Frosty840 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
19	Double Standards Yeah, "Are we actually even talking about the same thing?" should be the most-asked question on the internet, but you hardly ever see it in practice. I was just providing as much context as possible. That an being an asshole, but I managed to hold off from that for three whole paragraphs, which might be a personal best.	/r/MensRights	13/07/13 03:21 PM
52	Double Standards Well, there you've got a language problem. To the "slut-shaming is wrong" crowd, women who have sex with many partners are perfectly capable of taking care of their own sexual health, we live in a modern society with all sorts of means of STD prevention, in a perfect world there are no dangers to sex, etc, and so the word "slut" is basically the positive, responsible side of all types of sexually promiscuous behaviour. To people who would claim that being a "slut" is a bad thing, the word will r…	/r/MensRights	13/07/13 03:14 PM
-16	"I have never seen a gender divide like the one that now exists in Australian politics as a direct result of a cynical Prime Minister systematically and methodically insulting men and debasing feminism by invoking gender as a weapon to make false claims and cynical smokescreens" Yeah, this situation (if his figures are even correct) is simply an indication of shitty attitudes towards women in Australia. What you're seeing at the moment in Australia is the kind of shit that feminists are completely right about. The kind of language where the symbols of oppression are brought out to taunt the oppressed and underpowered. "Get back in the kitchen, love, you're obviously not cut out for politics." and similar insults are no better than racist insults about how blacks are laz…	/r/MensRights	17/06/13 02:24 PM
3	Jezebel: Fuck You Men's Rights Activists. Dude. You are the guy the article is written about.	/r/MensRights	14/12/12 08:10 AM
7	Jezebel: Fuck You Men's Rights Activists. No. Seriously, that's just silly. Just because the crazy ones call themselves feminists doesn't mean you can call all feminists crazy. That's lazy thinking, right there. You're not going to find allies among those people who are currently your opponents if you go around calling all of your opponents insane.	/r/MensRights	14/12/12 01:17 AM
4	Jezebel: Fuck You Men's Rights Activists. The linked article isn't an example of radical feminism. Radical feminists want to change "the system" from the ground up, and I have a certain sympathy with that viewpoint (a viewpoint which has nothing to do with the hatred expressed in the article). The article is an example of some other type of feminism, maybe "extremist" feminism, or "fucking nutbag crazy" feminism, or maybe just "fucking nutbag crazy", without any particular modifiers. Radical feminists are, in their friendliest form, the…	/r/MensRights	14/12/12 01:15 AM
4	EU ruling means insurance commpanies must end gender discrimination Here's a twenty year old US statistical research paper for you guys. Having scanned through it briefly, and with the caveat that I'm in no way qualified to perform proper statistical analysis so you shouldn't believe me anyway, the twenty-year-old data suggests basically that male drivers are around twice as likely to be involved in a fatal crash as women, and women drivers are more likely to be involved in an injury-level crash. What's interesting is that there's a section in the study which ex…	/r/MensRights	06/10/12 04:41 PM
3	Woman who falsely claimed she was raped by three men because she regretted having sex with them jailed for two years No, it's just pointing out that the Daily Mail is a shitty source for information and is not to be trusted when you believe it, nor when you disbelieve it. Admittedly, /u/geodebug is something of an ass for hijacking the top post to make this point, and for his tone, but it's still a valid point. I'd rather trust mainstream superhero comics for a balanced view on gender issues than trust the Daily Mail about anything.	/r/MensRights	19/09/12 06:43 AM
1	comparison posts like these make me ashamed to be a woman Because he's assuming everyone is straight and using "men" for "people who perform oral sex on vaginas" and "women" for "people who perform oral sex on penises". Funny how much that assumption creeps me out, really.	/r/MensRights	19/09/12 06:35 AM
1	comparison posts like these make me ashamed to be a woman Well, Apple have put the former head of Dixons Retail Group, the man in charge of the most loathed, lowest common denominator, "big box" tech stores in the UK, in charge of their retail division. So there's a party to leave before the cops show up...	/r/MensRights	19/09/12 06:28 AM
0	I think I'm through following Sinfest. Yeah, I know, but I don't see the issue as being that simple. I think there's both, operating simultaneously, each as poisonous as the other.	/r/MensRights	24/06/12 10:00 PM
-1	I think I'm through following Sinfest. I'd say the whole "MRM" thing is still very... I'll use the word "new", so as to specifically avoid words meaning "immature". On this board there's definitely at least two sets of people; the "All women are filthy, sex-addled, money-obsessed whores" posse, who it's pointless to ignore, but who you certainly don't need to listen to. Unfortunately, depending on the time of day, you'll often find threads where those guys are the majority. Many of the rest of us are of the "traditional gender roles …	/r/MensRights	24/06/12 09:57 PM
0	I think I'm through following Sinfest. I'd disagree with that, actually. There has definitely been a "patriarchy", very recently, and a very strong one, too. It definitely still exists in places, but it's weak/broken enough that it's actually quite difficult to get some people to see it. There is, in places, and in narrow bands of society, also a "matriarchy", which has been developing since time of the Suffragettes, et al. Both are poisonous, both exist.	/r/MensRights	24/06/12 09:37 PM
1	Hey MRAs, I just thought you should know that SRS and SomethingAwful are about to redditbomb you in an attempt to have you shut down. Wouldn't it be awesome if people could have different positions about things?	/r/MensRights	18/03/12 03:54 AM
0	Hey MRAs, I just thought you should know that SRS and SomethingAwful are about to redditbomb you in an attempt to have you shut down. Not entirely sure why you would make such a patently false claim. (either because I don't care or believe in my position - it's a toss-up) It's almost like we're having a conversation :D	/r/MensRights	18/03/12 03:44 AM
1	Hey MRAs, I just thought you should know that SRS and SomethingAwful are about to redditbomb you in an attempt to have you shut down. Sure they can. They consistently responded as if they were answering a particular question about what "authoritarian, hyper-liberalism" was, though; apart from some guy who denied that a question had been asked.	/r/MensRights	18/03/12 03:31 AM
1	Hey MRAs, I just thought you should know that SRS and SomethingAwful are about to redditbomb you in an attempt to have you shut down. Sure it is. In every response except for yours it's been taken as a query regarding the quoted text. This shows that I've made a response which has been consistently taken to have a particular meaning. Not entirely sure why you would make such a patently false claim.	/r/MensRights	18/03/12 02:56 AM
-2	Hey MRAs, I just thought you should know that SRS and SomethingAwful are about to redditbomb you in an attempt to have you shut down. authoritarian, hyper-liberalism. wat EDIT: Yay! Negative points-count for asking questions! Thanks, hivemind! "Liberal"	/r/MensRights	17/03/12 01:57 PM
9	The Female Privilege Checklist irregardless Nope.	/r/MensRights	27/12/11 02:02 AM
-4	I'm a supporter of R/mensrights for a good reason Schrodinger's Rapist and Schrodinger's toxic ex-wife who won't let you see your kids Had not heard these two before. Very nice phrases, thank you for introducing them to me.	/r/MensRights	08/10/11 03:59 AM
14	So Yea this is totally fair... sent from my iphone	/r/MensRights	01/10/11 07:55 PM
4	Fuck everything about this mentality This link is entirely unrelated to the discussion at hand, sorry. I do agree with you, though.	/r/MensRights	20/09/11 06:37 PM
11	"A surprising 86% of survivors of sexual abuse were not believed when they said the abuser was a woman. But despite the seriousness of these offences, women generally escaped custodial sentences." Good post, but that's a bizarre, and likely incorrect, way to phrase the statistic. Much more likely to mean something like "Of those whose female abusers were convicted, 86% were not initially believed when they claimed that their abuser had been female"... I wonder how "belief" was measured, and what the opposing statistic actually is. I mean, are we measuring "the victim was not believed when they claimed their abuser was female" or "the victim was not believed when they named their abuser" a…	/r/MensRights	13/09/11 12:22 AM
2	Human Rights > Any sub-group's rights what is good for all humans is certainly good for any human. Suggest any "good for all humans" example, and I can assure you that there will be some counterexample, however specific, where "good for any human" fails. We can start with the "good for all humans" example of "oxygen" and the counterexample of "someone who is currently on fire". It's all very well saying that we must counter all injustice, but the only practical way to do that is to fight against specific injustices, while keeping in…	/r/MensRights	23/08/11 06:22 AM
3	Feds Order Insurers To Cover Birth Control Free Of Charge To Women Covering the pill seems like the best idea to me, on the basis that it's a precaution one can take while sober. Providing free condoms presumes that they will be used, and it's surely less likely that a (possibly inebriated, sexually excited, understandably distracted) person is going to put on a condom than it is that a (presumably sober, much earlier in the day) person is going to take their birth control pill. I'm not saying that condoms shouldn't be free; they and many other forms of birth c…	/r/MensRights	03/08/11 06:33 AM
2	Feminists say female privilege is really benevolent sexism, and claim they are against it. Then why do they support female quotas, female-only scholarships, etc.? Sorry, you are in denial of facts. What I have said is true. And I have not, at any point, said that what you have said is untrue. What I have said is that you have failed to support your position. I simply asked for citations, not for my benefit, but for the benefit of anyone who might wander into this subreddit, see this loud and obnoxious headline, come here looking for facts and citations and found (until I asked for some) none, and come to the conclusion that none exist. Until you provide s…	/r/MensRights	12/07/11 06:38 AM
0	Feminists say female privilege is really benevolent sexism, and claim they are against it. Then why do they support female quotas, female-only scholarships, etc.? Again, I haven't denied anything, I've simply asked for a citation, and pointed out that posting without a citation makes this subreddit look bad. The burden of proof was on Celda to point out that such a position was being taken. Since when is asking for evidence a denial that evidence exists? This thread isn't even a discussion, it's just an angry, hysterical, gender-bashing headline.	/r/MensRights	12/07/11 12:43 AM
4	Feminists say female privilege is really benevolent sexism, and claim they are against it. Then why do they support female quotas, female-only scholarships, etc.? Do point out where I "denied facts" rather than simply asking for a citation.	/r/MensRights	11/07/11 10:34 PM
8	Feminists say female privilege is really benevolent sexism, and claim they are against it. Then why do they support female quotas, female-only scholarships, etc.? Look, I'm all for serious discussion, but if you're going to throw up a gigantic straw man like this and declare "FEMINISTS BELIEVE" as if you were talking about some horrifying, monolithic hivemind, without even citing a source, then you're just playing up to the bigoted, misogynistic stereotype that gives MRAs as bad a name as these imaginary "feminists" you fail to cite. I don't doubt that certain feminists do hold to such contradictory viewpoints, but cite a claim by someone or GTFO, frankly…	/r/MensRights	11/07/11 10:07 PM
9	Let me be clear, women: you have changed the arrangement so that there is NOTHING in it for me. He's not saying "6000 years" because of history, he's saying it because he's a fundamentalist Christian and he's been told that the Bible says the earth is 6000 years old, and that he and his line have been genetic perfection since the creation of the world. So it's actually creepier and more insane than you point out.	/r/MensRights	16/05/11 06:13 AM
2	Forty Four Percent Of UK Men Afraid To Help Children because they might be seen as pedophiles I can only imagine that the other 54% are too dumb to watch the news. I would imagine that these days you could be arrested in your hospital bed for pushing a kid out of the way of a moving vehicle which then hit you. That says more about the sad state of UK policing than it does about anything else, but still...	/r/MensRights	03/08/10 02:03 PM
2	Lesson Learned The Hard Way Cool. Your wife's insane and violent and if you leave, she ruins you financially, forever. And they wonder why men think that marriage is a silly idea.	/r/MensRights	16/07/10 12:56 PM
2	Men lose out on companies simply looking at degree classification Yeah, this isn't about the US system, this is about the UK system, which is massively different from the US system. Way to RTFA, champ.	/r/MensRights	06/07/10 05:52 PM
1	Circumscision reduces minor penis injuries during sex-- but um, isn't circumscision itself more than a minor injury? Your comment doesn't specifically reference circumcision, only sex-related penis injuries, and your lack of knowledge about them. If you wanted to indicate your lack of knowledge of sex-related injuries to the foreskin, you should've been more specific.	/r/MensRights	06/06/10 01:14 AM
1	Circumscision reduces minor penis injuries during sex-- but um, isn't circumscision itself more than a minor injury? It is a sex-related penis injury, though.	/r/MensRights	06/06/10 12:55 AM
1	Circumscision reduces minor penis injuries during sex-- but um, isn't circumscision itself more than a minor injury? Obligatory linkage to this.	/r/MensRights	05/06/10 04:51 AM
8	When you type "issues of the mens rights movement" into Google, this is what happens... The most likely thing that has happened here is that google is returning the most popular of the potential results. Given that the men's rights search string returns just over a million results, and the women's rights search returns just under a hundred million results, I don't see an issue with that. This is blatantly just an issue of default behaviour. If you search for "issues of the natie american rights movement", google will autocorrect your search to "native american". If you email google…	/r/MensRights	31/05/10 08:50 PM
8	The next "Equal Occupational Fatality Day" is Sunday October 11, 2020. This date symbolizes how far into the future women are expected to work to experience the same loss of life from work-related deaths that men experienced in just the single year 2008. While I appreciate your point, the five quoted dangerous, largely male professions in the article are "coal mining (almost 100% male), fire fighters (96.6% male), police officers (84.5% male), correctional officers (73.1% male), and construction (97.4% male)". While the corporate overlordship of coal mining and construction can arguably support your point, the other three are genuinely professions that require their workers to put themselves in relatively dangerous positions. The alternatives th…	/r/MensRights	27/04/10 04:07 AM
-2	Women cannot commit crimes, if your girlfriend steals money from a bank for 5 consecutive years to a total of £921,717 it means you stole the money. "There can be no doubt that it was you who put Ania Wadsworth under pressure to steal." So... the guy's not "around". She's at work, he's in her house, he knows where her friends and relatives live, and if she goes to the police, they won't be able to hold him for anything (at that stage). If she refuses, he beats or even kills her, or perhaps just someone she cares about. If she goes to the police, then he'll get out and do the same.	/r/MensRights	07/03/10 11:20 PM
3	Women cannot commit crimes, if your girlfriend steals money from a bank for 5 consecutive years to a total of £921,717 it means you stole the money. "There can be no doubt that it was you who put Ania Wadsworth under pressure to steal." I think you overestimate the amount of faith that people have in the police force...	/r/MensRights	07/03/10 11:17 PM
8	Circumcise your baby? yes or no? It's a big deal later in life because it requires you to ask, and him to answer, the question: "Hey, son, how 'bout we head off to the doctor's and have a big chunk of your dick chopped off?" There's much less of an issue earlier in life because that decision only requires you to say "Hey, I'mma head down to the doctor's, get a big chunk of m'son's dick chopped off. A-hyuk." which is much less of conversation and more of a... I dunno how to descibe it... "freaky mutilation ceremony" I guess. Sor…	/r/MensRights	25/02/10 05:05 AM