TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Friendly_Radio_8814 Archive

View 0 posts and 100 comments by Friendly_Radio_8814 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You're just strawmanning an ad hominem on the "husband" and still not arguing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 12:53 AM
1

Ad hominem. Try to Argue the point. Perhaps you're projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 12:00 AM
14

Well the plumber is not going to work for free of course he's waiting for you to pay him.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 03:59 PM
1

10: because free bikini content drive engagement up and they sell more ads.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 03:45 AM
2

When they push the narrative to drive engagement to sell ads. You can't push your own because you're not vetted. They don't care about anything but the revenue and how to keep increasing the number.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 01:53 PM
4

This gentleman here, so elegant retort. Good job.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 01:50 PM
1

The amount of cherry picking and straight up bullshit on FF is unacceptable. Shit content.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 09:00 PM
8

When you're shallow a puddle feels like the ocean
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 03:41 AM
-3

Lol it's just like arguing with feminists!
/r/MensRights06/04/23 02:14 AM
-6

Yes, false flags to smear by association are common but this shit literally telling dudes to steal lol wtf this sub is a psyop run by covert radfems attacking the MRA's name in reddit. How can you allow a post telling men to steal when at the same time highlighting how men are grinded to a pulp by the legal system. What if it's a setup? Huh? Advocating men to steal goes the exact opposite direction of what MRA's are about. This sub should be stripped of the name on grounds of gross misrepresenta…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:07 PM
1

Shhh rage enhanced engagement suffers if you actually promote rational thinking!
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:32 PM
-12

This mra sub is a joke.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:28 PM
-7

Some of the responses are just plain unacceptable specially for a sub pretending to be advocating for men's rights. Stealing? Really? Morons or false flags.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:26 PM
3

This sub is just smearing the mra's by association. Malicious intent.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:25 PM
-38

So you can't discern between unsolicited approach in a parking lot and an emergency call for help? Is this sub ran by feminist sockpuppets wtf?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:20 PM
6

Bingo. Much less lonely women in lonely places it's not rocket science.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:17 PM
-29

You really don't understand the power imbalance?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:16 PM
2

Wow! Steal his purse what the fuck?! Advocating men to commit a crime against women? Are you a covert feminist seeding s false flag? Real men don't steal purses /s. Are you trying to make mra's look like petty, insecure men who would steal a purse? The correct answer is just don't approach lone women. Much less in environments where they may feel endangered, specially in a parking lot or late at night. Not overly public places are such an obvious NO NO. is not that hard and you shouldn't be that…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 03:12 PM
1

Oh no! Have they internalized the "pAtrYarCHy" too? /S
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 04:45 PM
6

isn't incel a derogative term, thus sexist and offensive?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 06:54 PM
1

Of course not. That's why there are massive numbers of feminist in the armed forces right? Ok seems like they hiveminded not to be part quite successfully.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 04:58 PM
1

Yes they're fucking yes. We're not blind, we all can see the TikTok s.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 04:04 PM
1

Human suffering is human suffering. If you fail to condemn violence against a human because of their genetic code aren't you failing for the same rotten ideology of the radfems? Doesn't men have mothers, sisters, daughters, granddaughter and wife's to care for. Isn't their rights not also these men's rights too? Haven't billions of men died defending them? Men's right are human rights, excluding the suffering of women casts a bleak light on a sub dedicated to men's rights and gives talking point…
/r/MensRights01/04/23 03:26 PM
-9

Yes! Fucking yes we must! We cannot turn a blind eye just because we have it shittier. It sucks for every nice person no matter the gender. Shitty women hurt men and shitty men hurt women. We must call out every motherfucker out there even harder least you become jaded hypocrites like those we gladly point our fingers at!
/r/MensRights31/03/23 07:15 PM
2

Wow wtf. Be careful. Maybe he just appreciated you but you never know. It can be really difficult to get a nice partner who is just happy to be in a ltr with his women and be happy. Hope you find someone nice to share life with.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 04:53 PM
2

Lol no. Those women didn't like danish beer. They liked free danish beer from a dolt that they may get more free shit. You can see women going hysterical for whatever boy band dude but you'll never see women flocking to a homeless. They always expect to get something out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 04:50 PM
3

Also women in LTRs also have way less sex drive and expect their partner to just go with it. Wich it's never going to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 05:26 AM
1

Women crave men who get what they want with whom they want when they want. They love to compete with each other too. When women see other women trying to get with one dude they automatically have to win him over. It's like a feeding frenzy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 05:23 AM
2

Because eventually he's going to meet someone who does something he really really likes and leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 05:19 AM
0

Better bored and empty than bored and blue pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 05:17 AM
4

Lol no
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 05:15 AM
-1

She stole that rich husband? Admiration, envy, scorn. Men cheat with a maid? He's a dog. It's not fair lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 05:13 AM
1

How do know all that info? I don't even think about tracking an ex like that. Is a small town?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 05:05 AM
2

Lol
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:43 AM
6

They are yelling "ki** all men" they side with the enemy.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:36 AM
2

Word
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:35 AM
7

Men are disposable and feminist know exactly what are they doing. They are just as guilty.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:31 AM
6

Wow such male privilege! To the surprise of absolutely nobody but the cynical hypocrites.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:29 AM
3

Forget the draft. Given the historically massive male losses in ward, ask them how many have volunteered to serve lately, since they can do that anytime.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:26 AM
9

Obviously the feminists of that country would say the same duh! /s
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:23 AM
8

Got me lol
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:22 AM
2

probably yes to all. however, overweight is too broad of a term to extrapolate anyting useful. personality would be the deciding factor 100% of the time for a second date or more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 08:49 PM
1

Kinda interesting to me that no one touches on how “blue pill” probably, supposedly worked/works because of cultural differences. ie in a time without the internet, giving women more control in how dating went down was new territory, in a way probably exciting for both parties. Men could relax a bit, step back, and let women “empower” themselves. They didn’t need to be or do anything special. The woman would like who she likes. I think that men always had and will have to be or do something spec…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 08:32 PM
2

You're welcome. Give me a minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 08:05 PM
4

while I don't agree with everything I do agree with most. Thanks for such nice long form reddit post. It was the most enjoyable post of the thread and for me at least of reddit in a long time. funny and on point. It had everything lol! you should write that book.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:48 PM
0

what? it's not to bend anyone. it's about becoming the best version of yourself, work to improve yourself everyday and let the results speak for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:16 PM
0

I agree, but would say that the blue pill does work, in fact works wonderfully if you feed from simps while the RP works for men to not be simped and scammed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:15 PM
3

because a shrewd pretty woman can get literally rich scamming simps. and the RP threatens their food pyramid.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:12 PM
3

well of course, it's designed to get you to kneel to her not to seek an equal partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:10 PM
2

yes, very on point!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:09 PM
6

pretty spot on by my anecdotal experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:06 PM
2

holy shit, the RP has become sentient, can you link to her tiktok?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:05 PM
2

hahaha lol I love your sense of comedy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:05 PM
1

yes, they would be roasted asap lol. seems like this account is just familiar with propaganda since fails to even try to argue the point of the RP and resorts to the usual SIGN language.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:04 PM
1

wow are you salt_mathematician24's false flag's alt account?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 06:01 PM
0

"Being pushy, pressuring, strong arming and bullying is manipulating" yes this is bad. conflating some morons with the RP is also bad. "TRP teaches men to "be superior to her in everyway" While I don't agree I would quote some bs I've seen women boast and brag about on tiktok. "he must make more money than me": he must be superior to her in the financial department. "Succesful women are having trouble finding even more succesful men to marry": self explanatory. "he must pay for everything": he m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:59 PM
0

ok I'm going to manipulate women by getting a six pax and a gulfstream. I think you are cherry picking the grifters to bash the legit concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:39 PM
3

exactly, RP bros would roast a fat dude claiming he can't get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:34 PM
1

yes, you can't be red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:33 PM
1

wow I'm amazed you just know what all woman say. wow mysoginists? being pro men's rights it's not mysoginist. is being pro women's right's misandrist?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:31 PM
2

well to be fair, you always have other women avalilable. Why would they say all those things. are they corrupting the general idea? are you cherry picking the grifters to strawmanning the redpill. It's like focusing on the radfems yelling "unalive all men" or "men are trash" and ignoring all the perfectly valid concepts of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:29 PM
1

just because a bunch of book sellers and ad pushers aka "content creators" like say pearly things propel a bunch of material doesn't mean they really care about the core ideas. They are just riding the wave of the popular sentiment of their adepts. From your decade long study, how would you synthetize the core precepts of the true red pill concepts? how can being "too overly informed" about something be cast as a negative?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:25 PM
1

nice points, yours is such a well articulated and pleasant to read post. thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:18 PM
3

I would argue that most women just reject any dude stupid enough to parrot the red pill grifters, not just for the parroting but specially because it shows that the guy is a moron and the chances of him becoming a suitable provider to finesse are slim to none.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:17 PM
1

wrong. she doesn't respects you. She likes the lifestyle you provide and probably won't say or do anything that would make you unconfortable and maybe jeopardize the resources she's enjoying. If you go broke, hell, even if you don't go all the way to broke but your lifestyle takes a 30% hit you may start to see what if that she really values. I undestand respect in the microscopic context of you comment as related to your status not yourself. does she love you rich or poor? chances are she doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 05:13 PM
1

99% is flat out wrong and facetious. you seem to imply that all women are out there schreeching "unalive all men", or advocating better ways to grift simps, or boasting laughable standars that they themselves can't and won't ever match etc. They are not, but it doesn't appear that way because the algorithms are pushing rage across both sides to sell ads. However. If a huge % of women wouldn't date God himself if he where to be broke, ugly, bald or short or whatever shallow BS and they brag 24/7 …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 04:49 PM
1

on the autism note, he's maybe trying to say that he doesn't want kids due to the risk of passing the genes. so no long term relationships maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 12:44 AM
3

Not equally at all. Women pick and choose. Only a few men can pick and choose and very few can steal a married women. While women gloat among themselves of their marriage destroyer badges.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 02:50 PM
1

Suuuure that's why women would pick smeagol before Thor even though the former is a magnificent actor. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:59 PM
2

Well yes and no. Some like the dude and would do anything anywhere anytime like a groupie. Others demand that the brain foreplay better be on point because the slightest failure will break their suspension of disbelief and poof the third act is gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:54 PM
3

Just like dictators are never wrong too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:45 PM
1

Lol, if that's so why didn't you refuse to take advantage of such breach of privacy in the first place? So devious. Unless other channels are used for privileged comms.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:44 PM
1

Sir hold please the flaming feminist pitchforks are on their way to cancel you! Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:42 PM
0

Wooooowowowow so toxic how dare you invade his privacy in such a nonchalant demeanor. He has no doubt internalized misandry so deep he doesn't even see what's wrong no more. I could see the pitchforks if the roles where reversed. So you are overseeing your adult partner private comms in social media? And think it's ok? Do you think then than all men should have full access and veto right over their woman's social media? I would want to see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:40 PM
1

And they offer modeling trips all expenses paid. Why do you mean I can't go?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:35 PM
1

You would need to quantify cheating from the women's perspective. For example if x amount of women experience similar feelings to sex after eating chocolate, could be eating chocolate be considered cheating like just like some women consider men watching porn cheating? And reading, watching romantic novels, movies, soap operas and their subsequent erotic release too? Men are simple and cheating is pretty clear. Women may cheat the same in the physical sense like men, but I guess all the other in…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:34 PM
1

You left out the part when she fast scrolls through the DMS looking for the holy grail of gold diggers. The famous dude dm.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:19 PM
0

Wich means that the argument is precisely on point, hence the ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:16 PM
4

You know you hit the bullseye when they shame and deflect in a desperate attempt to derail the argument. In a twisted sense it's the way you know that's exactly the point. Like Bill Burr says about arguing with them. If they are right they argue the point and nothing will make them stray from it. But if you are right that showing their body publicly for the sexual gratification of other men is disrespectful for their partner? They will deflect the point and launch an ad hominem attack to both de…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:14 PM
2

Thats why saying the right things is paramount to seduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 10:45 PM
0

If you boil down the nebulous, ambiguous and elusive you'll find that it's power. Unlimited power. Power to attract that dude, make him destroy his marriage, hurt his woman, and then dump him for he was just a flex of her power. Power to suck the air of the reception when she enters, all eyes on her, all the other women must be smaller, shorter, uglier. Who else would claim to want equality while wearing the highest heels she could bear? She wants his mind read because that reflects omnipotent p…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 10:43 PM
1

it's like an only funs objecting his partner masturbating to another content creator. they think they are in the right because the there are millions of simps in the pipeline. they want to excercise their leverage.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:09 PM
1

of course. it's a leverage game.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:05 PM
2

yes, unless the man is a chad, then they have two options try to gaslight him to change and reject his cirle or accept that he's going to excercise his options.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:04 PM
8

I think a lot of the anger of those men come from a place when they just got cheated by their partner and are entering the red pill after they smashed the blue pill wall of lies. so they not only realize that their partner was lying to them since the beggining but that the whole blue pill was gaslighting them since day one. thats why the matrix blue pill red pill analogy has been adopted. this sudden realization creates anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:02 PM
5

but but maybe if she pleases him he would fell in her spell and commit to her. Disney told meeeeeee! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 03:58 PM
13

obligatory, people are unique and diverse this comment is regarding some women, some men, not all woman, not all men disclaimer. ​ "Because in her mind, she is never attached, never beholden to another man UNTIL she reaches her pinnacle man." This is just perfect dude, so clear. I would note that what she's chasing is not a relationship, that's the euphemism they use to obfuscate their true objective to not be labeled as plain old golddiggers, it's much more selfish, she would keep climbing abov…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 03:35 PM
2

With the meme being that everybody gains a bit of weight and sex life slows down because the schedule.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:58 AM
1

If you're looking for a marriage and kids before 30, you have a handful of shots. Say from 18 to 30 you only have 12 years, assuming 1 year to date, 1 year to marry etc. Selecting the right dude gets complicated specially if a ltr just failed. They have to restart the vetting process on their roster again, and for that it's natural to pack the calendar.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 03:45 PM
1

I agree, however just because something is data doesn't mean it's correct. There are many instances when the protocol was flawed or someone made a mistake. Also data can be also skewed by deliberate bias and skillfully obfuscated.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 01:39 PM
1

Babytrapping is like the story about running away from the bear. You don't need to be super rich because there's almost always a woman who would benefit from your free money. They don't need to babytrap a rich man, they just need to babytrap a man richer than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 06:25 PM
7

So she failed at every single relationship she chose and wanted to have for 15 years straight and finally when all the good men wouldn't date her she had to evacuate to an emergency friendzone marriage and she is selling it like a win? He wasn't her first choice. He's not even her 324th choice. He is the reason why women work so hard to keep simps orbiting. He was the humpty Dumpty janitor. Now enjoy the cheating and the divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 08:02 AM
1

Lawyers dont work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 11:46 PM
8

So to marry its OK if the men must sign but to have a kid, nah we will just trust her word. Very equal gtfoh.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/23 01:00 AM
2

Exactly. it's a stupid and rude question to ask. And is even stupider to not be able to understand that she will have sex with as many people as she wanted and then believe the answer whatever it may be. If you like her it shouldn't matter since no one is a virgin anyways. And if it matters to you, then you should be able to estimate the number.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 09:29 PM
1

Lol what wrongest way? it was literally what you said. Lie until the victim has commited to an engagement then tell the truth. Lol right. She lies but if the dummy falls for the marriage then she will tell the truth. Lolol sure a woman that shrewd will just ditch a marriage by telling the truth instead of just keep lying about her past sexual habits.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 09:15 PM
2

"what kind of life do you think these women actually live?" Shallow lifes, they carefully and meticulously weave thmeselves a purposefully shallow live braiding the resources they manage to ensnare with carefully cultivated targets and backup plans and they live in your life like the movie american psycho, where what they fear most is that intrusion from reality that disturbs the perfect mirror of insanity where they gaze at their idealized reflection all day long. They abhorr normalcy, being fl…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 02:16 PM
4

exactly. perfect example of her doublespeak.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 01:28 PM
1

Lol if the woman can divorce at will no man can rule over them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 11:29 PM
2

1900: attractive was defined in comparison with peers within your own class, village, circle etc. 2023: world class attractive. The pool of competitors is global and the allure of social media is that if you hit the popularity lottery you may get to date the 5 percenters. In comparison, average people look undesirable to vacuous and shallow people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 08:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter