TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fizzer_XCIV Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by Fizzer_XCIV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The ideal version would have everyone in so many boxes that, while everyone has an equal amount of boxes, the differences are so negligible as to disappear from even a short distance... Feminism is a dystopian future where people would have at most 2 boxes. I want everyone to have hundreds. Vote for me this coming election.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:01 AM
2

That's the whole point of tickling... it's be no fun at all the the person wanted it. Siblings do "non-consentual" stuff all the time to each other. Stepping on the backs of shoes. Randomly taking things from each other's hands just to be a dick. Touching with the intent to annoy. Not quite touching and saying "im not touching you" with the Intent to annoy. Repeating everything they say with the I tent to annoy. Taller one putting things out of reach of the shorter one. Tickle torture. Ect....
/r/MensRights12/09/16 06:39 AM
30

Murder victims don't remember either... wtf.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:45 PM
1

Nah. I don't think of "noob" itself as an insult. If you are a new person in a game, you are a noob, and most everyone, noobs included, can agree on that. Its just slang for 'inexperienced, new person'. It's just the gamers equivalent of " greenhorn". I can be used in an insult though. Things like "What a useless noob.", or "That fucking noob just lost the match because he sucks." comes to mind... It's especially insulting to use the word to describe someone who is not a noob. The word itself, w…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:53 PM
1

Give me an example.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 04:11 PM
1

It realy doesn't matter whether it applies anymore. That's not going to make it somehow go away. There are many instincts that we needed thousands of years ago don't apply anymore, and this is just another one of them. And just like all the others, there is almost nothing we can do about it except wait for evolution to naturally get rid of it. Whether you like it or not, males will continue to be naturally protective of females. Saying that males should just stop being protective of females is l…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:36 PM
9

No, its almost certainly genetic. Almost certainly instinct. Humans are social creatures. We gather into groups. Communities. The most valuable members of a community is always the females, and the children. You need females to sustain population, but you only need one male(this will lead to genetic defects,but the population will still manage. This is why males have almost always been the fighters throughout history. They are expendable. If a community loses 90% of its males, it can bounce back…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:32 PM
34

Wow. She perfectly explained why I think females should not be in ground based combat roles... at all. Let them fly. Let them captain a ship. Let them perform logistics work... but keep their boots clean. Whether the PC crowd likes it or not, females in combat unwillingly, and of no fault of their own, put others in danger. Apparently females make better UAV pilots anyways? Or something like that... That's great. If this is true, then females should dominate that role. The military is for effici…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:24 PM
1

No you dont! :p
/r/MensRights11/01/16 10:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter