TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Forsaken_Hat_7010 Archive

View 1 post and 327 comments by Forsaken_Hat_7010 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
44

DiscriminationForsaken_Hat_7010/r/MensRights01/07/24 04:18 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

However, feminism does not seek to equalize the same rights as men, but to obtain more for women. Even if women were at a disadvantage, overcompensation is not equality, and there are always better ways to achieve it without creating new injustices; but none of that matters, because the disadvantage of being oppressed by patriarchy is strictly imaginary.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 11:11 PM
28

I make that point every time someone disables adult women from consenting to sexual relations with significantly older men. It's fun to watch them implode.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 03:39 PM
-3

It's normal for there to be a limited number of available slots, so more women being forcibly recruited, even in rear-line roles, means fewer men being forcibly recruited overall. The comment above doesn't imply that forcibly drafted women should only be placed in non-combat roles, but honestly, I don't think it would be such a bad idea in most places. A massive portion of the population simply won't tolerate women being sacrificed the same way men are, so if you try to push for more equality, y…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 03:33 PM
8

It's a silly bias.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 12:53 AM
4

There's a difference between clickbait titles and maliciously false ones. I'm not even going to open that crap.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 12:52 AM
2

There is a clear bias against male victims, who are treated more disparagingly. But cheaters are generally condemned, no matter the genders involved.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 10:34 PM
16

It requires penetration, so in practice, yes. They did something similar in spain (solo sí es sí/only yes means yes), and as expected, it further undermined the presumption of innocence for men.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 12:51 AM
18

At least in mexico (where most of the cases I’ve seen come from), you could if you’re legally recognized as a woman. Although the more misandrist they are, the more TERFs they tend to be, so they might just get even more unhinged.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 04:59 PM
3

Thank you, I couldn't find the reasons, so I assumed it was simply anti-militarism. I should have expected this level of hypocrisy, especially since they did the same thing in spain; all the service performed by male victims doesn't even count towards retirement, as it would be "discriminatory against women".
/r/MensRights28/10/25 01:50 PM
83

There are a few videos of men doing that. They were attacked by female passengers, and then by men and women when they were forced to leave, sometimes also attacked by staff. Of course, there is no news of those attackers even being charged.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 12:39 PM
33

It should be noted that it has been approved by the right-wing parties, with opposition from the left-wing parties. Don't forget that, for one reason or another, they are all misandrist.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 10:24 PM
4

I find it hard to believe that it's easy to set a bed on fire with a aerosol spray and a lighter. I don't even want to imagine what the pile of rubbish next to the bed must have contained to achieve that.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/25 09:43 PM
27

There aren't many reddit communities for men's issues like r/MensRights, because site admins ban them for very little, and sometimes completely arbitrarily. That's why some of them are moving elsewhere.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 10:32 AM
73

Checking the settings after installing or signing up should always be the first thing you do, starting with the privacy section.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 10:32 AM
1

I don't know how much they actually believe in those ideas, or how deep it goes (probably more than I'd like to think), but I'd bet most of what we see is just a show. They know well they have to parrot the dogmas of the reigning creed if they want to keep their relevance and avoid being tossed aside like yesterday's trash.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 09:43 PM
5

I'm just looking for a culture where men and women are treated as equals. I am quite certain that such a place does not exist, in fact, I would not even bet on there being any country with full legal equality. You will have to settle for those that are making a serious effort (such as the scandinavian countries).
/r/MensRights02/10/25 04:32 PM
5

That's not a good deal either, it seems more logical to adjust to each person's situation. If there's a big disparity and the one earning more doesn't adapt to a lower standard of living than what the other can afford, the one earning less ends up losing out too much.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 10:24 PM
2

Those are a lot of relevant sources! Can I ask how you keep them organized with so much drama happening all the time? Asking someone who (I just checked) has 5156 links on this topic in just a few firefox folders, and is terrified that this chaos will keep growing :_D
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 12:39 AM
9

Among anti-feminist influencers in spain, this book is practically sacred and always recommended. It's a pity that it receives so little attention.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 10:10 PM
0

That's what I meant. Just do a quick search for countries like israel, sweden, norway, and denmark; all of them, by the way, with conscription for women (or in the process of introducing it).
/r/MensRights19/09/25 06:14 PM
1

I don't know where your experience comes from, but in practically all western recruitment systems there are medical exams and physical fitness tests, as well as psychological evaluations. Positions are limited, and the best candidates are selected according to objective criteria with a specific purpose, just being in "better health" is not enough. Even in an egalitarian system, average physical abilities leave women behind, so it doesn’t make sense to expect women to even be the majority. Even i…
/r/MensRights19/09/25 04:27 PM
1

How did you mix meritocracy and parity? Meritocracy depends on each individual’s capabilities, regardless of whether it ends up being 99% men or the other way around; only practical criteria, not the typical superficial sexist ones. A 50-year-old short, obese man who takes care of his kids is left out, while a 25-year-old tall, strong woman working as a military mercenary gets in. If nobody wants to protect your country, then it’s not worth enslaving and sacrificing anyone for it.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 12:19 PM
5

That's sexist. It's better to simply do it based on meritocracy, or better yet, not enslave anyone.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 02:22 AM
4

Do you even realize that it's the original title?
/r/MensRights16/09/25 02:03 AM
3

In fact, according to the news, this system is unique in the world.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 11:15 PM
2

I see it as an improvement. A quick search shows that both are functionally identical, and the only difference is that "not proven" is extremely stigmatizing. If they have concluded that your guilt cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, they should simply declare you innocent, not "innocent but with a red flag".
/r/MensRights12/09/25 11:15 PM
7

I had assumed this was already happening, since it has been applied to adult minor offenses for years. Women first, girls next, and we'll see if we ever think about boys?
/r/MensRights11/09/25 07:53 PM
2

If men who reject overweight women were accused of misogyny, I’m sure the arguments here would revolve around the idea that sexual preferences are natural and strictly personal 🙄
/r/MensRights10/09/25 03:31 PM
0

Yep, and that would be appropriate for any country that isn't irrationally punitive, but that's not the case.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/25 01:50 PM
17

I was taught from a young age that everyone is equal and that human rights are important, without realizing until much later that men weren’t included. When I understood this, fortunately I stuck to the true definition of equality, but it is not surprising that others radicalize in the opposite direction: you can’t lie and betray so blatantly without expecting backlash.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 01:26 AM
1

OP isn't talking about karma, but about the attacks they've received. It's unpleasant to make a good point only to have someone undermine it (in the eyes of part of your target audience) simply by antagonizing you. There's also the risk of being banned from some subs because of your history.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 01:11 PM
1

This is great! So far, my solution has been to simply keep a separate account for controversial gender issues. I still get some ad hominem attacks for my activity on reddit, but only in comments that were likely to receive them anyway, and I can feel comfortable on my main account even on left-wing subs.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 01:04 PM
-1

The term "cis" does not imply ideology or imposition, and is useful for highlighting differences in how groups are treated. For example, that feminists do not attack trans men with the same hatred they direct at cis men, revealing not only sexism but also transphobia.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 10:45 AM
2

I don’t need your man card, or anyone else’s. If being a man to you means cannon fodder or just being an idiot, then you go to war; I’m perfectly fine with my masculinity.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 10:29 AM
4

It's definitely better, but it's not exactly safe either. Everyone will consider you a traitor, and you may be one of those cases where you "commit suicide" by head trauma while in the custody of recruiters.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 10:21 AM
0

First of all, MRA is not redpill, even if the mods seem thrilled to let that plague slip in here. Your post is a mess, and you assume everything is about money without actually reasoning it out, as if ideology didn’t exist. Even if it were about money, as long as they defend the ideology it’s still legitimate, it’s not "infiltration". These are not "men's spaces", that's sexist jargon imported from feminism. This isn’t a social club, it’s a forum for debating inequality against men, which is rel…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 12:19 PM
22

If your reasoning boils down to "some X are bad, so it's fine to hate and criminalize all X", then you don't actually have an argument, just prejudice dressed up as thought.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 01:08 PM
10

"Anyone who thinks <insert shitty opinion> is <insert dehumanization>" isn’t an argument, it only fuels echo chambers and antagonizes those you’re trying to convince. The ad hominems and insults just prove you have nothing to offer beyond empty hostility.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 09:49 PM
-11

No, what you have isn’t fire, it’s incendiary stupidity. Congratulations, you just became the perfect argument to keep fueling feminism! They don’t need to make up sexism where it doesn’t exist when they have real sexists openly justifying it, like you; perfect for attracting more people with tribal thinking (which you clearly enjoy) to their ranks.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 08:25 PM
-17

You both talk just like feminists.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 06:39 PM
1

Don't lump them together. One is applied by default and indiscriminately, the other (ideally...) only in pressing circumstances and conditionally.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 09:36 PM
4

Woah! That's an average of 1 semicolon every ~10 words!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/25 07:58 PM
2

Thank you! I was looking for the history, which is in that same report.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 09:36 PM
2

I think that apart from this sub r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates and r/Egalitarianism could be good targets. Anyway, remember not to be pushy. They might be interested or use their contacts… or see it as a nuisance.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 05:12 PM
2

Maybe better to send the suggestion to the modmail of some related subs, before asking in public to the community? Someone might try to take it with malicious intentions.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 04:45 PM
1

Do you have a link? I'm failing to find it, even with exact cuts of the text.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 10:45 AM
8

Tradition is inherently good, so let's go back to slavery! And if anyone protests, we just have to give them random political labels to disqualify them.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 04:22 PM
7

“I have suffered, so I will deny your human rights and you I will make you suffer, that will make you closer to me 🤪”
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:47 PM
3

You make assertions with a lot of confidence, despite being an absolute ignoramus without the most basic common sense.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:45 PM
7

In fact the mods deleted both posts. I’m not surprised, since the foundations of feminism imply a gender war and a rigid oppressor-oppressed dichotomy.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 08:39 PM
7

It is important to make it clear that it cannot be sexual harassment if there was no awareness, reiteration or intent. You established your version from the first moment, and your cousin can justify your behavior, so you are in a good position. But don't settle, document everything, especially in detail what story she is spreading in case she distorts it. On a more optimistic note, it's plausible that her version is actually yours, and she really thinks it is only because that's how she felt, as…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:28 AM
1

They didn't do it, it's a hoax.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:50 PM
16

*Sigh. Yet another acronym for the same thing? They could fill a dictionary with all the versions and variants. Btw, it's funny that they think that, when half of the "GSM" suffers from the discriminations (at least much of it) that MRAs denounce; hence one can see there many gays and some trans exposing themselves, without any rejection for it.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/25 08:17 PM
1

Fortunately this is not the case. The OP is spreading hoaxes and clicbait garbage. It is a common tax that makes no distinction by sex or marital status, intended to encourage parenthood: https://kidsnomics.space/en/kidsnews/child-care-subsidy-program-starting-in-2026/ Calling this a tax for being single is no different from saying that public education is too, or that public health care is a tax on the healthy, and a very long etcetera until dismantling any form of social welfare, is nonsense.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:28 PM
8

I agree, but what follows this is clear: feminists will use it to paint men as vile, selfish creatures with whom it is not possible to cooperate, and thus justify the cast only to women.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:47 PM
9

Do you really have the nerve to accuse him of arguing in bad faith, after such blatant misrepresentation? You must be trolling.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 10:48 PM
57

It's certainly reprehensible, but I mean, with that username I think the same thing would have happened no matter what you said lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 12:24 PM
121

Too bad that, to determine what is hate or toxicity, they used an AI hate speech detector made by none other than google. It is a safe bet that it is heavily biased in favor of feminism.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 12:41 AM
4

Unfortunately you went to ask experiences about straight dating to someone gay 🙃 These are speeches I see a lot on the internet, but in real life (outside of dating) I've barely heard it a few times, and thankfully still no one brazen enough to invoke the patriarchy. Instead of such feminist verbiage, what I have heard a lot of are silly excuses that basically boil down to “if he doesn't pay, he doesn't value me”; also a very bad thing for too many reasons.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 01:37 PM
59

I used to see feminists argue about this with quite a bit of support for 50/50, now it seems quite a bit more common for them to say that men have to pay for the “historical debt of patriarchy” and the costs of female aesthetic products.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 10:45 AM
7

Yep. Feminism is very strong here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 08:59 PM
11

You can repeat old discriminations (ignoring those suffered by men), whether real or invented, but you are telling the tale to someone who lives in a country that has been feminist for decades (like many others especially europeans, or like the UN itself). In fact, we have over 500 laws that discriminate against men, including things like feminist courts for men, crimes that can only be committed by men, taking for granted the perpetual misogynistic motivation of men (even in cases of self-defen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 07:50 PM
12

Feminism is not consistently misandric across the board. Absolutely it is, and it's damned obvious, literally routine all over the west even in law. Your silent majority is false, because the “real life people” you say are feminists don't even know what feminism is, except for the lying mantras of “feminism=equality”; it's like you saying most people are christian because they claim to believe in god, but it turns out their gods and beliefs barely share terminology, and oppose what any christian…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 05:47 PM
12

They are organized and structured in governments and supranational organizations, always maintaining the same core discourse in a coherent way. But let's forget that for a moment. So according to your logic, it is reprehensible to say that PUAs and blackpillers are toxic sexists, since they are not organized and that would be a hateful generalization, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 04:10 PM
5

I hope this helps a little to make it more obvious that feminism is not an ally, as is often believed in the gay community. They will always see us as men first, even if because of their homophobia they see us as flawed men.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/25 01:01 PM
17

Not if they use the magic words: Abracadabra, power structure, systemic oppression... BOOM! Sexism nullified.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/25 12:55 PM
7

Just the opposite of men, women are not taught not to sexually harass but to not be victims. Too often I see it normalized even in the media, considered by perpetrators as flirting or even a kind of “reward”.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/25 10:01 AM
6

It has another huge advantage (when using local models), it is private and it is easy to open oneself to a thing with amnesia; it is also inexhaustible, cheap and always available everywhere. They still have a long way to go, but I have a hard time imagining anything better for this use case.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 12:33 AM
9

It is particularly outrageous because 4B is so much worse. MGTOW points out the discriminations suffered by men, and they choose to isolate in order to protect themselves. This can easily lead to sexist rhetoric, but it is not intrinsic. 4B also points out the discriminations suffered by women (or rather, the imagined patriarchy), but holds all men responsible for it and seeks to punish them all as a political protest. It criminalizes them due to their gender, it is sexist from its foundations.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/25 06:57 AM
2

It is an indiscriminate grouping of all movements loosely related to male issues. No doubt it is malicious and meant to fallaciously defame its good members by highlighting the bad ones, a bullshit term, but to say it doesn't exist is not really correct. Ironically we can't do the same in response, there would be no point in a term to group feminism (even the most hegemonic one) with groups like femcels or FDS, because these are in fact well accepted and overlapping within feminism.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 10:28 AM
12

I have seen feminists defend it as empowering... and then humiliate men for doing just that.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/03/25 07:24 PM
2

The worst thing is that they will pretend to have a defense of human rights, but if you make a discourse strictly based on equality before the law and presumption of innocence, they will still keep throwing these smears at you; it is baffling how delusional people can be without even suffering from cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 02:36 PM
2

Yay! She has been banned. Don't forget to always report, because although most of the time admins don't do their job with second rate victims, sometimes we get lucky when it's very blatant.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/25 04:38 PM
2

That's fine as long as it's your choice, but the problem here is that it's not.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 03:04 PM
2

It's kind of funny, the whole image is gender stereotypes that feminism claims to want to eradicate. PS: OOP is right, it's so horrible it looks like a meme.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/25 03:41 PM
3

tons of activists That's pretty vague, it might as well be people on twitter. Do you know of any outstanding examples from any big NGOs?
/r/MensRights08/03/25 01:37 AM
10

“Women's rights” is also the term they used when asked in the survey, and what this whole propaganda piece is based on. It is obvious that they were trying to be misleading so that the respondents would think it was about feminism, and then pretend it was about misogyny. As usual, feminist studies are trash.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:04 PM
17

Feminism is a sexist and hate movement, aggressively attacks men's rights and promotes discrimination even legal. If you pretend to be egalitarian but respect feminism, you have failed.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:01 PM
10

Bait or not, he's right on this, and you're just making an adhominem. If you want to be the weirdo spying on profiles to make cancellation calls, you should at least do it where it's relevant and provide some reference.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:16 PM
11

Yuck... I shouldn't have gone down the rabbit hole. In those posts and in recent history, even leaving aside ideology and endless misandry, there are too many childish, silly, counterproductive or just plain insulting comments, even labeled as mod. The user seems to fall for every provocation in the worst way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/25 08:49 AM
23

There is only one mod, who moderates +80subs, including "blatant misogyny" and some quite popular ones. I'm going to guess that the sub ran out of mods, and this user accepted it just to maliciously censor and propagandize. I figure doing this must take up much or all of his/her time, that user must have a really sad life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 11:36 PM
148

This is not gender-related, nor did either party make any allegations in this regard.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/25 03:20 PM
1

That's accurately (furry included) the vast majority of shounen isekai in manga/anime, a very popular genre these days.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/25 12:52 PM
3

Maybe it's not such a bad idea that lobbyists keep writing the laws instead of politicians lol.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 05:18 PM
3

That feminism has overtly sexist discourses is not uncommon, but the norm. But if the incessant normalized misandric narrative seems little to you, there is something totally objective, indisputable and easy to verify: the law. Here is a compilation of hundreds of laws that discriminate by gender in spain, some of them taking human rights away from men. All of them openly promoted by feminism, implemented by feminist governments, and defended tooth and nail by feminism. You are right about one t…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 10:49 AM
6

Pretending that any form of hate, prejudice or discrimination requires “systemic oppression”, I think is the worst bullshit invented by SJW, and the most delusional by far. It's just an excuse to be openly hateful and pretend otherwise, even while blatantly accusing others of it.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/25 11:45 AM
1

Avoid females for awhile. Act like they don't even exist. It accomplishes multiple things at once. No attention, no validation, no one willing to help, no one will to do things for them, no security, no protection, no sex, and no children. MGTOW is supposed to be about self-protection, but this is revenge, it looks like 4B for men.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 12:16 PM
4

One could do the same thing by switching genders, or two men, or two women. There is also nothing wrong with having preferences, standards or, what the heck, even sexual orientations could be applied here.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/25 04:23 PM
6

It's something that can happen all over reddit, I've seen it and suffered it too many times. If they don't accuse you of not being a good member or ally, they will accuse you of being the enemy; the only point is to make an ad hominem. Even worse, you may end up shadowbanned just for commenting here, something that seems to happen quite a bit. For that, and to avoid accusations in non-controversial discussions there is a fairly simple and effective solution, use multiple accounts; if you use som…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 08:51 AM
4

Seems like just a joke about bdsm.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 01:38 PM
13

Society is so dominated by feminism that opposing it is automatically demonized, people are afraid to be ostracized. For there to be more real actions and be successful, it's important to build awareness in society to lay the groundwork and gain support or at least acceptance; so I think even being “whiny” on the internet is useful for that. And spaces like this are really important to articulate the discourse. I'm optimistic that as popular opinion of feminism continues to deteriorate, politici…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/25 03:58 PM
24

The captors are victimizing her more to increase the media impact, because as you say there is always more delicacy/sympathy for women. It doesn't make much sense to assume it is due to abuse, when everyone there suffers various forms of abuse and the rest are in fact are more dangerous.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 01:50 PM
2

Basically, the norm for feminists is to criminalize men and lower the bar of tolerance for them to a minimum, as well as not allowing a man to be seen as a victim or women as false complainants or aggressors. This sub is full of examples. The inevitable result is a horde of young feminists who see themselves as victims for nothing, and feel entitled and justified in defaming. This works without reasoning it out or seeing the contradictions, precisely because it has become naturalized.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:58 PM
14

Society judges women for promiscuity and men for lack of it, so the derogatory use of incel is like whore/slut. People will excuse themselves by saying it also includes for misogyny... bullshit, if you want to call someone a misogynist, call them a misogynist. The only thing incel brings to it is a sexist and vulgar insult, what the muricans call a “slur”, so it should never have been normalized in discussions.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 01:54 AM
2

I am a bit surprised to read the experiences in the comments, is this a common occurrence in murica? To me holding the door is a matter of basic education, regardless of the gender of those involved.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 06:43 PM
1

What’s the difference between the men’s rights movement and feminism?
/r/MensRights30/12/24 04:27 PM
-6

Also who wants lip balm for a holiday gift? Leaving aside the rest of the OOP's delusions, I must agree here: in fact the lack of holiday gifts is much better than gifts that seem to be obtained at the last minute from a vending machine.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 01:59 PM
-2

Queers for Palestine An stupid example, you're putting it alongside others where the victims support the hate groups that persecute them, but far from defining the palestinians it's just the umpteenth mostly intolerant people. They too are not supported because of their intolerant majority, but because they are suffering damn genocide (call it what you will), supporting them just requires a very basic respect for human life or not being petty. Without addressing anyone in particular, I hope that…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 11:07 PM
5

I think this is usually the case in europe, at least two weeks.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 09:32 PM
5

Here is the post
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/24 03:19 PM
3

You have no idea what you are talking about. The other user is right, and many years of public smear campaigns and harassment (often just from anonymous accusations) that have wrecked lives and driven men to suicide are the clear proof.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 09:30 AM
2

I'd say it's a mixture of misandry and homophobia. Woke and feminists will excuse their preferential treatment of gays with intersectionality, however, a hetero man who checks all the other boxes as oppressed will still be considered part of the oppressors. This is not the case for a gay man who checks all the other boxes as oppressor, and that is because they do not consider us real or complete men. Btw, this also shows that even they don't believe in their own intersectionality schemes. Or may…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 09:12 AM
17

with a men’s rights activist relative (...) He is a Tate bro who believes the solution to men’s problems is returning to traditional gender roles, that women should be submissive (...) He represents the average MRA This is not what you will see in this sub nor in r/MensRights, because that, tate, or anything like that, is not related to men's rights. Ending gender roles affecting men (which includes taking responsibility for women) is precisely one of the key points. You're probably confusing it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 08:12 AM
4

And I guess that ... yep! They authorized women to have long hair. Can anyone confirm that they didn't do the same for men?
/r/MensRights11/12/24 06:19 AM
5

Are you a woman? By saying this so out of line in a derogatory way, you just gave yourself away as a feminist troll.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 07:37 AM
22

In fact, this is true for 2/3 of the world's population. It should be noted that there are laws that do allow women to be convicted as rapists in theory, but in practice there are malicious requirements such as “penetration”. That makes it very easy for them to spout falsehoods such as 99-100% of rapes are perpetrated by men.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 06:53 PM
9

Did you have the audacity to address the key point of the topic in a measured, respectful and rational way, in a space for discussion on the topic? ...how dare you!
/r/EverydayMisandry04/12/24 01:56 AM
2

You saw that many many users here suck, but the mods seem to do their job well. If you see such things, please be sure to report it; tolerating it only abides us into a downward spiral.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 10:39 PM
8

This reminds me that “the last of us” initially wanted the infected to be women only. Where I heard it the narrator said it was necessary for two women to complain that it was misogyny to only kill women, mocking and pointing out that no one noticed the “obvious” before. It's quite normal in movies, videogames and other media for 100% of the victims to be male, but it seems that here it's all fine and dandy and the brain cell stays off.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/11/24 04:39 AM
-13

Does this sub now support gender segregation? If feminists were to disappear or do a 180-degree turn, I see that many here would be delighted to take their place.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 07:24 PM
-16

I see you didn't read the article. He is accused of directly discriminating against people because of their religion, textbook islamophobia. It began after the schoolgirl in question claimed that Paty had ordered Muslim students to leave his classroom while he showed the rest of the class caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad by satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 12:28 AM
25

These discussions are always difficult to address because they are based on perceptions, so I like to base them on objective discrimination, the law; nothing is clearer than the loss of rights, including human rights. Some examples from spain: By the “ley integral contra la violencia de género”(integral law against gender violence) and jurisprudence of the supreme court, in cases of “gender violence”, according to the law all men have sexist motivations regardless of the evidence, and all women …
/r/MensRights25/11/24 08:46 PM
5

That is a very reasonable assumption, but it is not what is implied in the article: “Dubai has only recently legalised out-of-wedlock sex for tourists (...), but only if both parties are over 18.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/11/24 06:11 PM
1

you don't have an ounce of testosterone in you, do you? Your provocations are very silly... but they also make no sense. 🤓 : One ounce in total would be extreme, thousands of times more than the average, you would definitely die.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 11:53 AM
36

"Some of you may die, but that is a sacrifice I am willing to make."
/r/MensRights19/11/24 12:42 AM
30

I am in spain, where every little case of a woman victim is news and appears on the front pages, feminism is EXTREMELY strong here. With the genders reversed this would have given for months of tv debates and would be considered proof of the existence of patriarchy. However, I never heard of this blatant case, not even from the anti-feminist channels that are dedicated to finding and exposing them, and the OOP is from a month ago. Victims are really invisible when they are men.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 06:48 AM
3

That sub is about everything but geography 🙃
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 08:50 PM
17

I've seen that. I think the most lame excuse I usually see is “cishet men like lesbians”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 08:48 PM
55

This could work well in r/MapPorn, it's a pretty feminist sub but all the more reason to raise awareness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 02:04 PM
11

Even if the OOP is not about gender, OP highlights the double standard.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/10/24 05:22 PM
2

I bet the same feminists who use stupid examples from the animal world where males are cruel to target men, are the same ones who will use examples where females are cruel as desirable.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/10/24 12:27 AM
22

When they use statistical arguments, the r/menkampf strategy works very well. Of course they will often try to deny it and make those kinds of excuses, but at least it's fun to watch them have cognitive dissonance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 12:01 PM
4

The reasons may be diverse, but I suspect that it is common is that they hate gays, and especially trans women, because they have a very strict prejudice of what “a real man” is; they think that those collectives do not fulfill their inalienable role, and invade female spaces and privileges.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/24 06:10 PM
2

Feminism seeks rights and benefits for women, even if it is at the expense of men; so in theory it is beneficial to some degree for women, but in practice it is not so clear. Many of the clearest and fairest benefits, such as voting rights, equal pay, condemnation of violence, or women's shelters, are prior to and were simply appropriated by feminism; to focus on the real feminist movement we must point to the last 4 decades. The best and most remarkable thing I can think of that affects women a…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 12:25 PM
9

I blame the victimhood and fear-mongering that feminism has inoculated.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 09:08 PM
11

In fact, they fought for census-based (i.e. wealth-based) women's suffrage, at a time when universal suffrage already had strong support. They argued that women's suffrage should go earlier, and they delayed universal suffrage with their terrorist attacks. So, the events that for some reason feminists chose/robbed to be the most representative of their first wave, is a terrrorist group... that fought against the vote for all women and delayed their rights ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 03:43 PM
10

In the case of metro mexico, there are in fact quite a few videos of fights (like this one), and lots of testimonies of abuse of all kinds, including sexual. The irony here is that, if they were not segregated, it is very likely that there would have been a man willing to take the blows to protect a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/24 08:16 PM
82

So, your own criteria and willingness to decide to whom to leave your belongings is only valid if it fits with the “right values”.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:42 PM
22

Some countries did this before. Was it not stopped, not for human rights reasons, but because it was not effective? And I seem to remember that sometimes even counterproductive (in terms of the violence exercised).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/24 12:53 AM
3

I think a few kids were killed too :( Lately, killing a lot more than a few children has become routine for israel.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/24 12:03 PM
3

This is a small sub focused on other topics, surely you would have more success in subs like r/AskMen or some specialized in style.
/r/MenSupportMen16/09/24 10:23 PM
1

Maybe I should have been clearer. Things like the nordic gender equality paradox are fine, or would that qualify as bioessentialism? Tabula rasa theories are supported here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/24 12:35 PM
-6

So the key points of MGTOW, but without their sexist rhetoric and toxic community. Sounds good. This is very good evidence that feminists not only attack MGTOWs for things that are appropriate, but also (or mainly) for being men who have the “audacity” to take control of their own sexuality.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 01:06 PM
1

So, biological (not biologistic) arguments with disclaimers or proper explanations are fine, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/24 07:16 PM
18

Just in case you're not being ironic: if you think the context doesn't make it clear enough what you mean, be explicit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/24 09:32 PM
12

What do you understand by that? Usually, becoming a “high value man” is not about becoming better or more attractive, but about commoditizing yourself; reducing your “value” to those resources you can provide, and becoming a provider according to traditional gender roles. That might attract “high value women,” who will appreciate you only as much as you can give them. It's up to you to decide what you want or how you live your life, but I strongly encourage you to be wary of messages from “pick-…
/r/MenSupportMen02/09/24 08:07 PM
9

The other user is just rationalizing the origin of the biological bias. Even if applying them makes no sense in many particular cases, it doesn't really matter as long as evolutionarily it works. To give an example of how flawed they are, the cuteness schema should work for human children, and it ends up applying to cats ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ We can fix the cultural part, but the biological part will always be there screwing around, so it's important to understand it.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:08 AM
14

They even repeated it being specific: While the pursuit of love might seem secondary to dealing with missile attacks, power outages and food shortages might seem secondary to dealing with missile attacks might seem missile attacks 🙃
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 11:36 PM
40

Reminds me of this article. Men kidnapped and enslaved to be cannon fodder, and that's suddenly a problem... because women have a harder job dating.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 11:45 AM
2

He started his post as most do with “how come, nobody ever talks about…” and I replied we do talk about it often No, we didn't, and you only mentioned that someone somewhere tried to address it in isolation and failed; pretending it's a closed issue is delusional. And I hope you're not complaining that the OP exaggerated when you do the same. because I have a vagina you all freaked the fuck out. Nobody gives a shit about your vagina. Your repeated accusations of misgonia are supported by nothing…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 11:57 AM
9

then remembered that that sub is a misandric shit-hole I've always wanted (but I'm too lazy) to do reposts but changing the genders. I've seen some pretty similar ones where the reaction is opposite, it would be fun to compare when the post is almost identical except for the gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 10:03 PM
10

You forget the part about putting hours into what may be crap, huh? Reviews are there for a reason, think before being rude.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 03:01 PM
8

Seriously? This is far from a closed topic, and discussions on it (and on any topic appropriate to this sub) have always been discrete; of course almost everyone is unaware of any possible precedent and will continue to talk about it. And I stress “possible precedent”, you fall into r/USdefaultism The OP doesn't blame women, on the other hand you do blame men.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:42 AM
15

“My body my choice” should be followed by ”my responsibility.”
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:30 AM
3

When it is a normal ban reddit notifies you of it and its duration, and may include a note from the mods. You also stop being able to see the mods list, try to comment or post. For shadowban there is no warning, just everything works normally but only you and the mods see the comment/post, so to notice you have to check it from outside the account.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 02:29 PM
8

I have this account just for gender issues and controversies for that very reason. While I try to always abide by the rules and be polite, I still find from time to time that I've been shadow banned from several subs I've never commented on before.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:20 PM
3

I think most of us here also started out as feminists, as it is common to be educated by being told that it is gender equality and women's rights, which is reasonable for almost everyone. If one looks at the facts instead of propaganda it is easy to see that it often works badly or the other way around, but it is not so easy to oppose the hegemonic ideology at the risk of being ostracized. So, congratulations on prioritizing your values, and welcome! You may want to see r/Egalitarianism or r/Lef…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:16 PM
0

We don't need it? So, it's only made for women, because only women want that?
/r/MensRights20/08/24 10:19 PM
10

You see the thing is most whites go through some kind of robbery by blacks in their life at least once in their life and there have been cases where even their most trusted people would robbed or assaulted them. So they have to be wary of every blacks not because they hate blacks or all blacks are thieves just because they don't wanna get assaulted. The easiest way to expose comments of this type is to change the collective. If you see that it turns into hate speech, well guess what.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 01:00 AM
3

It is quite normal for them not to be reversible after several years.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 01:06 AM
2

Beware of "pickup artists", their advice is based on prejudice and manipulation; they are fucking toxic and nothing good will come of it.
/r/MenSupportMen08/08/24 01:42 PM
5

They will even delete legitimate questions, asked in the most conciliatory and polite way possible, if they might lead to answers that are not to their liking. There are many subs that are not worth trying, including one as anti-science as r/science.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/24 10:26 PM
4

I've done a lot of them (when it's obvious and blatant), and achieved a few successes in a few years... that I can count on my fingers. I know it's better to try than ignore it, but sometimes I wonder if they did it properly by mistake.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 12:27 PM
8

This very post is about him creating false and malicious content -_- That's not to avoid being cancelled, if that were the case, it would be as simple as not addressing these issues.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 03:20 PM
1

You are overlooking that the term refers to discrimination and prejudice. Certainly systematic oppression is its pinnacle and therefore much more relevant, but it is not the whole. When depending on the collective you invalidate the victims, you are discriminating against them and being that which you say does not exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 12:09 AM
6

A and B have the same definition, except that it applies to different collectives. A is more prevalent than B, therefore, B does not exist. Actually this bullshit is your argument, or am I missing something? Because it sounds to me like the same thing feminists use to denigrate raped men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 06:26 AM
2

Leaving aside whether in this case they went overboard, I'm glad that finally the mods are tougher on genralizations; before it seemed like there was a free bar with them. Although we can read between the lines, an environment in which prejudiced language is tolerated can naturalize it and attract sexists; we don't want to be the flip side of feminism, do we? It also gives easy excuses for reddit admins to ban the sub.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 12:23 AM
1

I would like to insist that at that time feminism did not even exist. Of course we should not underestimate the advances in equality (even when they are for the wrong reasons), but current feminism uses many lies to legitimize itself, so I think it is important to point it out. There were not many demonstrations (the remarkable changes had few protagonists) but they were not always favorable, so... I'll take this as an excuse to go back to ranting about the british suffragettes 🙃 They actually d…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/24 09:52 PM
1

none of us were around at the time of the first wave- we don’t know what went on- Uh? It's not an dark age, there are newspapers, books, etc., and there are people who have studied it and spread the word. Let’s not cherry-pick the worst ones. No need, even with just the highlights controversy abounds. Earlier I mentioned the example of british suffragism, which is the most emblematic and yet was mostly violent and terrorist (including many fires and some bombs) to fight against universal suffrag…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/24 07:48 PM
0

The problem here is that the first wave is a scam (apart from being full of polemics, like the suffragettes anti-universal suffrage and terrorists). What feminists call first wave were different isolated movements, there is a gap without continuity of any kind between them and feminism; it claimed them and called them first wave to pretend to have some legitimacy. Although it must also be recognized that in the second wave there were points in favor of breaking gender roles and sexual liberation…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/24 12:31 PM
2

Oh okay, now it shows (or at least I see) "page not found".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 12:41 PM
2

Wow... this reminds me that I should be deleting and rotating accounts often, some users are real stalkers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 12:29 PM
2

When it is suspended it indicates it, and those who reported it get a notification. I guess the user deleted the account.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 12:26 PM
3

Here with an alternative front-end: https://imgur.artemislena.eu/a/qeJY7nR
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 12:19 PM
4

It isn’t sexual assault if you enjoy it and consent to it. The former does not imply the latter.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 05:43 AM
54

I can already see the mods banning and saying something like "that didn't happen, OP is an incel", etc.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 05:40 AM
2

It is quite similar to what happens in spain. I would like to point out some differences: you get arrested for max 6hs in a 1x1m cell while they gather details and fill reports. I don't think there are those mini-cells anywhere here, but they arrest you until they take you before a gender judge, who are the only ones who don't work on weekends. That is, if you are denounced (which means an almost automatic detention) on friday afternoon (which in fact, happens in most cases), you will be 3 days …
/r/MensRights04/07/24 06:09 AM
11

Bullshit, there feminism is actively criticized to the core. Edit: Ha, he spewed more lies and blocked me. For the others, just take a glance at the sub, it is blatantly obvious that it is the opposite of a feminist ally.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:26 PM
3

That a hate movement like feminism does such things is an indication that it may not be for the best. What r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates do is reasonable. On the one hand, making this kind of hyperbole and oversimplifications can appeal to a certain unintended audience. On the other, reddit mods and ideological opponents can decontextualize it and use it as ammunition. That r/MensRights wants to go for a harder line of free speech is also fine. It's great to have variety in this regard.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:18 PM
1

It could be a mistake, you can ask in the modmail (sidebar).
/r/MensRights20/06/24 11:27 PM
2

I think it's pretty clear, and a feminist troll (u/AnonymousRJ25) showing up to insult and block is not a good reference. But just in case, I clarify: Having fewer/different rights/privileges is quite normal with infantilization; just like infants. That is drastically far from treating people like things.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 11:10 PM
11

I have yet to see a single country in history that treats its women as objects (just because they are women). Feminism didn't even need to invent anything here, infantilizing women is bad enough.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:35 PM
16

I'm not clear if you're trolling me. Precisely the examples you give, such as female beauty pageants and porn actresses, are the focus of feminist rage; as well as anything that looks like female sexualization for the pleasure of men. No one here has complained about seeing male sexuality. The topic is the double standard of feminism (those who make comments like the title), how "heteronormative" male sexual desire is condemned, considering it impure and objectifying, and the rest is mostly laud…
/r/MensRights17/06/24 02:38 AM
27

As the local gay guy, I feel sorry for you for missing the point, the double standard.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 01:18 AM
2

I understand that the point is not "one group should not decide things about the other", but that "equal rights should be accompanied by equal responsibilities". Sounds good, but I guess it deserves a lot of nuances.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 11:06 PM
5

The burden is on the "victim" It is more correct to say that it rests on the plaintiff or the prosecution. Equating whistleblower with victim is a language that the media has extended and normalized, ignoring its potentially devastating consequences.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 12:57 PM
7

You should know the answer, almost no one offers empathy for men with self-destructive addictions.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:45 PM
5

If there was any slight hint of coercion I don't think the media would have omitted it.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 01:43 PM
6

Even then, her having a report is still positive for her future victims, I suppose.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:11 PM
2

What happens to those who are arrested and refuse to cooperate? Do you know of any cases?
/r/MensRights30/05/24 01:07 PM
0

That they are all female protagonists surrounded by the same palette of diversity is absurd, but not annoying. That they interrupt the plot to focus on explicit propaganda is very annoying. But what I absolutely hate is how scripts are based strictly on prejudice, with knowing them you can take a superficial look at the characters and know who are the good and bad guys, even if the script tries hard to pretend otherwise. It's something that used to be characteristic of children's movies.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 02:32 PM
22

Even if we were sexist and accepted that women should not fight or have the same "responsibilities" as men, but have more rights and privileges, there would still be good economic and labor reasons for them to stay. Having half the population conscripted or pending, and encouraging the other half to flee, is a very stupid idea.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 12:32 PM
13

That's why those who try to evade military service are typically assembled in the worst units. They are used in the worst ways, just cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 12:28 PM
15

If they want to do so voluntarily (or typically under social coercion), it is radically different to be forced to do so. Western gender equality may be something more cultural and under many interpretations, but equality before the law is clear and fair, a (supposed) fundamental human right.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 12:26 PM
1

The reason this does not happen is not because gender roles have changed, but because there is more peace; when wars break out, history repeats itself. Fewer men are also dying on the job, but this is due to prosperity. I would point out more how the will is manifested by creating all kinds of aids/privileges only for women, even when men are the main victims; see homelessness, depending on the location up to more than 95% male. Or how they fight shared custody and do their best to give full con…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 06:26 AM
5

I am not obfuscating, but illuminating your contradictions and double standards by making use of an analogy. You could be coherent and argue for discrimination of blacks/men, or try to argue that it is not a valid comparison, or redirect the discussion with new points... anything before accusing me of not discussing while you do just that ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
/r/MensRights24/05/24 11:46 AM
9

Alert for silly reddit mods: this text pretends to equate sexism with racism in order to condemn them both. The black/bear question is a proxy for assault statistics. You are taking it too literally. That's why this thing has gotten so much traction. It's the defensiveness that's telling whites that blacks don't get it. When it comes to assault statistics whites are predominantly the victims and blacks are predominantly the perpetrators. Those are US Dept of Justice numbers.There should be littl…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 03:19 AM
18

I don't know about poland, but in spain if a mother breaches her duty, the father will have to report her and go through a long process for a judge to tell the mother to stop; if the mother continues, the police still cannot intervene (although I have seen cases where the police decide not to intervene even when the father has sole custody...), so another judicial process has to be initiated for the breach of the previous one. This is aggravated with false denunciations (where there is no presum…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:31 PM
3

I know many who advocate that all men are evil, it makes you wonder what they are projecting. I can't think of any male media personalities who take this kind of stance. In spain, denying that men can be abused is practically a requirement in all major media.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/24 08:28 AM
55

There are some countries (like spain) with " ministry of equality", which are essentially feminist/misandrist ministries. Other countries are more transparent and call them things like "ministry of women".
/r/MensRights19/05/24 03:59 AM
5

I guess it depends on how you interpret it, I understand that it doesn't refer to women in general as a matter of gender, but rather to the nutjobs who choose the bear.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/05/24 02:12 PM
9

Somewhere along the line, a corrupt version of social struggle was imposed on top of everything else, with meaningless classes like gender, which only provoked silly conflicts within the working social class itself. I don't think it's overly conspiratorial if I imply: who would benefit and could promote something like that?
/r/MensRights15/05/24 02:09 PM
2

I don't even know how it is humanly possible to pronounce that! Doing a quick search, it appears that the german one is rather more limited; not only does it have many exceptions of application, but it even allows to deny the change of documentation when it is “in the public interest”. In spain not even a judge can question us if we have committed fraud, we decide what it is to be a man/woman, and misgendering is a crime without presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:03 PM
2

That doesn't happen in any country, not even in afghanistan, it's just feminist propaganda. Infantilization and objectification are dramatically different, even if they are motivated by the same sexism.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:53 PM
3

It depends on which law you are talking about. In spain you can change your gender on all identity documentation, including your birth certificate.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:52 PM
3

If it comes to it, you're likely to be in a scenario where both sides are sexist, and whatever you do, you're going to lose a lot.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:51 PM
5

It would also be slavery in a patriarchal country, or in an egalitarian one. The motivations for doing so are not as relevant as the drastic loss of human rights, to be subjected to forced labor and thrown to death.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:51 PM
8

You basically say "I see more men being criminals, that justifies prejudging all men", right? Now change men to blacks.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/24 02:25 PM
-3

Because that is what the defense of universal rights is all about, they have to apply to everyone, even those who dislike or dislike you. You could argue that "it's not my fight," and that's fine. But that such atrocities are happening while the west (who swaggers about defending human rights) defends the perpetrators is extremely outrageous, and the outrage mobilizes people.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:51 AM
2

And the Jews are the bad guys? Hitler said the same thing. Israel is not "the jews", learn to read before spewing fallacies, idiot. And yes, a nationalist and ethnicist movement that has promoted crimes against humanity and an apartheid state, like zionism, is a hate movement.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:42 AM
3

This sub just keeps getting worse and worse. It is shameful that people here are always endorsing human rights to defend the human rights of men, but despise them for the rest. Let's keep it simple for the idiots and zionists: Criticize israel and its war crimes =/= Support hamas and its war crimes. Support the liberation of a people who are victims of atrocities =/= Support their ideology or that of their dictators.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:38 AM
-6

“More realistic” seems like a euphemism for more tolerance for dirt. Even if it's a popular stereotype, I don't think there's too much of a gender difference there.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:35 PM
2

are now 100% completely false. What changed to reach 100%?
/r/MensRights12/05/24 10:32 AM
36

I think I read that it was the opposite for henry cavill.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:35 AM
4

Unfortunately, for those caught in the cycle of abuse it's never “that simple”. It usually comes or leads to all sorts of disorders, they are not in their right mind to flee.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:43 PM
15

Socially anxious or autistic people will have a hard time if this silliness becomes popular, or just those who are tired or bored.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 08:00 AM
6

No, the other user is objectively correct and has provided pertinent information.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:56 AM
8

But it still gets worse! Recently sexual assaults against men were decriminalized. Looking for the link among my bookmarks I saw some more related ones that may be of interest: 1,2, 3, 4
/r/MensRights06/05/24 01:38 AM
6

Ukraine has been on the lips of all western countries for years, commenting on every little advance and policy. Did you see any of them criticizing the repeated violations of men's human rights?
/r/MensRights05/05/24 02:41 AM
4

That means you hit a nerve, good job 😂 I have never encountered any like that, although too many times they have spied on my history to make an adhominem. Having semi-disposable accounts for polemics is very convenient for both parties.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 05:36 PM
5

It's worth a try, but unfortunately they rarely do anything in the face of misandry. Yesterday I got a response from reddit saying they didn't see hate in stating that men are hardwired to be pedophiles 🤦‍♂️
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/24 09:44 AM
12

Every time I have tried to argue in good faith and rationally with misandrists who blatantly spew such moronic hate speech it has required a lot of patience and effort, each time ending in disappointment. They don't want to listen, and will humiliate themselves even without your help, I would recommend just ignoring or mocking them, for the sake of your mental health. Btw, since around here it is mainly recommended to convert men to <insert minority group>, I must make an honorable mention for r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 08:46 AM
4

How difficult is it for ukrainian men to obtain refugee status?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 09:26 PM
5

There is a comment mentioning that. The OP's delusional response: Fuck off moidlet. Take your whataboutism elsewhere. And if there are female pedos, guess what? It’s men who created them.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/05/24 07:02 PM
6

Yep. If you want a source (in spanish) on a specific issue, I might be able to help.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:29 PM
24

Hundreds of laws in my country discriminate on the basis of gender. To give some exclusively legal examples: The law says that all men are sexist and their acts against women are sexist motivated. I am gay, but if a woman says that we are or were a couple and that I assaulted her or even disrespected her, I will be charged with gender violence, which is only applicable against men and has much higher penalties; I will go to a biased “gender court” where the accuser will be presumed to be truthfu…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 11:30 AM
14

As a left-winger, I find it extremely dissonant that among my peers the norm is that they are with me in favor of human rights and equality, including gender equality, but suddenly I am treated as the enemy if I mention gender equality for men. Fortunately, there are little oases like r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates Right-wingers also have deep-rooted sexism (a different one), but at least it's not such a radicalized issue, you can talk about it without it seeming like a summary judgment.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 11:33 PM
8

A couple of related news: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/07/20/feature/crossing-the-divide-do-men-really-have-it-easier-these-transgender-guys-found-the-truth-was-more-complex/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12183781/Trans-man-weeps-explaining-easier-make-friends-women.html
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/24 06:03 AM
8

I agree with your point, but I wanted to mention that I would even include women. I really hate the term “ally”, I have always understood it not as an identitary but an ideological group, it doesn't make sense to have first and second category members.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/24 06:02 AM
27

However, Judge Elizabeth Nicholls gave her a suspended sentence saying that although there was no excuse for the crime she committed, she could see Dodd was a ‘hard working woman’, ‘loving mother’ and ‘no risk to the public’. But with a freedom pass, and I would bet that gender is a determining factor.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/24 08:44 AM
8

If they were to lead by example, enslaving others would still be exactly as unacceptable, but at least they would not be as hateful.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:01 PM
6

I'm even surprised it was only 2 weeks. I've been banned from many subs for highlighting what could be summed up as MRA issues, and it's always been a permanent one. On quite a few I was also instantly muted from modmail, and even reported for harassment and spam; it would seem that reports to reddit by mods have more value to reddit's automated moderation tools.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 08:26 AM
-8

This sub usually complains loudly about restricted spaces for men, but supports the restriction of women :-/
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:14 AM
1

Regardless of gender, this is not a problem for the wealthy.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:43 PM
4

That reminds me of this case. The agreement was "honored", but instead she was practically considered a worker of the husband and collected a salary for doing "housework" for 25 years.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:53 AM
3

Silly man, you shouldn't leave home without your patriarchy shield.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 06:43 PM
1

Someone who is not hypocritical and sexist like you?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:38 PM
3

I've heard some feminists do it, paraphrasing it is something like "calling it mutilation is putting it on the same level as FGM, but for women it is much more serious, so you intend to denigrate the suffering and relevance of FGM". From there, try to build the lie that a cause for human rights is a misogynistic incel attack. Edit: They have similar rhetoric about recognizing male rape victims.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 03:05 PM
1

The only procedure that requires it that I have ever heard argued is phimosis. But it's a fallacious dichotomy, it's skin, it can be stretched and there are medications to make it easier. Sometimes people also talk about STDs, but it's false.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 03:00 PM
2

I am currently an abstentionist. I know that the most rational thing to do would be to support whatever is most convenient (or least inconvenient) for me, but honestly: I hate all political parties, and I would hate to legitimize any of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 02:44 PM
3

I do not want to point the finger at ukrainians, but at ukraine, mainly because of forced conscription. It is authoritarian, there is a serious loss of individual and collective human rights, exacerbated nationalism, persecution of dissent, glorification of militarism... I guess one could argue that it's conditional, but it still ticks many boxes of fascism. I understand the lesser evil point, in fact I don't think that's debatable. Although it is not exactly flattering that, in order to put ukr…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 05:26 PM
12

"You have to support the small fascists to prevent the spread of the big fascists, and if you have anything to say against the small fascists you are one of the big fascists." The first part is questionable, but the second is plain moronic.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 03:37 PM
8

Are you a feminist troll? It's been a long time since I've seen blatant misogyny around here.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 03:30 PM
5

I agree about islamic countries, but I would not be so adamant. Anyway, these discussions are not worth it either. I wanted to share a couple of articles I have saved about the situation of men and boys in afghanistan (comparatively better or worse, but definitely not good), as it is rarely talked about: 1 (spanish), 2.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 07:43 AM
9

It is certainly a simplification and generalization, but maybe you took it too literally? Where there is sexism against women there is sexism against men, it is strictly subjective to make a comparison and determine that one or the other suffers more discrimination, but that does not negate the discrimination suffered by the other party in general or individually. Anyway, I really just wanted to point out that in countries with armed conflicts the severity of discrimination suffered by men is (g…
/r/MensRights06/04/24 07:02 AM
15

You precisely chose to use a country as harsh and conflictive as the congo as example? I would gladly be a woman and suffer difficulties in accessing politics, work, etc., in exchange for not having any of the legal or social responsibilities that would lead me to suffer greatly or die.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 05:28 AM
2

Leaving aside the main topic, why do you censor gaza?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:04 PM
2

Unfortunately, the funds do not only come from the ministry of "equality", but are applied at many levels throughout the entire administration. To give an example of a large figure, in 2022 the government announced that they approved spending 20 billion just between 2022 and 2025 on "equality" policies. Many funds also come from european policies. And what is more unfortunate, I cannot give precise data because they are mostly secret, without parliamentary controls or transparency of any kind. T…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:01 PM
16

Always twisting the past as it interests them to illustrate their fantasized present 🤦‍♂️ I live in an extremely feminist society with feminist governments for decades, and yet now there are a multitude of aids and quotas for women even where they are in the majority, and legal discriminations that even take away human rights from men. My mother enjoyed equality, not the case with my grandmother, but even my grandmother had more equality than me. It is not some patriarchy that promotes sexism th…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 06:57 AM
23

Absolutely, spain has invested billions of € in feminism in the last few years alone, and almost all of it ends up for feminist associations/clientelist networks. If this money had gone to talks about manspreading or any sexist nonsense not hated by feminists, it would be just routine.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:07 AM
19

Sure, because in the first world men are not expected to do the dangerous and hard jobs (they don't exist!), men are not expected to be just providers, their health matters, etc.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:44 AM
3

The worst thing is that this was not the case before, positive discrimination (or the new stupid euphemism) is fine as long as it is applied to individuals, due to their personal circumstances such as disability or effective discrimination, in limited areas. If done correctly, it should have minimal impact on the meritocracy and great impact on the marginalized. The problem starts when, thanks to the wokes, it was applied to entire groups (which are in fact the majority -_-) based on their own b…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 06:48 PM
10

There have been some later studies, in short, they found no differences when conditions were identical. The study used by feminists did not take into account things like equal dress or physical activity (your experience surely differs here), as well as studying very few women. A quick search didn't give me very good results, but this may help: https://www.mcmorrowreports.com/ashrae-rebuts-original-study-nyt-story-about-why-women-are-cold-in-offices-in-the-summer/
/r/MensRights31/03/24 08:43 PM
11

At least that made some sense at one point, because a study that said that men and women were comfortable at different temperatures. It's just that there is the small detail that this study was discredited shortly after its publication, more than half a century ago. But hey! Anyone can make a mistake and accidentally dig through ancient studies and only find the flawed one! It's not like feminism is serial victimism, is it?
/r/MensRights31/03/24 02:53 PM
-3

The ADL is a sexist, racist and zionist organization among others, but as much as people in this sub may not like it, they are right about this. Many here defend MGTOWs by arguing that their concerns are legitimate and that their theory only seeks to liberate men and stuff, but if we accept to judge based on that instead of acts and speeches, then we would have to do the same with feminism. The unfortunate reality is that they, and the attempts they have had to reform it, have ended up being mos…
/r/MensRights31/03/24 07:44 AM
2

Even if we go back to the 1970s, I doubt we will find a single case.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 05:11 AM
3

I've seen a few of those, it's pretty horrible the indifference of the people around, or the brazenness of the officers in abusing the victims. There is a dedicated sub: r/draftInUkraine
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:36 AM
6

Their survival may not be so threatened or not so important if, far from enslaving, demanding or begging, they encourage half the population to leave.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 05:58 PM
8

That would also fit very well with racism, I've lost count of the times I've seen muricans (they are always muricans) say things like "it's not possible to be racist against whites".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/24 05:47 AM
6

I encourage you to publicize that case, maybe in a related subforum on suicide (r/SuicideWatch?). Misandry aside, incitement to suicide is a crime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/24 12:10 PM
7

They are already doing so, with considerable success. Even here it is not uncommon to see users who have fallen for one of their hoaxes.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 10:36 PM
21

Women who volunteered for military service accounted for 25.1 per cent of the cohort This is an unexpectedly high figure.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 04:21 AM
21

More retarded than being aware that you are discriminated against and have fewer rights (including human rights), and still do nothing? Not even a small formality? Besides, a search of a few seconds would have given you plenty of news where it is reported that the administration is saturated with trans women.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 08:21 AM
17

If you're going to be controversial (or sexist), at least try to make your text paragraphed and comfortably readable, unless you want people to hate you twice.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 05:29 PM
7

So, you think it is necessary to use force to commit any kind of abuse? Without force there is no abuse?
/r/MensRights28/02/24 05:47 PM
17

Just surrender its freedom? Is it satire? Is he saying they have to enslave to preserve freedom?
/r/MensRights28/02/24 11:17 AM
4

Because of the misogynistic crap? OP could be a troll, and most of the comments criticize sexist bullshit. But yeah, you go on with your fantasy.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 08:40 AM
5

The worst thing is that everything here revolves around the supposed good of the minor (of being educated by a violent madwoman), but at no time does it say whether she is the one who has sole custody or not. There may be a father there, maybe in the same house, but from the text of the news item it doesn't seem to have any relevance either to the media or to the judge.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 06:45 AM
-2

Wow, I was expecting to have to reply to a defamatory and stupid response from you, but not just plain ret*rded. You're not worth the trouble.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/24 03:12 PM
-3

The other user is not humanizing, but highlighting objective facts instead of speaking from ignorance. You should try it sometime, Mr. human of: "I decide who deserves to have human rights, and who I don't like should be tortured for my joy".
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/24 07:47 AM
1

I think so, social perception differs depending on the age of the perpetrator, it's not an irrelevant error. It's a pity to see so many hostile responses.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:33 AM
4

I seem to recall (without any confidence) that there are studies that show that the mother's family tends to be more involved. The hypothesis was that it is evolutionarily convenient to invest more when kinship is guaranteed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/24 12:49 PM
12

If you're in favor of legally discriminating against men "for the sake of some women's feelings," you should go to r\TwoXChromosomes
/r/MensRights12/02/24 07:44 AM
12

Btw, about gender violence in spain, a complaint (without conviction) automatically prevents joint custody, and if the accusation includes physical injuries it also automatically blocks visitation rights.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:31 AM
27

In spain the law says that claiming it is a form of gender violence against women, and that it is pseudoscience while condemning parental alienation (renaming it) when men do it.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:27 AM
10

You've hit the worst possible key here. If you value equality among people (not just gender), you might want to save labels and simply embrace the r/Egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 01:42 AM
36

Because majorities in statistics is all that matters... but only with the right genders, otherwise don't point out the facts or you'll be a misogynistic incel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 02:14 AM
19

I'm all for the man's rights(...)otherwise, not just men would be killed. I don't know what conspiracy you're talking about, but you don't seem to get that the whole point of this sub is to confront sexism against men; endorsing violating their human rights and using them in a disposable way is the opposite. that's the only way to keep our nation and country existing. Being born in some coordinates does not give any country ownership over you, nor do you have to have any loyalty/patriotism/natio…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 07:26 AM
8

But you have to protect the human rights that the invaders do not respect! *Proceed to enslave half of the population.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:48 PM
-4

Correlating health care to life expectancy is an oversimplification.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:26 PM
4

Simplifying it: if I have to choose between having no rights and being a burden with no responsibilities, or having almost no rights but heavy responsibilities... let someone else work!
/r/MensRights03/02/24 09:44 PM
17

Why India sees sex on false promise of marriage as rape
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:55 PM
20

India has a moderately low rape rate, but the ever-biased feminists raise the alarm by using the total numbers for the world's most populous country.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:46 AM
20

It would be great to get the source.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:43 AM
12

The last link is down, luckily someone saved it on wayback machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20220523203743/https://beel.la.psu.edu/documents/Puts%20et%20al.%20EHB%202012-1.pdf
/r/MensRights28/01/24 11:46 PM
22

In many aspects they are going backwards, especially related to sexuality and sensuality such as prostitution. Before it was sexual liberation and doing what you want with your body, now they demonize any female sexualization that is considered to be addressed to men. Feminism is sexist, including misogynistic.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 02:07 AM
4

If you want it in english I think I only have this one. It highlights some issues about the most important law (ley integral contra la violencia de género) and has some links. This wiki is mainly oriented to its victims, but there are also some explanations and known cases. You can read about the jurisprudence I was referring to here. Here is a compilation of sexist laws in spain, including things like financial aid. I think this covers the basics. If you want something specific let me know and …
/r/MensRights24/01/24 04:43 PM
105

The film even glorifies matriarchy, it's its happy ending.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 11:53 AM
13

In Spain and in the context of "gender violence" this is not a matter of random judges, but of law and jurisprudence. Regardless of whether the woman is the aggressor and the man is only exercising self-defense, the man will always be convicted of "gender violence" (without presumption of innocence and in "gender courts"). In fact, even if the man leaves a small mark on the woman by holding her down to prevent her from injuring him (or even injuring herself), it is also "gender violence".
/r/MensRights24/01/24 08:28 AM
2

I guess for the same reasons daddies are sexy; they've already been validated, there's less risk, they prove to be functional, etc. Having prejudices based on social context (stacked with others) is the norm, and we all do it unconsciously all the time in all kinds of contexts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/24 11:41 PM
7

As european who doesn't have to suffer the consequences: Me too, I miss the memes.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 08:01 AM
-17

Certainly that men organize these shows and traps to try to victimize themselves on the internet is not something usual at all, but regarding the clothes... men also tend to show a lot, even in this example you can see two shirtless guys.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 10:43 AM
55

Study Reveals Queens Were MUCH More Willing To Pursue Violence Than Kings
/r/MensRights19/01/24 10:10 PM
19

Better not, this is the result of 20 long years of systematic discrimination that has led to literally millions of men being accused of gender-based crimes. That is why almost everyone knows of a case close to them. Even if they don't know the details about gender courts, gender-exclusive crimes, the presumption of guilt based on gender, the hundreds of laws that discriminate based on gender, etc., people at least know that there is a bias.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 12:16 AM
49

Maybe this is it? Or at least it is related. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272775718307714
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/24 09:35 PM
7

It's curious that, despite a decrease in street harassment statistics, the fear among women of being assaulted while walking alone on the street is sharply increasing.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 10:40 PM
4

Please don't abuse the formatting with so much bold and large fonts.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 09:38 PM
13

They have one of the longest and hardest in the world. From what I've heard it's socially frowned upon for a man not to have done it, and it can even be a problem when looking for a job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/23 06:55 PM
3

Going to an extremely feminist country with hundreds of laws that discriminate against men and take away even the presumption of innocence was not a good idea.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 03:28 PM
1

Do you mean the sample? It is the number of respondents, you may see it as N=<number>. They usually don't even have balanced groups to study. It would also be worth looking at the methodology, in sociology too often they are biased and the results can become absurd, see this.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 05:06 PM
13

A study with a sample of 40 (including non-feminists) can hardly suggest anything, it would not be a no true scottsman on their part, but a hasty generalization or fallacy of composition on yours. Be careful not to show pitiful studies as truths, because sociology is full of similar feminist studies with which they will counterattack.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 09:25 AM
2

I could not say about sexual assaults, but as for "gender violence" (ranging from assaults to insults, including self-defense), in spain, the prosecutor's office and its biased data says that less than 0.1% (some years 0%) are false allegations. At the same time, we have "gender courts", laws that deny the presumption of innocence to men and many other hundreds of discriminatory laws and incentives to make false accusations, but still those accused of "gender violence" are innocent 4/5 times. Oh…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 08:30 PM
3

Idealistically that's great, in practice it's a fucking dangerous idea. You'd probably be tried under a military law or tribunal, maybe even executed on the spot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/23 07:50 PM
2

So, are you saying that almost all women are cowards? I guess you think they too must sacrifice themselves for third parties (and infrastructure...), love their homeland, or take on the nationalistic and ideological goals of their country's government. Because you say this here for only humanitarian nationalist reasons and not for sexism or a mix of both... right?
/r/MensRights22/12/23 01:49 PM
11

In good times: Our rights, your responsibilities. In bad times: My right, your duty.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 12:05 PM
4

Is there any tool to compare the activity? It would be much more useful.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 11:13 AM
1

It seems like it could boil down to a matter of ego.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 06:58 AM
3

Thank you. Even if it was a throw and no attempt to escape, trying to restrain your aggressor (proportionally) is pretty far from assault.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 06:37 AM
-7

If you only just tell one side's conclusion it's pretty hard to understand. What is the other side's argument about the crime he allegedly committed?
/r/MensRights14/12/23 08:21 PM
12

And more importantly stop saying "grape". I've never seen it before, but it seems like it's just a euphemism for rape, right? I guess it's because some bots are pretty aggressive.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 08:58 AM
6

I've seen a lot of prejudiced and stupid comments on this post, but yours deserves the prize.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 04:52 AM
8

You try to rationalize it, but we're talking about much simpler situations. If someone discovers that their partner previously slept with a black person, and this causes them to be disgusted and distrustful of their partner, what would you call it?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 04:44 AM
1

You ask too much of a pyramid chart.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 09:44 AM
5

Not all typically ethnic traits are equally attractive to most people. It is no use blaming systemic biases, even if they exist.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 01:57 PM
2

Yep, it looks odd because the same arguments for saying there are misandric anti-feminists would hold for saying there are misogynistic feminists, but I guess that's not the point of the OP. The overlap is because at the "manosphere" end of the spectrum there are many groups that also have a lot of sexist prejudices about how men should be. PUAs, blackpill and so many others (always focused on interpersonal relationships between men and women) that stand out for their toxicity; a well-known exam…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 04:14 PM
7

Most support the misandric narrative to some extent and those who push it. It will not be the minority elite who you will see everywhere justifying misandry and harassing anyone who questions feminist sexist dogmas. Misandry is an integral part of feminism even if it is softer for the majority, or is so out of sheer ignorance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 04:00 PM
2

The guy denied consent even using force and she went ahead, that he didn't resist "enough" is the least of it.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 06:03 PM
1

I refuse to put a "/s" when it should be grossly obvious.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 09:31 AM
4

Sometimes the boy is even blamed for the woman's ruined reputation -_-
/r/MensRights17/11/23 07:22 PM
7

this is Russian propaganda. Literally. These are facts. Facts can be propaganda, but just because the facts benefit one side doesn't automatically make it propaganda. Think it's hard being a Ukrainian man? Try being a RUSSIAN man and living in a country that uses you as meat for the grinder. Ukraine does exactly the same thing. No doubt it's a horror for both, but if given a choice, I think I'd rather not be in the country in the process of devastation, the most desperate, and has the least meat…
/r/MensRights17/11/23 07:08 PM
0

Lots of them will stay behind to support their families and hide their men. Lots of them will leave while mocking the men who die and ranting about a patriarchy. It doesn't bring much to speak in these terms, unless you really want to advocate that there is something special/different about ukrainian women.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 07:03 PM
-12

But when men choose dangerous jobs that shorten their lives or die from it is only their choice, not like when women have children, then there is a wage gap the patriarchy's fault.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:16 AM
8

First of all, salaries in sports aren’t determined by how good you are, it’s determined by how much money you make for the team in terms of viewership and advertising revenue. Sweet child of summer~ https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/30/football/us-women-soccer-pay-deal-qatar-world-cup-spt-intl/index.html
/r/MensRights10/11/23 08:05 AM
2

Didn't it come out of the documentary red pill? It highlights some points where the law and society discriminates against men, pretty good. For quite some time I never considered them a defined group, practically another way of calling the "manosphere". But they ended up focusing on interpersonal relationships between men and women, and for some reason that always ends up being fucking toxic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 09:28 AM
9

That you speak of any "biological reality" to advocate that men can't be battered just shows that you don't even know what a abusive relationship is. That puts you below the average ignorant feminist bigot.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 07:01 PM
2

King Juan Carlos of Spain should go down in history for ridding Spain of the dictator Francisco Franci. (...) But King Juan Carlos brought democracy to Spain What parallel universe do you come from? Everything you've said is bullshit, I'm surprised there's still anyone left who believes those myths. Let's get some facts straight: It was by the dictator's will that the restitution of the monarchy was forced. Far from "bringing democracy", the transition to democracy began before the king got his …
/r/MensRights11/10/23 10:32 AM
4

The n*zis also had different laws and courts for the same acts depending on the identity group of the accused. Fortunately this type of discrimination disappeared with the third reich in all of europe... until 2 decades ago, when spain instituted exactly that, ending men's human rights and eventually adding hundreds of discriminatory laws. Of course, neither the european Union, nor the UN, nor any human rights organization has been the least bit concerned.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:55 PM
6

So... calling a man hysterical is misogynistic?
/r/MensRights09/10/23 02:47 PM
7

As far as I know, this and many other subs considered controversial by reddit are prevented from appearing r/all. If you see it on your main page, congratulations, you are a happy subscriber to this sub!
/r/MensRights08/10/23 11:14 AM
76

It can be read between the lines that they would have done it if they could have.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:20 AM
8

Yep, when I said in equal terms I meant things like having the same roles, duties or duration.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/23 01:49 PM
28

As far as I know (please correct me if I am wrong), there are only two countries that recruit on equal terms, sweden and norway. Forced conscription takes away most human rights, it is essentially slavery. It should not be acceptable, but patriotism/nationalism always wins.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 08:34 PM
14

Not exactly, gpt was trained on a multitude of databases, ranging from endless academic studies, books and news, to blogs and forums like reddit. User feedback influences in the mid-to-long term, but its source of misandry is embedded in its foundations. In addition, "open"ai added censorship filters, among other things so as not to be offensive to women and other "minority" groups.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 08:58 AM
2

Perhaps it is more common among people who have ideologies based on hatred and prejudice, but I think that mainly it is not a matter of antisocial disorders but something of humanity itself. Sadly it is quite easy to see normal people dehumanizing others whom they consider enemies, not distinguishing an eye for an eye with justice, embracing any confirmation bias, justifying injustices for greater causes, reacting aggressively to any small threat to their dogmas, and a long etcera.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 08:47 PM
21

It could have been the rich, poitics or anyone with real power who wields it selfishly or maliciously, but those are the ones who fund these hate movements to get us to fight each other.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:01 AM
1

It is a bad example, bathrooms are intimate and segregated spaces for both parties, for the interest of both, equally. Here it is a collective that is suddenly banned from a part of the public space, all its members are prejudged as criminals based on statistics and prejudice. As other users have mentioned, a better analogy would be racial segregation in public transportation in murica. That there is a real problem is a terrible reason to embrace sexism, I mean, it's not even as if there aren't …
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:10 AM
3

The fact that you use irelevant nonsense to dismiss other people's arguments and attack them is all I need to know about you. And yes, black is a widely accepted and non-contemptuous term, as is white.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 10:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter