TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Feministsarepureevil Archive

View 1 post and 99 comments by Feministsarepureevil on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Feministsarepureevil/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:33 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:56 PM
-4

Why don't women just leave? Because the vast majority of domestic violence claims are fraud used by women to get custody, property and half of the man's assets and throw him out on the street. That's how much women despise men in this country. Any man who would get married nowadays would have to be stupidest, most ignorant drooling imbecile to ever live.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:22 PM
0

Why don't women just leave? Because the vast majority of domestic violence claims are fraud used by women to get custody, property and half the man's assets and throw him out on the street. That's how much women despise men in this country. Anyone man who would get married nowadays would have to be stupidest, most ignorant drooling imbecile to ever live.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:20 PM
1

Lol. what year do you think this is 1813? You're independent - you're female - you got all your 'rights.' Next step in the family court system is to abolish all alimony. Period. It's nothing more than extortion nowadays.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:14 PM
13

It's good to read that Father's Rights is actually having a real world effect - that things are finally starting to change (after 20 fucking years nightmarish Hell on Earth). I just never understood why women in this country just went along with such a dysfunctional system in the first place?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:07 PM
3

It's amazing that as a society, we haven't evolved any further than 1692. Cell phones, the internet- so what? The mindless mass majority just use these devices to more efficiently conduct their absolute, mind boggling stupidity. "WHAT?! A teenage girl and boy had sex!?!?! OH MY GOD!!!" The people who need to be swinging from trees are the ones making the threats including that piece of shit that actually calls herself a mother. CPS needs to take that child away immediately- she's obviously psych…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:41 PM
1

But of course everything they say IS a lie or a fraud, while the MRA is the complete opposite- revealing the truth. Anything a Feminist thinks is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:52 PM
-4

It should be the other way around- he should be telling HER that this isn't an invitation to FINANCIALLY RAPE ME.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:07 PM
1

there are actually feminists who support the MRM If they claim they're Feminists, then they're obviously ignorant and need to be educated.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:53 PM
1

Feminists are certainly 100% liars. I can't think of anything about Feminism that isn't either a lie, a half-truth, misinformation, deception, or out and out fraud.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:22 PM
1

Nice. Someone intelligent enough to be on a forum like this. It's been lonely and boring. Was just about to ditch this place.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:46 PM
3

What the fuck is SRS?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:42 PM
1

That's hilarious. Someone who doesn't comprehend human behavior giving orders to random people on an internet forum. Your genetics smack of garbage collector meets lot lizard.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:42 PM
1

I have a background in psychology AND biology Well then you must have gone to some shitty schools if you actually need someone to provide links about genetics. It's so vast no one would even know where to start. You're asking for me to provide links to an entire field of science and all of it is relevant to human behavior. You obviously just have gaping holes as huge as the Grand Canyon in your education.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:28 AM
1

Those are trivial examples. The point is that women in this country would have us believe society tells them what they're interested in. And that is beyond stupidity and reaches far into the depths of psychosis. That sentence itself doesn't even make any sense- 'society tells them what they're interested in.' To even debate something that psychotic is for people in padded cells.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:20 AM
1

No, there are mountains of scientific research proving genetics has more to do with human behavior than your simple minded psychology experiments. That's OK, though- you wouldn't be able to comprehend any of it anyway. I suppose someone as weak minded as yourself is a constant victim of your environment. Must be Hell.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:42 AM
0

This graph and the article it's linked to is pure simple evil. It's creating the illusion that we don't ever have to fear getting falsely accused of rape. Guess the cunt who made this doesn't ever watch the news and the daily false accusations. Someone also needs to explain to the author the 4 major reasons why women make false accusations. We need to make our own graph demonstrating the percentages of each category of false accusation- for revenge, profit, getting out of trouble, and attention.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:29 AM
-10

http://imgur.com/Tlu45
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:23 AM
2

Here you go: I FIXED IT!!! look at this http://imgur.com/Tlu45
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:21 AM
1

Affirmative action does not exist because certain groups are not smart enough. You can both be just as smart and need affirmative action to stand on equal footing. All of that is a fraud and a lie. Women use Affirmative Action to push out more qualified men so they don't have to try to achieve anything. And of course that's not 'equal footing,' that's just pathetic laziness. I suppose I wouldn't mind a setup like that either- "hey, we've got a program wherein you don't really have to try to comp…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:06 PM
1

the reason why these poor countries are poor is NOT because of genetics, but because of a long chain of events that lead to their inevitable downfall A long chain of events that were the result of that race's genetics. Would you be the same person you are today if your parents had tried to raise you as a girl? Do parenting styles matter? My parents tried to raise me to be a religious zealot like them. It didn't work.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:01 PM
1

Guaranteed, if you were kidnapped when you were younger and held hostage for decades while being tortured, you would NOT be the same person coming out of it? You'd most likely be broken and depressed. Or do you deny that as well? We've already covered this. Yes, you can break someone's will. That's not what the topic is about. The topic is about people choosing what they want to do of their own free will (that is obvously not broken) in a free society. Experiences shape who you are and how you r…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 04:55 PM
1

Finally someone with a brain on this site. It DOESN'T matter. And the people that care the least? WOMEN. I say leave them alone and quit trying to make them do something they don't want to. It's stupid. Here, let's make an example- I'm going to tell you what you like- you like ballet and opera because I SAY SO. Goddamn, that is SO fucking retarded. Feminists and liberals in general really are mentally retarded and completely cut off from reality. I wonder how they even drive a car or hold down a…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 07:18 PM
1

Since there is no genetic reason why males should be inclined to these subjects more than women, there must be an external reason. More lies. these differences are an unfortunate result of social conditioning by marketing, advertisements That's just stupid. It was this way thousands of years before advertising.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 07:11 PM
1

he just wants to FORCE people do something they don't want to do- like all Feminists and social engineering types & Communists. And then hold people back who actually want to do STEM- is sick & perverse.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 07:09 PM
1

First, unwed is not single. OK, fine- how about we just go with, "my mommy's a whore." That's more to the point anyway. That's what makes Feminism so evil, is it's allure and lie- the illusion that draws you in and now so many women have thrown away their lives in the pursuit of nothing.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 07:05 PM
2

Most of them really just want equality. As in, "I'll have your baby whether you like it or not, and then you go live somewhere else and send checks every month to pay me & your child to live with all my boyfriends. Or else go to jail." You know.. 'equality.'
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:42 PM
1

Let's try something new dueshbag- prove me wrong. How fucking pathetic would you have to be to not know 50% of children are born to single mothers? http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/for-younger-mothers-out-of-wedlock-births-are-the-new-normal/ Where do you live? Inside your own ass? People like you are the other half of the problem. Cheesy slimebags that try to trick people into believing in lies. Never understood you people- guess you're cheering for the team that wants to go to Hel…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:43 AM
1

I haven't the time or energy to re-educate you as to how the whole world works- what you have is a case of fractal wrongness http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~klee/misc/lexicon.html
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:31 AM
1

I'm saying we don't give any leeway to unattrative women, despite the allegations that their reproductive organs give them value, so they have no need to prove it. There's always tons of guys who will take ugly women, plus the government gives women free money to live because they have vaginas regardless of how attractive they are- proof again that they don't have to do anything of any value. Or because the people in power are military men and often start joint companies with greedy white evange…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 01:07 AM
1

Then why do we give more leeway to attractive women than to unattractive women? Both have reproductive organs. Because they're more attractive. If people accept male artists and musicians, then that stigma is released. The jobs that need to get done will still get done, and people will feel less restricted by social stigmas. Never gonna happen. Now, I know that you're a troll. You know that in most third world countries, labor is a lot less pampered than in developed countries right? Hershey con…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 12:38 AM
3

And you obviously have nothing else better to do. How pathetic is that?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 12:13 AM
2

That doesn't stop them. People are going to be arseholes, it's just a fact of life. Most men haven't taken the Red Pill and thus are ignorant of the possible consequences if the woman in their life is a bitch. Oh yes it does stop them. Any woman telling you that her husband is the cause of their divorce is almost undoubted lying, and that's because women today in america aren't capable of accountability. Most men haven't taken the red pill, true, but even the worst case blue pillars know they ha…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 11:54 PM
1

Well, the problem is, and Girl Writes What talks about this a lot- that men call other men 'girly' if they're not contributing in some major way in real tangible nuts and bolts- or technology is OK- Steve Jobs wasn't the most many man, but he falls in the genius category, which acceptable to even the most macho guys because it's an incredible contribution- even revolutionary. Art is seen by most men as frivolous at best. Music at least is entertainment- most guys want me around for my musical ta…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 11:40 PM
3

And how much of that is because the man is an arsehole? Really? In 2013? A man can't AFFORD to be an asshole in a marriage or else he's going to end up in the street and cut off from his children. How much is because she's looking for the ever-elusive "better" she believes she deserves? Oh yea! Won't argue with that one- but just another example of how the modern American female on average is a complete asshat not worth talking to for 2 minutes. Then stop jumping to conclusions you can't prove. …
/r/MensRights05/01/13 11:19 PM
1

This whole debate has been raging for decades- there's sources and studies that have been done, but not the kind that are going to give you the clear answer you want. You just have to connect the dots yourself sometimes. Who says you're not intelligent to be your own anthropologist? Some of the dumbest people I know have 'Phd' after their names. Yea, it's not 'fair' but so much in life isn't fair. If I had pursued a life in sports, chances are I wouldn't have made it to the NFL and thought THAT …
/r/MensRights05/01/13 11:07 PM
0

Women initiate 70% of divorces and the ones where the man files is usually because the woman is intolerable. There's plenty of sources for the divorce rate in this country and who initiates them, but it's not going to tell you all the rest, you goof. Feminist heads would explode and heads would roll if universities or the government said that women made marriage impossible because they're such bitches in this country.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:56 PM
1

Why is it important at all to involve women in such things? What would be the point? I've never understood why anyone would even care! (??) Now, if there were women who truly were interested in STEM and construction and were talented in those fields, and were being excluded and not hired or rejected, THEN that's a problem to be dealt with. But that certainly isn't an issue- in fact it's the extreme opposite in the workplace and in colleges - they literally BRIBE women to go into STEM. But what h…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:24 PM
1

You're actually talking to someone who is a musician and an artist. My father was a super jock and tried to force me into sports and I hated sports- still do - and have a difficult time relating to most men, though I do have solid male friends who share my interests. Funny how the greatest poets, dancers and ballet performers are still all men, huh? Not to mention the greatest hair stylists, fashion designers, chefs, interior decorators, and on and on and on. Sure, I pay the price for the choice…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:01 PM
1

All of the friends I have are all successful business men- every last one of them married (but not me) so these aren't stupid or loser men. In every single instance, every last one of them is just over a barrel and nothing more than a monkey with all the status of the family dog. That is the definition of a 'successful' marriage in 2013. Why? Because legally you have no rights and she has god-like power over you and can blackmail you with the threat of false accusations that will leave you eithe…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:11 PM
-4

Living with two people that do nothing but make each other miserable is awful. True, my parents fought a lot and then finally got divorced. It still would have been 1000 times worse though had they divorced when I still lived with them- that would have been devastating. But the real problem was with my mother- never happy, superficial, demanding, stirring up shit, never accountable, just wanted to fight 24/7 and that's typical. If you want to get to the root of the problem in 98% of marriages, i…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:04 PM
5

No.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:59 PM
20

No woman, period, will ever know what it's like to always be automatically suspected of being a rapist or child molester when out in public. To have to be careful to never even so much as make eye contact with a child, lest you want to be falsely accused and arrested. EVERYONE on the other hand, knows what exclusion feels like - whether it's from a clique or the popular crowd or from a group of wealthy people and on and on and on. This is about spoiled rotten cunts whining that they can't have 1…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:54 PM
1

I was trying to find that one story the guy posted the other day about the woman who tried to seduce him and when he turned her down she reported him to the police as having tried to rape her. I keep hearing more and more about this- and it's happening a lot in the workplace as well. Just because a woman wants to have sex with you doesn't mean she's attractive or that you would want to have sex with her! So it's now gotten to the point to where if you refuse a woman you run the risk of being fal…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:38 PM
-1

You know, this is actually something a man could use to his defense if falsely accused of rape- if you're not really gay, of course it would be a lie, but who could really prove otherwise? Even if you were married, just say you're a closet gay. I mean if it's the difference between prison for something you didn't even do and freedom, then I say tell them that. We live in nightmarish times with women falsely accusing men of rape everyday. Whatever tools you can use to help combat this nightmarish…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:27 PM
11

This reminds me of those endless MSM commentators who always say, "she/he used to be the hottest back in the 70s and 80s- what HAPPENED?" Like they're retarded and don't realize people get OLD. "David Lee Roth used to have women throw themselves at him, now look at him!" Yea, and he's like 50,000 years old, for christ's sake. Were they expecting something else? I don't get these people.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:22 PM
0

That's just simply more of the same Feminist propaganda that claims these proclivities are based purely on outside influences. I have seen films of children as young as 2 years old as far back as the 80s where a group of 6 boys and 6 girls were shown into a room full of toys and the girls instantly went to the dolls and the boys, the trucks and robots. The Feminists were proven wrong through scientific studies decades ago, but still stupidly insist on their proven wrong theories. Just the 40 yea…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:02 PM
1

we can discuss better solutions all say long, but there is a huge imbalance in gender in engineering and everyone is aware of it. Why? Why is that even important- at all? Why do you want to force people do something they don't want to do? That sounds an awful lot like what Right Wing Conservatives are accused of. Hitler wanted to create a master race as well. The only difference in his social engineering was his first step was to exterminate the 'undesirables' first. Why don't you just leave peo…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:58 PM
-4

And of course Feminism is to blame for the 50% divorce rate and 50% of children being born to single mothers. Because Feminism teaches women that fathers are unnecessary and constantly petitions government for more financial aid to support single mothers, giving them the incentive. So once again we see Feminism is pure evil and the cause of yet another societal problem. I can't wait for the day when society finally catches up to the the 21st century and begins to treat Feminists the way they des…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:44 PM
1

good one.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:37 PM
3

What a bunch of kid gloves bullshit. Though I did learn that boys do better nowadays on standardized tests- didn't know that. Just another MSM article that says nothing and gently pokes at the real problem and goes away without saying anything at all. Boys didn't suddenly become stupid, "Male Hating Feminists Teachers The Reason Boys Are Failing In School." Now there's the headline we need to see- the truth.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:35 PM
1

How does propaganda in commercials even work then? Did propaganda never happen during the holocaust? I understand psychology only too well, propaganda is nothing more than trickery through fraud and deception - it's exactly what Feminists do best- but it only works in the short term to trick the population into something- that doesn't shape someone's personality or inform them of life plans. I've been traumatized- I was in a horrible accident when I was 5 and another boy was involved and I came …
/r/MensRights05/01/13 06:16 PM
0

I don't see any evidence anywhere in our culture of anyone discouraging african americans they can't run for governor or ..PRESIDENT. In fact, society bends over backwards to go out our way to roll out the red carpet for african americans. So if there are few african americans in politics, that would be because it doesn't appeal to them. It only further proves social engineering doesn't work.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 06:05 PM
0

Why are african americans, latinos, white people, etc. (All races) less likely to excel in school and then get great jobs later on if they are born in raised in ghetto towns? Why are people who are born rich more likely to pursue more prestigious careers than people raised in poorer cities? You're not seeing the bigger picture. Why are those ghettos (and countries they originate from) piss poor in the first place? Genetics. Genetics of their ancestors, that they have in them as well. You need to…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:58 PM
1

Accountability is what makes us human. So I'm not going to say the words, you can fill in the rest in your head.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:32 PM
0

To be successful at negotiation you have to know what you want and be aware of the value of what you have to offer. You also have to be willing to refuse a bad deal. What I am saying is to make the value of what you offer clear, as well as your willingness to refuse an unfair deal. Don't let a woman think she is entitled to your "cash, prizes and affection" for free, nor browbeat you into thinking you are morally obligated to give her those things. Sounds exhausting. I don't want to have to come…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:28 PM
0

I would be exactly the same, only having to follow Indian custom and laws, but that wouldn't mean I would internally want to. The same as I am forced to follow customs in the states, though I do so only because otherwise it would be difficult to hold down a job or even get one in the first place. But those are only trivial societal conformities, not who you choose to marry, profession you choose, or direction you take in life. I might take a 'liking' to Indian food if I actually liked it.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:21 PM
0

You need to clarify your question- it's not clear- are you asking born to the same exact parents in a different country?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:25 PM
-1

I've actually spoken to GWW live on air on AVFM radio - I like GWW. But GWW isn't really a heterosexual female, because well, she's bi. It's a huge part of what makes her so different as a female. And GWW would agree with that herself and has even indicated it several times already. I would be shocked if even the intelligent women who come to this site are capable of accountability. Accountability just isn't in a woman's scheme of things. In fact I've been trying to work out why that is exactly-…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:17 PM
1

The reason there are all these social forces in the first place is due to 100,000 years of genetics. A female bird at a certain point simply gets busy building her nest. The biological urge in women is the same- they just build a more 'sophisticated' nest.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:01 PM
1

But if you convey that her behavior is affecting the relationship in such a way to threaten her needs in a larger way than the issue you're arguing about, then you can prevail. For example, if you cast her behavior as so unacceptable that you must withdraw your emotional investment in her, and she values that emotional investment, then she will quickly rethink her position. Another example is if she is shown that her behavior might hurt her social standing among her friends. Oh I see, you have t…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:55 PM
0

OH MY GOD!! YOU SAID SOMETHING NEGATIVE AND CRITICIZED WOMEN!!! You're a MISOGYNIST!!! YOU HATE WOMEN!! And you are what the MRA doesn't need and you give MRAs a bad name!! Was that a good impression of the typical dueschbag on this site? Lol. Just couldn't pass up the opportunity to demonstrate the depths of stupidity people on here will sink to when you dare to speak the truth. Of course you are 100% correct, but that doesn't matter. Oh, wait a minute, you're 99% correct, because we have go th…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:48 PM
1

I already did- all of the social proclivities that genetics influences eventually trickle down to even where you find yourself and what you happen to be doing at any point in time.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:31 PM
1

If they want to be a housewife, then that is their choice. Who are you or anyone else to tell people how they should live their lives?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:30 PM
2

There really isn't much to choose from in human society when you're talking about getting through your day - which is what customs really boil down to. It simply isn't practical for me to say, walk to work since it's 20 miles away. So I drive out of convenience - I'm simply making the most intelligent, practical choice like millions of other people do everyday. A lot of not following 'customs' has really more to do with deviant behavior or mental illness.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:28 PM
2

Just one of a zillion studies in the last 10 years. http://www.apa.org/monitor/apr04/gender.aspx
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:22 PM
1

Feminists take it to the extreme- they are trying to tell us that women are told what to be interested in and that in turn will make them interested in something. Which is extremely insulting to women - as if they have no free will to make their own decisions in life or are even able to formulate what it is they even like. That's just nuts. This ridiculous premise of course throws open the door for endless meddling, trying to force square pegs through round holes. You can break someone's will an…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:12 PM
2

Of course you can make it 'look' ridiculous by pointing out trivial, petty details, but what you don't realize is that all of the social proclivities that genetics influences eventually trickle down to even where you find yourself and what you happen to be doing at any point in time.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:43 PM
1

I'm a perfect example of why social engineering and social forces do not work. My father was a super jock and tried from birth to mold me into a jock. Not only that, every social pressure was on me to choose that direction- the jocks, got the prettiest girls, etc. But I simply wasn't interested - it just wasn't in my genetic makeup. I derailed the whole thing and went into music and art. My father still doesn't much want to talk to me to this day. This becomes a debate of which came first the ch…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:11 PM
2

then how do you explain cultural differences? Genetics.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:57 PM
1

Lol- you're obviously not educated enough or even intelligent enough to understand genetics and the complexity of how they impact the roles in all of your decision making and reactions in life. Science is in fact proving all the time a little more that genetics are in fact why even entire races behave differently. Yes, it IS a Feminist's or any Communist's (read: liberal 'progressive') total and complete nightmare- because it proves that you can't force humans to want to do something. Yes, you c…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:56 PM
1

http://www.google.com/cse?cx=015901153337142161077%3Awwes8uoeifc&ie=UTF-8&q=wage+gap&sa=Search+Harry&siteurl=www.angryharry.com%2F&ref=www.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3D%26esrc%3Ds%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D1%26sqi%3D2%26ved%3D0CDQQFjAA%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.angryharry.com%252F%26ei%3DS_DnUJqmAoiy2wXduoC4DQ%26usg%3DAFQjCNGPXK3HRw7Ub6YGQwj2ayXlvPwKmA%26sig2%3DNpYC83ioMyxFeRlCdPO6nA%26bvm%3Dbv.1355534169%2Cd.b2U&ss=2897j1280719j8#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=wage%20gap&gsc.page=1
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:23 AM
1

which is why I think a place that isn't absolute shit for searching to store all of the MRM data/statistics/references other than the MRAref sub-reddit would probably be best. It'd be awesome if I could go somewhere and just type in "wage gap" and every single piece of data or report that has been tagged with "wage gap" comes up. Angry Harry is such a place http://www.angryharry.com/
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:22 AM
1

The idea that people are told what they are interested in is insanity. Let's start with you. You will like what I tell you what to like and I'm going to make a list. And how well do you think that is going to work out?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:15 AM
1

I don't take orders from anyone. Here's some rhetoric for you: Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:03 AM
1

The 80s?! You mean that magical time before societal pressures and socialization? There was more pressure to behave a certain way than there now. Didn't work on me though, or anyone else that didn't want to conform. Pay attention to the world around you and the people who defy the social norms. Obviously social 'conditioning' didn't work on them, But if you see seriously don't know anything about genetics and it's effects on human behavior, there's a vast wealth of research on it - but you would…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:02 AM
2

The debate over this went on for decades, but it has become obvious that social 'conditioning' isn't really much of any kind of factor. Genetics determine behavior in all living things. If social engineering actually worked, Feminists would have managed to socialy condition girls into STEM decades ago, and we wouldn't even be having this conversation. Biology and genetics are far too complex for a Feminist's mental capacity. The very fact someone would even adhere to their overly simplistic worl…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 08:54 AM
-1

That's just simply more of the same Feminist propaganda that claims these proclivities are based purely on outside influences. I have seen films of children as young as 2 years old as far back as the 80s where a group of 6 boys and 6 girls were shown into a room full of toys and the girls instantly went to the dolls and the boys, the trucks and robots. The Feminists were proven wrong through scientific studies decades ago, but still stupidly insist on their proven wrong theories. Just the 40 yea…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:47 AM
96

I was the only one with my hand up Out of 13 girls, you were the only one who wanted to go. THIS is what is truly at the heart of the matter, the problem, and the reason MIT is only inviting girls. You witnessed for yourself a completely random sampling of girls wherein only 1/13 of them were interested in science. And that is the true reason women are 'underrepresented' in STEM. It's very simple- they're not being 'oppressed' or told not to participate, they CHOOSE OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL to not…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 12:27 AM
3

I've been involved involved with men's rights going back to 2005 starting with Glenn Sacks and Fathers and Families and was simply told about this place. There really isn't anything else even half as important to talk about than these issues- nothing else really even matters when you can be thrown into prison for nothing more than a pointed finger. Nothing except maybe government corruption.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:52 PM
-1

Bring up how huge and mannish women have become and are now far more threatening. As late as about the 80s, it was absolutely ridiculous; this idea of a woman beating up a man in the U.S. because women in the U.S. still tried to be thin & feminine back then, but then when Feminism really kicked into high gear in the 90s, women in the U.S. just ditched all of that for the most part & went all out for the super butch, 'I don't give a fuck what you think of me, I don't have to try, fuck you' attitu…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:10 PM
4

Btw what she did was blackmail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail Do any of the voice mails include her actually making the blackmail threats? More men need to become educated about blackmailing, because basically that is what an 'ultimatum' is as well - blackmail.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:56 PM
-1

Funny how before the 1960s, sex outside of marriage was a social taboo and extra-marital sex was hard to come by. Now we've come around full circle to where it's just as impossible, and now with the threat of going to prison. Maybe our grandparents weren't quite so out of touch after all and knew what would eventually happen if all the women became sluts. It's like being in the middle of the ocean surrounded by water, but you can't drink a drop of it.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:36 PM
5

Try to get custody of her- I got custody of my daughter, but not until after she turned 12 - after 12 they can make up their own mind. The worst part is it sounds like they're going to force her to take dangerous psychiatric drugs. The only reason the mother is having 'difficulty' with her is because she prob hates her mother- a lot it prob to do with the way the mother treats you and prob says horrible things about you. That's the way this always works. It's really the mother who is mental and …
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:17 PM
3

So fractal wrongness is like Whack-a-mole and that's exactly what it feels like arguing anything with someone who is in favor of Feminism. To adhere to it, you have believe all the lies that it's based on, the 1 in 4 myth, men keeping women from making choices of their own free will.. etc forever. You would really have to be mentally ill to abscribe to any of it, with the way that it is so opposite of the reality around you. The brainwashing in the schools and the wholesale selling of Marxist th…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:43 PM
3

Women in the U.S. are saturated with non-stop stories of serial rapists and child molesters, serial killers and the like. It's their no. 1 obsession. All of their magazines as well- all of the programs and networks they watch might as well be called, "Men are rapists TV." All of the day time TV is basically nothing but that - Opra was also very instrumental in spreading the hysteria.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:59 PM
4

And all of that is 100% certifiable, insane asylum, crazy to even suggest such a thing.. that the only reason that a father would either want to see his children or have custody of them is based on the notion that the father either is a peodophile or beating them. Even if you want to go there with the peodophilia notion, it's been shown statistically that even bonafide child molesters (who are a microscopic % of the population) won't even molest their own flesh and blood- that's statistically th…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:24 PM
9

This is why even arguing with them at ALL quickly gets bogged down and becomes impossible- because now you would have to go back and explain all about how money is earned, not just simply handed over to you, as if you were having to educate a child. Then THAT explodes into yet ANOTHER argument, then it all just gets shut down and the debate goes no where. This is why any kind of public debate between men and women on the most important issues concerning both of us is completely impossible. Women…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:23 PM
0

When the race of the defendant is added to the analysis, the following pattern appears: 22% of black defendants who kill white victims are sentenced to death; 8% of white defendants who kill white victims are sentenced to death; 1% of black defendants who kill black victims are sentenced to death; and 3% of white defendants who kill black victims are sentenced to death. So you want Men's Rights to help black murderers- you're high.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:41 PM
1

You're obviously out of touch - you're not even aware that women are above the law in this country- and you're obviously in the wrong place. You just need to create a forum that caters to out-of-touch bill pill ignoramuses like yourself who are only concerned about black men. You can call it 'The Out Of Touch Losers.'
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:57 PM
1

so in your estimation... the majority of guilty women go free There have been COUNTLESS articles and posts on this site about it- at the very most, they're given a slap on the wrist with community service or 6 months in jail - which is basically the same thing. why does mens rights not focus on the unbelievable discrimination towards black MEN in particular? Look, I don't know what your problem is- white men aren't exactly having a 'party' in this country either. We've got our own problems just …
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:39 PM
2

It's funny how all the reaction in the mainstream has been, "oh my GOD, now women have no protection from being beaten up!!" As if some men out there are saying, "well, time to go beat up my girlfriend, cause now I won't go to jail for it!" Oh my god, it's mind boggling to realize just how insanely stupid the average person is - plus they have NO idea why VAWA was so evil.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:31 PM
0

It's funny how people like you don't even know that when you write letters like that to extremely high profile politicians, it does nothing at all because they'll never read it, and then you're put on a watch list as a potential terrorist and the Feds will begin to monitor all of your phone calls and internet usage more closely.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:28 PM
2

you are talking about something that hasn't happened... you are making wild assumptions No, it's a logical prediction based on countless other cases where women go free- that's called 'precedent.' The same exact way you can predict a mother is going to get custody in a divorce.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:49 PM
7

? Men's Rights is 100% in favor of black men. ALL men. Not only that, you're talking about a whole other subject. We're talking about a murderer going free.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:35 PM
-5

Preferential treatment based on her gender is almost guaranteed. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002 http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=gang_lee&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3Dsentencing%2520gender%2520disparities%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D1%26ved%3D0CCkQFjAA%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fdigitalcommons.utep.edu%252Fcgi%252Fviewcontent.cgi%253Farticle%253D1001%2526context%253Dgang_lee%26ei%3DoeRg…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:51 PM
5

hate, hate, hate, and slander, slander, slander. Yep, that's a Feminist organization - fits the MO.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:36 PM
2

They won't convict her- everyone knows that laws don't apply to women. Which brings up an interesting point- if a guy's wife cheats on him, robs him blind in court, takes his children- you know, the standard, and if he wanted revenge, well, all he'd have to do is get a woman to kill her- she goes free and he gets his revenge! Perfect!
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:18 PM
4

There seems to be a new case of a woman killing her husband about every week in the U.S. and typically they get no jail time at all. Mary Winkler was the most famous recent one, blew her husbands brains out with a shotgun while he was asleep and then just claimed she was 'abused' and went free - then got custody her children and then collected his life insurance! Isn't our criminal justice system just great? After Mary Winkler, people just became accustomed to women murdering their husbands and …
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter