TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FelidiaFetherbottom Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by FelidiaFetherbottom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You know how you can avoid stress, hardship, etc? Don't get into an abusive relationship. If you decide to, you know the consequences. The cops are given a job to do, and they can't play therapist in order to figure out whether it's a one time occurrence or not. It's also not the state's job to help your relationship. It's the state's job to enforce the laws that are on the books, one of them being if you hit your significant other, no matter your best intentions, the state will press the charge…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:30 PM
1

Okay, not that this was political in any way, but there's a difference between a healthy relationship vs. an abusive one. The fact that I even need to tell you that? Christ...
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:10 PM
108

I have no idea about all laws, but in Florida, that only applies to domestic violence. That's because so many victims will decide not to prosecute their SO. As far as regular battery, the victim will always be the person being battered
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:03 PM
1

Shit, you're still talking. Bye now
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/17 05:21 PM
2

I never advocated for killing babies. My second statement was that they are annoying, so the less babies, the better (that includes people deciding not to have them to begin with)
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 07:59 PM
1

It's fucking hilarious I keep getting called a white knight when I'm not defending her at all. As for your first comment, it's telling you referred to it as retaliation. But it absolutely does need to be proportional, you dimwit. That's why you're not allowed to kill a person for throwing a drink on you. God, this sub is fucking moronic
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 07:39 PM
3

You don't have to be a shit person to kill a baby...you're a perfect example
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 07:33 PM
2

I never said to kill people for being annoying
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 07:33 PM
2

It's been a living set of tissues prior to its existence as a set. I'm an advocate of a woman's right to choose. But babies are fucking annoying anyway
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 06:28 PM
3

Did they at any point imply it was necessarily a baby? Abortions can happen much earlier than that stage
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 11:27 AM
3

Okay
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/17 10:07 AM
3

Add that to the list, I guess. And for future reference, "why you mad bro?" is a pretty lazy argument tactic. Cheers
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/17 02:19 AM
4

Hahaha, why are you so mad, pal? Because I'm dealing with morons You didn't say it though, I get it. I love the fact that all you have is saying you didn't say something - which you did God damn, this is what I'm talking about, I never said that I didn't say it. So once again, good going It's likewise hilarious that you keep calling me a white knight when I never defended her. Who's the one who can't make an actual point again?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/17 01:46 AM
5

being stronger and bigger means you have quick decision making skills? I don't think that's how it works Yeah, that's not what I said, but really not surprised I'm having to explain myself so much here...the fact that he's a college (now pro) level running back is what makes me believe he should have quick decision making skills And if you actually read what I wrote, you would see the fact that I said several times that she got her comeuppance and I was not defending what she did, but hey, why d…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/17 12:36 AM
1

I've already made my point, nothing to respond to, but thank you for demonstrating that I'm speaking with a child
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/17 09:47 PM
1

Okay
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/17 09:39 PM
1

And yet there you remain, unable to address my put as well. Have a great day
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/17 09:16 PM
1

Did it stop the immediate threat? In this case he had nowhere he could go, but Mixon had an exit available. Also, she came back after him after another dude started trying to fuck him up. Sorry if that was lost on you
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/17 06:52 PM
1

It's up to Mixon to demonstrate that his response was a reasonable one and I am thoroughly satisfied, given the context, that he used reasonable force Sounds like you'd make a shitty cop then, considering he was charged...and PR had nothing to do with it She believed as you apparently do, that small people (or is it just women?) are absolved of the consequences of their shitty choices Way to put words in my mouth, why don't you actually read what I've said, and you'll see that I don't excuse her…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/17 03:15 PM
1

He was subject to an ongoing physical assault with no sign of it stopping. so he responded with a decisive action that stopped the assault That's hilarious. You have not demonstrated that any of the options I named were any less reasonable. And the punch was absolutely NOT the minimum necessary force to stop the attack. As colorful of language you use to describe how she slapped his neck, she wasn't some martial arts master that required the maximum force he used, especially considering he was t…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/17 06:05 AM
1

if a slap might stop your attacker but a punch will, you go with the punch, continuing if and only if it didn't work And if you refuse to assess exactly how much of a threat was posed to you, while refusing to assess how much threat you pose to that person, my point stands. If you have a reasonable option of leaving the situation you are obligated to take it. Even then if you have to defend yourself you are still limited to reasonable force as a response. That is, the minimum amount necessary to…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 10:13 PM
0

How am I not taking this seriously? You said his first obligation is to himself full stop, meaning you have no obligation to assess a threat before reacting, is that not correct? If that's the case, when do you advocate for assessing a threat and acting accordingly? By the way, the fact that I used an argument tactic that you don't like doesn't make it fallacious, if that's what you're implying
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 09:35 PM
-3

Because what if the "maybe" option is a knife? Or a gun? Should you always resort to the most violent form of defense without critically thinking about the threat? If a 10 year old's about to push me, do I have a right to hit them in the head with a baseball bat? I'm not even saying she was right to hit him, but you know what was also a "sure thing" option? Pushing her to the floor, or into the booth, or grabbing her hair/arms and swinging her to the ground. All of those are just as sure to stop…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 07:59 PM
-4

So you're saying that girl would have not been fazed by a college football running back slapping her in the face? If so, you're delusional
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 07:20 PM
5

I don't think that's what anyone's implying. If someone much weaker than you slaps you in the arm, perhaps you should use your superior quick decision making skills to assess how much force you need to use in order to keep the threat from further causing you harm. I always consider a woman hitting first to be partly responsible for what comes next, but come on...that level of retaliation (not self defense) is pretty ridiculous
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/17 07:17 PM
12

this sub isnt about calling out things shitty things that women do specifically its about being hateful to women that are shitheads Tell me, if a woman does something shitty, is she not a shithead?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/17 09:05 PM
1

Whatever you say
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/17 11:00 AM
4

He criticized someone for investing too much time in something he found trivial, and many find reddit to be trivial
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/17 03:23 AM
3

So can straight men
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/17 11:52 AM
15

But....why a male model?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:23 PM
7

Anecdotal evidence that's easily testable. It would take you an hour to set this up, then you could give it a shot and see if you get the same results. Hell, post results, especially if you don't get them. I would love to see that conversation too
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:22 PM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siCNdfH9U40
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 05:02 PM
6

It was a pretty shitty method of political discourse...luckily, trump's election has mobilized a population into becoming politically active who otherwise would not have voted. So I'm great with trump making America great again by convincing democrats to participate in politics, even if it was by accident Edit: a word to clarify
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 03:44 PM
8

That is the grossest thing I've ever heard in my life
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 03:39 PM
2

Okay, just...jiggle the handle when you're done
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/16 04:57 AM
3

Literally the first stereotype in this thread referred to belligerent black women, not all women, not all black people. And gasp they called them annoying. We're not talking about who faces more stereotyping, which I agree with you, so, what now?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 12:55 AM
7

r/holdmybeer...get off your high horse, plenty of groups of people are stereotyped. I've always ever looked at remarks such as "WTF white people" with, at best, a "meh." If you're offended because someone's making a judgment based on their experiences with a group of people, I've got need for you, white people don't hold the monopoly
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/16 11:31 PM
1

That's usually referred to as "Sail Away," I believe
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/16 11:26 PM
5

This is the problem with blanket statements. Sounds an awful lot like a blanket statement, hmmm? Edit: shit, joke fell flat. Fuck it, I liked it
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/16 01:41 PM
6

On, otherwise you run into public decency laws
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/16 03:10 PM
1

I didn't mean I haven't experienced it first hand, I meant I've never seen an example of a guy experiencing backlash for homophobia as a result of not wanting to be objectified But I kind of understand where you're coming from
/r/MensRights05/08/16 02:32 PM
3

I've never come across that...even if you were accused, it's a pretty easy position to defend
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:24 PM
2

Just looked at my local refuge house's website. In their defense, they talk about men being affected, and talk about providing services to male victims, but they somehow left this sentence in: "We offer guidance and encouragement for families and friends worried about a daughter, sister, child, or parent." /r/mildlyinfuriating
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:34 PM
189

"Baby, you want me to give it to you?" "Oh yeah, give it to me..." "Baby, for the record, when you say 'give it to me,' please be specific about what you want and where..." "Huh?" "And please enunciate, yeah, it turns me on when you speak clearly"
/r/MensRights15/07/16 11:39 PM
2

I don't really know where to look, but do we know who delayed it? It's possible the defense did
/r/MensRights20/06/16 01:49 PM
3

And I totally support that decision. I too don't frequent some establishments, not because I'm trying to put them out of business, but because I don't want to support their product(s) or views
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:47 AM
13

I'd say that was different, because the amount of people who boycotted was offset by the number of christians who increased their patronage. Normally when there's mass boycotts, it's a net loss, because there are no people who come in to pick up the slack, but that didn't happen with CFA
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:55 AM
7

Absolutely
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:21 PM
24

You know what, i am going to oppose it because the actors are female. Not for the sake of 'hating women' though, because i really don't. Just to prove that a movie with women as the main actors can also work. And i don't doubt that is possible, if you have good actors to play those main roles. The descent. All female cast, amazing movie. Bridesmaids, pitch perfect, mean girls. It can be done, it just needs to not be shit
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:35 PM
1

So many
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:57 AM
-4

I guess that depends. When I picture a homeless person, I picture a guy...i did not know women made up 23% of that population, so the graphic makes sense. Besides, it's just a demonstration of what was said in the article. Whenever there's an infographic that mentions something from an article, they tend to use the info directly.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:54 PM
0

I'm not saying people don't...I'm saying it's not obvious to everyone and apparently the people at the paper had the idea that not many people think about the stat
/r/MensRights02/06/16 05:11 AM
-13

"Nobody cares" is much different than "Nobody is surprised"
/r/MensRights02/06/16 02:50 AM
-13

But, that story was about the homeless problem in general. And my take on the graphic was just to point out one of the several groups that were affected, one that people may not expect to be that high. Edit: the victim complex on this sub seems to be pretty high. In the article, there was one stat that mentioned the rate of homeless women (also mentioned the rate of aboriginal homeless, but no outcry there), and this infographic simply visualized it differentlydifferently. Bunch of god damn cry …
/r/MensRights02/06/16 01:42 AM
1

So why should men be expected to be more able to do this AMD more punished if they don't I wasn't saying that, I was saying that if you, as a man or a woman, are struck by a man or a woman, it doesn't give you the right to hit back. One is really only legally allowed to defend themselves, and if that means causing harm, then so be it. But if your hit is strictly retaliatory, then that's illegal
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:51 PM
1

someone slaps you, give em a good slap back I think the better way to approach situations like this is to have no problem defending yourself. If you simply do it as retaliation, you're just as liable criminally as the person who initiated. You should commit only enough violence that prevents further attacks. If someone punches you, and you punch them back not to defend yourself, you are liable for any unintended consequences (they fall back and knock their head on the pavement).
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:35 PM
17

She's a moron in general. Looking just at her recent tweets: "No offense, but there is no way you could even listen to me on a pseudo regular basis to even associate me with that" A journalist should have some basic vocabulary comprehension, I would think, but that's just me. Good for him, fuck her
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:14 PM
2

Yeah, I've had the same experiences. In the age of instant information, why would you take any bold claim as absolute fact? I talk to my neighbor all the time and he makes the most outrageous claims, all because he heard them on a political radio station.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 02:38 PM
1

That's true I suppose. I looked into it a bit further, and yeah it does appear to fit the definition. I was only speaking based on the large part of the text initially
/r/MensRights14/01/16 01:27 PM
1

I get that, but even then, I wouldn't consider it a "myth."
/r/MensRights13/01/16 05:11 PM
1

Interesting and not at all surprising...But I'm looking at Myth #1, is that really a "myth"? Usually that word is reserved for facts that are debunked, not clarified. If someone said "there's 8 billion people on earth," would you call that a myth simply because the number is closer to 7 billion?
/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:42 PM
0

Killing of firefighters does carry more weight, and killing of law enforcement officers applies to when they were carrying out their official duties. Yes, firefighters are involved with many shitty people, but they are rarely targeted because they are firefighters, or to keep them from performing their duties as firefighters.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter