TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Flymsi Archive

View 0 posts and 89 comments by Flymsi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thats not how any of this works. Tbh i think you fight is not worth fighting for. Your counterarguments remind me of the good old climate denier days. I am just not convince that some missing data on some very specific problems justifies wanting to dismantle feminism. You know i usually categorize political actions in 1. immediate need 2. support worthy 3. Not harmfull 4. Harmfull 5. Deadly. Most things are in category 3. And i consider this also 3. Its not worth it. On the other hand my evaluat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 09:56 PM
0

You are hard as stone
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 09:23 PM
-2

They don't even know if problem exists, what is the root cause or how to solve it. But they already jumped to implementation phase. That's recipe to disaster, spending resources and never solving anything. Is that truly your stance on all topic or only when its about things you dislike? Idk what country you from, but if that is your concern you could prioritize bigger problems first. Like for example economics doesnt know their shit but implements things constantly. Or on the other hand you coul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 12:59 PM
0

I am wondering what exactly you are trying to do. I dont think its worth debating so much over a semantical issue. One of the problems is, that no data is gathered. It is proof that we are not aware of it. This alone is concerning. It kinda reminds me about similar problems. A problem is voiced and we have this problem of not having any statistics on it because no one was aware of the problem. Then people wont recognize it because there is no "objective" numbers to tell them how to think and see…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 09:46 AM
3

Is there any information gathered, anywhere in the world, how prelevant sex-based murder of women even is. Actually just coherent definition of femicide would be good start. The Global Study on Homicide by UNODC seems good. On their webpage they have an extra resesrch article in tandem with their report linked, which specificly talks about Gender-related killings of women and girls (femicide/feminicide). A very interedting info there is that while men are victims of most homicide (80%), the tren…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 07:27 AM
-1

It just sounds dismissing to me. The curious aspect is not communicated well in your phrasing. I wonder if you always talk to people like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 07:14 AM
0

Ah so its more like "i dont understand how ..., can you please explain how you see it?" ? I interpreted your comment as sceptical rather than curious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 11:39 PM
-3

I mean you can choose to believe their report or not. On how you make sense of it is another problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 11:22 PM
0

Nowhere in this comment do they say its impossible to communicate with men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:10 AM
0

I ordered the comments by "top" to get the ones with the most upvotes. I properly summarized them. The first comment is trying to deflect onto a different issue entirely, and the second is stating that they think its impossible to communicate with men entirely, so why bother not being sexist? Source. no comment above 5 likes said things like that. The comment you quote directly is not one I can find using the search bar. Is that a direct quote? Yes https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:32 PM
0

You already gave me that comment. One wrong does not justify the other wrong. Though I do support abortion, it's more equal that women don't have access to it, from an objective perspective. This one is about the right for bodily autonomy. From an objective perspective Men do have bodily autonomy (unless they are forced to do military service which they can usually refuse) while women do not in case of abortion. Its not all so clean cut. You can just take the half of the objective reality that f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:45 PM
0

No the most popular comments did not hate it. Most upvoted comment calmly argues that she is unsure if a comfortable way even exists Second upvote tells a story about a man trying to defend a stupid argument. Another one says that individual blame is not that frequent. Another one says that "it's a fundamental problem in human communication that messages which are simple enough to reach everybody are usually too simple to be correct, and vice versa. " AND Op agrees to it. 36 upvotes. What more d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 08:43 AM
-1

Besides, you give your group too much credit. Going historically, the files would be released... with Ghislaine Maxwell's name conveniently written out. Sure.... Women have more legal rights than men in the US. There's a reason for this. I dont see that when talking about abortion. since they call us a hate group at every single oppurtunity, well... Maybe there is a reason for it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 08:36 AM
-1

I've never once seen any genuine criticism towards feminism from feminist literature that takes into account a (non-doormat) male perspective, just a lot of lip-service. Seems like a cop out to simply label any evidence that could prove your wrong as lip service or doormat perspective. But ok, you know best where to search fof that if you really want to. Not going to feed you any more. More importantly: I get it. You see many horrible books that probably are lip service and weak doormat perspect…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 10:47 PM
0

I see nothing wrong with thst post. Its nice and understandable. The different perspectives are argued in a sensible way and discussion is possible. I dont see what more you want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 09:44 AM
-1

I dont see how Feminists are the powerful group. Trump managed to become a President who "grabs women by the pussy" and gifts a drawing of a naked women to epstein. If Feminists had power, he wouldnt be able to stay president. And the epstein files wouldve been released much sooner. Or another example: Feel free to convince be how feminists are more powerful than the christian nationalism? What do you think about this? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=moam79nT_Mo
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 09:36 AM
0

Only petty people do comment on my username like that. And the funny thing is you exposed yourself. No matter how weak i argue, there is literally nothing to justify pettiness like that. You can just hate me without ad hominem. Be a decent human being at least. I showed sincerity. Even if my performance is bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 09:22 AM
-2

Simone de Beauvoir is a respected feminist and had plenty of intellectual talk with her husband... Rosa Luxemburg talked to all kinds of intellectual men and is one of the most inspiring feminists ive ever read. I dont know what you are even talking about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 09:18 AM
-5

Thats not what i said. I find it hard to answer when you twist my words like that. yes, Men's rights are part of their narrative.. The narrative of "Men have ALL the rights" No. Just no. This old feminism you talking about. The newer feminist take is intersectional. It says "some men have all the rights" and " most men suffer from patriarchy too". This what feminists of age 20-30 in my city says and collectivly agree on. [...] or how they claim "Feminism is for men too!" But when asked to back u…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 11:20 AM
-11

You talked about "the definition". I gave you an answer about how historically the movement changed. Tell me what else you want. Give me a straight demand! Dictionarys are usually made by few people in power. How can they represent the movement itself? Thats such a lowball take.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 11:10 AM
-10

I am on the topic. You ask if it changed and i supported your observation and gave my explanation for it. What more do you want? Whats with your agressive tone?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:46 AM
-21

It did change. Thats because they actually try to listen to criticism from trans people, people of color, and from men. Thats why you see names like terfs. Those are generally older feminists that have anti trans views. Newer feminism was able to critize that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:19 AM
-1

Men rights are part of their narrative. Doesnt matter if you call it a lie. Because if they believe that feminism is about men rights too then you can discuss that. And i siccesfullly did so many times. So perhaps the reason you are called misogynist is not the criticism you have, but simply your attitude. Stop playing the victim here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:16 AM
0

Its not a strawman. Are you saying anti-feminism is the same as misogyny? And anti-feminism is analogous to being violent and dangerous? I dont even know what you mean by that. Critizing feminism is ok. Not wanting feminism (defined as equal rights to all genders) to exist is sexist and dangerous. You seem to think in strict boxes. All you do is categorize buzzwords. I see not content. Nothing explicit. No substance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 10:12 PM
0

The main aspect of it was that they were the powerfull group but pictured themselves as being oppressed by the jewish minority. You cant say this about feminism. Their propaganda is fundamentaly different. You cant just take one aspect and draw an equation. The main aspect is the power imbalance. Its like how the trump administration does propaganda for example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/26 10:09 PM
1

Lol, and they categorized criticism of feminism by accident What? No. About the links 1: why is it bad to be able to report clearly misogynic and violent actions? The example they lists as "anti feminist" are all clearly dangerous and should be cared about. I dont specifically agree with the amadeus antonio stiftung because i hate them, but i dont think that this is stasi behavior. Thats such a stupid take. Thats german right wing rethorics you are reprodicing here. Comparing this to stasi wtf..…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 10:53 PM
0

Its my perception. You are not allowed to deny my perception. You can give me a tiktok acc of a men rights advocate that has more clicks then any of the top 100 misogynists on tiktok, if you want. Your link is weak. Sexism is growing in spain and feminism is shrinking. Maybe they are connected to the manosphere rising? Or to the right wing politics taking over? If you criticize feminism more than you criticize sexism, we have a problem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 10:38 PM
-1

So he was..... dismissive of men's issues ... by portraying them as full of mysogynists... even though misogynists are only a negligible part of the manosphere Then you are really bad at getting heard if this negligible part is the loudest with the most clicks and money involved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 10:08 PM
1

No fir the first part. Yes for the second. Criticism of feminism is generally ok. Its part of feminism. They criticize each other all the time. I mean there is even a mean about leftist splinter groups. Its all about how you criticize them. Because they are allowed to criticize your critique.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 10:04 PM
1

You are wrong. Go and use your time better. Its a waste to discuss semantics.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:47 PM
1

Actually this is very wrong.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:46 PM
1

Just to clarify. You are talking about the production of a different documentation and assume/conclude that the same team did this documentation in a similar way?
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:45 PM
1

Afaik they try to critize that aspect of mysandri, transphobia nad racism (and classism). Most of the dedicated and active feminists i talk to acknowledge these problems and are able to name various feminist books on those topics that critize feminists for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 01:42 PM
1

Sow hat did you mean by writing "bow to the feminist boot" ? Because i also understood it the same way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 01:40 PM
1

Oh can you explain what exactly is the similarity between feminism and nazi propaganda. Ive studied nazi propaganda very well and i dont see how feminism is a state controled quasi monopoly. I would rather say fox news is much much closer to being nazi like propaganda channel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 01:38 PM
1

Literally no one i know (myself included) thinks that legitimate male advocates are are part of the manosphere. And i have talked to many radical feminists. It doesnt get more radical in my area.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 01:33 PM
-1

No i dont support it. I just argue its not sexist. I find the other statements also not to be bigoted. It is just another way of describing a statistical evidence. However i do think its dehumanizing. I will unstrain my gray matter by ignoring you from now on. This is not worth "nitpicking" on.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/26 04:40 AM
-2

One says: "we should..." otherone explains a statistical fact and then goes on to say "we could... and it would show the statistical fact".
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:46 PM
0

Yea but this page allone is not written for layman because it is not explained what the psychological construct "Agressivness" is and how it is quantisized. SO yea the book is written for beginners but the page alone not. Idk why you even feel the need to point out such an unimportant thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:31 PM
-3

If I were to say that we should round up all the black people in America and ship them back to Africa, that isn't a literal, actual threat. Thats a totally different framing.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:29 PM
-1

What is your argument? Ofc women do more abortions. Thats really just a fact. Whats the argument? Making statistical claims about race is also ok. The problem is the itnerpretation that is done.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:25 PM
1

putting POC into cryo genetic sleep on the other hand sounds not racist
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:14 PM
1

I think the first step though in not normalizing marginalization is calling it for what it is. But this fails. We fundamentally disagree on what it is. Its a statistical fact. Thats what it is to me. You even call it overtly sexist. Like wtf is even happening? Even if this is some sort of misandric statement then its certainly not overt. And it seems like we have politically more in common then not. So i think this is wasted time if we talk about discussion efficiency. Yea its good to call it ho…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 10:08 PM
1

Yea thats what i said.... Oh ok i get it. You seriously fear that people will come of wit hthe idea to eradicate all men to simply lower the crime rates by 2/3?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:56 PM
1

It said able bodied young men. Which is the group where 2/3 of the criminals are. It did not say that all men are criminal.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:51 PM
-1

I mean, we do commit more crimes statistically. Thats just a fact. Also not all cirme is violent. I find it smarter to move the conversation away from "buh misandry" to "why are young men commiting more crimes?". The later is very productive. I know its a bit too late but i want to add that i find not that statement concerning. The concerning part is earlier: "Drugs that reduce testosteron als subdue mens aggressive tendencies". Thats where the problem arise and the stereotype of aggressiveness …
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:43 PM
-5

Ah yes, just because i do not take this one specific thing serious, it means that i do not take anything serious..... The thing in the textbook is not a "joke". Not like those sexist jokes. But i am open to changing my mind on that. You say it "insidiously worms its way into the larger conversation". Can you tell me how exactly the textboook quote would do that? Will there be a moment where we all suddenly talk about using our new cryo technology to put criminal men to sleep?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:34 PM
-11

Nah i find it bad and unscientific. Its not even a good demonstration. So iwould have it in a textboook for that reason. As far as i see it, crygentic sleep is something you could wake up from. And it does not even exist (yet), which make the hypothetical statement obviously absurd and fictive. ALso he is not speaking to the public. Its a bit different from "if we were to kill all men".
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:28 PM
1

THe whole concept of "bastards" is just something made up by patriarchy to give you a reason to argue for "patrilineal" tradition. As others pointed out, its really outdated as a concept.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:23 PM
9

The implication is that men are associated with dangers at work while women are associated with dangers in private life.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:19 PM
-10

"We could" is for me a hypothetical statement. We could destroy the USA, Russian and Chinese Government and it would at least pause most wars for a while. Am i now a terrorist or am i just saying that they do start/maintain wars?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:16 PM
2

seriously wonder how much of the male loneliness academic is solely because all men want is sex. Anecdotal but my 20 year old brother is depressed, but he tells me it’s because he hasn’t found his friend group at his college yet and because he’s struggling to find an entry level job in this shit economy. He told atleast for himself, he just doesn’t care for a relationship rn but if he happens to meet someone, then it happens. I wonder how many other young men are also like this. I mean we alread…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 09:12 PM
-14

I looked up Lykken and he does not look like a leftists at all. Some of his work is funded by the Pioneer Fund. A nazi eugenics group.... I would distrust anything he says about the psycho-biological system of humans. You know that this was not mean to be an actual argument? Its more of like "if we put this group aside, then this would change". Its basically just demonstrating the the statistics in another way. Its common pedagogical trick i have heard a few times in my life. its really just a h…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 08:59 PM
0

sry but you are gish galloping. Instead of like picking one single person we could speak about what most feminists agree on. Instead of using crap social media for proof, we could look at the bigger picture. You get lost in the forest while trying to explain to me that trees dont exist. This person is not trying to educate you. Ever thought about how maybe , just maybe this is not made for men?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 08:37 PM
1

OP tried to say the "crazy exes" reference was on point when there's no reason to assume that at all, and you yourself have continued now repeatedly to rationalize for the position of castigating a man regardless of his actual experience. No i did not "castigate" someone. Sry but this stupid. We are not talking about a spefic man. We talk about a stereotype. And life experience says that this is typically true. Except for one person i met, every woman or man who said this is crazy themselves. Th…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 03:48 PM
0

Wrong. Totally wrong. I said that one person does not REPRESENT the whole ideology. Insane.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 03:17 PM
0

Low hanging fruit. That person is shitty and does not represent feminism. End.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 12:53 AM
0

What? I never talked about that.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 11:19 PM
1

I think there is a way to critize feminism without saying that everything is shit. In my region they fight for abortion rights and against partner violence. I dont see how thats a problem. Women literally die because of their partner. In our region thats a problem and i think its good to focus on that problem. Sry but i dont know what kind of person prioritizes manspreading mansplaining or mankeeping. Those are just words to describe certain behavior. When i ask a feminist what the most pressing…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 10:19 PM
1

The causes of social equality, anti-discrimination, anti-bigotry, etc., both can and must be taken up by a different political tendency Who would you suggest? A working class and its class allies sharply and successfully divided by feminist hate-mongering counts as a political reality that affects the class struggle.. Oh wow. Im surprised. Citing Engels huh? Interesting. Are you by chance a socialist? Anyways; To me it is very very obvious that this narrative of "feminist hate-mongering" IS divi…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 06:18 AM
1

About 4. Sure you can say that, but usually its really a thing. Usually they are actually a good judge of character but choose abusive partners because of unhealed relationshop trauma. Ofc thats not a gendered thing. For the rest i would say it is kinda a stereotype but it leaves a bad taste to fight fire with fire. Its as if this post is tje perfect material to divide us. Good feminism is against this beauty norm and that includes this height norm for men too. Or that baldness thing. And how a …
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 01:12 AM
1

I mean its also hard to discuss things here. Its all just echo chambers. And bonkers people exist here too. Like lets get real about this. People who understand this are rare
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 01:04 AM
1

Its a stupid thing to shout. Dont let that change your moral view on it. Its just a really really bad version of "my body, my choice".
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 01:02 AM
0

I think that your experience and their experience are both happening. I dont understand why we need to compare them when obviously her experience is shitty. Somehow we must realize that some in out society are at different places culturally. And i want to focus on those where its still shitty.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 12:55 AM
3

Feminist separatism is nothing new. There are many who opt out of dating The thing is thst woman want sexual/romantic connection too. So they take the risk.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 12:44 AM
1

There is not only one flaw. Also its not what i said. I said it makes the speculations invalid. You are being semantic here instead of engaging in my argument which is actually a part of the "alt right playbook" (go watch it on youtube)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 12:17 PM
–

Its has a connection to the main topic. She basically said if you csrefully choose who you are empathetic to then it wont be a loss. Or maybe thats just my take. Im happy that i found some women that give me that empathy energy back. Some others are just vampires. Equality means that women can be assholes too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 05:19 PM
1

Pathetic. Stop derailing yourself. Do you agree or disagree with what she said?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:42 PM
1

I already added a reasoning to my theory. No i dont judge men to be pro life? And yes i recognize that men are also forced into gender roles. Enough whataboutism lol. Marital rape was part of my example. Im not gonna re explain why i brought it up, but it was not my main point. You are focusing on it. Not me. You just demonstrated that you either forgot or did not read my reasoning. How convenient to not be able to find it. Sry but you lost my trust. I dont believe you anymore. I did clearly exp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/25 11:55 PM
1

You are being paranoid and revealed your sexism here. judging me as female... wtf wtf No im not undermining any rights. Wtf is your problem. Show this comment section to real life people and ask them what they think about it. Go get a grip in reality. Please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/25 04:00 PM
1

Yea exactly you did not say or imply anything about the pregnancy that i spoke of. You simply dropped that point. So what else should i assume in that case? But painting the pro-life movement as beneficial to men is dishonest. Can you add reasoning to your assumption? It feels like you focus on small points without engaging in my overall argument an im tired of repeating my core argumetn over and over agin. Ofc course its marital law, not martial law lol. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_ra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/25 01:44 PM
1

Oh yea, everyone who disagrees with you is a troll. Wow. Great debate culture you have there...... I tell you that you are not the monopoly on associations. GO ask 10 people what they associate with the skull. GO check reality if you insutl me with "gaslighting" You can't change what my association is. THose are extremist aesthetics, not right or left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/25 01:20 PM
1

So having to carry out a child for 9 months and having to give birth is nothing for you? Sry but thats a huge pain. Women potentially lose their job over such things. And at the very least its like robbing 9 months of your life. And no. If you are up for abortion it does not mean that you can easily give for adoption. You completly disregard the emotional plane here. Having a living organism in you for 9 months does something to you. You basically force the women to establish a deep connection w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 09:35 PM
1

Oh yea, thats a huge problem. If you want to share some thoughts: Do you have any ideas on how to make this a better space for you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 12:09 AM
1

If you want to explain im curious: What is the difference? Until now I thought it would be more harsh as a women. Sad that you are mocked for being you...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 12:03 AM
2

Feminists also have many different schools that critizes each other. They are not the same as they form different conclusions. Some are critizing misandry. I find intersectional feminists to be based
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:59 PM
0

Anarchism is tricky because there are many streams and its hard to speak for all. So its my opinion, but mostly it is based on egalitarian values and the belief that a society without hierarchies is possible and favorable. Its based on wanting freedom. And anarchists seem to agree that "no one free until everyone is free" So discriminating a group based on their gender is a fundamental contradiction because it creates a power imbalance where there should be none. However, they are free to have a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:57 PM
0

Reality tells me that feminists are treating me like human while other humans more often do not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:44 PM
2

Lol thats a new take with the nazis wtf... sry but as a german i feel shame for your misrepresentstion of how they came to power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:42 PM
3

Dude those are general biases that everyone has. Its not limited to far right. Far left has the same problem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:39 PM
0

But it makes all you speculations invalid since the association is with metal gear solid and not with far right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:36 PM
1

You said: "I am not aware of any institutions (in western democracies) that favour men. Could you provide some examples? I'd be happy to document them in r/SystemicSexism. " The pro-life movement advocates for restricting the rights of women over their own body. This favors men indirectly in establishing more dependencies which result in more power over women. This one thing on its own might not seem much but together with other things it can become a strong dependency. Like for example if defin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:12 PM
1

There are like a ton of Institutions in the name of pro life, (traditional) family life, catholic or christian way that are favoring men. I do not say that all who advocate for these favor men since traditional family life in itself is ok. But many of these group try to inhibit women from taking other roles or actions and thus favor men. 2 more: The US government Heritage foundation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 08:07 PM
1

How is that subtle? I don't belief that their statement is true. SImple as that. I am open for it being challenged, but what can i do if i never experience this? I would need you to show me .
/r/MensRights24/08/25 03:58 PM
0

while Its good to call out those things, i really don't see how this has anything to do with supporting the claim that feminism is stupid. Actually i think you touch upon a topic that is serious thing. It reminds me of this post: "What you’re describing is discrimination in the form of gender profiling." https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/09/dear-therapist-my-daughters-friends-arent-allowed-play-our-home/616484/ Edit: I looked at both posts you linked. The comments very often say th…
/r/MensRights11/05/25 10:27 AM
1

Can you give proof of that?
/r/MensRights11/05/25 10:19 AM
1

I see men issues getting taken moreand more serious.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 10:18 AM
2

Prohibition is a joke. Since 100 years it isnt working. That doesnt even count as attempt.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:55 AM
3

And a real guide wont tell me to hurt myself by cutting off my social interaction i want. This "real xxxx do yyyyy" is such a bullshit argument.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/17 03:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter