TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FewWeek0 Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by FewWeek0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You’re legitimately retarded.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:12 PM
0

Women can survive without breasts. Removing them could save a lot of women from breast cancer. I understand that foreskin and breasts are different body parts. But why can the same logic not apply? You haven’t provided a compelling reason why all women should not be forced to have mastectomies. My argument would be: it is wrong to force a woman to have a mastectomy, even though it might prevent future cancer. People have the right to be able to do with their own body as they see fit, even if tha…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:42 PM
1

What are you talking about
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:25 PM
0

The question is: should we remove parts of someone’s body to prevent possible future disease? That is your logic for supporting circumcision. I’m asking you why that same logic cannot be applied to mastectomy to prevent breast cancer. You have yet to provide a response on this point. I will continue to wait for your response.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:24 PM
0

So why did evolution select for it across virtually all mammal species?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:58 PM
0

Once again, I will ask you: should we force girls to have mastectomies to prevent breast cancer? Yes or no. I want to hear your answer.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:52 PM
1

The data show that you have to circumcise over 900 men to prevent 1 case of penile cancer. And penile cancer has a 5 year survival rate of 85%. So you are circumcising everyone to prevent a rare and usually survivable form of cancer?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:49 PM
1

Are you saying that the foreskin has no function? It serves no purpose?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:41 PM
1

The article you posted states that penile cancer accounts for only 0.1% of cancer deaths in the United States. LMFAO.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:37 PM
0

The human tailbone is a vestigial structure. The foreskin is not a vestigial structure.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:31 PM
0

If circumcision protects against STDs and STIs, then how come the United States (where circumcision is relatively common) has higher levels of STDs and STIs than, for example, many European countries (where circumcision is rare)?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 01:28 PM
4

Should we force girls to have mastectomies to prevent breast cancer? Also, you realize how rare penile cancer is right? It’s one of the most rare forms of cancer. And the relationship to circumcision is very small. If foreskin provided that much of a survival disadvantage, evolution would have selected it out a long time ago. But still almost all male mammals have foreskins. I’m sorry, but I trust thousands of years of evolution over some idiot on Reddit. It is not good medical practice to start…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:56 PM
8

"Maingaining" is mostly BS in my opinion. It typically is much faster to just do a traditional bulk and cut.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/21 07:15 PM
10

“Men don’t get any consequences for knocking her up” Ever heard of child support?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 12:44 PM
14

4 out of 10,000 lol, that’s pretty selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 12:21 AM
3

Are we holding looks constant? Do 1 and 2 look the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:52 PM
5

6-6-6 is not “1 in 200.” What is your source for that stat? My guess is that having that combination would be significantly more rare than 1 in 200. Maybe 1 in 500.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 09:52 PM
13

Riverdale is a stupid show made for teen girls. Try watching a real show like: the wire, Sopranos, True detective season 1, Chernobyl.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 04:38 PM

Agree completely
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 11:01 PM
1

Maybe I should. This is most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 09:54 PM
1

So you’re ok with me saying I’m only interested in fit and athletic women? Because a lot of women would definitely disagree with you on that, and would not hesitate to berate me for that statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 09:36 PM
1

How come women feel fine saying they only want guys 6 feet or taller, but then if guys say they only want fit/skinny girls then all of sudden we're horrible, sexist, shallow, etc.?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 09:28 PM
2

she's most likely unattractive That's a pretty safe assumption on this sub lol. I agree with your points though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 09:08 PM
1

There is no data that shows tall men prefer tall or short women to that same extent. How often do you see a 6'3" guy with a 5 foot tall girl? Not that often. It's more common to see couples with similar heights than massive height discrepancies Also, I'm 5'10", so it's not like I'm some butthurt midget. Just pointing out the obvious double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 09:07 PM
4

So if I was morbidly obese, but I was only willing to date women that are supermodels, that would be realistic? Seems like a double-standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 08:20 PM
5

Well if you are tall (like 5’7” or up) I don’t think it’s unrealistic for you to prefer guys who are over 6 feet. But if you are average height or below average, kind of seems like a ridiculous demand lol. I mean, you’re entitled to your own preferences, but it seems kind of unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 08:17 PM

How tall are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 08:13 PM

Lmao. That’s not true. Plus, I think a girl would rather hook up with a hot guy whose dick is 5.5 inches than a fat ugly guy who’s dick is 6.5 inches.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 08:11 PM

Steroids are way more common than you think. Go into a serious gym (not planet fitness or la fitness) and probably 30% are on roids or have been on roids at some point. Now this doesn’t mean they all look like bodybuilders. Most of them still look like shit, and you would never know by looking at them that they were taking roids.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 08:09 PM

I’ve seen a couple comments now from women about “womanly hips.” Can you elaborate on what that means? Do you mean you are attracted to guys with a good v-tapered physique? Small waist, broad shoulders, lean and athletic build?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 07:53 PM
2

What’s the point of the high paying career though? You can’t take the money with you when you die. Who gets the money?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/21 01:41 AM
11

It’s illegal nationwide in the U.S.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 07:25 PM
1

Europe is a fucking disaster now in almost every way. To think it was once the cradle of Western Civilization, and now it has become a woke, dystopian nightmare. Anyone with half a brain that can leave, should leave.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:33 PM
3

My physique is on my Reddit profile. I’ve seen guys post good physiques on TRP. However, I have yet to see evidence that any FDS women are actually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 03:33 PM
1

Same. My BMI indicates I am borderline overweight at below 15% bodyfat.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 01:33 AM
0

Not true: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/06/08/troubling-shift-in-american-obesity-women-surge-ahead-of-men-40-percent-now-obese/ Also, using BMI as the measurement of obesity overestimates obesity in men, because it doesn’t account for muscle mass for guys who have built 20/30 extra pounds of muscle weightlifting for years. So the obesity gap is even larger than this article lays out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 02:19 AM
10

More of the same patronizing bullshit from the mainstream media. Any opinion that falls outside of the media's perverted, woke, morally bankrupt ideology is considered "extremist" and invalid. Even when opposing views are thoroughly supported by empirical evidence. The article is, as usual with the media, totally out of touch with what actually goes on online. The article reads like it was written by some boomer who has done nothing but watch Rachel Maddow for the past 5 years. The article remin…
/r/MensRights11/06/21 02:02 AM
57

Yeah, the dating apps are a sausage fest. And of the few women that are on the apps, a lot are just clout-chasing, landwhales, or single mothers. Time to let these apps die, at this point they are basically just scams to take money from men.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/21 01:14 AM
17

There are more overweight and out-of-shape women than men right now, and the stats show that the gap is growing. Women getting lazy and thinking they're all hot shit because of simps on Instagram, Tinder, and OnlyFans. Go to any gym right now, and there are way more men than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 12:03 AM
15

Make a Tinder profile of a random average looking dude. Spend a few days on the app and let me know how many women will agree to meet you. Then do the same thing with a new profile, but catfishing as a gorgeous chad. If you do the same experiment as above except with a female profile, you’ll still get plenty of attention from guys, even if you just use an average looking woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 09:56 PM
2

He’s also weird af. No disrespect to the guy, but he’s very strange. Also, I haven’t seen pictures of young Ben Carson. But I doubt he was a 10/10. Being handsome is not 10/10. 10/10 is perfect. Great face, tall, big and shredded, nice skin, nice hair. Don’t think that’s Ben Carson lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 08:17 PM
3

Ok. Show me a 10/10 guy in a relationship with like a fat, ugly 4/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 08:13 PM
3

Please explain
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 06:27 PM
81

Women are all about body positivity for themselves, but won't hesitate to bash any man who's not 6 feet tall, shredded, with an 8 inch dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 06:08 PM
10

The top 1% of men want nothing to do with the kind of women that are on FDS. Top 1% of men are only interested in top-tier women. Top-tier women have better things to do than bitch on FDS all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 06:05 PM
10

Yeah, they lose a lot of credibility when they try to argue that obesity is perfectly healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 02:24 PM

Yeah, that's kind of sus. Although a lot of women who are objectively 3s and 4s are now holding out for 9s and 10s, due to an inflated idea of self-worth. So would not be surprised if sexlessness was rising amongst below-average women for this reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 08:39 PM
1

Testosterone is a pretty decent male birth control. After a couple months of injecting testosterone, most men’s sperm count goes way down. It’s not near 100% effective though. They are doing trials with testosterone + progesterone as a male contraceptive now. My guess is, something like that will come onto the market in the coming years.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 02:30 PM
4

It's human nature. Men are biologically hardwired to be attracted to younger women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 01:43 PM
1

I think for women if you are decently in shape and your face isn't hideous, at least 8/10 men would find you attractive. I disagree that women need "tits and ass," just need to be relatively fit and not fat. This requires effort, but it also requires effort for men to have a lean and muscular physique. If a man is in good shape, it's not unreasonable for him to look for women who are also in shape.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 01:39 PM
56

Lmao, yeah many of us have to work like 10+ hours everyday.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/21 07:12 PM
1

What does hunting have to do with testosterone?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 01:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter