| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ladies which man do you prefer in this example. I’m curiousOkay? When did I even insinuate that? I simply said that a 3 and I would not get along due to differences; 3 is assuredly an extrovert who thrives in the party scene and I am most definitely not, and having dated a 3 whose main form of fun was getting drunk at clubs to dance while mine was not (so therefore I'd be left behind most nights), it was no longer sustainable as a long-term relationship. As far as I know he never fucked around behind my back but this was still the main catalyst in our s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/22 04:23 PM |
| 2 | Ladies which man do you prefer in this example. I’m curiousIgnoring the fact that personality will play the most vital role in how I attracted I'd be to him, 1 would be my first option, 2 would be the next best, and I wouldn't even look twice in 3's direction. I'm an introvert and a wallflower who much prefers people who would match my energy. I dated someone I'd consider close to a 3 and it was not sustainable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/02/22 02:54 AM |
| 2 | Do you agree - Even if having sex with a man would literally save his life, a woman has NO moral "obligation" to do soSomeone actively bleeding out from a gunshot wound on the cold hard ground and walking past without a second glance is one thing. They will die from an outside deadly force whether or they want to or not if they are not helped. Not having sex is not actively killing anyone the way a bullet to the femoral artery would. Sex is a privilege and a desire, not a life-giving necessity and a right. Are you obligated to give someone money because they're broke and they say they'll kill themselves if no o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/22 03:55 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter