TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fichek Archive

View 0 posts and 2,860 comments by Fichek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,860 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

You are so fucking naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:01 PM
–

Yeah. Now it's probably above 90% :D
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:53 PM
–

To be fair the average 25 year old woman if she isn’t fat is not actually average due to how overweight everyone else it. Does that not apply to an average 25 year old man if he isn't fat? 50k isn’t average lifestyle anymore though so it’s not average these days it’s the sad reality if you on 50k you probably struggling. Idk I think average implies middle class. The average income doesn't care if you struggle or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:49 PM
2

Perhaps bedding a lot of partners is a predictor of infidelity/poor relationships in future, rather than a cause? Perhaps jumping out of a plane without a parachute is a predictor of death in the future, rather than a cause? Dude, it's a good predictor exactly because it's a cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:37 PM
–

People are becoming more religious. At least in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:01 PM
–

OP is ignoring the fact that Aztecs are still around. And you are ignoring the fact that you are replying to a comment of a person who, like 99.99% of other people, thinks that the Aztecs are long gone. That's how irrelevant they are today. Think about why that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:32 PM
–

Some are more so than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:21 PM
5

But do they want it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:00 PM
6

Do you think you are an exception in this case, or do you think that most women could tell your story as their own?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:58 PM
5

but other women Yes, all women other than you :D
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:46 PM
–

It's a matter of choice, nothing more, nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:07 AM
-1

But you just told him he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:21 PM
5

Do you know how many lazy or barely employed guys get laid? A lot. Is that a positive thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:50 PM
-4

Did anyone claim otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:26 PM
-1

If you are "deconstructing" it as you claim (whatever that means for you), you are by default engaging with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:49 AM
-1

The analogy could be bad, but the point is not to take it literally like you did because: Food is a human need. is completely irrelevant because (counterintuitive as it may be) it had nothing to do with food.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:47 AM
6

Food is a human need. Sex is a human desire. And analogy is something that flies right over your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:43 AM
1

Top 0.00001% argument for this. Really hits hard!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:49 PM
2

So u have the solution "be rich" yet you refuse while using the term "unfair" for ur choice to be homeless and destitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:37 PM
4

Isn't that poetic justice of it all? If you are painting people as monsters, why are you surprised they become monsters?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:34 PM
1

Oh, my mistake. I misunderstood. I read it as if you are single right now. Without being with your partner beforehand, you wouldn't want to be with someone like him because it would take a man of your dreams to consider dating (meaning that he isn't that).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:10 PM
1

That's such a horrible thing to say. You say you love your partner, but if you were single now, you wouldn't choose him as a partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:10 PM
13

I'm an atheist, but every time I visit PPD, I get the uncontrollable urge to kneel down and wholeheartedly thank god that women in my life are the total opposite of the top 1% women posters (and some others) here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:43 PM
6

Yeah! He should be much more attractive to do something like that!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 07:25 PM
3

That's a caricature of an actual situation that happens often. Girl gets with a buff dude and then complains, "But he is constantly in the gym!!!!" Yeah, no shit, how do you think he got that buff in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:39 PM
1

I don’t mean this as an insult, but :D
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:31 PM
1

Do I have to post the assortative mating studies again ? Please do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:11 PM
3

Women have a far different set of standards for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:03 PM
7

Because it had a bunch of major flaws Oh, ok. Which might those be? selection bias Wha? limited sample size Whaaaa? no control Whaaaaaaa? and the survey marked “skip” as an automatic 1 rating out of 5, potentially tainting the results. I never heard about this before. Where did you get this info from? Can you link it? I wanna check it out. If you are correct about this, then the sample really is tainted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 11:53 PM
1

Ok, you explained the difference. Can you now explain why one is OK and the other one is NOT OK?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 11:06 AM
4

But don't you think it's kinda disingenuous to compare dinner/stand-up show/movie/play/ballet/beach to night club as if they are the same thing because someone could approach you at any of those places? It's like saying that free solo climbing is equally as dangerous as just walking the pavement because you can die doing either of those things. Or do you honestly think that being in a situation where you are potentially drunk, with much lower inhibitions than usual, with impaired judgement, in a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:32 AM
2

Is the soon-to-be groom not participating as well? So it's for him too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:50 AM
2

Explain the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:43 AM
2

I still don't get it. But thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:57 AM
2

What's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:11 AM
4

I think independent career women would disagree with you on that. Paid maternity leave and then back to work after a year =/= stay at home mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:00 AM
9

They aren't complaining that they are having to pay for dates for a stay at home mother of their future children. They are complaining that they are having to pay for dates for independent career women who forget the concept of a wallet when the bill comes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 12:55 AM
1

So explain the relevance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 10:39 PM
–

Ts from the LGBTs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 10:23 PM
3

It doesn't help. You haven't explained the difference in the context of this discussion. You just explained what each thing is, which is completely irrelevant if you have complete trust in your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 10:22 PM
–

Yeah, you're right. Let's institutionalize everyone you dislike. But can we at least also institutionalize the Ts as well. They constantly invent new words and names and pester everyone to use them. They are so massively unpleasant to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 09:42 PM
–

Oh, how very specific of you to only focus on specifically autistic men for this :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 09:23 PM
4

Yes, together with the completeness of the LGBT community.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:56 PM
–

The empathetic gender strikes again!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:55 PM
5

It wasn't that long ago when we used to institutionalize men who like men, women who like women, men who think they are women, and women who think they are men. I'm not saying they should be institutionalized now, but it does put things into perspective when you realize our society just didn't tolerate these types of people to the extent we tolerate them in today's post-Reagan era. It was Dead Prez Reagan who closed all the institutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:50 PM
6

A strip club and a dance club are two very different things. What's the difference? I mean, if we go by your supposition that everyone should have complete and utter trust in their partners, what could be the meaningful difference between a strip club and a dance club in this context?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:40 PM
2

My suggestion is understanding that people can lie. Ok, but why make that suggestion was my question. I don't know if you have a significant other, but when you ask him something, do you expect an honest answer from him? You probably do. Do you at any point think "people, including my SO, can always lie"? You probably don't. So if you decide to ask your SO about his past relationships and sexcapades, do you expect the truth from him? If you do, why would you suggest to the guy you replied to tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:07 PM
1

Also, everyone can and does tell the truth. In all situations. Even basic politeness is based on your truthfulness. So, I have to choose the baseline. Is your suggestion that I always think that women would lie about their past?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:49 PM
0

They want a relationship with the man as a person Really? So why then would his height, weight, face, hair, voice etc etc if you want a relationship with him as a person? Only one of those is self-interested Hm, I count 2 self-interested sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:46 PM
1

their personalities are that awful Nah, it's just women being that shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:46 PM
2

Why do some men like you insist on women taking on your value structure? Do you have a problem with people having different values? But you are literally doing the same. You are telling him what he should value based on your own value system.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:41 PM
1

Are you suggesting that we have a baseline, "All women always lie about their past?"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:38 PM
–

Leagues don't really exist. Is that why I'm seeing all those 3s walking hand in hand with 9s and 10s? Oh wait......
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:19 AM
–

Classifying people into leagues based on looks alone is short-sighted and far too narrow of a qualification to base a person's entire worth. Good thing OP didn't claim anything close to that. People tend to date others that are roughly as attractive as they are. It's the way it is. Colloquially, "in their league". That in NO WAY means that someone that's hot has more value as a person. Good thing OP didn't claim anything close to that. People push back on "leagues" because a person's worth shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:16 AM
–

Regardless of how widespread you think abuse is, most people don't solve problems or express their emotions through violence. Not even most, I would actually say that is true for the vast majority of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 07:58 PM
9

Some women are into men that are on the feminine side. How many of them are there? Those are so rare that are only few and far between. And even if he manages to meet such a woman, it's not like she would be into him by default. He should go after women that are into him... Not flirt "shamelessly" with people that are NOT into him... How do you know they aren't into him? Maybe they aren't into him the way he is now, but they would be if he presented himself less feminine and more masculine?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 07:50 PM
1

Do you call out your friends if they play this push-pull shit? And please don't tell me you've never seen your friends doing something like this..
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 08:43 AM
2

Is there anyone denying that? The point is the difference in how far you can push things before they are considered creepy as an attractive guy vs less attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 08:13 AM
5

If you are the 'bestie' type and just start being overtly sexual with all the women treating you so, it will just be awkward and they will ostracize you, not suddenly want to fuck you. So what is he supposed to do in that case?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 08:10 AM
1

I don't understand. Is it more than 3 or less?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 09:07 PM
1

I know because my husbands bands fans are largely middle-aged lesbians All 3 of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:20 PM
1

most women people don’t solve problems or express their emotions with violence
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:17 PM
1

Oh wow. So women don't want to be breadwinners in either heterosexual or homosexual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:09 PM
6

I think it tells you far more about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:04 PM
1

🤡 This was very fitting :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 10:31 AM
20

So you establish the entirety of someone's personhood based on their weakest moment?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:50 AM
–

I don't think lots of people were claiming that. What the main claim was with regard to that is that "Manly, masculine and high testosterone" means not unattractive. Meaning that the opposite of that is unattractive, so you want to avoid that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 08:03 AM
3

Easy. I do swipe right on men that i’m not really attracted to (but not repulsed also) That's still a looks check. It's just that your standard is way lower compared to others. You don't give a fuck about the personality of the guy that repulses (whatever that means) you physically. He could literally be the perfect amalgamation of all the character traits that you are looking for in a person, and he still wouldn't get a chance because he didn't pass the looks check.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 03:32 PM
–

Exactly the sentiment OP is talking about. But you are the one who actually did her a favor (or tried to do her a favor, you didn't say if she listened to your advice) because if she bought those initial jeans, she would probably be a laughing stock for everyone else who isn't your friend group.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 07:20 AM
4

If she's that shallow But she isn't, that's the point. All women on PPD will tell you (and they constantly do) he HAS TO pass the attraction threshold (for her) to be considered anything more than a friend. And that's a completely normal and expected stance to have in regard to this. But then you can't claim that something else is more important than looks. If B would never be taken into consideration unless A is triggered first, how can you claim that B is more important?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:40 PM
5

but personality matters more for getting a relationship No, it doesn't. Because if you don't pass the attraction threshold, your personality won't get vetted at all. So how can you say that personality matters more for a relationship? I never understood this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:57 PM
0

You seem to be whining about whining, so why are you whining?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:42 PM
3

Did you know there are other things that life contains other than having sex and dating? Which might be those "other things" that men have an obvious advantage over women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 01:18 PM
-1

In general, very empathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 07:38 AM
0

There have consistently been threads on this subreddit in which you have men asking for empathy/sympathy/understanding. So clearly SOME people want that. Are there threads that they want empty empathy/empty sympathy/empty understanding? If not, then what are you talking about? They want actual empathy/sympathy/understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 07:36 AM
5

In so doing you made your life even more shit but you don't even realize it. Maybe. Possibly. But I don't think those people care. The way I see it, they had 2 options: Option 1: I feel ostracised, demonised, neglected, and in general treated like shit. If Harris wins, even if things don't get worse, they definitely won't get better. And the side that's doing this to me wins again and keeps on treating me like shit while living their life hunky dory. Option 2: I feel ostracised, demonised, negle…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 01:22 PM
1

something almost everyone does So what's the point of mentioning that in the profile? It's like saying, "My hobbies are autonomous breathing and body temperature regulation." Why are you so defensive about this? You are defending women for the same thing you would shit on men (which you are already doing in this thread) if they were doing that. If the guy had in his bio, "My interests are watching Netflix, eating sushi, and social media." you would think "OMG this guy has literally no hobbies, I…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:36 PM
3

men should take women’s playbook and engage in their interests more socially. They do. Just because you don't give a fuck about those activities doesn't mean they don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:05 PM
3

Of course it is. After you trigger all the other things the commenter above talked about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:52 AM
3

Maybe that was the point. Side A was "losing" to B, which revelled in their misfortune and enjoyed the mistreatment with a holier-than-thou attitude. Ironically enough, side B was supposed to be the tolerant one. Election time comes, and some members of side A (and undecided ones who were also caught in the shit flinging that side B was doing) simply decide that they will vote for the maximum chaos option even though they wouldn't do that in different circumstances. You were adamant in keeping m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:49 AM
–

You are a direct example of what happens when you don't get that cringe edginess out of your system in highschool. It's actually quite fun to observe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:30 AM
0

Said the product of breeding.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:27 AM
–

You seem to be smelling lots of your own farts in your little bubble. Try making that bubble a little larger at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:21 AM
1

The constant misogynistic vitriol spewed by men on here, for example, does not warrant me saying that women are being "abused" by said comments. 95% of other women posters here would disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:08 AM
0

Really? And what would your comment be if he said something to the effect, "I don't think getting my son a dress from Frozen is the best idea ever. We are still living in a world bound by strict gender norms, and he would be the prime target for mocking and bullying, and I don't want to allow something like that to happen to him."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:26 PM
1

Don't be dishonest. You weren't clarifying. You were preparing a "gotcha" if he answered in a way you expected him to answer. But he didn't, which is quite ironic when you think about it. You are all for gender neutrality and erasure of gender roles, and yet you have clear expectations of how he, as a man (because of his flair "Egalitarian Mens Rights Activist Man"?) would act. Quite telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 06:59 AM
7

But the issue is that all you just said here are pure platitudes because one gender is so loud and united in proclamations of how "traditional gender roles must be abolished!", a generalized statement that includes everyone, but in reality, they only refer to themselves (their own gender) when they espouse it. What kind of fairness can be expected down the line when the starting point of it all is dishonesty?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 09:45 PM
1

That's completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. You are talking about gender expression. The comment you replied to was about gender expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 09:26 PM
22

Beautiful at any size? But only if you are a woman :D
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 02:08 PM
8

Pretty sure you didn't either.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:30 AM
–

More picky =/= more discerning.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:25 AM
–

So you agree that all women are trashy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:25 AM
–

How do you figure that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:23 AM
–

Or you need to be clearer in what you are trying to convey because it seems everyone got the same message :/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:18 AM
–

But the question is whether you see that behavior as acceptable or aspirational, or something to be embarrassed about. That's not the question. The question is how common that behavior is. If you and your two saintess friends are surrounded by a sea of trashy women that you don't interact with, can you really say that women are generally not trashy? Mind you, I'm not making the claim that all women are trashy; I'm just illustrating how misguided your reasoning is. You are arguing from a moral st…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:12 AM
–

and therefore are more discerning Are they really, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:00 AM
1

So that means that there is no penalty for not paying child support, and your initial point is moot, wouldn't you agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:52 AM
3

I was taught that orgasm with a partner is the closest one can experience to heaven on earth. Is that something you learn in Catholic school? Who exactly "teaches" you that? I can't comprehend anything being better than either of those things Have you tried chocolate?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 10:57 PM
–

Great comment! And great retort below as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 02:08 PM
–

I feel like you’re letting a lot of your general frustrations out on me. If irony could kill, you would be dead 10x over.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 02:06 PM
3

That's completely irrelevant. There are a multitude of things that are extremely important for a relationship that take only a fraction of the time sex takes. How much time in a day do you spend sharing basic non-sexual intimacy with your partner? How long does a drive-by kiss last? A hug? A kind word? A kind gesture? All of that combined takes only a fraction of the time sex takes. Do you also find that unimportant because of the lenght of time in a day it occupies?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 01:55 PM
2

"A lot of women approach men! A lot I say! Not me, I never did that. But a lot do! A lot I say!"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 01:43 PM
1

You are telling a singular success story that fits your narrative. That is a textbook definition of "anecdotal evidence". If he told you about successfully cold approaching an attractive woman, you would reject that completely, even though he would be doing exactly the same thing you are doing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 01:37 PM
11

We aren't talking about the same thing. Women not saying "Looks don't matter!" doesn't equal women being very open about looks mattering. Women aren't very open about that. Men are. When a man is asked what he considers attractive in a woman, he will open with "cute, sexy, pretty" and then list character traits he also finds attractive. When you ask a woman what she considers attractive in men, she will list a plethora of character traits / interests / activities and whatever else, but she won't…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 01:11 PM
2

Because they think they CAN, they think they DESERVE. How do you think people feel when you tell them they probably WON'T get the thing they feel they DESERVE? Do you think they will step back and objectively assess their situation and think about why that is? As William Munny said: "Deserve's got nothing to do with it."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 12:56 PM
3

women aren't attracted to average guys because they can get better ones You see, this is "the curse of CAN". Just because they CAN, it doesn't mean that they WILL. It's far more probable that they WON'T. So in effect, they think they can, they are under the impression that they can, but in any meaningful and functional sense, they CAN'T.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 12:46 PM
3

Sex is a tiny part of the relationship To you. I would dare say that you are in a tiny minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 11:32 AM
1

The top comment of this thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 11:09 AM
12

Nah I think women are very open Well, you think wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 08:29 AM
6

So I have never heard the "men who can't find partners are probably incels who hate women" Neither have I. But how different is that from saying "There is probably something wrong with him" (implying an obvious character flaw), if a woman is asked why some dude can't get a girlfriend? Because I have heard that A LOT. 9 times out of 10 if you ask a woman why that and that doesn't have a partner, they will say "There is probably something wrong with him" instead of saying "Well, he's obviously not…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 08:13 AM
7

Is it possible to express actual grievances you have with half the human race (like that half is constantly doing to men) without it being considered insulting?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 07:55 AM
3

Or you can have many sexual partners and only one or two real actual friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 07:24 AM
4

I think you’re being extremely naive if you think there’s not a huge overlap between misogyny and inceldom. It's a good thing then that he didn't claim otherwise. I wouldn’t call the “average non-incel male demographic” particularly misogynist or feminist. If you ask feminists or feminist leaning people, if you aren't feminist you are by default, at least somewhat, misogynistic. So it's either/or.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 07:19 AM
1

I always wondered how do you decide what statement from "Men" you will believe?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 12:13 PM
–

Is it against the rules to tell someone to have their head checked if they, obviously, need their head checked? Asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 10:31 AM
–

and theres plenty of women who are like me on this Really? How many of them do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 02:06 PM
2

You think they need that here :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 10:35 AM
1

I love this! I just love posts like this one, where the poster is so sure they are making a cogent point for their case, when in reality they are destroying their own argument so efficiently. What the OP wanted to portray: "Look at these men who, despite not being good looking, slept with and married so many women! It's not about looks, it's about status!" What OP is actually proving: To actually beat good looks as a means of getting women, you have to have the sheer amount of status that only a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:40 AM
0

Each and every one of them would be nothing without him. And if you asked each and every one of them, knowing what they do now, and experiencing what they did, would they make the same choice they did then, I'm pretty sure each and every one of them would say yes. But hey, keep on fighting the good fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:01 AM
1

So they were dumb?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 07:58 AM
1

Me personally I don't care about height as long as he's as tall as I am. Holy contradiction Batman! Do you think there is a difference between your statement and "Me personally I don't care about height as long as he's 6' tall."?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:29 PM
6

I think the problem is that men claim that women don’t find their non-chad boyfriends also attractive. Well, you think wrong. The problem is that women claim that they treat their non-chad boyfriends better than they treated chad, while at the same time making that same non-chad boyfriend jump through 1 billion of hoops, for a sliver of the good treatmen that chad gets for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:19 PM
2

Most women are treated quite badly by men. Funny thing is, most women would disagree with you. Most serial killers and rapists are men. Not only most, but an overwhelming majority of them are men. And yet they are a tiny sliver of a minority of the totality of men. Most people who suddenly decide to live their partner when she is pregnant or has a toddler is men. And women have nothing to do with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:15 PM
1

There's always a tradeoff. And what do you consider a trade-off in this case?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:11 PM
16

No more or less than their prospective female partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 09:04 AM
0

It's like writing the most poignant definition of selection bias. And then, as a cherry on top, saying that your experience is completely the opposite of that (anecdotal), but then you double down on selection bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 08:23 AM
1

Still digging? :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 10:22 AM
2

All the flags. Name a flag. That's the flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 02:32 PM
1

Like all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:54 PM
6

And if the society doesn't exist, neither do women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:42 PM
3

Are you honestly asking me why recommending Marx to a 16-year-old is a stupid idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 02:25 PM
–

So many words to simply say "She isn't that into him!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:58 PM
–

principles It's not a principle if you apply it differently to different people. In that case, it's a standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:46 PM
–

Nobody is saying “settle for someone who’s treating you worse” You are saying exactly that. I don't mean literally. Literally you are saying "different", but when clarifying the difference you are clearly describing "worse". Okay, let’s think of it this way. Say compatibility within a relationship can be summed up in attribute sliders - sexual, romantic, emotional, humor, problem solving, conflict management and whatever else you want to add. Okay. Say partner A scores a 10/10 in sexual compatib…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:29 PM
–

Is it an arbitrary waiting period? Of course it is. If others didn't have to wait, and you do, it's that by definition. “I would maybe prefer to get to know this person non sexually first”? And why would she think that way? Could it be because the sexual part is somewhat absent so she would like to get to know him better to see if there are other things about him that are good enough for her to maybe/eventually compensate for that initial lack of attraction? You are literally using an argument a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 12:57 PM
5

Yeah, I don't like his work for some reason. But regardless, it's the crappiest of crappy recommendations to an impressionable 16-year-old.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 12:49 PM
8

You didn't recommend a book, you recommended an author. And it's a complete and utter shit of a recommendation. You are saying that he is too young for the PPD poison (which he most certainly is, but then again, can you ever be not "too young" for the shit that PPD is), and then you nonchalantly recommend the ultimate poison of the mind, to a 16-year-old. That kind of recommendation is such lazy intellectualism. It's the equivalent of supermodels recommending The Alchemist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 12:30 PM
6

Considering divorce statistics, seems to be about 50% likelihood of lifelong love if you are able to get relationships. Nope. It's a 50% likelihood of not divorcing. Nothing more, nothing less. If you didn't divorce, that doesn't mean you are in a lifelong loving relationship with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:59 AM
11

read some Marx No, fuck no. Why are people recommending this shit ever? Read literally anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:53 AM
1

No, you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 11:23 AM
1

But men finding more women attractive means women are more replaceable. Women don't find most men attractive so harder to replace. It's pretty basic logic. Yeah, you're correct. It's pretty basic logic, and you somehow manage to fail to understand it. Something being replaceable means that you have an easy time replacing it. Who has a FAR easier time replacing a partner, men or women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 11:07 AM
1

You seem to be alive enough to make stupid topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:59 AM
2

No, it's exactly what you want to believe it sounds like.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 02:46 AM
2

Can you provide evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 02:43 AM
–

You actually think you made a good analogy there?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 03:18 PM
–

Am I supposed to believe that you wouldn't object if a woman who is close to you (daughter, sister, close friend...) starts dating a convicted rapist?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:39 PM
–

How bout a rapist? Can he be rehabilitated? How bout a serial rapist?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 12:37 AM
2

Oh dear lord, how many platitudes can you stuff in such a tiny comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:25 PM
–

That's commendable of you, but that in no way negates the privilege you mentioned - your opinions being given more weight in a professional setting compared to your female counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:16 PM
–

I make efforts to negate this privilege How exactly do you do this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:11 PM
6

because in spaces like these, men are seen as inherently valuable with no need to debate their worth. Literally the opposite of the general consensus here. Even when you take red / black pill into consideration. The general consensus is that women have inherent value while men are completely expendable. I have no idea how you came to the quoted conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:06 PM
2

"Women are evil" =/= "women are incapable of feeling romantic love towards men".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:03 PM
6

he would be called a "simp" No, he wouldn't. None of what you described makes him a simp. I don't think you understand how the term is used. And congratulations on a great relationship with your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:58 PM
1

And some are buying property like it's a loaf of bread. That's the whole point that went over your head. Among all the other points that went over your head. Plenty of them when looking at this topic. And plenty more in the future, no doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:30 PM
2

So now it’s not about whether men struggle but how much sex and dates they’re getting? That's exactly how the struggle is defined. What are you on about? The dude above linked the article about lifelong virgins totally unprompted when no one was discussing that, and it has 0 bearing on the discussion at hand. If you, on one side, have a girl who is in a long-lasting, loving relationship with her boyfriend, and on the other side a girl who has had 0 relationships her entire life but met someone w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:26 PM
1

You don't ask yourself why there is 80:20 ration of men:women on dating apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:10 PM
2

Women's suck just as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:07 PM
1

This is proven everywhere, the moment you step outside and walk among the public what do you honestly see? An endless stream of lonely, depressed, single men or countless couples and families surrounding us? As if we needed more proof that you are incapable of critical thinking. You just made a perfect "selection bias fallacy" example without even realizing it. If you don't observe something, it doesn't exist? Really? You are so removed from reality it's actually worrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:05 PM
2

It actually was clever. Maybe it went waaaaay over your head, but it was actually quite an apt comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:56 PM
1

Holy drivel...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:51 PM
1

Oh, choose better right :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:44 PM
1

meeting one and thinking that he is below me because he attracts less women that i men is just weird But that's exactly what women are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:40 PM
–

It’s the same with a bald dude, bald dudes can be hot and are hot, gender swap him and he’s a bald woman and most men aren’t into that. Same with women. Vast majority of them aren't into bald men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:23 AM
2

"Helpful" is only someone who enables your delusion further?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:59 AM
-2

Nothing that you mentioned here is gendered behavior. Both genders can (and do) act like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:56 AM
9

Is your anecdotal evidence worth more than his?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:00 AM
0

Yeah, it really is weird using something that basically doesn't exist as an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 12:54 PM
1

It's just funny how you say ALL and then mention 2 things. One of which is a fucking Airbag :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:28 AM
-2

You: "All the safety features in a car are built with men's size/body in mind." Me: "What all?" You: "Seat belt. Airbags." :/ Airbags, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:25 AM
1

And yet, women are told we’re too picky How else would you call wanting something and no instances of that something satisfy your standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:14 AM
0

Male only gyms? Where? I never saw something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:01 AM
-4

All the safety features in a car are built with men's size/body in mind. Really? All of them? And which ones are those?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:54 AM
-2

Unequality doesn't just stop existing. But it did. All of what you mentioned isn't relevant anymore. So why are you mentioning it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:51 AM
3

The effects don't go away. Really? So women still can't vote, open a business or have a credit card?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:50 AM
–

Yeah its a unchangable rule. Why? Women are not as horny as men are, thus men want women more than women want men. For sex, undoubtedly so. But what about relationships? I'd say women want a relationship way more than men. So if your goal is a successful relationship, being proactive (as a woman) towards someone you think would be great for a relationship is far more beneficial than just passively waiting around for the holy trinity to happen (him being interested, him wanting a relationship, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:44 AM
–

More options to do (or don't) something = violation of freedom? You haven't thought this through much, have you... Is this another version of "I wish women forced themselves to date unattractive men out of pity"? So you think that women, when they have to actually be proactive and actually TRY, would go for someone they consider unattractive when currently, when they are completely passive and have to put in 0 (zero) effort in initiating, reject everything and everyone. You haven't thought this …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 07:45 AM
–

Gaslighting 101. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:47 AM
1

That's not a study. It's a literal survey. You just googled and saw "harvard" and thought it was so smart to link an article without even looking at the content. You didn't even need to read beyond the subtitle: "Researchers share what Americans have to say about social disconnection and potential solutions" but I guess even that was too much. Other than it not being a study, it also has nothing to do with what we were discussing here. I really don't know what I expected. Actually I do, I expect…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 07:58 AM
1

What studies are those? Present one at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:36 AM
8

You are being intentionally daft. He clearly means that if your primary goal is to pursue women, then doing activities not related to that (regardless if they are community activities with women involved) means that you are PASSIVE IN PURSUING WOMEN!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:11 AM
–

Are you the third option from your comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:05 AM
1

What studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:58 PM
1

What studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:58 PM
–

And you know all of that based on what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:59 PM
–

While your "arguments" don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:57 PM
–

Values don’t really pass this way. They kinda do. It's not an instant thing, but it's the very mechanism that does transfer values to the younger generation. Many feminists are from conservative families. And several orders of magnitude more are from liberal and progressive families. But what you said is nothing unusual, it's just them rebelling against their situation and upbringing. The same way that there are more and more new conservatives who were raised in liberal and progressive families.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:31 AM
0

But that fits perfectly with what you said hypocrisy isn't: Not everything that are not equal is a double standard or hypocrisy There is no hypocrisy in what you mentioned. He just wants a great woman with low standards. The hypocrisy in your example would be if he claimed he only wants women who have high standards, but then asked her to lower her standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:17 AM
0

Can you give me an example of hypocrisy then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 03:20 PM
–

So it shouldn't be a problem to show a few examples. I mean, there's plenty of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:37 AM
–

maybe 20% of good guys Funny how that number keeps popping up :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:36 AM
–

and I want other women to know the truth too And what is this truth you are talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:34 AM
–

I believe my local media As one should. Never doubt your local media. If we lose trust in our local media, we will be confused and lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:12 AM
–

Pooping in the mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 10:02 AM
0

There no hypocrisy in wanting something you’re not giving yourself You literally defined hypocrisy. So, if we go by your reasoning, it's not hypocrisy when a fuckboy wants a chaste woman when he is ready to settle down?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:43 AM
–

Ergo, you are taking them for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:44 PM
–

I think that is what you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:32 PM
–

You are being intentionally daft. What you are describing is a "committed relationship", not dating. Dating is a process of trying to find someone for a committed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:00 PM
0

You're gonna have to ask OP that question since he's the one who chose to ask the question that way Yet you are the only one who interpreted it that way. Weird how that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:57 PM
5

First, you have no idea what women are thinking Nor do you have any idea what men are thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:39 PM
1

To me a relationship is doomed when waiting for sex is something one party imposes on the other rather than a preexisting commitment the two have in common. How is he imposing anything if he is properly informing them (like he said he would)? My SO is equally on board with waiting until marriage. And how did you know that you are both on board? Did you "impose" it on him, and he caved? Or did you communicate beforehand to get to an agreement (like OP said that he would do as well)? Neither of us…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:34 PM
2

The mirror!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:03 PM
1

Yes, I'm including all of that. So, what is your choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 01:19 PM
1

If you have two options: 0 attention and Lots of attention that also includes some obese guy double my age is imagining me sucking him off What is your choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:51 AM
3

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:49 AM
3

How did you manage to not address a single one of his points?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:49 AM
0

Great, so we can agree that I don't argue either of these positions. You literally just did, 1 comment prior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:34 AM
1

You definitely have the wrong flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:17 AM
0

Literally just being a low bmi And what % of people do you think that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 07:21 AM
3

You literally described the inappropriate thing happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 10:23 AM
1

Yeah, you could. Ask her. I'm really interested in how little fuck was given that the dude actually showed effort to appreciate her bio :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 02:22 PM
1

So far only one of the guys who wrote her an opener actually referenced it. And she probably didn't give a fuck about him :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 02:03 PM
6

Because everyone is oh so natural, honest, and truthful in person :)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:56 PM
7

okCupid isn't a looks based dating app. That's the point. Even on apps where people write detailed and expansive bios, looks take the center stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:48 PM
1

Well, that's one way of looking at things :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 10:26 AM
2

There is a world of difference in having your 12th kid at 40 and your 1st kid at 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 01:42 PM
1

So you just admitted age is a proxy for toxin accumulation.. Glad we agree.. I'm not sure what point you wanted to make here, but yeah, we agree. The older you get, the more your body is riddled with toxins, which in turn causes countless issues if you want to have children. Mind you, I'm not limiting myself to women here; it's the same thing with men, but women are impacted with this far more directly because they are the ones carrying a child during pregnancy. So that's a HUGE argument for hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:44 AM
1

The vast majority of people do not die young. So why did you use that as an example? And yeah, you can't control everything (sometimes you can't control anything at all), and people can die suddenly for a myriad of reasons. It's not really feasible to plan with potential unforeseen circumstances in mind, but age isn't that. Age is as predictable a signifier for the future as you are going to get. Regardless of whether you are dying in one year or 51 years, each day that passes is you being one d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:34 AM
0

I don't understand why you think that's an argument against OP when it perfectly strengthens his point. Imagine if your mom had you in her mid 40s. How old would you be if she died at the same age?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:45 AM
1

You can say that for a lot of things. It's not as good an argument as you might think.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:43 AM
0

It isn’t age. It literally is exactly that, and you presented it perfectly without even realizing it. Everything you described compounds the more you are exposed to it. When your body is older it means that you were exposed to toxins, microplastics, and whatever else for a much longer period of time. The compounding effect of that starts taking far more greater effect compared to when you were younger, together with general aging and weakening of the body, wreaks havoc on you. Now add pregnancy,…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:40 AM
1

You are only adding to OPs argument. Imagine if your parents had you in their 40s. They would have left behind a literal kid. But because they had you earlier, you managed to grow up, and they were with you for almost 30 years of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:25 AM
1

I don't think women's standards are too high, as long as there are people to meet them. What a silly statement. I don't usually generalize like this, but this is so typical of "some" women. I'm not sure if you meant it that way, but the way you wrote that completely disregards the other side. If a woman likes men who all, each and every one of them, find her completely invisible and there is literally 0 chance of her ending with any of them, you don't think her standards are too high?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:29 PM
5

What the fuck is wrong with you. Never even think of suggesting leg lengthening to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:58 PM
4

My opinion is that people from "your" side are far too quick to completely dismiss any grievances that run counter to your own perspective. That said, there are some really unhinged people, some people who never tried anything at all but are talking like the world is ending, some people who are really over the top, exaggerating everything, but there are also a lot of posters here with negative but level-headed views. Yet they all get painted with the same brush. Both sides base their opinions on…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:17 PM
2

Are you convinced that you’re correct? Could you be wrong? I haven't stated my opinion. I just asked the question to the commenter, to paraphrase, why he thinks he is qualified to think that he understands "how most relationships work".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:33 AM
2

based on the reality I see You never stop to think that the "reality" you see might be a simple selection bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:22 AM
2

I am here to convince people that this ideology does not understand how most relationships work. Based on what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 02:27 PM
2

and be active and eat healthy just like women when they are trying to concieve Really :D
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 12:04 PM
3

Unempathetic, manipulative, and sociopathic behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:23 PM
1

Would you call out your friend if he was like "Look at that hog, OINK OINK!!" towards a random gravitationally gifted woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 11:46 AM
–

I liked you so much more when you had brain damage that caused you to write in bullet points. What happened, man!?!?!?!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 10:35 AM
3

I'm glad you find yourself funny. That's great for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:31 AM
5

Your Joke Maker over 9000 could seems to need some tweaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:27 AM
3

Really? There is not one mention of the word "friend" on that wiki article you mentioned above. It couldn't be that you are arbitrarily making up metrics for measuring EQ precisely because the commenter above you is completely correct, could it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:06 AM
1

How would u do this in a more empathetic way? You can't, that's the point. It's the behavior itself that is completely unempathetic and sociopathic; there is nothing you can do to make it not so. It's like asking, "Is there a more empathetic way to do a premeditated murder of an innocent?"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:53 AM
-1

So how is that a stand-in for the rest of society?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 05:24 PM
1

That's the equivalent of saying, "Billionaires are a great stand-in for what an average person would do when they're not forced to do other things by poverty."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 02:06 PM
8

Did he need to marry her in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:38 AM
20

Yet he married botox with legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:10 AM
2

I wasn't criticizing you. I just find it fascinating how this works :D Everyone is using the term with full expectation that everyone else interprets it exactly the same way when in reality everyone has different interpretation. I mean, even you used Source as an explanation of the term that has the picture of an older gentleman that looks NOTHING like the one you initially posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:50 PM
5

The schrodinger's dad bod. Nobody knows what it is or what it looks like until exactly one woman defines it. Then that becomes "the dad bod" that is completely different from every other dad bod defined by all the other women :D
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:39 PM
5

I don't agree with this one. Is attraction all about sexual to men? What about emotional attraction? The initial attraction, yeah, mostly. The same thing with women, no matter how much you try to push the "demisexuality is oh so common" narrative. Regardless, I don't understand how you can interpret it any other way than the commenter you quoted. If you have 2 people and one of them gets more by investing less, then you are favoring that person one way or another. I don't know what you don't agr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:34 PM
4

That is what you wrote. I pursue relationship with men I lust for. And then this: I don't get sexual feelings to men if we are not deeply emotionally connected That's called contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:27 AM
4

You obviously have no idea what demisexual means. You wouldn't be lusting for someone unless you have a deep connection with them if you are a demisexual person. It has nothing to do with the act of sex itself, but with sexual feelings towards a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:47 AM
3

Relationship started as enthusiastic sex is outlier. Most sex happens after 6 or 7th date according to the study According to what study? I have no idea what you are referring to. Btw, did I claim otherwise? My only point was that asexuals and demisexuals are outliers. Demisexual is actually the norm not the outliers No, it isn't the norm; it's as much of an outlier as it gets. Having sexual desire (not necessarily indulging in it) before having a deep connection with someone is common. The oppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:26 AM
3

There are demisexuals and also asexuals. Pointing to outliers never really boosts your argument as you think it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:49 AM
-2

So people are disagreeing with her because she is a woman and not because she could also be stupid and wrong (which is always an irony considering her handle)?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 05:31 PM
2

The person who did a misdemeanor but didn't get caught = serial killer energy. I think I understand you now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:53 PM
-1

Thinking that the only reason another woman can have a vastly different worldview than your own is because she is autistic is pretty autistic in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:49 PM
3

You need proof that he was stupid enough to get caught?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:41 PM
3

They are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 09:53 AM
4

With the caveat that women are the greatest supporters and enforcers of patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:26 AM
2

I suggest you read the article with a bit more understanding. It does not say what you think it says.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:31 AM
1

Is HIV the only STD? Btw, you can treat HIV to such a degree now (if diagnosed early enough) that you can live completely normally with it and you can actually lower the amount of HIV in your bloodstream to the levels of it not even being transmissible anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:28 AM
3

And some people like eating shit. The word "some" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 01:06 PM
8

I'm fairly sure not one woman who has an ick for bi men takes that into consideration. Women would rather sleep with a man who slept with 100 women, but would throw up at the thought of sleeping with a man who had sex with a man once in his entire life. So, no, STDs don't really play a role here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 01:03 PM
5

Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female D…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:57 PM
3

We can say "dyke" but not "female"? You can say both freely. Am I the only one who finds this weird? lol I find you weird for thinking about this more than 0.01sec.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:51 PM
7

Oddly specific. Are you sure you are talking about "them" and not you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:19 AM
7

Not even in the same realm of thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:38 PM
11

Still not even in the same universe as advocating for rape. But do go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:30 PM
1

same...team.... Of course. Today, when almost everything in the west is geared towards women, "Hey, we're the same team! Whatever benefits women, it also benefits men!" When it was the reverse, it wasn't "Hey, we're the same team! Whatever benefits men, it also benefits women!", but "PARTRIARCHY!!!! MISOGINY!!! DISCRIMINATION!!! THEY ARE HOLDING US (women) DOWN!!!" Funny how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:00 PM
4

It's nothing of the sort, it's just you not understanding what you are reading. The guy says: "Women aren't being shamed if they don't want to be with a fuckboy!" And you respond with: "But what about women being shamed if they do want to be with a fuckboy!" Only in your head is your reply a counter to the initial claim. In actuality, those are two completely unrelated statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 03:58 PM
3

But in what way is funding education or healthcare bad for men None of it is done FOR men, which was your initial claim. They aren't doing anything FOR men. They are doing everything for women, and if men happen to benefit in the process, like I already said, "oh well" is their stance in that situation. Let me ask you something. If we go back in time when there were 60% men and 40% women in colleges, and someone says, "We promise to increase funding for education!" and each and every program is …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:52 PM
3

Again, everything you listed is specifically to help women, and if it happens to include men, oh well. Colleges are currently 60% women and 40% men, and getting more skewed towards women each year. So, who exactly would free education help more? And when you take that percentages into consideration, who would benefit more from forgiving "predatory" college debt? And in the initial comment, you mentioned "free trade school classes". Funny how that happens now when there is more of a push to get w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:31 PM
3

You are listing talking points without explaining anything. Improvement in everything that you have written favors women more and is specifically done in such a way to improve the lives of women, and any improvements in the lives of men complete sideffect and never the main goal. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and ask you to just expand on the first 2 "points", healthcare and education. In what way do dems want to improve the lives of men in those aspects?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:04 PM
3

You are literally adding to his argument. Yeah, they are being shamed for NOT AVOIDING those men. But they wouldn't be shamed for avoiding them. What's so hard for you to understand there?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 01:24 PM
3

Yeah, your ebb and flow between lies and mistruths.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 01:21 PM
1

No. Oh come on :D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 01:14 PM
6

I will offer the atmosphere Oh well, I read this today.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:54 PM
3

Lefties and feminists generally want men to do well. What causes do they support that uplift men's lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:40 PM
1

😂 women just aren't that horny But they seem to be hungry 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:32 PM
1

Why the new account?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:54 PM
2

I, on the other hand, laugh about the irony of you laughing about the irony without even noticing it. Because, again, it's women who are perpetuating the notion that men contaminate anything they fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:25 PM
1

I feel like they’ll see me more as a person. You may be somewhat wrong about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:18 PM
1

Oh wow, so when it's about someone like you then it's ok to be annoyed, disappointed, to complain and to not like someone who rejects you. Competely different attitude then the one you usually project towards men's issues with women here. How interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:33 PM
2

It's a literal definition of hypocrisy :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:30 PM
3

The second part as well :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:23 PM
1

Are you equating homosexual men with animals, or am I misunderstanding something?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:22 PM
1

Neither will.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:15 PM
1

The input is "College Yes / No".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:40 AM
1

Because (as you may notice on this topic as well), many women equate trades with conservatism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:28 AM
0

It's going to be a very short lived relationship if someone can't keep pace with me intellectually. I want to be able to have complex and technical conversations, and I want them to be with someone who would actually understand it. I didn't do no.2 this morning, but then I read this. This was great for my morning bowel movement. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:21 AM
1

It's about level of intellect and formal education. Only an unintelligent person would equate college with intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:16 AM
1

And I know of several billionaires who don't have a college degree. So by your reasoning, it's better to not finish a college, you will become a billionaire :D Btw, those 3 are out of how many of their college colleagues who also have degrees in creative writing. Ask each of them how others from their college are doing today.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:08 AM
4

It's actually incredible! I'm so grateful for the existence of the Top 1% Commenter badge. You are literally all the same. The perfect image of a Medusa, individual snakes growing from the same stupid head.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:41 PM
7

I still have no idea what point you are trying to make. How does any of what you say tie in with the OP? Does the collapse of pill spaces have any actual meaning to what he was talking about? Do you think that his "radicalization of young men" theory is overblown? Do you think young men today are perfectly fine, and the loneliness and other things are just something that was being propped up here and on other subreddits discussing similar issues but in reality none of that was applicable to real…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:32 PM
1

And the ones they usually send to die? Guess which key demographic they send? You, they will send you. But you didn't answer my question what-so-ever. I mean, you did, partially, you consider the world less safe now compared to then. But I asked if you consider the world a better place now compared to before. Imagine this, if I randomly grab 1000 people from the population today, and 1000 from 1996 and ask them if are they happy and satisfied with their life, do you think more people from today …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:30 PM
2

Let me ask you a simple question. Do you think US (and world in general) is in a better place today compared to 1996 when the novel Fight Club was released?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:17 PM
3

I don't understand the point you are trying to make here. Are you saying that male / female relationship today are in a much better state now than several years ago when r/TheRedPill and r/incels were a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:08 PM
2

Maybe you should study the exact same thing you are advising him to study.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 12:27 PM
7

Make the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 11:09 AM
8

So, there are no systematic societal issues with either misogyny or misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:50 AM
3

By your "reasoning" incels don't exist since r/incels doesn't exist anymore. Great reasoning btw. And an article about right-wing media declining that was written in summer 2024, just before Trump's re-election in a landslide victory of a republican candidate who also won the popular vote. Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:41 AM
5

This is yours: Restricting womens’ rights is wrong This is also yours: What’s right and what works aren’t always the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:37 AM
6

So neither exist, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:23 AM
1

We don’t really know why girls do better in school either. And that's that, right? When something benefits women, it's "Oh well, what can you do, it is what it is!" and we just leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:51 AM
2

Unearned wealth = successful :)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:48 AM
3

Grateful to have a dad who is consistent and loves me, because so few men and women have that. Many have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:27 AM
1

You say that after extensively dealing with me. I really don't understand the need to delete comments, but to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:43 AM
2

It's quite common for women to turn lesbian after being hit by a man. Yeah, nothing more common than that. Way too common. The commonest thing ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:38 AM
2

If we're just guessing, gay people historically experience more drama in their adult life after a lifetime of masking and pressure to conform to hetero/religious standards and to hide who they are from friends and family, i.e. their support system. A constant battle to fit in and fight natural inclinations is probably going to result in some internal and external strife. Now pair them up and double the problems. Is this not excusing? How would you classify this? Explaining? Extrapolating? Imagin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 03:34 PM
6

Men are conditioned from childhood to not put their hands on women ... That's the reason why the comment above the one you replied to asked "Why is it different for gay men then?" If men were conditioned only not to hit women, you would have increased instances of DV in gay relationships, when in actuality, those relationships have the lowest rates of DV.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 03:28 PM
2

Did I say that? I don't think I did. I specifically said that you are quick to judge men even when they haven't done anything other than just being autistic. Unless you consider them being autistic enough of a factor to warrant such a reaction. The question now arises, do you actually think of ALL autistic men as highly probable violent abusers? Which is closer to the truth that you perceive: - All autistic men are violent abusers just waiting for their opportunity to abuse someone - All autisti…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 03:19 PM
4

I'll ask you again. Do you believe sexual and social frustration justify the hatred and violence unpopular men exhibit towards typically developing people? You literally have the answer in my comment white on black (or black on white if you are an insane light theme andy): NO HELL NAW! And I completely agree with that. Feeling frustrated in that situation is completely understandable. Feeling like you are being treated unjustly could also be debated. But when it weers into a tendency for violent…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:59 PM
6

Judging by you and other women here (and probably most men as well), NO HELL NAW! And I completely agree with that. But when we flip genders, suddenly you have excuses galore ready at hand. Weird how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:35 PM
2

Such a convenient excuse for violence :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:30 PM
1

I thought it was fairly obvious :/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 12:47 AM
–

I always thought the standard of masculinity was more Clint Eastwood Wait till you hear about INTERNET!! OMG it will blow your mind!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:16 AM
–

Which you so easily filter out, and are left with more than enough decent matches and messages. As opposed to those 900 applications, and still nothing. I may be mistaken, but one of those scenarios seems infinitely better than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:07 AM
–

it will probably be someone else next month In your case, no, it won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:04 AM
–

Via the internet All of what you mention (and more) was going on before, but you didn't know about it because you didn't have the quoted part.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:01 AM
-1

The latter is usually said by men. I see you haven't met any women yet who have the ability to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:54 AM
-3

You mean like Biden in 2020 or some other kind of cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:36 AM
1

Would you like: A perfume that smells like shit or A piece of crap that smells like the best perfume And why?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:47 PM
11

That only works if you are a woman :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 12:36 PM
–

This does not extend to hugs. Why doesn't it? Why do you separate one kind of intimacy from another?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:54 AM
–

Don't act daft (you are acting, right?)! Would you use the same excuse for the lack of any kind of intimacy in a relationship (other than sex)? Meaning, you only get to hug or kiss or cuddle several times a year, but nothing whatsoever in the meantime?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:45 AM
–

This is what a perfectly healthy relationship looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:34 AM
–

We're not going to be upset that someone doesn't want to have sex. Very easy to say that something isn't a problem when you don't have that problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:32 AM
–

Would you use the same excuse for intimacy in the form of kissing, hugging, cuddling and stuff like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:29 AM
0

when men claim that women’s standards are unreasonable Did he do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:23 AM
0

Do you think it's acceptable to suggest that that is the level of cleanliness that he is ok with when nothing in his comment suggested as such?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:48 AM
0

That's not the world I want to live in. But you are living in that world every single day.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:17 AM
3

I live the life of a never-fat plain girl. Which is still light years away from the experience of a never-fat plain guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 10:49 PM
1

Anyone who’s been around a nerd CEO, fat comedian or ugly rock musician knows there’s a way to improve your genetic hand I use that exact argument when mentioning Barack Obama in some discussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 03:24 PM
0

I doubt any woman with a high-flying career would be very interested in me at first face Why do you think that, considering the fact that you are currently with a woman of high status?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:10 PM
–

What’s the point being in a debate sub if your just going to assume everyone is lying? Mirror?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 12:47 PM
1

Why is it given that we are talking about those women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:53 AM
3

And what are those children supposed to learn from watching Adolescence in school?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 10:32 AM
2

It only requires sperm in vagina, which can literally be done as simply as putting sperm on your finger or a baster and popping it up there. Way thinner than a penis. Hahahaha, literal equivalent of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTTRVAH8zsc
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:37 AM
–

It usually has nothing to do with our “energy.” Neither does Big dick energy :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:26 AM
–

The equivalent concept is "girl boss" or "boss babe" No, it isn't. That's how girls are gassing themselves up. If men are using that, more often than not, it's not in a positive context.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:22 AM
–

I'm not! I'm just suggesting you use the opportunity to dole out your "advice" when the opportunity presents itself because you are, as you said, an opportunist!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 09:49 PM
3

Of course it isn't. There is definitely something wrong there. But that's the reason I called you out. You were skirting around the issue, while it's obvious that the only context that information will have is negative and none other.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:03 PM
1

Doesn't this run contrary to the commonly held view on this sub that very sexually experienced men (aka Chads) are bigger misogynists than sexually inexperienced men? You literally don't understand what's written there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:39 PM
3

Of course, you don't do that, god forbid I even suggest something of the sort. My general point was that the next time a woman is sharing some horrific abuse experience, and you happen to witness it, use that opportunity (since you are an opportunist) to remind her to choose better.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:30 PM
2

Exactly, just like women who get used and abused. That's why I said you need to forward your "advice" to them as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:21 PM
3

What exactly was the issue there?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:58 PM
-1

If they are both, for example, 6, divorced father is so far at the front of the queue he won't be able to see the other guy behind him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:48 PM
1

But if you don't have clear rules when you apply/don't apply equality/equity, don't you think saying: Why should it? Equality/equity does not apply to all areas of life. is quite reductive when you can use that "argument" towards any grievance ever by anyone ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:00 PM
6

Who gets to decide where it should or shouldn't be applied?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:27 PM
0

My mistake, I framed it wrong. When I said "never-married single guy looking for those same things" I specifically meant those who are having trouble flings and relationships = "never-married single guy looking for those same things but having trouble finding them". I honestly think that a recently divorced dad would be at the front of the queue compared to those guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:17 PM
2

Because they broke up! So there are generally hurt feelings on both sides. Only some people are adult enough to say “we both made mistakes and it ended”. Well, you laid out the perfect reason why not to date those women (and men) then. Why would you try to have a relationship with a person unable to take on even the basic responsibility for the end of something like a marriage with someone you have a child with? What am I supposed to expect from that person in a new relationship then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:27 AM
4

The same is true for single fathers. Completely the opposite. Regardless of what you think, preselection is a thing. A divorced guy with a kid(s) in his 30s will have a much easier time getting women for flings and relationships than a never-married single guy looking for those same things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:14 AM
3

Perfect advice for women who are abused and raped in their relationships. You should forward it to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:05 AM
3

I’ve literally never observed that to be true, even anecdotally. In my social circle if you date a single mom then those are her kids & yours too permanently. Period full stop. You are talking about dating, and he is talking about a new marriage. And I've literally only observed the thing he is saying. In each marriage where either one got remarried, they had at least 1 child together.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:55 AM
2

In more words than necessary, you just said, "Yeah, there is something wrong with that person."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:42 AM
1

Do you believe in the different levels / amount of love? Or will you use the cop-out "different kind of love"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:52 PM
8

So women must mature to give a fuck about man's character? Am I understanding you correctly? Are you saying women don't give a fuck about man's character until they mature?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:58 AM
2

No, just not normal. No, it's implied (by women) that something must be wrong with you. How can you be charitable with that kind of characterization?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:56 AM
5

Well, yes. Or, to be precise, one could interpret your comment as "all women don't like the same things".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:36 AM
3

But the implication is that it's bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:35 AM
6

Seems like whoever is doing the grooming is really bad at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:31 AM
9

You are saying women can smell money and stability when they mature. How convenient :D
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:27 AM
5

Looking back ... And when did that "looking back" happen? Right now, when it suits your argument to completely reframe something you yourself wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:18 AM
7

I'm inexperienced so I don't think it would be sporting of me to shame a man for it. This is the issue right here, and you don't even notice it. It shouldn't be conditional on your inexperience; you should simply not do that, regardless of your experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:09 AM
7

By that same vein, aren't then women without children completely useless?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:01 PM
–

I’d take a break and let nature run its course. I believe that everything happens at the right time That works for women. That doesn't work for men. If men are passive there will never be "a right time". You are looking at things from a female perspective and trying to apply that to the male experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 12:43 AM
–

The overhead bin is too tall for most women by design. Yes, by GOOD DESIGN. If you have 2 equally sized groups (as in both have close to an equal number of members) of people, and one group is significantly taller on average compared to the other group, who do you model for when deciding the height of the OVERHEAD (meaning something that is standing above you; meaning a whole ass person is supposed to "comfortably" fit below it) compartment? The correct answer is: You design for the taller group…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 05:10 PM
1

It's not that deep, really. Having a self-deprecating handle is a selfown, simple as that. And btw, I never understood this as an argument: but also, because a dude with a small/ smaller dick who DOES NOT see sex as mostly = piv, will be considered a much better lover to a huge portion of women than a big dick guy who thinks all sex is putting it in quick and jackhammering Why are people always comparing with small dick foreplay and cunnilingus GOD with a 60IQ big dick? Why not compare small dic…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 04:14 PM
1

No no no, you are the penis sleeve expert, I am fully on-board with your judgement! I'm so sorry for speaking out of term, will not happen again your penis sleeve highness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:54 PM
1

Did I imply that? I don't think I did. I was just mocking your "solution" that would work on 1% of women at most.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:38 PM
3

It doesn't. But you are pointing at the comment of a dude and saying "HA, YOU JUST DID A SELFOWN!" all the while him having a small dick beta as a handle. Seems kinda superfluous to do that considering that every comment he makes will be under the handle small dick beta :/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:36 PM
4

probably 4 inches it was pretty small So 7" then :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:28 PM
8

In spiderman: With great power comes great responsibility! In PPD bullet points guy: With great dick comes great mental illness!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:27 PM
–

Do you not realize what his handle is?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:05 PM
5

And how long is your phone :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:00 PM
–

And are those posts about instances of shaming in real-life situations? Does something being a post means that everything and all it references is online only?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:38 PM
1

Because all women get instantly wet at the mere mention of penis sleeve, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:35 PM
–

Why do you keep focusing on the "online"? Nowhere in your OP did you mention that you are specifically referring to shaming people online, so why are you replying to me with that context now?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:38 AM
–

Perfect example :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 11:52 PM
-1

You completely misunderstood the quoted part. The issue isn't the disconnect between your own opinion and "studies". Studies aren't denying your experience, they are generalizing based on available data. The issue is that you (as in women here) are denying studies because of your own singular experience. Your argument is that studies won't ever be able to match your own experience but you think that your own experience is enough to generalize it to the entirety of the population. That's the pure…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:06 PM
1

I have 200K karma as, on a few occasions, I've been marginally funny. Really? My guess would be a lot of not-really-funny circlejerking in karma farming communities and reposting someone else's funny content for free validation. But I could be wrong, I don't know, I'm still 500 karma below knowing something. I'm sure that you would also believe someone who has 1000 photos on Instagram that they don't care about their Instagram :)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:51 PM
3

If she wants more girth, just be girthier :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:31 PM
1

You wouldn't have 200k karma if you didn't give a shit what people on reddit think about you :/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:17 PM
1

Yeah, that's how things work. Pick one you like and ignore 7 others. And pretend like that one represents all :)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:16 PM
0

There's a bunch of sub problems in here, but I don't think the expense is as hard as all that. It's funny how you start your comment with this and then go on and write several paragraphs why it's practically impossible to change anything because of how much it will all cost :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:28 PM
2

You are making a mockery of shaming :D !! But seriously now, that's not how shaming works and never did. You aren't virgin shaming a woman who had 100 partners (as in shaming her for being a virgin the same way men are shamed). It's kinda telling that you are strawmaning from the get-go. Shaming is setting up an environment in which it's acceptable and encouraged to castigate someone for certain behaviors/characteristics. And completely opposite of what you said, it's practically required that y…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:09 PM
-1

The question here is, why are you watching those things :/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 08:15 AM
29

You don't see the irony in your comment? If it's a mirror image of something you detest, shouldn't you detest it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:26 PM
6

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:12 PM
10

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:09 PM
4

That's what you got from his comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:55 AM
1

Should I assume this vicious women-hating rant is representative of the entire male gender? Is that a rhetorical question? Aren't you doing that constantly?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:35 AM
14

Would you be struck down right where you stand if you just once don't reply in bad faith?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 09:57 PM
6

I would never advocate for the intentional reduction of the human population Oh, how nice of you for not being a genocidal maniac. You should be really proud of yourself! but if it begins to happen organically through a reduction in reproduction, then I’m not going to pretend like that’s a bad thing. You really don't see any issues in population reduction in the current societal systems?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 08:15 AM
-1

So by your own logic His own logic is your own lack of logic :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:08 AM
2

adapted They did? How? From what I remember, crashouts continued until the end of lockdowns. Or do you consider that as adapting?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:04 AM
3

Why are you so defensive if none of this is about you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:01 AM
1

That's right, never miss an opportunity to shame and blame :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:42 AM
9

most will admit they want sex more than love. I've observed the complete opposite of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:16 AM
3

Is it possible that physically attractive guys are more confident and that increased confidence allows them to be more relaxed and humorous? The same thing said by the more attractive person will be perceived as more humorous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:14 AM
5

What else do they say?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:08 AM
6

It is not written in your post because you are "misdirecting from meaningful feelings". I'm arguing directly with your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:43 PM
2

Continuing on being intentionally (hopefully) daft. Lonely in a way that she wants a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:37 PM
12

The men don't say that they are lonely because they can't insert their dick into something. They just say "lonely", and you, conveniently, interpret that as "lonely because they can't insert their dick into something". That's completely on you. You are misdirecting from the feeling of men longing for a romantic partner to exactly what you are doing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:31 PM
4

So why are you doing exactly that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:26 PM
12

You are being intentionally daft right now. Do you want us to believe that you've never heard a woman say that she is lonely for the very reason that she has no romantic partner (while having tons of friends and family)??
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:23 PM
3

Lowest? Really? I'm kinda curious: what else do you consider low-priority but higher priority than male loneliness?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 10:03 PM
1

But, like I said, your story has literally 0 (zero) to do with what we are discussing here. The black liberal boyfriend is worried about their compatibility because of stark differences in their values and politics and he is bringing up those worries in a reasonable and rational way. On the other side is his girlfriend who ISN'T MAGA but is republican and is pretty reasonable in her stances as well. And he is worried that those differences will be too hard to overcome going further (marriage + k…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:00 AM
3

I'm not assuming anything about you since I don't know anything about you. I just fixed your faulty analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:45 PM
1

You do realize that Reddit rounds out the hour once you hit the 60 minutes since posting. Like there’s 60 minutes in an hour. Hover the cursor over that rounded time and tell me what you see :) Like they say, every day is a learning experience. Idk what your problem is, but seriously go talk to a therapist about this weird “gotcha” thing you’re trying to do. Trust issues this extreme are insane my dude. You should also go to help with your pathological lying habit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:34 PM
2

Tellin' on yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:21 PM
3

Yeah, that was some hilarious shit oh lord.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:19 PM
3

The completely realistic real-life dilemma strikes again :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:18 PM
0

I wasn’t lying. You were. Like I explained, it's easy to check (assuming you made the comment I replied to right after checking that topic). But I believe that the “newest” comments even 40 minutes later would be different, because duh. Yeah. They are different. And that's exactly why I scrolled down to the timestamp of your comment and checked comments prior to that to verify what you are claiming. And I verified that you are "lying out of your arse". Pro tip: Lie about things that don't take j…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:55 PM
3

You shouldn't have shared so much of your own situation if you want to make these "holier than thou" comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:47 PM
1

Because she is clearly conflating many subgroups of men. The mistake you are making is that you think she is doing this unconsciously.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:37 PM
3

It's a bad analogy. The old you was selling (I'm going to embellish your "worth" a bit now) Porsche Carrera GT for 1500 to lucky buyers but the current you is selling 2013 Dodge Avenger for 3000.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:36 PM
1

Hm.. Are you sure you are blue :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:17 PM
0

When I said I checked, I actually checked the comments just before the timestamp when you wrote your comment that I replied to. And that was the reason I said that you are "lying out of your arse" because you were actually "lying out of your arse" and anyone else that wants to bother to check can also see that you are "lying out of your arse".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:09 PM
0

I swear, the word "correlation" really brings out internet psueds. Only if used flippantly like you used it, otherwise this internet pseud would stay put. I didn't make any claim that feminism is what caused society to become prosperous, I pointed out that the two correlate. So what was the point of mentioning correlation if you didn't want to imply causation as well? This is not sufficient to prove that feminism is the cause of that prosperity Correct. but it is sufficient to disprove the oppos…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 12:58 PM
1

Kinda ironic considering that the study was done just before covid hit, considering everything that happened afterward regarding free speech :)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:17 AM
-2

Categorizes something as "deeply unserious" and afterwards makes the most outlandish "correlation =/= causation" claim with utmost seriousness :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:04 AM
0

Expected level of discourse on PPD when confronted with arguments you yourself asked for :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:00 AM
0

Logic 101
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:47 AM
0

For a while I was on my bf's insurance while I was broke and finishing school. He made the final say on decisions regarding our financial situation because he made 4x what I did. That's how that works. Would you have stayed with him if he did something like what that woman from the OP did to her husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:46 AM
1

What do you think the ratio is of women immersed in woke/elite culture compared to those who aren't?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:40 AM
0

I just check and you are lying out of your arse.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:01 AM
1

That has 0 common points with the OP. When people suggest to flip genders they usually mean "keep the guardrails of the story, just replace gender of the main characters". In this case it would be the following (now I won't even include the shortage to illustrate how fucking insane this is even without that detail): A man is the only one working and bringing in the money. His wife has been unable to work for the past 6 years because of her medical condition that requires constant medication. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:00 AM
1

You will be surprised to the answers to these 2 questions. Why would she be surprised? Her comment clearly indicates what she thinks is an answer to those questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 08:18 AM
1

Great. Has nothing to do with downvoting content.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 08:03 AM
2

I realize that is not your scene, just like nightclubs and raves would not have been your scene in the past. Completely irrelevant to what we are discussing here, but you guessed that right. I dabbled a bit, but definitely not my cup of tea. Which begs the question, why are you jealous of casual sex havers? Am I? How did you figure that out? I get that you want the sex Do I? How did you figure that out? but you do not want the lifestyle that goes with it The lifestyle of using inebriated and dru…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:21 PM
1

So you were expecting downvotes from users like myself who never downvotes anything? Kinda weird expectation :/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 12:41 PM
1

Being kind. Treating others with respect. Always trying your best with what you have. Being confident about being a completely normal, not a piece of shit guy? Yeah, that won't get you labeled as a "nice guy", not at all :D
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:02 AM
0

But why would you expect upvotes for something that is common sense? It's like making a topic that says "2 + 2 = 4 let's debate" and then being surprised when you don't get upvoted :/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:39 AM
2

What do you expect me to answer? Are you, as a woman, really suggesting, "Hey, there are tons of drugged and inebriated women you can have sex with at an electronica festival!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:34 AM
0

So drugged-up women are a freebie? Kinda weird sentiment coming from a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:08 PM
3

You expect upvotes for common sense? Ironically enough, that doesn't seem like common sense :/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:06 PM
1

He can also lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:04 PM
1

Most people also understand the syntagm "losing strategy".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:48 PM
1

You aren't speaking as a white person, you are speaking as a white woman. He is speaking as a cis white man. It's a very necessary distinction in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:46 PM
1

That's a lot of white men if you ask me. We should do something about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:44 PM
1

Irrelevant? No. But I also don't think things haven't changed at all in 25 years. You would need to present the case that things changed so drastically that it would make these stats incongruent with the current time. I mean you wouldn't take a survey about mobile phone usage 25 years ago to represent anything relevant for today; that's pretty obvious. But I couldn't point out any change that happened in the last 25 years that could affect the subject of this study to a meaningful degree. Actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 01:31 AM
5

It's almost 25 years old. How does that fact in any way influence the findings from the study? If you are implying that the findings are irrelevant to our current sociocultural climate, then you need to explain why you think that. In my opinion, nothing significant changed for this kind of data to be less relevant now compared to 25 years ago. The age range is limited, so it's not all women Neither is it all men. Do you have a reason to believe that in older age brackets things would be signific…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:21 PM
0

Feel free to disprove it. X being misinterpreted means very little unless you explain how it's misinterpreted.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:24 PM
3

I'm always appalled at what passes as science these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 07:51 AM
1

This is the same thing as using the stat "Women initiate 75% of divorces" without context. You can make everything fit your narrative if you leave out the proper context. You tend to do that a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:23 PM
4

The solution is to punish people. What's so weird about this? I mean that's how everything currently is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:11 PM
2

No. Statistics demonstrate that fathers who bother to care enough to seek full custody do so because they have the means and support system to take a child away from an abusive or neglectful mother. Most fathers do not bother going to court and very few cases are decided in court. Exactly! The statistics show that the only way for a father to win custody in court is when the mother is the spawn of satan. That way, the court MIGHT look favorably on the father's claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 03:49 PM
3

Tbh, I don't understand how bars are so much better than dating apps. I don't understand this, either. It's just one of those knowingly dishonest answers that no one further elaborates (because they have no arguments). Because, just like you said, you still pick based on appearance and minimal interaction. "But you have a chance to show off your personality!!!" Really? Not much of a personality if you can show it all in a few seconds of interaction that might or might not lead to further interac…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 02:34 PM
4

They don't have the burden of making the 1st move, and confidence is one of the most important attraction triggers for that 1st move. I mean, even as a man, you will generally want a confident woman rather than someone completely unsure of herself. There are very few things as annoying as a woman CONSTANTLY asking for validation about her self-image (as ironic as that seems) and about your feelings towards her. But women are "allowed" to express that confidence at their own convenience, while a …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 02:23 PM
2

Why wait for them to die? Just divorce them at an opportune moment!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:16 AM
-1

That wasn't his phrasing. You yourself are implying that by thinking the opposite of hedonism is misery. That's your mistake, not his.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:11 AM
3

nothing inherently wrong with shallow people Highly dependent upon context in which you are shallow. Is it wrong to hire someone just for being good looking but far less qualified than all the other candidates for the job?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:49 PM
3

True confidence ultimately comes from genuinely believeing you're a person who's worth knowing, worth dating (if single), who can achieve most things you set out to do, and it comes from within, not just because people validate you - because someone can always make a cutting remark, no matter how meritoriously you achieve things in life. It's ultimately a self-assessment, rooted in reality. You need to genuinely believe in your own self-assessment but only IF it's rooted in reality and that = tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 10:25 AM
1

they can't recognize a great plan I agree with this completely. But what OP is talking about is NEVER a great plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:56 AM
11

It's the equivalent of telling a person suffering from clinical depression to "Just stop being depressed!"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:55 AM
1

Shy men. Not shy people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 02:33 PM
3

Are trans black people black?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:20 PM
–

Just chill honey bunny! I was just jokling :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:19 PM
3

You struck a nerve with the reality. And with the judges that gave you 10 for your mental gymnastics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:16 PM
–

You mean exgf?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:02 PM
–

Again, how is that nazism?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:22 AM
–

And also plastic as fuck :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:05 AM
–

Man's baggage is inexperience. A woman's baggage is experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:01 AM
–

Suicidemaxxing!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:59 AM
–

Those pesky republicans!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:57 AM
–

How do you figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:56 AM
1

The irony of saying "don't deny your reality" when it's an opinion or worldview that you agree with, while you would be completely judgmental and "AAAA ANECDOTAL AAAA" if it was something you don't agree with :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:52 AM
1

And where do those observations form? Do they have a physical manifestation (like a cherry) where you just pick them up or do they form somehow differently? Let me ask you like this, if your character is 80% nurture, why are ALL (literally all of them, even identical twins which is the weirdest shit ever) the brothers that I know (meaning my friends, family, and acquaintances who have brothers) so fucking different? I won't even go into the brother/sister differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:37 AM
3

Nope. Trans women are women. No amount of mental gymnastics is going to change that. You get all 10 for that gymnastic performance!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:24 AM
4

He can. I think most men would more prefer woman with aids than a trans woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:23 AM
1

And where does that come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:11 AM
1

He illustrates that your assortative mating strategy fails in this case. And it's not a tiny bit of men that fall into the shy category.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:08 AM
2

Can she pass well as a pregnant woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:02 AM
1

So you are into vomiting on the feet first?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:56 AM
1

Are you mansplaining about dick size now?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:54 AM
1

:D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:52 AM
1

Cut me some slack, would you?! I've been banned for a month. The number of things you have written that could cause a brain aneurysm and I couldn't reply to any of it! This is the tamest I could muster as a reply. I'm actually quite proud of myself, was sure that I would get myself banned on the first day out of the jail :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:35 AM
4

So can you help me be less delusional. Put a pic of a man you think is her looksmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 06:47 PM
1

Women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 06:12 PM
1

How? I think the complete opposite would happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 05:13 PM
5

Nothing is more sexy for a woman than a man measured and rational! Uf!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:38 PM
4

It's fairly obvious. I've personally never met a right-wing man (at least in person) that had anything positive about them. That's such an extreme way of thinking that it's out of this world. You are generalizing for large swaths of people by using total absolutes. Where/how exactly is this trait being displayed for you to notice? It's fascinating how something like this can be in a blind spot for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:35 PM
4

So "most men you see are attractive" are 3 men that piqued your interest :)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:26 PM
3

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:25 PM
6

If you showed a picture of an obese man on a beach and said "According to true rate discussion, this man is disgusting and obese." you would have the exactly same reaction as you get for this woman. Even worse probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 03:09 PM
9

This has nothing to do with being picky. She is objectively medically obese. That's all I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:52 PM
3

But she is rejecting them, so what's the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:51 PM
6

She is obese though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:44 PM
1

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:43 PM
4

By most you refer to the ones you actually notice :D When in reality, you actually don't notice vast majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:42 PM
1

I have no idea how that has anything to do with my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:10 PM
–

For whatever. It would be funny seeing things go full circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:09 PM
1

Big blue balls bias :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:08 PM
–

I would really love to see DEI white man hire :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:44 PM
1

I support getting a test. I do not support the ability to accuse your partner of that without consequences. Then you would be ok with a setup where you can't do STI test without the knowledge of your spouse?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:41 PM
–

So we need DEI for hiring men before anything else in caregiving, do you agree with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:20 PM
1

I actually agree with that. But only if the father wants that kid. Otherwise, fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:10 PM
0

Sensible :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:20 PM
–

So you are ok with 100% of no men, but the rest is the actual problem :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:13 PM
1

That argument doesn't hit as hard coming from someone who is ok with killing a baby because it was called a fetus 3 days ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:10 PM
1

Didn't know begging is a good strategy for getting sex :/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:07 PM
1

The control is quite literally, in your own sentence, the man’s. The control is, quite literally, in the hands of the woman. If she is "letting" or "not letting" something happen she has complete control of the situation. The intent on the side of the man (if we assume that everything is to be consensual) is completely irrelevant because the woman is the one making the final decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:03 PM
2

Not bodily autonomy What happens if a man rejects paying child support?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:00 PM
3

I was kinda hyperbolic, but your height is average. If we are to believe you, your face is average as well (I have no idea). But having a decently solid/muscle build is not average in a nation where 70% of people are either overweight or obese, and a great majority of the rest of that 30% are probably built normally with no noticeable muscle mass. You are upper middle class, do you honestly think that = average in the us currently? And you have a strong social life and support, do you honestly t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 11:46 AM
11

You literally have no idea what average means. You are extrapolating population-wide conclusions based on you and your 5 friends. In the US, gym membership is 20% of the population. More than half of that is barely used, while half of the other half is relatively regular. So about 5% of the population goes to the gym regularly. In what universe is 5% of something representative of the average?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 11:41 AM
0

None of what you have written = Average. Literally none.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 09:26 AM
1

Both are completely useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 09:25 AM
1

A useless substack user does not an interesting data make.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 09:22 AM
7

and work out regularly You are not average. That's not average.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 09:17 AM
–

Nope, this is purely an issue of you not being able to understand things properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:59 PM
-2

No more or less telling than a person branding divorce as heartbreak.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:52 PM
–

There is a MONUMENTAL (pun intended) difference between not listing your height, and listing it at 5'4.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:46 PM
3

I don't believe that getting people to talk about consent is doable with your stupid app.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:43 PM
–

Change your height to 5'4 in the apps and see how many matches you would get then.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:42 PM
2

Oh sorry, I thought it couldn't be more useless. Guess I was wrong. That makes it even more useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:39 PM
–

If you can link anything about a woman saying she can only accept the tallest of men I’ll gladly read it Let's be serious, you wouldn't even glance at it, let alone read :D And why would I link something like that when I'm not claiming any of what you said here? I was debating on preference, not requirements. Don't project your inability to read with understanding onto me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:35 PM
–

Well unless you can grow a couple inches after puberty why dwell on it? Would you dwell on your baldness if you didn't have a hair system? Imagine not having anything to counter baldness and someone tells you "What's the point in dwelling on that?". Hypocritical much?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:28 PM
3

It just muddies the water. If you have an app that has the sole function of establishing consent between the parties but it can be voided at any point in time that is the most useless thing ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:20 PM
–

All three of my mums husbands have been shorter than her You think this is a good argument :D
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:15 PM
–

That women's preferences for men's height are just that: a preferences I know. The debate wasn't if it was a preference or a requirement, the debate was about what the actual preference is. The comment I initially replied to said that the preference is just "taller than her" while my position is "tall - as in taller than other men". If the preference was just "taller than her" then height would never be an issue and we would never discuss about it since almost all men are taller than almost all …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:52 PM
–

That depends on the woman. True. Everything is individual. Some people are coprophiles but can we really generalize based on their habits? We can't. But if you notice a pattern occurring more often than not, then I think it's kinda ok to generalize. If woman only ever went for the tallest man around They generally do. In a company of several men with similar attractiveness level, women will gravitate towards the tallest of the bunch. we wouldn’t have the literal millions of couples in every day …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:42 PM
–

You were a sour misanthrope and you finally realized that it's much better to just be sour misandrist :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:15 PM
–

But there are not enough tall guys. Really? I would have never guessed. So women compromise to get a partner. Really? I would have never guessed. Also women are in competition and the weaker contenders can't get the most desired men. Really? I would have never guessed. In any case, how is any of what you said relevant to my comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 12:55 PM
–

That's like saying "Money isn't everything" while being the top 1% of wealth. I would hazard a guess that the top 1% of height is much different from the bottom 1%. "Too tall" actually is a thing, extremes are always punishing, but your extreme is still EXTREMELY (pun intended) better than being on the opposite side of that spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 12:53 PM
–

Most woman do prefer men to be taller than them, but considering most men are taller than most woman that doesn’t seem like particularly hard standard. Because that's not the standard. No guy would have issues with height because there are swaths of women shorter than every guy out there. Women's preference isn't a guy taller than them, it's a tall guy, and a guy is considered tall when he is tall compared to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:41 AM
1

I don't know about him, but I think that there wasn't anything worthwhile after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:28 AM
1

How does that in any way relate to his comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:26 AM
0

Divorce rates have been declining for the past quarter century. Could you stop parroting this point if you don't know what it actually represents?!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:12 AM
1

Would you make analogies if you only had a 0.00001% chance of not making a completely shit analogy? Seems like you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:07 AM
0

I truly believe that experiencing domestic violence is part of becoming an adult, what you do with this in part makes you who you are. Some can't make it, this is life. Others thrive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:03 AM
5

Then it's null and void. So what's the point of the app then?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 08:56 AM
1

if my wife were to get sick or something and didn't want to for that reason I'd have no problem staying. The same probably goes for 90% of men. But in 99% of the cases, the dead bedroom isn't about that so that's completely irrelevant. I would otherwise have a CONVERSATION with her like an adult and go from there. You don't think those men (and women for that matter) had god knows how many conversations? Are you the first person who got the brilliant idea to talk to their partner? I would leave …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:59 PM
1

Would you stay with your partner if you were in a dead bedroom situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:37 PM
2

So you think cheating is okay, that is simply a moral issue we aren’t going to see eye to eye on. Nope, you are completely wrong about that. Have never, would never, under any circumstance. I find it abhorrent. But I'll continue to play devil's advocate in this case because I find this double standard (denying intimacy vs cheating) even more abhorrent. I expect people who feel this way to steer clear of monogamy or at least clearly state the second their partner stops putting out they’re thinkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:13 PM
1

I entered a relationship based on the notion that we are exclusive The same way he entered the relationship on the notion that he wouldn't be in a dead bedroom situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:35 PM
2

I find it perfectly acceptable that if one person isn't holding up their end of the deal (providing intimacy) that you as well can also not hold up your end of the deal (providing fidelity). Do you think it's fair to put the onus of the decision to leave the relationship on the person who was "wronged"? I'm more of an "eye for an eye" kinda guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:31 PM
2

Is intimacy part of that deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:12 PM
1

Would you apply that same standard if the person cheated and then you said: "Well, have you ever discussed that there should be no cheating?" Why is something taken for granted while something else needs to be discussed ad nauseam?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:10 PM
3

You enter a relationship based on the terms there’s no one else involved in the relationship. If there’s no loyalty, there is no relationship (unless you have DISCUSSED poly or open relationship) But if someone one-sidedly decides there will be no more intimacy in a relationship, doesn't that also mean that there is no relationship? The people in the relationship who DISCUSS their boundaries? Relationships are largely monogamous which is why i said “normally”. Normally you expect intimacy in a r…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 02:58 PM
-1

If no one is entitled to another one's body then you have no say if your partner seeks sex elsewhere if you deny intimacy. (not you you)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 02:18 PM
2

My husband, 99% of the time is willing to fuck, however, he will NEVER initiate... ever. It simply will not happen. No amount of talking about it has changed a thing. If you are comparing that to an actual dead bedroom situation we were discussing here than we literally have nothing to discuss further.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 02:01 PM
1

Hm isn't that like the default excuse when the woman is cheating :/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:21 PM
-1

If you're not happy with the amount of cheating because you are denying sex to your partner, then you need to communicate. If nothing changes, then leave. cheating just makes you a piece of shit and creates unnecessary hurt Denying your partner intimacy doesn't create unnecessary hurt?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:18 PM
4

You’re entitled to your partner’s loyalty though. Why? Those are normally the terms when you enter a monogamous relationship. Really? Who gets to determine what's the norm and what isn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:13 PM
2

Would you have the same advice for the wife if she was in a dead bedroom situation? Instead of "I must divorce him because this is unsustainable" how bout she thinks about how to arouse him so he doesn't ignore her sexually?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:09 PM
1

All I can say is: I never met anyone like her when I was younger, and if I had, my relationship history would definitely not have been so tumultuous in my early 20s. You can't know that. You changed. They (the women you cheated on) might have changed as well into someone even "better" than your wife. And you might have cheated on your wife if you met her when you were in your wilder years. You just can't know. You can just be happy with your current circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 11:24 AM
4

It's only crazy if you believe in a just world fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 11:10 AM
5

You are making it sound like that's all she's good for.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 09:30 AM
-4

Be honest (no reason to be mean) and we're fine. Why do you think you deserve honesty?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 12:42 PM
3

Just be yourself is as actionable as just be alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:03 AM
1

It is much rarer than before.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:28 PM
–

In my church (when I was still attending) old people who were never married remain single, widowed people remain single, and divorced people remain single. Not always, but almost every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:21 PM
–

Women are not a monolith!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:18 PM
–

Old people get married and find love ALL THE TIME! I have exactly one example of something that is happening ALL THE TIME.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:16 PM
1

Tell me you never watched Deliverance without telling me you never watched Deliverance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 12:35 PM
2

Can you explain the difference between fat acceptance and body positivity?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 12:20 PM
–

Do you understand what "taking things out of context" means?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:11 PM
–

( Patiently waiting for this to be taken out of context :D )
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:04 PM
2

You don't need to look any further than your own comments on this topic. Nothing in those comments qualifies as an intelligent answer/advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:57 PM
1

And what is representative of the "average" man?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:48 PM
2

I dont know what else to write Write nothing, please! At all! Ever again! PLEASE!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 01:06 PM
2

You are comparing emotional man to an abusive woman, kinda telling :)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:49 AM
1

The saddest of lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 12:04 AM
-1

Being a cum bucket for the rich = almost respectable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:55 PM
-1

No, you are being slow. Am I now? I think people reading this might think otherwise. I did not say she was eyeing up another man. Neither did I. You made that up. I guess you made up what I was saying. A pot calling the kettle black. Or a projection if we go by the newspeak. Because you think she was eying him/them up. Don't put that on me because I never said that. I have been on the other side as a young man, I was with three far more experienced women when there was a young man and I remember…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:52 PM
11

Day in and day out PPD seems more and more like a breeding ground for insanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 01:37 PM
–

Your life is so fucking sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:59 PM
1

The irony of equating reality with the contents of some random subreddit especially considering how often you see here "ppd is not real life" or some variant of it, but somehow r/GenZ actually is real life :D Even more ironic, I'm browsing through r/GenZ and seeing zero posts where people express frustration about the dating landscape. I guess we have different definitions of "a lot." My definition is closer to "the majority of something," while yours seems to be closer to "almost none at all." …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:19 PM
5

Based on ...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:05 AM
–

You are a piece of shit, but I absolutely understand the reasoning behind your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:00 AM
3

You are projecting too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:59 AM
5

And his is another. What makes either of you correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:58 AM
9

Work on reading before you reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:43 AM
–

Your comment is the perfect example of what OP is talking about. Thank you for your contribution. Please continue to support his point in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:35 AM
4

Really? In a Scandinavian culture where there is "A big difference between here and the USA is that women are more likely to acknowledge how much their men help them, you hear less about man-flu and the youngest generation of women seem to be concerned about being emotionally supportive to their men." there is still patriarchy abound? How convenient that whenever your wife looks at a man (for whatever reason) that she deems powerful and influential, it's the patriarchy that made her do it. The i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:29 AM
–

That goes for your job, not your social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 11:58 PM
1

There is a world of difference between a fat woman and a short thin attractive woman. I didn't ask about the latter. I only asked about a not fat woman. And if you honestly think women carry weight worse than men, shouldn't then a really obese man = fat woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 11:51 PM
3

short man = fat woman bald man = fat woman unattractive man = fat woman fat man = fat woman At what point does a man graduate from being the equivalent of a fat woman? What are the minimum requirements for a man for that to happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:21 PM
2

I am against the Selective Service and the draft for both sexes, but at this point the SS is an inconvenience, not a credible threat to every young man's way of life. There were probably plenty of stupid Ukrainian feminists spouting the same shit just before the Russian invasion. Funny thing is, those same stupid Ukrainian feminists could just leave the country at will if they wanted to (and they all wanted to) while the men had to defend it. Oftentimes they conflate it with the draft despite th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:14 PM
1

As opposed to the left which does what exactly :/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:04 PM
1

I also don't suffer schadenfreude; I'm not a monster like red pilled men. It's incredible, I almost believe you believe that :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 05:56 PM
1

Every other advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 05:47 PM
3

The equivalent of a short bald guy is an overweight woman. Really? And what's the equivalent of an overweight guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 05:44 PM
1

There is a name for that :) Btw, do you think he would do all of that without sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 06:08 PM
2

I don't think I would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:12 PM
2

You are wrong. Most families having children have more than one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:58 PM
4

What a stupid notion :D
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:56 PM
1

Would you accept romance without commitment?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:51 PM
1

It would be interesting to have a threat where RP men thinks constitutes as abusive behaviour from a man. It would be interesting to have the same thing by feminist women so we can compare.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:50 PM
1

Oh the irony :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:48 PM
8

There should be ZERO examples of this regardless of the gender of the person. ZERO. Do you understand? Z E R O!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:17 PM
5

Why do you act surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:06 PM
3

Only if sarcastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:48 PM
4

Who is the predator in that scenario?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:15 PM
-4

I think you don’t need to outright state the expectation. It’s going to hurt your prospects. Goes against everything said here by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 09:34 AM
–

Which makes things even worse. You could maybe wave it off as "they are just radfems, ignore them", but it's not like that, it's women from all walks of life having the same talking points as radfems used to have. Seems like mainstream now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:27 AM
3

Who is a "woman like that"? Are you a "woman like that"? Is the woman I want to approach a "woman like that"? Is there a way for me to know who a "woman like that" is? Do you understand our conundrum now?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 09:22 AM
1

Because they are not connected... Who is claiming they are connected? I'm asking you why that happens. Let's first get this out of the way. But if that person had lived and chosen to drop out of college, they would not have been committing murder by dropping out of college... I have no fucking idea what you wanted to say here so I'll continue on to the relevant point: If an 18 year old about to start college is murdered, everyone will decry that a young person just starting college was killed! Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:43 PM
3

Exactly. Just like a woman willingly engages in sexual activities, how is that being used for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 02:26 PM
1

Are you not asking why pregnancy is relevant or valuable, if abortion is not murder? Yes, that's exactly what I'm asking. Can you answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:46 PM
1

I have no idea what you are asking here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:41 PM
-2

This strikes me as such a bizarre position if you believe abortion is killing a child. Yet if someone murders a woman who was pregnant, EVERYONE (every pro-choice person) will decry how a pregnant woman was killed! But why do that if her pregnancy status is irrelevant? She lost her life and nothing else of value was lost. And yet ...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:37 PM
-2

" We’re sorry, the page you are looking for either doesn’t exist or may have moved. Try using the search to find what you were looking for. "
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:33 PM
–

The return of "My mother and step-father are completely financially illiterate morons" OP. Why shame your family once when you can shame them many times :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:23 PM
–

You chose categories in which men spend more and the conclusion is that men spend more in those categories. What a scholarly brain we have here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:20 PM
2

Are you serious right now :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 12:15 PM
-3

That's why financial abortion is something that should be done during the pregnancy :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:55 AM
-2

Once a child exists, it needs to be taken care of. Once a woman decides to carry a child to term, she can feel free to take care of it. It was her decision. The same way it would be her decision for that child to not exist at all. I am baffled how dudes don't understand this - we already have a fatherless epidemic, where "single mothers" are "ruining men", and yet men continue to want ONLY mothers to raise the kids they make, so they can more comfortably not provide for their own children. Why d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:53 AM
5

We should judge the entire gender based onthe actions of a minority Does that only work for gender? Can we generalize on other things like that :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:25 AM
6

You are completely missing the point. You don't deal with widespread societal issues by telling an individual how to try to avoid the issue. The individual might dodge it, but the issue remains. I'm going to make an outlandish example to illustrate my point. Imagine if rape became so acceptable in a society that there is no punishment for it anymore. But only in the case of male-on-female rape. Every other instance of rape is severely punished! And some woman raises the question about the absurd…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:13 AM
2

Are you sure you are bluepill :/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 09:22 AM
5

Extremely stupid comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:38 AM
5

What a stupid comparison. You really outdid yourself :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:05 AM
2

If that was enough to turn you away from this sub, then you are completely correct. This sub isn't for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:55 AM
5

You honestly don't see a difference between taking someone else's money (essentially stealing) and engaging in consensual, hopefully mutually beneficial activity? You are making it seem that sex for women is always conditional and that you have to "pay up" to get sex. I think there is a name for that :/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:52 AM
2

So you agree it should remain illegal?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:39 AM
1

It may come as a surprise to you, but people other than you do exist. Weird, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:24 AM
2

I though friend zone doesn't exist :/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:01 AM
2

He is suggesting that you should try sucking a dick and that you might like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 08:44 AM
–

Why cant she make the first move? Oh come on, there has to be a limit to how disingenuous you can be. What % of women you know would like to be the ones making the first move? What % of the women you know would think he isn't into her if he is waiting for her to make the first move?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 07:04 AM
–

How does he get to determine if she values him?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:58 AM
–

And what is that type?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:46 AM
1

People who write in italic are insecure. In general. Doesn't mean you, but in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:37 PM
4

How is that, in any way, related to what OP is talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 12:34 AM
8

... because no one I know would do something like that How would you know that? How would anyone know anything about the private lives of others? You are ALWAYS getting the curated version of every event of everyone's life. And you are thinking about this in a completely wrong way. I completely understand why - because the meme and joke version of it actually happened to you. But no, we aren't talking about women taking notes every time you show vulnerability just so they have ammo to use in som…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 03:36 AM
12

What if he's also black? Are you racist then?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:59 PM
7

The irony of that question is completely lost on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:57 PM
1

then there's room for you to actually provide some benefit to those women you're avoiding HAHAHAHAHAH :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:56 PM
-1

Sure, but that’s not what she said. She “stable sense of self” No, she didn't. She said: has his own sense of self Those two phrases are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:35 PM
1

Now sex with a robot...thats a whole different thing. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 01:31 PM
-4

Do you have any other avenues of thought where you need to explain to women what they were actually thinking and why they are wrong, or just this?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 10:52 AM
-2

Thank you for mansplaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:49 AM
15

For once, someone's ex-wife is right :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:44 AM
4

I don't think it was ever about something that was tried once, disliked and we moved on. It's about things that you constantly engaged in with your previous partner but you are denying it from the current partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 09:44 AM
8

Why? I though you shouldn't care about the past, what's the problem here?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 03:50 PM
4

Imagine your current bf being all adorable with you. And then you come to find out he was an abuser in his past relationships. What happens then?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 01:26 PM
3

And did they succeed?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 12:26 PM
3

Do you see a problem in men doing a carrot on a stick (the carrot being the relationship) to get sex from women?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:24 AM
0

Why are you asking pointless questions on the internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:23 AM
2

I don't give a fuck what people think People who write in bold think about what other people think of them. In general. Doesn't mean you, but in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:22 AM
1

But real life, no one blames men alone for bad sex. Really? Be honest now, have you ever heard ANY of your friends EVER take any accountability in this matter when they complain about bad sex? Have ANY of them EVER said something along the lines "We are having issues but I think that's on me for the most part. He's really trying, I think I need to communicate my needs better!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:18 AM
1

You are really doing bad at this debating thing on your work device. I really hope you are doing better at working thing on your work device.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:13 AM
1

I don't think you understand what's happening here. The OPs reply to her comment annihilated her point in one sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:02 AM
2

Imagine if women had that attitude! It's not hard to imagine, you are the perfect example of that. If your comment is what you surmised from his comment then you didn't read or understand any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 08:51 AM
3

I have never met a woman who admitted to me that she was having unsatisfying sex with a guy unless it was someone she was no longer with. You really don't see a contradiction here? It's like, for some reason, having a bunch of serial killers as friends and saying "I've never met a murderer unless the person I know was convicted of murder."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 08:41 AM
3

See, people you are the issue here. You just go and assume. She never even implied that he isn't an attentive partner, quite the opposite. She even said that she never even had an orgasm by masturbating. Is that on him as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 08:26 AM
2

And how did you figure that out? If young teens or even children are watching porn, does that mean that porn is for young teens and children or that someone isn't doing their job? Dandadan isn't a children's cartoon. As a matter of fact, it's not a cartoon at all. But let's not get into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:02 PM
1

I am not the stupid one here. I think you're giving yourself too much credit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:49 PM
3

Yeah, makes you wonder, doesn't it :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:47 PM
2

If that's what you consider dull, can you give me examples of things and behaviours that aren't dull?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 04:55 PM
3

Dandadan isn't a children's cartoon.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 04:16 PM
1

Lol I mean it's the reason why I had an abortion. No, it isn't. If you actually wanted a baby but didn't want to go through the pains of pregnancy you would adopt. But you actually don't want children and that's why you had an abortion. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, but I just can't understand why you are so adamant about gaslighting yourself and us. If I was down to go through a pregnancy What a silly notion. No woman is giddy about pregnancy (actually I do know exactly one woman who actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:00 AM
1

No, abortions are primarily about avoiding pregnancy. No, they aren't. I've never heard any woman say "I don't want to be pregnant right now in my life" or "I'm not ready for pregnancy right now" but I can't count the number of times I've heard "I don't want a child right now in my life" and "I'm not ready for a child right now". There is no point in carrying the child to term just to give it for adoption (if you have the option and are ok with abortion, of course). I'm sure there are plenty of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 09:58 AM
1

So if a dude rejects the financial support of the embryo, there isn't an issue here at all then?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 09:32 AM
0

To abort a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 09:24 AM
3

Time to get myself suspended again :D You're a moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 02:27 AM
8

My usual rhetoric? Are you sure you aren't confusing me with someone else? But in any case, you would be wrong then in thinking this is a deviation from the usual because men being able to cum in any scenario that you can imagine does make them somewhat flawless in that regard, and you being proud in managing the accomplish the simplest of tasks does make you seem like a child. So there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 03:03 AM
7

Never had a bit of trouble getting my boyfriend off without written or verbal instructions. I just find it weird that you would use that as an argument considering men can cum on cue while watching Ancient Aliens on History Channel. You are acting like a clerk at some government office thinking about last night's game where your favorite player fumbled the ball just before the endzone: "How can that happen to him, is it such a problem for him to do his job properly??? Look how easy it is... " An…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 02:45 AM
9

Did you come back to me to ... I just wanted to congratulate you for managing to find a penis. You seemed so proud of the fact so I was just happy for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 02:06 AM
17

Never had a bit of trouble getting my boyfriend off without written or verbal instructions. Wow, congratulations. You have managed to find where his penis is!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:52 AM
1

No, we shouldn't. We should just observe what they actually do, and that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 09:04 PM
2

How does that track with what he said?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:38 PM
–

Because marriage rates are falling rapidly. Please check out how the divorce rate is calculated. That's still only one of the many factors I mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:31 PM
–

A will?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:27 PM
1

Why would you be disinherited?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:47 AM
1

Why are you making a whole argument based on assumptions? In the same way, each and every woman here is making assumptions about women initiating 75% of divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:49 AM
1

Because, otherwise, they would be crucified in the family court. They would be brought to ruin by legal fees and they would still lose. So if mom isn't a monster the father opts out of full custody because the alternative is the legal hell that he will lose and that puts him in a far worse situation than if he simply relinquished sole custody rights to the mom. Every time it's mentioned that 75% of divorces are initiated by women, every woman here is like "... but but that's only because many ti…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:45 AM
1

They are. Not a vast majority, but a majority nonetheless. Imagine all the marriages that end up in divorce - I can't fathom much sex going on there before the fact. Add to that all the shitty marriages where people don't get divorced for whatever reason. Add to that marriages where one or both get complacent after some time and nothing is going on bedroom-wise (because of obligations, stress, children, whatever). Add to that seemingly happy marriages where a spouse is cheating and outsourcing s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:26 AM
1

More expensive than divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:11 AM
-1

And you can coach a promiscuous woman to stop being promiscuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 08:54 AM
8

Why do men pick women who hate them to be their girlfriends? Why do women pick men who abuse them to be their boyfriends?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 09:12 AM
1

So you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 08:55 AM
1

what got her to the point of making those choices And what exactly got her to the point of making those choices?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 08:48 AM
10

Your assertion is that black men benefit from male privilege (by the nature of them being men) while at the same time, they are oppressed. But they aren't oppressed for the fact that they are men, but for the fact that they are black. And that's not the answer to my question. It's completely understandable that the same person might benefit from some circumstance while at the same time be oppressed by another (different) circumstance. My question was how can men at the same time benefit and be o…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:56 PM
14

How do men at the same time benefit from patriarchy while being oppressed by it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:08 PM
4

Excellent self-awareness. And you even identified the potential source of the issue. Just keep working at it!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:50 PM
0

If I asked you "Do people have an obligation or moral duty to be decent?" would that be a stupid question as well? If you are going to say "Yes!" to both of my questions, can you explain why would it be expected of people to have an obligation or moral duty to be decent?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 09:31 AM
4

1 girl a year isn't rare? You and the rest of the humans on planet Earth operate under different assumptions about what signifies rareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 09:10 AM
5

I vomited a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 08:46 AM
2

Really? You think men at the frontlines want ALL women to save themselves by leaving Ukraine?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:50 AM
8

It has nothing to do with dating pool What do you mean by this? Because every time I saw this being said it was in the context of dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:48 AM
1

To the comment that women are showing their approval with their feet (meaning leaving Ukraine in droves) you said: Should the woman be acting against the wishes of men who are fighting and dying for their home land? And that goes for families of the men fighting on the front lines. And to that I asked what about women like you without husband and kids, why would you have the option of leaving Ukraine in that case?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:35 AM
1

I think there are more women like you without a husband and kids. What about you / them?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:43 AM
6

Every country in Western and Northern (and some Central) Europe was in a much better state compared to Ukraine before the war. There were plenty of Ukrainian immigrants in each of those countries prior to the war. You can only imagine how things are right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:27 AM
5

Would you be ok with being a breeding and birthing machine after the war to repopulate the country?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:18 AM
1

For future reference, I don't care I'm so sorry about that. If there is anything I can do to fix that, I most definitely won't. Go rant about what "the feminists" have said to the feminists who have said those things I just did that by replying to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:56 PM
–

Insulting me isn't a rebuttal. It wasn't an insult. It's a compliment on your butt and on the amount of things and definitions it can hold. This also isn't a rebuttal to anything I said. Didn't mean it as a rebuttal. Just an observation. I find it curious just how easily feminists invoke the most taboo term of them all - the traditional role of women (in this or that) - when it suits their argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:49 PM
3

So women are only good for making babies because it takes them 9 months to do so?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:36 PM
3

So you have a random grown-ass unknown man, a random grown-ass unknown woman, and a child. You would save any of the latter two, but wouldn't sacrifice yourself for the man. Can you explain to me how you rationalize that a random unknown woman is worth sacrificing for, and a random unknown man isn't worth sacrificing for?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:34 PM
1

Also I am actually a bit weird on that aspect. I’ve never seen a great value in materialistic stuff. If you aren't giving away all of your money except what's needed for your survival, then you are full of shit. I mean you can keep deluding yourself "Oh I don't care much about money! I'm just like that" while earning said money and spending it on yourself on the daily.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:31 PM
1

If men in Ukraine are drafted what do you envision women doing? Do you think they are going to sit at home with their feet up? No - they will keep doing the domestic labour they are already doing, and take on more work responsibilities/jobs that men are unable to do. They’ll just get on and do it, as women have done for thousands of years, without complaining. Or they will get out of the country if they so wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:21 PM
2

You are a good bloke.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:17 PM
0

You don't seem like a motherly type to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:16 PM
–

Bodily autonomy refers to what happens to your body, within or on the body itself. Being forced to do something is not a matter of bodily autonomy just because you have to use your body in order to engage in movement. You might be able to call it a violation of your freedom, or your human rights, but it's not a matter of bodily autonomy. You must have a big ass because this definition was somewhere in there at one point or another. Unfortunately for us all, it's now outside of it. The traditiona…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:01 PM
5

Are you saying that women are only useful for making babies and nothing else?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:40 PM
1

do you really think it’s smart to send out the people who can make babies too? Do you think it's smart to let people who can make babies get out of the country never to return again?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:31 PM
3

I didn’t know that. I knew women weren’t subject to the draft, but I guess that makes sense? Women in war are usually just rape fodder. So men can be tortured, mutilated, blown to pieces but hey, they won't get raped so it's all well and dandy! Okay so do you believe that women have just as much of a fighting chance against men as other men do? No, they don't. But more women fighting means more people are fighting for your side, which in turn means more fighting chance for Ukraine in general. Bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:28 PM
4

I'm aware of that, but that is such a small % of men that it's a completely irrelevant point to make. But you are correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:16 PM
5

By rebuilding infrastructure necessary to support a population, which should be arranged by the government/public works deivision whatever they're called locally. You are talking in pure hypotheticals like you are playing Sim City. Yeah, I know what needs to be done to have a functioning city that supports its population. The question from the very start was "WHO WILL DO THAT"? You say it needs to be done for refugees to return, but WHO WILL DO THAT? The refugees are not building contractors and…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:13 PM
11

Ukraine didn’t want a war at all. They aren’t sending anyone to fight because it’s GOOD for them. The difference is that a certain populace gets to choose if they will stay and help defend the country (in any way they can), while the rest don't get that option, they must fight and die. They were invaded. Yes, the country was invaded, a country composed of men and women. Yet everyone is acting like only men were invaded since they are the only ones obligated to defend it. It is just a fact that d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:26 PM
1

Why stop at 7, why not 77, or 777? Sounds equally plausible.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:05 PM
16

Does a country magically go from being war-torn to not being war-torn to then being a great place to live? You don't need to do anything just wait it out and it magically fixes itself and people can then return, right? Pray tell how do you think a war-torn country becomes ready for people to return there? Do any of you people think for a second what you are posting here or do you just press randomly on the keyboard and whatever comes out, just press "Comment" to keep that sweet sweet Top 1% comm…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:01 PM
23

That would not be strategic in terms of long term prosperity for the country. And it's very strategic to lose the majority of your young and able-bodied male populace?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 05:33 PM
23

And yes. Historically, most people go home when they’re able to. You literally have no idea what you are talking about. Almost all the people who left my country during the war never came back. Around 15% or something came back. Why the fuck would you come back to a war-torn country, especially if you managed to make a life for yourself in the country that you are currently in?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 05:30 PM
18

All women have the option to leave Ukraine, regardless of whether they have kids or not. No fighting age and able man can leave the country, regardless of whether they have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 05:24 PM
5

But it's not women replacing men on the frontline, it's them adding to the fighting force. How is it less fair to have more people fighting for your side? Make it make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 05:21 PM
3

Are you dumb as well for thinking that each man who is struggling with dating only has himself to blame? Because that's the same line of reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:52 PM
22

That's why I said you missed the point. You missed it completely and it's right there, staring at you! I'll explain: Women are looking for the ONE special match, real soul emotional connection. The reason you think that somehow magically happens on its own is because you are a woman. It doesn't magically happen. It never has, it never will. When you think you found "ONE special match, real soul emotional connection" you actually found a man that is working his butt off to make you feel that way.…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:44 PM
8

But it's completely right to label twox harpies as that regardless if you agree with them or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:34 PM
5

Why would it change anything knowing that lots of women feel the exact same way for completely different reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:30 PM
4

I agree with a lot of blue pill takes For example?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:27 PM
–

You're below average intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:24 PM
15

How to completely miss the point in 3 sentences or less.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 03:21 PM
23

More like the employer that offers low wages and is working you to the bone lamenting how he doesn't understand why no workers with excellent resumes are applying. And your solution for his problem isn't to drastically improve working conditions but to increase barrier to entry for those same conditions that no quality workers were applying to anyway. Seems completely logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:39 AM
8

Most probably, being fit/jacked, being obese or really fat, and slimming down, but no longer fit, just ok weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:26 AM
23

She's saying that after all the song and dance that men do to get a relationship and shortly after that, they stop trying after a month or so of the relationship. Not agreeing, just translating :D
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:14 AM
4

The actual irony here is that you are projecting and are unable to grasp the simple fact that men think differently from women. Another ironic thing is that the "sympathetic gender" is so prone to instant judgment that you can't even fathom men not being like that at all. So "sympathetic women" are actually being judgmental ones, and men who are stereotyped as such, actually aren't. Yeah, truckload of irony all around, just not the one you are thinking of. Which is also quite ironic in and of it…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 11:47 AM
1

And this is a perfect example of nagging.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 02:18 PM
1

I think his point was that he is expecting women to act like adults who communicate effectively when they are constantly going on about how important it is to be an adult who communicates effectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 02:00 PM
0

The problem is that people agree to do what the other person asks and then not follow through. That wouldn't be an issue and most honest men will not call that nagging. Nagging is when you unilaterally decide that something needs to be done exactly NOW (because why the fuck not now), completely disregarding any and all circumstances the other person is in, and when that person doesn't do that right at that moment because they just don't wanna or actually do want to, but can't right now and will …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 01:58 PM
1

You did that for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 01:55 PM
1

In Ukraine, if you are a fighting-age male you aren't allowed to leave the country. But you are allowed to die at the front lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 10:00 AM
0

Can you say that you are ignoring gender roles if you are conveniently rejecting aspects of the opposite gender role that you find bad and unappealing while at the same time placing those expectations on your partner (subconsciously or not) because they are essential for a functional relationship and someone has to do it? Like I said in my last sentence, it doesn't have to be that exact scenario. But the thing is, tearing down gender roles and restrictions is a moot point when discussing things …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 08:53 AM
1

You... Reading... Bad...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 06:19 PM
3

a man who dresses like a man So progressive of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 03:39 PM
4

But he isn't talking about progressive women, he was talking about "progressive" women. That's the whole point of the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 03:07 PM
7

So anyone who adheres to traditional gender expression is no longer allowed to call themselves progressive? You can call yourself whatever you want, no matter how contradictory that label might be considering your behavior. But you are literally asking "Why can't I say that I'm progressive while adhering to conservative gender norms that I like". You initially said: Im a progressive woman. I want a man who respects me, matches my intelligence and values, and contributes to society in a positive …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 02:27 PM
2

I think they genuinely believe they are acting like they are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:58 PM
1

Your argument is complete and utter stupidity. Women want someone better than THEMSELVES. It's actually your argument that is stupid. If that 2nd sentence was true, then only a very tiny minority of men would be excluded by height preferences because a vast majority of men are taller than the vast majority of women. 6' wouldn't be a thing. But it is a thing because women aren't aiming for men who are taller than them but who are taller than other men. Women compare men to each other, not to them…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:40 AM
3

Do you think that is a good counter-argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:19 AM
5

Are you saying that you are unable to grasp simple concepts and that you don't have a basic understanding of what you are reading and then replying to scenarios that you imagined in your head?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:04 AM
2

:/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 09:58 AM
8

You are definitely a huge contributor for that kind of sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:36 AM
12

Do you think I’m a minority of all women, or a minority of progressive women? A tiny minority of women in general. You exclaiming you are progressive has nothing to do with you actually being progressive. When push comes to shove and a situation occurs in which it's expected from your significant other to act in an obviously masculine way, progressive as you may claim to be, you will expect him to play that role.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:26 AM
24

It's hard to take you seriously when your equivalent for comparison is a slightly less masculine pretty boy vs "rugged bearded woman".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:16 AM
2

What do you consider progressive economic policies?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 04:35 PM
–

The only thing more useless than speed dating is trying to converse with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:30 PM
5

You think trophy wife and sugar baby are the same? What reality do you live in?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 12:42 PM
4

You can talk more without being nasty about it. How bout you read the OP once again. Nowhere did it assume them being nasty about it so why did you feel the need to go there?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 12:20 PM
7

By your reasoning, everything positive that happened for women in modern times in the west is done by men, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 11:35 AM
2

Both are shit. Is there really a point in discussing which is a tiny bit less shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 05:18 PM
8

You won't get much practice there. It's a short formulaic conversation that repeats over and over again. You might get some confidence to brush off obvious rejections live in real-time, but other than that, every other venue is a better medium to learn to communicate with women, which is ironic in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 08:44 AM
7

There is also a term for people who twist other people's innocuous statements into something disgusting. They are called pieces of shit. The fact that he thinks (justified or not) that many women are adult children, that doesn't mean that he wants to date them. Quite the opposite. He doesn't want to date them. He is just acknowledging that many women are currently undateable and it's hard to find a woman who isn't like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 08:26 AM
13

For all intent and purpose, it's the same thing. You are getting left or right-swiped in real life based on, almost exclusively, your looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 11:31 PM
4

Ok, but you literally said unsafe and I was debating that. If you didn't feel unsafe why say it then? I have no objections to anything you said after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 11:27 PM
4

I noticed that not once have you mentioned feeling unsafe.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 11:15 PM
3

No matter how moronic it is to think that to be the truth, even if 100% of men actually thought like that, they won't say that. That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 03:29 PM
6

I was being facetious and sarcastic. "The same way" that I was actually referring to in my comment is the feeling of ick that both an ugly man and an autistic man cause. Just like the comment you replied to said, calling it unsafe is just rationalizing the ick, nothing more, nothing less. Women used to rationalize not being attracted to ugly men the same way (conflating looking ugly to looking dangerous) but when it became socially acceptable to just say that you simply aren't attracted to someo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 01:41 PM
1

And he is supposed to answer "I'm attracted to you primarily because of your youth. I wouldn't consider you otherwise. Women older than you are expired goods. But I will probably be interested in you for a limited time until I manage to find someone younger." ?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 12:17 PM
5

It feels unsafe. The same way an ugly man feels unsafe :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 10:48 AM
-2

WTF is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 08:31 AM
1

But your example is moronic and has nothing to do with how small/big dick energy is used. Your example is equivalent to: P - good P Diddy - bad
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 03:34 PM
1

What a completely wrong analogy. How did you even figure out those two scenarios are alike? How bout this: Small dick energy. Bad. Big dick energy. Good. Fat girl energy. Bad. Fit girl energy. Good. Now imagine someone trying to rationalize the term "fat girl energy" into something like "It's a term that signifies girls who are lazy, lethargic, unmotivated, inactive, unkempt, and so on. It has nothing to do with them being fat, where did you get that idea?!" And "fit girl energy" as something li…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 03:05 PM
1

The TikTok trend you talk about, is disturbing, but it’s too contrived to be real. Who is filming? If the man doesn’t apologise, then the woman would be filmed committing a crime. So are you falling for a typical extreme video that is getting clicks and likes? He didn't claim it was real. It doesn't need to be real. The point of the video is to convey a message to elicit reactions. The fact that it's a trend and the reactions it's been getting should be concerning by itself. Imagine if it was a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:39 PM
3

Praise the lord for Mod Mail, the answer to nothing at all ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:09 PM
1

Funny comment :D
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:05 PM
3

Feminism is about women's rights Is it a woman's right to body shame while opposing body shaming of women? Don't you think that if you are fighting against certain behaviors against your group, you should also make sure that you aren't a perpetrator of that behavior on other groups? I mean, no one will take you seriously otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 11:48 AM
1

Can he also dunk?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 08:32 AM
1

That’s PART of reproductive freedom, but it does not at all encapsulate it totally. Is anything (other than abortion) missing? You speak only from the perspective of a man looking to chastise women who you believe to be promiscuous. I have no idea how you came to this conclusion. Can you expand on what I have already said that doesn't include "woman's perspective"? You didn’t even conceive of, for example, married women who want to have a family. Did you mean this as an example of me not observi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 12:19 PM
1

Yeah, let's take it sentence by sentence. From your comment: The fact is that feminism is a movement about seeking equality. That's that, we don't need to go further because you went on to explain how it isn't about seeking equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 12:10 PM
1

And you are seeing 100% of the population of Austin whenever you go out and all of them are happy-go-lucky and in relationships? This is what I'm talking about, how many actual people living in Austin do you actually see when going out to draw those conclusions that you did? It's ridiculous really when you think about it. By your reasoning, nothing bad exists in Austin because you don't see it every day on the streets, there is no mugging, no assault, no rape, and no murder because you just went…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 12:06 PM
1

I couldn't possibly answer that myself, you should ask them that. I don't know why they think what they think.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 02:24 PM
1

This sub is one of the lowest levels of the sewage system of reddit - all the toxic shit seems to pool here. You are in the right place then. Feel completely at home here!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 02:21 PM
0

Someone would say that your takes are stupid wherever they see you commenting. Not me, but someone definitely would. It's incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 02:17 PM
1

You are reading too much into it. You are receiving downvotes on a forum that has a "We Ask That You Refrain from Downvoting" in rules yet people are still doing it. So it's completely useless to even think about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:58 PM
3

dating and reproduction has never been about fairness How casual of an attitude to have when you are on a "i benefit" side of the argument. Would you think that a good argument coming from a man to a woman a few decades ago when women had to marry and have children to "have worth"?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:53 PM
1

Don't be bothered by the downvotes, and don't ever let the upvote/downvote counter inform your opinion on something.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:24 PM
0

And which % of the total populace is that? You literally have no idea. You could be seeing 0.5% of the populace and drawing sweeping conclusion from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:19 PM
1

But he isn't just an accessory if that accessory is required to earn more than her regardless how high her income may be.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:00 PM
1

You literally said the opposite of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:40 AM
0

But there was no point to go over his head, that's why he was confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:28 AM
0

You have the option to not have sex, the option to tie your tubes, plan b, and the option to risk potential pregnancy while using contraceptives or to simply have sex willy-nilly without the care in the world. That's reproductive freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:27 AM
–

My husband is a chubby awkward guy with pretty eyes. When he was younger he was a skinny awkward guy with pretty eyes. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:31 AM
–

Messaging once to get an attention fix from the dude =/= giving a chance. It says nothing about them going on a date (which is the actual act of giving someone a chance) with those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:21 AM
4

The outlines of 1 study (that you agree with) = timeless and universal. Such a tall order for something to be timeless and universal.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 08:51 AM
1

Tripe.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:32 PM
1

Are you ok with your teenage daughters watching porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 11:21 AM
1

How about you actually read.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:41 PM
1

Approximately 155mil people voted. If 64% of people didn't vote, that would mean that voting-eligible population in the US is 155 million / (1-0.64) = 417mil people. If only you could google a brain. Btw, the 64% is % of voting-eligible population that DID vote, which is 2nd biggest voter turnout ever (behind 2020.).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:38 PM
3

How did she support herself before meeting me?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 11:14 AM
4

No, it isn't. It literally means that he doesn't care about her job or the money she makes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 09:37 AM
3

Whenever the guy doesn't initiate, he's not into her. Whenever the woman doesn't initiate, she's not into him?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 09:30 AM
1

64 percent didn’t even bother to vote How exactly did you figure this out?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:54 AM
0

Any issue. I'm giving you a blank cheque here. You mentioned mental health issues. Name the person.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 03:26 PM
-3

Who speaks about it? I'm asking again. Name the prominent person on the left focused on issues of men and young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 03:25 PM
6

Can you name a prominent person on the left who speaks directly to young men and their issues without coopting those struggles to actually focus on women's issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 03:21 PM
3

It's the same men you are talking about. That's the thing, you are unable to grasp that simple fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 03:11 PM
3

Oh right, they don’t and they still won because of the double standard and misinformation. How ironic thinking that while 10 days ago you were probably thinking that a Kamala sweep was incoming. Due to misinformation that you gobbled up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 03:09 PM
55

And yet ...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 03:04 PM
–

:D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 12:42 PM
–

If it’s consistently being mentioned multiple times a week that’s all the time. If it's mentioned by, for example, 2 people at a rate of about 4x a week, on a subreddit where there are hundreds of people actively posting constantly, making 10s of thousands of comments a week doesn't mean that it's mentioned all the time, it just means that you don't understand scale and context. What it has to do was that the 4B is a macro response to the dudes that were thinking that trying to push back/down on…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 12:19 PM
–

At least a few times a week in the daily and sometimes posts (unless the go a certain color then get taken down) Few times a week. On a sub with how many posts a week and how many comments a week? What the fuck are we even talking about here? Guess we have a different understanding of the term "all the time". And there is a whole narrative of “if it weren’t for women/feminism/beta orbiters/white kings/chads, etc making things worse?!!” Ok. Don't see what that has to do with anything we are discu…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 04:59 PM
–

Because you can see it on PPD all the time “if women didn’t have a choice they’d lower thier standards!” Really.. All the time? And what choice are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 04:49 PM
10

And I think it's coming back to bite them in the ass. Can you imagine the hubris thinking that you can freely act like that without ever expecting it coming back to bite you in the ass? I can't. They obviously can.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 04:16 PM
–

Which dudes would that be? The ones who weren't getting any before either? Why would they react like that? They will probably react with "Oh wow, so you are telling me I will be getting 0 sex from now on! And when I compound that directly onto 0 sex I was having previously I will, in aggregate, have exactly 0 sex. NO CAP GIRL!" Or something to that effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:38 PM
1

He also said this: As a bi man knowing a lot of other bi people the consensus has been surprising So not just his but the experience of other bi people that he personally knows. It isn't specified how many of them is he talking about, might be 2, might be 20, who knows. In the end, each and every post and comment is primarily based on personal and anecdotal that people try to generalize from.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:32 PM
–

If it was already in effect, then what's the point of the proclamation that it will now be in effect? There is no leverage to be gained that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:27 PM
5

Op is bi and seems to prefer men over women. Now. Because of his experience with women. Which he clearly describes in his OP. I'm still not sure why the rest of us have to have an opinion about it You don't. You weren't forced to write 1 letter of 1 comment on this OP. You yourself chose to do that. This sub is not for personal rants. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:18 PM
4

Wow, we got a Steven Spielberg here! You concocted that fantastic scenario all on your own. At no point in the writing of that diatribe did it occur to you to put dating right after meeting, and getting to know them, and talking to them and discovering more and more of their personality comes after they start dating? Weird and impossible, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:10 PM
1

But why do you assume there is a WHY hidden somewhere in there? That's my point. It's not about the willingness to share that information with you, it's about your presumption there is something to actually share. Sometimes there will be something to the effect of being afraid of stds or because of religious reasons, but the vast majority of women will just simply feel that disgust (or something similar to that) towards the man who used the services of prostitutes, and there is no deeper meaning…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 01:38 PM
2

Are you the arbiter of honesty? I mean what do you expect as a response? If she tells you she is disgusted at the thought of being with a man who was with prostitutes, what else is there to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 10:28 PM
1

I think if you were more honest with yourself as to why you viscerally react, we’d have a better discussion. Maybe you should think about why you are reacting like this to his innocuous comment. Imagine saying that literal sentence to a woman who balks at the idea of being with someone who used the services of a prostitute(s).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 10:17 PM
1

They all have the same MO but different ways of operating. I can't help it, I'm sorry. MO is modus operandi, latin for the way someone operates. You literally said "They all have the same way of operating but different ways of operating."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 10:01 PM
1

In a roundabout way, I'm trying to convince you to debate more honestly or quit wasting everyone's time. I'm good like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 09:40 PM
2

I know how to read I wasn't talking about the mechanical process of reading. Do you possess the ability to understand what you read? Judging by your response, no, you don't. Or you are just a dishonest and bad-faith debater. Take your pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 09:29 PM
8

Didn't Biden drop out?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 09:25 PM
4

I barely know anyone who had heard of reddit You also barely know how to read if that's how you got his comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 09:24 PM
1

I'm not talking about political parties. Liberals aren't a political party in the US. The specific term you used was "very liberal platform". That's what I have an issue with. You are using a term that has a specific definition, and you are using it as an excuse for a behavior that is the complete opposite of that definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 04:30 PM
1

But I can't understand how they can take the word that means "willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas." and twist it into a plausible and obvious excuse for literal hate of half of the population like it's something completely normal: "Of course reddit hates men, it's liberal to do so" :/
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 03:20 PM
4

Yes because reddit is a very liberal platform. How can you not see the irony in that being the starting sentence of a comment that is supposed to explain rampant completely accepted misandry on a platform like reddit? Am I going insane? Has everyone forgotten the actual meaning of the word LIBERAL? What the fuck are we doing when this has become par for the course?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 03:04 PM
4

you should have told us. We would have gotten women rights much earlier 🤷 If you were too stupid to realize it yourself then you got them just in time.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 07:09 AM
9

The good ol' "Be careful what you wish for!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 02:17 PM
2

I know several beautiful fat people. No, you don't. They either aren't fat or aren't beautiful. The friend I mentioned being one. She's gorgeous, so much so that she turned down a modeling contract. Modeling contract? Really? That used to mean something, but now she:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/091019-Feature-Plus-Size-Lead-2000-7b57716c5be14d4ea06427b63edf4034.jpg) is a model, and so is she, and she:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/091019-Features-Hunter-McGrady-embedd-2000-564346e0bf0c4dc68582b2…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 04:41 PM
2

I'm saying that fat people can't be beautiful. Talking specifically about looks, not personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 11:39 AM
1

You said: I wouldn't put commuting to work in the same category as doing household chores, personally. The narrative is that women always mention unpaid labor. Commuting is by every definition imaginable, exactly that, unpaid labor. But you refuse to put it into the same category because then you could add 2 more hours each day (on average) to unpaid labor for men. And you don't like that, because it would go against your narrative that women do much more unpaid labor compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 02:00 AM
1

Does it have to do with reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:13 AM
1

And here I thought that manifesto was "a written statement declaring publicly the intentions, motives, or views of its issuer". How silly of me to think that someone's intentions and motives are not actual reality :/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:02 AM
1

Yes. Is manifesto a reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:55 AM
1

Are his beliefs reality? I mean he made a lot of them a reality, but the book was written far before that. Meaning it was fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:53 AM
0

And that's my comment, no one told you to engage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:52 AM
1

So if "Mein Kampf" suddenly sells 50m copies in US, that means absolutely nothing, who cares, right? I mean, it's just FIKŠUN FIKŠUN!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:48 AM
3

Therefore the job task should be extended for the duration of commuting, but it isn't. People only mention actual work time, nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:25 AM
2

including beauty, except she's overweight. Yeah. Someone actually said this. And was serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 11:27 PM
1

What if a woman is tired of shaving? I mean no one is forcing you to do or not do anything you don't want or want to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 11:23 PM
1

I wouldn't put commuting to work in the same category as doing household chores, personally. Of course, you wouldn't. Why would you do something that goes against your narrative?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 11:17 PM
1

Don't you think that the opinion of the person who hates the idea of having kids (or maybe even hates kids) is irrelevant to this discussion? This discussion pertains only to people who want and do have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 11:11 PM
1

OMG, you literally can't go wrong!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 09:17 AM
3

So you are making outlier behavior as something mainstream and normalized. Never in my life have I seen something you are describing, but I won't claim that it doesn't happen at all, but it certainly isn't to the effect that you are claiming.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 09:12 AM
2

Invalidate the point, not the person making it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 09:07 AM
1

I really didn't see your comment when I was writing mine. We practically wrote the same thing with almost the same verbiage. But you did it with far more tact and consideration :D
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 07:24 AM
2

Strangely Really? You literally described the situation OP is talking about (your own example could be in the OP) and just don't seem to get it. When I think about it further, that actually is strange. We can talk about outmoded expectations on men to be breadwinners; or the only metric of a job’s value being measured in money - but that’s a different discussion. Or maybe you could invest an iota of thought into that situation and notice how it perfectly aligns with what OP is talking about. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:38 PM
2

That's called jumping to conclusions and unsubstantiated arguments without giving it any thought. Bad faith arguing in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:12 PM
2

What stupid reasoning. If women complain about the quality of men they date, it has nothing to do with their "standards", it's simply the best they could attract. And if they want to attract better, they should improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:02 PM
1

So why aren't you a billionaire right now? Or a millionaire for that matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 06:35 PM
1

I don’t really think it takes a ridiculous amount of effort to invest in the right industries. It just takes money and a few good ideas i’m not sure how skill based an idea is… What can you even say to this :/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 02:00 PM
2

I don't think I ever saw your OP I didn't agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 01:36 PM
3

OMG, you never disappoint!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 01:29 PM
0

Yeah, know. Your stance hasn't changed, it's the same ol' "I don't give a fuck if it's done to others as long as it isn't done to me". Funnily enough, the same reasoning people who hang out with abusers use.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 01:15 PM
1

Firstly, my husband would never fuck any of my friends, or anyone else really. I'm not familiar with your husband's circumstances, but the quoted sentence is something probably close to 100% of wives thought about their husbands before they fucked their friends or anyone else really. a friend of mine trying to seduce my husband would be a very bad friend don't you think ? I think she would be a very bad person in general if she was seducing your or anyone else's husband. Betraying my trust, bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 01:09 PM
0

Really, you don't know? But you were fairly certain a moment ago when it wasn't about you. Funny how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 12:23 PM
1

Completely understandable, but I didn't ask that. I asked what happens to your friend in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:57 AM
0

I don't judge friends for being with men who break their wedding vows. But your man/husband is off limits? If she does that to you, is she offered the same grace as if she was fucking someone else's husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:52 AM
1

they'd have to do something truly evil to stop talking to them For example?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:49 AM
0

I have no idea if you are married, but if your friend fucks your husband, by your own logic you are completely ok with that with regard to her actions, she remains your friend because she's not the one lying and cheating. Only your husband is to blame. Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:39 AM
3

Hurting kids or animals, that sort of nasty thing. "Hurting animals" (whatever that entails) - BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD Destroying families - Oh well, what can you do, happens
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:35 AM
1

The same goes for women entering into relationships with abusers who end up abusing them, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:30 AM
0

I also find it funny how wrong you are :)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:17 AM
1

To me the solution seems simple Always a starting sentence to something not even resembling a feasible solution. That doesn't fix the main issue of women going for only top 1 or 2 men at the event. Even now where you can have a diverse crowd of men and women (with regard to their attractiveness level) women still aren't going for average men, even though their level of attractiveness is way below those men. You think that putting an arbitrary minimum level of attractiveness will curb that issue?…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 08:30 AM
1

And singles events are definitely not one of those opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 08:18 AM
4

Sadism is not the word you are looking for in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 07:50 AM
8

How bout you actually read the comment you reply to? Currently, it's not a sausage fest because it's NOT a "good place for finding partners".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 02:55 PM
0

Does he spit on it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 02:04 PM
1

You think it takes more "skill" to be dime a dozen "musician" or an actor compared to someone making a billion $ company from scratch?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 08:14 AM
1

That’s not true at all. Men over value themselves and under value women. The man is probably a 5, but claims he’s a 7, and the woman is a 6 but he claims she’s a 4. I see it all of the time. I’ve even invited men to message me pictures. And they’re typically a 3-4 when they thought they were a 5-7. And the women they want are a 6-8 when they claimed they were all 5s. If irony had a different name, it would be something stupid like Realistic-Ad-1023.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 08:10 AM
4

Yeah, I'm sure that's the only thing :)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 07:57 AM
8

You are woman-ing too much. The OP was about how women don't care that much about status, to which the top comment of this thread replied that they do because they don't want someone with low-status job bringing down their own social status, to which you reply "yeah, no one wants a broke dude!!!!!" You'd think that I would get used to this on PPD, but it still annoys me to no end.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 07:47 AM
1

Most women are not insecure Really now, you are going with this :/
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 01:01 PM
0

There will always be shitty people in society. Anyone who thinks there wont be is deluded. There are people who have killed people over fries, IN BROAD DAYLIGHT, despite the severe penalty for murder. Why? Because they don’t care. They just want to be terrible people. The scale of things is the issue here you silly donut. Would every man kill another person over fries, IN BROAD DAYLIGHT? Even your deluded self would probably answer no. Would every 2nd man? Every 1000th man? 1 in a million??? Let…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:59 PM
2

66% of young men get laid How do they count this? If you get laid once in 25 years of your life, you count in the "gets laid" column. Kinda misleading data point. It's like giving all women a right to vote ONLY ONCE. Technically all women have a right to vote so they wouldn't have anything to complain about in that case, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:54 PM
1

When we're on the topic of insane standards :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:51 PM
1

It's not the same "need".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:46 PM
1

OMG you did them dirty! Poor dumpster chicken!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:44 PM
2

Says someone who thinks an anecdote about no one proves something about 8 billion people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 11:51 AM
9

Men think any woman who doesn’t worship the ground they walk upon is automatically an evil man hater. Far from that. We just think that someone who exhibits hate is actually hating. I’ve been told I hate men for everything from discussing feminist theory, to simply stating I don’t like penetrative sex. You have been told you hate men for simple fact that you hate men. You don't have to make it any more complicated than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 10:37 AM
7

He was so drunk HE COULD BARELY WALK but somehow he beat her. Weird how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 10:17 AM
10

When you speak honestly it becomes apparent that you hate men. Do you think that could make your opinion on men slightly biased?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 08:53 AM
2

Its a bunch of debate dorks answering safely So you mean like 90% of the things on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 04:38 PM
3

Of course, all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 01:57 PM
1

Because of their actions. The action of crying in front of someone you thought you could confide in when the going gets tough? Is that the action you are referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 01:55 PM
0

No, I just seem to notice that you feel entitled to tall men, nothing more nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 10:27 AM
2

Anyone else using the reasoning from the comment I replied to would be called a rape apologist. I mean you said that you wouldn't believe EVEN if the prosecution had DNA evidence implicating your son.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:36 AM
3

1% AAAAAAA why does everyone keep using completely bogus arbitrary rage bait numbers AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:30 AM
–

Does that mean you would be a rape apologist if it's about your son?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:12 AM
3

But it's a good question. If you apply one standard to your son, would you apply the same standard to your daughter?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:11 AM
5

It's not really similar. The situation you described is like you caught your son with his dick in an unwilling woman. In that situation, the guilt is already an established fact. The OP asked about accusation which is something completely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:08 AM
2

Imagine thinking. At all. Try it! Btw, you have no idea what you are talking about. I wasn't referring to the contents of the work that got awarded the Nobel Prize, I was just flabbergasted why would something like that be awarded the prize for literature when it's, more or less, economics? And I checked and yeah, it was economics.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 07:40 PM
3

What's the point of linking a subreddit with 100x fewer members as proof of something? What did you want to prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:20 PM
8

Your inner world is not society. Thankfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:12 PM
5

Off the internet and inside some institution.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:08 PM
-1

And you're acting like a large contingent of women aren't spending their free time on the internet calling men evil, rapists, #killallmen and similar. The internet has provided insight into how women talk and think about men like nothing before, and the number of men choosing to remain single is higher than ever before. It's not coincidental.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:04 PM
4

Wasn't the last nobel price in literature an analysis on why women earn less than men? That tells you all you need to know about Nobel Prize for literature these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 01:54 PM
2

Seems like the two of you feel entitled to tall men. Do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:33 PM
2

It's a completely useless phrase. If someone does something shitty to me, should I somehow feel less aggravated about it if it wasn't personal? It's still the same shitty thing that was done. The only thing that matters is intent. If the shitty thing that was done was completely intentional, I don't give a fuck if it was personal or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:49 PM
1

I hope for this time you learned how to properly interpret the data :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:49 AM
2

Nope! Can't let you take the blame for the shittiness of my joke! The responsibility for that is squarely on my shoulders.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 02:57 PM
1

I was.. refering to the part of the sentence "you cant take the catholic shool out of me.".. In a naughty way.. Sometimes jokes just fall flat..
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 02:42 PM
3

The fact that outliers exist does not IN ANY WAY negate the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 02:19 PM
0

Would it kill you to answer a question properly?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 02:06 PM
0

Damn! What was happening in that catholic school!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 02:03 PM
10

A woman's opinion on this matter that's a breath of fresh air on PPD. What's weirder is that your reasoning regarding kids is even more hardline than mine :D
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 01:59 PM
2

Yeah, I read the diatribe. You completely failed to differentiate between the thing I quoted and "direct link". It's the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 01:55 PM
1

I don’t think there is a relation between attractiveness and social anxiety. Do you actually think this is true? :D
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 01:50 PM
19

being good looking does not magically make things easier Of course, it does. But it doesn't magically absolve you from putting in any effort the way you felt it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 01:48 PM
6

Your most poignant argument about something to date. You are progressing at a rapid pace. I'm proud of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 01:44 PM
4

But you certainly know what deflection is :D
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 07:46 AM
7

"Pretty obvious fake stuff" is kinda subjective, don't you think? Like you said, you may be a bit more skeptical (and cynical) compared to others so your bias is expressed in this way. Let me ask you this. Which of the following scenarios is more probable: Scenario A: People don't think much about things and take things for granted. In the case of AITA they, by default, treat all posts as genuine if they aren't blatantly false or completely filled with contradictions and inconsistencies. Most po…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 03:29 PM
19

Because, like I said, they all reply to it "as if it's genuine"!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 03:11 PM
2

Really? It actually suggests "male" instead of "men"? Does it also suggest "an implement consisting of a small, shallow oval or round bowl on a long handle, used for eating stirring, serving food and as a torture and murder device in a fantastic short film "The Horribly Slow Murderer with the Extremely Inefficient Weapon"" when you start writing "spoon"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 03:07 PM
-1

You should always ignore the haters and just do your thing and post your posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 03:01 PM
19

I disagree completely. When the post is all over the place or blatantly fake, it always gets called out. When it has some "fantastic elements" someone will express their doubts about it. But in both of those cases, and in the case when the post seems perfectly genuine, the rest (as in other commenters who aren't doubtful about OP content) will respond like the OP is genuine.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:57 PM
1

Is that in any way related to the question I asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:49 PM
6

Oh wow, an honest mistake.. That somehow always happens to you without exception :D
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:40 PM
4

Why do you think she does that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:36 PM
2

And you should continue making posts like this one, I can never get enough of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:29 PM
1

You are all over the place. Do you even know how to organize your "thoughts" (or whatever you are having) properly? Again, can you tell me what do you disagree with in your own statement: “I don’t hate women I just think they are all fat and unattractive” A completely valid statement. You can consider someone fat and unattractive and not hate them. I would venture to say that in 99% of the cases where you consider someone fat and unattractive, you don't hate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:26 PM
42

Counterpoint: AITA is a creative writing subreddit Counterpoint: Your counterpoint is irrelevant in this case (determining if gender bias exists in AITA) if we assume that the commenters' reactions to such posts are genuine - meaning that they are reacting to those posts as if the posts are factual.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:18 PM
1

Oh lord, you really had to go a year back in my comments to find that innocuous and out-of-context comment. I'm fairly sure I had way more actual zingers in the meantime but I guess this is what they call "different strokes for different folks" kinda thing. Anyways, you still haven't pointed out what's factually incorrect in the statement you replied to. Let me give you one more example. I find you irredeemably stupid, but I don't hate you at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 07:36 AM
1

Your idiotic comment warrants such a question.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:49 PM
1

And if you/yourself decide that your self worth is determined by the number of dicks you receive, do you need therapy?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:09 PM
4

Maybe not you, but you need to ask yourself if that's enough of a reason to generalize.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 04:39 PM
–

Oh, so then you are using PPD as an outlet for your shittiness so that you aren't like that in a relationship, gotcha gotcha. Modern problems require modern solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 03:51 PM
–

You haven't learned yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 02:50 PM
3

We corresponded for week before I knew what he looked like
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 01:13 PM
-1

That's a completely valid statement. I don't know what's confusing about that to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 01:05 PM
-1

I’ll wave down at you from above. Like I said before if you think you would be compared to Icarus because he was brilliant, it won't be that. Because you completely miss the point of that tale. It's a cautionary tale. And the quoted sentence really speaks for itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 12:51 PM
5

If that's no different then there is no difference for women between being desired for their personality and who they are, and being desired as a cum receptacle and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 12:43 PM
4

No, I actually don’t even know what he looked like when we initially started dating. The 1 week you were texting was not dating. You started dating the moment you met when you first saw him and you found him attractive enough to date. and at the time he worked at a hardware store. What is the relevance of this statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 12:22 PM
0

Are you misgendering right now?!?!?!?!!?!!?!?!??!?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 10:03 AM
2

Yeah. I'd say that going to war, dying or being maimed, and then coming back and trying to reintegrate into society in which you will also be working on jobs where you could die or be maimed is kinda oppressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 09:50 AM
-2

Hm, that's not the reason you would be compared to Icarus :/ But good try!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 09:42 AM
1

But it is specified. It's sex. I don't understand why you need it to be more specific than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 09:29 AM
0

Are you saying this what, keeps you from assaulting women? You should go to your psychiatrist for a checkup because something is wrong here. I have no idea how you came to this after his comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 09:14 AM
5

That seems pretty pathetic to me. Putting all your worth into a orgasm is pretty lame way to live. To define your worth by the ability to cum. 😆😆😆 The dumbest thing I've ever heard. Kinda weird coming from a "Promiscuous Woman". Disgenuous? Lacking in self-awareness?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 09:10 AM
1

I don't think it's unreasonable to ask what it is then, that sex provides. You didn't ask that. You asked what sex provides that masturbation doesn't after he told you that his body craves sex (not masturbation). And he already answered. Sex just fulfills his body's need to engage in it. Nothing more nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 09:06 AM
1

Are you for real with this question?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 08:38 AM
1

It's like being born in an insanely rich family and be a millionaire and having people "liking" you because you are rich. It doesn't mean a thing and it is lonely. A completely off-base comparison. You honestly think "homeless person alone under the bridge somewhere" and "a rich person pondering if others like them for them or their money" is the same kind of lonely?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 08:36 AM
1

In your opinion, what should your self-worth be tied to so that it doesn't warrant therapy?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 08:26 AM
1

It's also popular to call people ugly, fat and other names. People also have issues around self worth when it comes to their looks completely outside of sex. It's like you have 0 self-awareness in your comments. Calling someone fat and ugly is literally insulting their ability to get sex. Do you think anyone would care for being called ugly or fat if it had no repercussions on the possibility of getting with someone you like?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 08:24 AM
1

And lots of people of all genders don't tie their self worth to sex. Honestly the folks in happy stable relationships don't do it because they have sex and find that it doesn't completely change their own sense of self. What a silly thing to say. It's like a trust fund baby telling a man struggling to provide for his family how he shouldn't equate his self-worth with money. Do you think those "folks in happy stable relationships" would be like that if they were in a dead bedroom situation :/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 08:18 AM
6

So? Not all of us get jaded and blamey. Such a hilarious statement coming from you considering your posting history here :D
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 08:01 AM
6

And how many of them are such savvy, smart, and manipulative abusers? 1%? 5%? Why are you talking about them when there are like 95% of "run of the mill" abusers that you can spot from a mile away?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 07:56 AM
3

Yup.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 07:51 AM
–

Yeah, more delusion is always more helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 12:46 PM
–

Your gender is delusional?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 12:45 PM
11

Really? Bare minimum you say? That would imply that people who are disruptive and offensive are heavily scrutinized. And we both know that can't be further from the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 11:30 AM
10

was only walking her home to hopefully get in her pants Why do you go straight to this? Do you think walking someone home inordinate amount of times is a good way to pump and dump? Could he actually be hopeful that she would become his girlfriend and maybe even something more in the future? People like you are the main cause of issues between the genders today. You assume the worst of the other person from the get-go and suddenly the starting point for that person, as far as you are concerned, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 11:24 AM
6

I don't think it's the school's responsibility to teach kids how to get dates. And parents are heavily biased to be good teachers to their own children. So who then?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 11:07 AM
2

Hrithik Roshan HASHHAhahaahahahHAHhHAHShhhshahshahhaHHAHAHAhAAHhaH
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 11:01 AM
11

This is so funny :D You are making the same excuse as pretty young women dating rich old men, an excuse as old as time "I'm with him because of his personality, it has nothing to do with his money!!!!". Some of them could actually be telling the truth when saying that, but if we are being honest, "some of them" would be a tiny insignificant minority in this case. If I point out to you a couple where you have a pretty young woman and an plain older gentleman, and ask you what's the first thing th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 10:46 AM
5

Or he knows them well :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:23 PM
2

So, in a roundabout way, you just said that you are ok with child abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:20 PM
1

Judging by your initial statement, you are equating potential paternity fraud with child abuse. So the only reason you could be against DNA testing to confirm paternity is if you are ok with child abuse. Are you ok with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:04 PM
2

As usual, some people will cry when they're ignored and then still complain when they're given attention 🤷🏼‍♀️ The irony in saying that after the fact women were fed literally the same excuse throughout history when voicing their (rightful) grievances about their condition. Funny how things switch the instant the shoe goes on the other foot. Or actually they don't switch at all. Do you want ... This doesn't sound like a threat to you at all? Like an unfair ultimatum? "Get with the program you st…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:26 PM
1

That sub is the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 11:50 AM
–

Being a standard piece of shit as usual I see :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 11:48 AM
4

How would you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 12:46 PM
6

You are completely correct. I'm gonna use your reasoning whenever someone cries about whatever discrimination they face (regardless if it's warranted or not) and tell them they are crying little bitches and what do they expect will change if they are lazy and they fucking do nothing about it other than making excuses. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 03:05 PM
4

I don’t watch cartoons pal. Oh sorry for assuming that you might have broad interests. My mistake. These are true, it’s mainly more of a school or college thing when we’re still young and trying. So what's the point in mentioning a scenario applicable only in those environments (when both of you are practically kids)? And even in those scenarios, I don't see that happening often. Are you really trying to convince me that high school and college-aged kids are accepting of awkwardness and shyness …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 03:01 PM
6

Yeah, much better to complain about what he cant change and keep living the quality life he has now. Even better than that is inventing scenarios in your head and saying that the person is lazy and crap for not doing that imaginary scenario while knowing nothing about them. You are debating with yourself and the ironic thing is that you actually act like you won the debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:53 PM
3

Yeah, I can see that fixing going real well :D
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:05 PM
6

It’s rather endearing when a guy is clearly trying to flirt with you but is struggling. Most woman don’t expect you to be sliver tongued but the effort is cute and appreciated Oh, stop the cap. You are equating anime scenarios with real life and saying they are true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:03 PM
4

Great. But that's not flirting. That's just compliments and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 02:00 PM
4

Yeah, wat a little bitch. He should stay 5'4 instead of improving to 5'11!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 01:58 PM
3

most are pretty average Which, to women, defaults to "not attractive" and we are back to square one again.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:58 PM
–

Argue in good faith. HAHAHaahahhhahahah
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:50 PM
1

I’m making the point that if men don’t appreciate the value their girlfriends and wives add to their lives So what's the point of saying the quoted thing then? Maybe you should take that up with yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 11:02 AM
1

Are you sure you properly thought this through? You are "punishing" good-looking jerks by saying that personality is important while also expecting all men to realize that looks are important as well. The conclusion is that those good-looking jerks are well aware that looks are important and that personality takes a back seat to that so they just continue on doing their thing, while average and less-than-average guys think that "personality is really important" without realizing the implied part…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 09:04 AM
5

I don't give a fuck about any of that. My issue with the blocking function is that you can't reply to the comment thread of the person who blocked you, not even to comments of other people. That's extremely annoying!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 08:33 AM
2

I’m making the point that if men don’t appreciate the value their girlfriends and wives add to their lives Could there be a situation or a scenario in which they don't actually add any value to their lives? Or do they always add value by default by being women and they (meaning women) just have to find someone who appreciates that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 08:28 AM
7

You can't see them either.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 08:26 AM
1

Everything she wants to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 08:20 AM
2

What do you mean “both sides”? He not knowing about her past. She not knowing how he would feel about her past if he knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 01:48 PM
2

Why would she set herself up to be devalued? For him to bring it up every time they argue? Why would she want the man she loves to feel less than and insecure? Trust? Or you prefer both sides to be blindsided? Do you really think it's good advice to tell a woman to stay quiet about her past so that her partner wouldn't be disgusted with her instead of finding someone who wouldn't mind? Your literal advice for a high n woman is to be with someone who could possibly be literally disgusted by her i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 11:39 AM
3

Is it not common sense that the potential partner has a personality that's attractive to you as well? So why mention one and not the other? That's what I'm asking, why is one always mentioned while the other is always implied?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 10:26 AM
3

Because to many women it is the entire package Yeah, but when asked about what that package comprises, you mention some things while omitting others. Can you see where the disconnect comes from now? How do you rationalize the fact that a guy being attractive is implied and it doesn't need to be said, but then you (not you specifically) go on and specifically mention other things like his personality and beliefs and whatnot? If I was to surmise something from that, it would be that the guy being …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 08:49 AM
6

"There is someone out there for everyone" That's not an advice. There is nothing prescriptive about that statement. It's just a platitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:57 PM
6

I feel bad for your reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:56 PM
-4

Maybe you need to click harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:30 AM
2

That was OPs suggestion to “filter the best ones” from “thousands of matches”. I was questioning that was really “easy”. It wasn’t my suggestion to do it. So take it up with OP. I'm going to use my male brain to interpret another male brain and say that he didn't mean literally go through each and every match out of thousands to select the best few. He probably meant that you go through enough of them to get 3 or 4 guys you like and then connect with them. In reality, people who have thousands o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:26 AM
-4

That's a you problem then. Zero of that is analogous to any women I know be that family or friends alike. As a matter of fact some of them wield much more authority than most men I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 12:42 PM
-1

Try responsible and accountable?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 12:37 PM
1

And as soon as you hear that widows do better than widowers, and the happiest groups are married men and single women Literally what he said :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 11:24 AM
0

In fact I am the "ugly guy in this scenario" too because I'm average looking. Are you seriously comparing an "average woman" to an "ugly guy"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 11:21 AM
1

Maybe look up what "looks" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 11:13 AM
2

How, exactly? I’ve never had thousands of matches, and it still took me a long time to filter. This is the main issue with women today. Do you really need to filter every fucking match? Is the fear of missing out so strong that you can't just be "Hey, this one seems ok, let's see what he has to say!" but you have to keep on checking out the next one and the next one and the next one because a "better" one might be just around the corner and you wouldn't forgive yourself that you didn't continue …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 08:49 AM
2

You just said the same thing he did just in a different way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 01:00 PM
3

Why would you see someone as not trashy if you perceive their behavior as trashy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 12:25 PM
4

No reason to post stupid comments like you are doing either, but here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 08:48 AM
6

A lot of the people in porn are exploited too. They are living humans. Kinda feels empty saying that while using iPhone or something made by slaves in China made from materials mined by little children in Africa and all of that while wearing clothes and shoes made by slave children and women in Indonesia. But hey, don't let that stop you from talking down from that high horse of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 08:42 AM
6

Why do your topics remain the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 02:43 PM
9

But your topics remain the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 02:40 PM
–

But that's such a moronic advice. If someone works extremely hard on being happy by not relying on relationships, and he attains that peak happiness on his own without a significant other, why would he want a relationship afterward? Your advice is essentially "Find a way to be happy alone!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:39 PM
–

I would think that your intellect alone should be enough to find a partner And this here is a perfect example of what bluepill represents.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:34 PM
–

You have dragged reading comprehension to an open field and executed it with a shotgun shot to the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 08:06 AM
1

That's a meme of James Harden cool walkout from the courtside interview after Huston beat the Clippers in a close-fought game.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 07:34 AM
1

Yes, because on face value, it would be impossible to interpret that statement as meaning all women. It's logistical impossible. But how do you know I didn't mean all women? Who exactly are you to decide what I actually meant to convey with that statement? But even if I agreed with you, and it's logically impossible to interpret my statement as "all women", how do you decide how many women I was referring to? Some, most, many, few, tiny minority, vast majority? See how stupid that is, I tell you…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 08:43 AM
1

Well, we could choose different terms All you need are qualifiers. That's all. Some, most, many, few, tiny minority, vast majority. It takes 2sec more to get that in front of the statement to make it specific, yet people aren't doing it. I'll let you figure out why that is. but more people should understand to just assume that you don't literally mean everybody in that demographic. But that's completely opposite of how language works. If I use non-specific terms that encompass everyone, while no…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 08:12 AM
1

And that's my point. Why should we consider that only a specific group of people is implied when the terms that are used ALWAYS encompass everyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 07:50 AM
1

The point is that there is no point in talking about aggregates when the vast majority of terms and sayings about a certain gender do not imply the aggregate but the whole gender. You are essentially arguing that "hey, look here, these terms that are used 1% of the time imply aggregate, so I don't know why people are using them to generalize the entire gender" when 99% of the terms actually imply the whole. Does "Teach men not to rape!" imply that we need to teach those 10 men who rape not to ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 07:36 AM
–

Are all twinks kpop men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 03:44 PM
6

What's the aggregate of #killallmen and "Men are pigs!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 02:01 PM
9

If you were reasonable in your assumptions about things and asked about something "boring" like depression would they take away your woman card?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 01:46 PM
10

If I, for example, make a "omg you are fucking disgusting" face toward a fat girl asking for my phone number, I'm not a piece of shit person, she's just a stranger so it's all fine?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 01:40 PM
3

Being nice to someone as a response to them being nice to you isn't what we are talking about here or what the comment you replied to was talking about. I have no fucking idea how you managed to interpret it like that from his comment. He was so obviously talking about someone being nice to him only because they needed him to do their homework and nothing else, a means to an end.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 12:45 PM
-1

I mean yeah, I don't know anybody with a poppy field in their closet. Because you can only be a dealer if you produce the stuff yourself, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 12:20 PM
0

She said "a lot of drug dealers". Are a lot of drug dealers selling ONLY habitual drugs and nothing else? And habitual drugs can also be destructive because they are often a pathway to hard drugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 11:25 AM
-4

So supplying poison to ruin other people's lives for your own financial gain = legitimately super nice and trustworthy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 09:34 AM
–

And you are also what would statistically be named as "extreme outlier".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 03:27 PM
–

Tell me how much that iphone will offer once you revert to a financial drain that shits around everywhere :)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 03:09 PM
-1

What a brain dead take. Do you have a lot of experience being a heterosexual man in today's dating world?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 06:56 AM
3

It also works for men to do whatever to get sex they so desire. The morality of both of your choices on the other hand is hmmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 06:19 AM
3

It can't be cheating if you aren't in a committed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 06:17 AM
3

It's like gaming. But ya know... excessive. Quite a simple concept really Subjectivity is also quite a simple concept that is heavily applicable here. That's why I asked. There are people that consider 1h a night as excessive gaming. And that goes for people who haven't neglected any responsibilities and have done anything and everything that needs to be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 12:52 PM
2

What exactly useful are you doing while also doom scrolling?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 10:13 AM
4

Define excessive gaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 10:10 AM
–

“submissive wife he could beat” What the fuck is this caricature that you are comparing all men going abroad to find a partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 10:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter