TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FudgeMuffinz21 Archive

View 0 posts and 162 comments by FudgeMuffinz21 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Women act like they wanna sleep with a man in order for men to post for stuff all the time, what are you talking about. Foodie calls have been a thing long before people started calling them that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 12:56 PM
6

So exactly what women do and men get mad at
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 05:15 PM
2

I appreciate the insight. I know this is a debate sub so thank you for not taking my question as a challenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 04:20 PM
2

Question (not trying to ask this as a debate to anything you said) If you had someone you’re in love with, and you do all of the non-sex touching, but rarely sex, if ever. Would you be ok with that? Or would you feel like missing that over the long term would affect the way you love/touch your partner outside of sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:46 PM
1

This response damaged your credibility more than it supported your case.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 07:05 PM
–

Pleeeeease link some dude. I wanna see them rationalize more than they already have
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 10:13 PM
3

What exactly makes me sound triggered by anything here? All I said was, if th debate is pointless to you, you shouldn’t comment. Which you shouldn’t. Mind you, I’m not the same person you’ve been talking to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 07:52 PM
2

So it’s that this “all men” shit actually does exist, but it doesn’t to you because it doesn’t affect you. If the debate is pointless to you, you shouldn’t comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 07:23 PM
15

Tends to happen when people don’t agree with you. Or is he supposed to agree without actually feeling the same way as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 01:38 PM
6

Just riveting debate from the both of you, bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 05:48 PM
–

>penetrative experience There it is right there. Men think most women go crazy for penetration, when in reality it’s the clit play that does it for them. Not a reason to be secure about it as much as illustrating that dick size isn’t the end all be all that men make it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 11:57 PM
9

Who said it couldn’t be right or accurate? I said it doesn’t make it right or accurate. Which it doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:09 AM
20

Many racists and sexists were made racist or sexist because they had a bad experience and applied that negativity to the rest of the group. That doesn’t make it right or accurate, that just makes them racist or sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:22 AM
2

Let us know what she says
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:15 PM
1

Ya know, typically this would be the part where I’d ask for receipts. But honestly Reddit is so weird I believe it. Now, if you DID wanna show me examples that’d be great. But honestly I’m not trying to prove you wrong or anything here. I’ve just never heard that here before. Not even from the most red pill mf’ers here
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 12:19 AM
1

That’s cool. But the whole “this begs the everlasting question brought up in this sub. Do straight women actually exist?” thing is kinda out of left field because I’ve NEVER heard this as a question asked, let alone be an everlasting question. At any rate, best case scenario she wanted a clip for YouTube shorts. Worst case scenario she actually believes that bs
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 12:15 AM
2

I don’t like oranges. If, one day, years from now, I decide to give an orange a try, and say it’s still not for me, that means I still don’t like oranges. The curiosity didn’t change how I felt about them. It seems like your point of contention is more about the host’s opinion than anything else
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:59 PM
–

For a lot of guys, I’d imagine they’d feel like they’re adding enough value in the capacity they see it to see themselves as valued. Like, that employee doing a great job feels valued as an employee. Doesn’t matter if it’s personal or not. I do wanna say though, the fact that there are guys trying to tell YOU how YOU feel is laughable in any capacity. I know for myself, before I got into a relationship, I loved FWB for that exact reason (aside from the convenience). I knew the value I gave deriv…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:52 PM
–

A lot of guys absolutely live for the “they fuck me good” compliments and for a lot of us the way that makes us feel outweighs the feeling of being a loving respected partner. Not saying it’s right that’s just what I’ve seen from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 07:28 PM
6

Not to mention that sex work in particular will always exist, so it’s much better to have sex workers go through proper legal channels so they can get paid appropriately/receive benefits/not feel like they’re constantly at risk of the government ruining their lives. If it’s illegal it’ll always be more dangerous both to the sex worker and to the consumer
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:47 PM
4

Right but you went into that deal knowing what could’ve happened. Don’t get me wrong, it sucks when people present themselves as someone they’re not/into something they’re not actually into. So i get what you mean, kind of in the same lens as a woman getting mad at a guy promising commitment when they know they don’t want it. Personally, i haven’t been single in years (thank god) but when i did I never paid that much for another person who I just met. So in your shoes i still woulda been more ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:19 PM
8

Eh, I think that’s pretty fair game too to be honest. Cause the reverse of that is “it only becomes bad when women have sex expecting dates or financial reciprocation and don’t get that” but in reality that’s on the person who had the expectation. Like, I’ve never been mad that I bought drinks for someone who didn’t put out. I got mad at the fact that I over valued my ability to get laid in that moment
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:31 PM
3

My general rule of thumb is that if I’m making more than my partner, my partner makes at least 50% of my income, and if they make more, I bring in at least 50% of what they are. Allows both parties to contribute, can save some money for themselves, and keeps the option open of leaving if need be, which would help potential financial abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:34 PM
13

The whole comment is absolute truth, but that third paragraph is so spot on. We lament the fact that men have to pay when we don’t actually have to pay. No one is forcing us to sacrifice our wallets for sex. If you’re going for someone got the long run, being able to count on your partner to cover a date is like the first prerequisite to consistent dating in this economy
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 04:38 PM
1

Are foodie calls not efficient enough for you anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:32 PM
16

You could’ve answered the question without being defensive. Like shit man, if you’re not in a relationship, be proud
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 01:52 PM
3

The new RP ain’t designed for that, chief, sorry to tell ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:23 PM
4

Has this been 10 years ago I’d wholly agree, but the Manosphere started marketing HEAVILY and preying on weak minded men. Kinda like how you have feminism and feminazis, there are guys who subscribe to RP, and guys who take it and run with it to justify themselves being dicks to women. If RP wasn’t so thoroughly taken advantage of some of these conversations here would go so differently
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:04 PM
8

Would you want a bear to approach you? If you want a man to approach you more than a bear, you’re kinda choosing the man. The analogy of choosing the bear or the man is such a gross way of explaining that women don’t feel safe anyway. But if we’re gonna let that analogy play out, the above is fair to say
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:01 PM
10

I don’t have the video, but typically you’d put the “note” on the order in the app so the person that drops it off sees it as they pull up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 03:58 PM
2

I got berated and blocked because I pointed this out on here btw. This should be not controversial
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 02:40 AM
1

Nobody said it did. My experience with the people around me is different from hers. She says it doesn’t happen, I’m refuting that. So I’m not really sure what your response has to do with anything, but go off I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:11 PM
3

It really doesn’t It really does. Your relationship experiences don’t line up with a lot of people. And that’s okay. But don’t start with how it doesn’t happen when you don’t know. Have you been around for all of our relationships since childhood? insecure losers sure Hard agree here. If a person feels like a high body count is tied to negative traits in a partner, they should be able to show/list those negative traits outside of the number. He doesn’t trust a word she says because he wasn’t the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 08:02 PM
0

The conversation comes up often in new relationships, and yes, men are more likely to be bothered by a woman’s n-count than vice versa. If you’re saying he won’t know about her n-count because he wasn’t there, I mean, I guess you’re right. But at that point the problem is moreso that he doesn’t trust a word she says.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 07:40 PM
4

Leap year cock has gotta hit different
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:03 PM
5

29M here. I used to frequent red pill spaces and even there I’ve never heard of this bullshit before. If it’s there now it’s definitely some rage bait. It’s just the “girls have 2 roles for guys, the one that loves you and the one that fucks you” trope, except repackaged into something that makes almost no sense
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:02 PM
7

On your last paragraph, my girl and I do 50/50 and I already have it in my head that if/when she gets pregnant I’m gonna take over the majority of the bills/keeping after the house and her when I’m home (she has a side gig online that brings in some change every week that she said she’d wanna keep up with) That said, outside of pregnancy/post pregnancy the 50/50 model makes sense when both parties make similar amounts of money. A lot of couples are gonna ebb and flow with how they spend money de…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 08:34 PM
19

As an individual, of course it’s simple. To change something like this across enough men such that it changes the culture is an entirely different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 07:33 PM
–

Being skinny is a different disadvantage than being short though. Like, a subset of women like skinny guys over average/muscular/overweight guys. And I imagine a subset of women like short guys, I just never see this preference IRL. Like I’ve never heard a woman say, “I prefer short guys”, while I’ve heard women say, “I prefer skinny guys” Just my experience though
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 03:22 PM
1

I literally just told you I made a mistake dude. Calm down a little man
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:50 AM
1

I misspoke there. Thank you for straw manning that mistake out, genuinely. Main point still stands though. You don’t need to be chronically online to be an incel
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:48 AM
1

Jesus, give me a second.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:43 AM
2

Check r/niceguys out, tons of examples of the nice guy archetype that can’t get women and the resentment shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:43 AM
1

Show me where the “nice guy” mating strategy wouldn’t breed that level of resentment coming from the nice guy. Just so we’re both clear on what me and the parent comment mean by nice guy, we mean the type of guy who fakes being nice to get into a woman’s pants. These aren’t actually nice people we’re talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:42 AM
10

Incel = involuntarily celibate. It is most commonly associated with the people you’re talking about (which I never disagreed with). But the term encompasses more than that. It’s literally “involuntarily celibate”. There’s no need for the hostility by the way. You’re supposed to be reality pilled right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:38 AM
12

The term incel encompasses more than just the terminally online rage circle jerking people you see on Reddit. A guy who’s a genuinely good guy with a positive outlook on the opposite sex/dating would be an incel if he was to have sex but can’t find anyone to have sex with. He wouldn’t be what people are trying to convey when they typically use the word incel, but they’d be involuntarily celibate nonetheless
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:25 AM
7

They’re not mutually exclusive terms. Tons of ‘nice guys’ are involuntarily celibate. The mating strategy isn’t a very good one
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:19 AM
4

1) what post are you talking about? This one? 2) you do realize all the men that humanity has to offer don’t frequent this sub, or Reddit in general don’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:01 PM
4

Because we aren’t a monolith. Some guys feel the way the parent comment feels, other guys get upset at what you’re saying. Some guys are upstanding adults and citizens, other guys are hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:55 PM
3

you say to the people who have already been familiar with the concept and had the debate months ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:05 PM
–

Ohhh I get where you’re coming from a little better now. I will say it’s tough to make an assertion that assumes the worst of the person/people in question if that person hasn’t shown a reason to believe the worst. Innocent until proven guilty vs guilty until proven innocent type of thing BUT I do know that with the amount of risk inherent in a woman meeting a new man, women more or less have to assume the worst, even if only at first. I think OP is lamenting the fact that the culture has led to…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 02:59 AM
–

I just realized I wrote you a book lmao. Feel free to not read all that, I genuinely don’t wanna preach to you
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 02:28 AM
–

I think men with wholesome intentions strike out way less than 90% of the time. I posit that tons of bad men prey on weak/isolated women, because they’re easier to manipulate than confident individuals with clear morals and a healthy support system. Regardless of the %, a decent amount of good men find themselves in a position where they can’t approach, as the post is pointing out. Just as an example: My GF of almost 4 years (wow! Time flies.) live in Philly. Men’s pick up culture in Philly is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 02:27 AM
–

And I don’t think your response is accurate given that men can be interested in wholesome memories, and also have their chances of holistically finding a partner be shattered because other guys don’t have that same interest in wholesome memories. I’m not saying the person you responding to is right. I just don’t believe the comment I responded to was on point either.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:46 AM
–

Right because men are one giant hivemind
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:29 AM
2

if a man has any discernible interest in sexuality, it should be considered suspect I could not disagree more. Both parties should be able to show sexual interest. It’s called flirting. Thank you for your insight though! Have a good day
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 05:54 PM
2

But how do you tell what the difference is between seduction and a woman wanting to sleep with you? Please, ELI5, I’m a guy but I’m ignorant to the difference
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:53 PM
2

I get that in terms of a woman being able to manipulate a man. There are tons of common examples in media that paint that picture now that I think about it. Is there any difference in reasoning for the seduction that would make it different for you? Like, if a woman wants to seduce a guy for money or leverage, would you consider that morally different from a woman seducing a guy because she genuinely wants to sleep with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:47 PM
6

Care to elaborate on men being seduced by women being considered a classically bad thing in society? I’m not agreeing or disagreeing, I just wanna hear more of your perspective on that. If it’s too much to ask I get it
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:39 PM
–

crickets
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 11:15 PM
3

1) fairness has nothing to do with who people choose to be with/mate with. 2) people judge value differently. Just because someone doesn’t cook with their partner doesn’t make them a lazy bum. And just because someone does cook with their partner doesn’t mean they’re exciting, respectful, and have a meaningful impact on another human being’s life
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 03:52 AM
2

“Hey I don’t want pickles on my burger” “What so you’re gonna tell me you don’t want cheese or lettuce either?!” “Ummm, no?”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 07:49 PM
3

Thankfully he isn’t making it everyone’s problem!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:56 AM
1

Of course you do. Because this whole entire thread shows that you don’t care. And that’s great.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 03:34 AM
-2

This did a lot less than you think it did
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 03:29 AM
3

THAT’S what was dramatic? Out of that whole thing? The entire comment is fake btw
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:23 AM
2

I’m actually curious for you to do these things. I have a GF so half of these come off as things that I’m already doing and the other half come off as completely unnecessary. I read the list to her and she audibly whispered “the fuck” like 3 times. I didn’t get the girl by being chivalrous though. I gave here good behavior as she gave me good behavior. Makes me wonder what a black pill guy being a consummate gentleman would accomplish
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 01:18 AM
3

Oh, the irony
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 11:08 PM
4

In the VERY NEXT COMMENT he literally says “3 and 4% in a century”. So unless you’re positing that 3 or 4% of millions of people = zero people, you’re full of shit. So your argument against his actual point is “he’s wrong. Point blank”. That’s miles more than anything you’ve offered this whole thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 10:56 PM
–

And he clarified what he meant, and instead of then arguing his actual point, you decided to harp on, wait for it… semantics! As a neutral, on first read through, it was pretty obvious they meant women as a whole. If you don’t agree with his point after he clarified it, that’s one thing. But again, you chose to argue semantics. So stop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 10:43 PM
–

You seem pretty excited about semantics being your main point there
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 10:37 PM
–

Not supporting or contrasting OP. That said, my personal definition for ‘simping’ is doing something for someone you normally wouldn’t do, just to get them to like you. At least, that’s what it is to me in the broadest of senses
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 12:21 AM
2

And it’s interesting you’d rather harp on his grammar then respond to his comment. That’s why I’m triggered. We’re here to debate. And you understood what he said, but chose to be a grammar nazi instead. Maybe don’t get off the subject and other people… won’t get off the subject? Revolutionary, I know. I’ve got work to do, have a great day.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:11 PM
2

Says who? You? And you know that this is how he talks all the time? Save it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:44 PM
–

The comment was pretty easily understood. Maybe a little jumbled but if you’re asking him to repeat himself because you couldn’t understand… that might be a you problem
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:00 PM
2

God this sounds like it was ripped straight out of the notebook.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:44 PM
4

Apparently not
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:22 PM
1

Other people can’t see if your comment has been upvoted or downvoted. So it’s still plausible they’re telling the truth. Just so you know for next time
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 12:22 PM
–

… why?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 11:44 PM
12

RP leaning guy here. In no way does “it matches what we see in other areas” mean that you can make a different conclusion than what the article you posted concluded. The fact you think you can is part of what makes people think RP’ers are delusional. Based on the article, you can’t really say “well based on what we see, men don’t do that” because A the article is literally saying otherwise and B everyone else can have a different experience/confirmation bias than you or I.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 04:17 PM
3

He said what he wants. Don’t conflate that with what “a lot of you” like. Take what he said at face value.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 04:52 PM
1

Not really
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 01:31 PM
1

Can you add more to this? I lean RP, and while I gather that you’re a woman (correct me if I’m wrong) I mostly see the progression for men going blue-red-black. I’ve never seen blue-black before
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:31 PM
5

I lean RP and just wanted to tell you your analogy achieves the purpose it was meant to
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 04:01 PM
12

Think they made the analogy to paint the picture that we’re not interested in them/never will be
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 03:59 PM
1

As someone with no kids, with a girl who might fit the mold of a wife, this thread intrigues me. So I’m commenting here to come back later and see other responses
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 10:57 PM
21

Wow, it’s almost like there are shitty women AND shitty men!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 12:03 PM
1

Sure it is! Whatever you say
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 02:09 AM
0

ain’t no such thing as a free lunch When blue pillers and red pillers agree it brings a tear to my eye
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 08:17 PM
0

The people asking you for proof are being idiots. That said I do believe you’re vastly overestimating the amount of people who date out of their league (men moreso) (attactiveness-wise), and why they’re dating out of their league. At least if attraction is meant purely in the physical form.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:05 PM
2

I’m saying that the act of raising someone doesn’t happen in the time it takes to do the paternity test. So you aren’t raising someone in that time. You raise someone over 20 years. Again stop reaching. Like I said, have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:55 PM
–

When did I raise this child in the few weeks it’s been born? Stop reaching. Child is born, I get a paternity test, either the child is mine or it isn’t. Taking on a child that is confirmed not to be yours when it’s born doesn’t make you more morally correct, and choosing not to doesn’t make you less morally correct. I’ve already said my stance on the situation. Could care less about whether you save the kid you held for 2 minutes after they were born, or a kid from across the country who you hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:42 PM
–

I will happily abandon a child that isn’t mine if it means that I’m not indebted for something that’s not my fault, you’re damn right. Because it isn’t my fault, it isn’t the kids fault, it’s the mom’s fault. It isn’t on me to raise someone else’s kid. It doesn’t make people bad people to not wanna raise another person’s kid. Period. That isn’t some alpha bullshit, that’s “I don’t have infinite money to support someone who betrayed me, and as a result someone who isn’t mine” The problem of me en…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:26 PM
–

More than 1 thing can be a problem. More at 11
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:05 PM
–

When you’re on the hook for a child that isn’t yours for 20 years, then talk about how strange of a way to view raising a child that is. What’s also strange is having a man raise a child that isn’t his, without him knowing. Apparently the problem hasn’t been solved if it isn’t culturally accepted for men to request paternity tests. Men shouldn’t be seen negatively for protecting themselves. My problem is men who don’t communicate their need for a paternity test until a pregnancy happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:46 PM
–

Women are just as afraid of having their phone gone through, esp when they have something to hide. My GF can grab my phone and look through it at any point, same with me to hers. Turns out, people aren’t as trustworthy as you may think at first. And protecting yourself from 20 years of financial pain is worth it. Not saying paternity tests should be mandatory. But the premise for men wanting it is legitimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:31 PM
–

2% is absolutely a huge number. Were not talking about the % of cars that get recalled. We’re talking about men raising kids that aren’t theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:22 PM
1

Nah go look sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:59 PM
0

And very common unfortunately. Glad you can see it through the proper lenses
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 10:54 PM
3

Forgive me, but I’m blanking on the logical conclusion in this scenario. Not trying to be funny, but can you dumb it down for me?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 11:56 PM
4

And then men who follow MGTOW get shit on for giving up on dating when they’re tired of figuring out which women are using them as a foodie call. I’m glad to see people starting to take the approach of not even bothering.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:56 PM
6

Thank you. Couldn’t have said it better myself
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:49 PM
1

There’s also value in not being low value though, so to speak. Like, the guy above says he didn’t feel necessarily high value by dumping either of his GF’s in the examples listed, but he would have a lot less self respect if he stayed with the woman who cheated on him. Low value/high value is all relative, so while I understand where you’re coming from, and agree to a certain extent, I don’t feel the question asked was too bad in a vacuum
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 11:47 PM
1

Tbh dude, I wouldn’t even be that mad at her for telling the truth about how she operates. Be more mad at the people who act like they aren’t freeloading. If her husband’s cool with her being a waste of space and that’s the dynamic they got, so be it. What’s worse is gold diggers who trick you into loving them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 09:46 PM
–

If I made 300k a year it still wouldn’t be enough to let somebody freeload off of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 01:18 PM
4

When you take it out of context, of course it seems hypocritical. When you put it back into context that men would rather have a monogamous relationship over casual sex then it makes a lot more sense. EDIT: Spliced 2 comments together initially
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:19 PM
8

I was asking to myself, what counts as a first love? I’m on my 3rd actual GF (2nd after graduating high school) and for all 3 relationships my perspective on love has gotten more defined. Makes me wonder if my current GF is my first love, or if I haven’t experienced love yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:41 PM
1

Nah, we’re actually having a pretty civil conversation over here. Maybe stop babbling about something unimportant to the subject and you can too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 03:59 PM
11

You’re not allowing them to even see the truth, let alone make a decision about it. If there were bowling balls falling from the sky, and you didn’t know, you’d be much more likely to leave the house than if you did know. Just because you’re hiding the truth from somebody doesn’t mean they aren’t/won’t be affected by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 03:57 PM
1

Yourself, silly. You’ve already done that. Answer the question. No dancing around it this time. Do you even remember what the question is at this point?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 07:24 PM
1

Way to project smart one. Next time answer the damn yes/no question in a yes/no format and you’ll deserve an answer in kind. Like I said, you’re not fooling anyone, no matter how much dancing around my original question you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:59 PM
1

All these questions you want me to answer. Meanwhile you can’t answer a yes/no question in kind. God you’re delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:24 PM
1

Right, because I thought this was a conversation. Like I said, I’m sorry. You seem very adversarial, which in this sub I get, but I’m like 90% agreeing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:43 PM
1

Plus agreeing with me straight up would require you to take accountability. The fact that you chose to write a book over answering a yes/no question in a yes/no answer format shows me everything I need to know about the way you take in information that’s contrary to your beliefs. You can stay butt hurt on the internet. End of the day, behind that screen you know what the answer to my question is. You aren’t fooling anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:42 PM
1

Well, maybe answer a yes/no question in a yes/no answer? No? Still dodging the yes/no question? That’s what I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:33 PM
1

Says the one referring to a whole other comment on a whole other post. I’m sorry, I thought we were having a conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:26 PM
3

I agree. I definitely have to readjust my content creators on a near constant basis. I view it as watching Fox for republicans, and then switching to MSNBC for democrats. I wanna see both sides, uninhibited by the prospect of someone speaking out against them. See the views in their totality.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:45 PM
2

I can tell you’re not bullshitting when you say you call out misandry. I do believe that both sides have a way of avoiding accountability. BUT when one side has a lot more accountability to avoid (guys) it’s hard for me to argue that we get mistreated too. I told another commenter: women lie to courts and get away with it, can cheat and still get 50% or more, while men assault, rape, and kill consistently. I know for damn sure which is the bigger problem. Other guys just dissasociate with the fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:38 PM
2

Hey I just made a response to your first comment. I hope it doesn’t come off as combative. I’m no saint either. Do I listen to RP content? Yep. I listen to it more in the context of “what I need to avoid/watch out for when getting married”, I challenge those views and ask my partner how she feels about certain dynamics, and try my best to separate the content from the creator. 1 thing I hate is people who use it to justify their own shitty behavior. I believe it’s useful to read to gain full und…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:27 PM
2

I agree with 90% of this. Only thing I’d wanna add is that when I speak of misandry, I’m thinking more of things like my mother being able to lie on my father with zero proof, have him arrested, and custody taken away at her will. But even then, women may lie and cheat, but men assault rape and kill (as well as lying and cheating). I care about misandry in terms of watching out for the pitfalls of being married to the opposite sex. The fact that a lot of men here miss the forest for the trees di…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:22 PM
2

I’m sorry, I have to ask. Did you make that comment thinking that I didn’t?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:33 PM
2

Check out my comments to u/mrs_seng. Or literally 2 comments below the one you replied to. I already said that misogyny concerns me more than misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:27 PM
2

Let the record show, that u/velvetalocasia is refusing to answer a straight forward question in a straight forward way. You’re doing a lot less than you think. It’s pretty clear that you agree with me, but don’t want to give a strict yes or no answer. Thank you for proving the point that the whole crux of your argument is a croc of shit when flipped on its head.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:20 PM
1

Still no answer to my question btw
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:10 PM
1

We all appreciate that. Tbh it concerns me a little less than actual misandry, which ALSO concerns me less than actual misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:10 PM
1

Tell me you agree with me without telling me you agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:59 PM
1

The word ‘if’ is powerful. I said IF I didn’t get it on my feed. You jumped to “he doesn’t get it on his feed, aha gotcha!” Which isn’t true. Stop trying to outsmart people and answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:46 PM
1

The rise in misandrist content should be enough to concern you, whether it’s on your feed or not
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:38 PM
2

If I don’t get Palestine on my feed, is it not trending for most of the rest of the world? Can I just ignore the problem that other people are talking about, because I don’t see it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:37 PM
13

Plus it weeds out women using guys as a foodie call.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:34 AM
5

Don’t speak for most women. Speak for most women you know. Most women I know DO care about height, and it works in my favor being 6’1.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:13 PM
1

Equal as in the same amount of work? Or equal as in the same work?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 02:24 PM
1

Until she gets older than ~45 and she wants the professional soccer player back because nobody else who’s worth it will wife that
/r/seduction12/09/22 09:02 AM
1

Just like this woman did. Damn, so you cheated on your husband because he wasn’t good enough in bed? And you couldn’t vet that out about him before marrying him? It’s cool to just say the woman in the OP fucked up. Was a hoe.
/r/seduction12/09/22 09:00 AM
5

WWE sucks
/r/seduction12/09/22 08:49 AM
3

Most don’t choose that option Thomas
/r/seduction21/05/22 11:31 PM
2

Dude, you’re not even playing the right sport.
/r/seduction23/07/20 09:15 PM
1

I totally feel that bro. Repetition is good, but “next time” mentality is no bueno. You already know that though. Good luck
/r/askTRP22/07/20 10:18 PM
2

Hell yeah he should next her. There’s a ton of things he can do though. If you don’t mind the possibility of him wanting to assault you for stealing his girl (or anything similar) there’s nothing really stopping you. At the same time, you’re a high value individual. I understand stealing someone’s girl to make a point to yourself (hell, I’ve done that) but if she was ready to bang you when her boyfriend was right there, undoubtedly you’d have the SMV to pull similar looking women. Then again, yo…
/r/askTRP18/07/20 11:20 PM
6

The drama of possibly having to deal with the guy. Her decision was to flirt with you. If you ‘attack’ that’s your decision.
/r/askTRP18/07/20 11:06 PM
2

If I were you, I would research ‘outcome independence’. To me, this is the crux of having the gonads to introduce yourself, get a number, close for sex, or anything non-sexual that makes you afraid or nervous. Just think, it should be much easier to be independent of your outcome in terms of dating than, say, an important presentation at work. Master outcome independence and the gravity of the situation becomes nothing more than, “if she doesn’t go for it, I possibly could lose one woman.
/r/askTRP18/07/20 11:04 PM
3

Lmao. American Dad. Kind of like Family Guy but less everything.
/r/askTRP07/07/20 06:01 PM
2

Good luck with that my man. You’ll always have something to do if you strive for better
/r/TheRedPill04/05/20 03:19 PM
1

If you think I’m gonna read that book when you’ve proven yourself a hypocrite who can’t pay attention, I feel bad for you. Go back and read my first comment. And when you get the nerve to come back with some more bullshit, go back and read it again. The only one you’ve convinced of anything is yourself, which makes sense given you don’t even know how to articulate yourself.
/r/seduction12/03/20 11:30 AM
1

Says the guy bringing up comparisons that barely have any application to this, and applying things that I haven’t even said. I specifically said attraction opens the door. Meaning that the door stays shut without it. You fucking ape.
/r/seduction11/03/20 06:23 PM
1

If the fat ass is allergic to nuts, yeah
/r/seduction11/03/20 05:48 PM
1

Oh my god man you’re so right. I’m such a donkey Is that good enough for you to let this go? Don’t worry, you’re always right and 98% of us are always wrong.
/r/seduction10/03/20 06:46 PM
2

Lol hopefully I’ll get the women’s vote. I’ll start on tinder and go from there.
/r/seduction07/03/20 04:16 PM
6

This right here. The only positive I’ve gotten from it so far (besides the efficiency aspect completely taking away oniitus) is the fact that less dudes seem to be good at cold approaching. Takes the edge off real fast when the bar is a swipe lmao
/r/seduction06/03/20 11:13 PM
28

When it doesn’t matter what you say to someone, you tend not to let emotion get involved. All you can do is try to put people on to some good advice. Whether or not they listen is inconsequential
/r/seduction06/03/20 07:40 PM
8

Don’t even give him the energy bro. He’s on a seduction subreddit saying that seduction doesn’t matter. He’s a troll
/r/seduction06/03/20 07:13 PM
480

Attraction is what opens the door. You still gotta close the deal. Attraction doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a guarantee you’re gonna sleep with her. A man’s value to a woman can drop with one misstep
/r/seduction06/03/20 02:20 PM
1

Not the most consistent effective way of exchanging numbers unless you’ve established yourself as higher value. Even then I’ve found leads to be more finicky when you let them take the lead. I know you didn’t ask me, but multiple perspectives on a question never hurt.
/r/seduction27/02/20 01:29 PM
1

This right here. If I set out a night for straight up cold approaches I can still get my fair share of decently solid follow ups, but there’s nothing like going out to enjoy yourself and the company you came with, being the most magnetic person in the room, and switching the dynamic toward women chasing your presence because it’s obvious you couldn’t care less about appealing to a woman on that night. The high value qualities you have come off as much more genuine.
/r/seduction27/02/20 01:26 PM
1

Ask yourself this; what redeeming qualities does she have that make you wanna continue to see her?
/r/seduction25/02/20 07:58 PM
1

Want some real advice? Ghost her. Just do it. She has all of the power right now. All of this is indicative of the fact that she’s a gold digger. At least to some extent. If she’s comfortable using lots of your money, but not comfortable being physical with you, then you either gotta switch the power dynamic to get more of what you want, or just completely move on. If you have an abundance mindset the latter is way more practical and much more appropriate for what you deserve. It seems like you …
/r/seduction25/02/20 07:57 PM
3

She friend zoned you.
/r/seduction14/01/20 09:09 AM
8

To be honest, I thought that kind of thing stuck with you for life regardless
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/19 01:34 PM
4

Try to create a dynamic that separates you two from the rest of the world. A narrative, if you will. It separates you from the rest of the guys that probably approach
/r/seduction18/12/19 09:56 PM
10

If the opportunity is there, and you don’t take it, they might perceive that as being unconfident, when you’re actually just being respectful/reserved. Forcing it makes it weird, and avoiding it makes it weird
/r/seduction07/11/19 11:38 PM
2

Damn, now I wish I knew what he said.
/r/seduction07/11/19 11:25 PM
1

Number 3 hit me, but for reasons other than seduction. Thanks
/r/seduction04/11/19 12:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter