TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FiFiFoFumHeHiHoHum Archive

View 1 post and 81 comments by FiFiFoFumHeHiHoHum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Leave her and don't look back, a woman like that is never going to respect you or treat you affably, especially considering the huge lack of relationship experience between you and her. Trust me, this isn't a relationship you want to be a part of.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 11:22 AM
1

Oh yes, back when women had less rights. Back when there was rampant sexism and racism. I'm sure all of those women were all very happy to be dependent on their husbands, especially when they were abusive. Their biological needs were still being naturally met, so, yes they were better off.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 12:10 AM
1

Soviet Russia despite having legal abortion also had an orphan problem, the issue was not the pro natalist policies (outside of taxing childlessness). People were not miserable in the 1950s when what I am suggesting to revert to was the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 11:13 PM
1

Why is it acceptable to you to restrict women's bodily autonomy? To ensure civilizational survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 10:50 PM
3

We're not going to convince you, people think in the interests of themselves rather than society as a whole. Hence why patriarchal norms were needed for civilizational survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 09:23 PM
3

Maybe popular consensus will realize male power was a mistake and causes tribalism, sexual jealously and violent societies and insteas men will be relegated to the home and used only for manual labour and cum dispensing. The basic cycles of history as well as any past precedent would prove that this untrue, every time women were empowered in society, they quickly lose their power, it always happens. ​ Let's see what selfish revenge fantasy comes true. I mean we at least know one hasn't already f…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 06:07 PM
1

Popular consensus, it's already happening in South Korea.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 05:55 PM
1

That's why I noted that in the past the wealthy had more children, not in the present. You can do a cursory google search if you want proof, it isn't difficult to find this stuff out.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 04:17 PM
4

Woman under age 30 are already heavily out earning men. Nobody is getting married, and nobody is having children. When women have the option to wait, they do, and usually have 0 kids. Soon we will mostly die out, and the next generation will be saddled with having to deal with hundreds of millions of 80 year old geriatrics will realize that women's liberation was a mistake and things will go back to normal, as a matter of national survival. Proceed to downvote me like you people normally do, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:51 PM
1

The reason they do is because their women are less educated, and they have lower rates of birth control use. Wealth positively reflects onto fertility, not the other way around. Correlation does not equal causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:24 PM
1

Yeah, let's have the human race become all identical zombies raised by our all powerful government overlords, just like the plot of "Brave New World", that sounds like a great idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:10 PM
1

People have been doing that since the dawn of time, and their populations still expanded.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 03:37 PM
0

The former of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 03:26 PM
-1

There is no other way, if you don't want to have kids, then don't have sex. Sex has to have consequences again, that would fix all of this bluepill/redpill/having 15 ex girlfriends nonsense. Human beings weren't evolved to have these kinds of dynamics. If they want to keep society functioning, ban birth control, or keep women out of the workforce. We can't keep putting bandaids on gaping wounds anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 02:58 PM
-2

The issue is birth control and women in the workforce. If we had the will to eliminate at least one of these things, the birth rate would immediately skyrocket. But they lack the will to take them away, so they put as many bandages on the leaking holes as they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 02:05 PM
1

Wow, you're really obsessed with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 10:41 PM
0

Yeah, you're pretty upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 08:56 PM
1

Yeah.... For someone who's not very upset you seem pretty upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 04:21 PM
0

You seem to be very upset about this, and for someone who kept going on about how thin you were, this and that, and having those kinds of pictures on the front page of your account, of course it was brought up. I'm not "looking for dirt", all I did was click on your profile. If you're this insecure about your physique, I would suggest deleting those posts, so nobody "creeps" on you again.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 02:49 PM
0

You were telling us how skinny you were, so i wanted to check if you were gaslighting us or not, if you don't want people finding out about your appearance, then delete the posts or use a different account. What's the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 10:31 AM
0

Creeping? You were soliciting people to buy for your OnlyFans, explain how bringing up your business advertisements is creeping.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 11:29 PM
0

I just perused your profile, you're not "very thin", you look very much average in terms of weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 09:53 PM
–

Avoid women in general, be it for romantic purposes or otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 07:03 AM
0

These types of answers are an example of feminist indoctrination does to people, Sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 04:01 PM
1

It's selfish of women to not have lots of kids so that the future generation doesn't have to take care of them when there are 3 geriatrics for every young person. That's what's selfish. Obviously we've learned that when women are given equal rights to men then they refuse to have lots of kids, hence why throughout history, civilizations where smart enough to take those rights away from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 03:50 PM
0

So you agree to end tens of thousands of years of human progress and evolution, the first intelligent organisms to exist and flourish, to be bold, be brave, create music, art, literature, philosophy, civilization. I guess it's worth it for women's "rights" to be subservient to depends on their employers instead of their husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 03:40 PM
1

They used to say that overpopulation would destroy us all the way back in the 19th century it never, and no, earth is not overpopulated, not even close to it. If anything, societies were overpopulated in the past due to incredibly inefficient agricultural techniques compared to the techniques of today. Having a steady self replacing population is what you want. Population decline equals 3 geriatrics per young person, this has always lead to national destruction and economic ruination, bad idea. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 11:23 AM
-3

No more country, no more society, no more human civilization, we don't reach the stars, we don't conquer death. And we have 3 geriatrics per working age adult making the economic burden on society untenable. But wait folks, this could all be resolved by, wait for it. LISTENING to the wisdom of our ancestors and returning to the normal human order that we had for hundreds of thousands of years. Wow, what an amazing solution, bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 10:37 AM
2

No it's not, Rome between the end of the second punic war, and the ascension of Augustus Ceasar was exactly the same, it only lasted for about 110 years. Considering our second punic war was WW2, I give the current "liberated women", at most another 50 years before things return back to normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 10:25 AM
-1

I'm an extremist arch-conservative and I know most women do not like men like me. Hence my inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 06:49 AM
1

Your employer isn't enslaving you, but your husband is. Nice backwards logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 01:57 PM
1

I've never wanted or tried to hook up with anyone, and yet here I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 09:56 AM
–

More proof of why the sexual revolution of the 1960s must be rescinded.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 09:15 AM
2

In the past people married young and were able to have consistent sex. Now having sex with strangers is considered normal, unfortunately for these folks, getting a stranger to have sex with you is not particularly easy. Same goes for bf/gf, most couples stay together for short periods of time, very different to how they used to. This is why most folks are now single, the only solution is a repudiation of the sexual revolution and a return to past norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 05:12 PM
0

This is correct, divorce is one of the most vile things anyone can due. It is a punishment against not only your significant other, but your children also. Incredibly selfish, vile behavior. Divorce should not be legally allowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/23 05:02 PM
1

​ They were popular because they worked to enforce a hierachal structure that benefitted the men of the society. That's how oppression works. Concentrated power amongst one group being used against another. No, they were popular because they out competed all other systems, were incredibly stable, and didn't result in internal collapse. It has nothing to do with feelings or niceties. I actually find it sad that you think men cannot flourish without restricting the rights of half to population. Ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:34 PM
0

And your proposal is that these above average educated women with above average incomes should be the ones to leave the workforce because average men can't keep up and therefore aren't viable partners? There are posts on here every other day admonishing women to "pick better men"; you're complaining we won't have children with men we don't match with. We're gold-diggers if we can't pay the bills; we're the reason society is collapsing when we get an education and are financially independent. I'm…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:38 PM
1

Pre-agricultural civilizations had around 50% of men reproduce simply due to men dying in wars, and the performance of dangerous duties. After human beings settled, this stopped happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:30 PM
3

I personally, am a huge promoter of traditional households. But not by forcing them, taking right away, not educating. The handmaid's tale is a dystopian story not a what people want society. That is a fascist society. The handmaid's tale is a fearmongering fantasy, nobody wants "broodmares". All I am talking about is a return to past societal norms (think 1920s America), not enslaving women. Many single moms nowadays are making "mom houses" where other single moms are getting together to share …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:25 PM
1

Fascism has nothing to do with traditional patriarchal social structures. I doubt you would call the Amish, Mycenaeans or Urartians fascist. Statistically the Amish are the happiest people in the country, lowest rates of mental health problems, drug abuse, etc. This is because they kept the traditional family unit instead of accepting "modernity".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:17 PM
0

If keeping slaves and hanging and burning people wasn't good for society, then people wouldn't have done it. There is a reason they did. Keeping slaves and burning people was done by some cultures, but not most. Patriarchy, and a lack of sex equality was done by ALL cultures. Yeah because they were primitive men written by primitive men to provide justification for their feelings of insecurity and inadequacy. Not rocket science. The reason their religions were popular was because they worked to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:15 PM
0

The problem is that your wishful thinking society is the one that eventually fails. The traditional patriarchal one is the one that stood the test of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:08 PM
-1

No, what I said was that the intellectual, workplace, societal contributions of 1 woman who is a stay at home with 4 kids, are orders of magnitude higher than the feminist woman who has 1 kid. And that is only counting boys. Look at my math again, it's inarguable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:05 PM
1

They aren't going to raise any children, instead society will collapse, and some fascist will take over. This is the end point of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:54 AM
-1

These are worst case scenarios, but the point remains. When a society economically burns out, with normal societal bonds broken, only disaster comes about. Solutions are needed to fix the crisis, and paying people to have kids or "male positivity", "mental health" (no mater how many SSRis they put people on, the problem is worse and worse), hasn't worked. By the way, I'm not the person who came up with these ideas, that man was Oswald Spengler who predicted everything that's happened in the west…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:52 AM
0

The problem is having 3 geriatrics per 1 working age adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:38 AM
0

How is having less men going to get women to start having more children?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:37 AM
-1

Statistically, the average man out-earns his spouse by a considerable margin, outliers exist in every case and are to be expected. Women would work prior to marriage, very rarely part time, but often in family businesses (usually owned by the husband or other family/people close to her in the community) (think farms, general stores, things of that manner, with her kids often helping her). Stay at home dads were also quite normal, as people even in the past would be able to earn an income from ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:36 AM
-1

Both.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:24 AM
-2

A business that is not exploiting workers pays decent wages. A well paid, non-hungry, non-desperate staff has less turnover, less payments needed for constant new training. People who feel appreciated and respected at work. Who's going to pay the wages of the employees? In state run facilities, taxes. For instance in the US, we could easily change how much we spend on the military and make it instead so that some parts of military spending are cut and that goes back into the coffers to support p…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:19 AM
-1

No, this is why a society requires strong communal, legal, and familial bonds to prevent this from happening. Women are marrying men who have an income higher than theirs, and an education that is on their level or above. The issue is that women now out-earn men, and have a higher education than them, making a massive subset of the populace as undesirables. I also doubt these women are having 4 or 5 kids (numbers needed to prevent future catastrophe), and if they are, good for them for being sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:11 AM
0

Yes, the socioeconomic causes created by a decline in birth rates, which is the number one cause of economic decline. Lonliness is a cause of suicidal tendencies, and causes men to drop out of society completely, as they see no hope of raising a family like all the generation of men who came before them did. "baby mama" shouldn't even be a term in the lexicon of a normal person. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/men-workforce-work-companies-struggle-fill-jobs-manufacturing/ https://www.apa.org/monito…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:06 AM
0

Leagues, and societal expectations of average attractiveness are based soley on averages. In Mormon circles for example, the averages for women are much higher than in other circles, not so for men. So a Mormon "5", is a regular 6 or 7. In Russia for example, a young woman can be called "zhirnaya" or "tolstachka" even if she's 10 or 20 pounds below the threshold for "overweight", simply because the AVERAGE standard for weight is higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:00 AM
-2

There's no such thing as a beta provider. Just redpill bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:56 AM
-1

Except that stove chained woman will be creating FUTURE societal potential, as well as motivating the male to achieve MUCH MORE of his potential than he would have otherwise (as proved by basic statistics). Take 1 woman, she's a feminist, waits till 30 to have a kid with some "deserving" fellow. She's contributed 1 person to society, being herself, plus the kid. The kid goes on to also have 1 child. Now let's assume that instead, she's a housewife and has 4 kids, 2 of them are boys, so that's 2 …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:49 AM
1

Men also tend to value kindness, and non-assertiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:32 AM
2

Women no longer need men, so they have no pressure to settle down. As such the "ugly guy" who in past days would have been able to partner up, is no longer able to.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:31 AM
-1

It's not alarmism, nobody needs to panic about an eventuality that will play out in the later half of the 21st century. The point of this is to try and spread awareness of this issue, and to prevent a reaction too rash from occurring.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:28 AM
-1

Pay caretakers a good wage, make their ratio of caretaker-to-patient reasonable and untaxing, give them benefits, stop demeaning the position in society, bring in more immigrants, are just a few things you can do that won't have anything to do with unethically and draconianly trying to just get couples who don't want to couple up or don't want babies to birth them just to feed them to an overworked machine. Who's going to pay the salary of the caretakers? Who's going to pay for Granny's lunch, g…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:24 AM
0

If every guy looked like Brad Pitt, they'd just want the guy who's more attractive than him. Attractiveness will always be on a scale, the center being whoever is the average of that group, not of some objective metric. Just go walk around Minsk if you want to see what I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:13 AM
0

But the problem is that Japanese men didn't used to jump in front of trains, they only started this after their traditional society fully caved in the 1960s. Bribing people to have kids has never solved anything, or even stabilize birth rates. Italy, Japan and Korea are doing this, even if they begin paying people a grand per kid per month, they'll still not do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:10 AM
1

Sky isn't falling, there will be no civil war, or anything of that manner, simply decay until some fascist dictator, or popular uprising takes over. This is the end point of feminism. Societies have historically changed on many levels. Such radical changes in relations to the sexes, have never stood the test of time though. A glance at the historical record proves this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:05 AM
0

We aren't going to make more attractive, all that would do is set the bar higher and higher and higher. In Eastern Europe or Iran for example, the bar for an "average" woman would be about a 6 or a 7 in the US, and the average man is about a 4. That doesn't change their respective gender's relative attraction to their them. Women not needing men and their offspring is the issue, and the only system that sustainably worked to prevent this was patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 02:03 AM
0

Do you think that all societies of the world secretly conspired to "oppress" women? If a society was truly more efficient when women, or in a mixed gender system, than said society would have risen above all others, just based on Darwinian evolution. These societies did exist, but were always swallowed up, or their "gender equality" experiments extinguished before they would begin. We've had thousands of years of societal development for this to happen, how come it's not?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:55 AM
-2

Because it ends in Japanese birth rates, men jumping in front of trains due to women no longer having a need for men of low standing due to their own newfound relative high standing, 3 pensioners per working adult, and economic, and national stagnation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:50 AM
-2

And the root cause of this, is the fact that women no longer need men due to a high relative socioeconomic standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:48 AM
0

That's not how it works. What you're going to have (and what you already have in say Greece), is 2 or 3 pensioners for every working adult. Men who see no purpose in their lives as they cannot have children simply dropping out of the workforce; the testosterone powered youth that drove previous civilizational development, wasted on video games, and Manga. Creating such an immense economic burden on them, that the economy stagnates, and as seen throughout history, eventually collapses. I see thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:46 AM
1

Sustainability means not having 3 pensioners for every working adult, and a significant part of the male population, unemployed, suicidal and lonely. Japan, Greece, and Italy are the Canary in the coalmine for the rest of the west to get it's act together. In Japan, already 20% of their working age men aren't employed, they have no will to do so because they realize that their chances of reproductive success and evolutionary fulfillment are nil, the country is slowly imploding. Italy is similar,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:31 AM
1

I'm not going to adapt to anything, that's like telling a "kulak" in 1930s Russia to "adapt to the times". If the times are an aberration, than no adaptation can be done by the reasonable man, for if he adapts he becomes unreasonable and betrays his evolutionary character. I'm just pointing out the most uncomfortable truth about any of this "redpill" "bluepill" stuff. It's the root cause of the "pills" even existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 01:03 AM
-1

A sustainable, and expanding civilization that isn't stagnant and provides for a high standard of living and social, and economic stability? It's in the best interests of women to fulfill their evolutionary, and societal duties regardless of what they teach you in school. Female equality isn't going to exist for much longer, it's not a debate of "if it will end", but "when and how it will end". And personally, I'd rather not have another Augustus Ceaser have to end it for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 12:47 AM
-4

I mean, if you look at the historical record, every time a civilization would give women equal rights, they'd go down the toilet pretty quickly. There's a reason why Buddha, Confucius, Mohammad, Jesus, and every other major religious, philosophic figure of any historical significance thought quite poorly of female equality. You don't get a common idea throughout all societies in history, if said idea is defective or built on laziness, that's not how it works. If women having equal rights would h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 12:38 AM
-2

We aren't talking about sex slaves, we're just talking about housewives who follow their husbands, same way it's always been before the 1960s. All this modern day experiment will yield is decay, and eventual collapse. and it will be replaced with an anti-feminist system, whether you like it or not. Your granddaughters or great granddaughters (if you have any), will be housewives, I guarantee it. ​ The Roman Republic is the most famous example of a society trying "female liberation", it last or a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 12:33 AM
-2

It'll cause population decline, economic stagnation, and eventual societal collapse, when we will once again revert to the old order as it is the only system that allows for societal progress. Just sucks to be living in this insane, historically abberated time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 12:15 AM
-9

Traditional Islam is correct in terms of women's issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 12:10 AM
-10

For the sake of society. Civilization will collapse if this trend continues. There's a reason why historically, all societies and religions have always prevented women from getting educations and earning incomes of their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 12:05 AM
17

Juggernaught law, men assume that because you are overweight, you're easier and thus aren't as intimidated to hit on you like they would be with a more attractive woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 11:19 AM
2

No, we really, really don't. Up to a certain point, the thinner, the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 11:10 AM
1

Obviously the software engineer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 08:13 PM
–

Of course I would, as an incel, I already know it's over, so all this would do is ease my suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/23 09:40 AM
1

By "A man who strives to be his best, give his best, and love his best. Who is a provider, protector, and seeks to grow to together in a happy way", you mean a 6'4 guy with hunter eyes and a lantern jaw.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/23 12:35 AM
5

A fat, promiscuous woman typed this. LMFAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 04:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter