TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Firekeeper_Jason Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by Firekeeper_Jason on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Unity implies war, and we can't win wars where we need the other side. Most men either understand this explicitly or implicitly. It's the same reason now all women are feminists. The solution to our problems isn't division. The solution is cooperation through integration.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 12:41 PM
1

Yes, BUT it is important that those natural expressions be grounded in masculinity or femininity. Or, more accurately, if we don't ground expression in one or the other, we lose the polarity that drives everything
/r/MensRights16/06/25 01:37 PM
1

You're right that capitalism shaped how we measure and distribute power, and that both men and women have been crushed under its weight. But that doesn't contradict the original argument... it proves it. Feminism didn't just want equality. It wanted the kind of power men appeared to have, namely institutional, financial, and visible (think CEO visibility). The problem is feminism misunderstood that most men never had power. Men had pressure, obligation, and, well, exhaustion. Climbing the ladder…
/r/MensRights15/06/25 12:15 PM
1

I find it insulting you think so poorly of yourself. Get over the victim mentality and you'll have a lot more success.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 07:37 PM
7

We create something more interesting (and mutually-beneficial) not by changing society, but by craving out a community that does things right. "Right" can be however you define it, as my "right" might be different than your "right." But any of us who have studied pair-bonding academically (and anecdotally) have a pretty good idea of how this is supposed to work. And we're hard-wired for tribalism, so we lean on that predisposition to create a micro-Utopia. How we go about creating this matters. …
/r/MensRights11/06/25 11:36 AM
3

Haha, amusingly, I am a writer of sorts, and this is a topic I frequently cover. It's made me a hundredaire and, for a few years, a thousandaire. It's allowed me to live a bitchin' life decked out in sweats from Walmart, rollin' in by '97 Corolla, knockin' back two or three 40's of Mickey's... Anyway, You have some excellent points and very good questions that warrant a full response, which goes beyond the limitations of Reddit. However, I will say I'm a decidedly average dude, and my wife, whil…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 09:49 AM
4

Neither of us were emotionally healthy in the beginning (childhood trauma; fucked up family dynamics). In the first few years of the relationship, the sex probably got us through the tough times. The emotional fluency and intelligence was a later development. I always balk at talk about society's generalized effects on groups of people because it blinds us to the reality that all of us are individuals with dispositions far more diverse that a statistical average. And there's a self-fulfilling pr…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:25 PM
5

I have mixed feelings about this. My wife has a few dispositional things that make her a little different than most women, but the real secret is just that we're well-matched and, early on, understood the value of supporting each other in personal growth. That, in turn, fostered growth of the relationship. We treat hardships, and we've definitely had hardships, as an opportunity to grow. That's something available to anyone.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:04 PM
6

The erosion of social skills.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 07:28 PM
56

That's a pretty damn sad perspective, but it's not necessarily wrong. Most modern relationships don’t offer much to men. A lot of guys end up in dynamics where they’re expected to be providers, emotional shock absorbers, home repair techs, and therapists, hwile getting very little in return. But that’s not a woman problem. That’s a mismatch problem. When a man partners with the right woman, one who is emotionally literate, self-accountable, and aligned with his mission, the benefits are massive.…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:11 PM
3

Well, if you've ever tried radical honestly and unregulated emoting in any relationship context, you quickly realize why both are a bad idea. As far as healthy versus toxic relationships, just observe a representative cross-section of humanity. You'll see both.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 05:42 PM
1

Feminism isn’t evil so much as it's confused. Really, really confused. And frankly, so are most of its critics. The original feminist movement fought for real things like basic legal rights, bodily autonomy, protection from violence. These goals were virtuous. You’d have to be morally bankrupt to oppose those goals. The problem is what happened next. Somewhere between the second and third waves, a bunch of postmodern academics started pushing the idea that gender is purely a social construct. Th…
/r/MensRights06/06/25 12:53 PM
1

Men suck up to the "tough guy" types because the tough guy types enjoy a sliver of success compared to their fanboys. Discipline, resilience, and not needing excessive external validation are, indeed, positive male virtues. But they don't exist on an island. If they're not tempered with other characteristics and not deployed situationally, they're as maladaptive as being weak and supplicating. But this is the state of the modern understanding of gender. It's seriously fucked up. In other words, …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:32 PM
6

If you're in a hole, stop digging. If the poison you're drinking is making you sick, stop drinking the poison. If social media is causing you mental health issues, stop using social media. It sounds like you're allowing strangers to infiltrate your otherwise good relationship. Stop that.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:16 PM
2

Oh my god, you have no idea how much anxiety I was experiencing over the fear nobody here was old enough to get the reference! Thanks, Man!
/r/MensRights30/05/25 11:35 AM
4

Where have you gone, Mrs. Robinson?
/r/MensRights30/05/25 09:00 AM
2

I don't like being spammy, but my profile has a link to the site where the project currently resides. The general idea is based on the psychology of tribalism. I'm creating a network of local tribes centered around a particular world view (think evo psych). Inside the tribes, there's a sisterhood and brotherhood, which is where femininity and masculinity are discussed.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:40 PM
2

Yes. I've been working on a social model that will eliminate the dumb shit that defines modernity without tossing all the cool shit we have that past generations did not. So far, so good.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 07:17 PM
2

Men starting life in prison? This is such an utterly stupid fucking thought, I have a hard time believing anyone would waste a second of their life consuming this information. Maybe it's the wisdom of old age, but I learned long ago the power of ignoring the ramblings of idiots.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 09:27 AM
4

Well, because a lot of women DO want to help... especially if they're struggling to find good men. Unfortunately, very, VERY few women can understand men's issues from a man's perspective to the degree where they can offer better advice than other men. There is value derived from the female perspective, but it has to be framed, and weighted, as such.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:43 PM
1

Haha, I'm old enough to be flattered by your assumption, Man. And I appreciate your concern, but I've taught the stuff you're talking about for a few decades.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:01 AM
1

This isn't a public thing. The tribe is exclusive. Forcing your way in isn't an option.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 11:19 PM
1

I assume that's the case. Write your fucking legislators, kids; I didn't make the shitty laws!
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:58 PM
1

Haha, I know. I've been experimenting with providing some answers using a trained AI chatbot; one of the interesting benefits has been telling people what they don't want to hear in a way that makes the advice palatable. After tons of A/B testing, I think I finally figured out the secret spoonful of sugar to help the medicine go down.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:15 PM
7

Thanks, Man, I appreciate that. My hope is to try to work out a model that can be replicated. The ultimate goal is to create a federation of local tribes, each with a sub-group for men and a sub-group for women. I want each to have their own space, then a space for collective stuff. I'm trying to rebuild micro-environments so we can fix the fuck-upedness of the last fifty years.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:49 PM
14

It's something our older relatives had in abundance, and absolutely disappeared. I'm no spring chicken, but there's never been a point in my life where that was normalized. We need to change that. It's not a difficult thing to do, but we do have to be willing to put up with the bullshit we get when we post the "no girls allowed" signs.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:03 PM
33

Yes, men need male-only spaces where we can talk about emotional shit. These spaces men need can't occur anywhere that anonymity is allowed for what should be obvious reasons. The Internet is too much of a cesspool to be of real value... unless the men actually know each other personally. Or, better yet, IRL groups. That's essentially what I'm working on building.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:44 PM
0

I agree. While some would make the STD/I argument with stealthing versus lying about birth control pills, in my mind, it's the same issue. As a sidebar, I've never had a joke comment result in so many downvotes. WTF is up with this topic?!?
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:39 PM
1

I actually like the Canadian law. And yes, that's my interpretation of the California law (per the actual statute and the jury instructions).
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:12 PM
4

Oh, I absolutely agree. I'm making the argument of what the law says, not expressing my opinion. I think victims of baby trapping should be liable for punitive damages. Eighteen years of being an involuntary father? That's worth a lot of cash.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 04:58 PM
-9

This doesn't apply to the "she told me she was on the pill" scenario. I don't live in California, but perusing the jury instructions on this specific crime is interesting. It can be found on page 737 based on the page numbers in the document itself. So no, in California, this is not rape. https://courts.ca.gov/system/files/file/calcrim_2025_edition.pdf
/r/MensRights22/05/25 04:55 PM
-16

What jurisdiction? I'll take a look at the elements of the crime.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:32 PM
-62

This was a joke, but I can't turn down an opportunity to educate. No, this is not rape. Depending on the specific jurisdiction, there may have been a crime committed, but that crime would not be rape based on the known and assumed elements. Now, to give you some latitude, I didn't specify if the sexual encounter was consensual, though it was implied. If it wasn't, then yes, this could be considered sexual assault. Depending on the jurisdiction, there could be a host of factors or variables that …
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:22 PM
84

As we're lying in bed, still slightly sweaty, she turns to me and says "By the way, I'm not really on the pill."
/r/MensRights22/05/25 12:23 PM
9

I don't know how you see the male role model. Some people's perceptions of the male role model is pretty bad. Others have a perception that is pretty good. If you perceive my perception as men being pack mules and worker bees, your perception of my perception is pretty far off. While men *can* accept that kind of role, my experience seems to suggest men find the most purposeful, meaningful lives when they discover their true self, find a passion, then pursue that passion with enthusiasm. The pos…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 09:44 AM
7

Exactly! I really love that example. Hated PewDiePie, though.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 09:18 AM
73

The third wave feminists wanted what successful men had without considering the sacrifices those men had to make to become successful. All they would have had to do is look at unsuccessful men to realize masculinity is a brutal meritocracy, one that doesn’t care how you feel, only what you do. Most men weren’t free. They were dutiful. Overworked. Emotionally isolated. Often unloved. Feminism mistook this grind for empowerment and sold it to women as liberation. The flaw wasn’t in the desire for …
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:16 PM
2

I agree a comment like "He's bad at sex" is a poor attempt at narrative management. I think it's more about alleviating post-decision dissonance and reputation preservation than anything else.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 11:22 AM
0

Well, because some men are bad at sex. Based on my understanding of the OP's intent with the meaning of the post, he's describing a scenario where a woman is talking about one man, who she's had sex with repeatedly, my response changes pretty radically. In that scenario, the woman (note the singular) could say "Kevin is bad at sex." That's her giving her subjective opinion of Kevin's performance and not condemning the entire sex. Then we can let Kevin respond with "Well, you fucked me 124 times.…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:43 AM
1

In that scenario, the complaint sounds a lot more like sour grapes and social assassination (from the woman) than an objective analysis of the state of men's collective sexual skills.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:32 AM
-8

Are you talking about serial partners or one partner. Because those are very different scenarios.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:07 AM
-3

You don't know someone's bad at sex until you have sex. Having said that, I wholeheartedly agree that communication, mixed with high expectations of a growth mindset, should be a feature of every relationship.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:05 AM
-11

They keep doing it because they're looking for a man who isn't bad at sex. They complain about it as a means of both finding better partners and, likely, pushing men to get better at sex.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 09:42 AM
2

Charm. When you're disrespected at work, your best play is to assert your boundaries with precision and force, but in a way that doesn’t escalate tension. That’s where charm comes in. The trick isn’t to be soft. It’s to be surgical. You make it unmistakably clear that the behavior won’t fly, while still giving the other person a way to save face. The result? You look strong, they don’t feel humiliated, and the boundary gets enforced. For example, someone cuts you off in a meeting. You don’t get …
/r/MensRights13/05/25 09:16 AM
1

This post is close, but it misses a core truth about respect: it’s not just about emotional regulation. It’s about status signals. In any human hierarchy, tribal, corporate, romantic, or primal, respect is the social currency that signals your position. When someone disrespects you, it is information. They’re testing your position. They’re checking to see if you’ll defend your ground or defer. That test is ancient. What matters isn’t whether you feel disrespected. What matters is whether you res…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 01:23 PM
13

It's a marketing issue. Most mainstream subs lean hard toward a narrative that frames male struggle as either suspect, trivial, or your own fault. If you speak plainly about what’s breaking men, you’re either ignored, mocked, or flagged for violating some vague tone rule. But here's the real kicker: it’s not because most men believe this stuff. It’s because most men have been conditioned to stay performatively agreeable. Online culture has taught them to signal sensitivity instead of strength, s…
/r/MensRights06/05/25 12:18 AM
1

I understand why you're frustrated; real conversation feels rare these days, and it can be hard to trust what we read. But I’m not here to fool anyone or "outsource" my thinking. I use every tool available, including AI, to refine my ideas and sharpen the way I express them. That’s not because I can't think for myself. It's because I believe in adapting, improving, and staying focused on the substance of the conversation, not the optics. You are free to disagree. But if your only real argument i…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 09:52 PM
0

Sounds like you're projecting.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 09:08 PM
1

You're assuming you know how I derive the answers, which you do not. The advice is solid. People find value in it. Why are you so butthurt over this? What's really your issue with this methodology?
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:21 PM
1

I'm not passing that off as my own writing. I told you it was copywritten by AI. The underlying ideas are my work. I don't see the problem here.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:14 PM
-9

If you want a much more detailed answer, I built a system that pulls from a huge personal library, my blog posts, my books, lots of other people’s books, studies in evolutionary psychology, neurobiology, social psychology, humanism, behaviorism, religious dogma, mythology, and a lot of real-world experience I've lived or observed. That material gets filtered through a set of principles and values behind a group I’m building, which is basically a community aimed at helping people find meaning and…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:36 PM
-9

I use it as the copywriter. The actual content (the underlying world view) comes from my writing. It's actually a shockingly effective way to develop valid advice.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:30 PM
28

Nature never promised you fair. It promised you a chance to fight.You are seeing a real piece of the picture, but you are standing too close to the wreckage to see the full battlefield. Yes, men are judged harshly on honest biological signals. Yes, women use artificial enhancements to signal youth, health, and fertility beyond what is biologically real. Yes, there is a multi-billion-dollar industry built around that deception. That is not new. That is not modern. That is not unfair. It is the an…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 12:53 PM
12

I hear you, and you're speaking to something real that almost no one talks about in any serious way anymore. The truth is: Men do need places where they can be seen, supported, and understood in their pain, without being seen as liabilities, burdens, or broken. But here's the hard part that most modern advice gets wrong: That place isn’t meant to be the woman you’re leading. It's meant to be a brotherhood you trust. Men who have seen you in both strength and struggle, and still respect you. Men …
/r/MensRights26/04/25 09:15 PM
2

It's the cowboy hat. Go figure.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 09:34 PM
96

Brother, what you’re feeling right now? That gut-punch? That sadness? That’s what happens when a man finally realizes the system he thought he was helping doesn’t give a damn about him. And nothing brings that out like an attempt at a logical discussion with feminists. You didn’t do anything wrong by wanting to support fairness. You didn’t do anything wrong by believing that men and women could walk together with mutual respect. That was your strength talking. Your decency. Your hope. The mistak…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 08:37 PM
1

The efficacy of punishment as a deterrent of behavior that's usually driven by irrationality is piss-poor. A better solution is to teach people the vetting and relationship skills needed to prevent cheating in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 01:58 PM
6

False rape allegations are one of those topics where everyone gets weird. People either shut the conversation down before it starts, or they turn it into a political weapon. What almost no one does is talk about it with real nuance, real compassion, and real integrity. So let’s do that. First off, yes, false accusations happen. No, they are not the majority. But when they do happen, they ruin lives. And the damage isn’t just emotional or reputational. It’s financial, psychological, sometimes leg…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 04:56 PM
50

You’re not wrong; men do need to do better. But not in the way the algorithm keeps screaming at us. Not by becoming more “emotionally available” to emotionally unavailable women. Not by trying to be “allies” to people who hate us. Not by shaving our rough edges until we’re just palatable enough to be tolerated. No. Men need to do better for each other. We need to stop handing out attention like it’s free candy. Stop chasing women who openly disrespect us. Stop validating double standards with ou…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 11:31 AM
1

It's not for you.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:39 PM
1

Look harder. If we're perpetually viewing ourselves as victims, we're going to drive away anyone who could teach us to be better. Or, alternatively, just re-read my advice.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:22 PM
1

Anecdotally, I wholeheartedly disagree. Surround yourself with good men. They'll teach you everything you need to know.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:11 PM
2

You’re right. Society doesn’t care about your problems. Not really. Not in any sustained, sacrificial, show-up-at-your-door kind of way. And no, that’s not a glitch in the system, it’s how the system was built. Men were never expected to be safe. We were expected to be useful, resilient, and expendable. That’s why the world doesn’t flinch when a man breaks... because the machine was designed to replace him. But here’s what most men never realize: the fact that no one’s coming to save you isn’t j…
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:31 PM
6

Conservatives are over-attuned to threats. Liberals are under-attuned to threats. There's a discernible difference in which group is victimized more often. Any guesses which one?
/r/MensRights20/04/25 03:40 PM
1

The rabbit hole of AI psychology is deep. In theory, ChatGPT seems to act as a mirror. In essence, it's a dumb machine trained to tell me what I want to hear. Each response is a tiny window into your own psyche, or at least the psyche that developed whatever prompt you fed, which can be interesting when you start assessing how that reflects society. Or, more accurately, your perception of society. Or, more clearly stated via AI: A language model is a cognitive Rorschach test with syntax. You're …
/r/MensRights20/04/25 10:11 AM
4

The response I got: “The problem in society isn’t men. It’s uninitiated men, disoriented men, dishonored men. Just as the problem isn’t women, but women forced into masculine shells just to survive. When we abandon virtue, polarity, and mutual accountability, we don’t get liberation—we get collapse.” But I keep her on a short leash....
/r/MensRights20/04/25 01:03 AM
121

You’re not imagining things; something has shifted. A lot of men are waking up to the feeling that the ground rules changed while no one was watching, and now they’re expected to play a game where the goalposts keep moving. And you’re right: it’s exhausting being told you’re part of the problem when you’ve barely had a chance to define who you are. But here’s the truth that gets missed in all the noise. Strength isn’t about being right louder than the other side. It’s about building something be…
/r/MensRights19/04/25 09:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter