FireZeLazer Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Oxford Students Told to Call Each Other ‘Ze’ Instead of ‘He’ and ‘She’: Feminist compliance tests used to weed out those who question the narrative. You're mistaking physiological differences for psychological differences, and your statement contains several logical fallacies. Gender is not physiological, sex is. Sex is biological, gender is psychological. Yes, it's true that there are physical differences in men and women. However, the vast majority of implied psychological gender differences do not exist - psychology yearns to discover differences, which means that the vast amount of research reinforcing the idea of similarity will be dism…	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 02:01 AM
2	Oxford Students Told to Call Each Other ‘Ze’ Instead of ‘He’ and ‘She’: Feminist compliance tests used to weed out those who question the narrative. I was mainly referring to his post history. I don't agree with feminism - hence being on this subreddit. However, I also understand that a lot of feminism is focused on trying to bring gender equality, I just don't agree with its main paradigms.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 01:35 AM
2	Oxford Students Told to Call Each Other ‘Ze’ Instead of ‘He’ and ‘She’: Feminist compliance tests used to weed out those who question the narrative. Checks profile Ah yes, /r/The_Donald subscriber spouting bullshit when clearly not educated on the issue. Explains a lot.	/r/MensRights	14/12/16 12:34 AM
4	Oxford Students Told to Call Each Other ‘Ze’ Instead of ‘He’ and ‘She’: Feminist compliance tests used to weed out those who question the narrative. I don't know why you're trying to convince people on this sub, got overrun by Trump supporters a while back. It's just an anti-feminism sub now rather than constructively trying to achieve equality for women and MEN.	/r/MensRights	13/12/16 08:31 PM
2	the literal shakening: SJW meltdown I want to reiterate that I have no problem with women who want to do this. There's nothing wrong with groupies or women who know that they are good looking enough to sleep with an athlete or celebrity due to their fame. I know that some women will line up in order to do this. I'm not even sure if I think it's sickening, since it's two consenting adults (albeit one might be in a somewhat hysterical state). However, this is different to what we mentioned. There is a difference between wanting to e…	/r/MensRights	11/11/16 03:10 PM
1	the literal shakening: SJW meltdown Like the guy above, you should probably go check the legal side of consent. Not saying stop does not mean a woman or man has consented.	/r/MensRights	11/11/16 02:34 PM
-4	the literal shakening: SJW meltdown So if I grab a woman by the pussy on public transport, and she doesn't stop me, I haven't committed a crime? I think you need to check the legal side of consent.	/r/MensRights	11/11/16 01:56 PM
-9	the literal shakening: SJW meltdown I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab em by the pussy. You can do anything. He never said anything about them being all over him, he said if they're an attractive woman he will just kiss them without waiting for a response. Because he's famous, they won't stop him. This is different to consent. The same way if I grab a woman's pussy on the bus, and she doesn't stop me, then I have still s…	/r/MensRights	11/11/16 01:25 PM
-12	the literal shakening: SJW meltdown I mean, how is a consensual sexual act worse than proposing to forcefully grab a woman by her pussy?	/r/MensRights	11/11/16 11:43 AM
5	the literal shakening: SJW meltdown Labour didn't exist when women were granted suffrage... also initially it was only middle class women allowed to vote. It was the Labour Party that gave all women the vote, which resulted in Labour being reelected. So yeah basically you don't know what you're talking about do you?	/r/MensRights	11/11/16 11:34 AM
-1	Sexism in a nutshell [3] Yet you didn't have a problem with the generalisation "feminists only see what they want to see"?	/r/MensRights	02/09/15 03:59 AM