1

Guys I think I can fix the woman on the pic/j
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:13 PM
2

Jews are part of that sociopolitical propaganda. Don't view them as victims.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:07 PM
6

Of course a feminist would have a problem with that.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 06:50 PM
3

I think it's especially shit for white men seeing this as an outsider. The native men need to bring patriarchy back.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 06:48 PM
1

Yeah. But I was speaking about the sources of the articles
/r/BlackPillScience14/12/24 05:00 AM
1

I think it is part of unpaid work, but I don't know if it is part of household chores, but it might be. Even grocery shopping doesn't make sense to call it as if it is work.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 12:38 AM
1

I remember too that fixing appliances or that doing yard work wasn't included in a report in europe neither so it might be that it wasn't included because it would show that men do more work lol. But isn't shopping included in unpaid work also? Which it might take a lot of time if you include the traveling distance.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 11:30 PM
1

Also do you have stats on men vs women on time spend on paid work plus un paid work?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 10:49 PM
1

I was speaking about the 2 sources you mentioned above.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 10:48 PM
1

You are welcome! Thank you for the sources as well! Are your sources only about physicians?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:50 PM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20240215184901/https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/nis4_report_congress_full_pdf_jan2010.pdf
/r/MensRights13/12/24 05:56 PM
1

Conservative culture uses biology to refer to men's and women's and role and is correct for the vast majority of people. That's not stereotyping. That's giving their rightful roles. Now a minority of men ad women don't adhere to these roles, but that's not the problem of the majority, but of the minority. We can see how destructive the leftists values have been on the continueation of many ethnicities by saying that women should work and should have the same earnings as men (by making the false …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/24 05:29 PM
2

Can someone debunk these: https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/are-dating-apps-facilitating-chadopolies https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/is-there-a-single-young-male-crisis
/r/BlackPillScience12/12/24 10:56 PM
1

Can someone debunk these: https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/is-there-a-single-young-male-crisis https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/are-dating-apps-facilitating-chadopolies
/r/TheRedPill12/12/24 10:55 PM
2

That's just biases in favour of women. They still come from biological reasons (even though I don't think that women are better suited than men for raising children if the children can walk and talk, at best they are equal) and it goes even further which is the women are wonderful effect.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 08:50 PM
2

Wrong. The laws make the gap smaller not bigger.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 07:25 PM
4

Not really. You can look it up "the gender equality paradox". In nordic countries in europe there's a greater difference between men and women. In some poorer countries there might be a difference favoring women in stem fields due to those fields generating more money.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 06:30 PM
4

They come from biology.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 05:44 PM
4

No I didn't say it like that. Even in other animals there are behaviours which differentiate between the sexes and these are animals that are a little more similar in looks. Whereas in humans you could say that there is an even greater difference between the sexes.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 05:21 PM
1

That's why there should be a push to have women have more kids. The population needs to be replaced and with natives at that, not with foreigners.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 03:04 PM
5

Still just because they are worn in those cultures, it doesn't mean that they are worn everywhere. And 3 of those don't really look like dresses. And yes there's clearly an agenda to make guys wear feminine clothes especially if you follow online media. And I don't care about feminists opinions.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 03:01 PM
6

Yes, by saying that men aren't women I am admitting that women aren't men. And I know that we are humans, but there still are differences between the genders.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 02:57 PM
8

Why is this obsession with making men feminine or with being feminine or with wanting to be feminine as a man? Men aren't women so why should we try to be like them?
/r/MensRights12/12/24 01:38 AM
1

If at least women gave birth enough to replace the population at least it could be justified somewhat. But in this scenario it is complete and utter privilege.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 01:31 AM
1

Which section?
/r/EverydayMisandry12/12/24 01:28 AM
1

Their rhetoric never changes no matter how privileged they are. If men (especially white men since these things are happening in their countries and with the upcoming years will affect white boys even more) don't band together things will get only worse and if gender traitors aren't reprimanded many men will just cow tow to the feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 09:07 PM
4

Precisely. You can move in silence to achieve your goals and as I said earlier they aren't that happy that you are ignoring them, and the funny thing is that they can do nothing against it.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 09:03 PM
1

Well tbh men don't really seek much from the state.​
/r/MensRights11/12/24 08:58 PM
1

In many countries women can retire earlier than men. As in have pensions earlier. That was what I think the OP was refering to. And about the humane working conditions, women benefit more from protections such as sexual harassment and they can even make false accusations and ruin a man's life. Also men work harder jobs which have to be filled to be filled by someone so it's not like as you say that men can just work comfier jobs because men do really necessary jobs which if they wouldn't do the …
/r/MensRights11/12/24 02:16 AM
5

I really like the ignoring part man. It might have shocked them when they couldn't get attention from you lol. Also smart of you being openly anti-feminist since it really saved you time in dating.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 01:52 AM
1

Even gender affirmative care? That's insane. Now even fucking mental illness is sponsored by the state lol? You are right the health care costs would be higher by those things even though I don't how how much do they raise the cost.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 12:12 AM
2

Yeah I think that in the beginning of christianity whilst in asia circumcision was done, but I don't know of it being a thing in europe. Thank you for the source I will read it!
/r/MensRights10/12/24 06:13 PM
1

It's not healthcare at all. It's nothing more than just another privilege afforded to women. I have never heard of it being a thing at all. And even abortion unlike they say in the vast majority of cases it's not healthcare it is a privilege so even that (bar cases when life is in danger) shouldn't be covered by the state.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 06:11 PM
2

You are welcome!
/r/MensRights10/12/24 06:07 PM
2

It shouldn't be covered by the state. That's nuts. Do guys get free girlfriends to give birth to their children by the state? No they do not. So why should women be given that privilege? This just shows the immense stupid levels of privilege that women have. Men should do something against that.​
/r/MensRights10/12/24 04:23 AM
3

You are welcome!
/r/MensRights10/12/24 04:20 AM
1

Do you have a stat on the gender distribution of blood donors?
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:47 AM
2

Seriously?? Is buying sperm at sperm bank really covered by healthcare?
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:45 AM
1

https://archive.is/2024.12.10-023519/https://theweek.com/culture/1008283/is-sperm-donation-good-for-feminism
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:38 AM
1

https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/mESt3jwv_d0
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:27 AM
1

https://archive.is/2024.12.10-022328/https://x.com/WassonWatch/status/1865948350018957796
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:24 AM
6

Precisely, that's why it's pointless to say that conservatives just do gynocentrism their own way since with conservatives you know what you get. The way society should be arranged as per the republicans is known. Also in their worldview atleast women have duties too. They have to have babies and be a homemaker. Whereas in the leftist so called "progressive" mindset women should only get things from society and not give anything back. And they haven't really done something about the draft to my …
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:17 AM
6

https://web.archive.org/web/20100430061624/https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96jun/cancer/kadar.htm
/r/MensRights10/12/24 02:04 AM
6

https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/men-are-more-likely-to-be-homeless-in-most-countries-but-there-are-exceptions https://ourworldindata.org/homelessness#all-charts
/r/MensRights10/12/24 01:44 AM
12

[ NISVS 2010 showed in the past 12 months, 1.1% of men were made to penetrate and 1.1% of women were raped. Table 2.1 & 2.2 on pages 18/19. NISVS 2011 showed in the past 12 months, 1.7% of men were made to penetrate & 1.6% of women were raped. Table 1 on page 5. NISVS 2012 showed in the past 12 months, 1.7% of men were made to penetrate & 1.0% of women were raped. Table A.1 & A.5 on pages 217/222. NISVS 2015 showed in the past 12 months, 0.7% of men were made to penetrate & 1.2% of women were ra…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 01:34 AM
9

https://web.archive.org/web/20110810022011/https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/lawreview/articles/volume153/issue3/Maldonado153U.Pa.L.Rev.921(2005).pdf.pdf)
/r/MensRights10/12/24 01:24 AM
1

Nah, it's ok.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/24 11:37 PM
5

You usually use "if" to the statement to explain to others that you do not actually think that. That's why I took your claim as you supporting it even if you weren't 100% sure of it. But since I was wrong I am sorry! I thought that you meant that white men can't be discriminated because of being white in their countries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/24 10:56 PM
2

What's YW? Is it you are welcome? Yeah it's best to doubt their claims and search for sources to see if the claims has any footing on facts.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 10:52 PM
4

Thank you for the source! https://archive.is/2024.12.09-212327/https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/governments-huge-cancer-funding-gender-gap/
/r/MensRights09/12/24 09:22 PM
1

The op confused me at first I though he was speaking about some european guy from another country, but I should have understood it by the use of quotes lol.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 08:33 PM
1

Thank you for the info!
/r/MensRights09/12/24 08:29 PM
4

Thank you man!
/r/MensRights09/12/24 08:24 PM
10

Funny, but she would be the first one to be angry if she was called a whore for sleeping around or if she was called a whore for not being a virgin.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 07:06 PM
7

https://archive.is/2024.12.09-183058/https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/blogs/inequalities-mens-health-why-are-they-not-being-addressed
/r/MensRights09/12/24 07:02 PM
3

Precisely. Now I'm not saying you shouldn't protect someone, but it's something else when you are protecting someone who is clearly at fault.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:59 PM
-1

Christianity doesn't have circumcision allowed. And your point about having kids is if you find it more pleasureable you will have more kids and thus more kids so I don't think it is the best argument.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:54 PM
1

Question: Is there any negative effect to removing the frenulum besides losing sensitivity and is there any positives to it?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:51 PM
8

https://archive.is/2024.12.09-184103/https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_otfwl2zc6Qc/Soqj36X3AyI/AAAAAAAAK9o/FvfYMkwSZL4/s1600-h/cancerfunding.jpg Where did you get those stats? I mean from what article or pdf?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:43 PM
9

https://archive.is/2024.12.09-183407/https://imgur.com/they-come-up-with-most-absurd-ways-to-justify-life-expectancy-gap-u0VDxiF
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:39 PM
3

Because from what you wrote you you didn't make the statement that white men can be discriminated from both categories ie gender and race. You even said that whiteness is not vulnerable is at best true in the states and europe which I countered. You can't make a false claim as a possibility of it being true. This is like me saying that east asian men not suffering from misandrism is at best true in east asia which then I show you proof that it is false and you say that I said at best, but that s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/24 06:32 PM
4

https://archive.org/details/BrainsexTheRealDifferenceBetweenMenWomenByAnneMoirDavidJessel I didn't find a more newer version of the book.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:25 PM
1

https://archive.is/2024.12.09-181448/https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/dec/08/alarm-bells-why-are-australian-boys-doing-better-than-girls-in-maths-and-science
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:18 PM
23

And most likely they are the same people who think that if a woman hits a man that he shouldn't beat her up, but defend scenarios like this.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:13 PM
3

Why where is he from?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:12 PM
1

Nowhere near the same level as the left especially as it pertains to white men since they aren't in one of the oppressed classes according to the left.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/24 06:05 PM
1

Nah it was a catholic university professor I think. Still the logic doesn't make sense. It just shows the pure misandrism.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:01 PM
0

Still a man's life should tell him if he is privileged or not and if he isn't rich he won't get any of the privileges which is attributed to the "patriarchy" so even if they are fooled by the lefts rhetoric at least their life should tell them otherwise. Another thing and the only group which is truly stupid that they might vote for the left is the white guys. Even though only a minority of them voted for them still it wasn't a insignificant one I think it was from 14-24% that voted for the left…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/24 05:59 PM
1

Are you serious? I am the furthest from a feminist. I have criticised feminism countless times in the comments. What did I say that gave the impression that I am a feminist troll because I can't see it. I only said that since he/she reacted in an emotional way to what I said which had nothing to do with the other commenter.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 05:38 PM
0

I searched her name online and I saw an image of her and a guy who looked like he is east/south east asian.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 05:34 PM
1

Thank you for the source!
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:45 AM
9

https://www.zlibrary.to/dl/the-empress-is-naked-from-female-privilege-to-gender-equality-and-social-liberation-0
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:42 AM
12

"“There’s been attempts to redress that, but while teaching is still highly skewed towards women, science and maths is overrepresented by male teachers,” he says" You can see why they do better, they don't have misandrist teachers grading them less so now they are ahead. This is the best argument for gender segregation in schools. With this misandrist bullshit the time has come once again for them to be taught at different schools. Also the woman who was worried about the disparity was touting h…
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:08 AM
11

Instead of being happy about the boys succeeding they can't stop from being misandrist and only tout the disparity as being cultural whilst not doing the same thing the other way “What we want is boys numbers to go up as well as the girls – if we have programs, we should have physics for everyone and some specialised programs for girls, so we’re increasing total participation numbers.” Again just clear discrimination.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:03 AM
-9

Who was speaking to you? The one who is stupid is you. You came and replied to my comment since it seems it hurt you. Are you a woman?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 02:51 AM
-27

She did this despicable thing (if true) and it seems that she is a race traitor. Fuck her.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 02:44 AM
5

Hahahaha!
/r/MensRights09/12/24 02:38 AM
1

Well there's one problem with your logic. It is accepted for white men to be insulted and denigrated just for being white (and for being men) unlike in other cases so your logic falls flat. You have many people saying that white people or white men can't experience racism which is flat out wrong even in their own countries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/24 01:41 AM
4

Also the birth rate is going to shit in Sweden as is in all european countries. Women are net beneficiaries and men are net contributors to society. Still men are treated as contributing nothing to society and women are treated as ​if they bring extreme levels of contribution to society. If this isn't clearly misandry I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 11:15 PM
1

This is not something new, but when most men are invisible and you only highlight the rich men and the criminal men you can create an image of men which doesn't map to reality. Especially in the case of white men.​
/r/MensRights08/12/24 11:07 PM
4

"men as a group exist in all the 'vulnerable categories', except women, tho of course women are no more really a 'vulnerable category' than men, howsoever people want to cut that. this is common lore in racial studies and gender studies. you cannot separate out men, or women, or queer people, from the other categories they exist within, black, white, filipino, etc... allowing the harassment of men is allowing the harassment of black men, native american men, queer men, and so on. whiteness as a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/24 07:47 PM
3

One of the reasons why men write as women as far as I know is because men have a more difficult time to publish their works. It's funny because that's supposedly why women wrote their works as men too in the past. Amazing how the tables turn!
/r/MensRights08/12/24 06:20 PM
5

It's also that these are fiction books and if I'm not mistaken women buy more fiction books than men thus they buy more books from female authors to support them and to "crush the patriarchy". Whereas men aren't as likely to be biased towards men. And also even though today the books that are written by women are sold the most, the best books of all time were written by men. You will hardly find any women in there.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 06:08 PM
3

Even in the past there were rape laws to protect women from men, but there weren't any to protect men from women if there were any at most it was man on man rape which was criminalised and even then I think it might have been due to sodomy laws rather than actually caring that a man was raped. https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/medieval-women-spoke-against-sexual-violence-middle-ages/
/r/MensRights08/12/24 05:54 PM
0

Which is why I don't understand why is there any man who votes for a party that hates them?
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 05:50 PM
8

Even while they pretend to care about men they still can't stop themselves from being condescending assholes.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 05:49 PM
10

White men are discriminated so your point is moot. It should be every category of men not just the ones that you like. Edit: Sources https://archive.ph/2021.04.07-031134/https://twitter.com/united/status/1379426304857141250 https://www.ky3.com/2022/11/08/1-6-hiring-managers-have-been-told-stop-hiring-white-men-survey-finds/ https://archive.is/2023.12.22-220437/https://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/content/news/wanting-to-hire-fewer-white-men-not-discrimation-tribunal-finds https://www.foxnews.com/politic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/24 04:08 AM
6

https://archive.is/2024.12.08-032859/https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360045715951-Promoting-Hate-Based-on-Identity-or-Vulnerability
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 03:30 AM
3

https://archive.is/2024.12.08-031346/https://imgur.com/a/fEqjUb0
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 03:18 AM
0

This quote was about abortion. This doesn't have anything to do with fucking women, but with them not being able to kill babies. It's also a joke.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 03:11 AM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20210116154705/https://menaregood.com/trash.html
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:35 PM
1

https://archive.is/2024.12.02-001118/https://imgur.com/a/ZjuD148
/r/MensRights02/12/24 12:29 AM
1

Yes and that constitutes more homogenous ones. But I wonder who is the one behind wanting to make white nations more "multicultural" and wanting to lower the native population?
/r/MensRights01/12/24 10:08 PM
2

And doing it to the native men nonetheless. In no other country except in white majority countries does this happen. And I have to say this, but it's white men's fault too. They have tolerated too much hate and discrimination towards themselves just because they are selfless and care about other people. Others have benefitted from their kindness which is something that should have never happened. White men should take their countries in their control so that this doesn't happen anymore and so th…
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:25 PM
1

That's why homogenity of a population is important so that things like this don't happen. The majority do not have to cater to a minority. I'm not saying that there should be discrimination, but no one should cater to the minority by giving them privileges which if you have a homogenous population this would not happen.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:20 PM
4

"Removing DEI shifts the culture back how it should be. And if we’re lucky enough maybe if we can get less women in the workforce and to be stay at home parents again we can go back to having the mans income support a family of 3+ and increase wages." This is what should happen and the white percentage of the population should increase so that the country is like it should have been so that the culture stays the same. A more homogenous country is better.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:12 PM
3

https://archive.is/2024.12.01-155115/https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/10/21/miley-cyrus-message-to-women-you-dont-have-to-be-gay-there-are-good-people-with-dicks-out-there/
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:05 PM
3

As far as I know EQ doesn't even exist. The only one is IQ which measures how quickly someone can solve problems, pattern recognition and how quickly can you process information. https://www.onecentralhealth.com.au/therapy/psychology/what-is-iq/
/r/MensRights01/12/24 07:18 PM
2

A woman speaking about logic? How funny! You have created an entire movement by fabricating statistics about men. A misandrist like you is not in a position to call this sub incel or misogynistic because in no way shape or form is this sub like that. You project your own hatred onto others and think that other people are like you. You took another movement from South Korea just because men didn't vote like you wanted. This just shows the hatred that you have for men.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 04:58 PM
1

From your study: "The sample comprises graduates of master's programs (second-cycle or long-cycle studies) who completed their education in 2014." So it means it was studied from 2014-18 which doesn't mean that things haven't changed since then. I wonder why this study didn't take more recent graduates for example the cohort from 2018-2022?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 11:29 PM
1

You can't even quite use the gender pay gap for the first year after graduation since men could have negotiated for more pay. We don't know about the controlled gender pay gap which is the one which is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 11:15 PM
1

From your article: "However, when analyzing the gender pay gap between women and men with the highest degree in their fields, there are certain occupations where women earn more than men. For instance, women working in petroleum engineering, on average, earn $27,000 more than men. On the other hand, women employed in environmental engineering fields have the highest gender pay gap of all engineering occupations." These gender pay gaps are without controlling for other factors they are just about…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 11:13 PM
1

So you don't even reply to what I said since you had no argument just feelings and you compare a country to every other one in OECD?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 11:10 PM
1

I didn't know that abortions have increased. I would like a source about that. If that's true it seems they have done it out of spite. How am I not motivated by babies dying? Wtf are you even saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 11:08 PM
1

How many women have died and how many babies have been saved?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:01 PM
1

Are you insane? How can you make laws that make pregnancy safer? That's something that has to do with healthcare and yes I support healthcare to be supported by taxes so that everyone can have access to healthcare. Also I think that abortion should be redefined and in the cases where you are removing a dead baby it shouldn't be called abortion because it logically isn't. You can't abort a dead being. Also I'm not a lawmaker and I'm not from the US so I can't change the laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:49 PM
1

"Yes they can but women have less wealth and structural power so less reach and influence over what hits the mainstream. Most people in power in those positions are men." Wrong women have more reach because society caters to them. And now especially with social media they can have a lot of reach. "Patriarchies will tend to be gynocentric since most men are straight. Solution? More gay guys. Like Ancient Greece. Very phallocentric. Or less patriarchy and more women being straight everywhere inste…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:44 PM
1

"It isn't about what is the "best" it's about who has the positions and resources to make and distribute and historically it has been men and even until very recently (last 100 years). These structures persist." It is about what's best. And women can do art that "cater" to women. "Men still occupy most positions of power therefore it is a patriarchy. It is as simple as that." This so called patriarchy doesn't benefit men because it is a gynocentric one. "No, because it's a stupid and ignorant qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 06:44 PM
1

When did I say that I don't want pregnancies to be safer? Are you hallucinating? I said that I don't want murder to happen. Should we now not criminalise murder because there are poor people according to you? Murderers should be punished, whether they are women or men it doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 06:33 PM
1

These are 2 different cases and who said that it's not a factor when the mother dies?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:45 PM
1

"Yeah. From a male perspective. And they can yes and are more than ever but men have and still to some extent hold most power in mass media and production." How else would you do a portrait or sculpture of a woman? From what kind of perspective? Again since they can do art why isn't theirs the best? "The more patriarchal a society, the more dangerous it is to women. See; history, India, many African countries, the Middle East. The west is what I call a "patriarchy lite". The most gender equal co…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:28 PM
1

Funny now these 2 links do not work. Maybe they don't work just for me.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 05:19 PM
1

So that the father's health doesn't deteriorate or he doesn't die. He needs to be in the childs life at full health. And again donating your organs isn't natural many times the body will refuse the organ whereas the pregnancy is natural, but again I can't expect a feminist to use logic or to be knowledgeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:06 PM
1

"Not necessarily but a society ruled by men isn't going to represent women or create art that is as fulfilling to women. Just the way it is. Same would be true in the reverse. Also "women's safety" isn't clear cut. You could say Islam cares deeply about women's safety - to the point they don't let women leave unchaperoned, but heavily masculine coded societies are actually the most dangerous for women. Don't mistake mate guarding in a society where women have diminished status as protection." Ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:01 PM
1

I already said that you can find other donors if there's a need for that and fathers have donated countlessly their organs for their children. You are a misandrist why do you act like you care about anyone else except for yourself and women?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:45 PM
1

What punishment? Not wanting someome murdered is punishment? Are you seriously saying that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:17 PM
2

"Yes; they get a society filtered through the masculine perspective; most art is made with them in mind, most religion and societal structure is from their psychological perspective and puts them at the top of the hierarchy in terms of potential status." Wait should men do art that appeases women now? Well men created religions and as for societal structure women's safety is the most important thing so men aren't the main focus. "No; men have an evolutionary incentive toward inequality (unlike w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:15 PM
1

No, my concern is not murdering anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:03 PM
2

Wtf are you saying lol? Most people don't attack someone just because of ones gender and most victims of violent crime are men. They wouldn't have targeted a man because they aren't gay not because they care about men so much. Sorry to hear about what happened to you! I hope you feel better! NISVS 2010 showed in the past 12 months, 1.1% of men were made to penetrate and 1.1% of women were raped. Table 2.1 & 2.2 on pages 18/19. NSIVS 2011 showed in the past 12 months, 1.7% of men were made to pen…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:52 PM
1

In what way was the article debunked lol? What sources do you have for your claims?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:49 PM
1

No they are not similar either. They are completely different. In the case of pregnancy you are not gifting any of your organs and the only way a human develops from conception is through pregnancy. There's no other way. Also pregnancy is natural whereas donating your organs isn't. Many times organs don't completely adapt and you have to get medicine in order to force the body to not fight the organ as far as I know. So these are completely 2 different things. Finally you threw out the misogyny …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:47 PM
1

You did imply that they are similar. Because a pregnancy is not the same as someone donating an organ. The only way for a human to develop from conception is through pregnancy. It's quite disingenious for you to compare that to donating organs when you can find another donor.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:26 AM
1

This is a critique to my link: https://nathannobis.medium.com/when-does-life-begin-and-are-fetuses-human-two-bad-questions-to-ask-about-abortion-12477b37e967 Here is a study writing about giving personhood to prebirth: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10067861/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:21 AM
0

You are indirectly comparing slavery to abortion by using the "leaving it to the states" argument. You didn't show that since leaving it to the states is only about the abortion issue not everything. I already gave you an article where the consensus is that life begins at conception. You now instead of conceding the argument change the subject to it not being proven. When the consesus between the scientists is that it is life you just disregard it because you want to retain the right to kill a b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:19 AM
1

When did I say that? But not donating your organs is not the same as neglect since it is the hospital that should provide the organs plus now if I'm not mistaken there are temporary plastic organs in some cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:12 AM
1

No I did not say that the only time murdering a baby is wrong is when the mother does it by not carrying it to term. That's a strawman. A father not sacrificing his body for the baby is not murder​ since a father can't get pregnant for the baby needing to develop. A woman does. Again a false equivalency. You forcefully remove a baby for abortion to happen. In the case of a father donating his organs he is not hurting the baby since the baby is not connected to him and the baby is not developing …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:12 AM
0

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36629778/ https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/fetus Don't compare slaverly to abortion that's not a good argument since they can't be compared. Abortion is a privilege. Someone who has an abortion is killing a human being whereas with slaverly you are subjugating a human being to do a job without consent. Abortion is not reproductive freedom it is murder. By your own logic a born baby is not a human since it is a human in development. Also someone …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:53 AM
3

You are welcome. But tbh I didn't do much since the website was already archived I just copy pasted it.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 01:46 AM
1

How can children be entitled to their father giving​ them all his organs and you compare it to pregnancy which is the natural way and the only way the human development at conception happens? A father will give his organ to his child if need be it's not something that has not happened, but it has never happened that all of someone's organs failing and needing replacement unless some kind of disease happens which I don't know if you can replace all the organs in that case At least I haven't heard…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:44 AM
0

Again it is a privilege to abort a baby. Men only had a say in not keeping women privileged they by and large still can't force them to not have an abortion since in most states it is allowed. Half of the baby's genetics come from the father so of course the abortion applies to them even if they can't have one. Look up the definition of fetus. It is quite black and white from the point of conception onwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:04 AM
1

Now you are shifting the goal posts. Since you just said what you said without proof you now have to just concede what I said. But that would prove the person's (who made the post) point that women aren't oppressed. That would also mean that the society is misandrist. And it was men and women who stacked the deck against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:00 AM
-1

Poland is a western country whereas on the conservatism thing that's another thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 12:51 AM
4

You say that I am illiterate but you don't even fully read what I sent: "When controlling for compensable factors, Technology, Engineering & Science, Education, and Healthcare achieve pay equity, closing the gender pay gap. These are industries that have stronger pay equity practices with more skilled labor. These are also industries with more salaried workers that may be affected by pay transparency legislation." Also my stats were for US. Are you polish?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 12:49 AM
1

Yes. Life starts at conception.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 12:24 AM
2

Does a "patriarchy" benefit men?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 12:20 AM
2

You are debating pointlessly. These women you are arguing with can't stop relying on false equivalencies, non issues or even inventing things out of nothing. They will never leave their victim position. They created a movement based on being a victim lol which from the start was misandrist. They will never accept that men are discriminated against or will just at best still blame it on men just as many have done which they don't even understand would mean that society is not misogynistic as they…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 12:00 AM
3

Wtf is a gendered crime lol?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 11:50 PM
1

Now sorry to hear what happened to you, but now you want to have sex with everyone because of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 11:44 PM
1

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00038-018-1097-3 Funny how many women use the "biology" argument when it benefits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 11:31 PM
0

Women want the right to kill babies and you compare it to removing men's possibility of having kids physically. How can these 2 things be compared to each other? You can compare female castration to male castration not 2 completely different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 11:27 PM
2

Are you really that attractive?/j
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 11:06 PM
2

Wrong it's men who have the deck stacked against them not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 11:01 PM
3

The duluth model. The education system which is run by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:58 PM
0

Abortion is not a right, but a privilege. A woman wanting to kill her unborn child is a privilege not a right. And men don't have a say at all in abortion. They don't have reproductive rights. So how is it again that women are oppressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:56 PM
4

Women are "achieving" more in education because men are being discriminated against.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:02 PM
5

The controlled gender pay gap in the US is only 1%. Funny that you like to discriminate towards men for "diversity" issues. https://www.payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-gap/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 09:59 PM
3

https://photius.com/feminocracy/facts_on_fatherless_kids.html
/r/MensRights29/11/24 09:23 PM
1

The thing is that they are safer because they are less likely to drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs or are less likely to drive at higher speeds, not because they are better drivers because if I'm not mistaken women have more minor accidents. That's why they use the "safer driver" naming and not the "better drivers" because they know that men are better drivers lol. If men drank less or used less drugs or drove at lower speeds the difference would completely go away and maybe even go …
/r/MensRights29/11/24 09:21 PM
4

https://archive.is/2023.02.21-161156/https://www.gilmorehealth.com/men-are-20-times-more-likely-than-women-to-be-killed-by-the-police-regardless-of-race/
/r/MensRights29/11/24 09:16 PM
1

Thanks for the info! It would be better if you changed the title of the post since people could be confused and think that it was a female who did this crime and not a male.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 06:40 PM
2

https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/u6oqDnm6j6A
/r/MensRights29/11/24 06:37 PM
2

Thank you for the info!
/r/MensRights29/11/24 06:08 PM
1

Oh ok thanks! Do you have some article for that?
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:50 PM
1

Do you have an article?
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:49 PM
1

An article that I found online said that the cctv footage wasn't of the woman in question: https://www.thejournal.ie/debunked-footage-nikita-hand-beacon-hotel-6556733-Nov2024/
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:23 PM
1

Wait where did you get the info that the person wasn't female?
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:01 PM
2

Go search on google "boys do more child labor than girls" click the unicef link and copy it. Copy paste it somewhere else and you will see that you have copied a link about female genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 05:53 PM
5

Go search on google "boys do more child labor than girls" click the unicef link and copy it. Copy paste it somewhere else and you will see that you have copied a link about female genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 05:52 PM
10

"Sorry but this seems to be following a similar line of reasoning to radical feminists’: assuming that the only explanation for a disparity must be one particular sort of discrimination." This is not even nearly the same thing. In this case there are actually more men wanting to go to that field whereas when there is a debate about the disparity between the genders where the men are more represented in a field men do go more to that field. This is a false equivalency fallacy. Whether the reason …
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:50 PM
7

"They're in a simulation that it's okay to grope men cuz all men want it. And they think that cuz ages of Men acted like it and determined that wanting all the sex is being a Man. Which traps the ones who don't." How come those women can escape the simulation when it benefits them just like for example sexual harassment or sexual assault towards women, but not when it doesn't benefit them like the same action being committed towards men?
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:46 PM
6

How can you compare wanting to kill someone with a joke that I control your body (which is related to women not having the right to kill babies lol most likely)?
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:37 PM
1

My question was made to the other person and was used to evaluate his position on the current state of affairs. He mentioned that he has military experience, but you didn't mention if that information was loaded or not. And frankly I don't care if you think that my questions are rude or not since they weren't towards you or other people except the specific person I was writing to. Those questions were needed since they were to gauge his position when it comes to men. Feminists in Britain used bo…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 05:35 PM
-1

I don't think that discrimination should happen. But in populations with an european majority white men are discriminated against and it is to some extent their fault since they have been cucked (I don't mean it literally) to basically simp for women and to accept everything that anyone says or does to them. It's why this happens and if white men had the mentality that older generations which build those societies had this wouldn't happen and they would still be the best.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:17 PM
0

So are you ok with the current state of things?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:04 PM
1

And who are you going to support?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 09:52 PM
2

They only hate white men because white men have been the most succesful group and have created the most succesful societies of all time. That's why they emphasize the bad things that white men have done even though you can find men in all countries or continents have done bad things or men in all continents have subjugated other people of other countries. The reason why they are so open about this is because white men have created the most free and safe countries on earth. Also another reason mi…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 09:43 PM
3

Yes the family structure was the best because women stayed home and even extended family helped with he kids (depending on where you lived, but I think this was true for the US too). Yeah promiscuity was heavily frowned upon and there weren't many children being born outsideof wedlock and most men I think could be married and have kids unlike today where a minority of men fuck half or over half of women. And female promiscuity destroys the family (even though male promiscuity has disadvantages t…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/24 03:17 PM
1

And what proof do you have for that?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 08:33 PM
1

Where did you get that? Especially since they allowed this misandrist bullshit in their website.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 04:33 PM
1

Funny, seeing as men on average live less than women and both men and women who are married live longer than their single counterparts. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7452000/
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 04:30 PM
6

Because people didn't hate their own race and had babies.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 04:28 PM
2

You can see how social leftist views are destroying societies especially those with an european majority if you look at birth rates. And there are still many men who view those views as positive whilst those views being quite destructive and which if it's going to be around for centuries to come it will lead to the extinction of european ethnicites. If you don't believe me look at Rome for example. One of the most powerful empires to ever exist and they don't exist anymore. https://www.thearchae…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 04:17 PM
2

Funny how even the language is gendered. MGTOW is viewed as misogynist whereas 4b is viewed as only radical feminist movement, but not a misandrist one on wikipedia.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 04:12 PM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20241111153905/https://documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=55305
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/24 03:41 PM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20160121172320/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:37 PM
1

I have a question. Are lifetime estimates of rape accurate? And are the lifetime stats more accurate or the 12 month stats?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:53 PM
2

I sent to you 4 studies in total and you just focused on one. If men are liked less just on the basis of their gender how do you think ugly men would be thought of as? You also seem to forget or don't know about "the halo effect" (which means that attractive people are liked more) so you can infer from that how much ugly men are liked or not. You just used an anecdote of a fat woman being riddiculed at the gym, but you forget that men are insulted too for being at the gym and women even have the…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:16 PM
1

So this proves that average men (AVERAGE) are liked less than women so of course that ugly men would be treated worse. That's not the only study I posted, I posted 3 other studies. Which shows how men are viewed as. What does women having poor experiences have to do with ugly men being treated worse?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:41 PM
0

Yes since you made that claim. It is clear that sexual harassment is subjective, but you think otherwise. You even have studies proving that, but still you don't agree so it is your claim to prove.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:37 PM
2

Because the world incel is used more in my opinion and it is used even when you disagree with someone and it is a word which tries to dehumanise men since it has quite a negative connotation. Unlike ugly words towards women which usually are only focused on women's apperances whereas incel is used to say that a man is a woman hater, can't get a woman to fuck or like him, or you can even infer that he is antisocial.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:05 PM
2

It's about genders. I already said that I don't have stats about ugly men vs ugly women. But you can infer from this that ugly men would be treated worse and I already mentioned how ugly men have the incel connotation and how they are treated.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:55 PM
2

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342642686_Man_up_and_take_it_Gender_bias_in_moral_typecasting https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341827530_2018_Article_The_Moral_Machine https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8226295_Gender_Differences_in_Automatic_In-Group_Bias_Why_Do_Women_Like_Women_More_Than_Men_Like_Men https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mar.21480
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:02 AM
4

I can give you studies for men and women on average, but not specifically ugly men and ugly women. But you have the word "incel" which is used towards below average men to notice how those kinds of men are treated.​
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:59 AM
1

It's sad that you have deleted your account, but I wanted to say thank you for caring about men if you ever lurk on this subreddit again.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:56 AM
1

https://archive.is/2024.11.09-180748/https://www.elle.com/uk/news-politics/a62849491/sex-strike-trump-afua-hirsch/
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:04 AM
4

Wrong, women are protected and cared for by society. Even those who are ugly. You can't even say that for the average man (that society cares for them).
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:00 AM
1

What is real sexual harassment?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:39 AM
1

"Nonetheless, women often have a biased interpretation of whether a catcall is uncomfortable or not. In a survey of women about street harassment, they found most catcalls usually just involve whistles, stares, sexual comments or comments about their appearance. Grabbing or fondling was relatively unusual. Typically, they considered it uncomfortable if they were alone or it was nighttime. Some said it was uncomfortable if it was on public transportation or the streets, but it was less uncomforta…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:22 AM
1

It seems a study 6 years after your comment says that in fact the book was written by the actual author. I don't know how accurate the study is though. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://academic.oup.com/dsh/article/38/2/750/6773078&ved=2ahUKEwjwgYGXstCJAxUULRAIHT7_K9QQFnoECCwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1XqChrfmfOxysPTQR-dPS3
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:39 PM
1

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.909811/full
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:52 PM
1

https://archive.is/2013.11.26-221934/http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/418234/Co-op-threatens-to-ban-harmful-lads-mags-in-censorship-ultimatum
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:21 AM
1

https://archive.is/2017.08.10-011422/https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/suzanne-venker-on-womens-rights-mens-responsibilities-and-why-she-divorced-her-first-husband/
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:52 PM
1

https://archive.is/2014.03.03-220701/http://theantifeminist.com/are-all-feminists-rapists-a-thought-experiment/
/r/MensRights07/11/24 10:39 PM
1

https://archive.is/2014.05.12-154919/http://theantifeminist.com/all-feminists-are-rapists-meme-redux/
/r/MensRights07/11/24 10:38 PM
1

Even if lets suppose that every female victim has been targeted by gender hatred is true that still doesn't justify targeting men to harm them if I'm getting what you are saying right.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 01:39 AM
1

https://archive.is/2023.05.11-071208/https://areomagazine.com/2017/08/09/assessing-female-mate-preferences-answers-to-ten-common-criticisms-of-evolutionary-psychology/
/r/MensRights22/10/24 05:10 PM
0

That's related to getting married though. I did say that you maybe should consider not being married at all in wealthy western countries. And I did say that you can have kids even whilst being in long term relationships.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 03:32 PM
1

You are welcome!
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:34 PM
1

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yue-Qian/publication308706518_Gender_Asymmetry_in_Educational_and_Income_Assortative_Marriage/links/59ed31eca6fdccef8b0dc686/Gender-Asymmetry-in-Educational-and-Income-Assortative-Marriage.pdf https://academic.oup.com/esr/article/36/3/351/5688045 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340068405_Sex_Differences_in_Mate_Preferences_Across_45_Countries_A_Large-Scale_Replication https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335623782_Mismatches_in_the_Marriage_Marke…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:33 PM
3

Thank you for the previous sources! I will check them later. And thank you for the current source. In fact men with a high school diploma make a little more than women with an associate degree, but the difference is really small. I am from an eastern european country (don't want to specify) and I haven't checked the stats for my country tbh, but I am quite confident that men make more. And more women go to college (or university how we call it here). If I remember correctly the difference is sim…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:27 PM
2

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_155.asp https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/actually-50-years-of-test-scores-do-confirm-that-boys-outperform-girls-on-the-sat-math-test/
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:48 PM
2

I think that the issue of education is in the whole world not only in the US, but the results could differ some countries are better and some countries are worse. Schools are not equipped to truly teach in my opinion since learning is more than sitting in a subject and listening someone explaining a subject and completing some tasks. To truly learn something you need to learn it by yourself. School don't really teach how to learn to students which in my view is quite a large part of not achievin…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:35 PM
3

You are just saying it to not seem biased because I don't really think that you think that. And my question didn't have anything to do with that, my question was why is one accepted in society online or in the media whereas the other one isn't?
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:16 PM
0

What's title IV-D?
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:40 PM
6

Sorry to hear that man! I hope you are feeling better!
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:31 PM
9

Why is male hate is accepted while female hate is not (even though there isnt really a lot of hate or not all things that are called hate are really hate just like in this case when the guys were mentioning sexual dynamics)? I would say it is due to women are wonderful effect.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:30 PM
2

https://interpersona.psychopen.eu/index.php/interpersona/article/view/3469 Even though the difference was small there was a difference of half a point in advantage of men having more unconditional love
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:25 PM
0

Certainly get cameras, but I would say spread your seed if you can lol since it is one of the basic tenets of being a living being.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:22 PM
9

That's why guys should negotiate having kids in their own terms and when they want to and not be with run through women especially if guys haven't been with many women and have build a good level of income and have improved themselves in whatever way they could.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:21 PM
27

That's why guys shouldn't be fools and marry without thinking about it at all. Or maybe they shouldn't marry at all especially in western countries. They could have kids by just being in long term relationships.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:18 PM
5

Men have made modern life so comfortable and they have made it possible to fecundate through ivf that people think that men aren't needed lol. This just shows me that who says these kinds of things doesn't know how reproduction works lol.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:10 PM
9

Congratulations on your life man! I hope that you live even more happily!
/r/MensRights21/10/24 07:36 PM
3

Was the metro strike made by men?
/r/MensRights21/10/24 07:33 PM
1

What are you saying lol? I wasn't flirting with you. I was only asking what do they these hot women offer since you said that they "have lots to offer". Idk how you thought that I was speaking about you since I don't know how you look or how old are you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 07:26 PM
1

The average woman makes less than the average men so where did you get that men are marrying their equal socioeconomically? https://archive.is/2024.10.21-183039/https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2024/median-weekly-earnings-1227-for-men-1021-for-women-first-quarter-2024.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 06:28 PM
1

[But then they get really angry at the “delusional” women who are young and thin and hot and have lots to offer a relationship try to get men of the same caliper. Because “their standards are too high.”] What do they have to offer to the relationship besides being hot?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 06:26 PM
1

Precisely. Men shouldn't stop approaching attractive women because they think that she is out of their league. At best you can have a night with her or a relatiinship and at worst you might get a humiliation or get called a creep which it doesn't mean that it will not happen if they approach less attractive or unattractive women. That is if they don't have a problem with rejection or with being insulted or called a creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 06:17 PM
1

Men do love more unconditionally than women whether you want to accept that or not: https://interpersona.psychopen.eu/index.php/interpersona/article/view/3469
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 05:52 PM
1

https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/female-victims-sexual-violence-1994-2010
/r/MensRights20/10/24 09:53 PM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20120103184829/http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf
/r/MensRights20/10/24 09:52 PM
1

https://www.zlibrary.to/dl/the-privileged-sex
/r/MensRights20/10/24 03:01 AM
1

What traditionalism do Swiss women follow? Or is it just some made up term over there?
/r/MensRights20/10/24 02:37 AM
1

https://archive.is/2022.05.02-165052/http://age-records.125mb.com/
/r/MensRights20/10/24 02:09 AM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20200902153808/https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=13620&fbclid=IwAR1zxexkrfKy5VeGcW0IC-hUy6mgUMQS4F8di_Eyk3ZDt2jhMVgtTcX6WcA
/r/MensRights19/10/24 10:34 PM
1

Precisely. Unless stated by the perpretrator it would be quick to judge an act of violence as an act of hatred towards the gender of that person.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 10:25 PM
1

Precisely. Men build the world so they should try to go into those subjects as much as possible because the world needs to build the world again. With one caveat though we should learn from history the pas and the present and see that the western model of society with girlbosses and woman empowerment and whatever else doesn't really work. Birth rates are low if things continue like this the later centuries ethnicites could be wiped out. And the current social landscape supports this sort of livi…
/r/MensRights19/10/24 08:59 PM
3

Thank you for the article! Misandrists should be revealed. That's why free speech is amazing. https://archive.is/2015.11.03-171831/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/03/bahar-mustafa-charges-dropped-killallwhitemen-row https://web.archive.org/web/20240114164352/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/03/bahar-mustafa-charges-dropped-killallwhitemen-row
/r/MensRights19/10/24 08:47 PM
2

She doesn't mention at all that boys are discriminated in school and that hampers opportunities to going to college (because it's against her agenda). Also she wants men to accept femininity as if they can't just be masculine and have to be feminine just because she says so. Also there are few times when boys can do physical activities in school or in college (unless you have an athletic scholarship). But it would be good if there were male only colleges or even male only public schools maybe. A…
/r/MensRights19/10/24 07:05 PM
1

If we go by the logic of feminists or women who think the same as feminists, but they don't say that they are one of we go by violence statistics alone as they do we live in a much more misandrist country since men are disproportionally victims of violent crime. Also domestic violence (at least in the US) it's at least equal if not women are the major perpertrators. https://familieslink.co.uk/download/sept07/Reciprocal%20violence%20AJPH.pdf https://archive.ph/SuGxj https://www.sciencedirect.com/…
/r/MensRights19/10/24 05:02 PM
1

Sure in terms of totalitarianism. But on the political spectrum they are polar opposites. Also communism lasted longer and it still exists.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 04:57 PM
1

Exactly. Free market is hated by both socialists/communists and by corporations.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 10:23 PM
2

I am neither a socialist and neither a communist. My country had communism so I know the extent of evil that it can go to. I consider myself a capitalist, I just don't think that companies should do whatever they want or to buy as many businesses as they want. Also I especially have a problem with american social media companies censoring speech or being given the ability to do so. They should at most adhere to the first amendment or to have free speech be absolute in my view.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 09:53 PM
4

Also just by these stats it seems that men have the same quality of life and that women in the US live longer. It shows who lives a better life among the genders.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 09:48 PM
1

At least the guy you linked used his wealth to do that and for that I applaud him despite his obvious mistakes. Unlike the creators of communism/socialism.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 09:43 PM
1

Thank you for the link! https://web.archive.org/web/20240417054502/https://mensrights.com.au/feminism/marxist-feminisms-ruined-lives-mallory-millett-1sept-2014 https://archive.is/2024.10.18-213223/https://mensrights.com.au/feminism/marxist-feminisms-ruined-lives-mallory-millett-1sept-2014
/r/MensRights18/10/24 09:37 PM
1

Communism does the same thing lol. And which regime lasted longer I wonder? Fascism or communism?
/r/MensRights18/10/24 09:30 PM
1

In whatever case it isn't derogatory. You mentioned a case where it could be derogatory even though it isn't. So you think that saying female is more derogatory than person with a uterus lol. That logic doesn't make sense since if you don't have a problem with saying person with a uterus there shouldn't be a problem with saying female since it is basically the same thing (even if you use men for males and female for women). Also women are the ones who don't what a woman is since they think that …
/r/MensRights18/10/24 07:48 PM
2

Yes, in this specific scenario sure they are blaming 2 groups for their failures, but the scenario is different since one is based on economics which you have some control whereas in terms of dating you have less control. It's harder or impossible maybe to become attractive to a woman you like or to even have a woman like you especially if you are ugly not to mention the other criteria of the list like money being charming or so on. It's easier to learn a skill and go up the ladder in terms of y…
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:23 PM
1

Do you have sources that counter the claims made in the third post you linked in your post history? Also why did you link this link? Women weren't really excluded from research and when that happened it was due to concern for women's health and especially when they were pregnant. https://web.archive.org/web/20100430061624/https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96jun/cancer/kadar.htm https://journals.lww.com/epidem/fulltext/2001/09000/did_medical_research_routinely_exclude_women__an.20.aspx
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:08 PM
1

If you find evidence in favour of feminists they would then just be more hardheaded in their movement. So I don't think that they will rethink their actions lol.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:03 PM
1

Does it surprise me what?
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:01 PM
1

Sure neither side really cares about men, but the right hasn't spout hatred towards men like the left has done. Also if I'm not mistaken the right has done something to strike down false accusations of sexual assault towards men, but I don't have a source on me right now so take it with a grain of salt. Also I don't think that it is a good decision to choose someone just to spite them since if you were an american you and other men would be the ones who would suffer her reign the most.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:59 PM
2

"So most of what happens to men shouldn't be called as misandry, but the standards for crime being hatred are so low that "apples to apples" misandry is basically everything not misogyny." From this I didn't got that. Either I am reading it wrong and I don't understand it or you wrote something wrong. But what I'm getting from that is that misandry is blown out of proportion. Men don't really say that crimes that women commit on men are misandry. Men only say that it is misandrism when the crime…
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:54 PM
3

Yes both want to undermine competition because of their greed to have more than others. At least with companies you know what you get whereas socialism wants to sell to you a beautiful lie. Also it easier to stop big business (or wealthy people) than communism/socialism. 20th and 21st centuries show that.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:25 PM
3

Just like communists/socialists do.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:23 PM
0

No, you can say that both use immigration or that they get immigrants to enter in a country, but it would be disingenious to say that conservatives are more pro immigration, but I guess your partisanship is so important to you that you create false information about immigration lol.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:21 PM
4

Sure change the gender and get the the award lool.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:15 PM
4

There's no socialism in european countries. There are only mixed economies
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:12 AM
2

Prior to 50's there was a higher spending according to your link.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:11 AM
3

In order to have a high trust society you need to have more homogeniety which as a leftist I don't think that it is something you want. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335924797_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_A_Narrative_and_Meta-Analytical_Review
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:09 AM
6

There's no truly free market capitalism anywhere. Most countries are mixed economies. For free market to exist there should be no regulation for businesses at all (theoretically at least). But if you do that in current times with big companies existing they will have quite an easy time to stomp your business and build oligarchies or monopolies anyway. Also due to ignorance of the masses a true free market without regulations at all can't exist in my view.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:00 AM
10

Also because those groups (except for christianity) are mostly comprised of men and many women if not most don't like men having their own spaces and enjoying themselves without women.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:56 AM
6

It basically means to rely on yourself to improve your life.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:54 AM
6

No feminism perfectly aligns with communism/socialism or the far left. They want others to provide for them. Conservatives don't think that.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:52 AM
16

Now do it with white men and see the AI go crazy lol.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:31 AM
6

She most likely hates white men.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/10/24 08:17 PM
1

"So most of what happens to men shouldn't be called as misandry" So what do you call it? It isn't men who have a lax description or use of the term misandrism. It's women who do it with misogyny. Don't confuse the 2 cases. What would you call discrimination in educaction workplace, sentencing, healthcare and so on if not misandrism?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 06:03 PM
1

Men's rights activists or men who aren't MRA, but support it call everyone who is a misandrist a misandrist. If most feminists are women then it is directed to those people. If a single woman is a misandrist then she is a misandrist. If a man is a misandrist he is a misandrist. The word isn't really targeted in a gendered way. The gendered notion only comes from who is doing the misandrism.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:52 PM
3

I still don't get how she got the nobel price in economics. Shouldn't the nobel price be for some extraordinary work?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:43 PM
1

Lol. Female is dehumanising, but person with a uterus is not when both are highlighting the sex of the person.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:16 PM
1

Yeah, but the controlled part of the 20 cents is one cent not 0.25 cents. Since the gap is 1 cent to a dollar that men earn. It's used 99 cent to 1 dollar for ease of expression. If it were 1% of 20% gap it would be 0.05 cents.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:10 PM
2

So female is derogatory, but saying a person with a uterus isn't? Aren't both terms highlighting the sex of a person?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:05 PM
3

I think that men don't use female in a derogative manner even when they use men for men. It's mostly the way they were used to say it to women. Whereas feminists use it to dehumanise men since they consciously use it in order to paint men as animals. Men don't typically think of women as animals or less than so Idk that it is the same scenario. If there even is some bias to men saying female it most likely is subconscious.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 04:59 PM
1

No, your are confusing the 2 gaps. The 20 cent wage gap is the uncontrolled gap. The 1% or 1 cent gap is the controlled gap. 99 cents for every 1 dollar a man makes.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 04:45 PM
1

"Well said. That’s what was trying to get at earlier. Even if the 1% of the uncontrolled variables of a 20 cent pay gap is due to entirely to discrimination (unlikely), we are talking about a fraction of a penny to the dollar. That’s an incredibly small consequence compared to so much of the discrimination makes face." No the 1% gap is of a dollar so 99 cents to a dollar tha men earn. It isn't related to the uncontrolled gap. But yes as I previously said it is a really small problem which could …
/r/MensRights17/10/24 04:37 PM
17

Wait, do you even know the birth rate in european countries and In the US Canada or Australia? Because it is below replacement rate in all those countries. And the government of course instead of asking women to be responsible and have more babies for the country (just like men have put their lives on the line and still do for the country, and not only in wars, but in physically taxing jobs too.) they instead take migrants in without even having background checks on them because women's whims ar…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 04:31 PM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20221126195519/https://www.iq.harvard.edu/files/iqss-harvard/files/dube_harish_queens_nov2016.pdf
/r/MensRights17/10/24 04:20 PM
1

"However to the OP’s point, what the public is hearing isn’t driven by facts so much as it is by agenda, that agenda including not only biased reviews, but burying legit data and making propaganda more prevalent." This is the biggest problem. And now unfortunately the propaganda is working against men and especially white men in the US or wealthy european countries. Which I'm afraid will lead to even worse conditions for boys and men especially in pursuing science. Scientific research lies on th…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 04:14 PM
1

That's what I am saying. Someone who practices science shouldn't rely on ideology for interpreting their results. When I read it it said that they controlled for compensable factors. But do these compensable factors take into account hours worked and assertivenes? https://eddy.com/hr-encyclopedia/compensable-factors/ "Compensable factors help employers decide how much a job is worth by identifying the most valuable elements of each position in your workforce: the factors on which you base compen…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:59 PM
3

How do you reconcile the fact that married queens were more likely than married men to attack with men causing most wars? That's not a fair comparision since there were far more kings than queens so in absolute numbers of course men caused most of the wars. But when you do a qualitative study you can speak about gender differences as evidenced in this study. Women need support in order to fully use their power and when they do have that they are worse than men. That's it. It completely shatters …
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:57 PM
1

The controlled gap is only 1% and in 9 years the highest gap was 3%. I am not speaking about the uncontrolled one since it isn't fair to the guys who take on the hardest or the most physically taxing jobs in the economy and that they work more hours and so on. I want to know what causes the 1% of the controlled gap though. The payscale study says that it is due to discrimination, but it could also be due to other things.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:47 PM
1

I didn't read it I just saw it when I was looking for the consad study. It might be due to feminism or even gynocentrism tbh that it was discredited. This study was in 2019 so it was republicans which discredited it I guess which is wierd, but not completely unexpected since as always the interests of women are priority. I have another report which said that the controlled gender pay gap is 1%, but I don't know if they truly took everything into consideration: https://www.payscale.com/research-a…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:18 PM
4

It does load for me you just have to wait a little. You are welcome! Are you speaking about this study: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WB/media/WB_Gender-Based-Pay-Disparity-Study_4-6-21.pdf Idk how accurate this is tbh since it could have been manipulated by feminists as you say.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:27 AM
13

Is it this the consad study you were speaking off? https://web.archive.org/web/20090620083700/http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:00 AM
4

Thank you for linking the post!
/r/MensRights17/10/24 01:26 AM
1

Do you remember the study?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 12:57 AM
0

Are you saying that that study you linked is true?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 12:32 AM
2

The first link is mentions that 1 in 5 women are raped, I don't know how true it is tbh. And the second one is just a self reported study. I'm not saying that you believe in those studies btw. Funny how the first link said that women are less likely to have a traumatic event happen in their life. https://www.nsvrc.org/publications/NISVS-2010-summary-report
/r/MensRights17/10/24 12:25 AM
3

No, the phrase would be better if you put "women are strong" first and then contrast it with the "we have PTSD now" lol
/r/MensRights17/10/24 12:21 AM
3

Thank you for the first link!
/r/MensRights16/10/24 10:24 PM
11

Women don't want masculinity and even said that men shouldn't approach them. Now they have to reap the consequences of their decisions.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:16 PM
1

So this means that those men were gone seeking whales so that's why the women were running the businesses? Sure I did not oppose the claim that there were women who did run businesses, but I only doubt the claim that most women did so.​
/r/MensRights16/10/24 08:46 PM
8

It is the best time to live in technologically speaking. Economically in the west not so much. Socially not at all. There's no paradox in all ways of life it's just based on what prism you view life in. Socially it sure is a paradox.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:06 PM
2

I don't like revisionist history being done by feminists, but I don't like this other thing either. How can most businesses be run by women? Is he saying that men can't run businesses since that would be against the whole history of humanity and even today you see the best businessmen being men. It's in the word itself lol. And what is whaling?
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:42 PM
2

It seems I have downloaded it before, but thank you anyway! It is great that be can debunk that claims that women were viewed as less as human or that they were more oppressed than men.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:00 PM
2

Thank you for the source! Do you have more sources for privileges or rights women had in older times?
/r/MensRights16/10/24 04:24 PM
2

Idk about millions, but many people have died mostly men at that. The fact that they want to kill babies in the womb because they are inconvienced is not a good thing, idk how society was fooled into thinking this was a good thing, but I guess that this shows that society is soo gynocentric that everyone else is second to that.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 04:04 PM
1

Why would you care to find evidence for feminists?
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:53 PM
3

Thank you for steelmanning their arguments since that way we can debate them better! One thing though recently you said that you would vote for Harris even though she said that the government doesn't decide what to do with men's bodies. How can you vote for a person that doesn't acknowledge men's issues at all?
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:50 PM
2

Your link only speaks about how feminists think that men's rights hate women and that they are illogical, but they also think that most men's rights are traditional lol. Also they put the blame of men's issues on patriarchy so men again. That's no proof that men's rights hate women just that feminists think that men's rights hate women. It's not men who are privileged in society and it's not men's rights who have worked to advantage men and disadvantage women. We can see who truly hates who base…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:43 PM
1

This just shows that abortion is a power move for feminists. They want to have full on privilege about deciding if babies are human or not and if they are worth of life or not and have full on privilege to get rid of the baby like it is some piece of cloth. Also men should have complete responsibility otherwise men shouldn't have had sex according to them lol. This is why the only fair thing is for abortion to be banned and thus men having responsibility for their kid. Men not being able to deci…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:34 PM
1

In the third reddit post you linked do you have sources that debunk the claims and sources that the woman did in the comment section?
/r/MensRights16/10/24 02:59 PM
6

Feminists do hate men. You can't be part of a misandrist movement who hates men and then say that you aren't misandrist yourself.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 07:15 PM
1

That question is more appropriate to be asked to feminist women and men, but if you want a short answer it basically is misandrism.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:02 AM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/humor-sapiens/201910/are-men-really-funnier-women
/r/MensRights14/10/24 04:25 AM
1

Feminist's sexist or hate speech against men: https://archive.is/2024.09.30-163843/https://www.facebook.com/feministnews.us/posts/pfbid037v9ZzeGqnzEm5kJ2QZR9s258mpZn9CoQyF3LHL4jYcTyXq3xzXP9eQSkTq6JWxjgl https://web.archive.org/web/20240418145527/https://antibullyingcentre.ie/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DCU-Toxicity-Full-Report.pdf https://archive.is/2024.09.30-170134/https://www.facebook.com/feministnews.us/posts/pfbid0a4QVX3wrsrjnP8f1KWQQaiGQJyMkJrtynEMz6nYfVuv5fsCg4iBZQT2e2DYbs5PKl https://web.…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:35 AM
2

Feminist's sexist or hate speech against men: https://web.archive.org/web/20240918103800/https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/clementine-ford-apologises-after-tweeting-coronavirus-isnt-killing-men-fast-enough/news-story/f87086f85ce4adda0bed7249efdbe7ae https://archive.is/2024.09.30-021600/https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1819007216214573268 https://www.instagram.com/p/C8pWoLSN4sn/?igsh=eHU5MmoxcDhyYWg5 https://web.archive.org/web/20220822203710/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/fema…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:33 AM
2

Feminist's sexist or hate speech against men: https://archive.is/nr26b https://www.azquotes.com/author/30006-Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/elizabeth_cady_stanton_765261 https://misandry.tripod.com/id6.html https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/germaine-greer-quotes#:\~:text=I%20think%20that%20testosterone%20is%20a%20rare%20poison.&text=One%20may%20not%20reach%20the,the%20path%20of%20the%20night.&text=The%20essence%20of%20pleasure%20is%20spontaneity.&text=The%20tragedy%20…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:29 AM
1

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/domestic-violence-super-bowl-sunday/ Don't put feminism in with children since it doesn't have anything to do with them. It has only got to do with females and in the children part there are boys too but feminists don't care about them.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:23 AM
1

The article doesn't actually mention stats it's just a feminist bullshit article where they say that women have the same libido level or something like that so they need sexual variety too. It also mentions that just because women want to be more adventurous it doesn't mean that they will cheat and you can make things better so that women don't feel bored so it's most likely something to make men do whatever women want even though I don't have actual proof for that. In fact millennial women and …
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:05 AM
1

Yeah we can't do something about it it seems we live in the age of stupidity at least in older times they didn't have enough knowledge and the means to access it freely, but in today's day and age there is so this level of stupidity is surprising to say the least.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 02:47 AM
3

What threatening behavouir was there? Sexual harassment which includes catcaing is subjective so what I said earlier still stands. This is an attack on free speech and an attack on men specifically since if a woman sexually harasses a man they won't take it seriously. They don't even consider a woman forcing a man to sleep with her rape for fucks sake. This just shows how strong and independent women truly are when they can't even stand some words and they have to censor people for that.​
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:09 AM
7

Catcalling is subjective. It can be anything a woman says. "Many women feeling scared and intimidated and seek out alternative running routes or changing the times they go out to avoid cat calling, offensive comments and physical harassment." "Bradford Council can also enforce its Public Space Protection Order which bans the anti-social use of vehicles and includes 'shouting, swearing at, or abusing, threatening or intimidating another person – including using sexual language or making sexual su…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:31 PM
3

https://www.beta.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/meanweeklyhoursworkedbymencomparedtowomen#:\~:text=In%20the%20period%20November%202022,of%2027.8%20hours%20per%20week. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/bulletins/timeuseintheuk/23septemberto1october2023#:\~:text=Women%20spent%20an%20average%20of,2%20hours%20and%2043%20minutes.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:17 PM
2

You have to take something into account. In the US the second most cited reason for divorce is cheating which don't get me wrong Idk how true it is, but that's second most mentioned reason. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/divorce/divorce-statistics/ Also look at the stats for 2021, they are interesting even though most likely they were influenced by the pandemic: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/divorce/common-causes-divorce/
/r/MensRights13/10/24 09:56 PM
3

You said that women do most housework and work 40 hours work week (which I doubt that they work 40 hours, but anyway) you forget that men work more hours than women and men make up the majority of those working in blue collar jobs which are sone of the hardest jobs to do physically and many men will have issues from working in those jobs.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 09:53 PM
12

So waving a flag in front of someone means that someone has the right to punch you, but if you punch someone the other person can't do that to you because you are a woman? Am I getting this right? And I don't condone him waving the scarf in front of her and I don't know the story behind it, but why did she react immediately in punching him?
/r/MensRights13/10/24 08:33 PM
1

I think that you cut the link that's why it didn't work.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:14 PM
24

This is the feminist utopia the destruction of all western societies and by extent the western civilization.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:56 PM
42

This is nothing more than censoring speech. UK is looking more and more like a communist country. I thought that women were strong and independent, but they are scared of someone finding them sexually attractive?
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:55 PM
16

So if someone says to a woman that she is hot, she isn't safe?
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:51 PM
1

Here is another source for your question: https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/female-victims-sexual-violence-1994-2010
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:47 PM
1

Still it doesn't make sense that 2 people have the same comment.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:40 PM
1

Your link doesn't work again. Is it this one?: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1b142j7/study_shows_fifty_percent_of_men_self_report/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:37 PM
1

"During World War I, Orczy formed the Women of England's Active Service League, an unofficial organisation aimed at encouraging women to persuade men to volunteer for active service in the armed forces. Her aim was to enlist 100,000 women who would pledge "to persuade every man I know to offer his service to his country". Some 20,000 women joined her organisation.\13])\14]) Orczy strongly opposed the Soviet Union.\15])" Also here's women creating an organisation to persuade men into going to war…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:24 PM
1

https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/White-Feather-Movement/
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:23 PM
1

I thought you might have the results of those studies since I wanted to know what kind of result did they want to show by manipulating the proof.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:18 PM
1

And what is the conclusion of those studies, that meat is bad or good?
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:26 AM
2

Your link doesn't work. It says "internal server error".
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:19 AM
1

If I'm not mistaken 1 or 2 of those women were feminists.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:03 AM
1

https://home.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/htdocs/assault.htm
/r/MensRights13/10/24 02:58 AM
1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/bhr/1976/penal-code_html/Bahrain_Penal_Code_Decree_No_15_of_1976_EN_translation_-_non_official.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjb8qDMqIqJAxU7h_0HHSE0CjcQFnoECBEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0EsAuWn1FLde6njCRJka_3
/r/MensRights13/10/24 02:33 AM
4

Even though I don't like censoring speech using something like this against people who want to censor men is funny lol and you could also say deserving. Edit: Even though I don't understand how this could be though of as sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:25 PM
1

Sure there are many guys who buy into the feminist ideology, but it doesn't mean that they are the majority. Red pill, mgtow and black pill are growing I think since I see the kind of comments which make you think that they belong in the groups I mentioned in posts that might not have anything to do with red pill or the other ideologies.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 08:22 PM
3

If those women were shaming men into fighting they are complicit no matter what you say. No one is saying that the men in power who decided to sent men to war are guiltless all I'm saying is that those women are at fault too.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 08:20 PM
2

https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-campus-rape-myth
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:39 AM
3

Why are there the same 2 comments by u/Alternative-You3143 and u/Spicyrub2024?
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:37 AM
9

Why didn't women refuse to do so?
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:30 AM
12

Even if men do care about the gender of the PM or president it is their right to do so and no one can or should force them to vote someone else.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:18 AM
9

"For these 50%+ men, they think that women want what women say they want (a nice lapdog)." No most men aren't delusional or that self centered. They actually mention what women want lol. They mention that women like looks, money and charisma. They might not be correct on how much they value them as a percentage point, but not that they don't know the reasons. That's why online you hear advice as go to the gym to get fit, work as hard as you can to become financially independent and go out and sp…
/r/MensRights11/10/24 12:55 AM
1

"doubling down on your reductive conclusion? Very intelligent." It's quite logical since both are decisions which have an impact on your life. And as for the no sex thing if you want to not have one don't have sex because you can't make the possibilitybof it happening 0.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 12:08 AM
1

"You are literally only saying that because you're a man, and one of those things is oppressive to men. Of course you would think that." No it's logical. Women having access to abortion is a privilege. Killing someone is a privilege. "for you to be oppressed by something it probably should be active, huh?" Well if men have to sign up a paper where they give up their body to the government in an eventuality of a war is oppresion. "You don't have a single ounce of applicable proof. Ukraine is not …
/r/MensRights10/10/24 10:38 PM
1

"Because consenting to a completely normal and human activity like sex is literally nothing like signing up for the military? Almost everyone has sex. Very few people join the military. Beyond that, both women and men can do their absolute best with contraceptives and still get pregnant. It's unreasonable for you to argue that everyone should just practice abstinence if they don't want children. What about the people who don't ever want children? No sex for life? That's a wee bit bs. And it is s…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 08:08 PM
1

"Yes, because I believe in bodily autonomy and freedom to not be forced to risk your life, clearly. It's disingenuous to compare draft laws that aren't active now but "aren't farfetched" to laws that are quite literally affecting women at this very moment in this country. Again, your arguments are all based on chance, you're extrapolating on things you have no idea about. Again, yes, war is possible, but it isn't now, and you have no idea if it would be necessary for the draft to be reinstated."…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 07:55 PM
1

"A lot of these liberal or feminist types don't even believe what they preach. Body positivity until it's someone they don't like. No sex shaming until it's someone they don't like. They go back and forth on their principles all the time." I see it all the time online. The contradictions on both wings of the aisle is outstanding and funny lol. They are power hungry so will say anything since they know that their worldview is the morality and worldview of the current times. [Liberals: "Trans man …
/r/MensRights10/10/24 04:31 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Defense_of_Abortion She uses the same stupid kidney analogy even though it doesn't make sense. I already dealt with it. "Thomson concedes that a third party cannot make the choice to kill either the person being crushed or the child but argues that this does not mean the person being crushed cannot act in self-defense and attack the child to save his or her own life. To liken this to pregnancy, the mother can be thought to be the person inside the house and the fe…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 04:17 PM
1

"It absolutely is a possibility, but again, we cannot speak definitively. Yes, the population in the military currently is lower than the last WW and the Vietnam war, but that is at least partly offset by the large amounts of funding going towards new and better technology. There is less and less of a need to fight wards with folks on the ground now. Let me also clarify, I believe the draft should be abolished as well, because I believe in bodily autonomy" I never said that the war will definite…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 04:09 PM
1

"Oh, and why is it the only time men talk about the draft is in response to women talking about abortion? Oh yes, it's because the draft has literally no current affect on you. You don't need to think about it until a war actually breaks out and the draft is reinstated. Women are at risk at this current moment. I will take an L on the ad hominem though, I couldn't help myself lol" A woman said that the government don't have power to make a decision over men's bodies when it does. She opened the …
/r/MensRights09/10/24 11:01 PM
1

"fair point, but you're talking about a chance of a chance. Your argument would only work IF we had world war 3 and IF then the gov chooses to instate the draft" Well you can't deny the possibility of it happening and it's not something farfetched. The government would definitely instate the draft because most likely like in the previous world wars the number of people wouldn't be enough. "I'm laughing, I could literally make the same argument towards you and your view on abortion." My argument …
/r/MensRights09/10/24 10:55 PM
15

Yes it is a violation of her right to bodily autonomy so a guy has not right to do that. Also if a woman wants to fuck someone else she has every right to do so since you misogynist freaks have no right to a woman's body./s Guys this is what feminism is or what many women if not most women in today's day and age believe. They want to make guys cucks and simps who do whatever women want and can't have no boundary or shouldn't expect loyalty. They don't care about men wanting to preserve their mat…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 10:00 PM
1

"the draft is not currently active and hasn't been since '73, men are not at risk. If abortion is banned, the number of maternal deaths go up. The choice to remove something from your body being taken away is a bodily autonomy issue, are you a bit slow? Since when do the rights of another trump the right to a person being able to control their own body? If a person is dying and needs my kidney, I can say no without being labeled a murdered. You have an extremely poor argument" Men have to sign u…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 09:31 PM
12

Nah redpill didn't change laws to benefit men or to disadvantage women. They are nowhere nearly the same.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 12:39 AM
3

https://fathers.com/the-extent-of-fatherlessness/
/r/MensRights09/10/24 12:35 AM
16

Yeah and wouldn't it this be them objectifying themselves by saying that a man who can't get a woman is an incel? Also if they are not offering themselves to have sex with him why do they care about his sexual life? Not to mention that it is an ad hominem and it adds nothing to the discussion.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 10:49 PM
1

No it isn't lol. How can a zygote or and embryo or a fetus be the same as a spermatozoid? A spermatozoid has only 23 chromozomes whereas a zygote has 46. A zygote is made from 2 cells combining whereas a spermatozoid is a single one with no combining happening. A zygote can grow and develop whereas a spermatozoid can't. The potemtial for human body goes as far as a zygote.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 10:30 PM
2

https://www.payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-gap/
/r/MensRights08/10/24 09:56 PM
2

Women don't have specific bodily autonomy issues and no abortion is not a bodily autonomy issue it's a privilege that you can kill another person because you are inconvienced. Men actually have bodily autonomy issues.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 09:46 PM
6

"womyn's rights to murder her babies." That's what it truly is murder and only women have that right. It's horrendous to say that it is a human right or a right to bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 09:24 PM
4

https://familieslink.co.uk/download/sept07/Reciprocal%20violence%20AJPH.pdf https://archive.ph/SuGxj https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178911000620
/r/MensRights08/10/24 09:04 PM
1

There's multiple reasons for why a man doesn't want a high body count woman. The reasons are that a man wants a higher likelihood of securing paternity, a lower likelihood of getting std's and a lower likelihood of her cheating. Another quite important reason which might actually be the preclude of all the aforementioned reasons is the what I would call "the disgust effect" the vast majority of guys have a in-built disgust for high body count women and can't make themselves like them romanticall…
/r/MensRights06/10/24 07:28 PM
1

Can you send the sources for your claims? Not wanting to argue just wanting to see the proof and collect it.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 07:13 PM
1

Well it's not appealing quite enough.
/r/MensRights05/10/24 05:31 PM
4

That's why I said that they should take responsibility just like men have always done.
/r/MensRights05/10/24 03:09 AM
3

No I meant they should take more responsibility in having more kids
/r/MensRights05/10/24 02:50 AM
3

Yeah, but you asked in the beginning: "you guys are you gonna fight for your freedom or not" and men can do nothing about this since women don't want to have kids. Men were asked since the beginning of times to be responsible for their community and in modern times for their nations going as far as fighting wars for the country. It's finally the time that women take some responsibility for the country too.
/r/MensRights05/10/24 02:18 AM
1

6000 men around 10-15% were burned. And the witch trials killed around 30000-60000 people not 70000. Unless there were 10000 more murders accross the americas the number doesn't make sense.​ https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/learn/histories/eight-witchcraft-myths/
/r/MensRights05/10/24 02:11 AM
3

https://web.archive.org/web/20241005020224/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/04/dutch-feminists-campaign-for-national-monument-to-witches
/r/MensRights05/10/24 02:04 AM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20241005015042/https://www.centreformalepsychology.com/male-psychology-magazine-listings/two-comedians-and-the-male-mind
/r/MensRights05/10/24 01:52 AM
8

It's women mostly who don't want to have kids not men.
/r/MensRights05/10/24 01:19 AM
3

https://archive.is/2024.10.05-010942/https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/chart-of-the-day-2019-advanced-placement-test-results-by-subject-and-gender/ https://web.archive.org/web/20241005011313/https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/chart-of-the-day-2019-advanced-placement-test-results-by-subject-and-gender/
/r/MensRights05/10/24 01:15 AM
1

We can see now how much women are having kids and with how much contempt they view it. They would still not do it even then since women can't take responsibility and would say it's misogynist that women have to have more kids.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 04:37 AM
1

Do you have a source on your claim because it would mean that women don't actually find giving birth as painful or hard as they think it is?
/r/MensRights04/10/24 04:25 AM
3

https://archive.is/2023.09.23-031739/https://lundybancroft.com/mens-angry-messages-to-me-part-2/
/r/MensRights04/10/24 04:19 AM
4

https://archive.is/2024.10.04-040328/https://www.wokefather.com/sexism/violence-against-women-act-legal-sexism-against-men/
/r/MensRights04/10/24 04:06 AM
8

No it isn't at least in that case you are getting something this is more akin to striptism even though even that wouldn't explain this quite well lol. I say this, but I would not have the biggest problem with them drinking the drinks (hypothetically speaking because I don't like alcohol) and especially not have a problem with getting them home if I had a car.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 03:55 AM
6

Hahahahahaha! lol
/r/MensRights04/10/24 03:21 AM
1

Not really. It says that women give more money to attractive men. It means that women give privilege to them in that regard not that attractive men are more privileged than women in society since it didn't have anything to do with that because they didn't study the differences in treatment of attractive men and, women in society they only dealt with how women treat attractive men and unattractive men. It only implied that unattractive men are discriminated against.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 03:17 AM
28

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1314788111 This study was interesting in the second article that says that twice as likely to be hired than women in math tasks when only the gender was available as information whereas the bias reduced, but didn't go away when information based on their performances is given. I would like to know if someone can mention the validity of this study.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 02:40 AM
25

Thank you for the articles! We need to compile and archive these articles because they show their sexist language towards men. Also embarrasing for the guy on the idependent article defending the claim that girls are smarter than boys and at the end saying that some suggest that it might be due to teacher discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 02:36 AM
9

https://web.archive.org/web/20241004015905/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/gcse-results-girls-boys-smart-b1901508.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230608164126/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/20/boy-crisis-sexism-women-at-work#comments
/r/MensRights04/10/24 02:00 AM
7

This study wrote about how women treat attractive vs unattractive men it doesn't have anything to do with attractive men being more less or equally privileged to women since it didn't have anything to do with that.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 01:54 AM
3

https://web.archive.org/web/20241004015017/https://www.gilmorehealth.com/handsome-men-receive-more-privileges-from-women-while-unattractive-men-get-less-leeway/
/r/MensRights04/10/24 01:51 AM
20

Precisely. At least they superficially say things that seem like they care about men. That's why I don't understand why some white guys go to the left when it shows that they don't care about them.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 12:43 AM
8

Yes can you send the sources about your claims? That's huge since it would dispel the myth. I know that parents use corporal punishments more on boys than girls, but I don't remember the severity of it.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 11:53 PM
23

Maybe they asked that since she doesn't have those kind of songs? Otherwise they would have known about them or someone would have mentioned them in the comment section.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 11:51 PM
95

Of course according to their nonsense logic white men can't be discriminated against. That's why white guys should band together and notice that both of the political wings don't care about them and especially the left which it openly shows their contempt for them.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 11:49 PM
3

Men can't be run through because it is them who are doing the running through lol. Men shouldn't be cucks or ashamed for their preferences especially since in this instance it's really in someone's choice on what to do. A low body count or preferably no body count at all for women is preferable because it means that a monogamous relationship is far more likely to resist and that she is less likely to cheat. https://archive.ph/mPOLf https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192513X231155673 https…
/r/MensRights03/10/24 05:34 PM
1

Why do you think that you can dictate who belongs or doesn't belong in this sub?
/r/MensRights03/10/24 05:21 PM
1

Do you have a source on that? Who are they having these kids with?
/r/MensRights03/10/24 05:18 PM
5

He would get accepted immediately if he was from there lol. There needs to be a talk in this sub that many countries with a majority european population don't like or even hate white men. They are racist ad sexist towards them even though it is they who build those countries lol.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 05:17 PM
2

https://web.archive.org/web/20241003170414/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/20/norway-populist-party-quits-coalition-over-isis-bride-repatriation https://web.archive.org/web/20241003171152/https://www.thebarentsobserver.com/life-and-public/new-foreign-minister-adds-power-to-norways-feminist-government/147078 Thank you for the articles!
/r/MensRights03/10/24 05:08 PM
1

https://web.archive.org/web/20241003163324/https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2024/10/01/going-back-to-russia-would-be-a-dead-end-street-en
/r/MensRights03/10/24 04:34 PM
1

Does this link work for you? https://archive.is/
/r/MensRights03/10/24 04:12 AM
1

Thank you for the info! I think that the heterosexual domestic violence and homosexual might be less, but I could be wrong. I have heard about the one way domestic violence perpertraded by women is 70%. Also I don't think that we can compare an emotional relationship to sex. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113571/ https://familieslink.co.uk/download/sept07/Reciprocal%20violence%20AJPH.pdf https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-004-1001-6 https://domesticviolenceresearch.o…
/r/MensRights03/10/24 03:54 AM
1

Estimates of individuals killed range from a low of 10–20 million to as high as 148 million. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes
/r/MensRights30/09/24 01:01 AM
1

"Like, you're so caught up in what sources are acceptable and unacceptable based on your ideological bias, you don't care that your criticisms have already been more than adequately shot down" You have an ideological bias and not me. Neither of my criticisms were shot down. "Not only does it plainly explain that the book's co-authors distanced themselves from the work due to the ideological bias of Courtois, but it also goes on to list Noam Chomsky's poignant revelation that if the same methods …
/r/MensRights30/09/24 12:45 AM
1

"Dude, what? You want me to install an epub reader so I can download an entire book by some clown from 1975? What am I even looking for? Did you have a page number in mind? Do you know how fucking nonsensical it is to ask someone to download a book to substantiate their claims, in 2024? Unacceptable. Moving on." The clown you are speaking off is Eugen Von Böhm Bawerk and he was an economist of the austrian school. So you don't like the sources? Ok, but don't be hypocritical and say that the othe…
/r/MensRights30/09/24 12:37 AM
1

"You took umbrage with my economic position, I refuted your criticism of socialism and your defense of capitalism, and you just shrugged of historical facts as coming from too biased a source to be trusted." Yes because I think that it's quite a dangerous ideology as seen with it's close ideology communism. Historical facts that some guy mentioned without giving sources? Because it is a biased source. A left winger defending a left wing ideology what more of a bias do you want here lol? "You're …
/r/MensRights29/09/24 11:29 PM
1

"There it is, in text. With sources. Evidence of frequent, massive conspiracies against the general public. And if your only response is "well, all of those sources are also leftist", what is stopping you from fact-checking the claims with sources you do find factual? You're the one demonstrating an obvious bias in acceptable sources, I'm willing to entertain anything that's historically factual." What about censuring of the information? You should know that being a men's rights activist this is…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 11:13 PM
1

"My guy. This is how I know you're arguing in bad faith! I know you know how to use a search engine. When I type "documented evidence of fairly large conspiracies against the public interest in the name of capitalist financial gains", this is the first result." What's this nonsense? If you make a claim you should bring proof for it, it's not my job to do it.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 10:49 PM
1

"Ugh. I'm not looking over your long list of links you added to your previous post, after the fact, because it looks like you just barfed a list of google results without any context to the conversation. If it's not part of the initial response, it may as well not exist. No one gets alerted to an edit. Learn how to use social media, ffs." I was putting the links manually becuase I had to search for them. They are studies, book pdfs and google books. Funny how you didn't like that I didn't like t…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 08:07 PM
1

"So... you linked me to an article that gives a very neutered definition of socialism... and... said absolutely nothing about it being a failure or costing hundreds of millions of lives, like capitalism has. I don't understand what point you thought you were trying to make. Let me pose you two critical thinking questions. Indulge me by answering honestly, if you will. Capitalists have an obvious incentive to control the market where they own the means of production. Their motive for spreading pr…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 07:39 PM
1

"I mean, you proclaim him guilty of disinformation by virtue of being a leftist, do you not? Would you trust his sources? Why not investigate his claims on your own? Do you not know how to use a search engine? Or is my previous assessment of your character deadly accurate, and you lack the curiosity to engage in an intelligent discussion about the complexities of economic policy?" Someone who is biased is more prone to misinformation as it pertains to his topic. So instead of giving actual sourc…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 07:33 PM
1

The videos are made by a leftist. He didn't not give sources in the description of the videos as far as I saw. "If your core argument is "anything that criticizes something I like must be biased", then again, you're acting quite feminist." That's you. You immedietaly became defensive when I attacked your ideology. Your arguments of class and exploitation seem qute feminist I'd say.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 06:29 PM
0

"I can see that you lack the curiousity to even casually review my sources, let alone discuss things in an intellectually honest manner." Your sources are biased. I did discuss things in an intellectually honest manner. "If your knee jerk defense is "hurr durr, you fell for propaganda", why can't I dismiss your claims the very same way? The questions you're still asking me were answered, in depth, by the links I provided. You just choose not to view them." You did. [IMO, your current ideological…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 06:18 PM
1

"I don't think female scholarship is discrimination against men either, I actually like seeing women do great in school and contribute and be accepted in as many fields as they can but claiming women do better than men on their own merit and are just better than men, they mature faster, their brain is formed sooner is just ignoring all the hoops we put to put them above." So you say something and completely contradict it in the same sentence?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 06:07 PM
1

Thank you for all the sources man!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 06:05 PM
1

ok thanks!
/r/MensRights29/09/24 05:06 PM
0

Also do you think just because one heavily supports capitalism it means that they don't support regulation at all? The guy himself the chad who created the father of capitalism Adam Smith said that there should be regulation. And if you go to the wikipedia page you would see that the critics criticise the corporation government working together funny how leftists criticise government just because it is related to capitalism (which in that case it isn't capitalism really in my opinion), but don't…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:39 PM
1

If there is some source that could counter the one I sent I would appreciate if you could sent it to me.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:33 PM
0

Analysing communism trends and reading comments online is what led me to knowing about these things, but mainly analyzing communism the comments you could say confirmed more so or gave me a better way to form arguments you could say. My claims aren't wrong lol. You are bringing a biased source to supporting your point. It's like me using a far right person who supports fascism and says that fascism is good as a source. The guy also uses the argument that those weren't real communists at the begi…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 02:58 PM
1

One thing socialism is a bad economic theory and even a political one. Socialism is quite similar to communism. The main and should I say the only difference is that a socialist goverment is elected through a democratic process and a communist government can also use violent ways to get into power. Now let's go into analysing socialism. It supports itself on the idea that workers should own the means of production and who is it that gives them that right? It's the government since you don't have…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 04:13 AM
2

Also I was seeing your comments. Do you actually support socialism and you think that capitalism is the problem of modern world?
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:46 AM
2

Idk from what time do most of the quotes come from since I didn't actually put them in order by the time they were made in tbh, but that was my argument that they oppose it because it could have affected women not because it did affect men. Few mentioned that it's actually sexist towards men I think only one directly mentioned it which leads me to believe that they don't care about it affecting men. Also I agree with your point that they frame war as something that men do (as if queens never wag…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:35 AM
1

Also is your username based on deidara?
/r/MensRights29/09/24 01:18 AM
1

Also are you even female?
/r/MensRights29/09/24 01:12 AM
1

"1 By repeating and presenting the points, they have become your narrative. Do you believe the points you’ve presented? 2 Yes I do think you’re wrong. 3 That is an assumptive statement, yes. Your title; feminists don’t care about men is just untrue, plain and simple. You and many other men may believe that, but it is false. I’ve met many feminists who do care about men. In fact, every single one mentioned cares about men. Are they an entire movement? No, but maybe some of the problems that are m…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 01:08 AM
1

I am in this sub because I believe in men's rights. But I don't think that you care about men. That's why I asked.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 12:46 AM
1

"Some governments have been throwing a lot of $ at their falling birthrates" Yeah and this doesn't work. Unless women choose to give birth more things will get even worse.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 12:43 AM
1

Why are you in this sub?
/r/MensRights29/09/24 12:38 AM
1

Russia's population is bigger than Japan's.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 12:11 AM
1

https://hasbrouck.org/draft/women/feminism.html When I was debating with some guy on this subreddit he send me a google search link that I found the link that I sent in. I think that these statements were made due to potential proposals of women being drafted too especially when you look at quotes made in 1980, but I haven't analysed them so I can't say for sure.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 12:04 AM
8

Free speech is the birth of any democratic or healthy society. If it's not absolute it can be censored by anybody with a large voice enough. And the censoring changes based on the morality and cultural behaviours of a specific society. That's why it should never be censored no matter how good or bad it is because anyone with power can silence the truth if it is inconvenient.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:51 PM
0

The only thing that I agree with is that women yes had social power that's why women are pampered in society even today. As for building the society nah, a book published in 1946 with he said she said or with he wrote she wrote statements isn't enough. I don't even disagree that some women were educated just as some men, but that doesn't mean that they made scientific contributions en masse or that they contributed to philosophical thought and law in the past. You can see it today how much women…
/r/MensRights28/09/24 07:03 PM
0

How could women fight in wars as much as men in antiquity especially since in those times strength had an even greater advantage in those days than today since we now have guns? Just by this sentence I can see that you are biased. And to say that women have built society is laughable. Men have have made most of the contributions in the sciences and math and they are the ones who maintain the world by doing the dirtiest and hardest and most important jobs in the world.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 06:36 PM
5

Killing a baby is a privilege no matter how you want to twist it. Also how abortion is not a men's rights issue? Men not being able to decide of their child lives, how is it not an issue? I don't care if you share or don't share republican views in Finland this has nothing to do with republicans and I'm not an american.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 05:24 PM
5

I think the person you replied to is either a bot or just advertising herself since she has adult posts on her profile.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:13 PM
6

Abortion is a privilege. Men don't have reproductive rights anywhere. Which western countries have religious laws in place that limit women's ability to have abortion even if they are raped? Also funny how you use a 31 year old law which doesn't exist anymore to say that it completely non trivial yet.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 03:37 PM
1

https://archive.is/2021.03.05-091600/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known/
/r/MensRights28/09/24 01:59 AM
1

https://archive.is/2024.09.28-012052/https://coffmaninjurylaw.com/drakes-hot-sauce-and-condoms-potential-legal-issues/
/r/MensRights28/09/24 01:22 AM
1

https://archive.is/2021.05.28-153036/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/female-sex-offenders-more-common-gender-bias-statistics-rape-abuse-a7839361.html
/r/MensRights28/09/24 01:18 AM
1

https://archive.is/2022.01.02-080652/https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/11/woman-who-impregnated-self-with-stolen-semen-from-billionaire-wins-child-support-battle/
/r/MensRights28/09/24 01:16 AM
1

https://archive.is/2024.09.28-000231/https://pjmedia.com/toni-airaksinen/2018/08/06/professor-slams-hegemonic-masculinity-of-homeless-men-n60017
/r/MensRights28/09/24 12:04 AM
1

https://archive.is/2017.10.29-194907/http://www.publicbooks.org/big-picture-confronting-manhood-trump/
/r/MensRights28/09/24 12:00 AM
1

https://csbronline.org/?p=822
/r/MensRights27/09/24 11:56 PM
1

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/4517164/sex-robot-with-resistance-settings-that-let-men-simulate-rape-should-be-banned-barrister-says/
/r/MensRights27/09/24 11:54 PM
1

https://archive.is/2024.09.27-234605/https://www.thetimes.com/article/circumcision-ban-is-a-win-for-the-far-right-vdlbx62sg
/r/MensRights27/09/24 11:49 PM
1

https://archive.is/2024.09.27-233457/https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/may/20/women-against-rape-anonymity-defendants0
/r/MensRights27/09/24 11:38 PM
1

https://archive.is/2024.09.27-233037/https://www.chicagotribune.com/2018/07/18/prison-is-not-where-women-need-to-be-all-female-task-force-wants-to-cut-illinois-female-prison-population-in-half/
/r/MensRights27/09/24 11:33 PM
1

https://www.pdfdrive.com/the-suffragette-bombers-britains-forgotten-terrorists-e196882680.html
/r/MensRights27/09/24 11:12 PM
1

"That's called implicit admission. Which you just did again." I didn't.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:59 PM
1

You said in one of the replies that feminists care about equality lol.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:53 PM
1

"And?" It's not many and most I have never heard about. "Or there was an uptick in 1980 because that's when the draft was reinstated. Obviously they wouldn't protest the draft in 1979 when there was no draft." There was a draft before 1975, but they didn't protest it as much if at all. "And most weren't" I didn't analyse the political climate so I can't say for sure why they made those claims in the other times, but I think that it might have to do with the same thing, a proposal to draft women.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:49 PM
1

"Which organization?" The feminist one that you sent lol. "No I didn't. That doesn't follow logically. You are making an irrational strawman" Yes you said they are being equal by doing that.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:45 PM
1

"Then you would at least have consistent standards, yeah" Again I'm not an activist so I don't have to be consistent with her. "No, you definitely are not saying anything that suggests you have the moral high ground" Now I get it. You are saying that I'm worse than them. Got it. I couldn't expect nothing less from a male feminist. "Except in the examples we already talked about? Also this has nothing to do with my claim. Feminists are not obligated to protest things you want them to protest" I m…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:44 PM
1

"No you didn't" Yes I did. Even the website about the organisation againt the draft that you sent proved that. "This doesn't support the claim you're trying to make. Did you read this before posting it?" Yes it does. Public protest would be fighting on the streets.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:32 PM
1

"This will not start to have anything to do with my claim no matter how many times you bring it up" Yes it does. Equality does have to do with this. "Yes you are" No I am not. "Scroll up. Also, this has nothing to do with my claim" You didn't bring any proof that men could vote before being drafted lol. "Scroll up" So no proof for my mistake? Got it. "Oh right, you're not fighting to abolish the draft, you're fighting to expand it. My mistake rofl" Men didn't fight for the privilege of voting wi…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:30 PM
1

"You clearly didn't read it rofl" I didn't read it fully, but it was not needed since it proved me right in the first paragraph. "That's not what "strawman" means" You claimed that men weren't drafted before getting the right to vote. You didn't send proof for your claim. That's why I asked if you are claiming that men weren't drafted just because you said so. So not a strawman. "Before the US federal government existed? As I already explained, the thirteen colonies individually set their own vo…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:11 PM
1

"Open a history book" So you don't have proof? "Open a history book." So you don't have proof? "Because the federal government didn't exist at the time. Open a history book" So you know better than the person who wrote the wikipedia article? You don't have proof for your claim. "The people who wrote this article did not say that. I noticed you ignored the part I bolded specifically so you wouldn't ignore it, so I'll repeat it again: The United States first employed national conscription during t…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:02 PM
1

"I made a very simple claim: "feminists oppose the draft, and women did not have the right to vote when it was created." You responded by ignoring it, making irrelevant attacks against women (specific or in general), and telling me you think I'm wrong. When I respond to any of this, you just say "strawman/hypocrisy/equality" and more often than not, aren't using those words correctly You still haven't addressed my original claim (except in a few cases where you admitted you agree with part of it…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 06:59 PM
1

"You're welcome to not believe her You don't get to tell her she believes something different than she says she believes That's called gaslighting Here, watch the difference: "I don't believe her" "She doesn't actually oppose the draft" See how easy that is?" If I don't believe her I will say what I think that she actually thinks. I am saying this towards you not her. I didn't say that I know her thoughts better than her. "I have no idea what you're trying to say, I assume you wrote something wr…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 06:46 PM
1

"You literally just said the anti-draft article was from 2019, now you're saying the organization that wrote it was created in the last 2 years?" I was speaking about the organisation against the draft that you sent not the anti-war woman. "Scroll up" Again disingenuousness. I said that your claim that feminists "oppose the draft" is thrown out since feminists between themselves can't decide on it. I used your examples against your claim. Where did I say it? I was speaking about your claim that …
/r/MensRights27/09/24 06:33 PM
1

Yeah when it comes to her making statements in her website.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 06:29 PM
1

"No. That is literally what you just wrote" "rofl so you're openly admitting you won't consider anything I say as evidence? " I never claimed that. That's a strawman, but your indigeniousness won't accept that. "You said that about why you ignored all the links to evidence I provided. Meanwhile, you've literally provided nothing but your own words (mostly arguing irrelevant tangents). You would do well to heed your own advice" I did send links. You never dealt with them. "Strawman" You used thos…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 06:27 PM
1

"They do, but that has nothing to do with my claim so you'll get nowhere attacking that point" So you know say that they care about equality? If they say they care about equality, but act differently it shows they are a hypocrite which was my claim. "That doesn't follow logically. You are being irrational. Wanting to abolish the draft is not proof or disproof of supporting equality, it's a single policy position" It's the reason which tells me why they want to abolish it. And they only care beca…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 06:18 PM
1

"Them not having the right to vote only affected them. And without the right to vote, wtf do you expect them to do when men like you keep voting to keep the draft in place? You're literally blaming women for something you know men did (and women oppose)" Some women had the right to vote at the same time as men did. "The US" When? What protests? "That doesn't follow logically. You are being irrational" No it does. I am not being irrational. "I didn't" You did. "No it doesn't. It shows that I don'…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:50 PM
1

"You are blaming them for something you know they oppose (and you also know was created by men)? Because you feel they are "being a hypocrite about equality"? And your explanation for feeling that way is that they don't support expanding that system you know they oppose (and you also know was created by men)? I want to be clear about what you just admitted." I blame them not protesting it just like they did with things that affected them whilst at the same time saying that they are with equality…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:13 PM
1

"The majority of them, yourself included, support keeping the draft system in place. They also oppose adding women to it." Wrong men don't support keeping the draft system in place in one of the replies I sent an article that mentioned a poll which said that most men opposed the draft. "Nah you're just making that up. You even admit you support the draft yourself." Where did I say that? Again another strawman. I said that as long as wars exist a draft can't be annulled since men will be forced t…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:07 PM
1

Where did I admit it? I just said that it's not an illogical claim I didn't deal with the other part of the sentence.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:41 PM
1

"That was never part of my claim" Then since you don't claim that feminists care about equality then my claim that feminists are lying is true and that they only care when it affects women.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:40 PM
1

There were around 40 statements in there. Most were from individual people I think. Also did you ignore that I said this? "Many though were made in 1980 when it was proposed to draft women so as I said they oppose the draft because it could affect women. Ultimately it's true what I said that feminists care about the draft because it affects women" And they only made statements again no mention of protests.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:35 PM
1

["No proof" of what? This? It’s Time to End Draft Registration Once and For ALL! - CODEPINK - Women for Peace Are you going to start addressing my claim or nah?] I was speaking about the organisation against the draft not codepink in this instance. "rofl did you read this one before you hit send? My claim is what I wrote. What I wrote doesn't depend retroactively on some irrelevant stuff you wrote later. That's not how time works." You said since feminists want to abolish the draft they care abo…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:33 PM
1

"No one said otherwise. What point are you making" Because you said that I should storm the street too to show that I oppose the draft. "On that we both agree roflmao" Are you being sarcastic? "One that prominently and famously opposes the draft. What point are you making?" That she isn't showing her strong support in abolishing the draft by protesting. "You're just making that up, though." I was wrong I didn't know that she made protests against the draft before the article that she had a state…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:29 PM
1

[As I just explained, I cannot "backtrack" from something that was never my claim. Since you seem to have "forgotten" yet again, that was: "feminists oppose the draft and women weren't allowed to vote when it was created."] So you never claimed that feminists care about equality? "And I said you're wrong." No I am not. "You're not even responding to what I wrote. You're also lying about history." What proof did you bring that men could vote before being drafted? [Scroll up. You even apologized f…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:18 PM
1

"You're claiming the US federal government did that before it existed? Are you even trying to be taken seriously? You're lying about history, a topic you know shockingly little about." The wikipedia article said so. "Strawman" Not a strawman. You didn't have proof for what you said.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:59 PM
1

[The pattern remains consistent: you desperately need to brush up on history As I just explained, the US government didn't exist before 1789 Prior to that the Continental Congress and the Articles of Confederation, both of which very much included voting, let the colonies set their own voting rules Saying men couldn't vote prior to 1789 is an outright lie. The Wiki page you're citing spells this out, and you still messed it up] "The Declaration of Independence, formally titled The unanimous Decl…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:51 PM
1

"No you're not" Yes I am. "Projection. You still have not addressed my original claim, instead making irrelevant attacks against specific women (and women in general)" It's not projection it's the truth. You are constantly making strawman after strawman. I attack their hypocrisy. "Why shouldn't they?" I didn't say that they shouldn't or that they should. Why are you asking questions for things I never claimed? I asked that to say that they could fight for men too, but choose not to. "They have" …
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:45 PM
1

"You literally are disagreeing with her about what she believes lmfao what else could you possibly call that" Not believing her that's what it's called. "And you're doing it based on the shittiest evidence I've ever seen in my life--saying she supports the draft despite having written articles denouncing the draft, but you didn't look at them, therefore you conclude she actually supports it? lmfao gtfo" Wrong I said that she doesn't care about the draft if it affects only men not that she suppor…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:37 PM
1

"Except all the examples I've posted are feminists opposed to the draft except one who would also support an equal draft" You posted of a woman and an organisation which was created in the last 2 years. They care about the draft because it affects women. [And you're still claiming this means feminists "don't support equality"] Where did I said it? "You are a fundamentally unserious and dishonest person" No it is you who is that. You also never dealt with the hate speech that feminists have said.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:33 PM
1

I said around the time the article was posted which was in 2020 what you posted is in 2019 I didn't look at that year.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:29 PM
1

"Because no one ever claimed she does" Well you said that feminists care about equality since they want to abolish the draft so can't that be extended to her? "No we don't, and it wouldn't be relevant if we did. You wanting to talk about something doesn't make it become relevant" Yes we have. She didn't mention male victims at all and even said stupid stuff like women suffer the brunt of violence from US foreign policy. "And when I post examples, you ignore them, talk about irrelevant things the…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:28 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/xb8z1q/some_malerelated_statistics_for_germany_2022/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:36 AM
1

https://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/literatur/vollanzeige.html?FId=3062471
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:34 AM
1

[I'll repeat the question. "Why would women, who didn't even have the right to vote, concern themselves with making things better for men?"] If they care about equality equality affects all not only women. "You need to brush up on your history again." Where did they oppose it en masse? "Time is a finite resource. What's your point?" So they don't care about it. "Strawman." No you implied it yourself. "Strawman. At least read what you wrote before you get all frothing mad about my response. This …
/r/MensRights26/09/24 07:45 PM
1

"But you are blaming women for it" If they are being a hypocrite about equality yes I will blame them. "Unlike the women who oppose it, yet you're eagerly holding accountable for something 100+ years before they were born, created by men, when women couldn't vote?" Yes I will blame them if they are hypocritical about equality. If they truly opposed it just like they whine for the mythical 20% wage gap they could fight for this too. [Opposing the draft and having no part in creating it has nothin…
/r/MensRights26/09/24 07:34 PM
1

"Apparently not enough of them" I said that the draft was annulled for about 5 years so they have done something. It was reinstated in 1980. "You'll need to convince the men who designed it and vote to keep it this way" Which men vote to keep it this way? Most men oppose it, but they are still forced to abide by it. "Stop blaming women for your support of the draft. You are responsible for your own thoughts and feelings." I didn't say that I support the draft. Another strawman. I said as long as…
/r/MensRights26/09/24 07:19 PM
1

It's not an illogical claim.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 06:59 PM
1

"Right. So what are you objecting to?" That feminists care about equality. There aren't massive protests of feminists, there aren't famous feminists opposing the draft thus your claim that most or all feminists oppose the draft doesn't hold truth to scrunity. [Sure there ae] Against the draft, where? [This has nothing to do with my claim.] The massive protests of feminists I was speaking off was in relation to the draft not all issues that might pertain to feminists. [When referring to "my claim…
/r/MensRights26/09/24 05:51 PM
1

https://hasbrouck.org/draft/women/feminism.html Ok. It seems that many feminists opposed the draft, but not all wanted to abolish it. Also Rivera the woman mentioned in the first article you linked it seems has made 2 statements against the draft. Many women who opposed the draft were making sexist claims though. As if violence or military is patriarchal as if there weren't queens that have waged war.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 05:43 PM
1

See when you have no proof you just repeat words. If they care about abolishing the draft without it affecting women why did they say that they don't want inclusion for marinalized groups in unjust systems? It shows that they don't see men as marginalized. It shows that they don't care about men. It shows that they don't care about equality. Unless your claim is that feminists don't care about equality than yes then and only then you can say that what I said has nothing to do with your claim.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 05:32 PM
1

[As I just explained, I cannot "backtrack" from something that was never my claim. Since you seem to have "forgotten" yet again, that was: "feminists oppose the draft and women weren't allowed to vote when it was created."] You said that everyone wants privileges so how aren't you backtracking from your claim that feminists are fighting for equality? "You literally haven't. All you've done is repeatedly ignore the first half, and admit you agree with the second half." I fucking said that feminis…
/r/MensRights26/09/24 05:26 PM
1

"Then stop using the word incorrectly." I am using it correctly. You are constantly making an argument against things I never claimed nor said. "Then you agree with my claim. Why do you keep blaming women for something you admit men created?" Didn't they fight to get the vote or other rights and privileges? So why couldn't they fight to either abolish the draft or to equalise it? Because they aren't for equality. [Are you accusing me of strawmanning myself?? My claim has always been: "feminists …
/r/MensRights26/09/24 05:07 PM
1

Wrong fucking wrong. I am saying that she is lying to sound better not that I think that she is "incorrect about what her beliefs are" or that I know what she thinks better than she does. The strawman after strawman.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 04:58 PM
1

Again disingenuousness. I said that your claim that feminists "oppose the draft" is thrown out since feminists between themselves can't decide on it. I used your examples against your claim.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 04:55 PM
1

So they didn't say anything against the draft when the article was posted on their website, but you don't think that that shows a bit of a hypocrisy when that is related to their cause?
/r/MensRights26/09/24 04:51 PM
1

"No she didn't. Even if she had, it wouldn't be relevant to my claim. Stay on topic." How it's not relevant if she suposedly supports equality? And how didn't she? You have proof that she didn't care about male victims otherwise she would have spoken for them too. "You literally just accused me of "thinking supporting dictatorships is good" rofl" I said if you think dictatorships are good. "If". Which it's not farfetched to think since you dismissed it as not important information. "Nope, that's…
/r/MensRights26/09/24 04:30 PM
1

I meant her surname so we can verify the story.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 12:44 AM
1

This question wasn't towards you it was towards another guy, sorry if I tagged you wrongly.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 12:43 AM
1

Both are at fault. Lol my comment was deleted for hate speech by reddit.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 12:29 AM
1

What's MSM?
/r/MensRights26/09/24 12:28 AM
1

Which government sites? The one with the refugees? He was sued by some people.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 07:00 PM
1

http://gatewayjr.org/project-veritas-and-the-changing-face-of-fake-news/
/r/MensRights25/09/24 06:57 PM
1

https://books.google.com/books?id=pMocEAAAQBAJ
/r/MensRights25/09/24 06:48 PM
1

"Why would women, who didn't even have the right to vote, concern themselves with making things better for men? Do you ever stop to think about what you're saying?" If they truly care about equality they would care about all of equality not only when it benefits them. They have long gotten the rights, but didn't oppose the draft en masse never. [You literally just said it again immediately after saying you never said it rofl] [You're the one whose argument is just "if feminists don't spend all t…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 06:41 PM
1

"But that's not how men designed it. We could also just get rid of it, that would be equal (and better)" Sure, but men have tried it and it was disallowed for 5 years only. When USSR attacked Afganistan I think President Carter reinstated it. Also the design can change. Also as long as there is a threat of war unfortunately the draft will exist. This could also be noticed in Europe where many wealthy countries either have conscription or are considering selective service due to the threat of Rus…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 06:26 PM
1

Yeah good that you admit that you don't have proof.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 06:01 PM
1

"You literally admitted you don't care about equality lol" I said that men's rights doesn't care about equality since it's neutral in that direction. It cares about men's rights since it's men who are discriminated against not women and women already have a movement. "Sure there ae" Against the draft, where? "There absolutely are" Which ones? "I never said "all" feminists, I'm sure there are a few exceptions" That's why I said most or all. What's your proof that most feminists oppose the draft?
/r/MensRights25/09/24 06:01 PM
1

"Except I already provided it. You provided nothing. Here's more, though." You didn't. A claim of 2 women doesn't mean anything. Also from your article:
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:52 PM
1

[Everyone wants privileges. You would do well to act like you want equality too. Are you going to address my claims?] So now are you backtracking from your claim that they want equality? I don't have a problem with equality, but right now there's no such thing as equality women are privileged at least in the US. Also not everyone wants privileges otherwise men would have fought for it. "I'm not "backtracking" anything, especially something that's not even part of my claim." Your quote is in the …
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:49 PM
1

["Strawman" doesn't mean "false" it means "you're arguing with a claim I didn't make."] I know what a strawman is. "When you say "the government," you mean "other men." Women weren't allowed to vote at the time, remember? The first draft in the US was in 1863. What do your bullet points from 1789 have to do with anything? What, because one state allowed women to vote in local elections?" No one said that women could vote. Again a strawman. Wrong you have proof in front of your eyes that men were…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:40 PM
1

That's not mind reading. That's being skeptical about her claims.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:35 PM
1

Wtf are you saying? The politican wants the equal draft that's who I was speaking for in that moment. Also you can see that that example throws the the argument that feminists oppose the draft since they can't even decide between themselves.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:32 PM
1

https://www.codepink.org/press_releases If you see their press releases there hasn't been one where they spoke about the draft around the time the article you send was posted.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:29 PM
1

Here some feminists oppose the equal draft and some support it. There was even a poll mentioned that most women don't support equalising the draft whereas most men do support it even though neither gender supported the draft in total. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52274164
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:20 PM
1

"How?" She showed that she doesn't care about men since she said that women bear the brunt of violence from the US foreign policy which I don't even believe in no conflict have ever women been harmed at the same rate as men to my knowledge. [Cherry-picking and a red herring and a strawman, wow! I'm going to ignore all the irrelevant tangents you cherry-pick from a random person's website unless you can explain how any of this is relevant to my claim. Which, in case you forgot, is: "feminists opp…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 04:51 PM
1

Again you are making a strawman. The politician didn't oppose the draft she agreed for the draft to be equal it was the anti-war activist that opposes the draft dammit. How can you confuse the 2. Idk if the anti-war activist can propose a proposal to the commision idk that she can do that and that was never my claim that she can do it.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:49 PM
1

"They don't. That's not a thing." Yeah again I stand corrected. "Specifically, one person? Who you decided can't possibly oppose the draft because one quote you found didn't mention "storming the streets" to protest something you want her to protest? That doesn't follow logically. You are being irrational." It's you who argued that feminists oppose the draft by using those 2 women as examples. If there's no actual proof that she opposes the draft since she is an anti-war activist besides her wor…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:46 PM
1

(So men didn't fight in wars previously?) "Strawman" No it isn't since men did fought in wars before and it was the governemnt who send them to fight too.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:41 PM
1

"No. That's not a thing. You don't get to "opt out" of selective service by simply not voting." Yeah, I stand corrected. There are penalties related to dogding the draft, but voting is not part of it. "The draft men created is only for men." Yeah and it can be equal. "You keep blaming feminists (and women in general) for the draft existing. That's not what a "strawman" is." I blame them for not fighting it when they act like they are for equality. Yes it is a strawman since I never argued agains…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:39 PM
1

Again just repeating words with no proof.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:16 PM
1

"You not having evidence of something is not evidence against it." It's you who don't have evidence of supportinf removing the draft not me. You used 2 examples of 2 women who don't have a lot of influence on feminism and you are using it to represent all of feminism. "That makes it okay to want to subjugate others?? rofl" Where are men's right subjugating women? Again strawman after strawman. "How is opposing the draft "supremacy"? Are you going to address my claims or not?" There aren't massiv…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:15 PM
1

"Are you going to keep avoiding the claims I made?" What claims? I dealt with them. "How does opposing the draft equate to "fighting to get privileges"?" They oppose the draft if it affects women they haven't had a problem with the draft affecting men. "Everyone wants privileges. You would do well to act like you want equality too. Are you going to address my claims?" So now are you backtracking from your claim that they want equality? I don't have a problem with equality, but right now there's …
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:10 PM
1

I said that because as far as I know masturbation can have a temporary effect at least in sperm quantity.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:03 PM
2

"Palestine didn't create or control Wikipedia, though... it's easily researchable who created it and funded it. Anyone who puts information that goes against the mainstream is banned. It's why they can baselessly slander people on there when they don't follow the mainstream narrative. It also works in the reverse that you will get banned by changing pages with verifiable information if it goes against the agenda." No one said that Palestine created or controlled wikipeadia though. I said that th…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:01 PM
1

As I said did they take into account masturbation?
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:46 AM
1

"You have to remember what drives women. Evolutionary psychology is a powerful tool. The ones who run the media use those instincts to lead us to a bad outcome on purpose. Purposefully destroying us." Again don infantilise women. Men can be manipulated too , but they aren't running the country to the ground. "You can research the breastfeeding thing. It's been well known for a long time. I literally got banned from a sub on reddit for mentioning it. A new mother said she was breastfeeding, and I…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:42 AM
1

So why did you reply then?
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:27 AM
1

I wasn't wanking lol. Is that her real name? She isn't nowhere to be found. Idk if the story was true.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 10:31 PM
1

No I don't have a problem with them being female lol, but you could say that I have a problem if they choose to support an ideology which is misandrist and feminism fits that bill.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 10:26 PM
1

And she was allowed to be a reverand? I meant her full name.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 09:54 PM
1

In the study in the second link it mentioned only girls. Does the sperm count study account for masturbation? Women's sexuality was controlled for paternity. So that guys didn't have to raise someone elses kid. Now you have many retards liking cucking. It's disgusting tbh. Also the prince charming is bad too. It makes women think that they should have the best of the best which doesn't make sense since only a few guys would have kids that way and you can't have a society that way. Monogamy has b…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 09:50 PM
1

https://archive.is/2021.05.26-145025/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sperm-count-dropping-in-western-world/
/r/MensRights24/09/24 09:38 PM
1

Wait what was her name again?
/r/MensRights24/09/24 09:07 PM
1

I think that the iq of the population might be because of the low quality of the food and the fact that the majority of the population is overweight. Even the first link said that the quality of food might be a reason for that. Also do you have a source for the +15 iq points if you have been breastfeeded? There's benefits related to breastfeeding without being related to iq though and they are known. If I'm not mistaken it helps with your immune system and your healthy development so it's not li…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 08:45 PM
1

Sure if he's speaking the truth of immigration it's ok. Idk about the UN plan, but it seems that it speaks about replacing the declining population with immigrants which it's not like the politicians aren't doing the same thing lol. So yeah the same bad thing that the native politicians or not native politicians in some cases are doing in the european countries. As I said if white women don't reproduce that's what's going to happen. White guys can't do anything against that. This is the problem …
/r/MensRights24/09/24 07:28 PM
2

Yeah, but I was saying that just because the babies forget the trauma it's not a good argument no matter when they forget it after 78 hours or after one hour. To make an operation that causes pain that isn't needed to be done it's stupid.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 07:20 PM
1

"Right. What do they have to do with the conversation at hand?" It speaks about her organisation's activity and it reveals her hypocrisy. [I don't think you know what cherry picking means. I'm going to ignore all the irrelevant tangents you pull from one person's website unless you can explain how any of this is relevant to my claims. Which, in case you forgot, are: "feminists oppose the draft and women didn't have the right to vote when it was created."] Cherry picking means picking something t…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 07:17 PM
1

"No it wasn't. And it's still not clear why you think that would happen before, during, or after the commission. Why would someone propose something directly against their own beliefs?" Yes it was just because you couldn't understand it's not my fault. If she thinks that the current draft is unequal she could have proposed a new draft to the commision and that before someone else did it. She said in the article that she supports the equal draft so are you saying now that she doesn't want the dra…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 07:08 PM
1

"No it doesn't." Yes it does. "Yes you are." No I'm not. "This remains ahistorical no matter how many times you repeat it. Men had the right to vote for ~100 years before the first draft. Women didn't get it for about 75 years after the first draft. So again, this doesn't follow logically, and you are being irrational." So men didn't fight in wars previously? Also why do men have to sign up for the draft to vote then? "No." What are you saying then? "Right. So what?" So that means that she isn't…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 07:04 PM
1

"No she wouldn't. That's not what those words mean." Since she has an anti-war organisation and the draft is related to that, yes she fucking is a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:57 PM
1

"lmfao what history books are you reading? I understand that you're not American, but seriously? Brush up on your history." What? Do men not have to sign up for selective service in order to vote? And aren't women not obligated to do to the same? "No you didn't" Yes I did. "You don't have to keep convincing me you're arguing from a double standard." It's feminists who are doing that not me. "lmfao my argument is literally just "feminists oppose the draft and women weren't allowed to vote when it…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:45 PM
1

"Have you talked to feminists at large? What evidence do you have for your claim that most feminists support the draft? They seem to disagree with your claims about what they believe." Their silence. You mentioned only 2 feminists at most where are the other feminists? "lol you don't have to keep convincing me you don't actually care about equality" Why does men's rights have to care about equality? Feminism actually says that they care about feminist whilst doing the positive. "Well because of …
/r/MensRights24/09/24 05:58 PM
1

"And?" Women don't care about men being affected by the draft. "Then why are you saying the same thing about women?" Because men didn't fight to get privileges whilst saying that they are for equality. "and?" Women act like they want equality whilst they want privileges. "Yeah, I don't blame them. Why would they want to expand something they oppose existing?" If they opposed it they would make protests against it if they truly care for equality. Women ask of men to support them for equality to s…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 05:52 PM
1

Research the Flynn effect. The guy who noticed that saw that the iq of populations in the US and Australia I think has risen if you compare by generation and it's because of education and the environment becoming more complex. I tried to research the guy you mentioned, but his substack has no posts it's just blank.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 01:45 AM
1

"The pacs are saying people donated like 15,000 times in a year. Hes gone to interview them, and they have never heard of it. The story is so huge that he's asked the public for help. Anyone can search the campaign finance records. So he's asking people to search the records for crazy transactions like that local to you, and go ask if they made 20,000 dontations for a few cents each." What do you mean?
/r/MensRights24/09/24 01:39 AM
1

I like anime too even though I don't really watch it now. Even one piece who is older has trans people for example, but Idk about the "how the lgbt, trans, positive reinforcement of bad mental health (the idea of how it's cool to have tons of mental health diagnosis), and how they are taking men out of power/MC roles and making everything women" statement at least in shonen which is marketed to boys. There was some controversy with Sweet Baby Inc. recently, but tbh Idk what was it. I think it wa…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 01:33 AM
1

"Both O'Keefe and Project Veritas have produced secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or illegal behavior by representatives of those organizations; the recordings are often selectively edited to misrepresent the context of the conversations and the subjects' responses."
/r/MensRights24/09/24 12:57 AM
1

It most likely has to do with educational levels, but over time education has some effects on the population it will improve it, that's why I always hammer in that white guys should educate themselves as much as possible since it's one of the most important factors in the wellbeing of a person. Then they can pass that cultural behavouir to their sons if they have one or they could help their brothers, cousins and friends to improve their education. Health, strength, self defense and education sh…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 12:55 AM
1

https://archive.is/2024.09.24-002247/https://www.wisemantriallaw.com/blog/why-does-the-man-get-arrested-in-a-domestic-viol/
/r/MensRights24/09/24 12:25 AM
1

Thanks for the calculation man! Do you have any other stats on men's issues?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 11:25 PM
1

When I was looking online one time about how did men get the right to vote in the US it was due to the suffrage, but as far as I know if men don't sign up for the draft in US they can't vote. Do you have any sources stating that the right to vote for men was gotten due to the draft?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 11:04 PM
2

Precisely when you make a claim you have to have sources for it. I have plentybof sources that I have found online and most are for the US due to of course this app and sub and google being based in US, but I would like to have as many sources as possible about as many men's issues as possible in order to have a fact oriented argument. Thank you for the sources again!
/r/MensRights23/09/24 11:01 PM
1

I have seen previously the page of the second link, but since I don't have a twitter account the posts are randomly shown. I'm sorry for the woman in the third link, but she shouldn't have gone in a foreign country where you don't know the security level without someone or without safety measures.​
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:28 PM
1

Tbh it's discusting how the white population being reduced is considered a good thing. Yeah an Japan managed to keep a strong economy despite it's really low birth rate and it's toxic work culture even though based on GDP per capita even Poland surpasses it as far as I know lol. That's what Europe should have done whilst focusing on supporting men and supporting birth rates. Interesting so black rock is buying anime studios? Is it doing it through Netflix? Also one thing that I didn't mention pr…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:23 PM
1

These quotes are in her website for anyone to see. I didn't cherry picked them. I'm saying that she supports dictatorships that's all and from that I can know her thought process better. Also what proof is there that due to the US foreign policy women face the brunt of the violence when that has never been the case in wars ever unless she is speaking about something else. Also I'm critiquing her biased stance on the Israel and Palestine war that only condemns the murdering of Palestine people, b…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:14 PM
1

It's quite clear who I'm mentioning when I wrote my replies. When I spoke about proposing the equal draft to the commision it was clear that I was speaking about the politician and when I was speaking about the anti-war woman it was clear who I was speaking about lol. Idk how you didn't understand it.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:10 PM
1

"This doesn't follow logically. You are being irrational." Yes this does follow logically. No, I'm not being irrational. If most feminists haven't held protests to oppose the draft since the draft is an issue of gender equality we can say that they don't oppose it. There aren't claims made ny famous feminists of being against the draft either though you will find misandrist quotes of them wanting to reduce the male population. "So why do you keep blaming women?" Men had the right to vote becuse …
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:06 PM
1

"What are you talking about? She "has" an anti-war movement? What does that even mean? No one has a responsibility to protest anything. What are you talking about?" Don't you know what are we speaking about? The woman who had an anti-war organisation. She would be a hypocrite if she is against the draft, but doesn't protest against it. "???" The protest against the draft in the Vietnam war mentioned in the article. I was saying just like that protest was mentioned there since it's relevant to th…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 09:48 PM
1

"I love how you left out the part about men creating it so you could continue pretending to be confused." I didn't left it out I fully quoted your claim in my reply. It's you actually who quotes half-quotes. Also can't men be sexist against men? Still being disingenuous. (They did and they still are. I absolutely love how you think women finally getting basic civil rights (like voting) and not immediately using them to fight for men's issues is somehow hypocrisy on behalf of women and somehow sh…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 09:41 PM
1

"By tricking men (who had not yet allowed women the right to vote) into creating a male-only draft? Is that your argument? Is this a joke?" Wtf are you saying? Men got the right to vote by being responsible to being drafted women got it just because they were women. "Then surely you will be able to point out how my arguments aren't sound, rather than just skipping that and accusing me of "lying that my arguments are sound," right?" I did, but you only half-quote my claims (Men's rights is for me…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 09:12 PM
1

"Opposing the draft for everyone is equal." Yeah, but feminists at large aren't doing that. Just because one or two come pit doesn't mean that feminists at large oppose it. "lmao I appreciate you just coming right out and admitting that, but it does make it seem rather bold to turn around and accuse feminists promoting equality of hypocrisy." Wtf does men's rights have to do with equality when it explitly states that it is for men's rights and issues. Men's rights aren't the ones claiming that t…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 08:47 PM
1

"For that same reason it doesn't make sense to say "most men didn't protest the draft, therefore they must not really oppose it." It doesn't follow logically. It's non-sequitur." Well it was a large protest which took place and most were men who protested against the draft. There wasn't an equivalent protest of mostly women so they don't care about it. Most men haven't protested for anything that doesn't mean that they like the draft. "So what?" So there weren't many women thus women by and larg…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 08:03 PM
1

https://www.codepink.org/issues_campaigns This is her page.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:35 PM
1

"It was your question mate I'm not saying it makes any sense"
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:08 PM
1

"My argument, since you seem to have forgotten: feminists oppose the draft and women couldn't vote when it was made. That's actual sexism. Men creating a male-only draft is not an example of sexism against men (certainly not an example of feminists being sexist against men)" No one is opposing the fact that the politicans were sexist when they made these claims against men. Women who have fought to be equal and in reality to also actually be privileged should have fought to get rid of the draft …
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:06 PM
1

"No it doesn't" If most women didn't protest it how doesn't it make sense to say that women oppose the draft if it could affect them? "There were, and this wouldn't justify your claim even if it were true" There weren't many even the damn journalist at the time said that and I quote "there were many men and some women". So how can some women become many women? "So what?" Well since there weren't many women we can't say that women at large or feminists at large oppose the draft thus my claim that…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 05:36 PM
2

Yeah of course, but the only argument in favour of that (a stupid one at that) is that they forget the pain, but that could happen to an adult too lol.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 05:08 PM
1

"What happened to the one you've been arguing with this entire time? And what goalposts do you think I'm shifting?" You are building strawmans and just arguing for feminists that's all. You put the activism on me when I didn't ever claim that I'm an activist when she actually is a damn activist you are just trying to absolve her of her responsibilities based on her claims. "You read a quote that didn't mention activism, therefore she's never done any? That's your argument? Is this a joke?" I onl…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 05:06 PM
1

"Yes, it is. And the end of it doesn't follow logically from the beginning. It's just a thing you're saying." Yes it does follow because there weren't many women opposing the draft otherwise there would be many more storming the streets and protesting just like they did for feminism. They could go and protest for their fathers, brothers, cousins, boyfriends, friends, husbands, sons or just for men at large, but only a small minority did that's why I said that women only oppose the draft when it …
/r/MensRights23/09/24 04:44 PM
1

Thank you for the source! Idk why they are framing this as a good thing and speaking about racial diversity? What's this nonsense? And did you notice how they said to
/r/MensRights23/09/24 04:13 PM
1

I acknowledged that the study was debunked. Idk why are you arguing for that when I'm not opposing your claim. I will explain it again. The terms alpha and beta are used to indicate leaders and followers. An alpha is a leader and a beta is a follower. In the ancient greek alphabet alpha is the first letter and beta is the second letter that's why they are used as symbols in relation to leadership and followship. It's symbolc in the sense that a leader goes first and the follower comes after. A c…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 04:04 PM
6

I'm not from the US, but knowing how men are discriminated against is good in assessing the problems men have and if need be use those sources as proof for men actually being discriminated against and in a developed country at that and not act like women who make unfounded claims of oppression. Thank you for the sources!
/r/MensRights23/09/24 03:56 PM
2

Hi! Do you any any other stats on men's issues?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 03:37 AM
1

Hi! Do you have some studies or articles scholarships grants and special programs that are in favour of women and discriminate against men?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 03:21 AM
6

https://archive.is/2024.09.22-204538/https://www.ft.com/content/17606f25-1d03-4f37-b7f4-f39989af9bd Can you view it now?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 03:19 AM
11

https://archive.is/2020.06.21-101430/http://www.saveservices.org/equity/scholarships/ Just leaving the archived article if it ever gets deleted. Thank you for the source!
/r/MensRights23/09/24 03:08 AM
2

Yeah of course it hurts since it's a really sensitive part plus any kind of operation that needs cutting hurts I think.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:43 AM
1

"Correct. The one I quoted does not follow logically from what you wrote before it (a compound sentence with 2 separate ideas). Where are you getting lost?"
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:18 AM
3

Yeah I suppose in kids it could bring problems since the foreskin is attached to the glans. The frenulum is the part that connects the foreskin with the part just under the head it's in front of the urethra where it's kind of a canal, it's like the part under the tongue which connects the tongue to the lower jaw that is called the frenulum too. "The frenulum of your penis is a band of tissue found where your foreskin (prepuce) intersects with the head (glans) of the underside of your penis."
/r/MensRights23/09/24 01:09 AM
17

"I feel exactly the same way, very very disturbing like what's the point of having a will?" Not only of the will any kind lf contract that you can use that argument to just bring it down.​ "There may have been other factors aside from gender (while the daughter is using gender to justify alteration to the arrangement) but even if it was just gender-based discrimination and regardless of what factors went into the mother's decision-making it was her decision to make and her will to make it that w…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 11:30 PM
1

"Do you know what a sentence is?" Yes, but in the comment that you are reffering to I only wrote 2 sentences. "Again, you're just making that up (as shown by the quotes you provided in your last comment)" River Sun said that the draft isn't a woman's rights issue and that the draft should be abolished. What activities has she done with her anti-war organization? How come she couldn't gather the feminists to abolish the draft just like when they had their rights given? "It's literally not. That w…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 10:58 PM
60

Wtf is this? How can a court rewrite a will? Neither the son nor the daughter is entitled to the wealth of their parents after they are grown. If the mother decided to give more to the son so be it. It would be the same the other way around if the daughter was given more. If there would be any qualms about it it would be with the mother, but now she is dead so it's pointless. The court has no right to change the will though Idk what kind of effed up laws are there in Canada.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 10:25 PM
1

I think all of europe, Australia, US and Canada are too late just on the birth rate which I don't think that it will become better just worse. Orban is just some liar he still takes chinese in and I think other immigrants he just acts more righteous and as if he cares about europeans. Didn't he refer to himself as an asian? "Less than 10% of children entering primary school in America are of European heritage. " Is this true? "Then, the screeching white women will get a taste of being a second-c…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 09:14 PM
1

You can send the websites on the chat if you want to.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 09:08 PM
1

Men having fewer friends is actually related to loneliness you can't just say that it has no relationship to that. As for the degree to how much is that related to loneliness sure it can be up to discussion. I agree that sexual intimacy matters and that it is different to platonic friendships. Sexual needs if I'm not mistaken are also part of the hiearchy of needs. That's why I also said that I would like if there's a way for men to be ok living alone without friends or romantic interests withou…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 08:12 PM
1

"What I wrote. Your last sentence does not follow from what you wrote before it. It's just a thing you're saying. It has no basis in evidence, so I'm going to keep dismissing it appropriately." Wtf are you saying? I only wrote once to you. "I have no idea what this means. "A speech that they might be obligated to do it"? Also, you keep jumping back and forth between "feminists" and "women." I meant it as in when someone holds a speech that the draft should be for both genders only then do women …
/r/MensRights22/09/24 08:00 PM
1

If europeans will do nothing in the future they will not be able to decide anything about their countries.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:47 PM
1

Men women all are susceptible to manipulation that's why men fall for conservative politicians because they promise them that they will make the country a better place to live they will reduce the number of immigrants etc. and completely do the opposite at least the left does things for women whereas for men no one helps them.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:46 PM
1

Europe, but I don't want to specify my country. I never said that diversity is good. All I was asking is whose fault is that and who continuesly votes for those people to come and who blames white men and calls them racist for not wanting immigrants? It's not mostly men who do that even though there are many simping cucks who do that. I know who you might be referring to I think that you are speaking about jews, but anyway the culprit and those who make this thing worse is not them, but women. I…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:41 PM
1

I think it was me who posted this link that you are referring lol. No need to be sorry. Wait it doesn't ask you to register to download the document? "I don't know if this is another site where you must register. Good luck!" Also this site that you mentioned here you don't need to register the only downside is that I think you can only download a document per day.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 05:31 PM
2

He is saying that evolutionary speaking women like to reproduce with attractive mates and select for parental qualities when raising their child even if said child isn't of said guy who has good parental qualities, in this scenario he is speaking about why women cheat. A guy isn't a "beta" if he raises his own child (unless he acts in the way his partner wants and doesn't have his own independent thoughts and actions and then you can say that he is one even in tha case) in this specific scenario…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 05:26 PM
2

You have to register to get the pdf though.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:55 PM
2

The link doesn't work.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:42 AM
4

Yes it states that the cheating rate is at the same level. The first one is related to millenial women and gen z women whereas the second one is related to the cheating rate in relation the number of partners you have had. Yes I have seen the article you sent and it says that men cheat more that's what you would find online also in the first searches where it says that 20% of men have admitted to cheating and 13% of women have admitted to cheating. That doesn't mean that that's true it could mea…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:31 AM
1

"Yes, exactly! They need to care for each other. Something that will never happen in a fractured, low trust society." Well who lowered the trust even though society is much better than in 20th century in terms of crimes. It certainly wasn't men even though in this misandrist climate men are being more careful in regards to relationships with women since they don't know for sure which woman will call them a creep if they approach them and put them on social media, they don't know if they will mak…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:28 AM
1

"I agree that solving the problem with women is the number 1 problem. You just have to understand where this programming comes from to fight it. Without women, humanity is lost. However, at this rate, they are happy to destroy it for base pleasures. People truly are evolved creatures. The traits women carry are totally different than men. These traits have been exploited by the media for centuries, at least. The sad thing is that women have an ingrained need to "fit in". This is an evolutionary …
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:23 AM
1

"Of course, individualism isn't at fault for low birth rates. Low birth rates are part of the plan to destroy the West. However, the lack of a group identity will be the downfall of the West. The individualism you spoke of worked great because the societies allowed it to do so. They were homogeneous, high trust societies. That isn't the case anymore. You can see clear political movements from every group except Europeans to "take as much of the pie" for themselves. This way of thinking is both g…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:15 AM
1

And neither are men equal to women in Israel either: "As of 2022, the minimum required length of military service is two years and eight months (with some roles requiring an additional four months of service) for all conscripted men, and two years (with some roles requiring an additional eight months of service) for conscripted Jewish women.\3]) Once they have completed their mandatory term of service, all discharged citizens remain eligible to be called up for reserve duty) until the age of 40.…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:54 AM
1

"You obviously aren't putting all the pieces together with working and wages. It goes back to putting women in the workforce. Using feminism to convince all women to work increased the labor supply instantly by almost double in a generation. Driving wages down. On top of this, small business was squashed by large corporations. There are many reasons why you would need to work two of the same jobs just to survive when in the past one could have raised a family comfortably. All these topics of men…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:52 AM
3

The alpha, beta male argument isn't of main importance in his comment. Yes even though that alpha beta thing was debunked it still doesn't mean that they can't be used to describe something. In this case it's used to differentiate between assertive and non-assertive men or dominant and non-dominant men. Since they are letters of the ancient greek alphabet alpha is first and beta second thus it's a way to show that someone who is an alpha is a leader and someone who is a beta is a follower. So yo…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:41 AM
1

That should be everywhere where conscription exists or where the draft exists or where the Marshall Law or however it's called exists. Equality I mean.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:33 AM
1

"For that government website, just search whatever state/area you want. It will pull up groups assisting the government for money. I have actually gone to my local ones to try and get footage and interviews. They do NOT like publicity." I'm not from the US so it's not really important to me I was just wanting to know who was funding them to see if there's some shady business going on.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:31 AM
1

"Also, good deeds are not welfare. It has always been a virtue to do for yourself. It's a lot different when someone chooses to help. Also, it was taught that too much help is a bad thing because it leads to dependence. You know the old fish and rod parable. Welfare is a governmental theft and redistribution of wealth to discourage things like stable marriages. Just imagine if they gave housing subsidies, extra vacation time, and job stability to those who were both wed and with children. It wou…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:30 AM
1

"I am 1000% in favor of logic and reason, but I also realize that not all things are known or explained. I believe that faith helps, and having a guidestone can be a rock in a storm. Now that faith and guidestone can be different things. My guidstone atm is advocating for unity among my people. Seeing each other as a brother. Rather than a stanger." You don't advocate for nor believe in things that you can't prove that's antithesis to science and/or masculinity. You can unite people without reli…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:21 AM
1

"Since 1985, women have been able to enlist for voluntary service as regular recruits.\11]) On 14 June 2013, the Norwegian Parliament voted to extend conscription to women.\12]) In 2015 conscription was extended to women making Norway the first NATO member and first European country to make national service compulsory for both men and women.\13]) In 2020, women made up one-third of new conscripts.\14)" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Armed_Forces I was wrong it seems conscription has bee…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 12:58 AM
0

Didn't Norway make the draft equal whilst the Ukraine war was happening? And has Israel drafted women in combat positions in this ongoing war? "Sweden has had partial conscription for both men and women since 2017." And Sweden has done it in the last 7 years which means that women were quite privileged "Between the 17th century and 1900, Sweden had an allotment system. Mandatory military service for men was introduced in 1901. During the height of the Cold War, about 85% of Swedish men were cons…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 12:51 AM
1

Thank you for the sources! In the second link where can I see the organisations which are paid to do resettlement? Christianity isn't manly. It goes against principles of logic which is believing in something without proof or sound argument. Plus it encourages being to serve a god which goes against the dominance part of masculinity. It teaches you to be a follower. Plus I don't know if you know, but there is an anology of christians being sheep and Jesus being the shepherd so it's not a pleasen…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 09:07 PM
6

The first study speaks about South Africa and it was in only 23 families. The second study states: "Further crosscultural investigation of the relationship between paternity and paternity confidence is warranted." The third study doesn't state what you said. https://dnatesting.com/paternity-fraud-the-tough-realities-men-must-face/ https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/business-news/paternity-test-father-bioclinics-group-12399580
/r/MensRights21/09/24 05:30 PM
1

Do you really think that accessible health-care and social programs are communist? Sweden is more free-market oriented than the US. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/mirage-of-swedish-socialism-the-economic-history-of-a-welfare-state-parts-1-and-2#:\~:text=With%20the%20exception%20of%20the,Freedom%20of%20the%20World%20data.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 05:07 PM
4

It's not a reflection of the whole comment. What source do you have on the claim that it's a problem that affects less than 5% of the population?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 05:00 PM
5

https://medium.com/@aka54deep90/millenials-and-gen-z-women-cheat-more-than-men-a-data-insight-b6c0e83cdd5e https://archive.is/2015.07.05-070842/http://www.statisticbrain.com/percent-of-female-infidelity-based-on-number-of-premarital-partners/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352250X16300227
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:51 PM
8

You don't have any argument against his points, but you only focus on one thing which wasn't really important to his points in order to shift blame from women to something else and you act like you care about men a lot lol.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:00 PM
12

That's why guys should be strong and hold the ground and not be cucks. If she cheats you immediately leave. Also if you see it as a high risk you could just do one night stands and/or fwb
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:48 PM
1

My problem is them saying that they are for equality, but then completelty acting another way thus showing that they don't care for equality, but only for superiority.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:39 PM
1

"Your last sentence doesn't follow from either of the first two" What do you mean? "and is disproven in the link." No it isn't, women oppose it only when there is a speech that they might be obligated to do it too. (Rivera Sun of Code Pink, a women-led grassroots antiwar organization, disagrees. She told the commission: “The draft is not a women’s rights issue. Women’s equality will not be achieved by including women in a draft system that forces civilians to participate in activities that are a…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:30 PM
2

I have read that the Pope said that same-sex couples should be blessed or something like that, but I don't know how true it is. If you could bring sources on that or other things I would greatly appreciate it. Also about the child saints, do you mean that they were removed from the story of the church? Also yeah some days ago the Pope said that both Trump and Kamala are against life since Trump is against immigration and Kamala is pro abortion so your point about the Catholic Church supporting t…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:20 PM
3

Christianity isn't leftist. That's like saying that only a heterosexual relationships where you have as many kids as possible is leftist. Also how does christianity turn it's back on tradition? Do you read what you write? Also when did all the other things you listed become leftist?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:20 AM
2

I'm not saying to go or not to go to her church. What I'm saying that this could be a precedent on what could happen in other countries. If you "adapt" "modernise" "change" or "open your mind" this could very well happen at your church. And there's not being pretty traditional you either are traditional or not. It's not a percentage thing. Also didn't the woman at your church change the liturgy? So what would stop this according to you from happening in the future?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:31 AM
1

That's in Sweden and fortunately what she proposed didn't happen as far as I know.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:26 AM
1

Well if it doesn't offer any benefit to men why should they go there? If there is this leftist propaganda pushed onto the church and in the future men are requested to abide by their traditional roles whereas women can do whatever they want just like it's happening in the society right now who would want that deal? It reminds me of that lesbian bishop in Sweden lol. "In September 2015 Brunne proposed the removal of symbols of Christianity, including crosses, from the Seamen's Church in Stockholm…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:04 AM
1

That was what I was saying. Relating to the religion's rituals and so on no need to adapt it doesn't have anything to do with electricity or indoor plumbing lol. I don't think that there is some religious law prohibiting you from using new technology.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:01 AM
3

I meant it in general as in christians who go to church.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 12:30 AM
-1

No, in this specific case it doesn't. The church doesn't have anything to do with modernity as per the religion's rituals. You can also say we should write a new bible, and to that I say well what's religion or christianity in this case then? What purpose do they have if they can't even stick to their own values?
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:59 PM
2

If you mean that all of christianity is infested with leftist politics sure it could be, but you have to bring some proof for that.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:56 PM
1

DEI-speak? Well it seems the church it's fucked too lol. Did she flirt with anyone whilst you were in the church?
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:55 PM
1

"I’m an old school radical feminist." "I’m an ultra maga supporter." Lool
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:51 PM
1

Women*. Most women are feminists. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:48 PM
0

Which countries? Countries like Ukraine?/s
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:47 PM
1

In the article you linked it said that only some women opposed the draft and that many men opposed it in the protests. Women oppose the draft only when it is being called into question if they should serve too.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:40 PM
3

What do you mean? Do you think that churches need to adapt?
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:23 PM
1

https://archive.is/2024.08.15-183656/https://medium.com/the-knowledge-of-freedom/single-father-households-do-vastly-better-than-single-mother-heres-the-real-reason-why-8a7fd7c5611d0
/r/MensRights20/09/24 11:18 PM
1

https://divorce.com/blog/divorce-rates-in-the-world/ 60% of spouses married at 20-25 years old will divorce. Look at this interesting statistic. Also look at this: https://divorce.com/blog/divorce-statistics/ "A prevalent myth about divorce rates in the U.S. suggests that 50% of first marriages, 67% of second marriages, and 73% of third marriages end in divorce. However, these statistics are not based on any verifiable data, and their origins are untraceable, as highlighted in Shaunti Feldhahn's…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 10:51 PM
4

First off wtf does a church have to do with modernity? A church has a specific relationship to the text the bible which is 400-3400 years old and it has nothing to do with modernity. Politics have no place in the church. Also guys this should show us that we should always be competitive and hold the ground no matter the profession otherwise you could get replaced. Anyway most of the churches outside the catholic ones or orthodox are infested with leftist politics so it doesn't make sense to deal…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 10:30 PM
1

In the same link there were these 4 sources: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.12420 https://academic.oup.com/book/1722/chapter-abstract/141338163?redirectedFrom=fulltext https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://xyonline.net/sites/xyonline.net/files/2020-01/Anderson%252C%2520Modern%2520Misogyny%2520-%2520Anti-Feminism%2520in%2520a%2520Post-Feminist%2520Era%2520%25282014%2529.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiQs_PexdKIAxVP_bsIHWRuA6cQFnoECBYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3nZV7my0VIyM…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 10:12 PM
3

Would removing only the frenulum cause any problems? I mean in adults.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 07:39 PM
8

(The court stated, “In order to determine if she can be sued for false accusation, we must first look at whether Oh was compelled or intimidated into sexual relations. It is difficult to completely eliminate the possibility that sexual relations took place against Oh’s inner wishes, but it is also not possible to say that oppressive tactics were used.”) This statement could be used against him so someone can say that he still raped her, but being a famous actor he was able to get away from it. Y…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 07:32 PM
2

https://www.zlibrary.to/dl/the-empathy-gap-male-disadvantages-and-the-mechanisms-of-their-neglect https://oceanofpdf.com/authors/roy-f-baumeister/pdf-epub-is-there-anything-good-about-men-how-cultures-flourish-by-exploiting-men-download-77987845165/
/r/MensRights20/09/24 04:48 PM
3

https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html https://epdf.tips/what-men-know-that-women-dont-how-to-love-women-without-losing-your-soul.html
/r/MensRights20/09/24 04:44 PM
1

That's why if men don't fight back they will become a minority in even the subjects that they are the majority thus fewer men being educated. The quality of those fields will drop and inovation will stagnate thus the quality of life won't improve as fast if at all.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:38 PM
6

What is masculinity? And what parts of masculinity are toxic?
/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:17 PM
2

Men had to be cooperative too. How do you think they killed big game in the past especially mammoths? You can't out-muscle or use your assertivenes against it. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21910518/
/r/MensRights20/09/24 02:44 AM
2

Well that's part of it since men have fewer close friends than before and more men have no close friend at all than before, but it is also related to men not having someone who is romantically interested in men. I would like if there could be a way to make it comfortable being able to live alone without much contact with others without having any loss in health or even social skills.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 02:38 AM
2

Does anyone have studies on gender disparity on sentencing for other countries?
/r/MensRights20/09/24 02:08 AM
2

Ok, I will try and look if I can find it.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 11:15 PM
3

Was it this study: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277943167_You're_OK_Until_You_Misbehave_How_Norm_Violations_Magnify_the_Attractiveness_Devil_Effect From this video?: https://youtu.be/PDmCfUZPkNE?si=yA9IWwirRijUIN3Y
/r/MensRights19/09/24 11:07 PM
4

Ok take all the time you need. I have seen some of his videos he is an australian youtuber. You are welcome! It's true that many people make claims without supporting them and I try to support my claims as much as I can.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 09:30 PM
3

Do you have a source for your claim? That way we can use the research if need be and people can be more informed on how to act in social situations if there's risk involved.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 09:16 PM
1

https://medium.com/@johnbfenn/ways-education-was-affected-by-the-industrial-revolution-78644198dec3
/r/MensRights19/09/24 09:01 PM
1

Women don't want to work: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315481098/women-work-east-west-dual-burden-employment-family-life-norman-stockman-norman-bonney-xuewen-sheng Page 200 https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2007/07/12/fewer-mothers-prefer-full-time-work/ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2013/08/19/mothers-and-work-whats-ideal/ https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/12/11/chapter-5-balancing-work-and-family/ https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/jo…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:19 PM
1

Also are you from the US if you don't mind answering?
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:15 PM
1

Thank you in advance if you post something in here! You are welcome man! Glad to hear that you are doing better!
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:13 PM
1

Not even 5 minutes in and you couldn't stay without mentioning something misandrist. And I quote: "They also feel more entitled to it because of the patriarchy which makes a lot if them feel superior." That's a reply to and I quote: "And that's not the only reason they are hurting us and others." Also the person you were speaking with (and I could be wrong) due to the username it seems like she is slavic. I didn't see the whole video btw because it's too long.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:04 PM
1

Men had to work they didn't have a choice: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bevin_Boys
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:18 AM
1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/mill1869.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjboaLYgs6IAxWA_7sIHY6GLPkQFnoECDEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3EpEi0U0wg464WE2abRx4v https://www.jstor.org/stable/3786786 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/abs/frauenarbeit-im-dritten-reich-by-dorte-winkler-historische-perspektiven-vol-9-hamburg-hoffmann-und-campe-1977-pp-253-dm-36/C45D6499600D2B3E5ABBE9BEA5F05D08 Pages 110-9 https://ww…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:05 AM
1

"Also yes, I am sorry, I should have included poverty of being the main source for little opportunities for men to each higher grounds, that is true for sure. But you can't compare that to women. Even in poverty, men still had more rights than women and still could achieve more things than women. Its not that it was written in the law that men couldn't achieve education or go to higher jobs. For women, on the other hand, it was written in the law that a women can't EVER achieve an education, nor…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:29 AM
1

"Dude, you are denying history. Look in front of your fucking eyes. Women were oppressed by men and you should just accept it instead of babbling out in emotion." What history? You have to prove it that women were oppressed by men you can't just make that claim and then go with it as if anyone is gonna believe you without proof. Funny how you say that I am emotional when we can clearly see who is the emotional one here. " How many circumstances should I tell you about this? I might run out of br…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:23 AM
1

Yeah in most cases, but why do you ask?
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:36 AM
1

Even in the states though maybe in urban areas it could be treated differently, but in rural areas I don't think that a boy can be relaxed about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/24 01:35 AM
2

Thank you for the article! Even though the study was done by a religious group atleast there is something which someone can use as proof if needed. The very fact that there isn't an academic study on domestic violence suffered by men just shows the actual sexism against men. Do you have some social journals where you can find studies for this in germany? Since I think google being american you would have a really difficult time finding a german study.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:34 AM
2

"You're right, it's difficult to find good links about the situation in Germany because most of the reporting is about the female victims of domestic violence. As a male victim, you are virtually invisible in Germany (own experience). We do have a men's helpline, for example, but only a handful of shelters for men affected. There is also a huge social stigma, which makes it difficult to collect data." Yeah I think that's the case all over europe unfortunately. "Years ago, when I was physically a…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:25 AM
2

"The 2012 National Crime Records Bureau report of India states a reported crime rate of 46 per 100,000, rape rate of 2 per 100,000, dowry homicide rate of 0.7 per 100,000 and the rate of domestic cruelty by husband or his relatives as 5.9 per 100,000.\6])" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_in_India https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26449344/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360463477_Dowry_and_Domestic_Violence_Against_Women_In_India
/r/MensRights18/09/24 03:53 PM
2

You don't have to worry about it man you were busy doing your things. I have one argument though the first link is about the UK and it doesn't give us a picture of the situation in Germany and also it was speaking about the barriers of men's help seeking from domestic violence. Thank you for the links anyway!
/r/MensRights18/09/24 03:42 PM
2

"Also yes, the can't escape marriage thing was true, and is still true today. In India, there is this system of Dowry where the women's family has to pay the guy's family in order for the women to be married to the guy. The more Dowry the women's family payed, the more humanely the guy would treat the women once the two get married. Majority of dowry matches end up in abusive households towards the women, with the guy's side of the family constantly harassing the wife, the guy beating the wife a…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 03:23 PM
2

"Bruh, do I have to put a 5 page essay every time I say a random comment. And for proof, yea, these men try to deny history when its most obvious is just woman-hating if anything at all. This sub isn't about equality, but always whining about how they are the victims and nobody else is, the same with feminism." Men don't deny history it's you who is doing that and who is saying strawman things like "when its most obvious is just woman-hating if anything at all.". There's no woman hating by and l…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 02:36 PM
1

But mental health professionals are capable of proving a causal relationship. That's like saying doctors can't diagnose a disease because a person has many different symptoms that are related to many diseases. Sure the field of mental health is not as established as other medicinal fields, but still I don't think that it is impossible to see a causation between mental health and stress at work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/24 02:07 PM
3

What facts? And who is hating women? You just said some claims without backing them up. When could men choose to work whatever job they wanted have all the education they want? And how was the right to vote given to men? And you say that women were raised just as another mouth to feed and how were men raised according to you? The only differing thing would be that men would be another hand in bringing money to the house, that's quite the privilege I would say. What special events are you speakin…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:05 AM
4

It is just a way to shift blame from the movement nothing else. Just like they say about men not all men, but always men even it's actually statistically correct to say that most men aren't violent they still don't care, but they expect us to be sympathetic to a movement that has had plenty of people who have been misandrists towards men as evidenced by their quotes and as evidenced by them manipulating stats in favour of women and trying to also censor stats which could be in favour of men just…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:43 PM
4

The post you linked is deleted. "And feminists are too amazing to be put in the same basket with misandrists." Also looool!
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:28 PM
6

"I and my feminist friends are not misandrists those misandrists are posing as feminists, real true feminists wouldn't say such things, but I also don't condemn them unless the image of feminism is being attacked and then I act like I care about hatred against men" https://thoughtcatalog.com/jake-fillis/2014/05/23-quotes-from-feminists-that-will-make-you-rethink-feminism/ https://greenpill.net/the-feminist-or-nazi-challenge/ Are these not true feminists either? Have these women infiltrated femin…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:20 PM
2

She is a white woman who doesn't like white men. She might also be a feminist disguising as someone who cares about men.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:13 PM
-1

"This seems very accurate. For some reason it's perfectly acceptable to shit on asian dudes, even publicly. ItS JusT a JoKe bRo. And they legit thought asian dudes are inferior and no competition. Now they're mad and confused that white women stopped giving fucks about the opinion of entitled white dudes. No amount of shit talking is enough hide the fact that a lot of asian dudes are doing better in every single aspect. We have access to the internet and unlimited information, we're also able to…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:11 PM
1

You are a woman? I thought that you were a guy tbh. Thank you for caring about men!
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:07 PM
9

How can 86 out of 132 be just 44.1% when it's actually over 60%?
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:00 PM
4

Thank you for the info! if you have some studies or specific laws on these issues I would greatly appreciate it if you could send them to me. You are welcome! European guys should help each since that might be the only help that we might get. I hope that things will get better for you in Germany!
/r/MensRights17/09/24 05:17 PM
12

One thing she blames men for being sexist or violent and for being right wing? Why does she complain then that the right wing men don't want migrants don't they do that too? By her logic 2 of these horrible cases were from 2 countries outside of europe so should Germany not accept migrants now? Wouldn't that be xenophobic or racist according to her? Or maybe she doesn't think that she maybe wants to control native men white men otherwise she didn't need to go outside of her country for that in o…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 04:41 PM
1

But again wouldn't the serial rapist claim actually support the claim that not many guys do actually rape?
/r/MensRights17/09/24 03:37 PM
1

Well these studies aren't being made from lay people. These studies are done from professionals in the field.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 03:36 PM
1

So you are saying that mental health professionals can't measure if the mental health of many people is affected positively, negatively or not at all?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 03:35 PM
1

His serial rapist claim was also opposed by a feminist.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 01:22 PM
1

If you are speaking about mental health studies they should have some sort of way to know if something truly affects mental health so that there isn't some mistake being made. If you are speaking about biological differences between men and women well they are different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 01:06 PM
3

Yes but how would you do the other kind of data without having the average mental health situation of men? Which means that you have to gather data on men and then you could do a study about men. Also a mental health study is quite different from finding the average height of men or women. Men and women are biologically different and we don't know if the stress has the same effect on men as it has on women. It could be the same it could be better for men or it could be better for women, but with…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 02:38 AM
1

Do you have any backround in statistics?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 02:32 AM
1

https://academic.oup.com/sf/article-abstract/100/4/1561/6322750 This might be the reason why women don't like meritocracy.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 01:30 AM
1

Though there weren't any sources I think that could confirm France helping the Rwandan government
/r/MensRights17/09/24 01:28 AM
3

So if there are no studies on it how would you know the effect of it? What we did is in a sort of way a "study". We gathered the data and we made conclusions based on that data so in the previous case if you don't gather data on men's mental health in repetitive jobs you wouldn't know the effect that those jobs have on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 01:15 AM
0

The average is dependent on the number of people. If the number of men and women is equal than the average is 155. If there are more men the average would be over 155. And if there are more women the average would be lower than 155.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 01:08 AM
2

That's what ultimately masculinity is. Assertiveness, dominance, aggression, discipline and logic. https://helpfulprofessor.com/masculinity-vs-femininity/ https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fhelpfulprofessor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F07%2Fmasculinity-vs-femininity-1024x724.jpg&tbnid=mVKvETOR8lX2hM&vet=1&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fhelpfulprofessor.com%2Fmasculinity-vs-femininity%2F&docid=nFvLkehDQnX8_M&w=1024&h=724&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim%2Fm5%2F2&kgs=6fe7f878f5f538f9&shem=abme%2…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 01:02 AM
1

You can't manipulate natural sciences or formal sciences not at least without destroying things or people. As for social sciences sure you can manipulate them since the there is a replicability of those sciences. Only in medicine could that manipulation happen and as I said it will ultimately result in destroying lives or it could result in cures not being found.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:58 AM
2

How would these results be reflected in general population if you don't have studies about men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 12:55 AM
2

They aren't a good source when you need to generalize that's why we use studies.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:49 AM
3

So wtf do you trust? What sources do you use for your claims?
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:37 AM
1

The serial rapist theory is actually somewhat to the benefit of men since it would mean that even a smaller number of men rape rather than saying that for each raped woman there is a new rapist so a 1:1 ratio.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:34 AM
4

No, it isn't since you can't verify the info on chat gpt if I'm not mistaken whereas you can look at the sources that an article might give if they have them on google.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:25 AM
-3

Google.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:22 AM
1

You agree to what you wrote or to what I wrote?
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:10 AM
6

Precisely, but it's not truly against white people in general it's mostly towards white men since they are envious of the success that they had and since they created one of the most powerful countries to ever exist and that in a foreign land. Now they are falling behind and some asian ethnicities are going ahead of them in terms of earning power so I would advice white guys to seek in becoming financially independent, to become as educated as possible, to take care of their health and to become…
/r/MensRights16/09/24 11:50 PM
11

First off stop taking agency for women and seeing women as perpetual victims. They have had great benefits given to them by feminism and many things being undeserved. Secondly I wouldn't use Chat Gpt as a reliable source since as far as I know it is prone to mistakes.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 11:42 PM
1

Yes I am a man. I am not speaking about social differences in general just this specific one. I disagree with your claim that boys aren't berated for getting a girl pregnant in some cases a guy could even be killed for that in some countries and nowhere that is treated as nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 11:09 PM
8

In this sub there's still a feeling of wanting to remove responsibility and blaming sometthing else and in many times also ending up blaming men again ie. Rothschild and so on. There's this hyperagency for men and hypoagency for women. In any way somehow men are always to blame.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 07:04 PM
1

"leave well alone"???
/r/MensRights16/09/24 06:50 PM
1

Are you sure that boys aren't berated when they get a girl pregnant?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 05:36 PM
1

Then htf are guys in here leftists? When the left actively supports feminism and never condems it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 05:33 PM
1

Can we disprove the claim that women recieve harsher sentences than men for homicide?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 05:27 PM
1

Which evidence did ACLU bring that showed that women are sentenced more in homicidal crimes?
/r/MensRights16/09/24 05:23 PM
1

I saw this post of yours: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/194yjlc/women_receive_harsher_sentences_for_killing_their/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button And wanted to say thank you for your work. The comments especially have some useful sources so again thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 05:11 PM
1

You are welcome!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 05:09 PM
1

So it's not the same thing the other guy said? But according to you what he said is conspiratory whereas what you said is not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 04:53 PM
2

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0146167220916622
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/24 04:52 PM
1

In the link you sent it said that France supported the Rwandan government after the genocide had started so it seems there's some truth to it.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 04:17 PM
1

This conflict the Rwandan genocide is said to be caused by europeans which I don't know how true it is.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 02:55 PM
2

You are welcome!
/r/MensRights16/09/24 03:44 AM
2

https://familieslink.co.uk/download/sept07/Reciprocal%20violence%20AJPH.pdf https://archive.ph/SuGxj https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178911000620 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment
/r/MensRights15/09/24 10:55 PM
4

https://familieslink.co.uk/download/sept07/Reciprocal%20violence%20AJPH.pdf https://archive.ph/SuGxj https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178911000620 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment
/r/MensRights15/09/24 10:52 PM
2

I have not seen the show tbh. I have seen memes of it though. It is the series with the homelander guy right?
/r/MensRights15/09/24 10:22 PM
2

That's why white guys should band together and not let that happen. They should become stronger physically mentally, should become financially independent, should educate themselves in as many fields as possible otherwise the worst could happen. Also you have a word for that "treason" no need for fraternisation. I think that fraternisation is used to mean becoming one with the enemy even though Idk how fraternisation could be used for that since fraternity doesn't have anything to do with women.…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 09:04 PM
-1

Nah most guys don't want to see nude guys lol.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 08:49 PM
1

"Women have no problem with polygyny. The only criterion important to them is that there's enough money to go around." Plenty don't like to share men most even, but this might be a more modern thing since they can provide for themselves whereas in the past they had to rely on men. With the economy worsening this thought will slowly go away and women as you say will have no problem with polygyny. "The top women (10 on a decile scale of looks) will be swarming to the harems of the wealthy in futur…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 06:11 PM
2

Monogamy also benefits men at large in mating success since before poligamy was the norm and few men had many women which you can't build a society with it since if many men if not most men aren't reproducing you won't be able to create a functioning society since the men won't have a reason to work and build one. Also there should be no children from the woman and preferably she should be a virgin since also studies confirm that a marriage will be more likely to last if she has fewer partners, …
/r/MensRights15/09/24 11:56 AM
1

"From what I've been able to read, there was 'more to go around' for a time after the plague. Against that, you've got the 'history is bunk' viewpoint of Henry Ford, and the 'history is written by the victors' viewpoint of someone else, and the 'history is written by white, heterosexual men' viewpoint of feminism. What do I know? All I really know is my own history - that monogamy was (relatively) good for me, although she could bury her head in the sand when it suited. And that my two, adult ma…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 06:39 PM
1

"Yes, visionaries going after a return on investment has vastly increased the quality of life for the human race. No problem with that." These people should be celebrated rewarded and supported so that the world develops faster. And as history has shown those visionaries are men and since the industrial revolution white men were at the forefront of stem, but if we go and do things by quota and take places from white men in white majority countries which this happens nowhere in the opposite way w…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 02:48 PM
1

"Some powerful people have invested in 'green' technologies. They're getting impatient for a return on investment. They've been conflating 'green' with female interests [all green organisations ultimately founded on ecofeminism. See the horrors of Mary Daly's 'Gyn/Ecology' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly" Of course that investors want return on their investment, hopefully they don't get too greedy in wanting to get that forcing people even more to cater to their desires. If all green org…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:24 PM
1

"Meanwhile, men are 'programmed' to defer to women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ (or sexual opportunism, if they see half a chance, Even with bots) Men have been disadvantaged in employment. No job = no girlfriend. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf" Men shouldn't simp and men who do so should be held accountable by other men if that simping is detriment to his well being whether that is mental physical or social. Also men in managment or shareholders of companies should…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:04 PM
1

"Thanks for a very thoughtful and considered reply." You are welcome! Thank you to for these thought-provoking replies and for the sources you have listed. "Big money in supporting women and not men' here. See the 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link : https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens" This is why men shouldn't be passive and should be more aggressive dominant and opportunistic in job opportunities and seek the highest paying jobs, l…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 08:45 PM
1

"No idea about the sympathies of the author of the first study. Came across it in a search I was doing on vested interests behind feminism." Oh ok I got it, I noticed the bit against capitalism in the last sentence of the abstract. "Everything indicates that there's big money behind it. It's the sort of money which would want to manipulate data to their advantage. My guess (and it's only a guess) is that those sort of players could organise bots quite readily, trawling for inconvenient questions…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 05:33 PM
1

Is the first study you sent made by a communist lol? I don't think that it is quite easy to create a profile who is an AI on reddit, but I could be wrong, I am not an AI researcher afterall. The sentence that you used lf Tavicakes might indicate that it is a bot or AI, but I'm not sure about it. Though the post itself seems wierd that she is writing a manga about a man and the place the story takes place is in Japan and she is writing it with a japanese-american guy, but wouldn't it be better if…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 04:21 PM
2

Emotionality between the genders: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5937254/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisonescalante/2021/11/12/men-are-just-as-emotional-as-women-says-new-research/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-022-04227-z https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954116/ https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sexual-personalities/201504/are-women-more-emotional-than-men https://www.verywellmind.com/women-are-not-more-emotional-than-men-study-finds-52077…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 03:34 PM
2

I think even conservative women do abortions albeit of course at a lesser rate than liberal women. In my view true conservative women (I know someone might say that it is a no true scotsman fallacy, but I will explain what I mean) don't exist, some might be brainwashed into being conservative maybe even all of them, but many when they are adults use conservatism to their benefit even if in reality they might not be one and might do things that aren't conservative in secret. There are some libera…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 03:25 PM
2

It might be that Idk, but seeing the answer towards my comment it seems like it is a very advanced bot if that's true lol.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 03:04 PM
4

Some studies on pain tolerance say that men tolerate more, some say that women tolerate more and some say that there are no differences: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-colombian-journal-anesthesiology-342-articulo-pain-gender-differences-a-clinical-S2256208712000089#:\~:text=Hormonal%20variations%2C%20puberty%2C%20reproduction%20and,less%20tolerant%20to%20noxious%20stimuli. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590023006077 https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/probing-que…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 02:52 AM
2

Thank you for your kind words, take care and have a good evening aswell! I wish you well!
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:35 AM
1

I am gonna be honest and say that I didn't see the video. If I see it I might give my thoughts on it.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:24 AM
1

"ETA its worth noting that the other person claimed that backroom deals are how tissue is procured, yet we see the doctors talking about it in what looks like a bar. If it's so secret, why would they talk about it so openly" Well speaking in a bar isn't so openly because they could very well speak in such a way as not ti be understood. Otherwise why would someone do such a stupid thing if it would get them into prison?
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:08 AM
1

"When someone files a patent, they disclose how something is made, blueprints or steps to create it in exchange for being granted a monopoly on the use, production and licensing of it for a period of time. Whether it's with public funds or not, patents require disclosure to get that monopoly right. If someone doesn't want ro file a patent, they don't have to, but their product doesn't get protected from competition" Yeah, but as you said someone doesn't have to file a patent if they don't want t…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:00 AM
2

If that's true that's even worse even he wouldn't go to those lengths.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:52 AM
5

The living longer before 1920 that I was speaking off: https://web.archive.org/web/20100430061624/https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96jun/cancer/kadar.htm Cultural oppression towards men: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967052/ https://aliesq.medium.com/extensive-research-women-initiate-domestic-violence-more-than-men-men-under-report-it-3bbaa4fbec9d https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-10737-001 https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrpa/1/3/332 https://www.researchga…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:48 AM
3

"Do you contest any of my facts? I'm not here to gain readers, just correct representation of a male experience for my character. I haven't even mentioned the name of the manga. Does caring about men mean I need to lay on my back and take outright disrespect and erasure? I'm not the one for that, but I will be there to make sure men get equal rights and representation. What is your stance?" No one said that you have to take dissrespect or erasure and no taking someone else surname isn't erasure …
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:41 AM
4

"Do you contest any of my facts? I'm not here to gain readers, just correct representation of a male experience for my character. I haven't even mentioned the name of the manga. Does caring about men mean I need to lay on my back and take outright disrespect and erasure? I'm not the one for that, but I will be there to make sure men get equal rights and representation. What is your stance?" What facts? Even if true whatever you said doesn't mean that you are stronger since men are vastly stronge…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:38 AM
6

"Now read my comment again and tell me how it is not appropriate. I wrote about just how strong we are. The supporting facts are there. I am being told my last name needs to be of the alpha male in my family - the strength. I get no name, yet I am the literal strength down to the DNA - mitocondrial marker. In IVF acquaintance s are recommended the strongest embryo is even the girl if there is issues of defects/disorders in the family. Yet we are weak and therefore meant to be stepped on. If I wa…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:17 AM
4

First off your comment isn't out of context since it is fully copied. I took it from a post which said what are some myths that are said about women or something like that. I didn't see who you were replying to because the post was deleted I think which led me to believe that your comment was directed to the post and not some commenter. "I don't condone incel behavior where men lash out at women and belittle them and oppress them. Or vice versa. And I dont condone men saying women are meant to e…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:08 AM
1

The NIH database is about government grants right? Only in the case of a publicly funded patent is the patent accesible to all in privately funded patents it is not an obligation to do so. In your third website they are using cell lines from aborted fetuses so even though they aren't using the fetuses directly they are using cell lines from it so still they are needed for it. Even though I don't know how are they using cell lines, but not fetuses. Aren't cells part of fetuses? Isn't it the same …
/r/MensRights12/09/24 05:33 PM
8

"That women are the weaker sex. We live longer, we can endure more pain, we live with harsher cultural oppression and still manage to function without killing men in mass numbers in their sleep, we have the lasting mitochondrial marker, we are stronger and more resilient fetuses/embryos, we have better emotional poise despite hormonal spikes. And you can negate all of this because there is no absolute 100% untrue myth about women. There's always some asshole or ignoramus that brings down the ave…
/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:50 PM
2

"Private companies get grants and tax breaks for research, and if they want their IP protected need to file paperwork with the patent office. We do know, or at least CAN know what is being done. If you have evidence of what is actually happening then present it. Otherwise this brain worm shit is a waste of time." Private companied can use their own money to conduct research they don't have to necessary depend on grants, but it's always nicer to rely on other peoples money to do research lol. Yea…
/r/MensRights12/09/24 03:40 PM
1

I know, people like to defend topics which they care about even if there's no logic in doing it or that they don't use good arguments or actual proof to defend it.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 03:34 PM
2

The second link doesn't work it says this page doesn't exist. I am against all abortions because I think that it is murder, but that's just my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 03:31 PM
2

I said the research could be different not that it actually is, because things could change in a decade. And one thing to keep in mind this is government funds right? So we don't know what private companies are doing.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 03:20 PM
5

https://archive.is/2021.08.07-022844/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-truth-about-fetal-tissue-research/ Your second article is 9 years old and the research it references is based on 2014 so 10 years ago which means that research today on it could be different. Also only a person said that it's political play, but didn't debunk the content that it was speaking about.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 03:37 AM
0

I'm not saying that it's not understandable what I'm saying is that it doesn't look like it's a human who is writing it. And if you read the post fully the second to last sentence doesn't look like it fits in there. Maybe I'm wrong and hopefully I am, but I doubt it.​
/r/MensRights12/09/24 12:53 AM
4

If that's true that's really terrible. But why would they allow this classified information to surface on the internet? Also I can see how kids could be used and or manipulated, but I wouldn't say the same for women. That's just serves to remove accountability and responsibility from women thus they never suffer the consequences of their actions unlike men.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 12:14 AM
-1

Dialects are regional variations of the language. The standard variation is the most agreed upon and thus the correct version. But the sentence I referenced did not seem like a regional variation.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 12:03 AM
2

As I said even if english is their second language I don't think that they speak like that. English is my second language and I don't speak like that, I might make mistake sometimes, but it's either a typo or not knowing how to properly write a word, I rarely speak or write like that if ever.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 05:37 PM
1

Having moved to Santa Fe to write, Pizzey promptly became involved in running a refuge in New Mexico, as well as dealing with sexual abusers and paedophiles.\14]) Pizzey said of this work, "I discovered that there were just as many women paedophiles as there were men. Women go undetected, as usual. Working against paedophiles is a very dangerous business."\37]) While she was living in Santa Fe, one of her dogs was shot and two others were stolen, which she claims was a result of racist neighbour…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 05:25 PM
1

"University heads have spoken publicly about this-it is on record that feminism has now LITERALLY led to the 'death' of research, science, logic and fact, all due to this." Do you have sources for that? It would be nice to have them since it would give even more proof that men are discriminated against in stem and that feminism is a movement that likes to counter information against women or feninism since it shows their true face. Erin Pizzey is one that had death threats against her I think be…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 05:12 PM
2

"What my fellow gender mates think of my statements above?" As seen by this sentence it might be a bot. I don't think an average person writes likes unless that person doesn't have english as their mother tongue, but even then I find it unlikely to speak like that.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 05:00 PM
-3

Do you have a source on that, that BigPharma uses dead body tissues and organs to use them in their cosmetic products and surgeries? That could also be used as an argument against an embryo or a fetus not being a living organism. If I'm not mistaken there are countries who don't have it allowed to experiment on embryos due to it being unethical, but why is that so if it is just a clump of cells just like feminists say? It just proves that it is actually a living organism it's just that gynocentr…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 04:51 PM
1

So I was wrong, women actually suffer more from heart disease.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 04:42 AM
1

Men's issues are political since if you have a law and it's discriminatory towards men it's politicans who change it or if you need funding for men's health it's still politicians who decide to create a fund (there's private investment too, but it's inconsistent and based on if people want to do it or not and you shouldn't force people to do it that's why taxes exist as long as they are used properly) or education scholarships sentencing etc. all are related to politics.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 01:43 AM
1

They also defeat their own logic and whatever movement they have, by saying "trans boys have it much worse than biological boys" they are admitting that they aren't actual boys, but another gender thus the term they use is a misnomer.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 01:36 AM
5

"(women as well as men alike have it awful in such parts of the world)" If this is true than how you can write about women specific problems as if only they suffer?
/r/MensRights11/09/24 01:31 AM
1

"Food stamps" Oh ok thank you for the info! "Even in states where voluntary relinquishment can remove child support, it's incredibly difficult to get it, and judges can be arbitrary. As can be seen on this North Carolina lawyer's website. https://www.breedenfirm.com/legal-blog/does-signing-away-parental-rights-stop-child-support/" It seems you can't get rid of your parental rights if you don't want to pay child support. It seems nuts.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 01:22 AM
2

If you are from the US, don't you have a below replacement birthrate too?
/r/MensRights11/09/24 01:15 AM
2

That's what I think too! If men keep going out of society the society will decline just like wealthy societies are declining because they don't respect their own men. It's not nice that this is happening, but it is what it is. When a country doesn't respect it's own men (like it is happening to white men in european major countries) the society will fail and maybe even get replaced. I don't want that to happen, but I think it might be inevitable and the only way to stop it is if you give respect…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 01:11 AM
8

Yeah, but how much is the pay gap according to them?
/r/MensRights11/09/24 12:33 AM
3

Wtf is that subreddit lol?
/r/MensRights11/09/24 12:29 AM
1

"I disagree, Sommers shows a feminism there to support men and MRA's in men's issues, and sees many male issues as major societal ones. As seen by her actions in the Education Crisis and College Rape Crisis. She herself took to guest speaking and was often called by conservative college groups alongside different commentators popular among young conservatives at the time. She treated them as equal peers by all that was seen. Her and Daniel Crittenden also interviewed Jordan Peterson more recentl…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 11:34 PM
20

Thank you for the article! This is proof that also boys were forced to pay child support. It seems even boys are to be made more accountable than women just like men. Where are the feminists who say that they are for "equality"?
/r/MensRights10/09/24 10:03 PM
1

Thank you for the info, I have heard about it. Do you have studies that show how men and boys are disadvantaged in france? Like for example, grading in school, sentencing in prison, scholarships based on gender, net contribution in society (ie. taxes and how much help do you get from the state in social policies)
/r/MensRights10/09/24 09:48 PM
2

"Politiking is the act of engaging in political activity. Yes, it would make the MRM stronger, even if Sommers' equalist feminism had a little more power, it would give MRAs some space, they have us under the figurative microscope." Politicking is the actual word, but I don't remember if I have heard ot before or not so thank you for teaching me a new word. I don't think that Sommers feminism would do much for men since it would still be her or women in general who would be at the forefront and …
/r/MensRights10/09/24 09:44 PM
0

"She lived in a time where the age difference between her and her younger lover was not illegal, he was an adult, and was about 26 when they met. What was controversial in the period was the open relationships she and her main bf had." I was speaking about her relationship with young girls. That's where the controversy comes from. "We are speaking of Camille Paglia, not Simone de Beauvoir. Are you going to consider me to be a cheating slaver because I enjoy Jefferson's writings?" Jefferson was a…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 09:36 PM
3

That's really wrong the ridiculousness of that is off the charts. Sorry to hear that man! Do you have some stats about France on how men and boys are disadvantaged in France? Studies would be really nice to have about that.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 06:07 PM
2

"You're not familiar with how politiking works are you? Supporting feminist allies is just a single goal to make the MRM stronger, and remove a hurdle against men's rights, it would be hitting 2 birds with one stone." Did you mean "You're not familiar with how politics work are you?" or something else? No it wouldn't be hitting 2 birds with one stone it would just make feminism even more impossible to argue against and it wouldn't make MRM stronger. "The MRM is overrall pro choice, regardless of…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 05:55 PM
5

When asked in a 1975 interview with Betty Friedan if she would support a minimum wage for women who do housework, Beauvoir answered: "No, we don’t believe that any woman should have this choice. No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one. It is a way of forcing women in a certain direction", further stating that motherhood "shou…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 05:39 PM
4

"We cannot deny that feminism is here to stay. We can support feminists who'd support and show sympathy for men and men's rights in the hope that their feminism will become popular." No, we don't need feminism so men shouldn't support it any kind of it. We have our own movement. Any feminist movement is to the detriment of men since it puts women in the center of attention. It's only due to men's benevolence and men's weakness that feminism became this strong and we are in this state of affairs.…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 05:22 PM
5

I don't think that Camille Paglia should be referred as an ally and I would go as far as to say that maybe even Christina Hoff Sommers shouldn't be considered one. As long as they refer to themselves as feminists not matter how many names they use attached to it I don't think that they can be allies to men.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 05:08 PM
1

White men make up the majority of people killed in the US by the police in absolute numbers it's only when you look it based on the population percentage that black people are killed more, but of course no one cares about white men even though in absolute numbers they are killed more because you hate them that's why saying all lives matter seems nonsense to you. You also don't take into consideration if there's or there isn't police being attacked which leads them to defend themselves and lives …
/r/MensRights09/09/24 03:49 PM
1

"Because it need the fucking mother to do everything for it!!! WTF is so difficult to understand!?" I do understand it. I never said that the fetus doesn't need the mother or that it was doing everything or anything at all by itself. What you don't understant is that by your definition a baby isn't a living being either since the baby can't live without it's mother or at least someone who can feed them and the best way for a baby to develop is to get the nutrients from the mother's milk. "A fetu…
/r/MensRights09/09/24 03:47 AM
0

Wrong, white western women would treat badly white men not men of colour, they spew vitriol anytime they can get towards white men, whereas they try to protect other men as you yourself say by going to protests or by wanting foreign men to come to their country even if those men have vastly different ideologies compared to them and if some of them might hurt them, this happens in wealthy european countries too and only after recieving abuse for so long do they decide to change course as reflecte…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:04 PM
1

"Just because it have the early sign of a system doesn’t mean it is complete nor functionnable. And just because it’s a living being "in developpement" doesn’t mean it’s a proper living organism. By this logic, even using protection is murder because you’re sacrificing 300 millions sperm cells which could be a baby, which would make any men having sex or masturbating genocider" Who said that the system is complete? And how can you say that it isn't functionable? If it wasn't it wouldn't be possi…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 09:26 PM
0

But they are saying that the claim is dubious that women are being fired for reporting sexual harassment at work so how do you know that they are a troll? Have you noticed a pattern in this sub? And why would they do this kind of thing?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:23 PM
0

We risk being eco-chambers in that way. We are criticised as a men's rights subreddit even though we use a lot of stats for our statements and it's not like we are making claims out of thin air, now what do you think would be said about us if we decide to censor them. Me also being a free speech believer it seems pointless to censor them and quite frankly illogical, because if we let them post or comment we can know what their thoughts are​ and their arguments and their sourced and in that way i…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 08:19 PM
-2

I think that we should allow them so that we are better than feminists and that we should criticise them.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 06:44 PM
0

No, I wouldn't like to be a stay at home dad. I think it's dangerous to put yourself in a position of having to rely on another person. Men should seek to be financially independent and not having to rely on anyone. If they want to be fathers they should look for a scenario where their partner wants to be at home and take care of their kids, or they should hire a surrogate and hire a babysitter to take care of their kids, or even if they have kids with a partner, they could hire a babysitter in …
/r/MensRights08/09/24 06:39 PM
1

"They are in the fetus intestines, however they are i complete and lack key part of a proper digestive and excretion system, the main one being the absence of a intestinal microbiote until the third trimester of the pregnancy" Well a fetus has a digestive system. No one said that it is complete after all a fetus is a human in development just like a infant is a human in development just like a teenager is a human in development. A human being is in development until 25 years old when their prefr…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 06:26 PM
1

"And waste travels through the ombilical cord because his excretion system can’t do it on its own (And additionally because you don’t want the fetus to literally float in a pool of shit)." If his excretion system can''t do it on it's own where does the waste come from then? Your second point makes sense. "And I don’t see how fetuses kicking at a certain week or not discard my point. Maybe I should have precised that I’m pro-abortion except for late ones, as now the fetus truly develop the traits…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 01:28 PM
2

What does this mean? Did the judge allow the witness for the guy or for the accuser? And was the witness a last minute addition or is there something else to it?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 02:48 AM
1

"And no, the fetus doesn’t digest the food through the ombilical cord. At this point, the food is already processed, only the nutrient stays" I said that the waste travels through the umbilical cord not that the food is digested through there.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:45 PM
1

"Pregnancy is a normal physiological process that requires the synchronized adaptation of multiple organ systems. Pregnancy dramatically alters energy balance, osmoregulation, and the metabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids, lipids, nutrients, vitamins and glucocorticoids in order to maintain maternal and fetal homeostasis." Third study.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:32 PM
1

"Therefore, it is important that in vitro conditions are designed to minimize stress on the embryo and maximize the ability of the embryo to maintain cellular homeostasis." Second study.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:30 PM
1

It said that the fetus is thought so it could mean that previous research named them like that.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:26 PM
1

"Your first sources is indeed interesting, but form what I understood, fetuses are seen more as "glucose-dependent" parasite than actual living organism, meaning they are more like a limb attached to you, that you need to feed so it can grow. But then again, would you call only a limb as an independant living organism?" A fetus can't be a parasite. If a mother's organs are damaged there are stem cells sent to the mother through the umbilical cord as far as I know. They have a fuel homeostasis fr…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 10:47 PM
1

"As much as we can discuss about the hypocrisy of the writer regarding political language, the point here is that fetuses aren’t proper living organism" They are proper living organisms. "And yes, a newborn baby having nipple sucking reflexes is indeed a proof of living, as it show it react to stimulis (Because a reflex come from neuronal stimulus), and the fact it can drink milk mean its digestive system can process it. That’s what make his body biologically independent" Fetuses react to stimul…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 10:41 PM
1

"A baby can’t chew solid food because his teeth hasn’t grown, not because his digestive organs cannot process it! Jesus H. Christ the amount of mental gymnastics you need to do to make your argument "work" is way too blatant!" Did I say that a baby's digestive organs cannot process food or did I say that the baby can't chew? Can't you understand what I'm writing about? My comment about chewing was because the baby can't feed itself not that it can't digest all kinds of food. Why are you being di…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 08:00 PM
1

In your second link the writer says that there's a battle to use language in a way to stop abortion whereas she herself refers to mothers a pregnant people lol as if men can have babies. She is fine to use political language when it refers to her leftist politics, but she doesn't like it when that is used for embryos and fetuses (which I don't think is political, but anyway) and says that only when they can live indepedently from the mother you can say that is viable even though according to her…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 03:04 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3659908/
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:45 PM
1

"A baby can’t feed itself because it is psychologically inapt to do so, because his brain isn’t fully matured. However, he can biologically process food because his digestive organs are fully formed, which a fetus can’t do." So he can't eat by himself. And it's not psychologically inept they are biologically inept since they can't hold food and neither can they chew. "And where did I insulted you, exactly? Point me where specifically I insulted you first" When you said that what I said was incel…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:34 PM
1

"Fetuses aren’t human beings. And I don’t just say that in a moral stance, they are biologically not a human being" The name itself means unborn baby. "To be considered a living organism, many criterias must be checked to determine its status between alive and non-alive. Among them are for example, but not limited to: The capacity to feel stimulis, have a fully autonomous organ system (which include processing foods, breath, expulse body waste, etc. independently), and be able to reproduce. A fe…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 03:42 AM
0

"Ajortion is absolutely a right. It’s part of the jigger right of body autonomy. To say it’s a privilege to have control over your own body isn’t just delusional, it’s an incel take. So yes, "killing" fetuses is absolutely a female right" Wrong, it's a privilege. You have to deal with another human being it's not just "having control over your own body" What's incel got to do in here? You are sounding like a woman. I knew you are a feminist lool. The fact that you put killing in quotes as if it'…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 03:03 AM
1

Abortion is a privilege not a right. Men don't have access to abortion. Men don't have reproductive rights at all. Men't can't have a woman pregnant for free and have her have his baby without his consent, whereas women can do that they can even rape a man and have a baby and even on top of that have him pay child support, and that has happened to a boy too btw. Men can't kill fetuses just for feeling inconvienced whereas women can do that. Woman are the only social group in planet earth (not in…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 01:46 AM
2

What privileges do men have?
/r/MensRights06/09/24 11:10 PM
4

Wrong, men's spaces don't censor opponents like women's spaces do. They also aren't sexist as much as women's spaces are. And men's spaces are more welcoming. So the analysis of women's spaces by men is much more valid than feminist analysis of men's spaces.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 11:08 PM
1

Men didn't create laws which privileged themselves and subjugated women. It was women with the help of men which did the opposite of that. Gynocentrism is the fault of men's issues and that includes feminists too. The generalisation of feminists is accurate, they are a man-hating movement and if you want to be part of them go for it. Men don't need feminists to accept the MRM. The only thing holding men back is not coming together for the common cause
/r/MensRights06/09/24 11:03 PM
2

How come? Was it called a false accusation or was she paid?
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:36 PM
2

He was truly overturned? I am surprised. Does he want to file a case against the accusers?
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:26 PM
2

Which metoo cases were overturned?
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:24 PM
2

You don't have to specify witchhunt for men. As far as I remember over 6000 men have died due to witch trials it's just that this is the only time that more women were killed so it's mentioned more and the men are completely forgotten. After all you have stupid people who say that women suffer more in wars so it isn't surprising that in the only case where women are the main victims men are more forgotten. Also men and women were equally likely to call for a witchhunt even kids snitched as far a…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:23 PM
7

Especially white guys since you could say that misandrism is stronger towards them. There's also racism too so two things together.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:18 PM
3

And we need to educate ourselves more than ever even if it means that we have to self study. We shouldn't go and not choose to work high paying jobs otherwise things will get even worse for men when at this stage where men do most of the high paying jobs and there are many misandrist laws and many misandrist biases that hold men back. ​We should also hold men accountable that are misandrist and support feminism or women at the detriment of men. One case is in education where in stem fields many …
/r/MensRights06/09/24 09:39 PM
19

I would say it's true lol they say that they advocate for men, but supporting feminism seems a little bit like contradictory to their claim.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 09:20 PM
1

This is about a later period and I wanted to know if the differences are larger or smaller.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 04:22 PM
1

What about this one? https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=How_do_women_and_men_use_their_time_-_statistics#Equivalent_involvement_of_men_and_women_in_childcare_but_in_different_activities
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:36 AM
-1

Sure if you say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 12:26 AM
1

I couldn't find it in here: https://cpr.heart.org/en/resuscitation-science/cpr-and-ecc-guidelines/executive-summary#REF17
/r/MensRights03/09/24 04:16 PM
1

The 23rd edition was on internet archive whereas the 24th was behind a pdf which I don't think it would allow me to download it without registering. Anyway thank you!
/r/MensRights03/09/24 04:00 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights03/09/24 03:58 PM
1

"AHA Guidelines for CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (latest edition)." Also in which section is the part about estimated lives saved by CPR and ECC?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 03:22 PM
1

(CDC Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (WASH) Reports CDC Clean Water and Health "Principles and Practice of Surgery") Is this the 23rd edition or the 24th one?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 03:07 PM
1

Sure. If you have them in studies it would be even better, but however they are it's great.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 03:05 PM
1

Thank you for the sources!
/r/MensRights03/09/24 02:49 PM
1

I meant just of the inventions you listed not of all inventions ever made. Around 79% of inventors are men in US as far as I know which is one of or maybe even the most equal in terms invention between genders lol so worldwide it would be even more I would guess it at 90-99% to be men. Do you have the stats for the estimated lives that were saved by the inventions that you listed?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 01:38 PM
3

200 years before? Where?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 01:27 PM
14

Equality as women define it. You know you have it in the name of feminism lol. After all if she is equal to a man in a relationship in terms of wealth she is settling so that's why she has to have more in society since equality doesn't exist in their minds.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 01:23 PM
2

For any type of topic relating to men you are better off in mens subs. Reddit is a leftist platform and so is misandrist towards men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:58 PM
1

Most men aren't part of that community. Wealth equality is nothing more than wealth theft progressivism as seen in practice is nothing more than a misnomer it lead to this massive misandrism and to the devaluing of native men in their own country as you can see in USA. And it doesn't matter how it is in paper (even though it isn't all that good) what matters is how it is in practice. You always have to bring up conservatives when you speak about the leftists even though no one mentioned them bec…
/r/MensRights03/09/24 12:33 PM
0

Do you have stats for the estimations? Great post btw, but it would be strengthened if you named the inventors and the stats of the estimated saved lives.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 12:39 AM
1

Wouldn't threatening to leave someone if they mistreat you be a form of control and/or manipulation?
/r/MensRights03/09/24 12:33 AM
1

Well maybe it's some american joke and and I don't get it since I'm not american. You could say it in my dms if you want to
/r/MensRights03/09/24 12:21 AM
1

So you aren't gonna explain what you meant lol?
/r/MensRights02/09/24 10:34 PM
2

Ok we get it now, you are too far in your political partisanship that you think that the left was "lied" by feminism and that the left only wants the best for all am I right? You think that they have no guilt and that they aren't misandrist towards men too right?
/r/MensRights02/09/24 10:32 PM
4

So they support a misandrist movement, but they are for equality? Make it make sense. And it's not only generic lefties either, but political parties too.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:27 PM
-3

No, left wing is contradictory to equal rights or they wouldn't defend and support feminism.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:15 PM
8

No, equality doesn't define left wing I don't know where you got that, if that was true they wouldn't defend and support feminism in virtually every country or at least in the first world countries.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:13 PM
1

"I see. Here's some context. In relationships, whether they are same sex or not. One tends to take on a masculine role, and the other by default would be feminine. This goes for 2 men as well. In this case, the feminine would put a more dominant role onto the masculine partner, therefore making that partner the protector and provider. This is not a costume but rather a role that is forced on them to be able to participate in the relationship. As a straight cis man, I don't quite grasp the dynami…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 06:12 PM
1

Those reasons are important, logical and valid, but even if those things would not happen a girl having several partners is disgusting to many guys or at least to me. There is paternity fraud that is part of that to since in ancient times you didn't have a way to know if the child is yours or not and even in modern times in some countries you can't have a paternity test without the knowledge and consent of the other parent so it's not all that different. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 05:53 PM
1

Well didn't you notice the survival of the fittest in your own experience? Didn't the 2 "gigachads" as you said approached your friends? Weren't your friends also happy about the fact that they had fun with hot guys and out of their league guys? So why do you blame the redpill for trying to adapt to the situation at hand, but not of the women trying to be shallow?
/r/MensRights02/09/24 04:07 PM
25

Well of course the feminist movement was never about equality. You can notice that on the naming of the movement. Also the many sexist quotes by many feminist women proves that. But if you are extremely left wing I don't buy it that you are for equal rights or that you care about men. It is contradictory to the political wing.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:56 PM
1

I said that neither scenario is good for men, but I guess that your partisanship got ahead of yourself.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:52 PM
1

"I believe if there were current up to Date research studies, "siting some of the dates in your links," I think the outcomes might be a little different." I think that the outcome would be even worse. Masculinity would be more attacked. I think I saw it somewhere that research mentioning toxic masculinity was used rarely from the 90s to 2015 and then it growed far more from 2017 forward, but I don't have a source for it so you can take it with a grain of salt. "And therefore Empathy for the masc…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:50 PM
6

Tbh I think that neither scenario is good for men, but I think that Kamala is worse even though I'm not an american.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:49 AM
12

Hahaha! I don't know about the soy, but the leftist and buzzwords is true, they use these words to control and intimidate men.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:46 AM
-1

Hahaha! You are right lol when she believes in that I was wrong to think that I could get a logical explanation
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:04 AM
4

"Well said, sir. I appreciate your perspective." Thank you! Also thank you for the kind conversation! "The male experience or emulation of the male experience is often portrayed as toxic even when performed by a woman." I would not say that this is correct women are more appreciated when being masculine. You know the phrase girl boss or the other one boss babe? Men are far far more likely to be portrayed as toxic when being masculine than women are. Women are viewed negatively when being masculi…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:51 AM
4

First off the contribution in numbers is not equal so that the appreciation shouldn't be equal, but of course to a woman it should be that way. Secondly funny how you didn't say anything about the other part of the comment.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:19 AM
23

"incels" is used generally against men who criticise women whereas "whore" is used generally against women who sleep too much. The first word is used as a strawman whereas the second one is used as a prescriptive word it is specifically used in that way in that kind of discussion.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:11 AM
2

Sometimes we can be or do wrong even with good intentions. A man complaining about dating issues in here is valid because this sub is about men and relationship with women could be attributed to men's social issues. A woman complaining in here has no place even though her dating experience is with women because 1 this perspective isn't novel so there wouldn't be something new to learn​. Another thing I don't like is treating masculinity like a costume that everyone can wear everyone can be mascu…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:03 AM
8

You are just a misandrist. You have countless of comments recomending a book of Lundy bancroft who is known for saying that men who were victims of domestic abuse were perpertrators lf it. I was suspicious of you at first when you said that this sub focuses on hating women, but I didn't want to make value judgements about you yet. In your 2 comments in this post you tend to put a lie and you hide it with pleasant words in hopes no one will notice your bullshit. You also only tend to blame men in…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:33 AM
4

.This sub is for men's rights and issues. One of those issues is men being viewed like evil in rhe society, by showing examples that counter that like when women do crimes it can open minds about the fact that not only men commit crimes, but women also it would also lower the women are wonderful effect which serves as a positive bias towards women and it helps them to not be accountable for the bad things that they do. This sub does uplift men, but the main focus is on men's rights and issues if…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:17 AM
4

So you think that women with a bit of medical engineering can reproduce, but you think that men can't create artificial wombs? The hypocrisy is outstanding lol.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:01 AM
0

So you think most women would be able to live like a tribe lol? With no modern technology?
/r/MensRights02/09/24 12:58 AM
1

Well it doesn't have anything to do with men. This is only her experience as a lesbian which is not the same to the heterosexual experience. This is a sort of insult to men because she and you too are treating masculinity as a sort of costume or construct when masculinity is based in biology. Your argument about feminism is wrong it's not even near to being the same. Feminists silence people who counter their points or their movement mensrights don't do that and this case is not comparable to th…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 12:37 AM
1

https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrpa/1/3/332 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0886260518788367 https://archive.ph/2020.09.16-200339/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/10927507/Women-are-more-controlling-and-aggressive-than-men-in-relationships.html?fbclid=IwAR1zlTkxvaKYPzFCVIntaRBFvY3adKOX25fUtlZY-RXnO47fLg91w95hlzE https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113571/
/r/MensRights01/09/24 11:03 PM
11

This sub is not focused in hating women, but it criticises women's misandrist quotes or women's actions especially when it is about crimes to show that women are not angels and that they commit crimes too. I wonder what are you doing here if you think that this sub is focused on hating women?
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:40 PM
3

So a woman's issue is a men's rights issue? Did you even read what you typed?
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:04 PM
1

Yeah if a man complained it would be ok, but why does a woman have to complain in here when this is a man's space and when she has her own spaces? She has nothing to do with men she doesn't even date men so she doesn't know anything about men.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:03 PM
4

Many guys also were simping about her story and saying bullshit like she is one of us. No she isn't. She only came here to complain about her life in a male space that is and thinks that she is in the same shoes as a man when she isn't. And she and other people in the comments are treating masculinity as some sort of performance as some sort of construct that came out of nothing even though it is related to biology and it has male in the name. This is nothing more than insult to men to act like …
/r/MensRights01/09/24 09:58 PM
0

Wrong lesbians hate men and she had to act like a man to understand men so her experience as a lesbian proved that she didn't understand men until she tried being in the shoes of one. Think rationally even men have an outgroup bias but you think women who have an ingroup bias would care about men? Especially when she is a lesbian who is attracted to only women so she only likes women sexually, but you truly think that she got the back of men. Maybe speak about yourself.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 09:53 PM
-3

No she is a woman she is not one of us. I wonder why do you get so sentimental when you hear a story and completely abandon logic and rationality to replace them with emotions and feelings. If you want to treat being a man as a costume and everyone can be one just speak for yourself not for all men.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 09:48 PM
1

So you came in the mensrights to complain that you have it hard in the dating world and you somehow understand men despite not being a man? "I am a giver and I've always wanted a wife and a family." Also lol. If you would do it through surrogacy you would still need a man and if you would do it through adoption it would not be your biological child. Either way it would be a wierd relationship dynamic to have.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 09:45 PM
1

What do you mean lol?
/r/MensRights01/09/24 07:13 PM
1

God brought you here? Did he send you a special message when you prayed lol?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 10:13 PM
1

"Does that excuse shipping young men off to the military and possibly traumatizing them? No, of course not, but many feminists are also against that." If feminists would be against that they would have changed it just like with things pertaining to them when it benefited them, but they won't so your claim is wrong
/r/MensRights31/08/24 10:08 PM
1

"If their first response to a comment about the abuse of girls is to just say "So you hate all men?" It's kinda implied where their priorities lie. South Korea does have a problem of how they treat women and this tegram scandal shows it." If you generalise all men they have every right to question you if you hate all men. I would say being treated in front of the law differently is a far more direct way to see how someone is viewed but I guess it can be open to interpretation. Also the telegram …
/r/MensRights31/08/24 10:06 PM
1

Who is being ok with young girls being used to create fake porn? No one is saying that you are only imagineing it. All he said that a person is normalising hate against men when the person that he was replying too was generalising millions of men. South Korean men have mandatory selective service in their country so by you not saying that you are against it means that you support it. See how I also made an assumption about you just like you did about the guy? Do better don't make assumptions and…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 03:16 AM
1

Did the op defend the crime? Or do you have such contempt for men that they aren't allowed to complain due to offensive language being spread against men due to a crime that some men commited? How would you feel if some women commited crimes against men and men would now use offensive language towards women for that reason? Who in this comment section is even defending the crime? When men complain that they aren't criminals like some men who do crimes are they are distancing themselfs from the m…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 03:07 AM
1

"The victims are often minors and the perpetrators are mostly teenagers." So it means that the criminals are either kids or men aged 18-19 since later in the article it was mentioned by the president that young men need to educated so it might mean that it is the later category who is mostly guilty of this crime, but you want to put it on all men?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:55 AM
1

The video doesn't open in the web you have to have tiktok to access it. How can you generalize milions of men to 200000 doing that if that's even true at all? Isn't that sexist and also racist?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:33 AM
1

What claim do you mean? And what did I not read?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:11 AM
4

Funny how you are in the mensrights subreddit. How did you come to here if I may ask?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 12:51 AM
1

So in the document she called them; liberal, farsighted and open to a exchange of ideas. She sad that CIA was the only one with guts and foresight to see that youth and student affairs were important. So when she called them liberal and that they saw that youth and student affairs were important she basically said that they are leftist lol. No where did you see any mention of her being paid to defend capitalism. The only thing that I got from that is that she got funding to further the movement …
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:34 PM
1

Maybe you are projecting with the brain rot phrase. Class consciousness is a phrase specifically related tl that movement the left and communism. The CIA could have helped feminism to grow I will not dispute that, but that CIA's job is to protect capitalism is just that a claim you have no proof for that. When was feminism leaning socialist? In the beginning it was only about white women in relation to men it was later on that it included black women so I don't know where did you get that femini…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:23 PM
3

"You want sources? As early as Ancient Greece, Aulus Cornelius Celsus described in On Medicine I Proem 23 how early medical experiments were conducted on the dregs of society: either living male prisoners or corpses of executed prisoners. Most early discoveries about female anatomy came from Galen (or "Aelius Galenus") who dissected a bunch of different monkeys. This tradition continued as recently as the 1800s in the USA: the only legal source of cadavers were executed convicts. Since criminal …
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:05 PM
4

"The Sex-Bias Myth in Medicine' What about all the new drug tests that exclude women? Don't they prove the pharmaceutical industry's insensitivity to and disregard for females? The Food and Drug Administration divides human testing of new medicines into three stages. Phase 1 studies are done on a small number of volunteers over a brief period of time, primarily to test safety. Phase 2 studies typically involve a few hundred patients and are designed to look more closely at safety and effectivene…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:02 PM
4

"The fact that the potential impact medical studies could have on a woman's reproductive system, being more delicate and important than men's by comparison, doesn't seem to register when this topic comes up is mind-blowing. Isn't it just common sense, taking into account those potential risks? You're very right; it most definitely is an overblown issue: 'Did Medical Research Routinely Exclude Women? An Examination of the Evidence' These analyses indicate that before 1990, women routinely partici…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:01 PM
1

It's not that I'm not curious, but I can't take seriously statements that say that the leftists feminist movement got infiltrated by CIA to keep them distracted from class consciousness. As if feminism didn't get what it wanted and as if the left doesn't support feminism. Feminism from the beginning wasn't about equality and any argument someone might make can't refute that. It's you who have an agenda not me. It's not me who is advocating for a political movement directly or indirectly it is yo…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 10:54 PM
4

"That's not what I mean, and that's not what a patriarchy means." "This is just another example of how a society that favors men (patriarchy) negatively affects everyone." So these two statements are consistent and logical according to you? (Like the slides showed, ALL areas of medicine and beyond used men as the default and never take into account how physical and mental health conditions manifest differently in women. What is it y'all say? "Women ignored and left out of medical research, men m…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 10:32 PM
1

Yes they are keeping people from knowing how beautiful communism is, that's true even though many leftists like communism and or socialism lol. It's always people from privileged first world countries speaking how marvelous communism is despite never living in a country who implemented it. Even east Germany noticed a stark difference between the West Germany and East Germany how better life was in West Germany even East Germany football players noticed that.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 10:14 PM
6

If we live in a patriarchal society which I think you mean that benefits men, then why would they allow research that shows men as being evil and not putting much attention on the fact that women can be too and that the difference is not as big as previously thought or go even further to make only women to look like psychopaths and men to look like angels who can do no harm?
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:56 PM
4

Can you see the misandrism in the comment section of that video? How they want there to be less men how they call men predators? Then women say that misandrism doesn't exist. With these thoughts that they have it's a blessing that men are stronger on average because I don't know what would happen otherwise. Men should be strong and support each other. It's men being weak and passive that has allowed this kind of language against men whereas if you say anything towards women it is censored.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 02:14 PM
1

So pro revolutionary just being against capitalism? Also anarcho-capitalism would make just a little more sense if people would appreciate themselves and others much more because all it means is that there isn't government intervention, but knowing human nature and the desire to suppress others so that they don't become as good as you or even better than you (something which in my opinion is the reason why many people like communism and or socialism so that others who can become successful don't…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 01:07 PM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beautiful-minds/201207/men-women-and-iq-setting-the-record-straight This speaks about the study. It's the same link you sent lol. That's why it appeared as purple in your reply. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251531344_Modern_women_match_men_on_Raven's_Progressive_Matrices This is a study by James Flynn. I think this might be the same one. "Raven’s Progressive Matrices data of high quality from five advanced nations show that females matched male…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 03:51 AM
3

Yeah that's why you describe yourself as a stalinist. You sympathise with that dictator I get it. "Utilitarian Anarcho-Stalinism." Your philosophy. I can't even begin to mention how anarcho-stalinism is a misnomer lol.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 07:28 PM
5

Cia works with the left not against it or otherwise the left would never be in government and a mentally incapable individual would never be a president. The left also killed people and put in place communism who killed millions of people so what does that mean?
/r/MensRights29/08/24 06:38 PM
1

I meant as more things than that. I know that men have mandatory service, but we need to have even more arguments than that.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 06:35 PM
3

It don't see it as feminism using the left I see it as a symbiotic relationship where both beneft from each other.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 06:34 PM
1

I previously said in another comment that Richard Lynn is a racist and he isn't taken seriously in the psychology community as far as I know since even his title as professor emeritus of psychology was removed from him in 2018.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 04:03 PM
13

So feminism was a plot to destroy the left, but the left actively supports and contributes to the empowerment of feminism? How can these 2 coexist?
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:57 PM
1

Your link doesn't work. Also since you are korean can you bring some studies or laws that show that men are being discriminated against in South Korea? Edit: Here is the working link: https://www.pannchoa.com/2024/08/theqoo-international-k-pop-fans-feeling.html u/Prudentwolf thank you for showing how to fix the link!
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:41 PM
1

Also the person who did this study was a racist so he isn't taken seriously I think in the psychology community. We have to find a more serious and robust study.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:20 PM
3

Thanks for answering! I didn't know that the participants were 18 or younger tbh. What about only adults older than 18 then is there a difference between them? Because if as you said differences start around 16 it should be advantageous towards boys and men since around that time puberty ends for boys because it wouldn't make sense for the difference to be more in favour of women
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:11 PM
6

There was only 1 study in multiple countries which put women I think 0.5-1.5 points higher than men. It was made by James Flynn of the famous Flynn effect. It was published in 2012 as far as I remember and had more than 100000 thousand participants. One thing to note is that Flynn is a leftist and I don't know if there were any biases in that study. It would be nice if someone could debunk it. Edit: I think that the difference was 0.5 points higher not 1.5 points higher in favour of women, but I…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:13 AM
2

Eugene Eric Kim and Betty Alexandra Toole consider it "incorrect" to regard Lovelace as the first computer programmer, as Babbage wrote the initial programs for his Analytical Engine, although the majority were never published.\77]) Bromley notes several dozen sample programs prepared by Babbage between 1837 and 1840, all substantially predating Lovelace's notes.\90]) Dorothy K. Stein regards Lovelace's notes as "more a reflection of the mathematical uncertainty of the author, the political purp…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 01:48 AM
2

Between 1842 and 1843, Lovelace translated an article by the military engineer Luigi Menabrea (later Prime Minister of Italy) about the Analytical Engine, supplementing it with an elaborate set of seven notes, simply called "Notes". Lovelace's notes are important in the early history of computers, especially since the seventh one contained what many consider to be the first computer program—that is, an algorithm designed to be carried out by a machine. Other historians reject this perspective an…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 01:29 AM
4

This reminds me of Charles Babbage the first inventor of the theoretical computer if you want to call him that and his transaltor Ada Lovelace. She is heralded as the first computer programmer even though as far as I know that's inconclusive (if someone can correct me so be it) she was a translator who didn't have a formal education as far as I know. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Babbage Ada Lovelace, who corresponded with Babbage during his development of the Analytical Engine, is credi…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 01:23 AM
5

The argument is bad since in Korea the birth rate is the lowest in the world so they can't even do their biological duties it seems. Even if you are speaking about the US still the birth rate is below replacement rate so again they aren't doing their job.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 01:07 AM
9

"This is a male-dominated society, where men are the priority and enjoy all the privileges simply because they are men," she said. "For me, the price that they have to pay for that privilege is the time they have to serve in the military." Since men don't have right for their bodies neither should she then because if one gender can't have it then the other can't either. To add to that women are the only social group that have the right to kill another human being just because she is inconvienced…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 01:03 AM
1

"I’m Canadian, but given the chance I wouldn’t vote for her. I can’t see her having deep intellectual discussions about wars and economics etc. with Presidents and PMs and Kings and the like, and coming up with the answers." Interesting did you vote for Trudeau (if that's how his name is spelt lol)? The thing is that war mostly affects men and having someone who I think has less empathy for men I don't think that it is a smart decision but whatever. "Long article, and I’m a little sceptical too.…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 07:47 PM
1

Still if feminists don't advocate for equality before the law just like they did when it benefited them they are supporting it and if men are doing it it just means that they are misandrist too since many of them are supportive of feminism too. Yeah that's what you get when guys don't go to college in those areas that much anymore. We shouldn't let women win the battle of education and we shouldn't retreat from society or things will only get worse for boys and men just like it is happening now
/r/MensRights27/08/24 07:39 PM
1

I'm surprised tbh that you don't want to vote for her. Did she really say that? Also this study could be in your favour though I'm sceptical of it: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04966-w
/r/MensRights27/08/24 05:03 PM
1

Isn't being treated before the law equally a right?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 05:01 PM
1

But you would vote for Kamala right?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:47 PM
1

"I saw it on the science sub maybe a month ago, ill see about digging it up." Thank you! "As for family and friends, that turns into dissonance; male family members aren't them, unless they are. You can find more than a few interviews where the women being asked the question if their fathers, brothers, sons are the men they speak so soundly negatively of, and the answer is usually a vehement 'no'. You will also see some women who will say, yes, they are, frighteningly enough." It could be that t…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:46 PM
1

The red pill is not male feminism they are not a political movement and there are many movements inside of it who differ in their life choices. I don't think that you can say that women didn't take rights away from men or otherwise there wouldn't be a sub to speak about men's issues.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:41 PM
1

You do see women as a team you just do it subconsciously in my opinion. Women have an ingroup bias whereas men have an outgroup one sonI think it is important to highlight it and to have men be a little more cohesive with each other and a little bit more supportive of each other without sacrificing individuality
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:23 PM
2

I could be wrong, but I think in most countries retire earlier and live longer so it's not just a lot of countries.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:17 PM
2

Yeah it's nice that we highlight the issues of men in these posts, but we have to bring up stats to defend our points we can't be like feminists who say every bullshit and it is believed. We have to have strict rules when defending our points.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:16 PM
2

I don't know if what you are saying is going to happen I really doubt it, men aren't even fighting for their own rights nevermind taking the rights of another group. Though if men from the middle east who believe in Shia law become a large number in european societies and other english speaking european majority societies that's another thing. The men of european heritage are to weak to do anything in favour of them. Besides if feminism rose as a a counter to the supposed misogyny women were hav…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:09 PM
1

The thing that has to do with me is that they are men as I am. I'm not saying that I am taking credit for their work this isn't about me. It's about men as a whole and what they do. Men as a whole are net contributors to society and it is right that they highlight the contributions of each other and highlight the fact that they are men. Think of men as a team with many groups some groups do construction some do science some do engineering some do math some do medicine some do electricians etc. s…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:59 PM
2

Oh got it now what you meant (I thought that you might be speaking about that, but I was trying to truly understand what you meant and not make an assumption). It insists on doing this much harm because it wants to make women powerful and to make them even more powerful than men. They do it by causing harm since it is the only way they can achieve their goal otherwise they wouldn't have gotten all their rights and privileges because women can't win in a meritocracy. Also they have to destroy the…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:44 PM
2

Well since it is mostly men who do it it was right to write men and men can take credit as a gender it doesn't mean that the man himself who is speaking is doing that job it means that many men and it is perfectly fine to highlight the gender. As I said you can't have all men do a particular job for example all men doing construction since first of there is not a need for that many workers in construction and secondly there are other jobs who need to be fulfilled. Sure there are female scientist…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:34 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:21 PM
4

Yeah I too am skeptical even though I'm not from a first world country, I think that it is more likely that his income is part of the reason that they are treated well and not just because of the country, but I might be wrong
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:20 PM
2

The thing is that it was and is mostly men who do that. You can't have all men who do a particular job so your point doesn't make sense. What I'm getting at is that it is men who do those things women represent a small insignificant minority in jobs dominated by men. A scientist is benefitting from men doing construction as you say, but his contribution is as much or even more than the one guy who does construction or even more than many guys since his work could advance society far more than th…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:11 PM
1

I think effecting is an understatement.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:01 PM
3

What social power did men in Ukraine get?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:52 PM
1

The thing is in an article that I have seen on forbes cites lack of commitment as the main reason for divorce and then infidelity. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/divorce/divorce-statistics/ So it would interesting to know if this is true.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:43 PM
1

Can you send the studies that women prefer a man who makes 65% more in average? It would be nice to have them so everyone who is interested in saving them can have them and use them in arguments if need be.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:41 PM
3

They aren't your friends then if they support their wife in supporting your wife just because of being afraid of divorce or any other reason. Many men instead of being masculine and having their own thoughts would rather do or think what their wifes want. It's pathetic.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:38 PM
1

We are roasted not cooked. Due to feminism and women all european societies or countries with a majority of european descent will go extinct along with east asia many countries in south america many other countries in asia and a country in africa. Nothing will happen to change that. In my opinion few countries will survive this in the centuries to come. https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/which-countries-have-fertility-rates-above-or-below-the-replacement-level
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:30 PM
3

Men don't owe their lives to society either. Even though it was and it is MEN who built society it was men who maintained and they are the ones maintain society it was men who contributed to society more by taxes and it is still men who contribute more to the taxes whereas not getting much benefit from the social policies. To add to that they are constantly belittled, taken for granted, called evil monsters and all kinds of evil things whereas at the same time people who say those things towards…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:26 PM
0

More opportunity not equal* lol or are you forgetting all the quotas all the scholarships etc.?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:12 PM
2

Well since most women support feminism you should put them there too. Why is this fixation in this sub to many times paints women as only being victims being brainwashed by feminism and not being capable of doing harm themselves? You are removing the accountability of women by yourself. Since 61% of women are feminists you can infer from that that they are misandrists otherwise they wouldn't support a movement that constantly villifies men since the beginning at that and that has given privilege…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:10 PM
1

Well to your point of empathy being learned (if you can send studies that would be really nice) since as you imply they aren't taught to have empathy towards boys or men, wouldn't that mean that they don't care about men or boys who are even around them?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:00 PM
5

True friends that you have there. In my opinion you maybe should revisit your friendship with those so called "best friends".
/r/MensRights27/08/24 01:55 PM
2

You won't be able to make them care about men I'm afraid. What's more important in my opinion (and really funny at the same time) is the fact that they accepted that they are weaker than men. Patriarchy always wins lool.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 01:53 PM
1

I didn't say that you did , but what I think is that many left wingers would vote for the left just in spite to the right
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 01:39 AM
1

Well you don't have to vote for a right wing party if you don't vote for a left wing party, you have another choice and not vote at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/24 08:36 PM
0

So you would still vote left wing even though they are misandrist, right? The political echo chamber is strong in this sub. What can I expect when the sub says that it discusses the male advocacy from a left wing perspective ultimately doing what the very same political wing is doing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/24 04:57 PM
0

How can you say that the right is worse on the issue of misandry?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/24 04:41 PM
9

First off what's male privilege?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/24 04:29 PM
10

This is why in my opinion men should never be house husbands or house boyfriends they should always work and seek to increase their wealth as much as possible in legal ways of course so that they can retire as quickly as possible and do what they want with their life since no one cares about men and if they make the mistake of depending on someone else it will not turn good for them just as this woman in the article is complaining.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 03:56 PM
3

If as you say they do care about men, but only because they get to blame men for what happened to a hypothetical man wouldn't that be dissmissing the man's trauma thus going against their own philosophy of supporting the victims 100%?
/r/MensRights26/08/24 12:11 AM
1

Most of the sources I sent are unique, but you might see some times the same study twice because I have saved them from different websites. Most speak about problems men and boys face, but you will also see articles or studies where women aren't portrayed as angels and what I mean by that is that it serves as a way to remove the violent monster archetype that has been always associated with boys and men and also sometimes you might see articles which speak about how bad the leaders of feminism (…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 03:07 PM
1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/22892/1/Philippe_22892.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj48ITO4fmHAxUcnf0HHalDBdAQFnoECDMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0kpAXy6DktFB7tZPdi2sHD https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2024/06/SPACE_I_2023_Key_Findings.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiF5NnMl_qHAxUI_7sIHcXKIkQQFnoECBYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2DyQmZrV-VexE74Hvefn8v
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:49 PM
1

Boy's and men's issues on a legal level and on a societal level in the world https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452000/ https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-11-537 https://www.thecollegefix.com/household-labor-study-design-is-biased-against-men/ https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette_bombing_and_arson_campaign https://avoiceformen.com/featured/simone-de-beauvoir-a-nazi-a-pedophile-and-a-misogynist-2…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:48 PM
1

https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-18-258 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7048288/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13552600.2016.1159343 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17704459/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37093258/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/sc…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:45 PM
1

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0886260518788367 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175099/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047235204000637 https://www.prosecutorintegrity.org/pr/survey-over-20-million-have-been-falsely-accused-of-abuse/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32807017/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35165162/ https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Famp0000494 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1020583425623 https://www.scie…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:44 PM
1

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341827530_2018_Article_The_Moral_Machine https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8226295_Gender_Differences_in_Automatic_In-Group_Bias_Why_Do_Women_Like_Women_More_Than_Men_Like_Men https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5112287/ https://news.usni.org/2015/08/14/document-guide-to-u-s-military-casualty-statistics https://www.prio.org/publications/7207 https://www.globaljusticecenter.net/beyond-killing-gender-genocide-and-obligations-under-internatio…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:42 PM
1

Boy's and men's issues around the world in law and society: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967052/ https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrpa/1/3/332 https://archive.is/2024.08.09-055744/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15629876/#:\~:text=Results%3A%20At%20interview%2C%2091.2%25,wards%20compared%20to%20surgical%20wards https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16730276/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/757…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:41 PM
4

It would be nice if you would put him in a position where you can see that where does he actually stand on his activism. I can send you some sources on how men and boys are discriminated against around the world, but they are mainly focused on europe and US
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:37 PM
2

https://www.academia.edu/41092862/500_razones_contra_un_prejuicio https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://varonesunidos.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/500razones.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj_gcXx142IAxWHhP0HHco0F6gQFnoECA8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0rHZlj4H1ZTxwrpxYNgDIb
/r/MensRights24/08/24 12:55 PM
1

Hi! If you would be kind enough can you provide sources for your claims? It would be nice if we all could have more sources to defend our points in a debate and discuss men's issues while having real arguments for your points.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 12:02 PM
8

If men like flashy and expensive stuff at least they buy it with their own money. Men aren't known to get free money from someone else so I don't know how the gold digger argument makes sense in this case.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 04:06 AM
1

And then what kind of reshaping is happening?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 03:58 AM
1

So the reshaping is only taking the green party and unions? So just being more left lol? As if that means that they will do anything for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/24 11:05 PM
1

Firstly I'm not a republican. Secondly what do you mean that you threw a trump shaped brick to destroy the american empire and reshape the parties? What kind of reshaping happened on the left?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/24 10:17 PM
1

Firstly I'm not a republican. Secondly what do you mean that you threw a trump shaped brick to destroy the american empire and reshape the parties? What kind of reshaping happened on the left?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/24 10:16 PM
1

"win or lose it makes no difference for men's issues on the left." It does make a difference men's issues will become worse "exactly bc as a lefty i was disgusted with where my generally preferred party was going. i appreciate them better now, they far more aligned with unions, economic issues, and so forth, and far less the feminista bs." Kamala 5 years ago mentioned the mythical 20% pay gap when it actually is only 1%. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/may/23/kamala-harris/colbert-kam…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/24 09:53 PM
1

Why do you ask of the right to center around men's issues and you don't do the same for the left? I get your logic let the right lose so that the left wins and tries to make women evem more priviledged than they are and let's hope the right does something for men. What a magnificient plan!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/24 09:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter