TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Frgo Archive

View 15 posts and 30 comments by Frgo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
277

Frgo/r/seduction17/01/17 03:34 PM
119

False AccusationFrgo/r/MensRights13/06/15 01:23 PM
72

Marriage/DivorceFrgo/r/MensRights21/07/15 12:54 AM
55

UnconfirmedFrgo/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:02 PM
32

Frgo/r/seduction19/02/17 11:53 AM
28

Rant/VentingFrgo/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 03:52 PM
18

GeneralFrgo/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:30 AM
8

Frgo/r/seduction13/02/17 04:08 PM
6

GeneralFrgo/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:51 AM
3

Frgo/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:52 PM
2

Frgo/r/seduction01/12/17 07:57 PM
1

Frgo/r/seduction03/12/14 02:51 AM
1

Frgo/r/seduction17/03/17 08:25 PM
1

Frgo/r/seduction20/02/17 12:58 AM
0

Frgo/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:38 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The reason why I like this guy more than any other PUA on youtube (and I watch a lot of them) is because Todd goes more in-depth about his techniques than any other person I've seen in this business. He was a psychology major (so I've been told) and that really shows the way he analyzes every aspect of his interactions with women. I genuinely believe he's the most intelligent professional PUA out there.
/r/seduction13/02/17 04:22 PM
3

Cats remind me of Jerry. Tom is usually just minding his own business and Jerry just comes out of nowhere and does something really messed up to him or hits him really hard in the head. That causes the whole chase thing where Jerry goes on to put Tom through even more shit. Ironically, in all these videos I see, the dog is always Tom. The dog just minds his/her own business and the cat just comes and annoys the shit out of the dog (or in many cases outright bullies puppies). I hated Jerry as a k…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 12:21 PM
0

ok
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/17 01:17 AM
-8

Can we please upvote this dude?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/17 03:47 PM
6

He doesn't wanna talk to you because he's one of the cool kids..
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/17 03:47 PM
1

Haha nice dude (the handjob part). Shame you couldn't convince her to put her mouth in eh? ;) What'ju blackmail her for? Grades or money (or both)? :P
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 08:31 PM
2

Couldn't agree more with you on what you said. Thanks for the detailed analysis. Our ancestors were fucking way older women left and right in the stone ages because they were considered almost adults at that age. No need to turn us men into women by applying female standards on us. We can handle grown ass women in our teens just fine thank you very much. It would be different if it were a girl because the two sexes are biologically and psychologically different but some people just don't get tha…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 07:59 PM
7

We can tell the teacher off for fucking a 13 year old twat and we can pat the twat in the back for being a fucking boss and banging the hot teacher. Its as simple as that.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 07:43 PM
-2

Agreed and fixed.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 06:01 PM
-19

Guys and girls are biologically, psychologically and fundamentally different. That is a fact. A 13 year old who gets to bang his smoking hot teacher will carry it around like a badge of honor with his boys for the rest of his life and will get high fives all around. A 13 year old girl will feel vulnerable and ashamed and feminists will never let her forget that she has been abused as a child no matter how hard she tries. So yes, it would be VERY different if he were a 13 year old girl instead. B…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:18 PM
-46

This is what the men's rights movement has devolved to. Instead of focusing on paternal custody rights, we are all whining about a 13 year old kid having a good time with his hot teacher. Lucky kid, I wish I was him. The kid loved it and is bragging about it to his boys. The teacher has some mental issues and needs to get help. End of story. Its like NONE of you people here have ever been 13 in your lives? Feminists aren't the only ones taking away our masculinity, YOU GUYS are just as culpable.…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 04:59 PM
52

I don't disagree with you at all buddy, but if most of our posts are coming from emotion, what separates us from radical feminists? Whether their (redfems) anger is misplaced or not (some of it is definitely valid), their anger makes them lose objectivity and they make it an "us vs. them" issue. I think I'm starting to see VERY similar trends here as well where I feel that several of us here genuinely hate women for the actions of a few.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:37 PM
4

The ethics of circumcision is a different story and personally I am leaning towards not circumcising young babies. However, going back to point, circumcision most definitely reduces chance of contracting STI. I don't know where you are getting your 1.3% from. This RR corresponds to a protection of 60% (95% CI: 32%-76%). When controlling for behavioural factors, including sexual behaviour that increased slightly in the intervention group, condom use, and health-seeking behaviour, the protection w…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:28 PM
2

Thanks for the info. Yeah I've seen the links you guys are right about this.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:31 PM
-2

Here, now look into some more peer reviewed medical papers and tell me how your UNSUPPORTED opinion is more valid than all of theirs :) Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e298. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):643-56.…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:29 PM
-6

Here, now look into some more peer reviewed medical papers and tell me how your UNSUPPORTED opinion is more valid than all of theirs :) Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e298. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):643-56.…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:28 PM
-2

The objective of this study was to determine whether the justifications given for promoting mass circumcision as a preventive measure for HIV infection are reasonable and whether mass circumcision is a feasible preventive measure for HIV infection in developing countries. The medical literature concerning the practice of circumcision in the absence of medical indication was reviewed regarding its impact on HIV infection and related issues. The literature was analysed with careful attention to hi…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:19 PM
1

Alright point taken. Thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:04 PM
-3

Sorry but your opinion is irrelevant on this issue. I have provided you with biological facts from reputable, peer reviewed medical journals. They wouldn't have been published if they couldn't even control for basic things like number of sexual partners and hygiene. As it stands, I have provided you with actual biological facts and you came back with absolutely nothing. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E et al. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infe…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:01 PM
-4

The WHO study is one of many references they used. How come you didn't mention all the other medical journals they cited that has nothing to do with the WHO study? What you fail to understand that studies are irrelevant when it comes to this. This a Biological FACT. Another biological fact is that if you cut your hand and don't treat it, you're more likely to get infected. You DON'T need a study for this, because its a biological fact. That is why there is academic literature on this topic on me…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:55 PM
0

Obviously a person who goes around having sex with more people is more likely to contract HIV, circumcised or not. What you fail to understand that this ISN'T a study. Its a Biological FACT. Another biological fact is that if you cut your hand and don't treat it, you're more likely to get infected. You DON'T need a study for this, because its a biological fact. You understand the difference now? Religious, non-religious doesn't matter for biological facts. Fact is, having a foreskin makes you re…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:45 PM
-1

Thanks for your comment. Its not that I mistrust you, but can you link me to reputable sources that verify what you just said? I couldn't find anything online that testifies to what you or the other person said (regarding men feeling pain during sex)
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:38 PM
-2

Yeah because in a conservative country like Egypt, you go around talking to women about their circumcision every day right? Whats next? You're a gynecologist?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:32 PM
-10

Its a BIOLOGICAL fact that removing foreskin reduces chances of catching STI. http://www.catie.ca/en/fact-sheets/prevention/penile-circumcision-reduce-risk-hiv-infection Last time I checked, Canada was a first world country. I could be wrong. http://healthland.time.com/2013/04/17/why-circumcision-lowers-risk-of-hiv/ Polls and Surveys (and more importantly your opinion) is irrelevant in face of a biological fact.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:28 PM
-8

Sorry dude, but its a BIOLOGICAL fact that removing foreskin reduces chances of catching STI. http://www.catie.ca/en/fact-sheets/prevention/penile-circumcision-reduce-risk-hiv-infection http://healthland.time.com/2013/04/17/why-circumcision-lowers-risk-of-hiv/ Polls and Surveys (and more importantly your opinion) is irrelevant in face of a fact.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:27 PM
-13

I'm terribly sorry you're going through this. My deepest sympathies are with you. But for what its worth, I really don't think your problem has much to do with circumcision. Circumcision only slightly reduces the sensation on a small part of your penis, the rest of your penis stays more than sensitive (especially near the head). Also its not normal that you're feeling pain during sex. Have you consulted a doctor about this?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:20 PM
16

Lying on Reddit. Why am I not surprised. http://i.imgur.com/I56HxRx.png http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/33bxxj/circumcision_babies_feel_pain_like_adults_they/cqjjal3?context=3 Here /u/Cypher_Aod claims that he was circumcised from birth. But then he went onto defend uncircumcised sex (against a guy who was claiming circumcised people last longer) by saying he lasted more than 40 minutes the first time he did it. So which is it? Are you circumcised or not?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:17 PM
-2

Wait, didn't you just say that you were circumcised on another comment?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 12:57 PM
-13

I totally agree. Given that I have a lower chance of catching STDs (although I know it definitely won't prevent it), I would gladly go back and get circumcised again if need be. It also helps that there are a few other minor benefits but lets not get into that argument now. It just so happens that the only people who complain about male circumcision, are feminists and uncircumcised men. From my personal experience, I haven't seen any circumcised man ever complaining about it; in fact, most I've …
/r/MensRights21/04/15 12:40 PM
1

That's almost what she said really. I highly recommend checking the video out.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter