| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | An abusive lesbian couple with 6 adopted black kids, do a Thelma and Louise off a cliff with 3 kids, after Child Services was checking in on the kids.Court records in Minnesota show Sarah Hart received a 90-day suspended jail sentence and a year of probation in 2011 after her six-year-old daughter arrived at school with bruises on her stomach and back. The girl told a teacher, "Mom hit me," according to records. You can see how the tone changes, as well as the terminology, the farther you proceed through the article. It almost convinces the reader that at some point there was nothing to suggest it had been intentional. No skid marks? Neighbor… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/18 05:03 PM |
| 0 | Christian website says "Banning circumcision would give Hitler a posthumorus victory" WTF?I wouldnt say medically necessary however the paper you provided does more to highlight the best of what circumcision has to offer than it does to argue against it. I've repeatedly used the word benefits. And I still think the word was appropriate. Most of my arguments of been of my own research but I like playing devil's advocate which gets me down voted alot (!) | /r/MensRights | 27/03/18 11:15 AM |
| -3 | Christian website says "Banning circumcision would give Hitler a posthumorus victory" WTF?Again, it may not seem important, but it isn't amputation. There are many papers discussing circumcision and it's counterpart for females. If I'm correct, and I can find it, it is from Columbia possibly (don't take my word for it). Since it ruled out any benefits for a female it isn't allowed but the same cannot be said for males. As for the level of control parents have over their children in all aspects it is difficult to agree upon. Where does it begin and where does it end? What can parents … | /r/MensRights | 25/03/18 07:46 PM |
| -1 | Christian website says "Banning circumcision would give Hitler a posthumorus victory" WTF?^ (not the intentions in circumcision. See earlier comment with Old and New testament texts regarding circumcision) | /r/MensRights | 25/03/18 07:05 PM |
| -3 | Christian website says "Banning circumcision would give Hitler a posthumorus victory" WTF?By definition it isn't amputation. I do agree that it is non-consentual and I have no answer for that. However in many instances parents wield immeasurable influence over their child's life and since religious practice is allowed, and circumcision falls in that category, it remains legal. Now the argument I've heard against circumcision has mostly been since it removes the foreskin and therefore a large portion of the individuals potential sexual gratification you've taken away a vital part of w… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/18 06:41 PM |
| -1 | Christian website says "Banning circumcision would give Hitler a posthumorus victory" WTF?He seems to have harsher terms than Jesus did, which I found interesting. Perhaps he had a different interpretation than Jesus? But this whole "I don't agree with something from the Bible so I'll just omit or remove it" is something I don't buy. (If you "buy" religion at all) It is something that is prominent in every religion, mainly of the 3 Monotheistic religions. There's plenty people just don't do :slavery, capital punishment for non-adherence to religious law (arguable), sacrifice, etc. Ho… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/18 05:48 PM |
| -8 | Christian website says "Banning circumcision would give Hitler a posthumorus victory" WTF?I would suggest looking up what circumcision is from a religious and a medical perspective before attributing words like mutilation so callously. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/18 03:30 PM |
| 2 | "Men...intentionally taking their own lives, in their own homes, constitute 37% of the entire body of all firearm deaths."It would seem that suicides are much more preferable with a gun than any other means, as the data shows, but plenty of suicides, as people have pointed out, are not. (My father decided to jump off a bridge apparently). Has anyone ever addressed if there's a psychological aspect as to why we've attached the instrument of such destruction in mass shootings and other murders as the sole vessel of blame? Is it easier for the mind to comprehend? Does it seem simpler to solve? Im interested. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/18 05:41 PM |
| 1 | “I would like to share my opinion without it being critiqued by a male who has never faced any discrimination”Rosie Larkin= Cenk Uygur | /r/MensRights | 05/03/18 05:16 PM |
| 1 | Society beginning to tackle the issue of male genital mutilation (aka circumcision)That's some very specific yet hilariously offensive antisemitism | /r/TheRedPill | 21/02/18 05:25 PM |
| 1 | Society beginning to tackle the issue of male genital mutilation (aka circumcision)That may be true but my response was to the insinuation of perverted intentions regarding circumcision. | /r/TheRedPill | 20/02/18 10:20 PM |
| 0 | Society beginning to tackle the issue of male genital mutilation (aka circumcision)The same can be said for Priests... | /r/TheRedPill | 20/02/18 03:57 PM |
| 2 | Society beginning to tackle the issue of male genital mutilation (aka circumcision)People get skin infections from just having overlapping layers of skin... | /r/TheRedPill | 20/02/18 03:56 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter