TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FlosCarmeli Archive

View 2 posts and 77 comments by FlosCarmeli on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
136

False AccusationFlosCarmeli/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:41 PM
4

Rant/VentingFlosCarmeli/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 04:48 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thank you, the suffrage movement was absurd. Women can make or break a nation simply by how they raise their children and submit to their husbands.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/18 12:42 AM
5

Not going to rip into you because /u/Crackertron already did, but that is something you need to lay the smack down on immediately. There is no way I would put up with that type of behaviour, especially from someone who's job it is to be a housewife.
/r/MarriedRedPill17/05/18 02:02 PM
1

I agree. That's totally unacceptable. If she is drinking all day, 3 or 4 days a week, that's is a serious issue that needs to be addressed, especially since she is ignoring her duties.
/r/MarriedRedPill17/05/18 02:01 PM
8

Yeah it's sad. I go to a traditional Catholic church and the dynamic is way different than your run of the mill Catholic church. Wives submit to your husband's is strong there and the priests emphasize that most marriages fail when the wife tries to wear the pants. It's great.
/r/MarriedRedPill28/04/18 12:32 AM
1

It is clear to me you're missing very important metaphysical points in my arguments, so I'm going to step away from this conversation, not that I'm not interested in debating, but you seem stuck in a modality of materialism, unable to see how metaphysics and sensible nature work in unison and are only separate from each other by abstraction. I really have nothing further to say, not because I cannot respond to your objections, but because I think it would be fruitless at this point.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 09:15 PM
1

Existence doesn't logically necessitate creation. Cosmogonists (those who study the "big bang" era of the universe) aren't settled on an infinite vs finite past for our universe, yet. In other words, we don't know if there was a beginning or not. Sure it does, if you accept logically that we are not the primary cause of bringing ourselves into existence and accept there is a first cause from which all things proceed. With regards to the science of the universe being finite vs. infinite, there ar…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:01 PM
1

Reality, creation itself. You, me, the grass beneath your feet, the sunlight on your face, beautiful music, the stars and planets, the wind, the ocean. All of it is the effect of God's first movement, bringing creation ex nihilo by his fiat, i.e. His act, the unmoved mover if you will. This is a super nutshell of St. Thomas's five ways: Here. You can read the actual arguments in English, translated from the Latin Here in the 3rd question specifically (I prefer to read it in Latin because it is c…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:19 PM
1

God is purely immaterial. So I can only prove and deduce Him insofar as observing His effects, i.e. created reality. He came materially in the person of Jesus Christ, but that is an entirely different topic and I'd rather stick to proving Him through purely natural reason alone, which like I said is demonstrable by ascertaining Him through His effects and other means in created reality, observable, sensible reality because that is really what we're discussing and what St. Thomas discusses.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:03 PM
1

That's quite a blanket statement. There is more than ample evidence, but I don't have all the publications, articles, videos, papers, and books sitting in one convenient location on my HD or in my office. It would take me probably days to agregate it all and send it to you. Some of the "proof" is dubious protestant sensationalism but there is genuine empirical scientific evidence as well, no just from Catholics and Protesants, but secularists as well, even pagan China, one just has to look in th…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:05 PM
1

Have you read St. Thomas's 5 ways? I would encourage you, if you are truly interested in reading and understanding both sides of the argument to read Dr. Edward Feser. He has written multiple books on the New Atheism. He is a philosophy professor. Most notable the "The Last Superstition" and "St Thomas's Five Ways". I'm not sure what your mean by evidence though? What exactly are you looking for? Material? Philosophical? We should probably continue this via PM instead of this thread.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:03 PM
1

Not everything can be explained in terms of natural science. That what philosophy and theology is for. You're a secular humanist materialist, no argument I make is going to convince you of the existence of immaterial reality until you're willing to dispose of your presuppositions regarding scientism. Regarding Noah's flood, like I said, there is an exceptionally abundant array of geological and archaeological proof, so I'm not even going to concede or grant you the possibility that it was a myth…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:49 PM
1

There is no further point in debating on this anyway since you're not open to the possibility God exists. There is much more to the argument than can be said in the small space of a reddit post. And given your alias, it's hard to take you seriously at all.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:39 PM
1

I see no reason to accept this premise, and this doesn't quite match my definition you agreed with above. I define truth as a descriptor, not an object in and of itself. 2+2=4 is a true statement in and of itself, it has nothing to do with whether or not someone describes it. It is in the object itself. I don't think it makes sense to define god as reality and the source of everything. Such a concept has no explanatory power and is unfalsifiable (without being given more info about your god). It…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 01:52 AM
1

To answer your last question... Truth is that which comports with reality aka an accurate description of reality. Correct. Truth is that which conforms with reality. As to "where" truth resides, I'm not sure I understand. I don't believe truth is an "object" that resides somewhere. It is a adjective (truthful) applies to thinks which are accurate statements of reality. Truth is immaterial, the reason I ask is to get an idea of where people are in their understanding of ontology. Truth is a thing…
/r/MensRights29/07/17 11:47 PM
1

God is truth. Without God, how does one know what is true? They can't, since all order and perfection proceed from Him and are contained in Him to some degree. Where does truth reside? What is truth?
/r/MensRights29/07/17 10:07 PM
1

Catholics are opposed to libertarianism, so I'm not sure what point you're making.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:10 PM
1

Oh really? Were you there? Give me a break. There is an astounding amount of geological evidence for a global flood.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:10 PM
1

Well you have nothing to pull me to except smoke and mirrors. Atheism didn't build western civilization, but it sure is destroying it.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:29 PM
1

Study some political philosophy. Just because someone is against government hand outs doesn't make them a CIA operative. That's a total non sequitur argument.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:11 PM
1

Ok Karl Marx. Your false equivocation doesn't negate the fact that there is a true God. People can be wrong and are often wrong in their belief. If you have no basis for truth, such as secular humanism, then you can make absolutely ZERO assertions that your opinion is true since you have no basis for the immaterial reality of the essence of truth. According to secular humanists like yourself, truth is whatever you want it to be, which is straight from Hell and entirely without substance or logic…
/r/MensRights29/07/17 04:09 PM
1

I'm not even sure what point you're trying to make. But saying "killing people for their god" is a blanket statement with no qualifications that liberals love to use to somehow justify ignoring morality or the reality that sometimes people are justified in going to war in the name of God. Like the Battle of LePonto. There is only one true God, the holy and undivided Trinity, and one true Church, the Catholic faith. All other "gods" are demons. Saying "believe in yourself" is secular humanist gar…
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:51 PM
1

Come to /r/traditionalcatholics and we'd be glad to explain trinitarian theology. It's not borrowed from anything regardless of what pseudo scholars say.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:43 PM
1

Did you even read what I said? I'm not denying that there are CIA fronts, that is obvious. But you're accusing CMTV and St Michaels media of being one, which is completely stupid. If you can't have a conversation that stays on topic or addresses the points I made, then there is no point in talking.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:08 PM
1

Men also die for their God (early Christian martyrs for instance) and men kill for drugs and sexual gratification too, so your argument is a non sequitur. Not all killing is evil. There is such a thing as Just war. There is no true freedom outside of God.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:58 PM
1

Your assertion was that they ARE CIA not that they are susceptible. By your premise no one can be trusted because everyone is potentially susceptible.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:56 PM
1

There is only One, all the gods of the gentiles are demons. The Holy Trinity is God.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:55 PM
2

Thanks for ripping off what I said with some secular garbage. Very gentlemanly of you.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:04 AM
0

Put your confidence in God, not the state.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:36 AM
1

I can assure you that Church Militant TV and St. Michael Media are definitely not CIA. It is a Catholic Media organization run by a former Catholic seminarian Michael Voris. They are very well known amongst faithful Catholics. /u/ee4m you are absolutely insane if you think that ChurchMilitant is a CIA front. Seriously man, stop believing every conspiracy you read on the internet. While I do believe there are Soros funded groups and things like that, I know people who know men who work at this or…
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:09 PM
4

Yeah right, DM is basically softcore porn. They love to post pictures of trashy women half naked constantly. Are you kidding me?
/r/MensRights28/07/17 08:56 PM
5

Daily mail is essentially a softcore porn news site unfortunately
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:46 PM
15

No, I never finished.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:01 PM
5

Yes, some of them do.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:51 PM
30

She should definitely be charged. Well, they did throw him in Jail for 12 hours based on essentially hearsay. A very similar situation happened to me while I was in college. Though I never got thrown in jail (because there was zero proof and it wasn't true), I got kicked out of my university at 2am on a Sunday night based on an allegation from a girl who didn't even attend school there. The cops even showed up, which was absolutely absurd. I wasn't even being charged. It was like living in the t…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:48 PM
2

Yeah if my wife hit me or called me a twat I would throw all her crap in the street and tell her to come back when she learns how to speak like a lady.
/r/askMRP13/04/17 04:46 PM
1

I am honestly shocked he did nothing when she hit him. I would punish my wife immediately if she did that to me.
/r/askMRP13/04/17 04:35 PM
2

Lol, I don't disagree with you there.
/r/MarriedRedPill11/11/16 05:09 PM
1

Well he said he doesn't believe in "converting people," it just seemed like an over-simplification to me. I am talking about it in more general terms. But you're right, if someone is not receptive, it's a useless endeavor. I am not going to try to sell something to someone if they're not receptive, but that doesn't mean it's not worth trying, you never know when you might get a buyer. I don't go around preaching the gospel of MRP because I think there are certain foundational flaws in the though…
/r/MarriedRedPill11/11/16 04:57 PM
1

Well how would they know about it unless they were told? The knowledge starts somewhere. Whether it's a forum post or an idea. I'm thinking of it in more epistemological terms. I wasn't talking about the sub specifically either, I was talking in more general terms, which is clear from my examples.
/r/MarriedRedPill11/11/16 04:50 PM
1

Can't say I agree with this, here's why: Isn't this entire subreddit geared towards converting men from blue to red? Yes. It is. So, it seems contradictory to say "I don't believe in converting people." If you didn't you wouldn't be here. If you are in the business world, do you not try to convert people to your product over the competitors? It's just life. It's reality. I think there is a time and place to keep your mouth shut, but a blanket statement like "I don't try to convert people" is mis…
/r/MarriedRedPill10/11/16 08:21 PM
1

Best comment here IMO
/r/MarriedRedPill10/11/16 08:09 PM
1

It's her birthday man, just get the cake and stop over-thinking it.
/r/MarriedRedPill20/07/16 03:32 PM
1

I was about to say the same thing, that wall of text hurts my eyes.
/r/MarriedRedPill01/07/16 07:08 PM
1

I don't remember where I read it, but essentially it's your bed, your house, don't let her bitchiness dictate you not sleeping in your own bed. It's a huge sign of weakness.
/r/MarriedRedPill28/06/16 01:55 AM
2

He was saying he is not religious, I was saying I was Catholic, that is all. No one cares what some skank offered you.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/05/16 05:15 PM
1

I agree with you, although I am Catholic, that is besides the point. People are going to choose evil and ignore their conscience, it's just reality. Just out of curiosity, how do you define Masculinity? Because I believe we have different views on it.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/05/16 03:01 PM
0

Feelings and emotions are fleeting, we let reason control our actions and not emotions, which is something I see mentioned here a lot, this is how men differ from women. We act on reason primarily, women on emotion. Reason says it is wrong to commit adulterous acts, and people know it's wrong to cheat, regardless of one's feelz. I don't really get what point you're trying to make with the cheating. People are weak, it's going to haopen, we live in an imperfect world. Religion / morality is for c…
/r/MarriedRedPill23/05/16 01:07 PM
2

100% this, so much.
/r/MarriedRedPill20/05/16 05:26 PM
2

Wow, that's crazy. I'm glad you got your daughter back, I'm sure she was traumatized from that.
/r/MarriedRedPill17/05/16 06:10 PM
4

Then don't read the sub.
/r/MarriedRedPill14/05/16 03:07 PM
-2

She hates you cause you don't want kids. It's obvious.. She is trying to fill the void with dogs/school because you're a selfish prick. I mean if you are really a practicing Catholic, you should know this. Your wife is in PRIME BABY MODE and you're robbing her of that.
/r/MarriedRedPill06/05/16 04:20 AM
1

After reading what he said, I honestly think she resents him because he refuses to have kids; therefore, she sees no reason to open her legs.
/r/MarriedRedPill06/05/16 04:18 AM
1

Well, I can tell you, if you're Catholic and you're choosing to not have children you're being a selfish fuckboi and you might as well not have gotten married. If you never had the intention to have children in the first place then your marriage is invalid in the eyes of the church and you can possibly get an annulment. I'm Catholic, and you sound like a really shitty Catholic. That's probably why your wife resents you. She wants a dog because you won't give her kids. It's obvious as fuck.
/r/MarriedRedPill06/05/16 04:13 AM
1

all I can say is, it won't be me who files, unless maybe she goes completely batshit crazy off the deep end...but there is no law that says I have to tell her that. I 100% agree with you there. I go to the FSSP as well, sometimes the SSPX. I was in the FSSP seminary for a little while. Novus Ordo parishes are full of hardcore feminists and push-over wuss men, I avoid them at all costs, and because the liturgy is a joke. Come check out our sub sometime /r/traditionalcatholics
/r/askMRP21/04/16 02:01 AM
2

Well said. I am a former seminarian, now married. We go to the traditional latin mass every Sunday. I literally just implemented TRP behaviors, the NEXT DAY my wife was in a better mood, wore sexy lipstick when I got home from work for the first time in 2 years, cuddled with me, didn't disrespect me and banged me the next morning. In terms of practicality, most priests have no idea about the married life, they can only advise in terms of spiritual matters. Catholicism does teach a strong patriar…
/r/askMRP20/04/16 04:38 PM
2

Catholic here too. It does not forbid civil divorce because that has no bearing on church law, but yes the sacrament is indissoluble, so there is no such thing as divorce in Church law. There is the annulment process, but that is meant to deem that the marriage was never validly sacramentally contracted in the first place. I would never divorce my wife either, although I think sometimes it could be beneficial to leave for awhile. I don't believe in divorce, I think it is a cowards way out, a lot…
/r/askMRP19/04/16 09:57 PM
1

Church teaching doesn't change, so no Pope Francis's encyclical means nothing.
/r/askMRP19/04/16 09:54 PM
1

Which one is that my friend? I just started reading this sub.
/r/MarriedRedPill18/04/16 09:33 PM
0

I'm not getting divorced, get over it.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 09:20 PM
1

Can you expound more on dread not being true? I posted a thread in TRP and those guys are pushing dread hard, but I'm married so I don't see how it will work.
/r/MarriedRedPill18/04/16 08:50 PM
1

I'm not the one who started talking shit buddy, that was you. I don't just insult other people. I asked for advice, not your belittling bullshit. That's why I got angry, cause you insulted me and my children. Stop trying to justify you being a complete and total ass-clown. Pretty much everyone else has shown and given good-advice, except you.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 08:28 PM
-1

Dude, back the fuck off. You have some anger issues. If you said that shit to me IRL I'd knock your fucking teeth into your brain. I came here looking for advice, not some armchair warrior neckbeard telling me he is going to "go after my children" what the Hell is wrong with you?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 07:26 PM
-1

You are the sole reason children grow up to become heroin addicts and prostitutes.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 07:09 PM
1

How are my responses "typical male hamstering"? I'm open to constructive criticism, just not blanket statement bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 06:57 PM
1

This post gives me hope
/r/MarriedRedPill18/04/16 06:53 PM
1

Now that I think about it, I didn't follow through with punishment, nor have I ever. Think we just found the root of the issue. If I say I'm going to leave, I just should. I should probably take away her debit card or take her off the checking account. Not sure how I could punish her outside of those two things. Do you have other suggestions?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 06:34 PM
0

Well yeah, I've been trying that... Doesn't seem to work. I've told her at least 3 times in the last month she is disrespecting me and to cut that crap out. We haven't gone to counseling yet, it was something I have thought about.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 06:26 PM
1

I appreciate the sentiments, but I would just leave for a period of time instead of getting divorced. With regards to the religion/morality/Catholicism controlling me, I have firm belief in the faith and I would never recant it. The way women act now is a product of feminism and the corruption of culture because of modernism not because of anything Catholicism has done. Catholicism throughout history has been the strongest proponent of the alpha-male driven family. Always will be. Unfortunately …
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 06:23 PM
1

Sounds good man, that is helpful. I'm sure I can figure out a way to push the dread game, we have a lot of friends and social events.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 06:12 PM
1

Thanks for your advice. Was that so hard?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 06:10 PM
1

So why don't you offer a solution if that's what you think instead of talking crap about everyone else like an 11yr old kid who sucks at Call of Duty.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 06:03 PM
1

Yeah I know, I am seriously considering it. I have emphasized to her recently, within the last couple of months that her refusal to fulfill her marriage vows is a mortal sin and grants me the right to "put her away" for a period of time, meaning, I leave until she gets her act together. I have told her recently, like 3 days ago, that she is bound by her Catholic faith to respect me and obey me and to not withhold sex, under the pain of mortal sin. We are traditionalists and go to the latin mass,…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 06:01 PM
0

How is it negotiating if a priest or a marriage counselor told her to stop disrespecting me? That is not a discussion in the merit of my attractiveness but a correction in her behavior, two totally different things.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 05:57 PM
1

Because it is not a possibility; therefore, it cannot be explored. I could always just leave. Doesn't mean we have to get divorced. I've threatened to just leave before. That's why I mentioned I was considering marriage counseling so that someone besides me can tell her that she's acting like a bitch. You ever heard the term "familiarity breeds contempt"? I love my children, so I will not leave them. Unlike most people, I'm trying to do what I can to help her get back to her old self instead of …
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 05:48 PM
2

Also, wanted to ask, can't really find it on the sidebar, what is a good resource for dread game (not 100% sure what it is).
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 05:26 PM
1

Has nothing to do with the pope, useless comment is useless.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 05:23 PM
4

Thanks! I'm gonna go by the gym on the way home from work and sign up.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 05:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter