TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Firm_Effective967 Archive

View 1 post and 37 comments by Firm_Effective967 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Did you just excuse rape to say the victim paying the person who raped them it supports the child? You realize the rape victim is being forced to pay money TO THEIR RAPIST. Does that not sound absolutely insane???? Should the rapist not be in jail???? The fact you even have the confidence to say that is astounding I’m shocked That’s the equivalent to saying if someone killed you your family would have to pay your killer, does that sound right to you???
/r/MensRights29/11/25 05:42 AM
2

Gold pill is when you take a gold supplement for it’s vitamin benefits
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 12:03 AM
4

Where did you find this post with these comments
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:14 AM
7

Mammals can’t produce through parthenogenesis, so it’s impossible to naturally have all female, what’s funny though is if we were most other species that don’t have XX XY chromosomes and instead ZZ ZW if they wanted to reproduce through parthenogenesis it would result in all male offspring since males are ZZ
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:14 AM
9

They say patriarchy caused inbreeding but want the #1 recipe to create rapid inbreeding and death of humanity
/r/MensRights19/11/25 03:12 AM
1

People voted for Biden because he wasn’t trump, people voted for trump because they didn’t like Biden and Kamala is a carbon copy of Biden, and Zionism isn’t popular (despite trump also being a Zionist). The old senile president thing is kind of being phased out though, it seems it’s going to be JD vs Newsom in 2028 both of which are comparatively not old for US presidents in recent times
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 10:18 AM
1

The answer to the question is all of those are majority held by women, you saying because the US hasn’t had a female president means it’s 100% patriarchal is ridiculous, you can take a look at recent elections to see there are no longer any barriers to women in the US job wise, Kamala did not win because she was a bad candidate, not because she was a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 09:55 AM
0

It isn’t tied to misogyny it’s tied to her being a terrible Zionist genocide supporting candidate and non-progressive who was a copy-paste of Biden. If a good female candidate actually ran they’d win, a progressive one, not one with zero actual policy complicit in a genocide and with increasingly conservative policy agenda proposals, she would not have been competent, literally just better than trump is all she would have been, just like Biden was. Tell me, who are the majority of tertiary educa…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 07:33 AM
0

Because it doesn’t make any sense for a matriarchal system to be centered around men, women do not want to appease or make things easier or make more advantages for men, the difference of the genders make men enable gynocentric culture to feel like they’re protecting and helping women, that doesn’t exist in the inverse, it’s like asking why women aren’t taller and stronger than men. Androcentric culture can only exist outside of a system of rule by women
/r/MensRights08/11/25 06:57 AM
1

It is the impossible concept out of those, androcentric patriarchy definitely can and has existed, gynocentric patriarchy can and does exist, gynocentric matriarchy hasn’t really existed or if it did it was extremely small scale, but it aligns with the connotations of the system, but androcentric matriarchy is impossible and contradictory entirely.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 02:27 AM
0

Cmon, at least get better comebacks. Doesn’t even make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 12:39 AM
8

If you were happy you wouldn’t be yapping about it on Reddit lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 07:29 AM
5

The Reddit report/help form https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
/r/EverydayMisandry12/10/25 04:26 PM
6

lol. Are you serious? The UK is probably the most vehemently and overtly radically anti-male country on earth, I have never seen a country that hates its people Nordic countries like Sweden Finland Norway Iceland etc are bad too. The US is better on these things. They arent forcing innocent young boys to watch some Netflix made propaganda of how they’re evil. Some Eastern European countries are more conservative but still see men as cannon fodder. South Korea, China, and Japan are three states t…
/r/MensRights10/10/25 11:46 PM
2

Fetishes are extensions of human sexuality, sexuality is kept in the brain, humans brains evolve and so does sexuality as a component of it, animals have a more basic sexuality a primal one, human fetishes aren’t evolutions but are results of the higher complexity for learning and context. I had strikingly similar attractions to femboys watching sissy hypno except the femboy is wearing a chastity cage, and am wondering if I’m watching the same porn as you, but that’s exactly beside the point, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:28 AM
0

Again, benign traits aren’t proof evolution isn’t real. What’s the purpose of the appendix? Does it mean we didn’t evolve? Does it contradict human physical evolution because we have things that are benign or useless in the body? No. Gay people obviously aren’t useless whatsoever I’m basically one myself, but my point is homosexuality is natural and exists because attraction and sexuality isn’t binary, same sex attraction is not harmful to evolution, and so it stays, however it’s a minority of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:11 AM
0

Explain homosexuality and fetishes? I myself am pretty gay, evolution does not get rid of things that are benign or non harmful, homosexuality is natural because human sexuality isn’t a binary thing, I’d suffice that ‘everyone is a little gay’ isn’t correct but that more people are not straight than they let on. Fetishes are created from socialization and upbringing and or psychological trauma, or neurological disorders. None of these contradict what I said, people with fetishes and gay people s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 08:58 AM
-1

If physical attraction wasn’t key and genetic beauty and or handsomeness was not part of it, humans would all be disabled mutated sickly and have died off a long long long time ago along with all the other extinct animals that did so. We can surpass nature sure I’m not saying we can’t, but the biological evolutionary reality that isn’t dystopian or bad, why do you think some areas are sexual? Why do you think heterosexual males prefer the buttocks and breasts and hips? They signal fertility with…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 08:43 AM
1

I have autism and can’t tell if you’re being genuinely serious or being facetious/sarcastic/tongue in cheek, I really hope you are though because if you’re not then Jesus Christ
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 08:38 AM
0

They don’t really exist according to most anthropologists, when I google it or or ask ChatGPT they give me similar responses that those societies are misinterpreted as matriarchal but aren’t
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 08:37 AM
3

Reddit CEO (and other social media companies) are testifying before congress on extremist content, I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re quickly banning a lot of extreme or hateful “fetish” communities before the hearing, especially more I guess what would be considered “woke” extremism
/r/EverydayMisandry09/10/25 07:55 AM
2

Report the subreddits in a report help form for violating TOS, if enough people do they’ll be reviewed and possibly banned
/r/MensRights09/10/25 07:17 AM
1

So you’re a homophobe and a pseudoscientist fedora wearer
/r/MensRights07/10/25 02:31 AM

That sounds unethical, and doesn’t account for non-heterosexual and non cisgender people. It’s also dystopian.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 05:07 AM
8

Patriarchy refers to men so it is men, it’s a gendered term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 09:30 AM
1

He literally has access to the best lawyers on the planet, he could buy the top law firms in the world if he wanted to, he could buy the prison he’d be sent to, he has such vast resources he could hire as many of the top lawyers on earth as he wanted to defend him. This doesn’t apply to average men or even millionaires, but billionaire men are practically immune to being criminally persecuted ever. He could 100% receive a presidential or governor pardon if nothing else worked, bribing the govern…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 02:13 AM
0

I think he’s referring to amazons like an all women society separate from men, which is equally as unrealistic but not the same as one with women and men. Gender separatism isn’t the same always. But many many many people want a gender separated society or one where women are totally dominating and enslaving men politically financially economically power wise etc (especially 4b and radfem women)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:24 AM
3

You said it was a step in the right direction, maybe it was poorly worded and you meant recognizing class was a step in the right direction instead
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 09:51 AM
1

No. The UK did not become a matriarchy because Margaret thatcher was elected, nor when any of the historical queens ruled. Iceland has a female PM and president but a 51% male parliament, are they a full patriarchy? That isn’t how these systems work it is rule by a gender but it’s more nuanced than simply 51%
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 08:48 AM
0

Males are all the geniuses and inventors and great rulers, they’re also most of the criminals and failures and idiots, that’s high variability. Women are kind of just in the middle average not at either extreme, average men of course edit in good quantity but not the same as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 09:36 AM
3

Violence against women means all men are evil we need a matriarchy and to take men’s rights away and the Y chromosome is a mark of the devil. Violence against men is mocked made fun of seen as a casual normal thing or that the attacker was defending themselves (especially if the attacker was a woman).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 11:15 PM
37

This has been happening for a long time, look at news articles 4 or 5 or 6 years ago where they were basically calling for totally stripping men’s rights autonomy and humanity (not an exaggeration by the way) the UK is a deeply, deeply disturbed nation worse than any other I can think of on earth in terms of this kind of extreme vitriolic unending hate towards men that only seems to get worse, it’s a nightmarish mix of gynocentric culture domination institutional anti maleness and incentives for…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 11:05 AM

Probably because they want equality? Patriarchy nor matriarchal are solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:22 AM
13

Yes if male education rates and employment rates that lead to white collar jobs does not increase and start going back to parity and sustainable numbers it will be kind of over. The forcing and massive push for men to go into back breaking manual labor and blue collar work (and inverse for women to go into cushy office jobs) instead of higher education or white collar prestigious jobs or even just regular office jobs is a massive issue that is much much more urgent than almost any other problem …
/r/MensRights31/08/25 02:40 PM
2

It 100% is productive, men DONT need women, the LESS men feel the NEED for women the more men will benefit. MGTOW is the only course of action left, being a pathetic incel who moans all day about no gf is infinitely worse and more likely to lead to idolization and simping and worship of women than MGTOW which is the right path. More and more women do WGTOW and 4b, men need their own 4b and to use MGTOW, men need to succeed on their own be independent and be sustainable for themselves, chasing su…
/r/MensRights30/08/25 02:27 AM
12

Only support and shop at male owned businesses, exclusively only hire male workers and employees, only go to baby showers if the baby is a boy, only help other men out, give promotions to male employees exclusively, only be polite to other men. Only listen to male musicians, only consume male made art, only watch media made by men. Kinda /s but not really atp with what I’ve seen with radfems (If you think this is extreme rhetoric it is and has been posted exactly like this on radical feminist su…
/r/MensRights30/08/25 02:10 AM
1

Women have been up for that since the beginning, if they could they 100% would move to that kind of society. However, the concerning part is men beginning to support it, if men do that that’s the concerning part.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 03:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter