TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FrulioBandaris Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by FrulioBandaris on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

Men not ending relationships doesn't mean they are more committed. They just prefer to keep the relationship and cheat on the side. Gay men are more likely to be in open relationships, so it isn't as much of a problem for them. Most straight men would not be cool with their gf/wife sleeping with other men, even if they themselves were sleeping with other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 02:32 AM
8

If women truly hungered for freedom the way they claim, we would observe a mass exodus toward the actual loci of autonomy. Sole proprietor trades, independent consultancies, businesses that live or die entirely by one woman’s decisions. We would see them fleeing the city for land they can shape with their own hands, answering to no one but weather and market. Idk where you live but this couldn't be further from the truth where I am. Shit tons of women, a lot of them in their 40s or 50s are just …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 02:22 AM
–

Out of curiosity, what would "living your truth" look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 06:15 PM
–

Short answer: no. Anyone making such sweeping statements isn't worth investing energy in. Longer answer: the word "human" is a bit fuzzy here. Obviously human men recognize women as "human" in the sense that they are members of the same species. No one is disputing that. What people mean when they describe male sexuality as objectifying, or that men don't see women as people, is that a lot of men tend to only consider women insofar as they can use the woman's body for sexual or emotional gratifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 06:14 PM
2

I would imagine that a woman who has lots of sex but wasn't in a relationship simply wasn't interested in a relationship. When the genders are reversed, we call the guy a playboy and it generally isn't considered a problem, and certainly isn't a personality flaw. Some people just want to have nsa sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:56 AM
1

I don't know why people are downvoting you. The historical norm for almost all cultures was men having wives for children and homekeeping, but otherwise having their friendships and "romance" be with their male friends. Being friends with your spouse is relatively new.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 08:28 AM
1

So you started with quality of life, now you've moved the goalpost to starvation. Is that the only metric you use? Don't you think there are other factors that might cause starvation rates to increase beyond quality of life? Like, y'know war and global economic depressions?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:28 PM
5

It will. Feminism has already wildly evolved from what it was even 50 years ago. There are anti-women "feminists" today. None of that has anything to do with having kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:44 PM
7

OP is ignoring the fact that Aztecs are still around. There's almost 2 million nahuatl speakers in Mexico alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:41 PM
9

All of those groups are still around in one way or another. Things change. They evolve. It's natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:36 PM
1

I literally don't care about what the ideological composition of the world will look like in several centuries. I will be long dead. I just hope there will still be a world for whoever those people are to enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:32 PM
11

Gay people aren't raising kids to be gay, yet there are always new gay people. Often they are gay despite whatever their parents wanted them to be. The same is true for feminists. Some people are raised trad, hate it, and leave. It's important to note that feminists are not trying to eradicate traditional lifestyles. All they want is to not be forced into them. The option is always there for those who want it though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:28 PM
20

I just think women are people who have largely the same desires and problems that men have, and that the redpill is mostly just very young guys who don't even know what they want yet (which is normal) being manipulated by a much smaller class of grifters. There are some things that are just obvious that kind of give the redpill and air of legitimacy I guess. Things like looks mattering, which is true. But it's the whole idea that every women is a rubix cube that you can do the right order of ope…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:53 PM
0

Quality of life in the USSR was a massive step up compared to imperial Russia. Our standard of living is going down because of corporate greed and politicians who support corporate greed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:22 PM
0

If we set equality to to worst standards maybe, but why should we do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 07:18 PM
2

I mean, if it wasn't clear from my first comment you responded to, it should be clear now that I don't agree with the OP
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 04:30 PM
2

I think that depends on the man. Some are the primary parent. These days though men are expected to help out. A woman who doesn't expect her husband to, for example, change diapers would be seen as somewhat taboo.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 03:48 PM
5

Call it inner character then. Or meaning. Or purpose. Whatever keeps you on this earth. I don't mean "soul" in a religious sense at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 02:19 PM
2

It really depends on the mother. My mom and my wife are very good friends, and we'd never move far from her because we both figure she'll move in with us whenever she can't live alone anymore. Conversely my wife has a pretty strained relationship with her mom. It's civil but not warm. If we had kids, my mom would be the far more involved grandparent. But in general? It should be obvious that same-sex support systems are good. I'm sure there are things about motherhood I don't understand, and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 01:58 PM
0

Horses, water, drinking, etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 01:34 PM
2

These are all things that leftwing policy would help with. Better labor rights means more time off for education, and believe it or not men's medical needs would be taken better care of as well. It's the right that sees us as valueless automatons.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:55 AM
1

I am American, as is most of this board. No need for doomerism. That will improve nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:15 AM
2

Do you think perhaps men should make more use of education and healthcare?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:14 AM
7

If they voted left they might at least get healthcare, education, maybe ubi depending on how left we're talking. What does the right offer other than empty platitudes? Making trans people's lives harder? That doesn't benefit men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 12:46 AM
2

Except envy hollows out your soul into a void that can never be satisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 12:43 AM
2

That doesn't benefit those men it would just make more people miserable. Becoming a pawn in a political movement out of pure spire is extremely emasculating. Men would be better off and happier if they embraced absurdism and became artists
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 12:41 AM
1

It does seem like humanity at least in the modern era would benefit from like a 60-40 birthrate weighted towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 04:46 PM
–

That's not true at all. The vast, vast majority of households and families across history and cultures have been multigenerational and interconnected with aunts/uncles/cousins etc. all living together with the mother/father/children. The atomic family was a postwar invention. Family is important. I never disputed that and have agreed with you multiple times. We have a different idea of what family means, I think, but my point is that blood or a DNA connection is not at all necessary for satisfyi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:42 PM
–

I never said you said it was the only way. I don't think it's that reliable or proven, which is what I was getting at in my last comment. Family bonds in the past were stronger because they were necessary for survival, and this led to all sorts of bad things like women and children being chained to their alcoholic and abusive husband/dad. Or to give an example of women here to keep things fair and balanced, they were often institutionalized because people didn't understand postpartum depression,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:26 PM
–

I do think "if you don't get married and have kids your life is going to feel empty as fuck" is the wrong framing. It should be something more like "find belonging" or more colloquially, "find your tribe". I'd argue that your framing is toxic because it forces people down one singular path when that is an illusion. It doesn't matter if you're straight of gay or some other thing. What we need is to feel accepted and loved. A partner and kids is only one way to get that, and not even a surefire on…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 04:47 PM
2

Fair. There are business relations that aren't actively corrosive to society, but corporations certainly are.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 04:33 PM
–

Biological goals have nothing to do with how someone should be perceived by society though. There's a reason people who are ruled by their urges are looked down upon. And I'm not saying that someone's job is the greatest thing they can do, either. That might be true for scientists or artists, people who are "married" to their work, you know, but not the average person. I actually agree with you that family is extremely important for the human psyche, but I don't think children are absolutely nec…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 04:00 PM
2

I do think sometimes it gets deployed too early. I've tried to engage with women at like a concert or bar about something innocent, sometimes with my wife literally standing next to me, and they perceive me as flirting and say "I have a boyfriend" almost instantly. Not saying that it isn't a good response to unwanted advances, I think that it is, but yeah. Definitely some people have their finger on the trigger on that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 03:51 PM
–

Very true. Most people don't know what they're looking for in the first place, but I'd argue people need that before they attempt a relationship. It's good that you know what you want!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 03:46 PM
–

I think a lot of women would disagree that childbirth is the greatest role they can fulfill, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 03:41 PM
1

These are slow processes. They work longer than human lifespans. That's why the study of history is so important.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 02:53 PM
4

I wish more redpillers would understand this. Like yeah, to me the hottest woman in the world is early 2000s Jennifer Love Hewitt. Obviously my wife does not look like her, and I do not look like any of the men my wife was obsessed with when she was 18 either. That is completely normal. There's far more to love than looks. I think the problem with rp discourse is that a lot of them are not interested in or mature enough to really understand love.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:47 PM
6

It's the "hikikomorification" of society. We're all being so atomized by capitalism that we can't form social bonds as easily anymore, and some men just decide to opt out because they don't think it's worth it. It's affecting women at a slower rate because their social bonds were stronger to begin with, but it's coming for them as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:21 PM
2

Academic feminism is still a very broad topic. There are thinkers who I agree with and thinkers I disagree with, and some who I think are extremely complicated. Any tent that includes people like Sontag and Paglia is going to have a lot of internal disagreement. The oppression/privilege thinking imo stems from Kimberle Crenshaw's theory of intersectionality, which I personally think is compelling but often misapplied. People use it to try to measure out some kind of oppression hierarchy but real…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 01:12 PM
1

Are men a monolith too? Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 11:26 AM
0

My point was never that there wasn't a bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 04:34 PM
3

A woman could walk up to some of the posters here, tits out with the words "I would like to bang you" written on them in glittery letters, and they still wouldn't get the hint.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 02:57 PM
0

All women on PPD will tell you (and they constantly do) he HAS TO pass the attraction threshold (for her) to be considered anything more than a friend. "All" women here are not saying that, first of all, and for the ones that, the bar isn't that high. You don't need to be a 6' gigachad to be attractive to most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 12:08 PM
–

Yes but your mind can guide and control those things. Men have a feminine side, and women have a masculine side. It is important to be able to tap into both.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 09:28 PM
–

I agree with the idea that people need a balance of masculinity and femininity in their lives. Everyone has some quantity of both. Where I disagree is that I don't think those qualities map directly to biological sex. Feminism is largely a protest against women being pigeonholed into embodying the feminine only.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 05:42 PM
–

I think there shouldn't be a stigma against being a stay at home dad, so we agree there, but I think you're blaming the wrong thing. There are plenty of career driven women who are fine with a househusband, like Ali Wong. It seems like it would be to your benefit to support feminism, to normalize women being the breadwinners, and to free yourself from a masculine gender role. Then there would be more women who are okay with such an arrangement.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 04:40 PM
5

Somewhere there was a greentext that basically said "bitches love twinks" which in my experience is basically true. Obviously there are some women who like burly men but there's a reason people like Justin Bieber or Timothee Chalamet get popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 04:28 PM
0

I addressed this. If she's that shallow, she isn't worth getting into a relationship with in the first place. And looks aren't the only things that can be unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 04:00 PM
–

I'm not saying it's your job or responsibility to make your partner happy. I'm saying you should want your partner to be happy because that's a normal thing to want for a loved one. You are reading too far into this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 02:58 PM
–

None of that is what I said though. Sure you should be a whole person, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't give a shot about your partner's happiness too. Why would it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 02:31 PM
1

If the global economy goes into a depression, we'll see people forced into relationships for survival. If we avoid that though and the future is prosperous, I think marriage and relationships in general will become less common. This on it's own isn't bad, because it means we've reached a point where people only get into relationships because they both want to, not because they have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 02:08 PM
1

Nice! I'm at 9 years with my wife. So what is the best way to get yourself into the position of having options so you pick the right women to commit to? Personality and finances then. This becomes more true the older you get, but even for young men this is true. You need to be stable and fun to be around before anything else if you want a good relationship, and if you want to pick the "right women to commit to", then you shouldn't be going after the looks-obsessed ones in the first place. The pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 01:22 PM
1

It's a lot easier to predict what the quality of a boy's life will be like, no matter what the future political climate might look like. With a girl, sure there's the potential that the advantages women have in 2025 might carry on into her adulthood, but it's also possible that her rights will be greatly restricted in a few decades or something. I'd worry a lot more about a girl and I don't think I'd want to gamble on her life like that. There's no equivalent threat to a boy. Fwiw though I don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 01:10 PM
1

And the question that needs answering is "what kind of options does he want?". If it's just sex without connection, money. If it's fleeting romance but easy access to sex, looks. If it's a loving and fulfilling relationship, then he should learn how to be a considerate partner ie "being nice". That's only one part of having a contented life though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 12:47 PM
2

You're making a lot of presumptions to try to force a particular answer from me I think. I don't see it as an "either or" situation. There's no inherent tradeoff between looks/being nice. Really you should just be nice in general, so I'm not sure what working on that would even look like, but you can be nice and work on your looks with zero conflict. and in your opinion that'll work for most guys? Not what I said. If you're hot but an asshole, a woman will figure that out eventually and you'll b…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 12:29 PM
1

I don't think it's numbers necessarily. The issue is it's two different questions: sex vs relationship. Looks matter a lot for getting easy sex, but personality matters more for getting a relationship. The problem is one person asks about one or both, and naturally gets conflicting answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 12:03 PM
–

I really don't think women are painting with a broad brush either. Usually they complain about specific behaviors rather than "all men bad". I'm sure you will disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 12:11 AM
32

I feel like both of those things can be mutually correct and always have been. Even ugly misogynists can find women because some women are fine with that, because they aren't a monolith.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 10:23 PM
1

Thanks, I enjoy being in love.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 09:47 PM
–

You can criticize specifics, which you should be doing anyway. Show you're a better interlocutor than those women you despise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 09:45 PM
1

But all of your criticisms are just slogans. What exactly are the themes of the film you take issue with, and how to you think the film could have been better?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:46 AM
0

You still have to acknowledge the fact that there's at least two irreconcilable wings of feminism, plus all of the competing factions within those wings. There isn't a single "true feminism" in the modern era.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:32 AM
1

If your relationships are predicated on viewing people as a commodity to be bought and sold perhaps, but that's a very hollow life, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:15 AM
2

Yeah, but the things I have a problem with are normal things to have a problem with, like being cruel towards animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 04:33 AM
2

Yeah that's cool. I've had threesomes before too. Why would I judge someone for something I myself have no problem with?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 04:13 AM
0

It's just very odd to have a complex about it. Ydyig
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 04:07 AM
1

People have sexual pasts, yeah. It's weird to be bothered by that. I also fucked people before her. It's completely normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 04:06 AM
-1

The fact you would compare a relationship to the quality of house you're able to buy is grim. Why would you apply such a materialist perspective to love?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 01:08 AM
5

Call it what you like, but it's clearly not a deciding factor for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 11:43 PM
3

Never get married
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 11:40 PM
3

Being chosen doesn't mean she sexually desired you more than other men but I bet thats what you tell yourself when you are fucking If I were to think about other men at all during sex, which I don't, but if I did, I would only think about how unfortunate it is for them that I'm fucking her and they're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 11:38 PM
–

She must be willing to go to a variety of events and festivals with me, and to banter with me about the things we see there. This was kind of my life for a few years anyway because my wife had cervical cancer so we obviously weren't having sex and I wasn't exactly expecting her to give me a handy while she was undergoing treatment/recovery. She hated it more than I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 10:39 PM
3

The amount of short dudes who are married or dating would suggest that yes, it is just a preference, because they ended up partnered despite being short. But the framing of "the only real excuse would be a over saturation, like she is already going on like X dates a month and needs to cut the numbers" is wrong, because people judge whether of not they want to date someone based on a series of preferences. Was she not into that guy because he was short, or maybe because he had a face tattoo, or m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 10:27 PM
2

You are so mad lol. My wife and I's texts are cute animals, memes, and weekend plans. It's pretty great ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 09:04 PM
2

More intelligent men than you don’t experience this. They aren’t desperate for approval. I'm sure. Hopefully they're happy with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 08:59 PM
1

why does a man owe a woman any “introspection” over whether her flighty, frivolous, whoring ass wants to date him? You don't. Why should you be with someone who makes you so unhappy?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 08:59 PM
1

That's fair. I've always had sex on the first or second date so I guess I'd probably think it was a turnoff to wait longer unless there was some extenuating circumstances. I just don't think how quickly she fucked someone else would cross my mind. I mean, it's not like I would have access to that info unless she told me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 07:07 PM
1

Nah he can't until I fuck him first, but I'm flattered you were upset enough to type this out. You look fantastic doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 06:59 PM
1

I sent this to my wife and she said "😂🤏"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 06:17 PM
-2

I just think having that mindset is a surefire way to never be happy. It's strikes me as unnecessarily paranoid for no other reason than raw jealousy (fear of losing what you have, not to be confused with envy). I actually do agree with you that I'd rather be single than with someone I thought would leave me at the drop of a hat. Where I disagree is that I don't think her willingness to sleep with someone before she was in a committed relationship is good indicator that she's going to abandon he…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 06:16 PM
0

If you're in a lower tier of desirability you aren't the full package. It's like saying a partner not trusting you for emotional support is her "liking other packages" No, your partner should trust you for emotional support, but she probably also has other people she trusts for that, too. I have other people than my wife for that, as do most people. Your romantic partner is not supposed to be your anything and everything - that's too much pressure for a single person. That still doesn't change t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 06:08 PM
1

Because the most successful relationships stem from both parties liking each other as a full package. But liking your partner as a full package doesn't preclude also liking other packages. It's unreasonable to expect one person to check every single box. And how are you defining success anyway? That's only relevant if you consider the concept of an arbitrary relationship with a woman to be valuable in and of itself. All relationships are arbitrary. They like whatever they like about you enough t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:47 PM
-2

latest studys show men actually stopped approaching woman What studies and to what extent? Men obviously haven't stopped approaching women. Were is the rise of female approching? It's literally never been more common. We just have more people of both sexes who are single. For women, that seems to be by choice, and that's impacting men for whom being single isn't always by choice. The question I think should be pertinent to men is "why are women chosing to be single over being with us?" But that …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:38 PM
3

Yeah, it's not like I told every single hookup that I was bi, but I had it publicly listed on my socials so it's not like it was a mystery either. Some asked about, some probably saw it and didn't care to ask, and some probably never found out. I was just surprised by the people who went out of their way to tell me how disgusting being bi is (I was told this by straight women and gay men multiple times).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:30 PM
6

Why would tech companies be accountable to or for feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:26 PM
4

Bi, easily. It's the commitment that matters to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:11 PM
-2

woman can literally just exist and get offers, men need to invest somthing This basically explains it doesn't it? If men weren't so quick to make an offer, maybe women would approach them more often?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:05 PM
0

This. One of my favorite things about my relationship is finding a thing or an event, or having an idea or even just seeing a meme and going like "oh she's going to love this" and then sending/doing/planning it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 05:02 PM
1

I'm not interested in that kind of relationship where I'm put in a lower tier of sexual desirability. This is an interesting thought, and probably at the heart of a lot of discourse here. I'm less trying to challenge you on this and more kind of trying to interview you, but could you describe why this is a problem? I guess it doesn't make sense to me because I figure and accept that all people are attracted at different levels to a lot of people. I see people who aren't my wife who, if I weren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 04:53 PM
3

You're presuming quite a bit. I've been married to my wife for 7 years, and with her for 9. I have a relationship. I'm just also open about my sexuality so of course that came up while I was dating. Why wouldn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 04:39 PM
0

Lol no one sorts their sexual attraction by just gender. That's an extremely oversimplistic view of human sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 04:32 PM
3

Nothing about my comment is homophobic. It's actually pro-homo.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 04:31 PM
2

Yes, I agree completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 04:27 PM
4

Yup. I'm also bi but I've been with my wife for 9 years. I think it's weird but when I was dating there were a lot of women (and some men) who had such a problem with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 04:04 PM
1

Lol are you upset at the idea that you might be a little bit gay? Or have you never heard of the kinsey scale?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 04:02 PM
2

It really depends on the goal. If it's just sex? Yeah, men are easier, and most people aren't a 1 on the kinsey scale, however much they might want to deny that. For a relationship? I mean, you can still sleep with guys to tide over until you find a woman, but some women get the ick from bi guys so ymmv.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 03:39 PM
18

Literally everyone has baggage. It can come from a toxic ex, or an abusive parent, or whatever other traumatic experience a person might have had in their life. We all have to learn to live with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 01:46 PM
1

Is it that hard to understand? Forbidden love/lust is hot. The women writing letters to criminals in jail are getting off on the idea of a powerful, dangerous man, who they have no chance of interacting with because he's safely separated from them. It's basically a complicated kind of masturbation. Men do something similar by fantasizing about unattainable women, it's just that men are more likely to privately watch porn about it instead of writing a letter.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:28 PM
3

Care about your partner's happiness. If you don't, why would you even want to be with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:54 PM
1

It's a problem of economics, culture, and psychology. Economically we're well past the need for most people to be partnered. Marriage and kids used to be necessary for survival, but now neither are and the expectation for everyone to be partnered and having children is unsustainable. Culturally it's very unlikely that the cat can ever be put back in the bag. Women don't need to be with a man for survival anymore and that's probably for the best. No one should be coerced into a relationship by ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:18 PM
-1

She's probably correct but that leaves us with the distinctly human problem of awareness of that reality. There isn't anything other men can do to help. The traditional paths for a man in this situation are artist, soldier, or criminal. The first is the hardest but probably the healthiest option.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:12 PM
1

I wouldn't date someone with kids due to the economic burden they carry and because I don't want kids period, not because I have an aversion to raising someone else's kids. If someone can afford it and likes kids, I don't see why they would have a problem. Lots of families are now blended, with both partners bringing kids, and that seems to work fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:04 PM
8

Woman made rejecting a nice but unattractive guy a Heroic act No they didn't. The hot girl rejecting the ugly nice guy has been a trope for at least 200 years, and has never been viewed as heroic. Hell in 1834 they were already playing with and subverting this idea in Hunchback of Notre-Dame.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:35 PM
1

That's a very recent idea, all things considered. It remains to be seen if the next generation will have the same taboo. For now it remains though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 07:29 PM
4

Men are more likely to fantasize about being a billionaire, not being with one. In both cases it's a power fantasy. The difference is probably that women are socialized in a way the makes holding power outright somewhat taboo, while holding power is treated as normal for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 05:05 PM
6

My point was that this is in no way gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:16 PM
3

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:15 PM
22

If we acknowledge the reality that women aren't angels any more than men are, does that mean that they shouldn't be entitled to safety when they date? Shouldn't everyone be able to partake in society without threat of bodily harm? If those things are true, which I at least think they are, then you can't really blame women for trying to protect themselves. I'd be doing the same, were I in their situation. But I think this is all too out in the open for it to be gaslighting. The bear question and …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:59 PM
2

Hmm, I disagree with your end conclusion but not necessarily the reasoning that led you there. It is true that a lot of men lie about what they really want. A lot of women do to, and for largely the same reasons, but firstly, I don't think men just want sex. There might be some ogres for whom that is true, but most men want a woman in their life, which includes sex but is not limited to sex. It's things like having a woman around to decorate the house, to plan the day, or to occasionally spoil t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter