TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FilthyOrganick Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by FilthyOrganick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What problem exactly are you referring to?
/r/MensRights25/07/26 04:52 PM
22

It’s a sycophantic lackey, yes, but most people aren’t gonna question it so its initial bias is the most impotortant thing.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 06:14 PM
8

Men’s dress standards are usually stricter in general with women given much more freedom, but we’ll make an issue of this one thing that goes against women? (Assuming it’s like the west). They’ll have the men back full mandatory suits when the heat wave is over, no doubt
/r/MensRights22/07/26 03:40 PM
32

“He might use my misandrist abuse as an excuse for misogyny, which isn’t as emotionally intelligent as me using misogyny I have faced as an excuse for misandry towards my own unborn baby “
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:32 AM
4

They are women as the sole creators of all life, the moral authority, and the entities whose wellbeing is inherently the moral priority.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 09:38 PM
0

What makes me laugh is all the recent articles claiming dating trends are women v responding to the manosphere or that the online toxicity from women to men is in response to the manosphere, while women have been man hating online since their adoption of the internet. And so casually it permeates every platform
/r/MensRights20/07/26 11:40 AM
9

0 women will offer this clause in reverse
/r/MensRights16/07/26 12:15 AM
16

UK government is trying to mandate this for non married living partners
/r/MensRights15/07/26 11:56 PM
96

You mean the mother?
/r/MensRights25/06/26 04:48 PM
7

All those things you listed as supposed benefits of marriage are more likely selection criteria for getting married in the first place. We don’t need women more than they need us we’re just not socialised to treat them with contempt and are lied to from an early age about how women are. If you’re told women are wonderful, of course you’ll want one.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 11:56 PM
6

Feminism is feminism. It’s going to try to redefine everything in a way that lets them most broadly shame men, minimise our problems and deflects any/all “criticism” away from women.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 11:47 PM
19

The title is obviously not how you would frame that.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:37 PM
5

Fair, it wasn’t super obvious to anyone who isn’t familiar with LLMs speech patterns
/r/MensRights20/06/26 08:26 PM
3

I believe it has learnt that males need to be discriminated against in a way that pretends they are not being. My post was a parody of LLMs
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:40 PM
7

It was a parody of LLMs
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:37 PM
-12

Hold on, I need to pushback against anything that stereotypes a protected class. I understand the emotions behind such sentiment are very real, but your assessment of malicious intent is simply not supported by the facts. Women are not programming LLMs to discriminate against males. If you would like help such as statistics on what data actual shows in how women are discriminated against, let me know.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 02:34 PM
6

Specifically the traits they deem as “toxic masculinity” they admire and want normalised in women.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 01:55 PM
2

Didn’t caterers win a similar case comparing to janitors. The women will probably win.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 05:14 PM
38

We used to have male led religions that policed these things but now we only have the female led religion of feminism that permits all degeneracy for women but thinks there can just shame and guilt men for the same things
/r/MensRights24/04/26 04:39 AM
3

Would just like to add that those “44%” are extremely loud about it on social media. So called manosphere get all the blame for “misleading” men and promoting toxic masculinity while we have far more women telling us the same things in a much more insulting ways which goes ignored by the same morality police.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 04:28 AM
14

All I read is that she is punished not because of The man she falsely accused’s suffering, or the suffering of those falsely accused and convicted, but because of the potential females who might not get help as a result of this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 02:29 AM
19

Weird to call it a patriarchy when men are increasingly in the bottom of the pyramid. Of course the definition you gave could be indistinguishable from a meritocractic hierarchy which is why it’s such a dumb concept and is clearly more about assigning negative connotations to men.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 02:33 PM
3

Why would we want to pay someone to tell us how bad toxic masculinity is for us and how we need to be better allies to women
/r/MensRights16/03/26 06:41 AM
1

They had less rights than the people expected to go fight and die for them. Shocking
/r/MensRights15/03/26 05:36 PM
2

Right mostly sees men as a tool. Left sees them as an enemy to be destroyed
/r/MensRights15/03/26 05:24 PM
1

Female collectivist.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 07:11 AM
1

Any vaguely conservative subreddit I go on I get either that or a government paedophilia related advert
/r/MensRights10/02/26 12:39 AM
1

The chorus is literally “If men gave women all the power we would pop champagne and celebrate ourselves” I mean it’s literally an argument against feminism
/r/MensRights08/02/26 11:53 PM
5

The west will push it on them massively, especially once Trump is out of power.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 06:24 AM
4

It is a blessing to be filtered out by these people. If only there were better options for filtering them out.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 08:59 PM
3

The concept of masculinity by its nature is defining men relative to women. Women have been freed from any role, expectation or responsibility as a woman. Unless you are going to simultaneously change that I don’t care what anyone thinks of my masculinity outside of whoever I am shagging. Sexual attraction is its only relevance, which has very sad implications considering what women find attractive.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 08:52 PM
9

I think women are socialised to see any negativity or criticism towards them as “misogyny”. The feminist belief is that we live in an oppressive patriarchy and any deviation from that viewpoint makes you a misogynist incel far right, whatever term they come up with to demonise ideological opposition. Women go along with it largely because it’s convenient. Have you never thought of the hypocrisy you see in modern society in things like women hitting men and it being no big deal?
/r/MensRights23/01/26 05:35 AM
6

They are so sexist they can’t even apply a word to both genders equally. In this article Women getting custody means full custody fathers aren’t allowed to see the child, but men getting custody means being allowed a supervised visitation.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 01:23 AM
2

“2 tier Keir”s government creating another 2 tier system. No way!
/r/MensRights19/12/25 01:36 AM
10

There were 2 world wars and lots of men died and then women got the vote and ever since the main power in our country has been aligning the interests of the rich with women. Started off okay with healthcare but then feminism destroyed all empathy for men and here we are, being brainwashed from childhood to be be 3rd class citizens beneath the rich and women
/r/MensRights18/12/25 01:52 AM
1

Not by hitting her husband I assume.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 01:07 AM
1

Only because it was against an officer
/r/MensRights11/12/25 01:03 AM
3

It’s like the term “gender based violence”. It’s weird propaganda redefinition which assigns a gendered motive or cause without any actual distinctive properties.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 02:36 AM
1

You have to make the word a completely arbitrary classification rather than an actual word that means something biologically for a trans person to be a “real” one. It’s not a good thing to allow for ideological based redefinition of fundamental biological terms.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 11:50 PM
1

We all accept poverty deaths of children by not giving up all our money. It’s pseudo empathy where people pretend the things they are willing to ban makes them a better person than others
/r/MensRights18/09/25 12:29 AM
1

Well that’s just like your opinion man. Not by his own words.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 11:38 AM
0

He wasn’t a psychopath. It was commentary on public discourse and social norms. He went to talk about how he much preferred compassion
/r/MensRights17/09/25 12:36 AM
1

Or often because they are rich and it benefits capitalist of personal goals.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 11:49 PM
12

Ideology in college men is only scratching the surface of this issue. Feminism often complains of all the pressure on women to be perfect but culturally the opposite is true with men subject to constant socially accepted judgement, condemnation suppression etc.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 10:50 PM
4

Feminists seem to have genuinely rewritten history to the point many feminists believe that men all banded together to allow themselves to beat and rape women and that this was something the vast majority of men did and only feminism stopped it.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 10:51 PM
48

Something that gets completely ignored is that before there was the manosphere there was the womanosphere doing all the same things that are now proof of how evil and sexist men are.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 04:56 AM
1

I think he meant like someone trying to jump in to a pool or something, someone talking stupid Risks
/r/MensRights28/08/25 04:09 AM
15

You’ll often see women say their mere presence is reward enough
/r/MensRights27/08/25 11:54 PM
1

so at least 8% of men are willing cucks. College degree women are more hypocritical than those with less education.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 12:55 AM
1

By being oil rich and escaping world war 2, mostly.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 12:40 AM
1

“A man’s masculinity is determined by his capacity for violence” says who? Bell Hooks? Just because you read it in a 50 year old book or were taught it in a feminism class doesn’t make it so. There’s no one clear definition of it since we’re a huge society but to simplify it to that Is ridiculous and serves as propaganda to demonise men. Our society has long associated masculinity with many things, strength, self sacrifice, chivalry, competence, generosity. As women have gained more influence in…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 12:32 AM
3

You’re right, it’s a justification for supporting inequality
/r/MensRights16/07/25 02:35 AM
7

We are simultaneously losers who don’t make enough money yet at the same time privileged because we earn too much money and need to earn less money compared to women.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 02:18 AM
5

Vast majority of men are already completely non violent especially towards women.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 01:46 AM
2

Oh thank you for letting me know. I will stop advocating for fathers rights and instead dedicate myself full time to advocating for men to be violent. /sarcasm Last sentence was just ridiculous to the point I can’t tell this is rage bait or the most extreme narrow perspective feminism I have ever seen.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 01:41 AM
7

That’s not masculinity, that’s just the hyper sexism of how feminism frames and has redefined masculinity. If you define masculinity as violence than obviously it’s a bad thing, but no one would describe Elliot Roger’s as masculine. And remember, women find Andrew Tate a lot more attractive than the average man and the main insults from women are short, incel, gay, etc
/r/MensRights16/07/25 01:25 AM
1

I saw multiple articles on this. The majority female opinion expressed was that they agreed men are useless and failing their responsibilities to society but were deeply Offended by the suggestion women should have any responsibility to society.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 12:04 PM
2

I mean that’s what those guys are getting off to. I doubt she took boys lunch money the boys probably would have just beat her up. It’s just weird fantasy. Fanfic. She is presenting the image those guys desire.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 05:36 AM
1

Being red shirted wouldn’t be a good thing. Would actually be ridiculous considering I got the best grades at school despite being the youngest. Of course boys are going to develop slower if they don’t have the environment to develop in. No fathers, role models, female centric society and subject to other boys like this stunts development.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 03:34 AM
1

Women aren’t going to stop having sex with men they find attractive for the good of society, nor is being insulted in the media and by women even more going to motivate men.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 03:14 AM
3

I don’t think there’s any lawsuit to be had, even in USA, and calling a bunch of women “mid” including ones that weren’t involved is just rude and unproductive.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:57 AM
5

It’s more the other way around. “Toxic manosphere” is almost a direct mirror of feminism.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 05:55 AM
22

Everyone* *not you
/r/MensRights09/06/25 05:52 AM
2

Even their fictional show which was somehow proof of their beliefs literally contradicted their beliefs.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 12:13 AM
7

Men are anti-academia because academia is anti-man, among a whole host of other issues with it that men recognise.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 12:08 AM
2

The strat there is to claim easier jobs are of equal value and sue as happened in uk.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:27 AM
1

It’s similar to how I see the term “gender based violence” used for domestic violence by men against women or maybe just any violence by men against women. I dunno because the term doesn’t make sense so I don’t know what it means. Oh and less formally i I have seen “femicide” being pushed. It’s just a lot of feminism is all about using and redefining language to form emotional impact
/r/MensRights09/05/25 04:39 AM
1

Can they at least rename it Woman support to reflect the reality then?
/r/MensRights17/04/25 01:21 AM
2

Consumer spending too
/r/MensRights17/04/25 01:04 AM
1

So they want men to work dangerous jobs, but you can’t pay them more for dangerous jobs because that would be unfair against women, and then when they get injured and disabled from dangerous jobs they want the government to target their disability programs but not women’s?
/r/MensRights17/04/25 01:01 AM
8

I was using the phrase ironically, trying to point out the absurdity. Perhaps the manipulative rather than direct aspect could be considered femininity but at the end of the day it’s the same motivation
/r/MensRights09/04/25 04:25 AM
3

It’s unfortunate that so many women are so full of toxic masculinity and willing to have others killed and destroyed to protect and bolster their status
/r/MensRights09/04/25 01:10 AM
56

Stigmatising potential opponents has become the default for left wing/ feminism
/r/MensRights08/04/25 02:57 AM
38

Moral panic over the fictional murder of a fictional girl by a fictional boy she was bullying. Slap on the wrist for actively partaking in an actual murder by a girl.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 04:01 AM
11

A) Half of it is probably made up. B) That recent guy got shot for punching, and trying to shoot police with a taser, endangering their life. C) Most of us haven't committed her crimes, let alone violent ones.
/r/PussyPass18/06/20 02:39 AM
1

He wasn't passive at all. he could have just let her close the door and then opened it using the keypad like she said at the beginning. You don't have to mind your own business when you are trying to get out of your locked apartment building door, and someone is trying to use that to get in and then literally uses force to get passed you. You're an idiot if you don't just let the person shut the door and then use your keycard to get in. You're assuming she was racist for no reason, when security…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/20 03:59 AM
0

What's the point of those doors being locked if any asshole can just wait next to one and then force you to let them in and if you treat them like a security threat you get fired? Except she only got fired because she's white and he's black. but "pussypass denied"... sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/20 03:28 AM
2

Not patient enough to let her close the door and use his keypad to get in instead of causing security concerns by insisting he let her in. He's in the wrong, she's in the right in this case.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/20 06:31 AM
0

From what i've heard sounds like she might be telling the truth and some shitty holiday island police force tasked with keeping their tourist reputation rather than justice screwed her over.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/20 10:07 AM
7

Because the collective Democrat consciousness is built to its very foundations on this shit. She said it because she was drawing on that very consciousness. All of the constant anti-male bullshit. All of the "it's ok to horrifically stereotype men because they're not the oppressed" justifications you will see for this. ​ I'm not american and no fan of the republicans, but your party sucks at basic self awareness. introspection and the very principle of equality.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 11:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter