TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Former-Floor9376 Archive

View 6 posts and 58 comments by Former-Floor9376 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If you got what I want to say, but don't like the phrasing... how do you expect to argue? Only with what sounds nice? Regardless, for any adjacent school of Manosphere, accepting Evolutionary psychology as the driver of most things is the default, I didn't say anything radical
/r/MensRights09/01/26 03:28 PM

Ok, i think you need to decouple the rationalizations from the argument itself. I have said it a million times, but politics and gender wars are one and the same. From monkeys to the entire animal kingdom hierarchies (i.e. political battlegrounds) are formed to assign access to sex. In humans, nothing is different, politics assigns status and power, therefore breeding rights. Now anything that has to do with sexual strategies is evolutionary based. As male and female mating strategies are fundam…
/r/MensRights09/01/26 02:16 PM
2

I would challenge you on this. Because the masculine mode of living (as in evolutionary psychology perspective), creates repeating experiences with consistent modes of expression, refer here: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/09/06/the-myth-of-blue-pill-origins-of-blue-pill-series/ So in short a Masculinity exists, both directionally as shared lived experience and as a guidance to how men should develop themselves. Live everything to social forces and men might get convinced they are wome…
/r/MensRights09/01/26 10:46 AM
1

Skill is about maximizing your potential right now, in the short term. To achieve consistency and quality you need Value as well (real value). The answer is to practice Game and build your long term value in the background. That is true for everyone in this niche
/r/seduction09/01/26 10:02 AM
1

This is misdirecting though. Approach anxiety is endemic psychologically speaking and can never forced to be away. At best it can be learned to be managed. This is just strawmaning the argument of approaching to blame men and mask the fact that the social environment is highly hostile. Here is the source on AA: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/05/02/approach-anxiety-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/
/r/MensRights09/01/26 09:57 AM
1

got it, dont worry
/r/seduction09/01/26 09:28 AM
2

The girls get the hint: - based on how ofter you see each (1, maybe 2 times at most per week) - based on what you doing on the date (sex should be the main focus) - how much time you spend together (keep it less than 5-6 hours total) You don't need to say anything, they will know
/r/seduction09/01/26 07:32 AM
3

Understand this, nuance matters ... but only at advanced levels. Essentially, by stopping her more smoothly you are showcasing calibration and social intelligence. But at beginner stages, you just need to approach. Then you will discover everything else as it goes. For now focus on AA and not freezing up while in set. Doing otherwise is a fool's errand because there is no guarantee the set will go well either way. The end result is you approach less and you delay your progress. Here is some extr…
/r/seduction09/01/26 07:24 AM
2

How receptive they will be is a cultural norm. For example in NY people are more talkative than London for just a “chat”. You can generalize this for big cities vs smaller cities and for tourist places on season. However, that is why it is a bad metric and the best metric is lays themselves. Because lays remain usually invariable to location noise. But from DG stats: stopped for chat, maybe even 80% with some pre approach calibration numbers usually 1/2 to 1/6 dates 1/7 to 1/15 lays 1/30 to 1/60
/r/seduction09/01/26 03:55 AM
4

Its a fundamental part of life that Politics (or who gets power and status) are essentially Gender Dynamics. They are the same. Take this to see the civilisation scale: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/11/17/where-are-we-gender-dynamics-into-perspective/
/r/MensRights08/01/26 05:02 PM
0

Ok, fair enough and noted. I will take care of it. A small disclaimer: the book is a blogpost collection. The blogposts are online… totally free (and add-free site) - clarification, not excuse
/r/seduction08/01/26 10:38 AM
1

These are beginner stats. I am not sure what you are expecting if you take your average Joe and let him do Daygame. The emphasis is on the progression and improvement over the 4 weeks. In any case, i will resonate with people that started the same way as me, low and getting no action. For people that started better, this indeed might sound useless.
/r/seduction08/01/26 09:48 AM
17

You want to see the full picture on the women’s power of control? Here: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/09/13/the-birth-of-philosophy-origins-of-blue-pill-series/ Thank me later
/r/MensRights08/01/26 08:41 AM
3

Mate… find me the AI that could write this and i will pay money for it.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/26 07:25 AM
2

Social media conveys only one thing: Status. Maybe looks as well, but once you switch from dating apps to Instagram you are full on the status Game. So… you will attract the status conscious girls… that also usually tend more materialistic as well. Can they be hot? Absolutely. Are there other girls that are hot and won’t get by social media (… and need in person approach) … also Yes. This is the social game vs cold approach game debate dressed differently. In short, you are falling into survivor…
/r/seduction08/01/26 06:54 AM
1

How fast sex happens is irrelevant to how long lasting the relationship is. The faster sex happens usually the better, nearly always. Now unto fast escalation, here is a guide: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/10/25/a-date-model-for-fast-escalation/ And if you are using dating apps, fast sex is more likely to be on the table. As a pre screening of physical attraction has happened (from her seeing your pictures)
/r/seduction08/01/26 04:09 AM
2

No serious daygamer or daygame coach advocates that. In the community we have seen horror stories of thousands of approaches with no success. Daygame is built on top of very solid SMP theory and the baseline assumption is that we play within our SMV + 2 points hotter. The whole concept is summarized in "High value women go with high value men" and the corollary "If a hot girl rejects a low value PUA, this is the market place working as intended" This is not to say redline here and there, sometim…
/r/seduction07/01/26 06:01 PM
1

Skillset + value, you can't beat the marketplace.
/r/seduction07/01/26 05:36 PM
1

Then go take no hoper chances, learn nothing (because you are not taking feedback) and let's see if you will indeed improve or you will end up more broken.
/r/seduction07/01/26 05:35 PM
1

When you approach you have to think your own mental levels in the long run. It is important to open within your realistic SMV range (for the most part). Approaching is catabolic, a rejection matters because it hits in the brain. There is withdrawal of Dopamine (expected reward), oxytocin (acceptance and belonging) and serotonin (status). So no matter what you do, eventually rejection will weather you out in the short term. This is not to say don't approach or redline. But keep it grounded to rea…
/r/seduction07/01/26 05:28 PM
2

Daygame Mastery is the deepest (for Daygame), then everything else goes. MM is still fundamental btw, as a meta-model of seduction procedure. I think stuff got hyper-specialized and there is no all encompassing books anymore. Which aspect of Game you are most interested in?
/r/seduction07/01/26 04:02 PM
0

Its bad advice mate. Neurochemically you will get starved from dopamine, oxytocin and serotonin. It doesnt build muscle, it destroys your soul
/r/seduction07/01/26 01:31 PM
2

I believe it is impossible to “keep them invested” for a long period of time unless sex is there. There is only so much you can discuss without the relationship not turning friendly. The key is on timely escalation than “being interesting”. Sex itself is interesting enough to keep you together. Dont sweat over this, there will be other girls
/r/seduction07/01/26 01:31 PM
2

This doesnt work neurochemically. What you are only describing is detachment which is bad long term. Dont enjoy the rejection, strive to be better
/r/seduction07/01/26 01:28 PM
6

Actually most of advice in general is bad and misdirecting. Deep down i believe even the part of asking for advice is about a dominance play. With bad advice being the ultimate dominance play. Because the person getting the bad advice is engaging in self-defeating behaviour (and some part of his unconscious knows this). That is the ultimate form of submission/dominance because the person giving the bad advice doesnt need to lift a finger to establish it. The advisee does it voluntarily. Therefor…
/r/seduction07/01/26 01:19 PM
1

There is the concept that sex exists for better immunization against ever evolving viruses and bacteria [Red Queen - Matt Ridley] Therefore the idea of finding exotic (to our culture) people is supported directly from there. But you don’t need to go far. Even within a country, there are studies that people with complimentary immune systems “smell” better to us and are mutually more attractive partners
/r/seduction06/01/26 06:36 PM
1

Realize that essentially your task is like trying to swim while not knowing how to swim. And you are doing this one the middle of the Ocean. Even something as basic as approaching is counter-intuitive… because you never trained for it before. Now the other side of the coin is that unless you don’t do it, you are trapped into whatever society and your social circle was giving you so far. It comes down to a battle for agency. There is no magic to it. It’s a force of will game, eliminate all expect…
/r/seduction06/01/26 05:49 PM
22

If they are the ones initiating, that means the value discrepancy is heavily in the guys favor. Because the girls can do nothing and guys of equal value (or more) will initiate first. In short girls might hit on you, but usually it will be the worse ones in your range. Not even to mention, by them initiating (and you following up their lead), you already give up the frame, which can hurt later on
/r/seduction06/01/26 11:17 AM
1

you are unnecessarily get stuck on terminology here
/r/seduction06/01/26 10:56 AM
6

PUA theory has advanced quite a lot since then. Not that it could never work, it is just that it is not the best. Technique (or the practical how-to) is only part of what constitutes the skillset for Daygame. There are other things like your value in general, your logistics and your inner game that you need to develop over time. Also, be mindful, Daygame is hard and it will take a lot of dedication to even see your first results. This is usually called the 1,000 sets of hell in the community (mo…
/r/seduction06/01/26 10:43 AM
2

If the goal is to get her at your country -> focus on that. For example a scenic picture from your city with “come here!” Forget Alpha, Beta, Game, anti-Game for now. You are just playing on the low probability she will actually come visit you. You have to shoot your shot. Even if it sounds anti Game
/r/seduction06/01/26 01:45 AM
1

Well said
/r/TheRedPill05/01/26 05:39 PM
1

Because how a society functions is politics and politics are gender dynamics themselves. It is not people just engaging into behaviours randomly (this is also the basis of evolutionary psychology) Albeit, one correction in your post: the Male and Female spirits are abstract psychological profiles that can exist in both genders. That is why societies can adopt them. The gendered names come because each profile collectivises each gender’s lived experience in pre-history. If you read the source [Wo…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/26 05:38 PM
4

Because how a society functions is politics and politics are gender dynamics themselves. It is not people just engaging into behaviours randomly (this is also the basis of evolutionary psychology) Albeit, one correction in your post: the Male and Female spirits are abstract psychological profiles that can exist in both genders. That is why societies can adopt them. The gendered names come because each profile collectivises each gender’s lived experience in pre-history. If you read the source [Wo…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/26 05:37 PM
1

Depends what you truly want out of this. I will answer based on long term goals Some books on evolution (selfish gene, red queen, etc.), some game books (mystery method, RM, etc) and some others usually quoted (Influence, some neuroscience, etc) - are a big must. This is about understanding deep human nature. On top of reading, you need practice. If you want just a girlfriend, this is easy enough and safe to say will naturally happen just by being social. If you want a repeatable system, now we …
/r/seduction04/01/26 08:05 PM
4

then it was arousal, 9 times out of 10 this is a blatant signal to go further (way more than it is needed tbh). For the next time ;)
/r/seduction04/01/26 03:24 PM
3

Maybe something unique in her. Some people will say arousal, but unless there was something to induce that arousal (intimate touching) i think this is a little bit off. It just doesn't make sense to heavy breath while making out, it messes up with the act of kissing.
/r/seduction04/01/26 02:57 PM
23

So you are gonna try to shame him for taking steps to make his life better? He doesn't need to be a 10/10 to get success. He already has enough tools and case in point he can get dates.
/r/seduction04/01/26 08:24 AM
8

The good news is that you are already seeing the cracks of the "traditional" viewpoint, i.e. you can date girls 15 years younger than your wife (and possibly much more pleasant). Don't worry about success yet, you have time to experiment and practice. Realistically speaking for your situation, ethics aside, you shouldn't mention family (or reframe it as divorced(?) - borderline). And I would suggest to seriously think of renting a studio somewhere central. Let's be honest, after attraction, logi…
/r/seduction04/01/26 08:18 AM
5

This answer is through the Daygame perspective, but if I have to guess anything, you take too long to escalate. It is technically impossible to get friendzoned if you escalate on time (you will get rejected instead). In short, escalation reveals exactly where you are in the interaction, if she accepts -> she fancies you (not just in your own head). Therefore it is the most strategic tool. It has some side-effects of displaying confidence and competence indirectly, but these are only secondary to…
/r/seduction03/01/26 08:46 PM
2

You are realizing the myth of this subreddit. That despite what people say, male value is mutli-factor and no looks alone cannot get you laid. Game has a brutal learning curve. I can only speak from Daygame, not Nightgame, but it is not uncommon for people to report <5 lays in the first 1000 approaches. From the limited nightgame I know, the fact is that you play the entire venue. Each consecutive set in in the same venue builds on top of the other, as the girls have time to (unconsciously) obse…
/r/seduction03/01/26 04:49 PM
1

There is a truth to this, but blind approach is not the way to go. Approaching is a catabolic process in the long run. Eventually one cannot live under stress eternally. So it needs to be directed with small victories spread out. I highly disagree that approaching = success (unconditionally), for the vast, vast majority of people
/r/seduction03/01/26 12:49 PM
1

"I realize I'm probably making this harder for myself than it should be, aren't I?" - Nope because it is hard for all of us, but you are returning on my first comment again. You are burying a process that is already hard (have sex with a girl) under layers of morality that have nothing to do with the girl. Essentially, you want the goodwill of being "a good religious person" while every part of your thought process points you to be "efficient" with the process. Nothing wrong btw, we all have to …
/r/seduction02/01/26 02:22 PM
2

It goes with all dates: You need to escalate gradually to sex. (and personal opinion: you need to escalate early to filter out the "just friends" girls) In short, any location you can escalate counts as a "date". I am not a gym person, but to me it feels like a restaurant. You have to go through the motions without being able to meaningfully escalate. The social environment is not meant for that. But this matters in inverse proportion to how much she already likes you. As long as you can get her…
/r/seduction02/01/26 02:01 PM
3

you are mixing two completely different things that are totally unrelated. 1) is about your life and standing on your feet. This is your emotional low point that you describe. Ultimately girls won't fix it for you, this is a you issue and you need to delve deep into your psychology to find your path. 2) about the girl and how to proceed with her. This is simple from a seduction point of view - just ask her out and proceed with any date model normally. If what you say is accurate she is nearly gu…
/r/seduction02/01/26 01:33 PM
1

Because you align the goals of women in mating with your goals. They are totally different. The women "have it easier" for the average low value guy. Have you seen women compete for high value guys who will ghost them after the lay? Can you imagine the anxiety they must feel after social media has raised the bar so high? From your end, you seem them rejecting you, but from their end, there is really no-one to date them (that they want). And finally, as dating has transitioned so much online, can…
/r/seduction01/01/26 05:14 PM
3

How much of it is repeatable and on demand? How much do you control the input output equation, are you not capped on likes? How much can you guarantee on your profile visibility? These are the fundamental differences between repeatable skill based systems (akin to hunting) and ecosystem set ups (akin to farming). This is before the practicality of the quality of girls, type of girls and pleasantness come into play (because at this point everyone has their own opinions). What I want to say, is th…
/r/seduction01/01/26 04:58 PM
3

Sure, here are the answers: This varies by city. CITY_1, somewhere in the anglosphere, was easy to hook and chat. I would say 2 out of 3 sets would hook, with the barest hint of Calibration. CITY_2 was feast or famine, it would be 7 blowouts in a row, then a 20 minute idate kiss-close. This was a combined workrate of about 3-4 months. There were 3 weeks that i daygamed everyday and everything else was blended with daily life (i.e. in work breaks, after work and weekends). After the initial rush …
/r/seduction01/01/26 01:51 PM
7

Ok, let's take things a bit slower. Top Daygame online claim 1/30 open to lay. In reality from people I have met (and my long term stats) it is more 1/50. This number comes without Geomaxing and without excessive pre-approach calibration. Imo lays is the only stat that matters and I am making this disclaimer because many people have unrealistic Daygame expectation. This post is to share my experience with Daygame (when it was used as a background to my life). Readers get to make their own conclu…
/r/seduction01/01/26 01:37 PM
1

It can work, but it is most likely Flash Game. It is even doubtful they got anything meaningful out of it. Cold approaching has a really narrow mindset, expressed well here (for Daygame): https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/08/23/the-initial-stop/ Deviate any bit from the assumptions of Game and then you need a whole new theory to explain what you are seeing.
/r/seduction01/01/26 10:24 AM
1

At the heart of things this is Approach Anxiety. I suggest this one for some of its inner mechanics: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/05/02/approach-anxiety-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/ The true way out of this is courage, as defined here: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/11/18/the-essence-of-courage/ But be a little mindful. Modern pick up theory is developed for anonymous cities. If your hometown is a village like place... think about your reputation in general
/r/seduction01/01/26 08:01 AM
0

Be radically honest hear. Beauty in the eyes of a man, evolutionary speaking, is fertillity. At 40 years of age, most girls have lost all their quality eggs (if not all in general). That is why older women are less attractive to us. The next realisation, is that when you say in other countries older women look better looking. They are doing so by faking youthfullness. Softer skin, less fat, etc. But as you can clearly see, this is a cope, it is a fake fertility signal. There is some slight value…
/r/seduction31/12/25 04:40 PM
3

Daygame is the only option for what you descibe. Direct is usually best if it is not a standing social setting. Here is some guidance for the daygame journey, it is a long road to mastery: https://coffeedaygame.wordpress.com/2025/11/07/how-to-get-laid-with-daygame/
/r/seduction31/12/25 04:30 PM
1

Learning seduction is akin to eastern mysticism. Every student is a whole new discipline by himself, despite the material being the same. Because the way the material applies to you specifically is the riddle itself, not the high level concepts. Your strengths and your weaknesses and your biases. Now with this in mind, you can see that a coaches "true" task is very demanding. That is why 99% of the time you will be wasting your money or gaslighted to the coaches viewpoint (based on his character…
/r/seduction30/12/25 04:11 PM
0

Speaking of 7 years experience with Daygame. The average "text" game is: Ping Follow up Date request The rest of the chat is logistics It is actually more pivotal to not overgame the chat into silliness, than do something proactively. Now, for things to be this easy... you need good game infield, and that is the true key for text game, the work done before the number. If you are getting too many flakes, make sure you bring the set down to reality after attraction is established.
/r/seduction30/12/25 03:38 PM
1

Bros before hoes! That is why we learn the skills, so we don't engage in dubious morality
/r/seduction30/12/25 03:22 PM
1

you need a superficial layer on top of your logical communication. This is where the fun is, because you can move in and out of logic to absurdity. But this is not enough, depending on your type of game you want the superficial layer to be on you and her, so personal communication. Link everything you two are saying about you and her. Logistical communication is not more efficient btw, it is the same as emotional communication. You can pass information with both. Think of saying "bear attacks ar…
/r/seduction30/12/25 03:11 PM
2

showing intent is not against you, even if she has a boyfriend. Just ask
/r/seduction30/12/25 02:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter