TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fine_Musician_1016 Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by Fine_Musician_1016 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I wasn’t really being serious lol. Of course those things have nothing to do with parenting ability. I’m glad you have a good relationship with your mom :)
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:30 PM
2

As someone who works with children who have experienced trauma, that breaks my heart :(
/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:43 AM
32

So does this then mean that if a woman has a c-section and/or is unable to breastfeed she’s a bad parent too?
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:13 AM
10

I’m curious to know what their take is on male children who are raped by female adults…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:10 AM
1

Doesn’t helping kids with unsupportive parents help society in general though? Since they would be more likely to finish school, become productive members of society, not be stuck in a cycle of poverty, etc.? So in a way wouldn’t you yourself benefit from whatever portion of your tax dollars goes towards helping children by being able to live in a more prosperous society? Thanks for the detailed explanation btw
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:31 AM
1

Yeah the decision to opt out of child support should be made before the kid is born
/r/MensRights28/08/21 08:37 AM
1

Can you explain what you mean by this?
/r/MensRights28/08/21 08:36 AM
7

I hope these people get the therapy they need
/r/MensRights28/08/21 08:12 AM
1

Lmao of course when I click the link to find more about the study it states that it’s not peer reviewed 🙃
/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:58 AM
2

Yay for personal growth? 🥴
/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:56 AM
2

Oh no I always assumed that Greta just talked about the environment :(
/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:54 AM
7

:(
/r/MensRights27/08/21 05:38 AM
2

😂
/r/MensRights27/08/21 01:15 AM
24

:(
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:54 AM
1

Do you generally struggle to have conversations with people you disagree without insulting them?
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:34 AM
1

It means that I presume I’m coming from a different viewpoint than you because our experiences are different. As in having worked with people who are suicidal, I would have had different experiences than someone who has not done so, and therefore might see it from a different perspective. I assume that you don’t work in mental health or with suicidal people since you haven’t brought it up.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 09:23 AM
1

I was meaning globally
/r/MensRights20/08/21 05:09 AM
1

I think my experience working with people who are depressed and/or suicidal has given me a different perspective. It’s a bit hard to describe, but most of the time when people are suicidal, they’re wanting their pain to end and see no other option, they’re not necessarily just wanting to be dead, if that makes any sense. So with your example of love, care, and attention, if someone who is suicidal who lacks those things is provided them, they may no longer wish to kill themselves
/r/MensRights20/08/21 04:08 AM
1

I feel like maybe I’m not expressing myself clearly or I’m being misinterpreted. All I was really addressing was that your comment seemed to be promoting some harmful ideas about suicide. I don’t think someone should view themselves as incompetent for not going through with killing themselves, and assuming that a suicide attempt is fake is extremely dangerous
/r/MensRights20/08/21 04:03 AM
1

I’m sorry but it sounds like you’re just justifying why Afgani mothers should be killed by terrorists? I thought you said you weren’t advocating for that
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:56 AM
1

Are we sure that women use fake suicide attempts though? I feel like there would need to be scientific studies before we could really say that was the case
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:48 AM
1

Im not sure why you so strongly believe that I’m wrong and are insulting my intelligence; I’ve learned this information throughout my degree and it’s backed by published research? These opinions are not my own, but they are held by researchers in the field, I’m simply repeating the information. Remember that people didn’t live nearly as long in our evolutionary history as they do now, so reproductive issues of older men is much less relevant in this context. Additionally, the average age gap (if…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 03:43 AM
4

Do you mind clarifying?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 10:56 AM
-4

Why are you assuming that if someone isn’t “successful” in killing themselves that they were faking wanting to kill themselves? People that attempt suicide aren’t psychopaths
/r/MensRights16/08/21 08:50 AM
1

I mean how do you know that there are less men than women? Sorry this is a bit of a tangent, not related to the minority thing
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:15 AM
1

I mean 6 years isn’t a lot of time to shift demographics, and my understanding is that it was in response to gender based abortions. Im not an expert in this area at all lol I just find it interesting. Btw do you have a source for the 40% men stat you said earlier? I’d like to read it
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:06 AM
-2

In regards to your first point, I’ve found through working in the mental health field that “failed” suicide attempts are more often than not a desperate cry for help. Human beings need attention and to feel loved and cared for; your phrasing makes it sound like you believe wanting attention is a bad thing. I’m also not so sure that we should be considering people that survive a suicide attempt to be incompetent, rather I think we should be happy that they’re still alive.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:21 AM
1

Ok so you’re specifically talking about the US then?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:31 AM
1

Why are you swearing at me lol
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:30 AM
1

The person who sent me the link pointed out that countries that contain a large proportion of the human population, like China, have much higher abortion rates for female fetuses than male because of their one child policy. Tbh I also thought that women outnumbered men for a variety of reasons but now I’m not so sure lol
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:29 AM
0

I’m not trying to be rude but do you have any formal education in this area? Peer reviewed publications of studies conducted by trained scientists are not pseudoscience. Evolution is the foundation of biology, and the human mind is within the realm of biology. Again, just because you don’t like the conclusions of experts in the field doesn’t make them untrue
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:27 AM
5

Just to clarify, is your argument that Afghani mothers should be murdered by terrorists? Or am I misinterpreting?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:21 AM
2

Really? I always assumed it was because women and children would generally be less physically able to defend themselves than men would, and that some men might perhaps stay to fight but idk
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:17 AM
1

Hm yeah fair point
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:14 AM
1

Where are you getting your stats btw? Someone just sent me a link showing that there’s slightly more men globally, but I’m not sure how accurate it is
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:13 AM
2

Oh that’s an interesting link, thanks for sharing. I wonder how they get that information and how accurate it is
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:11 AM
0

Oh I meant conception in a biological sense, like there are slightly more female zygotes than males zygotes it’s not perfectly a 50/50 chance male or female over all I’m assuming you’re referring to parents keeping male fetuses over female ones?
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:09 AM
0

Can you provide the source? My understanding is that conception is slightly biased to creating more females, and that young men die at a higher rate than women, and women tend to outlive men at old age
/r/MensRights13/08/21 06:38 AM
2

Yeah that’s why I went back later to clarify. Still not sure where one could interpret that I said it wasn’t a description of a guy getting screwed tho lol
/r/MensRights13/08/21 06:36 AM
2

I’ll try to make what I said clearer: my comment was in reference to your first sentence “Emotional responses with facts and statistics don’t quantity with each other”, which I hope you realize is not a meaningful sentence. Since it’s unclear what you’re actually saying there, I was just hoping that it’s wasn’t a fAcTs NoT fEeLiNgs type comment that was followed up by an emotional story, as that wouldn’t make sense. Literally that’s it lol not sure where anyone decided my comment had anything to…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 05:31 AM
2

Is English your first language? Not once did I say anything about the truthfulness of the story… are you trolling or can you truly not read?
/r/MensRights13/08/21 04:15 AM
-10

Reading comprehension my man. Where did I say it wasn’t a description of a guy getting screwed over? Take a breath and focus your thoughts bc you’re kind of all over the place
/r/MensRights13/08/21 03:14 AM
1

A bit of a tangent but aren’t there slightly more women than men?
/r/MensRights13/08/21 01:28 AM
10

How many times are you going to copy paste this
/r/MensRights13/08/21 01:21 AM
-8

Please don’t tell me you think this story is a fact or statistic, it’s literally an emotionally charged story 🥴
/r/MensRights13/08/21 01:20 AM
1

My reasoning isn’t my own, it’s that of scientists in the field. There is nothing physically tying a man to the child after sex, and having sex with multiple females without investing resources is a documented reproductive strategy. Human males do not stick around 100% of the time, I’m sure you are aware of this. The woman is picky because she is wanting to get a male that will stick around and provide resources. Also keep in mind that we are talking about during our evolutionary history, the ‘c…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 12:33 AM
1

Dude take a breath. Nowhere did I mention feminists.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:22 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:21 PM
1

Nope, it’s well documented in evolutionary psychology research. Just because you don’t like scientific findings doesn’t mean that they aren’t true ;)
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:13 PM
0

It’s just a strange term to choose imo. Obviously do whatever you want but I would think that simply saying a marginalized or oppressed group would make more sense
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:44 AM
0

My dude slightly less than 50% is a reaaaal reach in terms of defining something as a minority let’s be real here
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:37 AM
1

Uhhh I feel like this may be a bit of an extreme stance… I tend to doubt that the majority of women really are that enthusiastic about murder and violent assault
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:36 AM
1

I know that there’s slightly more men than women, but how can either sex be a minority when roughly half the population is one or the other?
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:32 AM
11

Men having a tendency to be more attracted to women at their reproductive prime and women having a tendency to be more attracted to somewhat older men at their ‘resource-providing prime’ is just how human beings evolved to be tbh
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:30 AM
2

Tbh this inequality is probably mostly due to how we evolved. The sex that bears children is more ‘choosy’ with mates and the opposite sex typically has to work harder to impress. For example, male rams fighting each other over females or the fact that the plumage of male birds tend to be much more colourful and extravagant than the females of the same species. Take seahorses for example: since male seahorses are actually the ones that become pregnant, they are the more particular sex and female…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:24 AM
5

There’s a name for this, it’s called the ‘No true Scotsman’ or ‘appeal to purity’. It’s a logical fallacy where someone makes a generalization of what they think members of a particular group ought to be like, so any differing viewpoints expressed my members of that group can be quickly disregarded as coming from someone who isn’t truly a member of that group
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:00 AM
6

The best way to keep your teeth clean is to simply have no teeth 🤷‍♀️
/r/MensRights03/08/21 05:43 AM
2

Sorry friend, as a human you have an innate biological drive to find a mate. I don’t know of any other real solution than to just try to find the one 😰
/r/MGTOW229/07/21 07:54 AM
-2

The pew study was directed by a man and the second article was written by two men as well so I’m not too sure what you’re saying
/r/MGTOW229/07/21 07:49 AM
0

I’m not really sure what your argument is, can you elaborate? The articles you posted just discussed different aspects of gender and leadership and didn’t seem to decisively say men or women are better, but maybe I missed that part
/r/MGTOW229/07/21 07:46 AM
2

I mean, the percentage of women raped is going to vary depending on specifics such as how the study is defining rape, what time period it’s looking at (eg lifetime prevalence or incidence per year), the location being looked at, and the demographics of the women, so she would need to get specific on what exactly she means. But a good place for you to look for scientific evidence is just by searching though google scholar, and if you don’t have access to an article you can copy paste the title or…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:48 AM
4

This is such a strange take on what happened
/r/MGTOW227/07/21 08:52 AM
1

What country do you live in where men are expected to be celibate?
/r/MensRights22/07/21 11:38 AM
1

Is asking questions not trying to educate myself? I can’t know about every single thing on the planet, please forgive me for not being a circumcision expert :/
/r/MensRights08/07/21 05:05 AM
3

Birth control is not 100% effective, and you can’t expect people to be celibate until they’re ready to have children
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:56 AM
1

Thanks for giving me an actual answer rather than just downvoting lmao
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:40 AM
1

Even more concerning lol
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:38 AM
2

Ok thanks!
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:38 AM
6

Good
/r/MensRights06/07/21 08:41 AM
1

Dude I’m not sure what you’re arguing against but it’s definitely not any points I made anymore :/
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:57 AM
1

Ok we are not talking about the same things lol. To clarify: circumcision is still popular in the states and doctors there in the past thought it was beneficial. Different countries can have very different medical practices, but we’re getting on a bit of a tangent I think
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:56 AM
3

Again, I wasn’t speaking about doctors globally, just American doctors during that time period
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:54 AM
0

Damn did you have that already prepared? I have heard the masturbation argument tho, my understanding is that that was one of the earlier arguments for it
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:54 AM
2

Yeah Idk about that lol. It’s not routine in Canada or most of Europe. I remember reading that it was initially thought to reduce masturbation, and then that transitioned to a belief that it was good for hygiene, etc.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:48 AM
1

Hmm I’ve read otherwise but that’s ok lol. I wasn’t really referring to places where circumcision isn’t routine, I was more meaning places like the States 🤷‍♀️
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:46 AM
1

Strange, I’m in the healthcare field and Iearned otherwise, but I’m also not American. Where are you getting your info on past doctor’s beliefs?
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:42 AM
1

Oh god I don’t want to even think about an infant having a frost bitten clitoris :( My understanding is that in the US, it was once thought that male circumcision was good for a boys health, but it’s become a norm there, so despite the American Paediatric Association no longer recommending it routinely, some Americans feel that it’s a normal thing to do. I wasn’t aware of American families circumcising their boys so that they feel less pleasure during sex though
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:39 AM
11

I don’t really understand your comment. Are you saying that your clitoris was removed?
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:34 AM
9

Yeah :(
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:32 AM
14

Do you think that you might think it looks better just because you’re used to seeing it/it’s familiar to you?Like I remember thinking that AirPods looked weird as hell when they first came out but now they look normal to me lol
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:28 AM
1

Yeah my understanding is that doctors used to think that it would benefit male health but that that information has been discredited, and the American Paediatric Association no longer recommends routine circumcision.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:24 AM
0

My understanding is that it is extremely rarely medically necessary to circumcise a boy, but that since FGM typically refers to removing the clitoris so that when she grows up she doesn’t enjoy sex as much, it’s never really medically necessary. If you’re aware of any medical reasons could you please elaborate?
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:22 AM
15

I don’t think circumcision is that common in Canada or Europe, I think you must be American.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:20 AM
-6

Are there less extreme cases? I’ve only ever heard of FGM where the clitoris is removed/damaged.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:18 AM
19

They are very different but there are similarities as well, in that both are altering genitals without consent of the person receiving it. There’s no medical reason as far as I’m aware of to routinely circumcise male infants; it’s also a pretty horrifying looking procedure if you’ve ever seen one performed :(
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:16 AM
10

It’s done so that the women won’t enjoy sex (the clitoris has a high concentration of nerve endings)
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:12 AM
2

TIL that Canadian courts think that BDSM includes sexually abusing children 🥴
/r/MensRights06/07/21 05:11 AM
1

Well I wish you the best of luck; perhaps you could one day move somewhere where you could comfortably teach
/r/MensRights06/07/21 04:16 AM
5

This is so strange; if a woman sexually abuses children I don’t understand why the inner workings of her mind should matter when the end result is still child sexual abuse. Regardless of whether we want to label her a ‘true pedophile’ the damage to the child is the same…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 03:14 AM
1

If you don’t mind sharing, working as what? What field do you feel like you’d be “safe” in?
/r/MensRights06/07/21 02:38 AM
1

That’s so sad :( What are you planning to do instead?
/r/MensRights05/07/21 07:43 AM
1

I completely agree with what you’re saying but ngl that’s a weird example you’ve linked
/r/MensRights05/07/21 07:36 AM
-1

Is asking your partner to try to be discreet about checking other people out when you’re together really that selfish? She wasn’t saying he couldn’t do it, just to make it not so obvious when they’re together. Would you be happy about your gf checking out guys when you’re with her? Edit: autocorrect
/r/MensRights05/07/21 07:32 AM
1

If you feel comfortable, it might be helpful to mention this to the doctor, as it may have been an oversight that your reminder can prevent happening to others.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 05:20 AM
2

Please report this to whatever the professional association is for physiotherapists in your country. Anyone who behaves that way towards a patient should not be in the medical field.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 05:18 AM
1

I approached both my previous and current boyfriend :)
/r/MensRights05/07/21 05:16 AM
3

The more you learn about human cognition, the more you realize that we are not very rational or logical beings lol
/r/MensRights24/05/21 02:51 AM
1

Oh wow thanks! That’s awful :(
/r/MensRights28/04/21 07:05 PM
1

Is that globally? Or just in your country? And are you talking strictly government funding or donations from citizens as well?
/r/MensRights28/04/21 04:11 PM
1

No worries :)
/r/MensRights28/04/21 01:40 PM
1

I think it’s important to remember that online you’re not seeing the other person face to face, so you are not seeing their humanity and their reactions when you communicate with them, so it can be easy to think of someone just as their demographic and whatever stereotypes a person has about it. So for example, I would wager that many of the women that say things online that hurt you may be not thinking about the effect on you as a real human being, but as whatever image they have in their head …
/r/MGTOW228/04/21 01:36 PM
1

Are you saying that in your country a man cannot get a vasectomy without a woman’s consent?
/r/MGTOW228/04/21 01:29 PM
1

Are you sure that women don’t date and marry rich men as well? In my experience I’ve seen that a lot. To be fair anecdotal evidence from observing celebrities isn’t likely to give you the most accurate representation of the average person’s reality. From my understanding generally woman have an evolved preference for men who can provide resources for their offspring and men have an evolved preference for younger attractive women that can produce “quality” offspring
/r/MGTOW228/04/21 01:24 PM
1

I encourage anyone who’s thinking of circumcising their child to watch a video of the process so you are aware of what your child will go through.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 01:10 PM
1

Oh no, I promise it will get less overwhelming the more you practice it! To cut down on reading I recommend looking over the abstract of the article first to see if it’s worth the time to read the whole thing. And if you don’t have access to the article through your school, you can copy and paste the DOI or title into sci hub so you don’t have to pay for the article
/r/MensRights28/04/21 01:07 PM
1

Do you find that most women support circumcision? I live outside of the US and that hasn’t been my experience but idk
/r/MensRights28/04/21 01:01 PM
2

Not saying you’re wrong, but do you have sources to back that? I’m not from the US so idk 😅
/r/MensRights28/04/21 01:00 PM
1

Does it really? Where I’m from there are very active breast cancer and prostate cancer charities
/r/MensRights28/04/21 12:56 PM
1

I would recommend looking through google scholar, especially since this is an essay you’ll be submitting I’m assuming. A good starting point off the top of my head would be men’s mental health, suicide rates, etc. Hope this helps :)
/r/MensRights28/04/21 12:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter