TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FlapjackFreddie Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by FlapjackFreddie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This just shows the breakdown by sexual orientation. The highest rate is F on F and the M/F and F/M rate is very close. I don't know where someone found that F/M is the highest. This also shows that gay men have the lowest rate of DV. It's not a perfect source for SirSkeptic's claims, but it backs up two of four.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:23 PM
4

Here ya go. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/2010_soreport.html
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:33 AM
13

If we're so terrible, you'd think they could just let our words and actions speak for us. Instead, they have to make stuff up and fight to keep people from listening to us.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 08:52 PM
3

I guess it depends on whether you believe men receive too harsh punishments or if women receive too light punishments. I think the answer is, as it almost always is, somewhere in the middle.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 05:40 PM
3

Call it whatever you want, there are clear cultural differences between "races" and a clear difference in how each "race" is treated by society. Black men get an even shorter end of the stick than white men. Just because you might be race-blind that doesn't mean the rest of society is.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 05:19 PM
2

http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/20mhr6/hold_everything_something_sensible_just_happened/
/r/MensRights18/03/14 05:13 PM
7

And anything that is centered around one's gender is sexist. Right? Why have men's rights and not just rights?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:45 PM
7

Most definitely. I was just giving some examples, not making any judgments on any of the info.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:37 PM
14

Men of all colors are more likely to get harsher sentences than women. Black men are more likely to get harsher sentences than white men. Boys graduate from almost every level (possibly every level now) of education than girls. This stat is worse for black boys. Men are more likely to be stopped by police, more so for black men. I think suicide rates and workplace injuries are higher for white men, but I doubt much else is.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:02 PM
9

We had a post yesterday about a 21 year old guy having sex with a 13 year old girl. There was a decent split between people who thought the guy was terrible and people who thought he wasn't in the wrong. The latter make people furious and hurt the credibility of this sub.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:38 PM
12

I believe this is called confirmation bias. People believe what they want to believe and they tend to only see what supports that belief.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:36 PM
22

Being black amplifies pretty much every issue faced by men, so it's definitely an important thing to consider. White men still suffer from the same stuff, just to a lesser degree.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:33 PM
2

Not once did I say that I want him in the room.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:07 AM
1

Read the rest of my comments on the topic. I don't want the father to be allowed in the room with her. I simply believe that he should be notified of labor. I'm not debating my reasoning again, so feel free to read the rest of my comments.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:21 PM
1

I know we're discussing this in two places, but I should reiterate the fact that the responsibility would fall on the hospital, not the laboring mother. The rule would include a clause about notification being within a reasonable time. The first priority is safety of mother and child. If there's an emergency and the child is born before the hospital has time to notify the father, then that's fine.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:54 PM
1

Not everyone who disagrees is a troll. I don't think my arguments are so ludicrous. I'm fine with not being notified about abortions, I'm fine not being in the room during birth, but I do think the father has a right to know when labor starts.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:49 PM
1

Again, you wouldn't have to release all of the information. Contact #1 "your child is on its way." Contact #2 "false alarm." That could be the extent of it. If the child dies during childbirth, before being completely born, would you tell the father?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:38 PM
-3

we are saying that the father has the right to access medical information about the woman who carries his fetus, without her consent We're really not though. Limit the scope of the rule to "a father has the right to know when labor begins." That's all you'd have to do. This is definitely not that slippery a slope. Note that I also don't believe that a guy has the right to be informed if his partner has an abortion I don't believe he has a right to know. I do believe a good partner would tell the…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:16 PM
-6

I would disagree. I can't think of a good reason to not notify the father of labor. It being a medical procedure for the mother isn't enough for me.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:01 PM
6

Do you really think that gay people are created by fathers letting their kids play with dolls?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:22 PM
6

Do you actually believe that dolls contribute to pregnancy rates?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:20 PM
6

For playing with dolls or for being a dad?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:19 PM
15

They also joked about the fact that he was a virgin.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:28 PM
3

Ideally, we'd rethink our approach. That doesn't seem to be very popular though.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:05 PM
7

Debt isn't the best term for it. The point of prison is to punish, rehabilitate and protect. If they've done their time and taken their punishment, then they should get their rights back.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:54 PM
0

That is what the person you responded to is talking about.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:32 PM
1

I think the point is more about a situation where the drunk person is barely capable of walking. If someone basically drags them to the bathroom in that state to have sex with them, then it's rape. The drunk person isn't making any decisions. They're not making any actions. They simply are too drunk to fight off their rapist.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:26 PM
1

Totally agree.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 09:21 PM
1

I mostly meant that they deserved to be treated with respect.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:39 PM
1

I've always argued that you can have a person who feels like a victim, who deserves respect, without having a rapist. Sometimes things happen and you feel terrible and violated, even if someone didn't actively set out to do so.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:26 PM
18

It would be rape if the guy knew she was too drunk to understand she was consenting, and if he was sober enough to consent. Many people black out without appearing to be blacked out.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:20 PM
14

I'd rather us not use the argument that it wasn't rape because he was smaller than her. I definitely wouldn't want the same argument to be used against a guy if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 05:48 PM
1

There's more to war than front-line combat soldiers. People who aren't "young, able-bodied men" can do those other jobs. This always kind of bothers me. Something about the fact that men join the military and get stuck on the front line while women join and get safe desk jobs.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 05:47 AM
26

This is my biggest issue with groups like SRS. They're mostly made up of guys who haven't dealt with any of the stuff we talk about. They cant relate to men who really need help. Because of that, they only see women as potential victims and men as potential criminals.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:29 PM
1

That was great. Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:19 PM
5

Of course we are. Most of us aren't naked on TV every week though. She does this thing that seems strange (shows up naked in her show on a regular basis doing mundane stuff), then gets offended when she's asked about it. Now everyone seems to be jumping on this guy for asking about the strange thing. It makes no sense.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:55 PM
10

The whole point seems to be that it's totally normal to be naked, even in unsexy situations. The question was fine. The problem is that everyone seems to be on the defensive when any woman is asked anything about her body.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:15 PM
7

She's also naked doing relatively mundane stuff. The nudity clearly isn't meant to be attractive to the audience. It's not hot. The nudity in GoT is intended to be hot to the audience. That's where the question comes in. Now, these are the headlines built after the question by other sites. Lena Dunham, star of HBO's 'Girls,' sharply defends her plus-sized nude scenes: Agree? Lena Dunham Slammed By Reporter For Flaunting Her Naked Body ... Girls' producers in uproar over question involving Lena D…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:00 PM
4

This is true in some states/countries. They typically use "sexual assault" or some other word to describe what happens to men. In some places, it's just impossible for a man to be considered the victim of a sexual crime.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 10:12 PM
3

But it already is involved. There are tons of government enforced benefits to being married. I can understand not liking the concept, but I at least want the benefits to be available to everyone.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:09 PM
4

I tried to explain this to someone the other day. They basically asked why we don't have subgroups for lgbt and trans people. My explanation was simply that we support men who face issues as men. Everyone is welcome, but we don't focus on issues that are unique to groups for reasons outside of their gender.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:01 PM
2

Why don't you support it?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:52 PM
5

I watched a friend of mine go through this. He spent somewhere between 10-20k in court fighting for just 50/50 custody. He's a professional that works hard and clearly cares about his kid. His wife was a drug addict that brought felons around her daughter and regularly abused my friend. This was all in the court records. He still had to fight. In the end he has 50/50 custody and pays minimal child support.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:08 PM
20

1 in 2 women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. 1 in 3 will be raped. No men will be assaulted or raped. Women are also more likely to be victims of other violent crime. Men can go about their lives without worrying about violence. No matter how crazy the above information sounds, people still eat it up. Many women live in a constant state of fear. They will be a victim of something in their lifetime. They're also told that unless they were completely sober, initiating the contact, and …
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:47 PM
8

He has paranoia issues. Properly disposing of condoms is understandable and should be encouraged. The rubbing alcohol is overkill, to me
/r/MensRights03/12/13 07:19 PM
5

The risk is just so high. I trust my girlfriend to get an abortion, but I still use a condom instead of the pull - out method because I just can't risk her getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 07:14 PM
1

Something is extremely fishy about this whole thing. If he can prove that he's the father, then he'll get custody. No court is going to allow an adoption to go through when the father has clearly demonstrated a desire and ability to care for the child. If he has an attorney, then he needs to get a new one. If he doesn't have one, then he needs to get one. Even if the adoption goes through, the father will be able to get his kid back from them once paternity is established. If he has signed anyth…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:49 PM
1

not expand it to include a college girl's boyfriend. You mean the father? He's the father of the kid. He has just as many parental rights as she does.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:37 PM
2

The argument here seems to be that white men are racist because they want to date outside of their race. The mental gymnastics that came with this study are just astounding.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:11 PM
9

It's not a feminist conspiracy, but one of the main rules of feminism seems to be that women are always the victims, or at least the victims most of the time. Some women are just frightened all the time. They fear that they're going to be attacked at any moment. In reality, they're far less likely to be attacked than the men they're afraid of.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 04:33 PM
10

Both are killed more by men. It makes sense to consider that, but when people talk about who is more often a victim, it's men.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:03 PM
1

One of the main examples of racism in Western society is how black men are treated by police and courts. It's amazing how often people discuss this without ever realizing how sexist the system really is.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:50 PM
1

People get away with a lot of scummy behavior because of poorly written rules.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:53 PM
1

It's still pretty scummy, especially considering the history of the Beastie Boys. They need to wait for consenting artists, instead of using a court to enforce their wrongdoing.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:26 PM
2

You could. I'm not sure how that changes anything here.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 10:34 PM
0

32 upvotes in a sub of more 70k hardly makes a hate movement.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 09:00 PM
9

Can someone post a screenshot?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 05:37 PM
12

It's 1 in 3 now. Get it right.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 02:34 PM
4

there's a concerted effort among men's rights activist groups to push for horribly sexist laws and social programs in the name of 'men's rights.' I would love to see an example of a horribly sexist law or social program that MRAs fight for.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:14 PM
3

Most stuff out there is on general contract law, which is what people usually reference when they talk about consent - "well, you can't sign a contract while drunk." There are cases that apply the same logic to rape cases. Just do some googling and it shouldn't be hard to find.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:08 AM
11

In criminal proceedings, it only negates consent when the person is basically unconscious. Otherwise, the drunken consent is legally valid. Only feminists and nice guy allies consider drunk women to have zero control over their drunk mistakes.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 11:36 PM
16

Slut shaming and body shaming from an SRSer. Say it ain't so. Cool. No one wants your gross penis anywhere near them anyway.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 01:56 PM
7

I was banned from SRSDiscussion today for this comment: The only times we're against safe haven laws is when the mother can drop off a kid without naming the father. It takes away the father's right to consent to the abandonment. The same is true in adoption. We want fathers to have the right to oppose adoption of their child. In response to: MRAs are against safe haven laws, but I forget why. I'm sure it's really because I post here and in SRSSucks but shouldn't they be willing to listen to oth…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:23 AM
1

I can agree with that, job gap would be a better term. I recognize that women typically make less (not for equal work), that's what I mean by accepting the wage gap. But, job gap is better.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:04 PM
3

He explains that under the old law, biological dads who had kids from extramarital affairs had absolutely no standing. Now, dads who did not know the women with whom they were involved, was married do have legal rights to a child born out of an affair. You're totally right. The law is still ridiculous, but it does seem like this is narrowing the focus, not broadening it. It seems like the guy in the story is challenging the new law because it still bars bio dads who knew they were part of an aff…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:15 PM
8

These types of laws have been abolished in most states. It blows my mind that Michigan, instead, is expanding them. Disgraceful. Edit: See the below comment. The law is being narrowed. It's still an abomination.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:19 PM
5

I have no idea what that thread is about.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 04:57 PM
9

But, don't forget that feminism is for men too. All of those issues you guys face can be addressed by feminism. They'll totally be taken seriously and not be mocked. /s
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:45 PM
1

I consider the choices we make, based on our gender, to be issues. I think a large part of why women end up being paid less is because they choose jobs with more flexibility, such as teaching. I don't consider that a viable job choice for men. It should be though. The split in education should be 50/50, but for some reason teaching is an extremely risky job for men. I'd also like to get past the notion that men should be providers. We should be able to make choices for ourselves without feeling …
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:25 PM
6

Anytime men's issues get brought up in feminist circles the response is either a dismissal through "what about the menz," some variation of mansplaining, or the patriarchy. I support feminism as a movement for equality but most vocal feminists take it to an extreme that I'm extremely uncomfortable supporting. That makes it very difficult for me to say that I support feminism as a whole. There are no valid women's issues or rights that we oppose. Equal pay for women, we want that. We disagree wit…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:15 AM
17

I can guarantee that it would not receive a positive reaction. I know that guys who put any type of weight requirement end up receiving a lot of hate.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:49 AM
2

I was responding to your comment about adoption and safe haven being controlled by both parents. It's only controlled by both parents if the father is informed, which happens less often than it should. I think that forcing people to name a father for the child at birth would carry even worse consequences. Other than child support what would be worse consequences? It seems like common sense that both parents should be named on a birth certificate.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:48 AM
3

The problem is that most states allow for the mother to leave the father space blank on the birth certificate. All it takes is "I don't know who the father is" and she can put the child up for adoption or abandon it. Many conversations have taken place in 2X on the topic of not telling the father or putting his name on the birth certificate. The top response is almost always "that's your choice."
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:20 AM
19

The 80% stat is really interesting. I remember when I started online dating. I signed up for match.com and deleted my account later that day. Every woman that was remotely attractive had a 5'11" height requirement. It didn't matter how tall they were. If they were 5'0" they had the height requirement. I did have a lot of luck, and eventually met my girlfriend, on okcupid. I had a friend experiment with online dating and it was a disaster for her. She would probably fall under the 4th or 5th girl…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:08 AM
0

I rarely see anyone mentioning even just a few items on that list. I would be shocked if anyone held more than few of those as true beliefs.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:39 AM
9

The problem with this situation is that this person believes that every problem in the world is by the patriarcy. I've just gotten to the point of saying "fine, I don't care what you call it as long as you recognize that men are also disadvantaged." Then list out a counter to each problem she mentioned. My biggest issue with patriarchy theory is that it's used as a crutch for being bigoted toward men. If the issue is something women face, then the issue will be addressed by feminism. If it's a m…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:09 PM
1

I'm glad we had this talk. I actually refer to you on occasion when I talk about level headed feminists. I have an alt that you had a discussion with some time ago about men's issues.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:59 PM
3

I can appreciate that. I'm sure it sucks growing up with a parent who doesn't really care. It doesn't really impact my belief that child support shouldn't be so high. The most rights a child has (outside of those that adults have) are to be supported by their parents until they're able to fend for themselves. That doesn't mean they have a right to their parent's fortune. It just means that they need enough support to survive, or possibly enough to live an average life.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:50 PM
3

To the child support? I mean, seeing as he's not paying anything, I can only assume the exes are contributing all the child support. I mean the guy is supposed to be putting in $60k, which is already more than he should be paying. How much are the mothers putting in? I imagine somewhere similar. If that's the case then you have $120k just covering kids. It's more money than necessary. Some people have a certain standard of living and others don't. So who gets to decide which standard of living t…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:17 PM
2

The fees make up about half I think. That means that the exes should be contributing as well. It's just overkill. I think child support should be based on what's necessary for the kids, not his income or his potential income.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:44 PM
5

Kids don't cost $120k per year for the vast majority of people. If the amount had. been reasonable then he might have paid it.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:31 PM
6

This is all subjective. You see not bankrupting yourself to support your kids as selfish. Many of us do not see it the same way.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:53 PM
3

I think its unfair to the kid too. This is the same logic that's used to force men to pay child support for hanging out with a single mom for a year or two. I want this to be about choice. He chose to give up his rights as a father early on. It would be great if the mother would give him visitation rights though. It's pretty fucked up if she doesn't.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:21 AM
3

You have no problem with the gender wage gap. But you hate having to pay for dates. It's not that we don't have a problem with it. It's that people who argue in favor of it mislead people to believe that it's as simple as "Women make $.75 per dollar men make for equal work." You insist that it’s a scientifically proven fact that men are stronger than women. But you complain about society believing that it’s worse for a man to hit a woman than for a woman to hit a man. It is scientifically proven…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:11 AM
9

This is technically the way that I'd want this kind of case to go. They agreed that he wouldn't be involved and he's not involved. I'd just also like it to be applied where child support is involved. I doubt it would be, but I maintain hope.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:13 AM
4

Could it be that she's not really giving it up for adoption and is seeking my waiver of interest just to get me to give up any rights so that she can keep it for herself without my input? Definitely. You'd lose any right to custody, but she'd maintain her rights to child support. It's a win-win for her and her attorney. Assuming that she has given the child up for adoption, am I obligated to waive my interest or can I just not pursue the matter while not waiving interest? Kind of like just letti…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter