TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FireWankWithMe Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by FireWankWithMe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

It would be if it wasn't based on incredibly shitty research with a broad definition of 'censorship'. For this 'censorship' is everything from not allowing payday loan companies to advertise on campus to kicking students out of clubs for unwanted groping to not playing Blurred Lines on the radio. The definition is so broad it covers everything from "all those who deny feminism will be sent to the gulag" to "could you please not call me a cunt?" Moreover an SU that censors a student paper in acco…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:55 PM
-1

Okay, these guys consider it a scam. The points they make in the page I linked and in the pages linked to within that are more than enough to persuade me. Even it's not a scam it still has absolutely no prestige and is using its similarity to the Cannes festival to trick people, as has happened several times here.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 10:36 AM
-2

They're allowed to hold their own festival, are they not? The other Cannes festival is hardly a neutral source here. That doesn't change that her previous film did not win at the Cannes film festival. I find it quite funny that you think the Cannes festival isn't a neutral source here but you somehow have no problem accepting Jaye's version of events regarding why her film didn't receive funding. But when it comes to the festival being a scam don't just take my word for it. Scam or not it's hard…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:49 AM
-2

For what it's worth... she has won awards at the Cannes Film Festival. That's kindof a big deal. No she didn't, she won at the Cannes Independent Film festival, which is recognised as a scam by the real Cannes. Misleading bullshit like that is precisely what makes me think she's just pandering to an audience for easy funding. Further, she never said anything like "feminists are trying to stop my film!" The Breitbart article (and for that matter most of the comments here) sure does seem to give o…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:36 AM
-2

uh, no. she has already completed other features Did you miss the part where I referred to these in the very comment you replied to? one of which won at the Cannes Festival. Uh, no. One of which one at the Cannes Independent film festival, a 'festival' that is recognised by the real Cannes film festival as a scam. The other 'festivals' she has won awards at are either minuscule or equally dubious. It also garnered a great deal of publicity that is being denied to this film. Did it? Strange that …
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:26 AM
-6

You can't blame people for "misunderstanding" patriarchy theory when the definition changes every five minutes. I've seen various feminists argue that patriarchy is "rule of the father in the home"; a system "designed to privilege men at the expense of women"; a system in which "the majority of power is held by men"; a system that promotes "traditional gender roles"; etc. etc. etc. And none of what you've just listed is contradictory. "Designed to privilege men at the expense of women" is anothe…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:15 AM
-5

Where's your evidence? My evidence for what? I'm saying she has no evidence, it's impossible to evidence a lack of evidence. I'm not putting forward any viewpoint other than that we have only her word to go on and a absolutely no evidence to go on that suggests anything she said is true. If she'd have blamed her film's failure on any other group the reaction would have been much more skeptical. She already stated how her usual sources of funding and publicity dried up once they got the suspicion…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 03:49 AM
-3

I can absolutely blame Milo for writing up a non-story that could easily be summed up as 'filmmaker fails to get funding, like thousands of others' and spinning it as the fault of the feminist bogeyman. I can blame the MRAs for blindly lapping it up and jerking immediately into action mode no questions asked just because Cassie picked the right group to blame. At no point has anyone involved taken a step back and examined the situation, it's just blindly accepting a version of events because the…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:31 AM
-3

'An observer said...' is weasel words. The phrase serves two purposes: it lets you say things that could be true but might not be without fear of being criticised, and it lets you put your own view into an article in a way that sounds slightly more professional than "I think...". Because after all, 'an observer' could be anyone and could be made to say anything. I'd be able to take Gamergate a lot more seriously if in between ranting about problems in journalism today they didn't prop up Breitba…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:19 AM
0

Well actually I think what she said was that she had angel investors, but that they wanted some degree of artistic control in return Again though the same can be said about almost any film ever. It's not exactly unusual for producers to want to shape the films they fund, with the intention of making the most profit. The only source on this is herself. Well that's my main point. If we asked M. Night about After Earth or The Happening he's not exactly going to give an honest account on the quality…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:56 AM
-7

I'm saying there's no evidence to say the reason the film didn't get funding was because of feminist pressure. It could just have been a shitty film. It's not as if the filmmaker has made waves (or ripples for that matter) with any of her previous work. Since downvotes mean I can only comment here every 10 minutes I'll reply to this comment of yours here too. I absolutely do view it as you blindingly accepting feminism is responsible because feminists are something of a bogeyman here, and to be …
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:37 AM
-4

"The Patriarchy" is a conspiracy theory. "Patriarchy Theory" presupposes cooperation and coordination between men to keep women oppressed. Seriously? This is what you think patriarchy theory is? How can you effectively argue against a movement when you fail to grasp their most basic concepts? Patriarchy theory at it's core is simply the idea that society and culture are male dominated, male centred, and male minded. Of course that's a simplistic way of putting it but in any formulation the 'vill…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:26 AM
-7

So essentially you acknowledge there's no evidence, but because it sounds like something feminists would do you'll blindly believe it? Could you please explain how that's different to the feminists who blindly accept that anything is "because patriarchy"? You seem to be basing your views on feels just as much as them.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:15 AM
-3

No one's questioning Sarkesian about how her videos are supported by feminists and funded by feminists. Where is the feminist outrage over feminists funding pro-feminism media? There isn't any. Are feminists outraged over this? I'm not seeing any outrage: this article just has snark. Moreover the only thing the article takes issue with is the way the film presents itself as neutral and objective while receiving funding from one side of the debate. Sarkesian positions herself as someone viewing c…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:05 AM
-5

leaving out that feminist producers refused to fund the production Was there ever a single scrap of evidence for any of this? Her film didn't get funding, but neither have thousands of films over the last year. Her blaming it on some kind of feminist conspiracy is on the same level as a feminist blaming the patriarchy for a film about a talking tampon not getting funding. Maybe it didn't get finding because of feminism, maybe it didn't get any because it's a shit film. Without a single scrap of …
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter