TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FultonPig Archive

View 0 posts and 126 comments by FultonPig on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Because it's nice to be the beneficiary of something until you realize that it's an empty victory, and that there's no pride in your accomplishments when everything gets handed to you.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:27 PM
6

Exactly.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:22 PM
35

It's not just that someone does research, it's they type of research that they do. They can type in any number of things into Google with feminism as one of the search terms and get nothing but results that support feminism because of it, but if they're searching actual problems or statistics with no direction one way or another towards which audience the results are for, and be made to come up with your own conclusions based on the results. Feminists aren't stupid. A lot of them do actually do …
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:26 PM
2

The percentage of people who literally can't change how fat they are is so low that the odds of accurately offending someone for a legitimate medical problem is just about nonexistent. You can't control baldness, you can't control your sexuality, and you can't control some diseases, but if you shove three cheeseburgers in your pie sluice every day without walking it off afterward, you're going to get a gravitational field. Thats preventable, and shaming is sometimes the only way people are going…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 05:44 PM
2

I understand, but blaming an unrelated religion for something that isn't exclusively perpetrated by members of that religion doesn't help explain the motive, and makes the men's rights subreddit look bad for making such baseless accusations. If we want legitimacy, acting like bigoted assholes doesn't do us any good.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:32 PM
8

Fat isn't beautiful, but fat shaming sure is.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/17 01:38 PM
1

She can still see what's going on with her own face. A lifetime in prison with that shit is a pretty hefty punishment.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:31 PM
-2

There is no indication that this has anything to do with Islam. If she had shot him, would you have said "AMERICAN. NOT EVEN ONCE"?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:29 PM
3

They were skeptical of a lot of it, and some of their reactions I thought were actually pretty weird. One male friend thought that the "women and children first" spoke more to the infantilization of women than the disposability of men. To each their own, I guess.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:53 AM
6

This can't be overstated. There are insane people on both sides of the fence.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 09:38 PM
7

I watched it with a bunch of friends who were completely oblivious to most of the subject matter, and they didn't even recognize her at the end until they realized that it was the same person, but not yelling and calling people fuckface in every other sentence.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 09:36 PM
2

I thought it was definitely good, but I did think that it missed a bunch of good opportunities to humanize with both the feminists and MRAs in the movie. Both sides seemed bad, and while Jaye could have put in some rational points that feminists make, she seemed to gloss over them, maybe because she thought of those points as common knowledge. Meanwhile, some of the MRAs she interviewed made some of the weaker points than they could have, and missed their opportunities to cover some of the best …
/r/MensRights10/03/17 09:33 PM
2

They scheduled it for themselves, and the whole point of protesting on women's day is to not work, and for it to be inconvenient, thereby showing how valuable women are to the workforce. EDIT: And no, we're all salaried.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 03:16 PM
5

Same here. The staunch feminists (all of the women in the highest positions) said they were going to, but didn't end up following through...because they had work to do. Part of me thought it was admirable that they would protest, but I couldn't help but enjoy the irony that they chose not to protest because they had work to do.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/17 02:32 PM
5

Thank you. Christina Hoff Sommers: +. Breitbart: --------.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:56 PM
2

The weird thing about the name "Human Rights Activism" is that is still isn't gendered...I wonder why that is...
/r/MensRights01/03/17 04:58 PM
13

There's a non-gendered term for gender equality: egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 12:25 PM
1

Yeah, I agree. I love women. They're awesome to hang out with, and for all of the horror stories I've heard, I've met as many female assholes as male assholes, so it's not that women are bad, it that people are bad. We're all on the same team, and it isn't men vs. women. It's assholes vs. everyone else. The main reason I consider myself an egalitarian before I'd consider myself an men's rights advocate (I don't, but I'm conscious of how men are treated compared to how women are treated) because …
/r/MensRights27/02/17 07:03 PM
3

Yeah, absolutely. There are crazies at the fringes of any movement, and Mens Rights is no exception. Just like there are some perfectly reasonable feminists (Christina Hoff Sommers is one of my favorite people), there are reasonable people in the Men's Rights movement. At the same time, there are a lot of absolutely psychotic feminists who thrive on misandry, and there are a lot of psychotic MRAs who make the rest of us look bad. /r/MensRights is one of the most hated subreddits. The issue isn't…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:34 PM
0

I was wrong. This is why people think /r/mensrights is insane.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 11:07 PM
1

You do understand that a lot of people look at /r/mensrights, and knowing nothing about us, think that we all hate women and the very idea of women being equal to men, right? I'm not trying to change feminism, I'm just trying to point out that the vast majority of us think that the point of /r/mensrights is to defend ourselves and work towards equality, rather than unconstructively pointing out all of the flaws that women have because we've got a superiority complex.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:17 PM
0

Have you been to /r/TheRedPill? It makes men's rights activists look every bit as insane as the lady in this picture. My point was that there are extreme people in both groups that are loud and become de facto representatives of each group in the eyes of the other group. We don't look inherently bad unless someone comes in here with preconceived notions about what /r/mensrights is about. If you knew absolutely nothing about MRAs or feminism and you stumbled in here, you'd see a list of links to …
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:15 PM
4

It's out there, but there are also some neckbeards in the MRA movement that make the rest of us look bad. The way this represents women is equivalent to the way those misogynist neckbeards represent us, and look at us. /r/mensrights is one of the most hated subreddits on here. We could concentrate on images like this, but I think I speak for most of us when I say that most women are absolutely lovely. I love women. I like talking to them. My girlfriend is awesome. I like her friends. I like my f…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:30 PM
1

None of the letters look particularly similar. It looks as if she's holding the crease so the sign stays open. You can sort of see where the bend is on the right-hand edge.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:22 PM
4

To be perfectly honest, it's becoming a fairly common typography term these days. It definitely started as a joke, but it's really a perfectly fair description of bad kerning.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:20 PM
2

Ask them what the posture of high suicide risk looks like.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:51 AM
2

Who is going to point out their double standard to them? If they don't even see why they're wrong, they're never going to change what they believe, and odds are they won't even realize that what they really want is supremacy.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:44 PM
18

Implying this was her own fault for sleeping with someone she didn't know very well is called slut shaming. YES. It was her fault that she voluntarily slept with someone without getting to know that person first. What is it with Reddit and completely refusing to accept any personal responsibility? If you buy a car without a driver's license and get into an accident, is it the fault of the person who sold it to you, or is it your fault for not learning how to drive first? If you vote for a candid…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:06 PM
14

You're making too much sense, and have put too much thought into this. You've been banned from /r/LateStageCapitalism.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 06:55 PM
28

That entire sub is a fucking dumpster fire. I was banned a while ago for daring to say that people should only have as many kids as they personally are capable of providing for. Their argument was that society should be able to provide for however many people are incapable of providing for themselves.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 06:50 PM
7

Let's take a look at the old trusty map of credible news sources. What do you know? Occupy Democrats is over in Sensationalist Clickbait!
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:11 PM
10

Punishment is the goal of a prison system that doesn't work. It doesn't deter people from committing crimes, and the recidivism rate in prison systems that punish rather than rehabilitate is exponentially higher than in those that do it the other way around.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 06:19 PM
34

White knighting isn't new. There will always be guys who think they're being feminist allies by trashing their own gender.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 03:47 PM
2

Worth it, then!
/r/MensRights20/01/17 06:46 PM
1

I may have gotten a little carried away...
/r/MensRights20/01/17 06:30 PM
11

Yes. They do consent to being shot. They know what they're getting into when they voluntarily join the military.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 06:27 PM
5

I think the difference lies in the interpretation of how the person's life is going. If they're standing next to the toilet, but they're dry and clean, but looking longingly at the drain, people generally react to them diving down the drain with horror and call it a tragedy. If they're floating in the shitty water, and they're only going to get shittier as they float there, stewing in old piss and runny stink-pickles, flushing the toilet seems like mercy. I think it is, anyway. Being able to cho…
/r/MensRights19/01/17 07:18 PM
2

That's the lady's name, but I'm talking about the state. I was raised there, and left as soon as I could. They don't get called Massholes for nothing.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 07:11 PM
1

Lofstedt, a native of Massachusetts Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 06:30 PM
18

You might as well have fun in spite of all of the shit that life throws at us. Someone is happy that you're salty about this, so stick it to them and rise above it.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 06:23 PM
20

People here don't get banned for posting opinions and points that go against the mentality of the sub.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:45 PM
26

We could get bent out of shape about very minor things like this, or we could concentrate on bigger issues that actually affect our lives. Who is looking up the definitions of "hubby" and "wifey" on google, anyway?
/r/MensRights13/01/17 04:59 PM
18

Only men are convicted of rape when both are intoxicated. It doesn't have as much to do with the letter of the law as it does with the fact that juries aren't going to tell the prosecution that they're guilty of rape too, when both parties were drunk.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:49 PM
16

The legal system in the US absolutely works the way it's outlined on the poster, and that goes against what a lot of SJWs pretend is the way things work. If both parties are drunk, no jury is going to say they're both guilty or that the girl is guilty, which my comment addresses by saying that that partial treatment is what "the patriarchy" does for men.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:26 PM
18

If something is on the internet and blatantly not true, but upvoted quite a bit in a community that has a contrary opinion to what the message is, what are the odds that it's sarcasm?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:17 PM
327

No, the patriarchy is upheld to benefit men, so Jake is the one who gets the privilege of being arrested.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 03:30 PM
1

Archived, but there's still a paywall.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:51 PM
5

May I request a less phallic weapon?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 10:46 PM
16

Those comments down below...pure cancer. People will call anything sexist. It's close to losing its meaning. If everything is sexist, nothing is.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:56 PM
10

Can we please just post the archived versions for posts like this? We don't need to give them pageviews.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:41 PM
2

Care to explain?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:42 PM
6

He was being sarcastic at your expense.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 04:46 PM
7

Ah, the often-ignored Equal Pay Act of 1963.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 04:43 PM
1

I'd visit that, but I don't think it would do anything good for my blood pressure.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:10 PM
56

On the flip side, there's no surer way to turn him into an anti-feminist. Not an MRA, but someone who is vehemently anti-feminist because of the shit his mother put him through as a kid. He's going to have a warped perception of what women are like, and how to act with them. She probably doesn't mean to, but she's very possibly going to cause pain for some other woman out there when he lashes out at her for reminding him of his mother.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:07 PM
4

Saddam Hussein got his loophole...
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:55 PM
2

Or you know...hammering them home so hard that the surrounding material is beaten to a pulp.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 05:03 PM
10

I stopped watching when he painted the migrants in Europe as westernized disabled girls who just happened to be from a war-torn area nearby. Sure, some of them are like that, but there are also a lot of really despicable people who have no intention of assimilating into western culture once they settle in European countries. Whitewashing the situation isn't helping anyone. His delivery format is also intolerable for the length that the show is. It was fine when he was a correspondent on the Dail…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 01:50 PM
10

Jesus fucking christ. This is what I mean by "you can't please anyone".
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:32 PM
20

"Feminists call something sexist" Is that news? There's always at least one angry feminist who calls anything sexist. This isn't news, this is like reporting that someone was offended by an episode of South Park. Of course they thought it was sexist. It wasn't the Vagina Monologues as performed by level 7 vegan Amazons in a dark room with no audience.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 04:34 PM
8

Is that when you prove that there is privilege?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 04:06 PM
12

I'm amazed this isn't in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 04:05 PM
10

Because it's easier to dismiss something by grouping it in with a bunch of things you fear or don't understand than it is to try to understand that thing.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:19 PM
5

If you can get a car to take those things into account, don't you think the basic mechanical functions of the car would take precedence? I know it's a thought experiment, but the level of detail only serves to muddy the waters where "who would I rather kill" is concerned.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 07:49 PM
4

Well I guess fuck me for thinking that someone who drives a self-driving car should be first on the chopping block when their car fails... I wonder how they think they're going to get a self-driving car to take into account someone's fitness, sex, criminal background, species and job title to determine whether or not it hits them, but ignore the fact that this theoretical car has incredibly shitty brakes.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 07:27 PM
2

Oh, no no no, I agree that diversity by itself isn't inherently a strength, but working in a sausagefest isn't as fun as working with a more different group in a work environment. I completely agree about ethnic diversity, too. Some areas just don't have ethnic minorities in enough quantity to be representative in each company. I live in Vermont, and you'd be hard-pressed to find non-white people basically anywhere. Even if there was a larger ethnic population, there's still no guarantee that th…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 05:45 PM
3

Can you imagine what it would be like with nothing but dudes? I don't know about you, but I've tried that, and it gets really boring. I do kind of agree with you about 2, though.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 05:09 PM
14

PROs Having a mixed group of people is a morale boost for everyone. It appeases the SJWs who insist on such a thing. CONs Coworkers know when people are diversity hires, and may resent those people. Quota systems mean the best person isn't being hired, because the junk between their legs trumps actual skill. I don't know about you, but I don't want to be hired because of something I didn't work for or have any control over. I want to be hired because I'm good at something. The women who were hir…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:08 PM
1

Trust people. It's a gamble, but the odds are in your favor. The default state of individual people is good, even if you hear about the bad ones more often. You're right. No one has to stick around, but life is more interesting when more people participate in your life.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 03:31 AM
2

I hope you learn what the reward is at some point, man, because it's going to be pretty lonely, otherwise. It's out there, but it isn't going to just drop into your lap.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 12:08 AM
2

I know for a fact that while there is a risk of losing everything, it's not definite. I've only dated one person who I thought there was a chance of something insane happening, and I broke up with her. The rest are perfectly normal people who don't fit the profile of the kind of person who detract from society. I get where you're coming from, but completely withdrawing one's self from society to avoid a mere risk seems lazy to me. Life is full of risk, and you need to balance that risk with the …
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:44 PM
2

But it feels good to feel sorry for yourself! There's nothing quite as satisfying as boosting yourself up like knocking other people down! /s
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:02 PM
5

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT This is a prime example of a troll. OP's post is not representative of the general sentiment of the community in /r/mensrights or the men's rights movement as a whole. It is blatant sexism, and when people point to /r/mensrights as a bastion of misogyny, this post is what they're thinking of, not the other 99.9% of posts that actually do get more upvotes than downvotes. /r/mensrights is about just that: men's rights. It has nothing to do with taking anything away from…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 08:10 PM
6

Wrong sub. The bullshit you're spouting has no place here.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:16 PM
10

What does this have anything to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:56 PM
2

Hah, yeah, they got reeeeally pissed when I asked if it was a satirical sub or not.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:10 AM
1

People who are incapable of not getting themselves knocked up, like that lady in California?
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:37 PM
5

I wish it was that way, but common sense isn't as common as we would hope.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:35 PM
24

Yeah, there are a lot of subs like that. /r/The_Donald, /r/streetwear, /r/LateStageCapitalism, /r/socialism...
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:34 PM
4

Ok, but who is to say what's a "false insecurity" or not? That's subjective as well.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 08:58 PM
62

Same here. I went there because I thought one of the pictures of a street market sign that said "daycare for future shoppers of [name of market]" was ridiculous, and I thought that the concept of ingrained capitalistic conditioning was intriguing, but good lord, that community is downright cancerous.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 08:53 PM
7

Feeling safe doesn't have a direct tie to the elimination of the thing that's threatening, though. There could be no threat at all, and someone can still be afraid. Eliminating the threat of something can only definitively eliminate the actual danger itself. Feelings are subjective, so there's no standard where everyone is going to feel the same way. People are afraid of flying, even though it's statistically safer than driving by a decent amount. You can tell them that all day, but it won't nec…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 08:51 PM
431

Reddit HATES personal responsibility, though. It isn't just limited to /r/feminism. I got banned from /r/LateStageCapitalism for suggesting that people should only have as many kids as they're capable of providing for, because apparently "the State should be able to ensure that everyone is provided for, regardless of income".
/r/MensRights18/12/16 08:38 PM
11

About what?
/r/MensRights18/12/16 08:34 PM
3

I was banned from there with one of my older accounts, and I've found that their mods (and to a certain extent, their community) has a very specific set of ideals that don't necessarily have anything to do with capitalism (or socialism, for that matter). A lot of their ideals are either based on a fanciful version of socialism that have no basis in the real world. It is an echo chamber. They want to pretend it isn't, but as you said, they're ban-happy, and it can and has led to a space where dev…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:17 PM
2

Egalitarianism is what feminism thinks it is, but for titular reasons, feminism focuses specifically on women. If egalitarianism balances the scale by lifting both sides of the scale evenly, feminism (in practice) seeks to balance the scale by pushing down on one side and up on the other. Depending on which ideology people subscribe to, they can see that as digging into men, or empowering women, but unless those people define themselves as feminists, the feminist approach doesn't seem equal or f…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 01:54 PM
6

Sometimes I wonder if there's a difference in how men and women drive, and then I see (vertical) videos like this where the person filming could do this at literally any other time, but no, they need to film themselves talking to a phone while driving, and clearly distracted. Come on. Don't perpetuate the stereotype.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:55 PM
7

THERE IT IS! RIGHT THERE! Embracing egalitarian attitudes means that gender roles can be re-defined, or abandoned altogether, which can only be a benefit to the many men suffering because they do not feel “manly” enough. Not feminism, egalitarianism. You know, the one where you treat people equally, as if they're equals. Not feminism, which is about boosting women. Egalitarianism. The single biggest reason men stay attached to the status quo is that it helps them be more attractive to women. It …
/r/MensRights29/11/16 08:24 PM
3

Yeah, and the KKK just doesn't want to burden "people of color" with the proximity of their white privilege.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 06:39 PM
5

Well if that isn't the longest compilation of cherrypicked information from the deeper niches of the internet all dressed up to sell the idea that all men are misogynist pigs, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 10:01 PM
7

So an egalitarian. I'd judge them on a case by case basis. Some great people like Christina Hoff Summers call themselves feminists even when they actually act like egalitarians.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:06 AM
18

“It will be amazing to finally see a woman president,” said Sydney Robinson, 13. She was five when there was any president than the current one. "Finally" doesn't mean shit coming from you, SYDNEY. Apparently the assholes who represent one presidential candidate are indicative of how all men feel everywhere. Where are all of the female presidents? All over the world. Just because one woman got close and still lost this time around doesn't mean it's never going to happen. I've said it before, and…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:34 PM
5

I think that there's a very long line of people who would go down before someone as detached from the crimes as she is.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:06 PM
4

What do you think Michelle Obama did?
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:26 PM
35

Depending on what Tulsi Gabbard does in the next four years, I'd vote for her. I'd vote for Warren, too. This has nothing to do with the sex of the candidate, and everything to do with experience, lack of corruption, and how representative they are of our ideals. I think the majority of Americans understand that, but the vocal few act as if the issue is still sex.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:23 PM
2

Archive link
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:38 PM
5

Pageviews imply interest, and if sites like Heat St. are going to publish more things like this, it's because they got more pageviews in the past. If you link to an archived or cached version, we get the information, but they don't see that anyone has looked at the article.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:32 PM
23

Yeah, because it's that easy.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:37 PM
1

It kind of sucks that that insecurity is so prevalent. As long as you can make up for length or width with other skills, in my experience, you're fine. I'm very solidly average, and I've had FWBs who have been with people who were hung like stallions, and I've had girlfriends (my current one included) who are either trying to flatter me by saying I'm bigger than anyone else they've been with (which is statistically improbable, depending on how many people they've slept with), or had a small-enou…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:37 PM
4

Well, no, but killing someone as revenge doesn't prove them wrong, or even more wrong, it just makes you the asshole too. If you just kill yourself, everyone knows that they're the asshole. If they do something that's bad enough to lead you (or, you know, two people) kill themselves, they're the only asshole. The high road does count for something.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 08:08 PM
7

...because then you're wrong, too?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 07:51 PM
1

It has terrible punctuation, too.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:52 PM
6

So she's a c-list actress who sounds insufferable even without the social justice bologna...
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:35 PM
68

The only reason she's high-profile is that people spread what she says. I'd never heard of her before I saw here in this post.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:46 PM
1

The new one was just a godawful movie...
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:17 PM
1

Think about it. If you're trying to get people to empathize with you, to get them to see your point, you don't play into their presupposed notion of what you're like when it doesn't serve to further your cause at all.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 01:55 AM
2

It's an Australian thing, apparently.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 06:03 PM
5

Ever been to /r/CasualConversation?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:59 PM
2

This post isn't to blame all women. It's to draw attention to the fact that it does happen to men.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:53 PM
1

You know, when people point to /r/MensRights and call us assholes, it's posts like these that make their case.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:46 PM
3

Men and women rank altercations with other people differently. There was post somewhere yesterday where a male bartender was telling a story about how he was dealing with some drunk customers, and things got slightly heated. After it was over, a known feminist came over and said something along the lines of "now you know what women go through every day", and the gist of his response was that it was just some drunk customers, nothing got violent, and he was very used to dealing with them as a bar…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:45 PM
2

For self-defense, maybe, but turning it into an actual fight isn't the answer either.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:36 PM
1

Egalitarian is the word you're looking for, and there are fringe groups in every movement.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:02 PM
20

/r/MensRights gets a bad rap outside of itself, but we don't generally downvote people who identify themselves as feminists because they're feminists. There are plenty of other subs that do that, or even ban users for posting in subs like this, but we do actually try to keep an open dialogue going. We downvote people when they either don't apply logic to situations, or if they try to perpetuate a double standard. What you're describing is egalitarianism. It has nothing to do with either gender. …
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:00 PM
5

Wait... Hillary? PANDERING!??
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:36 AM
6

I get the double standard, but this isn't even a case of leveling the playing field. The playing field is pretty level, and if the playing field is as level as "true equality" would have it, it would be too smooth to play on.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 05:05 PM
16

As other people have commented on here, women spend more on products that models are used to sell, and they do it more often. If you're a guy, how often have you looked at a model wearing something, and thought to yourself "Damn, those jeans look good. I'm going to get myself a pair"? I don't know about you, but I buy my jeans from a shelf, not a model. Clothing companies know this, so they're willing to spend more money on female models than male models. It isn't something to get mad about, it'…
/r/MensRights26/09/16 02:10 PM
128

This can be defended the exact same way it can with sports. If you don't draw in as much money, you don't get paid as much. That's it.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:38 PM
1

I think at least part of this is that men can take/dismiss verbal jabs better than anyone. Whether that's a good thing or not is another question, but to a certain extent, sticks and stones still hasn't lost its meaning for most of us.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:19 PM
9

I wish I could use this, but the only person I know who's ever likely to use the phrase is someone I don't want to piss off, or I'd be fired.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:46 PM
36

Don't give this lady hits. Archived version
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:43 PM
1

So the point is that you shouldn't slap people because they don't like it? In all of those situations, is the slapper supposed to believe that the person they're slapping does like it? Doesn't that defeat the point of slapping someone? I'm not saying that slapping people is a good thing, but this video is using the same sort of flawed logic that leads people believe that "teaching people not to rape" is effective. People know that raping is wrong, and it doesn't stop them, which is why the "educ…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 01:59 AM
11

She doesn't need to ask for as many brain cells as a cheerio because she already has as many brain cells as a cheerio.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/16 02:47 PM
10

That's the thing, though. Candidates are never equal in everything but physical appearance. Literally everything else that has to do with the job is more important that what's between their legs or what color their skin is. It may "inspire" kids, but tokenism is one of the least relevant part of being the president. This isn't Pokemon. We aren't trying to catch 'em all. "Ooh! We got a half-black one!" "Ooh, we got a Catholic one!" It doesn't work that way.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 02:44 PM
41

I've been telling people for months that voting for her because she has a vagina is 100% as sexist as not voting for her because she has one. That being said, if someone's main criteria for voting for any candidate is so far removed from their actual ability to interact with the political process, it's unlikely that they can be reasoned with to the extent that they'll actually change their vote.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:55 PM
1

"It almost never happens, so why are we even bothering with it?" It happens more often than rape (0.1% of the US population 12 or older in 2013) in the US versus the 4% of illegitimate fathers who are on the hook for this sort of thing as linked by someone else. Basically, men statistically are more in danger of being left on the hook for child support for a kid that isn't theirs in cases where child support is involved than anyone does of being raped.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 08:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter