TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FredtheFailLord Archive

View 1 posts and 136 comments by FredtheFailLord on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

GeneralFredtheFailLord/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:39 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
80

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:10 PM
3

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:41 PM
9

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights29/12/17 03:42 PM
18

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights15/12/17 04:09 PM
5

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights05/11/17 05:27 AM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights28/10/17 04:08 PM
10

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:02 PM
7

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:29 AM
19

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:42 AM
6

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:40 AM
10

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 05:07 AM
7

deleted What is this?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 09:03 PM
1

If their goal is "encourage people to buy local" then it's working
/r/MensRights04/07/16 06:09 AM
1

Get a picture of a guy in drag winking at the camera, post it next to their poster
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:20 AM
66

When you tryna stage a murder but still gotta keep track of the calories
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:08 AM
0

They'd have to have an extension, but yeah, .b would be more efficient. Not sure why they didn't go all the way here since that was the reason they gave and someone just wanted .bro out
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:56 AM
0

Later in the thread mozilla said it's easier/lower memory to use fewer letters, which originally led to the .bro extension. .br is less descriptive but still 33% fewer letters
/r/MensRights10/10/15 10:43 PM
9

Really it's good practice to archive everything possible, then let users visit the original on their own
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:03 PM
4

"No, but if they keep equating non-activism with hatred, I might start"
/r/MensRights19/09/15 04:28 AM
7

The way I see it, the other person isn't looking for anything beyond an "agree to disagree" or "you're right" If they won't have an intelligent conversation, why try to force it?
/r/MensRights19/09/15 04:27 AM
1

Damn, foreign students who speak gendered languages will be confused.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:04 AM
2

Especially when the entire movement is predicated on social change and new ideas. Progressiveness wouldn't exist anymore if it didn't change and expand, which is why anyone claiming that slippery slope arguments are a fallacy is probably wrong.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:51 PM
1

Sure thing, I had assumed that since the week was just an aggregator, the author wouldn't be supported unless people clicked "see more." Which would remove the purpose of archiving anyway.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 01:04 PM
1

Flaired as general, maybe social issues would be more appropriate?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:39 AM
4

Sure it is. Both scenarios involve women who never experience said oppression complaining about it on the internet!
/r/MensRights07/06/15 08:58 PM
27

He'll be shadowbanned and his post deleted, most likely. Not for the content, but for the intent behind it.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 08:26 PM
2

I have dessert pretty much daily, but I also walk a fair amount, eat otherwise healthy meals, and drink water instead of soft drinks.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:17 PM
3

It's a shame they "updated" her to the 3rd wave version
/r/MensRights29/03/15 02:05 PM
37

Well apparently the college took them seriously
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:43 PM
9

To be fair, if someone's only news source is jezebel, they're beyond hope or reason anyway.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:12 PM
17

Yeah but we need a gendered term to keep feminism relevant!
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:25 AM
7

It's certainly not about taking away advantages
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:08 PM
0

Woops, should have said husband, not father, sorry for the confusion there
/r/MensRights23/02/15 07:04 PM
2

-105 points 3 hours ago Holy shit. You had it coming, given the subreddit culture and the whole "men should have to pay for everything in the marriage, never mind that we're talking about after marriage!" thing, but holy shit.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:15 PM
9

Because it could potentially remove an advantage of being female, in this case alimony, by setting a legal precedent that women should work after marriage instead of being financially supported by the husband.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:12 PM
13

Man here. I'd rather be rich, honestly.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:07 PM
9

More people see ads (especially during the super bowl) than read doctoral theses.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:53 PM
24

CHECK YOUR NOBLE GAS PRIVILEGE
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:52 PM
1

Think you took the b8, m8
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:27 AM
3

Conservative and liberal ideals are not all at odds with each other. You act like one side is universally right and one is universally wrong, then I bet you don't realize that sort of mentality is exactly why Congress hasn't done shit.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 06:03 AM
5

I'm pretty sure conservative ideals involve not cheating, honesty about whose kid you're having, etc.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 12:09 AM
3

/r/nottheonion would love this
/r/MensRights18/01/15 04:05 PM
2

So? Just walk in people's yards /s
/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:44 AM
3

It might be that there are no keyless locks on the interior, and that the lock that does exist requires a key to operate. Which typically only happens one way (entry) at gas stations.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 04:59 PM
51

Trash collection keeps society from turning into a pigsty. Look at the trash you generate in a week. This is easy if you've ever gone a week without it. Imagine that multiplied by however many people are in your city.
/r/seduction08/01/15 12:04 AM
-1

"It could never, affect me, I know better than to interact with those savages! But my comfort should take priority in MY country!"
/r/MensRights31/12/14 01:12 AM
1

Dr. MacKay said campus codes cannot replace a criminal process, but they can allow action to be taken immediately, such as separating the victim and perpetrator if they have classes together Presumption of guilt controversy engulfed Dalhousie University after it said it will pursue a restorative justice process to address misogynist comments posted on Facebook by 13 men in its dentistry faculty "Think like us or walk away" isn't a very learning-oriented thought process. That being said, maybe th…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 01:06 AM
17

pay more attention to their phones than to their company So much this. I've abandoned friend groups because of this, it's sickening.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:28 PM
1

Just as the Nazis were obsessed with burning books and exterminating any free-thinking group whose mere existence might be incompatible with its one-party fanaticism It's actually somewhat encouraging that "social justice" moves against Middle-Eastern culture. At least they're almost getting it. And theoretically, reducing funding to countries without feminist's standard of gender "equality" would save millions if not billions in our tax dollars. The foreign policy is just a bit worrying.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:30 AM
2

or exist within worlds written by male writers. Yes, that's an entirely reasonable conclusion to make. Men writing stories is problematic because reasons. Why not? Today, AAA games are produced with largely white, middle class males in mind, yet are consumed by an increasingly diverse group of people. That's misleading. While the games might be consumed by and INCREASINGLY diverse group, the question is increasingly diverse compared to what? Women don't outnumber men in AAA game consumption, as …
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:49 AM
3

Oh there would be no reason for it to be a common tourist attraction if it wasn't safe, but being safe and feeling safe are different.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:22 PM
14

Skydiving would be fucked if the right to feel safe was a thing.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:44 PM
4

The others looked ridiculous in their (poorly fitting) tshirts. Good on him for sticking to looking professional.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:55 PM
3

Wait, so she only has to pay back half the school's money, pay Banks after ruining his future earnings/education/reputation, and she doesn't get any other punishment?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 04:01 AM
41

Distribution, mostly. Well-recognized people are in a better position to spread an ideology
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:50 PM
5

Forbes, since it contacted them regarding the author's firing.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:23 AM
1

You can't control which people see which posters so easily. Some may get taken down, some may not be in areas they go to You aren't thinking on the right scale. Placing a lot of posters around campus, especially in high-traffic areas like cafeterias/lecture halls will ensure that a lot of people see a lot of names. If someone sees their friend's name on a poster, and mentions it to the friend, both are now suspicious of all posters. Friend circles and apps like yikyak help a lot, it's not just t…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:03 PM
2

So the point is to make enough posters, and post them in enough places, so people have a good chance of seeing bullshit. "If this poster was bullshit, are all the others bullshit too?"
/r/MensRights23/09/14 06:31 PM
0

That, and sending us checks and offering us better jobs. They're having to cut down on jobs though, it was in the last caviar social.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:07 AM
-1

1st and 2nd wave feminism, then it all went to shit. Instead of taking the movement out of the west and into places that could benefit, they started fucking everything over.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:35 AM
2

It's better than just letting it happen and treating it as normal, but yes. Hopefully people will begin to realize that these sites don't actually provide news on gaming and move on. That's the best possible outcome, the degradation of the userbase to the point where these sites have to fold.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:11 PM
1

Well only crazy feminism exists in Western nations. They should all go to the Middle East and make some positive changes there.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:31 PM
2

You're right. It seems to only give full coverage to women with no insurance in families making under 200% of the poverty line. Why men couldn't be included is beyond me. If this is accurate, then it's only about a 1% increase in patient volume.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:35 AM
0

This law only applies to breast cancer, which is fine. It's a certain type of cancer, and both men and women may join the program. Really, men have it slightly better in this case, as there are no citizenship/immigration requirements for men of any age, while there are requirements for women 65 and older.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:10 AM
4

Well, they're working on exacerbating male issues, if you count that!
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:58 AM
4

That's so depressingly pitiful I couldn't watch past 40 seconds. Whatever these people are trying to accomplish, they're failing.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:40 AM
6

They do have a certain creativity in their slogans, though feminism gets more points for graphic design. I bet it's all the feminist art majors.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:23 AM
7

First and second wave feminism were alright and pretty necessary. Third wave feminism would be a joke if it weren't so terrible for everyone involved.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:42 PM
1

That's a terrible way to explain it, but an effective way to make SJWs angry. I'd watch the resulting youtube vids.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:29 PM
2

In that case, fuck you
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:02 PM
-9

I like those odds.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:53 PM
2

I'd photocopy everything, then go sharpie/expo over everything that could be linked to me. Witness names, plaintiff, everything except the name of the judge making the request. Chances are if s/he makes that request of you, they'll make that request of others, so there's no way to doxx.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:55 AM
6

Not really. Feminism = neglect of men. Not necessarily hate (though it does happen pretty regularly).
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:48 PM
2

This is actually good advice for anyone in general, the background may as well be irrelevant.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:06 AM
9

Men and women respond to alcohol differently. Study after study shows this. What this has to do with the minimum drinking age, I have no idea. Actually, it seems counter-productive. Horribly counter-productive, actually. Not that it matters, people are going to break the legal drinking age, damn the consequences, no matter what that age may be. I personally think there shouldn't be an in-home age, and a 14-16 year old public drinking age.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 03:31 AM
7

Alabamian redditor here, no towns named noone nearby.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:11 PM
2

Do you still have the picture?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:46 AM
1

Because 2012 totally didn't have widespread media coverage of mass shootings (That link even goes to outside websites' coverage!). Nothing like Sandy Hook was going through people's heads then.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:12 AM
2

Well, regarding the idea that all men are capable of rape, it's technically true. That doesn't mean that even a significant portion of men have a desire to rape, or act on that desire, but yes, people can rape each other. The article does have a heavy "lots of men do this" bias, though
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:27 PM
1

So? People upvote unfunny posts on adviceanimals. How many of those posts do you think are true? People upvote biased news articles. Upvotes do not make truth.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:24 PM
7

This isn't really a men's rights issue, more of a gun fear issue. Even given the recent massacres, though, a drawing of a gun leading to this shit is a bit bizarre.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:08 PM
13

Even if you'd only get 1/3 of the money, you'd get justice and satisfaction And a third of the money
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:29 PM
2

This is an article from 2012.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:48 AM
2

Well that's no fun.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:22 PM
9

What gender do robots count as?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 03:23 PM
4

There's twoxchromosomes, but that's more about being a female in general (which raises the question: why is that a default?).
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:14 AM
7

Think of the median American student. Or in this case, median Canadian student. Half of them are less intelligent.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:32 AM
3

You're welcome!
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:11 PM
2

Well, the qualifier there should be "in a first world country." If you're a woman in the middle east, for example, chances of sexual harassment are much higher.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:06 PM
2

"but your honor, I shouldn't be charged with murder! That man is dead, I should know, I killed him myself! It's a victimless crime!"
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:04 PM
3

Because a person who has been raped will experience this far more than those accused of rape in most cases. And I am not saying that there are not cases where the accused suffers a great deal more than the accuser (because there are), but my point still stands that actually being raped will more so be the bringer of stress So because someone else might have it worse, nobody suffering should complain?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 10:18 PM
21

First off, there is no reason this message has to point to either sex So the whole "are you a dream boyfriend by day" thing doesn't point to a specific sex?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:35 AM
7

/r/femimemes?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:28 AM
4

"Current Issues in Feminist Art" class Wow. I can't believe this was actually a class. That's... impressive, if only in how stupid it is.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:52 AM
1

Well how would you prove this? Murder is a very serious crime hard to make meaningful argument for a potential murder, especially without priors. Even career criminals abhor murder. So is rape, actually.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:50 AM
1

I'd agree with marriage not being sexist. Divorce, however, is quite a different subject.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:36 AM
2

Because there haven't been enough (entirely justified) lawsuits to scare the offenders into legality.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:50 AM
5

This is why I like this sub. Because no matter how far against logic or accepted ideas people go, the mods aren't going to ban eggoChicken. Nobody has mentioned "ban" until me. And ioudas won't be banned for "sexist" language like twat. If this were another sub, people would be raging hard and looking past individual arguments. Good to know we can both insult people and argue well. /actually serious, just got back from a quick lurk on socialism
/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:46 AM
3

To some people, ridding others of the freedom to say "Muhammad is a cocksucker" is the most important thing in the world. Why should anyone give a damn? And if it's expected, but not required, why not change the expectation through practice?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:40 AM
2

Then nothing will do anything meaningful to change it, and confrontation might make OP feel better. Win-win!
/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:32 AM
6

He didn't even use latin, actually, you're just kinda dumb.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 06:31 PM
3

The majority of active institutions are like this, and there are few feminists who publicly speak against these new definitions. Complacency is acceptance, or at least resignation.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:20 PM
2

And boy is it fun when you're feeling argumentative! It can be productive, too.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:27 AM
2

You know, instead of arguing with a current employee, you should have a debate in court with the owner.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:22 AM
18

It has nothing to do with being white, it's basic capitalism. You risk some money, you have a chance of making a return on the investment. If you plan well, your risk is low and return is potentially high.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 03:37 PM
1

Man, someone needs to donate so they can cycle their works more.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 05:59 PM
2

Lets not forget: this is tumblr. There is no reason at all to take it seriously. Nobody cares what people on tumblr think. They don't influence public policy, they don't really influence people's actions in real life. Also, that's a really shittily made piece of art. 1/10, would not put in a gallery.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 06:27 AM
6

Something some feminists hate. The vocal ones. Who affect policy.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:26 PM
2

checks pants Yep. Still there. But we shouldn't have to reveal our names. Our words should stand on their own, without a name or title to back them up. If we rely on name recognition and titles, we're no better than the false feminists we are against, relying on the feminist brand name rather than their own merits.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:20 PM
-1

How is this similar to vandalism in any way? Nothing is being defaced, none of the information is being changed or deleted, just added to. In response to the argument that information is being made worthless: it's already worthless. No evidence, no credibility in the slightest. And even if it doesn't do anything to help men, it can prevent Occidental from hurting men in the future. Preventing abuse is better than responding to it.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:29 PM
6

Well, Jimmy, looks like you have some explaining to do
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:13 PM
13

Remember, people: his name was Robert Paulson
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:57 AM
7

Why did the Tea Party matter in American politics? They were a small group, and look what happened. The Republican party started focusing heavily on cultural matters instead of economic matters. The fringe can get shit done if it's loud enough.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 12:56 AM
1

I'm pretty sure it's a friendly reminder for you to check and see if there's any more privilege you can use. It's important for all of us to use our privileges to the greatest extent possible, we wouldn't want any to go to waste. It's sort of like someone reminding you to check to see if you have your room key before you leave your hotel room.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:48 AM
11

Men's rights include the right to self responsibility. Great, that means I'm NOT responsible for random strangers. Which isn't what you said here, with the "four things" statement, and with the "up to you to control your sexuality" statement. Everyone controls their own sexuality, not the sexuality of others, no more rape. Fantastic. And before you call someone ignorant and defend an already refuted statistic (look to much of the links on this very subreddit as a source), I'll need to see a sour…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 05:45 AM
11

Yes, you are personally responsible for every act of sexism. You are responsible for instigating and perpetuating the idea that Pakistani women shouldn't go to school, and it was you who shot Malala in the head, twice (you fucking failure). It was you who campaigned against women's suffrage. It was you who opened a fake abortion clinic that harasses victims. Because you have a penis, and that makes you more responsible than anyone else for all the suffering women have gone through. You are now a…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 01:59 AM
1

Lesbian couple create a child who is deaf like them Literally the title of the article.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:54 PM
2

It's not ignorance. The couple did their research.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:32 AM
6

The separation will probably be worse when the kid figures out that his parents purposefully denied him an entire sense. I'd be really fucking pissed knowing that because of something that needed to be sought out, I couldn't experience a lot of the world. I might not want to change myself, but I'd be mad that it happened.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:29 AM
1

Refusing corrective aids when they clearly imply an ability to comfortably afford one. If they were too poor to afford a hearing aid, that's understandable. They just want their special little pseudo-engineered snowflake to grow up knowing sign language (which they could teach him anyway) and not hearing (what's the point? What could that possibly accomplish?).
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:19 AM
3

"You should fuck a quadriplegic, I bet there would be so much scholarship money in it for them if they made it to college!"
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:16 AM
0

That's the joke
/r/MensRights15/11/13 01:41 AM
9

Sounds like a plan to me!
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:10 AM
195

Start an impromptu Communism Appreciation Club, and give them away to everyone for "true equality"
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:45 AM
5

That's not really critical of feminism, though. That's just promoting gender equality. You know, what feminists (not including the extreme crazies) say they want.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:08 PM
3

well, come on, the explanation is right in the url.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:05 AM
-1

Well your issue is that you assed them to leave, instead of asking them. But yeah, what the actual fuck is wrong with your PD? Next time, you should carry documents saying that you're the caretaker or something. It's bullshit that you even need to.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:54 AM
1

Well, she's essentially saying that you should just sit there and take it. You know, like rape.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:13 AM
3

Get people who actually care about the idea to staff it, and make a list of reasons why you should have it in case you need to defend the idea against the local feminist rage-brigade
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:45 PM
8

Document everything, if it happens again complain about a hostile work environment. Invest in a webcam and portable HDD to show them if your job is on the line and you actually want to keep working there.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:33 AM
2

I consider those sorts of feelings to be total bullshit and call out anyone I know who displays them.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:27 AM
2

"Your Honor, I'd like to stop this court case. I take personal offense at being vocally suspected of embezzling money."
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:26 AM
10

The problem is, you think reality TV has something to do with reality.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:52 PM
2

Looks like a crack house...
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:24 PM
2

Institutionalizing her might not be a terrible idea.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:46 AM
0

This is only an excuse if you choose to accept it as such.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter