TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FractalChinchilla Archive

View 4 posts and 185 comments by FractalChinchilla on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Do we?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 08:57 AM
–

Where's that from?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 09:48 PM
7

i understand that point you're making. I agree with it. Just - Isreal is poor example.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:36 PM
11

Israel is very poor choice, considering they're one of the few countries for which manatory military service is required of women aswell as men.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:29 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/23 02:45 AM
2

Modern time use studied show that fathers perform more combined paid and unpaid labor than mothers do. You can't say this, and not provide a reference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/23 03:01 AM
7

If she slept with other men before you but is only sleeping with you now then paternity is certain. Sexual promiscuity correlates with infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 10:44 PM
1

Yes, they have a better vocabulary for expressing their emotions. I do think men need to talk about their emotions more. But I don't think we can take the feminine way of doing it and transpose it onto ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 09:40 PM
-1

Right, you seem to think I'm disagreeing with you more than I am. My objection is that "'If you want to know who controls you, look at who you are not allowed to criticize" is a poor metric of determining social power. Sure it can be a factor. you can't say 2+2=4 because that would be wrong as I'm certain one said it. NeoNazi aren't the only ones saying that. Considering how loosely NeoNazi use language it would be foolish to take them at their word.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:45 AM
-2

Are you going to tell me that Kevin Alfred Strom, (the person who's quote you're taking) isn't a Nazi? Or are you misinformed and believe you are quoting Voltaire?
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:59 AM
-7

it used to be based on things like who can or can't you criticize Only if you're taking the writings of a Nazi.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:56 PM
6

Like it or not, Joe Biden is as left as they come. You Americans are special kind of arrogant.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 12:46 AM
4

but men in men’s rights would most likely fall in the oppressing group. Eh, I don't think that's as true as places like r/feminism would say, but there's definitely truth to it. This place is a weird mix of Humanitarians and TradCons. Although I don't agree with the framing of OP. It is concerning that the support of men is being brushed aside. I saw the same thing happen over Roe, a lot of "men vs women" rhetoric. Despite most men being in favour of upholding Roe. And this kind of rhetoric crea…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 01:35 PM
18

I mean, surely the fact the it was both men who are fighting for freedom and men who are oppressing the women. Invalidates any "men are X" statements. Some men oppressed women in the first place. and some men are fighting for their freedom.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 01:15 PM
22

I'm not sure how you drew that conclusion. The reality is, women leaders are just a shitty as men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 06:02 PM
9

Right but it's one thing not to speak out, another thing to publicise your support.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 03:49 PM
1

It was a feminist who started “whiteness studies” which is based on the sort of “analysis” that feminists use to claim wealthy white women are oppressed by working class men. Wait how do they do that?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:57 AM
1

Seriously, it's bizarre, I can't think of a single case of actual rape that they've brought up. Are you implying rape doesn't happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:52 PM
1

I mean if I feel shy just being around someone That tends to go away with experience. Hence why they speculated that if you were a virgin. but does that mean if I ever have another relationship it's unacceptable for me to abstain from sex before knowing someone because I'm not a virgin anymore? I don't think so. Do whatever makes you feel most comfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 01:56 PM
1

Right, that's why I said may. The 50% may be too high, but the criticism that the 2-11% is a lower bound due to the high level of proof needed to be classified, is still valid. And that's what I intended to draw your attention to. As for my question, I haven't heard 1 in 5 women are victim of rapes before. As I said earlier I've heard it in the context sexual assault but not rape. And you still haven't told me where you got that number from. I don't care that I disgust you. You seem to just pull…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 09:12 AM
4

So you've got nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 08:46 AM
5

1 in 5 women are raped? I thought the stat was 1 in 5 women were victims of SA on campus. So o you have a source for that? As for false allegations, the stats may be under representative.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 08:37 AM
4

"There's no such thing as ugly, only poor"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 03:47 AM
2

I'm looking for a pew research I read while ago. It showed life satisfaction over the years against gender.
/r/Male_Studies26/08/22 10:58 PM
2

Why do you keep refreshing this sticky every week? Surely it would be better to leave it up.
/r/Male_Studies25/08/22 01:32 AM
2

But feminism has a vested interest in ignoring this evidence. More importantly, men have not been allowed to speak up, Could you give some quick example of that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/22 11:44 PM
5

"patriarch" could refer to a masculine authority, not necessarily a male one. Counterpoint: One of the key aspect of traditional masculinity is that of the provider. The current system in which we live, values greed above all else. The exact opposite of providing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 11:10 PM
6

A female patriarch is not an oxymoron. I actually think it is. The appropriate term for women is Matriarch. What I see as happening is the rulers tried every possible way to prevent other from taking their power. But now they see divide the population by gender is too contentious, they'll let some women in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 08:57 PM
2

I'd really hoped he would call for a renaming of both these entities that don't reinforce gendered stereotypes (men bad, women good) He does address that towards the end of the video. But yes, better terms would be nice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 08:55 PM
3

Would you kindly link that video?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 08:51 PM
3

I think this YouTuber is delusional I'm not sure I'd go that far, as he seems to accurately describe what is happening to men. Delusional, in my opinion, would be to deny that men have some for of system disadvantage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 08:49 PM
3

I learned that while we are closely related to alpha-dominated chimps, we are equally related to comparatively egalitarian bonobos. Closer by behavior. I learned how hunter-gatherer culture was dominated by specifically anti-alpha countermeasures. And I learned a lot more after that. Could you point me in the way of some reading? I known the vague outlines of these concepts but haven't really looked too deep into it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 12:36 AM
8

SS: I don't quite agree with everything he says, but he hit the nail close to the mark about societies current attitude towards men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 12:17 AM
7

which effectively bans anyone other than feminists from being there Non-feminist can ask questions. But the sub is called Ask Feminists. If you're looking for different viewpoint, then go else where.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/22 06:15 PM
23

There have even been serious calls for the mass testing of all men just for such a purpose. Where?
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:59 AM
10

She's clearly a TERF
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 05:55 PM
18

Women are the only class of people that can’t physically, financially or intellectually contribute to civilization Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 06:14 PM
6

Japan also has a dropping fertility rate, but not the feminist thing going on to the same extent. It just what late stage capitalism does to a nation. Who give a fuck what a billionaire has to say? The US is built on the back of immigrants, both voluntary and involuntary, so a very American solution there.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:53 PM
5

Look at it this way, if you don't engage with feminist, the ultra-extremist will be the only one who will.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:36 PM
7

Eh, reddit feminist (on the whole) are terminally online. They're the female equivalent of neck beards. Leg beards, if you will. Go touch grass and speak to IRL feminist. I still find them to be misguided, but they're significantly more compassionate.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:22 PM
8

the men's rights sphere has been more tolerant of it than the feminists. Yeah, I'm banned from /r/Feminism for asking for a source of a claim. Asked the same thing here (almost identical phrasing), and just got downvoted, then upvoted.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:04 PM
8

it isn't quite that simple. Things never are. I'm disappointed the study doesn't look closer at the interplay between the earnings gap and state support. How much of the discrepancy is due to one or the other? Seems lazy on the researchers behalf to omit that analysis considering it's the main theme of the paper. I guess if I understood the income distribution, and the NZ tax code, I could figure out how much of the discrepancy is due to earnings differentials. Any remainder could (within reason…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 04:35 PM
53

Isn't this just the earning gap but refactored through tax? I think the article glosses over that point without due consideration. Now the sectioned titled called "In nearly all age groups, women receive more tax (by way of subsidy or benefits) than they give." Might shed some light on how women receive more state support, but it doesn't break it down, merely stating that it happens. Reading the reference doesn't clear thing up much either, (although I only skimmed it) Interstinglingly enough th…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 04:00 PM
2

One can’t be held responsible for what he doesn’t know. That only hold true on an interpersonal level. When an opportunity for growth presents itself. But when the person speaking is speaking to millions of people, you can absolutely hold them to account for their ignorance. I have laid out my criticism of Peterson philosophy and world view. By extension why you take his advice with a grain of salt. Simply claiming he didn't know better, reinforces my point that you should take what he says with…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 04:03 AM
1

I mean, you did kind of miss my point. The world is already run by; Or our Nation will be guided by an empty headed Narcissist meat puppet that gets off on hookers, money, & power So let me say it differently. The material circumstances of our society are such that those kind of people rise to the top. It not enough to wish for a better ruling class. The opportunity for such people to get ahead must be removed on systemic level. That's not going to to happen if you and I are too preoccupied abou…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:51 AM
1

Oh, nothing I have seen of hers has lead me to believe that she speaking in bad faith. On the whole diet thing, I really couldn't care less.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:38 AM
0

I've only seen a handful of her stuff. She a little to on the right for my tastes. More specifically she leans a little to close to climate denialism and traditional values. Both of which I find to be a poor fit for the modern world. But there is value in her commentary, or some of her guests views on the "human condition".
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:42 AM
3

I wouldn't say it's the best book. Just I fond it more insightful. Really depends on what you're looking to get from the book. Other recommendations for insight into oneself. Thinking, Fast and Slow - Daniel Kahneman The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature - Steven Pinker
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:30 AM
1

if One spend time setting ones house in order then Politics will have more COMPETENT ppl to be the ppls voice…. Eh? Well if we're talking about politics, I'm not sure about the relation. Idiots are going to voice their opinion regardless of what either you or I do. It better to have someone half-arsing than a complete arse. Many of the high power member of society don't clean their own house, they pay some else to do that work. The skill required to clean your room, and the skill required to be …
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:28 AM
8

It seem to me the most vapid and generic advice one could give. And hypocritical too. Take rule 6. ""Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world." Peterson says while under a crippling Benzo addiction. It didn't stop him, and it shouldn't stop you. The book also critiques the ambiguity of ideology, yet present it's own peusdo-christian ideology as the one truth, without a hint of irony. I'm glad you got something from it, there is good advice in there, but it's far from the mo…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:05 AM
7

Raab isn't known for his intellect.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 11:08 PM
1

The BBC is a neoliberal establishment news outlet that is increasingly becoming the mouthpiece for No 10. None, absolutely none of that is far left.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 08:44 PM
2

Different people want different things. I think you're mistakenly equating feminism with women.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 03:03 PM
4

Sure, I can agree with that to an extent. We're on /r/MensRights so you can probably assume what I believe about say "paper abortion". Say a man sleeps with a women, afterwards the women pull the condom out of the trash, and impregnates herself. (unlikely, sure, but plausible). The man, without consent is liable for the raising of that child. In principle, I believe the man should have the right to say "no". That's not the law, but it should be. I'm going to bed soon, so I'll leave it here.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:52 AM
8

I'm not asking about what you, personally, would do. You can be disgusted, applaud by their decision, I'm asking whether someone has the right, in principle, to change their mind.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:36 AM
7

No, I want a sincere answer. I see you responded to /u/jeylenoire that Yeah, you want people to be too scared to speak their mind online. Well here's you change, be sincere. This is still deep in the abstract. What I want to know is if you believe, in principle, whether someone has the right to change their mind in the context of supporting another life. After that, I'd like to discuss limit on that right. Such as how long is reasonable time frame for someone to make a informed choice on the lif…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:09 AM
4

Say you initially agree to support someone life, the question of weather you reserve the right to change you mind is important to the discussion. The reason why I'm using the example of a person on dialysis waiting on a kidney, is that there is some disagreement around when a fetus becomes a person. So to remove that ambiguity, I'm using the example of someone constantly hooked up to blood transfusion device.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:54 PM
2

I hadn't checked, maybe you're right. It is late where I am, but I'm willing to give them a shot. Who know maybe they'll change my mind. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:46 PM
-4

Some people don't see it the same way, so would you do it for someone you don't care for? Say you initially agreed, would you be entitled to the right to change your mind?
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:41 PM
-10

The argument here is that a child's life is not as important as an adult woman being inconvenienced for 9 months. So you're wiling to put yourself on dialysis for 9 months? to feed blood to someone with a failing kidney?
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:27 PM
3

But generally if the culture changed to become more connected family-wise, it could be a start. Culture had be family centric for centeries. Didn't do much for wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 08:29 AM
17

Women rated men lower but messaged everyone. Of women who messaged, they messages a greater distribution of men. But very, very few women messaged first.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 12:33 AM
2

Reddits servers are held together by paper clips and chewing gums.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 07:20 PM
4

Make one targeting left-wing What have I done to you? /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:42 PM
1

Now comment on https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/mensrights
/r/MensRights12/05/21 07:59 PM
30

This is peak, "damned if you do, damned if you don't"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 07:28 PM
10

Ah I see, "I as man am allowed to want to fuck you asap, but you a women mustn't otherwise I will think less of you". Yeah those double standards aren't a great sign.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 07:41 PM
4

Expecting fairness in a relationship that starts with double standards. If you need to abstain from sex for no reason other than fear that he'll think that you're "easy", you're basically saying that you're willing to tolerate more from him than he tolerates from you. I'm having trouble wraping my head around this one, could you explain it again, but with different words?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 06:44 PM
10

The top comment. [–]Select_Mood2368 20 points 22 hours ago I disagree with this write up, read about the Minangkabau people and their matriarchal culture. Matriarchy and patriarchy are both toxic systems which ought to be eliminated for a fairer and equal society.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 04:57 PM
1

at 430 million active users across numerous countries in the west and east, I would say that we can make some pretty broad generalizations about people and society with an acceptable amount of reliability. These number are dubious at best, but taken at face value, you still can't say it extrapolate to the general population.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 04:49 PM
5

Feminists are beyond reason. That's not true. There are two types of Feminist as far as I can see. Those that have been deceived. Those that do the deceiving. Type 1. tends to be your run of the mill egalitarians, who have just been swept up by type 2's marketing. These people can be reached.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:17 PM
28

(and leftists, and socialists, and marxists...) Hilarious. I do concede that the "left" is overran by feminists. But there are some places such as /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates that try and fight it. They're just coming at it from a different angle than the trad cons. We can work together on this one.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:13 PM
11

The left is always slowly devouring itself.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:20 PM
5

If we take this instagram post at face value (lol) then I can't say no anymore when drunk and that's just wrong. That's not my reading of the post. If you said no then it's rape. And your alcohol blood level content has nothing to do with that argument.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:17 AM
1

I mean you do have some hot take. . . . . but that spicy eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 05:06 PM
14

"Real men love curves; Picture of a large women | Picture of a skinny women Only dogs like bones"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 05:03 PM
6

1.) Because the present themselves and an all inclusive movement. 2.) I'm pretty sure you make up like half of all the posts on this sub, what happened to your old account.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/21 04:48 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/m5gsvc/moreland_on_womens_safety/gr05ie2/ Already done over at ukpol.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 02:24 PM
6

As a brit it's weird to watch. Our police force usually have a little more restrain and patience than this. Then again, Johnson is losing control of the situation, so is becoming increasingly authoritarian.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 08:03 AM
14

Thats such a wihtwashing of history.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 02:24 PM
1

Can you please tell that to every single red pill poster on here? I have, at times. I don't spend much time around these part for that reason, hyperbolic discord just divides. Clouds any sense of understanding. These men do exist. In significantly greater numbers than comparable slobbish women. Sure. I'm not here to disagree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/20 10:55 PM
11

It's bad form to argue through hyperbole.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/20 07:53 PM
1

That's not incompatible with what I said.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 01:45 AM
2

There's. . . . just a lot of them.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 01:40 AM
-1

The first MGTOW got over run by incels. So the guys who were interested in going their own way, went off to create another community. And now, it seems the same fate has befallen that sub too. Waiting on MGTOW3
/r/MensRights08/08/20 01:37 AM
2

Archive link doesn't work for me. . . .
/r/MensRights08/07/20 12:35 AM
1

differentiation altogether on the basis of gender sounds stupid and over compensation for the past But the person you're responding to already explained how they believed it to be effecting the present and future. When people decide that there are two kinds of spouse, the male kind and the female kind, then they start to think that there are two kinds of spousal abuse, two kinds of custody, etc.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 04:12 PM
1

I mean you're painting alot of people and organisations with a very wide brush there.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 04:08 PM
1

Unironic use of "libtard". You ain't doing yourself any favours.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 11:11 PM
1

Yeah it's a survivorship bias thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 09:26 PM
1

I've herd this, but do you have any proof of this? I mean, I could see the rationale behind it. I'd just like some data.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 01:29 AM
2

🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 01:41 PM
2

The intro, is an introduction to the content held within the rest of the media. (Whether, text, audio or video). Setting tone, and building expectations. The introduction of this video is completely disjointed from the rest of the media. To the point of irrelevancy. It's a shame, because I think the video was interesting and that by having a such an intro the creator is doing themselves a disservice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 01:32 PM
3

Nah, tapped out as soon as Introverts were grouped with simps and niceguys. Edit: just skip the first 3 minutes; the rest of the video is interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 01:53 AM
-17

Cool story bro, needs more dragons.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 03:08 PM
0

free basing?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 01:17 AM
2

Well, it was a bill proposed by a backbencher. that alone indicated it wont pass.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 01:43 AM
7

*there
/r/MensRights11/03/20 11:51 PM
5

UD is dripping in satire.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:02 PM
1

it’s a BETTER man. I mean the men in porn are hardly low tier? Being mogged is what makes the fetish what it is Maybe, I haven't spoken to anyone who open admits to this fetish. So I'm just guessing as to their motives. Maybe I'm conflating cucking with swinging. Although I justify that to myself as a matter of semantics.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 11:46 PM
0

what fo you think causes men to develop such a fetish? Well what it is, is getting off to watching the women of desire being banged by another man. This is basically live porn. I think the rise in cuckold fetish is related to the rise in porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/20 11:37 PM
4

Why?
/r/MensRights01/03/20 02:08 AM
1

Yeah, I decided to not be lazy and go check the ONS. (Primary source) https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/domesticabusefindingsfromthecrimesurveyforenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2018#groups-of-people-most-likely-to-be-victims-of-domestic-abuse
/r/MensRights22/02/20 07:40 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights22/02/20 04:49 PM
8

From an outside perceptive. You don't have any stats either. So if we're on data alone, both your arguments are equally uncredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 11:29 PM
0

Perhaps some protections should remain for the lower class but nothing to the effect of redistribution of wealth. I mean, that's kinda of hard to avoid. But redistribution doesn't need to occur soviet style. Just enough, so that they aren't in need of food, water, shelter, health, and access to education, to help them help themselves. if, the above is done. I would have a way easier time believe that peoples failures are their own. As it stands at the moment. I don't believe that can be asserted…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 06:57 PM
2

Maybe, I'd feel better about it if, we had a a minimum standard of living. Some people get trapped in poverty. But given the opportunity could be of great benefit to society and humanity as a whole.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 06:31 PM
2

So, what comes next?
/r/MensRights03/02/20 04:20 AM
3

know nothing of merit and hard work Well, how would you go about progressing their understanding?
/r/MensRights03/02/20 04:14 AM
1

average purplepilldebater. Average human. The world needs a better economic education process. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 01:06 AM
0

Taking a proactive, precautionary attitude. I have no problem with this.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 05:50 PM
3

Why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 06:35 PM
3

*You're
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 06:26 PM
1

For me, 5 is the defining point between; would fuck, would not fuck. I don't see how it can be generalized, as you pointed out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/20 11:08 PM
0

I don't suppose you have any theories as to what motivate this behaviour?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 05:09 PM
1

Eh, I'm not sure of that. Then again I can't put myself in that mindset, and make it make sense. Weather or not it's effective however, is very clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 04:40 PM
2

therefore everything is a feminist issue Therefore nothing is.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 11:41 PM
10

I mean, they had to pick models for the picture. There's nothing in the text that implies sexism.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:15 PM
1

HE means the men who rated themselves highly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 03:54 PM
12

Gotem
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/19 04:21 PM
3

RP doesn't own a monopoly on alternative perspectives on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 02:22 PM
0

I intended to draw attention to an example of the women are wonderful effect in action. In other words; OP initial assertion that women wouldn't think such things.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 10:11 PM
-2

I didn't think I was.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 08:59 PM
0

I didn't think a post was an actual woman and just a man trolling (because i didnt think a woman would actually think or post something like that in a serious manner.* How that person isnt embarassed is mind boggling). Women can think and act in all the way men can. Edit: Given the context is right there, above my very post, I would of thought context would carry over somewhat. It appears I was wrong. I have edited the quote to a more verbose form. Although I still stand by my selection for brev…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 08:31 PM
1

[removed] Apparently not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:03 PM
1

What's wrong with them expressing preferences?
/r/MensRights23/09/19 10:00 PM
3

STBH?
/r/MensRights22/09/19 12:25 AM
3

just let them have a place. 1575 member is hardly a representation of the whole movement.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:48 PM
1

Thx.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 12:58 AM
1

FSM ??
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 12:55 AM
2

UMC, UC < what do these mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 07:55 PM
1

What if you stick in her pooper?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 10:34 PM
3

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 12:20 AM
3

mens sexuality is repressed. Could you expand on this. I'm not sure I quite get what you intend to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 12:16 AM
3

rather than the intent behind statements like “sex is a need.” It's hard to parse intent when we don't agree on definitions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 02:44 PM
4

Timing.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 12:06 AM
1

Do you have any sources that show otherwise?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:25 AM
-1

I disagree.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 02:11 AM
4

I mean, it's well known the american intel community aren't on best terms with their boss.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 01:36 PM
1

That is usually offset by the greater bargaining power of larger groups of consumers. Secondly, that not a liberal policy. I'm guessing you're american and you're entire vocabulary involving politics is just straight up fucked.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:49 PM
2

They're not /thread
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 12:59 AM
1

Whats agenda 21?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:25 PM
1

But, casual sex a few times for a man isnt the same as it is for a woman. Do you have any sources for that, or anything to for me to google?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/18 10:20 PM
18

To further your point, humans are the only mammals where the mammary gland are inflamed for the duration of adult life. Other great ape mammary glands inflate post birth, then recede.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 01:25 PM
3

Men always want to be a woman's first love - women like to be a man's last romance. ~ Oscar Wilde
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/18 11:47 PM
1

You wouldn't get one, its for women only.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 01:14 AM
2

I exhaled briskly from my nose. Take your upvote.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/18 02:28 AM
3

Still, to me sound more I than E, but then again I only have these two comments to glean information from. . .
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/18 02:19 AM
1

Genesis 18:20? And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; -KJB I don't follow. . . .
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/18 01:33 AM
12

Shouldn't we wait until the dust has settle before we call how it is? The very fact this is getting coverage is an encouraging sign.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:27 AM
1

Daily Mail Yeah, one of the main paper pushing outrage porn, on this sub, this comment section should be civil.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 02:39 AM
1

Damn I didn't even realise it was deleted. I read it and it gave me a little faith in r/science.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 02:10 AM
6

they see women in charge. ಠ_ಠ There's nothing wrong with women being in charge. It rather the lack of male role models to look up.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 11:23 PM
1

🙃
/r/MensRights01/04/18 01:52 AM
1

't'was a joke. CMV a very good subreddit, that does thing that no where else on the internet does.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 01:39 AM
3

Shit, we're doomed.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 01:25 AM
16

*Undefined.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 07:05 PM
1

"He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee." /u/Nietzsche
/r/MensRights31/03/18 01:13 AM
1

that they are choosing not to get laid when in reality women make the choice for them It's been my observation that Incels, are not Incels, they just lack something. There are two positions at play here, one that advocate that men are in control of their sex lives, and another that states that women are in control of men's sex life. You speak as though you don't acknowledge the existence of the other camp. I find this, for lack of a better word, problematic. I think both sides have merit. Althou…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/18 02:38 AM
2

What did they ask?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 09:55 PM
-1

That site has such an obnoxious header. The article is interesting none-the-less.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:32 AM
6

ThatsMyFetish.jpeg
/r/MensRights18/02/18 03:57 AM
13

Donald Trump has a certain alpha swagger Are we even looking at the same man here? I thought the defining characteristic of beta buxs is they have to buy the sex. And here is a literally example of paying his way into a women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/18 11:42 PM
8

As a European, I'd like to point out that during America's reign at the top, they weren't particularly liked either.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/18 01:08 AM
9

Donald Trump is [...] leader of the free world Nah, that title belong to Germany now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/18 12:55 AM
0

From anecdotal experience I'd lean more towards the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 01:22 AM
2

That's okay, I could do with gaining a bit a weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 12:35 AM
2

I would like a cookie.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 12:27 AM
25

Although I agree with you, and I, in general, agree with this subreddit, My request for sources usually result in negative karma. Thank you for suggesting I'm not completely insane for asking for sources. :)
/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:38 AM
138

Got some sources on those numbers?
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:02 AM
1

Would you like to expand on your criticism? I'm just curious.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:21 AM
1

For what it worth, I'm consider myself left wing. Left leaning most certainly does not equate to feminist.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 02:27 AM
1

I had hear of the death, but I didn't realise he had committed suicide.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:55 AM
2

*Can pee standing up
/r/MensRights24/08/17 04:03 PM
4

Ahhh, gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:47 PM
3

I'm not quite sure what your trying to get at here, op.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:07 PM
1

RMV Whats this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 10:36 PM
1

What you've got there is good ol' selection bias. If they were indifferent, they wouldn't be crying on the internet. those MGTOW's that do that, just get on with their lives and never draw your attention to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/17 11:26 PM
5

Care to bring me up to speed?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:56 PM
2

I've heard variants of this often, do you not of any effective retorts?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:20 PM
1

This is a serious problem and I honestly don't know what the solution is. Easy, just hold them to the same standard. They'll catch on after a while. Or at least, shut up for a while.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 08:39 PM
11

I find "femsplaining" rolls off the tongue better than "womansplaining ", either or. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:21 PM
119

And no true scotsmans would add sugar to their oats.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:59 AM
0

Huh, I stand corrected, I'm on my mobile so can't cite my sources, but it was an older study.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 07:12 PM
-1

It is true on average women are smarter than men. However the standard deviation (the spread) of men is larger than women. Put otherwise, the smartest of the smart and the dumbest of the dumb are more likely to be male.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter