TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Flatline334 Archive

View 0 posts and 147 comments by Flatline334 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

You’re average joe deserves to be respected as a human. You don’t have to admire them but respect their right to exist.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:23 PM
-1

This sub has become so hateful. I think it’s time to unsub for me.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 07:07 PM
1

Yes it makes it less sensitive but i think calling it a dried callus is a little much.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 08:41 PM
-1

I had the same thoughts as you. I’m starting to think this thing is made up. It’s just so pathetic.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 06:16 AM
0

You should not have yielded to that bullshit or this is fake. I’m gonna go with fake.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 06:08 AM
7

And? That isn’t a good enough reason to make them cover up.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 08:35 PM
3

Well we have facts saying otherwise. Best job market in 50 years and bottom barrel unemployment. So how is that not a good economy? First quarter gdp growth beat all expectations.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:45 PM
0

Well that’s the only reason i can come up with to think that the economy isn’t booming right now.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:40 PM
-1

You must think we are back in 2010?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:32 PM
3

I’m guessing it’s his way of saying your word is unreliable because of it?
/r/MensRights28/03/19 05:58 PM
-1

Jeez way miss the point entirely. I don't agree with her tweet but OP called her a feminist in the title (see parent comment) with no real basis other than her stupid idea against men. Me using the word revenge in this context has no barring on the point being made.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 11:55 PM
-9

She said something critical of men and came up with a revenge twist so OBVIOUSLY she is an SJW super feminist based on how this sub judges people.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:56 PM
-1

Because like he said they would normally only run one so banning all support is a troll move.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 10:51 PM
5

It’s one person being vile. Let’s leave sex out of this one.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 08:11 AM
1

If you flip the genders in this case she would certainly have been held responsible. Don't look for gender controversy when there is none.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 07:29 PM
4

A lot of people. It’s taught in universities. I had it in my classes. It’s a power thing i guess. Because white people have the power and do the oppressing you can’t be racist against them. My teacher was an Asian lady and in class said she would rag in her husband’s whiteness but if he ever made a joke about her being Asian he would be in trouble.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:30 PM
2

That is some fucked up and scary shit
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:18 PM
9

Wouldn’t it be mutual rape if neither said yes?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:12 PM
1

He’s not implying being uncut makes you unhealthy.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:44 AM
-1

Yep, they may not prefer it but they will keep that private. It really only looks weird when soft anyway.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:31 AM
1

Problem is it would be nearly impossible to prove she was knowingly lying when she filed the report.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 09:22 PM
1

Neither do I. I was just trying to determine how Virginia’s abortion law conflicted with their fetal homicide law in such a way to save him those 20 years. I couldn’t find the conflict so chalked it up to a good legal defense.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:07 AM
1

It was an annoying conversation for sure
/r/MensRights25/05/18 04:52 AM
1

Lies, really? Implying a malicious intent? More like how I'm interpreting your statements and what they are implying. But it only places an unwanted obligation on him.... That is your quote, and implies that you don't like the fact the he has no say. You don't need to use the exact words for the meaning to come across. I had way more typed when I realized there was no point in continuing this so I'm done. Have a wonderful Memorial Day weekend if you are in the US, otherwise just enjoy your weeke…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 09:54 PM
1

Don't try and twist this. This started with you being annoyed the man had no choice in the abortion and the man being held accountable if she keeps the baby. Yet you can't seem to accept the man had a roll in getting her pregnant. Hence my first comment you replied to where I said it takes two to tango. Both parties are responsible for starting the pregnancy and at that point the woman is in charge with what happens. If you don't like that reality, don't have sex.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:23 PM
1

Ya no shit Sherlock and he shouldn’t. Don’t fuck people if you can’t handle the potential consequences of your actions.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:42 PM
1

Her unilateral choice? What keeping the baby and now he has to pay the consequences for it? Maybe that should be considered before pumping your seed into somebody.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:30 PM
2

Dude you can’t argue that it’s not both parties responsibility about getting pregnant but if she does the man no longer has a say. Her body and she carries it.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:40 PM
2

Then don’t bust your nut inside her. Use a condom.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:39 PM
1

Takes two to tango mate.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:37 AM
4

You quoted fetal homicide law but not the abortion law so it’s hard to say. I tried googling Virginian abortion law but from what i found none of it conflicted either. He must have one hell of a lawyer.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:28 AM
2

Seriously? Have you never the the classic gay guy lines that start with “honey” and are usually just a joke?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:23 PM
19

What the hell? Get in piss and get out? Do you really waste energy thinking about this crap?
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:19 PM
2

I didn’t say not to or it won’t help but not make it your only thing. People think the gym is the magic cure. It’s not. It helps. I never said it didn’t but there is just way more to it then just get in shape.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:11 PM
11

Neither is what i suggested. Confidence gets women and there have been very successful (with women) fat dudes and skinny dudes. Good looks and being fit doesn’t guarantee confidence and being good with the ladies. I’m a great example. I was terrible with women for a long time and would be considered attractive and fit yet i lacked confidence thanks to my childhood. The gym is not a cure all. That’s the point. The gym doesn’t make you anybody and we shouldn’t sell it as such. It will help ya but …
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:23 AM
-6

I dared a peak at his post history. I’m confused why he even cares since he’s gay and seems to judge the fuck out of dudes who take steroids.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:57 AM
-7

That was a lot of assumptions you made about her based off nothing.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:28 AM
32

Ok tell that to all the 5’5” guys. Getting into the gym doesn’t make you somebody. I know a lot of losers that spent too much time in the gym and made nothing of themselves. Taking pride in your appearance doesn’t require going to the gym and isn’t required for finding a good woman.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:23 AM
6

You’re a disgusting human being.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:01 AM
10

You're an idiot if you really believe this.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 11:39 PM
2

Also, how am I wrong?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:51 AM
3

God you're hilarious. Your ignorance is cracking me up.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:50 AM
2

Ah, back to the ignorant comments. Saying wrong doesn't prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:49 AM
2

You failed to make any argument at all. Just because you say something doesn't make it true. You have to back up your statements with reason, which you failed at. Again, can you please define those for me?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:47 AM
1

Eh, Reddit will Reddit. Just trying to spread reason.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:34 AM
1

Ok tough guy. I was trying to be civil and end this but I see you don't see it that way. I highly doubt you have the stomach to put your money where your mouth is.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:14 AM
1

Whatever you say dude. I love the classic kid line. That's your opinion about deserving a shot, it's not a universal truth and I can see you're stuck in yours so have a great Thursday night and an even better weekend my fellow American. I hope you had a wonderful 4th of July.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:46 AM
1

Ignoring all my points, nice. I see you post in the Donald and conspiracy so I know you have no idea what you're talking about. Learn to use words correctly. There is no such thing as an argument being degeneracy or cuckoldry. It's clear you have no idea what those words mean. Have a nice day with your head in the sand.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:36 AM
7

That makes no sense. You should invest in a dictionary. It's ok to say you have no argument. Trying to compare revenge torture/murder with working out when angry is asinine. One is short term and barbaric revenge which life in prison would act as a much longer suffering for the murderer, whereas working out is refusing violence as a form of anger management and using a better outlet to relive one's anger.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:27 AM
0

Care to make a point as to why?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:11 AM
-2

Great comeback guy. It's an not and. Try proofreading before you call me an idiot.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:10 AM
-11

You can sure, but it makes you look like an idiot.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:41 PM
5

Great reasoning and points there champ.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:40 PM
-3

Revenge through torture and murder is not the same. You can't compare the two.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:12 PM
7

Nothing will bring your kids back. Violence for violence does nothing and won't make you feel better in the end.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:42 PM
1

He wasn't trolling there mate. You were out of line. He was neither controlling or demanding.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:11 AM
2

Because you're not proving anything. Provide some evidence to back up your claim.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:07 PM
1

Ya, go a head and think that. I'll stick to Seattle. Still doesn't excuse your shitty tone and pretentious comments.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:56 PM
8

God you come off as a pretentious snob. Not surprised you live in the Bay area.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:33 PM
9

The boys are now hopped up on drugs with AK-47's and brainwashed to the point of almost no return :(
/r/MensRights10/03/17 08:05 PM
1

Wow...you have to know that both exist right? Dumb ass.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:43 AM
-10

Going to jail doesn't equal charged with a crime.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 12:49 AM
2

Try reading the Leviticus.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:29 AM
2

way harder to clean and such. Think about that statement. Would it be that hard to pull the skin back in the shower to scrub it? No, it wouldn't so I think "way harder to clean" is a bit of a stretch.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:27 AM
3

Why did she keep brining up the hibachi grill?
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:40 AM
2

Click bate title. She was not convicted of fraud.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:56 PM
12

Right? Guy left us on a cliff with that one.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 07:11 PM
1

If states went by popular vote I might agree with you but they are run by counties. All of Washington can vote republican for example but if King County is blue the state is. All of our points don't matter. What matters is people don't feel like their vote counts so a popular vote should increase voter turnout as it could give them that feeling.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 04:13 AM
1

But in the current system, to his point, in some places it just doesn't matter, like the west coast for example. Make it a popular vote system and that would change.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:34 AM
0

Why?
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:35 AM
1

Nah, they just felt they had to give Hillary "her chance" just people not taking Trump seriously until way too late.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:23 AM
6

Luckily he has just been signed and hopefully the retrial in Oct. proves his innocence. The truly messed up part of the initial case though was how if friend was found innocent of doing the exact same thing as Evans.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 09:11 PM
2

Did you even read his comment? You make no sense. What you said is in the same spirit as his comment. Is your whole goal to just be an annoying insufferable douche bag?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:36 PM
3

He has very valid and reasonable points and you your only point is upvotes...are you fucking serious?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:26 PM
6

No, you're a fucking douche man. No need to be so dam condescending. The guy has a point, 4 years old is not a good source, especially since there is a current "battle of the bulge" for this Olympics, which was posted recently.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:23 PM
-1

Which means nothing. The only conceivable way it would happen would be an invasion of US soil and at that point nobody would care. Hell most would probably enlist.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:11 AM
-6

Who the fuck stresses about registering for a draft that will likely never happen?
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:27 PM
0

I don't think we can say one way or the other but I would imagine it wouldn't be until you were well underway into your transition when the oh shit moment would hit that being a man ins't always what it is chalked up to be. At the same time, society doesn't generally treat trans men/women like they do their cis counter parts so it may be a non-issue for trans people currently.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:26 PM
1

The thing is I think it's an overblown fear. People have been transgendered for years but now we finally making an issue out of it. I think it's the next progressive step. The debate on gays is pretty much over so this is the next hot button issue.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 04:28 PM
5

So people kneeling to their kings back in the day wasn't a form of submission? Same principle applies here.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 11:02 PM
2

You can already see it with bathroom/transexual debate. "What if a pervert decides to be a woman one day just to get a look at that little girls"
/r/MensRights20/05/16 10:43 PM
1

I think there was already an altercation occurring in the back of the bus. The guy who got punched was recording it, you can see the light on his phone and the before he got punched the girl noticed it, obviously didn't want it recorded and punched the guy.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:45 PM
1

From what it looks like the girl that punched first was already in an altercation with somebody off camera and the guy who got punched was just recording it...obviously a hate crime worth punching somebody over.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:39 PM
3

Sad thing is this isn't considered a trial even though that is exactly what it is.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 06:23 PM
-5

You don't need evidence these days apparently in this world of false rape allegations. Sorry this is not relevant. And a hat/hood covers cameras if you were that concerned. It would be impossible to determine who did it unless they told somebody.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 08:03 PM
-1

And how would they find you? There wouldn't be any evidence.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:53 PM
2

How would anybody know you put it up though?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:33 PM
1

I don't think this was done out of malice but over inflated self importance but other wise your point stands.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 02:02 AM
2

That is dumb and you know it. Very weak argument.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 03:45 PM
3

Since when was murder the same as war? Your point is meaningless and just shows your inner bias against men.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 12:33 AM
3

In all fairness they may not live in the same state. No excuses for her actions but she could have a valid reason for not being in the hospital.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:27 AM
1

Your comment is wrong in some many ways. I don't even know where to begin.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 08:28 PM
1

The rape victim initially named Jackson when police questioned her. But Jackson was never arrested and later raped another woman and her daughter in 1992, about a mile and a half away from the first woman’s home. And the DA is still saying Jackson's confession is a lie? Da fuq?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 06:39 PM
1

Exactly right.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:11 PM
1

Ya you jumped to some major conclusions there buddy, and very condescending as well, good work you ass hat.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:09 PM
1

It is all or nothing with these types. Every man is X or Y. Can't leave room for grey area because that leads to critical thought and might just conflict with their ideological thinking.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:06 PM
2

Right, just being difficult. I'd do the same as you.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 11:17 PM
2

While unconscious? That's some next level self defense shit.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 11:06 PM
2

He probably means you would have gotten in trouble for defending yourself anyway. My only point was there is no way you could have defended yourself (in this exact situation of course) because you would be knocked out.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:49 PM
2

Well, the dude was out cold, so you wouldn't have been able to do shit.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:45 PM
36

37 counts of sexual misconduct including with an 8th grader.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:44 AM
1

I'm all for fairness and believe men can be raped but this article is bad and if I was that guy, I would not consider myself as being a victim of rape.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:53 PM
1

So he just proved how she didn't do what you initially claimed she did to call it rape, and you are still calling it rape?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:52 PM
5

Men can most certainly be raped.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:51 PM
1

Are you a special kind of stupid?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:50 PM
29

Except for the lazy men that make excuses for their ineptitude as well as successful women that are ready to climb the mountain. It is not as black and white as you put it.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:11 PM
14

So is the men's tweet account. The accounts are satire but the comments are not.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 11:34 PM
1

The defense attorney said it in the video clip. Edit: and some fat old cancer patient said she didn't deserve the sentence.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:24 PM
-6

Is she a lesbian? That fact makes sense though.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:26 PM
0

I hope so, the other version just adds another level of stupidness to this video.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 03:53 PM
2

He immediately starting agreeing with her so I think they were referring to Roger Goodell's press conference.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 03:44 PM
2

Are you that dense? It's in the case documents.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:58 PM
0

I think the point was that since women were not allowed on the front line until recently so that was an act of oppression for the simple reason of not being equally allowed to fight and die as men were.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:47 PM
2

His title was bad but if you read the article there was no confusion of consent. Consent was there all the way through and the girl was convinced over the course of a week after the fact to say there was no consent. So your lack of understanding if the case is ignorant.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:30 PM
2

Ya fits the profile. A hard working and successful young man. He played sports and was his high school valedictorian and had a good GPA in the university. Better knock this privileged man down a few pegs so he doesn't get too cocky.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:14 PM
4

And ignorant comments like this one based on the title alone and not the material detract from the legitimate comments in the thread.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:07 PM
1

I was simply clarifying the information. There is nothing wrong with what I said.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 08:28 PM
1

I never said it was. But the felony will pop up either way and it can easily be explained away and therefore not prevent him from getting a job.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:25 PM
0

How? He said that the application would be thrown away and I said it probably won't because they would read his explanation and then not count it against him.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:59 PM
-1

Because on job applications it asks if you have been convicted of a felony and if so explain. So he would state he was convicted but that it was overturned, (simply stated). I was also just answering that guys question. Not sure why I got so heavily down voted.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:54 PM
2

I suppose you could use that but I've never seen it or used it in any of my work.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 07:27 PM
3

Either 3B or 3,000MM. I personally use the later.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 07:06 PM
3

The banking world. Million is denoted as either MM or 1,000M.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 06:43 PM
6

Yes I did mean $100. Thank you for that.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:53 PM
6

She really only got $750M since her attorney took half of it and he was only legally allowed to get $200M, per state law. He got $100/day (missed some 0's) of false imprisonment the most allowed by California. Crazy I know. She was going to come clean during the civil case but her attorney told her to keep her mouth shut since he knew a big pay day was coming. Disgusting. Edit: And she got money from the high school not college. He was 16 when this all went down. Edit2: The M stands for thousand…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:07 PM
45

Because it has been so widely spoken about and publicized, he really has no stigma like your average guy would have. He was on the Tonight show even so luckily due how much he lost, scholarship, NFL career and how he handled it all he is going to come out better than you or I would.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:39 PM
2

He did get $200k, so that will help him for a few years and he did sign withe falcons in 2013 but got cut in final cuts to 53 players.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:38 PM
34

He got $200K from the state.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:37 PM
-16

In the application itself there is a box to explain your conviction. That is where he would explain it and the employer would more than likely accept it. Source: I work next to our HR lady and asked her.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:16 PM
2

If you have her SSN there is a lot that could be done. The first thing is to file a lien on her so she can never sell anything or buy anything without it coming up.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 12:38 AM
2

Yep. Put a lien on her and she won't be able to do anything without it popping up.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 12:36 AM
1

If its defense it's defense. Can't be jailed for protecting yourself.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:28 AM
1

Fuck that noise, I'll start with a cunt punt to get her off balance then a right hook to uh, safely disarm her.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:26 AM
2

Comment so I don't lose this.
/r/seduction12/05/13 07:25 AM
12

That is fortune cookie material.
/r/seduction26/02/13 09:45 PM
2

That makes sense but they have anal sex awareness or something, just limiting the age to 18 isn't going to do a whole lot in preventing the spread of infectious disease besides the fact that you are just a little more mature and hopefully think through what you are doing more and wrap it up or clean it out.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:04 AM
1

Yeah, it must be a nightmare for those guys. I think if its statutory rape it should fall off a persons record in 5-10 years or something because in an instance like this, the guy is no predator and does not deserve to be treated like one for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:01 AM
6

and kinky teenagers who just love butt sex. I guess lesbians got off easy then.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:54 PM
9

Right when I thought that Canada was doing something right, they go and screw the pooch on the anal sex consent.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:40 PM
3

Yep, if a guy brings it up he just wants to lower it so he can legal bang young girls. I mean that is the obvious conclusion right?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:51 PM
3

Its like the parents think like this. Well if we just ground her they are going to keep doing so the only way to stop it is to send her boyfriend of over a year to jail. Makes perfect sense to me.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:49 PM
7

Good Guy Canada
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:47 PM
3

I think that one comes down to lack of education and the banks took advantage of that. All the loans that should not have been given (granted I know the government was practically forcing the banks to give out these loans) but then the way the debt was packaged and sold was one of the most complicated leveraged financial products that nobody understood even the people selling it didn't really get it. You don't need to be the one uneducated to have it still be one of the factors that creates crim…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:45 PM
11

Oh yeah, I forgot about the screening process, usually though they have you explain the whole situation on the app and again, if i was the one reading it, I would let him through. I'm more understanding of this kind of stuff then some so maybe I'm just a nice guy, either way, it makes things way harder with that on your record.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:45 PM
44

Seriously, shame on them though. At least at a job interview or something he can be honest about it and it may not affect him to much. "My wife's parents had me arrested for having sex with her while we were dating and she was 17 because they didn't like me". If I was hiring manager I wouldn't hold it against him, especially since they are married.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:39 PM
5

I'm sorry to hear that. If this friend is a good friend and not like the ones I told you to stay away from then yes keep him but if he is a bad influence, he may be part of the reason you have not made other friends. Analyze how he treats you and if its not healthy he has no business being your friend. You can always make friends. I know it seems hard but I have been in your shoes until one day I just had enough and changed my life. Start working out, playing sports and just getting out and abou…
/r/seduction17/12/12 06:32 PM
11

If you have any negative influences in your life, like a friend that talks down to you for example or belittles you but in a subtle way, get them out of your life. People like that are nothing but poison and will prevent you from feeling better about yourself.
/r/seduction17/12/12 05:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter