TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FoolioTheGreat Archive

View 4 posts and 297 comments by FoolioTheGreat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

GeneralFoolioTheGreat/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:58 PM
21

Activism/SupportFoolioTheGreat/r/MensRights04/07/23 08:19 PM
4

GeneralFoolioTheGreat/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:26 PM
1

GeneralFoolioTheGreat/r/MensRights05/07/23 11:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well that generic job description is not really evidence of anything. When I looked up actual job posting almost all of them were for 50 pounds. 1 was 60, and 2 had no physical requirement’s listed. Also those are interesting numbers. You are correct in your views about white privileged and patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 07:51 AM
6

Yeah obviously, but OP is hoping there is some legal loophole he can use to get out of it
/r/MensRights09/03/24 07:44 AM
-4

I would be curious if you can find a job description for oil work that requires being able to lift more than 50 pounds. If you say, well a women couldn't do that, 50 pounds is usally the default requirement for most jobs, including retail. The reality is those oil rig jobs, are not constant back breaking work, and you do not need to be super fit or super strong. I've worked a lot of manual labour jobs, and have seen all sorts. Fatties, skinny guys, old guys, and yes, women. The biggest hurdle in…
/r/MensRights09/03/24 01:13 AM
-12

Yes a lot of men working there.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 01:07 AM
-9

Look at nursing. This exact same problem can happen there the only issue is that it's actively encouraged and they have no problem with it being a place that's anti-men. There are programs and incentives to encourage men to get into nursing. Not sure what you are talking about. Nursing also isn't it's own business. To make a fair comparison, you would have to look at the enitre hospital. And you will find there are a lot of men working there. False. It's not about equal rights it's about female …
/r/MensRights09/03/24 01:05 AM
4

Because he wants to be able to marry some poor foreign girl and ensure she won't be able to divorce him later and be able to live on her own, without spending any of his own money. This way she is 100% reliant on him and can never leave him. He's hoping we have some secret trick or loophole, femists don't know about.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 12:21 AM
-21

How is it legal to have a company with 100 employees, and no women? While the company doesn't explicitly say its due to discrimination. The only way that would be possible is through discrimination. So we can either make it illegal to have unbalanced gender/racial demographics within companies. OR encourage and incentivse those groups and companies to be inclusive. Those programs are designed to get women into the trades. What would be the logic in getting men into the trades, when they are alre…
/r/MensRights09/03/24 12:14 AM
0

Do a lot of feminist deny men die earlier? I don't get the point you are trying to make here. Like the wage gap, there are many factors and those factors are created by societal standards and culture. So what are you argueing for? Should men and women both shut up and just accept these outcomes? Or is it fair for both to point out the societal causes for these gaps, and want to correct them? Also if your goal is trying to muster support for improving mens life expectancy, using it as a device to…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 10:55 PM
0

There are literally no positive updooted comments on your post that do not support your side, in fact the majority of them do support your side. Also you are the one who is acting like its okay for women to cheat but not men. Your moms boyfriend, did not cheat, nor did he break your family up. Your mom did. He doesn't owe you anything, and thinking he does is so bizarre.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 05:23 PM
-1

Alright buddy
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:15 PM
-15

Like I said anecdotes are not arguements lmao. The anecdotes are also unrelated to what we are even talking about, so not sure what point you are tyring to make.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:08 PM
-15

I am not going to take anecdotes as evidence of a problem. Though I do agree. I think victim statements should not be a thing in our justice system.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:04 PM
-2

If you are walking through an alley alone late at night, are you more scared if a man or woman enters the alley?
/r/MensRights22/12/23 04:50 PM
-41

There is a problem with the comparison you are trying to make. Those male attacks are very rarely racially motivated or even relevent. Not only that, but just prove, men SHOULD be stereotyping men as dangerous. Because they are. If you are walking alone at night? Are you going to stereotype a big man walking towards you as a threat? More than a woman? I'm sure you have deluded yourself into thinking woman are more dangerous, but the majority of people probably think the man is the bigger threat.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 04:16 PM
1

The National Center for Health Statistics at the CDC showed in their most up to date statistics that 42.4% of U.S. adults were obese as of 2017–2018 (43% for men and 41.9% for women).
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:34 AM
-1

And are they getting into relationships? Also a few anecdotes from people you know, not really a strong arguement.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:33 AM
0

You don't know that forsure. But also she is famous. Literally hanging out with some of the biggest streamers and has her own following. You can't compare her to an average obese woman. Test it out, make a profile using the pic of an obese white woman with thinning hair, say you have 2 kids. See how many hits you get for actual serious dates.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 11:24 PM
0

1 Again. It is not a dehumanizing term. I think you should look up what dehumanizing means. Have the majority of woman ever used those terms to desribe a man? Probably. I'm a man, but I use them all the time. Also I don't see how asking woman to not use these terms means they will be more open to lowering their standards. Or even why this is an arguement for they they should? EDIT: Pwned this guy into the stoneage. L + Ratio + Rip BOZO
/r/MensRights21/12/23 11:22 PM
-1

Women saying they are not attracted to creeps/incels, do not mean all men or even all men they don't want to date are creeps/incels. Nor do the majority of women even call most men incels/creeps. They are also not even dehumanzing terms. Are they mean? Sure. But is it wrong to call someone checking out a 15 year old girl a creep? Is that too dehumanzing for you? Again, not saying that applies to all men or creeps. But catagorizing people by their behaviour is just something people do. Good and b…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:59 PM
1

“100% in your control” for anyone? Yes. I've never been forced to date someone. Who and when you try to date and how you go about it is 100% in your control. I see posts everyday in this subreddit and others of men unwilling to lower their standards in anyway. There is a whole community based around this belief. At the same time, those same men think woman SHOULD lower their standards. If this is your view, there is no discussion to be had.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:12 PM
-5

I don't think the majority of women do that
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:01 PM
-1

Lmao what are you basing that on? Just google it, you see tons of posts about how it's hard for "ugly" woman to date online.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 09:30 PM
0

Your position could be simply summarised as “man up”, which has historically been a part of the issue. My position is just be realistic and don't complain about something that is 100% in your control. LIke I said there are also other options than dating to help loniliness. I literally gave like 10 healthy suggestions to help someones lonliness. Because, you only have 2 options. Fix it or accept it. Complaining is pointless because there is no solution. and blaming woman is cringe. A lonely woman…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 09:22 PM
0

I am not advocating any solution. Like I said. I just think if you are lonely. Man or woman. Can't get dates, are unwilling to improve yourself or lower your standards. You probably shouldn't complain about it, or worse, blame the opposite gender. Also older female lonliness if a completely different issue. There are just less alive/single men as people get older. Plus being older and not familiar with being online, plus the risks of scams, older people tend to have a hard time dating.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 09:00 PM
1

The majority of men are not swiping on everything. That is not remotely true. And in the cases of men who do. I am sure they didn't start their tinder profile doing that. I'm sure the algorithm play some part in it. But ultimataly like I said if they are truely swiping right on everything and not getting dates. Baring that person having some sort of disability, they should work on improving themselves. I just don't think, an average weight man with a full time job, if they swiped right on every …
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:56 PM
0

I mean. That is what OP is basically saying and that is what I am talking about. But like I said, unless those lonely men are literally swiping right on everyone. Clearly the issue is their standards. My only point being is, you can't complain about lonliness if you are not willing to either lower your standard, or improve yourself. That goes for men and women. And the older woman loneliness is already a thing.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:51 PM
-5

Wat
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:46 PM
-3

LMFAO. Literally ruling out 40% of woman. "My standards are so low". And be honest. those are not your only standards. You going after 60+ year olds? Lots of singles in that demographic. Feminsts? trans women? Women with mental health issues? Disabled? Be real... But lets say your only standard is obesity. If you are still single, and don't want to be. Then Yes, lower your standard. Otherwise, do not complain about womans standards....
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:44 PM
-3

The problem with the lonely men debate. Is there is not a real solution. What are we going to do, force women to date when they don't want to at all, or force them to date people they don't want to. No one is owed companionship. If you feel this is something you need, and are not getting it. Then it is up to you to deal with it, or lower your standards. There are tons of woman who are single. Unless you are literally swiping right on every woman with a pulse and getting no dates, then I am sure …
/r/MensRights21/12/23 06:37 PM
-7

The patriarchy is hard to defeat. How many male leaders/generals DON'T want woman in the army. Not to mention, I don't think gender equality is a high priority in those countries, not that I am an expert. Also you ask what gender equality people advocate? They are against war and conscription. Period. If all woman/feminists say no one should be drafted and refuse to fight. They are still promoting gender equality.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 12:41 AM
-1

And I get that women are better at figuring out people and social situations. But what about that fact that men are almost always better at understanding things, and repairing things, You say something like this, and wonder why women think men are stupid? What are you basing this on? I would love to see any data that supports this at all. Becasue if you believe this without any proof than yes you may indeed be stupid.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 10:21 PM
-9

The majority of Syrian refugees are men in the EU. This post makes no sense.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:22 PM
-10

Well I can only comment on what you post, so I will take your word for it. But eitherway, I do not consider this subreddit a men only space.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:34 PM
-19

Your friend is right. This is not an unbiased men only social club. 1 there are women here. 2 this is more of anti feminst than pro men I don't think your friend was argueing against men having their own spaces.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:22 PM
-31

lol think you need to spend some time studying Anthropology
/r/MensRights21/08/23 10:13 PM
-1

yeah
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:28 PM
1

You'll find feminists are brought up that way, This is presupposing feminsim has always existed and was always pushed on people. We know this is not the case. It also didn't come out of no where for no reason. ​ it usually takes a personal event While I understand the human nature of this. People forming bias's, opinions, and beliefs due to personal anecodes is not a good thing for a functional and equal society. We should try our best to not let personal experiences affect out judgement of thin…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:03 PM
1

Agree 100% but I try and talk sense into people as much as I can. But a lot of people here are pretty entrenched in their beliefs
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:08 PM
1

Nah, it's because no one cares less about them, while all the attention goes to female victims, as propogated by world media. - People don't care about male problems - I explain why people don't care - You just restate people dont care about male problem - ??????? ​ Unless you're saying solidly left-wing journos are rife with the patriarchy? It is hard to remove unconscience bias. Specially as it has been present in our society for all of human history. But journalist have to write articles that…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:28 PM
-1

Going to DV shelters and having them try to force you to admit to being the problem is harassment you goofball😂. This is not how I read what he is saying. I don't think they were literally telling him to his face he was not a victim, but that is how it must have felt due to the lack of services. Which I would agree with, that is a reasonable to believe. But either way, this has nothing to do with my comment or that hate is directed to men's shelters specifically. ​ But then again this comes from…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:22 PM
-5

Yes I believe we live in a patriarchal society. ​ By patriarchy I am referring to a male-dominated society where males control majority of economic, Men are in charge of the majority of top performing comapanies. Men in general have more wealth than women. religious Women relgiouos leaders are very rare. social This is kind of odd? Males control social aspects of society? I assume you are talking about dating/marriage. I would say neither gender controls it. political power Most politicians are …
/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:37 PM
1

Okay?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 03:24 PM
-5

Because of one anecdote?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:08 PM
1

Sorry I am not a pubmed subscriber. Are you able to provide the data and metrics they used in their studies? EDIT: https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/ipv01.pdf here is what I was basing my arguement on.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:26 PM
1

Yes. As I stated from the very begining. I know this is the case. What i said was, at the time of the deluth model being founded and implmented the data AT THE TIME back up the policy decision.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:06 PM
0

Like I said I have not seen this at all. If you have a few examples within the last few years, that A, the person is a self described feminist, B, they are advocating for males being exluded from services or healthcare.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:01 PM
1

I am not saying people were saying it didn't happen. I am saying there is no data that the numbers were even remotely close. If you could provide any evidence that says otherwise I would be very happy to look it over.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:59 PM
1

What does this have to do with femnism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/23 04:38 PM
1

While I do see the occasional joke about it. Atleast on reddit, most threads about sex and lasting long, most top comments say it doesn't matter how long it lasts, in fact most comments say women don't like it when it takes too long.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/23 04:36 PM
-2

Look up Erin Pizzey. She founded the first women's domestic violence shelter and quickly noticed the high rate of reciprocity in domestic violence. I am not saying this is not true. But at the time she was saying this, there was little actual data to support this. She was using anecdotes and bad science to base her opinion on this. Again, at a time where no data remoetely backed up her claims. ​ That's the thing, it doesn't exist. If it did the models it makes would resemble reality. The deluth …
/r/MensRights17/08/23 03:35 PM
-1

Wrong. The fact women had no protections from their fathers or husbands and had to obey without question. They had no more rights than the family pet/farm animal.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 03:24 PM
0

Do you have any evidence of this? I think it would be extremely rare for a feminist to advocate for males being excluded from any health services.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 03:20 PM
1

They are not saying that. They are just saying accepting dad bods should not be part of the body positivity movement, as it goes against the original mission of the body positivity movement. While I do not agree 100% with the article. I think they make some good points. Specially when it comes to the racial differences. As I noted in another comment, and what is noted in the article. When people talk about dad bods, they are usually not talking about POC. Any articles or posts you will not see P…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 03:18 PM
0

There does not have to be a law in place to prove that this was the case. The absence of laws protecting women is proof. Not to mention tons of historical records going back to ancient rome stating women obeyed their husbands. And it is literally in the bible that most of western society followed for over 1000 years. We do not even have to go back that far. This was literally the case less than 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 03:09 PM
1

I never said anything about patriarchy being the cause of men being victims. I said it was the cause of society not treating male victims seriously
/r/MensRights17/08/23 02:33 PM
1

Do you have any evidence to back this claim up? Because I can provide a lot of evidence literally going back to the Roman’s about patriarchy. We’re there a lot of single lonely men during the Middle Ages?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:23 AM
1

I explained it. On my comment
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:08 AM
-6

While the statistics have changed over the years as male victims have been more comfortable coming forwards. At the time time of its creation all available data showed a huge disparity of domestic violence done to women by men. At the time it did describe reality at least as far as all available data showed. Also how useful recognizing patriarchy is irrelevant to its importance or the fact it exists. You want to know why it is important? Because patriarchy and toxic masculinity is the reason peo…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:07 AM
-1

when the cause of being overweight is diverse. I agree with you here. But the article is literally saying body positivity is not just about accepting being fat. It is about challenging beauty standards. You cannot say beauty standards are not applied the same way or as harshly between men and women. White? As if men of color are never over weight, the authors focus on a racial group. Look up any article about dad bods. I bet you will not see many POC pictured. I have never even seen a post or he…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 01:03 AM
0

But does this infer that men had it any easier? After all, men were essentially the property of the government; No one is saying men had it easier. Life was hard for everyone. But patriarchy is not just about who had it easier. Sure men had to obey their lords. Women had to obey the lords as well, but then they also had to obey their fathers and then their hubands. They had no protections from them. While men did not have politcal rights. They did have rights. Peasents could not kill or steal fr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/23 11:04 PM
-7

But the title of the article makes it clear, the authors hate men, No it doesn't. "Lazy white guys" are the words of racist sexist pigs. No it's not. The words alone do not make it racists/sexist. Some guys are lazy, some guys are white. Saying that is not racist. Context and intention are what make it racist/sexist. celebrating hate speech as "appropriate" or "justified. Not hate speech. Feminism is the ideology of misandry, the hartred of men, and an ideology heavily influenced and practiced b…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 10:17 PM
-8

You should date a feminist. They would never do that to you.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:32 PM
0

What are you basing that on? For most of western human history. Women had to obey their fathers until they were married (which they usually didn't have choice on), then they had to obey their husbands until they died. Women had no laws protecting them, and any laws that did protect them, protected from the view they were property. IE any offense done to a women was an offense done to her father and husband, they were the victim. And no laws protecting them from their fathers or husbands.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 08:21 PM
-10

No where on their website or in this article do they describe themselves as feminsts. Also, while this is a problem with all click bait articles. You are just complaining about the title. I don't think you read the whole article. They raise a good point and are right. The body positivity movement was created by and for women at a time when women's bodies were judged pretty harshly in media. Men including themselves in the movement seems very reractionary. I think that is a fair assessment. "body…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 07:51 PM
-4

What? The ideas men need to be strong and independant are almost universal and present through all of history. So when women were treated as property, and men were still supposed to be "men". Female hypergamy was the cause of that belief? I don't buy it.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 06:07 PM
-2

Why do you think many people in society perpetuate the idea men do not need help or that men need to be strong or breadwinners?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:40 PM
-13

WHAT??? This is wild. Why do you not use that high resolution view to look at why women are graduting college more than men, why men are the victims and perpetrators of violent crime, why men make up most prisoners? Every issue probably has a million factors that contribute to it. But in real life, some factors are more relevent than others. Listing every factor and saying they are all equal is ridiculous. Here is another issue that I know you will hate. But the "patriarchy" is also harming men …
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:31 PM
-1

lol gotcha anything else? EDIT: anyone who tries to set up a men's shelter, even with their own money, gets hounded, harassed, and receives death threats (Earl Silverman / Erin Pizzey). Do you have evidence of this? I just looked them up. I didn't see any abuse/threats sent against Earl or his shelter. And Erin, the threats seem to be for what she was saying/believes, doesn't look related to mens shelters.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:32 PM
1

How about 98-99% of all abuse refuge space being dedicated to women? While I agree, we need more shelters for men and will cede this does protect women over men. It is a sad example of how toxic masculinity defines our country. But there are some realities on why this is the case and I can agree with the reasoning on how we ended up with the disparity. ​ How about millions being spent to protect women through The Office for Violence Against Women, which doesn’t even exist for men? This really ju…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:02 PM
1

I notice you are saying “he” . Hmmmmm. Also you are implying wars are universally disliked and opposed. That is not true.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 06:41 AM
3

No worries. We need more non feminist men getting educated and in high positions of power to fight back against the femcels
/r/MensRights16/08/23 03:43 AM
0

People do not vote for wars. Even in America. The average voter has almost no say in foreign policy. I wonder what the percentage of women make up these governments? Not to mention, Russia is basically a dictatorship. You think Putin polled the general public before starting the war?
/r/MensRights16/08/23 03:42 AM
-5

It’s literally linked in the article which I assume you didn’t read either
/r/MensRights16/08/23 12:50 AM
1

that doesn’t really apply to statistics. Sorry facts don’t care about your feelings
/r/MensRights16/08/23 12:27 AM
2

true!
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:45 PM
1

Anything you have earned or bought prior to the marriage are considered seperate assets. Also if you do not want to split money/assets gained during the marriage, speak to a lawyer and have get a prenup setup.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:40 PM
0

wat
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:37 PM
1

Okay, well to answer the question murder-suicides do not make up a high percentage of male suicides. And next time you see that, I would just ask them for the source on that data. Or you can cite wikipedia - "1.6% of suicides involve murder" and have them try to refute it.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:59 PM
1

All women cheat eventually, can't blame him for that.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:53 PM
0

Well not that shocked… Yeah, as many have pointed out, you shouldn't be. No one just gets a paternity test for no reason. I am sure if everyone got paternity tests done, the number would be less than 1%.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:53 PM
1

Eh, the problem with Terfs is that any female anti TRA is labelled a TERF. Regardless of if they are feminist or not. Some of the most well known and vocal terfs are far from feminists. Kellie-Jay Keen is a good example. She does consider herself a feminist and is against trans people to defend women and girls. But than she advocates for MEN to go into womens washrooms to keep trans out. Advocating for voting for right wing parties becasue they are anti trans, regardless of their policies on wom…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:50 PM
4

?? What about this is about mens rights?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:44 PM
-3

An eastern european country, I wouldn't say is the forefront of gender equality. You are also forgetting the fact, these decisions are not being made by women. They are being made by men, who are the ones who think and are perpetuating this toxic masculinity thinking. Now you ask why is no one questiong it. Well people are. Just google it and you will see many articles talking about it. Ukraine are fighting for their country and lives, and you think now is a good time to point out the equality h…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:42 PM
1

Do you have any data to back that up? Because everything I have seen shows the opposite of what you are saying
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:47 PM
-2

What safeguards are we affording women victims vs men victims of violent crimes?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:42 PM
1

Okay gotcha anything else?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 08:41 PM
1

Lets be real. "True unconditional love" is not a thing. We are picking partners that meet a certain criteria. Looks, values, goals, ethics, etc. Financial security is a pretty important metric in dating for men and woman. A man living in poverty is probably not picking a partner that is contributing nothing or is going to be expect to pay more than he can afford. We are allowed to have standards for ourselves and our partners. A women wanting a man who can provide, there is nothing wrong with th…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:54 PM
1

I've literally never seen or heard this in my life. Can you provide link or article saying this is the case?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:48 PM
-1

The majority of people in high paying positions are still men. Also you have to live in this gynocentric world either way. Might as well have a good career.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:45 PM
0

This is something I am really struggling to understand here. I am not trolling or trying to start any arguements, I am actually curious. As most perpetrators of this violence are men, what are we hoping is going to change? Making men less violent through social conditioning? Or getting tougher on these crimes? As a progressive leftist. I personally opt for the social conditioning, regardless of men vs women statistics. Also preventing men from commiting these violent crimes would help all victim…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:48 PM
-4

In the grand sceme of things, not a big difference. Defineitly not a disparity that is needed to be addressed. It also doesn't track worldwide. This is an extremely small sample size. Depending on what FDV stats you are looking at, sure, sometimes things are 50/50, but the reality is there still some issues that disproportionately affect women. Including some of the most violent aspects of FDV. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/fastfact.html
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:42 PM
2

So it doesn't say explicitly that the FDV victims were majority men. You are extrapolating that. Just as I can extrapolate, if all the female victims died due to FDV cases, that would put that stat as about 50%, Men vs women.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:21 PM
1

Yeah. As many stated, your only option is a lawyer. But even with a lawyer, if you want any chance, you will have to pick between your mother or your kids. As that will be a major roadblock. Good luck and stay strong.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:01 PM
-1

What are you basing this on? The data you provided does not show men vs women statistics.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:54 PM
-7

Are most murderers men?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:48 PM
3

Justpearlythings, Rollo Tommassi, Fresh and fit, Jordan Peterson
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:43 PM
-10

How is it lies? What is wrong with the study and do you have information that disputes it? I agree this is scary, as the data backs up the article pretty well imo, maybe feminist have a point.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:42 PM
-8

I think the problem is you are using anecdotes to define a political movement or ideology. If you like argueing with feminsts here are some feminist/leftist sites saying the phrase "man up" is bad. Next time you see them say it, you can pwn them with facts and logic. https://www.yesmagazine.org/health-happiness/2018/08/27/why-we-need-to-stop-saying-man-up https://femmagazine.com/feminim-101-what-is-toxic-masculinity/ https://archive.attn.com/stories/3222/examples-of-gender-inequality-men-vs-wome…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:38 PM
1

Can you point to one actual harm that feminism directly causes men?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:06 PM
-1

The idea that you view facing ones fears and insecurities as "manning up" is the problem
/r/MensRights12/08/23 05:48 PM
-1

Okay. Well I didn't say anything about making warehouse jobs safer in the comment you are replying to. So not sure what you are going on about.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 11:07 PM
-1

I think you are replying to the wrong comment. While I did propose that idea, it is way deeper in this thread.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 11:04 PM
-11

I do agree with you, that I do not think people deserve to be hunted and harrassed outside the justice system. But I would not describe this as cancel culture.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 10:41 PM
3

Lower wage workers getting a higher wage does not = high wage workers getting less. That is literally not how that works. No one working these jobs live in poverty, which can not be the same for people working retail. ​ If the pay between warehousing and retail is equalised then there’s less incentive to take those jobs. It was already shitty enough That is okay. They can switch to retail and still get paid the same. There is not issue. This lets people work the jobs they want to work, and not t…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 08:12 PM
-12

Oh.. okay.. so all those feminists i've seen drinking from "Male Tears" cups / bottles must have been my imagination then... You are misunderstanding the joke. One obvioulsy the tears are not real, its just coffee in the cups. 2, The male tears do not represent the tears shed by men in pain or suffering, the tears they are referring too are the metaphorical tears men shed when crying or complaining about feminism. They are saying they do not care if, women getting ahead in society upsets men who…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 08:03 PM
-9

And are we to believe that it is ONLY men who judge men as "Weak" for crying? I never said men are the ones judging. I said people. ​ But time and time again we keep focusing on how its "Men" holding all men to these "Toxic" standards.. When feminists scholars talk about patriarchy and toxic masculinty, that are not exlusivly talking about things only men do. ​ So riddle me this.. if Women also perpetuate these toxic ideas / standards.. then why do we label it as "Toxic Masculinity" and not "Tox…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 06:54 PM
0

But they are getting good pay
/r/MensRights11/08/23 06:22 PM
-3

So you would rather men still injure their bodies and risk their lives? Instead of just making the jobs safer and easier?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 06:12 PM
-3

These are two seperate issues. Those guys already make a livable wage. More money is not going to prevent them from overworking or getting injured. We need to work on making those jobs easier and less dangerous. I have made many posts and comments advocating for such changes in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:20 PM
1

I assume you are not taking history in university. Because you are making some poor generalizations and comparisons that would not fly at a university level. You talk about the general public of men having to fight wars, but you are lumping all of history together. But if you were a student of history, you would know the general population were not forced conscripted into most wars for most of history. The idea that armies were filled with peasents is only true for a pretty small time in medieva…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:01 PM
-6

Yes it's a class issue. People shouldn't have to overwork their bodies or risk their lives for a livable wage. Retail workers deserve a livable wage. But because it will benefit women, people here are like, hold on a second. Lmao
/r/MensRights11/08/23 04:42 PM
1

You say you know his wife. But you don't know how she would feel about this or the picture before doing it? Have you had conversations with her, gotten to know her on a personal level, hung out? Or do you just know she is the barman's wife. It sounds like you have a pretty inpersonal relationship with these people. To the wife it seems like you are just a bar patron who got uncomfortably close to their child and the barman crossed a line by allowing it. Kind of weird to take a picture as well. A…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 04:37 PM
-14

To answer your last point. You are doing male advocacy no favours by comparing mens struggles to womens. It feels as though you are blaming women and feminism for the struggles of men. I am sure you and most people here believe this. But many of the stuggles men face can be met without comparing them to women. You can say there are 1 million homeless men, and only 1000 shelters for them. And advocate for them without saying women have more help. Framing your arguement this way is pushing people …
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:34 PM
-18

Ofcourse men are allowed to cry, no one is holding a gun to their heads. What people mean when they say that, is other people will judge a man when he cries. Why do you think that is? Your professor thinks it is because toxic masculinity. What they mean by that is according to historical patriarchal/masculine values, a man crying makes him look weak, like he's not a man. Now that belief is toxic. Hence toxic masculinity. This type of attitude is learned and has been accepted for most of human hi…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:27 PM
2

Then explain how it would work. Lets use one specific example. Pencils for school. Does parent A need permission and approval from parent B before buying said pencils? If yes, now times this buy a hundread. Because then you have to buy paper, binder, pens it cost gas to go to store, etc. If you agree that is not realistic. Then when parent A buys pencils for $5. Does parent B have to pay $2.50 no matter what? What if parent B argues that he found pencils for $3. Do they just have to pay or do th…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 10:40 PM
-5

Literally just said i was wrong about the disparity in other countries in the comment you are replying to. The second part is based on a study within the united states. Showing low gun owning states, have less suicide deaths. There is a correlation to be made, and it is reasonible to think more gun control would result in fewer deaths.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 09:22 PM
-2

I do pay child support, so I am in the same situation. I want what is best for my child and don't think my feelings towards their mother should affect how I treat them or their quality of life. I'm sorry you are stuggling. But that is a reality for most people. You are making more money than the majority of people, also your biggest expense has a time limit on it, so long term you don't have to worry so much. I would suggest therapy, as some of the language you use is concerning. I hope you are …
/r/MensRights10/08/23 09:19 PM
-3

I am okay with how child support is handled as it is. No change.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 08:11 PM
-9

Did you read my comment?
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:58 PM
-3

Not impossible, but defineitly unrealistic. Instead of having one arguement about the overall costs. Every item will be scrutinzed and need to be justified. This will inievibly end up filling our family courts with nonsense, parents argueing over the cost and need for a box of pencils, etc. You are living in fairy tale land if you think this is a good idea, and that it would actually ever be considered as a solution.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:55 PM
1

You can literally google this, and there are tons of shirts saying boys rule. A popular brand sold in walmarts "old guys rule". You can look at twitter and see hundreads of posts using #boysrules without recieeving ridicule and hate. You are getting worked up about something that is happening in your head mate.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:42 PM
-13

Yes, because there is no flat number. And the costs to raise a child will vary wildly dependant of family income. I think it is reasonible to base the costs on the parents income level. And not a flat universal rate.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:32 PM
-1

Well I disagree with you there. There is not a lot of evidence to say men and women are different, regarding their "nature". More likley the "nurture" is the greatest factor in differences. But if that was the case, that men and women were naturally different, then I would agree with you that men and women can co-operate to their strenghts. The problem is our society does not reward women for using their strengths. To be successful in our society, you need to have and use typical male traits and…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:25 PM
1

What does this have to do with mens rights??
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:16 PM
-24

Both parties are resposible to pay 50% for the costs of their child based on how much they make. It wouldn't matter if she was a billionare, legally he should still pay 50% the cost of raising the child, dependant on this income.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:12 PM
-8

That is not feasible. How tf are you going to split every grocery bill, every resturant bill, school supplies, clothes, gifts for birthday parties, gas, electricity bills, water bills, laundry soap. How do you possible calculate all that everytime you have to pay those. Literally doesn't make sense
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:11 PM
-3

They hate me because I speak the truth
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:00 PM
-21

Yeah I was wrong about the disparity between countries. Though studies within the united states show, low gun ownership states show less overall suicide deaths.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:59 PM
-18

Your slide about mental health research is very misleading and misinformed. The NIH does not spend double on womens mental health. As noted, the majority of spending goes to help both genders. Per the suicide stat, if you factor in total spending, the difference is just 8%. There is also a reason why money is given more to womens health research specifically. Statistically, women are more depressed than men and attempt suicide more often. So it makes sense to invest more in this demographic. Ofc…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:40 PM
-16

Why are men’s higher mortality rates so often waved of with, “well that’s just the way it is!” Why did you stop your research on the broadest possible statistics. Why not put some effort into the why? It feels like you are also saying "well that's just the way it is!". There is data and research on why this is the case. Why not add that, or make a new slideshow?
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:23 PM
-30

However, I believe that a large part of the difference goes to the poor treatment of men, which in part translates to more men committing suicide and also worse health outcomes and premature deaths. Men are not more depressed than women, nor to they attempt suicide more often. The opposite is the case. The reason men die by suicide is because they choose more lethal methods. And no that does not prove they are MORE depressed, or depressed women are just doing it for attention. The question is ho…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:21 PM
-6

The men rule thing. Which I do not even think is true, but if it is, this is a pretty dumb thing to be upset about. You think one of the primarmy reasons life is unfair for men, is because they can't say "men rule"? Ridiculous. Also in most western countries. Divorce law is not gendered. Men do not have it worse than women in this. The women are not taking half of the mans money. Both parties are splitting the assets and finances gathered over the course of their marraige. ​ When a man is in a r…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 04:14 PM
-6

This is not the case. Chads are still approaching girls, and betas are not. But this has literally always been the case. Metoo is just the excuse beta males are using these days.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 04:04 PM
-1

What does this have to do with feminism? Also men tweet stuff like this literally all the time? I really do not understand why you think that is not the case.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 04:00 PM
-3

Huh? Calling them influential women disrespects them? You are just looking for any reason to be offended. I said nothing regarding their reigns or over all power or influence. I am talking about numbers. I would bet there are less than 100 female rulers world wide. While there are thousands of men. That was the only point I was making. As OP stated, men rules the world for centuries. Just pointing out rare examples does not disprove this.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 11:31 PM
-4

You are making a mistake if you are saying patriarchy and womens sufferage are the same thing. The voting rights issue, is just an example of patriarchy. As you noted in many countries, voting rights were not achieved simultaneously. You have to ask yourself, why is that? Why in many of these countries, there was an equally strong movement to prevent women from getting the right to vote. Or how most of the general public was neutral on the topic. One would say patriarchy has something to do with…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 11:20 PM
-5

This is not a good arguement. You have to know that right. This is a tiny minority of examples. Like. 0.00001%. This does not prove anypoint. While yes, there were influential women in history. The reality is, the numbers do not add up. You can pick 1 single country in the world, and name more 100 more rulers than there were female rulers in the whole world.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 10:49 PM
2

It was normal 60 years ago
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:26 PM
1

No it's not
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:11 PM
1

Again if you are making a comparison to the way things used to be. The housing market is not high due to overcrowding. Unemployement is pretty much the lowest its ever been. People are working less hours than they used to. Inflation has almost nothing to do with the amount of people in the workforce. I do not want to put lipstick on a pig. If it was up to me, I would abolish almost all aspects of capitalism. Tax the ultra rich and help the lower class. You're fear of automation is a bit unfounde…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:53 PM
-2

I was going to reply to each individual point you are making. But the reality is each point is stemmed form the same things. One, a lot of these exmaples are just anecdotes of your family, they are not a reflection of most peoples experiences or society as a whole. Two, these beliefs are rooted in patriarchy, Boys need to work harder, be successful, join the military, don't need support. This is what we mean when we talk about patriarchy and toxic masculinity. I know this doesn't help, and your …
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:02 PM
1

You are the one conflating those two things. I'm just talking about safety. You also said "tried and failed for 100 years?" While there is a lot I want to improve in our society. Over the last 100 years, literally every aspect of human life has improved. And as we are only talking about worker safety in this thread. The numbers are staggering how improved workers lives have improved and deaths/accidents have gone down. I would say worker safety has been very successful. The only aspects where we…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:50 PM
0

You cannot claim martyrdom and demand sympathy and at the same time, not be willing to reduce death and suffering, or demand safer working conditions to prevent these deaths or create a hostile work environment for women trying to work in these jobs. While ofcourse some jobs are less safe then others. The reality is, we can always improve. It would just cost more money. While uber is a deadly job. Uber drivers are not regularly being murdered which is what I suspect you think is happening. They …
/r/MensRights02/08/23 06:02 PM
-1

Well if you don't want men to die less. I have 2 questions. Why is pointing out mens deaths such a large talking point on this sub? What exactly do you want or expect from this movement and society?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 04:34 PM
-2

So then why do we treat them as martyrs here?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:22 AM
2

To answer your first question. We know this is not the case. As men have worked these dangerous jobs forever, and over the last 100 years we have seen huge improvements on worker fatalities that directly benefited the men working. Had nothing to do with women getting into those jobs. Its unrelated.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:59 PM
0

You are contadicting yourself. You are saying men are dying because they ignore the safety practices that are in place to protect them. But then are saying those deaths are inherent, like nothing can be done. I am saying we can make these jobs less dangerous. Or we can make them more women friendly so women can share the burden. The cars are funny. Why don't we ever talk about the majority of vehicle deaths are men. Wheres the male privlege am I right? And it is not the car manufacturs fault. It…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:56 PM
-3

Not after alimony or any child support. Free money for the woman, devastating financially to the man. Alimony is very rare. The majority of women do not get it. The average child support payment is $4000/year. That is hardly enough for a women to live on and take care of a child. Hardly devestating for the man. And all the data shows men far better finacially than the women after divorce. Nice try. ​ ??? The majority of rapes do not even get reported, and when they do, an arrest is only made 50%…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:42 PM
-1

Unions don't help working people. Bold take. Would love to see any evidence of this. ​ As far as "demand safer working conditions", let's take one example, a cab driver. Cab drivers being killed is extremely rare. But for covnersation sake. The problem with cab drivers is how they are paid, they are also reliant on their tips. This gives the drivers incentive to confront robbers and fare thiefs. Pay them a decent wage, discourage tips, train them to deal with potential threats and violence. Modi…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:34 PM
0

okay. What about the average wealth men and women?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:42 PM
-1

I mean, that logic also applies to the successful women. But what you will find if you look into it, taking into account men and women of average means or upbringing. You will find men still have these exact advantages over women.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:34 PM
1

As I pointed out, I rarely see posts about or discussing improving work sites. Literally never. If the sub supposedly dedicated to improving mens lives isn't taking action, what hope is there? Also I suspect a lot of people vote a certain way here, and the party I suspect gets most users votes here, has been the party making jobs less safe.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:30 PM
2

wat??? You missed like 90% of what I said, and what the title is, literally had to rearrange my words to think that is what i said. Baffling.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:21 PM
3

This is a poor way to look at it. I wonder how many incidents there would be if sites needed to have a third party OSHA rep observing. Also if most fatalities are due to negligence by the worker, than it is odd for men here to claim being martyrs dying for their jobs when most deaths are not the jobs fault.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:19 PM
1

Wat? What does this have to do with my post? I'm literally saying, lets make the jobs less dangerous.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:08 PM
-4

You are conflating two completely different issues. Homicide is almost always done by someone the victim knows. It is not random violence. While I am sure some people are afraid of being murdered, that is not most peoples primary concern. Both as most people don't think they will ever be murdered, because it is very rare, but in general people think they are invincible to some degree, so dying unexpectedly is rarely a concern for most people.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:07 PM
-2

Huh? Are you saying unions cannot manage men and women together under the same union? I have never heard this before. Would love any data or info on this issue.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:54 PM
2

wat
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:54 PM
-1

It actually is that simple, atleast the ideas. Putting it into practice would be hard. But if a subreddit dedicated to mens rights is not even talking about it or organizing, what hope do we have on the issue. I wonder how many people in here vote for politicans who advocate for making jobs more dangerous.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:53 PM
-3

If criminal violence for men = rape. They would probably be a lot more cautious being alone at night. The problem with these arguements is you are just looking at criminal violence. For men that means being robbed and beaten, for women that means rape. I am sure a lot of men, given the choice would choose the beating everytime, but that is not an option for women.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:37 PM
-7

Men are: Significantly more likley to become a lawyer, judge, politican, CEO, Billionaire, Millionaire Better off financially after a divorce compared to their female ex-spouse Very good chance to get away with raping someone Can serve in the military without judgement or fear of sexual abuse Not judged for having multiple Sexual partners Significantly less likely to be raped
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:34 PM
1

As a feminist I would love to hear your arguements.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 10:06 PM
1

agreed
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:08 AM
-2

I literally see real feminists calling out terfs all the time. Literally everyday.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:25 PM
-1

The problem with feminism, is it is an idea. It is not an organization there are no leaders. Anyone can claim to be one, and anyone can say anything is a feminist idea. There is no way to prevent it, other than self policing by the majority by calling out bad faith feminists. People in here will quote bad faith feminists, and any reasonable feminist will denounce those. Such as blatant misandry or transphobia. Most peoples opinions on feminism in this sub come from anecdotes. Usually criticisms …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:59 PM
-6

This sub would rather see women treated worse than men treated better. They think the way things are, is okay, just any advantages given to women should be removed. People in here are not actually against disbanding the military/conscription, justice reform, safer work environments.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:22 PM
-5

This is the only article mentioning titanic, women and children first priority. I looked up 9 others articles and none have the same quotes. I would suspect this was not the companies or first repsonders policy, but perhaps something some western tourists were saying. The titanic is literally the only example of women and children officially taking priority in an emergency. Most vessels or first responders do not have this policy, as sorting people during an emergency is a waste of time. And per…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 11:05 PM
1

How do you think our soceity treats men so poorly? And what were the steps that lead you to become a MRA?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 09:22 PM
1

Gotcha anything else?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:24 PM
0

I don't have too much to add as I don't think this is a worthwhile conversation. But I will reply to last point. ​ Yes I'm pretty much disputing every single point you're saying with a logical answer it's just that u lack the ability to understand my point. The original question was is Patriarchy real. I said yes, and provided the deifintion being. A system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it. I pointed out how in society this IS THE CASE. …
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:09 PM
-2

So you are saying. Women and men are natrually different. They have different priorities/values. Different temperments lets say. But then when I ask if women truely ran society for all of human history. Those differences wouldn't affect society as a whole? You think osciety would look exactly the same if women rules for our entire history? Nothing would be different?? I find this hard to believe. Also it's funny, you are argueing freewill when men are advantaged. But this sub has a melt down whe…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:31 PM
1

So I assume you agree with the first two posts, as you are not really commenting any disagreement. So we can agree we are a patriarchy. Thats good. But I will answer your replies. This is an incredibly narrow view. "men had to protect women". Protect women from who? Oh, other men. I see. So really men were attacking each other for their women. Doesn't sound very good right. And lets be real. They were not defending their women. They were defending their own lives. Because just doing nothing, mea…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:20 PM
1

What are you basing this on?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:34 PM
-18

Why do you downplay the positions of power in our soceity? If those CEO's, billionaires, politicans were majority women. This subreddit would be melting down. You would forsure be making slide shows on why it would be bad. So incredibly bad faith lmao.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:32 PM
-1

I would say yes, in 3 major ways. First by definition. "a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it". This is undeniable right? Men make up a large majority of judges, politicains, CEO's, military, police, etc. Every role of power in our society is overwhelmingly men. And in most cases women have very little chance to make it to these positions of power and when they do, they are almost under constant attack. Even if you believe women have…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:29 PM
-14

You should add a slide for millionaires. By your numbers, women are over 1000 times more likely to be homeless than a billionaire, you should add that since its such an important stat. Healthcare is a good thing to look at privlege. While you are looking at one number, with probably a million factors contributing to it and simplyfing it. If you look at it any deeper, you will find men, generally have better health outcomes, and their concerns are generally treated and taken more serouisly.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:43 PM
-2

This is incredibly dismissive and an ugly way to view people with mental disorders. To blame every issue or problem you have with them on their condition. You have zero evidence of the claims you are making here. Clearly she is under treatment and likely medication. There is no evidence, her or Jonah's texts or actions are remotely related to her disorder. As one of the main arguements on this sub, is taking mens mental health seriously. To be dismissive of someone because of their mental health…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 11:54 PM
1

Slide 3: While the terminiology you are using is correct, and I agree it should change to be gender neutral. People without penises may be convicted of "assault by penetration" or causing a person to engage in "sexual activity without consent" (which, to me, reads exactly like a definition of rape). All of these carry the same punishment. The offence of sexual assault does exist, with lesser punishment, but what we would consider rape is more likely to be punished under one of the above offences…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/23 11:00 PM
-2

This is incredibly dishonest. One you are exclusively talking about sufferage in the UK, but your first slide and title are not labelled that way. So people are going to lump in or make assumptions from this relating to womens sufferage in America. Specially as you are quoting 2 american suffergettes. You are also hugely marginilizing the impact and advantage men had, even if it was a small percentage. Some men still had the right to vote in the UK and most men having the right in America. Ofcou…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:40 PM
0

Alright lol. You also have to realize this goes both ways. Men denounce women all the time for their standards. Specially in this very subreddit. But like I said, you would be hard pressed to find any serious publication or feminist scholar, saying people shouldn't have prefrences. Now as prefrences are heavily influlenced by society and culture. I think it is fair for people saying we should adjust societal norms to be more inclulsive and accepting.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 09:55 PM
0

Yeah, sure. But you have to realize, those people are not responding to people quietly declining a date with a fat person or a date with a trans person in real life. They are responding to people who are annoucing publically they wouldn't do so, not because that is their personal prefrence, but usually they are trying to make a point. Those people usually are fatphobic or transphobic. Once they are called out, they put their hands up, like "hey I was just stating my opinion or prefrence". Becaus…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 08:39 PM
1

I mean if they are calling you racist for that. Either they are joking or there is something you are not including in this story. Again, if it is true, then these are dumb people and should just be dismissed, I would not apply this anecdote to society at large.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 06:07 PM
-2

I haven't seen a lot of people or feminists say men should not have preferences or standards, or call it sexist. I would be interested to know where you are seeing this. As I requent many left/feminist/women spaces and have not really seen this, and I am sure this is not covnversations that are happening out in the real world. Other then when it comes to fetishizes something, where I think it's fair to say, that is not ideal. The only time I see the term mysogyny used, is when those men, think w…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:42 PM
1

Couldn't agree more
/r/MensRights08/07/23 12:19 AM
-2

Basically all I'm getting from you right now is 'If I ignore everything feminists say against men, then feminists say nothing against men'. No. Feminsts say plenty about men that is not misandry. And plenty of things that would benefit men as well. MRA's alsways point out how men work dangerous jobs. Feminists want to make those jobs easier and safer. Men have to enlist in the selective service, feminsts want to get rid of it. You are living in a bubble if the only thing you see from feminsts is…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 11:01 PM
-9

"Women are the primary victims of war. They lose fathers, brothers, sons." Lol, say one quote, than provide a different one. Either way. This is not evidence of misandry. Is it wrong? Maybe. But there is no ill intention to men. And this is a stance the UN has taken as well - "civilians, particularly women and children, account for the vast majority of those adversely affected by armed conflict." Which if you look at it through this context, makes sense. ​ But I can find MRAs who talk about men'…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 10:36 PM
-9

I have been a feminst for quite a while, and observe and participate in many left and right wing spaces. I have never heard of any of these. I couldn't even find that hillary clinton quote. And like I said, I obviously do not support these ideas, and I think it is fair to say, they do not represent the majority opinion among feminists, or the principal aim of feminsm, being womens rights on the basis of equality. I am sure you can find MRA's who advocate or participate in mysogyny. But that does…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 09:22 PM
1

People are not toxic by defualt. People are only toxic when they express toxic ideas or actions. It's the actions that are toxic. I am all for ungendering things. We can just say, if anyone in a relationship thinks they should be the "head" of a household or hold more authority over their partner or look at and treat them as a child. That is toxic behaviour. Again this movement would be better served if we tried that approach than denying the existince of toxic behavoir in society or relationshi…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:44 PM
-9

I think comparing feminism to individual cases of misandry is a stretch. It's like saying the histroic black civil rights movements were hateful to white people because of a few cases of black on white violence, or figures like malcom X. No principals of feminism or feminsts scholars call for misandry and many renounce it. It is fine for the MRA to be against misandry, but attacking feminism you are missing the mark.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:39 PM
1

It does not make it toxic masculinity. You can make that arguement if you want. But it is absoultely toxic behavior. Manipulating someone to refer you as a figure of authroity or that you are above them in some way is awful. It would be toxic if it was a feminist user, saying your husband is a child, they should refer to you as queen, or not allow cute nicknames with the goal to be having more power in the relationship. Which does happen, and this subreddit complains about it all the time. This …
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:31 PM
1

The original twitter post. Is saying, don't let your wife call you "Bae" even if you are okay with the name or like it. They are implying doing so undercuts your authority as "the man" in the relationship, even if you are okay with it. And the sir post below it. They are saying you should make your wife refer to you as sir/lord, again to reinforce your authority. Also both posters, refer to their SO as a child. Which is incredibly disturbing. OP framed this as a case of toxic masculinty, as proo…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 05:35 PM
1

The original twitter post. Is saying, don't let your wife call you "Bae" even if you are okay with the name or like it. They are implying doing so undercuts your authority as "the man" in the relationship, even if you are okay with it. And the sir post below it. They are saying you should make your wife refer to you as sir/lord, again to reinforce your authority. Also both posters, refer to their SO as a child. Which is incredibly disturbing. OP framed this as a case of toxic masculinty, as proo…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 05:33 PM
1

First off, stop it with pronouns! Its just 1 person and its a Traditionalist Man who prefers to be called "he/him", 99.% of Men on earth prefers to be called "HE/HIM". He/Him are pronouns. And all anyone is asking, is to be called the pronouns they prefer. If you want to be refered as he/him that is fine, no one is taking that away from you or anyone else. ​ He's just stating his opinion, men can agree or disagree with his advice! That is fine. But opinions can still be bad, toxic, manipultive, …
/r/MensRights07/07/23 05:20 PM
1

Except for the OP u/liltrex94 who's calling it Toxic Masculinity to dislike being called bae/baby and preferring to be called Sir. You are really simplifying things and misrepresenting the post. The original twitter post. Is saying, don't let your wife call you "Bae" even if you are okay with the name or like it. Not that if you don't like being called bae. They are implying doing so undercuts your authority as "the man" in the relationship, even if you are okay with it. And the sir post, is not…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:04 PM
-1

What do pronouns have to do with mens rights or feminism? Also no one disagrees with you, your nicknames or pronouns should be respected.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:05 PM
0

You can literally look at our Reddit comment logs lmao. I don’t expect you to do anything. I’m telling you, facts. But cope all you want. OP def need meds though lmao
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:34 PM
0

First of all, you asked me how the scenario benefitted men. I said it didn't, then you used this to make a completely seperate arguement to what we were discussing. Not only was it an increbily stupid gotcha, but what does it have to do with mens rights or anything we were talking about??? This is like grade school level debate tactics and logic. I do not believe "names have power things do not." This is not a core part of my beliefs. How you made this leap of logic is beyond me. But you need he…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 12:01 AM
0

lmao, I didn't say that. Do you live in fairy tale land or something???
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:20 PM
1

Can you care to explain how this was intended to benefit the men imprisoned there? I'm dying to know how that's a consequence of their privilege... I would love to read this news story as I could not find it. But assuming it is true. This does not benefit the men imprisoned. But what they are doing is wrong and illegal, I would think. So the system in this case is not working as intended. They are being abused. I don't disagree with this.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:57 PM
1

Dont get me wrong. I am sure there are tons of feminsts online who are not operating in good faith or could not stand up to any critism or arguement against their beliefs. But I am a feminst because, to me the facts and my own beliefs on morality and fairness, it makes sense. And as you seem resonable I will lay my arguement out on why I am pro feminism and I why I talk about patriarchy. As you agree at somepoint in history it was a patriarchy, which many on this sub do not believe, or believe i…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 09:21 PM
1

Haha, no. Lmao. Glad we can agree there. I mean, I agree we need safe gaurds, and ideally a society who's voting and political leaning would be based on ideas and policy and not innate charactersitcs of people. And I can 100% understand the churchhill quote. And agree while not perfect, and maybe not the best. On paper it is the most fair, and least bad. Yes the conversation has been good, and 100x better than most I get on this subreddit. I am definietly not here to change anyones minds, and I …
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:49 PM
-1

I do not want to get banned, so I will refrain from name calling. But you are really making up a lot of stuff here. I assume this is related to our conversations. ​ No, I have absolutely 0 hard proof of male privilege. Men were the heads of their households, men could start businesses, men could be in positions of power, men got paid, men owned land, men had political say and power, men could get education, men could be religious leaders, men could get divorced ​ u/ElisaSky has shown me plenty o…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:40 PM
0

Hey, I am the person OP is talking about, you can read all our comments and posts. But I never once said what OP is implying or "quoting". lmao.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:23 PM
0

It is interesting how society manipulated men into fighting. 100% agree, and I am certain any feminist scholars would agree with you. But you quote those leaders as if they were above it, or the ones doing the manipulating. But those leaders were manipulated into it as well. The idea of war and conquest were established and praised long before they came around. And this belief is largely rooted in patriarchy. I'd rather live in a benevolent monarchy than oppressive democracy This is a very weird…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 07:33 PM
0

A male peasant was essentially the property of the lord under European feudalism. You didn't really own much yourself. Most of what you had (hut, tools, livestock) was the property of the lord. You had little protections from being abused by your lord. It depends where and when you are talking about, and maybe that is the flaw with my question. But even in your example, women were under the same condition, but on top of their lord, they had to obey their husbands and fathers. In the hierarchy of…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:06 PM
0

Often feminists "use patriarchy" to mean a systematic way to oppress women and advantage men and that women have had it worse than men throughout history. I just don't see it. The only way that works is if they only look at the top (kings and nobles vs commoner women) and ignore the male commoners. Men are more likely to throw other men under the bus than women. If you looked at the median life experience of a man vs woman, life sucked for both. This is what I was refering to. I agree life sucke…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 04:47 PM
1

Just like men. The difference is women couldn't choose to get killed, while men can't choose to stay alive. While yes, most wars for most of human kind. Men were conscripted to fight. But in most cases, they were not dragged into it against their will. Most soldiers were paid, or compensated. It was also men engaging in war. Also in most cases, male war leaders are not just sending the masses to die. Rich and noble men, and leaders offten engaged in battle themselves. Again, while exluding women…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:31 PM
3

Thanks for the reply, but you are missing the mark a bit. You are answering what is better, being a man or a women. I am asking if you think overall, anytime society was a patriarchy. Not who had it easier.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:32 AM
1

Yeah, the conversation has not been concise lol
/r/MensRights05/07/23 10:54 PM
1

I've said this 100 times. Women did not have legal recourse. A lower class, single/alone women, had 0 legal recourse against rape for a very long time in our history. And 0 legal recourse against it from their husbands, and for almost as long time, 0 legal recourse against their parents/guardians.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 09:22 PM
1

You are not using logic at all. This is the least concise arguement I have ever seen. First of all "free use" in terms of modern sexuality and kinks, implies consent. Which is not the case when you are talking about rape. Also again, you are making up things I never said. "Collective ownership"?? How did we get here? lmao. I am not saying it didn't happen or it was okay. But male rape by a female was probably incredibly rare. But rarer than husbands raping their wives. Which again was legal. You…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 09:19 PM
1

Your logic is faulty. Saying there were no laws protecting men from being raped = men sexuality was free use, is bizarre. The lack of a law does not prove something is okay. Human kind was not born with all our modern laws. They were invented to prevent and punish crimes against people. Laws are only ever created to prevent a crime we know happens. We do not have laws on the use of devices that turn people into bubbles, because such a thing does not exist. The lack of historical criminal law per…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:15 PM
2

This person is referring to me, and some arguement we have been having. To be clear, I never used the term "theft of sex", this person is delusional.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:01 PM
1

Rape on women was allowed. Literally. A wife had no recourse against her husband. You are narrowing your view down to a pinpoint technicality, when the reality is, most rape happened to women, and most rape was not punished. Sound like that really benefits men doesn't it? Even in a case of non husband rape, if you think rape cases are hard to prosecute now, they were harder before. Specially if the defendant did not have the means to take legal action, which was the case for most people.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:57 PM
1

Yes at the cost of exact equality. While that would be the goal, obiovusly I do not have a plan to fully see that vision though. I just know, this would be a huge step in the right direction. I don't blame them for commiting crimes. But a violent criminal is someone we need to remove from society, and ideally truely rehabiliate them. But there is no reason that removal from society has to be torture for them.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:35 PM
1

I draw the line at violent crime.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:10 PM
1

Men are disporportionally arrested for marijuana charges over women. Marijuana is a relativly harmless substance. Legalizing marijuana for all, which is what I proposed would NOT be a equality of outcome proposal.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:09 PM
1

What? I explained how it would equalize, and most people are for it. While the results still will not be 100% equal, it would be a huge step. As men are disporportionally arrested for marijuana offenses over women.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:03 PM
1

Huh???? I didn't say legalize weed for just men. The outcome is not equal??? Millions of men would be free, while only a handful of women would be free.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:00 PM
1

Before it was legal, were men being arrested in huge numbers for marijuana offenses? Because this affects millions of men here in America
/r/MensRights05/07/23 03:59 PM
1

Obviously not.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 03:57 PM
0

I've never said it was feminists' fault. Literally this sub and almost every post in it, is about feminism and why its bad. Sorry for taking a huge leap of logic there. ​ I believe every man and every woman is a unique human being, so I would never hold all women responsible for something some women do. This was specifically about women being excluded from the military. It is fair to say all women, because they all had 0 choice in the matter. It is not an unfair generaliztion. It is the truth. ​…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 03:47 PM
1

I believe in determinism. So I don't believe we have free will anyway. And why are you asking "how?" My OP literally explains the how. Men are disporportionally arrested for marijuana charges over women, by a huge margin. Freeing those men, IS EQUALITY.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 03:31 PM
-2

This would be an easy and huge step in equalizing the male and female prison populations. It’s a slam dunk. One step closer to true equality
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:55 AM
1

That is not my definition of rape. At all. I have been referring to how it was viewed for most of human history. Women CAN rape men. I am not disputing this. I am not saying men's bodies are free use. If we are talking about modern day, I do not see rape as a property crime. So your entire argument is pointless. But I will cede, female rape laws are stronger and more present in our recent modern times. And I do think they should be equal. As do most feminists. But from the beginning we were talk…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:33 AM
1

I am 100% sure male on male rape did happen through out history. Obviously. But it was probably an incredibly rare occurance outside of war/salvery. And even rarer for someone to admit it happened to them and speak out about it. Let alone, pursue legal action. Not only did the idea of it, probably not exist in most peoples minds who were not affected by it. If it did, the victim would be looked down upon. Which is wrong, and something we deal with to this day. No disagreement there. Like I said …
/r/MensRights04/07/23 10:10 PM
1

Coverture - Yeah. A legal practice where a women was not treated as an individual human being is not making the arguement you think it is. Which again, the women had no choice in this arrangement. And to be clear, this was not set up for the womens benefit. France - I agree. This is a terrible practice. But you have to realize, this wasn't for the benefit of women. They humiliate the men, because they viewed the man should be doing the beating, not the other way around. A man to let this happen …
/r/MensRights04/07/23 07:41 PM
0

Sinking Ship - This is not a real thing. The titanic is lliterally one of the only exmaples of it happening. There are not rules or practices saying that is what to do on a ship. In fact, modern ships specifally say not to to do this, because sorting people wastes time. War - For a long time women were EXCLUDED from the military. They did not have a choice, you can not pin this on women. Not to mention the rates of sexual misconduct against female soldiers and toxic culture in the military proba…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:43 PM
0

You mentioned historical patterns of the idea society should benefit women. Could you give some examples? I've never heard of this before. Yeah you have not really made any arguement here, just stuck your fingers in your ears and said "lalalala". You are showing no examples or disputing anything I said. I said society is/was a patriarchy, and you are just like, "no its not". I need more than that lmao. Society benefits men. While that is changing, that is why I mentioned history. Men were the he…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:27 PM
1

Let me ask you. I think we can all agree. For a time in history most of the world was a patriarchy. Right? We can agree on that? Now imagine, how different the world would look if the world was a matriarchy. Would the world be different? Or would everything be the exact same? Would all organizations still be organized in a top down hierarchy? Would we still choose to brutalize criminals instead of rehabilitate? Would government repersentation be implmented the same way? If you think the world wo…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 09:58 PM
1

If this is true, I may change my mind on feminism. Please post the proof on this!
/r/MensRights10/06/23 02:11 AM
2

I’m not buying some book or trusting a Reddit post for my info. Do you have a link to the actual studies they used? Or you just believe anything that gets posted here without question?
/r/MensRights10/06/23 01:53 AM
-1

Excuse me? Ill have you know that domestic violence is a COMPLETELY non gendered topic, and a lot of recent evidence shows that sexual violence is mostly non gendered as well. The only people who say women are in more danger are idiots who dont do their research and abusive feminists. Men do face these problems and it does need to be taken seriously. But you are very ill informed if you think DV happens the same way to women as it does to men. Or that the numbers are even remotely close. https:/…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:43 PM
-3

One, I personally have not seen any femenist fight against gender neutral rape/DV laws. Feminist fighting FOR women specific laws, does not mean they are fighting AGAINST gender nuetral. Also equal laws, are not equal if the results end up favoring one group. So in order to have true equality the results are what need to be equal. Also these exmamples. While traumatic for both groups. These types of crimes are widly different between genders. Especially DV. They do not happen the same way or car…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:13 PM
-8

I find this so intersting. I consider myself a progressive/leftist/feminst, BECAUSE the facts and data back it up.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 07:45 PM
-20

Bruh. The message to not hit women was encouraged and spread. Not because we care more about women. It's because, before "not hitting women" was the norm. The opposite was true. Women got hit all the time, and for most of human history there was little they could do about it.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 11:54 PM
-5

Why do you think people need/deserve unconditional love? I also find it weird you are equating that to being able to "provide"? Not sure what you even mean by this.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:39 PM
-61

Huh?? A man is like 90% more likely to leave their sick spouse. How is a case where a women does it typical?
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:36 PM
0

ngl if a male friend of mine started crying, I would be deeply uncomfortable lmao.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:41 PM
0

i liked big joels critism of this movie very good
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:40 PM
2

The real question is would you ohave helped a 19 yo man who was crying in the same situation?
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:45 PM
-5

Lmao one I didn’t mention anything about the players skill level so to assume men were better is lol. Also the players didn’t actually know who they were playing against. They were just told they were playing a women/man. But the players were tricked. Because they would be told they were playing a man but really they were playing a women, etc. So even if a women was playing another women. In the games she thought she was against a man, she played worse.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 03:09 PM
0

There is a lot of information on this. I would recommend watching the youtuber Shaun's video on the subject. Firstly. More men being top chess players. Is not because there are more smart men than women. It is that there are just more men players, period. So the numbers will skew that way no matter what. But that is changing. We are seeing more women play chess and more women compete at the top levels. While a women hasn't won the championship yet, it does not mean it is not possible. There are …
/r/MensRights14/04/23 11:23 PM
-5

Why do we hold bars responsible to stop teen drinking? Unless you want to apply this logic to alcohol, tattoos, cigarettes, gambling. Drawing the line of responsibility at underage sex, seems pretty creepy...
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:57 PM
0

I sincerely doubt a woman wants to, but if she shows up, she gets the same treatment as a guy, do your job, show up on time and keep showing up. Also follow orders You are literally just describing every job ever. Again, I've said this like a dozen times in this thread. But jobs do not have to be "back breaking". and this is not a gender issue, it is a workers rights issue. FYI in the event women do enter the construction workplace, that does not mean there are more construction jobs, it would m…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 07:41 PM
-3

Bruh... One I am a man. Two I wouldn't say you are working well with english.. I literally said, make the jobs safer so men aren't dying. Why do you not talk about that. I don't see you posting on R workreform. Your solution to the wage gap and disparity in men dying, is to want women to make up equal death numbers is so bizarre?? Just make the jobs safer. Please explain why you do not want this outcome?
/r/MensRights03/04/23 06:23 PM
-6

No offense, but I honestly don't understand what you are saying here or what point you are trying to make in relation to what we are talking about...
/r/MensRights03/04/23 03:56 PM
-6

If women actually started making a sizable percantage of manual labour workers, I bet you would not be happy about that. There would be hundreads of posts in this subreddit about women taking their jobs... 100% guarantee it. Also instead of complaining women don't want to work these jobs. Why not argue to make these jobs safer. Lower manual lifting requirements, increase safety procedures, reduced overtime. This would be good for men, and prevent countless men from working themselves into disabi…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 03:30 PM
-12

Yes what a bizarre world where the group getting all these benefits and are still not equal in many of these examples and another group that doesn't get them is on top in almost every way. So unfair....
/r/MensRights31/03/23 03:31 PM
-10

That's awesome! What are some speicfic privileges you have already experienced? Or what are some you are planning? People in here always say women have all these priviliges just for being a women, but they never post specific examples.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:55 PM
0

Yes. And if you have cancer, start making and selling meth...
/r/MensRights27/03/23 04:04 PM
-11

That's awesome!
/r/MensRights24/03/23 10:42 PM
-12

Sorry what is the issue here?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 10:34 PM
1

Yes 100%. As a free speech absolutist, even if I don't agree with someone or they are hurting my feelings, that doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed their rights.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 10:31 PM
1

Actual it does. It's free speech, and I will die for our right to it. Also free speech also applies to private groups. Excluding people IS an expression of free speech.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 10:17 PM
1

So we are sacrificing our lives so a corporation can make more profit? That is what we are advocating?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:21 PM
1

Why do people hate free speech so much???
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:33 PM
0

I find it odd you describe this as a false accusation.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 05:17 PM
11

I don't think people think the majority of men had it easy historically, I personally have never seen that argued. But that doesn't change the fact men were in positions of power. Also while most men didn't have power in society, Men had all the power in their household. Women had no protections or laws, they had to be subservient to their husbands. Also not sure where you are getting "men alone were forced to work as slaves". This is absolutly not the case. Men being conscripted is true. But yo…
/r/MensRights23/03/23 04:04 PM
3

Sure. But there is no evidence this was a false accusation which the flair tag and OP are saying
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:57 PM
5

It wasn’t proven to be false. The victim did not recant her statement. The DA dropped the charges because due to lack of evidence. That does not mean he is innocent or that she is lying. Not to mention all the creepy behaviour that has come to light since the allegations came out.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:44 AM
-9

I hope this gets downvoted by all the people who quote men’s workplace death stats and how hard labour jobs are for men…
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:39 AM
-16

- Show me any evidence of this. How has education changed. Are the tests not the same? Do they study different now? No because if this was the case, mens rates would be declining. - It wouldn't be more difficult, it would probably be more expensive. - I want equality too, and so do women. But if on paper we have equality, but in practice we do not. You would think the next step would be to implement polices that favour the unequal party.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 12:03 AM
-2

I do not think the majority of men are "alphas" or even assholes. ButThe majory of men ARE either in a relationship or having sex. Also I don't think self described feminists are going for aggressive men. I assume you are basing your whole world view on a personal anecdote. But I would love to see any evidence of this. If you are sincerely asking for advice. The aggresive guy, is probably just more confident. That is what attracts someone. You can be confident without being an asshole. Also you …
/r/MensRights22/03/23 11:51 PM
-1

Weird I didn't know that. Could you give me an example on a popular feminist take that is not logical/nuts?
/r/MensRights22/03/23 11:41 PM
-5

Why you talking about the past? Do you think feminists make good points when they point to the past?
/r/MensRights22/03/23 11:30 PM
-26

IMO I don't think people are saying there are no differences. It's that those differences shouldn't matter. Men working jobs that are too difficult or dangerous for women? Make them easier and safer so women can do them. This would be good for men too. Also being different is not an excuse for bad behaviour. Men "needing sex" does not excuse agressive/deceitful men or full on abusers. It is important we recognize the differences, and create an equal society from there. So if we want to implment …
/r/MensRights22/03/23 11:29 PM
1

I wish men would stop sexually abusing women
/r/MensRights22/03/23 08:17 PM
0

Yes. Please explain the difference when you say "women" and when feminists say similar things about "men"
/r/MensRights22/03/23 08:02 PM
-2

Then why do I see post after post in the sub complaining when women/feminists do the same thing?
/r/MensRights22/03/23 08:01 PM
-1

Literally on every example.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 07:44 PM
-4

lmao. "Look at this double standard so unfair... I don't really care though" Literally describes every post in this sub.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 04:27 PM
-3

I find it very bizarre, so many posts in the this subreddit are "But not ALL MEN". But then you guys are very happy to say "All women".
/r/MensRights22/03/23 03:33 PM
-1

Yes you are right, I misread about the group. They were not based as I first thought. Also for the third time. I do not see how women outpacing men in graduation is a problem. Please explain.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 03:12 AM
-1

I guess you can't read. I said there are more men graduating university then ever before. Which is true. There are greater numbers and a higher percentage graduation rate. I said nothing about comparing men vs women graduation rates and I do not see how that is relevant or important. Women graduating over men would only be a problem, if the increase in women's graduation resulted in a decrease in men's graduation. But there is no evidence this is the case. While yes male graduation has stagnated…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 02:24 AM
3

25% that doesn’t sound like equality to me
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:38 AM
0

Where are you getting this info?? The percentage of men is increasing. So you are wrong. And just to ask. So when men were graduating more than women. We’re women suffering?
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:25 AM
-3

Heres the problem with your first statement. Women were not given a choice. You can't say, "men made all these advancements so women don't deserve equality". When women were purposely excluded from contributing. Also to take the fems approach. Actually women did contribute. Men would not make the advancements they did without women cooking/farming/raising children. Second point. if you look up any videos of precious metal mines in developing countries. You will 100% see women there. Literally di…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 11:39 PM
-7

"exclude men" how so? If on paper, we are supposed to have equality. But in practice we do not. What should we do? The logicial thing would be to make further corrections. The RAF example, is a government entity. So it is probably much easier to impiment and enfore these kinds of changes. I have never seen anyone pushing women for specific industries. If you have an example please post it. Also under qualified men get more and more higher paying positions then under qualified women. By far. it's…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 11:27 PM
1

I do not think that is what OP meant. But either way. I also do not think that is true at all. I don't think its a contraversial opinion, that people should not have to have sex if they do not want to. I do not think straight forward honest male sexuality is demonized. If you have any evidence of this, I would love to see it. Men are only looked down upon when they act like scumbags for sex. All guys have and want sex. The majority of men are not being demonized or accused of bad behavior. It's …
/r/MensRights17/03/23 10:15 PM
-40

In regards to the work related complaints. I think we should address the issues noted, regardless of gender. I think people should work less. All jobs should be safe, and able to be preformed by people of any backgrounds, genders or capabilities. I agree, there should not be "mens" jobs. And I am sure many femenists agree. But I think if you look at the industries and companies, you will see there is a continued history of descrimination of women. LIke I said. I do not see how this is a mens rig…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:48 PM
1

I mean. I know what he means. He means women need to have sex with men even when they don't want to.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:22 PM
-81

Huh??? How do you consider this suffering? Working is suffering now? This is my biggest problem with MRA beliefs. It is only suffering when compared to women. Men are getting more educated now than ever before. It wasn't suffering 20 years ago when there were less male graduates. But now that females are graduting at higher rates then men, it is suffering??? What is this logic?? Please explain it. Also the work stuff, this is more a complaint of capitlism and workers rights. Why is this a mens r…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:20 PM
-70

How do men suffer?
/r/MensRights17/03/23 08:22 PM
-9

I don't think very many people or organizations chastise men for having a higher sex drive. The problem is men who think, becasue they have a high sex drive. They are entitled to sex. Creating a pretyt hostile environment for women. Another problem is, men who "only want sex" are not usually upfront about that. If every horny guy didn't play games, was honest, and didn't friendzone themselves, there would not be an issue. Also this arguement is pretty much just a naturalistic fallacy. Just becau…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 05:53 PM
1

What do you mean by this?
/r/MensRights17/03/23 05:48 PM
-3

What does this have to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights17/03/23 01:09 AM
0

Womens day is on the same day as "be nasty day" trying to say women are bitches.... /s Really looking for any reason to be offended in here I see.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 03:47 PM
0

I do not have data. But I have to imagine the majority of war reporters are men. So you would think logically the numbers would skew that way naturally. I would also bet 11% of war journalists death represent like half of the women war journalist. While the 89% represent a small fraction of the male reports. Not to mention women reporters are in general taking greater risks then their male counter parts in most war zones. I think it’s reasonable and logical to put an emphasis on women’s safety i…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 04:43 AM
2

Also a key focus of womens day, is not just to celebrate women. Its really a celebration of womens sufferage and their battle for equal rights. While I am okay with everyone getting a day. Thinking mens day should have equal footing with womens day, is kind of like the UK having their own independance day on July 5 because they want to be included.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 11:55 PM
2

Assuming you are basing this on the wikipedia articles: From the mens day edit history, the initial note as "holiday" was removed - "Correcting "holiday" as this is not a universal practice. It is observed though not always as a holiday." Where womens day is an international recoginzed holiday by every country. Further in the mens day article it is referenced as a holiday many times. Speciallcaly by countries that recognize it as such. It is also catagorized in the "holiday portal" within wikipe…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 11:50 PM
1

Giving the kid up for a better life, is usually a thought process/justification done by the parent, and I have seen examples of this for men and women "in media". I have never seen it used by a third party talking about another person. Accept maybe in the case of third world countries. I have literally never seen or heard the second example, in person or in media/tv/movies. Against men or women. I am not saying it doesnt happen. Specially becasue I think only 50% of americans view adoption as go…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:18 PM
-10

It's true in regards to dating apps. If you are leaving that part out of the conversation, then ofcourse you look like a complete sexist idiot. The 80/20, can literally be explained by the fact that most online dating apps are 70-80 percent male. So ofcourse the numbers are going to skew that way. This also doesn't mean, women are only going after total chads. A women swiping off a man, doesn't mean it was because of their looks. While that may be the case, there is no evidence to make this clai…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:34 PM
-41

Yes, I agree. Because we have to act a certain way to maintain the patriarchy. It's really sad.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:26 PM
-3

wat?
/r/MensRights15/02/23 01:37 AM
-13

I don't see a lot of male college students asking for mens centers.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 12:47 AM
-2

Everytime I want to give MRA's a chance, I will come to this subreddit and see a r word comment like this, and know this is not for me. wtf is take...
/r/MensRights26/01/23 04:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter