TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fiorbeth Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by Fiorbeth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Simple but informative TL;DR All sex is rape as some women sometimes feel bad after sex without ever indicating this to the men they are having sex with giving them no way to know. For the funny highlights, the author goes into a diatribe about how consent can also mean "allow to be dominated by" despite that not being the context it is used in when in relation to sex. Takes two scientific answers to why some women get depressed after sex and calls them Pseudo Science, and then states that what …
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:59 PM
2

Sorry Trains are too fun, they will be banned next.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:48 PM
1

I'm most curious of the statement at the end there. "Other non-men and “gender outlaws” also experience rape at disproportionately high rates." Yet in the very sentence before it indentifies Women as victims while Other non-men and “gender outlaws” merely experience rape indicating they are on both sides of being perpetrators and victims. While never once stating the idea that Women are capable of rape.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:48 PM
2

I agree with you here and the only thing I could think when I was reading that part of the article was that I better get my Legal action against Domino's started soon, I mean I ordered the pizza accepted the delivery of it and then willingly ate it. However afterwards I felt bad about eating it. By applying this Woman's standards to other aspects of life I should be able to win a court case against them as while they didn't force me to eat the food they didn't psychically know how I would feel a…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:43 PM
7

I hear it can be quite distracting to the class.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 12:20 AM
2

Not really sure to be honest wouldn't want to put a big guess forward . I do remember reading a study a while back that stated there are some differences in the memory abilities of men and women but don't remember which way round it works. Possible men are just better at memory that would be good for history. Another posibility would be that if the course content holds more interest in general on average for men than women it may just be that the extra interest in the specific topic of the cours…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 03:25 PM
54

The general gist of this is that at the ages of 11-18 (GCES/A-Level) girls are outperforming boys for some reason, then when heading to University at 18/19 the boys are taking the advantage and performing better therefore that clearly needs stopping because girls are apparently incapable of sitting a timed exam and performing as well so it needs gearing more towards their sensibilities.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 05:19 PM
1

In response to 1, slippery slope would probably apply here taking something to its natural conclusion is pretty opinion based this complaint is valid others may not be even if more came in then surely they should be valuated on a case by case basis and determine if they are valid rather than simply saying if one gets through they all will. Furthermore the thing you are referring to is precedent in terms of legality. Precedent only applies with cases of similar facts or situation which is to say …
/r/MensRights01/05/17 08:02 PM
2

As I am no expert on Title IX partially due to not being American I do have an understanding of it due to various things read on this sub but just to confirm I did some quick googling showed this as the main line of the act No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. That to me especially the part about bein…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 07:09 PM
1

I mean based on what was written in the linked post for what was sent in the original application. The problem isn't so much that the information being taught is inaccurate or triggering, more just that the information is incomplete. The original post basically states that they teach only about male violence and nothing about female violence, that is excluding certain facts to push the narrative in a certain way. And it is not exactly like female violence (both to males and females) is such a ra…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 06:12 PM
6

From the look of it in the video, he ran at her in a violent fashion, she reached out and grabbed his collar/neck and then he punched her in the face. I mean they both were being violent and she did put hands on him but didn't land a punch. Then again they both turned up to a riot and she was wearing a mask so obviously after anonymity therefor probably going to the riot to riot. In that case getting punched in the face is the risk you run.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:46 PM
5

Tell the dean that you were offended by the teachers comments and that if you are punished for getting offended then you will be consulting with the local education authority about how you can proceed with filing a formal complaint against the school for the behaviour. If he doesn't get rid of the detention then follow through on the threat.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 12:37 PM
1

I'll see about doing it if I have time, not sure if I do currently though.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 12:12 AM
1

May be a little bit of extra work on this but is there any chance you could add some statistics to this list. Essentially what I am thinking is splitting these into sections based on year and including how many are on there for each year. That can then be used as a mild comparison of how many there are by year.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:14 PM
1

If this is a true case then it is pretty horrible and shouldn't of happened and yes the University should have done more for her. But the part that really gets me is, how did this mystery man (that was apparently targeting her for being a lesbian) get in, did she not lock her doors and windows at night. Especially after the first attack you would think she would do that. If she did lock them then there would be actual evidence of forced entry to the room unless the person somehow had a key, if t…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:47 PM
1

Okay so the part of it about rape being defined only as penetration with a penis, and that in certain places sexual assault with an object carrying less severity than rape is right in the scope of mens rights and one of the things that is quite wrong. The part about 'oh he is not actually a rapist as he didn't use his penis' is realistically irrelevant and stupid okay so from a classification standpoint he is not a rapist, he still violated another person and deserves punishment for it. I would …
/r/MensRights10/06/16 11:58 PM
5

Nope just a naive dreamer.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:46 PM
1

The article says that womens soccer (read Football) brings in more money for US Soccer than the mens if that is true then okay if they are earning the regulatory body more money overall than the entirety of mens soccer then it is fair enough that they should be compensated accordingly. Now without seeing the stats on that I do have a bit of trouble believing that is the case. I do have to wonder though exactly what they want here. So if the mens team all took a massive paycut to make the pay equ…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:47 PM
11

So hopefully they will end up in prison. Not only did they assault someone in broad daylight they also filmed it and put it online as evidence of what they had done. If he was harrassing/casuing problems for his ex online then there are plenty of ways to deal with that. Go to the police if you believe there is a serious threat, go to the university administration if it is causing problems at university. If it is just that its not nice to see then just block the twat on twitter then he can't say …
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:40 PM
1

In the US there were perfectly valid reasons why Women paid more for Car and Health Insurance, however because they did Feminists fought against it until the law was changed to make it more equal and 'fair' (I say it like that as as I say there were good reasons theirs were higher). In the same vein there are reasons as to why alimony affects men much more significantly (men normally earning more in a marriage etc) however that does not make alimony fair as a law. Due to the fact it is an unfair…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 05:53 PM
11

Ugh awful bullshit in this article, really does just practically say 'Oh men have problems well so do women so lets forget about mens problems.'. And, lest we forget, the primary reason young men are more likely to die at their own hands is because they’re pretty unlikely to die at all. So because men in that age range are less likely to die than those in other ranges we should ignore the problem that exists as a very prevalent issue. Suicide is the biggest killer among men aged 20 to 35, but it…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:03 PM
2

Realistically the problem a lot of people have with it is the idea that it is not a necessary thing. The only real reason it was particularly ever done is that certain religions told people to do it. The other reason is that certain people thought there were health benefits to it however studies show that there are no real health benefits. As a result there are no specific reasons to perform it unless there are specific health concerns. Realistically the problem is that when it is performed to a…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:10 PM
1

Oh yeah I agree that men would be affected more by this. As I said I very rarely visit the GP and a couple of weeks ago was the first time I did in around 15 years. So under this system I would have been receiving letters asking me if I am dead. My real problem with the idea though is that all of the problems it aims to solve either punish people for being healthy, or could easily be solved by better integrated systems that share information better.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:43 PM
2

Kinda irrelevant to it being a discussion on mens rights but this just seems silly as a concept. What they really need to do is improve communication between government departments not just automatically remove people from their GP. When someone dies it gets logged, the person logging it will have access to plenty of information about the person that has died and can input it into a system. Then the GP could get automatically informed by the system that the person has died. When someone leaves t…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:34 PM
1

I agree with a lot of the view points feminists hold with regards to gaining equality etc. It is just when those view points seem more geared towards furthering the position of women in society above that of men instead of equality that I disagree. Equal pay, end domestic violence and rape and alot of the other things that get pushed by feminists are completely fair and understandable it is more a matter of execution of the way they go about trying to achieve them.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:44 PM
1

I would say that she would get a slap on the wrist but that would probably count as abuse.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:13 PM
2

The failure to communicate no however is not always so cut and dry however, for instance there is a difference in the situation between someone not saying anything and somebody saying yes out of a degree of fear that they perceive. If they actually say yes how are you meant to know that the yes was 'coerced' if there are no verbal or visual cues from the person. That is where the difficulty arises from. On the front of someone changing their minds the difficulty arises from the idea that if you …
/r/MensRights22/09/15 05:54 PM
2

Its not reasonable if the person gives the statement in response to something else that someone has said. But here she appears to be reading from a list of notes and is using the statement that she prepared. She said that she did her research and had a series of notes. If she was asked an off topic question and had a quote from memory but had not prepared for that question then ok take that statement with a grain of salt until you see the quote. But here she prepares for the discussion researche…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:11 PM
54

Around 7:30 when she makes the claim that he said something and he said that he did not. The first thing she should have done is pull out a sheet with her list of sources and say that you wrote that statement on this day in this column and these are the exact words you wrote. The fact that she basically told him to fuck off when he asked for her to source her argument really shows how downhill oxford must have gone, not being able to provide a source for a quote in a debate when requested is rid…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 05:26 PM
1

It is really hard living in the UK, a lot of our laws and policies are structured in very interesting ways that half of the time seem to protect people from idiocy and the other time seem to promote it. Now I don't really know who Tyler the Creator is, I have heard the name before and a quick Google seems to indicate that all of this is essentially over him using words that offend people in his speech and music. It seems really dumb to me that someone can be banned from an entire country for tha…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 05:13 PM
6

The fact that the article does not say that would imply (yes only imply not prove) to me that it was consensual or at least appears to be so based on the evidence. With the way journalism is today if the film appeared non consensual they would have been called vicious sadistic rapists and every other name the author could think of, because they were not then that implies to me that it was consensual. In the case of whether or not the boys themselves should be punished I think they should (and th…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:17 PM
7

Ahh yes playing with a stick, junior baseball (or insert any other sport here) and building model rockets with their dad activities that every 16/17 year old wants be be doing. Your idea of maturity is silly as well, it is not that long since I was 18 (and I'm not sure how long it was since you were or if you even are) but you don't magically wake up on your 18th birthday and have an epiphany that makes you incredibly mature and sensible. Different people become more mature at different rates an…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:13 PM
2

To me feminism is a movement that a lot of feminists say is for equality and some actually do push for equality. However there is often a disparity between the few that push for equality and those that say that it is for equality and then cite examples of feminism helping men. Normally these cases are cases where by helping women men in some way profited. Most feminism is about getting more rights for women and protecting women in society and often the line that gets used when men are brought up…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 01:05 PM
1

Yeah I went to what is considered one of the more fancy restraunts in my city the other week with my family, we paid about £120 for four people. That is three courses and drinks.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 03:28 PM
1

I would say you are somewhat half right. Though in some ways your'e argument is a bit flawed. Yes one half of the group may have to say "I will stay at home and look after the house/kids" (though in some cases both parents could work alternating shifts and look after half the house as well though that is a bit difficult to get set up with) in the relationship that is what the other partner is essentially paying them to do. I know that makes it sound like one partner is hiring the other as a wife…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 03:21 PM
1

I know this would be the case in England that the doctor could not say that. In this scenario he is not accidentally revealing information he is revealing the information in a very obvious and intentional manner. Due to the way the law is structured revealing the information in that way would still be against the law and a breach of medical practice. However I am not sure how this would work in regards to before the child is born, as far as I know the father has no rights over the child until it…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 10:37 AM
8

I really like the idea that if women are under-represented in University/College it is due to systematic oppression, misogyny and other such buzz words but if men become under-represented it is because they are not trying hard enough in younger education. Has anyone maybe looked into the fact that maybe young men at lower levels of education are being discriminated against, young boys plain and simply do not get as much attention or time as young girls at school. Especially when you see things l…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 08:26 PM
3

Based on experience, I would say that men complain more and complain louder than women. My experience for this come from 1) My Dad will complain at the drop of a hat if anything whatsoever is wrong with something he orders. 2) Working in a shop I find that men complain a lot more about things than women. However from that what I would also say I have noticed is that men have a tendency to shrug off little things so using the shop example if the price of something is wrong and slightly high most …
/r/MensRights10/08/15 10:57 AM
2

I would potentially argue that this is not really a gendered issue due to the fact that the woman is also being forced to marry him (though I suppose she could say no and he would go to jail, also I don't really know if the judge would give the same verdict to a woman). I would say the issue really falls under the issue of secularism due to him being force to write Bible verses (as though that would have any possible affect on him other than boredom and possibly making him hate the bible) or it …
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:17 PM
2

The thing that this article seems to majorly forget is that as the work force becomes more automated is that costs will go down. This is due to the fact that companies can charge less for things if they are not being required to pay a salary to people. On top of that with the costs things going down and things becoming more automated I feel as though realistically companies will hire twice as many people to work half the time, so all of the jobs the article mentions will not fire anyone from the…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:48 AM
3

I absolutely despise the idea of them simply stating that 50% of the shadow cabinet will be female regardless. It is stupid and quite frankly wrong. They are saying that instead of the people that are best at the job and work the hardest to get there they will unilaterally give the positions to women to fill the numbers. Now I am not saying that women can not be better or worse than men in this position but to pre determine that you will only hire a certain gender regardless of the skill or abil…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:36 AM
3

The problem that leads to this kind of mentality where everything that gets said here is due to the fact that realistically mens rights is a fairly new movement. Compared to feminism that has had years to form as such it has not gathered the same level of following or organisation. The other problem that leads to this is that realistically the mens rights movement is a reactionary movement to feminism. It sees feminism doesn't like some of the ways it is doing things and so reacts accordingly. T…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:23 AM
4

My biggest problem with the whole diversity in the workplace argument is that people seem to expect the whole world to change overnight to match their perceived diversity standards. The only way to instantly get to the diversity standards that people apparently want is to fire a large percentage of the white male employees and replace them with other groups to give that sense of diversity (also irks me that this is pretty much targeted at white males, whenever someone sets up a womens company an…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:43 PM
3

You don't really need to provide sources in the terms of male genital mutilation simply point out that male circumcision in legal to perform on babies with no anaesthesia, while any female equivalent is illegal and seen as evil. Now her rebuttal to that would probably be that male circumcision has health benefits while female equivalents can be somewhat damaging to health or at least have no benefits. Realistically this is where you would break out evidence/sources to show that male circumcision…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 12:12 PM
3

TBH in a way it is not really about kindness anyway(though that is an aspect of it certainly), when people are in a relationship (hell even friendships do this sometimes though probably not as much) they do things for each other that they are not particularly happy/comfortable with to make the other person happy. This is a two way street and men will do things for women that they may not be happy or comfortable doing in exchange, now realistically the article they are condemning is a one sided a…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:07 AM
8

Gotta wonder given that children is not gendered do they help young men... but only up to a certain age. They hit their 16th birthday and a unceremoniously kicked out on their arse with nothing but £5 and their 'privilege'.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 10:57 AM
2

'I don't see what is so hard about walking around and shooting a gun.' Well the short answer is... nothing, it is when people start shooting back that things become tricky. (Also the moral problems that come from shooting said gun at other people.)
/r/MensRights31/07/15 11:08 AM
7

Saw this posted earlier on TiA and commented on that so gonna copy across my post from there. "I found a trio, two women — shoulders bare — and a man, in handsome, Navy twill pants and a smart, checkered button-down shirt, eating lunch together." Of course the women are cold they are wearing bare shoulders, probably a dress or bare shouldered t-shirt with a skirt. Ok so maybe the thermostat is set too low for that type of clothing so maybe they should wear more. Though that raises the inevitable…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:19 AM
7

Not sure entirely how serious this is as a software solution (realistically the requirement to send off a genetic sample to be profiled just to get on a site seems kinda trolly) but if it is serious I can so see this falling apart with the trans community that feminism seems to champion. As far as genetics are concerned men are XY and women are XX chromosomes there isn't an actual shift in your genetics just because you identify as a different gender. Even if you get gender reassignment surgery …
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:22 PM
0

Realistically I would like to think that the kind of person I would marry (as I say if I ever do) would not be the kind of person that would think like that. While that does sound somewhat like cherry picking problems ("that wont happen to me because I wont let it" kind of response) realistically choosing a partner would be somewhere along the lines of looking for a person with matching personality traits to me. I get what you mean though.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:30 PM
2

I don't know about all men but TBH I would like to marry (if I do ever marry) a woman that earns more than. Not gonna say that is the only factor (or even a big one) just would be nice to not have to worry about earning as much.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 01:18 AM
1

Realistically as a word there is nothing offensive about it simply meaning male that identifies as male, so in that sense then there is no real derogatory nature to it. However there is the element that when a word or term is used in a derogative fashion for so long it can get associated with that negative connotation and I think that may be what is happening to an extent here. For an example of that happening you simply have to look at a word that derived from the Spanish word for black in the …
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:48 PM
2

To be honest one of the only reasons I agree with showing my working out in any work that I do in exams is for the sake of error carried forward marks. Sometimes when doing a difficult maths (or several other subjects) problem it is incredibly easy to just make a simple error while doing it under pressure of an exam. Error carried forward at least means that if you get an error somewhere and use that error then you can still get the marks for most of the question. One big example of this from a …
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:59 PM
4

The rule I would say started out as a bit of a more of a rule that would be something along the lines of 'Never initiate violence against a woman' (though personally the rule that should be drilled into people is never initiate violence against anyone) That will have been simplified to 'Never hit a woman' and then lost the initiate part over time as it was drilled into each generation. Now it is just sat there as a rule that people have had drilled into them ever since they were children. Person…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 03:08 PM
5

TBH it looks to me like the way she had her fist was like she did not really know how to hold a fist to punch someone, to me it was very clearly an aggressive posture in which to hold your fist. The only way she could be gesturing with her thumb in that way is if she decided to point at her own face for some reason.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:29 AM
1

Technically the graph is everyone getting level 5 or higher so does include the level 6s though a separate graph or segregated bars to show what percentage of that total are made up by level 6s would be useful from a statistical standpoint.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:43 PM
3

It says just above the picture Figure 1: Percentage achieving the proficiency level 5 or higher in mathematics by gender, USA, UK, Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, 2012 Not the best graph admittedly no title, labelled axis or units etc but oh well.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:41 PM
1

Well to some extent you should really ask your friend for some of his sources with regards to what men and feminists (I like that the wording is not men and women). Then debunk his sources instead of providing an argument against what he said. Otherwise it becomes difficult to actually debunk his argument if you don't know where it is coming from.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:56 PM
2

What an excelent way to prepare young women for the working world, eliminate an entire gender from their classes. All this will do is delay the problem, if boys/men are a distraction to these girls/women working then what will happen in a few years time when they try to get into these fields and find they totally cant concentrate because there are boys in the class.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:09 PM
4

TBH this seems reasonable to me so long as it is not something like 50% of the jobs, despite the people in question being in prison they should to me still have some degree of rights one of those being having the ability to request a female guard in certain situations (such as when receiving medical examinations that require them to strip and the guard is required to stay in the room). That said the situations that allow them to request a female guard should be pretty clearly defined beforehand …
/r/MensRights20/06/15 10:44 AM
3

Thats strange because I like to cut down trees, skip, jump and press wild flowers.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 10:05 PM
2

Yeah I enjoy a lot of films/TV shows generally geared towards women especially comedies.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 10:04 PM
1

I've heard the stereotype a fair few times that baths are for women though I think the main stereotype there is that scented bubbly baths are for women and not manly because... err men hate bubbles? Though that does lead me onto my thought about a lot of this is that several of these products (such as the sunscreen, soap etc) will be scented in a way that is 'manly' scents that men are shown to like and women seem to like on men.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 09:54 PM
2

Would make for an interesting court case, both parties claim the other raped them as both of them said yes but actually meant no.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:30 PM
3

Funny part about the backlash as that one is that it was her own fault for running into the engine, realistically Michael probably wouldn't have killed her if he caught her just grabbed the tape and left. Contrary to that all the men that you kill are intentional or at least collateral damage to killing someone else.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter