TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FlyingDutchman34 Archive

View 1 post and 58 comments by FlyingDutchman34 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Marriage/ChildrenFlyingDutchman34/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:21 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I wouldn’t waste your time in that cesspool of self loathing and hatred. It’s amazing how poorly representative of feminism and women in general both witches Vs patriarchy and 2 X chromosomes are…. I don’t know how any person with common sense and logic and a functioning brained can spend more than 5 minute s on either sub without losing their minds…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:56 AM
14

Any speech that doesn’t align with my opinion is hate speech and those who speak it should be silenced!!
/r/MensRights11/08/22 12:20 PM
0

“I don’t think about you at all.”
/r/MensRights01/08/22 03:15 AM
2

A yo e who makes this argument in all sincerity is a nitwit. It’s a false equivalency. Forcing a procedure on someone who doesn’t want it is completely different from doing something is wrong and immoral. The correct equivalence would be to say men are not allowed to get vasectomies.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:57 AM
2

There is valid, scientific evidence supporting consciousness and ability to feel and sense pain between 12-24 weeks. On top of heart beat and personal circulation with explosive neurological development at weeks 6-8, o see no reason why abortion after week 12 should be morally or ethically acceptable except in cases where the mother is at risk and there are clear and documented indications to abort the baby. This also allows for time for rape/incest victims to abort their babies if they choose.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:43 AM
2

I’ll gladly discuss the issue of abortion itself, but this decision by the Supreme Court only makes it so the states can pass their own legislation regarding abortion. So if you’re in Alabama and 80% of the people want abortion to be illegal, then the government, which should represent its constituents, will make it illegal. If you’re in California, and 80% of the population wants abortion to be legal, then the their government can make it legal and reflect the desires of THEIR constituents. I k…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:10 AM
3

Because Toxic Femininity has been recast as strong and Independent.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 07:40 PM
2

When teenagers have 10x the awareness and fortitude than half the adults in society...
/r/MensRights23/05/21 07:14 PM
1

The OPs original notion is complete BS too, Men are far more likely to be victims of damn near every crime... So keep selling your butthole pics and shut up.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/20 11:17 PM
3

I’ve been saying this for years. You can it simultaneously believe the US is both racists and sexist against women. Yet, here we are.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:37 AM
4

The metoo movement is still defending that vile women?! Not shocking... not shocking at all...
/r/MensRights11/02/20 12:55 PM
2

Then you think wrong. Not a chance in hell you went on the main conservative sub, nicely said “I simply believe that those cops who act outside of the law need to be punished properly” and then got banned. You know how I know? Because 90% of the people on the conservative sub would absolutely agree with you.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 07:04 PM
3

I’ve argued gay marriage, abortion with them plenty. Difference is, you can have debates with people without calling them demeaning and vulgar names. That’s when I’ve seen people get banned.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 03:12 PM
6

False. I’ve been posting there regularly for months, I’ve seen plenty of argument I’ve comments. He’ll I’ve argued with people there. Still not banned. I did receive a short term ban from politics a couple of times for defending trump... wonder when that become against the rules.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 03:01 PM
10

Having common sense is a privilege now?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 02:51 PM
7

When you break Reddit rules and go to conservative subs name calling and shit flinging trying to be a troll you deserve to be banned. I’m a moderate democrats who got sick of r/politics bullshit and found a home on a conservative sub. They certainly have their biases, but people who come there and act cordial don’t get banned.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 02:50 PM
6

I wonder if I can get 30 years of back pay for my whiteness? With interest please... the white person interest too please.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 02:47 PM
1

Yet shit holes like fragilewhiteredditor remain!
/r/MensRights01/10/19 11:55 PM
29

The subs the ass hole
/r/MensRights09/09/19 09:44 PM
8

True, but it’s much so much simpler and straight forward to display pertinent information in graphics such as these rather than graphs and pieces of info from several studies. Unfortunately social media has ruined these kinds of graphics, but if you were to be presenting your own paper to professionals/experts/committees, this would essentially be the style one would use, so an extent.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:23 AM
3

Of really be interesting to see your story! What specifically will your story be targeting? I have a friend who is going through a messy divorce. She cheated on him and now wants his money. She works herself and makes decent money, but he makes a decent amount more. They have 2 children, he’s been a great father as far as I can tell, and obviously wants to be involved in their lives. Apparently she wants to have him pay alimony. Personally, I’m fairly naive on the topic, and my initial feelings …
/r/MensRights20/07/19 08:23 PM
1

Valid point. But doesn’t that then lend more credence to the idea that false allegations are less statistically present than they could be? Considering that at least some of these “not guilty” verdicts are undoubtedly just a false allegation.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 05:05 PM
12

So question, do all “not guilty” verdicts then get classified as false allegations? Wasn’t that one of the beefs that one write up posted here had with the data on false on allegations. That when someone was proved innocent of doesn’t get classified as a false allegation?
/r/MensRights05/07/19 12:52 PM
5

Your argument ends up relying on the notion that you should just be happy when the women agrees with you, just ignore the times when she doesn’t and you lose choice in the matter. Not to mention you even admit that men are financially obligated to a child they don’t want depending on the women’s decision. I still think there are major moral implications of ending a babies life after 12 weeks that get ignored, but that’s a broader issue than men’s rights.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:07 PM
5

I kind of disagree with this. Much of the pro-abortion movement is all about “my body my choice” while leaving men in the dust. Men’s opinions and thoughts are rarely considered when it comes to abortion. If I man wanted an abortion but the women wants it, tough titties. If a man wants to keep the baby but the women wants an abortion, you’re shit outa luck again. There is no positivity in abortion in general, but especially for men. This all precludes the moral implications of ending a life, of …
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:51 PM
1

There is some decent content over there every once in a while. I am subbed and check it out from time to time. It you are exactly right, I’d even argue that they do more damage than good for men’s rights. They spend much of their time shaming and humiliating any guy that acts masculine cause you know, all maleness is toxic. Where you are wrong is that men’s rights is about rights for everyone not just men. Equality for all, not just for women, not just for men, but for all.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:44 PM
3

A sub with the narrative that all women are the bastions of honor and virtue and that all men must fight the toxicity of masculinity for it will “destroy you” doesn’t accept in good faith when their false preconceived notions are challenged?! I’m shocked!
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:32 PM
2

Absolutely true. Stems from someone trying to manage numbers who doesn’t know how to manage them properly!
/r/MensRights27/06/19 05:37 PM
2

This is a fantastic write up, thank you! I think the menslib post by lefthand isn’t critical enough of the data, he takes the current data, treats it as 100% accurate and goes from there. I’d almost guarantee (sorry no source) that majority of false rape accusations never get embedded into that data properly. Consider the large amounts of rape charges that never go to trial but people use that as a “rapist got off free!” argument, rather than as a “false accusation”. Also, lefthand completely ov…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 05:14 PM
1

Meryl said something actually intelligent? That’s impressive! Good on her!
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:16 AM
18

Actually the thing the bugs me the most about this is the “old white man” jab. There are tons of amazing and influential women and people of color in our history that people listened to, followed, and looked up to. I love Patrick Stewart, but the notion that people only listen to old white guys is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:32 AM
0

I do have the scientific evidence. I’ve gone through this. I am a parent. You k ow how many books I’ve read on fetal development? The science shows the fetus is much more than just a clump of cells. And you’re right, no need for this conversation again. If you want to believe a living being with a heart beat and neurological function isn’t alive, be misinformed.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 12:12 AM
0

So, you’re against men being allowed a say in the fate of their own child? It’s always “body autonomy!” But that baby who is moving, thinking, has instincts, has flowing blood, apparently is just a clump of cells that’s no better than the piles my dogs leave behind in the yard? Like I said, I can comprehend the issues women face during pregnancy. I have two kids, my wife is amazing and tough as nails for what her pregnancies put her through. But I’d be pissed as hell if she just went and killed …
/r/MensRights24/05/19 12:05 AM
-1

I understand that majority of abortions occur prior to 13 weeks, so what’s wrong with banning abortions other than in urgent and rare situations at that point? It would affect very few people and would appease the pro-life crowd? Oh and didn’t New York pass a law allowing late term abortions? What’s the necessity of that? And that’s just not true, I agree the emotional attachment is quite obviously different, but that doesn’t make the baby any less of a life. One person just views it as such whi…
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:59 PM
0

I agree that people have sex and know that many people never want to have a child. But be smart, make that decision. There are apps and calendars designed to help women follow their fertility schedule, chose to stay abstinent during the 5-7 days of the month they’re most fertile, use condoms, use birth control. I’d imagine that pregnancy rate of women who are on birth control, use condoms and are knowledgeable of their fertility cycle are extraordinarily low. As I said, be smart, and you shouldn…
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:22 PM
-1

I guess I don’t know the best answer, but murdering a child isn’t really the best option. Be smart, use birth control, wait to have sex until you’re ready to be a parent, but saying a women has a right to murder a child because they don’t want them isn’t a great solution either.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:12 PM
0

Ugh, I just can’t accept this as the only solution. I mean, I hope these situations are few and far between, but damn that’s a horrible situation if your a man and you want that kid and this women is allowed to go murder it simply because she is the one carrying it. I agree there’s no easy solution, especially if you have a mother that doesn’t want to carry the baby she may not take care of herself. But she also consented to sex, the baby isn’t 100% hers to be allowed the sole decision maker....
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:08 PM
1

I disagree with this sentiment. I do t know what the best solution is, but if a man and a women both chose to have sex and a baby was made, as a man, I should have a choice as to whether that baby loves or dies. That baby may be within the mother body, but that baby is not fully hers to decide their fate. I don’t want to “control” women’s bodies, as I said, I don’t have a great solution, but the fate of a baby shouldn’t lie solely with the female simply because she is carrying them.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:04 PM
1

I understand completely. In order to deny to yourself what you’re actually doing, you’d rather just claim a fetus isn’t actually human and just a clump of cells... even though a random clump of cells doesn’t have a heart beat, hands, feet, a brain... but hey... whatever you need to tell yourself
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:29 AM
2

How is not allowing someone to murder a child equivalent to defending themselves? Seriously?
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:37 PM
5

He thing that always bugs me the most about these stories are people asking “well why would she lie?” Who knows, why does anybody lie? People lie all the damn time. It’s always much simpler to defend the accuser than the accused, but it’s so much more important to defend the accused, maintain their rights, and give them every bit of trust in their word as the person who is accusing them.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 07:41 PM
2

Can I report u/oracular_duck for being a giant hypocritical dueche canoe? And would it accomplish anything?
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:32 PM
1

I was able to find a story on the study that mentions what’s happens, but not tha actual study
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:37 PM
19

There was an Australian study done (don’t have the link now, I’ll see if I can find it) where a feminist group had companies remove name and gender on applications to show how discriminatory hiring practices were. They didnt finish the study because the companies hired an insane amount of men, and the amount of women being hired went back to being higher than before after the study was stopped... if that doesn’t indicate the privilege of being a female in the workplace I do t k ow what does Stor…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:14 PM
10

Meh, I’m subbed there, and while there is an occasional solid post, there’s a lot of man hating and male demonization going on over there. Unless youre crying while knitting, you’re considered a toxic male
/r/MensRights04/12/18 04:27 PM
1

Too bad for them, I identify as a non-binary, trans, Asian, gay black Jewish women... which means I hit all 4 qualifying markers... I’m a shoo-in!
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:14 AM
0

“Preference will be given to straight white men” Racist patriarch at work, enjoy your privilege!! “Preference will be given to anyone whom isn’t a straight white men” How empowering!! Such diversity!!
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:05 AM
1

I guess I can’t say I’ve been in these types of situations, but I’d venture a guess that if a women was egging another women to fight, she’d be calling her all sorts of derogatory names to entice her. A guy begging another guy to fight and calling him a pussy cause he won’t doesn’t make for toxic masculinity, that just makes him a bad person in general. We need to stop taking obscure situations and poor overall character and generalizing it as “masculinity” just so we can have this trope of “tox…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:55 PM
21

What a horseshit article. 2/6. I always love how its men that are “encouraged to be violent” when every movie/tv show depict women slapping and hitting men and it’s seen as acceptable, yet men are CONSTANTLY told to never ever hit a women. But men are the ones being told you have to be violent to be a man? Being a man doesn’t mean you hate guys, no man is telling other man they have to hate gay men in order to be more manly. No man is telling other men they have to rape women to be manly. This a…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 12:24 PM
6

It’s interesting how during all these believevictims and metoo movements, people refuse to believe that false accusations happen or can occur. Yet there are more and more situations showing just how much women tend to lie about these things. I get it, I want to support women (and men) coming forward about assaults and provide honest and quality investigations, we just need to make sure it doesn’t turn into witch hunts where a women’s word is sufficient enough to put a man behind bars.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 02:29 AM
2

Ummm I personally never said toughen up..... I read though the article and I didn’t see any mention of him grabbing her ass, let along twice. The o my hing I saw was that he brushed her from behind in the wheel chair. Either way, whatever he did was probably wrong, but most likely this is just a case of a girl wanting some attention and decided 4 years later was her best time to get some fame for a former president doing something she interpreted as bad
/r/MensRights25/10/17 06:47 PM
1

Meh... quit trying to make this more than it is. First of all, if anything it’s harassment, if he grabbed a thigh or ass or whatever, it should be considered harassment which is wrong and he should be educated (if possible) on why that’s not appropriate. When you reference assault, you more reference a forced interaction. I know it’s a slight difference but it’s important. Finally I think some people do take liberties when they make these complaints. I’m not saying “man up” but maybe he accident…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 06:25 PM
0

How is she dirt poor after she got $1.5 million dollars?!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:42 PM
0

Correlation doesn't prove causation, that's what your missing.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:19 PM
-2

Funny how the statistics don't align with that pamphlet. So you are choosing to believe a pamphlet that agrees with your viewpoint rather than the statistics that disagree with you viewpoint and then call me bias? That's rich. And I didn't say it was necessary, just stating that statistically speaking, there are proven benefits. But argue with facts all you want.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:19 PM
-1

There is also the fact that the US has some of the highest rates of STD's and circumcisions in the industrialized world. Compare that with Europe which has much lower rates of circumcisions and STD's.< This is actually false. In fact, the rates of STIs in uncircumcised men is more than twice of the rates in circumcised men.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 02:00 PM
-8

I know this won't be a popular opinion around here, but as someone in the healthcare field, circumcision does have benefits. Decreases risk for infection Decreases risk for cancer Decreases risk for STIs These are all statistically shown according to the Mayo Clinic. So to say a male getting circumcised is stupid or pointless is false. Now, if your a conspiracy nut and believe all MDs are evil and want to see people hurt, mutilated, or injured all in the name of earning an extra buck, then maybe…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 01:53 PM
20

The thing that gets missed so often in today's socio/political environment and the billion different movements for equal rights is that everyone has shit they have to deal, everyone has stereo types or social roles that are expected to be filled. Right now, all the issues men face are being ignored because men are continuously being made into the villain and the scapegoat of all the problems (at least in America) our country faces. It's really quite sad, this is such a great video, but man it wo…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 01:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter