TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ForeverSolitary Archive

View 1 post and 65 comments by ForeverSolitary on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

ForeverSolitary/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 08:10 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

She didn't have to 'KNOW' the hot guy in the foam cannon party in Cancun on spring break.
/r/seduction25/11/25 01:24 AM
3

That is pretty high IQ, even if excessively wordy.
/r/seduction19/09/25 05:59 AM
-7

Yeah, 'afraid'. Imagine having other things to do throughout your day as an adult man besides talking to random females.
/r/seduction15/09/25 12:00 PM
1

Well, there are still women you have not yet asked out. As a man you never actually meet anybody that likes you back anyway because women fall in love with lifestyles as opposed to actual human beings (men). That is to say, your mindset should be centered around the sort of lifestyle you lead and the size of the audience it attracts, rather than any one woman in particular. Otherwise, you cease to lead a lifestyle and a man that fails to lead even in his own life cannot be attractive. I myself h…
/r/seduction03/06/25 10:07 PM
5

I agree. I think that failure to notice any of these indicators of disinterest stems primarily from the scarcity mindset. You can only ignore total absence of reciprocity in interest if you believe, perhaps on an unconscious level, that you have no other options.
/r/seduction03/06/25 05:23 PM
1

Outperform by what metric? Number of graduates? OK.
/r/seduction19/05/25 04:40 PM
4

Granted, most women are not actually busy, so a simpler alternative option is just moving on.
/r/seduction18/05/25 10:34 PM
10

It's OK to be busy and take days to respond as an adult. I certainly do. If you "confront" her with your Excel spreadsheet of response times, she will (rightly) lose whatever interest she now probably has. To test whether she is objectively busy or subjectively disinterested, try to set up another date. If she is open to meeting you but has many things going on, you will be negotiating suitable date, time and location. If she is just disinterested, you will get soft rejection like 'maybe sometim…
/r/seduction18/05/25 10:32 PM
-8

Wrong. At 23-25 females get out of college. To them it's a party, not a place to get educated. So once they hit that mark, they conclude that the party is over and begin to look for a long-term provider I gather they now try to extend the party into the 30s but it is at 24 when there is an objective milestone.
/r/seduction18/05/25 05:42 PM
-18

It is though.
/r/seduction18/05/25 12:59 PM
2

The average IQ is by design roughly 100. People with this level of intelligence are actually quite dense.
/r/seduction16/05/25 11:12 AM
2

"Just be a nice guy" theory.
/r/seduction15/05/25 08:48 AM
3

If a girl said that to me, I would flat out propose a day, a time and an activity (unless I had zero ideas). If she rejects (most likely outcome), I move on. My time is of value.
/r/seduction12/02/25 03:11 PM
14

Cope. Why would you even need a test if you aren't getting any action, which is the case for an increasing percentage of men?
/r/BlackPillScience18/01/25 12:50 PM
8

What a wall of text. TL;DR: females still select mates by Stone Age criteria even though it is not the Stone Age anymore and they will never evolve past it.
/r/seduction31/10/24 05:15 AM
1

ViBe.
/r/seduction30/10/24 05:44 AM
0

Bold of you to assume I will read this.
/r/seduction17/10/24 07:34 PM
1

Yet here we are, with most of this thread an embarrassment and me standing up to the white-knighting all on my own.
/r/seduction17/10/24 02:11 PM
0

Define 'success with women'. Show me where I referred to myself as an authority. Show me evidence that I smell, which is what the previous comment stated. If you want to try to pretend to be the smart guy in the room in the big boy pants and all that, you are going to have to pick another room.
/r/seduction17/10/24 09:16 AM
1

Imagine thinking you are the advanced one.
/r/seduction17/10/24 07:26 AM
1

It would not matter then.
/r/seduction17/10/24 07:08 AM
1

Not even this sub can handle it but goos to see it's not just white knights ITT.
/r/seduction17/10/24 07:01 AM
0

FYI, I am much better groomed and built than you.
/r/seduction17/10/24 07:00 AM
0

Says you?
/r/seduction17/10/24 06:58 AM
-10

That's because marriage benefits older females, providing them long-term security when they are not in as much demand as in their hot years.
/r/seduction17/10/24 06:12 AM
-23

You are interpreting the hypothetical 'single long term relationship' wrongly. Your premise is that one LTR is an alleviating circumstance. I would argue it's about as aggravating as 5+ relationships in college. Yes, she may have had fewer men but she also wouldn't leave this one guy for some reason and that one guy is not you.
/r/seduction17/10/24 05:54 AM
2

25 is a hell of a cap if you think about it. What do you think this girl was doing for anywhere between 6 to 10 years of sexual maturity? Memorizing Bible verses and learning how to bake? Most doubtful.
/r/seduction17/10/24 05:50 AM
27

This is predicated on the belief that women select the better men, which is not at all the case.
/r/seduction27/08/24 06:09 PM
0

Cope. No girl is 'looking for something srs' (spell words out in full, you lazy fat ass) if you are attractive enough.
/r/seduction26/08/24 09:01 AM
2

Approach both. If both reject, you know you have not wasted any opportunities. If at least one reciprocates, you can run dread game and get them both.
/r/seduction03/07/24 03:56 PM
2

Do it.
/r/seduction27/06/24 05:17 AM
1

There is a difference between attraction and arousal. Can you imagine a woman laughing as she is passionately having sex with you? I cannot imagine that either.
/r/seduction26/06/24 03:54 PM
1

Very high IQ.
/r/seduction22/06/24 04:29 AM
1

The only sound comment ITT so far. If she had one deadbeat dad, you could make a case it was on the man. She has multiple baby daddies all of whom ran away and that's on her.
/r/seduction20/06/24 05:07 AM
4

I don't disagree but I do think you ought to clarify what you count as IOIs.
/r/seduction19/06/24 03:39 PM
2

I suggest we wait for someone who actually knows to elaborate.
/r/seduction17/06/24 04:42 AM
11

I don't know but my guess would be "random number generator". Abbreviation really is abused by lazy arses on the Internet these days. Sometimes I wish acronyms were not a thing at all.
/r/seduction17/06/24 04:37 AM
2

Next.
/r/seduction14/06/24 05:15 AM
3

Find a girl capable of it, i.e. very young.
/r/seduction13/06/24 04:13 PM
2

Who exactly is OP cheating on in this particular instance?
/r/seduction12/06/24 05:06 AM
2

Straight facts here.
/r/seduction08/06/24 07:28 AM
0

You may want to start conversation some other way and bring up the post later on so it appears as though your interest increased.
/r/seduction02/06/24 05:24 AM
1

If girls come to you, you can be introverted. This is not the case (or you would not be here), therefore you need to go get them. That's how I deduced the need to approach. Once I realized what I had to do, I began to execute it.
/r/seduction01/06/24 05:46 AM
2

I don't think it changes much about my reply because that was how I went about my "first date" with a new girl a couple days ago. One difference from your story is that it wasn't an OLD match, I don't do OLD. I just approached her at an event, which we left soon afterwards. If you believe you have built rapport (via OLD app texting???), then perhaps she does see you as a source of attention rather than a potential sexual partner. When in doubt, try to get more plates spinning and let the disinte…
/r/seduction29/05/24 06:07 AM
2

I myself am inclined to interpret silence on the girl's part as indication of disinterest but I don't think it's necessarily the case. If she does support the conversation somehow, I proceed. If she agrees (or initiates) an exchange of contacts and a meeting at a definite date and time, I know we can still talk. Granted, if you are after same-night lays, this does not apply. Indications of interest have to be more intense and outward or you can safely conclude you are not getting any from that g…
/r/seduction29/05/24 05:08 AM
5

I have found that it works best to improvise. Read the information that is out there and make something that catches your attention a conversation piece. Basic questions about age or education or whatnot are an OK place to start if you have zero information and need to initiate dialogue somehow. As soon as she starts responding, you want to start thinking about an appropriate, organic segue into a more interesting topic.
/r/seduction28/05/24 04:31 PM
3

Then ask what encouraged her to join, duh.
/r/seduction25/05/24 08:11 PM
3

I'm still bad at game, day or night, so my advice will be of little utility. As for night game specifically, I simply built up tolerance to the overload with practice.
/r/seduction25/05/24 08:09 PM
7

Legit. 'Nightgame' was a literal nightmare to me initially; I would get borderline paralyzed because of that sensory overload.
/r/seduction25/05/24 09:18 AM
2

I agree. A good relationship develops naturally and is therefore effortless.
/r/seduction24/05/24 06:46 AM
10

Cope, the minivan is the gigachad automobile that enables you to pick up 7 chicks at a time. Edit: spaces
/r/seduction23/05/24 07:37 AM
8

That's my understanding as well. This is why I personally see night game as an extension of day game rather than an independent entity.
/r/seduction10/05/24 04:33 PM
1

Next.
/r/seduction08/05/24 03:11 PM
7

Any situation is redeemable if you have sufficient social proof to generate third-party dread, i.e. demonstrate you have multiple other options but are also open to something with the girl of interest.
/r/seduction04/05/24 04:07 PM
0

You could try to run platform shoes game. So long as you are confident about it, you can both look taller and peacock – two birds with one stone. I would say it's a high-risk strategy though.
/r/seduction04/05/24 04:02 PM
2

It's not gay if you repeatedly mumble 'no homo'.
/r/seduction19/04/24 02:31 AM
3

4 * 0 = 0
/r/seduction08/04/24 04:06 PM
1

It's more sexualized than 'cute' in my estimation.
/r/seduction07/04/24 04:53 PM
2

I assume it's a female friend. She's fishing for compliments. You can give her what she wants and compliment her appearance (bad idea) or agree and amplify, e.g. "Yes, she's a smoke show" (slightly better idea). If it's a male 'friend', just ghost her like the other guy here has written.
/r/seduction07/04/24 03:32 PM
17

I move on. Women talk, men do. It's also a matter of opportunity cost. If you are the one to always 'reignite' the conversation, you are also the one who is more invested in the conversation. More likely than not, she will perceive it as lack of choice on your end. If you had countless other options, you would be turning your attention to the more receptive girls.
/r/seduction07/04/24 10:05 AM
1

Next her and move on to other girls. Do what the other guy wrote.
/r/seduction04/04/24 02:48 AM
1

I would only do that if we were already in a relationship.
/r/seduction02/04/24 04:59 PM
-3

There is only one type but this type shifts its shape as the given female ages out of her prime years.
/r/seduction23/03/24 04:24 AM
2

First you are compatible and then you share intimate things, including sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 05:04 PM
-1

If she looks better for wearing make-up, she's too old to date and should be married.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter