TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Francois_Rapiste Archive

View 3 posts and 636 comments by Francois_Rapiste on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 04:38 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 03:03 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 02:45 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 02:06 AM
-1

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 01:40 AM
-1

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 10:26 PM
11

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 03:36 PM
50

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:13 PM
111

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:07 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW28/07/16 11:58 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill21/04/16 08:02 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 01:19 AM
-21

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill27/03/16 07:00 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/askTRP26/03/16 09:36 PM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/askTRP26/03/16 09:03 PM
-16

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill26/03/16 08:57 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 08:55 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 10:49 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:12 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:10 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:05 AM
25

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 09:29 AM
14

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:30 AM
64

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:43 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:34 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:22 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:21 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:14 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:58 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 09:00 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:54 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:52 AM
7

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:00 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:07 PM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:04 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:07 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:12 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:59 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:47 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:46 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:44 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:40 AM
-2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:25 AM
11

Probably more an issue for /r/theredpill or /r/MGTOW, who are both more concerned with dating than we are.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:22 AM
4

"Opinion"= biased, misinformed propaganda
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:21 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:21 AM
17

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:18 AM
10

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:11 AM
14

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:10 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:35 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW07/07/15 07:55 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW07/07/15 07:47 AM
12

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:14 AM
31

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:41 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 06:40 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 03:53 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 03:41 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 03:25 AM
14

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 03:11 AM
7

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 02:56 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:39 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights06/07/15 06:31 AM
10

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights06/07/15 06:26 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/RedPillWomen06/07/15 01:16 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/RedPillWomen05/07/15 11:35 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/RedPillWomen05/07/15 10:53 PM
11

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 11:06 PM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill04/07/15 10:27 PM
15

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/07/15 10:59 PM
16

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:05 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:52 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:16 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:42 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:30 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:22 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:20 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:10 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:44 PM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:30 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW24/06/15 07:34 AM
16

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW24/06/15 01:59 AM
14

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 07:14 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 06:04 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:29 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:36 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:26 AM
1

Oh, alright then. Have an upvote, internet stranger.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:53 AM
2

Oh. Well that means that the vast majority of "feminists" aren't feminists then. So you agree with me.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:52 AM
7

What do "moderate" feminists do, besides cover up the sins of radical feminists and help spread radical feminist lies? Once in awhile feminism still proves useful in the third world, like the recent outlawing of FGM in Nigeria IIRC, but it has run out of all uses in the West by now.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:40 AM
3

Wrong. As much as they claim to want equality as a principle, in practice their policies mostly benefit women to the detriment of men. I had to explain this elsewhere today as well, to someone who like you had no comment history on this sub, making me wonder if we've been flooded by something.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:38 AM
8

By this definition there is only one living feminist, and her name is Christina Hoff Sommers. So no, I'm not buying it.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:21 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:46 AM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:19 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:42 AM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:34 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:28 AM
4

The problem with that is that morals, responsibility, logic, and reason hurt feminists' feeeeelings.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:27 AM
11

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:26 AM
40

I think it's important to remember that this isn't just Pao. There are plenty of feminists among Reddit mods, and they are the biggest assholes on the site.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:58 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:56 AM
370

And the award for 2015 Lie of the Year goes to "Feminists just want equality!"
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:55 AM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:49 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:40 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:39 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:35 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:27 PM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:56 PM
13

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:51 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:43 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:43 PM
15

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:37 AM
7

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:25 AM
13

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:10 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:09 AM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:29 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:26 AM
7

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:23 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:34 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:42 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:00 AM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:30 PM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:18 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:11 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:03 PM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:01 PM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights07/06/15 04:15 PM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights07/06/15 04:14 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 09:44 AM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 09:44 AM
5

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:46 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:43 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:38 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:36 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:35 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:33 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:32 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:27 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:15 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:13 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:54 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:44 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:19 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:57 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:56 AM
25

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:44 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:33 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:30 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:25 PM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 11:22 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 11:18 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 11:16 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 11:14 AM
26

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 11:12 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:09 AM
50

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW02/06/15 05:22 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:59 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:23 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:13 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:10 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:01 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 11:59 PM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 11:59 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 11:07 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 11:04 PM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:55 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:18 AM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:07 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:03 AM
9

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 10:28 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:40 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:05 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:00 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 04:55 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:30 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:05 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:04 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 01:01 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 12:58 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:27 PM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:10 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:46 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:37 PM
1

Fucking glorious. Too bad it's only focused on Gamergate, but I'll still love it if this shit happens.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:33 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:26 PM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:25 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:12 AM
15

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:20 PM
1

She won't be. These laws will fail the test, which is one of the many reasons I am against hate speech laws.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:17 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:14 PM
11

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:11 PM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:05 PM
1

Well, Hitler's book burnings probably helped prevent Germany from going the way of Ukraine, so... The people tricking others nowadays are the same people clamoring for censorship. I'm guessing it's always been that way. So no, censorship wouldn't help.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:01 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:11 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:01 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 08:59 PM
31

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:34 AM
31

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:16 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:12 AM
14

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:03 AM
15

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:17 AM
-5

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 06:13 AM
9

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:05 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:59 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:56 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:49 AM
27

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:47 AM
17

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:46 AM
55

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:45 AM
162

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:43 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 03:32 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 03:30 AM
-1

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 03:21 AM
11

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 03:15 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 03:02 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:36 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW27/05/15 07:31 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW27/05/15 06:50 AM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW27/05/15 06:10 AM
5

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW27/05/15 05:55 AM
5

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:26 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:37 AM
5

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:23 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:12 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:47 AM
5

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 11:21 PM
11

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:10 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:01 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:52 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:50 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:44 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:42 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:39 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:36 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW24/05/15 11:49 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW24/05/15 11:42 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW24/05/15 11:38 PM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights24/05/15 10:58 PM
10

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 06:24 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 06:09 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 05:43 PM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 05:36 PM
11

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 05:24 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:12 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:21 AM
15

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:16 AM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:54 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:53 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:44 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:05 AM
8

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:02 AM
12

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:01 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:00 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:59 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:58 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:03 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:01 AM
12

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 03:55 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 03:53 AM
33

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 03:51 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 01:12 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 01:11 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:45 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:45 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:25 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:43 AM
-4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:20 AM
47

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:17 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:38 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:28 AM
9

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:27 AM
5

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:26 AM
14

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:20 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:09 AM
53

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:08 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:06 AM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:59 AM
4

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:44 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:41 AM
21

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:56 PM
0

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW20/05/15 10:54 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW20/05/15 10:01 AM
-4

deleted What is this?
/r/MGTOW20/05/15 09:56 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:44 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:36 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:25 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:39 AM
5

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:38 AM
9

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:35 PM
48

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:34 PM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:18 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:15 PM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:13 PM
57

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:11 PM
29

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:50 PM
7

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:41 PM
62

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:37 PM
9

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:53 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:50 AM
1

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:24 PM
-5

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:24 PM
11

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:01 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:49 AM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:43 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:12 AM
9

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:42 AM
35

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:01 AM
37

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:59 AM
46

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:58 AM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:32 AM
2

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:54 AM
7

Yeah, actually useful inventions should be kept around. Circumcision is useless and savage. By the way, architecture doesn't involve nonconsensually removing parts of people's bodies. You're not following me? Really? People without modern education are good sources on medical issues for you? Really? Yes, I DO eschew outdated and barbaric practices. There's nothing innocuous about maiming people you fucking moron. An entire planet adhering to the traditions of any ONE of its faiths is completely …
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:46 PM
1

That would be true if it were true. Lot of men voted for women's suffrage. Lot of whites voted for black suffrage. The entire North during the American Civil War, so many of them fought and died for black freedom. Never got a thank you note, but they did it.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:21 PM
4

I'm saying that people who commit genocide (namely the ancient Hebrews in this case) and stone women aren't reliable sources for anything at all. You mention black people, but do you know what you'd get if you took a black man and stripped him of his 21st century first world education? The same thing you'd get if you did that to a white man: an ignorant man whose opinions can't be taken seriously. That's what the Hebrews were. Running water wasn't even invented back then. Which brings me to my n…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:19 PM
1

Diana Davison feels the same way about other female MRA's, stating that they often do not care as much about the cause as much as they claim. And you two aren't wrong. Still, they're better than the snowflake generation women raised to disdain and distrust us.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:02 PM
9

I'm calling bronze age tribal people savages because they mutilated men, stoned women, quarantined women during their periods, kept slaves, occasionally raped said slaves, committed routine genocide, you name it. They were savages and we shouldn't be taking advice from them on how to live or whether our genitals should be cut up. If you really believe that people should have parts of their bodies removed for political reasons or because their dad thinks it's a good idea, I have nothing more to s…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:53 PM
13

There was nothing wrong with my foreskin you dolt. And just because some illiterate proto-Hebrew savages from before the fucking Iron Age invented a wonderful tradition of deliberately maiming infant male genitals doesn't mean that anyone in the 20th century was justified in doing so. He may have thought that he was doing the right thing, but in hindsight, he clearly wasn't.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:34 PM
12

How would that be a joke? The guy mutilated me, seems like something that a parent and child would want to talk about at some point. What? I'm saying that doctors shouldn't unnecessarily remove parts of people's bodies without their consent. How that would be considered an unreasonable request, I have no idea.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:20 PM
9

I would agree with you, but the thing is, we've lost this one. This kind of thing is only considered a problem if it happens to women. That's how extreme this has gotten. You can shame men just for being men, and it's considered a good thing to do, and the men have no recourse. They're just supposed to let it happen.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:16 PM
8

My dad made the same argument. That argument was wrong and stupid then and it remains wrong and stupid today. No human being has jurisdiction over another's genital integrity.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:10 PM
1

I can understand and even agree with that. Women are taught that they not only deserve everything we can give them, but that they even deserve everything they can take from us. An extreme sense of entitlement coupled with basically no one holding them responsible for their actions leads to zero incentives to be loyal. The only exceptions to this rule that I'm aware of would be female MRA's, girls from #womenagainstfeminism and so on, because they actually understand, at least to some degree, the…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:07 PM
1

Every MRA on this sub who watched up to the sexist parts of the video is condemning it. This shit isn't MRA. It's sexist drivel. And unlike you, we can tell the difference.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:58 PM
4

Well, the marginally higher point is a consistent phenomenon seen in different times this data is taken, but you're right on the whole "not statistically significant" bit because the difference was never big enough to matter. He's got a point with greater deviance though. There are simply more male geniuses and more male retards than there are for females. It's biology. Male extremity coupled with male ambition (testosterone associated phenomenon) is why men will generally but not always make a …
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:56 PM
2

Dude, Western civilization has gone full Macintosh. I can't tell where the SJW event horizon is anymore.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:49 PM
6

Really? We're back to the traditionalist bullshit about women being stupid? Really? They have the same average IQ scores as men. Claiming intellectual superiority to the other gender is laughable regardless of which gender you are.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 12:18 PM
2

Partially because everyone and their mother is terrified of opposing feminists. You just get branded a sexist, which is a societal death sentence. It's the same reason that white people refuse to use the word nigger even in non racist contexts.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:56 AM
6

Wait, what? Are they fucking serious? Murderers playing the victim card? Has it really gotten that bad?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:33 AM
3

Wow. That was so stupid that I actually couldn't be offended. Honestly, that was such superlatively shitty logic that I was kind of impressed at the author's ability to write it without vomiting all over the keyboard. Or perhaps vomiting on the keyboard was precisely why the article was so amazingly bad.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:29 AM
1

Well, yeah, and I don't want to be culturally gassed. So I'm not attaching myself to the Jews in this situation. System's fucked, gotta be crafty to survive.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:55 AM
4

And it wasn't fishy at all that Eve Ensler was involved? I'm not seeing it specifically because I never want to give patronage to someone who supports rape. It's not even political, it's a moral objection.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:46 AM
9

Only a Sith deals in absolutes, friend.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:25 AM
1

I'd guess it does. Still, I really need to check out some MGTOW subs.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:35 AM
2

I think you're both right. When the MRA Diana Davison has videos titled "Women are Retarded," she's deliberately appearing offensive for attention. But when Sargon calls someone a faggot, he's not trying to hate on or offend gay people, he just says that shit because he's Sargon and he doesn't give a damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 03:31 AM
4

I don't fucking know this person, I'm not going to assume shit. TRP would say she wants a beta to serve her in an asymmetrical relationship. TBP would take her at face value. Either could be correct; depends on the girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 03:24 AM
1

I wonder if there's a purple pill subreddit? /r/purplepilldebate comes to mind but it's not really the thing either... What about a version of TRP with less sexism, generalizations, and armchair psychology but more MRA and MGTOW theory? That would appeal to me.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:12 AM
-1

Meh. Time it using their period. Do the dirty a few days before you predict the ovulation to occur since sperm survives for a week, that opens your temporal window. So yeah, they could skin that cat, especially women with particularly consistent periods.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:35 AM
4

Ground Rule #1: I'm only going to treat you like a princess if you treat me like a god damn king.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:24 AM
8

Yeah, AWALT is retarded. I live in one of the worst SJW hellholes in the US and I STILL know multiple different women who don't pull that shit. TRP has such a strong history of taking brilliant observations and running them straight into the ground. Right now there's a post on TRP that states that no one cares about low value males. Its first half is a thoroughly insightful look into how Nice Guy betas and TRP style alphas are both shamed by feminist society for different reasons. Now, Nice Guys…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:20 AM
5

I actually am not quite a redpiller. And I agree that associating the two makes the MRM look bad, I've actually told TRP'ers on this sub that they should use alt accounts for that reason.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 12:42 AM
28

A few important differences between me and a redpiller: 1) I believe that NAWALT punches a pretty big hole in TRP philosophy that most redpillers don't account for. 2) I can't identify with the movement because there are too many misogynists in it. I do not write off the entire movement as sexist drivel, but I still see too many of its members just hating on women. 3) My pickup methods are very non-TRP. I don't manipulate or play mind games at all. That's the shit that women need to stop doing s…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 12:39 AM
3

It's a self fulfilling prophecy. They can't do any better until they, in the words of Diana Davison, "stop marrying these bitches."
/r/MensRights17/05/15 12:28 AM
9

Yeah, Diana Davison makes some good points about how putting the pussy on the pedestal is a huge reason for the gender disparities observed in modern society. I recommend checking out her videos on youtube if you want to learn more. I may not be a redpiller, but I think they'd agree when I say that it's white knight beta fucktards who put women on the absurd pedestals they're on today.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:38 PM
6

Haha! For women it was contraception and the microwave, for men it'll be hydraulic fleshlights! XD
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:31 PM
41

Yeah, I'm an MGTOW until I find a woman who actually treats men as equals, which is way the fuck rarer than I used to think. For now, I have a policy that I won't date the same woman for more than two weeks. I love flirting, taking girls on dates, screwing around in bed, etc., but I'm not going any further than that until I know that my partner gives a shit about me and what I believe in.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:56 PM
8

I've been terrified by the efforts of Senator Gillibrand and others to strip more and more legal rights of men until we have a dystopian degree of inequality even worse than what we have now. When I'm a PhD cybernetics researcher, author, and everything else I want to be one day, people will listen to me. And mark my words when I say that the feminists will start an absolute gender war within three election cycles from now once they've fully cannibalized the American left, causing the opposing v…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:45 PM
1

I fail to see the humor in people being physically assaulted.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:31 PM
3

What with the whole not punishing women for deliberately fabricating false accusations to hurt men, it makes me think that the police don't really care if the accusation is true or not. They seem to have some sort of fetish for putting dudes in jail regardless of whether they should actually be in jail or not.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:27 PM
52

"I shall not be held accountable" Of course not, you're a woman. Women can have their own flesh and blood children cut up and vacuumed out of their bodies if they don't want to deal with the consequences of their actions, but men can't even decide to financially abandon the baby. Women can get off for murder of their own husbands by hiring a lawyer with the money their victim earned for them to say on her behalf that she did it because she was in suuuuch a bad relationship. If a woman does somet…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:18 PM
212

They're just woman-worshippers. There's a big difference between loving someone and being servile to them, but I find that most men in the Western world are socialized into believing that they're the same thing.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:08 PM
2

With 1.7 million women raped and 1.67 million men "forced to penetrate" in 2010, the exact same question could be asked of women. But it isn't, because feminists have turned rape into a gendered political issue instead of, oh I don't know, a fucking crime. These people cannibalize every aspect of the human experience, good or in this case bad, to further their agenda.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:00 PM
2

Given that this is your only comment on Reddit, I'm going to assume that you're a troll.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 11:31 PM
3

I had my first serious conversation about this with my father earlier today. Went horribly. He's an SJW shill. He even referred to tech companies as patriarchies. I can't recall the last time I was this disappointed in someone.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 07:29 AM
3

Yeah, I particularly liked the part where she beat the shit out of superhuman robots immediately after escaping
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:58 AM
6

Yeah, Black Widow was really well written imo. Someone pro-female would love the realistic portrayal.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:32 PM
2

That's why I call it a genetic crime. His DNA is his property more so than literally anything else he owns in my opinion. It should be illegal to use someone's DNA in that way without their consent.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:27 PM
1

We don't want to be catered to. We just wish that we wouldn't be mutilated so often.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:22 PM
5

What a shitshow. I don't think you can call it full on rape due to the fact that he thought he had consent, but he was being a pushy asshole the entire time and should have respected her boundaries. Poor girl's probably traumatized.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:19 PM
2

This is excellent news. I hope that other cities follow suit.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:07 PM
47

Wat How is that funny by any stretch of the imagination
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:56 PM
38

Okay, SHE committed a genetic crime against HIM. SHE should be the one giving money and HE should be the one with custody (if he even wants it). You know who might actually hear us out on this? Libertarian state senators. If your state has any, shoot them an email asking for a law that men should never become fathers without their consent. I plan to do the same for Oregon tomorrow.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:14 AM
134

Yeah, when I learned about that one, my reaction was basically, "oh hey, looks like I don't have any rights around here after all."
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:09 AM
1

Yeah, this is up there with manspreading on the biggest cases of "who gives a fuck" in recent memory.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:10 PM
3

But how dare us horrible shitlord misogynists hold a proud womyn accountable for their actions as if they were adults!
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:45 PM
3

This is insane. I've been woken up with a kiss from a woman before. Provided you're actually dating the person it's a really great way to start your day.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:00 PM
2

Yeah, everyone here is right to tell you to lawyer up. I don't think anything else can save you.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:57 PM
5

"Women can do no wrong" is a staple of feminism, though.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:53 PM
9

Here's a fun little detail: men aren't able to financially abort children partially because they are considered responsible for the child's existence. They are held accountable for the child's well being. A woman, on the other hand, can give her child up for adoption (basically the same thing as abandoning it) or even terminate the pregnancy. And no one bats an eye. Why aren't women held accountable for their own actions? We give them the coddling of children and the respect of an adult, and som…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:52 PM
2

Yeah, and if I were a woman I'd return the favor, but then again, I believe in equality.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:20 PM
1

I'm praying that automated transportation, fusion energy, and other advances will help out there.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:19 PM
2

Right, they don't want to have to get the wife's permission. Yeah, don't you have to pay a 15,000 euro fine for getting those foreign ones?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:08 PM
1

You're right, we need money. How do you think we can get enough of that?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:56 PM
1

Then why do more French men take this shit to Spain then doing it in France? Even though it's illegal to do so?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:49 PM
6

"Champion diversity"? Fuck. That's what SJW's say when they mean " parade minorities about the place like diversity trophies."
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:47 PM
5

Men are as likely to be raped and much more likely to be physically assaulted or murdered in the first world, and generally third world societies will leave women safer at home so that their villages don't die out. In the worst cases, nearly a generation of boys will be made into child soldiers. Women are often brutalized in the less civilized parts of the world (observe the over 200 women raped until pregnant by boko haram) but I don't think that they're worse victims than men are.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:37 PM
1

I've read several different articles on this and they all agree. I'd look at the law itself as a primary source, but I don't speak French so that's not happening.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:52 PM
1

Pretty sure I've made the same mistake before, haha.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:36 PM
2

Nope. In other countries, that's how it works: US for us example, peace of mind paternity tests are legal but only licensed paternity tests from professional labs are taken as court evidence. Contrast that with France: you have to get a court and the mother to give you permission. This is successfully conducted very rarely, because as always, Western courts don't give a shit about men, and the women are offended by the lack of trust, or some other such excuse for cheating.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:31 PM
9

I hold the door for women and men. Seems like the polite thing to do.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:16 PM
0

Sometimes I wonder what kind of college student I'd be if I hadn't been brought up in a gynocentric education system.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:13 PM
2

Good thing that's in Thailand instead of Taiwan ;)
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:07 PM
1

I have to study them more. Those guys might be Asian MGTOW for all I know.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:06 PM
1

Really? I didn't know that. What do they do over there?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:28 AM
0

We would've had it coming, I'll admit. If the SJW's win I am moving to Japan without a second thought. Intersectional feminism can't do shit to "POC" (God that term is racist) so you want to be surrounded by anyone brown or yellow after this goes to hell. Africa and the middle east are hell on Earth, China is poor and really polluted, India is poor and crowded, but Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea will be nice. South America's a mixed bag.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:59 AM
5

I still have a little hope. The only thing that can stop this, I think, is if a national level American figure let the cat out of the bag (revealed the true state of men in America). Perhaps running for President with the platform of ending circumcision, the draft, the harsh prison sentences, etc. Ironically the only thing that can save feminism in that scenario is the far right. They're pro religion, pro military, and anti criminal enough to agree with misandrists on the issues mentioned above.…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:53 AM
3

"Media" is a very nice word for quasi-fascist propaganda.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:51 AM
4

Both are good reasons to do this. I'll see if I can put your work to use in the field since you mentioned that you want these used. Thanks for making them.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:26 AM
6

Excellent work.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:31 AM
2

Yeah, well by the insane definition of the term "MRA" that the feminist author seems to believe, he was one. If you really wanna see some rage bait, check out Wikipedia's article on gamergate. It might be the single most biased and inaccurate thing I have ever read.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:28 PM
4

If they wanted to give real solutions to real problems, they'd be focused on developing nations. But they don't want to solve anything. They just want to win.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:30 PM
1

B-baka! Don't ban me there, I'll... Kyaaaaaaa!
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:23 PM
2

I've seen two possibilities presented about this: 1) just a marketing gimmick to draw in more cash for the cause. 2) they sincerely only intend to help women. The latter is obviously extremely sexist. The fact that that would be considered acceptable is appalling to say the least. But I think that the former would be even worse, not on the Association's behalf, but as an indicator of society as a whole: if misandry and gynocentrism have gotten so bad that a cause can get more money by pretending…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 09:04 AM
1

I'm offended that they haven't noticed me yet.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:26 AM
2

I'm still waiting for my bans. When someone bans me from some shitty subreddit, I'm going to respond by banning them from my three basically nonexistent subreddits. And if they say "that's useless, why would I have wanted to go to your subs anyway?" I'll tell them "I was thinking the same thing about you."
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:54 AM
2

Piss off who you need to piss off. I spent a few years tip toeing around radfems, only to realize when I came out as a reasonable person that those "friends" hated me all along for being male. One of them was pretty close, a childhood friend, but I'm not interested in being "friends" with someone who denies reality and views me as an antagonistic figure for wanting to protect myself.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:39 AM
0

People who think that women are going to come out in droves to be the matriarchs of tomorrow are wishful thinkers at best. Women aren't biologically geared with the same average desire to lead that men have. You'll have your Margaret Thatchers once in awhile, but generally speaking 70% or more of the people who want to be congressmen and CEO's are men. That's just what testosterone does to you.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:30 AM
4

This kind of shit is why I am completely anti feminist. I'm pro women's rights six ways to Sunday but women have rights in the West, more so than men in fact. People working to provide women education in countries where that isn't allowed, or to stop FGM, are awesome, but they are an entirely different faction than Starbucks assholes and Kirsten "fuck due process" Gillibrand. I consider myself an egalitarian, feminist in the Christina Hoff Sommers sense of the word, and obviously an MRA. Titles …
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:18 AM
2

Are they... are they protesting rape? Seriously? "Swiper no swiping" logic? And they think that their march will stop any rapists? If only crimes actually worked this way. Instead of locking my house at night, I'd run around yelling "BURGLARS NO BURGLARY!" on my morning walk, and sleep sound knowing that the criminals are kept at bay.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:09 AM
-2

I highly doubt that it operates that way in China, mang. The West is run by feminist-worshiping white knights who enable that shit at every possible opportunity but China's got that Confucian patriarchy for days
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:01 AM
3

I could get down with all judges being women, gay dudes, or dudes like Sargon who just don't give a shit about your pussy pass.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:53 AM
1

Excellent work. You definitely hammered home the point that feminism isn't about equality, it's about women winning and men losing. Your points about ideology were spot on as well. All the factions that have done the biggest damage throughout history have been ideologically motivated. Mao, Hitler, the Crusades, take your pick, but humans are aware of the fact that this world is designed to slowly break them down into corpses, and they are terrified of this fact, so ideologies will offer them sig…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:47 PM
2

Jesus, the leaders in this movement are the biggest nut jobs imaginable.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:19 PM
2

You should make an anti-suicide pact. Promise a loved one that you won't leave them alone by killing yourself. If you aren't already, get help. You deserve better than this.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:00 PM
3

If this person was in any way remarkable or important to people back at home, they wouldn't just call her "so and so's wife."
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:46 PM
18

"for their ideology to survive they must identify new victims and blame new oppressors." That's the SJW left, right there.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:07 AM
5

A-MEN!
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:22 AM
2

Almost like?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:13 AM
2

Meanwhile Susan B Anthony doesn't just roll over in her grave, but vomits at the idea that her name would be used to honor someone like Sulkowicz.
/r/PussyPass04/05/15 08:34 PM
2

Doesn't matter what you or I think is the problem. I've met some pretty reasonable redpillers, personally. But the movement as a whole comes across as very sexist to the average observer, and these relatively impartial people are exactly who we're trying to win over.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:01 PM
4

God dammit. Of course they're married. player.modav faithinhumanity -1
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:50 PM
4

I'm guessing that some of these women are married, too. Some people have no respect, no loyalty.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 05:48 PM
13

And you don't want dead people to be able to vote? You misnecroist! You need to check your breathing and heartbeat privileges. This is it guys. I'm done with you being-alive chauvinists. I'm moving on from the MRM and I'm going to advocate for dead people's rights
/r/MensRights04/05/15 05:44 PM
3

I was going to say "okay, this was a couple decades ago, that's probably not relevant to today," but I can't even say that. What the fuck. This is the most disgusting representation I can imagine of this issue.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:57 AM
1

The one thing I disagree with is that I should be offended. Being offended by someone so incredibly deluded and unintelligent is like being offended by a five year old or a low effort YouTube troll. I'm just amazed, honestly. I do not understand how this problem could possibly have gotten so bad that the LA times would publish this. The media has become such amazingly stupid drivel over the last few decades.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 05:49 AM
1

Kind of expected that response.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 04:38 AM
4

Honestly. If I wanted to write an essay from a feminist perspective, I'd have to hit myself really hard over the head with a baseball bat, smoke enough weed to where I dissociate from reality, and then start writing. There's no other way to have your thinking be as warped as a victim of brainwashing
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:36 AM
12

Female entitlement has gotten so ludicrous with the snowflake generation that one of them sexually assaulted me and then complained that I was being a buzz kill afterwards. She wasn't even a bad person, honestly, just someone brainwashed into thinking that it's impossible to hurt someone bigger than you. Or a year after that incident, a girl who grabbed my ass publicly in a crowded bar on St Patty's day. She did not seem to realize that she had no right to do that. She genuinely seemed to think …
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:29 AM
10

I'm not saying she shouldn't get due process and so on. Further, as I said, this is more necessary right now due to the gravity of a false accusation. If the day ever arrives when MRA's disband this insane hysteria over sex crimes, then the severity of the crime of false accusation will be reduced, but until that day comes, a false accusation is a horrible thing to do to someone. The main reason that crimes are punished is to deter them. Women use false accusations to ruin men's lives because th…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:22 AM
2

Why don't they join NATO then?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:14 AM
11

But she would have the same right, innocent until proven guilty. She would only be punished for making the accusation if it can be proven false, and proven that she knew it was false (it's possible to not know the details of your own rape if you were unconscious or are mentally unsound). But if it can be proven that she made up a lie about him knowing that it would seriously damage him? As long as we have this insane "guilty until proven innocent" attitude outside of the courts towards men accus…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:00 AM
3

The draft is disgusting and wrong, but I actually agree that it seems necessary for Finland. An entire nation with the population of one large city, right next to Russia? Not a situation that I'd want to be in.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:46 PM
1

Men and women are equal, but they're different. Theoretically, a society optimized for military power drafts men into warfare and uses women to manufacture materiel, breed the next generation and so on, because men are generally better at war. You wouldn't draft both populations because the women can contribute more value in the factory or as a nurse in a military hospital than in the field. It's wrong, and it's an disgusting breach of natural rights, and that's why the US shouldn't have it be l…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:41 PM
2

Source? Not that I don't believe you, but I like primary sources
/r/MensRights03/05/15 09:16 AM
1

I'm not saying they do. I'm saying that even if they do, we still don't want them associated.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:36 AM
2

I love this article, but you can't take it seriously. Brick is a confirmed moron and the news source is awful. Also, what does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 04:48 AM
34

"Men are failing to achieve higher education due to a biased system, but the real problem is educated women who can't find a date!" What? Really?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:37 AM
1

I'm aware of men's abject lack of rights in that department, but isn't it possible to defend yourself from that using a prenuptial agreement?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:06 AM
2

While he's making big statements about how men are supposed to be servile, why doesn't he rename himself "doormat"?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:30 AM
1

I know, I want those things too, but that's not what this discussion is about. We're talking about whether or not there is a good reason to get married in spite of the lack of legal rights that husbands have relative to their wives. I'm arguing that since some states don't give any custody to unmarried fathers, there is a reason to get married.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:16 AM
2

You define misandry as hate or fear of men. Wouldn't sexism be hate, fear, or any other negative emotions attached to either sex?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:13 AM
-4

So by "reproductive rights" you mean "no visitation, but you still pay child support"? Because if you don't get married, that can happen. We don't have as many rights as we should. That's just how it is for now.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:09 AM
2

They do, but they haven't. I just proved that not getting married can also get you buried. Furthermore, in some states having a family and living with them for long enough will render this whole discussion invalid because you end up legally married anyway.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:08 AM
3

If misandry is hatred or fear of men, then what would you call sexism against men?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:05 AM
3

I'd rather have an appropriate level of custody of any children than my money.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:01 AM
8

How can something be sexist against men, but not misandry or bigotry?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:53 AM
3

Some states still automatically give the mother custody in the case of unmarried parents.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:39 AM
-11

So that they could be able to be in the lives of any future children.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:30 AM
11

How is this reaching a low? I'm affirming to him that there are bigots who wish to use him as a token, who don't respect him like they should. With what he's told us, it would be irrational to conclude otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:37 AM
2

You're so right. They don't want to fix anything, they just want to win.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:35 AM
2

So you mean an MRA? She calls herself a feminist, but that's by the old definition: someone who actually supports equality.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:35 PM
1

Hit me up if you live in Oregon!
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:34 PM
1

The feminist narrative is so absurdly powerful by now, so effective of silencing other narratives, that it could take centuries for the damage to be reversed.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:14 PM
2

By then they probably won't let men leave the country very often. I will probably be willing to illegally emigrate though if it gets bad enough.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:08 PM
1

Meh, I think that using force can be justified if you're attempting to save someone from greater harm, or prevent them from running around breaking windows and throwing shit at people for the horrible crime of being white.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:05 PM
1

Because women are beautiful nurturing goddesses and the bedrock of society. They can do no wrong!
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:00 PM
1

Shit like this is tacky and has no place in the 21st century. As much as I despise what feminism does to men and all the lies it spreads, I agree with them on this.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:49 PM
1

Username- relevant: sperm whales are one of two toothed whales that are not dolphins, the only other being the orca.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:46 PM
3

I think that the crucial thing to remember is that as a man, going up against a woman in the context of Western legal systems, you do not have rights. You are a second class citizen and there is no way around that except to follow advice like the advice posted here.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:34 PM
1

Having a male centric cinema industry isn't optimal, but it's probably not institutional misogyny. Most likely more men work in it because more men are interested in it, and they usually will write about more masculine characters and themes. As for women's bodies being shown off more, there's simply more of a market incentive to do so. Besides, sexualizing and objectifying an actress or her character are two different things. Objectification would be when the only thing you value is their body, …
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:21 PM
1

I vote Libertarian. They're not perfect, but they actually care about rights.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:15 PM
3

Like it or not, feminists are against equality.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:18 PM
3

Look, I welcome redpillers with open arms as brothers in the struggle against misandry, even though I disagree with a lot of shit I see coming from TRP. But you guys need to separate your identities as MRA's from your identities as PUA's or you will ruin this movement. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/34k0nj/red_pill_about_to_surpass_mens_rights_in/cqvjxs5 Basically this is a battle for hearts and minds, and we will lose unless you guys start using alt accounts and stop lumping TRP an…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:15 PM
2

The only "privileges" I know of are wealth, legal rights, and a horde of activists justifying everything you do and giving you money for your skin color.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:03 PM
4

"We're going to fix systematic discrimination by systematically discriminating."
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:02 PM
2

Yeah, I've been telling my friends lately. And I've been pretty open about my sexual assault, especially on the internet (because anonymity). It's especially important to my being an MRA because my assault-er wasn't even a bad person- she was just deluded by this culture into believing that she was incapable of hurting a man due to her small size, that "no" means "yes" if they have a penis, and so on. Same goes for my being an atheist. Atheism gets way more hate than I thought it would, so I lik…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:00 PM
38

That's because they're misandrist shitsacks who want you around as a diversity trophy.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:43 PM
1

I have no idea how this is lost on you. The more misogynistic shit you say, do, and in this case, associate with, the more misogynistic people will think you are. I've met redpillers who weren't particularly misogynistic but the group as a whole? I mean, come on- there was a recent thread asking if redpillers loved their own mothers and most of them said no. If we never blame it all on women, try to strip rights from women, talk about women as inferior, etc., then it will be far harder for femin…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:38 PM
0

Sweet Christ. Get the picture. They will call us sexist no matter what, but if they can prove that we associate with redpillers, then that claim will look legitimate in the eyes of everyone else. Political movements and similar things are "hearts and minds" campaigns. We can't convince feminists how brainwashed they are, but we can show millions of non-feminists that men need and deserve their help in order to secure their freedom.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:21 PM
12

"I'd" means "I would," not "I will." As in, if I were in a situation wherein hiring a male model was on my to do list in any capacity, I would hire him. Obviously I am not actually in the business of hiring models. "You can't even cover your own bills." Source on that one? Oh, wait, the source is your ass, and you're being an ass for no reason.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:08 AM
7

Nice ad hominem buddy, really adds to the discussion. Look, I'm not going to get married most likely, but any decent wife is a trustworthy life partner. I know so many women who would never do anything like that, even though the system entirely enables them to do so. I have seen redpillers say shit like that, multiple times. So many of the angrier ones just view women as bimbos looking for the next cock to ride. There is a world and it exists. You live in it. It consists of everything you have e…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 01:31 AM
3

No shit. The feminists hate us either way. I'm worried about everyone else. If I look misogynistic in John Doe's eyes, then nothing can stop the feminists from tearing apart my credibility in John Doe's eyes.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 01:04 AM
10

Until I can exercise fucking mind control and force people to consider my perspective valid, credibility matters. No one will listen to someone who has successfully been branded as a misogynist.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 12:01 AM
8

Buddy, they have free reign over every echelon of Western society specifically because they can accuse any opponent of misogyny and wildly, instantaneously reduce their credibility. I have no intention of giving them ammunition to shoot me with.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:52 PM
2

Bring a voice recorder, wear it at all times. Sue the fuckers.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:49 PM
14

Dude, their modpost right now is about how even your wife will never be on your side. I've talked to a lot of them and many of them sincerely believe that women are outright inferior. Some of them may have some valid points, but if it were my way the MRM would be completely divorced from them. We are the literal opposite of a hate group, but red pillers make us look like a hate group. And that is ALL the feminists need to keep us genitally mutilated and locked behind bars, is to make us look sex…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:43 PM
13

Yeah, this is still an egregious case of inequality. Worse even since he uses that face she maimed for his livelihood.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:32 PM
28

I'd hire the shit out of him. That scar and the discrimination it represents is the perfect symbol for the MRM. Hell, my circumcision scar is a record of misandry that I carry with me everywhere I go.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:31 PM
2

Yeah, on the extreme off chance that I ever get married, paternity tests are going to be in the pre nup. My theoretical fiancee would know enough about my gender relations attitudes not to take it personally, I hope.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 06:49 AM
8

That's awesome that this company is doing this. One theme I feel is really underdone in fiction lately is the importance of fraternal relationships. I'm super close with my brother, and I also have three friends from high school who I consider family as well- I can't imagine being a man without having my brothers to support me. On a broader definition, I actually consider fellow MRA's to be brothers as well- "brothers in arms," perhaps- against institutional misandry and a society that shows apa…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 06:34 AM
3

Yeah, but sound thinking like that is never used at universities.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 06:10 AM
3

I don't know how anyone could consider her anything remotely similar to "competent" after Benghazi. I think that, more so than any other American stateswoman, her success comes from her gender. She's a walking monument to /r/pussypass.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:01 AM
2

Pretty much. I feel like the majority of all jobs are within women's physical capabilities, but some of the ones that generally aren't would definitely be paid well enough to help explain some of the "wage gap."
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:39 AM
2

The problem with that is that it doesn't apply to my parents at all. The sexual dynamics just aren't at play there, they don't even bone much anymore and neither of them want to. They're in their fifties, man. And even when they were younger, they cared much more about my brother and I than they did their dynamic. My mom wasn't loyal because she perceived my dad to be dominant, she was loyal because my dad was her husband and the father of her children. She didn't not pull that shit because she …
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:21 AM
2

Really? She must assume she has women's votes in the bag.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:58 PM
1

Oh, yeah. That is wrong.
/r/PussyPass29/04/15 10:38 PM
3

Yeah, men and women characterize one another. Men characterize men and women characterize women, too. I characterize my older brother to be a super chill dude and I characterize this chick this spread rumors about a buddy of mine to be a bitch. What's your point? That women as a whole characterize men as a whole in these specific negative ways? Because one shitty book is a far cry from that.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:59 PM
1

Good luck getting that one past the feminists. "Equal rights with men? I don't think you understand- by equality, we mean fuck you."
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:57 PM
1

I cannot, for the life of me, tell whether you're a low effort troll, or even more insane than your namesake. You are the epitome of Poe's Law. I'm honestly kind of impressed.
/r/PussyPass29/04/15 07:15 PM
2

You can gas Jews and get away with it if you have a vagina. How has Western society degraded to that extreme?
/r/PussyPass29/04/15 07:04 PM
3

Dude, Mattress Bitch is a psychopath. She has repeatedly said that men should be stripped of due process in the case of sex crimes.
/r/PussyPass29/04/15 06:57 PM
2

Definite pussy pass. Here we have two young people. One of whom is guilty of slander and libel, the other of whom got kicked out of college. Even if he wins the case, the fact that this happened in the first place is indicative of her having a massive advantage over him from the beginning.
/r/PussyPass29/04/15 06:55 PM
14

I don't see how it isn't acceptable to portray this. Sexually assaulting minors is absolutely horrible, but no worse than anything else that happens in Game of Thrones. You're not supposed to sympathize with the conniving sociopaths of King's Landing. Complaining about this show portraying this crime is like saying that the show promotes murder because people die in it. Plus, the actor said that Dormer was super professional and helped him through the total weirdness of it. I see no problems her…
/r/PussyPass29/04/15 06:46 PM
4

I think it's both a feminist and Men's issue. Men are "slut shamed" more often than you'd think. Many Americans seem to regard promiscuous men as "players" or some other such drivel, but unfortunately the opposite extreme is adopted by both the left and the right from time to time: feminists often treat promiscuous men as misogynistic, and religious people from the far right often treat sex as shameful in general unless it's between married people.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:29 PM
3

Of course it's okay. She's a woman. Didn't you know that they can do no wrong?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:25 PM
3

The one problem I have with that is the idea that men are being outcompeted. They probably only fail more because the education system caters so thoroughly to female students and the methods in which their brains tend to pick up information.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:24 PM
3

Pretty much. You think Congress is going to try to pass a bill prohibiting Selective Service? It's Congress that votes to send our young men to die.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:22 PM
8

This is terrifying. If you haven't yet, read Harrison Bergeron. It's a somewhat fantastical scenario of this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:19 PM
4

Eeeehhhhhhh. Women can generally do the same crap that men can, but they generally have less interest in doing so. Like how less apply for STEM field positions, run for Congress and so on.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:18 PM
1

Glad to help, brother.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:20 PM
1

The counselor might be the right advocate. I honestly don't know how important that would be. It could save your skin, or prove useless. I would have no way of knowing which.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:54 PM
1

Stands to reason. A lot more people at minimum wage than there are CEO's. I'm assuming that the wage gap itself would be roughly normally distributed, though, if it existed.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:51 PM
1

Look up Maddox's video about it. He cites a lot of good sources that you can use.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:48 PM
1

Nice. In spite of Maddox's impeccable work, sadly, they probably won't consider him a credible source. I recommend citing the same sources he does instead of citing him.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:53 AM
1

I swear, so much of this sub is basically /r/PussyPass. Women might have even more privilege than feminists claim men have.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:37 AM
10

That book sounds terrible, but this article is also shit. It criticizes categorizing men as alphas and betas while doing the same. Narrow vision and hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:35 AM
2

A Redpiller painting with extremely broad brushstrokes. Not uncommon.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:30 AM
1

Congratulations! Now you can ruin basically any man's life by launching a rape accusation! Who cares if it's true? Certainly not corporations or universities!
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:21 AM
1

Maddox did an amazing video about it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDj_bN0L8XM And it might be a good idea to use some of his same sources and debunk it in a similar way that he does.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:20 AM
5

Jesus, not good. Definitely follow /u/PreftigeWhore's advice. Also, you might want to see if you can find a faculty member who isn't an SJW loony like most of the staff seem to be to confide this in. That person might become an advocate on your behalf.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:18 AM
2

Remove the personal info. Also, buy that man a beer.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:13 AM
1

No shit? If you've ever met an 18 year old who lost his virginity just because he didn't want to be called a virgin anymore, you've met a shining example.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:08 AM
0

Except for the fact that I never referred to him as biologically female. Get the fucking picture. I am divorcing the biological phenomenon of being female with the psychological state of identifying as a woman.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:56 AM
4

You've got to set a line somewhere. Some of the countries you mention have the bar set at 15 or even 13. No way in hell those kids are ready to be fucking adults. Hell, many 18 year olds aren't ready for that. There's no way that most 16 year olds are ready for it.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:53 AM
3

It should be legal for 35 year olds to fuck teenagers? Yeah, no.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:37 AM
1

I should hope so, especially in this case.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:04 AM
1

Do you actually believe that?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:34 AM
1

Yeah, it just... the more you analyze this statistic, the more abundantly obvious it is that it's insane to assume that it's for the same job.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:34 AM
43

Lemme get this straight. Woman attempts to rape man: Doesn't get charged Almost certainly gets half of her husband's assets plus alimony Even after she cheated on him by attempting to rape one of his friends. I have no words for this.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:31 AM
1

Eeehhhhhh. I'm assuming a normal distribution, as that's what's most commonly observed in most situations wherein statistics come into play. Still, in your scenario, that would mean that 23/24 employers would be currently getting sued...
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:24 AM
0

... what? When did I say anything remotely along that vein? The whole point of differentiating the biological and the psychological is to avoid such absurdity. Bruce, while being a trans woman, still has a prostate for example, correct? So in spite of being a trans woman, he should still have prostate examinations, yes? And since I'm only attracted to people who are biologically female, I wouldn't fuck him, right? You can respect someone's identity without denying the reality at hand. I do not u…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:30 AM
0

Those are gender roles. If those were what defined gender, then tomboys (girls who act like boys and so on) would be trans men. They aren't. By "psychologically a woman" I mean that he has a mental condition that causes him to regard himself as a woman. I shouldn't have to argue that point with you. "What, if you fuck him enough times he'll get pregnant, will he? If you want a sample of female DNA, you can give him a swab and you'll get it, will you?" Considering that I referred to him as being …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:22 AM
3

Except for the part where you fucking did. "I am only offended by the suggestion that finding such ideas suspect means I am filled with hatred and contempt for people who are, at worst, harmlessly deluded." Call it whatever law you will, but you are being judgmental. You're probably just butthurt that I deconstructed your absurd fallacy. I did read what you said, and I disproved it. Yet another thing that I really shouldn't have to point out: the fact that humans are capable of suffering gender …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:10 AM
4

Look, when I was 16 I would've been happy to fuck a hot 35 year old teacher. But on her part it's an egregious breach of ethics, and should definitely be illegal. For one, the age gap is downright creepy. If it were a 19 year old girl and a 17 year old boy, I wouldn't give a damn. Similarly, I didn't feel guilty a few years ago when I was 19 years old and dating a 17 year old. We were peers. But what kind of 35 year old man fucks a 16 year old girl? Ephebophilia just isn't okay. But she has all …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:02 AM
2

Oh, just shirk responsibility, sure. You DID call trans people deluded. That IS judgmental. I AM judging you for it. Everyone passes judgment, myself included, but someone is only judgmental when they pass unfair judgment on strangers. You do that. Even if some star-kin or other such bullshit arises from that once in awhile, that is not what dysphoria is about. That's like saying that marijuana is a gateway drug that leads to heroin: can it happen that way? Yes. Does it usually happen that way? …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:50 AM
2

Regarding your spouse as anything other than a life partner would be pretty likely to lead to divorce, man.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:37 AM
2

First off, you and I have very different definitions of the word "delusion." To be clear, Bruce is aware of the fact that he has a penis. He is aware of his male biology. However, he identifies as a female. Have I in any way manipulated or bullied you or anyone else here? Your last argument is a slippery slope fallacy, making you intellectually suspect. I don't think that you hate trans people, no. I just think that your attitudes towards them are backwards and, yes, judgmental. Calling someone …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:08 AM
0

You seem to be defining "woman" as biologically instead of psychologically female. By that definition he's not a woman, sure, but why would you take up that definition? That does nothing but piss off and marginalize people. It doesn't help this cause or any other cause.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:42 AM
3

Firstly, there are still a lot of psychologists who put out good work. It's unfair to dismiss the entire field. Second, if gender did not have a psychological element then it would be impossible to be trans. Third, even if it isn't a case of gender dysphoria, it doesn't matter what disorder it is: people with mental health issues deserve sympathy, not judgment. Particularly because it's none of my god damn business why they want to be a different gender. I only assumed that you might be offended…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:39 AM
0

"You've, uh... You've never heard of gender dysphoria? I'll give you the run down. Sex is a biological reality based around hormones, chromosomes and so on. Gender is a psychological reality based around identification with one sex or another. In most humans, gender and sex match up: you're a man and feel like one or you're a woman and feel like one. Some people, however, suffer from gender dysphoria, a psychological condition wherein your gender is aligned with the opposite sex. These people ar…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:22 AM
-1

Yeah, there are observable and quantifiable psychological differences between women and men. I think them to be equal due to equal average IQ, but there are differences in how they function. Honestly, I question the idea of equality itself, though, as it makes a comparison based dynamic that might not need to be made. People should have equal rights, deserve equal respect, and you shouldn't judge individuals as extensions of their demographics, but other than that I do not see the point in compa…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:18 AM
-1

You, uh... You've never heard of gender dysphoria? I'll give you the run down. Sex is a biological reality based around hormones, chromosomes and so on. Gender is a psychological reality based around identification with one sex or another. In most humans, gender and sex match up: you're a man and feel like one or you're a woman and feel like one. Some people, however, suffer from gender dysphoria, a psychological condition wherein your gender is aligned with the opposite sex. These people are re…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:14 AM
1

/u/frackzilla is referring to Bruce's gender dysphoria. Not the same thing as sexuality but you get the idea.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:08 AM
8

I have no idea. The lack of thought required to believe that is absolutely amazing. Think about it this way: if the 77% gap were true, then for every employer who paid women as much as men there would be one that paid women 55% as much or less. For one, how in the fuck could they get away with it? Second, why would you hire men when you could pay women half as much? I fucking wouldn't. Third, what kind of dystopia hates women that much? That is some Saudi Arabia shit. Any thinking human would re…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:05 AM
25

I dunno, she seems pretty good at it.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:36 AM
4

If a pay gap is what defines the state of being female, then I bemoan the loss of nearly every female in this entire nation.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:36 AM
2

These assholes always make this into a gendered political issue instead of a crime like it is. It disgusts me.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:34 AM
2

What kind of sociopath do you have to be in order to do this?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:30 PM
2

Mental issues don't always invalidate someone's opinion; sometimes they have nothing to do with the issue at hand. In this case, however, the bias stemming from her illnesses and disorders is very clear.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:26 PM
5

It was satirizing real instance of colleges showing heavy bias of one idea over another.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:21 PM
2

See, I'm not talking about this through a lens of preconceived notions, I'm just analyzing what it says. And it says that your fucking wife isn't your friend, that you can't trust her. Do you have any idea how unhealthy that dynamic is? Living with someone and assuming that they would betray you the moment it became expedient to them? Not to mention it's freaking crazy.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:57 PM
1

I agree that those variables affect someone's objectivity, but I also think that someone's ability to be objective is its own variable from the beginning. Some people are simply not willing to divorce their experiences or feelings from the reality of a situation, but some are.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:35 PM
2

"Women aren't your enemy, but even life partners are never going to act in your interests unless it aligns with their own. Even your wife isn't on your side." See, still adversarial. And for the last fucking time. NAWALT. Fucking NAWALT. There are women who bend over backwards just to see their husbands happy, even if it isn't easy, even if they don't get anything out of it other than to see their loved one smile.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:31 PM
2

I find it tacky at best. It's just downright unfair.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:25 PM
1

Really?!? I thought that you had to ask permission first!
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:10 PM
2

It's a pretty understandable stance in most people's view. You guys literally have a modpost up right now saying that women are pretty much the enemy. I mean, come the fuck on.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:54 PM
2

You're right: conservatives aren't always in favor of policies that would bring the cause forwards. Still, I think that they're much more receptive to the idea of men's rights than liberals are. Partially because the liberals don't want to rouse the ire of SJW's, and partially because liberals are more likely to believe SJW horse shit.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:33 AM
10

Like when someone tries to claim that their opinion as a survivor somehow nullifies the opinions of anyone who disagrees? Because that shit is insane.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:29 AM
1

Yeah, I might start recording in spite of it being illegal. You become way more bullshit resistant, seems like a smart choice.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:40 AM
7

Bit of an overstatement but I stick by the principle behind it: institutional misandry as observed in the draft, circumcision, court biases, and other examples, very often exists because of apathy towards men and their struggles.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:05 AM
8

Until that movement wins, I think it's fair to say that this problem exists on an institutional level. Also, it's fine to disagree, but your comment was just dickish. Don't talk to me that way.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:58 AM
2

Yeah, maybe I was a bit harsh. Sorry about that. I consider myself a bit of a purple piller who doesn't fit the mold of alpha, beta, or any other Greek letter very well. Like, I'll admit that some women are like that (SWALT?) and I have zero intentions of being a "beta" doormat, but the "alpha" lifestyle sounds insanely shallow to me. Ultimately I think that NAWALT is the bullet in the heart of TRP. My parents are the best example imaginable. My dad has all the positive traits alphas are suppose…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:10 AM
2

I did a little Google-fu and apparently a gamma male is a male feminist white knight ding dong or some other such moron. A very odd thing to accuse an /r/MensRights subscriber of. I think that this strange creature believes that you hate men because you do not appear to hate women. Like all members of Homo Sapiens Redpillus, it appears to believe that the relationship between man and woman is intrinsically combative. Also, Omega males are guys who want to kill everything. I don't fucking know, t…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:51 AM
1

Wait, where did he say that?!? Man, this asshole is a goldmine of hilariously stupid comments.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:44 AM
1

Well obviously people have a right to call me misogynistic all day, but I'm saying that it'd be optimal if our culture was one wherein people are slow to throw terms like that around as an ad hominem attack. Just because men have higher sex drives doesn't mean I'll lose control and rape someone if I see too much skin. This isn't Saudi Fucking Arabia, right?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:38 AM
2

Fair enough. I suppose I took it up with you because I heavily doubt that TRP offers an emotionally fulfilling V card swipin' experience. Even if it gets him there faster, losing your virginity just so you're not a virgin anymore gets you nowhere.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:34 AM
2

... "Only place where you'll get the tough advice necessary." So... Somehow /r/theredpill is literally necessary to get laid. I wonder how I got laid without all you guys' amazing wisdom? Oh, right. Necessary my ass.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:22 AM
1

In addition to my other comment: Sex is something beautiful and special for a man and a woman to share. (A man can have it with a man or a woman with a woman, too, and there's nothing wrong with that, but since you're straight that's not the topic at hand) It's supposed to be fun but intimate, and it's supposed to be exciting, it's supposed to make you a little nervous at first, it's supposed to come from a place of mutual respect. I hate that some people tell you that your virginity is somethin…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:01 AM
4

I only think that they're so seemingly effective at that because they have momentum. Society has so thoroughly bought into the narrative that white menz= racist sexist bad guy blah blah blah that all a feminist has to do is cry "my soggy knees!" and people will either agree or stay silent so they don't get accused of bigotry.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:51 AM
1

Depends on why the comment is removed. We believe in free speech here, it's in the side bar. But we don't believe in being assholes.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:41 AM
2

I should tell you something: You are no less a person or man for being a virgin. Do not let feminists, redpillers, or other assholes shame you into a desperate struggle to shed your virginity. That'll drive you up the wall. I didn't even make out with a girl till I was 17. And when I did, it was with someone I really liked. Loved, even. And I ended up becoming sexual with her. Redpillers would twist that narrative into a horror story because she ended up hurting me pretty bad, but I'd do it the …
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:39 AM
1

Radicals are terrible.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:22 AM
2

I'd have to think about that. I hate him and think he's a bigot, but that doesn't make him physically incapable of making good points. For all I know there's a portion of his content that would make sense here. If anything, any post or comment amounting to "hurr durr women are dumb sluts" should be removed, and repeat offenders banned.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:21 AM
1

Honeyed? Maybe he's a better writer than I give him credit for. What few articles I've read seemed like complete retard bait. Anyway, we might want to have a chat with the mods about the Redpillers leaking in here. If they want a TRP rights sub, they can make their own.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:03 AM
4

/r/bigdickproblems
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:02 AM
4

For being so moronic, SJW's are amazing at taking shit over. A concerning trend to be sure.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:59 AM
1

I hope we start banning those assholes. If they want a "Red Pill rights" sub they can have at it, but that's not what we are.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:55 AM
2

Funny how the rest of us manage to get laid without it...
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:53 AM
2

Yeah, Return of Kings is such a fucking dick. I remember an "article" of his wherein he argued that women weren't intelligent from personal experience, but didn't even give any personal experience. Like, a step below anecdotal evidence, we have non-anecdotal non-evidence. That retard bait is gender bent Jezebel.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:53 AM
1

Really? What is it that I'm so dreadfully ignorant about? Would I be so fucking enlightened if one day my brain were noble enough to comprehend the higher idea that women are all horrible, conniving sluts? Would I be such a better person if one day I finally transcended to the point where spinning plates was more important than having meaningful relationships? Bullshit question. Some MRA's are more concerned with legal rights, others with a more equal society as a whole. Some aspects of the men'…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:38 AM
1

I actually think that it should be legal for people to be all kinds of naked, but that the only people who would do that are assholes. So a girl can show up looking trashy as shit wherever she wants and Uncle Sam shouldn't be able to do anything about that, but a restaurant should be allowed to kick her out without getting sued and I should be allowed to call her out on it without being accused of misogyny. Same rules should apply to men.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:32 AM
1

I get what you're getting at, but this post would look wildly bigoted out of context. I'd recommend only saying stuff like this while referring to specific cases of insane bigots like Lena Dunham and Mattress Bitch falsely accusing men of sexual violence.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:30 AM
7

The fact that people pay this filth to spread her bigotry reflects shamefully on American society.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:28 AM
7

I agree with some of your points, but I do not believe that victims are incapable of reason. I speak from experience: some of us can see what stems from our anger and what stems from the reality of a situation.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:26 AM
2

Am I really kicking and screaming for a hellhole society, though? I want to abolish the draft, circumcision, court biases against men, the horrid way universities treat men. I want divorce laws that are fairer to men. A society wherein male sexual assault victims are taken seriously. Wherein delusional fantasies like the wage gap, rape culture, or the patriarchy are no longer taken seriously. Is that really such a dystopia? To address your other points, men's rights can never have a proper "face…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:22 AM
2

Partially because they know it works for attracting men, partially because they know that a horde of white knights will defend them if anyone calls them out for it. NAWALT, though, as always. Some girls are pretty classy.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:17 AM
3

I may as well be abundantly clear with you, since you seem to have no problem with controversy. You are the problem. You are why people think that the MRM is a hate movement. You wanna know why? Because you are full of hate, and you're an MRA.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:07 AM
1

Remember old Treebeard's argument that he's on nobody's side because nobody's on his side? Yeah. That. Feminists are against men's rights, absolutely regardless of how you slice it. They claim to be in favor of it in principle, but the overwhelming majority of them act and speak against it given the chance. They will deny men's issues even more than they exaggerate women's issues. Furthermore many of men's issues are caused by feminism in the first place. You may not be this way, but most femini…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:59 AM
6

I literally just explained that it's more about apathy than hate. If society cared enough about boys, they'd understand that that tradition is backwards, and they'd stop doing it.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:25 AM
3

Look, I've been there multiple times. I'm not saying that it's bullshit because it disagrees with stuff. I'm not even saying that it's 100% bullshit. But I've seen real data on what men and women are like. Neither are angels relative to the other in the majority of possible respects. Neither are devils relative to the other either. And I've seen circular logic there. Someone might roll up to say NAWALT, and you guys will just reply "oh well women who don't throw their pants off for alphas have j…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:22 AM
1

That's likely an exaggeration. Take my parents as an example: my father did much more of the work than my mother did, but she did most of the packing and so on every time he got moved for a promotion, she took care of me and my brother so my dad could work full time, and she even was willing to move to Europe while pregnant with me so that my dad could keep going with his career. I'm sure there are some women who don't do shit, but some of the time, the saying is really true that great men have …
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:13 AM
2

If you believe that capitalism benefits men...
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:08 AM
1

I hate the fact that it isn't legal to do that in Oregon. Would've made my life a lot easier when this insane white knight decided that I had assaulted his friend.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:05 AM
7

Dude, the first time I went to /r/theredpill their front page featured an argument that it's okay for a man to cheat on a woman, even though a central point of their theory is about how horrible it is that women cheat on men. I won't claim to have all the answers, but most of the rest of us know that they don't have them.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:02 AM
6

sucks air through teeth I think that /r/theredpill has a few good points, but you need to take it with a grain of salt the size of your head. Their theory is not entirely accurate, and I say that as someone who's studied evolutionary psychology, biology, and gender theory (not from shitstain radfems, but from gifted and reliable academics like Christina Hoff Sommers and Roy Bauermeister). They repeatedly ignore the fact that not all women are like that, so much so that they have a term for when …
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:00 AM
4

I love "true" subs. Trueatheism has such logical, non-bigoted discussion about religion, I subbed there after I got sick of /r/atheism's shit a few years ago. Apparently /r/atheism is better now than it was then, but I like trueatheism too much to go anywhere else.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:55 AM
2

A friend of mine gets a lot of shit for his sexuality, and I've gotten my share as well. It deeply disgusts me that these people would be so hypocritical as to glorify female sexuality and condemn male sexuality.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:51 AM
3

I think that it should be mandatory, actually. If the marriage was faithful, then you've got nothing to hide. And if the baby was raped into her (meaning that she was faithful but was impregnated by someone else anyway), that's something her husband would have a right to know.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:43 AM
5

They really expect you to raise someone else's child in a household built on lies? How could anyone be so hateful as to subject another human being to that treatment?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:41 AM
2

No, really: replace "capitalist" with "Jew" and you're a Holocaust denier. This is great.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:57 AM
2

I never thought I'd meet the Chinese equivalent of a Holocaust denier today. You should do an IAMA.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:20 AM
21

Circumcision is actually worse than piercing a baby girl's ears, but I'll agree that it should never be done. The reason that it's considered bad to pierce a girl's ears as an infant but acceptable to circumcise boys is that nobody gives a shit about boys. Same with the draft and other crap like that. Institutional level misogyny only ever existed because women were viewed as overgrown children. That was disgusting, so we ended it in Western civilization. Institutional level misandry operates on…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:55 AM
2

Mao killed like 50 million people man.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:49 AM
-1

Ann Coulter is completely nuts, regardless of whether she's on the money in this article or not. I wouldn't want my name attached to hers with a ten foot pole.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:34 AM
2

This really should be illegal.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:29 AM
1

"I wouldn't know. How does it feel?"
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:14 AM
18

You're on the money: male sexuality is becoming demonized. Man stares at woman's ass? Rape culture. Woman stares at man's ass? Empowerment. Everyone checks someone else out at some point, yet somehow it's considered bad when men do it.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 07:36 AM
-1

You're saying that women are encouraged by society to go for alphas?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 08:58 AM
0

Yeah, they can be utterly terrible about it. PUA's are worse, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 08:51 AM
2

Great work. An especially important point to drive home is that when feminists say that feminism offers solutions for men, they are wrong. Go to a feminist meeting of any kind and bring up the issues that men face. At best, they'll listen for a bit, and then do nothing about it. More likely, they'll downplay the issue and change the topic. At worst, they'll just harass you for it. Feminism does not believe that men have need of it, and therefore it does nothing for men. That said, they generally…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 08:36 AM
-1

TRP is all about manipulation, to which stupid and insecure people are especially vulnerable. A Redpiller or a Bluepiller has decent odds of sleeping with anyone, but it's a no brainer to say that the Redpiller has better odds of getting a bimbo in his bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 08:18 AM
1

I'm still hoping that this is bullshit. That doesn't seem like a credible source, and 50% have cheated sounds like it could be bullshit on par with 25% being raped. I'm guessing that the study in question was utter shit in its design. Probably a terrible selection bias.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 09:00 PM
9

People always say that "bad feminism" isn't "real feminism," but even the most "moderate" feminists base their ideology around outright fabrications such as patriarchy, the wage gap, and rape culture. They even turn rape from a crime into a "feminist issue." The only rational people who call themselves feminists nowadays are CHS style feminists. Also known as MRA's.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 09:47 PM
2

Heh. Kinda backfired when I ended up questioning our religion, I suppose.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:00 PM
6

Depends on the kid, honestly. My parents raised me to be a rational, skeptical person. Even at the age of eleven I was questioning everything around me.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:27 AM
10

"We live in a culture in which rape and sexual violence is expected and accepted as a norm." Suuuuure you do. Man, I don't remember being that stupid when I was that age.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:39 PM
1

... I was trying to say that certain male organs are extra susceptible. Like the prostate. Which is. So part of the higher cancer death rates would be the fact that we can get prostate cancer in the first place, which is deadlier than breast cancer. The other part is that prostate cancer is underfunded, exacerbating said problem.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 08:38 PM
0

That one wouldn't entirely be society's fault. It's possible that the male body has a few organs that are susceptible to cancer. Like the prostate. It is society's fault that funding for research of that is underfunded, but part of the cancer death rates could be accounted for by the biological reality that we have to begin with.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 01:39 AM
1

No doubt! I love CHS. She actually gave a positive review of an amazing men's rights related book I've been reading lately.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:20 AM
3

Depends on the crime. Public urination? Yeah, take 'im off the list. Raping your daughter? That should not be forgotten.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:18 AM
9

This disgusts me. Rape and sexual assault are crimes, not "feminist issues."
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:13 AM
5

"Don't protect yourself from rape! Tell men not to rape!" -Feminists using Dora the Explorer logic
/r/MensRights14/04/15 12:28 AM
0

Slavery is when you can decide everything that someone does, and violently punish them if they do not comply. They are legally considered your property. You can buy and sell them. Ex wives have nothing close to that level of control over ex husbands. Is it fair? No. But it's not slavery.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:26 AM
2

The only rape culture in America is the one where male survivors aren't listened to and respected.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:33 PM
3

"Are the ideals of feminism and the convention of a man paying for a first date incompatible? I say no. Emphatically no." Oh my god, my sides. These people are so determined that women should have their cake and eat it too. You can't tear down all the gender roles that you get the short end of the stick of and leave the ones that benefit you, you cherry picking hypocrites. Reminds me of a recent date of mine. Claimed to be a feminist and all that, but she made no attempts to split the check, and…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:27 PM
2

In other news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:14 PM
1

The only rape culture I've seen in America is how little we seem to care about male sex crime victims. Of course, it's the SJW's that take it to a whole new level, becoming full-blown rape apologists.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:09 PM
3

Bengazi wasn't enough to teach that lesson? That one made it abundantly clear to me that that entire administration is a shitshow.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:06 PM
2

The system is wildly unfair to family men, but I don't think it's fair to call it slavery.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 10:55 PM
2

Do we have a better source on children out of wedlock being the legal custody of the mother but not the father? That is fucked up.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:32 AM
1

Male virginity shaming is half of why I lost my virginity the way I did. I'd just broken up with a serious girlfriend and a promiscuous young woman got me on the rebound. Part of why I went for it was that I was sick of being judged as a virgin, which was seriously exacerbated by the fact that I don't fit in well socially. I have a strong desire not to be seen in a negative light, so when I had the chance to prove that women could find me attractive I took it. This completely ruined my friendshi…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:58 PM
4

So that's why Reddit hates fedoras... (Kidding)
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:01 AM
0

No, she still views you as resourced and powerful. Most women don't sit around looking for other options either; once they're married they stick to it. There's a reason that the divorce rate is fifty percent, and it's that many people divorce multiple times. The majority stick it out with their spouse. Also, every singular scrap of scientific evidence goes against everything you just said. Just letting you know.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/13 01:00 PM
1

Fucking think about it retard. If she stays with you she has access to all of your resources and if she leaves she gets half, although if there's a prenup she gets less.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/13 02:53 AM
1

Divorced women have less wealth on average than married women, so that's bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 08:34 PM
-1

Given that psychologists consistently report higher sexual activity and more enjoyable sex for married couples than for singles, I would say that we aren't.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 12:48 AM
-1

Again, romance elevates attraction. Google "love goggles". Also, only an SO knows just how you like it in bed.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 10:17 PM
-1

Again, romance elevates attraction. Besides that, your partner is the only one who knows just how you like your nookie. Most partners don't cheat. So no, she probably prefers her SO. Also, providing for them makes you attractive to most women because it means power and resources.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 10:06 PM
0

No, my point wasn't that women don't date normal guys or something like that. You guys were saying that we know for certain that she was only dating steadily because she lost the ability to attract one night stands. I'm saying that that's not necessarily the case. This guy was telling me that she does because all women are the same and they all fuck random guys until they aren't attractive enough to draw them in, which is of course complete bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 02:05 PM
1

So what? My point still stands that many women never sleep with "bad boys" and you guys' arguments are based around that they all prefer bad boys. If so many of them have never sealed the deal with one, your point there turns to liquid shit.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 07:23 AM
2

If they do it by being fucking sociopaths, they're obviously not dating material over the long term. Duh. Many men are happy knowing that their girlfriends and wives don't consider them sociopaths, and I'm going to be okay with that too. Given the effect of love goggles, my future wife is going to find me more attractive than pretty much anybody, just like many of my girlfriends did. Remember, a good pair of love goggles trumps being a machiavellian prick unless a) the prick looks way the fuck b…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 06:51 AM
-3

A huge percentage of women have never slept with an asshole, but you don't see that because you surround yourself with women who sleep with assholes and act like an asshole to attempt seducing them.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 02:16 AM
0

That can be true, but those traits are only attractive in one night stands. They're huge turnoffs in relationships. Those two facts make it easy for me to believe that a woman can change preferences or simultaneously hold those two conflicting preferences, which is why I don't find it so hard to believe that that woman was attracted to "alphas" and now is attracted to her current SO. Maybe her tastes changed, maybe they didn't. Either way it doesn't mean that he's less attractive as much as it d…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 01:48 AM
-9

-or- they're sick of guys that don't care about them and prefer a stable guy because it's more romantic and sensible on an emotional level. Speaking of which, romance elevates levels of attraction, so she's probably more attracted to her current stable SO than she was most of the douchebags she used to fuck.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 01:29 AM
-6

You're either calling yourself a notorious, sociopathic machiavellian or someone with bad game. Your pick.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 01:26 AM
-4

Yeah I read that thread, I was the fucking OP. And I really think that elitists and bad boys are separated at least by social class if nothing else. By the way, that thread also subverted your "all women are alike paradigm" at least on things like height, hairiness, weight, and social class. The diversity of the responses was pretty big.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 01:23 AM
-2

That doesn't mean they all prefer dickheads and only settle for stable men when they can't attract assholes anymore.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 01:18 AM
-6

Is that applicable here? She says that she used to prefer "bad boys". Y'know, men with criminal records but not stable jobs. Do enough women prefer dickheads for this "observation" to be sound? No. They do not.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 01:15 AM
-3

No. Bad boys and "alphas" are not synonymous. Bad boys are the kinds of guys who have criminal records and your "alphas" are capable of picking up women. Those two things aren't always the same.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 01:06 AM
0

If there's a shit ton of women who sincerely get sick of "bad boys" and a shit ton of women who just hit the wall, she's likely to be either one. Why the fuck should I sit around and pretend that I know which one she is?
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 12:49 AM
-8

What, so you think that all women are the same?
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 12:47 AM
-16

Now I get it. You, uh... you guys have never met her though so I wouldn't make assumptions. It's not like women are made from a cookie cutter.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 12:23 AM
-3

Observe how I used the words "Some women" instead of "all women".
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 10:58 PM
-4

Yeah but you were all "Oy don't take that as advice" so I was like "Neh breh relax, I was just there to see shit"
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 10:37 PM
-4

Are you saying that she got sick of bad boys or that she lost her ability to get them to fuck her?
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 10:35 PM
-7

I wasn't asking for advice breh. I just wanted to take an honest look at the broad spectrum of female preference.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 10:31 PM
-7

Here ya go http://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/1debn5/ladies_of_reddit_what_tastes_in_men_do_you_have/c9pvnta?context=3
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 10:21 PM
7

Yo, it's OP from the link up top. Good news for us masculine guys who are blunt, don't shave often enough, have decent musculature instead of being built like a stick and are seen as cocky by most of our peers, etc.: some women like us. Bad news is they pretend not to.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 10:14 PM
-5

That chick had issues.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 10:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter