TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fokillew Archive

View 38 posts and 139 comments by Fokillew on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
216

Fokillew/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:48 PM
205

Fokillew/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:29 PM
181

FeminismFokillew/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:40 AM
38

Fokillew/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:58 PM
35

OpinionFokillew/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:56 AM
32

Fokillew/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:48 AM
26

Fokillew/r/MensRights12/10/13 08:13 PM
19

Fokillew/r/MensRights04/04/13 03:04 AM
18

Fokillew/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:03 AM
16

Fokillew/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:28 AM
12

Fokillew/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:35 PM
9

Fokillew/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:36 AM
8

Fokillew/r/AntiFeminists23/10/14 08:06 PM
8

Fokillew/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:07 AM
6

Fokillew/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:19 PM
4

Fokillew/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:02 AM
4

Fokillew/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:05 AM
4

Fokillew/r/MensRights09/11/13 03:00 AM
4

DiscussionFokillew/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:48 PM
3

Fokillew/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:32 PM
3

Fokillew/r/MensRights03/05/13 02:41 AM
3

Fokillew/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:33 PM
2

Fokillew/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:56 AM
1

Fokillew/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:33 AM
1

Fokillew/r/MensRights14/01/14 03:10 AM
1

Fokillew/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:31 AM
1

Fokillew/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:32 PM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights21/09/13 02:06 PM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:51 PM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:41 AM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:00 PM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:36 AM
0

OpinionFokillew/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:50 AM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:12 AM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:13 AM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights14/02/15 03:01 AM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:05 AM
0

Fokillew/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:35 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm fully aware of that. Moreover, I'd vote for him TWICE over her. Still, I wish someone more oratorically Lincolnesque would come along. He'd probably get nowhere because of it, though.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 05:38 PM
1

I find his fourth-grade use of language annoyingly puerile and unpresidential. He's got three adjectives: "great," fantastic" and "tremendous."
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 03:52 AM
1

Another disadvantage: micropenis.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/16 03:47 AM
22

I remember about ten years ago there was a spate of commercials in which men were slugged by women as though it were funny. Seemed like every other ad had to feature one of these female-to-male K.O.s. EDIT: tense
/r/MensRights16/01/16 08:25 PM
1

Doubly grateful for the info and for the way in which it was presented. Oh -- and for the outcome. That's triply pleased.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 07:04 AM
2

Feminists have already run enough confessional pieces on what they see as the ugliness of "the patriarchy." It's getting wearisome even to them. So to get published as a feminist nowadays you've got to seek out whatever elements of male behavior haven't been sufficiently excoriated, then find a way to piss about them.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 04:38 PM
1

Many of the shorter ones do, though.
/r/seduction13/08/15 01:03 AM
1

"Harpy feminism." Great. If that isn't already part of the lexicon, it should be.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:03 AM
27

It's not only their pussies that got these women a pass.
/r/PussyPass11/07/15 09:59 PM
1

That happened to me without my first being raped by an older woman.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:33 AM
1

Sorry for any confusion. Perhaps my edit helps to clarify things. Glad for any agreement we may have.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:56 PM
5

I suppose that if an accuser (incidentally the first order of business in these matters is for the media to quit identifying accusers as "victims" -- this is the public square's version of a false accusation) can demonstrate that she had a false memory it would be exculpatory, but IMO, the equivalent of a murder defendant cynically claiming temporary insanity as a get-outta-jail-free dodge. Secondly, as SJWs have been eager to extend the definition of "rape" to include such things as innocent ap…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:22 PM
0

As against what -- the woman's inadvertant making of a false claim?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:59 PM
0

This is not quite ethical. If you had shown me the courtesy of using my full quote you'd find there was no inconsistency in what I wrote. Suffice to say that I disagree with your conclusion.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 07:18 PM
1

And this: The illustration apparently posits that the achievement of an "asshole free company" requires the relegation of men (and presumably betas with willingly subordinate characters) to a lesser -- i.e. posterior -- role. Never mind that it's the "bulls" who anchor the line in tug-of-war, this illustration and its accompany text imply that any man ambitious enough to seek a ranking position in the company is necessarily an asshole. Or is it just me who sees this?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:14 AM
1

Nope. Thanks for that.
/r/seduction15/11/14 06:01 PM
2

So what are your specific recommendations?
/r/seduction15/11/14 02:51 PM
1

What's more, her comment was removed from the youtube page.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:39 AM
-4

Checked your history. You're obviously talking about yourself. Worst case of projection I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:14 AM
2

I'm not justifying it -- just setting those wondering about it straight. It pisses me off too.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 08:01 PM
2

It's meant to imply the madness that the thing known as "a bad hair day" can instill.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 03:08 PM
1

I am a male and if I had been 14-15 years and had had the opportunity to have sex with a woman I would have loved it. It wouldn't have negatively affected me in any way. I agree with you. In fact I believe I would've found the experience to have enriched the rest of my life. However, either we are to have equal justice under the law or we are not.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 02:33 AM
0

Nailed it. Something tells me that /r/leftofcentaur hasn't been discriminated against in successive job searches based on his sex, nor ordered to pay alimony to his abusive ex-wife (who got the kids) and the guy with whom she'd cheated. Good luck to him then -- but he should recognize that many of his "bros" have had to endure such things and worse in the feminzed cultural clime he seeks to mollify. There is such a thing as righteous anger, bro -- and after they've been denied, falsely accused a…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:35 PM
1

Exactly. Without a shared concept of the enobling virtues of manhood, we are cast adrift and left to the tender mercies of those who would re-define us in accord with their own agenda. In the hands of feminists, the injunction to "be a man" (I'll admit that "man up" sounds demeaning and pejorative) has somehow been hijacked for use in defining -- with a mild air of insult -- how we should behave. Feminists may contort language however they please, but they don't own the meaning of words and phra…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:29 PM
43

He claims we'd say things about women that he "doesn't want to hear." A very telling bit of phrasing there. A man wants the truth to set him free. A snowflake doesn't want to be made to feel uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:28 AM
2

Great analysis.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 03:31 AM
1

Feminism in a nutshell
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:37 PM
-2

pm_me_ur_underboob, are you reading this?
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:07 AM
1

My friends and I used to seductively (and successfully) wear Old Spice in the belief that it subliminally reminded women of their fathers.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:04 AM
3

She's not going to deliver. The thought of two men (with one her boyfriend) in conflict over her makes her cummm in the night.
/r/seduction15/04/14 03:30 AM
1

How's this then? Piss off.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 02:14 AM
2

The scenario does have a Mad Men feel to it; but then, I'm no kid like most here. Apologies for not writing to your level.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 02:53 PM
11

On rare occasions one of my friends or I would spot an elegant woman across the bar and ask the bartender to bring her a grilled cheese sandwich. We'd watch as the barkeep would deliver the thing and, bending down to whisper in her shell-like ear, indicate one or another of us had paid for it. Then -- after she looked up to see who her benefactor was, he'd raise his glass and deliver a confidently smoldering half-smile complete with arched eyebrow. Unused to this kind of treatment -- and not kno…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 03:49 AM
7

Comment deserves the Red Pill Gold Star
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 02:26 AM
1

Raymond (to his wife at some point in every episode): "I'm saaaaaawry."
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:02 AM
1

After the advert, comes the show -- where men are portrayed as stupid, maladroit, craven and/or evil.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:53 AM
4

Her husband, Adam Keesee, was placed on leave after the lawsuit against his wife was filed in June. Oregon State Police launched their own investigation of him. Huh?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:55 AM
2

I can't think of any possible witnesses other than the atty herself. Besides, I'm not comfortable with betraying the privacy of a man who was both a relation and great (and greatly missed) friend any more than I already have. Just spit it out. Indeed. Stay klassy, my friend. edit: Parenthetical remark
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:31 PM
1

Sadly, my cousin -- an historian and best-selling author -- died in 2011.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:25 AM
0

Figure it out.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:03 PM
5

My cousin's wife -- a wealthy, feminist Manhattanite -- was seeking to divorce him sometime in the 1980s. With money no problem, she hired the same attorney that had been used by Mia Farrow in her case against Woody Allen. As she told my cousin following their (partial) reconciliation, the lawyer's strategy, as announced at their initial meeting, was to accuse the male party of sexually abusing the couple's child -- in this case a very young daughter. As my cousin was wholly innocent of this cha…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:17 AM
1

A brilliant observation badly spelled.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 03:36 AM
5

Great statement. Almost a manifesto.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:50 PM
1

Because a man performing the same act would not automatically assumed to be mad -- but malevolent.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 09:15 PM
11

Of course. My apology for assuming reason might've been useful against these fascists.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 03:12 AM
35

A lawyer might argue that with the number of sexes being limited to two, it's impossible to actively discriminate in favor of one without actively discriminating against the other, ipso facto, discrimination against males did occur.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:01 AM
27

Here's a portion from the first draft of a letter I intend sending them once turned down for the job: I can only infer that this decision constitutes another instance of your policy – openly stated to me during my interview – that you “prefer not to hire men.” That you practice this policy is confirmed by your staff's almost entirely being made up of women. Moreover, that you are aware of its illegality is confirmed by the fact that you asked me not to say anything to the “labor board” concernin…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:19 AM
42

I understand how you might doubt it, but this did actually happen. The company is a relatively small one (about 40 employees -- of whom all but two are women) and I was interviewed by the two females who co-own it. No one else was present in the office, and a feeling of informality prevailed. I think the interview was going well and they thought me to be an exception to the kind of men they won't hire, so -- in a loose moment -- the older owner confessed to this. (I also think that a culture tha…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:57 PM
65

I actually muttered "Well -- that pisses me off." Now what is she going to do? If she doesn't hire me she can bet I'll report discrimination to the EEOC (not that doing so will get me anywhere).
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:56 PM
1

Curious reversal there. The idea that waterboarding is torture is generally agreed to be arguable and not its defining act.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:42 AM
1

Affirm that.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:59 PM
1

With the exception of my final observation, the things I stated are the actual consequences of misandry that your narrow view of this redditt requires
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:23 PM
7

As a woman, Mrs. Zimmerman could rely on the fact that greater weight would be given to the charge that her husband assaulted her, as well as the likelihood that a false accusation would bear no consequences for her. The fact that she was accusing George Zimmerman added to this. She must be an idiot to think that the truth wouldn't eventually come out however. Didn't she attend to her husband's recent trial?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:57 AM
3

I've experienced this many times and noted that it IS especially characteristic of women engaged in feminist argument. Moreover, it often results in gang-hamstering if more than one woman is present.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:03 AM
1

Sexual profiling.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:00 AM
1

It's only ONE of the reasons for me.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 06:47 PM
4

I'll take that bet.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:19 AM
4

A breezy overview that fails to address one of the most significant ways in which men are discriminated against: Hiring.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:04 AM
1

You mean imagined racism.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:39 PM
4

This culture gives women a sense of entitlement.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:04 AM
1

"Social justice" is the antithesis of justice.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:48 PM
1

It's a double-standard, I know, but while men teachers who have sex with their teenaged female students ought to be left alone (like their female counterparts often are), women teachers who have sex with their teenaged male students should have statues erected in their honor. Perhaps on campus, and especially when they're as good looking as this.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:57 AM
1

Picture number 7 made me cry.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:46 PM
15

Needn't take her seriously. She's a weak-minded and half-formed poseur, desperately trying to adapt herself to the cocoon of feminist victimhood for its myriad cultural rewards -- including an imagined "patriarchy" whose fabricated villainy is always there to lie about.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:11 AM
3

Bravo. And thank you. It's an important document.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:21 AM
9

Perhaps they shouldn't allow women to sit next to young boys on airplanes.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:01 PM
3

I hate NPR. I remember on the day of the Fort Hood Massacre they referred to those killed as "collateral damage."
/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:00 PM
6

than she
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:24 AM
2

It's an old expression.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 01:59 AM
4

A have a friend whose schoolgirl daughter falsely accused a boy of rape. Whether by her direction or not, a group of other boys attacked and crippled him for like.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:41 PM
1

I'm dead set against AA; but I've got to admit this is emotionally satisfying.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:54 PM
1

Elegantly put.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:00 PM
0

Because white-knightism emerges from man's otherwise laudable impulse to protect and defend women. Lacking any corresponding cultural/biological tradition, women are happy to revile and castigate men unreservedly.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:13 AM
1

Another way of saying that feminism believes in ends justifying means, a form of conducting ideological (and non-ideological, come to that) warfare going back to Lenin at least. Conversely, the MRM functions on the basis of principle, characteristic of the right.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:03 AM
3

I always thought that was obvious.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:57 PM
0

Awww -- now you've gone and made me feel sorry for you. Not everything needs to be an empty but insult-rich screed, y'know.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:20 PM
1

You left out my "de-facto president." Or -- maybe you agree with me about his murky background and Saudi-driven success. Keep laughing, friend -- but don't let them stuff you into the sausage-grinder.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:27 PM
2

Your characterization of insurance company as holding "death panels" is wrong on the face of it, and your suggestion that their policies entirely emerge from greediness, rather than mere profit, misleading. Insurance company policies that appear to unfairly discriminate against men emerge from the same sort of studies that you screech are justifiable when conducted in pursuit of similarly discriminatory policies on the part of the government. The first difference here is that while insurance com…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 02:56 PM
14

Funny how male priests have become stereotyped as predators, but female middle school teachers have not.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 02:22 AM
1

Farrow's lawyer was Eleanor Alter. Here's People Magazine's account of the verdict: http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20110668,00.html
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:50 PM
10

True story, I swear. My cousin and his wife were getting divorced. She was rich, and hired the same (feminist) attorney hired by Mia Farrow in her dispute with Woody Allen. According to what my cousin's wife later told him, at her first meeting with the lawyer, the lawyer said: "First thing we do before anything else is to accuse your husband of sexually abusing your child" (a daughter in this case).
/r/MensRights09/03/13 04:25 AM
2

First of all, you mean oral consent (I'm not trying to be cute, "verbal consent" can also indicate a written document). Second, what good would oral consent provide any man falsely accused of rape? Women given to make such a false accusation would certainly have no problem denying that they gave oral consent. That leaves one with the need to obtain written consent -- an absurdity on the face of it.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:33 AM
0

Not just get away with it, but be CELEBRATED for it.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:03 PM
8

Makes one wonder what the relative suicide rate might be for boys raised in households where the sole parent is a feminist .
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:55 PM
5

I need Men's Rights because -- in my field -- I've repeatedly been discriminated against in hiring on the basis of my being male.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:51 AM
-7

Be a man.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:04 AM
1

The pusillanimous way you're reacting to this outrage is an example the problem men are facing. This is a human rights issue -- stop degrading yourself to appease these oppressors.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:03 AM
1

Voted down for "your."
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:13 PM
3

Here ya go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:10 PM
1

Grace derives its meaning from graciousness, not gracefulness. Thus -- it's not meant to indicate the absence of clumsiness, but rather the kindly disposition that one person has toward another. It's therefore gender neutral. Grace can also be the undeserved favor one receives from God. So it can also be divine.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:21 AM
2

I WISH it read like a novel. The fact that I think (with all the gobbledygook, I can never be sure) I agree with the author makes his incomprehensible prose that much harder to take.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:32 AM
1

You cited it. It's rather for you to link to it than require others to look it up.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:25 AM
1

It's a great word. Very expressive of pussy.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 03:35 AM
1

And how unmanly to downvote with comment.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:08 AM
-11

Gaaak! How unmanly.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:18 AM
1

Women tend to respond to surveys with answers reflecting popular feminist ideology rather than personal truth.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:25 PM
-1

How about ever since he sold out fiscal responsibility, America's allies, the Constitution and the West in general?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:16 AM
1

And I agree with your smaller point. While -- when studied in isolation -- individual facts (such as dates) may seem less important that a comprehensive understanding of history, they are essential to the task of forming that understanding.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 12:09 AM
3

Not for the man who has penile cancer.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:25 PM
6

Second compartment from the bottom on right. Middle guy. That creep is checking out a woman's breasts!
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:29 AM
1

Don't.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:05 AM
-3

No -- he didn't have a SINGLE reply telling him what it is.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:04 AM
1

Done reading now.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:20 PM
0

Am I the only one who see's loads of women wearing white shirts (over bathing suits) to water parks? Here it's blondes in black Yukons talking (illegally) on their cells.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 10:00 PM
1

There's something else here that's being overlooked, namely the inherent murderous extremism and barbarity of Islam. Its the same thing that finds expression in the "honor killing" of errant daughters by their Muslim fathers and brothers. And -- just like the violence perpetuated against men by women generally -- it's all but ignored by main-stream Western media.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:05 AM
-1

Yes -- after assuming them to be immediately intelligible. And then getting asked.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:33 PM
-1

Not ALL acronyms are immediately intelligible y'know.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:35 PM
3

They can't.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:31 PM
2

As a supporter of both, I say that at least that's one thing for which to be grateful.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:16 AM
4

The bunny-killer would get a pussy-pass.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:15 AM
1

Can you name any prominent Republicans who are working with you?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:12 AM
2

Don't need to read further.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:05 PM
2

A cause to which to rally.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 11:38 PM
1

Your guess is as good as mine. I agree that there are aspects of this remote style of waging war that are reprehensible. However, as it keeps boots off the ground and thereby holds US soldiers out of harm's way, it's been highly favored by Democrat Party presidents like Clinton and Obama.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:16 PM
1

Due process does not apply in warfare.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 06:12 PM
1

Especially if you're male. Your guilt is presumed.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 06:08 PM
-1

So then -- not many.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 05:58 PM
1

Huh?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:57 PM
2

This is a generation of women raised to believe that men are devoid of rights and feelings. Instead they are mere receptacles of blame, and thereby handy as agents through which women can fraudulently claim that oh-so-desired "victim" status.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:22 PM
8

Years ago, a friend of mine told me that his daughter (then a young teen) had accused a boy of raping her. Hearing this, a group of boys loyal to her attacked the accused rapist, crippling him in the process. It was only a short time after this that my friend's daughter confessed to having made the whole thing up. I asked him if he ever called the parents of the boy who'd been crippled. He said no.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:25 PM
3

What a nest of vipers the Obama administration is.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:25 AM
2

Unaware that phlake had beat me to it, I tried posting this with the title: "Sadistic Female Murderess of Innocent Animals Gets Off with a Slap on the Wrist"
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:47 AM
0

I haven't read all the fearful dogs barking their calls for appeasement here Mr. Elam, but I've read enough to recall that it's a hallmark of a certain class of cowardice to counsel against doing what the situation demands out of fear of condemnation and/or reprisal by the offending party no matter how dangerous, mendacious, hypocritical, oppressive and generally ugly they are. Fucking Scum Girl and her confederates deserve exposure regardless of consequence. Besides, how would you feel if you w…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:17 AM
2

A man lets the feminists bray their spittle-flecked invective and continues to do what's right.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:57 AM
0

Very savvy.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:35 AM
2

Just because he's had sex with you, doesn't means he's raped you. Don't be THAT girl.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:08 PM
7

Do what's right and let them say what they will!
/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:58 AM
3

It's more than sad -- its a violation of "equal protection under the law." But then -- who cares about such niceties then there are men's rights to be trampled for the benefit of women.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:38 AM
1

Any vocabulary error lies in the idiotic assertion that a man's physical endurance and life span are the same thing.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:20 AM
2

These ugly feminist conventions are only deployed when (depending on the female's age) the male pursuing her is insufficiently "cute," wealthy or bad-boy enough to draw her interest. At your age the first and last traits win feminine hearts regardless of their ideological posturing. If you have the former, or can develop the latter, you may sally forth with confidence.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:41 AM
-6

Although a generalized one, it's a courtly expression of a man's evolution-honed superior strength and endurance. As long as it's not required by civil law, it's an elegant and voluntary tradition steeped in the biological history of the sexes that feminists are always urging us to forsake.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:33 AM
0

If he invited her, he should offer to pay.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:27 AM
2

Let me get this straight: The second man was able to get past her looks and only wanted to vomit when he reached her vagina?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:45 AM
-5

When I see the word "womyn" I reach for my revolver.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:19 AM
-1

Downvotes? Hell, no -- that's a brilliant observation.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:17 AM
1

OK. I guess that makes it not just as not OK.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:36 PM
-1

Good job, but what the hell kind of locution is "just as not OK"? That detracting from your student's education.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:41 AM
7

I think you've got that equation backwards.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:23 AM
-10

Fair's fair.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter