TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Feuilly Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by Feuilly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

There is no such thing as innocuous religious bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:00 AM
1

I was just doing an approximation based on their stats. In most cases it was being round up, too. And even still it comes out as way off. I think this pretty clearly indicates that they want these things to be true so much and didn't bother to fact check them, and thus didn't notice that the two disagreed with each other.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 05:40 PM
1

It still doesn't work out if you multiply that by the average life expectancy of a woman. You get around 15%, and that's with the 300,000 figure.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 05:25 PM
12

The use of 'Patriarchy' almost invariably involves circular reasoning. It's akin to right wing extremists who believe in the absolute literal truth of the Bible above all other sources. Also, if 40% of the victims are male, then 60% are female, so by a number of victims count, it'd still be right to say that women suffer more from that particular thing, globally. Whether it's meaningful to examine this on a global level, or even possible to do in a statistically valid way is another question. It…
/r/MensRights06/09/10 06:25 PM
1

It's so shameful how many of these are being called 'scientifically proven'.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 03:30 AM
1

There is actual a limit on the number of teachers that are required. So that's one reason. I think most people prefer to become lawyers, too.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 09:03 PM
1

The number of classes will vary based on the way that the school is organized. If they have many classes that are shorter in length, that means that the students will have a lighter load and thus even fewer papers.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 08:31 PM
0

Maybe you need some help with reading comprehension - thats after classes (which take up 5-6 hours depending) and doesn't include lesson planning. Teachers don't have 5 - 6 hours of classes. You are dreadfully uninformed, and I'm guessing you were homeschooled. This all pales in comparison to my 48 hour days, though. I have to use a time machine to get it all in and I get paid a microcent an hour. Plus my job involves making the world turn and the sun keep working, so it's vitally important. Wha…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 08:31 PM
2

Do you have data or just anecdotes? Because I have 48 hour days, so by your same rationale, I'm in a much worse boat than teachers! Incidentally, classes sizes aren't that large in public schools, so they wouldn't be marking 56 papers for one class. People generally write more papers in university too, since they have dedicated markers. Plus university papers are longer and more involved in the first place. Just compare the amount of effort it took to write a paper in university versus one in hi…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 02:55 AM
1

Those figures I linked were state medians. Have you ever taught? This statement is ludicrous. I went to high school during major work-to-rule action by the teacher's union. I know precisely that their job requirements were to arrive at 8:15am and leave at 3:15pm, and no more than that. Most teachers do not engage in extracurricular activities even without that sort of labour action. Grading 56 papers would be a big ordeal, but you don't have to do it in one night. Do you think that I didn't go t…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 02:41 AM
2

You are completely out of touch with reality. 60k is a very good wage. And a dual income family with two people earning 60k each for a combined 120k is not 'barely middle class' in most of the united states. If you teach summer school, you can make even more money. The work is not onerous for most teachers, either. Most of it is up front in lesson plans, and those can remain unchanged for years. Plus your daily hours are much shorter on average, and you have a lot more time off. Yes, a teacher c…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 01:59 AM
2

I was talking about the benefits of teaching. It's actually quite a high paying job, and it's only propaganda that they aren't paid very well. http://teacherportal.com/teacher-salaries-by-state http://www.alleducationschools.com/faqs/teacher-salary
/r/MensRights04/08/10 12:12 AM
1

Because you can end up making 60k a year with comparatively fewer hours to a normal job?
/r/MensRights03/08/10 11:36 PM
3

There's also this. I'm not really bothered by it because the guy is much better looking than his girlfriend, though. She obviously is more threatened by her boyfriend having a wandering eye than vice versa.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 09:48 PM
1

Psychological violence is so common in any sort of long term human interaction that this doesn't seem reasonable.
/r/MensRights11/07/10 05:54 PM
1

I don't see why it's surprising that they'd privilege gender based insults above all others. They're invested in their own particular type of victimhood, just as everyone else is. Edit: Incidentally, you've apparently been unbanned.
/r/MensRights05/07/10 10:37 PM
10

You said she behaved 'like a little bitch'. Anyway, it's just a good idea not to use that word in reference to a person on 2xc.
/r/MensRights05/07/10 04:18 AM
10

You seem oblivious, so I'm going to inform you that you were probably banned for calling her a bitch and not for anything else within your post.
/r/MensRights05/07/10 03:47 AM
1

An absolute gem of a post.
/r/MensRights20/06/10 07:33 PM
1

I am very interested in hearing about their technology that allows them to measure stress and compare those results between people. Because I'm guessing that this is utter nonsense based on relative, personal measures.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 04:48 AM
9

That is what /r/equality is for.
/r/MensRights13/06/10 04:38 AM
8

Some men are more interested in meeting other men.
/r/MensRights11/06/10 10:22 PM
5

Humans aren't 'designed' for anything, actually. You're assigning intent to evolutionary processes.
/r/MensRights06/06/10 06:47 PM
1

I take this as an an attack on the non-functional rooms that are often advocated by interior design. I'm sure you've all seen them on those decorating shows, where they create a living room or family room where the essential component is that there's a computer, TV or exercise equipment, but instead of having those being a central design point, they sort of shift them to the side. They pretend that people aren't gathering in that room to watch TV or surf the Internet, but instead to sit and chat…
/r/MensRights28/05/10 09:52 PM
1

There is a certain mentality among people that it's OK to air any and all dirty (or potentially dirty) laundry in public. So many very ill mannered people see nothing wrong with saying 'is this wrong (or some other negative)' and then telling a very personal or private anecdote about a friend, SO, boss, etc. It's even worse on web communities, because they often can have horrible group think that doesn't result in anyone giving the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 04:17 AM
9

He didn't get fired. He found a better job and left for it.
/r/MensRights12/05/10 05:10 PM
2

Kidnapping and aggravated battery. Of course most crimes have a continuum of horribleness. Property crimes can be extremely awful if they involve all of your savings at a certain point in your life (Ie. when you're old).
/r/MensRights10/05/10 11:58 PM
1

I don't agree that rape is the second most serious offense next to murder. Is that your personal opinion or is there an actual hierarchy written down somewhere?
/r/MensRights10/05/10 10:14 PM
3

It's also a little bit of added protection to the people that do choose to donate sperm.
/r/MensRights07/05/10 08:55 PM
1

The age of consent was 14 at this point, so it's not really outlandish that they would have thought she was legal if that's how she represented herself.
/r/MensRights07/05/10 08:52 PM
0

Peer review doesn't mean much if the discipline itself is flawed.
/r/MensRights28/04/10 08:24 PM
6

This story doesn't involve men at all.
/r/MensRights26/04/10 12:02 AM
2

Personally, I don't expect blokes to glass each other, either.
/r/MensRights26/04/10 12:01 AM
2

You could take it as the statement that being in a relationship doesn't grant the other person control over your sexuality.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 05:42 PM
3

But the subtitle is 'Satoshi Kanazawa is just so cute when he rails against feminists!'. The article wasn't in any sense a response to what Satoshi Kanazawa wrote, so maybe she's mentally ill.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 04:43 PM
3

Where does that happen in the article?
/r/MensRights25/04/10 07:24 AM
3

I express my masculinity by defining myself through my own wants and desires and not through the wants and desires that are expected of me.
/r/MensRights24/04/10 05:27 PM
4

I don't think men's rights is about someone else telling me how to be a man or masculine, sorry.
/r/MensRights24/04/10 05:23 AM
1

I'm not sure why you would think I'm a feminist or a woman. Anyway, my issue is that your opinion is monumentally stupid, and you're stupid for having it. Suit yourself, though.
/r/MensRights22/04/10 05:41 PM
1

This is exactly my point. They showed the poor angry man getting upset, oh well, its all better now that she got caught b/c now she feels bad for herself. No criminal punishment , no jail time. Had they shown the man being a wimp, THEN I would have something to bitch about, got it. Is what she did actually illegal? Ultimately she would have been working towards that, but I don't think planning to do something illegal is necessarily illegal in all cases. I certainly don't think that shows should …
/r/MensRights22/04/10 04:39 AM
2

If what's not mentioned? They pretty explicitly portrayed the character of the wife as a villain. I mean, not only was she an extremely lazy, greedy asshole, but she also faked a pregnancy and peddled (over the counter) drugs to kids. I actually think they may have explicitly called her evil or some variation therein when she was caught on the drug thing. And her husband certainly was upset when he found out about the fake pregnancy. Do you really expect them to just parade her around all of the…
/r/MensRights21/04/10 08:52 PM
4

I don't agree. I think the wife was definitely portrayed as a secondary villain of the first half of the season. If it wasn't a big deal I don't think it would have ended up in them separating and leading to a divorce.
/r/MensRights21/04/10 08:33 PM
-1

Is the difference in cost due entirely to cancer? I would have thought that a lot of it was due to reproductive health, which is a choice.
/r/MensRights19/04/10 06:46 PM
1

Yeah, this is a pretty silly article. Tight clothing has often moved in and out of fashion throughout history. It's like they fixated on one single point in history and decided that that fashion is manly and everything else is effeminate.
/r/MensRights17/04/10 06:54 AM
1

Oh, you were merely pointing out that something was oxymoronic, and not in any way impugning it by indicating it as such? I find that extremely unlikely, since there was no point in you mentioning it in the first place. It'd be the equivalent of pointing out that someone used alliteration. Incidentally, there are many definitions for those two words. You should strive to pick the ones that best fit the original context.
/r/MensRights17/10/09 05:41 AM
0

Except that they're not normally contradictory terms. And you were implying that they were inherently contradictory and that the statement was meaningless.
/r/MensRights16/10/09 04:27 PM
-1

Yes. That sort of thing isn't altogether uncommon, and generally it happens when someone well meaning points out a flaw.
/r/MensRights15/10/09 08:48 PM
3

Rude compliments is not an oxymoron. Someone can say in a loud voice that you have a nice dick, and that'd presumably be a compliment about your genitals, while also being very rude to mention so publicly and openly.
/r/MensRights15/10/09 05:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter