TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ForwardCommercial670 Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by ForwardCommercial670 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

These people are so desperate to maintain control.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:09 PM
7

Welcome to the social sciences, where all premises are assumed to be true without a hint of a falsification procedure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 04:20 AM
2

Do you have evidence for this? If not, we can dismiss your assertion. Hitchens's Razor applies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 05:39 AM
1

The first sentence is a claim.. it needs a citation. What "sucks" is an opinion. If you want that statement to have weight, that needs a citation too. The claim about "women shooting for brownie points" is another claim. Again, where is the evidence? Your first sentence of the second paragraph requires a citation. That's a claim. "Incels being the largest cohort to be citizens" needs support. The rest is speculative without an excerpt to understand context. Basically, every forum that desires fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/25 11:42 PM
1

This is a false dichotomy. There are always more than 2 options, plus the use of "no".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/25 05:58 AM
1

The thing is, language doesn't really matter; what does, are actions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 11:31 AM
5

How so? Have any evidence to support this assertion? This is the problem with Reddit. People just throw out claims but they never back it up with tangible evidence. "That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." Hitchens's Razor applies to everything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 11:47 PM
2

You could write a stellar paper and they'd still fail you because the title's premise will be perceived as absurd. Retaliation will be their go-to. Just like American cops retaliating against those that exercise their Constitutional rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 09:02 PM
1

Providing evidence would be the tipping scale for such a claim. It's a shame you didn't, which means we can dismiss your assertions. Did you think that the claimant doesn't have the burden of proof?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 11:48 AM
2

Just a bit of feminist info they don't want you to know. In 2021, American feminists lobbied Congress to only include men to register for Selective Service (draft lottery). A couple months later the US Supreme Court passed that ruling to exclude women, even though all the justices acknowledged that this ruling was de facto, unconstitutional, by breach of the 14th amendment under the "equal protection of the law" clause. So feminists know damn well what they are doing; feminism has nothing to do …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 11:43 AM
3

Yet women are not at all required to sign with Selective Service. In fact in 2021, feminists lobbied Congress to only force men to be drafted. A couple months later, the Supreme Court passed the ruling that indeed only men must register with Selective Service, even though the justices acknowledged this ruling fundamentally violated the 14th amendment's "equal protection under the law". Gotta love the hypocrisy and how professional simps will go on making decisions that'll crumble society, yet lo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 09:54 AM
7

This is retaliation for simply having the balls to correct misandrous feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 09:46 AM
32

I don't know why this hasn't been said before, but everything that comes out of the feminist camp is misandrous. Repeat after me: "Hitchens's Razor applies: That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 09:41 AM
6

Define equity? The problem I have with this term is that it's subjective. The second issue is that you can't tie equity to economics without some merit system or else you'll wind up with sentiments felt in socialist regimes where the high producers will gradually decrease their margins as they realize the low production workers are receiving the same pay as they are. So keep in mind this system being proposed needs to make room for the human condition. Also... Equality must be equal inputs only.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 12:21 PM
1

The answer is misandry. That's why.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/25 06:58 PM
0

Just now taking the red pill? This has been known to me for at least 12 years... It's still a hard pill to swallow but there are other, more pressing concerns than knowing that men are indeed ignored and are primarily disposable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 03:43 PM
1

All claims... No evidence. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Hitchens's Razor is valid, here.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/25 04:41 AM
2

Feminist projection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 01:33 AM
1

A single mother can't raise a man; that's why there are a good portion of fatherless men, incarcerated.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:30 PM
1

Where were you 5 years ago? Oh that's right.... Bullying men like me that claimed because we didn't kiss feminist ass, that we're leaders of the patriarchy against equality... ...When feminism was gd never about equality! Where have you been?! Of course every man's defense has been warped into a false dichotomy. You know, religious idiots do the same to each other. You get no sympathy from me; we've been telling you left wing fools for about a decade now. But you're just now realizing? Means you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 09:02 PM
1

Goddesses don't exist so yeah, I would ignore "my" goddess.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:54 PM
1

Most of the fear is projection.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:52 PM
1

Your shaming tactics are subjective, irrelevant and outside good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/25 12:52 AM
1

Well... What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Hitchens's Razor applies here because feminism is just like religion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/25 12:51 AM
2

Is this the Baby Moses Act?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 06:42 AM
1

Yup. That would be equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 06:41 AM
16

There is no definitive evidence the "patriarchy" exists. This is just a baseless claim; and largely used to dodge criticism and responsibility pertaining to the equal distribution of rights between the sexes. "But that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." —Hitchens's Razor What a lot of people don't seem to notice is that women throughout the United States have more rights and privileges than men. There is no reason for Feminism to prolong its existence in t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 06:04 AM
47

No true Scotsman's fallacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 06:01 AM
-3

Who cares?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 06:01 AM
3

The US is gonna be hurting when the government wants a draft.... But men say there is nothing to fight for; nothing to defend. Where are the feminists when you need a draft? Feminism doesn't exist when you need a draft; look at Ukraine. Everything is faux feminism; nothing is about equality.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 03:56 PM
1

It may not be against the law (accept a few states), but it is breach of contract by failing to oblige a negotiated performance. No fault only helps women; it certainly doesn't help men recoup the losses they've incurred by her breach of contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 05:52 PM
1

It's essentially a loaded argument. There are plenty of men not in power. Does that mean that anyone not in power is automatically represented? If so, then we don't even have to worry about women's equality? Great! Let us be done with this nonsense! In other words, we come to a reversed Hitchens's Razor, in "that which the topic of men can be dismissed without evidence can the topic of women be asserted without evidence. Thus we both accomplish nothing. See... You don't want this because it does…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 03:23 PM
1

Citizens can't save Roe because the rule of law is not up to citizens; it's up to the Supreme Court Justices.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:19 AM
1

Their intention was to manipulate you using a false dichotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:17 AM
1

Ever served in the military? As a veteran, myself, I can say I don't perceive this as "stolen valor" at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:15 AM
2

Redpill isn't bullshit. There is just nothing 1 person can do, so it's best to go your own way... Which literally means discontinue membership in all others and focus on you. This doesn't mean be disrespectful; just unbothersome to people, generally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 10:58 PM
7

I think it's already been mentioned but society does not allow the topic of misandry to be had. How convenient. This is why political correctness is damning. I know of many people that always pushed this narrative that political correctness had anything to do with manners. While that may be the case in some aspects of history, political correctness, as an official "term", "first appeared in the Marxist-Leninist vocabulary", describes Roberta Schaefer, "following the Russian Revolution (really, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/25 10:24 PM
1

This is a claim. Where is the evidence?
/r/MensRights07/04/25 03:27 PM
1

Don't hold your breath.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 10:23 PM
2

That's right, because "toxic" is an adjective and must be first, qualified. But ...this is a value judgement. There will never in existence be an objective good and bad because perception is relative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/25 09:50 PM
1

"Bad" is a value judgement. Everyone is both good and bad. Now what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/25 09:48 PM
1

Ahh... Isn't this telling. Now you understand the same dilemma feminists tell men: "Well men politicians passed the bill so we don't have to worry about it." So since Google is headquartered in the US, means that such disparities in the treatment between men and women can be ignored since Google is an American company. How convenient. Meanwhile nothing has changed and issues will continue to exacerbate themselves because it's easier to ignore that which doesn't directly benefit you. Hypocrisy mu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/25 03:54 PM
14

Now flip the script and substitute men with any other demographic like women, people of color or Jews for that matter. Now try it on for size. Anyone can be a hypocrite; power has jack all to do with it; in fact that's an excuse to shift blame and escape accountability. Yes... How equal?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/25 05:07 PM
1

None of that is worth it and the "equal" laws we're supposed to have but never do despite the "privilege" label is reason enough to drop out altogether, be a forever bachelor and enjoy my peace whenever I can find it. Fk all the bs!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 09:04 AM
2

People are too stupid to advocate equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/25 12:01 AM
2

"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." Hitchens's Razor applies here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/25 12:00 AM
11

It's just another angle to "justify" misandry. This whole equality BS is selective at best and for the worse, malicious; some flavor of propaganda. I tuned out long ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/25 12:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter