TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Flasteria Archive

View 0 posts and 120 comments by Flasteria on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

During my time in the Army I meet many different men from many different backgrounds. The number of people who fit the "dudebro" stereotype that this video is trying to paint as the norm is incredibly low. And this is in the Army, which by it's very nature should have seen a far higher concentration of "dudebro" and "toxic masculinity" than another comparable group of men. It's almost as if these people have no concept of what reality is actually like.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 04:13 PM
13

Because "no one would lie about rape".
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:57 PM
2

The income gap is not the problem though. Would it be better that poor people earn less than the do now, provided the income gap were smaller? Of course not. The problem is that the average household income has not increased at a rate equal to inflation.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 12:46 AM
0

I agree. It looks "ok" and I might decide to watch it but it's nothing I'll be rushing to see on day 1. It seems people on both sides of the argument are heating each other up and turning another non-issue into an internet problem.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:57 PM
1

I admit that people do not like some authority figure demanding they follow some set of rules. Nobody likes a Dictator. But people do have a tendency towards following a figure that represents something they agree with. It's interesting that you would pick a cult leader. I would point to religion in general. Religion tells people what to believe and how to behave. And it's very successful on a global scale. If people, by nature, hate being told what to think, why I religion so successful?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:55 PM
1

I'm not trying to silence your differing point. I'm not trying to attack you or discredit you. I'm simply explaining why I disagree. That is the difference.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:17 AM
1

No worries, take all the time you need. I check in every day or so.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:11 AM
2

I do believe that there are people out there who are essentially egalitarian but wear the label of feminism. Sadly I do have to agree with you. Most who call themselves "feminist" seem to be far too focused on proven lies.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:10 AM
1

People like to be told what to think. They like to follow the crowd and attack any outside opinion. Whether the subject is religion, race, nationality or gender. It's always the same. People would rather shut down others than admit that they might be wrong. The would rather live in ignorance than allow someone to actually make a valid point that challenges their precious view of reality.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:48 AM
1

Anti-feminist is not a very helpful name. People automatically think of misogyny. That's not going to help the movement gain any traction. People have a tendency to completely ignore those they see as opposition. Feminists like Christina Hoff-Summers, those who actually are seeking equality for everybody, are what I consider to be true feminists. Sadly it is the very loud and obnoxious people, like Sarkeesian, who are the most well known. And it is people like Sarkeesian who have completely ruin…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:35 AM
7

I used to really enjoy reading cracked. Things like this are exactly why I stopped. I am fine with this movie being related to the previous two. Not so much with it being a remake, and that has nothing to do with who is in the lead roles.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:04 AM
2

It is complete hypocrisy. And most sane people realize this. Unfortunately many feminists and politicians don't. This reinforces the perspective that men are agents who act and women are objects who are acted upon. Jake cannot be raped because Josie cannot act. It just reinforces the victim mentality that feminism claims to oppose so strongly. Anyone who advocates for true equality would denounce this clearly sexist practice. Unfortunately instead of that it becomes law to reinforce this insanit…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 12:58 AM
1

I don't know about the UK, but in the US the father is assumed to have timeshare rights unless the mother can provide a reason why he shouldn't have them. Even if the father was broke, he could represent himself well enough to get SOME visitation, barring something like a felony conviction or proof of drug abuse, child abuse, etc. Yeah, that is true. Kind of. But he has to get the whole thing started. And in this case the woman is looking to get into a new house. She could easily hide her addres…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:57 AM
1

The article says she lives in the UK. I don't know the laws there but if they are similar to US she can't. However he would have to pay to pursue legal action against her. And there are, to my knowledge, no penalties for a mother who has custody disobeying any court orders regarding custody or visitation and just keeping the father out anyway.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:41 AM
2

This is incredibly selfish. All that matters to her is that she has a baby. If she actually cared about the baby itself she would not be cutting it of from the father for no reason whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:39 AM
5

No. Because we aren't insects. We have the ability to make decisions contrary to what our instincts tell us to do. But that does not remove the underlying compulsion for humans to act that way. And I'm aware that being homosexual is not making a choice against instincts. It's a difference in the brain and the way it processes chemicals. It's not a sin or unnatural, it's just not the way the "average" brain operates.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:11 PM
13

Patriarchy theory was devised by feminists who wanted to blame someone for what they felt was wrong with the modern world. You can't view the current world as an isolated experience, everything that exists is an extension of what happened in the past. Example, Similac has not always existed. Before formula there was only one way to feed infants. The mother had to feed them. And because the mother fed them she had to take care of them. And because we have a long, long history of women taking care…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:46 PM
2

Caveat. 50+% of everything good. No call for equality among Coal Miners.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:22 AM
1

People consider anything other than the accepted narrative to be wrong. And they often refuse to ever give it a chance. People like to believe what they are told by authority figures. Despite what people tend to believe, we are most definitely a pack species. And those below the "alpha" status of society prefer to believe what those on top tell them to.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:58 PM
2

In this day and age, it is heartening to see students like Airaksinen stand on the side of reason when it comes to the emotionally charged issue of campus sexual assault. It's not the fact that people intentionally leverage the emotional response to "rape" that is really terrifying. It's that so many people fall for it.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:43 PM
2

Absolutely. It's just a problem when politicians and laws disagree with facts.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 02:49 PM
3

Exactly. But progressives, including feminism, disagree.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 01:21 PM
2

Reality?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 01:16 PM
16

I agree with you. But feminism doesn't. Define man. By most progressive accounts (including feminism) being a man is a social construct. Having a penis does not make you a man. Feminists loudly support this idea. Therefore it is blatant hypocrisy for a feminist to support the idea that we can should pre-define the gender-identity of another based on genitalia alone. According to feminism this "man" was well within "his" rights to use whichever bathroom that "he" felt most comfortable in. Because…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 12:27 AM
4

It isn't considered "preferential treatment" because then yes, it would be unfair. Instead they think of it as giving women a chance to succeed, because the all-powerful patriarchy will not allow them to succeed without help.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 12:14 AM
5

Basically feminism and mainstream media say that MRA is misogyny. There are some points that MRAs pursue that are in direct opposition to feminism. They use this as proof that anyone who is MRA is anti-women. And everyone just takes it at face value. They also wrongly consider MRA, "Red Pillers" and PUAs to be exactly the same thing. And again everyone just takes it at face value.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:12 PM
1

Wow. Yup, you're right.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:21 PM
1

I tried to explain that using the word "survivor" is the wrong choice. You don't say someone is a mugging survivor, you say they got mugged. The response I get is "it's better than victim. It's empowering" which makes me wonder. Are women so sensitive that they can't describe things accurately without the need to feel empowered? Yes, technically you did survive. But that implies that you were in a huge risk of death. And that really isn't the case, in most circumstances.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:53 PM
1

Interesting. My information said 1979-1990. But yes, the point is she made it to that position because the people voted her there. Not because feminism made a stink about how it isn't fair that political office is not 50/50.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:49 PM
2

Circumcision?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:04 AM
2

Margaret Thatcher was the Prime Minister of England for 21 years. And she did that of her own merit, without the need for affirmative action. If she was able to reach that office without feminism, with the "patriarchy" fighting her every step of the way, what is stopping women from doing it today at a smaller level? Only their own choices.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:48 AM
2

Because women are oppressed they must be given advantages equal opportunity. Because men are not oppressed there is no such requirement.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:39 AM
1

In that regard I fully agree. Although it is similar it is not exactly the same. And because it is not the same it should not be called the same. But trying to classify anything that has already been classified as rape would likely be met with failure. I would imagine the typical response would be along the lines of "trivializing lived experiences" and such. There is already a very loud movement against the "rape culture" and I suspect that trying to classify things would only be adding fuel to …
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:32 AM
0

So you're asserting that men are disposable. That's something we're trying to get people to stop thinking. I don't like being compared to a fucking bathroom tissue. Neither do I. But it's a biologically programmed impulse. It isn't going away until people understand that we are naturally inclined to act in that way and take conscious steps away from it. And because that is how humanity has evolved to act it is considered horrendous to attack those most in need of protection.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:31 AM
1

If 99% of the women on the planet died overnight it would take quite some time before our population returned to it's current level. If 99% of men died overnight it would be possible (though perhaps not realistic) to return to our current population within a year. Legally it is worse to murder than to rape. But our species evolved to protect women because they are the limiting factor in reproduction. And so anything that threatens women is a threat to the species that must be dealt with. Despite…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:18 AM
2

Having sex with someone against their will is rape. This includes intentionally using illegal substances to circumvent their will. This does NOT include that person willingly drinking alcohol, being a conscious and willing participant, and then feeling regret and shame. The term rape is being overused, and applied to things that don't even qualify as rape. But because of the private nature of sex, and by extension rape, it's almost impossible to come up with any clear way to discern what actuall…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:08 AM
4

Suppose we have a class of 20 students, 10 boys and 10 girls. The teacher is told to describe the class to a superior. "The boys in my class love football". What does this mean about the girls? Because the teacher did not say "the boys and girls" many will assume that the girls do not love football, whether this is true or not. So whenever someone makes a statement aimed at only one group and neglects to mention the other it implies that the other group is not included in the statement. People c…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:57 PM
2

This whole thing seems oddly familiar.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:10 PM
2

If only all these college-age women weren't being taught the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:07 PM
2

If only all these college-age women weren't being taught the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:07 PM
5

Unfortunately society teaches us that what she did was exercise her right to her sexuality and, because he didn't respond the way she expected, he is clearly not a healthy, heterosexual male. After all, biologically speaking, it is men who pursue sex and women who allow sex. If a women is allowing sex, no "real man" would turn that down. Right?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:02 PM
6

No, it doesn't mean that it didn't happen. But it does mean that, if it DID happen, she is guilty of perjury. If perjury is enough to impeach a president then it's a serious offense.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:59 PM
1

Good point. For some reason I just wasn't sure.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 03:01 AM
3

It's just a shame that we can all agree than men are responsible for their own sobriety, yet women are incapable of making any decision after a single drink.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 02:34 AM
1

You do know that's a parody, right?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 02:30 AM
2

Oh that one. I'm guessing "a real man knows when he's had enough".
/r/MensRights21/02/16 02:27 AM
6

While this may be true it doesn't excuse the blatant disregard of the legal process that people are calling for. If I convince 30 people to accuse you of attempted murder, should we demand that everyone assume it to be true? Of course not, that would be insanity. Not saying it didn't happen, just saying that evidence is needed.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:55 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYtbWWmtVYM Rape is a political buzzword. If you give women an answer they accept you get their votes. And women are the majority of voters. Any politician would, logically, want the bigger number of votes. Loud, extreme feminists like Anita and "Red" stand up and demand that the government take action to protect women from whatever the new definition of rape is. And politicians, wanting the female vote, make it happen. She is not legally responsible because femin…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:52 PM
2

It's a shame when somebody get's downvoted for making a logical argument, especially here. The entire point in the link was from an "evolutionary point of view". And, from an evolutionary stand point, women do have it worse during pregnancy. After childbirth is another story.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 12:55 AM
2

Seems to me the people I actually want to be around are always libertarians.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:35 PM
1

I still think it's ridiculous that, in many instances, it is highly discouraged or illegal to ride a bike on the sidewalk. The potential damage that a bike can do to a walking pedestrian is nothing compared to what a car can do to a bicyclist.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:53 PM
5

(of a man) explain (something) to someone, typically a woman, in a manner regarded as condescending or patronizing. In other words, any time a male tries to tell a female that she doesn't understand something. In this clip she accuses him of mansplaining before he even says anything. And, ironically, she accuses him of this with a very condescending tone.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:43 PM
11

Sexual abuse includes unwanted sex, withholding sex, forced engagement in any sexual activity that frightens or hurts you, refusing to practice safe sex or preventing you from using birth control or making decisions about pregnancy/abortion.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:07 PM
3

This article leaves out a large amount of information. It makes no mention of motive. Although I'm sure we can be fairly sure that she decided to have the child against his wishes. Nor does it mention the fact that Misoprostol is medication used, among other things, to cause an abortion without surgical intervention. It is not poison. He did not poison her, he slipped her medication. Yes, it was a terrible idea and he should face legal consequences for it. But what other choice did he have? If s…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:15 AM
7

Glad to actually see a politician call out the hypocrisy. Even if she kept on insisting that she was in the right.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:58 AM
6

Not at all the point and nice try with the straw-man argument.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 02:19 AM
11

She didn't make it up. She was pressured by the patriarchy to say that she made it up so that the rape could be swept under the rug. Did you miss the memo? Seriously, it's ridiculous the lengths they will go to in order to excuse anything that women do wrong. Women admits rape never happened? Only because she was forced to lie by men.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:23 PM
2

Exhibit A: Margaret Thatcher.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:56 PM
2

Well I had been trying to get her to understand that being pro-one does not mean anti-another which had some progress. She agreed with many issues, like circumcision, family court and alimony, before I ever met her. But she had been to college and taught the whole patriarchy thing and held firmly onto that ideology for a long time. We had a long conversation one a road trip to Vegas a few years ago where I explained to her that most of what feminism blames on "patriarchy" is just the extension o…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 02:43 AM
3

My wife did, actually. Until I put it exactly like that. If being alive is really so bad you can change that. The fact that you don't proves you wrong. The real test? Say the same about rape. And then run for the hills, because pitchforks and torches are headed your way. And I don't mean actual rape. I mean the kind where the women is convinced afterwards that she must have been raped or she wouldn't feel so guilty and ashamed about it. I have complete sympathy for people who are victims of a cr…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:06 AM
2

The most important thing I got from this? I need to find out more about this Milo Yiannopoulos person. Surprised I haven't heard of him till now.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 12:55 AM
3

Oh god, that quote. My response? If being alive is so much worse than being dead why are you still alive? You can "fix the problem" very easily. Generally not received well. But the people that actually get what I'm trying to say tend to disagree with Hillary.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 12:10 AM
2

Just for reference, it took me 2 years before my wife finally understood that MRA is not the same as misogyny. The feminist narrative has labeled it as anti-women and therefore anyone who supports it must also be anti-women. Until you can get that idea out of their head you will never make any progress.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 12:07 AM
3

Not at all, it's just nice to see proof. Which most will write off. One of the comments basically said the only reason there were wars is because the OTHER rulers were male.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:48 PM
-3

See, this is why I say that there are some people on this planet that need to be cured of this condition called life. Her and the judge.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:46 AM
2

In an ideal feminist world, men would not get aroused by women until a woman wants a man to be aroused. And then, when the woman wants him to get aroused (signaled by telepathic means) his level of arousal will be capped at the level she has decided for him and not go one inch beyond that. Yeah, I'm being tongue-in-cheek, but I don't think I'm really that far off. It's sad when humor is more accurate that "facts".
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:33 AM
1

Rape, by it's very nature, is a difficult crime to prove. To further complicate things many women refuse a rape kit (aka refuse to provide evidence) or file the report months after the event. So what happens is men who are accused CANNOT be found guilty because there is no evidence. And feminists blame the police because it's sacrilegious to ever blame the victim. Even when it is their fault that there is no evidence. The next step is what we see at colleges right now. Even men who are found inn…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:31 AM
2

It's a shame that it takes something like this for people to finally be willing to listen. People will ignore facts and statistics all day long until the consequences are literally staring them in the face.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:07 AM
6

Wow. Some of these questions are so stupid I almost can't believe that they are serious.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:42 AM
6

It's more a case of older woman trying to get people to realize that men have been treated like shit and now we can see the consequences of it. Male traits have no value in the western wold anymore. Meanwhile the younger woman keeps trying to say that it's not the feminizing of men that is the problem, it's the refugees not respecting women. That the refugees shouldn't be raping. I really hate that argument. No shit, it shouldn't be happening. Nobody is saying that this is ok. But it is happenin…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:26 AM
8

But men can't be abused. /s
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:15 AM
1

Me too. I should know better by know.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:32 AM
1

Once someone figures out how to help a man equate the glass situation (which does not, and will never, affect him emotionally) with DEEPLY wounding his wife and making her feel sad, alone, unloved, abandoned, disrespected, afraid, etc. … Once men really grasp that and accept it as true even though it doesn’t make sense to them? Or, and here's a novel idea, she could stop assuming that men think like women and just tell him what the real issue is. And then actually listen to his side and realize …
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:24 AM
1

He didn't do something exactly the way she wanted, so she felt unsafe with him. That's manipulative, and abusive. Correct. Sadly, in western countries, this is far more common than it should be. If he doesn't do everything she wants then she deserves better. After all, if he really cared about her he would gladly do it. Right?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:14 AM
4

I have a solution. My wife was in the Navy. She uses the toilet in about a minute. Do what you went in there to do and get out. There won't be absurd waits.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:04 AM
5

They argue that it isn't a "realistic" portrayal of women. That it promotes an "unrealistic" expectation of how women should look. Which is, more often than not, ridiculous. Just because it isn't how most women in the west look doesn't make it unrealistic. "More than one-third (34.9% or 78.6 million) of U.S. adults are obese." - http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html So the average body type that they are talking about is including people who are overweight. Ever see the "realistic video gam…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:57 PM
1

Thank you. That's exactly what I was getting at.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:37 AM
2

Right, because of technology. And government. They mitigate or outright remove the challenges that our species had to face for most of it's existence. But the changes that were brought by natural selection don't just suddenly reverse themselves. That was my point. I still have an appendix though it no longer serves any purpose.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:54 PM
1

You're right, it isn't. But nothing else makes sense.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:52 PM
1

Really? Selective breeding? Who is selecting and what exactly are we selecting, which human traits? Natural selection? What works survives and what doesn't work dies. Despite whatever is PC and what isn't human biology and society have evolved a certain way because it kept the species alive. Certain traits are no longer required because of the advanced in technology we have achieved but evolution doesn't just say "Whelp, they invented cars. Guess they don't need feet now". Things which have work…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:17 PM
1

There's a line in the movie Frozen. "The heart is not so easily changed, but the head can be persuaded." When people feel like they are right they tend to shut out any opposition. This applies to every group covering every topic, it's a fault of humanity. This is why, no matter how many times she proves to be either completely clueless or straight up trying to sell bullshit, I still watch videos from people like Anita Sarkeesian. Maybe, just maybe, there is some true and relevant information tha…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:21 PM
4

I know. Unfortunately many women don't seem to agree. There's even a quote, will have to look it up. Something along the lines of "We cannot allow proof in cases of rape because evidence is logical and men dominate logic". I'm sure that's way off but the idea should be the same. There should be consequences for filing a false report of rape. Not for a case where rape cannot be proven, but for cases where it can be determined, beyond reasonable doubt, that no rape took place. There was a survey d…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:41 AM
1

Agreed. But too many people are demanding the right to be believed. And God forbid somebody has their rights infringed upon.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:35 AM
17

To me this quote boils down to: female feelings >>>> male life. I get that losing somebody is a tradegy. But if being left alive is sooooo much worse wouldn't it be better to kill yourself? If being alive is worse than being dead then stop being alive. Otherwise I'm afraid you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:33 AM
8

I want to agree. But not in the mining industry. It feels less like progress and more like a body count. Plus I have a feeling that if 29 women were killed it would be more than just a year. Cutting corners at work is one thing. Ignoring the safety of your employees is another. He should have 29 counts of manslaughter.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:20 AM
1

I'm just going to leave this here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLgJjlFIxGA
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:09 PM
2

Individual women support the men they know. But as a collective whole? The issues of men are largely ignored, flat out denied, or dismissed as non-issues. At least as far as the media is concerned. Consider this. I have a bowl of apples and a bowl of oranges. I tell people that I love them both equally. When I invite people over they see that the bowl of oranges is still full while the bowl of apples is nearly empty. I am clearly eating the apples and not the oranges. No matter how much I claim …
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:06 PM
1

"Social conditioning" and "male privilege". I get what you're saying but you're using logic and facts. They generally don't seem to work.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:46 PM
1

I usually get a response something like: The right to fair pay The right to feel safe The right to be taken seriously And so on.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:21 PM
1

Why is this even a school issue? Shouldn't this be handled by parents? I was always told growing up that if I had a secret that I didn't want anybody to know I shouldn't tell anybody. Because you cannot guarantee that it will stay a secret once you have told it.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:18 PM
1

Meanwhile a college football player was suspended for defending himself on video.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:04 PM
2

It's almost as if they don't care about true equality, they just want equality of outcome.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:01 PM
3

Beautiful as always.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:51 PM
6

Wonderful little paradox. We demand you treat us seriously while proving exactly why you shouldn't take us seriously.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:44 PM
2

Someone, please, recreate this exact video but replace men with women. I really, really hope that this is a joke. But given what lunacy passes for politics these days I can't be sure.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:18 PM
2

childcare and house keeping (are) unpaid labor Building log cabins for the family to survive in the 1600s was also "unpaid labor" and yet everybody was fine with that. Are they making the error in considering there to be a fundamental right to money in the case of any "work" being done? This is exactly what they are doing. But as I said in another comment: You are paid by an employer when completing the required objectives as an employee. An employer can only pay money out if money is coming in.…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:04 PM
2

Because every husband and wife are like sitcom parents. I am the husband. I create the weekly shopping list. I know where the keys are. I know what foods my boys like and dislike. I know when they are tired or bored. I listen to my wife talk about the shit she has to deal with at work. I do things for her to make her happy, even if I don't want to do them. By this article I am entitled to compensation for "emotional labor" and yet I disagree. You are paid by an employer when completing the requi…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:02 PM
1

Male privilege > all. It's a great fall-back excuse when there is nothing else. Men cannot be discriminated against because privilege. Men cannot be oppressed because privilege. Men cannot suffer because privilege. Only women are oppressed, discriminated against and suffering.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:57 PM
1

People are far too polarized. If boys are going down then girls must be going up. Hurray for feminism! Except no, it doesn't work that way. Boys and girls are not playing tug-of-war for good grades. There isn't a finite number of A's and B's that can be available at any given time. Consider: All the boys in Ms Smith's class have an A. Does it make any sense to think that now no girls can possibly get an A? That the As are all used up? Of course not. But that's how people tend to react to these t…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:50 AM
1

I want to say yes, it is illegal. But since when did anyone publicly acknowledge that it's even possible to discriminate against men? Women only is empowering. Men only is sexist and oppressive.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:40 AM
2

Things like this are so pointless. A criminal knows things are against the law, they just don't care.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:36 AM
20

marriage – an institution created by men, in favour of men, to benefit men Excuse me, but where do you get that stupid idea? Marriage was created by men, in favor of women, to benefit women. I know it's hard to remember but there was a time when men were working 12+ hours a day in coal mines just to make ends meet. Or working 12+ hours a day in a steel mill. Or working 12+ hours a day laying rail road track. Men were doing the kind of jobs that most women literally cannot do, even today. And so …
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:30 AM
1

Similar here. Dad was accused of beating me and my brothers though. And she filed for child support in both the state of Nevada and Utah. At one point he was paying damn near his whole paycheck to her while being denied any visitation, phone calls or even letters in the mail.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:24 AM
1

Most just don't see it because it doesn't involve guns and generals Note the "doesn't involve guns" portion. And honestly if you are on this sub and already don't know what's happening you have some reading to do. War: a state of competition, conflict, or hostility between different people or groups. Given the many feminists and mainstream feminism itself are openly hostile to any who dare to say "what about men?" I would say the word war is quite applicable.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:51 PM
2

No. There will be no war. This is the point I am countering.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:51 AM
3

Yes that's true. There's less room in there for men. I may never understand the pain of childbirth but women will never understand the pain of accidentally sitting on your balls.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:52 AM
15

And while we’re sure men will try to come up with some excuse for their pole-dominating behaviour – just like their ‘we need to make room for our balls’ nonsense to excuse manspreading – there isn't one. Please, oh please, no. I don't tell women that a bra can't possibly be as uncomfortable as they make it out to be. I don't have first hand experience with that anatomy.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:33 PM
2

Then you need glasses.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:54 PM
3

Most just don't see it.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 12:40 AM
6

It doesn't. It's in the environment it created. After vawa many more states created a mandatory arrest policy. In many states they determine who to arrest by determining the primary aggressor. http://www.stopvaw.org/determining_the_predominant_aggressor Several of the points to consider are almost a guaranteed point againt men. Seriousness of injury? Men are stronger so a single defensive hit will cause more damage. Height and weight? Generally men are taller and weigh more. Potential to serious…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:28 PM
5

The war is already going. Most just don't see it because it doesn't involve guns and generals.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:11 PM
8

The violence against women act for starters. If a man is beaten by a women and she bruises her fist hitting him HE is the one arrested. Sometimes not even that, they say it was proactive self defense because he was "intimidating" or "threatening". I know a man who was beaten with a baseball bat by his girlfriend. When he called the cops HE was arrested because "she wouldn't have done it without a good reason".
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:05 PM
6

All I got from here is: "international women's issues matter on one day and men's don't matter at all". The way she acted during the interview was very childish. And people like her wonder why they don't get taken seriously? Act like an adult, not a child, and you will be. I agree with Phil. It's lunacy to say you are for equality and yet only allow one side to talk. I read feminist material regularly. Some of it I agree with, most I roll my eyes. But I read it. Although I disagree with it I kee…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:55 PM
2

How can people understand what "rape" is when it keeps getting rewritten?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:05 PM
19

The Safe Campus Act would do what activists have long advocated but apparently never really meant: force colleges to treat sexual assault as a serious crime. Love this bit. It's a shame there are many people in this world who think that things are good the way they are. I'm glad that I'm not in college right now. I could be expelled because some girl I never met wanted me gone.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:51 PM
15

Because it's perfectly fine to enact policies that only advantage women (ie feminism) but it's "sexist" and "wrong" to do it for men.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:04 AM
1

Polarity. The "if you aren't with us you are against us" mentality. Feminism is "pro-women" and therefore anyone who is "pro-men" must also be "anti-women". It's just as incorrect as assuming that if I am a dog person I must hate cats.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:40 AM
1

Subscribed. Though I will probably read far more than I write. I tend to get very irritated when people can't understand simple logic.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:32 AM
1

I agree that it's unfair that a man may want the child of an accidental pregnancy and that the woman still has the right to terminate. Unfortunately, I don't think there's a good legal solution that protects the man without unnecessarily infringing upon the woman. This is exactly the problem though. Women have a choice to become a mother or not, regardless of what the father wishes. Men do not have that choice. They are stuck with whatever she wants. And I agree, nobody should be able to infring…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:15 PM
1

I think you are missing the point. Rape is, by definition, when someone can't or won't give consent. On a similar topic, did you know that a male rapist can be required to pay child support? Did you also know that a male rapist who is paying child support can sue for custody? http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/01/us/rapist-child-custody/ And no, a man should not be required to have surgery or avoid all forms of sexual contact when no such requirement is ever asked of women. If a man does not want a chil…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter