TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FormerDemOperative Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by FormerDemOperative on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Definitely not, neither gender wants a lazy spouse. It causes the same reproduction issues from either gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 05:13 AM
1

Then you know how inaccurate it is to say that genetics have a limited effect on us. No one here is saying genetics are the only thing that determine personality, but you're saying that genetics and evolution play a limited role in how we are, and that's just not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/17 08:49 AM
1

It's all speculation and it's almost unanimously agreed upon by sociologists and psychologists that genetics are quite limited in their effect over the preferences of people. 1) It's not unanimous at all. 2) Would not evolutionary and genetic biologists know more about the topic than sociologists?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/17 07:49 AM
0

.........why do you think that you, a person who developed their genes and anatomy through millions of years of evolution, would care if the members of your tribe were active or not active? Do you not think there is some evolutionary benefit to having tribe members that are active and motivated?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/17 07:28 AM
1

...right, yes, that's what I'm talking about. The reason why your brain cares about that at all, is that you get a survival advantage if your mate is fit and motivated, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/17 04:43 AM
1

That's literally the same thing. The fact that you find your husband being lazy such a repulsive thing - like you're having a visceral reaction to it right - is the exact thing I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 11:51 PM
1

Well, it's pretty clear it's an unsustainable solution in any case. Even if you could argue it's the "best state" for society, however you define that, the cat's out of the bag on that one already. But I do think we have to be aware of those biological components while crafting the culture we're evolving into. Because if we ignore that, it's going to go badly. Which is sort of what's happening now with whatever this transition is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 11:50 PM
1

Right. To provide for their children and to protect them from animals or hostile people. These are all the same thing, we're just using different words for them. You can call it status, or competence, or the ability to provide/ability to not be dependent on the woman. Those are all the same concept. Drive = status = competence = ability to provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 11:17 PM
5

Hilariously, regard and respect for other people's boundaries, cultural beliefs, and behaviors is the exact opposite of sociopathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 10:34 PM
1

Physical strength has definitely decreased in importance as society has become more industrialized (the whole point of tools is to make things physically easier, after all). But the problem remaining is that humans (and our ancestors and their ancestors) evolved hierarchies and complex social rules over thousands/millions of years that revolve around strength imbalance between gendered members of the species. So the question is: if we live in a society more and more disconnected from our biologi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 10:32 PM
1

Hard to tell if this is ultimately good or bad. While it was hard to reach people on incels in groups, PMs were often a little more effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 10:19 PM
2

The best way I've heard it put is that the differences between individuals within a group (between a man and a man, or between a woman and a woman) are greater than the differences between men and women as groups. From a personality trait perspective. So I think being less focused on where you fit as man or a woman or more how you fit as an individual is more helpful. You can make some generalizations about men and women based on their sex/gender alone, but they don't really give you that much i…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 10:18 PM
1

I think for some of them, they are so jaded and cynical and resentful at this point, that they are anti-LTR in a mostly defensive way. I think that's mostly what they want, and they think it's impossible so they focus on ways to make their lives not about that. Sexual conquest is one of those ways. Honestly, some feminists embody the same principle. They've taken their specific bad experiences with men and extrapolated those bad experiences onto how society itself is organized and the nature of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 10:08 PM
1

Jordan Peterson is a strong influence for TRPers, imo. It's going to take a while for his message to sink in, and fundamentally his message is anti-TRP (if women don't want to date you, maybe you need to sort your life out a bit, etc). But it's also pretty anti Blue pill, which is probably how most TRPers encounter JP the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 10:06 PM
1

I think it's smart to start from that place, but there are also a ton of kind, generous people out there. Filtering can be tough, and once you're playing on defense because of bad experiences in the past, it's hard to change. But I'd encourage you to look for those opportunities. For some reason, meditation/yoga/mindfulness related groups all tend to have kinder people in my personal experience. And the best part is that once you meet one kind person, all of their friends are usually kind. That'…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 10:03 PM
1

...because drive and discipline result in greater status. That's why drive is attractive in the first place, because it's used to achieve something: status.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 09:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter