TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FreeSpeechFFSOK Archive

View 4 posts and 431 comments by FreeSpeechFFSOK on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You frequently argue that it should be legal to fuck underagers. No. I don't. This is your small minded and vulgar misinterpretation. To "fuck" is not "to rape" but is much closer to "rape" than to love. I never promoted "fucking" anyone. But people like you who think its fine to go around fucking people above a certain random age you made up have no moral high ground whatsoever. In the past people like you promoted fucking people of the "right" race, nationality, religion or gender and age was …
/r/MensRights20/05/23 03:00 PM
0

Are you a mind-reader as well as an ephebophile? You are not a psychologist psychiatrist. In fact you are woefully ignorant of psychology and psychiatry. Even if you were an expert, you still could not make such a diagnosis over the internet, nor would you try. So all you did with that stupid accusation, which is untrue BTW, is expose your own ignorance and label yourself. Go away.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:55 PM
-5

Islam is not so bad. But there are people who can make anything bad when they get their hands on it. A quarter of the world is Muslim. They honestly are NOT being so bad per capita. Per capita Americans make them look like utter pacifists.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:51 PM
2

Honestly I think its a defense mechanism and I think men of the past created it. It was formerly a good way to protect from rape and survive long enough to bring kids into adulthood...and thus, carry on those genes. So now, its essentially genetic. It still sucks though.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:49 PM
-5

I am not so sure. I see so many women who seem to be half zombified and unaware and really don't know some things they are doing and saying. I suppose men can be like that in some ways too, but its not usually anything I would care much about. Of course other women are perfectly aware of the crap they pulling and very proud of themselves when they get away with it. Again, some men too, but not much I would actually care about....personally anway. The men that excel at these things tend to be pol…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:45 PM
0

but no denials or rebuttals. And why would you expect any? You twist everything I say, and insist there are things there that aren't there. You ASSume. You don't listen and you don't think. And you have zero intention to treat anything I say fairly. You also make everything personal. Then you feign surprise that I respond to you with disrespect. Intentional or not, you are nothing but a troll. This is the most I intend to feed you directly. You will no doubt continue to bottom feed from other co…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:37 PM
-3

The fact you're linking a lack of said fucking to school shootings looks a lot like a veiled threat. To a stalking lunatic, I am sure it might look that way. You have an amazing propensity to see things that are not there. See, I speak plainly and logically, and try to eliminate nuance. You fill in all the nuance blanks with things straight out of your own head because it seems you need that emotional baggage to try and make sense of things....which of course, you consistently fail to do. Of cou…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:44 AM
1

Something that has to be said is that humans have some bad tendencies they have to fight, and some of them are very male and female specific. One that is universal though is the tendency to not be fair to other's personal situations, value to the people around them, and their specific or even gendered needs. An example would be what I see as the tendency of women to see my need for sex as some kind of joke. I mean, I am not asking them for it, I am just saying that in order for me to be happy, s…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 08:10 AM
0

I would not write off the entire western world, but definitely be extra special cautious having anything to do with a woman immersed in Anglo culture. I also don't think having a foreign bride even in America is such a bad idea, just a bit of risk she may get her mind poisoned while there. Banishing TVs from the house might be an effective measure.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 07:57 AM
0

I don't much like to hear men told to "get it together" just to have dates. Men and esp, young men (including and esp. teenagers) need to have an idea what they will be getting when they "get it together". Mere words are not sufficient. Hope is not built on nothing. Hope is built on evidence that things are possible. And the evidence comes from experience of at least some of it existing.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:37 AM
6

Its simple. Even when the police do sexually assault a man, nobody cares. But when its women, suddenly people are paying close attention.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 02:46 PM
0

Oh, I think they did believe women, just not the girl. The women in charge of her though, I am pretty sure this was steered by them. Someone raped that girl, and they probably know who. But they pinned it on the guy they didn't like.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 12:52 PM
-2

I am generally talking about teenagers. Its people like you so obsessed with children you always have to make it about children.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:44 PM
-7

Oh look. My stalker is back...proving my point about people's obsession with the "sex with kids" topic while they shug off kids getting killed and murdered.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:39 PM
-5

I cannot tell you how many times I have been punished for "sexualizing minors" and yes I am pretty sure its almost always women and/or feminists shredding my free speech. I would not say that is what I did...in fact...the entire premise of "sexualizing minors" is utterly preposterous. Its sort of like putting a string bikini on a tree and saying I sexualized it and now men are going to come hump it who otherwise had no sexual interest in trees. Indeed, a great deal of what feminists and women sa…
/r/MensRights18/05/23 01:05 PM
-20

Best thing to do would have been to contact her and tell her you want another session. And what you did from there is none of my business.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 11:44 PM
11

Surely AJG meant "Amazing Jumbo Genitals". What was she thinking? A Jumbo Genital? Clearly she is off her rocker!
/r/MensRights17/05/23 11:24 PM
-6

Dude.. you are big mad you can't legally fuck kids. I am mad that kids are getting murdered while imbeciles are too busy making stupid sexual accusations to even notice.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 11:05 PM
1

Indeed. I mean't "strange" as in logically unsound and unsettling. Downright disturbing in fact.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 11:03 PM
-19

Because that part was fucking insane so of course I pointed out the insane bit Insane is murdering the little children of someone merely suspected of being a terrorist...if that bit is even true. Mostly I just see guys opposing American meddling and murder in their own countries. Then the United Snakes blows up their house when they aren't even home, and him coming back to find his baby's arms and legs in different corners of whatever is left. Also insane is for something to be perfectly normal …
/r/MensRights17/05/23 03:38 PM
-22

Of course you don't understand. I made it perfectly clear I am upset about murdered children and you take it right back to teen sex cause that is all you can fixate on. You are exactly the type of person I am referring to. What does this have to do with men's rights? Nothing I was making a point of. I was asked a question and I am answering it. You can't even follow the conversation, yet you speak. Why can't people like you just figure out once and for all you don't what the hell is going on and…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 03:25 PM
4

The more things change the more things stay the same. When I was young, in my area, Black and gay people were the Devil, and marijuana was the Devil's poison. Now gay and Black people and weed are okay, but "pedos" and Christians are the Devil, and cigarettes are the Devil's poison. Early 1900s, White people married to Asians and adulterers were the Devil, and alcohol was the Devil's poison. Most people out there are just nuckin futz. They don't learn, and part of the reason is they don't want t…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:49 PM
-9

in a similar way that "incel" has been coined as a slur on mens sexual competence Not true. Its been twisted to become that way. But it was coined to mean masculinity so extreme it became bad....like competing so intensely one becomes unsportsmanlike or cheats.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:48 PM
19

Same. The term "bromance" just ruins the entire concept some people are trying to promote.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:46 PM
-31

Its hard to say, but it was probably everyone's almighty concern about teenage girls having sex with older guys, screaming "rape of children" even when the girl herself (rarely) says that is not what happened, while these same people are shrugging at things like America's murder drone program murdering actual little children and school shootings where actual children get murdered. I have cited Myra Gale Brown...the 13 year old who married her cousin Jerry Lee Lewis. She is old and was happy at t…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:40 PM
85

Obviously, you thought wrong. And this example is the tip of the iceberg.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 11:34 AM
169

Very strange and very chilling. So she was raped by someone else and it seems, no one cares who that person is. That it takes 100 letters from the victim to free the person not even accused by her is evidence of just what a complete farking insane world this is, with completely farking insane governments, completely farking insane so-called justice system and completely farking insane people running them and walking the streets. Just a nother fine example of why I have given up on the human race…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 11:31 AM
17

I might be from America, but that nation is alien to me. Its a police state now, run by a corrupt oligarchy that only wants the people kept down and believing in imaginary freedom. Anyone who cares can find evidence and examples just like this all over the web of how the police are just a citizen hating brute squad now....literally hired for their low IQ and inability to question their superiors or the needlessly brutal tactics and techniques they are indoctrinated with. They could not de-escala…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:51 PM
6

If we treat women like "one of the guys" they think we are targetting "ONLY" them and being misogynistic only. Actually, we guys are probably more misandrist by the logic of the definitions most women use. Thus, if we say a guy lost a game because of his little dork and tiny balls its okay by them. But if we say a female lost a game because of her A cups and knock knees we are being misogynist. Its bad enough we have to walk on egg shells around them any other time, but now they want to invade o…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 06:02 PM
144

Meanwhile, there are completely innocent people trapped in a Hell society made for them that could not afford even one of those damn balloons. And most of them are men.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 05:54 PM
1

Wow 10 insane people agreed with you, crazy. 1 vs. 11 is never good odds when it comes to who is crazy. But you sealed it by offering not a single logical counter. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 05:45 PM
1

Sure. But that is not a problem of the words or the slogans. Its a problem of people being A-holes.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:35 AM
5

The core of women's power is psychological tricks that lend themselves toward psychological abuse. Just use logic? Oh hell no. And since most women will use a mix of logic and psychological tricks freely and think this is right and good, many easily get completely tainted in a downward spiral of pre-occupation with emotion to understand how to sabotage other through their emotions. Women have one saving grace, and that is that they will use everything they have to try and protect and nurture the…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:20 AM
4

I don't think women are genetically predisposed to be a house wife Neither do I. I think most of them are genetically predisposed to desire a man with clearly demonstrable power, and a house husband hasn't got that. Therefore a man has to choose the roles that have demonstrable power or he will likely be an incel. So women created this situation from the start and ensured the role of homemaker is open to no one but them. Therefore, most of them have to shut up and fill that role whether they are…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:04 AM
1

I am pretty sure it was the look.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:14 PM
49

The main reason was so few of them willing to support a house husband. That proves right there that they are not truly interested in equality and are certainly not interested in social, biological nor economic reality. Someone taking care of the house and kids directly is extremely important. The lack of such a person is a major cause of the American obesity and disabetes crises. But since they won't take a house husband he must earn cash to find a mate. The result is women ballooned the worker …
/r/MensRights14/05/23 01:49 PM
1

My ex is Japanese and probably never saw a circumsized penis before.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 01:23 PM
1

Thanks. But that still highlights the lunacy. Jump a border you are a child. Jump it again you an adult. Child. Adult. Child. Adult. I wonder what will happen if someone of 17 has sex while half in and half out. Half the sentence in the state where its 18? Utter freaking insanity. And not a single scientific study to back up anyone's aoc. Plus, these ages of consent were literally made to protect young women's reputations. Start to finish.....crazy.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 01:22 PM
1

I could not find a single thing there supporting your assertion. Is that the correct link??
/r/MensRights14/05/23 11:27 AM
1

It's a matter of becoming someone you're not. Becoming the man you want to be. This is a direct contraction. You make some good points....and some non-points, but what I just cited is extra wrong. Becoming a different person is highly recommended to attain success. Life is literally a process of becoming a new person, otherwise, you stagnate. Every guy should be looking at successful guys and emulating those guys on the points they believe they can handle. For example the popular guy whose hair …
/r/MensRights14/05/23 11:23 AM
1

The title is an absolute trash lie. This should be removed on that alone, or have a big old sticky put right at the top calling this crap out. Those are a just a bunch of random WOMEN some of whom are clearly anti-feminists and others probably neutral. Get outta town with this!
/r/MensRights14/05/23 11:18 AM
1

I think it's overly focused on here to the determent of real issues. This sounds an awful lot like you do care, so I was pointing out why you are in the woods, at night, alone, wondering where everyone else is at. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 11:06 AM
3

Is there a good answer? I would say no. But if they at least dedicated some thought to it and have proof they did, well, it just makes it harder to convince them of their "tide pod" mentality. But if they haven't a reason of some kind, you really got them by the nuts.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 11:04 AM
2

feminists say this is about terminating innocent till proven otherwise in sexual violence investigations I never heard one admit that.....although that is what they are doing...whether intentionally or not....and its a prime reason I turned on feminism.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:59 AM
1

Innocent until proven guilty. And citing Twitter is really poor form. Here is a proper news article. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/reed-messer-former-delaware-teacher-charged-child-sexual-abuse-2014/ ​ Note that the allegation is being made 9 years after the alleged events. Also note that no age is given. It is just possible the young man was 16, the AOC in South Carolina.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:50 AM
6

Ask them if have any reason to do it other than everyone is doing it. If they don't have a solid answer, offer them a Tide Pod.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:38 AM
3

No one is complaining about adults electing to get it for whatever benefits may exist. The core problem is them doing it to a baby that has no choice. But an underlying, largely unspoken problem is people treating it about as seriously as a haircut, and therefore, quacks who should not be anywhere near a scalpel causing permanent damage....that we hardly hear about.....cause parents have no empathy for their boys and living 21 years with people telling you to "deal with it" does not make for one…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:36 AM
1

I am just going to guess it was those #U<$ing Victorians and their loony anti-sex ideas that are still ruining life for us to this day.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:29 AM
0

I was circumcised and I oppose circumcision. No son of mine would even be circumcised, and a big reason is because my little brother's mutilation was botched. But my ex-wife, the wild cat, loved my penis for being circumcised, so I cannot deny some mixed feelings.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:27 AM
3

My brother had a botched circumcision. He was much younger than me and from a step-father I had major issues with, and I never got close to him because his IQ was about as low as his father's...there was just nothing there to relate to...there real end was when he was kicking a dog...I told him to quit it....left...came back and he was doing it again. That was it. Done. I was probably 17 and him 9. He disappeared at about 20 or so. No one knows what happened to him. I think he had issues unrelat…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:24 AM
7

Stupid? Excuse me, but you are talking as if facts, logic, and fairness are going to save you in this world women were given too much power to shape. If this were 1590 and someone were going to be burned for witchcraft, most people would stand aside and that would be smarts talking. You can't beat the mob and you have to be careful of them.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:52 AM
11

Do you guys just casually go walk out the door at night? I am pretty sure most of us do. I have not lived in America in a long, long time, but here in Japan women are generally afraid to. Ask them why. "As a woman, its not safe." they will say. Not safe from what? They will say they will be raped and/or murdered. This is one of the safest countries in the world, and STILL they will insist they are prime and common targets for murder. Just not enough bodies in the morgue for that. Now the rape bi…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:39 AM
24

Even the people who made the study said to take it with a grain of salt. I did before even reading the article. The key reason is there is no way to agree on what and who is misogynist or to what degree. The whole issue is far too nebulous. Further I am sure if they used the same methods and concepts, we would find similar number for misandry. These just aren't really gendered problems. They are people problems.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 07:03 AM
13

Jealousy is an ugly thing. Don't let people tell you it was anything else.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:14 AM
0

"rape is sexy" Wow. Actually she said "I think most people think of rape as being sexy." in response to Cooper saying most people think of rape as violent. She was not voicing her opinion about rape. She was voicing other people's opinion. She is not exactly wrong. Loads of depictions of rape are meant to portray rape as sexy. Rape fantasies that both genders enjoy are a thing. The trouble is getting people to agree on if it was rape or not. If at the time I was married to my second wife I threw…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:20 PM
7

Can you imagine all the crying and screaming if Father's day was taken more seriously than Mother's Day? We would find out who really is a "mother" wouldn't we?
/r/MensRights13/05/23 11:18 AM
11

Oh...I don't think its about being cheap. What dad wants to be taken to a restaurant with a line to get in, or even eat there when its full of people and noise and problems? No no. Its generally women that want to be seen by as many strangers as possible getting feted.....fetid psychology right there...very gross. No. Most guys would rather be at home with friends and family around only. No showboating. No issues with the waitress. No fuss about the tip. No rat race for a place to park. No expec…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 11:15 AM
13

Somehow you can just tell that the question "What do we need men for?" is not really a question but a statement of "we don't need men at all". Although clearly this one needs five million of a man's money to assert her freedom to call a man a rapist with no proof except he said "grab them by the pu$$y" that one time. I should get my wife to make accusations too. Seems a lucrative line of work with plenty of people out there supporting it as legitimate.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 07:10 AM
3

She speaks for all women. Didn't you know? /s
/r/MensRights13/05/23 07:06 AM
41

Given so may of the bad, anti-free speech moderation decisions I have been subjected to on various websites, including this one, I tend to feel that most moderators are female. After all, who has been shaming, "correcting", condeming my speech most my entire life? Its largely been women....being Karens, not only taking offense at things being said, choice of words, certain words being "unspeakable", but also firmly believing they have some God given right and duty to make sure it never happens a…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 07:03 AM
0

Here, I will agree with you technically again. So now you can treat me as if I disagreed again. BTW, you could blame me for getting information from a newspaper article on the internet. I mean, how dare I? This is so important to the future of everything and especially my life I should have quadruple checked this one. What was I thinking?
/r/MensRights13/05/23 01:54 AM
-1

No. The stupid fucks are his fans, and its seems he has plenty. And this is why there are so many rich and powerful liars....because so many people are so very stupid.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 01:36 AM
0

Thank you. While I have side with your technical correctness, I still find it daft that someone can claim rape from 20 years previous without a shred of evidence, and be able to get jack out of any court. Now I am wondering if there will be a counter-suit.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 04:33 PM
1

Right. Nobody drives for fun. Nobody.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 04:30 PM
0

Since your claim of being held liable for defaming her runs directly counter to the link I posted, you are going to have to provide a link proving mine wrong. Japan Today might be a crap tabloid, but its still a cut above a rando on the internet.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 01:56 PM
-1

Going to any sub and telling people to stop stupidly letting off steam won't go well. Unfortunately this is exactly why most of social media is just a collection of idiot echo chambers. Not my doing and I have no super powers to fix it.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 02:37 AM
3

Having pride in your group or who you are is good. Thus Black pride, female pride, gay pride, White pride, male pride etc. should all be fine. What is not good is hate....so attacking Black pride, female pride, gay pride, White pride, or male pride....not for any hate they voiced...but just for having pride...is hate and is not okay. And its an extention of that hate to have beliefs/ slogans that exclude other groups from public life. Its bizarre how people get so confused over such simple conce…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 01:34 AM
-1

Now kindly direct me to the post of women condemning Handler for her garbage I never made the claim they existed. I was just trying to make the point that just because there is not an apparent "public backlash" does not prove agreement. But thank you for proving the men's rights sub does voice disapproval with Tate. I just wanted to be sure your claim was accurate.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 01:18 AM
0

There are all interesting characterizations and I don't know what you are talking about. I don't pay much attention to Trump but I found this story and went "WTF?" But I see no evidence of your claims....or hers. So. WTF?
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:51 AM
1

So if I say that Donald Trump punched me in the stomach on the moon in 1980, leaving me with permanent trust issues, take it to court, but Trump doesn't show up to defend himself, then he has to pay me 5 million dollars?
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:48 AM
2

Ever notice that she came forward NOT before his 2016 run. NOT before his 2020 run. But just now? Its in the title. She made this claim in 2019.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:42 AM
-3

Condemn Tate for me please.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:12 PM
-1

Where’s the public backlash from women about this? Right now there is an ultra-feminist condemning men's rights activism for not enough backlash on Andrew Tate. All some people want is conflict and never progress or rapproachment.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 10:39 AM
0

This is why I recommend using pull out method with condoms. But people have been brainwashed into thinking the pull out method does not work to the point they think even stacking it with other methods does nothing....or worse. In fact, I used pull alone with women I did not mind having a baby with and caused exactly zero pregnancies. Not recommending it to anyone because I had to create a set of rules for its proper use....but no one will tell you such rules because people will actually get angr…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 07:38 AM
-1

Anyone with a condom fail rate that high is probably drunk and stupid. Anyone near that rate was simply not properly educated. I myself had to figure out some certain things for myself that were in sex ed because they were "inappropriate" and I suppose because people are not smart enough to separate the genders for gender specific sex education.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 07:34 AM
2

Yeah. That much I agree with.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 07:32 AM
1

Well, I think that is a little unfair. I am willing to admit its far more than just one. But I think a boatload of them are not really being serious. Even so, they have placed a foot on a very stupid road and those saying we need to keep our eyes on them are not wrong.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 07:31 AM
1

Fair points. Its not video games directly. Video are games are just the latest target of the same old psychological abuse. But there are many examples were X is blamed and people claim to hate it, but its actually just a symptom of something else...some deeper...something darker that is being denied to exist in people. I often claim this with gay hate. I don't think anyone actually hates all gay people or even most of them. They just became a handy target and a vessel for hate....because that is…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 05:24 AM
-18

Those numbers are always fishy. You decided to put all you eggs in that one basket and I am sorry, its not remotely enough.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 05:16 AM
-15

Right, a woman with 7.5 million twitter followers is not feminism. And I am sure they are all real and actually follow every word she says and agrees too...like regular bobbleheads. ESPECIALLY this single point you mention. Nobody engages in crap like that just to let off steam....NOBODY.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 04:14 AM
-39

That is not really feminism though, that is feminist extremism. If you go believing that is all feminism it pretty much sets you on the path to hating all women. I mean there are few extra steps to hating traditional/conservative women but such views will put you on that path.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 02:33 AM
19

Incel is one of those words that exposes how badly human language is in need of reform. It has two separate meanings but it can be hard to correctly guess which one is meant by anyone at any given time. The basic meaning of incel has no insulting connotation. It just means someone who wants to have sex but is not able to find a partner for whatever reason, including reasons totally outside their control....could even be an STI panic or something crazy like that. The newer, popular meaning of inc…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 02:27 AM
0

Uh....contraception exists to prevent pregnancy so......risk of pregnancy???? I singled out condoms so.......with those.....risk of STIs also....and STIs could lead to death. With cars its risk of being injured, crippled or dead. And those are not equivalent risks, I know...yet...what risk is constantly being talked about?
/r/MensRights11/05/23 01:36 AM
35

Well, we are always taking a risk...in nearly all we do. Welcome to life. The thing is with the available contraception, especially condoms, sex is probably safer than getting in a car. But nobody says, don't get in a car unless you can afford to be crippled..or want to be.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:23 PM
1

Like I said, it annoys me that no one was there for you. I would have been, and so my advice would have had a chance to work. Obviously, everyone around you failed you. That annoys me. I am sorry you had this experience.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:53 AM
8

Oh...I see...you were expecting an article to openly pinpoint mothers for us. I am afraid you don't now how the matriarchy/ feminism works yet.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:50 AM
1

So is the sex of the monarch really of importance? Its important in the world, so yes. Jada Smith was not in a competition. She was just demanding she be defended. Will didn't have to get violent. He just didn't have an effective verbal retort.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:37 AM
9

Fornite is full of dancing, music, and cuteness and it has no blood, gore, screams of pain or dead bodies laying around. Sounds like exactly what parents would want. Yet, Epic got complaints that made them screw up the accounts for kids under 13. It took away their screen names and ability to hook up with friends etc. Why? Cause parents were not paying attention. They had every tool they needed but they didn't use them. I can guarantee its mostly the mothers complaining...but...look at this game…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:35 AM
1

The company should sue her into the ground. So should her ex.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:19 AM
-10

every culture is misandrist its just if its explicit or not. This is incredible. I specifically said many countries are *not quite so* misandrist and gynocentric. This is clear English meaning they are, but not as much. Meanwhile I get downvoted and the guy who clearly does not understand English and has twisted my meaning in doing so gets upvotes. FFS So, okay fine. Keep beating your heads against the wall with your local women. You know exactly what to do and you know what's best and don't nee…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 05:26 AM
42

This is a little weird. Women tend to harshy judge EVERYONE'S promiscuity or even just their regular sex lives. Even their own. I was once dating a woman who put her tongue up my butt without me asking or wanting it. I let it go a few times. But then we were going to a restaurant about an hour after a similar experience, we're alone in the car, and I asked her about it and she absolutely flipped out like I just showed her an eye surgery photo while she was having dinner or something. Its one ane…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:43 AM
22

The technologcal/ sterile modern western world was not made for humans. It was made for the comfort of the majority of women and what they decided was best and "safe". Even the things modern women complain about were largely based on their most basic principles. Take video games for example. Women may hate them and complain abou their content, but the kids are in the house, mom knows where the kids are, and not a single scraped knee. So in this world built for women's comforts and demands, boys …
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:25 AM
1

It annoys me that no one was there for you. I would have instructed you to find a way let everyone you meet that you are not interested in Jess, and despite what others may think or were told, you don't want that girl anywhere near you. And she had better keep away from you or you will kick her ass. Also, someone should have gone with you to see some teachers and have them ensure that she is seated away from you. I would not have made a big deal about the initial sexual assault mainly because 1)…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:13 AM
-16

every culture is misandrist its just if its explicit or not. That is so bombastic I can say the same for misogyny. i mean look at drafting or rape laws in India or Thailand does that seem "pro male" to you? ​ No. But those are two small examples. Do the anti-abortion laws in America and some states' allowing rapists to claim parental rights seem "pro woman" to you?
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:11 AM
-18

Whatever country you are in, women there don't represent "women". If the women in the country you are in are trash, specifically look for foreign women. Many cultures are not quite so misandrist and gynocentric.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:24 AM
0

Yep. Its just like breathing and farting for us...effortless.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:12 AM
-3

You are simply uneducatable. I have to tried to explain, but you wind up processing everything wrong. I don't know what the hell is going on your end, but there is something very wrong with you. You are a kind of troll, and I am thinkiing its mostly unintentional actually.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:12 PM
-5

You sure pay attention to a lot of things I say, but just enough to get most of them horrifically wrong. Anything else you want to accuse me of while you drag everything I said to every new thread (its almost like you are my new wife or something). Do I eat babies or murder prostitutes you think? Maybe sell drugs to elementary school kids or something? Rape poodles perhaps? Imagine you just sticking to the fking subject of a thread. But since you can't...I am starting to wonder about your gender…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:01 PM
5

All the scenarios mentioned in this thread exist. What is the majority scenario? IDK. I have no actual data so I cannot side with anyone. But let me mention a few things I don't see. Men mowing the lawn. Some guys love it, some hate it, but it gets hot out there and its exhausting. Men changing the oil in all the family cars. Men repairing the damaged items around the house, like the hot water tank. fixing leaks in the roof and the AC. Why men? Cause women usually not only can't, they won't. Or …
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:50 PM
0

All the scenarios mentioned in this sub exist. What is the majority scenario? IDK. I have no actual data so I cannot side with anyone. But let me mention a few things I don't see. Men mowing the lawn. Some guys love it, some hate it, but it gets hot out there and its exhausting. Men changing the oil in all the family cars. Men repairing the damaged items around the house, like the hot water tank. fixing leaks in the roof and the AC. Why men? Cause women usually not only can't, they won't. Or the…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:50 PM
-10

Here is one. Note the link to the SNL video calling it sick. If its sick, I have to assume they think the young man testifying is meant to represent an older teenage "child". 16 and not 17 but, its only one year. Its pretty obvious what they think. Note that others have blocked me for telling they are wrong so not easy to link them. Those types are a sensitive bunch. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/12x977n/comment/jhkexmw/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:32 PM
1

Things will certainly not be perfect with women in charge, esp for men. Women had too much power even back before women's lib if you ask me. But I do believe if typical women were in charge there would be less war. However, typical women won't be put in charge. Its just a dream that they would. Only the competetive women will make it to leadership, whether like Thatcher, Cleopatra, Catherine the Great or Elizabeth I. And being not only competetive but leading in a world where most women are not …
/r/MensRights09/05/23 11:14 AM
-26

Several I have had the displeasure of conversing with. But most seem to have taken my comment personally which is unfortunate.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 11:08 AM
-2

About your ad hominem, yes I do a lot of construction and carpentry, not sure how a screw relates to this situation much. When building something the size of a breadbox or smaller, do you generally guide the screw to the hole, or do you pick up the item and try to line up the hole with the screw? And you seem to be misunderstanding what I am saying about control. I don't mean control over whether it happens or not. I mean actual physical control over the penis going in whatever hole its going. Y…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:49 AM
0

Well, glad to get an answer. No too happy to be downvoted for asking a question. But I still want to know, are you saying that a guy going to prison after being lied to about age is okay by you or no?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:05 AM
1

Geezus. The idiocy never stops. No. Or are you saying all surgeries are vivisection since the patient is usually unconcious and certainly has no control of the situation? God damn. There is so much I love about this sub, but even most of you don't seem to have any clue how sex works but act like you know anyway....and oddly its exactly what those ultra-feminst knobs say it is and how it works. Most women are passive. Some are active, but most aren't. But its still mostly the pole going in the ho…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:01 AM
-10

Is the mistake of age thing wrong or something? Otherwise, why throw in "Commiefornia"? Only commies don't insist on ID first?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:38 AM
44

There are women who love group sex and then afterward worry so much about their reputation they preempt the guys bragging by telling a fake rape story.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:37 AM
-77

There are many here who would insist that at 17 she is merely a child and therefore responsible for none of her own actions. Or at least, that is what they would have said yesterday if the subject was consensual sex. But today we are talking about false rape accusations so now she may as well be a grandmother. Don't you just love consistency?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:35 AM
1

The women are claiming abuse due to defending the police. Is English your second language?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:44 AM
0

I think your wire A is connected to connector B. I think you don't now what "defund the police" means or what the thing is about. I think you also believe the Patriot Act is patriotic and that a rug burn involves fire. I think this because your post contains no logical link to its title, nor clear reference to the video or article you linked....and...its FOX news...which while being equal propaganda to CNN is much more popular with people who make random associations in their heads due to miswir…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:02 AM
1

I didn't see any women in the video. The video shows men betraying a man. We can WATCH that in the video. What we cannot see or watch is the system which contains both genders....in that video.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:41 PM
-6

Nonsense. Getting manipulated means you are a victim. But there is a question of if one has an excuse to have been manipulated like that. A 13 year old has an excuse. A 30 year old? Seems a bit unlikely.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:25 PM
0

Are we blaming all women for that? Its "some" people of both genders, or any number of genders you like.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:24 PM
-2

You are trolling. Nothing I have said is pro-life. The woman can get an abortion if she wants. The man can easily prevent pregnancy using condoms, knowledge, the pull out method, and a bit of concentration all at the same time. In the astronomically small instance that all fails...welcome to life. Don't like risk? Stay away from women, cars, trains, airplanes, roads, dogs and anywhere else sudden death can happen. Cause a pregnancy though, and then all you got is begging the woman to get an abor…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:16 PM
1

You are 1000% in favour of abortion. But men just have to follow contraception. Men don't get abortions.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:49 PM
-25

There is a thread for that. This is the incorrect thread. To drag that here you must be real scared that I made good points over there too. Grow up troll.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:44 PM
0

Women are plenty evil. That does not mean they tend toward all the evil you wish they did.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:42 PM
-4

Give me one example each of a child conceived through blackmail, knife to the throat and extortion. To prevent cumming inside her you only need to push her off for a few seconds. Are you seriously going to come inside her because she threatens to claim rape???
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:41 PM
17

Isn't it just great watching men betray other men? Even in our own countries we are surrounded by enemies.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:25 PM
-3

She is literally the ruler of the entire country with nobody to contest or oppose her, Clearly you know nothing about ruling a country. Not a single damn thing. That is not how it works. Ask Julius Caesar about being all powerful. He will tell you....it can sting...like a hundred knife wounds.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:22 PM
-2

Drugs, blackmail, extortion, knife to the throat, etc. I will give the drugs but the rest.....I don't think you live in the real world. You are presenting the most oddball scenarios in human history and trying to present them as problems we all need to be on the look out for.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:18 PM
-3

That "man bad and aggressive" and "woman saint", as it's clearly not true What you just said clearly is not true. But its not women employing trickery to become soldiers.....except a very rare one like Joan of Arc. Men have been commonly known to lie about their age, and cheat on the physicals to get into wars. Among women, its just not a thing.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:13 PM
-4

You cannot just toss a female into a male dominated sphere and expect her actions to be "typical of females in that sphere".
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:10 PM
-1

The U.S. Constitution is a great theory. I am far more interested in how its actually put to use. All men are created equal....except the ones they owned. Yeah, there is your Constitution.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:08 PM
-13

Look man, short of a woman being King Kong compared to you there is no way she is going to force you to squirt in her vagina. If you do, but didn't want to the options are: 1) you got manipulated 2) you are uneducated 3) you have no willpower 4) you are an idiot Most of us can handle this. No want baby, no do the raw dog squirt. Even you, I think you can handle this.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:06 PM
12

Thing is I find it hard to treat her as your typical "victim narrative" female cause I think old crazy eyes Lizzy is actually crazy.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:03 PM
-4

First, it doesn't matter the population differences between male and female rulers as there are a number of statistical analyses that compensate for tha ​ Absolutely not. In a male dominated sphere, a minority of women CANNOT be assumed to be performing the same as they would if it were a female dominated sphere, or equal sphere. Its like shipping you to Japan, noting your behavior and ability, and assuming it would be the same if you grew up here. No. Just NO.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 12:00 PM
1

I’ve read through several of your comments, And you seem to have overlooked the loads of upvotes I got in this sub. Look man, I have had sex hundreds of times and the number of times my female partners put my semen in her vagina is exactly zero. Flipping the genders makes zero sense unless its rape. Rape is a different subject.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:55 AM
-1

How does that match with her putting semen in her vagina? That makes no logical sense unless its utter rape. Therefore, its a misquote. You don't put someone's words in a quote box like that unless its a proper mthrfking quote anyway. Its right out the fking door. Its rude and disrespectful. There is a way to do it properly and that ain't it. Edit: the coward hits me with an ad-hominem and then blocks me immediately. Zero spine.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:52 AM
2

And the fricken Earth could blow up tomorrow immediately after you get hit by a bus. Use your head. If there are brain cells in it, you will probably be fine.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:49 AM
0

Cars can crash, yet most people get in them. Are you always this paranoid? Condoms are not going to fail if you use them right. But you got to be so paranoid and don't like condoms then do oral and anal. FFS stop whining like a baby.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:47 AM
1

There was only one time I got lucky...that was my first time when I was drunk, had no condom, and she said she was on the pill so it was okay. Too many guys do stuff like that because their education was not solid enough. And lack of solid education is how many men lose their rights.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:45 AM
-3

Look. The female options are all crap in some way. The condom is fricken platinum class IF the man is using it right. Hint one: use water based lube. Hint two: pull it out and look at it sometimes. Is it on? Is it broken? Hint three: Pull out to ejaculate even with a condom. I have had sex hundreds of times with dozens of women and I have only the kids I intended to create. This isn't rocket surgery. You just got to use some sense and care
/r/MensRights08/05/23 07:52 AM
-2

so females have no say in the creation of the baby? It obviously takes two . The issue is who has actual control over what. ​ and if you don't want one then keep your legs closed, at least be consistent in your opinion The concept of equality has gone to your head so deep you now don't seem to understand physical reality. The women cannot place her eggs inside the male. Nor can she draw the semen out of the male in any direct fashion. The semen comes out of the male. Its in his control if he see…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 07:48 AM
-5

You were saying exactly the same things that hardline pro-lifers say. You just thought it was OK because you were saying them about men instead of women. You hypocrite. That is straight up insane. You directly misquoted me. I am not putting up with this crap today. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 07:11 AM
0

Yep. The counter to whiny little bitches is not become a whiny little bitch yourself.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 07:09 AM
-9

There is a good case to make that its male advisors doing a lot of the pushing. Thus the problem is still the male leaders. I don't know if the issue is curable, but we can at least admit what the actual issue is.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 07:08 AM
-13

What claim are you accusing "feminsts" of making? Is Steven Pinker a feminist? Does Sheryl Sandburg count as more than one? Are the two making the same claim?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:15 AM
-7

Thank you. I hope others can absorb the fact because the vote reaction to my post is smelling like misogyny. Misogyny hurts this sub.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:13 AM
-18

Wow. The study does not prove the two people mentioned wrong. Its apples and semi-trucks time again. Steven Pinker said "almost all" so there is plenty of room left in there for the handful of female rulers compared to men. And the feminist said that no two female rulers would war against the other, but there is no logical way to disprove it unless we find two female rulers in history warring upon eachother. And even if we do, its only fair to give her absolutist statement a bit of wiggle room, …
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:10 AM
-25

This bit of research does NOT prove the two people mentioned wrong. Steven Pinker said "almost all" which is clearly true, give the sheer number of male rulers compared to female. Also, the feminist named said no two female rulers would wage war against another female ruler. Well is basically impossible to prove or disprove this using history because 1) the examples are either few or don't exist and 2) there is no category of waging peace. For all we know several wars were averted simply because…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:04 AM
-3

Why did you misquote me on the second quote??? I did not say every woman. I said every man. And then you ask me about a raped man or teenage boy? WTF? Yes, we can safely assume a person forced to do something is not free.....of course that is not what I was talking about. Of course that man or boy should not be forced to provide or partake. FFS I support men's rights because I support they get educated on things like the almighty power of a condom so they can generally insulate themselves from u…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:38 AM
-55

I have not read the study but I already doubt it is fair. There is a far smaller percentage of ruling queens compared to ruling kings. Just to become a ruling queen required more ruthlessness just to stay in that position since her legitimacy was generally already threatened just for being female. You might call it a tendency to over-compensate. Many societies won't even allow a female ruler to exist to this day. The discrimination is real and severe and if you did not prove the detractors wrong…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:24 AM
-6

Because we could vote to go into a war or not. This never happened. Ever. Apparently we get to vote for which rich douche puppets get to be president or sit in our legislatures, but you, as a plebe like me, will never get to vote on a war. The rich douche puppets will (or seem to) then you sir, or your sons, or both, will be frogged march off to fight it so that rich douches and their puppets can turn your blood into cash. Land owning men were given the right to vote for the rich douche of their…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:18 AM
-11

I can only assume you read a couple lines of my post and assumed the rest. I am am 1000 percent pro-choice. When I talked about the current abortion madness in America, what did you think I was saying??? Or what? Do you want me to say that choosing to abort is a simple decision for a woman, or, that if we men scream at them enough it will become a simple decision?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:07 AM
-1

That is why there is oral and anal. Vagina? You don't want kids? Condom. Don't like that? Vasectomy.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 05:03 AM
-21

Every man can opt out of parenthood already. Simply do not put your semen inside a vagina EVER, not even if she says she is on the pill. Just don't put your semen in there. DON'T. The condom is the pre-conception abortion miracle for men. Appreciate their power and availability! I often even use the pull out method WITH the condom on just to be extra sure. But I tell you what, once a man has impregnated a woman, I run out of mercy. He has just saddled her with some hard choices and serious respo…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:20 AM
-1

Sour grapes time I guess. If you want to believe the term was created to disparage men, you go right ahead and be a fool.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:56 PM
-3

I find it very hard to believe that someone will voluntary use obviously negative epithet on themselves I shall give you nothing until you prove you are following the thread...because that bit I quoted shows you aren't.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 03:39 AM
2

Post about normal heterosexual male attractions in full and get banned, even here, because of stupid Reddit admins. Admit to certain normal hetero male attractions and get psychologically attacked with names like pervert, monster, pedo, etc. She might be 17 and legal in their home state of N.Y. He is 18 and they have had sex for months. But they are visiting Oregon and the AOC is 18 and there is no Romeo and Juliet law. So now he is a pedo and a pervert and must go to jail. And you say different…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:03 AM
0

It is a smart-sounding buzzword invented by men-haters. Well you are dead wrong. It was invented by early men's rights activists.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:45 AM
-2

The term "toxic masculinity" is being misused. Its sort of like thinking that moldy bread describes all bread, when in fact it means that only some bread is moldy. Well, some extremes of both masculinity and feminity are toxic. How else can we describe those extremes besides toxic femininity and toxic masculinity? Unfortunately, people always do this. In a couple hundred years someone will read my post and think 21st century people ate moldy bread, and all bread will be banned cause its "moldy".
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:31 PM
3

Its not just feminists. Its also broken beta males and simps. I just got a warning about "sexualization of minors" and since they deleted the post, I don't even know what I said. Usually I am just asking questions trying to get the other person to understand that nothing about the age of consent is clear, and often the laws are not fair or sensible. And its odd. If I suggest we need reform to marijuana laws and even totally abolish all of them, that's okay. If I suggest that weapons possession l…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:20 PM
1

There are a lot of gorgeous female truck drivers here in Japan. I have no idea if they get any special privileges though. But I would be surprised if they were not really minor things.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:38 PM
0

15 is NOT a kid. 15 is a teenager. That was normal marrying age from the dawn of marriage up to maybe 1900. Are you a Christian?
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:14 PM
1

I don’t think we should normalize attraction to teenagers Its already normal. You cannot normalize what is already normal. What you are talking about is destigmatizing it. And yes we should destigmatize normal attraction even if we don't destigmatize acting on it. That way if someone needs help to stop themselves acting on it, they can feel free to seek it. As it is now people are hiding it until they explode one day. I think this literally accounts for a significant number of mass shootings in …
/r/MensRights05/05/23 12:57 PM
7

I wish I could agree. But its gone from laughable to serious. Normal hetero men esp. are being labeled as chomos and pedos just for calling attractive someone a couple decades younger than themselves, even if the younger one is 21. People are taking this crap seriously and seriously let it taint their views of others. Its sickening that people are doing this and getting away with it. Those people should be literally screamed at until they shut it.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 11:40 AM
61

You mispelled jealousy.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:59 AM
13

Also jealousy. But this is also a reason why men also attack men for this.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:59 AM
30

Well that's YOU. We are not YOU. We don't want to be YOU. Its YOU that needs to adjust, not US.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:57 AM
40

I think that it creepy. You need to get that under control. Anything can be found creepy. But its asinine to go around calling normal things and normal people creepy just because of some made up social crap.....or is this how you deal with jealousy?
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:56 AM
14

This is a prime core issue of men's rights right here. The very right to even be a normal heterosexual male is under fire and made into a cause for shame. EVERY normal heterosexual male finds at least some teenage girls attractive, including those who insist it never happens to them, which runs the gamut from just plain CYA to deep psychological and diagnosable denial. It is scientifically proven normal men are attracted. Not that it ever needed to be proven. We all know GD well its true. If we …
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:49 AM
18

If she was 20 and attractive she would be trying to get a date instead. But she isn't and knows she has no chance, so this. We all know its true.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 03:37 AM
-3

Seriously? You don't know if they didn't. Who gives a damn either way? The idea that sex=abuse because of age is a mixture of mental retardation mixed with the latest stupid taboo of the time. If a boy had sex at 13 he is free to talk about how great it was. But if a girl had sex at 13 she is free to do one of two things consequence free 1) shut up 2) describe it as abuse or something negative. And that standard is society-wide in both genders and very few women fight back without being in some …
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:43 AM
1

I don't have much difficulty determining who is an abuser and who is a victim, and what is abuse, and what is being a victim. But people keep thinking its about gender, age, race, nationality or anything but what it actually is, and that is behavior and intent. Granted that it takes a lot of work to look at each case individually, but if you are unwilling, you need to just get completely about of the "determining abuse" business and that applies to many people playing judge in courtrooms.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 09:20 AM
1

In patriarchal societies men invent the laws that benefit men over women. Its an illusion and you are falling for it. Men get one thing and lose two things. Women lose one thing and gain one thing. Who actually profits? The mega rich who get armies of men doing the difficult and dangerous jobs for them, and literal armies too.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 01:57 AM
1

That was some grade A gaslighting. Men made sexual comments to women and didn't know?? How did they manage that? Ask her to wait until his fatigue induced boner subside before lifting that heavy box for her? Poor female! Having multiple sex partners is a problem or something? What? It makes men sad or something? Not in my experience. No sense bothering with being strong? So, all that natural strength and testosterone and just advise boys and to let it go to waste. No sense enhancing it. Especial…
/r/MensRights02/05/23 08:50 AM
1

I would guess Therein lies the problem.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 06:48 AM
1

The amount of time he spent in jail without trial based on accusations alone, and the number of times he was denied bail served to make him a martyr.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 04:26 AM
1

No, and I don't think you understand....that is my point. Not everyone undergoing these treatments have gender dysphoria.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 03:53 AM
1

Rape leaves a person traumatized I was raped by many people's definition and I am not traumatized. But murdered is always dead.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 11:09 PM
1

I would be happy with a paraphrase from memory.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 08:00 AM
0

Rape is also a range. But generally speaking if people are given a choice between rape and death its going to have to be a pretty bad rape for someone to choose death.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:52 AM
1

As a circumcized man I can tell you that if I had been transitioned as a teen I would have offed myself by now. I am not happy to have been circumcised but living here in a nation that does not do, and having an ex that loved it, my complaints are pretty minor. So I cannot agree.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:15 AM
1

What I mean by achieve is like the technological advancements. Oh, I know you mean well, but that is exactly what I am worried about. Most things touted as "advancements" are just advancing us closer to extinction. Most "green" tech has a huge hidden environmental cost the corporations are not telling us about. I literally want to take us back to horse and buggy. The way forward is back. If its a machine, its not green.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 03:09 AM
-4

Here in Japan genitals are pixelated in porn by law. Someone on this sub said that for boys and men to have proper psycho-sexual development they NEED to see female genitals. That seems totally logical to me. But just the fact they WANT to see so badly is enough when also so many women are willing to show. I want to see the pixelation law removed. I also want prostitution legalized and regulated so that men can safely use their services and not have to jump through women's excessive hoops just t…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 03:03 AM
2

Imagine what would happen if EVERYONE got along. I see a lot of good there. ​ What humans could achieve. Okay. That makes me worry. Mostly I just want people to leave each other alone except for things that REALLY matter, such as stopping polluters, war mongers and murderers.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 02:16 AM
-2

There are absolutely guys like that, but in my experience, it is such a female thing to do. Yes we men have our Jussie Smollets. But there are many moreTreva Throneberrys, Tawana Brawleys, and Wanetta Gibsons.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 02:12 AM
2

Well...many mammals, and birds too. We cannot deny that human evolution does have some special traits, and also traits that skipped some species in between and came back (since they are based on the same core genetics and evolutionary tenets. A key example would be females being more nervous, and therefore extra cautious and insecure....thereby desiring more safety....thereby desiring more wealth to ensure safety and security. The trouble is that women can go way, way overboard with it but weste…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 02:05 AM
3

Well, yes and no. A lot depends on how people define misogyny. We cannot deny that the standard layman definition of the term applies to many comments here. But we also cannot deny that that definition is insane and geared toward manufacturing outrage on false grounds. Its also worth pointing out that comments get deleted and users get banned and I don't always agree with the reasons (some are not trolls at all). One thing I wish this and many subs would do is create a "core member" status which…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 01:54 AM
-6

What is the evidence that something printed or emailed elsewhere originated here??? This is not an email server. Its not Facebook. And who would ever say "Yeah, I sent death and rape threats to X and BTW I am User X on r/mensrights just so you know". Only a troll/plant/spy/ agents provocateur would do that. Any moron can make an account and post whatever in any sub on Reddit,and at that time there was actually free speech here so it tended to stay (RIP free speech RIP Aaron Swartz....we miss you…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:44 PM
3

Could you give me an example or two of the misogynistic comments you see here?
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:36 PM
3

Funny how its such an unknown word isn't it? Meanwhille its antithesis flows like water. "I think most, but not all, women would be happier having and raising children as housewives than give all that up to be a CEO. That's what my Grandma thinks too." mIsOgYnY!!!!!
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:35 PM
9

(In the middle of an argument) Remember that unrelated thing you did that one time way back? The thing I apologized for and was forgiven for? Yeah, that thing. I have not forgotten and will beat you over the head with it until the day one of us dies. ------------------------------ Which gender does that most I wonder?
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:31 PM
-1

The antifeminist[208][209]: 323 subreddit r/MensRights As a former feminist and now anti-feminist I find it laughable that this sub would be labeled anti-feminist. IDK if these incidents from ancient Blackberry times are really from this sub in those times though, but what I see today is mostly not anywhere near that ballpark. I get plenty of disagreement here on my anti-feminist takes. Oh, and anti-feminist is not misogynist in case anyone is confused. Any group with too much power HAS TOO MUCH…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:26 PM
6

And they are so brave....so brave.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:15 PM
-2

I have been told that rape is WAAAAAAYYYY worse than death. Not even in the same universe. So I have to assume threats of rape are also worse than threats of death. Mind you I am not confirming any such threats ever happened.....cause....I see claims but I don't see evidence.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:15 PM
0

I see you posted a couple of boobs. Pretty sure you don't have any buddy.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:05 PM
1

It was the last two instances of "we" I was referring to in the bit I quoted, not the first instance.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:35 PM
2

Neurotic. Its an old word that needs to make a comeback.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 01:50 PM
0

Ah. I see. You can't explain clearer or even differently. You just want to have a fight. Not interested.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 01:30 PM
0

If he does not have less, and feels the need or urge to marry "women with money", then I fail to see how your comment has meaning. Could explain a bit clearer?
/r/MensRights30/04/23 12:24 PM
2

I could not place any culture on a scale, but I feel like the Chinese and Indians do hold females to more moderation. The Japanese used to as well, and you can still see aspects of it, but they are not doing such a good job in modern times. But basically when western women are screaming that a certain culture "Oppresses women" I think probably 70 percent of the time or more its just that culture preventing females from becoming greedbags like them.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:17 AM
1

Rare case though. Exceptions have their place but its the general situation that really matters.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:59 AM
0

That's not fair. Birthing and being the primary caregiver is absolutely work and frankly, most men can't handle it. I would give myself a "fair" rating for childcare but I know well that I don't have half the patience for it as the average women and pretty much get none of the joy out of it....its just work to me.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:57 AM
2

I think a lot of men are waking up to this.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:55 AM
2

Women are taught they're a princess from the time they're born and they deserve the finer things in life just for being female. This is the exact opposite. Females are born with an over-riding, intense desire for security in their hearts. Wealth = security. Some cultures are aware and temper it, and other cultures are clueless and let females run wild until that turns into greed. America is a culture of the latter, and that is the key reason why America is the most polluting country on Earth per…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:54 AM
0

Absolutely not. Women with money are largely NOT marrying men with less. There is not greater turn off for a woman than a man with less money than herself.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:49 AM
1

For the most part I don't think we're nearly as special as we like to think we are. Just a little hint but be careful with the use of "we". Most of us maybe, but there are a significant number of people who know that most of us are nimrods who think they and humanity and general is special and somehow not even related to the rest of the animal kingdom.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:46 AM
1

I also need to add that while I reduced the birds to a nest, its not that simple. Some male birds also help with the feeding. And with humans there is of course much more breadwinning than just providing a domicile, which is, all too often these days, done in the form of throwing money into a pit called an apartment.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:41 AM
0

The real problem is that the definition of "decent home" has had the bar raised to insanity. There are still people on Earth who can build what is a decent home to their people in a matter of months.....but its made of mud, sticks, slats, and/or reeds.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 01:30 AM
-2

Ask a female bird why she expects a potential mate to have built an excellent nest to share with her. Its because her job is to lay those eggs...and its a damn tough job. His job is to build the nest...and its a lot of work. Together they will raise successful offspring. We can't blame women for demanding men work and have a degree of wealth. However, we can blame them for flooding the job market making it much, MUCH harder to do the things that make men attractive to women (have more than her) …
/r/MensRights30/04/23 01:02 AM
0

I am sorry you cannot see the difference between angry over not being the baby daddy and threatening to leave. I can't help you. So I can only wish you luck as you continue to blunder through life.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:34 PM
1

Depends on the place/country/state. Do you think 19 year olds automatically have ill intent or something?? Or what age is it that there is absolutely ill intent?? The example I gave people have gone to prison. Its insane.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:23 PM
-1

He threatened to leave because he found out the child isn't his. Please report this to the police immediately. They are not aware that actual witnesses were present and listening. Normal people don't kill others because of an argument. The hell they don't. Its not a common outcome, but its not just nutters doing it. ​ That's like saying that a woman would have avoided a tape I'd she was behaving and dressing decently. Statistics suggest that in about 5 percent of cases provocative clothing was a…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 09:42 AM
-1

Obviously a baby cannot consent to circumcision. But a teen could and having some safeguards would be fine. ​ In the West we don't consider children able to give consent when itcomes to sex, why should it be any different for something whichdrastically effects their future sex life? I would like to answer that question but since freedom of speech is not a thing on Reddit, I can't. But I will say that if children dying of cancer can elect to quit chemo and the entire country does not lose its dam…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 09:14 AM
19

I hope that will make them appreciate their male privilege.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:36 AM
6

If the parents agree, the minor agrees and a panel of psychiatrists agree what is the issue? Is more agreement needed? How about a teacher of the minor must also agree, or some other person deeply involved with the minor? Why does this have to be a fight? Why can't people just find a middle ground and move on to bigger issues such as the American war machine getting children and other innocents murdered overseas? Oh, I wish this was about male circumcision/MGM but it isn't.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:27 AM
1

I thought Pedo acts were criminal regardless of whether the child gives a shit or not? One is apparently 11 and the other is 6. Would you classify kids playing doctor as "pedo acts"? (this does not appear to be that, but still). If you do, is it because it gives you some sort of thrill?
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:37 AM
0

Looking at it one way, your barely saving the child's reputation. That only works if people are rumor mongering trash that cannot be stopped. I have to assume this is your take...that even if the news tried to protect the alleged victim's identity, that the whole town would pry and find out anyway. ​ Looking at it another way, you are making the perpetrators crime sound as if.. it's not that bad. I literally don't know what the crime was. It could have been anywhere from full on anal rape to mas…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:32 AM
-2

But it's everywhere. And it goes un noticed. Even by the people looking for it. Because it all goes around quietly. I don't understand what the "it" is. I assume its age gap relationships. I think they are often very hard to spot, despite so many people who get so very stupid online or when they think its safe, who claim its easy....can't you TELL she is 17?....or what not. And also when its friends people will either protect their friends or shut up because other friends okayed it. I got to exp…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:23 AM
1

which gives credence to the "scared about getting in trouble over being a victilm" part, which is highly effective at silencing victims, which invalidates your other two points. You seem to be doing a lot of projecting which is exactly the reason why I complain about the lack of details. You are assuming the worst, which it may or may not be. Also I direct you to my last paragraph. Its not just about being the victims of assault, but its also about being a victim of society, the spectators, who …
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:03 AM
10

Its gross how so many people are constantly on the hunt to negatively judge other people's private lives when they aren't hurting anyone. Slaps for such people should mandatory every time they do it.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:24 AM
5

The trouble is that its hard to find verifiable examples outside of celebrities and big time politicians which amount to celebrities. And when you do, they are usually criminals or suspected criminals in the newspaper that make whatever you are trying to evidence seem bad.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:22 AM
-1

This is a repost and the headline is still misleading. It implies she killed him because he discovered the kid was not his. In fact, investigators believe she killed him because he threatened to leave. Its also known they had a furious argument. But no one really knows her exact motive because after killing him, she also killed herself. The point is, he probably could have saved his own life by simply avoiding having a furious argument. That is wisdom for us all. If things get emotional control …
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:12 AM
13

This issue is probably the starkest evidence there is of how most North American women have zero ability or desire to approach gender related issues with logic and fairness. IDK what percentage are intentionally gaslighting us about how putting the seat down is somehow equality and what percentage is well aware of the gaslighting, but either way the result is to browbeat men and boys into submission of female irrational demands by incrementally ratcheting up the idea from a please to screaming a…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 12:43 AM
4

I didn't put the lid down for a few months. I got sepsis and died. Okay, okay. What you say does make logical sense in the sense that the plume of aerosolized fecal matter and urine is kept down a bit and its not just some sexist screed. However, I assure that the toilet lid being down does not create an airtight seal and the aerosols are still leeching out plenty. Either way, you'll live. Our modern lives are ridiculously clean compared to the human past, even with the toilet seat up.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 12:38 AM
-16

I don't. Everybody now knows who that boy is and for the rest of his life, he is going to be the kid that got raped. Every one else is saying SA for good reasons, and one of them is less stigma. Edit: Is no one going to consider or accept what damage this reporting and wording is going to do to the victim here???? If you all give such little concern to the victim, then why dedicate a single brain-cell to the situation? You may as well support the perpetrator!
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:42 PM
3

I really, REALLY hate the omission of vital details typical to reporting of cases like this. People will whine and cry that its all to prevent someone getting their jollies (as if that is of PARAMOUNT importance) but the end result is that we are left guessing about what happened and think we understand what happened when we don't. Those who assume the absolute worst will be given the benefit of the doubt. We have only one bus driver's claim to be a witness of an event one time. What exactly did…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:38 PM
39

I may get downvoted for saying this, but this is why women's claims of rape were so often ignored by the law in the past. They always could get public support if they claimed rape and the man always could get his reputation tarnished....guilty or not. Explain to me why a woman should get EVEN MORE support (including civil suit money) and power to go after a man...innocent or guilty? I am not saying this how I want things to be. I would much prefer she get nothing and he get nothing until AFTER a…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:12 PM
1

I am probably only speaking for myself, but given the mindset of most women, I have given up thinking that gender equality is actually possible. If a majority of men also make it impossible, I have not decided. But of course, some men are also impossible to work with on such issues. Obviously I am not advocting for something I believe to be impossible. The key sticking point I often point to is how most women demand that a man earn a sum equal to herself at minimum, but usually they demand he ma…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 02:10 PM
4

Women haven't yet realized that they are privileged, not oppressed. I....uh....have an objection........ I think plenty realized...long ago.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 02:01 PM
0

This sub is better...but far from perfect. FAR. I love this sub but it could be better. That said, Reddit admins seem like the bigger issue, but I cannot be sure.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 02:00 PM
1

AFAIK women who post here do NOT get banned. I know of no moderator on any sub with so much decency they post a list of banned users. They damned well should. Until then I suggest you not assume or take anyone's word for this. This is a crap ton of fkery going on on Reddit, and I would show the proof, except it would get me banned.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 01:59 PM
1

How exactly is Asia Argento connected to Pound Me Too? Having a grievance against Harvey Weinstein and a drug rape allegation against Rob Cohen is not quite enough to establish that connection.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:01 PM
10

I feel villified not so much for being a man, but for having some pro-man attitudes, that I feel that even many men don't support due to either cowardice or a belief that they will get laid for telling anti-man lies. I have been attacked and banned for many of my opinions, even though they are just words on the internet, that you can leave or take freely.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:22 PM
3

I don't think a source is required to explain that lmao. I appreciate what you said as well. The thing is that people have really gotten conditioned to believe that society cares about victims, and therefore treats them well. Good and responsible people probably do, but are few. But even good and responsible people are often not aware of how popular beliefs and statements harm vicitims. For example, many think they do victims a service by attacking the perpetrators with statements like "They are…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:27 AM
51

Scotland is one of the few countries in the world to be able to claim to have invaded another country (England) and have its forces commit no rapes (1745 Jacobite Rebellion). But if we can blame that on progressive and civilized attitudes concerning women, well, this is going way, way too far. Such a serious crime carrying such severe sentences should NEVER be in the hands of a judge, not even a panel of them like here in Japan. Its straight up insane. Its a Feminazi dream and a decent person's …
/r/MensRights27/04/23 10:56 AM
0

Well, promises of future action and inaction are always sketchy.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 07:01 AM
16

Well now she has a comfy excuse why her 51 year old wrinkly ass won't be getting any more dates. The sad part is she is trying to foist that on her daughters too. Amazing how much misery loves company isn't it? Some will sabotage their own children for it.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:47 AM
21

Do you have a source for this? Its a fair question. I do not. But I explained why I do not already. Society will never blame itself. Imagine trying to sell news by declaring: "Most of you people care more about having some gossip than you do about the lives of innocent teenagers". I say it all the time and my usual reward is downvotes and bans. Its definitely not a good model for making a profit. And that is what news media is about...profit....not the truth. But if you know the ACTUAL source of…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:06 AM
2

Its another one of those wonderful woman effect deals isn't it?
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:30 AM
62

Pretty much nobody likes having any shred of their sexual past as a subject of general conversation unless it was something they chose to brag about, but even that can backfire. Say whatever about sex abusers, but as we can see here, and so many other examples, society is as cruel or worse. The headline is inaccurate you see. This young man did not kill himself immediately after his name was revealed in December. He killed himself after people ran their mouths from then into March. And they ran …
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:01 AM
1

Well, so much for innocent until proven guilty. Who needs a trial? Just fire them when they get arrested. No smoke without fire, eh? (cough)
/r/MensRights26/04/23 11:07 PM
-2

Are they married? No. Would YOU be more noble? Maybe, maybe not. If dealing with this is not in her skill set, she could well make things worse for him. She might be doing him a favor. We don't know. This is real life, not a movie.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 10:57 PM
3

Perhaps now is the time to start a letter campaign to Jason Mamoa and get him to say "Either she goes or I go." CANCEL AMBER TURD
/r/MensRights26/04/23 10:47 PM
1

I have no idea what is up with you. Its not me coping. Its you denying simple reality. Somewhere above I explained that they may be beautiful, like a statue is, but that does NOT mean they are attractive to most men. If tall women were considered attractive, women would generally be taller than men after all these millions of years of mate selection...but they aren't. Miss Universe and other pageants are NOT a contest of who is the most attractive to the typical man. Most fashion designers are g…
/r/MensRights26/04/23 01:35 PM
-6

That's not news. That's a purile barely non-fiction short story designed to lead the reader to certain opinions and conclusions. It's over-long and the chronology and content is mixed like it just came out of a blender. I might have read a third of it before I could take no more. Garbage.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 12:24 PM
2

This one goes both ways.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 11:56 AM
1

Looking good to the camera means you look good to the eyes. A massively ignorant thing to say. Photogenic is a real thing.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 11:54 AM
3

Your emotions are your problem. Well, I cannot throw all my weight behind that. But to a degree, yes. I have a bigger problem with their belief that they can mind read though. They look at a man's face and think they can read his mind....and its always sex on his mind....rape in fact. There are many, many women like that, they are mentally distburbed and no, its not from some childhood trauma they made up.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:18 AM
1

The only other option is to get a good job at home and a mail order bride. And harden up and be ready for the comments about your new wife.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:35 PM
5

Snopes says NO! https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/was-all-female-responsible-bridge-collapse/
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:26 PM
0

You can find jobs overseas. You may need to borrow money from family for the plane ticket though. If you truly bust your butt, you can learn the language via free online resources, but its got to be every day and you got to have the language around you as much as you can, TV shows and music always on at home and in the car, etc.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:13 PM
6

Do you have unrealistic standards? Of course he does. He expects a less than middle aged woman under 5'11 and 200 lbs. in the U.S. and not have to wait in a mile long line.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:09 PM
16

I am not a woman. But its a good old fashoned thing called neuroticism, that, obviously, no neurotic person likes to be recognized as having. See Emily Atack
/r/MensRights25/04/23 12:57 PM
36

Emily Atack: I feel like I'm sexually assaulted 100 times a day Sounds like a persona.. uh.....mental problem.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 12:52 PM
1

Well, I have seen loads of pretty people, pretty on the level of statues, I don't want to date.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 05:15 AM
1

Statues are pretty. But I don't want to date one.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 05:05 AM
5

most of them end up dead You are talking completely insane. They are not killing most the women and girls. Never happened.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 01:58 AM
3

When you compare male circumcision vs female genital mutilation, that's where your common sense should set it. It sounds to me like you know enough to realize that FGM covers a wide range of procedures, some on par with male circumcision and some even more mild. But no, it seems you don't at all. And you say male circumcision is just "a little pain"? Why do you put the word "little" in there? Its as if you want to start a fight.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 01:56 AM
1

Victim complex is a powerful thing and huge numbers of women have it and huge numbers of men let them have it.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 01:51 AM
6

Lets assume that for every prostitute there are 10 customers. Its far easier to arrest charge and jail the prostitutes. Going after the customers would be a never ending job. On the other hand the Nordic model is job security for cops and parole officers, and lots of money for private prisons. Also makes sense if you want an army of females or even gay males that entrap men or otherwise get them jailed in huge numbers.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:24 PM
12

Its the magic of gender bias!
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:20 PM
11

When a thing has been made illegal that necessarily precludes any government protections. In other words, if you create a black market, it will act like a black market.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:17 PM
20

This things are common sense. Famous last words. Putting lead in paint to brighten the colors was also once common sense. In a land without soap and hot water, I might buy into the idea that male circumcision was helpful, assuming the cut boy did not get an infection. But my little brother did get an infection even in this "clean" modern world we live in , and his penis did not heal right and was an open wound for a long, long time. I never saw it after the time I had to change his diapers, but …
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:04 PM
21

A major issue with the terminology is the fact that with male circumcision we almost always know exactly what we are talking about.....the procedure of removing the foreskin from the penis...nothing more, nothing less. However there is much wider variety of cutting procedures for the female genitals. It should be that female circumcision is simply removal of the clitoral hood, nothing more and nothing less, since that is the equivalent of the male foreskin. And both can fairly be called specific…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:53 AM
-5

I am trying to think what movie and who that might be. Is Rhea Perlman in it? Cause it sure as hell would not be Elle McPherson at 6 foot tall.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:32 AM
-12

I cannot even think of a single movie I saw where a woman was taller than her man....except I think I have a vague memory of that being the literal plot of a movie. There was a vague mention of Hagrid's dad in Harry Potter being a man who loved a giantess. I mean, there is a reason why women are generally shorter than men, and its millions of years of feature selection on both sides, with men choosing shorter women and women choosing taller men.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 03:10 AM
-33

Who told you that models were considered as generally more attractive?? Models are hired for photography, not dates. Short girls get the dates.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:29 AM
-25

And how do you figure that?
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:23 AM
2

Damn but you assume a lot and fill in all blanks as you please. I don't expect women to stay at home or live as I want. I expect them to live with the consequences of their own farking decisions. If I had my way women would love men for who they are, even if that just meant things like their physical looks and penis size. But that is not how women are. I explained how women are and how everything flows from there. But you won't even touch that part. If you won't start from step one you will neve…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 07:43 PM
2

Look, I am sorry I didn't write an entire fking book just for you, but it does not say men are perfect. Men also need training so they won't be selfish, violent A-holes. Also I did not say anything about forcing anybody to do anything. All I did was explain what was going on. You came up with the "solution" all by your damn self.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 06:59 PM
-1

If you unironically believe society was what broke it then you were left in the dark about it. I am just stopping this conversation now. You are playing mix and match. What I said about society had nothing to do with my marriage. And even if you got that right, you still know nothing of my marriage or my ex. and how could you? Goodbye.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:57 PM
1

No, I read the whole thing. Then I am not sure how you are arriving at your conclusions. That's not for you to decide. Decide? This is my opinion. I have a right to my opinion. So do you. Your disdain for women is obvious throughout the rant I have disdain for all humanity! Yes, men included....the war pigs! ​ These are not the only two options available to women. Then why do you offer no more options?? Look, you don't have to like it, but you have to accept logic. Women can* value men as equals…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:15 PM
-2

That is a weak response. Its your intolerance of my needs which I find horrific. I am not you or anyone else, and I don't strive to be. None of you out there are any better than me though many like to pretend.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 11:07 AM
0

If you add cuckold couples and other kinds of one side open relationships to the stats, the number is significant. And why would I do that? We were talking about sex outside marriage being accepted, not happening behind the other's back. ​ At least around 4%- 5% are polyamorous: If I held out for a percentage of women that small, I would still be a virgin. ​ Edit: do you have two accounts as I was responding to the other user? I carry on too many conversations at once. But I am using only one ac…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 11:05 AM
-2

People like you will act like a person, especially a man, should give up chocolate, beer, video games, friends, candy, etc. and only eat bread and only drink water because a spouse is dying...as if his suffering on top of hers is going to help anything. Well it wont. You think like a Hollywood movie or a cartoon. I always treated my steadies better when I had a girl on the side, and I don't give two craps if you like it or approve. Its who I am, and I am not the only one. I won't screw up my lif…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:43 AM
0

There are plenty of couples where sex outside of marriage is accepted. Plenty? Give me a percentage. I have datef loads of women. Not one ever said it was just plain "acceptable". One said it was inevitable but she had to not know. I married her although it did not work out. But I am just one man and its likely the women I attract are just that kind of woman. But there is also the fact what when I talk like this on the net I tend to get attacked and called a dirty cheater....even if I never said…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:33 AM
2

Yes, let's control and train women better and stop them from stealing men's rightful property and all will be well. Wtf dude? WTF is you didn't read half of what I wrote. Also, you assumed that since I did not write that men also need training as boys, that you could further assume I thought they needed none. No. Humans are animals and they all need training, or they are worse than wild apes. Women don' t know everything. Neither do men. Both will work against their own interests sometimes, unti…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:22 AM
1

I will tell you things I am shocked people do not understand. It all begins with one very simple thing....most women are formed, by evolution, in mind and body, to create and then later, care for children. Some are more aligned for all this than others. Those who are not confuse everybody. And of course, some are better formed than others. A key part of this is that most women seek security much more than men do. And their inner need for security is simply insatiable. Most can never have enough,…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 07:23 AM
2

You must be really, really desperate. My wife never was a looker...most people say she is ugly as sin. And while she used to have a perfect backside, she is now literally the fattest person I know. Condom or not, I doubt you could even find the right place. For a better time, I suggest you go to the store and buy a beach ball.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 04:35 AM
0

It takes a little navigating, but you can find the age of consent in Italy, which confirms the original claim. The age of consent in Italy was not the claim. The claim was about the intent of the law with regards to the age of consent.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 04:27 AM
-1

Honestly your marriage was dead the second she offered to let you sleep around. No woman who actually loves her man would ever want to share him. She was probably just comfortable with the life she had but didnt care about you personally anymore (which is a really shitty way to treat someone) You weren't there. And that is why you don't know crap about it. She came up with that before the marriage. We were living apart until she completed her Master's degree, which would be a couple years after …
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:32 AM
0

You are weird. I would insist on condoms. I would want to know the guy...not just "someone else". I would also want to be on top of the situation to make sure it does not get out of hand.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:15 AM
1

Ah.....I think the screwed up grammar and spelling made me skip over that point. And there was nothing about it in the video. But I will point out that we don't know how this conversation got started. One of the women may well have asked him out of the blue and he just answered honestly. I seriously doubt he whistled at her walking by, turned to one of these women and said "Damn, she fine! I'd tap that anyday!" Much more likely they caught some boy staring at her and asked this man if she was th…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:13 AM
-8

I find you to be inhuman and heartless. The only way I could find the strenght to face my dying wife and give her the support she needs would be to have a fulfilling sex life going on. Someone like you would no doubt prefer I blew my brains out from the despair, which of course helps no one but I suppose....YOU and your fking self-righteousness.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:10 AM
-1

Honestly if youre attributing blame to a 3rd party for your marriage ending then the 3rd party isnt really the issue, the weaker link in the marriage is. You don't think that outside people can destroy a marriage? Society has broken up plenty of inter-racial marriages by making their lives hell. Today they work on barely legal by age/age gap marriages a lot. My ex-wife, of her own accord, said I could have affairs, but she was not to know of them. So of course I would strive to hide them per her…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:03 AM
2

Just to clarify if property will be joint or separate is a good reason to have a contract. From there, some property could be of special status. I am sure I could think of loads of good reasons to have a contract. But you can't contractualize emotions, that's true.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:54 AM
2

I am not sure where you pulled this step-daughter stuff from. But it seems to me its you that brought it up. Which brings us to this point about keeping it to yourself.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:20 AM
-3

If that was the case, cheating will be illegal, and there would be some requirement to keep your spouse happy and sexually satisfied. Not all. We have condoms, birth control pills and abortion. There is no reason that cheating = babies. Its not the 19th century. Sex can be separated between the recreation element and the procreation element now. There is no reason to bar cheating anymore except jealousy, which is a crap emotion that needs to be suppressed. Sexual cheating is not a problem. Emoti…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:08 AM
1

don’t kid yourself that it is in any way helpful to you. Its a tool. Tools can be used in both good and bad ways. Sadly, no one is teaching how to use porn correctly and that is the source of the destruction. Its like giving everyone access to cars but teaching no one how to drive. Men absolutely need to learn how to operate their penis. They need to learn what stimuli facilitates it becoming erect, which is deeply personal. They need to learn how to prevent ejactulation coming too soon, and tha…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:00 AM
2

One of my biggest issues with women is the number of them that engage in extreme shaming of men for simply having normal man thoughts and attractions. I am not talking about men's actions here, just the things in their head. Shaming is a form of psychological attack. But when its used to attack someone for thoughts and attraction they cannot control its a form of psychological abuse. In my experience, its overwhelmingly women doing that. They can be sad or disappointed or even mad that men gener…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:51 AM
3

If you think its weird that he does something about it,that is one thing. But to think it weird that he is attracted? He cannot control that. So the weird one would be you.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:44 AM
2

I don't understand why anyone would think marriage was primarly a business/financial partnership. If I were going to distill marriage down to one element it would be a stable environment to raise children. A close second would be a partnership for running a stable household for the sake of the health, stability and happiness of the people in the partnership. Neither of those requires both parties to earn money, much less both earn equal or near equal. And the idea of divorce as soon as one stops…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:31 AM
-3

and to blame the correct party regardless of sex. And sometimes its a third party with a big mouth.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:04 AM
-7

I don't envy anyone who has a spouse or bf/gf dying of cancer. I would not come out of that looking so noble myself. But I remember when it was found that John Edwards' was having an affair amidst his wife getting terminal cancer. He didn't leave her. He wasn't leaving her. He just didn't put all joy on hold for his dying wife and man, did he get spat upon. IDK if it was the bad press or just knowledge of the affair but SHE divorced HIM. Meanwhile, if the press and public had just left him alone…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:02 AM
0

Does the title misrepresent the article? It absolutely does. There was no rape to report. She did not know his age and he was above the age of consent for sex in Italy just not for porn distribution.....so she cannot make the porn available as she planned. That's it. The OP is a liar.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:24 AM
-2

And the link proves Sininenn incorrect. Thanks, but seriously, you need to let people making claims provide their own proof.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:20 AM
0

I asked for proof of the claim. Anybody can claim anything. I can claim that Romeo and Juliet laws apply on the moon. Until I prove it I would expect no one to take it so seriously as to bother wasting a single second trying to prove it for me.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:16 AM
0

Oh JFC! THIS specific case has nothing to do with men's rights and the headline it was given is a lie. The double standard of OTHER CASES of course concerns men's rights. Read what I write next time. You can't skim and get this stuff right. I am suggestig a mega-thread.....not banning of the topic. FFS
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:11 AM
0

Stupid bot
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:08 AM
2

She may of thought he was older but that would not hold up in court or to the general public if the genders were reversed. Intend does not matter in mostly places. Traci Lords had sex with loads of people on screen while underaged and all but one of her vids were deemed child porn but were available everywhere. Nobody unaware of her age went to jail. I know of one guy who went to jail because he knew her age. He went to jail for one year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._X-Citement…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:06 AM
9

Heading? I think its already there.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:52 PM
3

Everyone?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:52 PM
8

Or the fox to the gingerbread man, "Jump on my nose to keep out of the water!"
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:27 PM
-10

Google Romeo and Juliet laws. No. If Italy has them and they apply, you prove it. Nobody is here is your secretary.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:19 PM
-1

So you don't know how to post links you found...to show others exactly what you are talking about with no disparity. You need to get your internet user level up to the year 2005 or something.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:17 PM
1

If humans were smart enough to put restictions on things BEFORE they go wrong yeah. So I predict it won't get too far before something screws us all. AI is the tip of the iceberg for how humanity is screwing up.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:15 PM
-4

Literally takes two seconds to Google. So why don't you? ​ Seems to me like you were asking me to prove the intent behind the laws being what I said, which is impossible. Now I understand. Look, IDGAF about the intent of the law to be honest, I care how its used in practice and how its worded. And if neither is as you say, then you are most likely wrong about the intent, aren't you?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:32 AM
1

Who the fuck asks consent AFTER you've already boned? Who gets a consent form at all? All this stuff is weird and technical. It could have come down to some oddball thing like needing to get it notarized, but not wanting to 1)leave the place of filming 2) go to the notary 3) go back to the place of filming. Much easier to film then go to the notary. Lots of possible reasons.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:28 AM
-5

How would you prove intent? What does that have to do with anything mentioned? No, telling me to find evidence of your contention is not going to fly. I think that European ages of consent are exactly what I would expect them to be.....that anyone over that age is free to sleep with 100 year olds if they want, so long as its not necrophilia.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:16 AM
-8

The headline put to this is utter contrived crap. I Just saw a boy a few weeks ago...first year of junior high....he looked 20. Some other boys looked more like 10 than 12-13. So yeah, boys who look older exist, but are rarer than girls. She says she did not know his age as she put the contract signing after. Her first time making a porn vid. This was a mistake. Plus, he volunteered for this contest whatever it was, and somehow won. And he was a subscriber. But the headline makes it seem as if 1…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:13 AM
2

I don't think you read the article.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:01 AM
4

You are going to have to evidence that, not just claim it.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 10:57 AM
-18

I..... ....don't think I said anything against it having something to do with men's rights. I am just observing what I see as this topic being over-posted and perhaps needing a mega thread. Is it really this popular? Cause it seems a bit suss. Also, there is not just one way about a double standard, whatever "rules" get made up about this topic.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 10:56 AM
-1

She might elect to use conscription. But we might choose to take our 2nd amendment rights more seriously.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 10:49 AM
2

If you don't actually have sex, you soon won't be able to, certainly not do it well. The real thing is best, but being withheld from young men. Porn and masturbation are not optional. They are mandatory to maintain sexuality now. But masturbating with an aim to have sex, in a way that mimics sex, is ESSENTIAL.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 09:21 AM
-14

Is this topic really so popular?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 09:18 AM
0

AI is incredibly convenient..and it will be the death of us.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 09:06 AM
3

Pretty much anything Wranglerstar is worth watching for anyone considering homesteading....he speaks on gender issues and politics a bit as well. I really cannot recommend this guy more. My only qualm is he does seem a bit unrealistic at times, almost Martha Stewartish. But no one is perfect and he has a channel to promote. https://www.youtube.com/@wranglerstar Here he is spitting some facts about woman and age. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lovQeA2jrdc
/r/MensRights22/04/23 09:05 AM
18

The only way "patriarchy" makes sense is if its a minority handful of men with great power and wealth keeping the majority of men downtrodden and powerless. As one of the downtrodden I am sick of being treated like the patriarchy hands me free stuff for having the "right genitals". They buy and give women stuff. Not me.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 08:54 AM
6

I think that women are less inclined to competition among themselves than men are. Men being so competititve does hurt men's standings in society compared to women. Men tend to think any way they can undercut other men will help them get laid more, but I think that is the animal way and its use is limited. I have passed up quite few women I was interested in to make way for friend, sometimes even taking on a woman I was not as interested in to ensure we had a good group dynamic going on. Pulling…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 08:48 AM
2

Amen. Change and learning are required on both sides. What I am really sick of on the women's side is all the damn shaming coming from the women's side, not shaming what we do or fail to do, but shaming us just for what is in our heads. That's a big red line for me. My head is mine to deal with; no one else's. And no man should be shamed for those parts of his mind he cannot control absolutely.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 08:35 AM
1

I am heartless to you that is for sure. I hope society turns on you for some reason and you get to see how it destroys your little world, your friendships and your family and lets see how tough you are. ​ Most guys want a Mrs. Robertson because of the sex. Can you blame them given how women greatly overvalue themselves, expecting men to dedicated their lives to women just to get a few hours of mutual pleasure? Men would be a lot more open to women if they stopped acting like sex was the most ser…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 03:12 AM
0

kids don't know what they want until they experience life. And you want them to not experience life I suppose. ​ The green mile guy and courtney got divorced. I rest my case. It wasn't love, apparently WTF? No one who divorced loved now? The social pressures and media attention they faced could not destroy their emotional and mental stability and marriage? WTF? You just seem utterly heartless to me.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 02:17 AM
0

If I fuck a straight married man on grindr, does that change the fact he is a cheater, and probably bisexual? OMG. That is so completely stupid. I once dressed as a woman for Halloween. Does that make me a cross-dresser for ever and ever?? Bisexual is NOT a psychological diagnosis of mental disease. Apples and semi-trucks. Look, when you are you going to just admit you are way out of your fking element here? ​ She got caught, it's foolish to expect honesty from a criminal. And how do you know wh…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 02:10 AM
1

And once again you are ignoring vital caveats, and I have to assume you are doing it because you do not have the intellecutal capacity to hang on those caveats at once. She was married to an adult. Therefore, the attraction to the 15 year old was not exclusive. Even if you go with the often used "primary attraction" definition (which I reject) its unproven between the fresh sex partner and the old one. Next, as she said herself, she has been a teacher for a long time, but this is the first time …
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:48 AM
0

Nope, I disagree, Could you be clear? See, this is why I am giving you a hard time. You are DODGING. If Courtney never met Doug, where do you think she would be?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:38 AM
0

Entrapment is when the police cause a civilian to do something they wouldn't have normally done. Can you agree that fully adult male attraction to teenage females is normal? If you need assistance........this might help. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/12/jn Oh, there is some BS in there, like acting like psychology is not clear on this point. It is. Its just shutting up because society is stupid about this. The next link is also admitting the fact, but trying to make it out to be some "new cri…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:19 AM
0

I guess you missed all the comments condemning this marriage. Its abusive, allowed by law, but laws allow a lot of terrible things. Tell me something and tell me true. If Courtney Stodden had never met Doug Hutchison, do you think she would be living a "normal" life in your view? That she would have just been another typical 16 year old, going to school, hoping to get into a good college, just a passing interest in boys her own age, hoping to win a medal at the horse jumping championship or what…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:01 AM
2

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and swims like a duck, it's likely a duck. And I have clearly explained to you that this is no duck. Did you watch the video? They keep repeating the word "pedophile". No one even says "hebephilia". So what's up with that? I will tell you what is up with that, neither them nor you know what the hell you are even talking about. You just think you found a way you are superior to some other people and you run around beating that drum like a fking child. …
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:49 AM
-1

Mental deficiency is not a defense for breaking the law. Its also not an excuse for legal entrapment. Even the dumbest cop could trick kids into buying beer and arrest them. Its wrong. Clearly. People just enjoy such spectacles of people getting raked over the coals. Its been this way since before the days of the Roman Colloseum. And you know damn well its your entire reason for defending that sick show too. You damn well know it. but won't let it go and admit the rot that is your heart.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:44 AM
1

I just think she could find someone her own age to date. You are the one repeatedly making this statement. Don't get mad at me for calling you out on it.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:12 AM
1

Ok so you're not just a groomer, you're a sexist groomer, You are witch hunter to attack me personally for telling you some facts and opinions. Basically what I am saying is that you are not only of low IQ but also an arrogant POS. There is a wide range between retarded and mentally deficient. Many mentally deficient people are living normal lives. Do you really think normal men are naturally attracted to immature girls? Not girls. Young women. And I know they are. If they were not there would h…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:10 AM
2

This isn't proof of hebephilia either. tf is wrong with YOU? If she still likes him old as he is now, she does not have hebephilia. Hebephilia is the exclusive attraction to early adolescents (note the plural S) and you got nothing because she was once attracted to one early adolescent person and remains attracted now that he has grown. If you are gonna use big words, learn what they mean first.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:05 AM
1

You have to appreciate the way they have to keep reminding you that he is a victim cause you see him laughing and smiling in her presence and your dumb azz might forget. In fact he is tore up inside, completely shredded and any second now he might explode like a Space X rocket. Edit: The interviewer is an attack dog....constantly repeating the accusation of her being a pedophile and refusing to even engage with their opinions on their own situation. He says he was the predator...the interiveiwer…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:59 PM
1

Teenagers are not kids. Adult male attraction to teenagers is scientifically proven to be psychologically normal and near universal, but has been deemed to be illegal for....reasons. Thus, going online and tempting men is nothing but a bullship man-hate entrapment scheme that will net those men with diminshed self control (mentally impaired through no fault of their own.) Its like constantly talking about whisky in front of an alcoholic. Its the act of an A-hole and a self-absorbed son of a batc…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:48 PM
1

They moved the age of consent up. I personally think 17 would be better than 16 years. Based on what? Your personal preferences? You think everyone is like you...or should be? The only valid point here is ensuring that no one is being abused. And if no one is being abused then everyone needs to frankly Fk off and mind their own business. At what age are people not being abused? Nobody knows because that's not how abuse is measured. And thus ages of consent vary wildly from country to country and…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:36 PM
1

That was a sick ass entrapment scheme that mostly netted mentally deficient people who needed pity and help, not public humiliation and a jail sentence for your entertainment.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:30 PM
1

I don't get why she couldn't find someone around her own age? This and so many other things you said make it seem like age to you is like a price tag, and people are just things you pick up at the store. People like who they like and don't like who they don't like. They don't like someone, then hear a number and stop liking them. They don't NOT like someone, hear a number, and start liking them. Love is not a commody you shop for. And I am not saying anything about this is legal, should be, shou…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:29 PM
1

Did you make a few typos maybe?
/r/MensRights21/04/23 10:25 PM
1

u/ExMuzzy wrote: I remember that person defending the term toxic-masculinity in another post. Now they’re convinced that the number of male teachers having inappropriate relationships with female students is underreported, despite weekly articles of it happening the other way round. I cannot reply to this idiocy beneath my own comment because the liar u/AvailableCandidate89 blocked me. So... WTF does "defend the term toxic maculinity even mean? What I did was say the term was being used wrong, a…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 10:21 PM
1

Thank you. I am starting to feel much the same. And if the operators of this sub want everyone to circle jerk the same opinion they should ban all human users and train some chat GPT bots to regurgitate various of their Fking opinions instead of jerk us humans around.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 10:08 PM
0

Gender warfare??? Nothing I have said is going to spark "gender warfare". How could it? The mods are just curating opinion and this is a pet topic they creepily want to force universal opinions on.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 10:04 PM
1

BS The mod shadow blocked my reply. And what is with this clown in the comments asking me questions then blocking me before I can answer? WTF is going on here? Whatshisface wants stats even though I was not claiming anything but just expressing a doubt. Sue me. I don't care about men's rights? No, I just care more about things like conscription, homelessness, suicides, sexlessness, child custody, excessive imprisonment, false rape accusations and you know, things that affect way more males AFAIK…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:54 PM
1

Only statistics would show how many there are. Anyone could post individual instances of just about anything to make it seem that there are more than there are. Besides which, the lack of male teacher/ female student articles is making it seem like there are FEWER, which I seriously doubt is true. And you side-stepped my point about the echo chamber. There is never anywhere near a debate or discussion on this...just the same tired sentiments over and over. Edit: Wow. This guy blocked me after on…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:34 PM
1

There should be a mega-thread for this topic here. For one thing, the female teacher/male student thing keeps coming up at an over-represented rate concerning all male rights. For another thing, its an echo chamber with no actual discussion taking place....probably related to rule 9. Edit: The mod is preventing me from replying to the fool below, using shadow blocks, plus the fool below blocked me immediately after asking me a bunch of questions. This is lame tactical crap I would expect from a …
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:54 PM
1

Right. But we can see how they got to be privileged and how they hang on to it....with a very convincing song and dance about being victims.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:44 AM
0

You should be able to sue in civil court, but I don't know how you would prove or calculate damage what with the government itself hiding its data collection activities.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:35 AM
-2

We probably will wipe ourselves and all other life out yeah. But that is a side issue.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:57 AM
-4

Unfortunately, even a cursory look at nature shows a bias in favor of the female helps ensure the survival of offspring. Humans are still affected by the resulting evolution, and its so deep that its hard for most people to see even when they get the data. We humans no longer need this, but millions of years of evolution won't just disappear quietly overnight.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 12:44 AM
1

Look, I never insisted there was a screw up. I was just pointing out that mistakes are possible, so killing someone over the first test result is even dumber than it first appears. If the result is horrific, confirm it with a second test.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:59 PM
7

True that.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:40 PM
12

Usually what I do in such situations is hang out somewhere I can see what is going on, but not close enough I look suspicious....but not far enough I could not intervene if need be. Women can be insane about attempts to help them. Always approach with caution....and a smile...and be ready to just walk away if she is unappreciative and drop your sense of caring immediately if so. Women have a nasty habit of complaining about people being cold...while literally creating the very atmosphere that en…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:08 PM
0

The difference is, he threatened to leave because of the result, not because a test was performed.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:41 PM
1

I wouldn't want to waste my time on it. I would not waste my time reading your troll crap.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:45 PM
-1

Rough but friendly competition with rules and acceptance of defeat is maculinity. Ramping up competition to the point one takes sports personally, then violates the rules and cannot handle defeat is toxic masculinity. https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/12s8ohu/kid\_sucker\_punches\_other\_wrestlers\_after\_loss/
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:42 PM
3

"Mix-ups of babies" is a funny way to say cheating, trickery, and lack of accountability. Am I out of date or something? Is this some new euphemism or something? I would never, ever, refer to any of those as a "mix up". Of course, by mix up, I only meant a switching of babies at the hospital.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 11:19 AM
0

Well, I can admit that it has acquired, however unfairly, popular negative connotations. So now the question is how do we differentiate between good/usual masculinity and "toxic" masculinity? We have to. Its important. If we don't then masculinity and toxic masculinity is essentially being treated as synonymous anyway.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 11:15 AM
3

The chance of test being false is very low (sub 1%). I have to believe that is in the case of a perfectly performed test, not a case where the lab simply screwed up.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:46 AM
1

What is your point?
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:44 AM
1

I think it’s more he genuinely thinks it’s murder Its possible I guess. That take is just so horrifically over-simplistic I find it difficult to accept. Dig deeper and the amount of hypocrisy becomes overwhelming.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:32 AM
6

Also, just to be pedantic, America is not the richest country. Luxembourg has almost TWICE the GDP Per Capita of the US. If you adjust for purchasing power parity per capita, then Qatar is the richest. The US doesn't even rank top ten on either of those lists. Yes it depends on the measure. But being wildly the overall richest country and not being the richest per capita is certainly indicative of some structural issues. ​ Money is almost certainly one of the factors that creates this problem. I…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:29 AM
-1

although "adoptive father" might work just as well. I understand what you mean and why you use that more popular term. The trouble is that no adoption has taken place, so I use the term "custodial" to differentiate.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:48 AM
-2

But your position is he should care cause well its expected by Society and Women. I will be bothered only with this pile of manure. I neither said nor suggested any such thing...at all...at any point. Shut up with your insane misinterpretations. I never said a God damn thing what he should do or what anybody should expect him to do. Begone troll.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:43 AM
-1

Cunt. Woketrain prick. I have no idea what set you off. Calm down. For all I know I may have fathered several children I don't know of. But if it turns out the children I have helped to raise are not genetically mine, I will still feel like a real father to them and not feel like a father to those I never met. What is your malfunction over this? Would Perseus say Zeus was his "real" father? I am pretty sure he would object. Edit: Your edit won't work. I already quoted you.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:33 AM
-9

You are taking my post to be more hostile towards you then it is. No. Your takes on what I say are wrong, persistent and annoying...to the point it seems intentional. ​ Your position is one of compassion. Not remotely. My position is one of logic and accurate terminology. That said, I should say DNA father rather than blood father. ​ it ultimately exists to serve the interests of society and women. What your "it" is here, I am not sure, but it seems to be my position. But no, my position is not …
/r/MensRights20/04/23 04:52 AM
-25

I absolutely do not understand you. I offered no opinion that fits your contention. He was tricked and that is wrong. He thought he was both the blood father and the custodial father. AFAIK, the mother is both the blood mother and custodial mother, and its possible to be one but not the other. I am entertaining no double standards here. I am sorry, but merely providing sperm does not make a man a "real" father. To claim they are just for that is demeaning to men. Anybody that skips over the labo…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 04:07 AM
-32

Good point, but a "real" father is directly involved in raising a child. What you are referring to is the blood father. The murdered man was the custodial father and much more "real". Edit: IDK what part of this simple post is such an issue, but I suspect trolling.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:33 AM
13

Ah....I thought you meant Young Turks or something. I never use YT to mean Youtube since its not two words.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:09 AM
5

Could you provide a link?
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:42 AM
5

And now a three year old has no parents.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:41 AM
7

It is extremely important to not stop at the headline here. Even the article immediately insists the violence began because he threatened to leave her OVER the paternity test, NOT BECAUSE of the test. But, even that is the guess of the investigators. I will point out another thing....paternity test results can be mistaken. Even something as simple as mislabeling can occur. No idea if that was the case here, but people are treating doctors, scientists and lab techs as infallible bishops of God Hi…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:37 AM
-5

And why would I click a random link reply? My answer is that you are being such an A-hole that you should be grateful. Might seem counter-intutitive to you, but when people treat me poorly, I treat them poorly back. You may have been expecting a shoe shine, or a successful assertion of dominance perhaps? They are youtube links. So you can rest assured they aren't gay porn. And anyway, would you believe me if I had labeled them? I am thinking.....no. They answer your question of where I got my in…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:28 AM
7

What a weak little baby argument to try to assume that toxic teenage boys must not have a stable household. You are weird and creating strawmen everywhere. I am cutting communication with you. I want nothing to do with your drowning in your own delusions. Bye.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 01:55 AM
-13

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_Dc_A-REhM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APoQuX5M2P4
/r/MensRights20/04/23 01:46 AM
8

I wasn't saying horrible shit as a teenager to toughen people up I was doing it to hurt people because I wanted them to suffer for beating me in a video game. Sounds like you needed guidance but didn't have any. You needed to learn self-control but had no proper role models. Mothers will simplistically demand no bad words and "play nice". Fathers will understand that you need to attack your enemies in a way that does not show they beat you psychologically. Even if they beat you in a game, you ca…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 01:44 AM
5

I refuse to call words used to toughen up your fellow men as "toxic culture". Your enemies will attack you psychologically. For that matter, so will your wives and girlfriends. If your friends fail to insult you sometimes, they are not your friends. They are setting you up for weakness and servitude. That said, they better build you up sometimes as well. Someone who does nothing but smash you psychologically is toxic and the equivalent of an enemy if not one outright.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 01:27 AM
-17

The phrase may have been coined by a man, but it meant pretty much the complete opposite of what it does now. No. It means what it meant when it was coined. People are just using it wrong now and its very common for people to do this. An example from history.....the word "big" used to mean simply "strong". Thus a "big shield" could have been as small as buckler, but would hold up in battle. That is exactly what we see here...people confusing meanings. Toxic masculinity was never meant to describ…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 01:17 AM
1

What you are talking about it is the psychological abuse that women excel in deploying and men excel in getting entangled in. Men's only natural defense is physical violence. But women have won to the degree that physical violence is now out, but the psychological violence that women excel at is not only allowed, but praised.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 01:11 AM
43

The clip brings up many good points and facts. However they seem to have come up with the same tired conclusion that just isn't true....that money problems are at the root and so money will solve it all given time. America is probably the richest country in human history. America's problems boil down to attitudes, including greed. You don't solve greed with money. You just put a bandaid on a bullet wound and kick an ever growing can down the road.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:57 AM
-27

This is sad really. The term is just being misused because people are really not very smart. Imagine if for some reason the danger of moldy pizza were being popularly talked about. And then people started getting the idea that ALL pizza is moldy and pizza was a bad thing. That is what is happening here. Masculinity is good. Toxic masculinity is bad. But now people think all masculinity is toxic. Nope. It was men that came up with the term "toxic masculinity". The entire point was to warn young m…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:41 AM
0

I don’t understand why he thinks tbh I doubt he really does either. Recently I have been thinking that most anti-abortion sentiment in America is little more than a backlash against feminism. But I guess it could also be a deep, deep desire to see misery in the world. It never ceases to amaze me how much people desire to see misery. Its really eaten away at me too, and I find myself internally wishing for everyone else's pain because of it, even if I still post positively and for hope most of th…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:45 PM
1

You will get banned from this sub quick. There is much to talk about with what you wrote but its not allowed. You just get to take a certain hard position and anything deviating means a ban....even if you back it up with scientific facts.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:13 PM
0

Learn to read, fool. Its an emoji. You want to have an adult convo? Do better than emoji replies. My issue is your claim that wiki is biased. Of course it is. Everything is. But you say it like its something really, really sinister.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:27 AM
0

Oh. This is Reddit. Some things you are not even allowed to hint at or lean toward..sooo.....
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:23 AM
2

You also have to consider how the washing maching, vacuum cleaner, hot water, cars that do not require serious upper body strength, the refridgerator, freezer, mixer, etc. has made it so people could even have the time that someone was not always in or around the house just so the family could eat, have clean clothes, and not live in a dump.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:20 AM
0

Oh. That's why you offer no alternative while you accuse Wiki of bias. I see.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:16 AM
-2

Putting all feminists in the same box is not smart. https://www.dw.com/en/feminist-group-in-russia-helping-men-dodge-conscription/a-63509559 https://couragetoresist.org/feminists-against-the-draft-panel-discussion/
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:15 AM
0

I know you wish there were some kind if easily accessible source of ultimate truth out there. In fact, you don't know me from Adam. Plus, we all wish this, but you have seem to have me confused with someone who believes it already exists. Either that are you just being rude for no damn good reason.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:09 AM
0

Offers no alternative.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:06 AM
1

There is a difference between not caring, and caring less.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:06 AM
-1

Offered as many as you. Is this seriously your honest reply? No. I do not believe it is. I have no obligation even in the drug addled mind of junkie who just smashed his head against a wall to offer an alternative to something I am not insinuating requires a better alternative. And you just keep flaunting that Ph.D. you got in "research skills" while you get lost.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 05:35 AM
1

I am not going to ask you to clarify....nor assume.....nor accuse....but I feel like you are....holding back. Would you say that is true? BTW...I agree....the system is broken....8 ways from Sunday....and mostly what I hear are wrong answers....popular, safe, but wrong answers.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:45 AM
0

The silence on this is.....strange.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:42 AM
2

This will give you a better handle on how the members of this sub view abortion. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/12izjgz/what\_are\_your\_views\_on\_abortion/
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:36 AM
2

It is not a question of fragility Well its many things, but fragility plays a role. Some mods just literally cannot emotionally tolerate some opinions, or even demonstrable facts. And they will ban people and come up with the most wild excuse to do it...but of course my favorite is when they say nothing because even they know they have no good reason for what they are doing.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:17 AM
4

I know its hard to get close with a father. One key is to avoid talks where you disagree...sometimes you just got to let him talk, feel he was heard, and then just be quiet and move on. Even when you disagree with what he said, later on you will at least find some good reasons why he said it. But for now, its important to remember that most fathers are literally too old to change their minds about much and don't really have a need either. But he is a fountain of good information regardless and h…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:10 AM
0

Frankly, he is a massive hypocrite and its going to take ages for him to realize what is wrong with that and that he is one. That said, you yourself could admit the evils of women from time to time. Its not just men. I would suggest you avoid the more contraversial political topics. They are not what a dating relationship are based on. Communicate more personal things, such as daily occurrences and dreams of the future and what to have for lunch.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:02 AM
4

You don't know nearly enough to give such fatalist advice. You have not even asked any questions to try and make sure you got everything right. Sit down.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:55 AM
4

A crap ton of mods are fragile and trying to make all its members adhere to specific agendas. Most of them need a spanking in order to effect an attitude adjustment. Also, echo chambers are stupid and only make for stupid people who come up with stupid answers.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:39 AM
15

You and your father should find a literal game to play, one you are sure she will suck at, whether its cards or a board game. Get her to play with you. Every time you destroy her at the game, point out how much she sucks at in the same way she belittles you. Use her own words as much as possible. I don't think explaining things is going to work. She needs to be shown her error; to feel it personally. Anyway, having a better paying job is not clear proof of being better. Some very dumb people hav…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:33 AM
1

I am sure there are many. Its not like the "no misandry" view isn't as common as it is wrong.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:20 AM
2

LOL The country that sends its women to do the combat will live so short that history will soon forget it. Somebody has to raise the children, somebody has to cook the food, somebody has to maintain the house, and somebody has to bring home the money. And anyone trying to do it all at once will soon find their sweet little brain taxed to the point they are doing a poor job of something, whatever gender. Sharing the work works better yes. But its still two people trying to do many different tasks…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:17 AM
-1

I can only view these anti-wiki voices as people repeating what they were told, esp. when it has the ring of "I know better" about it. Nobody claimed Wiki is perfect, but among a sea of imperfect reference materials, Wiki is pretty damn good. I would prefer Colliers Encyclopedia updated along the standards of the late 1960s, but that's a dead dream. The fact no one is sticking their head out offering an alternative speaks volumes. Not even a Brittanica pundit claiming perfection. Anyway, we live…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:03 AM
2

You literally will not see a feminist object to to MGM because FGM is worse in their mind. This is false. I was on a feminist sub the other day and they were objecting to MGM. They did down play it in regard to FGM though, even saying it was worse when just removing the clitoral hood, or even the inner labia with no sewing, even though removing the clitoral hood is exactly the same thing as a standard circumcision and removing the inner labia, well, a common enough beauty operation called labiap…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 01:53 AM
0

Offers no alternative.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 01:49 AM
-3

Offers no alternative.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 01:49 AM
0

You may as well have asked preying mantises how they feel about the treatment of males by the females of their society. "Its not misandry", they would say, "that the females eat our heads after sex. This is the way its always been. This is normal. Yes, its a bit daunting, but we are males. We die for a noble cause. I have heard talk of giving the female a cricket to eat instead, but those males are just weak. I don't listen to them. What's to live for after sex anyway? We are lucky to get it! Th…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:04 AM
0

I never said women don't swear. I said women are the ones who get triggered by swearing most and why we have rules about it in places like the office. Why is a guy suddenly a "witless chump" for getting turned on??? Most men are turned by displays of a woman's body, and why should he have to contend with that in the office which is a place to do work and concentrate? Newsflash, matey: men used to get the horn looking at ankles. Newsflash, they still do. If you are wearing a shirt with a footy te…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 06:39 AM
-1

Or how about you have a modicum of self control? I am not sure if you understand what a "modicum" is. A man without a modicum of self control would simply proceed to put his hands all over her...maybe even rape her. ​ Are you a mindless, hormone driven beast, with no thoughts or free will of your own? This is sort of how I feel about cursing. They are just words. Mostly its only been women I have seen that get so almighty upset by them. We guys hang out and say the F-word, S-word, C-word, D-word…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:33 AM
1

It must be the former. The straight jacket society is going to take us all down painfully.....I think it is already set to in fact even leveled at mostly men.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:12 AM
1

I think I have an answer, but I am afraid the utter Frankenstein that is rule 9 will attack me if I characterize it properly here.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:09 AM
1

Its a fair question. But no one can answer. But what can be said is women need to abide by a strict dress code or else they are fairly suspect of willfully enticing men....if they have the features to even do that. And I don't mind women enticing men. I mind their denial of all responsibility and consequence for it. That rankles.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:30 AM
-3

Well, I never said "need". I am only pointing out that among the major charm points a man has for a woman, this is probably the most powerful. And it makes sense if you consider evoluntionary psychology. People like to demean women for the very popular attraction to rich guys. But that is unfair. Women have good reasons to be attracted. Rich guys cover almost every Achilles heel a mother could have. But yeah, a man can be attractive in other ways, but to beat a rich guy, they better be several a…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:26 AM
0

Yeah. But the guy's point (I think) is that when you get into the reasons why you shouldn't, and how that matches up with the treatment of the person who strove to give you that boner, it gets real silly real fast. People are weird. They are massively fking weird. And they are never weirder than when it comes to sex issues. As soon as its sex issues, you can only expect inside-out, upside-down, and backwards....inconsistent, unfair, piece-meal, lopsided, deaf to reason, mismatched, and attention…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:16 AM
-3

That is some weird absolutism. Who was so specific to bring in sugar daddies? There is a massive variety of things that turn different women on. Being absolutist about women's turn on's is all manner of silly. Some absolutely are sexually attracted to their sugar daddies, but certainly not all.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:12 AM
2

I was a passport bro long before this term was created. Locked between the solid rock wall of the American female and the hopelessness, intolerance, and despair it offered, and the swamp of learning a new language and culture with both its pitfalls and rewards, I chose the swamp. The swamp promised difficulties, but also life and acceptance. The rock face promised only internal demise, pain, and torture. I have lived in Japan almost non-stop since the 90s. If there are reasonable and attractive …
/r/MensRights18/04/23 03:27 AM
2

Starkest example of doubling down on stupid I have ever seen. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 03:05 AM
0

Y’all need to be on some watch lists The ad hominem attack is bad enough. The fact it comes without even a passing attempt to justify it smacks of an admission of being wrong without being mature enough to accept it.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:52 AM
1

I think if you do enough of the math you eventually come down to the the following choices: 1)women as a group want to be able to speak freely, accuse freely, and claim victimization freely so badly, they are willing to sacrifice all or most ability to effect legal charges OR 2) women as group want to be taken seriously in courts of law when they make claims of victimization, to the point they are willing to control even their most baseless gossiping, shaming, group think, and accusing and limit…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:16 AM
-5

No. Men provide for women. Women provide for children. Women ascertain that men will provide for them so that they can be assured that they can provide for children. This is not via conscious thought. This is evolution at work. Women will find men who provide as sexually attractive. Those who find men who don't provide attractive are far more likely to fail to procreate or fail to produce successful offspring. And I cannot think of a single society where it is different, except maybe that small …
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:30 AM
1

I have a real hard time dealing with people's emotions over every damn little thing. As a man, if a woman says she is on her period, its just a fact of life. She could even tell me a sight or sound got her wet and to me its just information. If she said I got her wet somehow, its a compliment. What makes a boner different? Well, I guess it depends on the individual. But what I do know is that those who are intolerant are NEVER going to change, you just could not even smack them hard enough, and …
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:12 AM
1

...i can't even begin to say in how many ways this guy's speaking nonsense Damn right you can't. You admitted yourself you cut the video short. ​ don't take life advice from someone that looks and speaks like porky from looney tunes This vacuous ad hominem says far more about you than him.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:05 AM
0

you had to continue by saying "it's ok to go and harass that woman because she was asking for it by wearing a tight dress" and even implied "you could do something about it and it would still be ok" That is NOT what he said. Its how you are willfully misinterpreting what he said, because you cannot even imagine a woman being saddled with a single ounce of responsiblity or tolerance for a situation she herself instigated. In fact, if we use your own standards here, SHE was harassing HIM long befo…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:02 AM
0

I disagree. The worst thing to come to the internet was humans.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 12:31 AM
10

Of course they can. .....just like a human can advocate for the rights of other animals....you don't have to be one to want to further and protect one. That said though many groups are exclusionary and the men's right's movement could possibly become largely exclusionary just as BLM has. Feminism sure looks to me to be becoming largely exclusionary if it isn't already.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 12:03 AM
1

Who set that system up? NOT me. Some small groups of mostly men who care even less about me than any random woman. I mean, damn, why assume they cared about me, them being male and me being male? Is that projecting or something? Nobody asked me. No phone call, no vote, no nothing. And very little is set up how I would have set things up. So explain my "privilege" in a system I fundamentally disagree with!
/r/MensRights17/04/23 04:45 PM
3

This is selective freedom of speech aka censorship. Yes. Its one thing to ban people who are making personal accusations, calling people names, and not contributing to discussion but Reddit is infamous for admins and mods who have a hidden agenda and ban subs and users to push it. And they are all absolute coward slime.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 04:36 PM
-2

I think you are putting way too much stock in the power of a subreddit. ​ All i'm advocating is that reddit apply it's rules consistently Half of Reddit's rules are festering feces and need rolled back, not shoveled around more. Better those in the right insist on having the freedom of the evil, than to attempt to get the evil oppressed equally. The evil will weather the oppression better.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 04:11 PM
16

That will remain true until women go overboard. We have to let them go overboard. We can't shut them up. We have to call them out.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 04:05 PM
-2

You are advocating a never ending battle of whack-a-mole though, and the more Reddit squeezes the more people will migrate to other platforms making that whack-a-mole game even harder. I believe people like that will eventually steer their way right over a cliff if left to their own devices. Best not to alert them to their own mistakes. Smarter more decent women shall surely prevail.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:55 PM
1

As someone who puts a LOT of stock in evolutionary psychology, this sounds VERY suspect. Look at just about any large mammal society and what do you see? Clear, distinct gender roles....often a male lording over groups of females and keeping other males away or in check. Even a look at recent and modern primitive tribes thows this into suspicion.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:37 PM
0

I do not believe there is a one-size-fits-all diet. I think if there is one area you can expect rapid evolution to take place, its the area around diet. Different people will do better with different diets I think, due to genetics. In fact, even climate makes a difference. You dont want to be eating like a Sakha in Egypt, and you don't want to be eating like an Egyptian in Sakha.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:33 PM
35

Some day some Senator could be waving that book around advocating for a men's rights law. Applaud these people outing themselves, their motives and their methods.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:22 PM
1

How is this allowed on reddit? Attacking free speech is poison. Its up to us to make a better case for being a decent person. Besides which, if their tricks are announced, we get to learn their tricks. Then we can spot them in the field and deal with them appropriately. We can also teach our sons.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:20 PM
3

Reported "in the news" more? I think we all see that. Reported by alleged victims more? Seems so, but is dubious. Prosecuted more? That requires the citing of statistics, particularly per capita statistics. Of course it will "seem" prosecuted more if reported in the news more.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:06 PM
6

I was a bit confused by her claiming to be oppressed all her (their) lives, as I am not Aussie and just heard of her...so at first I thought....."as a woman?" She is a mix of three different Aussie Aboriginal groups and, of course, European. Thus her claim of "Black brothers" and of course, her slur against the White woman now make "sense"...umm...using that term loosely here.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 02:37 PM
142

Orgasm delusion? I looked it up and was led back to this sub...to a post from 7 days ago...that was deleted. What is it and where did the term orginate?
/r/MensRights17/04/23 02:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter