TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Forackol Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by Forackol on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

"It's not though. It would be essentialism if they claimed it was in the nature of that demographic instead of culturally and socially created." Its called social essentialism and they do it by faulty generalization. It has also some tie with fixism. But aside from social essentialism, I've seen many feminist as bio essentialist. It's true. I don't understand why you disagree with this claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/26 01:53 PM
17

How it is anti essentialist when they see every "men" evil? Not only men but also every people they see AS men (which Im sadly included). Also, they blame people by saying " of course you are men or etc."who are amab trans,genderless, etc. When they do bad in terms of their view
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/26 07:56 AM
16

It does not help Men. Yes, progression is great but feminism is bigoted and bio essentialist (even thought they disagree with these claims), it increases the contradiction of genders. I, a genderless person, also get effected by feminism in a bad way (as every person in the world). Feminism has brought some good things tho. I cannot deny them. But in 21th century, we need something else—postgenderism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/26 06:54 AM
-5

Biological essentialism is right wing ideology and today's findings in anthropology, biology, neurology show us that we dont have an essence. We are shaped by material conditions
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 08:50 AM
2

What does that mean
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 05:57 PM
1

Sorry I cant see your other comment can you write it again
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 03:12 PM
0

Yes, elites had more sources and power than commons, but elite women weren't as powerful as elite men, and common men had more "rights" in family, and their social relations. Also, weren't most wars caused by men? And men that went to war also worshipped the idea of defending the country or shortly 'militarism'. So, the argument women who died from a cause that's made by men has more value than men who died by men, And men rulers outnumbers women rulers, and this also shows the power imbalance b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 02:51 PM
2

But shouldn't we analyze this problem in same categories? Yes white women owned black men but white women opressed by white men and black women opressed by black men and white people. (I dont have sides btw I just had question so I wanna ask you)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 12:41 PM
2

Does anyone opponent idea? Im open to hear
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 12:31 PM
5

I partially agree with this post. Yeah, for the most part, class is the primary driver of privilige and bourgeoisie can be both men and women. I dont say men were the rulers because it's historically wrong, but men had more potential and rights than women and it's historically correct. Look at middle eastern in 500s, women were burried alive, they were "loot" for the men that won the war. In ruling families, men were more prominent due to cultural significance. Most wars started my men, most fam…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 07:40 AM
0

I'm postgenderist, so I look from outside of the gender perspective. I don't have much time to explain what I REALLY think and what should be done, but long story short, Misogyny and misandry is "equally" harmful (not because they have the same effects but they bring same chaos. And you know, Im human so my thoughts may change later). I dont support both of them and even the slight jokes are dangerous. I've seen that many feminist say "misandry has no real life effect but Misogyny kills women" b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/26 09:55 PM
2

Yeah, tahnk you for the answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/26 09:40 PM
2

What is your argument for people who say this? Im just curious I wanna hear opinions, please dont get offended.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/26 05:47 PM
1

Liberalism is a right wing ideology that defends private property over communal usage. Right wing does not only mean authoritarian. Maybe you are confusing about libertarian socialism and liberalism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 05:36 PM
11

I don't know the research you are talking about but yes, people don't know the difference between "significant" usage in a scientific way and daily life usage way. Also in science community There are some critize about "p<0.005" type of notation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 05:34 PM
3

Let me fix something, System is not against anything. System is both okay for misogyny and misandry. Neo-liberalism and bourgeoisies love to segregate people. They don't care about identities, how people feel and how humanity goes. They only care about how to disperse working class. So, it's important to be open-eyed and not be sided with something when it comes to topics like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 05:32 PM
-2

Just read the fucking text
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/26 09:45 AM
4

I didn't even read the post but how in the "left wing" sub reddit do people say "we deserve 10 million dollars" as if the system is spectacular and the million dollars wont be given by corporations and governments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/26 09:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter