TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FickleCaptain Archive

View 5 posts and 73 comments by FickleCaptain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If you actually have been practicing death grip masturbation, you may do better with a lighter grip and some lubrication.
/r/MenSupportMen30/09/23 02:01 PM
6

I am surprised that you did not mention your circumcision status which has an acute effect on sexual function. https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Sexual\_effects\_of\_circumcision
/r/MenSupportMen30/09/23 01:58 PM
7

She got that right.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 04:28 PM
1

Circumfetish.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:53 PM
3

CDC can make that claim but it is wrong.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:51 PM
2

There are such crazy things as you discovered. But here is a selection of medical ethics articles at Intactiwiki.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:45 PM
1

Doesn't anyone realize how freaky all of his is?
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:22 AM
3

This article is a bit dated but still useful.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:37 AM
4

This is simple. Circumcision has no medical indications and in harmful because the pain, trauma, and permanent loss of function. You have a parental duty to protect your son from harm.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:32 AM
16

Involutary non-therapeutic posthectomy of boys.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:17 PM
1

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs))
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/22 03:01 PM
1

It starts in the first few days after birth.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 08:18 PM
7

Actually, they are intact. You did the ethical thing.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 12:56 AM
1

Says the ICCPR and the CRP.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 06:01 PM
3

No one knows at birth who is going to be diabetic in adult life. There is no way to know which males may benefit from circumcision, which may be done at any age. Diabetic males tend to have more sugar in their urine. This encourages fungus infections of the penis. It does not require phimosis. Some diabetic males benefit from circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 12:54 AM
5

Male circumcision of children is a medically-unnecessary non-therapeutic amputation of functional tissue that causes lifelong impairment of function. When done to a child who cannot consent, it is a violation of numerous rights of the child.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 02:30 PM
1

Have you considered foreskin restoration?
/r/MensRights09/07/22 03:52 PM
1

Have you looked into how the foreskin protects the penis from infections?
/r/MensRights09/07/22 03:46 PM
1

The circumcision operation is not restricted to infancy. It may be done at any age. If you believe in circumcision, then go for it! But please report back here on your experience six weeks after your surgery.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 03:36 PM
3

Did you get your answer? What is your opinion now?
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:59 PM
3

I agree with you to the extent that the decision to circumcise should be reserved for the individual, however the decision should be postponed until the subject is an adult when he can grant informed consent for circumcision. The alleged major benefits are entirely illusory.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:43 AM
1

Circumcision for Christians was rejected at the Council at Jerusalem early in the First Century.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:45 PM
1

Foreskin is good to have.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:38 PM
2

https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Judaism
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:36 PM
6

Circumcision amputates the multi-functional foreskin and leaves its victim permanently impaired with physical, sexual, and emotional injury. When done to a child, it violates the child's right to physical integrity and autonomy. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Main\_Page
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:31 PM
2

https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-parents/care-of-the-intact-penis/ https://www.yourwholebaby.org/basic-intact-care/ A survey done in Denmark, where boys are not circumcised found that the average age of first foreskin retraction is 10.4 years of age. It can be earlier or later. Here is some background information for adults: https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Immunological_and_protective_function_of_the_foreskin Retraction and washing of the foreskin usually can start with puberty. S…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 12:28 PM
5

This tells how we got into the circumcision mess in America. https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/United\_States\_of\_America
/r/MenSupportMen15/10/21 05:51 PM
2

NSFW https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Foreskin\_restoration
/r/MensRights05/09/21 07:37 PM
2

There is a previous case,_(No_2)_EWFC_3) also from Leeds, that appears to be precedent for this case.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 05:17 PM
19

Dr. Kellogg was horrible but the American Academy of Pediatrics is worse. https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/American_Academy_of_Pediatrics
/r/MensRights31/03/21 11:04 AM
21

Non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in the United States is a major violation of human and children's rights. https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Human_rights Circumcision of boys is promoted by the medical industry for profit. https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Financial_incentive
/r/MensRights31/03/21 10:58 AM
3

Yes, you have a good point. This court did two things. It recognised that male circumcision is a "significant harm", which is important because those are the words used in the Childrens Act 1989 and it reserved the decision to the boy, not either parent. It is interesting to watch and see what happens next. This is a precedent for the courts. Moreover, the British Medical Association updated its guidance on male circumcision in 2019 that it publishes for its physician members to include this cas…
/r/MensRights03/01/21 12:12 PM
6

Here is a description of what you don't mind not having. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Foreskin
/r/MensRights02/01/21 11:16 AM
15

It depends on whose penis it is. If it belongs to someone else, then it is not a big deal, but if it belongs to you, then suddenly it is a big deal. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Foreskin
/r/MensRights02/01/21 12:08 AM
33

It is a step in the right direction, at least.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 06:43 PM
0

https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Circumcision My son is intact.
/r/askTRP24/12/20 02:33 PM
8

Some of this is caused by the USAID PEPFAR circumcision program. https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2020-06-15b_LettertoPEPFAR.pdf
/r/MensRights15/12/20 01:36 PM
8

The child's religious rights should be protected, not the parent's.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:31 PM
2

Non-therapeutic child circumcision is a total violation of numerous human rights. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Human_rights
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:30 PM
3

This absolutely is a men's rights issue. One may read legal commentary here: https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Circumcision_legal_commentary Ethically, the decision should be reserved for the child to make when he is of age.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 12:28 PM
2

I suspect he is unhappy because his foreskin was stolen. A foreskin is a good thing to have. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Foreskin You are right. It is not easy to reverse it, but over time one can recreate something like o foreskin. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Foreskin_restoration
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:06 PM
3

One may find a collection of legal commentaries on the law of circumcision of boys at: https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Circumcision_legal_commentary
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:02 PM
3

No, one is challenging the First Amendment which is a part of the Supreme Law of the United States.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 01:10 AM
3

The loving thing to do is to recognize that an infant son is a human person who has rights of his own separate and distinct from his parents. It is his life, his body, his penis, his foreskin, and it is his right to decide for himself when he is of age.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 04:17 PM
3

I hope something works out for you.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 04:11 PM
2

I advise you to contact David Llewellyn of Atlanta, Georgia. He won this case: https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Schmidt_v._Niznik https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/David_J._Llewellyn David allies himself with local counsel to litigate in any state.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 12:24 PM
1

I think it has been that way for quite some time.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 01:02 PM
3

You are definitely right about the trauma of circumcision. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Psychological_issues_of_male_circumcision#Trauma_of_circumcision
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:22 AM
3

No, you are normal for your age. It is easily fixed with some manual stretching. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Phimosis
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:06 AM
3

So according to Equality now, MGM is good, but FGM is bad. Somehow that does not sound like equality. Human rights apply to all without discrimination on the basis of sex or gender. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Human_rights
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:01 AM
5

It becomes ethical at age 18, when the child may legally consent. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Human_rights
/r/MensRights13/04/20 02:54 AM
3

Check out the human rights issues: https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Human_rights
/r/MensRights08/04/20 05:56 PM
2

It is now very clear that non-therapeutic circumcision of non-consenting children violates numerous human rights. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Human_rights Here is a recent address concerning the progress of the law in the U. K. https://www.genitalautonomy.org/2017/10/14/the-english-courts-approach-to-genital-autonomy/
/r/MensRights05/04/20 02:59 AM
2

It can only happen where most men and judges are intact. The United States will probably be last and that is probably decades away.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 10:20 AM
2

What a cruel, heartless, and selfish mom.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 11:47 PM
3

Yes, I agree. https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Phimosis#Treatment_options
/r/MensRights01/04/20 11:36 PM
37

Doctors Opposing Circumcision is notifying authorities that infant circumcision is elective and unnecessary.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 08:50 PM
3

Yes, that is true to an extent, however circumcision causes depression and suicide in a few cases. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-47292307
/r/MensRights22/02/20 04:00 AM
2

I am very sorry to hear of this. Unfortunately, it is not the first case. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-47292307 ​ https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Psychological_issues_of_male_circumcision#Depression.2C_rage.2C_and_grief_in_circumcised_men Neonatal circumcision as promoted by doctors and hospitals in the United States is a medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic surgical amputation that has no upside, only a downside of physical, sexual, and emotional injury. The only beneficiaries are…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 07:35 PM
5

Christians have not been required to circumcise since the Council at Jerusalem. See Acts 15:1-30.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 10:50 PM
3

Yes, indeed. Money is the driving force that makes doctors and hospitals encourage non-therapeutic circumcision. And an incredible amount of money is spent by the federal government to pay for medically unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision. I believe that the United States supports non-therapeutic circumcision in the following ways: Medicaid pays for about 45 percent of the births in the United States and in most states pays for non-therapeutic circumcision without question. Children's Heal…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 10:46 PM
2

You would get about 80 percent of lost sensation. /r/foreskin_restoration
/r/MensRights12/05/19 09:24 PM
20

Almost every mother who have ever granted consent for circumcision of a son will defend that decision to her grave. It is simply to painful to admit granting consent to harm one's own child.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:14 AM
47

The total take from circumcision, when all costs are considered, approaches $2 billion annually.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 07:57 PM
85

Most medical insurance pays for medically-unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision in the United States. Many hospitals consider circumcision to be a profit centre and promote it.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 07:55 PM
23

You need to get him out of that fiendish hospital and safely home as quickly as possible
/r/MensRights17/03/19 07:52 PM
2

There is a very good discussion of how a boy's human rights under international law are violated by non-therapeutic child circumcision. https://www.i2researchhub.org/articles/ch-9-international-human-rights-law-and-the-circumcision-of-children-doc-genital-integrity-statement/ Non-therapeutic male circumcision of children continues to be promoted by the AAP, which refuses to recognize that infant boys are people with human rights. Their doctor-members get a lot of income from doing these non-ther…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 10:45 PM
7

The whole thing is nutty and contradictory. See the other places the author writes. " Mark has written for Cracked, the Modern Rogue, McSweeney's Internet Tendency, the Atlantic, Motherboard, the Daily Dot, and a bunch of other places that he can't remember off the top of his head. He also writes most of the nation's grocery lists." ​
/r/MensRights01/12/18 08:30 PM
2

Boys are not usually circumcised in India, so they are doing something right.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:31 PM
9

Here is a video of an infant circumcision. Screams speak louder than words. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAHEAcaPQtM
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:09 AM
11

Federal law requires that your medical information be kept private.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:09 PM
7

No doctor will perform a circumcision without your consent. Your parents cannot consent for you unless you are are incapable of consenting due to some incapacity. That is not the case here. There also is the issue of who is going to pay for it. Circumcisions cost several thousands of dollars. There are no medical reasons for this religious circumcision. Insurance may or may not pay for it. It will be up to you are your parents to pay, if insurance will not. There are a lot of good things about n…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:07 PM
10

The vast majority of circumcisions in the United States are perpetrated against children who are unable to consent to the total violation of their rights under domestic and international human rights law. These circumcisions have no medical indication and are non-therapeutic. They are totally unethical. Here is one discussion of the international human rights. https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/human-rights/ The result of this practice is that most of the males in the …
/r/MensRights22/06/18 11:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter