TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ferocian Archive

View 2 posts and 322 comments by Ferocian on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

Ferocian/r/MarriedRedPill26/11/15 12:04 AM
10

QuestionsFerocian/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Wow, you are right, the comments are ridiculously supportive of a theif. "If the world was run by women, everything would be perfect!" No, crime would be rampant because there would be no real consequences for immoral or anti-social actions. No one would be safe.
/r/PussyPass08/07/16 03:23 PM
22

Of course not, women can do no wrong in the eyes of the legal system.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 12:43 AM
2

People like this don't deserve to live. It's even worse that they live on the public's money.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 12:42 AM
61

On single guys their favorite word to try to control you is "creepy". In relationships it's "abuser". It's all about getting what they want at no cost.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/16 04:32 PM
4

This makes me sick. What the parents did that is, not the justice or injustice part after the fact. Fucking morons.
/r/PussyPass25/06/16 06:34 AM
1

If it was just a mistake, the question would be so obvious that nobody would bother putting it on a test. It was intentional.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:04 AM
0

Not so fast, those were all such obvious examples of sexism that they'd never bother to put it on a test if the "real answer" wasn't "hidden".
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:02 AM
8

Oh it is, and it's also resoundingly bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 05:59 AM
4

This kind of shit is wayyy too touted. You idiots are so busy running around guarding your woman and trying to get someone else's you aren't leaving yourself time to fucking accomplish anything. Anyone who thinks being constantly shit-tested is normal, anyone who has to constantly overcome competition and objections in order to get laid; is doing it wrong. If you're doing it right you should know your wife is waiting to fuck you every single day and you can actually concentrate on doing more wit…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/16 11:27 PM
4

Yeah well their wives sure as hell aren't that dipshit's either.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/16 11:22 PM
0

Nobody's wife's pussy is yours, it's theirs. That's the contract. I don't give a fuck what you take immense pleasure from. I hear masturbating with a rope tied around your neck can give you immense pleasure too, you should try that next.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/16 11:21 PM
0

There are some allies worse to have than the enemy you're fighting against. I don't stand allied with people who behead tourists just because they're white.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:19 PM
1

Do you think those guys are reading those posters? For one, they're made in English. If they are fluent in English, do you think reading one of those posters is going to change them? Muslim men are clearly not the target demographic of the "you're a dirty rapist predator because you were born with a cock" types of posters. Those are targeted at white males because women get bored, echo chamber with their friends and decide to "do something about it!!!". It's an easy crusade against the least lik…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:17 PM
1

Why is it that some people are incapable of not taking things literally?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:11 PM
2

This is obviously an intentionally overblown reaction to the posters that women put up to "teach" men. Sometimes hyperbole works, except when, you know, some people are too literal.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:09 PM
1

No you're not, and if you are, don't. Get a t-shirt instead.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:05 PM
1

The whole reason certain laws are in place; ie "age of consent" "statutory rape" "age of majority" etc is because at the age of 15 he is not considered legally old enough to be able to make informed decisions for himself. The courts should know this and stop using what he says against him. Shame on them and shame on his lawyer for not doing a better job and making better arguments. His age should be central to their whole defense.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:34 PM
14

It's an odd insult. It's accepting the notion of a man having sex as being representative that he has value, yet they're using that to argue against TRP.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 08:45 PM
2

Honestly, these sad, old men chasing women half their age just cannot face up to the fact that they are no longer young and 'have it'. It's disturbing how they really believe these women want them. Are they talking about themselves? Seriously, that seems like them thinking along the lines of "if I were with a guy that much younger...". It's a romance novel cliche of the younger woman with the older man. If they weren't turned on by it, that wouldn't be the most popular theme and sell the most no…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 10:58 PM
1

To supplement: Someone who is a loser who is alright with that as a state of being has no motivation to push past it and make something of themselves. That results in today's society where most people will try to tear down successful people via words than try to raise themselves to their level.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 10:37 PM
1

I think that's what any reasonable person means when they say equality. Maybe you're right about any reasonable person, but that shouldn't be construed as the majority. When the majority thinks of equality, they think of that blatant lie "everyone is equal".
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 10:35 PM
1

IMO you shouldn't have bothered trying to respond, they were bringing up an exception, sure, but that doesn't mean you weren't right about winners and losers as a general principle. The response just detracted from the original statement.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 10:21 PM
1

I just believe that nobody in positions of power in our respective societies has any level of benevolent masculinity about them to try to provide this to society. (Though maybe Trump will prove me wrong?) The sort of man who pulls ahead, then leads everybody else forward. Good point. There is a real lack of that quality in men of power in modern society. Looking at history, that was traditionally praised. In order to be respectable, a man had to not only have wealth, but he had to use that wealt…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 10:12 PM
1

I think he meant he wants to cannibalize her.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 09:47 PM
0

I highly doubt Usain Bolt spent his time sitting around on his ass eating junk food before he won his gold medal. The difference genetics makes is that between two people who are both working hard, the one with the better genetics usually wins. If the person with better genetics doesn't put in the effort to go along with them, they can and and often will (not always, depending on how far apart they are naturally) lose to people who have worse genes who put in more effort.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 09:45 PM
1

It's a topic of substance because its been targeted for 3 decades. Most people who fit that physical description are descriminated against if not outright attacked because of it. The point is to be aware of it and not think of it as acceptable and not just allow it to happen.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 09:42 PM
3

The part that gets me is how most white males not only watch it happen, but also actively support it.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/16 09:29 PM
2

I know a guy who's slept with more women than anyone else I know. He's fat and he smokes but he's really forward and he just doesn't give a fuck. So much of it is just presenting women with the option. Of course if you want women to want to stick with you past a ONS you'll want to do more, but the point is that the OP is correct, you CAN get women in your current state. That shouldn't stop you from self improvement though. The better you are, the better woman you can get.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/16 05:21 PM
3

Good running commentary. Reasonable and logical. A lot of people would've modified this to just write easily dismissed angry statements. You gave your reasoning as to why you disagree concisely.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 09:25 PM
5

haha when I read that line I was like "yeah, really really shouldn't have that in there, it's going to derail the entire point you're making"
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 05:03 PM
2

Measuring yourself against another man is a far better test of self anyways. One of the things I'd argue that TRP is about is not measuring your worth by what women in your life tell you it is.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 08:08 PM
2

I love that you made a short post with concise points but backed it up aggressively with sources. Well done.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/16 07:58 PM
1

This is why security is needed. Every time I read something like this I think to myself that this could be prevented. You make the simple rule of "those interfering with other people's ability to hear the speaker or those who intentionally disrupt proceedings will be removed from the building", security escorts them out and you move on with your day.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/16 03:40 AM
1

Actually it's not irony. The whole post was about temptation and self control. She was trying to control herself, he was temptation. She succumbed to the temptation. He concluded self control is the most important feature to look for in a woman.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:52 PM
1

He was giving an example of a woman whose resistance crumbled and how it lowered her value. It was part of his backstory in explaining how he came to his conclusions. Before that example he didn't believe that women who succumbed to temptation were a real thing, he figured they were essentially just making excuses. Once he realized they were actually being swayed into it, his conclusion was self control is the most important feature to have in a woman. So, he started evaluating women based on li…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:50 PM
15

then refuses to avoid certain inappropriate situations with other men A lot of people think self control is about the ability to have something tempting right in front of you and then reject it. The truth is, self control is at least as much about being able to look ahead to situations that might involve possible temptation and avoiding those situations. -At the grocery store? Pie is on at a good price, people you live with like pie. During a shared meal, you might eat a single slice. You know y…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:41 PM
1

What? wait... WHAT? I'm 99% sure you didn't understand my post.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:04 AM
2

Sure I can make it really clear. If you've ever had sex, even once, you're a rapist by modern definitions. I'm sure there was some moment during the act that if viewed through a skewed enough lense would've had someone outraged somewhere. The law has been warped so much that once again there would be some incredibly broad definition in there under which it would fall.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 11:46 PM
2

Yeah I'm glad I've had my kids before it became essentially illegal to have sex.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 11:44 PM
3

Back in my dating days I always hated when I'd start talking to a girl and they'd start saying things to me that were cautionary about men or the nature of men. Things they'd picked up via media in some way and I'd always think to myself "I haven't done anything to this girl, can't she tell I'm a trustworthy person? At the very least can't she reserve judgement until she gets to know me?". Of course to them I wasn't "Ferocian" (not my real name obviously), I was "a guy they might date and theref…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 11:39 PM
18

This is why there needs to be consequences, legal consequences, for false accusations. Otherwise they'll just keep doing it again and again and inspire other crazy bitches to do the same.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 05:40 PM
14

Nah, they're confused about why they're not turned on and just start flailing about mentally looking for something to point their finger at.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 07:14 AM
7

When someone's been told a particular set of falsehoods their entire life, then they're suddenly presented with the truth, they usually won't recognize it as the truth. At the very least they'll have extreme skepticism because of the cognitive dissonance battering their brains to pieces.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 07:13 AM
6

Unfortunately, posting in a forum like that is a guarantee that he'll get reinforcement of bad behavior and he'll amplify it even more. It might even manage to get whatever last little bit of attraction she has to him snuffed out and end it, which might end up being a good thing in the end for him. Then he can start to actually improve.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 07:08 AM
6

I fucking hate relationship subreddits because of the self righteous idiots that populate them. I often intentionally post opinions that run contrary to the established commenter narrative and eat the turdburger of a reaction just because I think it needs to be said.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 07:03 AM
3

This makes me sick. Like, I couldn't read it due to how disturbed I am by what she was trying to do. Some people should not continue to live after committing certain acts.
/r/PussyPass02/04/16 06:55 AM
1

Fat positive fitness advice. Bahahahaha. Nice exit.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 04:05 PM
3

If you look at the things they lobby for, at its core it's actually about more pay for less work. There are actually many feminist initiatives that are about getting paid for no work, and the pay is based on credentials given out by a female-biased education system. Maternity leave, stress leave, mental health leave etc. There's such a thing supposedly as Paternity leave, but these types of "leaves" are overwhelmingly used by women. Now they're trying to get period leave. Ridiculous.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 08:10 PM
3

God. As if there aren't enough drains on the economy as-is. PERIOD pain? Out of the guys in this thread, how many of you wake up on an almost daily basis so stressed about work that it basically gives you the shits, and you god damn go anyways? Period pain. Guffaw.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 08:07 PM
1

The true benchmark is though in my opinion wheather they have high n counts What does "high n counts" mean?
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 08:27 AM
5

Can confirm. Dated a girl who was 19 when I was 23. She'd recently gotten back from 6 months overseas. Her partner total before she left was 4, her total after she got back was 10. If you're counting that's a new guy every month. If I recall, only one of them was a one night stand. Can you even imagine that fast of a cycle of dating/sex and breaking up? I sometimes go a couple weeks without seeing my friends, I can't imagine changing partners at the same frequency as I hang out with people.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 08:23 AM
3

I forgot the most important rule for any non-American. Never, ever ever make any kind of comment on American politics. You'll get instantly swallowed by a sea of shit. I've learned my lesson guys, no more comments necessary.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:40 PM
6

The things Hillary Clinton says are so incredibly inane. Banks have nothing to do with racism and sexism. If we provide Detroit with a new water purification plant, would that get us to Alpha Centauri? No? What's the point then?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:14 PM
2

Yeah she was definitely trying to lock him down while at the same time telling him she fucked someone else. It's like "if he'll put up with this, he'll put up with anything!", and that's the message she received. She won't think twice about doing it a second time ++
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 10:06 PM
1

"aww I slept with him but I really wanted you!" "If I'm who you really want, I'm who you sleep with. Bye, have a nice life."
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 10:02 PM
2

This seems true. I don't know necessarily about her saying the same thing to the other guy, but the rest of it bears out. She's definitely poking at OP to see if he'll stick around despite her infidelity. Unfortunately I think she got the wrong message, that he will in fact stick around. I also get the impression he's a little bit attached to her despite him claiming or trying to act otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 10:00 PM
5

She wrote that line like the correct and proper response from Stewart-Binks was to change her mind, act like a victim, and blame Gronkowski. This kind of crap being given a voice is why subs like this exist.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 02:17 AM
3

I've been watching Bill Burr for years. He's TRP as fuck.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 11:11 PM
9

The details of the prenup seem more than reasonable. Despite the fact that they're no longer together and getting divorced she's still being provided with a place to stay from his money and despite the fact that she has custody of his kids he's still providing for them until they're grown up. I don't see the injustice here.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:57 PM
3

That's definitely the right kind of goal to strive for as an actual end result. The problem is; that's not how people work. The ones who have tried to approach it reasonably (women included, in fact moreso because they've been "movementing" for much longer) have been shouted overtop of and drowned out as background noise. Their well-intentioned words are seen as permissiveness by the extremists if they're on the same side, or as weakness that they can crush (making them a more desirable target t…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 07:22 AM
1

While you have a point in everything you just said, your air of superiority was what bothered me about your post in the first place.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 06:57 AM
1

Your point? Their plan was still to run out in front of something that could kill them, and it did.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:59 AM
1

Typical of white knights to congratulate themselves on their "broad vision". Wait, he said "broad"! That's not very PC, white knights, get him!
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:58 AM
1

Way to give them all the credit. They didn't have to shed any blood because men didn't fight them on it. It's that simple. Wars have two sides.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:30 AM
-2

ome of the comments in this thread are pretty embarrassing but if women did have to fight and die for the right to vote They didn't. Multiple comments in this thread prove that. If you were "embarassed" by them, it might've done you some good to actually read them at the same time as you were busy being embarassed.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:28 AM
3

Men are in those situations now because men never tried to fight against women. The same is not true the other way around.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:26 AM
1

She meant to hang a flat that said "Votes for Women" on a horse as it ran by and was trampled. She didn't intentionally throw herself in front of it. Her being stupid rather than suicidal doesn't make her more noble.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:23 AM
3

Eh, yes and no. To some degree even they had to fight for it as in multiple situations in history all policy decisions were made by a King or Emperor. Those of course are well publicized, for example the murder of Julius Caesar by the Roman senators. Multiple Kings and Emperors were murdered by society's highest classes in order to depose them and gain more power for themselves. Just as prevalent was the deaths of the members of those highest classes by imperial decree in order to prevent such u…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:30 AM
2

Firstly, I'm not talking about men. I'm talking about women. As I said before, the rationale to expand the vote stood on it's own, regardless of the draft, obviously. Given that the entirety of the comments here center on the comparison of the right to vote for women versus the right to vote for men, you can't just discard men from the discussion. You want to discard men's struggles to vote in order to make your position easier to defend.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:25 AM
3

What a fucking stupid thing for her to say.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:17 AM
2

High five. Also, the dude trying to discredit you by looking through your post history is the lowest, cheapest form of arguing on reddit, so even if he'd made a few good points (he didn't), he can still eat shit.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:04 AM
4

It is a right they should have, period. Men had to "give" it to them in this case, but the right to vote wasn't a man's to give, but to legally allow at this point. Voting shouldn't be a right one group can give to another. It should be inherent in society. Saying how things "should" be is irrelevant to history. Things either happened or they didn't. Should only enters into it if you know Dr. Emmett Brown. The fact is men did give the right to vote to women, and gave it at the same time as they …
/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:00 AM
5

There was an article recently talking about how female soldiers change the behavior of all the male soldiers around them. The males try to protect the females and the casualty rates increase by about 30%.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:54 PM
3

With all of the account bannings and muzzling of people talking about it it'd kind of make sense that some people missed it. That was probably exactly what the people doing the bannings etc were going for, muzzling the story so that people wouldn't find out.
/r/PussyPass25/01/16 07:48 PM
2

Links etc? I don't even know what you're talking about. It'd be nice to be on the same page.
/r/PussyPass25/01/16 08:53 AM
1

You're a little up in arms about this. The linked picture doesn't even have proper spelling. It says "top" instead of "stop" human trafficking. I don't know who creates these kinds of things or distributes them, but if it was really official, they'd have a proofreader.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:18 AM
1

My wife says she feels sorry for men all the time because women's triggers are different and men are highly triggered visually. There are so many ads everywhere with scantily clad / sexual women and they're targeted at men. You basically have to willfully ignore the crap on your screen like "nope, nope just trying to download a patch here... must.. not... look!"
/r/MensRights24/01/16 06:19 PM
1

Well the "article" isn't exactly clear what it's about. It's not really about levels of subjugation either, just weighing in with my two cents with a way men are preyed upon online.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 06:15 PM
1

That definitely would be a dick move, but it'd also be pretty much the perfect way to pour any sympathy you may have had from any witnesses down the drain with it.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 08:08 AM
1

IDK, I can see the point that he has nothing to lose, so he may as well make a play to turn things back on her. If you were part of that group and you knew what went down and the next morning the dude is cooking up breakfast and cracking jokes at his ex-gf's expense, you'd have a lot more respect for him than if he just tucked his tail between his legs and slinked away.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 08:02 AM
1

The advice in that archived thread is hilarious. I love the people telling him to go upstairs and cook himself food with all her most expensive shit and then start cracking jokes at her expense, especially the guy who told him to make a lot of jokes about sausage.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 12:23 AM
2

What about all of those "date a hot russian" or whatever ads with some mostly naked super hot chick in them? That shit is targeted at men for sure and it's everywhere. It's all some kind of scam, it's all trying to get money out of you in various forms of illegitimacy and it's all preying upon the way men are built, to respond to females who look like they want sex.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 06:20 PM
3

I fucking love that conclusion message.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 09:05 AM
1

That's a great idea. It's entirely fair and it places the financial burden square on the shoulders of the person who's actually responsible.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 04:32 PM
1

Good pep talk! I'm off to the damn gym! I don't know about anyone else but when I haven't been to the gym yet my brain feels constipated.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 08:02 PM
0

If you're going to take that step, that would suggest taking the further step of then examining the way in which female students are graded in order to see if educational bias is giving them higher grades due to gender (this has been shown in previous articles linked to by this subreddit). Sometimes it's easier to just leave a fact as a fact.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:09 PM
3

Agreed. When talking about it to other people you absolutely must remove the jargon.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 06:10 PM
1

The first rule of fight club is don't talk about fight club. At least not in public in front of everyone.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 06:09 PM
1

"The absence of a no is not a yes" rolleyes
/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:37 PM
2

This is sad but true :(
/r/MensRights04/01/16 05:45 PM
2

You're absolutely right. Sorry.
/r/MarriedRedPill31/12/15 11:27 PM
1

^ This guy is right on.
/r/MarriedRedPill31/12/15 11:09 PM
12

He has zero incentive to maintain boundaries. Right now with you providing for the kids, it's all sex and attention for him and no consequences. Your wife is his candy shop and dodging you has probably become their favorite game. You should check out my response to /u/exbp . You should give her/them the opportunity to cheat and set up a (several actually) nanny cam so that you have evidence. After that, get your kids paternity tested. Find out whose they are for sure, then you can decide on your…
/r/MarriedRedPill31/12/15 11:08 PM
3

This is fantastic advice. I think a big part of OP's problem is he does a lot of hoping his wife will suddenly change and everything will be better. He still tries to trust her after she's proven untrustworthy. OP should set up some kind of nanny cam and then go about his business. His wife has probably been waiting for the opportunity to cheat with this guy, he should give it to her, and then he has evidence. It's not only better for a legal standpoint but from a mental one as well. Then he kno…
/r/MarriedRedPill31/12/15 11:04 PM
22

I may honestly abandon reddit entirely. I get tired of having to triple-pass my posts before posting to account for various predictable arguments. Half of the time I leave shit in there that people will get mad about, just out of spite for having to filter in the first place. I want to be able to converse, not dodge censors.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 06:17 AM
3

Part of the journey is not to waste too much time on the bar slut and the cc rider. Just ignore them. Ignore areas like tinder if looking for a non cc rider. I agree with you, but while avoiding the sluts, be careful not to get stuck with a prude, a lesbian looking to marry for children only, or an asexual. People always forget about that side of it but it can cause some real pain in its own way.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 06:12 AM
2

I really missed the boat on reddit. I didn't have an account until about a year and a half ago, but I love the truth in all things and being able to speak your mind and listen to other people speak theirs. I hate judgey censorship.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 06:05 AM
1

Our marriage hit what I'd consider to be its low point about 4 years ago. It got bad enough to the point that we separated for a few months. Lots about the relationship changed when we got back together, for the better. If it ever got to be like it was back then, I'd start forming an exit strategy. It's not something I really like to think about now while things are good and they've been on an upslope since we got back together but having been through that once already where it got that bad, I w…
/r/MarriedRedPill09/12/15 07:24 AM
1

Honestly it didn't have much of anything to do with her, I was more or less happy, at least to the degree of frequency and quality of sex, quality of our interactions etc, all the things I'd mentioned before. I just used it as an excuse. It's not what was preached nor would it have been recommended. It was simply a case of "focus on yourself." "Will do." It was into the realm of taking her for granted. I did however have the empathy to turn that around after not too long after identifying the ef…
/r/MarriedRedPill02/12/15 03:25 AM
1

Wow, that's a fantastic synopsis. That dread post is also one of my saved favorites. Jack has an excellent brain. His particular angles on TRP work really well for my line of thinking as well. I find his advice to be the most personally useful.
/r/MarriedRedPill01/12/15 09:21 AM
1

That's completely untrue.
/r/MarriedRedPill01/12/15 08:45 AM
1

It ended up turning out fine. I'd basically been ignoring her and doing my own thing for long enough that she got really depressed. She felt like I wasn't interested in her etc. I just took it too far to where I was pretty much always choosing to do other things than interact with her, the only communication we did have was over logistics ie stuff with the kids. I eventually had a talk with her when she got strangely upset about me turning away to do something else during a lull in conversation …
/r/MarriedRedPill01/12/15 08:42 AM
0

See this I agree with.
/r/MarriedRedPill29/11/15 08:24 PM
1

Because you were being a total douchebag with how you were talking to people. If you don't want people calling you out on it, then change. It IS possible to talk with a bit of decency to other people and still call them out on being misguided and help them. What you were calling straight talk was just an excuse to be shitty. A few days ago I looked though your post history going back as far as about a month and it was just trolling. If you don't think that's what you were doing, you need to thin…
/r/MarriedRedPill29/11/15 08:22 PM
2

Thank you for this. I figured I should at least come in here and advocate for my opinion and the message I was trying to get across since this entire thread was meant to be a rebuttal of what I was saying. It's possible that he could be right and that's not what the community needs to hear. Let's hope that people are smart enough to recognize which advice is actually right for them. Sepean's main concern seems to be that guys are going to look at what I'm saying and use it to hamster away self i…
/r/MarriedRedPill29/11/15 08:12 PM
2

This is a total misrepresentation of my post. If you think this is what the community needs to hear, then I respect that and godspeed and all that. That being said, this is NOT what I was saying. I told you something like 10 times in my thread that I wasn't saying I was scared of my wife and I wasn't telling anyone else to be, but it seems to be a fixation for you. My point was for guys not to get over enthusiastic, go on a rampage and wreck their marriages because of "yeah self improvement". No…
/r/MarriedRedPill29/11/15 07:56 PM
1

Are you really saying that if you put in a lot of effort and your wife was still treating you like shit you'd put up with it? Or are you too ready to walk away? No man, my wife doesn't treat me like shit, and if she did, I wouldn't put up with it. I'm getting too tired to have this conversation (shouldn't have checked reddit before bed but hey I sleep easier if I clear my messages first) but my wife checks with me often enough as it is how I'm doing, if things are okay between us etc etc. going …
/r/MarriedRedPill29/11/15 09:51 AM
1

I accept that it's possible that I don't have much to offer people advice-wise that'd apply to their actual marriages. For me, I figured I'm in a good marriage where things are working well so it seemed to me that I was in a position to be able to help other people. It's possible though that all the things you're worried about are true. People could be dumb and apply things wrong or stupidly or "male hamster" their way out of taking responsibility for their lives, as you say. That didn't and sti…
/r/MarriedRedPill29/11/15 08:18 AM
1

I don't think marriage matters once kids aren't in the picture any more. As far as I'm concerned, once you have an empty nest for all I care you can get divorced for the sole purpose of travelling to Tibet to go hiking naked and pour syrup all over your body. By then most of your kids opinions on the world are already set, they're self-sufficient and they don't need their parents to have a stable household because they don't live there anymore and their parents aren't influencing their lives on …
/r/MarriedRedPill28/11/15 10:47 PM
1

You're scared of offending your wife. You keep saying that and it isn't true. This whole thing was about concern for other people and not having frauds dispensing advice. I'm not unhappy, I don't have a problem with how my marriage is or how my wife is. You are right about one thing though, if I were to have a problem I wouldn't just walk away from everything. As far as I'm concerned, my kids well-being is at least as important as my own. That's not some leverage imposed by my wife, it's my own …
/r/MarriedRedPill28/11/15 10:35 PM
1

And this thing about your kids, you're just wrong. The one who can walk away has the power. /u/stonepimpletilist has a better mindset because he can leave more easily. The emotional hooks that you and I have from our kids are a hindrance. No, that's backwards. Guys like him giving advice is like guys in the army who are fresh out of basic trying to tell veterans who have survived 3 tours of combat how to fight. It doesn’t matter what his aptitude scores are, he has no real world experience so he…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/11/15 05:54 PM
1

It's possibly because my marriage wasn't shit to begin with when I started reading TRP, so I might see more to lose for new guys if they're coming into this in a similar place as I was. It's been said before by people that TRP probably works best for people that are in a bad place when they "discover" it and I don't see any flaw with that thinking. I suppose a caveat to add to my advice would be "if you've just discovered TRP and your marriage isn't shit". If it IS shit, they have nothing to los…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/11/15 12:46 AM
1

No, it's not from personal experience. It's from seeing other guys post where it isn't working out for them. I explained this elsewhere in the thread. I don't really care if you don't like my advice. You've been here long enough that it's not for you. Again, this is something I already explained but it's for guys who are new to it. That's pretty fucking clear from the OP. You think it's a good idea to go jekyll and hyde, day 1. When the guy is still soft, when he hasn't really ingrained TRP into…
/r/MarriedRedPill27/11/15 04:40 PM
3

Wrong. The kind of thing that threatens MRP are people like stone whose wife is basically a glorified girlfriend who don't have kids so they're in a super low stakes version of marriage acting like they know everything and telling people "how it is" and getting people to detonate their marriages. Or just jumping all over people so that they stop looking for help and advice. Nobody needs some CHUD who if they were to get divorced even the closest people to them shrug because it doesn't matter dis…
/r/MarriedRedPill27/11/15 04:30 PM
1

Everything you just said is completely against your character. Your entire post history is you trolling unflaired guys, going back as far as I was willing to look. I don't know how you got flaired in the first place, but it seems to be all you care about. You're not even subtle about it. To you, your flair is a club and unflaired guys are a pile of corpses for your ego to stand on top of. You post for internet status, always. If you were ballsy and actually wanted to help people, you'd remove yo…
/r/MarriedRedPill26/11/15 10:15 PM
1

I don't see it jiving with what the manosphere has If I was just going to repeat what someone else already said, there'd be no point to posting in the first place. I'm addressing the guys who are trying to shortcut their improvement in their relationships and themselves. Trying to prevent them being self destructive. How many times have people posted about things going badly after they started TRP? The answer is always "too much, too fast, you're not ready". I guarantee you those few people brav…
/r/MarriedRedPill26/11/15 09:04 PM
2

You and I have argued about this kind of thing before. You know I'm being pragmatic, trying to help some guys out. You just don't agree with my outlook. Your posts that I've seen have always advocated to treat your wife like she's your girlfriend, including nexting her without much provocation. I get the impression that if you're even married, it's with no kids, and you're possibly a swinger. That means you have little to nothing to offer in advice for someone who does have kids and isn't ready …
/r/MarriedRedPill26/11/15 07:59 PM
1

Yeah, AWALT is true. I never said it wasn't. My point is that guys shouldn't expect one way of acting to be effective on every woman. Most guys should know how their spouse will react if they think ahead to a situation. I'm saying if they need to modify their approach to get a more effective outcome, they should do it. Some guys are going to destroy their marriages regardless. Some guys marriages are beyond help. I think the majority of people though can get their marriage to where they want it …
/r/MarriedRedPill26/11/15 07:28 PM
3

Yeah I did some of those face pulls today. I want to correct my forward pulled shoulders. That's the first time I've ever seen advice on correcting that or I would've been doing that exercise ages ago.
/r/MarriedRedPill26/11/15 05:54 AM
1

I know healthy men (two) who have looked at Red Pill and they dismiss it -- that's a sign of a healthy man. If you are here, there is something wrong with you and your marriage. Losing your marriage is a risk you take, but if you're here, it's shitty enough that it might just implode anyways. That can't be true for the entire community. I'm confident in saying that because it's not true for me. I didn't come here looking to "save" my marriage. I started reading TRP/MRP because it was a unique so…
/r/MarriedRedPill26/11/15 05:48 AM
3

I've been direct and honest with my wife during this type of scenario. That's respectable and it's worked well for me too. I don't go in for all this childish games shit either. It helps that my wife cares about my approval, but that's come about by being worthy of respect and by being direct. Not by acting like I'm cheating or saying one thing when I actually mean another. I say what I mean and my wife loves it.
/r/MarriedRedPill25/11/15 08:07 PM
4

That's true. She could just be fucking tired.
/r/MarriedRedPill25/11/15 08:01 PM
0

Whatever this is about, it's not BJ's. I get the sense that she wants some kind of comfort and is starting to believe you're not invested in her. It doesn't mean you need to put up with her shit, but I get the sense that she feels unappreciated and devalued. Sometimes being a good captain isn't about punishment and consequences, it's about inspiring the crew. I'm not saying to reward her behavior, but she's possibly confused about her place in the marriage and how you see her. I'd say that I don…
/r/MarriedRedPill25/11/15 07:55 PM
2

Yeah part of the problem for people that keeps them from being willing to work small muscle groups is they don't feel good. You don't activate as much muscle so it doesn't give the same endorphin rush. I like to save small muscle exercises for near the end of my workouts so that I'm not as likely to load up excess weight or cheat with larger body motions trying to feel something. I know myself well enough to know that if I tire myself out with cardio and big weights first, I'll do a better job o…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/15 07:05 PM
6

Good to know about the face pulls. I've got forward rotated shoulders from a lifetime of pushups and bench press without knowing what to do to strengthen opposing muscles. Also, Arnold on the lat pulldown machine is full-on beastmode.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/15 07:00 PM
2

Forever? They're borderline "sane" twice a month. That downtime when they're between their ovulation and their period. Women like to talk about how their period drives them crazy, but they're even crazier during ovulation. That's when they go to clubs wearing nothing but stars over their nipples and paint on their tits, jump on a random and get knocked up, then Mr. Random gets the consequences.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/15 12:30 AM
5

What are men's strongest areas in the fight against feminism? To stop giving feminism the time of day. It's important that we talk about it in TRP so that it's recognized as untrue, but in actual practice don't give it any credence or traction or legitimacy.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/15 12:28 AM
1

This is all cool and all but... #16: do you wear a fedora and neglect to shave your neck? If not, why would anyone say that to you?
/r/TheRedPill25/11/15 12:26 AM
1

I remember that post by GLO but missed the one by RPS. His particular points actually were all behaviors and utterances from my wife. A good reminder.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/15 05:13 PM
2

Well I have firsthand experience. Obviously I don't know your ex-wife, but I've been married 10 years and have 3 kids. I find the same qualities that leave me unimpressed the rest of the time also make for an unfulfilling sex life. It's not about the frequency, she enjoys it well enough, but she brings the same thing to the table, in the same kind of way, every time. Conversation tends to be stale and predictable, rehashing a lot of the same old topics. The marriage isn't an adventure, it's a ma…
/r/MarriedRedPill20/11/15 08:19 PM
2

Allow me to take a crack at what your former partner was like. I'm sure this will be wrong, but there's something familiar in the way you write about her. She's not lazy, she's not stupid (per se), but she's more programmed than she is a person. Goes about her day to day essentially according to her programming. You look in the eyes... lights are on, not sure if anyone's home. Makes wrong judgement calls with the kids on a regular basis. Reinforces the wrong thought patterns. Can't see the diffe…
/r/MarriedRedPill20/11/15 06:59 PM
1

That's it, from now on I'm only having sex with women tattooed with the Newman's Own logo! That man's face stands for quality!
/r/MarriedRedPill20/11/15 06:12 PM
1

Good story. Thanks for sharing. Edit: great answers to people in the comments too, staying true to your narrative and keeping people from stuffing it with their words.
/r/MarriedRedPill19/11/15 09:07 PM
-1

I actually don't think he missed the point intentionally. I think he's just so caught up in his own internal bullshit your words went in, then right back out. Honestly, fuck people like that. It's each and every person's own job to glean the truth from things they read/see/hear/experience. If they are so caught up in their own mental masturbation they miss the truth when it's spelled out right in front of them, it just makes them even weaker.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 05:27 PM
2

Wow, excellent insight. I like the way you're thinking.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 05:15 PM
1

It becomes a lot less difficult over time. Essentially, you start to recognize certain patterns more easily later in a relationship. Also, as time goes on, you're training her based on your past responses. The good news is that while you're figuring all this out it's still early days in your relationship when she has new relationship tingles (unless you're slow). Eventually, it becomes pretty damn stress free. That doesn't give you a pass to be anything less than a man though. Part of why it's s…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 05:04 PM
1

How the hell do you still not get it? Troll.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 05:55 PM
1

You're not explaining anything to anyone. If people wanted to be nicely fit into a little box, they'd go to that sub forum. They can read. They don't want to. Hence why some of them post on those threads and get banned. When they see something ridiculous like the 1 in 5 stat being touted as fact, they're not going to just quietly slink off to the other forum to politely go "gee that seems in error yes?" where the rest of the feminists will never see it. They want to post it right in the middle o…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 05:52 PM
1

Are you really this dense? They don't actually give a shit, that's their "clever" way to keep dissenting opinions out of their main forum. Men's Rights isn't like that, hence the fact that you're still able to post here.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 05:35 PM
2

Good job sticking with it. It was trying pretty hard to throw you off with buzzwords.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:15 PM
2

So that they can nicely keep the trash outside yeah? So any guy going there should politely look at the sidebar and go "oh right, I'm garbage, guess I'll just go post in the garbage forum".
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:10 PM
2

We just haven't figured out how to go up against them yet. Being less polite would be a good start. Elsewhere in the comments a couple of people went there to do the "so if two drunk people have sex, are they raping each other?" thing. The mods messaged the second person to say "will you guys fucking stop?" I would've liked to see more people go there to say the same thing instead of politely respecting their wishes. It would've likely gotten them into a frenzy where they would've made some "new…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:06 PM
1

Whatever. Obviously people want to talk about it, as per the popularity of this thread. It lets us know about what other areas of reddit are like and what we can expect if we should go there. It also tells us a fair bit about the mentality of those who are causing difficulties for men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:58 PM
1

I like that you got a mod response. I wish more people had continued to go there and post instead of politely respecting their wishes. It would've probably driven them into a frenzy where they made some "new policy" to lock the forum down even more and drive even more of their own moderates away.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:56 PM
2

But with your head so far up your own ass, how can you see your keyboard to type?
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:27 PM
1

I wish what you're saying was true. The unfortunate truth though is that reddit isn't about free speech. It'd be a lot more interesting place if it was. There was a post by one of the reddit higher ups several months ago about how it was not in fact about free speech. Those days are long gone.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:20 PM
1

That was the 60's. Now backwards is their only direction.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:18 PM
2

I'll have to come back to this thread tomorrow because I'm out of time. I just wanted to say though that the CBC has taken a real downturn over the last couple of years. Due process and the search for truth seems to have gone right out the window in favor of pursuing an agenda. The red flag for me was when Jian Ghomeshi was fired without any investigation whatsoever, just at the mere accusation of his wrongdoing, on the very day it came to light. That someone who had put in many very high qualit…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 09:02 AM
1

Arguing that acting without integrity or accountability is a step forward for humanity is ridiculous. The system is strained enough as it is from free handouts to females. The last thing it needs is for males to start acting the same way. It'd collapse immediately. That being said, long term a collapse may just be the best thing.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 08:37 AM
9

Swing and a miss. OP's point was that she had committed to another man. She then not only doesn't follow through on this commitment, she doesn't even mention him, ready to branch swing immediately to OP at the first opportunity. It has nothing to do with plating. OP never said he was committing to her. Nor is he jealous about her being with another guy. In fact he pities the other guy because the other guy has no clue that "his partner" who he believes to be committed, is fully willing to cheat …
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 08:07 AM
1

I actually don't mind debate but honestly it can eat my life. There are usually better or more important things to do.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/11/15 07:08 AM
1

I hadn't even realized purple pill was a subreddit. If so, I'd agree that it's a waste of time. I'm not even going to check it out. Nobody needs more blue pill in their lives, especially if they were raised the way I was. It's like growing up in a staunch Catholic family and then wanting to branch out. You don't need reminders of what it says in the bible, you just want to know how to live differently. To me a point Rollo was making is that "purple pill" is just blue pill with a red pill coating…
/r/MarriedRedPill12/11/15 01:00 AM
2

It was something like a month ago that someone called me "purple pill". At the time, I figured it meant that I was familiar with red pill ideology, but still had some blue pill holdout ideas. Having been raised by a single mom feminist, I didn't see any reason to debate that, regardless of my thoughts or intentions. I figured there was a good chance of some of that malingering in my psyche, especially since it was spoon-fed to me from fairly early childhood (dad removed from the picture at 6). A…
/r/MarriedRedPill11/11/15 08:39 AM
3

Along those lines, I can see a strong argument for it having more merit being posted in the more moderate of the 3 forums. Obviously it still received overall agreement, but it reached a broader audience and gave people something to think about beyond just "yeah, to hell with that bitch". I doubt we would've seen any debate in MGTOW.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:04 AM
3

Amazing poster. I took a logic course in University, my absolute favorite part of it was the section on logical fallacies. It's essentially applying mathematics to human interaction. It completely changed my outlook.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 08:00 AM
1

I appreciate what you're saying. It's like a resume. They're more qualified to give advice. Ultimately though I disagree. Even the people who make good choices on a regular basis in their own lives can occasionally give bad advice, even with good intentions. Sometimes it's as innocent and well-meaning as them saying what would work for them in their own lives but it's the completely wrong fit for the situation at hand, sometimes they just straight up made a mistake. Either way, you'll be better …
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 07:56 AM
2

If things get too compartmentalized, they get lost to obscurity. There is really no problem with posting this story in this forum.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:52 PM
1

That's an oversimplification. It's pretty clear OP's position is because he saw it literally ruin the life of his father. Not just kids either, but marriage too.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:25 PM
2

Lol, which part are you suggesting he forgot to mention?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:21 PM
1

The only way to win the game is not to play. What was that Broderick movie that first used that line? Wargames or something? Yep, Wargames, just looked it up. I'd like to see that mainframe go through the permutations of marriage from a male perspective. It'd end up saying the same final conclusion as it did for nuclear war.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:20 PM
2

Ironic username :)
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:17 PM
2

where the hell did you read that quote? That you're able to extract that message out of the previous post You say this, yet you do some word voodoo of your own immediately afterwards. Mistakes happen - she got married to a man that she never should have. Your very next sentence. You don't know that's the case. In fact, OP has said himself in the comments she just was "no longer excited by him". That doesn't mean that he was the wrong guy, it's more likely that she was just a quitter. I can't bel…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:15 PM
2

It becomes easy to "no longer love" someone if, once married, leaving becomes highly financially incentivized. Let's not forget on top of that the appeal of once again being single and the memories of being a prize and having men vie for your attention. Meanwhile, you know you're getting a nice big paycheque every month from the man who committed to you for life who you kicked out of the house. Still confused?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:09 PM
1

The legal support for leaving your spouse 4+ generations ago simply wasn't there. Leaving without just cause meant you took a real risk of going without any financial support at all. Now that financial support is essentially guaranteed to the point of divorce being the easier choice to make, staying married is the braver one. Pretty messed up.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:05 PM
0

kids are smart little creatures. Thank you for both reminding me to always take the high road when dealing with my ex To be fair, it was only as an adult that OP expressed the damage that had been done. It was only after having certain influences in his life like this sub that he said to her what he did. There's a good chance that your daughter won't have these influences in her life, and as a matter of fact will have the opposite influences. I wouldn't expect her to magically come to this concl…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:01 PM
3

Not everyone wants to participate in TRP. TRP is more like a course (complete with textbooks) in a particular way of being a man and is full of jargon of how you behaved "right" or "wrong" according to the doctrine. Mensrights is about being male, things that men encounter etc. It's much broader subject matter. TRP is focused almost exclusively on women and is frankly about manipulation and hardening yourself mentally against rejection. The two communities used to have a fair bit of cross cultur…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:54 PM
2

God just shut up. Look up "straw man" arguments. Actually let me save you the trouble and link it for you. There. That's you. Shut up.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:43 PM
6

You're being too permissive of her turning you down for sex. The "you only want me for sex" shit after her own rejections of you is just straight up hamstering where she's trying to justify her own shitty behavior to herself by blaming it on you. "Why'd I reject him like that? Because he only wants me for sex! Yeah fuck that!" In this case, murder the hamster. If she stops mid-bj and tells you to finish on your own, don't kiss her forehead. Instead say "are you fucking kidding me?", then leave t…
/r/MarriedRedPill09/11/15 01:06 AM
15

The fact that she threw the knife in the sink so that she could wash it rather than dropping it on the ground tells me she knew exactly what the fuck she was doing.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:40 AM
1

Link? Actually, nevermind, fuck it. I'm left disgusted at this whole thing. I hope someone from the guy's family winds her up so that she gets violent again versus an adult who's prepared for it while someone else who planned ahead videotapes the whole thing. If you want to not get screwed over guys, video recording devices are your best friend, especially portable ones like your cellphone.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:36 AM
5

Yep, crying is a great example of how she has her emotions in check and is ready enough to be a parent to deserve an early release. ALSO /S.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:35 AM
2

Yeah where the hell were these questions during cross-examination? Was cross-examination even allowed or did the judge quash it?
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:33 AM
3

Man, fuck this. Fuck this in its stupid fucking face. "When asked what the judge's response was to the letter, she said 'nothing, nothing'".
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:32 AM
-1

I don't want to bag on you too hard because you're essentially trying to do a community service with your post. Even though you don't know the guy, fucking his girl does affect him. As for commitments, do you really want other guys talking to your girl the way you talked to this one once you are committed? I know standard mantra is "if she cheats, it's my fault". The thing is, every relationship has its downs. Do you want the stress of having to be on your game 24/7? Keeping women interested whe…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 05:52 PM
-3

I wouldn't do this to another guy. All of the stuff you say is true, effective and it's useful, but this is the kind of shit that makes guys see other guys as "the enemy". This goes completely against the side of TRP that tells us to cultivate male friendships so that we can learn and be stronger. Yes the other guy didn't seem to give a shit about her, and there's an argument to be made that she was going to do it anyhow and if not with you it'd just be someone else. That's true. That being said…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 04:28 PM
2

That and the momentum gained over the last 100 years, along with all the cultural imprinting on generation after generation of girls who grow up to continue fighting, even after the battle has been long since won.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:23 PM
2

Just one thing after reading the comments tree related to the title and how we don't agree with it. Yes, that's true, but don't let yourselves get sidetracked. This film still needs to be funded.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:20 PM
4

Yeah that made me cringe a little bit too. I read TRP, but some of the guys in there have been hurt really deeply in the past in their lives and they end up expressing a really hardened, self-preserving approach to life that boils down to "don't get yourself emotionally invested in anything and you're untouchable". They say stuff like "her emotional well-being shouldn't be a priority to you. It should be something like #27 on the list of things of importance, or not at all." I subscribe to it be…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:48 PM
3

Common mistake, hating on the other man, even when they're not the perpetrator.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 07:01 PM
5

I can't underscore the importance of your statement enough. You're gilded. Genetics are the entire point people. People who downplay the importance of fidelity and get outraged at the notion of paternity tests (even those carried out in secret), play right into the narrative.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 07:00 PM
2

That isn't current royal protocol. That isn't a sense of humor. Or perhaps she feels that a 70% male parliament can address such issues in the course of day to day business. That isn't current political protocol. See what I did there? Probably not, due to the aforementioned missing sense of humor.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 04:10 PM
1

Derail? Calling Jess Phillips a member of "Team Sarkeesian" is NOT a compliment. People like Jess Phillips would have a much harder time saying what she does if the men around her didn't support it and in fact encourage it. They could've just as easily shut her down proceeduraly, like they did to Philip Davies. They could've said to her "we don't laugh at serious proposals Ms. Philips, you're out of order". Instead, they chose to roadblock Davies. Speaking of, I don't appreciate your tone. "Weak…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:51 PM
1

As they recognized that if anything were to happen you'd weigh your options and be decisive, whereas the women would panic, run around with their hands in the air, then dither away talking about it and do nothing to solve the problem.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:41 PM
2

I'm Canadian, actually, which I understand just plays even more into stereotypes haha
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:37 PM
1

lol Shrodinger's Rapist? AWWW WHAT'S IN THE BAAAWWWWWX
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:32 PM
2

That is excellent justification.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 10:04 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:10 PM
4

My suggestion would be to explain politely and respectfully why we want time for our grievances to be heard. Keep the matter on the topic, never go ad hominem. I actually think this is a big contributor to why things are in the state they are in. A man says something reasonable and is met with chants of "hey hey! We don't care what you have to say! Hey hey we don't care what you have to say!". It doesn't matter how good or reasonable your arguments are. Their minds are closed to them entirely. B…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:53 PM
5

Harsh words would be by far the easiest way to throw her off her game and provoke her into saying some very quotable stuff. If you read her account, she's clearly driven by emotion. Goad her into saying more stupidity. What this clip illustrates is that the system is already against us. Following proper channels just makes it easier to shut us down for proceedural reasons.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 06:57 PM
15

Women saying things like that makes me hope for the day when men stop being cordial and polite and stop restraining themselves. These quotes are women saying what men specifically make a point of not doing. Men are being backed into a corner. All options for reasonable and civil discourse are being taken away from us. Do they really want to do that to us?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 06:52 PM
5

Do yourselves a favor and watch the actual video. The link is here Start at 14:54:10. Add "Jess Phillips" to Team Sarkeesian. As you continue to watch, you see roadblocks being thrown up in the name of "order" or "proceedure", not in terms of merit. What I'm trying to say is, as disgusting as Jess Phillips's attitude is, what's just as bad or perhaps even worse are the rest of the men on the panel supporting her and throwing Philip Davies to the wolves. WHERE EXACTLY WOULD YOU HAVE THIS DEBATE M…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:30 PM
2

This I believe is the best post I have ever read in this forum. It's honest, it's inspirational, and it encourages men to come together as a team so that members of our gender aren't having to seek out abusive female approval in order to feel whole. I 100% agree with the concept of not seeing other men as the enemy, contrary to how we were raised. Well done.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 01:09 AM
3

Great article, weak conclusion. The average man could easily go a week without porn, especially if he was working towards a goal, some kind of reward at the end of it. Easily. You'd just shrug and deal with it then enjoy the rewards when it was done.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 07:36 AM
1

I'm guessing you meant to reply to /u/KnG_Kong ?
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 06:37 AM
1

I remember a bunch of shit like this in my early 20's. Girls would say some kind of prejudiced shit and I'd nope the fuck out. I was always offended that I'd be seen as "a guy" instead of "(my name)". My take on it was "I've done nothing to earn this distrust". They get so so mad when they get turned down. As Shakespeare said "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned".
/r/MensRights26/10/15 12:01 AM
6

Experiences like this polarize them even more. Their body is telling them to mate and their minds see men as evil predators. "He must've been getting ready to rape me." is her likely takeaway from this.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:51 PM
1

Heh when I posted I was actually thinking about war as a method of genetic selection, ie separating strong from weak genes. Simply having males kill each other in order to mate would replace that since war is now too destructive and the devices that kill people are too based upon luck to survive rather than skill. That being said, you make excellent points.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 11:27 PM
5

Yes because just living with her is such a treat that he should pay for the privilege!
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 06:52 PM
7

With our population problems and lack of war to thin the male herd, this may just be a great next step for humanity... Ugh, just actually thought about it as if it were real. Disturbing.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 06:51 PM
24

Well then, they can just do ALL of the child-rearing then. "You're pregnant? Sweet! My job's done, see you in 2-3 years once you're ready for another!" I'm being sarcastic obviously. We'd all want a hand in how our own children turned out as people. Just illustrating the ridiculousness of that mentality.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 06:49 PM
3

We still read shakespeare. Not to say that this is shakespeare, at all. Just to say that things shouldn't be discarded based on their age alone.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 06:44 PM
7

I'm surprised with those great quotes you still think that she's a troll rather than an actual fucked up person. Edit: Please don't remove them in any future edit or w/e. I have your post saved as a sociopathy greatest hits compilation.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 06:41 PM
3

^ That's what I'm talking about. Be ruthless. Gather evidence. Use the law. That "person" who was your spouse just became your number one enemy with more potential to ruin your life than anyone you've ever met. Get everything on your side. Win! If you can't do that because the cards are so stacked against you, make winning as hard for her as possible. You may end up coming out with a win in the end that way anyhow. Be mentally stronger and keep going until she quits.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 06:34 PM
3

There are two camps to this in MRP. I know. I got into a lengthy debate about this during that GNO article thread. It was titled something like "keeping your spouse from cheating" or something like that. Many guys were like "do absolutely nothing", whereas I argued for a subtle underpinning of consequence that'd influence her to change her own mind. If she thinks she is in the same boat as her sister and needs to go and "Find herself" (yeah I did the Dr Evil quote marks by hand) she can go but I…
/r/MarriedRedPill24/10/15 06:27 PM
11

If it's divorce time, all bets are off. Beta? There's a good chance it has nothing to do with being beta. In fact, he probably just wants to fuckin win.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 06:53 AM
0

I could have a mad max car chase in the parking lot of a wal-mart right now. It's just far more likely I'd be shot and killed by police :D Actually the most likely scenario would be getting hemmed in by some useless asshole pulling out his SUV, THEN getting shot.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 04:12 PM
1

Girls are being put in a position of authority over boys that are within their peer group and being taught to police their behavior. The fact that you can read this and not see anything amiss is an excellent example of how unbalanced our society has become. Also, why would you want to get more people to be teachers and nurses? Those professions are overloaded, especially teachers. We need more scientists and doctors.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:51 PM
1

In response, some schools are creating volunteer squads of girls to police sexist attitudes and report back to teachers. Third paragraph from the top. You're misunderstanding the men's rights issue here. It has nothing to do with eliminating bullying. It's about putting girls in a position of authority over boys that are in their peer group and teaching them to police their behavior.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:49 PM
16

The issue here is that from a young age girls are being taught to be in a position of authority over boys and to police their behavior. It has nothing to do with what people actually say.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:43 PM
1

Yep I got the same sense of procrastination from reading your post too. That's why scheduled things would help you. Especially if other people are relying on you, like on a team. As I said I play hockey but soccer and rugby are good choices too. Avoid football and baseball because you're standing around too much to "feel" how out of shape you actually are.
/r/MarriedRedPill18/10/15 11:25 PM
2

Get back into martial arts. Having something physical that also gets you out of the house and is scheduled so that you won't miss it in order to stay home is a win-win-win for you. You just have to keep pushing yourself in a way that you can manage. Scheduled physical activity is a great way to kickstart things. While you're back at it with martial arts, pick up something competitive while you're at it that's also scheduled. Personally I play men's league hockey. The competition vs other dudes w…
/r/MarriedRedPill18/10/15 09:31 PM
1

Lawyer: "But don't you have a tattoo that reads die bart, die?" Bob: "No, it's German. It says dee bart, dee"
/r/MensRights18/10/15 09:25 PM
1

Pleasure lost is plenty enough reason. It's equivalent to removing a large portion of your tastebuds from your tongue.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 06:48 PM
3

I just hated feeling like the world was watching everything I said (and as you say, tied to my real identity). I barely posted when I signed up in 2009 and removed my account in something like 2012.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:56 AM
1

Great idea.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:53 AM
2

For one thing, they have no choice in it when it's done to them because it's done to babies. Foreskin is packed with nerve endings, removing it removes a lot of pleasure. Are you circumcised? When you're masturbating, where do you feel most of your pleasure and drive to continue going? In your cock or in your balls? Most circumcised guys the drive is more in their balls. That's not how its supposed to be.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:52 AM
1

Interesting, and props on the terminology. I'll give it some thought.
/r/MarriedRedPill17/10/15 06:45 AM
1

Yeah I haven't followed too much of the Patrick Kane saga, but I believe it's really likely he was baited in just so the girl who's accusing him can try to get some of his cash.
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 09:40 PM
1

Fucking bitch mentality. I care about my kids, so I can't leave her! Do you think everyone in here with flair is just pretending to do this shit? Man you keep putting words in my mouth that I'm not saying. I'm talking about fucking divorce strategy and leverage and saying the opposite of what you're accusing me of. I'm saying that shit works against her just as much as it does against you. Stop trying so hard to shit on me. I'm not new here, I've been here for ages. You just don't recognize me b…
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 09:38 PM
5

if you had 8s and 9s trying to suck your dick every time you went to the grocery store would you be good at being faithful? I actually think that's why male athletes can get into so much trouble. That's literally their life.
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 05:19 PM
1

I'm not talking about either. I'm also not talking about showing yourself as being afraid of her cheating. I'm talking about you (subtly or otherwise) having the opinion that GNO's (especially to clubs) are childish and stupid. If you're right in your relationship, she'll see it that way too and actually going to something like that will feel like a chore to her. One of the reasons being she doesn't want to lose your respect, and she'll feel like with you, in your life together, she's above all …
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 05:14 PM
2

Exactly. If she knows from observing you with other people and in other situations that you'd be the kind of person someone wouldn't want to have as an enemy, it makes it a lot easier to in fact just be like yes, by all means, go out and have fun. Be magnanimous to those closest to you and destroy your enemies and you'll have very loyal friends. The last thing anyone would ever want to do is threaten her directly. That makes her feel trapped and increases the likelihood that she cheats/leaves/wh…
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 05:05 PM
1

It's not that simple when you're married, especially once kids are involved and all of your assets are jointly owned. Breakup strategies do come into play and they do matter. Just blowing things off is a good way for you to get absolutely screwed in court. If you have a more effective strategy that contradicts what I'm saying, then great, let us know. Don't try to tell me though that just shrugging your shoulders is going to help anyone in divorce proceedings. Dude, you are talking in married re…
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 04:55 PM
1

My last favourite part is where you say you want her to feel guiltily Check it again. I didn't say I want her to feel guilty, I said that simply shrugging and moving on after her cheating would absolve her of guilt. That's not you making her feel guilty, its her making herself feel guilty as a result of her shitty behavior and you making that easier on her after the fact. Afterwards doesn't count for mate retention but it does count for how the breakup and division of assets goes. You do move on…
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 04:18 PM
2

I agree with all the psychology of it, but his literal saying of "go ahead, have a good time" doesn't expose enough threat behind the veil for me. I'd prefer a note of condescension mixed in there, even if it's only in tone of voice. I think his wording and flippancy runs the risk of making him look oblivious or clueless. I get it that being aloof is sexy, but being subtly terrifying has huge attraction upside as well. I think it depends on your strengths as a person. You need to have a good bod…
/r/MarriedRedPill16/10/15 07:38 AM
3

I would've loved to see a flash forward about bears etc ravaging entire areas of their society due to never being stopped. "Sector 8 is now a red zone due to bears. Peace and harmony, citizen."
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 04:54 PM
2

Then at the end of the episode where she's hiding from Rick with Beta 7 and Rick's like "this isn't going to play out the way you think buddy" and beta is just like "you have been classified as a hostile entity, leave or I will engage weapons systems" and Rick is like "yeah right, you WISH you had weapons systems!" translation: she hides out with her beta orbiter to use him as her nice fluffy fallback cushion. Beta thinks she's with him now but she has no interest or intention of doing anything …
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 04:50 PM
3

I have to admit I've thought of TRP and beta behaviors a lot when watching Jerry in Rick and Morty. S2E07 was especially telling, as you say.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 04:21 PM
7

What the fucking fuck. Sorry for not being more eloquent, but what the fucking fuck. Having to read it would be bad enough, but they put it in the form of a "test" where you have to interact with it too and thus take part in your own attempted brainwashing.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 03:58 PM
1

Lesson Learned: Be careful if you've got friends who are bluepillers/white knights. If you're successful at seducing women, they may become resentful of you and seek to cockblock you. Better lesson; bring your friends up with you. Impart some knowledge. Help them be successful. One of our best strengths as men is that we have a real ability for teamwork ingrained to our core from millennia of warfare. Use it, help your friends out and you won't have to worry about them cockblocking you. Instead,…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 08:26 AM
2

I don't think it is going to be enough. They have won and the culture is gone. I really think what we do in MRP is create small pockets of sanity embedded in the traditional family so when TSHTF there will be some nuclei upon which to build the next society. Interesting take. If the shit actually did hit the fan, I think we'd see changes start happening pretty much right away. Of course whether or not we'll still have access to the internet to discuss it as it happens is a different matter entir…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/10/15 01:41 AM
2

That'd be nice...
/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:10 AM
1

"Oh Anita Sarkeesian? Yeah... I think she just hates men."
/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:09 AM
19

Yeah that was in hockey. The USA olympic women's team was playing vs high school boys as a warm up and lost all 5 games they played.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:05 PM
2

I knew I didn't like her, now I like her even less. She woke up that morning and decided that 10x was her topic of the day. She was going to eat 10 times the breakfast as normal. She was going to do 10 interviews instead of just one. She was going to be 10 times more stupid than anyone else has ever been in said interviews.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 05:57 PM
2

A victory! Holy shit a victory! Even though totally minor and not officially charged yet, this still helps!
/r/MensRights03/10/15 12:39 AM
2

I'm glad you didn't make it into just a personal post. This is very relevant info to every follower of the red pill, ESPECIALLY the married ones. This particular thread could save a lot of asses.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/10/15 07:14 PM
1

I actually wished that shutting up about what you're learning was a more enforced mantra, especially in the married version of this community. It would save a lot of carnage. It'd also save a lot of community backlash. At least some of the TRP hate out there is from guys who dabbled in it then absolutely imploded their relationships as a result of improperly applied principles. Now they're bitter. The first rule of married red pill should be don't fucking talk about married red pill! We've been …
/r/MarriedRedPill02/10/15 07:04 PM
1

Excellent post, one of the best I've seen. Well done.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/10/15 06:55 PM
-1

I'll just agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:35 PM
-1

Well someone checking to see if they're ovulating is a pretty damn relevant detail to the dude freaking out.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:27 PM
-1

Are you leaving out her ovulation sticks on purpose just to make your argument sound better?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:42 AM
-1

If explained the right way, she shouldn't take offense. To be fair, that same sentiment should also apply to him confronting her about the ovulation sticks and pregnancy tests.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:41 AM
-1

hahahaha
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:32 PM
-1

Yeah I do try to be a bit of a counter-voice in there as well.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:23 PM
0

Actually I get the impression that she told him she intended to buy condoms, after he'd confronted her. If she was so worried, she would've bought condoms at the same time that she bought the pregnancy tests and they would've been in the same drawer. Those things are sold at the same stores, in the same sections. The fact that he found multiple ovulation sticks and pregnancy tests and no condoms stinks. We don't know how long those were in her drawer for. The evidence points to trapping, and now…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:22 PM
-2

Him not wanting children was a pre-established fact in his relationship. She had equipment in her drawer that was specifically designed to aid in the creation of children, and she hadn't told him about it. His concern was legitimate. What does this have to do with men's rights? A lot. -Being trapped into fatherhood is a huge men's rights issue. -The general public sentiment in that thread that he's lucky and grovelling is how it should be etc etc shows an advocation for an uneven power dynamic t…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:17 PM
-2

I really don't think the OP was a troll post or a false flag op I think it was legitimately a dude who actually had that problem. I however don't doubt that it was stormed by another subreddit with an agenda though.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:08 PM
-4

Well I have two thoughts on that. First re the contract, him broaching that subject would bring up just as much outrage as him confronting her about the ovulation sticks and pregnancy tests. Second, I saw strong indicators in that thread that he was simply trying to be a "good person" and eat crow. I got the impression he was overselling his own approach to the situation. Basically he confronted her, decided to believe her, then backpedalled REALLY HARD. Like, literally grovelling and the whole …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:06 PM
1

It didn't have -24 points when I first linked it.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:55 PM
2

What?
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:54 PM
3

No, dude, she's overreacting and with what is going on with her SO, its to the point of being immoral.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:53 PM
-2

Yes a lot of people in that forum who get in the first comments and therefore often set the tone of responses to OP's tend to be very damaged people. I mean those are the people who sift through thread after thread in order to get to the newest, freshest pain they can find.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:51 AM
-3

Best to save your sanity and leave them to their little circle jerk. Hmm. The thing is, I don't think that doesn't affect us as men. Reddit is very widespread, and /r/relationships is a default sub. That means a ton of people are going to see and be influenced by it. People will visit the threads, look at the voting, and that will influence their own opinions. That's probably the whole point of particular "group(s)" storming it in the first place. Especially any popular threads. There are some s…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:45 AM
-3

Yeah that was something I never saw properly explored in that thread. I saw him backpedalling, falling all over himself and honestly completely debasing and humiliating himself over how "wrong" he'd been, but there was no evidence of that aside from her basically being like "newp."
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:43 AM
15

I love how he says in the OP that he tried to broach the subject delicately and she wouldn't take the hint and only later resorted to honesty to which she then pitched a fit. That of course didn't stop him from being raked over the coals for "not using" delicate phrasing, which he did use and was completely ineffective. To be fair though after reading the thread a bit more thoroughly I do see a decent amount of support for him from some of the commenters, and some of the voting. On the other han…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:09 AM
1

This is a great comment. I wish it had gotten more attention.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:34 AM
2

Whoops.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:47 PM
13

God, Sarkeesian is such a douchebag. I've seen her in the news before.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:39 PM
2

Honestly if you're having sex that infrequently, it'd be more of a distraction to start having it again. Probably easier on you to continue going without until you're farther along your self improvement path.
/r/MarriedRedPill17/09/15 08:28 AM
1

Totally not trolling.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 06:38 PM
2

lol @ "LOOK IT UP" all in caps. DEM BE DA FACTZ YO U MUSS BE STOOPID!
/r/MensRights08/09/15 06:38 PM
2

That's basically what already happens except without the "locking up" part. Well, mostly without the locking up part.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 03:59 PM
9

Nice one.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 03:57 PM
3

Meanwhile the dad probably had his suspicions but you've gotta go back to work sometime...
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:09 AM
14

I fucking care.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:05 AM
1

Tyvm for the link, saved in my favorites.
/r/MarriedRedPill19/08/15 03:24 AM
1

I was disgusted as soon as you said he "slapped" his son. Did he also waggle his finger while scolding him? Men pick their kids up in the air by one arm and get mad an inch away from the face they've lifted up in front of their own. That's for things like catching them stealing though. The kid's mom was probably being a bitch and the kid was trying to sympathize with the dad b/c he could see the dad was upset by it and the kid didn't think it was fair. So, he says his mom is stupid expecting it'…
/r/MarriedRedPill08/08/15 04:53 PM
1

Your post would've been so much better if you'd just left the sentence in the middle and cut out the first 2 and the final one. It's his opinion and people get what he's saying. It's weird just how much you let it get to you and it undermined your counterpoint.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 09:31 PM
2

Nice link, there are some great lines in there.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 05:17 PM
1

Sorry man, it was just the way you were talking reminded me of that song a little bit. I didn't mean to throw you off.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 05:15 PM
2

Interesting point of view and interesting read. I was going to post to say I have issue with the idea that who you as a person, (like your soul or somesuch?) is being consumed. Then I thought about it and I figured if he means our personality is being consumed, then it actually makes perfect sense as our sharp edges get blunted.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 05:19 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plgH1J1kTgI&index=95&list=PL4AE14C6E4D518ECD
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 05:03 PM
1

Well, speaking in a straightforward direct manner about your opinions is respectable. OP's response to you was done fairly passive-aggressively, trying to be "clever".
/r/MarriedRedPill23/07/15 04:07 PM
1

It's true though, focusing on the analogy instead of the content is missing the point. I think people just didn't like his snarky wording.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/07/15 03:44 PM
3

Laying out your future actions to your wife sets that as the bar for yourself in her eyes. Rather than getting credit for the steps you've taken, she'll just see it as part of the process rather than impressive self improvement. Why anyone would want to take credit away from their hard work through cheap and easy words is beyond me.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/07/15 05:41 AM
12

Society used to do that. Gender roles were a real and established thing. Then women went "we don't want to do the women stuff, we also want to do the men stuff!". Then people went "but you aren't good at the men stuff, you're women" and other people went "chauvanist pig! Sexist!" and so they went "fine, you can do this stuff too, but you need to be able to earn it based on standardized testing". Then the people said "but the standardized testing results favor men!" the response was "the testing …
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:32 PM
5

Nah, people just love to dismiss viewpoints that are inconvenient for them on the flimsiest of reasoning, then pat themselves on the back that "dear diary: today once again, I reminded myself how right I am about my views on the world. I'm awesome."
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:26 PM
3

I don't think "legitimacy" is the point. There's no governing board of the battle of the sexes. They don't say "hey that was a low blow, strike it from the record!". If there was, feminism never would've gained traction. The point is gaining (back) rights, hence the title of the sub. In order to do that, you have to push. Women didn't get the world handed to them on a platter by asking politely, they made it a constant multi-generational ongoing badgering until it became the norm.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:22 PM
2

Arguing the middle doesn't work. It never has in human history. It's not accepted by either side and it gets lost in the commotion.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:21 PM
2

We should be rational adults that dont put faith into 4chan posts. That's some lazy arguing right there. "Gary said it and nobody likes Gary so I can just remind everyone that they don't like Gary to make them feel ashamed for agreeing with his viewpoint! Free win for me!"
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:19 PM
6

I think you pretty thoroughly debunked his argument. Well done. I'd also like to add the people arguing against this are constantly citing the source. Dismissing something just because of its source is a fallacy, an easy and lazy way to discredit information that is inconvenient for the arguer's viewpoint, without needing to argue against the opposing viewpoint itself. Information should be evaluated based on its own merits. Perhaps people find that going to a particular site tends to have lower…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:14 PM
6

The source shouldn't damn the content. Dismissing something just because you don't like where it came from is narrow minded. It may be that nobody likes Gary because he's annoying and a dweeb, but even Gary's have something useful to contribute occasionally.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 05:58 PM
3

Bravo redpillschool. I admire your courage and integrity.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 12:04 AM
2

Then I will fuck that bitch so deeply that whoever pulls me out will be declared King of All England and Scotland, and things won't seem so bad anymore. Such a great line, cracked me right up. Xcalacock!
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 02:31 PM
1

The key is for Men's rights and Red Pill to gain enough traction by then so it stays merely "considered" and doesn't become law. Oh god the nightmare that life would be if feminist agendas became law. looks at rape laws and education laws and marriage/divorce laws. Damnit, too late. Now what?
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 06:55 PM
2

You want something to happen, you make it happen. That's true "empowerment" right there.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 06:42 PM
6

As I said in response to you earlier, it's sad that's the only kind of website that will host an article like this. It says more about the state of men's rights in the media than anything else. We all know religious nuts are a thing.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 06:40 PM
15

It's more embarrassing that that's the only kind of website that is willing to host an article like this. That's telling about the state of men's rights in the media.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:51 PM
3

That's an old article and is not the same as the one the OP was trying to link. He was trying to link https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/eliminating-feminist-teacher-bias-erases-boys-falling-grades-study-finds from 2013.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 04:20 PM
11

I once got accused of cheating by a math teacher, because I didn't bring a calculator to class and just did the problems in my head. I asked her to give me any math problem and I'd do them right there to prove I wasn't cheating. I was given 3 problems and gave the correct answer to each. She was really pissed off and I was picked on for the rest of the year.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 04:09 PM
6

"Page Not Found The page you are looking for no longer exists or has moved." https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/eliminating-feminist-teacher-bias-erases-boys-falling-grades-study-finds There it is.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:59 PM
2

That's so true. Why raise yourself above the competition when you can just bring it down to your level and not have to change a thing?
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 12:20 AM
1

It'd be essentially nothing but positive for men but women would hate it. All of the fluffy underpinnings of men that are "beneath her" would be gone because who wants the grief? That means the loss of having a buncha shit done and bought for them for free because for men they'd get a much more honest financial transaction from a robot. I buy you for 15k and you put out whenever I want. Deal? Deal. I'm sure they'd have a high price tag but the conclusion would be a sure thing instead of the curr…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 12:09 AM
2

Without "creepy" guys to put down as being beneath her, where's she going to get her self esteem boost? She'll actually have to admit she's competing with other women without having the bolster of "well I could always fuck X but haha not like I ever would, I'm better than that!"
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 12:03 AM
3

I don't know why this got downvoted. It was a decent tangent and a reasonably good sci-fi idea.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 12:01 AM
14

Mothers Against Drunk Driving.... unless it's a mother who is drunk who is driving away from one of those horrible man things. That's just self defense.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 11:52 PM
18

I've heard guys take responsibility for that shit all the time. I've heard a story and been like "and then that happened? shit!" and they're like "yeah but honestly it was my fault, I was doing some stupid shit and I deserved it." How many times have you heard women have that kind of accountability? If they EVER talk about mistakes they made or negative events it always paints them as the victim, completely blameless and all of this is just happening to them.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 11:49 PM
1

I was in a similar situation once except it was during a time when I was on an official separation from my wife. I was so desperate to get it on with someone (anyone) else that I lowered my standards. I was so disgusted with myself afterwards and so apologetic to her (because I like you had no intention of doing anything beyond what we'd just done). Like you say she was really enthusiastic then let down.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 11:47 PM
1

I know you were making a point with hyperbole, but the ability to point a finger at a man and convict him of rape on the spot isn't far off. Our current society and justice system has zero accountability for women.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 11:43 PM
3

...but...didn't your dad... shack up with one? I could just imagine that convo: Dad: Son, don't shack up with military girls. Mom: He's right son, they're horrible. You: But mom, aren't you one? Didn't dad meet you that way? Mom: Yep, huge mistake.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 08:07 PM
3

It's really not regarded as a joke. It's the "cause" of our time. It has been since the 1980's. It really gained traction when most of the racial based causes had succeeded and when AIDS forced everyone to pay attention to sexual habits. The feminist message was unrelentingly played alongside the safe sex message and then even moreso because talking about sex in mainstream media was frowned upon by studios but talking about causes was a long established practice. Most men didn't speak up at firs…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 07:58 PM
1

Honestly I appreciate what you're trying to do here but I'm tired of people having to make arguments like yours that yes, argue against the typical feminist message but also coddle and pander to it at the same time. If the feminist crap is ever going to stop, it's certainly not going to be because women suddenly start saying "shit, I just realized that what we're doing is wrong".
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 07:48 PM
1

If she can't consent because her judgement is impaired, how is it that he, also being impaired, can be charged criminally for not demonstrating good judgement under the circumstances?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:30 PM
1

For a woman I'd have to think someone who has skills is an investment in the future who will be able to keep providing as opposed to someone with money is someone who can provide now but may be broke in future.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/15 03:19 PM
2

I think how you say it helps. I think if you bury it too far down you risk looking ashamed and shame isn't attractive. Just own it, talk about it, and move on to the next subject.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/15 03:17 PM
12

This is a classic example of the one who deserves the most getting the worst treatment because he's devaluing himself. If he had more value and she experienced a little dread, she'd be putting out and enjoying it. She's wrapped up in her "issues" because she has the luxury of being able to do so and still keep her relationship/stability/meal ticket.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:18 AM
8

This was explained in the post. Larger numbers of partners are evidence of 1-bad decision making and/or 2-promiscuity and/or 3-having low value. Because either they 1-dumped who they were with and therefore didn't make a good choice of partner in the first place or 2-they were just sleeping around and therefore more likely to do that in future or 3-they were dumped by their partners which means previous partners saw them as not being worth keeping around for whatever reason.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:11 AM
1

Interesting. Thanks for the info.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 10:19 PM
3

She said she hates being called "mattress girl". Well, now she can have TWO mattresses to drag onstage when she's the guest on an "edgy, feminist talk show".
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 02:54 PM
1

How does one remove HTTP referers? For future reference.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 02:46 PM
-1

For anyone wondering if this is a men's rights issue, it is. Imagine if the genders were reversed. She is given way too much slack by the people reading and responding to the thread with absolutely no evidence or basis. The responses by people putting all of the onus on him to handle the situation are reprehensible. They would never do that if the OP was female.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:41 PM
9

pssh yeah right. I mean that'd be good if that happened, but yeah right. He'd just end up homeless and broke by taking it to court most likely.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:30 PM
8

That's why you need to defend yourself if that kinda shit happens to you. Guys shouldn't just walk away with a bewildered look on their faces, it legitimizes the woman's paranoia.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 04:09 PM
2

All good. The point about the baseline and competition makes perfect sense. About the rest, I don't have a problem with contributing money. I took issue with the idea that contributing money doesn't have value. It'd depend on the situation. If someone can only pay half (or less) of the bills or whatever is spent as part of the couple's lifestyle, sure they're going to need to make up the difference and then some. On the other hand, if someone is essentially bringing in all the money I think they…
/r/MarriedRedPill08/05/15 06:15 AM
2

I'm not feeling sorry for myself, that's not my situation. It blew my mind that this was apparently acceptable and taken as a necessary evil. Temper tantrum? Sure. I don't know how people manage to not be bothered by that. Either way, your space your rules so fair enough, I'll read more (I am anyhow) and post less. Also, I do own my shit.
/r/MarriedRedPill08/05/15 05:53 AM
3

I just don't know how anyone can be okay with being taken for granted like that. That has got to at the very least damage your self esteem. For me it'd really lower my respect for this (not so?) hypothetical woman. I'd also have to think that if people let that stuff slide it only serves to legitimize it and then you're stuck with it for real. It strikes me as a slippery slope where something that's not okay behavior becomes okay behavior and is now set as an acceptable baseline despite the dama…
/r/MarriedRedPill08/05/15 05:17 AM
2

The fact that the man is expected to be the provider AND ++++++ other things is such a bullshit attitude. Being the provider was how we were expected to be anytime pre-1980. Anything else a guy did was his own choice (within reason). Now we're expected to be so much more but STILL be the provider. Maybe there's something I'm missing here. I peruse MRP, I'm not super up on the lingo, but maybe someone can explain to me why this isn't supposed to piss us off? Traditional roles: Male - Provider Fem…
/r/MarriedRedPill08/05/15 12:33 AM
1

Word Riggs. (No I seriously agree with you and the OP, I just love that line from Lethal Weapon).
/r/MarriedRedPill08/05/15 12:19 AM
1

You say that, remember it. I said the same thing. Then I let it happen. It IS a fuckton of work to get back into shape. Welcome to my life for the last 2-3 months. 3 1/2 years ago I was running 3 miles per day, in 20 minutes. Now I'm barely up to 1.75 miles in 20 minutes, every other day. That is a literal halving of my abilities and it's because I let myself get fucking lazy and complacent. Sloth is tempting and insidious and it sneaks up on you. Be vigilant.
/r/MarriedRedPill17/04/15 08:45 PM
1

I know the purpose of this was self-discipline, but it really helped with my motivation. :D <---- shit-eating grin. Anyhow, off to workout now. Thank you :)
/r/MarriedRedPill17/04/15 08:40 PM
1

Awesome post. Brilliant. Deserves massive credit. Well written. Logical.
/r/MarriedRedPill11/04/15 07:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter