TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Frigorific Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Frigorific on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

No one said it wasn't? Are you talking to me? Because it sounds like you are arguing with someone who is saying completely different things.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 07:11 PM
-2

Because incels are mostly men and many of the factors that go into why someone becomes an incel(the ones that are actual issues) are harmful to all men?
/r/MensRights24/08/19 06:53 PM
8

Contrapoints has been expressing ideas like this for a while now. In the Incels video she talked a bit about male invisibility in online dating and how that can be harmful.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:13 AM
5

Because this is just some cartoon arguing against a feminist strawman and not a denied pussy pass. This doesn't belong in this sub whether you agree with it or not. The only reason it is in here(presumably) is because the mods are red pillers and don't give a shit about the quality of this subreddit.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 07:28 AM
1

Is it a double standard though? Almost everyone(outside of some crazy people on the internet) thinks both would be shallow and assholish.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:03 PM
1

Yeah but the fact that single women under 30 make slightly more can be easily explained by the fact that more women pursue higher education. I am not arguing that there is horrible discrimination going on, just saying that if you are going to play the this study shows x gender makes more game then there is a lot more showing that women make less than men. Because if they're not those things than there are other factors to consider as well. There are confounding factors in all studies. What makes…
/r/MensRights03/05/11 03:08 AM
1

There are more women who go to college than men. Of course there will be a resulting higher income for young childless women than men. However on average women still make ~73 cents to a dollar that men make. This can be easily ascribed to men exhibiting a preference towards higher paying jobs, but to say just flatly that women make more than men is false. women who were under 30, childless and single What about women who are not any of these things?
/r/MensRights03/05/11 02:28 AM
2

science has shown us that fewer choices make us happier. It was you who said that.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 09:25 PM
3

why they were happier as housewives is up for some speculation. science has shown us that fewer choices make us happier. i'm sure it's less stressful to be a housewife than a lawyer. Then by this logic most men would be happier being house servants as well. Also wouldn't men then want to fight for equal rights to be able to be stay at home fathers or domestic servants? Just because a life is less stress-full or makes you happier does not make it definitively better. I would much rather be a stre…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 08:04 PM
4

While women were restricted to the role of housewives, men were restricted to the role of breadwinners (how isn't working your ass off in the field or a factory more like slavery than slave ownership?). The implications of this go beyond being forced to live with certain gender roles. A woman could not live on her own, especially not with a child. This means that women of that time were constrained to being the dependents of someone else. Nowadays the situation is a bit different in the sense th…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 07:01 PM
3

If we just pick and chose the articles we use to back our views up we could prove anything. Here is a times article from the same year saying exactly the opposite. It's a fact that historically the pay gap was far worse. Could you explain to me the reasoning with which you get that women were better off being constrained to being housewives than they are now?
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:51 PM
5

There is a very notable difference between suggesting that feminism went to far and trying to say that women would be better off without the rights they have gained in the past decade. A good comparison is with civil rights. It is one thing to be against affirmative action because you think that it does not promote equality. It is a completely different thing to say that blacks were better off when they were slaves. el_chief's statement are pretty clearly misogynistic rather than just anti-femin…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 08:45 AM
3

Correlation is a necessary condition for causation btw. It is true that Causation ⇒ Correlation that does not mean however that Correlation ⇒ Causation The higher representation of women in college is probably due to a number of easily explained factors. Firstly women have a better affinity with language and reading than men do. Also, while mean intelligence is about equal, there is a higher deviation in male IQ scores than women. This means that if you accepts that it is difficult for someone w…
/r/MensRights30/04/11 07:34 AM
13

Feminism is a lie perpetuated by marxist lesbians. The persecution of women in this country is a real issue. Just because people in this subreddit agree that there are some issues in which men are treated unfairly due to their gender, that does not mean that we are anti-feminists. Your argument about the decline of women's happiness since the 1950s is so stupid I don't feel like spending my time on it. I will just leave you with the fact that correlation does not indicate any kind of causation. …
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:58 AM
16

I think you meant to subscribe to the misogynist subreddit. This subreddit promotes equality.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:43 AM
7

Watched to the end, was not disappointed.
/r/MensRights30/03/10 03:37 PM
2

Actually, I think they will both reach 66 years of age in about the exact same...
/r/MensRights07/10/09 01:05 PM
-7

I'm assuming that these conditions are expensive to treat which is why she wants money. I'll bet she's also one of the republicans who goes teabagging.
/r/MensRights02/10/09 07:33 PM
5

The judge turned down the Crown's request that the teacher's name be added to the sexual offender registry. If it was male teacher who had sex with a 17 year old student I doubt he would have gotten off so lightly.
/r/MensRights30/08/09 05:54 AM
2

That is all pseudo statistical bullshit. None of it is backed up with any citations or studies. If you make claims like that you should at least back it up with some kind of evidence to establish some ethos.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 01:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter