TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Full_Power1 Archive

View 1 post and 26 comments by Full_Power1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
404

Social IssuesFull_Power1/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:40 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

it's not idiot, are you this dense and ignorant? READ THE LINK I PASTED my English is perfect, it's just I'm debating with 7 people simultaneously and writing things rapidly. How do you know that statement is prohibited where did God say that? the god of Abraham which said circumcision is permanent everlasting covenant with people.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:54 PM
0

It's not absolutely the same lol, if you read literally the analysis I pasted it and of you studied circumcision you would know that risks and complications are way higher as adult, the studies show some leaping observable benefit are much less observable in adolescent and completely not observed in adult circumcision Are you dumb? Click on the blue color in my original reply. And ah no anesthesia is done by specialists so dunno what are you talking about. Just admit you are stupid and ignorant …
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:37 PM
1

"it has no health benefit" completely refuted by what I posted "a grown man..." actually science confirm it's vastly more harmful to do it as adult and it's vastly better to do it as child, much less complications, the benefits are way more, and much less risks. stop being dumb, Prove it's immoral, calling it disgusting isn't evidence it's negative claim without an atom size of evidence and mere assertion which is Hallmark of people who lack intelligence, western people should learn some rationa…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 09:18 AM
-9

You basically said the same benefits can be drawn with hygiene and safe sex. That's false , you clearly didn't read because a lot of what I listed has nothing to do with hygiene purely, or unless you read it but was ignorant and don't know what those conditions mean, and also even some of them are difficult to manage through hygiene alone and not easy to clean. "healthy" you mean natural, because Its cellular structure inherently and intrinsically invites problems, but what's natural isn't healt…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 04:21 AM
-5

That's begging the question, you are pre supposing that reason Is valid but that's what we are asking you atheists and secularists to come and provide objective moral justification for that and also the issue of age 18, why not lower or higher? Who decide that? It's arbitrary I will just quote my other comment "Can you provide objective prescriptive naturalistic materialistic morality where every single claim is proven with epistemically verified irrefutable empirical testable evidence that sugg…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 04:15 AM
1

"ARE YOU SERIOUSLY CHALLENGING ME AND ASK FOR EVIDENCE?! YOU SHOULD HAVE BLIND FAITH IN MY MY CLAIM, I TREAT MY CLAIM AS SELF EVIDENT EVEN THOUGH I NOT PROVIDED A TINY BIT OF EVIDENCE" The term mutilation is gibberish and arbitrary, not is it violent or disfiguring lol, science is based on net benefit not sentimentality. You lost your credibility that a complete and utter sociopath only accept it, you have to prove that too since a very large portion of the world accept it, you become actual idi…
/r/MensRights25/07/25 04:09 AM
-1

"the reality is that..." continue to speak gibberish without justification. first can you prove we are victims and we just don't know it and you are enlightened and have their arrogance of knowing the truth that we don't know about? Ready for debate with anyone here
/r/MensRights24/07/25 10:28 PM
-3

Justify that statement, I'm already being generous asking that since your comment is extremely fallacious and loaded with so many fallacies.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 10:25 PM
-12

Bring all your opponents and people and that "someone" debate me, I'm ready. It's so funny lmao seeing secularists and atheists talk about morality, they are so easy to demolish and obliterate and have extremely difficult time proving even the idea of most heinous stuff being wrong, anyway I'm ready anytime to discuss the topic, first in moral view and second from scientific point of view.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 10:23 PM
-6

You are begging the question, why should it be? Secondly your argument is actually counter intuitive and seems deeply ignorant, when done in adolescent and adulthood it's scientifically worse not the other way around, it's More painful, longer recovery, higher complication rate Requires abstinence from sex for weeks, More expensive and risk-prone.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 10:22 PM
1

Speaking without evidence is irrelevant, Men are only over represented, so called, because they are much more superior physically and hence able to commit more violence, that doesn't prove that men have more violent tendencies, why is it when women are in authority they are actually over represented? Because women do have violent tendencies but cannot express it and implement it the same way a man can do it. If you have a weak animal that Is hyper aggressive and normal aggressive animal that's v…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:59 PM
1

That kind of support our point.... The weaker the person is, the more likely they are victim of women, the stronger they are, the less likely. Because as I said earlier, especially male adolescent become stronger and more powerful than their mother's and the mother lose that power to engage in violence, but a younger child isn't like this. This align with our interpretation that it's mainly about capabilities, men are significantly stronger than women therfore much easier for them to be violent,…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:53 PM
2

I love you name 😭😭
/r/MensRights10/07/25 09:56 AM
7

When Queens got powers, they were more violent than men and many studies exist about this , it's all about capabilities, women aren't capable as men and hence cannot perform violence directly as easily as men can do and instead redirect it to other ways to express it.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 03:43 PM
1

I disagree you cannot be traditional woman while working, some works are quite feminine like teaching as teacher. If you are submissive and make your man head if the house and have desire to prioritize his needs, you are Traditional Woman, just lacking on aspect but having most aspects, it's not some zero sum thing. You could perhaps have easier work? Some women work in home for example and it's not significantly time or energy consuming work But your husband isn't traditional man that's certain…
/r/RedPillWomen18/04/25 08:19 AM
2

certain religion aren't man made Where do they get idea of morality from beginning? Saying "oppressive"?
/r/MensRights17/04/25 09:52 PM
7

Yeah i actually believe women can be psychologically as violent as men and there is no significant difference, it's just men are capable of exercising this violence because they are much stronger than women. But as you said, women actually do frequently abuse weaker people than them. If you look at times when queens ruled, they were more violent than male rulers, so it's actually completely plausible women could be as violent as men, it's just physical limitation prevent them from carrying out, …
/r/MensRights16/04/25 08:48 PM
6

Just open TikTok and search "stay toxic" that's all
/r/MensRights11/04/25 08:04 AM
8

Two social media with hundreds of thousands to dozens of thousands likes, 99.9% of the comment section support them which are very large in number, they face literally almost no criticism at all by other women. I just found these two by 1 minute search lol, you can find much much more posts saying same thing, just search "stay toxic"
/r/MensRights11/04/25 08:03 AM
7

All major religions I've known are supposed to (in theory) regulate women, there is reason they all came to the same conclusion.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 08:00 AM
72

"you can't take their words seriously" When they stopped acting childish and stopped making cringe statements thinking it's funny, maybe then we can consider that.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 10:59 PM
12

Massive W
/r/MensRights10/04/25 10:40 PM
19

Hear me out... Maybe, maybe because this affect men too? Maybe because this encourage women harming men. Maybe because this is just escalating and progressing to much worse future for men? Maybe because it's disturbing such large amount of women support this? And maybe because it Harms picture of women which indirectly harm good faithful loyal women as well
/r/MensRights10/04/25 10:14 PM
40

Yes you oppressive misogynist! You don't own your wife to tell her she shouldn't cheat on you! It's her choice! [I'm being sarcastic]
/r/MensRights10/04/25 10:13 PM
26

Said the same thing , literally.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 09:02 PM
71

Yeah lol, women with dozens of thousands to hundreds of thousands likes and facing little to no criticism, just small fringe amount of women
/r/MensRights10/04/25 09:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter