TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fictionarious Archive

View 2 posts and 29 comments by Fictionarious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You should still support reproductive rights for both sexes, but you are exactly right in your assessment of the situation. The poison known as feminism has almost uniformly soured women on giving men an inch, even as they demand a mile. Unfortunately, even the idea you have been considering here - so-called "financial abortions" - does a grave disservice to developing children by (further) systematically disenfranchising fathers from the child-rearing endeavor, which (going by all available evi…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 06:29 AM
2

neurotic narcissism
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:29 PM
28

If you want to have a laugh, read some of the comments people are leaving on this post - Summary: 24yo dude gets a vasectomy behind his 22yo fiance's back because he's obviously not ready for kids (but is likely reluctant to lose his fiance, who seems to really wants them). He starts getting pressured into starting a family around the same time, and 7 months after that finally reveals the vascectomy. A sample of some of Reddit's judgement: cruel, evil and disgusting. sickening and evil This is e…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 04:31 AM
0

If men dont want to be fathers to the child then that child is growing up in a single parent household anyway. Not if its dead, obviously. Financial abortions are the "seperate-but-equal" policy of the reproductive rights debate. Have some self-respect and demand the same executive filicide right that women have.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 11:57 PM
-4

No. While this would appear to be a step forward for men's rights, it would be two steps backwards for children, who deserve two loving parents/guardians for redundancy's sake. Removing this systemic redundancy for the sake of "men's rights" normalizes state-funded single motherhood, which itself is a giant step backward for men's rights everywhere (even single ones, who will predominantly be funding it via taxation in this scenario). If you promote a policy that normalizes male disenfranchiseme…
/r/MensRights14/08/22 09:15 PM
2

Yeah, I was waiting for this post. It crossed my mind too. It's gotten pretty bad.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:59 AM
-2

Where's the 'cruelty', though? This is all true and reasonably expressed. Had to downvote for the stupid title.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:36 AM
1

Reproductive rights Intactivism Eliminating "affirmative-action" policies that try to enforce equality of outcome, I guess
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:10 AM
0

I read it a few times. If I've presumed (incorrectly) that you disagree with any of my above elaboration, I apologize - but I felt the clarification was necessary.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:01 AM
6

Unfortunately, this is quite reductive. A pregnancy is not 'merely' a nine-month imposition on a woman's bodily autonomy (though it certainly is that), it also produces a baby. A baby that society grants moral/legal personhood to at precisely the moment of birth (not a moment before, or after; how convenient for the women!) As an expectant father, it is unreasonable for me to assert that I have any control over an expectant mother's pregnancy, even if she was my partner - it is her body and her …
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:49 PM
8

Abortion is murder There seems to be some popular confusion on this, then. I agree that people {should} have genetic autonomy, but that should come in the form of prioritizing "freedom from" over "freedom to" - that is, either expectant parent should be able to 'veto' their impending parenthood if they do not consent to it. There is an unavoidable conflict here, of course. If one is so pronatalist as to insist that either parent should be able to force the raising of a child that the other paren…
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:55 PM
7

paragraphs plz
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:25 PM
6

Strictly speaking, they don't. After having gotten pregnant, yes (that might be what you mean), but not in general. A man too should be able to hook up and take the kid Should a man be able to hook up and force her to remain pregnant in the first place, (rather than aborting)?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:23 PM
10

Do you view parenthood as a fitting punishment for having had sex?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:18 PM
12

There is no "right to become a parent", but yes, the second part of this quote is a justifiable outrage.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 07:50 PM
1

The definition of people is "Human beings in general or considered collectively", so that would include unborn babies because they are clearly human. I don't think there's anything to be gained from trying to blunt-force our respective definitions of personhood at one another. According to Wikipedia: "Defining personhood is a controversial topic in philosophy and law and is closely tied with legal and political concepts of citizenship, equality, and liberty. According to law, only a natural pers…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 01:03 AM
2

This is what really irks me. The hypocrisy is "needs-to-be-seen-to-be-believed" levels of absurd. They will go on at length about how important it is that women be able to control their lives and their destiny writ large, pointing out how sometimes young mothers will choose to abort because they're financially unready, only to choose to have a family years later. Try suggesting that the same reasoning applies to men and fathers? "BODILY AUTONOMY, BODILY AUTONOMY, BODILY AUTONOMY". Men, apparentl…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 10:22 PM
1

Maybe the fact that we shouldn't kill people. Also, I don't like thatyou use the word euthanasia as an attempt to make this crazy idea'palatable'. We don't agree that neonates are people, properly speaking. Some consider a zygote a "person", because it has the potential to be gestated, born, and raised. I'm not sure that you'd agree, given that you say the following: Abortion shouldn't even be legal (unless a threat to the mothers life)after 21 weeks. I still object to abortion as a whole but 21…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:55 PM
1

abortion and 'paper' abortions are a reactionary measure, a reaction to the unwanted pregnancy. This is true, but I don't think you've made the case that its a "problem". The best approach, and the approach I support completely, is the one that aims to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. This, imo, is a bit of a problem, if you're suggesting it is 'sufficient' to address the issue. I agree that it is the the most sensible first step toward a solution, since the majority of unwanted pregna…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:59 PM
1

Hey, I can't help it you aren't listening to the vast majority of people here telling you that you have your head up your ass. You do you, my dude.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:14 AM
7

Gotta love that internalized gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:12 AM
2

Make a salient point; get downvoted. That's Reddit for you, I guess, even here. You're exactly right, though; it's why fighting for financial abortions is a lost cause. We can make fun of "won't somebody think of the children?" as a political rallying cry all we want, but guess what: it works (and, not that it even matters, but it's actually justified in this case). Feminists have had great success in convincing people (rightly!) that fetuses can be aborted on the basis of preexisting interperso…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:09 AM
3

If she does, all financial (and mental and physical) burden falls on her, cause she chose this herself What are you talking about? Women aren't even partially responsible for their pregnancies. First of all: consent to sex isn't consent to pregnancy. Second of all: the fetus is the one violating HER bodily autonomy, not the man's. Furthermore: men are the ones that ejaculate! They must be given choices (like women are) and handle the consequences of their decision. That is just an excuse to furt…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 02:33 AM
1

Another person who cannot read clear implications: If a meme daring to appreciate good fathers on mother's day puts me on "their level", then their level has raised considerably since my last impression. I'll make it explicit for you, since that's what you require. No, that shitty meme does not put "us" on "their" level what-so-fucking-ever. To begin with, there is no "us". There's collection of individuals who care about seeing people be given fair treatment, in culture and under the law. Then …
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:11 AM
1

If a meme daring to appreciate good fathers on mother's day puts me on "their level", then their level has raised considerably since my last impression. Fun fact about mother's day: the woman who founded it would eventually go on to spend the remainder of her life trying to destroy it. It started as a way to remind people to express sincere appreciation for their mother, but the forces of capitalism co-opted it in her lifetime - she got to witness it become a thoughtless ritual of store-bought H…
/r/MensRights11/05/21 09:45 PM
7

I've got news for you, the people who hate men's rights and put you on blast for irrelevant shit like this are gonna continue to hate you and do that regardless. "Oh no! Mothers day reminded me of how much I appreciate my father, but I can't publically talk about it, or I'm a misogynist!" Spare me.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 02:35 AM
7

r/mensrights is making fun of you, but you're exactly right. This is why extramarital sex used to be so controversial - because it was legally tantamount to rape (under every then-common presumption: by the male, of the female). The point of a marriage contract was to (preemptively) legally exculpate the husband from this charge, and to simultaneously obligate him to provide for his wife economically and sexually. Like many inherited artifacts of what used to be a common culture, "marriage" has …
/r/MGTOW02/05/21 03:57 AM
2

"The first act of a prudent ruler is to write the dictionary" -Confucius, probably Easiest award I've ever given, btw.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 03:41 AM
4

Life does "begin" at conception, but that doesn't imply that personhood does. You're right about Leftists in general though.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 06:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter