TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Flavius_Stilicho476 Archive

View 2 posts and 190 comments by Flavius_Stilicho476 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How about do what you want?
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 11:18 PM
2

I think the Shaun White thing deflated it a good deal
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 11:16 PM
1

Bowling for Soup 1985: Debbie just hit the wall She never had it all One prozack a day Husbands a CPA Her dream went out the door When she turned 24 Only been with one man What happened to her plan She was gonna be an actress She was gonna be a star She was gonna shake her ass On the hood of Whitesnake's car Her yellow SUV is now the enemy Looks at her average life and Nothing has been all right.
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 10:57 PM
1

How do you make it to second year in law school without knowing the structure of a 5-paragraph essay, or without knowing how to write a coherent sentence? How do you not know what a "subject", "direct object," "passive voice" and "nominalizations" are? I mean, you are studying to write legal documents--that kind of presupposes an ability to actually write to begin with!
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 10:54 PM
1

I had a new attorney cry because I marked up her writing.
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 10:49 PM
2

Well, I could always have said: "I really didn't want to but felt like I couldn't say no because of the power differential." That said, the result still would have been laughter and termination in 6 months after "multiple, documented problems with employee's performance."
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 09:00 PM
4

Let me clarify....men socialize and get experience/advice. Women have formal "mentors" and "sponsors" who are specifically dedicated to making sure they advance. Having an older professional "take you under their wings" because they like working with you and the work you do is, in my opinion, wholly different than being assigned a formal "mentor" who is required to have x meetings and create "internal advancement/marketing plans" for someone.
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 03:40 PM
5

I am really sick of the whole "feel unsafe" bs. It is starting to work its way into the corporate environment. Trying to interview these people and figure out what, objectively, is the problem is darn near impossible. You are trying to question then about objective facts--who did/said what, and they just go on and on about how they "feel." They truly believe their "feelings" define reality. I even get accused of "attacking" them by asking neutral questions in order to gather evidence of wrongdoi…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:34 PM
5

Yeah, you can't have an honest discussion about this. It possible to be both repelled by Harvey's behavior but also recognize that MANY of these women consented--they made a choice and decided that furthering their career was more important than their self-respect. That doesn't make his actions "right" or mean that these women shouldn't have been put in that situation. It just means that many of them made a choice. I am a little touchy about this because I was put in the same situation early on …
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 03:27 PM
5

Men don't get "mentorship" or "sponsors" at work.
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 03:23 PM
2

Start with Univ. of Calif. v. Bakke and go from there. The decision upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific racial quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible. Again, thats just the starting point in the case law.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:59 AM
2

No fault was a good thing. Sure, it's led to less stable family units, but we should be focusing on making couples more stable family units, not forcing them to remain married against their will. I disagree. In order to be stable, society needs stable families. Once kids are involved, the cohesiveness of the family unit is paramout and supersedes all other considerations, unless there is a causal break in marital obligations. Hence why "fault" divorce made sense.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:57 AM
3

Uhh... lets not forget: 1) history being bullied; 2) loner 3) no family support; 4 on anti-depressents
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:55 AM
4

precisely.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:54 AM
1

He's a bit of a fixer upper. hehhee
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:54 AM
13

Exactly, the problem isn't men being "trapped" in their masculinity. Its that they are not allowed to express it, because it is "toxic."
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:53 AM
1

False. Companies cannot hired/promote/fire based on race or gender. Affirmative action policies allow them to take race "into consideration", and companies often need to adjust polices to avoid "disparate impact" (which is BS), but the Supreme Court has repeatedly said flat out quotas are unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:26 AM
3

They have expressly rejected us of quotas however. Instead, race/gender can be "one factor"
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:24 AM
3

But at 45 he'll have the money to actually pay for school, and he'll have a better idea of what he wants to go to school for And prob has a higher likelihood of getting a visit from the bias response team to making someone feel "unsafe" with his real world experience and desire to just get shit done.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:12 PM
8

They are cowards. Too insecure/fear of rejection to state their intent
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:08 PM
12

"unsafe" is the new buzzword
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:05 PM
19

Or constant belittling statements, "huffing", "the stare," constant contradictions in public, random crying, getting angry in response to sincere offers to help.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:37 PM
1

No doubt. We have raised at least 2 generations of women now who have been taught: 1) men are all evil; 2) it is acceptable to demean and make fun of them; and 3) men are responsible for all their bad feelings. No wonder the marriage rate is plummeting.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 05:07 PM
4

Further, as a teacher, this is one of many drastic showings of how teachers today take no responsibility for their classroom. Kids WERE NOT allowed to act this way when I was in school. Except now, most teachers AREN'T allowed to discipline unruly students because that results in "disproportionate outcomes." Even when problems are reported, the principal is not involved; the counselor now comes to ask the student WHY they are disbehaving.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 10:01 PM
2

Go find your own fucking shade at your own fucking watering hole. That pretty much sums up my thoughts on the whole piece.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:29 PM
1

i.e. men can work with people they don't like because shit still needs getting done
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:17 PM
3

Who the fuck teaches men to ignore "no" What she means is "failure to teach men to read women's mind and understand that yes doesn't mean yes unless its 'enthusiastic.'"
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:15 PM
13

73 here. I do not recall ever being told it is ok to ignore a "no." I remember repeatedly being told "no means no" and to respect your date's wishes.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:14 PM
4

Its like a mandatory male tax. Or "cost of doing business" if you are in a relationship
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:13 PM
2

I have encountered the same thing with SJWs mountainbiking. They get soooopissed when you ask about their gear. They think you are trying to "stump" them and make them look stupid when all you really want to know if about their bike because its the same shit you'd ask a guy. Instead of just saying: " I just started and don't really know about about my bike" they get all bent out of shape. its like: NEWSFLASH, I AM ASKING ABOUT YOUR BIKE BECAUSE I THINK IT IS COOL AND WISH I HAD IT!
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:19 PM
4

Tl; dr: I am a fat, self-loathing miserable loser who has to find evidence of a worldwide conspiracy against me in everything I see in order to justify my internalized hatred of myself. I also feel entitled to special privileges and think it is bad that people who like a similar activity want to compare notes, talk gear and technique, and size each other up. In sum, I am a pathetic loser who ruined a awesome hiking experience with my fee fees.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:13 PM
7

Great, so now the number of accusers establishes guilt or innocence. if people actually studied history, they would know that this is actually how accusations were decided during anglo-saxon times--by "oath swearers". The accused and accuser would each have individuals vouch for their veracity of the accusations (note, they need not have been actual witnesses) and the matter would be decided not based on the weight of any evidence, but on the weight of support. If that sounds insane, there is a …
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:00 PM
1

So, she's a witch?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:50 PM
6

Hope you recorded that. In many states it is illegal to provide a poor reference unless based on actual documented performance issues.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:47 PM
9

When in reality the underlying cause is those both felt threatened by you and needed to find a way to eliminate you to protect their position.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:38 PM
1

there were no witches. False, there were many "medicine women" and "healers" using "pagan" traditions and techniques to heal the sicks, etc. Anything that was not church-based was "witchcraft." Also, any woman with a strong personality could be named a "witch", especially if she "enchanted" a man.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:37 PM
10

I was in a band...lots of drinks, drugs, ass-slapping, crude jokes, inappropriate behavior...kind of goes with the territory.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:32 PM
2

My own experience includes pawing, inappropriate comments, and the more severe outright quid pro quo propositions by a superior. Being young, single, and ambitious, I "took the deal," even though I never would have slept with the woman otherwise. I didn't feel "right" about it, but also didn't consider it to be "rape" because I consented. I wanted the opportunities this person could provide me more than I was opposed to having sex with her. There have also been a few instances of "male" superior…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:31 PM
38

I had a millennial get "offended" and thought I was "hitting on her" when I offered to buy a round at a business social gathering. I offered as a goodwill gesture because she was new and I obviously made more. People were buying drinks for each other the entire night. I had bought shots for some other people who were nearby a half hour before. But she left the bar and then complained to another co-worker who informed me. When I said I would talk to her and "clear the air", I was informed that wo…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:26 PM
7

Also interesting that these same people cry "abuse, abuse" anytime a father tries to discipline his kids or when a father adopts a parenting "style" that is not in vogue with the intelligentsia.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:59 PM
5

No, quite the opposite. She is very intellectual, but has much disdain for "MRAs" for not being "manly" enough and being "crybabbies." Yet, she also goes on about gender stereotyping.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:58 PM
1

A female co-worker volunteered out of left field that she didn't toss the salad on the first date WTF does that mean? Now, if I would have gotten offended and made a bunch of complaints, then I would probably not have had a good working relationship. And, I think this happens a lot where women blow things out of proportion. Exactly, in most instances of what I will call "soft harassment", most men just accept it and move on.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:43 PM
27

Men are not bumbling idiots, One would think so judging by TV commercials. I got into it pretty good with my wife over the "man slips on toy and destroys room" commercial during the Olympics. She got legit mad when I asked her how she would feel about a commercial with a blonde bimbo having trouble driving a car or getting lost in the city or not being able to utilize some tool. "That's different." She said. I responded: "No, the fact you think its different is the problem." "But, its just a har…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:28 PM
1

Because they are drunk/high and think its a good idea. I never understood why, unless such conduct is repetitive, it becomes a news story.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:23 PM
103

Yes, welcome to the new world where "diverse" means "more of the same from a certain group"
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:13 PM
3

What...you didn't report it to HR for nonconsensual touching. I mean, she literally assaulted you? Also, did she have your permission to speak to you in the first place? /s
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:12 PM
7

Most of the time women put their ass and tits out for display. But its totally NOT to attract men. Only because it "makes them feel good"
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:06 PM
11

It chisels away at your self-esteem and self-worth until you are unsure whether your version of reality is valid or not. "Your version of reality"? Reality doesn't come in versions. Oh, to them it does... That is why they say such nonsensical things like "your facts are invalidating my feelings/experience" . To this group, there is no objective reality. Their perception IS reality and everything is about "validating" how they view the world
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:29 PM
2

Yes..in "traditional" circles, the initial "no" is seen as part of the mating "ritual"--the delicate dance that involves forms and traditions. After all, what self-respecting girl would say yes the first time a stranger asked her out?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:15 PM
24

She later conveyed to me through a mutual acquaintance that " I wasn't paying enough attention to her and she was just trying to make me jealous and fight for her." [Edit: For context, I probably was not "paying enough attention to her" as I was in a very tough post-graduate program and focused on that. But cheating on me and then breaking up with me was not the way to remedy that.]
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:54 PM
3

THIS. Female bosses are notoriously hostile to female underlings. --Especially those baby-boomers and gen x'rs who attained success by being alpha as fuck and sacrificing their family, health, etc. to get it. They absolutely hate whiny millennial women who care more about spouting off about free tampons in the bathroom "work life balance," and "mentorship" than busting their ass and contributing to the bottom line.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:59 PM
4

Bonus points for use of pusillanimous
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:42 PM
12

Guys will be super nice to a girl and never let on they're interested so it's similar to that IMHO, the only reason a guy will be "super nice" is BECAUSE he is interested.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:17 PM
36

Comments are gold and so true: My ex ended things abruptly and then got beyond furious when i called a family member to help me move my things out. Bitches stay crazy. I had the exact same experience. When I was moving my shit out, she said..."but but but..dont you even want to fight about it." I said: "Whats there to fight about. You fucked another guy and said we were over....Seems pretty final to me."
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:16 PM
6

Esp. as the commentators were tittering that the female would "take this one."
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:10 PM
11

I also don't expect them too I just think we deserve more respect than we get because we are willing to do those things. We are built for it. I also think they deserve the respect for the things they do like raising kids and generally making the world a more beautiful place. Agree 100%
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:35 PM
37

Never seen a woman swing a sledge hammer at a construction site.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:13 PM
-1

WOW..so now "mensrights rights" is "soyboi rights?" its wrong to be proud of our masculinity and accomplishments? What, we have to behave like good little cowed sheep?
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:12 PM
4

how many men were building skyscrapers and risking their lives in the coal mines
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:11 PM
5

Why is this being downvoted? Its made to have "male pride" now?
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:10 PM
62

Why not. How is it any different than "girl power." Men should be able to be proud of what we have built. I have no problem fighting back from the "all men are evil rapists" narrative that is currently engulfing our culture.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:09 PM
15

No. Its saying that historically without men, you wouldn't have skyscrapers and most infrastructure we depend on.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:02 PM
1

Media also affects culture
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:09 PM
2

Again...no one said it DIDN'T exist. Asking for it in the 80s would result in a face slap.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:52 AM
1

That requires one to know what normal sex looks like. One can reason that beverages do not belong in a sex act. The same process says nothing about positions, intensity, or how one finishes.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:41 AM
1

Jesus christ. Why do you keep presupposing I am making normative judgments!???? I never said we need to "change" anything. Just discussing cause and effect and historical differences. I never said there was a problem to "fix." Also, I am not a "perv". The whole point was that if you have never seen sex outside of pron you cannot know what "real" sex looks like.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:40 AM
1

No dispute....But my point was that show caused a SHIFT and CHANGE in attitudes.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:30 AM
1

Anal was pretty rare in porn in the 80s. And yes, my first "real experience", I imitated what I saw because I didn't know anything else.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:30 AM
1

Pepsi should not be involve din sex != Finishing on a girls face is normal
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:29 AM
2

Again. not the same. Common sense says "pepsi" or food don't belong in a sex act. How on earth does one know what "normal sex" looks like if one has only seen porn?
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:28 AM
1

Can you not understand the difference between A is different than B AND A is better than B
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:24 AM
1

I DONT find any of these behaviors "offensive". I am commenting of FREQUENCY and ACCEPTANCE I don't care what consenting adults do. I am remarking on the difference.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:24 AM
3

I dunno, do romance novels similarly fuck women's minds up? Yes Does the constant "Disney princess" image fuck girls up...yessiree bob. You probably also wont admit there was a distinct cultural shift in sexual attitudes/behavior after 'Sex and the City'
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:22 AM
1

If no one ever showed you "how to do it" and your only example is from porn, then yes, you will mimic porn. Remember we had no internet, "sex ed" in school was "don't do it or you gets aids."
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:21 AM
1

I grew up in a catholic family. No one talked about sex. The first "sexual experience" I had was finding old porn in the woods. School went over bare minimum. This was not RARE at all. You think people actually discussed "healthy sexual relationships" with their fucking family 40 years ago? It was porn, porkies, and talking about nailing chicks with buddies.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:18 AM
1

WTF? I did not make any normative judgments. But to deny the change in behavior is to deny reality. I am 50 years old.. girls were definitely NOT having rampant anal sex when I was younger. You were labelled a "perv" if you suggested to your GF that you watched porn....pretty much all of the "accepted" behaviors by 20-30 somethings these days just were not common when I grew up.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:10 AM
1

How does a 15 yr old know what sex looks like when all he has seen is porn? I am not for an instant saying porn is "bad"---but howe does that NOT affect someone when they have no base of reference?
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:05 AM
1

false equivalence. In all those examples, you know going in that it is not "normal" or "accepted" behavior. For many people, porn is their only experience/understanding of sex, so YES , it does result in a skewed reality.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:56 AM
0

No one is arguing it didn't exist..just that most "mainstream" people did not engage in that behavior
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:53 AM
0

Dont get the downvotes...this is spot on
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:52 AM
4

But but...thats COERCION
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:48 AM
1

preponderance of the evidence: A requirement that more then 50% of the evidence points to something. This is the burden of proof in a civil trial. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/preponderance_of_the_evidence even slightly in favour of the plaintiff, i.e. 51%; i.e. "more likely than not" Same same.....permissible to use all three formulations in closing argument
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:22 AM
1

"preponderance of evidence" means 51%...even if you are not "convinced", if you think it is "more likely than not," then the standard is met.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:53 PM
3

ahh....only sources that agree with you are not "biased" and any criticism on methodology must ipso facto be from a "biased" source
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:10 PM
9

Why would you be hesitant to say no? I would never be concerned for another guy talking to a girl. If he doesn't want to continue the conversation, he is a big boy and can leave.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:09 PM
3

No one says that. Most trump supporters have no problem with LEGAL immigration. They want enforcement so the only people incoming are LEGAL and they want the criteria changed so only those coming in LEGALLY will not be a drain on the system and will instead boost GDP and put us at a competitive advantage. Nothing "racist" about that at all.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:09 PM
1

Depends on the querry..is it based on geographical features? If I sort data based on a variable, the "discriminatory" intent is based on the variable choice, not the resulting output.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:07 PM
4

Not harmless...based on the notion that all men are predators. Change the facts. Dude is walking down the street and a person of [x minority race] approaches and asks for money. You respond: "Hey man, do you need to get out of here."
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:38 PM
2

False equivalency. What is "racist" is discrimination BASED ON race. I.e. "I won't hire latinos"; "We don't want [x ethnic group] coming here" In contrast, saying "we don't want poor people" is not "racist" just because most poor people happen to be from a particular race or ethnicity. Likewise, "we don't want immigrants from [pick any characteristic other than race] is NOT racist simply because the majority of X happen to be from one race. TO use your counter-"example" IF you said "We only want…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:37 PM
3

B.S. Adhering to the view that people should be judged by their merits and character and not according to their skin color is NOW considered "racist." Not supporting affirmative action is now considered "racist." Not "recognizing privilege" is racist. Insisting upon objective, color-blind merit-based applications for college or employment is now "racist." AND, the term has been redefined to mean that professors can fall for the extinction of the white race, but that ISN'T racist!
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:33 PM
6

I would call that sticking her nose in other people's business. No objective danger/threat.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:30 PM
15

How is asking someone out a "danger"? In college, I would ask out as many girls as possible because that increased the liklihood of a yes.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:10 PM
2

Pretty much it. Offering rational criticism of feminist doctrine now = "hate speech" and "failing to adhere to university values."
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:09 PM
4

People still adhere to this false belief that 1/2 of Turmp supporters are racist "deplorables." --- leftists have done to the word "racist" what SJWs have done to "rape." Now "racism" means "refusing to recognize 'white priviege' and arguing people should be subject to the same standards regardless of skin color."
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:08 PM
2

Mexican is a nationality, not a race
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:05 PM
3

Shithole has nothing to do with race; has to do with GDP, economic development, and education level
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:05 PM
50

I dropped my feminist theory class and transferred to a new "interdisciplinary studies" course after I was ridiculed for questioning the notion that all skyscrapers are phallic symbols of the patriarchy and that to further "gender equity" new buildings should be built in the shapes of bowls underground. I was literally laughed at when I tried to mention the costs of building an equivalent capacity underground structure and related engineering problems--apparently concepts like "efficiency" "prof…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:12 PM
-7

Well, from, a layman's perspective the problem seems to be the repeated stories of raw temp data manipulation, historical temperature data "adjustment" and inability of hockey stick theory to explain the warming "pause." But mention any of this and you are deemed am anti-science heretic. I question the above as a matter of intellectual honesty and because I believe the research thus far has been politically motivated--not because I like big corporations or am in favor of pollution. Anytime that …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:06 PM
3

great piece. Even liberals are starting to understand the madness. SJWs are fascists, plain and simple: Also, we would argue that “Right” and “Left” make little sense in either of these contexts. Both fringe groups, extremists wherever they are found, are more accurately described as authoritarian. . . . For today’s social justice warriors, only one narrative shall be allowed. It is unquestionable. Those who dissent are guilty. The “equity and inclusion” movement, cloaked in words that sound ben…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:56 PM
-14

Ah--so global warming then
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:42 PM
1

WTF is Blockchain?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 07:55 PM
11

What male in a high profile job has ever been "mentored"? You get ahead by working harder, longer, playing office politics, and fucking over the competition. Unless, of course, you are a woman..then you just blow the CEO, get "mentoring" and claim "METOO" when things dont work out the way you wanted.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:49 PM
16

But...but. but...thats just more evidence of patriarchy and structural discrimination. If you are not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about...sexist pig /s
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:42 PM
3

No, we can't. Men are busy working.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:41 PM
2

No...by staying in a marriage that like that, the woman is being "oppressed." How much you want to bet most of the men in those marriages have to agree to be cukced to "make it work."?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:27 PM
3

well, why not try taking a look at the woman that posted Because, muh, listen and beleive
/r/MensRights06/02/18 09:40 PM
7

900
/r/MensRights06/02/18 09:40 PM
19

The issue of disclosure of evidence has been at the centre of a series of sex offence trials which have collapsed in recent months. More than 900 criminal cases were dropped last year due to a failure by police or prosecutors to disclose evidence.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 09:40 PM
5

Also means "settling" i.e not truly happy with whom she "settles" and much more likely to "jump ship."
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:17 PM
60

With diminishing chances of winning a bumper share of a husband’s wealth, many wives now prefer to try to rebuild their marriage rather than risk a break-up. Why is it about "winning". The article also refers to women "suffering" because they are not getting "mealticket" divorce judgments. Why should they? The article characterizes equitable distribution of marital assets as "favoring men." How so? I thought they wanted "equality." Articles like this simply reinforce that feminism is not at all …
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:16 PM
0

Why should women need to "act like one of the guys" to be able to participate fully in their job? because when your job requires you to be a Type-A go-getter, high-strung asshole, thats how you act. I've never worked in a company where it would be acceptable or even thinkable to hold a work social event at a strip club, We take clients to stop clubs all the time. Also not unusual to be working 80+ hours a week and then "blow off steam" getting hammered, etc. If you want to move up, you play alon…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:11 PM
2

I think he was referring to the lawyer
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:26 PM
1

In my experience in a professional environment, woman are free to and encouraged to attend "strip club"-type social events. They just need to play along and act like one of the guys and its no biggie.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:22 PM
1

He will probably have an objection to weddings as well. After all, the father "gives away the bride" thus confirming his possessory interest and, that father daughter dance is just patriarchal symbol of transferring ownership.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:40 PM
1

You are taking a benign and fun activity and ruining it through some post-modern deconstructionist b.s.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:39 PM
1

Why is it "creepy" for a father to enjoy playing dress up with his daughter and taking her to the ball?
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:38 PM
1

Again, because of the minority, it has to be ruined for the majority Exactly. I mean, I am an atheist. I don;t have any problem with nativity displays, merry Christmas, etc. because it doesn't affect me other than people being generally more upbeat/nicer. Unless you are forcing me to do it, why should I care?
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:36 PM
2

Its a religion, complete with its own devil, doctrine, dogma, and heresies.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:35 PM
2

You are missing the argument. Its: "we need to diversity because that is what our client's want" not because "its more efficient."
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:34 PM
1

In the U.S. it is not.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:31 PM
2

And harassment used to mean repeated behaviors, not one-offs. yes, the definition of "harassment" is indeed, REPEATED unwanted behavior.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:06 PM
1

40 and married. I am a relatively high earner in a high stress job. Most of my female colleagues hate their husbands who make less than them and whom they consider lazy. My male colleagues who have SAHWs are essentially dealing with grown up teenagers, who still go out for "ladies night" with their girlfriends, take endless selfies, gossip about the garbage on TV, and are generally vain, vapid, and utterly vacuous. They only colleagues I know with stable marriages are men who married other high …
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:40 PM
19

The reality is that men are only valued for what they can provide: Resources and security. All the "soulmate" bs is just that.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:52 PM
3

Honest honey...I WANTED to say no...but those boobs were just right in my face. The power dynamics just too surreal.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:20 PM
4

Oh..you've seen the new Star Wars as well then......
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:30 PM
8

Again we see the movement is not about giving women the freedom to chose, but imposing the lifestyle choices of the elite.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:34 PM
3

No, see, its just that the "skills" that the "market" "values" are part of the patriarchal paradigm and systematic oppression. What is needed is a reevaluation of what "skills" matter. Specifically, females are undervalued for their superior social skills and emotional intelligence, attributes which the male dominated boardrooms do not value. --See, I can play feminist SJW too.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:32 PM
6

Lawyers generally eschew disclosing their evidence until required to do so in a court proceeding. Here, as a PR move, I can see someone saying: "Lets wait until everyone has their go" and then respond.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:30 PM
1

Don't tell reddit that...........
/r/MensRights30/01/18 10:03 PM
2

clap clap clap
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:36 PM
2

Note also the move to prohibit the defense from using pre or post coital text messages.social media posts that would indicate consent.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:49 PM
9

But we are all the same. There ARE no differences except artificial constructs!
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:24 PM
29

Its like "what attracted me to him is why it was rape"
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:33 AM
-1

>I did not say "must," Evidence must be present when the accusers are few >made no mention of different standards for the famous. When they are as numerous as in the Weinstein, Spacey and Cosby cases, it is virtually certain
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:10 PM
4

Also correlates to entire generation that can't separate feelings from objective reality.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 09:41 PM
3

I'm not sure I could bring myself to try dating women in the UK. But that view is independently justifiable......
/r/MensRights29/01/18 09:41 PM
61

Let me get this straight....female wants to have meaningless sex and takes advantage of man = empowered. Male wants to have meaningless sex and takes advantage of woman = rape?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 07:12 PM
4

Dear sir: Thank you for your enquiry. Based upon further review, it appears you harbour attitudes inconsistent with the goals of our programme and institutional values. You services will no longer be required. We do appreciate the time you have provided to our programme.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:33 PM
104

That train of thought---"I only did it because I wanted him to like me"--seems common in many of these "regret sex" cases. Statements like this should be prima facia evidence of consent as they are admitting the willingly did something. They are just upset it didn't have the desired effect.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:29 PM
0

You're kidding right? Enough people make allegations and "the man must be guilty of something"? Proof is only needed if you are not "famous"?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:16 PM
11

Anecdotal evidence: Every "high powered" female I work with or know who has a low-paying "blue collar" husband or SAHD cheats on them, when drinking disparages them for their laziness or not bringing home enough, and/or is involved in divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 11:54 PM
19

Tl; Dr: Women do not consider unemployed or unemployed men attractive. Men are unemployed and underemployed due to death of manufacturing, "gender norms," and "traditional notions of masculinity. If only men would take more "feminine jobs" they could be gainfully employed and in happy marriages. barf.....yep..men not wanting to be nurses is all about "traditional gender roles" and not the fact that many guys like to build shit and aren't, by nature, empathetic.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 10:32 PM
5

Yes. That is why the phrase 'a nation of laws not men' was coined. Justice should not depend on the idiosyncrasies of a particular judge. "justice" is not in achieving a particular outcome, but in fairly applying the procedural rules and governing statutes.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:24 PM
10

Up is down and down is up. A panel comrpised solely of one gender is "diverse" and evidence of "equality."
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:22 PM
4

Show me a male over the age of 16 who hasn’t asked a female (or another male) to “Suck my d---.” And the feminist response will be: "See, thats the problem, thats rape culture" The response to the fact that he kissed the second complaint on the bed will be: "Thats sexual assault; he didn't ask for her consent" This really is an attempt to criminalize normal sexual behavior, IMHO.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:51 PM
3

I dont know why you made this response. "Stop caring about that which you cannot control" is the key to happiness in many philosophies/religions.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:03 PM
1

Whats even the point of being alive? Well, I hate to parrot meme-worthy advice. But, seriously, exercise, get your head together and then do whatever the hell you want to do. Definitely go see someone if you are having that many issues dealing with things. There is no "point" of being alive other than what you want to make of it. ....until you have kids, then your "point" is to protect them and raise them to be good strong adults.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:02 PM
5

Daily argument: Q: Why is this here? A: Are you saying I haven't been working hard enough to pick up the house...I have been [insert diatribe about how she is a martyr for the family]....followed by accusations of insults. Me: I just wanted to know if you were making spaghetti, if not, I was going to put the pasta away.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:58 PM
6

I love when they pose a "question" and then when you probe for more facts, you get accused of "derailing the discussion" or get the response: 'I came here for support!' No, you posed a question, and I cannot answer it without further pertinent information.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:56 PM
7

Oh.. I have already "lost" my hearing and have been told I need to "get it checked." I have not gone because when the doc asks what is wrong, i would reply...."I performed manual psycho modification to eliminate the harpy range."
/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:52 PM
4

Interesting...when my libertarian college club did the same thing but in reverse to protest affirmative action, we were disbanded and all faced discipline.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:21 PM
9

Because "being lonely" sounds better than "being horny"
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:19 PM
6

Same treatment for me for taking my daughter to the park and taking pictures of her on my day off.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:17 PM
15

Coming from 10 years of marriage I have numerous similar stories. Anytime I ask my wife to explain something or question why something is being done a certain way, it is taken as a sign of criticism and implication that I think her way is "wrong".....when really I just want to understand the reasoning process too see If I am not aware of some important underlying fact. It nearly all instances, there IS no underlying rationale other than "thats how I do it." The biggest argument on this was my in…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:13 PM
6

The last part here is spot on. In many colleges and social circles, having some traumatic event that punches your "victim" card is a prerequisite to group membership. Here is a pretty good rule of thumb for the young ladies...You will know if you were raped. If you need to "discover" or "realize" it after gossiping with your friends or going to some campus advocacy group, then what happened is you are trying to rationalize poor decision-making.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 09:04 PM
4

An adversarial system is not a justice system...it is a legal system.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 08:59 PM
5

Also, understaffed government agencies and insane workloads play into this....People never consider that.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 06:09 PM
3

Not all discrimination is illegal or even morally wrong.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 06:08 PM
14

I have refused to speak to the woman since then. She has since demonstrated that she is completely psychotic. So, no it wouldn't surprise me if in her warped mind, she believed it. Could also be she was jealous of my wife and trying to ruin our new marriage because hers was falling apart.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 05:30 PM
1

I fail to understand why she should have any rights to custody of the child given that she is a sex offender.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 04:06 PM
1

you fucking dumbass. Not an argument In one case, she gets to decide what she shares with the public. In the other, someone else does. That is not accurate. People's photos on facebook are regularly shared beyond the "privacy settings" and facebook's user agreement indicates that they own everything you post and can redisclose as they see fit. And, again, you completely miss the point that she has no legal right to DECIDE whether an image of her in public is shared...because it there is no reaso…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 04:04 PM
1

Only under the warped millennial definition of "sexist." I do not believe either sex is "better" or should be prevented from doing what they want. However, there are biological differences between men and women and, generally speaking, they are better geared towards different tasks. I do not see how a man can produce offspring in a marriage without recognizing his obligation to provide for them and raise them. That is not sexism..that is being a responsible male adult. Please tell me what is "un…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 03:59 PM
25

People simply do not get how easy it is to falsely accuse someone--whether out of malice, ignorance, mis-impression etc. While thankfully I have never been accused of rape, I was falsely accused of "coming on" to a "friend" of my wife (recently married) at an office holiday party. The woman was horribly inebriated (throwing her dress shoes, crying, etc.) and I encountered her in the hallway whilst seeking the men's room. She was stumbling and balling that she was ugly and that no liked her (she …
/r/MensRights25/01/18 03:54 PM
4

That is part and parcel to an adversary system of justice. I sometimes wonder if an inquisitorial system is better in the long run.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 03:40 PM
1

Umm, yes. Your sloppiness is something up with which I do not need to put! The nuns smacked my hands for ending sentences in a preposition, so therefore I do not end sentences in prepositions, no ifs, ands, or buts.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:33 PM
1

Well, in my experience your typical drunken college "shitfaced" night does not make you legally incapable of consenting. If you lost motor control, were sent to the hospital, or actually passed out, then yes.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:32 PM
2

The feeling is how we learn and mature. That was my point.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:58 PM
1

No, actually...like legally incapable of consenting. You can consent to all sorts of stuff when you are "shitfaced." The standard is whether you have control over your actions, not whether you are capable of exercising sound judgment.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:54 PM
7

"non verbal cues"---i.e. he was supposed to read her mind.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:49 PM
8

“If you’re having to convince someone to do it, she doesn’t want to,” added Twitter user Jenjen. “Coercion is not consent.” That is where this whole younger generation is completely off the rails. They fail to understand the distinction between objective consent and subjective desire and cannot comprehend that people can consent to things the do not want. Meetoo now seems comprised not of actuall assault victims, but women who apparently need chaperones, lack agency, and are too squeamish or ins…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:48 PM
1

How are these even remotely the same thing? They are not and thats the point. There used to be a clear distinction between public and private. People did not share their private activities writ large (Note: there is no guarantee that something you post to FB will be restricted to your friends and family), but also did not feel entitled to any special protection of their public activities. Now the two have become completely blurred and people are fine sharing anything private to the world. Yet, p…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:40 PM
1

I agree...the BEHAVIOR is different. The "feelings" are identical.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:32 PM
7

or hunt
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:36 PM
1

What your post illustrates however, is the same mentality these "young women" (and I use that term, like they are, loosely), think their "shitty feelings" somehow entitle them to ruin a person's life or demand legal redress.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:22 PM
1

yeah, it feels shitty. Thats what happens when you make a bad decision that you regret. Remember that shitty feeling the next time your buds want you to do the 5th jagerbomb and a girl is hanging on your arm.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:21 PM
1

The whole point of PUBLIC is that its PUBLIC. You have no ownership in what you do, say, look in public. I find it quite fascinating and frustrating how people are totally fine with spilling the intimate details on their private life on public social media, post compromising pics of themselves for the world to see, yet become aghast when someone takes a picture of them on the subway.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:09 PM
2

Too shey ...because, i can't tell if you would consent to "touche"
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:44 PM
9

Judges and prior case law. It is judged in accordance with an objective "reasonable person" standard. Foul language, horseplay, random sexual innuendo/comments have repeatedly been held to not amount to a hostile work environment. Also, there is always the "equal opportunity harasser" defense. Under Title VII any claim of sex discrimination/harassment must show that the plaintiff was treated differently because of his/her sex. Thus, its not discrimination if a boss is equally an asshole to every…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:40 PM
3

Thats because we are busy working trying to provide for them
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:33 PM
0

You mean: From what is this?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:29 PM
1

Pro-tip: Getting black-out shitfaced drunk is not "cool" or "fun". The sooner one learns that, the sooner one learns that, the better. if you don't learnt that you either: 1) wind up getting Jenny pregnant; 2) killing your buddies in the car; 3) in jail; 4) in the hospital; or 5) jobless and divorced, passed out in an alley behind "Floyd's Tumble In" with a half-empty Hams in your hand and GPC hanging off your lip, while your crack-whore stripper girlfriend steals your 94 camry to pay off her pi…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:11 PM
2

Re: shakespeare..that has been happening for decades. In fact, good luck finding a white male author of yesterday who hasn;t been "disavowed" and "deconstructed" by academia.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:57 PM
8

Good thing the law is pretty clear in the US that offhand boorish remarks do not constitute "harassment" or a "hostile work environment" unless pervasive to the extent it interferes with the ability to work.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:54 PM
1

We do not know that. One can be drunk and "blacked out" (as in "can't remember what happened as opposed to "couldn't move or speak) and legally perfectly capable of consenting to sex.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:50 PM
2

What can I do? I feel abused and exploited but can't do anything about it. 50-year old dad here: This is called LIFE. You got drunk and did dumb things. Getting drunk was your own fault. its one thing if she forced you to penetrate against your will, but "fooling around"? You need to grow up and take responsibility for your actions, as do most 20 year olds. Learn from your mistake and quit whinning
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:49 PM
1

You have to be at an extraordinarily high level of intoxication to reach mental incapacity.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:47 PM
1

I pretty much disagree with everything you said. I 100% agree that the primary role of a father and husband is to "provide for his family." If you are unwilling or unable to do so, don't have a family. The only part I agree on is the sexual assault part, but even then, real men just deal with it and move one...not make it the defining moment in their lives and start movements. Men do, produce, create, act....the quintessential aspect of being a man is to conform the world to your will to the bes…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:25 PM
2

yeah, I never for the life of me understood why the "heroine" in that was in any way likeable.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:20 PM
1

Actually, it IS perfectly ok to photograph random strangers in public places without consent, so long as you are not using their image for commercial gain.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:14 PM
44

You think losing both legs and a dominant arm is hard? Try living with the tramua of someone fucking you when you didn't want them too engaging in poor decision-making while intoxicated and sleeping with someone that you now think is "ewwww" FIFY
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter