TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FreeAndHostile Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by FreeAndHostile on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Agreed. Women can be great. Men can be great. Women can be shitty. Men can be shitty. This is just a forum to celebrate men and help each other. I don't see how that's a problem.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:37 PM
1

Just getting back to this, but you're right and wrong. Those jobs ARE important. And they can be totally be mentally draining. But if you tell me an oil rig worker or a truck driver or a plumber contributes less to a society than a HR Compensation Analyst or a DEI Data Analyst, we're not on the same page.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 12:36 AM
19

I'm 100% for equal opportunity. But what I have a problem with is that men do 90+% of actual infrastructure work (plumbing, construction, electrical, waste management, mechanics, engineering, etc) while women are filling jobs like corporate project management, compensation, compliance, etc. Not that those jobs are not important, but it's not equal. And this seems to paint a broad stroke and doesn't indicate a healthy society at all. In fact, it probably indicates a problem that's getting worse.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 02:02 AM
10

Specifically, what rights do men have that women don't have?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:41 AM
14

Well, of course! Replace me with a guy that looks like Chris Hemsworth to serve a table of women and see what happens.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 03:36 PM
16

This is 100% anecdotal. Was she judging tips during the pre/post pandemic time? Is her restaurant near a conference center? Was she extra flirty serving a table of only men? Did she start working out or change her diet and saw an increase as she became more athletic/healthy? Did she change her hours from lunch to dinner? This is absolutely a ridiculous article that discounts all other logical reasons (even if it is true) and affirms feelings. We have fallen so far as a society.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:56 PM
55

The moment I heard "active aggressor" instead of "active shooter", I knew something was up.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 10:48 PM
1

This is literally the same logic used by gun control "activists".
/r/MensRights25/03/23 01:13 AM
44

Guaranteed "Are we nailing the same thot" would be instantly shut-down.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:56 PM
49

Women can't succeed without help. That's absolutely the message. Meanwhile, the "war on women" party is the one actually championing women and treating them fairly.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 04:11 PM
12

A man will pay the exact same price, if they choose to purchase those same goods. How is that not equal?
/r/MensRights14/10/22 06:07 PM
25

I just stopped shaving altogether.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 06:00 PM
1

They are. Read the full fucking post.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 09:28 PM
1

No. Of course not. But where did you see workers gaining ownership? Marxism isn't about a single company's direction... but the direction of society. It's about the breakdown of capitalism, and giving that power to the state. The modern HR professional believes in, and was taught at university, the need for "diversity" regardless of skillset (which can only be obtained from legislation - there are Fortune 500 companies that are over 60% female now), the forced education of unconscious bias (whic…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:04 PM
4

Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. Centralization of all credit in the hands of the state by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state. Extension of factories and instruments of p…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 10:16 AM
21

Agree with you for the most part, but capitalism is most definitely not a fraud. Marxism has been injected into HR and Marketing departments. Those groups wield enormous influence at the executive level. Governmental policies have hamstrung companies (for good or bad). Globalist financial institutions are flexing on those companies without a good credit score. What we have in the US doesn't resemble capitalism anymore. It is some weird blend of corporate-social-Marxism. The invisible hand doesn'…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:28 PM
2

Perfect post. You know, when Rage started out (under the Clinton Administration, and I think they may have broken up before Bush 2), I really thought they were just anti-federal overreach, and trying to be a voice for minorities they considered to not be heard, which is fine with me. Essentially, fighting the swamp. When Evil Empire came out, it was a major shift toward supporting anything non-white, with a huge focus on supporting the removal of borders. The Battle of Los Angeles seemed to have…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 10:15 PM
30

Disagree. It just puts the power back to the states, where it should've resided the whole time. It actually weakens a "national ban" argument.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:04 PM
61

Everyone is framing this as an abortion issue. It's not. It's just ruling the federal government should have never been allowed to overrule states on this issue. Literally nothing changes, unless you're in a state that votes to make abortion illegal. All the people freaking out on the media box will have nothing change in their life.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:36 PM
1

But that's the thing... We did. Civil unions solved everything, but it wasn't enough for some reason. There was no discrimination. It was just a new legally-recognized thing, equal to marriage. So, what didn't civil unions solve for?
/r/MensRights06/06/22 11:47 AM
1

I wasn't talking about biblical definitions. I was talking about legal definitions. No cherry-picking involved. Again I will ask, if civil unions didn't resolve the legality, what didn't it solve for? Why wasn't that enough?
/r/MensRights06/06/22 11:38 AM
3

See, that's not the thing, though. Marriage was solely defined as the union between a man and a woman. Period. It's like saying, "well, it's an archaic thing to consider day and night defined by the sun rising and setting... What if I work nights and sleep during days, shouldn't that entitle me to refer to days as night, and vice-versa?" During the 90's, the LG communities said.... "we should also have that right!" which they did all along. A woman could always marry a man. A man could always ma…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 03:57 PM
5

In over a decade, I have never.... Well once last summer, but I lost my cool, but that is a VERY long story. But you're exactly right.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 08:55 PM
38

100%. Was asked to leave the house because of a completely fictitious (insane) reason or the cops would be called. Wound up leaving. 6 weeks after separation, I get word that she took the kids to spend the weekend with this dude on vacation. She wound up dating a few guys, we divorced, and aside from less time with my kids (which is still emotionally devastating), I'm glad I got out of that toxic relationship. Over a decade now of not having to deal with daily emotional abuse.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 11:48 AM
14

There are approximately 260 working days in a year. So your plan is to pay a staff that contribute to the production of 14% less goods/service, but still pay them at the same rate as men? So do you (1) Pay men less to offset that or (2) hire only men or (3) raise the price of your goods/service to offset the costs? That's your three options, unless you have absolutely no business experience and are just shitposting for virtue points.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 11:57 PM
3

I've always wondered. Is that because they totally discount the science of evolution, or do they accept evolution and just concede their DNA is so flawed that it shouldn't be passed on to future generations?
/r/MensRights01/05/22 12:22 PM
14

Ok, let's just say an employer is 50/50 female/male and employs 10,000 team members. So, 5,000 would be female, with maybe 75% having a cycle (Im just guessing here), which equates to 3,750 team members that would get a day off per month. That's an additional 360,000 hours of work (3750×12×8) that is being missed out on. 960,000 hours if they just gave all 10,000 an extra day off. The work still has to be done. So, a company would need to employ an additional 173 FTE's or 462 FTE's each year (lo…
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:59 PM
16

I used to think this as well, but companies don't care anymore. They are willing to lose money in the name of "social justice". They are infested with communists and progressive-globalists at the HR and Marketing levels, and execs just seem to follow their guidance.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 05:44 PM
98

And then whine that there are no more male "providers".
/r/MensRights01/02/22 01:45 PM
58

Yep
/r/MensRights30/01/22 10:56 PM
92

It's a fairly typical opinion these days
/r/MensRights30/01/22 09:38 PM
6

That's why I will always buy Jif peanut butter (until they attempt to go woke). Changing their slogan from "Choosy Moms Choose Jif" to "Choosy Dads Choose Jif", even for just one ad campaign, was enough to make me support them. I always vote with my dollars.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 02:10 PM
7

So, the only "reasonable" answer I can come to is that these companies firmly believe they are on "the right side of history" and they are betting they will be rewarded in the future for being "allies" for the progressive globalist movement. Business only exists to make a profit. Period. Basic economics. But some companies seem to anticipate better profits on the horizon. Most of that stems from the influence of the rampant increases of globalist-leftists within the non-productive environments o…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 02:54 PM
13

You are way too rational about this. The clown world experience requires you to keep your rational thoughts, hands, and limbs inside the ride at all times.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 10:28 AM
2

That's really unfortunate
/r/MensRights13/10/21 10:20 AM
10

Haven't watched the show, but the comic run was very good at times.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 03:43 PM
13

In the US.... and that's an important distinction. Additionally, it MIGHT be because there were no US men playing in the world cup 2018, as they failed to qualify. In 2014, when the men did qualify, almost 3 times more US viewers than that of the 2018 women's world cup. Also, 3.5 BILLION worldwide watched the men's world cup in 2018 with no US men's team (or at least a portion of the tournament). Only 750 MILLION watched the women's world cup with a US women's team present (or at least a portion…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 11:54 AM
2

Reminds me when that song "No Pigeons" came out in response to TLC's "No Scrubs".
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:42 PM
5

I was talking about the book. He landed on the moon in the novel.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 01:30 PM
15

I remember reading that the author's intent was to make Forrest the symbol for living the Christian faith. Good-hearted, simple, caring, and even in extraordinary situations (I think he walked on the moon in the book) remained the humblest person. Jenny was a person that disregards that life and seeks worldy things instead of God. She joins the hippies, then social justice activists, then gets caught up in the club scene, abuses drugs, and always ends up unhappy but she always finds herself back…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 11:22 AM
15

Twitter, Reddit, Facebook... basically all social media.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 08:12 PM
2

Not to mention completely impossible to obtain. It may sound good, but it's literally impossible.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 12:22 PM
0

I'm with you. In 34/50 states (almost 70%), the age of consent is 16. Illegal? Yep. Wrong on so many other levels? Yep. If gender was reversed, would the male teacher receive a tougher sentence? Yep. The age of consent in Louisiana? 17. Was the student a day/week/month(s) away from 17? We will never know. I just know that me at 16, personally, would've had zero qualms with it. Still illegal, but that wouldn't have been a barrier for me at all.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 01:27 AM
6

Very true. I think its probably because the "celebrate single mothers on Father's Day" thing happens a LOT more. This was the first one where I remember the opposite. Like that first time I heard, Choosy DAD'S Choose Jif." Insert the DiCaprio pointing at TV pic.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 08:27 PM
4

Install a single urinal and a single toilet with stall in each. Make them both "gender-neutral". Then watch how fast these rules change.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 01:48 PM
5

With the recent numbers of testing results, isn't it now being extrapolated out to 0.4% - 0.6%? Edit: In the US, that is.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 04:09 PM
41

http://imgur.com/gallery/jGMZ1aw
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter