TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fichek Archive

View 0 posts and 3,598 comments by Fichek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,598 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You are the best debater here, don't let anyone tell you otherwise! You are showing your debating excellence with each and every comment. I would be so pressed to pick the best comment to illustrate how good of a debater you actually are, because there are so many on this topic here alone. Just continue doing an excellent job you have been doing up till now, and thank you for your service.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:57 PM
5

It's self-awareness and therapy. All part of your personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 08:02 AM
–

You are so fucking naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:01 PM
–

Yeah. Now it's probably above 90% :D
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:53 PM
–

To be fair the average 25 year old woman if she isn’t fat is not actually average due to how overweight everyone else it. Does that not apply to an average 25 year old man if he isn't fat? 50k isn’t average lifestyle anymore though so it’s not average these days it’s the sad reality if you on 50k you probably struggling. Idk I think average implies middle class. The average income doesn't care if you struggle or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:49 PM
2

Perhaps bedding a lot of partners is a predictor of infidelity/poor relationships in future, rather than a cause? Perhaps jumping out of a plane without a parachute is a predictor of death in the future, rather than a cause? Dude, it's a good predictor exactly because it's a cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:37 PM
–

People are becoming more religious. At least in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:01 PM
–

OP is ignoring the fact that Aztecs are still around. And you are ignoring the fact that you are replying to a comment of a person who, like 99.99% of other people, thinks that the Aztecs are long gone. That's how irrelevant they are today. Think about why that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:32 PM
–

Some are more so than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:21 PM
5

But do they want it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:00 PM
3

:D
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:59 PM
6

Do you think you are an exception in this case, or do you think that most women could tell your story as their own?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:58 PM
5

but other women Yes, all women other than you :D
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:46 PM
–

It's a matter of choice, nothing more, nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:07 AM
2

Nope. If you say this: Society doesn't think about men who don't get laid. Hurtful but true. Doesn't that imply that he is worthless to society as a whole? This sub is less debate and more twist words into the worst possible scenario. Of which you are one of the guiltiest, ironically enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:26 AM
-1

But you just told him he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:21 PM
5

Do you know how many lazy or barely employed guys get laid? A lot. Is that a positive thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:50 PM
-4

Did anyone claim otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:26 PM
9

If you had the most basic reading comprehension you'd see that "verbalising" the flaw is the first thing I did. If I had the most basic reading comprehension, I'd see that what you consider "verbalising" the flaw was just taking the analogy at face value (low-hanging fruit in a debate) because you weren't able to properly verbalise the flaw in his reasoning for using said analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 11:17 AM
5

The issue isn't with you dismissing the analogy because it was (by your opinion) "fundamentally flawed". The issue is the way you "dismissed" it because the thing you did here is something you can do with any analogy, even the ones that aren't fundamentally flawed but actually used perfectly in the context of the debate. So I can only assume that you are unable to verbalise why you think his analogy was "fundamentally flawed", so you went with the lowest of the low-hanging fruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 11:10 AM
-1

If you are "deconstructing" it as you claim (whatever that means for you), you are by default engaging with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:49 AM
-1

The analogy could be bad, but the point is not to take it literally like you did because: Food is a human need. is completely irrelevant because (counterintuitive as it may be) it had nothing to do with food.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:47 AM
6

Food is a human need. Sex is a human desire. And analogy is something that flies right over your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 10:43 AM
1

Top 0.00001% argument for this. Really hits hard!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:49 PM
2

So u have the solution "be rich" yet you refuse while using the term "unfair" for ur choice to be homeless and destitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:37 PM
4

Isn't that poetic justice of it all? If you are painting people as monsters, why are you surprised they become monsters?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:34 PM
1

Oh, my mistake. I misunderstood. I read it as if you are single right now. Without being with your partner beforehand, you wouldn't want to be with someone like him because it would take a man of your dreams to consider dating (meaning that he isn't that).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 02:10 PM
1

Generally is generous. Everything I've seen is just a normal Reddit every day. I was just there, and however I sort things, I don't see anything similar to what you are saying. By the way, are we now using 36,000-member Reddit communities to infer general public opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:23 PM
1

That's such a horrible thing to say. You say you love your partner, but if you were single now, you wouldn't choose him as a partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:10 PM
13

I'm an atheist, but every time I visit PPD, I get the uncontrollable urge to kneel down and wholeheartedly thank god that women in my life are the total opposite of the top 1% women posters (and some others) here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:43 PM
1

Just need to check Reddit popular to see how pissed people are rn Really? People in a leftist echochamber like Reddit are pissed off about Trump. That's new, I've never seen that before.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:36 PM
2

I'm not insulted because someone is incompatible. You aren't insulted because you feel like his (whoever he is) actions don't reflect on you in any way; it's just the way he is, he always goes 50:50. And you, for whatever reason, feel like you should be paid for in full. But imagine if you are searching for a partner and men collectively decide, "Oh, yeah, she's a 50:50 girl!" while at the same time going 100% for other girls. Would you consider it a compliment in that case? I'm going out on a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:19 PM
1

But people are starting to wake up to this and it's exciting to organise to fix those issues, even though the task is monumental. Where? How? Is there anything specific that you are referencing here, or is this a part of your mantra?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 10:48 AM
6

Yeah! He should be much more attractive to do something like that!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 07:25 PM
1

So much for "wanting to debate".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 04:39 PM
1

I believe that I would like to see the studies on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 04:04 PM
1

What was I supposed to debate with you after your initial reply to my comment? What did you even say in that comment that warranted a reply? Here: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1nkeuxr/comment/nexpkl8/ If you offer meat for a debate, I won't shy away from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 03:34 PM
1

If only more people were like me! Btw, I'm still waiting for you to post assortive mating studies on that other comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:46 PM
3

That's a caricature of an actual situation that happens often. Girl gets with a buff dude and then complains, "But he is constantly in the gym!!!!" Yeah, no shit, how do you think he got that buff in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:39 PM
1

I don’t mean this as an insult, but :D
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:31 PM
1

I do try.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:24 PM
1

I have enjoyed many people whole, and I will continue to enjoy many people whole!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:13 PM
1

Do I have to post the assortative mating studies again ? Please do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:11 PM
1

Not much. With "ew" you at least know how you stand with that person. "Meh" is worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:05 PM
3

Women have a far different set of standards for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 02:03 PM
7

Because it had a bunch of major flaws Oh, ok. Which might those be? selection bias Wha? limited sample size Whaaaa? no control Whaaaaaaa? and the survey marked “skip” as an automatic 1 rating out of 5, potentially tainting the results. I never heard about this before. Where did you get this info from? Can you link it? I wanna check it out. If you are correct about this, then the sample really is tainted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 11:53 PM
1

I was conversing with the Hooters sex worker, so I was distracted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 09:00 PM
1

So the answer is no. Ok. Thank you. It would be much easier if you said that from the get-go.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:56 PM
1

A simple yes or no would suffice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:32 PM
1

Do they mention Hooters servers?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:16 PM
5

The first is presumably what OP has done, because that's the type of data that people normally have available to themselves. No, it isn't. The type of data that people "usually" have is ALL of their family/friends/acquaintances, not just the partnered ones (or any other characteristic that filters for a smaller subset). When someone says, "Everyone from my family is so tiny!!!!" that doesn't mean that he saw his 4'9 third cousin Carlos and made a generalized statement for his entire family. It m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 03:46 PM
11

Selection bias. No, it's not (I'm not getting into the truthfulness of the OP just the way it's presented). Selection bias would be if he observed all of his partnered friends and acquaintances, and then identified the abusers among them, and then said, "See, all abusers always have partners!!!!" But if he "collected" his abusers independent of their relationship status and the ability to get themselves a woman, and afterwards observed for that and noticed that all of them have it easy when it c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 02:54 PM
5

You turned out really nice in that gif.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:12 PM
2

I do consider strippers and Hooters servers sex workers. Thank you for your consideration, but it's irrelevant in this case. Hooters servers are in no way considered sex workers. Strippers also aren't sex workers but fall under that umbrella for worker protection rights. A sex worker is a person who sells sex for money. And there's no "trusting" a man to not talk to their server at Hooters. It would be kinda hard to place an order without talking to your server, don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 12:48 PM
2

I'm not the person you're asking, but this seems like a common distinction in most relationships? It was. But in the olden times, when you got hitched, you generally put the club on the downlow. So if that's changed, the "common distinction" changes as well. Establishment that sells food and drinks- OK OK. Establishment that sells food and drinks with interactions with sex workers- not OK I agree, it's not OK if the person will interact with sex workers. But the entire point of this discussion w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 12:00 PM
1

Ok, you explained the difference. Can you now explain why one is OK and the other one is NOT OK?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 11:06 AM
4

But don't you think it's kinda disingenuous to compare dinner/stand-up show/movie/play/ballet/beach to night club as if they are the same thing because someone could approach you at any of those places? It's like saying that free solo climbing is equally as dangerous as just walking the pavement because you can die doing either of those things. Or do you honestly think that being in a situation where you are potentially drunk, with much lower inhibitions than usual, with impaired judgement, in a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:32 AM
2

Is the soon-to-be groom not participating as well? So it's for him too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:50 AM
1

You are at the very end of a relatively long discussion thread, and you somehow managed to completely miss the point. Husbands can go to dance clubs with their friends if their wives go to dance clubs with theirs. Similarly, if husbands go to female strip clubs, wives can go to male strip clubs. Great. Good thing everyone is in agreement there, and no one claimed otherwise. The point of contention here was the scenario where the husband doesn't approve of his wife going to the dance club. To whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:47 AM
2

Explain the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 07:43 AM
2

I still don't get it. But thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:57 AM
2

What's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:11 AM
4

I think independent career women would disagree with you on that. Paid maternity leave and then back to work after a year =/= stay at home mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:00 AM
1

We're right back to, "trust your partner or find another one." We agreed on that from the start. As long as it's the same thing whether someone goes to a strip club or a dance club.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 12:57 AM
9

They aren't complaining that they are having to pay for dates for a stay at home mother of their future children. They are complaining that they are having to pay for dates for independent career women who forget the concept of a wallet when the bill comes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 12:55 AM
2

As already mentioned, strip clubs are where someone will take off their clothes for the enjoyment of others. A dance club is where people dance for the enjoyment of themselves. And like I already said, in the context of this discussion, that distinction is completely irrelevant. In actuality, you just don't like strip clubs, and therefore, the context somehow magically doesn't apply to them. But then you have no argument because someone else could say the same about dance clubs, just because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 12:43 AM
3

I already have. You didn't. Not in the context of this discussion. Because you can't. Because you have driven yourself into a corner with your own argument. Yes, if someone is upset that their partner goes to the club, they should either trust their partner or find a different partner. is equally applicable to a dance club and a strip club. Either you trust your partner or you don't. If you think that there is a difference between the two in this context, please elaborate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 11:20 PM
1

So explain the relevance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 10:39 PM
–

Ts from the LGBTs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 10:23 PM
3

It doesn't help. You haven't explained the difference in the context of this discussion. You just explained what each thing is, which is completely irrelevant if you have complete trust in your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 10:22 PM
–

Yeah, you're right. Let's institutionalize everyone you dislike. But can we at least also institutionalize the Ts as well. They constantly invent new words and names and pester everyone to use them. They are so massively unpleasant to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 09:42 PM
12

And you are really good at being empathetic. As I have already mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 09:33 PM
–

Oh, how very specific of you to only focus on specifically autistic men for this :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 09:23 PM
4

Yes, together with the completeness of the LGBT community.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:56 PM
–

The empathetic gender strikes again!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:55 PM
5

It wasn't that long ago when we used to institutionalize men who like men, women who like women, men who think they are women, and women who think they are men. I'm not saying they should be institutionalized now, but it does put things into perspective when you realize our society just didn't tolerate these types of people to the extent we tolerate them in today's post-Reagan era. It was Dead Prez Reagan who closed all the institutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:50 PM
6

A strip club and a dance club are two very different things. What's the difference? I mean, if we go by your supposition that everyone should have complete and utter trust in their partners, what could be the meaningful difference between a strip club and a dance club in this context?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:40 PM
1

If a man views spending friends and family a cost than yes he should not get into a relationship. YOUR family. YOUR friends. Not his. YOURS. He wasn't mincing words when he wrote that. Chores around the house need to get done when you are single. Correct. That shouldn't be mentioned. You need financial stability to pay for that house that you are living in it as a single person. Partially correct. You can be crazy wild with your finances when you are single, and you can buy whatever shit your he…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 03:13 PM
2

But I really would expect everyone to lie or bend the truth about their sexual history. That's all I wanted you to say. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:45 PM
1

No I'm not. I literally stating facts. Yes, you did. But in saying this: Husband gets sex and exclusivity. You said that the husband gets MORE because he also gets exclusivity. The point of contention between you and the person you were debating was "Is exclusivity more?" He thinks it isn't. You think it is. But you conveniently forget to mention that in addition to exclusivity, the husband also gets a truckload of obligations as well. FWB sex is almost a no-strings-attached sex, while "husband …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:42 PM
2

My suggestion is understanding that people can lie. Ok, but why make that suggestion was my question. I don't know if you have a significant other, but when you ask him something, do you expect an honest answer from him? You probably do. Do you at any point think "people, including my SO, can always lie"? You probably don't. So if you decide to ask your SO about his past relationships and sexcapades, do you expect the truth from him? If you do, why would you suggest to the guy you replied to tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 01:07 PM
1

You have an excellent answer to a question nobody asked. But thanks anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:52 PM
1

Also, everyone can and does tell the truth. In all situations. Even basic politeness is based on your truthfulness. So, I have to choose the baseline. Is your suggestion that I always think that women would lie about their past?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:49 PM
0

They want a relationship with the man as a person Really? So why then would his height, weight, face, hair, voice etc etc if you want a relationship with him as a person? Only one of those is self-interested Hm, I count 2 self-interested sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:46 PM
1

their personalities are that awful Nah, it's just women being that shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:46 PM
2

Why do some men like you insist on women taking on your value structure? Do you have a problem with people having different values? But you are literally doing the same. You are telling him what he should value based on your own value system.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:41 PM
1

Are you suggesting that we have a baseline, "All women always lie about their past?"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:38 PM
–

Leagues don't really exist. Is that why I'm seeing all those 3s walking hand in hand with 9s and 10s? Oh wait......
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:19 AM
–

Classifying people into leagues based on looks alone is short-sighted and far too narrow of a qualification to base a person's entire worth. Good thing OP didn't claim anything close to that. People tend to date others that are roughly as attractive as they are. It's the way it is. Colloquially, "in their league". That in NO WAY means that someone that's hot has more value as a person. Good thing OP didn't claim anything close to that. People push back on "leagues" because a person's worth shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:16 AM
–

Regardless of how widespread you think abuse is, most people don't solve problems or express their emotions through violence. Not even most, I would actually say that is true for the vast majority of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 07:58 PM
9

Some women are into men that are on the feminine side. How many of them are there? Those are so rare that are only few and far between. And even if he manages to meet such a woman, it's not like she would be into him by default. He should go after women that are into him... Not flirt "shamelessly" with people that are NOT into him... How do you know they aren't into him? Maybe they aren't into him the way he is now, but they would be if he presented himself less feminine and more masculine?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 07:50 PM
1

Do you call out your friends if they play this push-pull shit? And please don't tell me you've never seen your friends doing something like this..
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 08:43 AM
2

Is there anyone denying that? The point is the difference in how far you can push things before they are considered creepy as an attractive guy vs less attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 08:13 AM
5

If you are the 'bestie' type and just start being overtly sexual with all the women treating you so, it will just be awkward and they will ostracize you, not suddenly want to fuck you. So what is he supposed to do in that case?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 08:10 AM
1

I don't understand. Is it more than 3 or less?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 09:07 PM
1

I know because my husbands bands fans are largely middle-aged lesbians All 3 of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:20 PM
1

most women people don’t solve problems or express their emotions with violence
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:17 PM
1

Oh wow. So women don't want to be breadwinners in either heterosexual or homosexual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:09 PM
2

You clearly don’t have the capacity to engage in that. Rules for thee ...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 06:34 PM
6

I think it tells you far more about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:04 PM
1

🤡 This was very fitting :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 10:31 AM
20

So you establish the entirety of someone's personhood based on their weakest moment?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:50 AM
–

I don't think lots of people were claiming that. What the main claim was with regard to that is that "Manly, masculine and high testosterone" means not unattractive. Meaning that the opposite of that is unattractive, so you want to avoid that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 08:03 AM
3

Easy. I do swipe right on men that i’m not really attracted to (but not repulsed also) That's still a looks check. It's just that your standard is way lower compared to others. You don't give a fuck about the personality of the guy that repulses (whatever that means) you physically. He could literally be the perfect amalgamation of all the character traits that you are looking for in a person, and he still wouldn't get a chance because he didn't pass the looks check.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 03:32 PM
1

Do you carry the fetus on the first date? Or the second date?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 08:15 AM
–

Exactly the sentiment OP is talking about. But you are the one who actually did her a favor (or tried to do her a favor, you didn't say if she listened to your advice) because if she bought those initial jeans, she would probably be a laughing stock for everyone else who isn't your friend group.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 07:20 AM
4

If she's that shallow But she isn't, that's the point. All women on PPD will tell you (and they constantly do) he HAS TO pass the attraction threshold (for her) to be considered anything more than a friend. And that's a completely normal and expected stance to have in regard to this. But then you can't claim that something else is more important than looks. If B would never be taken into consideration unless A is triggered first, how can you claim that B is more important?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:40 PM
5

but personality matters more for getting a relationship No, it doesn't. Because if you don't pass the attraction threshold, your personality won't get vetted at all. So how can you say that personality matters more for a relationship? I never understood this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:57 PM
0

You seem to be whining about whining, so why are you whining?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:42 PM
3

Did you know there are other things that life contains other than having sex and dating? Which might be those "other things" that men have an obvious advantage over women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 01:18 PM
3

It's real easy, just explain how I'm wrong. He did, but you are unable to understand simple concepts with regard to statistics, or you are just acting daft. I know which of the 2 possibilities I lean towards. But you can't, so you won't. He did, but you are unable to understand simple concepts with regard to statistics, or you are just acting daft. I know which of the 2 possibilities I lean towards.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 12:00 PM
-1

In general, very empathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 07:38 AM
0

There have consistently been threads on this subreddit in which you have men asking for empathy/sympathy/understanding. So clearly SOME people want that. Are there threads that they want empty empathy/empty sympathy/empty understanding? If not, then what are you talking about? They want actual empathy/sympathy/understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 07:36 AM
5

In so doing you made your life even more shit but you don't even realize it. Maybe. Possibly. But I don't think those people care. The way I see it, they had 2 options: Option 1: I feel ostracised, demonised, neglected, and in general treated like shit. If Harris wins, even if things don't get worse, they definitely won't get better. And the side that's doing this to me wins again and keeps on treating me like shit while living their life hunky dory. Option 2: I feel ostracised, demonised, negle…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 01:22 PM
1

something almost everyone does So what's the point of mentioning that in the profile? It's like saying, "My hobbies are autonomous breathing and body temperature regulation." Why are you so defensive about this? You are defending women for the same thing you would shit on men (which you are already doing in this thread) if they were doing that. If the guy had in his bio, "My interests are watching Netflix, eating sushi, and social media." you would think "OMG this guy has literally no hobbies, I…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:36 PM
3

men should take women’s playbook and engage in their interests more socially. They do. Just because you don't give a fuck about those activities doesn't mean they don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:05 PM
3

Of course it is. After you trigger all the other things the commenter above talked about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:52 AM
3

Maybe that was the point. Side A was "losing" to B, which revelled in their misfortune and enjoyed the mistreatment with a holier-than-thou attitude. Ironically enough, side B was supposed to be the tolerant one. Election time comes, and some members of side A (and undecided ones who were also caught in the shit flinging that side B was doing) simply decide that they will vote for the maximum chaos option even though they wouldn't do that in different circumstances. You were adamant in keeping m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:49 AM
–

You are a direct example of what happens when you don't get that cringe edginess out of your system in highschool. It's actually quite fun to observe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:30 AM
0

Said the product of breeding.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:27 AM
–

You seem to be smelling lots of your own farts in your little bubble. Try making that bubble a little larger at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:21 AM
1

The constant misogynistic vitriol spewed by men on here, for example, does not warrant me saying that women are being "abused" by said comments. 95% of other women posters here would disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:08 AM
0

Really? And what would your comment be if he said something to the effect, "I don't think getting my son a dress from Frozen is the best idea ever. We are still living in a world bound by strict gender norms, and he would be the prime target for mocking and bullying, and I don't want to allow something like that to happen to him."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:26 PM
1

Don't be dishonest. You weren't clarifying. You were preparing a "gotcha" if he answered in a way you expected him to answer. But he didn't, which is quite ironic when you think about it. You are all for gender neutrality and erasure of gender roles, and yet you have clear expectations of how he, as a man (because of his flair "Egalitarian Mens Rights Activist Man"?) would act. Quite telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 06:59 AM
7

But the issue is that all you just said here are pure platitudes because one gender is so loud and united in proclamations of how "traditional gender roles must be abolished!", a generalized statement that includes everyone, but in reality, they only refer to themselves (their own gender) when they espouse it. What kind of fairness can be expected down the line when the starting point of it all is dishonesty?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 09:45 PM
1

That's completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. You are talking about gender expression. The comment you replied to was about gender expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 09:26 PM
22

Beautiful at any size? But only if you are a woman :D
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 02:08 PM
-1

As they say, more women would do better if they had a wife. Who exactly is "they" that says that? Never heard of it, and will probably never hear of it. But "they" could easily check that if "they" wanted to. But I guess it's easier just to spout nonsense regardless of the easily verifiable facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:30 AM
2

I'm just following your reasoning. You are taking it to extremes, not me. You, as the vast majority of women, are probably afraid of walking alone at night. Why? By your own reasoning, I would conclude that you consider ALL men dangerous pieces of trash that only prey on unsuspecting victims. But it couldn't be that since you are married. So it can't be ALL. If not ALL, how many is it then? Well, obviously enough for you, and the vast majority of women to feel apprehensive about walking alone at…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:58 AM
2

Meaning of discerning: "Discerning" describes someone or something with sharp insight and good judgment, able to understand and evaluate the quality of things or people clearly and intelligently. A discerning person makes careful, accurate distinctions, as in being a discerning critic or having a discerning eye for quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:41 AM
8

Pretty sure you didn't either.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:30 AM
–

More picky =/= more discerning.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:25 AM
–

So you agree that all women are trashy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:25 AM
–

How do you figure that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:23 AM
–

Or you need to be clearer in what you are trying to convey because it seems everyone got the same message :/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:18 AM
–

But the question is whether you see that behavior as acceptable or aspirational, or something to be embarrassed about. That's not the question. The question is how common that behavior is. If you and your two saintess friends are surrounded by a sea of trashy women that you don't interact with, can you really say that women are generally not trashy? Mind you, I'm not making the claim that all women are trashy; I'm just illustrating how misguided your reasoning is. You are arguing from a moral st…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:12 AM
–

and therefore are more discerning Are they really, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:00 AM
1

So that means that there is no penalty for not paying child support, and your initial point is moot, wouldn't you agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:52 AM
3

I was taught that orgasm with a partner is the closest one can experience to heaven on earth. Is that something you learn in Catholic school? Who exactly "teaches" you that? I can't comprehend anything being better than either of those things Have you tried chocolate?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 10:57 PM
1

I'm not doing that. I wasn't even part of your conversation previously. I'm just pointing out the flaws in your reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 02:10 PM
–

Great comment! And great retort below as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 02:08 PM
–

I feel like you’re letting a lot of your general frustrations out on me. If irony could kill, you would be dead 10x over.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 02:06 PM
3

That's completely irrelevant. There are a multitude of things that are extremely important for a relationship that take only a fraction of the time sex takes. How much time in a day do you spend sharing basic non-sexual intimacy with your partner? How long does a drive-by kiss last? A hug? A kind word? A kind gesture? All of that combined takes only a fraction of the time sex takes. Do you also find that unimportant because of the lenght of time in a day it occupies?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 01:55 PM
2

"A lot of women approach men! A lot I say! Not me, I never did that. But a lot do! A lot I say!"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 01:43 PM
1

You are telling a singular success story that fits your narrative. That is a textbook definition of "anecdotal evidence". If he told you about successfully cold approaching an attractive woman, you would reject that completely, even though he would be doing exactly the same thing you are doing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 01:37 PM
11

We aren't talking about the same thing. Women not saying "Looks don't matter!" doesn't equal women being very open about looks mattering. Women aren't very open about that. Men are. When a man is asked what he considers attractive in a woman, he will open with "cute, sexy, pretty" and then list character traits he also finds attractive. When you ask a woman what she considers attractive in men, she will list a plethora of character traits / interests / activities and whatever else, but she won't…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 01:11 PM
2

Because they think they CAN, they think they DESERVE. How do you think people feel when you tell them they probably WON'T get the thing they feel they DESERVE? Do you think they will step back and objectively assess their situation and think about why that is? As William Munny said: "Deserve's got nothing to do with it."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 12:56 PM
3

women aren't attracted to average guys because they can get better ones You see, this is "the curse of CAN". Just because they CAN, it doesn't mean that they WILL. It's far more probable that they WON'T. So in effect, they think they can, they are under the impression that they can, but in any meaningful and functional sense, they CAN'T.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 12:46 PM
3

Sex is a tiny part of the relationship To you. I would dare say that you are in a tiny minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 11:32 AM
1

The top comment of this thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 11:09 AM
12

Nah I think women are very open Well, you think wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 08:29 AM
6

So I have never heard the "men who can't find partners are probably incels who hate women" Neither have I. But how different is that from saying "There is probably something wrong with him" (implying an obvious character flaw), if a woman is asked why some dude can't get a girlfriend? Because I have heard that A LOT. 9 times out of 10 if you ask a woman why that and that doesn't have a partner, they will say "There is probably something wrong with him" instead of saying "Well, he's obviously not…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 08:13 AM
7

Is it possible to express actual grievances you have with half the human race (like that half is constantly doing to men) without it being considered insulting?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 07:55 AM
3

Or you can have many sexual partners and only one or two real actual friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 07:24 AM
4

I think you’re being extremely naive if you think there’s not a huge overlap between misogyny and inceldom. It's a good thing then that he didn't claim otherwise. I wouldn’t call the “average non-incel male demographic” particularly misogynist or feminist. If you ask feminists or feminist leaning people, if you aren't feminist you are by default, at least somewhat, misogynistic. So it's either/or.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 07:19 AM
12

The question for you was: "Can you give examples of how a reserved introvert can appear charming?" You answer: "By not being introverted."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 04:12 PM
1

I always wondered how do you decide what statement from "Men" you will believe?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 12:13 PM
–

Is it against the rules to tell someone to have their head checked if they, obviously, need their head checked? Asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 10:31 AM
–

and theres plenty of women who are like me on this Really? How many of them do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 02:06 PM
2

You think they need that here :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 10:35 AM
1

I love this! I just love posts like this one, where the poster is so sure they are making a cogent point for their case, when in reality they are destroying their own argument so efficiently. What the OP wanted to portray: "Look at these men who, despite not being good looking, slept with and married so many women! It's not about looks, it's about status!" What OP is actually proving: To actually beat good looks as a means of getting women, you have to have the sheer amount of status that only a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:40 AM
0

Each and every one of them would be nothing without him. And if you asked each and every one of them, knowing what they do now, and experiencing what they did, would they make the same choice they did then, I'm pretty sure each and every one of them would say yes. But hey, keep on fighting the good fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:01 AM
1

So they were dumb?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 07:58 AM
1

Nice cherry pick Cherry-pick? I cherry-picked the OBJECTIVE OF THE RESEARCH? as the studies control has…young men who are sexually active. What are you talking about? Quote it from the study.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:46 PM
1

Me personally I don't care about height as long as he's as tall as I am. Holy contradiction Batman! Do you think there is a difference between your statement and "Me personally I don't care about height as long as he's 6' tall."?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:29 PM
1

Objective. To examine sexual frequency decline among American men and women between the ages of 44 and 72 born from 1933 to 1948. Are you sure your power is back?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:22 PM
6

I think the problem is that men claim that women don’t find their non-chad boyfriends also attractive. Well, you think wrong. The problem is that women claim that they treat their non-chad boyfriends better than they treated chad, while at the same time making that same non-chad boyfriend jump through 1 billion of hoops, for a sliver of the good treatmen that chad gets for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:19 PM
2

Most women are treated quite badly by men. Funny thing is, most women would disagree with you. Most serial killers and rapists are men. Not only most, but an overwhelming majority of them are men. And yet they are a tiny sliver of a minority of the totality of men. Most people who suddenly decide to live their partner when she is pregnant or has a toddler is men. And women have nothing to do with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:15 PM
1

There's always a tradeoff. And what do you consider a trade-off in this case?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:11 PM
1

Are you in the mood now? :D
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:02 PM
16

No more or less than their prospective female partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 09:04 AM
1

Not disgusted no. I think you should be. I can’t imagine anyone feeling a deep sense of revulsion about something so inconsequential. But is it really inconsequential? I mean, in the grand scheme of things, it absolutely is completely inconsequential, just like every other post and comment on PPD. But why then even comment? What's the point in copy pasting chatgpt output? You really don't have some sort of a feeling for being a "mouthpiece of AI" when someone asked you for your own original thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 09:00 AM
0

It's like writing the most poignant definition of selection bias. And then, as a cherry on top, saying that your experience is completely the opposite of that (anecdotal), but then you double down on selection bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 08:23 AM
1

Do you feel disgusted with yourself after you copy/paste chatgpt output as a complete comment with 0 input by you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 07:51 AM
3

Personally, I'm glad my wife had a lot of disappointment before me lol. I'm the best she's ever had and it isn't even close. I am far more secure in that than I would be if I was her first and only and we merely assumed we had top tier sexual chemistry. While we are on the subject of self-owns, I would say that this is quite a decent example of that. Think for a second about what you said here. You are glad that your wife had a shitty experience after a shitty experience, so that her bar was so …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 01:28 PM
1

Women who miss their exes typically miss the person more holistically and all of their affection, intimacy, and moments together. Oh wow. There is literally no opportunity that you will waste to be "holier-than-thou". Are women really such spiritual, otherworldly beings? It's kinda curious how women are missing the entirety of their ex-partners, literally everything about them, and somehow they aren't together anymore. Funny how that is. But when you descend from that high horse of yours and fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 01:15 PM
1

Still digging? :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 10:22 AM
2

All the flags. Name a flag. That's the flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 02:32 PM
1

Like all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:54 PM
6

And if the society doesn't exist, neither do women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:42 PM
3

Are you honestly asking me why recommending Marx to a 16-year-old is a stupid idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 02:25 PM
–

So many words to simply say "She isn't that into him!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:58 PM
–

principles It's not a principle if you apply it differently to different people. In that case, it's a standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:46 PM
–

Nobody is saying “settle for someone who’s treating you worse” You are saying exactly that. I don't mean literally. Literally you are saying "different", but when clarifying the difference you are clearly describing "worse". Okay, let’s think of it this way. Say compatibility within a relationship can be summed up in attribute sliders - sexual, romantic, emotional, humor, problem solving, conflict management and whatever else you want to add. Okay. Say partner A scores a 10/10 in sexual compatib…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:29 PM
–

Is it an arbitrary waiting period? Of course it is. If others didn't have to wait, and you do, it's that by definition. “I would maybe prefer to get to know this person non sexually first”? And why would she think that way? Could it be because the sexual part is somewhat absent so she would like to get to know him better to see if there are other things about him that are good enough for her to maybe/eventually compensate for that initial lack of attraction? You are literally using an argument a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 12:57 PM
5

Yeah, I don't like his work for some reason. But regardless, it's the crappiest of crappy recommendations to an impressionable 16-year-old.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 12:49 PM
8

You didn't recommend a book, you recommended an author. And it's a complete and utter shit of a recommendation. You are saying that he is too young for the PPD poison (which he most certainly is, but then again, can you ever be not "too young" for the shit that PPD is), and then you nonchalantly recommend the ultimate poison of the mind, to a 16-year-old. That kind of recommendation is such lazy intellectualism. It's the equivalent of supermodels recommending The Alchemist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 12:30 PM
6

Considering divorce statistics, seems to be about 50% likelihood of lifelong love if you are able to get relationships. Nope. It's a 50% likelihood of not divorcing. Nothing more, nothing less. If you didn't divorce, that doesn't mean you are in a lifelong loving relationship with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:59 AM
11

read some Marx No, fuck no. Why are people recommending this shit ever? Read literally anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:53 AM
1

Of course it was. He said: More options = advantage. Period. More options compared to what? Compared to who? It's entirely obvious that he was comparing men's experience to women's. Did he need to say explicitly "More options that women have compared to almost no options men have = advantage. Period." for you to acknowledge that he mean that (even though you are well aware what he meant). And even if he said it explicitly like that, you would make the same reply you did. So what's the point in b…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 08:28 AM
1

I'm a mid-40s woman who received waaay more attention from options in my 20s... ...and it actually really sucked. This was your first reply to a top comment saying that having more options is ALWAYS an advantage (compared to men having almost no options at all). You are countering that by saying that having options sucked. It's like if a broke person tells you "OMG, you are a millionaire, that's fucking fantastic!!!" and you reply "Yeah, but I'm not a billionaire though, am I :( ?"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:42 PM
1

So it's just a question of slight inconvenience? And you compare it to having no options at all and think it's a valid comparison?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:12 PM
1

I always try to be gender neutral in these cases Oh, so this was you trying! Could have fooled me :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 04:09 PM
4

Danger for women doesn't mean danger for men. Really? It's a good thing that the previous commenter supplied you with enough counterexamples. And that only happened to him. Now imagine countless other men and countless other similar situations. And btw, if a man doesn't follow a woman home or to the nearest cab, he incurs 0 danger to his wellbeing. If he does follow her home or to the cab, the danger isn't 0 anymore. And the danger for her is significantly lessened. For example in some cities I …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 02:09 PM
2

What did you expect as an answer? Doesn't the woman herself imply that the circumstances could be perceived as dangerous by the fact that she is asking to be escorted?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 11:05 AM
1

No, you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 11:23 AM
1

But men finding more women attractive means women are more replaceable. Women don't find most men attractive so harder to replace. It's pretty basic logic. Yeah, you're correct. It's pretty basic logic, and you somehow manage to fail to understand it. Something being replaceable means that you have an easy time replacing it. Who has a FAR easier time replacing a partner, men or women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 11:07 AM
1

You seem to be alive enough to make stupid topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:59 AM
1

What's that supposed to be, a non-existing Twilight Zone thing in your book? An outlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 02:10 PM
2

No, it's exactly what you want to believe it sounds like.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 02:46 AM
2

Can you provide evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 02:43 AM
1

Now that's a proper analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 01:55 AM
1

Do you consider apples and oranges to be the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 03:11 PM
2

You really think that someone who has been ostracised his entire life because he was ugly doesn't realize who he is and his life condition? You really think that he needs the advice, "Oh, maybe you should go somewhere where they appreciate you more!" ??????
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:16 AM
1

Yeah, but the point was that you are complaining that something was cherry-picked and therefore irrelevant, and as a counter to that, you post a cherry-picked alternative under the pretense that your cherry-picked example is much more relevant and representative :/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 07:25 AM
1

You really don't see the difference between gossiping with your friends and putting a person on blast to the entire internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 10:54 PM
1

"That collage is cherry-picked, but look at this collage that totally isn't cherry-picked!" :D
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 10:52 PM
3

But that goes directly against what you previously said about them being mid. So are they mid or very unattractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 10:49 PM
–

You actually think you made a good analogy there?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 03:18 PM
–

Am I supposed to believe that you wouldn't object if a woman who is close to you (daughter, sister, close friend...) starts dating a convicted rapist?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:39 PM
–

How bout a rapist? Can he be rehabilitated? How bout a serial rapist?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 12:37 AM
2

Oh dear lord, how many platitudes can you stuff in such a tiny comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:25 PM
–

That's commendable of you, but that in no way negates the privilege you mentioned - your opinions being given more weight in a professional setting compared to your female counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:16 PM
–

I make efforts to negate this privilege How exactly do you do this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:11 PM
6

because in spaces like these, men are seen as inherently valuable with no need to debate their worth. Literally the opposite of the general consensus here. Even when you take red / black pill into consideration. The general consensus is that women have inherent value while men are completely expendable. I have no idea how you came to the quoted conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:06 PM
2

"Women are evil" =/= "women are incapable of feeling romantic love towards men".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:03 PM
6

he would be called a "simp" No, he wouldn't. None of what you described makes him a simp. I don't think you understand how the term is used. And congratulations on a great relationship with your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:58 PM
1

And some are buying property like it's a loaf of bread. That's the whole point that went over your head. Among all the other points that went over your head. Plenty of them when looking at this topic. And plenty more in the future, no doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:30 PM
1

No no, it's great advice for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:27 PM
2

So now it’s not about whether men struggle but how much sex and dates they’re getting? That's exactly how the struggle is defined. What are you on about? The dude above linked the article about lifelong virgins totally unprompted when no one was discussing that, and it has 0 bearing on the discussion at hand. If you, on one side, have a girl who is in a long-lasting, loving relationship with her boyfriend, and on the other side a girl who has had 0 relationships her entire life but met someone w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:26 PM
1

You don't ask yourself why there is 80:20 ration of men:women on dating apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:10 PM
2

Women's suck just as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:07 PM
1

This is proven everywhere, the moment you step outside and walk among the public what do you honestly see? An endless stream of lonely, depressed, single men or countless couples and families surrounding us? As if we needed more proof that you are incapable of critical thinking. You just made a perfect "selection bias fallacy" example without even realizing it. If you don't observe something, it doesn't exist? Really? You are so removed from reality it's actually worrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:05 PM
2

It actually was clever. Maybe it went waaaaay over your head, but it was actually quite an apt comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:56 PM
1

Holy drivel...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:51 PM
1

Oh, choose better right :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:44 PM
1

meeting one and thinking that he is below me because he attracts less women that i men is just weird But that's exactly what women are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:40 PM
–

It’s the same with a bald dude, bald dudes can be hot and are hot, gender swap him and he’s a bald woman and most men aren’t into that. Same with women. Vast majority of them aren't into bald men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 10:23 AM
2

"Helpful" is only someone who enables your delusion further?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:59 AM
-2

Nothing that you mentioned here is gendered behavior. Both genders can (and do) act like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:56 AM
9

Is your anecdotal evidence worth more than his?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:00 AM
0

Yeah, it really is weird using something that basically doesn't exist as an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 12:54 PM
1

It's just funny how you say ALL and then mention 2 things. One of which is a fucking Airbag :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:28 AM
-2

You: "All the safety features in a car are built with men's size/body in mind." Me: "What all?" You: "Seat belt. Airbags." :/ Airbags, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:25 AM
1

And yet, women are told we’re too picky How else would you call wanting something and no instances of that something satisfy your standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:14 AM
0

Male only gyms? Where? I never saw something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:01 AM
-4

All the safety features in a car are built with men's size/body in mind. Really? All of them? And which ones are those?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:54 AM
-2

Unequality doesn't just stop existing. But it did. All of what you mentioned isn't relevant anymore. So why are you mentioning it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:51 AM
3

The effects don't go away. Really? So women still can't vote, open a business or have a credit card?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:50 AM
–

Yeah its a unchangable rule. Why? Women are not as horny as men are, thus men want women more than women want men. For sex, undoubtedly so. But what about relationships? I'd say women want a relationship way more than men. So if your goal is a successful relationship, being proactive (as a woman) towards someone you think would be great for a relationship is far more beneficial than just passively waiting around for the holy trinity to happen (him being interested, him wanting a relationship, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 10:44 AM
–

More options to do (or don't) something = violation of freedom? You haven't thought this through much, have you... Is this another version of "I wish women forced themselves to date unattractive men out of pity"? So you think that women, when they have to actually be proactive and actually TRY, would go for someone they consider unattractive when currently, when they are completely passive and have to put in 0 (zero) effort in initiating, reject everything and everyone. You haven't thought this …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 07:45 AM
–

Gaslighting 101. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:47 AM
1

I remember now, I already had "discussions" with you. It's always the same. At a certain point, you start typing like you had a stroke. You didn’t actually break didn’t the argument. What argument? You provided none. You just linked to a study that isn't a study, and you think that's an argument for something? Show where the conclusions were wrong OR provide counter evidence. What conclusions are you talking about? I'm actually willing to engage, just point something out from that survey report …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 04:07 AM
2

How about, just for woke arguments sake: you just read the “survey” so you can see what it says. I did. How bout you do it as well, for the woke argument's sake. It could be interesting if the person who linked something to actually read the contents of that before using it as an actual argument. Do you even know what's in the survey? It has very little to do with what we were initially discussing and it's a very flimsy argument for your stance. But it would be hard for you to know that since yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:30 PM
2

But one word isn’t what you want it to be so it’s an easy out to run away and dismiss the facts in it. From Harvard. A kinda important word, don't you think? But thank you for that survey report. From Harvard. That’s pretty sad considering how accurate this one is. It's actually more funny how you said "All studies ............" and then you provide a not study but a survey report and you are so adamant about it. What happened to "All studies ........."? Couldn't you just give me another not stu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:59 PM
2

I asked for a study, but I'm stuck in the fact that it wasn't a study because it is a survey report.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:41 PM
2

I asked for a study. You provided no study.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:31 PM
1

The only thing that was dropped is you on your head after birth. And what pills? Is No Pill a pill? Is No Pill more of a pill than all pills?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:28 PM
1

what Americans have to say about social disconnection and potential solutions The definition of a survey. Why didn't you quote this: Here are some of the findings from the survey which are explained in MCC’s new report, Loneliness in America: Just the Tip of the Iceberg, authored by Milena Batanova, Richard Weissbourd, and Joseph McIntyre. Feel free to quote wherever there is a mention of a word study. And I can quote 9 more mentions of the word study. Don't let that king poke you in the eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:22 PM
1

That’s not a survey it’s a literal study. From Harvard. Yeah, I noticed that you can read the word "harvard", but it seems like you have trouble with all the other words. No, it's not a study. It's a survey report. They themselves don't call it a study (the word wasn't mentioned once, the word survey was mentioned 15 times), but hey, I guess you know better than people who wrote it. I mean, it's their mistake; they should have contacted you before thinking that they would know what they were doi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:10 PM
1

That's not a study. It's a literal survey. You just googled and saw "harvard" and thought it was so smart to link an article without even looking at the content. You didn't even need to read beyond the subtitle: "Researchers share what Americans have to say about social disconnection and potential solutions" but I guess even that was too much. Other than it not being a study, it also has nothing to do with what we were discussing here. I really don't know what I expected. Actually I do, I expect…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 07:58 AM
1

What studies are those? Present one at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:36 AM
8

You are being intentionally daft. He clearly means that if your primary goal is to pursue women, then doing activities not related to that (regardless if they are community activities with women involved) means that you are PASSIVE IN PURSUING WOMEN!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:11 AM
–

Are you the third option from your comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:05 AM
1

What studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:58 PM
1

What studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:58 PM
–

And you know all of that based on what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:59 PM
–

While your "arguments" don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:57 PM
–

Values don’t really pass this way. They kinda do. It's not an instant thing, but it's the very mechanism that does transfer values to the younger generation. Many feminists are from conservative families. And several orders of magnitude more are from liberal and progressive families. But what you said is nothing unusual, it's just them rebelling against their situation and upbringing. The same way that there are more and more new conservatives who were raised in liberal and progressive families.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:31 AM
1

I think the two of us have very different understanding of the word "plenty". There will always be insane motherfuckers in all facets of our lives. But my point is that they are complete outliers. If you have to mention something that happened once 2 days ago, that in no way matches the definition of the word plenty.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:20 AM
0

But that fits perfectly with what you said hypocrisy isn't: Not everything that are not equal is a double standard or hypocrisy There is no hypocrisy in what you mentioned. He just wants a great woman with low standards. The hypocrisy in your example would be if he claimed he only wants women who have high standards, but then asked her to lower her standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:17 AM
2

All plenty of them, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:10 AM
0

Can you give me an example of hypocrisy then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 03:20 PM
–

So it shouldn't be a problem to show a few examples. I mean, there's plenty of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:37 AM
–

maybe 20% of good guys Funny how that number keeps popping up :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:36 AM
–

and I want other women to know the truth too And what is this truth you are talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:34 AM
–

I believe my local media As one should. Never doubt your local media. If we lose trust in our local media, we will be confused and lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:12 AM
–

Pooping in the mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 10:02 AM
0

There no hypocrisy in wanting something you’re not giving yourself You literally defined hypocrisy. So, if we go by your reasoning, it's not hypocrisy when a fuckboy wants a chaste woman when he is ready to settle down?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:43 AM
–

Ergo, you are taking them for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:44 PM
–

I think that is what you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:32 PM
1

but it’s a false dichotomy To you, it may seem so. That only speaks to how oblivious women in general are to what it means to be an average man. men get some attention too Very minimal for the majority of men. unless you’re really ugly, but if you’re a really ugly woman you won’t get any attention either Again, you show how little you know about the experience of an average man. By the way I'm describing that experience, you have already formed a preconceived notion that I must be talking about …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:29 PM
–

You are being intentionally daft. What you are describing is a "committed relationship", not dating. Dating is a process of trying to find someone for a committed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:00 PM
0

You're gonna have to ask OP that question since he's the one who chose to ask the question that way Yet you are the only one who interpreted it that way. Weird how that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:57 PM
8

And you aren't?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:53 PM
5

First, you have no idea what women are thinking Nor do you have any idea what men are thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:39 PM
1

To me a relationship is doomed when waiting for sex is something one party imposes on the other rather than a preexisting commitment the two have in common. How is he imposing anything if he is properly informing them (like he said he would)? My SO is equally on board with waiting until marriage. And how did you know that you are both on board? Did you "impose" it on him, and he caved? Or did you communicate beforehand to get to an agreement (like OP said that he would do as well)? Neither of us…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:34 PM
2

The mirror!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:03 PM
1

Yes, I'm including all of that. So, what is your choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 01:19 PM
1

If you have two options: 0 attention and Lots of attention that also includes some obese guy double my age is imagining me sucking him off What is your choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:51 AM
3

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:49 AM
3

How did you manage to not address a single one of his points?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:49 AM
0

Great, so we can agree that I don't argue either of these positions. You literally just did, 1 comment prior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:34 AM
1

You definitely have the wrong flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:17 AM
2

You are living in an alternate reality that most men would like to live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 09:15 AM
1

Pick any qualifier and I'll expand on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 09:13 AM
1

You keep insisting I meant “all men” when I clearly said “any man (even the good ones),” For all intents and purposes, in the context you used it, it's the same thing. as if your interpretation matters more than my intention. That’s not debate That’s ego being a semantic nitpicker. Your intention is irrelevant if what you write doesn't match that. If I say "We need to free all prisoners!" but my intention was to convey the message that we need to invest in efforts to educate people to release th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 08:48 AM
0

Literally just being a low bmi And what % of people do you think that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 07:21 AM
1

If I say “any man can struggle with vulnerability” that doesn’t mean all men are villains. It means the pattern exists. I literally covered that same case in the previous comment (the comment you just replied to): If I say "Any woman can exhibit (insert behavior)" that would mean that ALL women can exhibit that behavior, but I expressed no certainty of that actually happening. The keyword here is "CAN". And the point of this was that you DIDN'T use it like this. You don’t seem to be arguing in g…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 03:13 PM
1

Where did I imply that she would hate all men? You actually think that all men who get no attention from women hate all women? My point was to ask that woman (if she actually wants a relationship) her honest feelings about her situation and how she feels about women complaining about attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 01:11 PM
1

(I strike up conversations with strangers, which is much less creepy than asking strangers out... and if the conversation goes well, and I like them, I ask them out.) So cold approach with extra steps.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 01:08 PM
3

Attraction is a spectrum. Yeah, but the overarching point is that that spectrum is so much bigger when you compare what men are attracted to in women then vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 12:51 PM
1

Now ask actually invisible women (I can't even imagine how ugly they must feel) who get actual 0 (zero) attention from men, no sex, no nothing, how they feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 12:46 PM
1

Saying “it’s exhausting to be with any man (even the good ones)” speaks to the possibility of encountering emotional labor in any relationship with men, not a declaration that all men are exhausting. “it’s exhausting to be with any man (even the good ones)” IS NOT a declaration that "all men are exhausting" but actually “it’s exhausting to be with any man (even the good ones)” speaks to the possibility of encountering emotional labor in any relationship with men. So you expect people not to take…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 12:03 PM
1

No, you are wrong. The way you used "any" is interchangeable with "all". Context always matters. All the women currently alive don't understand simple language concepts. vs Any woman currently alive doesn't understand simple language concepts. Did I leave any wiggle room in the second statement for some women to understand simple language concepts? No, I didn't. They are effectively the same and encompass all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 10:50 AM
3

You literally described the inappropriate thing happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 10:23 AM
2

I think anyone who is Top 1% Commenter on PPD needs some help mentally.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 08:22 AM
1

Yeah, you could. Ask her. I'm really interested in how little fuck was given that the dude actually showed effort to appreciate her bio :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 02:22 PM
1

So far only one of the guys who wrote her an opener actually referenced it. And she probably didn't give a fuck about him :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 02:03 PM
6

Because everyone is oh so natural, honest, and truthful in person :)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:56 PM
7

okCupid isn't a looks based dating app. That's the point. Even on apps where people write detailed and expansive bios, looks take the center stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:48 PM
1

Well, that's one way of looking at things :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 10:26 AM
2

There is a world of difference in having your 12th kid at 40 and your 1st kid at 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 01:42 PM
1

I know you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:50 PM
1

Yeah, I'm just trolling a bit. He has silly reasoning that will land him an STD eventually if he continues acting like he does. But I still find it hard to believe that you wouldn't mind if a guy that you fall head over heels for asks you to present evidence of you being STD free.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:49 PM
1

Stop responding to me. No, thank you. Feel free to stop responding to me. I’ve answered you thrice. You gave a non-answer thrice. I just don't understand why anyone would think that "Be confident!" is a useful advice if the recipient is supposed to know everything that advice encompasses the moment they hear it, but theyhave never heard of the overarching concept that is "Be confident!". It just makes no sense at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:46 PM
1

So all "Normies" understand nuance and detail in the advice "Be confident!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:51 AM
1

Are they women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:50 AM
1

Because he believes all women! Is he wrong to do so?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:02 AM
1

So you just admitted age is a proxy for toxin accumulation.. Glad we agree.. I'm not sure what point you wanted to make here, but yeah, we agree. The older you get, the more your body is riddled with toxins, which in turn causes countless issues if you want to have children. Mind you, I'm not limiting myself to women here; it's the same thing with men, but women are impacted with this far more directly because they are the ones carrying a child during pregnancy. So that's a HUGE argument for hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:44 AM
1

The vast majority of people do not die young. So why did you use that as an example? And yeah, you can't control everything (sometimes you can't control anything at all), and people can die suddenly for a myriad of reasons. It's not really feasible to plan with potential unforeseen circumstances in mind, but age isn't that. Age is as predictable a signifier for the future as you are going to get. Regardless of whether you are dying in one year or 51 years, each day that passes is you being one d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:34 AM
0

I don't understand why you think that's an argument against OP when it perfectly strengthens his point. Imagine if your mom had you in her mid 40s. How old would you be if she died at the same age?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:45 AM
1

You can say that for a lot of things. It's not as good an argument as you might think.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:43 AM
0

It isn’t age. It literally is exactly that, and you presented it perfectly without even realizing it. Everything you described compounds the more you are exposed to it. When your body is older it means that you were exposed to toxins, microplastics, and whatever else for a much longer period of time. The compounding effect of that starts taking far more greater effect compared to when you were younger, together with general aging and weakening of the body, wreaks havoc on you. Now add pregnancy,…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:40 AM
1

You are only adding to OPs argument. Imagine if your parents had you in their 40s. They would have left behind a literal kid. But because they had you earlier, you managed to grow up, and they were with you for almost 30 years of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:25 AM
1

No, it's also targeting you my dude. Kinda hard to target someone who never installed TikTok. It's why you guys keep seeing it. You keep saying YOU, but why are you including me when I never indicated that it's happening to me? I just explained OP's reasoning. That's how the algorithms work. You should also check how reading with understanding works. I'm not a bitter angry incel that watches that shit, so I don't see it. Hm, I'm kinda interested now. What kind of tiktoks is your algorithm servin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:20 AM
1

So, only the most vocal "black pill" and angrier "red pill" guys on PPD have a problem with nuance within the advice "Be confident!"? Everyone else who isn't this edge case understands perfectly what you mean when you tell them "Be confident!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:11 AM
5

General minority =/= edge case. You are confusing the terms. But asking “why is the majority the most defaul!!!??” is silly. Good thing no one is asking that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:43 PM
3

ya’ll twist words and make strawman arguments Very ironic considering that the entire content of your comment is one giant strawman argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:36 PM
3

They aren't making that content for men. It's the content for women to doom scroll. He is just observing the trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:31 PM
1

How do literally all scientific studies translate to % of the population that they are generalizing for? Yet you would brainlessly use a 100-person study in your argument while asking a stupid question like you just did.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:29 PM
2

Do they really :D
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:26 PM
5

Because most people aren’t autistic and can grok the obvious (to most of us) nuances. You think people who can extrapolate nuance from the advice "Be confident" need that advice in the first place? So you are either giving that advice needlessly to someone who perfectly understands that and doesn't need that advice in the first place, or you are giving that advice to someone who could benefit from the nuance and detail that advice should be packaged with, but you refuse to do that. So in essence…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:05 PM
6

Then what's the point of giving such useless advice? You: "Every fucking advice given ever in the history of dating needs detail and nuance." Me: "So why is it always provided without either?" You: "Because no one wants to type out detailed essays on how to get a girlfriend. Not everything has to be spelt out as we expect you to know some of these nuances." Make that make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 09:06 AM
14

Every fucking advice given ever in the history of dating needs detail and nuance. So why is it always provided without either?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 11:35 PM
2

You understood him perfectly fine. You can criticize the way someone writes and address the underlying argument. Or you can continue doing that bad faith argumentative shit that you constantly do, that's also an option.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:33 PM
1

I don't think women's standards are too high, as long as there are people to meet them. What a silly statement. I don't usually generalize like this, but this is so typical of "some" women. I'm not sure if you meant it that way, but the way you wrote that completely disregards the other side. If a woman likes men who all, each and every one of them, find her completely invisible and there is literally 0 chance of her ending with any of them, you don't think her standards are too high?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:29 PM
5

What the fuck is wrong with you. Never even think of suggesting leg lengthening to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:58 PM
4

My opinion is that people from "your" side are far too quick to completely dismiss any grievances that run counter to your own perspective. That said, there are some really unhinged people, some people who never tried anything at all but are talking like the world is ending, some people who are really over the top, exaggerating everything, but there are also a lot of posters here with negative but level-headed views. Yet they all get painted with the same brush. Both sides base their opinions on…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:17 PM
2

Are you convinced that you’re correct? Could you be wrong? I haven't stated my opinion. I just asked the question to the commenter, to paraphrase, why he thinks he is qualified to think that he understands "how most relationships work".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:33 AM
2

based on the reality I see You never stop to think that the "reality" you see might be a simple selection bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:22 AM
2

I am here to convince people that this ideology does not understand how most relationships work. Based on what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 02:27 PM
1

Probably for the same reason women are still looking for men even though they would rather meet a bear in the woods :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 02:25 PM
2

and be active and eat healthy just like women when they are trying to concieve Really :D
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 12:04 PM
1

Based on all available data, patterns, and human nature: Based on this alone I didn't need to read anything else. Thank you for starting your post with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:26 PM
3

Unempathetic, manipulative, and sociopathic behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:23 PM
1

Would you call out your friend if he was like "Look at that hog, OINK OINK!!" towards a random gravitationally gifted woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 11:46 AM
–

I liked you so much more when you had brain damage that caused you to write in bullet points. What happened, man!?!?!?!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 10:35 AM
3

I'm glad you find yourself funny. That's great for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:31 AM
5

Your Joke Maker over 9000 could seems to need some tweaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:27 AM
3

Really? There is not one mention of the word "friend" on that wiki article you mentioned above. It couldn't be that you are arbitrarily making up metrics for measuring EQ precisely because the commenter above you is completely correct, could it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:06 AM
1

How would u do this in a more empathetic way? You can't, that's the point. It's the behavior itself that is completely unempathetic and sociopathic; there is nothing you can do to make it not so. It's like asking, "Is there a more empathetic way to do a premeditated murder of an innocent?"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:53 AM
-1

So how is that a stand-in for the rest of society?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 05:24 PM
1

That's the equivalent of saying, "Billionaires are a great stand-in for what an average person would do when they're not forced to do other things by poverty."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 02:06 PM
8

Did he need to marry her in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:38 AM
20

Yet he married botox with legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:10 AM
2

I wasn't criticizing you. I just find it fascinating how this works :D Everyone is using the term with full expectation that everyone else interprets it exactly the same way when in reality everyone has different interpretation. I mean, even you used Source as an explanation of the term that has the picture of an older gentleman that looks NOTHING like the one you initially posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:50 PM
5

The schrodinger's dad bod. Nobody knows what it is or what it looks like until exactly one woman defines it. Then that becomes "the dad bod" that is completely different from every other dad bod defined by all the other women :D
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:39 PM
5

I don't agree with this one. Is attraction all about sexual to men? What about emotional attraction? The initial attraction, yeah, mostly. The same thing with women, no matter how much you try to push the "demisexuality is oh so common" narrative. Regardless, I don't understand how you can interpret it any other way than the commenter you quoted. If you have 2 people and one of them gets more by investing less, then you are favoring that person one way or another. I don't know what you don't agr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:34 PM
3

You are the opposite of a person who can spell "statistics" and "outlier".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 01:39 PM
1

I pursue relationship with men I lust for. Does not equal: Men B : Been on a date. Got emotionally attached. Feeling lust. Being in relationship. Have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 01:26 PM
1

Most women long for LTR rather than casual. Completely irrelevant to this discussion. They aren't longing for LTR in which they might eventually develop strong enough feelings for them to want to have sex with their partners. They are longing for LTR with the person they are attracted to. Wanting deep connection before having sexual desire is also much more common No, it isn't. No matter how many times you write this, it will not magically become true all of a sudden.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:32 AM
4

That is what you wrote. I pursue relationship with men I lust for. And then this: I don't get sexual feelings to men if we are not deeply emotionally connected That's called contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 11:27 AM
4

You obviously have no idea what demisexual means. You wouldn't be lusting for someone unless you have a deep connection with them if you are a demisexual person. It has nothing to do with the act of sex itself, but with sexual feelings towards a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:47 AM
3

Relationship started as enthusiastic sex is outlier. Most sex happens after 6 or 7th date according to the study According to what study? I have no idea what you are referring to. Btw, did I claim otherwise? My only point was that asexuals and demisexuals are outliers. Demisexual is actually the norm not the outliers No, it isn't the norm; it's as much of an outlier as it gets. Having sexual desire (not necessarily indulging in it) before having a deep connection with someone is common. The oppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 10:26 AM
3

There are demisexuals and also asexuals. Pointing to outliers never really boosts your argument as you think it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 07:49 AM
1

Elementary school deflection. How bout you actually answer the question, what is the manosphere?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 06:53 PM
-2

So people are disagreeing with her because she is a woman and not because she could also be stupid and wrong (which is always an irony considering her handle)?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 05:31 PM
1

The manosphere is not a niche group. It is mainstream. This is the most ridiculous statement I've ever read. Are you actually serious about this? Maybe I'm completely misunderstanding you, what do you consider the manosphere?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 03:43 PM
1

Already have.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 03:30 PM
1

Do you actually want me to write you a bunch of rape fantasies Actually I do! And then after tell me they are actually my fantasies! Nothing gets me off more than that! You a hentai fan Yup!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 03:25 PM
1

Don't forget to tell him about your top 10 favorite rape fantasies! I'm sure he'll be delighted!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 03:18 PM
1

You guys have a really weird aversion to reading about rape that really hammers down my point. The denial. No no, you misunderstood me. I love reading about your very specific rape fantasies that you claim other people have. Feel free to share more of your own rape fantasies and pin them on whoever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:51 PM
1

I have the ability to imagine things. We are well aware of that. You have exhibited that with the "They are advocating for rape" argument that you have completely fabricated. But, I think we can both agree that there is a slight difference between "I'm gonna lie about this thing here to win an internet argument!" and "Let me share my favorite rape fantasy with the broad public!"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:26 PM
1

I don't know, you tell me. It went from 0 (your standard vanilla "they are advocating for rape") to 100 (a very specific rape fantasy completely of your own making) real fast there. What was I supposed to conclude from that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:13 PM
1

But it's not all or nothing way of thinking. You have just decided to (unfairly and incorrectly) interpret it like that because it goes completely against your worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:07 PM
1

It's the matter of fact black and white thinking Which is obviously a vastly different worldview than your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:55 PM
2

The person who did a misdemeanor but didn't get caught = serial killer energy. I think I understand you now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:53 PM
-1

Thinking that the only reason another woman can have a vastly different worldview than your own is because she is autistic is pretty autistic in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:49 PM
3

You need proof that he was stupid enough to get caught?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:41 PM
3

They are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 09:53 AM
4

With the caveat that women are the greatest supporters and enforcers of patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 08:26 AM
2

You jump into the pool of shit and you are surprised there is shit all around you? This is exactly what we are talking about with "taking responsibility". Btw, the vile things women are saying are all socially condoned, while the vile things men say need to be said in "closed" communities. Just don't go there if you don't want to see that shit. That's my advice for you. But if I want to remove vile things women say from my life, I need to turn off social media completely. There is a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:56 AM
3

On the other hand, almost every woman here provides an example with each of their comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:42 AM
2

I suggest you read the article with a bit more understanding. It does not say what you think it says.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:31 AM
1

Is HIV the only STD? Btw, you can treat HIV to such a degree now (if diagnosed early enough) that you can live completely normally with it and you can actually lower the amount of HIV in your bloodstream to the levels of it not even being transmissible anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:28 AM
3

And some people like eating shit. The word "some" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 01:06 PM
8

I'm fairly sure not one woman who has an ick for bi men takes that into consideration. Women would rather sleep with a man who slept with 100 women, but would throw up at the thought of sleeping with a man who had sex with a man once in his entire life. So, no, STDs don't really play a role here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 01:03 PM
5

Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female Dyke Female D…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:57 PM
3

We can say "dyke" but not "female"? You can say both freely. Am I the only one who finds this weird? lol I find you weird for thinking about this more than 0.01sec.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:51 PM
1

Depends, am I getting offered something worth my life for it? What do you consider something worth your life? Otherwise I would just shot my officers and squadmates. Great.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 12:39 PM
1

Isn't Ukraine considered (at least partly) a "Western country"? If yes, your entire point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:29 AM
1

Would you have joined the meatgrinder that was the European front at that time?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:28 AM
7

Oddly specific. Are you sure you are talking about "them" and not you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 08:19 AM
7

Not even in the same realm of thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:38 PM
11

Still not even in the same universe as advocating for rape. But do go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:30 PM
2

Also, yes refusing the draft is a felony. That doesn’t mean people who are eligible for the draft have voting rights because of it. But it means that they can lose their voting rights because of it. In all but two states you cannot vote if you are imprisoned for committing a felony (like refusing the draft), and in most states you still cannot vote even if you are released from prison if you are still on probation, and in some states you can't vote even after that period is done. That’s like say…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 01:15 PM
3

voting rights is a subsection of political power. Something that is a subsection of political power is political power.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 12:41 PM
4

So what's the problem with women losing their right to vote then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 12:20 PM
1

Is this some new variation of "Who hurt you?" It's evolving! Scary!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 07:27 AM
1

same...team.... Of course. Today, when almost everything in the west is geared towards women, "Hey, we're the same team! Whatever benefits women, it also benefits men!" When it was the reverse, it wasn't "Hey, we're the same team! Whatever benefits men, it also benefits women!", but "PARTRIARCHY!!!! MISOGINY!!! DISCRIMINATION!!! THEY ARE HOLDING US (women) DOWN!!!" Funny how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:00 PM
3

No worries, I expected this to be too much for you to read and understand. And you didn't surprise me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 04:03 PM
4

It's nothing of the sort, it's just you not understanding what you are reading. The guy says: "Women aren't being shamed if they don't want to be with a fuckboy!" And you respond with: "But what about women being shamed if they do want to be with a fuckboy!" Only in your head is your reply a counter to the initial claim. In actuality, those are two completely unrelated statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 03:58 PM
3

But in what way is funding education or healthcare bad for men None of it is done FOR men, which was your initial claim. They aren't doing anything FOR men. They are doing everything for women, and if men happen to benefit in the process, like I already said, "oh well" is their stance in that situation. Let me ask you something. If we go back in time when there were 60% men and 40% women in colleges, and someone says, "We promise to increase funding for education!" and each and every program is …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:52 PM
3

Again, everything you listed is specifically to help women, and if it happens to include men, oh well. Colleges are currently 60% women and 40% men, and getting more skewed towards women each year. So, who exactly would free education help more? And when you take that percentages into consideration, who would benefit more from forgiving "predatory" college debt? And in the initial comment, you mentioned "free trade school classes". Funny how that happens now when there is more of a push to get w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:31 PM
3

You are listing talking points without explaining anything. Improvement in everything that you have written favors women more and is specifically done in such a way to improve the lives of women, and any improvements in the lives of men complete sideffect and never the main goal. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and ask you to just expand on the first 2 "points", healthcare and education. In what way do dems want to improve the lives of men in those aspects?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:04 PM
3

You are literally adding to his argument. Yeah, they are being shamed for NOT AVOIDING those men. But they wouldn't be shamed for avoiding them. What's so hard for you to understand there?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 01:24 PM
3

Yeah, your ebb and flow between lies and mistruths.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 01:21 PM
1

No. Oh come on :D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 01:14 PM
6

I will offer the atmosphere Oh well, I read this today.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:54 PM
3

Lefties and feminists generally want men to do well. What causes do they support that uplift men's lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:40 PM
1

😂 women just aren't that horny But they seem to be hungry 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:32 PM
1

Oh I hate that shit the most!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 02:00 PM
1

Why the new account?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:54 PM
1

Yoda: Fuck not around and find out you won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:43 PM
1

This sub is generally overmoderated and you think that racist shit wouldn't be moderated? Come on now..
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:39 PM
–

Literally the exact sentiment that black pill dudes are espousing. Exactly. The. Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:37 PM
–

The "I have black friends" argument :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:33 PM
2

I, on the other hand, laugh about the irony of you laughing about the irony without even noticing it. Because, again, it's women who are perpetuating the notion that men contaminate anything they fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:25 PM
1

I feel like they’ll see me more as a person. You may be somewhat wrong about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:18 PM
–

I just love it when blue pill women just rain black pills!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 01:08 PM
1

Oh wow, so when it's about someone like you then it's ok to be annoyed, disappointed, to complain and to not like someone who rejects you. Competely different attitude then the one you usually project towards men's issues with women here. How interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:33 PM
2

It's a literal definition of hypocrisy :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:30 PM
3

The second part as well :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:23 PM
1

Are you equating homosexual men with animals, or am I misunderstanding something?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:22 PM
1

Neither will.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 12:15 PM
1

You don't have a clue what you're talking about. Good thing we have you then! emerging trends 2 instances of something = trend. I think Are we sure about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:32 AM
–

My mistake. Maybe it's not just a comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:20 AM
–

I was a bit (a lot) tongue in cheek in my initial reply to you. It was supposed to be a bit of a joke regarding other replies on this topic. But you actually asked her a completely valid question and I'm curious as well what her answer to that question will be. It's not a stupid comment, quite the opposite. Your next comment on the other hand could very much qualify as such (meaning stupid). But still, I didn't call you stupid, just your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:02 AM
1

Nah it's not me that's misguided. Yes, you are. You and everyone else that thinks incels are some grave threat to the society while nothing whatsoever points to that. I don't think it's the main issue or like a huge impending danger or anything. That's practically the complete opposite of what you were saying before, and why I initially replied to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 10:54 AM
1

So you have never studied history beyond high school and you’re telling everyone that it’s useless? Yes. Because it is completely useless as a degree. Very VERY few history graduates will find employment in something related to their field of study, 99% won't. Doesn't that qualify as a useless degree? Do you have any idea of what university level study of history entails Yes, I do. At least in my country. I have friends who graduated with history as their major. and what career paths it opens? P…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 10:45 AM
1

It's not just a concern that's come from me. My point is that it's a completely misguided concern. You literally have rape gangs operating in the UK and you are concerned about incels? Really? They've been classed as terrorist attacks for that reason. The concern is around the potential for further attacks due to extremist rhetoric and that it's a novel motivation. Again, completely misguided. UK has issues several orders of magnitude bigger than that, and that's what they are spending their tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 09:12 AM
–

I just have a tendency to reply to stupid comments, it's nothing personal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:53 AM
1

The input is "College Yes / No".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:40 AM
1

2 attacks? By incels? Ever? I think you should be more worried about some other people and some other demographic :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:36 AM
1

Because (as you may notice on this topic as well), many women equate trades with conservatism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:28 AM
0

It's going to be a very short lived relationship if someone can't keep pace with me intellectually. I want to be able to have complex and technical conversations, and I want them to be with someone who would actually understand it. I didn't do no.2 this morning, but then I read this. This was great for my morning bowel movement. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:21 AM
1

It's about level of intellect and formal education. Only an unintelligent person would equate college with intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:16 AM
1

And I know of several billionaires who don't have a college degree. So by your reasoning, it's better to not finish a college, you will become a billionaire :D Btw, those 3 are out of how many of their college colleagues who also have degrees in creative writing. Ask each of them how others from their college are doing today.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:08 AM
2

As a degree, of course, it's useless. How many history professors or historians do you actually need? What happens with 99% of graduates who will never find a job in something related to their history degree? I learned more history from a friend who has a Civil Engineering degree than my entire high school (and I was a straight A student). History is a personal passion, but a very bad choice for higher education.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:03 AM
1

I grew up around men who liked to threaten women to get them to behave. I don't put up with it lol Good for you. Has 0 to do with me. But thank you for that info.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 02:17 PM
2

Maybe you have no idea what you are talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 02:04 PM
1

I have 0 contempt for the women in my life, far from it. Female gender constructs on PPD on the other hand hmmmmmmmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 02:02 PM
4

I think you should remove "Man: all pills are " from your flair, it would be a more suitable flair if you do that. You completely misunderstood what the OP is saying. Men aren't coming here because of their anger. They are coming here because they are searching for reason they are doing bad with dating and after coming here they get radicalized and the "growing anger" part happens after that. At no point in the OP was it mentioned that the movement is growing or whatever you are implying. The OP…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:53 PM
2

I could use that very excuse for every argument ever :D
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:42 PM
4

It's actually incredible! I'm so grateful for the existence of the Top 1% Commenter badge. You are literally all the same. The perfect image of a Medusa, individual snakes growing from the same stupid head.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:41 PM
1

The same reason why we affirm yours each and every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:34 PM
7

I still have no idea what point you are trying to make. How does any of what you say tie in with the OP? Does the collapse of pill spaces have any actual meaning to what he was talking about? Do you think that his "radicalization of young men" theory is overblown? Do you think young men today are perfectly fine, and the loneliness and other things are just something that was being propped up here and on other subreddits discussing similar issues but in reality none of that was applicable to real…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:32 PM
1

And the ones they usually send to die? Guess which key demographic they send? You, they will send you. But you didn't answer my question what-so-ever. I mean, you did, partially, you consider the world less safe now compared to then. But I asked if you consider the world a better place now compared to before. Imagine this, if I randomly grab 1000 people from the population today, and 1000 from 1996 and ask them if are they happy and satisfied with their life, do you think more people from today …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:30 PM
2

Let me ask you a simple question. Do you think US (and world in general) is in a better place today compared to 1996 when the novel Fight Club was released?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:17 PM
3

I don't understand the point you are trying to make here. Are you saying that male / female relationship today are in a much better state now than several years ago when r/TheRedPill and r/incels were a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:08 PM
2

Maybe you should study the exact same thing you are advising him to study.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 12:27 PM
7

Make the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 11:09 AM
8

So, there are no systematic societal issues with either misogyny or misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:50 AM
3

By your "reasoning" incels don't exist since r/incels doesn't exist anymore. Great reasoning btw. And an article about right-wing media declining that was written in summer 2024, just before Trump's re-election in a landslide victory of a republican candidate who also won the popular vote. Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:41 AM
5

This is yours: Restricting womens’ rights is wrong This is also yours: What’s right and what works aren’t always the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:37 AM
6

So neither exist, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:23 AM
1

The guy sayin you were from Mesozoic Era was a bit too much, but he is right in saying that you kinda don't have any idea what you are talking about as it pertains to current dating scene considering you were married for 15 years (which also implies that you were in a relationship several years prior than that) so you are operating with lacking data. It's the equivalent of boomers telling this generation "What's the problem, you just finish college, find work, take on a low interest loan and buy…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:04 AM
1

We don’t really know why girls do better in school either. And that's that, right? When something benefits women, it's "Oh well, what can you do, it is what it is!" and we just leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:51 AM
2

Unearned wealth = successful :)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:48 AM
3

Grateful to have a dad who is consistent and loves me, because so few men and women have that. Many have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:27 AM
1

You say that after extensively dealing with me. I really don't understand the need to delete comments, but to each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:43 AM
2

It's quite common for women to turn lesbian after being hit by a man. Yeah, nothing more common than that. Way too common. The commonest thing ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:38 AM
2

If we're just guessing, gay people historically experience more drama in their adult life after a lifetime of masking and pressure to conform to hetero/religious standards and to hide who they are from friends and family, i.e. their support system. A constant battle to fit in and fight natural inclinations is probably going to result in some internal and external strife. Now pair them up and double the problems. Is this not excusing? How would you classify this? Explaining? Extrapolating? Imagin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 03:34 PM
6

Men are conditioned from childhood to not put their hands on women ... That's the reason why the comment above the one you replied to asked "Why is it different for gay men then?" If men were conditioned only not to hit women, you would have increased instances of DV in gay relationships, when in actuality, those relationships have the lowest rates of DV.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 03:28 PM
2

Did I say that? I don't think I did. I specifically said that you are quick to judge men even when they haven't done anything other than just being autistic. Unless you consider them being autistic enough of a factor to warrant such a reaction. The question now arises, do you actually think of ALL autistic men as highly probable violent abusers? Which is closer to the truth that you perceive: - All autistic men are violent abusers just waiting for their opportunity to abuse someone - All autisti…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 03:19 PM
4

I'll ask you again. Do you believe sexual and social frustration justify the hatred and violence unpopular men exhibit towards typically developing people? You literally have the answer in my comment white on black (or black on white if you are an insane light theme andy): NO HELL NAW! And I completely agree with that. Feeling frustrated in that situation is completely understandable. Feeling like you are being treated unjustly could also be debated. But when it weers into a tendency for violent…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:59 PM
6

Judging by you and other women here (and probably most men as well), NO HELL NAW! And I completely agree with that. But when we flip genders, suddenly you have excuses galore ready at hand. Weird how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:35 PM
2

Such a convenient excuse for violence :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:30 PM
1

I thought it was fairly obvious :/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 12:47 AM
–

I always thought the standard of masculinity was more Clint Eastwood Wait till you hear about INTERNET!! OMG it will blow your mind!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:16 AM
–

Which you so easily filter out, and are left with more than enough decent matches and messages. As opposed to those 900 applications, and still nothing. I may be mistaken, but one of those scenarios seems infinitely better than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:07 AM
–

it will probably be someone else next month In your case, no, it won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:04 AM
–

Via the internet All of what you mention (and more) was going on before, but you didn't know about it because you didn't have the quoted part.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:01 AM
-1

The latter is usually said by men. I see you haven't met any women yet who have the ability to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:54 AM
-3

You mean like Biden in 2020 or some other kind of cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:36 AM
1

Again, you are mentioning which discourse isn't worth taking seriously. I asked you which discourse is worth taking seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:28 PM
1

Would you like: A perfume that smells like shit or A piece of crap that smells like the best perfume And why?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:47 PM
11

That only works if you are a woman :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 12:36 PM
2

Lmao clearly hit a nerve. Judging by your comments here, you clearly hit your head with something really really hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 12:26 PM
2

And what online discourse is worth taking seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 12:24 PM
–

This does not extend to hugs. Why doesn't it? Why do you separate one kind of intimacy from another?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:54 AM
–

Don't act daft (you are acting, right?)! Would you use the same excuse for the lack of any kind of intimacy in a relationship (other than sex)? Meaning, you only get to hug or kiss or cuddle several times a year, but nothing whatsoever in the meantime?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:45 AM
–

This is what a perfectly healthy relationship looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:34 AM
–

We're not going to be upset that someone doesn't want to have sex. Very easy to say that something isn't a problem when you don't have that problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:32 AM
–

Would you use the same excuse for intimacy in the form of kissing, hugging, cuddling and stuff like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:29 AM
0

when men claim that women’s standards are unreasonable Did he do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:23 AM
0

Do you think it's acceptable to suggest that that is the level of cleanliness that he is ok with when nothing in his comment suggested as such?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:48 AM
0

That's not the world I want to live in. But you are living in that world every single day.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:17 AM
3

I live the life of a never-fat plain girl. Which is still light years away from the experience of a never-fat plain guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 10:49 PM
1

just because she expects a man to be 8 ft tall, doesn't make it high Not only does it literally make it high, it makes it high figuratively as well :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 03:26 PM
1

Anyone who’s been around a nerd CEO, fat comedian or ugly rock musician knows there’s a way to improve your genetic hand I use that exact argument when mentioning Barack Obama in some discussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 03:24 PM
1

there is no high or low really, just particular, unique, personal, individual, standards. What a stupid notion. If a woman expects a man to be 8' tall, is that not a high standard (oh the pun so intended)? There are currently 5 men in the entire world who are 8' or taller. You are operating on a logic that the lottery is a 50:50 chance, either you win or you don't :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:29 PM
0

I doubt any woman with a high-flying career would be very interested in me at first face Why do you think that, considering the fact that you are currently with a woman of high status?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:10 PM
–

What’s the point being in a debate sub if your just going to assume everyone is lying? Mirror?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 12:47 PM
1

Because that was the context of that conversation thread. As I noted in the comment you're referring to, that guy responded to me in two different places, and rather than respond to him in two different places, I responded to both of his comments in one. I know what you are referring to, but you are incorrect. That comment thread was discussing this paragraph of my main comment: That was your opening comment, yes. After that you got a reply which stated: As someone who has vaginismus, why not bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 12:24 PM
1

Why is it given that we are talking about those women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:53 AM
1

Why is it given that we are talking about those women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:52 AM
3

And what are those children supposed to learn from watching Adolescence in school?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 10:32 AM
2

Yeah, here we are, 2 stupid men just loitering around the vast internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:42 AM
2

It only requires sperm in vagina, which can literally be done as simply as putting sperm on your finger or a baster and popping it up there. Way thinner than a penis. Hahahaha, literal equivalent of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTTRVAH8zsc
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:37 AM
–

It usually has nothing to do with our “energy.” Neither does Big dick energy :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:26 AM
–

The equivalent concept is "girl boss" or "boss babe" No, it isn't. That's how girls are gassing themselves up. If men are using that, more often than not, it's not in a positive context.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:22 AM
–

I'm not! I'm just suggesting you use the opportunity to dole out your "advice" when the opportunity presents itself because you are, as you said, an opportunist!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 09:49 PM
3

Of course it isn't. There is definitely something wrong there. But that's the reason I called you out. You were skirting around the issue, while it's obvious that the only context that information will have is negative and none other.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:03 PM
1

Most of the women here as well, if what you linked there are your standards for identifying abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:42 PM
1

Doesn't this run contrary to the commonly held view on this sub that very sexually experienced men (aka Chads) are bigger misogynists than sexually inexperienced men? You literally don't understand what's written there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:39 PM
3

Of course, you don't do that, god forbid I even suggest something of the sort. My general point was that the next time a woman is sharing some horrific abuse experience, and you happen to witness it, use that opportunity (since you are an opportunist) to remind her to choose better.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:30 PM
2

Exactly, just like women who get used and abused. That's why I said you need to forward your "advice" to them as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:21 PM
2

By your contention, everyone here is abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:03 PM
1

You are too sensitive for internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:49 PM
3

You never mentioned anything about him being an abuser and hurting you. You just mentioned being miserable because you wasted nine months trying to get a man you love to love you back, and that didn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:39 PM
1

Which means that he is uglier than how many % of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:20 PM
1

Why do you keep mentioning he is on the shorter side? https://preview.redd.it/su8jo29rzlwe1.png?width=286&format=png&auto=webp&s=8d0064b0b96058a9a123ba56c331d1950b2b363f He's got 15" on her at least. If she is 4' tall, yeah, you can call him short. Now, what are the odds of her being 4' :D Btw, since you "fairly" graded him as below average, can you now fairly grade her as well? And can you also post a pic of a man you consider average if this guy is below average?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 04:17 PM
3

What exactly was the issue there?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:58 PM
-1

If they are both, for example, 6, divorced father is so far at the front of the queue he won't be able to see the other guy behind him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:48 PM
1

But if you don't have clear rules when you apply/don't apply equality/equity, don't you think saying: Why should it? Equality/equity does not apply to all areas of life. is quite reductive when you can use that "argument" towards any grievance ever by anyone ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:00 PM
6

Who gets to decide where it should or shouldn't be applied?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:27 PM
0

My mistake, I framed it wrong. When I said "never-married single guy looking for those same things" I specifically meant those who are having trouble flings and relationships = "never-married single guy looking for those same things but having trouble finding them". I honestly think that a recently divorced dad would be at the front of the queue compared to those guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:17 PM
3

I don't know any men like that. Then they probably don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:32 AM
2

Because they broke up! So there are generally hurt feelings on both sides. Only some people are adult enough to say “we both made mistakes and it ended”. Well, you laid out the perfect reason why not to date those women (and men) then. Why would you try to have a relationship with a person unable to take on even the basic responsibility for the end of something like a marriage with someone you have a child with? What am I supposed to expect from that person in a new relationship then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:27 AM
4

The same is true for single fathers. Completely the opposite. Regardless of what you think, preselection is a thing. A divorced guy with a kid(s) in his 30s will have a much easier time getting women for flings and relationships than a never-married single guy looking for those same things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:14 AM
3

Perfect advice for women who are abused and raped in their relationships. You should forward it to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 07:05 AM
3

I’ve literally never observed that to be true, even anecdotally. In my social circle if you date a single mom then those are her kids & yours too permanently. Period full stop. You are talking about dating, and he is talking about a new marriage. And I've literally only observed the thing he is saying. In each marriage where either one got remarried, they had at least 1 child together.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:55 AM
2

In more words than necessary, you just said, "Yeah, there is something wrong with that person."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:42 AM
1

Do you believe in the different levels / amount of love? Or will you use the cop-out "different kind of love"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:52 PM
8

So women must mature to give a fuck about man's character? Am I understanding you correctly? Are you saying women don't give a fuck about man's character until they mature?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:58 AM
2

No, just not normal. No, it's implied (by women) that something must be wrong with you. How can you be charitable with that kind of characterization?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:56 AM
5

Well, yes. Or, to be precise, one could interpret your comment as "all women don't like the same things".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:36 AM
3

But the implication is that it's bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:35 AM
6

Seems like whoever is doing the grooming is really bad at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:31 AM
9

You are saying women can smell money and stability when they mature. How convenient :D
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:27 AM
5

Looking back ... And when did that "looking back" happen? Right now, when it suits your argument to completely reframe something you yourself wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:18 AM
7

I'm inexperienced so I don't think it would be sporting of me to shame a man for it. This is the issue right here, and you don't even notice it. It shouldn't be conditional on your inexperience; you should simply not do that, regardless of your experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 12:09 AM
7

By that same vein, aren't then women without children completely useless?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:01 PM
4

Really? And which cultures are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 12:17 PM
–

I’d take a break and let nature run its course. I believe that everything happens at the right time That works for women. That doesn't work for men. If men are passive there will never be "a right time". You are looking at things from a female perspective and trying to apply that to the male experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 12:43 AM
1

The overhead bin is too tall for most women by design. Yes, by GOOD DESIGN. If you have 2 equally sized groups (as in both have close to an equal number of members) of people, and one group is significantly taller on average compared to the other group, who do you model for when deciding the height of the OVERHEAD (meaning something that is standing above you; meaning a whole ass person is supposed to "comfortably" fit below it) compartment? The correct answer is: You design for the taller group…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 05:11 PM
–

The overhead bin is too tall for most women by design. Yes, by GOOD DESIGN. If you have 2 equally sized groups (as in both have close to an equal number of members) of people, and one group is significantly taller on average compared to the other group, who do you model for when deciding the height of the OVERHEAD (meaning something that is standing above you; meaning a whole ass person is supposed to "comfortably" fit below it) compartment? The correct answer is: You design for the taller group…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 05:10 PM
1

It's not that deep, really. Having a self-deprecating handle is a selfown, simple as that. And btw, I never understood this as an argument: but also, because a dude with a small/ smaller dick who DOES NOT see sex as mostly = piv, will be considered a much better lover to a huge portion of women than a big dick guy who thinks all sex is putting it in quick and jackhammering Why are people always comparing with small dick foreplay and cunnilingus GOD with a 60IQ big dick? Why not compare small dic…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 04:14 PM
1

No no no, you are the penis sleeve expert, I am fully on-board with your judgement! I'm so sorry for speaking out of term, will not happen again your penis sleeve highness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:54 PM
1

Did I imply that? I don't think I did. I was just mocking your "solution" that would work on 1% of women at most.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:38 PM
3

It doesn't. But you are pointing at the comment of a dude and saying "HA, YOU JUST DID A SELFOWN!" all the while him having a small dick beta as a handle. Seems kinda superfluous to do that considering that every comment he makes will be under the handle small dick beta :/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:36 PM
4

probably 4 inches it was pretty small So 7" then :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:28 PM
8

In spiderman: With great power comes great responsibility! In PPD bullet points guy: With great dick comes great mental illness!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:27 PM
–

Do you not realize what his handle is?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:05 PM
5

And how long is your phone :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:00 PM
–

And are those posts about instances of shaming in real-life situations? Does something being a post means that everything and all it references is online only?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:38 PM
1

Because all women get instantly wet at the mere mention of penis sleeve, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 02:35 PM
–

Why do you keep focusing on the "online"? Nowhere in your OP did you mention that you are specifically referring to shaming people online, so why are you replying to me with that context now?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:38 AM
–

Perfect example :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 11:52 PM
-1

You completely misunderstood the quoted part. The issue isn't the disconnect between your own opinion and "studies". Studies aren't denying your experience, they are generalizing based on available data. The issue is that you (as in women here) are denying studies because of your own singular experience. Your argument is that studies won't ever be able to match your own experience but you think that your own experience is enough to generalize it to the entirety of the population. That's the pure…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:06 PM
1

I have 200K karma as, on a few occasions, I've been marginally funny. Really? My guess would be a lot of not-really-funny circlejerking in karma farming communities and reposting someone else's funny content for free validation. But I could be wrong, I don't know, I'm still 500 karma below knowing something. I'm sure that you would also believe someone who has 1000 photos on Instagram that they don't care about their Instagram :)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:51 PM
3

If she wants more girth, just be girthier :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:31 PM
1

You wouldn't have 200k karma if you didn't give a shit what people on reddit think about you :/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:17 PM
1

Yeah, that's how things work. Pick one you like and ignore 7 others. And pretend like that one represents all :)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:16 PM
0

There's a bunch of sub problems in here, but I don't think the expense is as hard as all that. It's funny how you start your comment with this and then go on and write several paragraphs why it's practically impossible to change anything because of how much it will all cost :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:28 PM
2

hared values, common interests and emotional chemistry None of that would matter if you consider the guy unattractive. Therefore, looks matter before any of what you have written.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:25 PM
4

Probably because it's laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:18 PM
5

There is a big difference betwen what you say he said and the actual contents of the comment your replied to. Do you see that distinction? Probably not, but bless your heart for not trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:17 PM
2

You are making a mockery of shaming :D !! But seriously now, that's not how shaming works and never did. You aren't virgin shaming a woman who had 100 partners (as in shaming her for being a virgin the same way men are shamed). It's kinda telling that you are strawmaning from the get-go. Shaming is setting up an environment in which it's acceptable and encouraged to castigate someone for certain behaviors/characteristics. And completely opposite of what you said, it's practically required that y…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:09 PM
-1

The question here is, why are you watching those things :/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 08:15 AM
29

You don't see the irony in your comment? If it's a mirror image of something you detest, shouldn't you detest it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:26 PM
4

You literally have no idea what liberal means. One of the main tenets of liberalism is having rights to private property.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:21 PM
4

So, liberal = state-owned? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:16 PM
6

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:12 PM
10

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 03:09 PM
4

That's what you got from his comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:55 AM
1

Should I assume this vicious women-hating rant is representative of the entire male gender? Is that a rhetorical question? Aren't you doing that constantly?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:35 AM
14

Would you be struck down right where you stand if you just once don't reply in bad faith?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 09:57 PM
6

I would never advocate for the intentional reduction of the human population Oh, how nice of you for not being a genocidal maniac. You should be really proud of yourself! but if it begins to happen organically through a reduction in reproduction, then I’m not going to pretend like that’s a bad thing. You really don't see any issues in population reduction in the current societal systems?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 08:15 AM
1

The left is perpetuating this far more than the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 08:07 AM
1

You've yet to cite any evidence for your claim You mean the same way you are citing evidence for your claims?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:11 AM
-1

So by your own logic His own logic is your own lack of logic :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:08 AM
2

adapted They did? How? From what I remember, crashouts continued until the end of lockdowns. Or do you consider that as adapting?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:04 AM
3

Why are you so defensive if none of this is about you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:01 AM
1

That's right, never miss an opportunity to shame and blame :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:42 AM
9

most will admit they want sex more than love. I've observed the complete opposite of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:16 AM
3

Is it possible that physically attractive guys are more confident and that increased confidence allows them to be more relaxed and humorous? The same thing said by the more attractive person will be perceived as more humorous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:14 AM
5

What else do they say?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:08 AM
2

No, it isn't. Even on this degenerate sub I can remember one (maybe two) men who actually think like this. But the OP isn't just about them. The OP is about every man that says that he is lonely because he lacks a romantic partner. She negates their loneliness and slaps "sexually desperate" stickers on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:05 AM
6

It is not written in your post because you are "misdirecting from meaningful feelings". I'm arguing directly with your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:43 PM
2

Continuing on being intentionally (hopefully) daft. Lonely in a way that she wants a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:37 PM
12

The men don't say that they are lonely because they can't insert their dick into something. They just say "lonely", and you, conveniently, interpret that as "lonely because they can't insert their dick into something". That's completely on you. You are misdirecting from the feeling of men longing for a romantic partner to exactly what you are doing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:31 PM
4

So why are you doing exactly that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:26 PM
12

You are being intentionally daft right now. Do you want us to believe that you've never heard a woman say that she is lonely for the very reason that she has no romantic partner (while having tons of friends and family)??
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:23 PM
1

The way you asked him about his accomplishments, I thought you were talking about accomplishments that improve the world around you in some way. But you actually meant just normal personal accomplishments. I'm glad to hear that your son doesn't have any qualms about his height. I really hope it stays that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 11:33 AM
1

And yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 12:32 AM
3

Lowest? Really? I'm kinda curious: what else do you consider low-priority but higher priority than male loneliness?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 10:03 PM
1

But, like I said, your story has literally 0 (zero) to do with what we are discussing here. The black liberal boyfriend is worried about their compatibility because of stark differences in their values and politics and he is bringing up those worries in a reasonable and rational way. On the other side is his girlfriend who ISN'T MAGA but is republican and is pretty reasonable in her stances as well. And he is worried that those differences will be too hard to overcome going further (marriage + k…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:00 AM
1

Am I really shocked? Or just not surprised? In any case, I almost never engage in bad faith, and I NEVER downvote.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 08:31 PM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 08:29 PM
3

I'm not assuming anything about you since I don't know anything about you. I just fixed your faulty analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:45 PM
1

You do realize that Reddit rounds out the hour once you hit the 60 minutes since posting. Like there’s 60 minutes in an hour. Hover the cursor over that rounded time and tell me what you see :) Like they say, every day is a learning experience. Idk what your problem is, but seriously go talk to a therapist about this weird “gotcha” thing you’re trying to do. Trust issues this extreme are insane my dude. You should also go to help with your pathological lying habit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:34 PM
1

Your answer is the microcosm of a lot of issues we have today. "I just completely baselessly assumed things about you, I don't see what's the issue?!??!!?!?"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:27 PM
2

Tellin' on yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:21 PM
3

Yeah, that was some hilarious shit oh lord.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:19 PM
3

The completely realistic real-life dilemma strikes again :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:18 PM
0

I wasn’t lying. You were. Like I explained, it's easy to check (assuming you made the comment I replied to right after checking that topic). But I believe that the “newest” comments even 40 minutes later would be different, because duh. Yeah. They are different. And that's exactly why I scrolled down to the timestamp of your comment and checked comments prior to that to verify what you are claiming. And I verified that you are "lying out of your arse". Pro tip: Lie about things that don't take j…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:55 PM
3

You shouldn't have shared so much of your own situation if you want to make these "holier than thou" comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:47 PM
1

Because she is clearly conflating many subgroups of men. The mistake you are making is that you think she is doing this unconsciously.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:37 PM
3

It's a bad analogy. The old you was selling (I'm going to embellish your "worth" a bit now) Porsche Carrera GT for 1500 to lucky buyers but the current you is selling 2013 Dodge Avenger for 3000.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:36 PM
1

Hm.. Are you sure you are blue :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:17 PM
0

When I said I checked, I actually checked the comments just before the timestamp when you wrote your comment that I replied to. And that was the reason I said that you are "lying out of your arse" because you were actually "lying out of your arse" and anyone else that wants to bother to check can also see that you are "lying out of your arse".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:09 PM
0

I swear, the word "correlation" really brings out internet psueds. Only if used flippantly like you used it, otherwise this internet pseud would stay put. I didn't make any claim that feminism is what caused society to become prosperous, I pointed out that the two correlate. So what was the point of mentioning correlation if you didn't want to imply causation as well? This is not sufficient to prove that feminism is the cause of that prosperity Correct. but it is sufficient to disprove the oppos…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 12:58 PM
1

Kinda ironic considering that the study was done just before covid hit, considering everything that happened afterward regarding free speech :)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:17 AM
-2

Categorizes something as "deeply unserious" and afterwards makes the most outlandish "correlation =/= causation" claim with utmost seriousness :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:04 AM
0

Expected level of discourse on PPD when confronted with arguments you yourself asked for :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:00 AM
0

Logic 101
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:47 AM
0

For a while I was on my bf's insurance while I was broke and finishing school. He made the final say on decisions regarding our financial situation because he made 4x what I did. That's how that works. Would you have stayed with him if he did something like what that woman from the OP did to her husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:46 AM
1

What do you think the ratio is of women immersed in woke/elite culture compared to those who aren't?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:40 AM
0

I just check and you are lying out of your arse.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:01 AM
1

That has 0 common points with the OP. When people suggest to flip genders they usually mean "keep the guardrails of the story, just replace gender of the main characters". In this case it would be the following (now I won't even include the shortage to illustrate how fucking insane this is even without that detail): A man is the only one working and bringing in the money. His wife has been unable to work for the past 6 years because of her medical condition that requires constant medication. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:00 AM
1

You will be surprised to the answers to these 2 questions. Why would she be surprised? Her comment clearly indicates what she thinks is an answer to those questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 08:18 AM
1

Great. Has nothing to do with downvoting content.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 08:03 AM
2

I realize that is not your scene, just like nightclubs and raves would not have been your scene in the past. Completely irrelevant to what we are discussing here, but you guessed that right. I dabbled a bit, but definitely not my cup of tea. Which begs the question, why are you jealous of casual sex havers? Am I? How did you figure that out? I get that you want the sex Do I? How did you figure that out? but you do not want the lifestyle that goes with it The lifestyle of using inebriated and dru…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:21 PM
1

So you were expecting downvotes from users like myself who never downvotes anything? Kinda weird expectation :/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 12:41 PM
1

Being kind. Treating others with respect. Always trying your best with what you have. Being confident about being a completely normal, not a piece of shit guy? Yeah, that won't get you labeled as a "nice guy", not at all :D
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 10:02 AM
0

But why would you expect upvotes for something that is common sense? It's like making a topic that says "2 + 2 = 4 let's debate" and then being surprised when you don't get upvoted :/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:39 AM
2

What do you expect me to answer? Are you, as a woman, really suggesting, "Hey, there are tons of drugged and inebriated women you can have sex with at an electronica festival!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:34 AM
1

Look at the emotional response Where Timmy, point it with you funny finger please. I can't really understand you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:33 PM
1

Manwhile you: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/znThk_5Lje8
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:30 PM
1

Play it in the background while looking at the mirror. That would be the best use possible of that song.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:26 PM
1

We are having this discussion because people here don’t like my answer, but it they can’t answer themselves. We are having this discussion not because people don't like your answer, but because your answer is nonsensical. And to quote KL again “Five percent will comprehend the other ninety five is LOST” I now imagine you perfectly as Timmy from South Park, and this fits perfectly with that bar. You think you are riffing Kendrick's lyrics, but all you are doing is saying "Timmeeeeeeh" the entire …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:21 PM
0

So drugged-up women are a freebie? Kinda weird sentiment coming from a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:08 PM
3

You expect upvotes for common sense? Ironically enough, that doesn't seem like common sense :/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:06 PM
1

He can also lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:04 PM
1

Not my fault if what’s described can’t be understood. Completely your fault. If you are any good at conveying your thinking we wouldn't be having this discussion. As Kendrick Lamar once explained You and Kendrick Lamar are so alike. Except in the fact that he can make sense of the entire world with his lyrics and you are unable to explain simple concepts. Other than that, you are completely the same!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:28 PM
1

0 focus will be on you if you bring your gay friend who loves weddings.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:23 PM
1

Who pays if women goes for dinner on her own?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:21 PM
1

You are gay as fuck :D
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:07 PM
1

You can subtract!!!! You go gir.... Oh wait, you're a dude. Carry on then!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:04 PM
1

I suggest a fun wedding outing (pun intended). - Officially come out as "maybe lesbian" - you are still soul searching, who knows what you will find. - I don't know if you have a gay best friend (if you don't then you really might be a lesbian), but find one that really likes weddings and really "gays out" when going to one. - Bring him with you as a fresh boyfriend and be like "I'm still not sure if I'm lesbian so I'll give it a try with a boyfriend!" and introduce him to everyone. - Let him do…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:00 PM
1

Feel free to count yourself in. That's the reason you are giving nonsensical answers, because you have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 12:47 PM
1

Your response to his question is nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 12:24 PM
2

You are tripping dude, read again what he asked you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 09:01 AM
1

Most people also understand the syntagm "losing strategy".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:48 PM
1

You aren't speaking as a white person, you are speaking as a white woman. He is speaking as a cis white man. It's a very necessary distinction in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:46 PM
1

That's a lot of white men if you ask me. We should do something about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:44 PM
2

So why are you doing it then?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 01:35 AM
1

Irrelevant? No. But I also don't think things haven't changed at all in 25 years. You would need to present the case that things changed so drastically that it would make these stats incongruent with the current time. I mean you wouldn't take a survey about mobile phone usage 25 years ago to represent anything relevant for today; that's pretty obvious. But I couldn't point out any change that happened in the last 25 years that could affect the subject of this study to a meaningful degree. Actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 01:31 AM
5

It's almost 25 years old. How does that fact in any way influence the findings from the study? If you are implying that the findings are irrelevant to our current sociocultural climate, then you need to explain why you think that. In my opinion, nothing significant changed for this kind of data to be less relevant now compared to 25 years ago. The age range is limited, so it's not all women Neither is it all men. Do you have a reason to believe that in older age brackets things would be signific…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:21 PM
0

Feel free to disprove it. X being misinterpreted means very little unless you explain how it's misinterpreted.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:24 PM
3

I'm always appalled at what passes as science these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 07:51 AM
1

This is the same thing as using the stat "Women initiate 75% of divorces" without context. You can make everything fit your narrative if you leave out the proper context. You tend to do that a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:23 PM
4

The solution is to punish people. What's so weird about this? I mean that's how everything currently is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:11 PM
2

No. Statistics demonstrate that fathers who bother to care enough to seek full custody do so because they have the means and support system to take a child away from an abusive or neglectful mother. Most fathers do not bother going to court and very few cases are decided in court. Exactly! The statistics show that the only way for a father to win custody in court is when the mother is the spawn of satan. That way, the court MIGHT look favorably on the father's claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 03:49 PM
3

Tbh, I don't understand how bars are so much better than dating apps. I don't understand this, either. It's just one of those knowingly dishonest answers that no one further elaborates (because they have no arguments). Because, just like you said, you still pick based on appearance and minimal interaction. "But you have a chance to show off your personality!!!" Really? Not much of a personality if you can show it all in a few seconds of interaction that might or might not lead to further interac…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 02:34 PM
4

They don't have the burden of making the 1st move, and confidence is one of the most important attraction triggers for that 1st move. I mean, even as a man, you will generally want a confident woman rather than someone completely unsure of herself. There are very few things as annoying as a woman CONSTANTLY asking for validation about her self-image (as ironic as that seems) and about your feelings towards her. But women are "allowed" to express that confidence at their own convenience, while a …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 02:23 PM
2

Why wait for them to die? Just divorce them at an opportune moment!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:16 AM
1

You could also sell them. You would make bank.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:14 AM
-1

That wasn't his phrasing. You yourself are implying that by thinking the opposite of hedonism is misery. That's your mistake, not his.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:11 AM
3

nothing inherently wrong with shallow people Highly dependent upon context in which you are shallow. Is it wrong to hire someone just for being good looking but far less qualified than all the other candidates for the job?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:49 PM
3

True confidence ultimately comes from genuinely believeing you're a person who's worth knowing, worth dating (if single), who can achieve most things you set out to do, and it comes from within, not just because people validate you - because someone can always make a cutting remark, no matter how meritoriously you achieve things in life. It's ultimately a self-assessment, rooted in reality. You need to genuinely believe in your own self-assessment but only IF it's rooted in reality and that = tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 10:25 AM
1

they can't recognize a great plan I agree with this completely. But what OP is talking about is NEVER a great plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:56 AM
11

It's the equivalent of telling a person suffering from clinical depression to "Just stop being depressed!"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:55 AM
1

I actually agree with this. I was trolling a bit with my dude. But this woman is his looksmatch as far as I'm concerned. Now the question is, do you honestly think that the difference in attractiveness between this woman and the one you initially posted is the same as the difference in attractiveness between my guy and your jacked guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:48 PM
1

Shy men. Not shy people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 02:33 PM
1

I mean, isn't that quite obvious :/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:49 PM
1

Actually, let's do this, can you give me what you think a female looksmatch is for my guy..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:46 PM
1

She isn't chubby. She's obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:45 PM
1

By that standard, my guy is also built curvaceously. He definitely has more curves than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:18 PM
1

No it isn't. He is definitely overweight by sthe tandard BMI scale, but far from obese. You are also conveniently comparing his muscle mass to her completely non-existent muscle mass.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:17 PM
1

You said "find a looksmatch". And that's what I consider looksmatch for her. He could have a smaller belly but be bald or something like that. Look at the entire package, not just the belly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:14 PM
1

Maybe she can't get any better than those chubby guys(for whatever reason). Maybe she actually really likes chubby guys. Wouldn't be the first, and wouldn't be the 76th (or last, whatever you prefer). You are aware of the concept of outliers, right? And don't you find it weird that even though women are not a monolith and they prefer different physical traits, only a tiny amount of men are physically attractive to vast majority of women. Funny how that works :/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:05 PM
1

If you aren't sure, always err on the side of caution. Let me ask you this, do you think this guy is medically obese?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:58 PM
1

Did I say she has a giant belly? I just said she's obese. Which she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:55 PM
1

And none (and when I say none I mean literally NONE) of that has to do with man being fat in either of your examples. They guarantee wealth with wealth itself, not fat tissue. It's also telling that you only consider west as civilized when I actually meant the entire population of the world other than far-away isolated tribes that are completely devoid of technology and modern amenities. And that's 99.99999% of the world. And when you said attractive, I was assuming you meant attractive for the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:53 PM
–

Oh, how refreshing! Something new on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:46 PM
1

That's basically saying there are no places but there are. I don't make my observations reduced only to the 'civilized' world "Please take into consideration 0.000001% of the world population that fit my argument when I'm talking about generalities of the entire world population!"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:31 PM
3

So someone just needs to start working towards it and that would be enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:23 PM
2

There's no such thing as trans woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:21 PM
3

Are trans black people black?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:20 PM
–

Just chill honey bunny! I was just jokling :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:19 PM
3

You struck a nerve with the reality. And with the judges that gave you 10 for your mental gymnastics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:16 PM
1

but my point is that those generalizations about gender, gender being such a small part of a person are not useful at all I really can't fathom that you honestly believe this. How can you say that gender is only a small part of a person when it's one of THE defining trait of a person. Everything else stems from that. Completely different realities, completely different worldviews, literally everything is different. dating changes from country to country, there are places in the world where being…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:15 PM
–

You mean exgf?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 12:02 PM
1

No, my stance is, little differences in treatment account for big changes in personality. No. You are confusing cause with effect. You think that difference in treatment causes the changes in personality when in actuality they were completely different personalities to begin with. and then there is brain development that accounts for even more changes Which goes against your "nurture" stance. Also, 20% is a big number, not even close to being all. Add 20% of a different color of paint to a mix a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 11:58 AM
1

But they aren't "masculine" traits. You just listed generally good traits to have (regardless of whether you are a man or a woman).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 11:47 AM
1

You didn't say ALL, but 80% is, for all intents and purposes, ALL or close enough. Is your stance really "Parents are treating each sibiling so differently that they develop completely different personalities"? I don't understand how you can seriously think something like that. I mean, either you believe that is true or your 80% nurture is fundementaly untrue. they're of different genders so treated differently by society at large Because they ARE different.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 11:45 AM
–

Again, how is that nazism?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:22 AM
1

Really? How do you do positive masculinity that attracts women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:19 AM
–

And also plastic as fuck :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:05 AM
–

Man's baggage is inexperience. A woman's baggage is experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:01 AM
–

Suicidemaxxing!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:59 AM
–

Those pesky republicans!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:57 AM
–

How do you figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:56 AM
1

The irony of saying "don't deny your reality" when it's an opinion or worldview that you agree with, while you would be completely judgmental and "AAAA ANECDOTAL AAAA" if it was something you don't agree with :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:52 AM
1

And where do those observations form? Do they have a physical manifestation (like a cherry) where you just pick them up or do they form somehow differently? Let me ask you like this, if your character is 80% nurture, why are ALL (literally all of them, even identical twins which is the weirdest shit ever) the brothers that I know (meaning my friends, family, and acquaintances who have brothers) so fucking different? I won't even go into the brother/sister differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:37 AM
3

Nope. Trans women are women. No amount of mental gymnastics is going to change that. You get all 10 for that gymnastic performance!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:24 AM
4

He can. I think most men would more prefer woman with aids than a trans woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:23 AM
1

And where does that come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:11 AM
1

He illustrates that your assortative mating strategy fails in this case. And it's not a tiny bit of men that fall into the shy category.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:08 AM
2

Can she pass well as a pregnant woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:02 AM
1

So you are into vomiting on the feet first?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:56 AM
1

Are you mansplaining about dick size now?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:54 AM
1

:D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:52 AM
1

Yeah, I can see that he doesn't have a giant belly. Weirdly enough, not having a giant belly tends to happen when you are trained and not medically obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:43 AM
1

Yeah, this guy is just as medically obese as her. He also carries it almost as well as her! I'm definitely less delusional now. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:41 AM
1

Cut me some slack, would you?! I've been banned for a month. The number of things you have written that could cause a brain aneurysm and I couldn't reply to any of it! This is the tamest I could muster as a reply. I'm actually quite proud of myself, was sure that I would get myself banned on the first day out of the jail :D
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:35 AM
4

So can you help me be less delusional. Put a pic of a man you think is her looksmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 06:47 PM
1

Women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 06:12 PM
1

How? I think the complete opposite would happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 05:13 PM
1

To me I made it extremely clear I'm talking about men I've met and/or know And I was referring to it as such. How can you honestly say that out of all the right-wing men you men none of them had ANYTHING positive about them? Really, absolutely nothing positive at all? And you don't think that's extreme? I find out new things about people I've known my entire fucking life, and here you are, figuring people out in an instant, figuring them out to their core by sole "virtue" of them being right-win…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 05:11 PM
5

Nothing is more sexy for a woman than a man measured and rational! Uf!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:38 PM
4

It's fairly obvious. I've personally never met a right-wing man (at least in person) that had anything positive about them. That's such an extreme way of thinking that it's out of this world. You are generalizing for large swaths of people by using total absolutes. Where/how exactly is this trait being displayed for you to notice? It's fascinating how something like this can be in a blind spot for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:35 PM
5

Why duh? What's so obvious about his observation that it needs no deliberation?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:30 PM
4

So "most men you see are attractive" are 3 men that piqued your interest :)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:26 PM
3

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:25 PM
2

I still don't see the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 04:16 PM
6

If you showed a picture of an obese man on a beach and said "According to true rate discussion, this man is disgusting and obese." you would have the exactly same reaction as you get for this woman. Even worse probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 03:09 PM
2

Do you know what the two of us have in common? Neither of us knows what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 03:07 PM
1

No goalposts were moved. I asked "And?" to your comment how MOST (MEANING NOT ALL) of the men she would be rejecting are just trying to pump and dump her and I see no issues with that. She should reject them. What exactly are you confused about?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:56 PM
9

This has nothing to do with being picky. She is objectively medically obese. That's all I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:52 PM
3

But she is rejecting them, so what's the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:51 PM
6

She is obese though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:44 PM
1

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:43 PM
4

By most you refer to the ones you actually notice :D When in reality, you actually don't notice vast majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:42 PM
1

Again, I'm not disputing that. I just wanna see a white man DEI hire.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:29 PM
1

No. I want exactly what I said to happen, a white man DEI hire. That's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:22 PM
1

I have no idea how that has anything to do with my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:10 PM
–

For whatever. It would be funny seeing things go full circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:09 PM
1

Big blue balls bias :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:08 PM
1

It's literally anti-family and anti-mothers. And was for some time now. I don't think you are very versed in feminist theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:53 PM
1

Because she is a sick person, I mean isn't that obvious from her comments here in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:50 PM
–

I would really love to see DEI white man hire :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:44 PM
1

I support getting a test. I do not support the ability to accuse your partner of that without consequences. Then you would be ok with a setup where you can't do STI test without the knowledge of your spouse?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:41 PM
1

I have no idea what your point is here. Nope to what? Especially if who voted for what? Can you be coherent for a minute please!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:22 PM
–

So we need DEI for hiring men before anything else in caregiving, do you agree with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:20 PM
1

I actually agree with that. But only if the father wants that kid. Otherwise, fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:10 PM
1

Every guy with a gun and a lack of inhibition is a chad with superior genes in a war. It's all shit and giggles for you while throwing under the bus all the victims of war atrocities just to win an imaginary internet argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 01:01 PM
0

Sensible :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:20 PM
–

So you are ok with 100% of no men, but the rest is the actual problem :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:13 PM
1

That argument doesn't hit as hard coming from someone who is ok with killing a baby because it was called a fetus 3 days ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:10 PM
1

Didn't know begging is a good strategy for getting sex :/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:07 PM
1

The control is quite literally, in your own sentence, the man’s. The control is, quite literally, in the hands of the woman. If she is "letting" or "not letting" something happen she has complete control of the situation. The intent on the side of the man (if we assume that everything is to be consensual) is completely irrelevant because the woman is the one making the final decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:03 PM
2

Not bodily autonomy What happens if a man rejects paying child support?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:00 PM
3

I was kinda hyperbolic, but your height is average. If we are to believe you, your face is average as well (I have no idea). But having a decently solid/muscle build is not average in a nation where 70% of people are either overweight or obese, and a great majority of the rest of that 30% are probably built normally with no noticeable muscle mass. You are upper middle class, do you honestly think that = average in the us currently? And you have a strong social life and support, do you honestly t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 11:46 AM
11

You literally have no idea what average means. You are extrapolating population-wide conclusions based on you and your 5 friends. In the US, gym membership is 20% of the population. More than half of that is barely used, while half of the other half is relatively regular. So about 5% of the population goes to the gym regularly. In what universe is 5% of something representative of the average?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 11:41 AM
0

None of what you have written = Average. Literally none.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 09:26 AM
1

Both are completely useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 09:25 AM
1

A useless substack user does not an interesting data make.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 09:22 AM
7

and work out regularly You are not average. That's not average.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 09:17 AM
2

You are far too surprised by that comment, are you new here? :D
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:30 PM
3

No, I think that app would have 0 impact on the number of people talking about consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:23 PM
1

Don't you think it's kinda useless looking for links and sources for things you think I think because you have issues with reading comprehension?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:22 PM
2

Yes, I meant that the app is useless in starting a conversation about consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:14 PM
2

I think you might be wrong about that. Reddit mods are next in line for deportation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:11 PM
–

Nope, this is purely an issue of you not being able to understand things properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:59 PM
1

I don't agree with that sentiment either. People who claim that are exaggerating or are hurt by their situation or have some issues. But you are also blind to your own privilege. It's like you yourself were expecting the panties to drop and are now disappointed no panties dropped, so you think that height is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:58 PM
-2

No more or less telling than a person branding divorce as heartbreak.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:52 PM
1

Why would I say something I don't mean when I could say something I do mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:47 PM
–

There is a MONUMENTAL (pun intended) difference between not listing your height, and listing it at 5'4.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:46 PM
3

I don't believe that getting people to talk about consent is doable with your stupid app.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:43 PM
–

Change your height to 5'4 in the apps and see how many matches you would get then.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:42 PM
2

Oh sorry, I thought it couldn't be more useless. Guess I was wrong. That makes it even more useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:39 PM
–

If you can link anything about a woman saying she can only accept the tallest of men I’ll gladly read it Let's be serious, you wouldn't even glance at it, let alone read :D And why would I link something like that when I'm not claiming any of what you said here? I was debating on preference, not requirements. Don't project your inability to read with understanding onto me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:35 PM
–

Well unless you can grow a couple inches after puberty why dwell on it? Would you dwell on your baldness if you didn't have a hair system? Imagine not having anything to counter baldness and someone tells you "What's the point in dwelling on that?". Hypocritical much?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:28 PM
3

It just muddies the water. If you have an app that has the sole function of establishing consent between the parties but it can be voided at any point in time that is the most useless thing ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:20 PM
–

All three of my mums husbands have been shorter than her You think this is a good argument :D
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:15 PM
–

That women's preferences for men's height are just that: a preferences I know. The debate wasn't if it was a preference or a requirement, the debate was about what the actual preference is. The comment I initially replied to said that the preference is just "taller than her" while my position is "tall - as in taller than other men". If the preference was just "taller than her" then height would never be an issue and we would never discuss about it since almost all men are taller than almost all …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:52 PM
–

That depends on the woman. True. Everything is individual. Some people are coprophiles but can we really generalize based on their habits? We can't. But if you notice a pattern occurring more often than not, then I think it's kinda ok to generalize. If woman only ever went for the tallest man around They generally do. In a company of several men with similar attractiveness level, women will gravitate towards the tallest of the bunch. we wouldn’t have the literal millions of couples in every day …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:42 PM
–

You were a sour misanthrope and you finally realized that it's much better to just be sour misandrist :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:15 PM
1

That's a shitty analogy. By the way you set up things, one cared more than the other and tried more. There was nothing in your comment about external validation or social connection. I have no idea what you wanted to illustrate with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:13 PM
–

But there are not enough tall guys. Really? I would have never guessed. So women compromise to get a partner. Really? I would have never guessed. Also women are in competition and the weaker contenders can't get the most desired men. Really? I would have never guessed. In any case, how is any of what you said relevant to my comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 12:55 PM
–

That's like saying "Money isn't everything" while being the top 1% of wealth. I would hazard a guess that the top 1% of height is much different from the bottom 1%. "Too tall" actually is a thing, extremes are always punishing, but your extreme is still EXTREMELY (pun intended) better than being on the opposite side of that spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 12:53 PM
–

You're comparing accusations to convicts. No, he isn't. Why are you disingenuous? Or daft? He is just saying that convicts treat those convicted of sexual assault WORSE than actual murderers. They aren't really treated any better or worse than other accusations. Again, disingenuous or daft, take your pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 10:18 AM
–

Most woman do prefer men to be taller than them, but considering most men are taller than most woman that doesn’t seem like particularly hard standard. Because that's not the standard. No guy would have issues with height because there are swaths of women shorter than every guy out there. Women's preference isn't a guy taller than them, it's a tall guy, and a guy is considered tall when he is tall compared to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:41 AM
1

I don't know about him, but I think that there wasn't anything worthwhile after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:28 AM
1

How does that in any way relate to his comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:26 AM
0

Divorce rates have been declining for the past quarter century. Could you stop parroting this point if you don't know what it actually represents?!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:12 AM
1

Would you make analogies if you only had a 0.00001% chance of not making a completely shit analogy? Seems like you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:07 AM
0

I truly believe that experiencing domestic violence is part of becoming an adult, what you do with this in part makes you who you are. Some can't make it, this is life. Others thrive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:03 AM
5

Then it's null and void. So what's the point of the app then?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 08:56 AM
2

people who like to cheat should be in open relationships. I'm being pedantic, but doesn't being in an open relationship defeat the purpose if you like cheating :/ And btw, what we are discussing here aren't people who like cheating. I'm not defending those people or that kind of behavior. We are talking specifically about people who are cheating because of a dead bedroom. Hope that answers this question No, it doesn't. Let me explain. You are presenting idealized circumstances which lead to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 05:52 PM
1

if my wife were to get sick or something and didn't want to for that reason I'd have no problem staying. The same probably goes for 90% of men. But in 99% of the cases, the dead bedroom isn't about that so that's completely irrelevant. I would otherwise have a CONVERSATION with her like an adult and go from there. You don't think those men (and women for that matter) had god knows how many conversations? Are you the first person who got the brilliant idea to talk to their partner? I would leave …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:59 PM
1

It's also a problem that comes up in a relationship. No different than other problems. Just discuss about it. Why are you applying different standard to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:38 PM
1

Would you stay with your partner if you were in a dead bedroom situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:37 PM
1

As I JUST said, you discuss relationship issues as they come in a relationship. Why isn't cheating included in that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:31 PM
2

If it does become a dead bedroom relationship discuss it or leave. I’m not sure what’s so hard about this. If she doesn't like the cheating that she caused, she can leave, I'm not sure what's so hard about that. Exclusivity is discussed when you enter a relationship sex usually is not. Do you discuss interpersonal violence when you enter a relationship? Do you discuss rape? Yet you don't expect those things to happen even without discussing it. Why is that? Could it be that the relationships hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:21 PM
2

So you think cheating is okay, that is simply a moral issue we aren’t going to see eye to eye on. Nope, you are completely wrong about that. Have never, would never, under any circumstance. I find it abhorrent. But I'll continue to play devil's advocate in this case because I find this double standard (denying intimacy vs cheating) even more abhorrent. I expect people who feel this way to steer clear of monogamy or at least clearly state the second their partner stops putting out they’re thinkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:13 PM
1

Welcome to humans, I hope you like your stay here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:52 PM
1

I entered a relationship based on the notion that we are exclusive The same way he entered the relationship on the notion that he wouldn't be in a dead bedroom situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:35 PM
1

Because you want the other person to suffer as you did?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:34 PM
2

I find it perfectly acceptable that if one person isn't holding up their end of the deal (providing intimacy) that you as well can also not hold up your end of the deal (providing fidelity). Do you think it's fair to put the onus of the decision to leave the relationship on the person who was "wronged"? I'm more of an "eye for an eye" kinda guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:31 PM
1

Was anyone claiming that cheating isn’t an option? If you are asking that then you haven't been paying attention on this topic. Plenty of people will claim that cheating isn't an option.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:22 PM
1

Is anyone claiming otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:14 PM
2

Is intimacy part of that deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:12 PM
1

Would you apply that same standard if the person cheated and then you said: "Well, have you ever discussed that there should be no cheating?" Why is something taken for granted while something else needs to be discussed ad nauseam?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:10 PM
1

Well if you converse with your partner about the lack of sex and brainstorm solutions… Dead bedrooms happened because none of that worked. Options are both parties agree to open the relationship or you don’t agree and walk away. Again, how is cheating an option when I’ve laid it out so clearly? If denying intimacy is an option, so is cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:01 PM
3

You enter a relationship based on the terms there’s no one else involved in the relationship. If there’s no loyalty, there is no relationship (unless you have DISCUSSED poly or open relationship) But if someone one-sidedly decides there will be no more intimacy in a relationship, doesn't that also mean that there is no relationship? The people in the relationship who DISCUSS their boundaries? Relationships are largely monogamous which is why i said “normally”. Normally you expect intimacy in a r…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 02:58 PM
-1

If no one is entitled to another one's body then you have no say if your partner seeks sex elsewhere if you deny intimacy. (not you you)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 02:18 PM
2

My husband, 99% of the time is willing to fuck, however, he will NEVER initiate... ever. It simply will not happen. No amount of talking about it has changed a thing. If you are comparing that to an actual dead bedroom situation we were discussing here than we literally have nothing to discuss further.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 02:01 PM
1

Did I say that? I just said that if that is breaking commitment then so is denying sex in a committed relationship while also banning that person from seeking sex elsewhere. Both are breaking commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:59 PM
1

I'm not advocating for cheating. I just find it weird how flexible you are in determining what's breaking commitment and what isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:40 PM
1

Do you even read any of the things you copy here? Please at least read something! Why didn't you copy the next section that says the following: What size penis do women want? A 2015 studyTrusted Source asked 75 females to indicate their penis size preferences using 3D-printed models of 33 different dimensions. The models ranged from 10–21.6 cm (4–8.5 in) in length and 5–17.8 cm (2.5–7 in) in circumference. The choices varied according to the nature of the relationship that participants were cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:36 PM
1

Hm isn't that like the default excuse when the woman is cheating :/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:21 PM
-1

If you're not happy with the amount of cheating because you are denying sex to your partner, then you need to communicate. If nothing changes, then leave. cheating just makes you a piece of shit and creates unnecessary hurt Denying your partner intimacy doesn't create unnecessary hurt?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:18 PM
1

Cheat is breaking commitment. Denying sex in a committed relationship while also banning that person from seeking sex elsewhere isn't breaking commitment?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:15 PM
4

You’re entitled to your partner’s loyalty though. Why? Those are normally the terms when you enter a monogamous relationship. Really? Who gets to determine what's the norm and what isn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:13 PM
2

Would you have the same advice for the wife if she was in a dead bedroom situation? Instead of "I must divorce him because this is unsustainable" how bout she thinks about how to arouse him so he doesn't ignore her sexually?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:09 PM
1

of a research that says that women don't care much about size The research theme isn't the issue. Research methodology and everything else and the fact that they call that research IS. Don't project on me what you find or don't find important. Just read what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:01 PM
1

Yeah, projection is exactly what that is. Stop projecting your shitty research onto me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:45 PM
1

Do you have any more research like this? I'm in the process of assembling a shitty science portfolio and you seem like a perfect person to ask. I have a feeling that whatever you link would perfectly fit in my collection.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:39 PM
1

Yeah, I'm always thinking a lot about big inconsistencies and big lies. I can't really help myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:35 PM
2

why are men like this? Are men like that? there's literally millions of other variants of this same interaction it's almost the default. Really? I just see one. but then men think women should give a man a chance because he likes her and is nice? chances are he's probaly a liar and only want sex. Excellent reasoning. A true erudite.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:34 PM
1

I just don't like inconsistencies and lies. Nothing more nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:30 PM
1

I think my dead grandma who couldn't read knows better than these "researchers".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:28 PM
1

Another one who doesn't know how research works. Oh wait, it's the same one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:26 PM
1

To test the notion of the possible importance of length vs. width and female sexual satisfaction, two male undergraduate college students - both popular athletes on campus - surveyed 50 female undergraduate college students, considered by the two males to be sexually active, based on the males' prior social experience and knowledge of the females. The pinnacle of science.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:24 PM
1

ITs way more important how to use it, more than the size. Size doesn't matter if you dont know how to use it That's the equivalent of saying "his personality is the most important thing for me" while failing to mention that only the ones who are attractive to her will have their personality judged. Which practically means that looks are actually the most important thing. Same thing here "size doesn't matter" UNLESS it's below a certain size, and above a certain size. If that statement was actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 12:19 PM
1

All I can say is: I never met anyone like her when I was younger, and if I had, my relationship history would definitely not have been so tumultuous in my early 20s. You can't know that. You changed. They (the women you cheated on) might have changed as well into someone even "better" than your wife. And you might have cheated on your wife if you met her when you were in your wilder years. You just can't know. You can just be happy with your current circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 11:24 AM
4

It's only crazy if you believe in a just world fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 11:10 AM
5

You are making it sound like that's all she's good for.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 09:30 AM
-4

Be honest (no reason to be mean) and we're fine. Why do you think you deserve honesty?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 12:42 PM
3

Just be yourself is as actionable as just be alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:03 AM
1

It is much rarer than before.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:28 PM
1

Yes, I'm gonna tell all of them to go to all of your churches so that one of them can get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:25 PM
–

In my church (when I was still attending) old people who were never married remain single, widowed people remain single, and divorced people remain single. Not always, but almost every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:21 PM
–

Women are not a monolith!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:18 PM
–

Old people get married and find love ALL THE TIME! I have exactly one example of something that is happening ALL THE TIME.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:16 PM
1

Tell me you never watched Deliverance without telling me you never watched Deliverance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 12:35 PM
2

Can you explain the difference between fat acceptance and body positivity?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 12:20 PM
1

Near perfect is good enough. The fact is this is how one should look for a partner instead of brute force dating and see what sticks. It's less about numbers and more about how much they fit like puzzle pieces. An average man would fit better with an average woman than with a woman that wants a very assertive or submissive man. In contrast, a submissive man would fit better with a woman that is assertive and wants their partner to submit to them but would be a bad match up with an average woman.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 09:13 AM
1

Not really because human relationships are about compatibility But perfect compatibility doesn't exist. You will be less or more compatible with someone. No matter how compatible you are, you will always have some incompatibilities. Or are you making it out to be a binary thing, meaning if you pass a certain compatibility "score" you are compatible, and below that "score" you are incompatible? But even in that case, different people will have different thresholds. No different from the fact ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 11:40 PM
–

Do you understand what "taking things out of context" means?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:11 PM
–

( Patiently waiting for this to be taken out of context :D )
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:04 PM
2

You don't need to look any further than your own comments on this topic. Nothing in those comments qualifies as an intelligent answer/advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:57 PM
1

And what is representative of the "average" man?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:48 PM
2

I dont know what else to write Write nothing, please! At all! Ever again! PLEASE!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 01:06 PM
1

I don't really believe in SMV because it makes as much sense as puzzle pieces have different values over another and some puzzle pieces fits more than another. They will only fit within the compatible pieces adjacent to them and nothing else and that is how I see human relationships. Completely useless analogy that completely ignores every and all nuances of human relations. I don't really see why the need to train for sex if you are looking for a serious relationship where inexperience isn't a …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 12:59 PM
2

You are comparing emotional man to an abusive woman, kinda telling :)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:49 AM
1

The saddest of lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 12:04 AM
-1

Being a cum bucket for the rich = almost respectable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:55 PM
-1

No, you are being slow. Am I now? I think people reading this might think otherwise. I did not say she was eyeing up another man. Neither did I. You made that up. I guess you made up what I was saying. A pot calling the kettle black. Or a projection if we go by the newspeak. Because you think she was eying him/them up. Don't put that on me because I never said that. I have been on the other side as a young man, I was with three far more experienced women when there was a young man and I remember…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:52 PM
1

"Reality - e.g. I saw it in r/GenZ" implies that very thing. I think you have no idea what an example of something is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 01:41 PM
11

Day in and day out PPD seems more and more like a breeding ground for insanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 01:37 PM
1

I don't see how that conflicts with any of what I said. By giving an example of something you give credence to the idea that you are providing the example for. I never assumed that reality is only r/GenZ and nothing else, but I did assume (because that's how examples work) that you consider something real because you saw it on r/GenZ . Do you have any issues with my reasoning there?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 01:17 PM
–

Your life is so fucking sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:59 PM
1

Reality - e.g. on the GenZ sub there is a lot of frustration about the dating landscape That's the exact quote of your comment. Reality = something you saw on r/GenZ ? Can you explain what I'm misunderstanding or what you think I'm straw-manning here?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:52 PM
2

There is no accusation of irony, I'm just going off of what you did. Except for my last point, I assumed some things there completely baselessly :) But honestly, if your argument is that something you saw on some random sub = reality while discussing things in ppd where there is a general sentiment (you don't have to express it yourself) that ppd is nothing like real life, if that's not irony, can you tell me what that is? Seems like the most typical example of irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:39 PM
2

Does your saying of "a lot" hang on to something?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:27 PM
2

I think I'm closer to the actual meaning of "irony" than you are to "a lot".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:24 PM
1

The irony of equating reality with the contents of some random subreddit especially considering how often you see here "ppd is not real life" or some variant of it, but somehow r/GenZ actually is real life :D Even more ironic, I'm browsing through r/GenZ and seeing zero posts where people express frustration about the dating landscape. I guess we have different definitions of "a lot." My definition is closer to "the majority of something," while yours seems to be closer to "almost none at all." …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:19 PM
5

Based on ...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:05 AM
–

You are a piece of shit, but I absolutely understand the reasoning behind your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:00 AM
3

You are projecting too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:59 AM
5

And his is another. What makes either of you correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:58 AM
9

Work on reading before you reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:43 AM
–

Your comment is the perfect example of what OP is talking about. Thank you for your contribution. Please continue to support his point in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:35 AM
4

Really? In a Scandinavian culture where there is "A big difference between here and the USA is that women are more likely to acknowledge how much their men help them, you hear less about man-flu and the youngest generation of women seem to be concerned about being emotionally supportive to their men." there is still patriarchy abound? How convenient that whenever your wife looks at a man (for whatever reason) that she deems powerful and influential, it's the patriarchy that made her do it. The i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:29 AM
–

That goes for your job, not your social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 11:58 PM
1

There is a world of difference between a fat woman and a short thin attractive woman. I didn't ask about the latter. I only asked about a not fat woman. And if you honestly think women carry weight worse than men, shouldn't then a really obese man = fat woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 11:51 PM
3

short man = fat woman bald man = fat woman unattractive man = fat woman fat man = fat woman At what point does a man graduate from being the equivalent of a fat woman? What are the minimum requirements for a man for that to happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:21 PM
2

I am against the Selective Service and the draft for both sexes, but at this point the SS is an inconvenience, not a credible threat to every young man's way of life. There were probably plenty of stupid Ukrainian feminists spouting the same shit just before the Russian invasion. Funny thing is, those same stupid Ukrainian feminists could just leave the country at will if they wanted to (and they all wanted to) while the men had to defend it. Oftentimes they conflate it with the draft despite th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:14 PM
1

As opposed to the left which does what exactly :/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:04 PM
1

I also don't suffer schadenfreude; I'm not a monster like red pilled men. It's incredible, I almost believe you believe that :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 05:56 PM
1

Every other advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 05:47 PM
3

The equivalent of a short bald guy is an overweight woman. Really? And what's the equivalent of an overweight guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 05:44 PM
1

There is a name for that :) Btw, do you think he would do all of that without sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 06:08 PM
2

I don't think I would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:12 PM
2

You are wrong. Most families having children have more than one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:58 PM
4

What a stupid notion :D
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:56 PM
1

Would you accept romance without commitment?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:51 PM
1

It would be interesting to have a threat where RP men thinks constitutes as abusive behaviour from a man. It would be interesting to have the same thing by feminist women so we can compare.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:50 PM
1

Oh the irony :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:48 PM
8

There should be ZERO examples of this regardless of the gender of the person. ZERO. Do you understand? Z E R O!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:17 PM
5

Why do you act surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:06 PM
3

Only if sarcastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:48 PM
4

Who is the predator in that scenario?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:15 PM
-4

I think you don’t need to outright state the expectation. It’s going to hurt your prospects. Goes against everything said here by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 09:34 AM
–

Which makes things even worse. You could maybe wave it off as "they are just radfems, ignore them", but it's not like that, it's women from all walks of life having the same talking points as radfems used to have. Seems like mainstream now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:27 AM
3

Who is a "woman like that"? Are you a "woman like that"? Is the woman I want to approach a "woman like that"? Is there a way for me to know who a "woman like that" is? Do you understand our conundrum now?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 09:22 AM
1

No one knows that. They could have committed suicide at 19. They could have died in a car crash at 20. They could have gotten terminal cancer at 21. Their future was completely hypothetical. Of course. Or they could become a serial killer in the future. No one knows what would happen, but that was my reasoning why they are emphasizing that. What is yours? There are experiences they may have had, just as a pregnant woman may have had certain experiences if she weren’t murdered. A lot of people va…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 09:15 AM
1

Because they are not connected... Who is claiming they are connected? I'm asking you why that happens. Let's first get this out of the way. But if that person had lived and chosen to drop out of college, they would not have been committing murder by dropping out of college... I have no fucking idea what you wanted to say here so I'll continue on to the relevant point: If an 18 year old about to start college is murdered, everyone will decry that a young person just starting college was killed! Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:43 PM
3

Exactly. Just like a woman willingly engages in sexual activities, how is that being used for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 02:26 PM
1

Are you not asking why pregnancy is relevant or valuable, if abortion is not murder? Yes, that's exactly what I'm asking. Can you answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:46 PM
1

I have no idea what you are asking here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:41 PM
-2

This strikes me as such a bizarre position if you believe abortion is killing a child. Yet if someone murders a woman who was pregnant, EVERYONE (every pro-choice person) will decry how a pregnant woman was killed! But why do that if her pregnancy status is irrelevant? She lost her life and nothing else of value was lost. And yet ...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:37 PM
-2

" We’re sorry, the page you are looking for either doesn’t exist or may have moved. Try using the search to find what you were looking for. "
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:33 PM
1

Does a value between 12% and 40% exist in your brain? You don't need to be 12% body fat. But that's a far cry from 40%, lets be realistic here for a moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:26 PM
–

The return of "My mother and step-father are completely financially illiterate morons" OP. Why shame your family once when you can shame them many times :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:23 PM
–

You chose categories in which men spend more and the conclusion is that men spend more in those categories. What a scholarly brain we have here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:20 PM
2

Are you serious right now :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 12:15 PM
-3

That's why financial abortion is something that should be done during the pregnancy :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:55 AM
-2

Once a child exists, it needs to be taken care of. Once a woman decides to carry a child to term, she can feel free to take care of it. It was her decision. The same way it would be her decision for that child to not exist at all. I am baffled how dudes don't understand this - we already have a fatherless epidemic, where "single mothers" are "ruining men", and yet men continue to want ONLY mothers to raise the kids they make, so they can more comfortably not provide for their own children. Why d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:53 AM
5

We should judge the entire gender based onthe actions of a minority Does that only work for gender? Can we generalize on other things like that :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:25 AM
6

You are completely missing the point. You don't deal with widespread societal issues by telling an individual how to try to avoid the issue. The individual might dodge it, but the issue remains. I'm going to make an outlandish example to illustrate my point. Imagine if rape became so acceptable in a society that there is no punishment for it anymore. But only in the case of male-on-female rape. Every other instance of rape is severely punished! And some woman raises the question about the absurd…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:13 AM
2

Are you sure you are bluepill :/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 09:22 AM
5

Extremely stupid comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:38 AM
5

What a stupid comparison. You really outdid yourself :)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:05 AM
2

If that was enough to turn you away from this sub, then you are completely correct. This sub isn't for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:55 AM
5

You honestly don't see a difference between taking someone else's money (essentially stealing) and engaging in consensual, hopefully mutually beneficial activity? You are making it seem that sex for women is always conditional and that you have to "pay up" to get sex. I think there is a name for that :/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:52 AM
2

So you agree it should remain illegal?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:39 AM
1

It may come as a surprise to you, but people other than you do exist. Weird, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:24 AM
2

I though friend zone doesn't exist :/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:01 AM
2

He is suggesting that you should try sucking a dick and that you might like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 08:44 AM
1

So if you aren't dating someone you: - Don't accept gifts and you don't give thanks for them - Don't respect someone's privacy - Don't keep your word - Don't give someone the freedom to say "no" when you ask them to do something - Don't answer questions - Don't respect someone when they don't want to do something for you - Do make mean jokes at other people's expense
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 07:52 AM
1

Are you sure about that list? Half of what you mentioned is being a functional human being interacting with anyone (not just your partner). Just for reference, can you make the same list for her knowing he values her?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 07:12 AM
–

Why cant she make the first move? Oh come on, there has to be a limit to how disingenuous you can be. What % of women you know would like to be the ones making the first move? What % of the women you know would think he isn't into her if he is waiting for her to make the first move?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 07:04 AM
–

How does he get to determine if she values him?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:58 AM
–

And what is that type?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:46 AM
1

People who write in italic are insecure. In general. Doesn't mean you, but in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:37 PM
4

How is that, in any way, related to what OP is talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 12:34 AM
8

... because no one I know would do something like that How would you know that? How would anyone know anything about the private lives of others? You are ALWAYS getting the curated version of every event of everyone's life. And you are thinking about this in a completely wrong way. I completely understand why - because the meme and joke version of it actually happened to you. But no, we aren't talking about women taking notes every time you show vulnerability just so they have ammo to use in som…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 03:36 AM
12

What if he's also black? Are you racist then?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:59 PM
7

The irony of that question is completely lost on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:57 PM
1

then there's room for you to actually provide some benefit to those women you're avoiding HAHAHAHAHAH :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:56 PM
–

It's sexist to treat one sex differently than the other out of fear. Hahahahahahah. You are debating yourself and losing the debate horribly. We are all just spectators who enjoy the show.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:46 PM
-1

Sure, but that’s not what she said. She “stable sense of self” No, she didn't. She said: has his own sense of self Those two phrases are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 04:35 PM
1

Now sex with a robot...thats a whole different thing. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 01:31 PM
–

You.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 12:05 PM
-4

Do you have any other avenues of thought where you need to explain to women what they were actually thinking and why they are wrong, or just this?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 10:52 AM
5

You are like a friend of mine that says "No one cares about that" for every thing that he doesn't care about. Incidentally, those are always things that lots of people care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:52 AM
-2

Thank you for mansplaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:49 AM
15

For once, someone's ex-wife is right :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:44 AM
–

It's so cute when a bluepill thinks he has a GOTCHA :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 09:45 AM
4

I don't think it was ever about something that was tried once, disliked and we moved on. It's about things that you constantly engaged in with your previous partner but you are denying it from the current partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 09:44 AM
1

You should read the definition of the word "violated". Because it isn't what you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 03:57 PM
8

Why? I though you shouldn't care about the past, what's the problem here?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 03:50 PM
–

You should read the definition of the word "most". Because it isn't what you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 01:35 PM
4

Imagine your current bf being all adorable with you. And then you come to find out he was an abuser in his past relationships. What happens then?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 01:26 PM
3

And did they succeed?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 12:26 PM
3

Do you see a problem in men doing a carrot on a stick (the carrot being the relationship) to get sex from women?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:24 AM
1

I'd be hardpressed to step into the viewpoint that poor people and black people aren't humans, yeah. But he isn't making them seem like that, you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 09:10 AM
0

Why are you asking pointless questions on the internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:23 AM
2

I don't give a fuck what people think People who write in bold think about what other people think of them. In general. Doesn't mean you, but in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:22 AM
1

But real life, no one blames men alone for bad sex. Really? Be honest now, have you ever heard ANY of your friends EVER take any accountability in this matter when they complain about bad sex? Have ANY of them EVER said something along the lines "We are having issues but I think that's on me for the most part. He's really trying, I think I need to communicate my needs better!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:18 AM
1

You are really doing bad at this debating thing on your work device. I really hope you are doing better at working thing on your work device.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:13 AM
1

I don't think you understand what's happening here. The OPs reply to her comment annihilated her point in one sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 09:02 AM
2

Imagine if women had that attitude! It's not hard to imagine, you are the perfect example of that. If your comment is what you surmised from his comment then you didn't read or understand any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 08:51 AM
3

I have never met a woman who admitted to me that she was having unsatisfying sex with a guy unless it was someone she was no longer with. You really don't see a contradiction here? It's like, for some reason, having a bunch of serial killers as friends and saying "I've never met a murderer unless the person I know was convicted of murder."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 08:41 AM
3

See, people you are the issue here. You just go and assume. She never even implied that he isn't an attentive partner, quite the opposite. She even said that she never even had an orgasm by masturbating. Is that on him as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 08:26 AM
6

On average harder for a man than a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 01:27 AM
1

Do you really want to have a discussion of what is considered appropriate in Japan vs the rest of the world? And thank you for that wonderful ss of an AI Overview.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:18 PM
2

And how did you figure that out? If young teens or even children are watching porn, does that mean that porn is for young teens and children or that someone isn't doing their job? Dandadan isn't a children's cartoon. As a matter of fact, it's not a cartoon at all. But let's not get into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:02 PM
1

Because you are using it as an argument and I'm arguing against it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:57 PM
1

I am not the stupid one here. I think you're giving yourself too much credit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:49 PM
3

Yeah, makes you wonder, doesn't it :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:47 PM
1

that's why 4b is happening It's a meaningless movement to even those who heard about it, and 99.99% never even heard about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:35 PM
2

If that's what you consider dull, can you give me examples of things and behaviours that aren't dull?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 04:55 PM
3

Dandadan isn't a children's cartoon.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 04:16 PM
1

Lol I mean it's the reason why I had an abortion. No, it isn't. If you actually wanted a baby but didn't want to go through the pains of pregnancy you would adopt. But you actually don't want children and that's why you had an abortion. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, but I just can't understand why you are so adamant about gaslighting yourself and us. If I was down to go through a pregnancy What a silly notion. No woman is giddy about pregnancy (actually I do know exactly one woman who actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:00 AM
1

No, abortions are primarily about avoiding pregnancy. No, they aren't. I've never heard any woman say "I don't want to be pregnant right now in my life" or "I'm not ready for pregnancy right now" but I can't count the number of times I've heard "I don't want a child right now in my life" and "I'm not ready for a child right now". There is no point in carrying the child to term just to give it for adoption (if you have the option and are ok with abortion, of course). I'm sure there are plenty of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 09:58 AM
1

So if a dude rejects the financial support of the embryo, there isn't an issue here at all then?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 09:32 AM
0

To abort a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 09:24 AM
3

Time to get myself suspended again :D You're a moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 02:27 AM
1

but I’ll just step aside No. Never do that. Never give in. Continue being a strong and empowered woman as you are and shout from the rooftops how you have figured out how to make a man cum. It's a worthy cause and a valiant effort on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 03:18 AM
8

My usual rhetoric? Are you sure you aren't confusing me with someone else? But in any case, you would be wrong then in thinking this is a deviation from the usual because men being able to cum in any scenario that you can imagine does make them somewhat flawless in that regard, and you being proud in managing the accomplish the simplest of tasks does make you seem like a child. So there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 03:03 AM
7

Never had a bit of trouble getting my boyfriend off without written or verbal instructions. I just find it weird that you would use that as an argument considering men can cum on cue while watching Ancient Aliens on History Channel. You are acting like a clerk at some government office thinking about last night's game where your favorite player fumbled the ball just before the endzone: "How can that happen to him, is it such a problem for him to do his job properly??? Look how easy it is... " An…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 02:45 AM
9

Did you come back to me to ... I just wanted to congratulate you for managing to find a penis. You seemed so proud of the fact so I was just happy for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 02:06 AM
17

Never had a bit of trouble getting my boyfriend off without written or verbal instructions. Wow, congratulations. You have managed to find where his penis is!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:52 AM
1

No, we shouldn't. We should just observe what they actually do, and that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 09:04 PM
1

Your point is completely irrelevant. Let me remind you what you said: You do not have any additional responsibilities, that women do not have, to have basic rights. To which I replied "Draft." It's completely irrelevant if feminism is against it or who is responsible for it. As long as it exists, it will always be the answer to your quoted assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 09:02 PM
2

Is 50 years such a long time that you can just wave away the draft like something unimportant? Funnily enough, whenever women's right to vote is mentioned it's always said "women got the right to vote ONLY 100 years ago!!!!" but a draft that happened 50 years ago was an eternity away from now :D In any case, your point is completely irrelevant. She said that men do not have additional responsibilities, that women do not have, to have basic rights. And as long as the draft exists, she is wrong. L…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:57 PM
1

You do not have any additional responsibilities, that women do not have, to have basic rights. Draft.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:44 PM
3

Your handle is the epitome of irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:39 PM
2

How does that track with what he said?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:38 PM
–

Because marriage rates are falling rapidly. Please check out how the divorce rate is calculated. That's still only one of the many factors I mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:31 PM
–

A will?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:27 PM
1

Why would you be disinherited?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:47 AM
1

Why are you making a whole argument based on assumptions? In the same way, each and every woman here is making assumptions about women initiating 75% of divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:49 AM
1

Because, otherwise, they would be crucified in the family court. They would be brought to ruin by legal fees and they would still lose. So if mom isn't a monster the father opts out of full custody because the alternative is the legal hell that he will lose and that puts him in a far worse situation than if he simply relinquished sole custody rights to the mom. Every time it's mentioned that 75% of divorces are initiated by women, every woman here is like "... but but that's only because many ti…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:45 AM
1

They are. Not a vast majority, but a majority nonetheless. Imagine all the marriages that end up in divorce - I can't fathom much sex going on there before the fact. Add to that all the shitty marriages where people don't get divorced for whatever reason. Add to that marriages where one or both get complacent after some time and nothing is going on bedroom-wise (because of obligations, stress, children, whatever). Add to that seemingly happy marriages where a spouse is cheating and outsourcing s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:26 AM
1

More expensive than divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:11 AM
-1

And you can coach a promiscuous woman to stop being promiscuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 08:54 AM
1

“50% of the crime” shit Can you expand on this, what's wrong with it? That’s not really the case with women tho. Women most likely really more “wonderful” than men in certain ways at least. And while I agree that people shouldn’t get too carried away being biased towards one gender/group etc.. I also agree that any guys whining about the “WAW” thing probably just don’t have enough experience dealing with people. Men are fucking insufferable in certain ways compared to women. So it’s no surprise …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 11:11 AM
8

Why do men pick women who hate them to be their girlfriends? Why do women pick men who abuse them to be their boyfriends?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 09:12 AM
1

So you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 08:55 AM
1

what got her to the point of making those choices And what exactly got her to the point of making those choices?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 08:48 AM
10

Your assertion is that black men benefit from male privilege (by the nature of them being men) while at the same time, they are oppressed. But they aren't oppressed for the fact that they are men, but for the fact that they are black. And that's not the answer to my question. It's completely understandable that the same person might benefit from some circumstance while at the same time be oppressed by another (different) circumstance. My question was how can men at the same time benefit and be o…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:56 PM
14

How do men at the same time benefit from patriarchy while being oppressed by it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:08 PM
4

Excellent self-awareness. And you even identified the potential source of the issue. Just keep working at it!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:50 PM
1

You think they’ll change their ways now? That's my entire point. No, they won't. Because each and every one of you who supported Bernie still voted Dems even though they ousted a candidate that would have handily beaten Trump in 2016. Vote blue no matter who. Well, seems like it actually matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 12:01 PM
1

That always works out super well. Better than your attitude in any case.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 09:33 AM
0

If I asked you "Do people have an obligation or moral duty to be decent?" would that be a stupid question as well? If you are going to say "Yes!" to both of my questions, can you explain why would it be expected of people to have an obligation or moral duty to be decent?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 09:31 AM
4

1 girl a year isn't rare? You and the rest of the humans on planet Earth operate under different assumptions about what signifies rareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 09:10 AM
5

I vomited a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 08:46 AM
1

And because of people like you, they have 0 incentive to change their ways because you keep voting blue no matter what. Enjoy the rot.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:55 PM
1

The same ones you vote for, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:35 PM
2

But no one is falling for yours so do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 09:11 PM
1

What do you mean, how did you turn it back on men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:51 PM
1

I don't think you are pondering much anymore. You are in a full-on insanity phase :)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:47 PM
1

No, people like you mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:45 PM
1

Who was he ratfucked by? Can you help me remember please..
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:25 PM
1

Can you explain how you reconcile that fact with "wokeness" being "the dominant American religion"? If it's so dominant, why didn't they win? He clarified it right after All of the mainstream media, entertainment industry, academia, and big corporations abide by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:07 PM
1

Not telling them they are, by default, pieces of shit and evil just because they are men. We can start with that and let's see where it takes us.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:00 PM
1

It wasn't mine you silly person. I just liked it :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 07:07 PM
2

Really? You think men at the frontlines want ALL women to save themselves by leaving Ukraine?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:50 AM
8

It has nothing to do with dating pool What do you mean by this? Because every time I saw this being said it was in the context of dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:48 AM
1

To the comment that women are showing their approval with their feet (meaning leaving Ukraine in droves) you said: Should the woman be acting against the wishes of men who are fighting and dying for their home land? And that goes for families of the men fighting on the front lines. And to that I asked what about women like you without husband and kids, why would you have the option of leaving Ukraine in that case?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:35 AM
1

You literally have no idea what you are talking about. You are conflating anything and everything right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:07 AM
1

It actually is, it just rolls off the tongue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:06 AM
1

I think there are more women like you without a husband and kids. What about you / them?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:43 AM
6

Every country in Western and Northern (and some Central) Europe was in a much better state compared to Ukraine before the war. There were plenty of Ukrainian immigrants in each of those countries prior to the war. You can only imagine how things are right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:27 AM
5

Would you be ok with being a breeding and birthing machine after the war to repopulate the country?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:18 AM
1

For future reference, I don't care I'm so sorry about that. If there is anything I can do to fix that, I most definitely won't. Go rant about what "the feminists" have said to the feminists who have said those things I just did that by replying to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:56 PM
–

Insulting me isn't a rebuttal. It wasn't an insult. It's a compliment on your butt and on the amount of things and definitions it can hold. This also isn't a rebuttal to anything I said. Didn't mean it as a rebuttal. Just an observation. I find it curious just how easily feminists invoke the most taboo term of them all - the traditional role of women (in this or that) - when it suits their argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:49 PM
3

So women are only good for making babies because it takes them 9 months to do so?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:36 PM
3

So you have a random grown-ass unknown man, a random grown-ass unknown woman, and a child. You would save any of the latter two, but wouldn't sacrifice yourself for the man. Can you explain to me how you rationalize that a random unknown woman is worth sacrificing for, and a random unknown man isn't worth sacrificing for?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:34 PM
1

Also I am actually a bit weird on that aspect. I’ve never seen a great value in materialistic stuff. If you aren't giving away all of your money except what's needed for your survival, then you are full of shit. I mean you can keep deluding yourself "Oh I don't care much about money! I'm just like that" while earning said money and spending it on yourself on the daily.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:31 PM
1

If men in Ukraine are drafted what do you envision women doing? Do you think they are going to sit at home with their feet up? No - they will keep doing the domestic labour they are already doing, and take on more work responsibilities/jobs that men are unable to do. They’ll just get on and do it, as women have done for thousands of years, without complaining. Or they will get out of the country if they so wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:21 PM
2

You are a good bloke.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:17 PM
0

You don't seem like a motherly type to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:16 PM
–

Bodily autonomy refers to what happens to your body, within or on the body itself. Being forced to do something is not a matter of bodily autonomy just because you have to use your body in order to engage in movement. You might be able to call it a violation of your freedom, or your human rights, but it's not a matter of bodily autonomy. You must have a big ass because this definition was somewhere in there at one point or another. Unfortunately for us all, it's now outside of it. The traditiona…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:01 PM
5

Are you saying that women are only useful for making babies and nothing else?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:40 PM
1

do you really think it’s smart to send out the people who can make babies too? Do you think it's smart to let people who can make babies get out of the country never to return again?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:31 PM
3

I didn’t know that. I knew women weren’t subject to the draft, but I guess that makes sense? Women in war are usually just rape fodder. So men can be tortured, mutilated, blown to pieces but hey, they won't get raped so it's all well and dandy! Okay so do you believe that women have just as much of a fighting chance against men as other men do? No, they don't. But more women fighting means more people are fighting for your side, which in turn means more fighting chance for Ukraine in general. Bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:28 PM
4

I'm aware of that, but that is such a small % of men that it's a completely irrelevant point to make. But you are correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:16 PM
5

By rebuilding infrastructure necessary to support a population, which should be arranged by the government/public works deivision whatever they're called locally. You are talking in pure hypotheticals like you are playing Sim City. Yeah, I know what needs to be done to have a functioning city that supports its population. The question from the very start was "WHO WILL DO THAT"? You say it needs to be done for refugees to return, but WHO WILL DO THAT? The refugees are not building contractors and…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter